Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 1995 0405 CC REG ITEM 11GTO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: •, AGENDA REPORT C = TY OF MOORPARK The Honorable City Council. ITEMJLG-.-�� 3 5 ' V Kenneth C. Gilbert, Director of Public Works March 31, 1994 (Meeting of 4 -5 -95) AK,. 3 Consider Approval of the Engineer's Report for Assessment District AD84 -2 for FY 1995/96 and the Scheduling of a Public Meeting and a Public Hearing to Consider Changes to and the Ordering of the Annual Assessments for Said Assessment District This presents for approval a Resolution approving the Engineer's Report for Assessment District AD84 -2 and setting the dates of a Public Meeting to discuss the proposed assessments for AD 84 -2 for FY 1995/96, and a public hearing to consider the levy of assessments for District for next fiscal year. The amount of the assessments proposed in the Engineer's Report are based on a preliminary budget and Fund Activity detail which has been developed by staff. That and other related information is attached hereto and identified as follows: List of Exhibits Exhibit "A ": Exhibit "B ": Exhibit "C": Exhibit "D ": Exhibit "E": Exhibit "F ": Exhibit "G ": Exhibit "H ": Exhibit "I ": • �. Assessment Summary Fund Activity Summary Zone Activity Summary Preliminary Budget for FY 1994/95 Capital Improvement Project Summary Street Light Cost Summary Engineer's Report Public Hearinq Notice Resolution Assessment District 84 -2 was formed in 1984 pursuant to the provisions of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972." This assessment district was established to allow for the funding of street lighting and parkway /median maintenance and improvement expenses through the levying of assessments as provided for in the act. As set forth in the Engineer's Report (Exhibit "G"), there are two types of district expenses, generally described as follows: those expenses determined to be of general' benefit to the community, which are spread to al-1 :)f the lots in the City; and, ad84- 96.rpt 00190 ?6 -alb AD84 -2 Engineer's Report April 1995 Page 2 those expenses for the construction and maintenance of improvements determined to be of benefit to the properties within a number of identified zones, which are spread to all of the lots within each zone. Citywide street lighting expenses are distributed to all of the properties in the City by means of a formula designed to spread said costs on the basis of benefit. The benefit spread formula identifies a number of factors (including lighting intensity, lighting security, people use, etc..) which are associated with benefits derived, and then weighs those factors by land use as a means to determining benefits deriwfed. In the past Citywide landscaping costs were spread evenly to all of the lots in the City. Section E of this report describes a number of alternative benefit spread formulas which use the Parks People - Use formula employed by AD85 -1 to spread these landscape maintenance on the basis of land use. Except for Zones 7 and 9, the zone expenses are distributed equally between the non - exempt parcels in each zone. In that the sizes of the lots in Zones 7 and 9 vary considerably, the expenses for those zones are spread to each non- exempt parcel. by means of a per acre assessment. The City must annually act to levy the lighting and landscape maintenance assessments. Said assessments have been levied each year since the formation of the di st;r i ,�t . DISCUSSION A. Resolution of Intent On January 4, 1995, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 95- 1094 initiating the proceedings required to consider the levy of assessments for AD 84 -2 for FY 1995/96. On that date the City Council also selected the firm of Dwight French and Associates to prepare the Engineer's Report for the district. B. Preliminary Budget for FY 1994/95 Attached as Exhibit 'D' is a copy of the preliminary budget for Parkway Lighting and Landscaping for FY 1995/96. 1. Operations & Maintenance (O &M) -- The budget amount proposed for O &M for FY 1995/96 ($438,015) is $52,235 more than the approved O &M Budget for FY 1994/95 ($385,780). Approximately $23,500 of that amount is an increase to the Citywide landscape maintenance cost resu3.tinq from the addition of the ad86- 96.rpt 00191 AD84 -2 Engineer's Report April 1995 Page 3 Tierra Rejada Road median within PC -3 and the new parkway and median landscaping on Princeton Avenue and Campus Park Drive. In addition, the cost to maintain the landscaping within the Zones of Benefit is anticipated to increase over $50,000. This is primarily due to the addition of the maintenance of new landscaped areas in Zone 8 (Home Acres Buffer), Zone 9 (Condor Parkway) and Zone 1.0 (Tierra Rejada Road parkway within PC -3). 2. Citywide vs. Zone Costs -- A line -item listing of both Citywide and Zone costs is set forth in Exhibit D -2. 3. Citywide Landscaping -- A complete list of the Citywide landscaped areas maintained by AP 84 -2 is set forth in Exhibit D -3. 4. Street Lighting -- The cost of street lighting is included in the utility costs listed under Account # 652 on Exhibit 'D'. A detail of street lighting costs is set forth in Exhibit 'F'. The proposed assessment amount for street lighting in FY 1995/96 is $186,000, a $4,000 decrease from the amount assessed last year. 5. Zones of Benefit -- Maintenance cost for all of the Zones of Benefit are itemized in Exhibit. C -1. Exhibits C -2 through C -5 state total Zone maintenance and improvement costs, assessments and carryover amounts over the past several years. Total zone maintenance and improvement costs and assessments are summarized on Exhibit. C -5. 6. Capital Improvements -- A detail of the proposed district funded landscaping projects for next year is set forth in Exhibit 'E'. Those projects are summarized as follows: • Parkway: East Side of Spring Rd S/O Peach Hill Road • Parkway: South side of L. A. Ave. E/O Tierra Rejada Rd. • Parkway: North Side of Poindexter Ave. C. Fund Activity Attached for your information as Exhibit 'B', is a summary of the Fund Activity for AD 84 -2 for the past several years. ad84- 96.rpt 0019'2 AD84 -2 Engineer's Report April 1995 Page 4 D. Assessment Summary The amounts of the proposed assessments for AD 84 -2 for FY 1995/96 are set forth in Exhibit W. A summary of that information is as follows: Page Description A -1 Total Assessment: The amount of the total Citywide maintenance assessment ($272,509) is shown to be equal to the total Citywide maintenance cost less a credit carryover from FY 1994/95 of $50,658. A -2 Assessment Amounts: a. Citywide: • Single - Family Residential Assessment: The total FY 1995/96 Single- Family Residential assessment for each of four alternative Benefit Spread Formulas is compared to last year's assessment at the top of page 2. [For detail pertaining to these alternative formulas please refer to Section E of this report.] • Carryover: The assessment amounts shown at the top of page 2 are, in part, the product of the proposed $50,658 credit carry over discussed above. The estimated assessment amount for Alternate #1 (present formula) with no credit carryover would be $36.31. -- not the $30.20 shown. b. Zones: The Zone Assessments proposed for FY 1995/96 are compared to those levied last year at the bottom of Page 2. For details pertaining to Zones of Benefit please refer to Exhibit 117" E. Revised Benefit Spread Formula The Assessment Engineer was asked to evaluate and present to the City Council possible alternative Benefit Spread Formulas designed to reduce the amount of the assessments to residential properties. 1. Prior Years: The benefit spread formula for AD84 -2 has two components: a: Lighting and b: Landscaping. The formulas used for these two components in prior years is summarized as follows: a. Lighting: Assessments were spread three "weighted" sub - components: Security and 3) Intensity. The lighting assessment was spread properties using this formula. No ad84- 96.rpt using a formula with 1) People Use; 2) total amount of the to all non - exempt portion of the total 00193 AD84 -2 Engineer's Report April 1995 Page 5 lighting assessment was first allocated to non - residential land uses as has been done in AD85 -1. b. Landscaping: In prior years Citywide landscaping costs were spread evenly to all non - exempt properties in the City. No part of the landscape assessment was first allocated to non - residential land uses, as is done in AD85 -1. In addition, landscape maintenance costs were not spread to the properties assessed based on land use, as has been done in AD85 -1. Using this formula, residential properties were assessed the same amount as commercial and industrial. properties. The figures presented in the Engineer's Report (Exhibit 'G') are based on this formula. A summary of typical assessments using this formula are set forth in Alternate #1 on page 3 of Exhibit A. 2. Alternative Formulas: Three other Alternative benefit spread formulas have been developed for consideration by the City Council. These additional alternatives, as well as the present formula, are described in detail on pages 3, 4, 5 and 6 of Exhibit A. A summary of that information is as follows: Paae Description A -3 Alternate 11 [Present Formula]: • In the upper left portion of the page, the total lighting and landscaping assessments are shown. As stated above, none of the assessment is first allocated by land use. • In the lower portion of the page the amount of the assessment for typical. land use categories are shown. Again, the lighting assessment is based on the benefit formula described above. The landscaping assessment is spread uniformly to all properties. • In the upper right- -hand portion of the page are some land use stat.isti:�s for your information. A -4 Alternate 12: • Allocation: Like Alternate #1., no costs have first been allocated by land use. • Lighting: No changes from Alternate #1. • Landscaping: This Alternate differs from Alternate #1. in that landscape assessment is spread to all lots using the People -Use formula used in AD85 -1. The results of this change has very little impact on the single-family residential assessment reducing it from $30.20 to only $29.81. This is due to the fact that the number of non- residential lots comprise only i '0(' of the total lots assessed. ad84- 96.rpt 00194 AD84 -2 Engineer's Report April 1995 Page 6 Page Description A -5 Alternate 13: • Allocation: In this alternate the landscaping assessment is first allocated by Land Use in a manner similar to that used in AD85 -1. Twenty -five percent (25 %) of the total landscaping assessment is allocated to non - residential properties. The remaining seventy -five percent (75 %) is allocated to residential properties. • Lighting: No changes from Alternate #1. • Landscaping: The amounts allocated to residential and non - residential properties are spread to non- exempt properties on the basis of land use categories in the same manner as described in Alternate #2. In this alternate, the single- family residential assessment is reduced from the $30.20 amount shown in Alternate #1 to $27.69, a 9% decrease. 3. City Council Direction: Consistent with past City Council Policy, it is the intent of staff to mail a Public Hearing Notice to the owners of all of the properties being assessed. That Notice will state the amount of the proposed assessments and the amount of any increase in the assessment above the FY 1994/95 assessment. In order to clearly state those figures in the Hearing Notice, it is requested that the City Council select and determine the Benefit Spread Formula to be used in spreading costs to the properties benefitted. F. New Zone Included in the Engineer's Report is the proposed establishment of a new Zone of Benefit ( Zone 10 ) to fund maintenance costs for the parkway landscaping on Tierra Rejada Road between the Edison Easement and the Arroyo Simi Bridge. The scope of maintenance funded by this Zone also includes all of the block walls along Tierra rejada Road, and the parkway landscaping along the Mountain Trail Street frontage of the High School. Maintenance costs are spread to all of the properties within PC -3, including the commercial property at the southwest corner of Tierra Rejada Road and Mountain Trail Street. The commercial lot receives a per acre assessment derived from the benefit formula. When multiplied by the number of acres comprising the property, the Commercial lot receives an assessment equal to 87 residential lots. The residential assessment is then derived by dividing the total assessment for Zone 1.0 by the number of equivalent residential lots (the total number of residential lots plus the ed84- 96.rpt 00 -19'5 AD84 -2 Engineer's Report April 1995 Page 7 G. ME I. eighty -six (86) equivalent residential lots assigned to the Commercial property). These numbers are recapped as follows: Number of Equivalent Residential Lots Residential Properties 2,401 Commercial Property 86 Total 2,487 Adjusted Boundary: Zone 1 Also included in the Engineer's Report is a discussion of the proposed adjustment to the boundary for Zone 1 to include certain lots within Tract 285:1 which had in the past been omitted in error. Engineer's Report The proposed Budget for AD84 -2 for FY 1995/96 (Exhibit 'D') was provided to the Assessment Engineer to be used as the basis for the preparation of the attached Engineer's Report (Exhibit 'G'). Said report sets for the proposed amount of the assessment for FY 1995/96 for various land use categories, along with an explanation of the Benefit Assessment Formula and other related information. The assessment amounts contained in the Engineer's Report were derived from the benefit spread formula used in prior years. Public Hearing 1. The "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" (Streets and Highways Code) requires a public hearing to be held prior to the annual levy of assessments for the purpose of receiving input and to hear any protests to the proposed assessments. 2. If the amount of the assessments are to remain the same, the law does not require a Notice of public hearing to be mailed to each property being assessed. However, consistent with past practice, it is recommended that such a notice be mailed to the owners of all of the affected properties. 3. Notwithstanding the above mentioned policy, State law requires that prior to considering any new or increased assessment, a public hearing notice must be mailed to the owners of the properties to be assessed. Said notice shall state the amount of the existing assessment, the amount of the proposed assessment and the amount of the proposed increase in the assessment The amount of the approved ad84- 96.rpt 00; 06. AD84 -2 Engineer's Report April 1995 Page 8 estimated assessment MAY NOT EXCEED the amounts stated in the notice. Said notice must be mailed at least forty -five (45) days prior to the date of the hearing. Although the Notice may be postmarked April 21, 1995, the content of the notice must be finalized by April 7, 1.995, to allow sufficient time for printing and handling. 4. State law also requires that prior to considering any new or increased assessment a Public Meeting shall be convened to allow the public an opportunity to discuss the proposed increased assessment. It is recommended that this Public Meeting be convened on Monday, May 15, 1995, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers. This will be an informal meeting conducted by staff for the purpose of providing answers to questions regarding projected program costs and the methods used to spread those costs to the properties assessed. 5. Attached as Exhibit 'H' is a copy of the Public Hearing Notice for AD84 -2. Said Notice sets the time and place of both the Public Meeting (May 15, 1995, at 7:00 p.m.) and the public hearing (June 7, 1995, at 7:00 p.m.). The date of the public hearing is the date of the first City Council meeting in June as required by law. Staff recommends that the City Council take the following actions: 1. Determine the parameters of the Benefit Spread Formula to be used for AD84 -2 for FY 1995/96; and, 2. Adopt the attached Resolution (Exhibit "I "): a) approving the Engineer's Report for Assessment District AD84 -2; b) declaring intention to make certain changes to and ordering the annual assessments for said assessment district for FY 1995/96; and, c) setting the dates and times of a Public Meeting and a public hearing to consider said assessments. ad84- 96.rpt 001,97 EXHIBIT "A" (page 1) 24- Mar -95 Fiscal Year 1995/96 AD 84 -2 ASSESSMENT SUMMARY -------------------- -------------------- 00198 FY 93194 FY 94/95 FY 95/96 Description Actua? Budget Proposed TOTAL ANTICIPATED ANNUAL EXPENSES 467,821 596,815 513,015 LESS TOTAL ANTICIPATED ZONE MAINTENANCE EXPENSES (84,057« (108,437) (134,849) LESS TOTAL ANTICIPATED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT EXPENSES 100,924) (192,028) (55,000) TOTAL CITY -WIDE MAINTENANCE EXPENSES -- - - - - -- 282,840 ----- - - - - -- 296,350 ----- - - - - -- 323,166 LESS PRIOR YEAR SURPLUS CARRYOVER J 0 (50,658) LESS TRANSFER IN 0 0 0 CITYWIDE MAINTENANCE EXPENSES LESS CREDITS -- - - - - -- 282,840 ----- - - - - -- 296,350 ----- - - - - -- 272,509 TOTAL CITY -WIDE MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENTS 293,400 296,350 272,509 PLUS CITY -WIDE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ASSESSMENT ] 0 0 TOTAL CITY-WIDE ASSESSMENT -- - - - - -- 293,400 ----- - - - - -- 296,350 k ----- - - - - -- 272,509 PLUS TOTAL ASSESSMENT FOR ALL ZONES 82,520 138,950 152,809 TOTAL ASSESSMENTS -- -' - - -- 375,920 ----- -' - - -- 435,300 II ----- - - - -- 425 - 318 i 1 00198 EXHIBIT "A" (page 2) Assessment Fiscal Year 1995/96 Amt ($) AD 84 -2 ASSESSMENT SUMMARY - - - -- 4,131 ASSESSMENT SUMMARY -------------------- -------------------- - - - - -- -- Lot Description 95.45 1,01 See Citywide Assessment -------------- - - - - -- Page Alt. #1: Present Formula - - -- A -3 Alt. #2: A -4 Alt. #3: A -5 Zone Assessments No. # of Lots - - - -- ------ - - - - -- 1 77 2 622 3 265 4 129 5 217 6 22 7 95 ac. 8 City 497 Home Acres 200 9 49 ac. 10 Residentia 2401 Commercial 11.81 ac. Total All Zones FY 1994/95 A R SF Res Assmnt($) Total A$) 33.00 296,300 Total Assessment Assmnt($) --- - Amt ($) Per - - - -- 4,131 --- - - - - -- 56,59 - - - - -- -- Lot 59,367 95.45 1,01 846 A, 19 Lot 0 0 (r) Lot 37,338 1-,'2 06 Lot 242 11 00 Lot 10,581 111 46 Acre 10,223 20.86 Lot 10,223 50.86 Lot 6,000 121 42 Acre N/A Nl Lot 138,950 30- Mar -95 FY 1995/96 ------------------------ C D SF Res Assmnt($) Total ($) Notes ---------------- - - - - -- 30.20 272,509 A/B : C/D 29.81 272,509 C = (AxD) / B 27.69 272,509 Total Assessment Assmnt($) ----- - - - - -- Amt ($) Per 5,939 ---- - - - - -- 77.13 ----- - - - - -- Lot 60,108 96.64 Lot 3,059 11.54 Lot 0 0.00 Lot 17,939 82.67 Lot 749 34.05 Lot 5,420 57.10 Acre 10,223 20.57 Lot 10,223 51.11 Lot 650 13.21 Acre 36,994 15.41 Lot 1,506 127.51 Acre 152,809 00199 Exhibit 'A' 24- Mar -95 Assessment Summary ALTERNATE #1: Present Formuia Page 3 of 9 AD84-2 Lighting & Landscaping STREET LIGHTING: spread to all properties based on benifit formula Allocation Res /Non -Res: None CITYWIDE LANDSCAPING: equal spread to all properties Allocation Res /Non -Res: None ASSESSMENT ALLOCATION INFOMATION Land Use Comparison ----------------------------- ------------------------------------ Element Lighting Landscaping Total Non - Residential ---------- - - - - -- - - - - -- Number of lots 274 Total FY 95/96 Proposed Assessments $186,000 $86,509 272,509 Percent of total Lots 3.30% Allocation to: None None Non - Residential: Percent of Total Non - Residential: Total Assmnts Residential Number of lots 7,743 Percent of total Lots 93.31% Residential: Percent of Total j Vacant Residential: Total Assmnts Number of lots 281 Percent of total Lots 3.39% ASSESSMENT CALCULATION -------------- - - - - -- - -- - - - - -- -------------______ _______________________________ ----------------------------- Land People Lighting Typical Land Use Use Allocated Total Unit Use Assessment Catagories Code Cost ($) Units Cost ($} Factor Amount ($) LIGHTING --------- ---- - - - - -- Non - Residential Bank 24 186,000 9,409 19. "'7 3 59.31 Retail 19 186,000 9,409 19. 17 4 79.08 Lite Mfg. 31 186,000 9,409 19. 7 5 98.85 Neighborhood Cntr. 15 186,000 9,409 19.7 6.5 128.51 Regional Cntr. 16 186,000 9,409 19. "7 6.5 128.51 Residential Single - Family 1 186,000 9,409 19. "7 1 19.77 Condo 3 186,000 9,409 19. 7 1 19.77 Apartment 5 186,000 9,409 19. ""' 0.75 14.83 Plus Lighting Assessment LANDSCAPING L/S Assmnt Assmnt ($) Total ($) Non - Residential ---- - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- Bank 10.43 59.31 69.74 Retail Lite Mfg. 10.43 79.08 89.51 Neighborhood Cntr. 10.43 98.85 109.28 Regional Cntr. 10.43 128.51 138.93 10.43 128.51 138.93 Residential Single - Family 10.43 19.77 30.20 Condo 10.43 19.77 30.20 Apartment 10.43 14.83 25.26 00200 Exhibit 'A/ Assessment Summary ALTERNATE #2� AD84-2 Lighting & Landscaping 24-0ar-95 Page 4 of 9 STREET LIGHTING: spread toall properties based on benifit formula Allocation Res/Non-Res: None K�� ,^� � � u ~ �x� CITYWIDE LANDSCAPING: costs spread based on Parks People Use formula Allocation Res/Non-Des/None ASSESSMENT ALLOCATION INFON&TIO0 ----------------------------- Land Use Comparison Element Lighting Landscaping Total __________________ Non-Residential -------- ----- '------- '------ Number of lots 274 Total FY 95/06 Proposed Assessments $186,000 S86,509 �",272,509 Percent of total Lots 3.00 Allocation to: None None Residential Non-Residential: Percent of Total Number of lots 7,743 Non-Residential: Total Aoomnto Percent of total Lots 9'.]l% . Residential: of Total Vacant Residential: ' Total Assmnts, Number of lots 281 || Percent of total Lots 2.39% ASSESSMENT CALCULATION -----------��������������������� --------------- Lund People Lighting Typical Land Use Use Allocated Total Unit Use Assessment {atagoriaa --------------- Code __ Cost ($) --------- Units Coot (6) Factor Amount ($) LIGHTING --------- _ '-_-- ____ ---------- Non-Residential Bank 24 186/000 0/409 lQ. 7 l 59,31 Retail 19 186/000 9,409 18.7 4 79,08 Lite Mfg. 31 186/000 9,409 19.7 5 98.85 Neighborhood Cotr. 15 186/800 9,409 19.7 6.5 128.51 Regional [ntr. 16 186/000 0/409 18. 7 6.5 128.51 Residential Single-Family l 186/000 9/409 19.'7 l 19.77 Condo ] 186/000 9/409 19.'7 l 19.77 Apartment 5 186,000 9,409 19.7 0.75 14.83 Plum L1obti -" Auoaoomout LANDSCAPING ' L/S Auamnt 600mnt ($) Total /�) Non-Residential ------ ----- ` ---'- Boub 24 86,509 34,474 2.51 } 7.53 59.31 66.84 Retail 19 86,509 34,474 2.�] 6 15.06 79.08 94'l4 Lite Mfg. 31 86,500 34/474 2.51 12 30.12 98'`85 l28'97 Neighborhood Cotr. 15 86,509 34/474 2.51 10 25.10 12851 l5]'6l Regional Cntr. 16 86,504 34,474 2'5l 30 75.0 l38'5l 2OJ^8l Residential Single-Family l 86/509 34,474 2.51 4 10.04 10.77 29.81 Condo 2 86/504 34,474 2.51 } 7.53 10.77 27'^]O Apartment 5 86,509 34/474 2.51 ] 7.53 14,83 2336 K�� ,^� � � u ~ �x� Exhibit 'A' Assessment Summary ALTERNATE #3; AD84 -2 Lighting & Landscaping 24- Mar -95 Page 5 of 9 STREET LIGHTING: spread to all properties based on benifit formula Allocation Res /Non -Res: None CITYWIDE LANDSCAPING: costs spread based on Parks People Use formula Allocation Res /Non -Res: "5% - 25% ASSESSMENT ALLOCATION INFOMATION Land Use Comparison ------------------------------------ Element Lighting Landscaping Total Non - Residential --- ----- -- - Number of lots 274 Total FY 95/96 Proposed Assessments $186,000 586,509 `272,509 Percent of total Lots 3.30% Allocation to: None Non - Residential: Percent of Total C1.25 Non - Residential: Total Assmnts 521,627 Residential Number of lots 7,743 Percent of total Lots 93.31% Residential: Percent of Total 0.15 Vacant Residential: Total Assmnts $64,882 Number of lots 281 Percent of total Lots 3.39% ASSESSMENT CALCULATION -------------- - - - - -- - -- - - -- ----------- ______.__ _______________________________ ----------------------------- Land People Lighting Typical Land Use Use Allocated Total At Use Assessment Catagories Code Cost ($) Units Cost ($) Factor Amount ($) LIGHTING - - -- -- - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- Non - Residential Bank 24 186,000 9,409 19. "7 3 59.31 Retail 19 186,000 9,409 19.7 4 79.08 Lite Mfg. 31 186,000 9,409 19. "7 5 98.85 Neighborhood Cntr. 15 186,000 9,409 19.''7 6.5 128.51 Regional Cntr. 16 186,000 9,409 19. "., 6.5 128.51 Residential Single - Family 1 186,000 9,409 19. "7 1 19.77 Condo 3 186,000 9,409 19. "7 1 19.77 Apartment 5 186,000 9,409 19. "7 0.75 14.83 Plus LANDSCAPING Lighting Assessment Hon - Residential L/S Assmnt ---- - - - - -- Assmnt ($) ---- - - Total ($) Bank 24 21,627 1,786 12.11 3 36.33 - - -- 59.31 ---- - - - - -- 95.64 Retail 19 21,627 1,786 12.11 6 72.66 79.08 151.74 Lite Mfg. 31 21,627 1,786 12.11 12 145.32 98.85 244.17 Neighborhood Cntr. 15 21,627 1,786 12.11 10 121.10 128.51 249.61 Regional Cntr. 16 21,627 1,786 12.11 30 363.30 128.51 491.81 Residential Single - Family 1 64,882 32,688 1.98 4 7.92 19.77 27.69 Condo 3 64,882 32,688 1.98 3 5.94 19.77 25.71 Apartment 5 64,882 32,688 1„98 3 5.94 14.83 20.77 0 02U? Exhibit A -6 00203 EXHIBIT "A" (page 7) Fiscal Year 1994/95 AD 84 -2 ASSESSMENT SUMMARY Summary of Acreage Assessments --------------------------------- --------------------------------- Total Total Per Acre Total Zone Assessment Acres Assessment A P # Acres Assessment 7 51420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0- 061 -015 1.680 95.92 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0- 061 -025 1.160 66.23 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0- 061 -035 1.160 66.23 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0- 061 -045 1.160 66.23 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0- 061 -055 1.160 66.23 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511-0- 061 -065 1.130 64.52 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0- 061 -075 1.060 60.52 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0- 061 -085 1.060 60.52 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0- 061 -115 1.060 60.52 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0 -061 -145 1.170 66.80 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0- 061 -155 2.130 121.62 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0- 062 -065 1.170 66.80 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0- 062 -075 1.270 72.51 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511° -0- 062 -165 2.750 157.02 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0- 062 -175 2.830 161.58 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0- 062 -215 2.940 167.86 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0- 062 -235 1.227 70.06 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0- 062 -245 3.072 175.40 7 51420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0- 062 -255 5.000 285.48 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0- 062 -265 0.547 31.23 7 51420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0- 062 -275 1.100 62.81 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0- 062 -285 1.080 61.66 7 51420.00 94.93 57.10 511-0- 062 -295 1.260 71.94 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0- 062 -305 1.330 75.94 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511-0- 062 -315 1.150 65.66 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0- 062 -345 3.080 175.86 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0- 062 -375 3.930 224.39 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0- 062 -385 2.020 115.33 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0- 070 -030 2.530 144.45 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511-0- 070 -040 5.180 295.76 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0- 070 -450 3.300 188.42 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511-0 - 070 -485 2.550 145.60 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0- 070 -490 0.500 28.55 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0- 070 -500 0.490 27.98 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511-0- 070 -510 0.490 27.98 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 - 0•070 -520 0.520 29.69 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0- 070 -530 0.950 54.24 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0- 070 -540 0.710 40.54 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0 °070 -555 1.670 95.35 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0- 070 -565 0.860 49.10 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0 °070 -575 0.339 19.36 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511-0- 070 -585 0.239 13.65 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0- 070 -595 0.239 13.65 7 5,420.00 44.93 57.10 511 -0 °070 -605 1.100 62.81 24- Mar -95 Remarks 00204 EXHIBIT "A" (page 8) 24- Mar -95 Fiscal Year 1994/95 AD 84 -2 ASSESSMENT SUMMARY Summary --------------------------------- of Acreage Assessments --------------------------------- Total Total Per Acre Total Zone - - -- Assessment ---- - - - - -- --- Acres - - - - -- Assessment ---- - - - - A P # Acres Assessment Remarks 7 5,420.00 94.93 -- 57.10 --------- ._- - - - - -- 511 -0- 070 -615 --- - - - - -- 0.800 ---- - - - - -- ----------------- 45.68 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0- 070 -625 1.169 66.75 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0- 070 -635 0.610 34.83 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0- 070 -645 0.339 19.36 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0- 070 -655 0.530 30.26 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0- 070 -665 0.469 26.78 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0- 070 -675 0.469 26.78 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0- 070 -685 0.469 26.78 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0- 070 -695 0.469 26.78 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0- 070 -705 0.469 26.78 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0- 070 -715 0.480 27.41 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0- 070 -780 0.839 47.90 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0- 151 -065 0.510 29.12 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0- 151 -075 0.180 * 10.28 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0- 151 -085 0.600 34.26 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511-0- 151 -095 0.700 39.97 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0- 151 -105 0.580 33.12 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 - 0-151 -115 0.680 38.83 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0 -151 -125 0.550 31.40 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0- 151 °135 0.650 37.11 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0- 151 -145 0.200 11.42 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0- 151 -155 0.550 31.40 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0- 161 -025 0.412 23.52 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0- 161 -045 0.464 26.49 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0- 161 -055 0.324 18.50 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0- 161 -065 0.292 16.67 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0- 161 -085 0.329 18.78 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0 -161 -095 0.295 16.84 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0 -161 -105 0.274 15.64 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0 -161 -115 0.261 14.90 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0 -161 -125 0.292 16.67 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0 -161 -135 0.534 30.49 7 51420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0- 161-155 0.580 33.12 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0- 161-165 0.387 22.10 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511.0- 161-175 0.287 16.39 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0- 161 -185 0.287 16.39 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511•-0- 161 -195 0.287 16.39 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0- 161-205 0.414 23.64 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0 -161 -215 0.492 28.09 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0- 161-225 0.440 25.12 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511.0- 161 -255 1.240 70.80 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511-0- 162 -015 0.687 39.23 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 - 0-162 -045 0.704 40.20 00205 EXHIBIT "A" (page 9) 24- Mar -95 Fiscal Year 1994/95 AD 84 -2 ASSESSMENT SUMMARY Summary --------------------------------- --------------------------------- of Acreage Assessments Total Total Per Acre Total Zone Assessment Acres Assessment A P Acres Assessment Remarks 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0- 162 -055 0.340 ----------------- 19.41 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0- 162 -065 0.530 30.26 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0- 162 -075 0.330 18.84 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0- 162 -085 0.440 25.12 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511-0- 162 -095 0.340 19.41 Zone ' Total --- - - - - -- 94.927 ---- - - - - -- 5,420.00 9 650.00 49.21 13.21 513 -0- 060 -035 1.000 13.21 9 650.00 49.21 13.21 513 -0- 060 -075 11.780 155.59 9 650.00 49.21 13.21 513 -0- 060 -085 0.000 Exempt 9 650.00 49.21 13.21 513 -0-060 -095 3.860 50.98 9 650.00 49.21 13.21 513 -0- 060 -125 1.020 13.47 9 Exempt -- 0 513 -0 -060 -135 0.000 Exempt 9 Exempt -- 0 513-0- 060 -145 0.000 Exempt 9 Exempt -- 0 513 -0- 060 -155 0.000 Exempt 9 650.00 49.21 13.21 513 -0- 060 -175 1.860 24.57 9 650.00 49.21 13.21 513 -0 -060 -185 1.360 17.96 9 650.00 49.21 13.21 513 -0- 060-245 4.980 65.77 9 650.00 49.21 13.21 513 -0- 060 -255 5.380 71.06 9 650.00 49.21 13.21 513 -0- 060 -265 16.080 ** 212.38 9 650.00 49.21 13.21 513 -0- 060 -275 0.889 * 11.74 9 650.00 49.21 13.21 513 -0- 060 -285 1.005 13.27 Zone ; Total --- - - - - -- 49.214 ---- - - - - -- 650.00 * Smallest Parcel ** Largest Parcel 00206 EXHIBIT "B" AD 84 -2 Fund 23 Activity Description -------------------------------- BEGINNING BALANCE REVENUE ASSESSMENTS INTEREST MISCELLANEOUS TRANSFERS IN AVAILABLE FUNDS EXPENSES FY 1994/95 FY 1995/96 FY Fly ---------------- - - - - -- Proposed 1992/93 1993x94 Budget Proj Actual Budget Notes: 256,185 315,355 179,326 224,527 119,183 449,164 374,909 430,350 435,300 425,318 1,436 1,000 1,000 1,000 �48 0 0 0 705,349 692,:48 610,6"'6 660,827 545,501 Personnel 16,727 19,360 * 19,007 * 20,000 * 20,000 * 0 & M 324,031 347,~.37 * 385,780 * 348,005 * 438,015 * Capital Improvements 49,236 100,24 * 192,028 * 173,639 * 55,000 * Less TOTAL EXPENSES 389,994 467,823 596,815 541,644 513,015 YEAR END BALANCE 315,355 224,`.;2' 13,861 119,183 32,486 LESS SET ASIDES: Reserved for Zone 2 Improvements (52,640) ) (6,220) (5,955) (12,175) Reserved for Zone 8 Improvements (20,445) (34,890) 0 0 0 Reserved for Zone 9 Improvements 0 ) 0 0 0 Surplus Zone Maint. Assessments (8,113) (4,8061 (2,586) (431) Future Capital Improvements (55,000) YEAR END AVAILABLE FUNDS --- - - - - -- 234,157 189,631 2,835 ----- - - - - -- 55,642 ---- - - - - -- 19,880 Less Street Light Carryover Deducted from Future Lighting Assessment (4,984) Net Surplus 50,658 03/24/95 00207 Exhibit 'C' Zone of Benefit Maintenance Cost Analysis FY 1995/96 30-Mar -95 Page 1 of 5 Remarks ** Paid by Performance Nursury 12 Months Maint. OO908 Amount of Landscaping Contract Utility Costs ($] Total Total Total Maintained Maint. ------------ - - - - -- Maint. Zone Lots Acres [Sq. Ft.] Cost ($) Water Electric Other Cost ($) 1 77 - -- 6,000 I 3,245.00 350-50 3,745 2 622 - -- 970,000 23,919.00 22,350 150 0 46,419 3 265 - -- 3,000 1,557.48 243 ) 0 1,800 4 129 - -- i 5,640 i 3,089.64 700 120 0 3,910 5 217 - -- 91,920 19,094.40 5,600 360 0 25,054 6 22 - -- 500 j i 270.00 250 J ** 0 520 7 - -- 95 10,000 4,800.00 1,500 0) 0 6,500 8 497 City 65,340 3,600.00 4,000 150 0 7,750 200 Home Acres 9 - -- 49 300.00 250 100 0 650 10 2,487 - -- 528,000 21,600.00 16,500 400 0 38,500 51,743 1,63) ------- V Total I - - - - -- 81,475.52 _.._._ 53,�s79 ------ - - - - -- 134,849 Iota] tilitLes 30-Mar -95 Page 1 of 5 Remarks ** Paid by Performance Nursury 12 Months Maint. OO908 EXHIBIT "C ": Zone Activity (14,360) 4,389 (9,207) (15,519) (7,469) 32,419 03/24/95 Page 2 43,882 43,882 53,888 53,888 FY 1994/95 36,140 FY 1995/96 34,675 28,363 FY FY FY ------------------ - - - - -- Proposed FY95/96 Description 1991/92 1992,193 1993 94 Budget Proj Actual Budget Assessment ZONE 1: Tract 2851: Bambi / Benwood / Flood Control Channel ------------------------------ Prior Year Carry Over 0 X26 1436 1,009 Maintenance (1,259) Plus Assessments 2,978 2,521 1,405 - ---- - - - - -- ------------------------------ Prior Year Carry Over 0 1,275 (1,819) 1,944 (987) (2,194) - - - - -- 1,800 Plus Assessments 6,773 6,185 9,7''6 4,131 4,131 5,939 5,939 Budgeted Expenditures 6,773 7,460 7,957 6,075 3,144 3,745 Less Actual Expenditures 5,498 9,279 8,944 6,075 5,338 3,745 Zone 1 Balance 1,275 (1,H19) (987`1 0 (2,194) 0 --------------------------------------------- ZONE 2: Tract 2865: E/S Peach Hill Rd, N/0 T R Rd ** N/S T R Rd Parkway ** S/S T R Rd Slopes ** Christain Barrett & Spring Maintenance ------------------------------ Prior Year Carry Over Plus Assessments Budgeted Expenditures Less Actual Expenditures Zone 2 Maint. Balance Improvements ------------------------------ Prior Year Carry Over Plus Assessments Total Improvement Assmnts to Date Less Actual Expenditures S/S T. R. Rd Parkway 0 (14,360) 4,389 (9,207) (15,519) (7,469) 32,419 50,500 17,6'1 43,882 43,882 53,888 53,888 32,419 36,140 22,060 34,675 28,363 46,419 46,779 31.,'751 37,579 34,675 35,832 46,419 (14,360) 4;S8u 15,519 0 (7,469) 0 52,640 52,640 52,640 0 ) 0 52,640 52,"40 52,640 (9,265) (9,530) 5,955 15,485 15,485 6,220 6,220 - - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- ----- - - - - -- $10 /lot 6,220 5,955 12,175 N Peach Hill Slope 0 1 i 34,141 Sunnyslope Debris Basin 0 1 28,029 Zone 2 Improv. Balance 52,640 52,640 (9,530) 6,220 5,955 12,175 60,108 ZONE 3: Tract 3032: Buttercreek Entry ** Peppermill Parkway -------------------------------------------------- Maintenance ----------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------ Prior Year Carry Over 0 X26 1436 1,009 538 (1,259) Plus Assessments 2,978 2,521 1,405 846 846 3,059 3,059 Budgeted Expenditures 2,978 3,147 ----- 2,841 - - - - -- 1,855 ---- - - - - -- ----- 1,384 - - - - -- 1,800 Less Actual Expenditures 2,052 1,811 2,303 1,855 2,643 1,800 Zone 3 Maint. Balance 926 i,# 538 0 -- - - - - -- ----- (1,259) - - - - -- (0) 0012 09 EXHIBIT "C ": Zone Activity Page 3 FY 1994/95 FY FY FY -------- - - - - -- Description 1991/92 1992;93 1993/94 Budget ZONE 4: Tract 3274: Williams Ranch Rd Barrier ** N/S Parkways ** S'S Parkway Maintenance ------------------------ - - - - -- 03/24/95 FY 1995/96 ---- - - - - -- Proposed FY95/96 Proj Actual Budget Assessment - ---------------- - - - - -- Prior Year Carry Over 0 2,445 -1 4 81901 8,125 4,342 Plus Assessments 5,930 4,21.2 12,118 0 0 0 0 Budgeted Expenditures 5,930 6,657 12,892 8,901 8,125 4,342 Less Actual Expenditures 3,485 5,88:1 4,167 4,095 3,783 3,910 Zone 4 Maint. Balance 2,445 il 4,806 4,342 432 ZONE 5: Tracts 3019 & 3025: N/S T R Rd Parkways ** S/S Slopes ** - ----------------------------------------------- W/S Peach Hill Parkway Maintenance ------------------------------------ ------------------------------ Prior Year Carry Over 0 (14,487) 1,669 (8,993) (7,542) 7,115 Plus Assessments 24,355 40,137 1?,340 37,338 37,338 17,939 17,939 Budgeted Expenditures 24,355 26,250 19,009 28,345 29,796 25,054 Less Actual Expenditures 38,842 24,581 26,551 28,345 22,681 25,054 Zone 5 Maint. Balance (14,487) 1,,66a ("',5421, 0 7,115 (0) ZONE 6: Tract 3306: West end of Inglewood (Glenhaven) -- ------------------------------------ Maintenance --------------- - - -- ------------------------------ Prior Year Carry Over 0 1�7) '22 593 294 (229) Plus Assessments 1,452 �?79 678 242 242 749 749 Budgeted Expenditures 1,452 1,554 1,400 835 536 520 Less Actual Expenditures 777 332 1,106 835 765 520 Zone 6 Maint. Balance 675 2G4 0 (229) 0 ZONE 7: N/S of L A Ave E/0 Gabbert ------------------------------------------------------ (West America) Maintenance - - - - -- ... - -- ---------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------ Prior Year Carry Over 0 `2l 942 (3,206) (3,279) 1,080 Plus Assessments 720 3,521 3,087 10,581 10,581 5,420 5,420 Budgeted Expenditures 720 4,247 4,029 - - - -- 7,375 ---- - - - - -- ----- 7,302 - - - - -- 6,500 Less Actual Expenditures 0 3,305 ,308 7,375 6,222 6,500 Zone 7 Maint. Balance 720 -JU (3 2'91 0 ---- -� - - -- ----- 1,080 - - - - -- 0 0 0 02 i �) EXHIBIT "C ": Zone Activity Page 4 Description --------------------------------- ZONE 8: Home Acres Buffer Area ------------------------------------- Maintenance ------------------------------ Prior Year Carry Over Plus Assessments Budgeted Expenditures Less Actual Expenditures Zone 8 Maint. Balance Improvements ------------------------------- Prior Year Carry Over Plus Assessments Total Improvement Assents to Date Less Actual Expenditures Zone 8 Improv. Balance ZONE 9: Condor Drive / L A Ave Parkway Maintenance ------------------------------ Prior Year Carry Over Plus Assessments Budgeted Expenditures Less Actual Expenditures Zone 9 Maint. Balance Improvements ------------------------------ Prior Year Carry Over Plus Assessments Total Improvement Assents to Date Less Actual Expenditures Zone 9 Improv. Balance 03/24/95 FY 1994/95 FY 1995/96 FY FY FY ------------------ - - - - -- Proposed FY95/96 1991/92 1992,'93 1993/94 Budget Proj Actual Budget Assessment 0 0 1,200 1,200 1,200 6,550 6,550 ----- - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- ----- - - - - -- 1,200 1,200 7,750 1,200 0 7,750 ----- - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- ----- - - - - -- 0 1,200 0 0 0 20,445 34,890 34,890 (20,365) 0 20,445 20,445 19,245 19,245 13,895 13,895 0 20,445 40,890 54,135 54,135 (6,470) 0 ? 6,000 54,135 74,500 0 0 20,445 34,890 0 (20,365) (6,470) 20,445 0 0 0 0 0 650 -- ---- - - - - -- ----- 0 0 - - - - -- 650 0 0 ---- - - - - -- ----- 650 - 0 0 - - - -- 0 0 0 0 6,000 6,000 0 - - - - -- 6,000 ---- - - - - -- ----- - - - - -- 6,000 0 6,000 - - - - -- 6,000 0 ---- - - - - 0 -- ----- - - - - -- 0 0 00,69011 650 0 650 EXHIBIT "C ": Zone Activity 03/24/95 Page 5 FY 1994/95 FY 1995/96 FY FY FY ------------------ - - - - -- Proposed FY95/96 Description 1991/92 1992/93 1993/94 Budget Proj Actual Budget Assessment ZONE 10: Tierra Rejada Rd Parkways in PC -3 ---------------------------------- - - - - -- Maintenance ------------------------------ Prior Year Carry Over Plus Assessments Budgeted Expenditures Less Actual Expenditures Zone 10 Maint. Balance Improvements ------------------------------- Prior Year Carry Over Plus Assessments Total Improvement Assmnts to Date Less Actual Expenditures Zone 10 Improv. Balance 0 38,500 38,500 38,500 38,500 0 ------------------------------------------------- TOTAL ZONE ACTIVITY SUMMARY FY 1995/96 Expenses Assessments Zone 1 2 3 4 5 6 8 9 10 Total Maint Impro4. Total 3,745 3,745 46,419 46,419 1,800 1,800 3,910 3,910 25,054 25,054 520 520 6,500 6,500 7,750 750 650 650 38,500 38,500 134,849 134,849 ------------------------------------- Maint. Improv. Total ----- - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- ----- - - - - -- ----------- ---- - - - - -- ----- - - - - -- 5,939 0 5,939 53,888 6,220 60,108 3,059 0 3,059 0 0 0 17,939 0 17,939 749 0 749 5,420 0 5,420 6,550 13,895 20,445 650 0 650 38,500 0 38,500 ----- - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- ----- - - - - -- 132,694 20,115 152,809 00212 EXHIBIT "D" (1 of 3) AD84 -2 Budget Department 143 Budget Summary SALARIES & BENEFITS MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS 623 Supplies 624 Postage 626 Printing 629 Special Supplies 637 Travel & Milage 638 Uniforms 641 Professional Services 642 Contract Services 648 Insurance 651 Equip Maint 652 Utilities 654 Vehicle Maint 655 Fuel 656 Lubricants 657 Small Tools 658 Maint & Repair 661 Equip Rental 49,235 -- - - - - -- M &O Total 903 Capital Projects TOTAL FY 92/93 FY 93/94 Actual Actual 16,728 19,360 1,617 903 0 810 495 200 0 307 0 0 0 0 3,267 5,190 100,862 118,620 0 0 0 0 213,931 216,814 260 218 2,109 756 0 0 0 0 1,166 2,913 324 -- - - - - 806 -- -- 324,031 - - - - -- 347,537 49,235 -- - - - - -- 100,924 -- - - - - -- 389,994 467,821 FY 1994;95 Budget Proj Actual 19,)0- 20,000 i50 550 LOO 2,025 C 0 C 0 C` 0 0 0 5,625 3,480 L33, L26 116,746 ( 0 0 0 240,465 221,480 150 135 ?64 189 (, 0 0 0 1,750 1,700 1,750 1,700 385,780 348,005 192,028 * 173,639 596,315 541,644 24- Mar -95 FY 95/96 Proposed Budget Remarks: 20,000 *,I See Pg 2 500 * 2,100 * 0* 0* 0* 0* 5,600 159,152 0* 0* 266,613 200 250 0* 1,800 1,800 0* 438,015 * 55,000 * 513,015 See Pq 2 See Exibit E 00213 EXHIBIT "D" (2 of 3) AD84 -2 Budget 24- Mar -95 Remarks: See Ex 'D' Pg. 3 See Ex 'D' Pg. 3 See Exibit E 00214 FY 1995/96 Budget Department 143 Budget Summary ------------------------------------- Zones Citywide Total SALARIES & BENEFITS (^ 20,000 20,000 MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS 623 Supplies 0 500 500 624 Postage 0 2,100 2,100 626 Printing ( 0 629 Special Supplies i 0 0 i 637 Travel & Milage C; 0 638 Uniforms ( 0 641 Professional Services 0 5,600 5,600 j 642 Contract Services i 81,176 * 77,676 * 159,152 I 648 Insurance 0 0 651 Equip Maint 0 0 652 Utilities i 53,373 * 213,240 * 266,613 654 Vehicle Maint ( 200 200 655 Fuel ( 250 250 656 Lubricants 0 0 657 Small Tools 0 1,800 1,800 658 Maint & Repair 0 1,800 1,800 661 Equip Rental 0 0 M &O Total j 134,349 303,166 438,015 903 Capital Projects ± 0 * 55,000 * 55,000 TOTAL 1.34,849 378,166 513,015 24- Mar -95 Remarks: See Ex 'D' Pg. 3 See Ex 'D' Pg. 3 See Exibit E 00214 Exhibit D (3 of 3) AD84 -2: Citywide Landscape Maintenance Cost Analysis Contract and Utility Cost Detail FY 1995/96 642 652 Amount of ------ . ------ -------------------------- Landscaping Contract Utility Costs ($) Maintained Maintenance -------------------- - - - - -- Map Description [Sq. Ft.', Cost j$) Water Electric Total A Campus Park Dr Ned: Princeton to Julliard 8,000 908.52 250 165 415 B Campus Park Dr Ned: Julliard to Marquette 19,712 2.'71.30 580 170 750 C Campus Park Dr Ned: Marquette to Collins 19,712 2,271.30 580 170 750 Campus Park Prky (N /S): Channel to Collins 12,240 1,750.00 375 85 460 Collins Prky (W /S: Benwood to Campus Park Dr 3,600 1 1,150.00 375 85 460 D Moorpark Ave Prkwy (W /S): N/0 High 4111 00.00 60 10 70 E Poindexter Prky (S /S): @ Sierra 2,1,- 000.00 300 0 300 F L. A. Ave Prkwy (N /S): Millard to Spring 4,71,- 1 100.00 330 0 330 G Spring Rd Prkwy (E /S): S/0 Peach Hill 15,820 1,1!00.00 2,275 0 2,275 S/W Corner of Peach Hill & Spring 2,401 800.00 300 0 300 H I Tierra Rejada Median N/0 Bridge 29,568 1,985.26 300 85 385 T.R Rd Prkwy (E /S): L.A. to Harvester 1,600 '40.00 350 85 435 J &K T. R. Rd Median: Spring to Peach Hill 76,0+" 7 080.00 9,000 170 9,170 L T. R. Rd Ned: Peach Hill to Edison Easement 16,896 3,'20.00 500 85 585 Sub -Total Existing Areas °5,676 16,685 Areas Added This Year M,N & 0 T. R. Rd Ned: Peach Hill to Edison Easement 84,480 10,800.00 9,500 255 P & Q Princeton Medians & Parkways 2,500 1,000.00 300 85 Campus Park Dr Parkway (W /O Penn) 3,000 1,200.00 330 85 R Peach Hill Rd Parkways 0.00 0 0 Sub -Total New Areas 3,000 Sub-Total All Areas 8,676 -------------------------------------------------------- - - - - -- _- - ----.--------------------------- Miscellaneous Contract )sts 9,000 Street Lights GRAND TOTAL "7,676 9,755 385 415 0 10,555 27,240 186,000 213,240 00215 EXHIBIT "E" AD84-2 Budget Department 143 Budget Summary Capital Improvements No. Description Acc. Citywide Capital Improvements -------------------------------------- a Prkwy: Poindexter @ Sierra - 000001 b Prkwy: W/S Spring S/0 Pch Hill - 000280 c Prkwy: E/S Spring S/0 Pch Hill d Prkwy: Peach Hill Rd (S /S & E /S) - 000353 e Prkwy: S/S L.A. E/0 Tierra Rejada - 000218 d Prkwy & Median: Princeton - 000221 g Prkwy: S/S Campus Park Dr - 000354 h Prkwy: W/S T. R. Rd S/0 L. A. Ave - 000226 i Prkwy: N/S Poindexter Sub -Total Citywide Improvements Zone Capital Improvements -------------------------------------- 2 Prkwy: N/S T. R. @ Southampton 8 Home Acres Buffer Area - 000350 9 Prkwy: L. A. Ave @ Virgina Colony - 000344 Total Zone Capital Improvements GRAND TOTAL Capital Improvements FY 1994/95 Projected Budget Actual 354 87 18,754 20,00o 37,00", 49,000 5,91= 352 F73 i i 0 37 (000 i 49,000 5,414 131,89 93,139 24- Mar -95 FY 1995/96 Proposed Budget Remarks ---- - - - - -- ----------------------- - - - - -- Completed Completed 5,000 0 20,000 Includes $7,315 from develope 30,000 55,000 ----------------------------- Total Accumulated Improvement Assessments thru FY 1995/96 ----------------------------- C 0 12,175 54,13' 74,500 0 (6,470 6,000 6,000 0 0 60,134-: 80,50C 0 192,02k 173,639 55,000 00216 EXHIBIT 'F' Street Lighting Cost Analysis AD84 -2: FY 1995/96 FY 1994/95 Summary ---------------- - - - - -- FY 1995/96 Estimate Last Year's Projected Cost (see above) .......... 185,016 Contingency for rate adjustment 3,700 Estimated Anjual Cost for added lights ........., 3,000 Sub -Total 191,716 Plus Prior Year Lighting Assessment Shortfall Less Prior Year Lighting Assessment Surplus (4,984) Total 186,732.04 Say... 186,000.00 03/24/95 Remarks ------------------------------ - - - - -- Six month cost Projected Annual Cost 0021'7 Street Traffic Signal Date Lights Safety Lighting Total July 1994 15,268.66 0.00 15,268.66 Aug 1994 15,330.21 0.00 15,330.21 Sept 1994 15,397.43 0.00 .15,39`.43 Oct 1994 15,468.58 0.00 15,468.58 Nov 1994 15,565.15 0.00 15,565.15 Dec 1994 15,477.90 0.00 Six Month Costs 92,507.93 O.0C 92,508 x2 Projected FY 1994/95 Street Light Costs 1.85,016 FY 1994/95 Street Lighting Assessment 196,000 Revenue Shortfall Revenue Surplus 4,984 FY 1995/96 Estimate Last Year's Projected Cost (see above) .......... 185,016 Contingency for rate adjustment 3,700 Estimated Anjual Cost for added lights ........., 3,000 Sub -Total 191,716 Plus Prior Year Lighting Assessment Shortfall Less Prior Year Lighting Assessment Surplus (4,984) Total 186,732.04 Say... 186,000.00 03/24/95 Remarks ------------------------------ - - - - -- Six month cost Projected Annual Cost 0021'7 PRELIMINARY ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF MOORPARK LIGHTING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. AD -84 -2 LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 Prepared By: DWIGHT FRENCH & ASSOCIATES, INC. 1470 S. Valley Vista Drive Suite 290 Diamond Bar, ('A 91765 March 1995 G -i OV TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Section 1 Authority for Report 1 Section 2 Description of Improvements to be Maintained 1 Section 3 Assessment Rol: 4 Section 4 Method of Assessment 4 Section 5 Estimate of Cost 6 Appendix "A" Street Lighting Formula - Table 1 Appendix "B" Landscape Formula - Table 2 Appendix "C" Assessment Summary - Table 3 Appendix "D" Budget Estimate Appendix "E" Boundary Map Appendix "F" Assessment Roll Appendix "G" Resolutions Appendix "H" Rebate Procedure 00219 CITY OF MOORPARK Engineer's Report Parks Maintenance Assessment District No. AD -84 -2 Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 For Fiscal Year 1995 -1996 SECTION 1 AUTHORITY FOR REPORT This report is prepared pursuant to City Council action taken at their regular meeting of January 4; 1995 to extend this District for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 1995 and ending June 30, 1996 in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, "Landscaping Act of 197211, being Part 2 of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code. The District will provide electrical energy for public lighting facilities and for operation and maintenance of public lighting within the City. In addition, the District will provide for installation and /or maintenance of public landscaping within the public right -of -way. SECTION 2 DESCRIPTION OF THE IMPROVEMENTS TO BE MAINTAINED This report covers the period of July 1, 1995 through June 30, 1996. An updated report is prepared each year to reflect updated annual costs and changes in parcelization The City of Moorpark Lighting Maintenance District is proposed to create a new zone of benefit for the maintenance of the parkway landscaping on Tierra Rejda Roach within PC -3, which will be designated as Zone 10. The District is also proposed to adjust the boundary of Zone 1 to include certin lots within Tract 2851 which had in the past omitted in error. The District is alo proposed to adjust the benefit formula for landscaping and /or for lighting. The assessments shown in apppendices A, B and C are based on the current formulas. These assesments will be changed upon further directions by the City Council. The improvements to be maintained in this District include all City -owned and Southern California Edison (S.C.E.) -owned street lights as well as all medians and street trees within public rights -of -way within the boundaries of the City. 1 00220 Lighting maintenance shall include, but is not limited to, energy costs, removal, repair, replacement or relocation of light standards, poles, bulbs, fixtures and all appurtenances. Servicing of S.C.E. owned lights as defined in Section 22538 of the Streets and Highways Code shall be furnished by the Southern California Edison Company or its successors, or this servicing shall be as authorized by the Public Utilities Commission, State of California. Maintenance of City -owned lighting :improvements shall be furnished by the City. Landscape maintenance shall include, but is not limited to, watering, fertilizing, mowing, weed control, shrubbery, tree removal and pruning, removal and replacement of dead growth, maintenance of irrigation facilities and other necessary work. In addition, the cost to maintain improved areas within an easement will be borne by owners within that project. These easement areas are: 1. Tract No. 2851 Maintenance costs associated with landscaping in the Ventura County Flood Control Easement and portions of the interior tract entry areas. The obligation upon these 77 lots is pursuant to a condition of development. 2. Tract No. 2865 Cost for maintenance of specific landscape areas within the tract, including landscaping at Christian Barrett & Spring Roads; Tierra Rejada landscaping, and Peach Hill Road landscaping on east side between Christian Barrett and Tierra Rejada Roads, and the entry monument sign at Christian Barret and Spring Road. The obligation upon these 622 lots within this tract is pursuant to a condition of development 3. Tract No. 3032 Maintenance costs associated with landscaping an entry monument at Buttercreek Road and Los Angeles Avenue. This cost to be spread to the 265 lots within the tract. 4. Tract No. 3274 Maintenance costs associated with landscape areas along Williams Ranch Road parkway adjacent to Peach Hill drain channel and Edison entries within PC -3. This cost will be borne by the 129 lots within the tract. 0a 00221 5. Tract Nos. 3019, 3525 Maintenance costs associated with landscaping the Tierra Rejada Road slope and parkway areas and parkway on the west side of Peach Hill Road between Williams Ranch and Tierra Rejada Roads within Tract Nos. 3019 and 3525. The cost is to be spread to the 217 lots within the tracts. 6. Tract 3306 Cost for landscape areas within Tract 3306 at the westerly terminus of Inglewood Street. The cost is to be spread to the 22 lots within the tract. 7. Los Angeles Avenue Parkway Maintenance costs associated with landscaping the parkway on the north side of Los Angeles Avenue between Gabbert Road and Shasta Avenue will be borne by all industrial lots northerly of Los Angeles Avenue, southerly of Poindexter Avenue, eastei- ly of Gabbert Road, and westerly of Shasta Avenue. 8. West Village Buffer Area Improvement and maintenance costs associated with the buffer area within Tracts 4340, 4341, 4342, the commercial and multi- family areas bounded by Tierra Rejada to the east,, Mountain Trail to the South, Countryhill Road to the west, Tract 4342 to the north and Home Acres. The costs are to be split 50 -50 between the area within the City (Tracts 4340, 4341, 4342 and multi- family areas) and the Home Acres,. 9. Condor Drive Industrial Park Improvement and maintenance costs associated with the parkway located at the northwest corner of Los Angeles Avenue and Virginia Colony Place will be borne by the developed parcels within the Industrial Park. 10. Tierra Rejada Road Parkway within PC -3 Maintenance costs associated with landscaping the parkway along Tierra Rejada Road within PC -3 will be borne by the developed parcels withi -i the boundary as shown on the boundary map. Plans and specifications for the irrigation, landscaping and lighting of streets, parks and easements, and other authorized improvements within the City are on file in the Department of Public Works. The Lighting locations and specifications for Q 00 _2 -22 Edison -owned lights are on file with the Southern California Edison Company. Reference is hereby made to said plans and specifications for the exact location and nature of the landscape and lighting improvements. Said plans and specifications by reference are hereby made a part of this report SECTION 3 ASSESSMENT ROLL All parcels of real property affected are listed on the "Assessment Roll ", Exhibit "A," which will be on file in City Hall with the City Clerk, and is made a part hereof by reference. These parcels are more particularly described in maps prepared in accordance with Section 327 of the Revenue and Taxation Code which are on file in the office of the Ventura County Assessor in the County Government Center Administration Building, 800 S. Victoria Avenue, Ventura, California and which are also made a part hereof by reference. SECTION 4 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT The Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, in Section 22573, states that "The net amount to be assessed upon the lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the new amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." Lighting The primary benefits of street lighting are for the convenience, safety and protection of people and the security or protection of property, property improvements and goods. The intensity or degree of illumination provided can have a bearing on both. The single family home - Level 1 has been selected as the base unit for the spread of assessments. By definition, the single family home - Level 1 is a single family home located on a street that has existing street lights. A factor of 1.00 has been assigned to the base unit, which is composed of benefit factors which correspond to the following types of benefit: People Use - People related benefits 0.50 Security Benefit - Property protection 0.25 Intensity - Degree of illumination 0.25 1.00 4 00223 Parcels in other land use categories were then rated by comparison with the basic unit. (See Table 1) People Use - People related benefits 1. Reduction in night accidents and attendant human misery. 2. Reduced vulnerability to criminal assault during hours of darkness. 3. Promotion of business operations during evening hours. 4. Increased safety on roads and highways. Security Benefit - Property Protection 1. Reduction in vandalism and other criminal acts, and damage to improvements. 2. Reduction in burglaries. Intensity Intensity or degree of illumination provided on streets varies with type of street, date of installation and the use of the property adjacent thereto. Landscaping The landscaping element of the spread formula recognizes that all properties within the City benefit from the maintenance of the landscaping within public rights -of -way and easements. These benefits include aesthetic enjoyment, creation of a placement living and working environment, an increase in general property values, improved safety resulting from a regular tree trimming program and improved street sweeping capabilities resulting from trimming trees which may otherwise interface with street sweeping operations. Because of the general benefit received, the cost is spread equally along each parcel in the City. This amount is shown in the appendix. Rebate The City Council approved a rebate procedure for disadvantaged property owners. The procedure shall be followed as described in Appendix "H." 6i ,-� -7 00224 SECTION 5 COST ESTIMATE The City staff recommendation for the District budget is shown in Appendix "D" of this report. The costs attributed to landscaping and the costs attributed to lighting will be separately appointed, according to the formula, and added together to constitute the total assessment for each parcel. Conclusion In conclusion, it is our opinion that the assessments within Lighting Maintenance Assessment District No. AD -84 -2 are apportioned by a formula that fairly distributes the net cost in accordance with the benefits that are received. \rpt \050ad842.945 6 0 0%2�i APPENDICES 0 0?26' APPENDIX "A'' CITY OF MOORPARK Lighting Maintenance Assessment District AD -84 -2 Lighting and Landscape Act of 1972 Table 1 Street Lighting Formula Use Code Description 0 Residential Vacant 1 Single Family - Level 1 2 Mobile Home 3 Condo (Per Unit) 4 Residential Income (2 -4 Units) (Per Unit) 5 Apartments (5 +) Per Unit 6 Single Family - Level 2 9 Mobile Home & Trailer Park (Per Space) 10 Commercial Vacant Land 11 Retail Stores, Single Story (Per Parcel) 12 Store & Office Combination 15 Shopping Centers (Neighborhood) 16 Shopping Centers (Regional) 17 Office Building (1 Story) 18 Office Building (Multi - Story) (Per Parcel) 19 Retail Stores (Multi - Story) (Per Parcel) People Lighting Total Annual Use Intensity Security Units Assessment 0.00 0 00 0.25 0.25 $ 4.94 0.50 0.25 0.25 1.00 $ 19.77 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $ 0.00 0.50 0 25 0.25 1.00 $ 19.77 0.50 005 0.25 1.00 $ 19.77 0.50 0.05 0.20 0.75 $ 14.83 0.50 0 05 0.20 0.75 $ 14.83 0.50 0 05 0.20 0.75 $ 14.83 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.25 $ 4.94 2.00 1 00 x.00 4.00 $ 79.07 2.00 1.00 :x.00 4.00 $ 79.07 4.00 1 00 L.50 6.50 $128.49 4.00 1.00 '.50 6.50 $128.49 1.00 1.00 t.00 3.00 $ 59.30 2.00 1,00 1.00 4.00 $ 79.07 2.00 1 00 x.00 4.00 $ 79.07 A -1 009- 27 Use Lighting People Code Description Use 21 Restaurants & 3.00 ('0 Cocktail Lounges 5.00 24 Banks, Savings & 1.00 3.00 Loans (!0 25 Service Stations 2.00 26 Auto Sales, Repair 2.00 0 Storage, Rental 0.25 30 Industrial land 0.00 0 1,.10 Vacant 0.00 31 Light Manufacturing 3.00 32 Warehousing 2.00 33 Industrial Condos, 2.00 Co -Ops, PUD's 38 Mineral Processing 1.00 44 Truck Crops 0.50 46 Pasture (Permanent) 0.50 48 Poultry 0.50 49 Flowers, Seed Products 0.50 51 Orchards 0.50 53 Field Crops, Dry 0.50 54 Pasture of Graze, Dry 0.50 55 Feed Lots 0.50 57 Tree Farms 0.50 61 Theater 3.00 69 Parks 0.00 70 Institutional Vacant 0.00 71 Churches, Convent Rectory 0.00 72 Schools 0.00 73 Colleges 0.00 78 Public Buildings, 0.00 Museums, Firehouses, Etc. 79 Flood Control 0.00 80 Misc. Vacant Lots 0.00 81 Utility Water Company 0.00 83 Petroleum & Gas 1.00 86 Water Rights, Pumps 0.00 88 Highways & Streets 0.00 91 Utility- Edison 0.00 1,00 1.00 1 �; 0 1.00 0.25 0 25 0 25 0.1.5 0.25 0 25 0.25 0.25 0.25 1.00 0 00 0 00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 ') 0 1.00 1.00 '.50 x.00 0.25 0.25 }.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 1.00 ).00 ).25 0.25 ID. 00 0.00 F) . 00 5.00 4.00 5.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 5.00 0.00 0.25 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual Assessment $ 98.84 $ 59.30 $ 79.07 $ 79.07 $ 4.94 $ 98.84 $ 79.07 $ 98.84 $ 59.30 $ 19.77 $ 19.77 $ 19.77 $ 19.77 $ 19.77 $ 19.77 $ 19.77 $ 19.77 $ 19.77 $ 98.84 $ 0.00 $ 4.94 $ 4.94 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 0.00 Lighting Total Intensity Security Units 0.25 0.25 1 ('0 :� . 00 5.00 1 00 -00 3.00 1 (!0 1.00 4.00 1 00 1.00 4.00 0 00 0.25 0.25 1,00 1.00 1 �; 0 1.00 0.25 0 25 0 25 0.1.5 0.25 0 25 0.25 0.25 0.25 1.00 0 00 0 00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 ') 0 1.00 1.00 '.50 x.00 0.25 0.25 }.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 1.00 ).00 ).25 0.25 ID. 00 0.00 F) . 00 5.00 4.00 5.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 5.00 0.00 0.25 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual Assessment $ 98.84 $ 59.30 $ 79.07 $ 79.07 $ 4.94 $ 98.84 $ 79.07 $ 98.84 $ 59.30 $ 19.77 $ 19.77 $ 19.77 $ 19.77 $ 19.77 $ 19.77 $ 19.77 $ 19.77 $ 19.77 $ 98.84 $ 0.00 $ 4.94 $ 4.94 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $ 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.25 $ 4.94 0.00 0.00 0.00 $ 0.00 0.50 0.50 2.00 $ 39.54 0.00 0.00 0.00 $ 0.00 0 00 0.00 0.00 $ 0.00 0 1,.10 ) .00 0.00 $ 0.00 A -2 00228 Use People Lighting Total Annual Code Description Use Intensity Security Units Assessment 92 Telephone 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $ 0.00 93 S.P.R.R. 0.00 0 00 0.00 0.00 $ 0.00 94 Undedicated Community Areas (Condos) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $ 0.00 95 State Property 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $ 0.00 96 County Property 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $ 0.00 97 City Property 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $ 0.00 99 Exempt 0.00 0 c0 0.00 0.00 $ 0.00 A -3 0 0220 APPENDIX "B" CITY OF MOORPARK Lighting Maintenance Assessment District No. AD -84 -2 Lighting and Landscape Act of 1972 Landscape Formula The landscaping element of the spread formula is calculated in accordance with the method described as follows: Total Annual Cost = $10 43 per parcel Notes: 1. In addition to the above landscape charge, 77 lots within Tract No. 2851 are assessed an additional landscape cost for a Ventura County Flood Control Easement and portions of the interior tract entry areas. The additional cost per lot is $77.13. The obligation upon these lots is pursuant to a condition of development. 2. In addition to the above landscape charge, 622 lots within Tract 2865 are assessed an additional landscape charge for the maintenance of parkways, Tierra Rejada Road slope and street scape areas, and the monument sign within the tract. The additional cost per lot is $96.64. The obligation upon these lots i.s pursuant to a condition of development. 3. In addition to the above landscape charge, 265 lots within Tract No. 3032 are assessed an additional landscape charge for the maintenance of an entry monument at Buttercreek Road and Los Angeles Avenue. The additional cost per lot i.s � >11.54. 4. In addition to the above landscape charge, 129 lots within Tract No. 3274 are assessed an additional landscape charge for the landscape for the maintenance of parkway areas along Williams Ranch Road and Edison entries within PC -3. The additional cost per lot is $0. The obligation upon these lots is pursuant to a condition of development. B -1 00 30 5. In addition to the above landscape charge, 217 lots within Tract Nos. 3019 and 3525 are assessed an additional landscaping charge for maintenance of Tierra Rejada Road slope and parkways and the parkway on the west side of Peach Hill Road between Williams Ranch and Tierra Rejada Roads. The additional cost per lot is $82.67. The obligation upon these lots is pursuant to a condition of development. 6. In addition to the above landscape charge, 22 lots within Tract No. 3306 are assessed an additional landscape charge for the maintenance of landscape area at the westerly terminus of Inglewood Street. The additional cost per lot is $34.05. The obligation upon these lots is pursuant to a condition of development. 7. In addition to the above landscape charge, 93 lots northerly of Los Angeles Avenue southerly of Poindexter Avenue, between Gabbert and Shasta Avenues are assessed an additional landscaping charge for maintenance of the northside of Los Angeles Avenue Parkway. The additional cost is $57.10 per acre. 8. In addition to the above landscape charge, 497 lots within Tract Nos. 4340, 4341 and 4342 are assessed an additional $20.57 per lot, the and multi - family parcels are assessed an additional $0 per parcel, for the improvement and maintenance of West Village Buffer Area. The Home Acres, not to be levied for any City -wide lighting and landscape charges, are to be assessed for $51.11 per lot for the improvement and maintenance of West Village Buffer Area 9. In addition to the above landscape charge, 11 lots within the Industrial Park on Condor Drive are assessed an additional landscape charge for the improvements and maintenance of the parkway located at the northwest corner of Los Angeles Avenue and Virginia Colony Place. The additional cost is $13.21 per acre. ;1-+Of 10. In addition to the above landscape charge, equivalent residential Lots within the boundary of the Tierra Rejada Road parkway PC -3 maintenance area are assessed an additional landscape charge of 14-6 per lot. IS �t B -2 00231 Use Code 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 9 10 11 12 15 16 17 18 19 21 24 25 26 APPENDIX "C" CITY OF MOORPARK Lighting Maintenance Assessment District AD -84 -2 Lighting and Landscape Act of 1972 Table 3 Assessment Summary Landscape Lighting Description Assessment Assessment Residential $10.43 4.94 Vacant Single Family - Level 1 Mobile Home Condo Residential Income (2 -4 Units Apartments (5 +) Single Family - Level 2 Mobile Home and Trailer park Commercial Vacant Land Retail Stores, Single Story Store & Office Combination Shopping Centers (Neighborhood) Shopping Centers (Regional) Office Building (1- Story) Office Building (Multi - Story) Retail Stores (Multi - Story) Restaurants & Cocktail Lounges Banks, Savings Loans Service Stations Auto Sales, Repair Storage, Rental 10.43 0.00 10.43 10.43 10.43 10.43 10.43 10.43 10.43 10.43 10.43 10.43 10.43 10.43 10.43 10.43 10.43 10.43 10.43 C -1 19.77 0.00 19.77 "19.77 14.83 14.83 14.83 4.94 79.07 79.07 128.49 L28.49 59.30 79.07 79.07 98.84 59.30 79.07 79.07 Total Assessment $ 15.37 30.20 0.00 30.20 30.20 25.26 25.26 25.26 15.37 89.50 89.50 138.92 138.92 69.73 89.50 89.50 109.27 69.73 89.50 89.50 00232. Use Landscape Lighting Total Code Description Assessment Assessment Assessment 30 Industrial Land 10.43 4.94 15.37 Vacant 31 Light Manufacturing 10.43 98.84 109.27 32 Warehousing 10.43 79.07 89.50 33 Industrial Condos, Co -Ops, PUD's 10.43 98.84 109.27 38 Mineral Processing 10.43 59.30 69.73 44 Truck Crops 10.43 19.77 30.20 46 Pasture (Permanent) 10.43 19.77 30.20 48 Poultry 10.43 19.77 30.20 49 Flowers, Seed 10.43 19.77 30.20 Production 51 Orchards 10.43 19.77 30.20 53 Field Crops, Dry 10.43 19.77 30.20 54 Pasture of Graze, 10.43 19.77 30.20 Dry 55 Feed Lots 10.43 19.77 30.20 57 Tree Farms 10.43 19.77 30.20 61 Theater 10.43 98.84 109.27 69 Parks 0.00 0.00 0.00 70 Institutional 10.43 4.94 15.37 Vacant Land 71 Churches, Convent, 10.43 4.94 15.37 Rectory 72 Schools 0.00 0.00 0.00 73 Colleges 0.00 0.00 0.00 78 Public Buildings, Museums, Firehouses, Etc. 0.00 0.00 0.00 79 Flood Control 0.00 0.00 0.00 80 Misc. Vacant Land 10.43 4.94 15.37 81 Utility Water Co. 0.00 0.00 0.00 83 Petroleum & Gas 10.43 39.54 49.97 86 Water Rights, Pumps 0.00 0.00 0.00 88 Highways & Streets 0.00 0.00 0.00 91 Utility - Edison 0.00 0.00 0.00 92 Telephone 0.00 0.00 0.00 93 S.P.R.R. 0.00 0.00 0.00 94 Undedicated Community Areas (Condos) 0.00 0.00 0.00 95 State Property 0.00 0.00 0.00 96 County Property 0.00 0.00 0.00 97 City Property 0.00 0.00 0.00 99 Exempt 0.00 0.00 0.00 Actual assessment amounts may vary due to discrepancies between use codes and actual property uses. c -2 009,33 APPENDIX "D" CITY OF MOORPARK LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT AD -84 -2 BUDGET ESTIMATE FY 1995 -96 ZONES OF BENEFIT 1. Tract No. 2851 SUBTOTAL $152,809.00 D -1 1_11 V0w34 Interior Parkway & Flood Control Channel 5,939.00 2. Tract No. 2865 Pacifica & Pardee 60,108.00 3. Tract No. 3032 Buttercreek & Peppermill 3,059.00 4. Tract No. 3274 Williams Ranch Road 0.00 5. Tract No. 3019, 3025 Warmington 17,939.00 6. Tract No. 3306 Glenhaven (Inglewood) 749.00 7. Los Angeles Avenue North Side Parkway 5,420.00 8. West Village Buffer Area 20,445.00 9. Condor Parkway 650.00 10. Tierra Reiada Rd Parkway in PC -3 38,500.00 SUBTOTAL $152,809.00 D -1 1_11 V0w34 BUDGET ESTIMATE FY 1995 -96 Total Annual Expenses Less Zone Maintenance Expenes Less Capital Improvements Total City -Wide Maintenance Less Prior Year Surplus *Total City Wide Assessment Total Zone Assessment Total Assessment *Street Lighting Landscape Total $ 186,000.00 86,509.00 $ 27,509.00 D -1 w'' $ 513,015.00 (134,849.00) (55,000.00) $ 323,166.00 (50,658.00) $ 272,509.00 152,809.00 $ 425,318.00 00235 APPENDIX "E" BOUNDARY MAPS 0 0236 JJ 1'r �� ._,111�I11 •n..l 1 rl �, 'I I I. .�` ,`1 � -- ...,.. _. __elm- -� —'' i_•f I I �.rr I I 1 r:rt I 1 _ In 1 , •�,f 1 1 � I I 1 - — ------ - + - - - - c + - - Ily -1 1 ' - ---- -- -- ----------- - +--/---- I/ t See attached pages for Zones 1 -9 as shown on map. - - - - - - - - - I 'I ..oc...nt co,.w•.e MOORPARK ,MOORPI RK P K. V'ALLLEVT�e..� - -r It �i I► I 7 � I a - -- f - _ I� -T 1 / S I ANGELES ro pG I i , ao O p� OORPARK Y p, 1 !MOOR ® Bounder Ma City en Moorpark Lighting and IVi a , Maintenance Assessment District No. AD -84 -2 •jj� L A j Boundary r' 1 I � T O f ) J W G ZOMV-- I . "'TRRCT ?BSI J� � � 36 A JA w �0 v s2 75 q w K i7 N I.OlAc. O O 1.17AC. O O O 132 O O O (( ® O u ® O 17 f8 19? OO O (E) 29 !31 O9 O O 26 A ! i O O Zr µ s 63 fib i 6 Q O 20 6O (( 25 3 3 Tr O ® Zs 0 w I Q4 y. m 40 99 zz BAMBI } U O � W a 0 Z76k 76 I N O 7 c ORS 7J � 72 � � � 36 A JA J9 �0 v s2 q is si K i7 N O O O O O O O O O O (( ® O O ® O b' 2 ! PARK 8 OR1Vf ,Za_- I ®® ®L Parkway Maintained by Zone Assessment 00239 C I N INNEN. Parkway Maintained by Zone Assessment 00239 ZOt�E 3: T 3032 '®®N® Parkway Maintained by Zone Assessment WE 004040 Zowc, �, -T • 3 2.74 ERR ©®®® Parkway Maintained by Zone Assessment -E N 00241' m ZoVA e- ("', = "C 330 40 ANOW Parkway Maintained by Zone Assessment t 00243 )_VVZ00 GBER My v MAUREEN = L -N. C C a,=@ AV x a _RCE AVE. N D I (' H GOLDMAN AYf, D I It► KO 3 SHASTA E. SHASTA L Z'- C )1-3 ba - IV b sc%gvi3 = L V40Z Vd Arie �ff It fth� Q� J H H 1 NI Q� r1,11O'a0 Cr2 Q'a'l. 0 1 r i r ® cM • �• y i4 1 IN f f 1 '= i .►1►� 1 'j1 „�1 ( •1 ,v 1, r • 1 \ tAo '� ►•� 01 .• 1 OrL0 1 r • 1 ?wry• \ � :.� :4 � B I •r/6C'0 � ,/• 1 • t af8ol cd � +J CO '•n }t p � •r•I fA •4ff•IY rtif.) �. (d U) :• 6J ► J • � 1 ,� N � f Y • ••{•{;1g, ' f •. q4 .� a• wtta00N00 t 1 \:��• .♦ � /"O 1 •f III IL•••O iri 1 � � • WK )r ei •�` r C C' j: a. 'I woo r ry +N ' 1•Mf 1 JI p/ f•Ml Ii C� -31 APPENDIX "F" Appendix "F ", the Assessment Roll, shows the assessment upon each lot or parcel (approximately 8387 parcels) within this District and is on file in the Office of the City Clerk and County Assessor. The Ventura County Assessor's office no longer lists public utility easements on the Assessor's Roll. it r: APPENDIX "G" RESOLUTIONS 00249 APPENDIX "H" REBATE PROCEDURE 00250 JOINT NOTICE OF A PUBLIC MEETIN " AND A pUBLIC HEAgING PUBLIC NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Moorpark calif ontia oa April 5, 1995, adopted Resolution No. 95 -bbbb fining the date and time of a public meeting to be held nn the 15th day of Asy 1995 at the hour of 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Moorpark City Hall, located at 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark. The purpose of said public meeting is to allow the public an opportunity to meet with Cit rttff to question and dttcum the proposed annual assessments for the "MOORPARK LIGHTINt3 AND LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. AD- 84-2" for the fiscal year commencing on July 1; 1995 and ending on June 30, 1996, which would provide for the fumishinyy� o�f power for and the usual maintenance and servicing of street lights and the landscape maintenance oT public rights -of- -way within the said City, and to question and discuss the proposed increases in said assessments over those levied for said District in FY 1994/95. PUBLIC NOTICE 1S ALSO HEREBY GIVEN that said Resolution No 95 -bbbb also fixed the date and time of a public hearing of the Moorpark City Council to be held on the 7th day of June, 1995, at the hour of 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Moorpark (`pity Hall, located at 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark. The purpose of said publi c hearinng is to consider makin certain charges in, and to order the annual assessments for the "MOORPARK LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. AD -84 -2" for the fiscal year commencing on July 1, 1995, and ending on June 30, 1996, which would provide for the furnish n of power for and the usual maintenance and servicing of street lights and the landscape maintenance of public rights -of -way within the said City. A copy of Resolution No. 95 -bbbb, which is captioned as follows: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR, AND DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO MAKE CERTAIN CHANGES AND TO ORDER THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS FOR THE "MOORPARK LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. AD -84 -2" FOR THE FISCAL YEAR COMMENCING JULY 1, 1995, AND ENDING JUNE 30, 1996 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972, AND FIXING THE TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC MEETING TO DISCUSS AND A PUBLIC HEARING TO RECEIVE OBJECTIONS THERETO," is on file with the City Clerk and open to inspection. A summary of said Resolution is summarized as follows: I. That the Engineer's Report prepares! for Assessment District No. AD84 for fY 1995/90 is approved. 2. That said Engineer's Report may be further modified or changed, pursuanl ,o applicable State law. 3. That the amount of the assessments for Assessment District No. AD84 -2 for FY 1995/96 are proposed to increase from the amount of the assessments levied for said district in FY 1994/95. 4. That it is the intention of the City Council a) to make certain changes to Assessment District No. AD 84 -2, including the benefit formulas, b) to order the extension of the annual assessment for said district for FY 1995/96; and, c) to levy and collect assessments for certain improvements described herein. Said district consists of a single city -wide zone to provide electric current or energy for public li �hting within the City, to provide for installation or maintenance of landscaping and the construction or maintenance of curg, gutter, or stdawalk structures and facilities, to install or construct facilities, which are appurtenant to any of the foregoing, for the maintenance or servicing or both, of any of the forgoing and to provide incidental expenses in connection therewith. Said district also includes assessments for the improvement and maintenance of the above described landscaping and related improvements in a number of zones of benefit. 5. That said lighting and lands ping maintenance ussessulenl district includes the l�i bghtin and landscaping sites with all improvements located therein, described by and included within Assessment District X. A� 84 -2. 6. That the foregoing described work is to be located within Assessment I:listricl No. AD 84 -2, the boundary of which is described on a nlup on file in the City Clerk's office. 7. That said proposed inai llcoalice and improvement is of benelil lo, "rid expense for which are chargeable upon, the district. 8. That a full and detailed description of the improvements cite boundaries of the District and any zones therein and the pntposed assessments upon assessable parcels within said bislrict, is set forth m a copy of the afore mentioned Engineer's Report on file with the City Clerk and open to inspection. 9. Thal lhu existing 8-"e8SoIQII(s, the proposal ussussnlents and the proposed uwreass to file assessment amounts are set forth ul EAhibil 'A' "Ilached hca'ut) and made it part hereof. W. That it ptoSlir nlvefir SS, Nhull he coovenod on May 15, 1995, a 7:00 Imn ,n the Council Chumburs al the Moorpark City ]lull to allow the putilir un o lorI liilyy to meet with City alai( to queslion and discuss the proposed annual assessments fur Assessment District No. AD � -2 for FY 1995/96, and the proposed increases to said assessments over those levied in FY 1994/95. 11. That a public hearing of the Moorpark City Council shall be held on June 1995, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at the Moorpark City Hull to consider making certain changes in, and to order the annual assessments for Assessment District No. AD84 -2 for FY 1995/96. 12. That this Joint Notice of Public Meeting and Public Hearing is given, and that any persons having any objections to the work or extent of (he aswssnlent district truly appeaar and show cause why aid work should not he done or carried out or why said district should not he ex(endud I'or the floral year co nnieneing Jyuly I, 1995, and ending June 30 1996. Protests must be in writing, mid mull be IiluJ by the property owner with the Cily Clerk prior to the conclusion of the hearing and such pnHa'st Shull auuu ell !.rounds of (he objection and shall contain a description sul'icienl to identify the property. A nwionty protest will cause ll e assessment increase to he ubandoned. 13. ']'hill all Ihu work IIxoposed shall he doll" in accordance Willi Ihu I.andscupmg and Ligh(Ing Act of 1972, being Part 2 of Division 15 of (h" She"ls and I lighwuy.s Code 401' Ilw Stale of Califoillia Id. I'hut 11"' C•ily ('Icik Shull cause troths of said pliblir fliet'rink, cud public he +uoiy' t1; hu glued by c�usiny thin alllllllllll'y ltI lhtl Kesuluhon of In(cntion to hr puhlisbvd and mulled in Ihu manner rapairal 1;y url z of Division IS of lhu Streets and I Iighwuys Code ll n(f Scrlion 1.19.5.16 of the Oovernua'all ('ode of the State ! C'uliluroui. I1. Thal file City C'Icrk shall ccitily to dw adoption of till's resoluuon. AVITST! City Ck.lk Paul W, I.awruson .li., Muyui I'IIIS No'I'lCk IS (;IVEN pui.NUmu in dir �novisuain of lho I.undsrupoig and I.i dhinlg Art of 14) 12, Section 225(1(1 ei sec. of Ihu titrcets an<I I lighwny (ode of the Slatr of l ulili cod is (filled this 6111 .lay o� April, 1995. S City ('jerk 00251 5 Exhibit 'A' , - 'Z AD 84-2 Summary of Assessments A. City Wide Assessments Prosed Proposed Use FY 1994/95 FY 1995/96 Increase Code Description Assmnt M Assmnt (Decrease) 0 Residential Vacant 17.87 15.37 2.50 1 S' Ia Family - Level 1 33.01 30.20 2.82; 2 Mil Home 0.00 0.00 0.00 3 Condo 33.01 30.20 2.82 4 Residential Income 2-4 units 33.01 30.20 2, 82 5 Apartnmts (5 +) 27.96 25.26 2.71 6 Single Family - Level 2 27.96 25.26 2.71 9 Mobil Home & Trailer Park 27.96 25.26 2.71 10 Commercial Vacant 17.87 15.37 2.50 11 Retail Store single story 93.59 89.50 4.09 12 Store & Office Combination 93.59 88.50 4.09 15 Shopping Centers (Neighborhood) 144.07 138.92 5.15 16 17 Shooppppm Centers (RRegional) Of ee Bguilding (one story) 144.07 73.40 138.92 69.37 5.15 3.67 18 Office Building (multi -story) 93.59 89.50 4.09 19 Retail Stores (multi -story) 93.59 89.50 4.09 21 Restaurants & cocktail lounges 113.78 109.27 4.52 24 Banks, Savings & Loans 73.40 69.73 3.673 25 Service Stations 93.59 89.50 4.09 26 Auto sales, repair, storage & rental 93.59 89.50 4.093 30 Industrial Land Vacant 17.87 15.37 2.50 31 Light Manufacturing 113.78 109.27 4.523 32 Warehousing 93.59 89.50 (4.09) 33 Industrial Condos, Coops, PUD's 113.78 109.27 (4.52) 38 Mineral Processing 73.41 69.37 3.67 44 Truck Crops 33.01 30.20 2.82 46 Pasture (permanent) 33.01 30.20 (2.82 48 Poultry 33.01 30.20 ((2.82)))))) 49 Flowers, seed production 33.01 30.20 2.82 51 Orchards 33.01 30.20 2.823 53 Field crops, dry 33.01 30.20 2.82 54 Pastures of graze, dry 33.01 30.20 2.823 55 Feed lots 33.01 30.20 2.82) 57 Tree farms 33.01 30.20 2.82) 61 Theater 113.78 109.27 4.52) 70 Institutional vacant land 17.87 15.37 2.50) �2. 71 Churches, convent & rectory 17.87' 15.37 50) 78 Public Bldgs. Fire Houses, Museums, etc. 0.00 0.00 0.00 80 Misc, Vacant land 17.87 15.37 (2.50) 81 Utility Water Company 0.00 0.00 0.00 83 Petroleum & gas 53.21 49.97 (3.24 ) 91 Utility Edison 0.0(1 0.00 0.00 92 Telephone 0.00 0.00 0.00 93 SAT 0.00 0.00 0.00 94 Undedicated Community Condo Development 0.00 0.00 0.00 99 Exempt 0.0( 1100 0.00 B. Zone of Benefit: In addition to the Citywide Assessments listed above by land use categories, the the Zones listed below properties within each of will be assessed a per lot Zone assessment for the improvement and maintenance of certain improvements determined to be of benefit to the properties within those Zones. Propposed ' FY 1994/95 FY L995/96 Proposed Zone _ Desc lion Assmnt Ass mnt Increase ract ar ways @ Bambi; 1, 20.54 Benwood, Pecan and VCFCD Channel 2 Tract 2865: Parkways East side 95.45 * 96.64 * 1.19 Peach Hill, N. Side Tierra Rejada; South slopes & Christian Barrett and Spring 3 Tract 3032: Buttercreek Entry and 3.19 * 11.45 * 8.26 Peppermill parkway 4 Tract 3274: Parkways, north and 0.00 0.00 * 0.00 south side of Williams Ranch Rd. 5 Tracts 3019 & 3525: Parkways: north 172.06 * 82.67 * (89.39) side of Tierra Rejada Road, west side of Peach Hill Rd; south side parkway & slope 6 Tract 3306 (Glenhaven): Parkway @ 11.00 * 34.05 * 23.05 west end of Inglewood Ave. 7 1ndustriet Park Northeast of Gabbert 111.46 ** 57.10 (54.36) a L.A. Ave.: Parkway North side of L.A. Ave east of Gabbert 8 Nest Village Buffer: • City area 20.86 * 25.57 " 4.71 • Home Acres 50.86 * 51.11 0.25 9 Condor Drive 121.92 ** 13.21 (108.71) 10 Mountain Meadows Planned Community Residential 0.00 * 15.41 15.41 Commercial 0.00 ** 127.51 *• 127.51 Note: * Per parcel Assessment ** Per Acre Assessment O 0 2 5 wp \rpt \ad85- 96.not - 4 RESOLUTION NO.. 95- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR, AND DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO MAKE CERTAIN CHANGES AND TO ORDER THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS FOR THE "MOORPARK LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. AD -84 -2" FOR THE FISCAL YEAR COMMENCING JULY 11 1995, AND ENDING JUNE 30, 1996, PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972, AND FIXING THE TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC MEETING TO DISCUSS AND A PUBLIC HEARING TO RECEIVE OBJECTIONS THERETO. WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 95 -1094, the City Council ordered the City Manager to cause to be prepared an Engineer's Report for Assessment District 84 -2 for FY 1995/96, in accordance with Article 4, Chapter 1, Part 2, Division 15 of the California Streets and. Highways Code; and WHEREAS, pursuant to said. Resolution, the said Engineer's Report was filed with the City Clerk on the 24th day of March 1995; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed said Engineer's Report and wishes to take certain actions relative to said report and to the levy of the assessments recommended therein. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS; SECTION 1. The Engineer's Report for "MOORPARK LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. AD -84 -2" for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 1995, and ending June 30, 1996, filed with the City Clerk on the 24th day of March 1995, is hereby approved. SECTION 2. That said Engineer's Report may be further modified or changed, pursuant to the provisions of Section 22630 of the Streets and Highways Code. SECTION 3. That the amount of the assessments for FY 1995/96 are proposed to increase )ver the amount of the assessments levied in FY 1994;95. 00253 17 Resolution No. Page 2 SECTION 4. That the public interest and convenience require and it is the intention of the City Council of the City of Moorpark to make certain changes, including the benefit formulas, to the "MOORPARK LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. AD -84 -2" and to order the extension of the annual assessments for said district for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 1995, and ending June 30, 1996, pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, and to levy and collect assessments for certain improvements as described herein, in accordance with said Act. Said "MOORPARK LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. AD -84 -2" consists of a single city -wide zone to provide electric current or energy for public lighting within the City, to provide for installation or maintenance landscaping and the construction or maintenance of curb, gutter, or sidewalk structures and facilities, to install or construct facilities, which are appurtenant to any of the foregoing, for the maintenance or servicing or both, of any of the foregoing and to provide incidental expenses in connection therewith. Said district also includes assessments for the improvement and maintenance of certain improvements within a number of Zones of Benefit. SECTION 5. That said lighting and landscape maintenance assessment district shall specifically include the lighting and landscape sites with all improvements located therein, described by and heretofore included within "MOORPARK LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. AD- 84 -2." SECTION 6. That the foregoing described work is to be located within said Assessment District, the boundary of which is more particularly described on a map on file in the City Clerk's office, and entitled "Boundary Map, City of Moorpark Lighting and Landscaping Maintenance Assessment District No. AD- 84 -211, filed in the office of the City Clerk on the 27th of January 1995. . SECTION 7. That the proposed maintenance and improvement, in the opinion of the City Council, is of benefit to, and the City Council hereby makes the expense of said maintenance and improvements chargeable upon the district. SECTION 8. That a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the Assessment District and an zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within said District, is set forth in a copy of the afore mentioned Engineer's Report, a copy of which is on file with the City Clerk and open to inspection. SECTION 9. That the proposed assessment amounts are set forth in Exhibit 'A' attached hereto and made a par hereof. 002'54 Resolution No. Page 3 T � SECTION 10. That a Public Meeting shall be convened on the 15th day of May 1995, at the hour of 7:00 p. m., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall of said City, located at 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, for the purpose of allowing the public an opportunity to meet with City staff to question and discuss the proposed assessments for FY 1995/96. SECTION 11. That a public hearing of the Moorpark City Council shall be convened on the 7th day of June 1995, at the hour of 7:00 p. m., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall of said City, located at 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, for the purpose of receiving oral and written testimony regarding the proposed assessments for FY 1995/96. SECTION 12. That Joint Notice of said Public Meeting and public hearing is hereby given. All persons interested in learning more about the proposed assessments and the basis for same, are invited to attend said Public Meeting. All persons having any objections to the work or extent of the assessment district may appear and show cause why said work should not be done or carried out or why said district should not be extended for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 1995, and ending June 30, 1996. Protests must be in writing, and must be filed by the property owner with the City Clerk prior to the conclusion of the hearing and such protest shall state all grounds of the objection and shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property. A majority protest will cause the assessment increase to be abandoned. SECTION 13. All the work herein proposed shall be done in accordance with the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. SECTION 14. The City Clerk shall cause a Joint Notice of Public Meeting and public hearing to be given by causing a summary of this Resolution to be published and mailed in the manner required by Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code and Section 54954.6 of the Government Code of the State of California. SECTION 15. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIN 5th day of April, 1995. ATTEST: City Clerk Paul W. Lawrason Jr., Mayor 00255 Resolution No. Exhibit 'A' AD ssessments A. City Wide Assessment Landscaping Lighting Total Use Code Description Assessment Assessment Assessment ($1 0 Residential Vacant 10.43 4.94 15.37 30.20 1 Single Family - Level 1 10.43 19.77 0.00 2 Mobil Home 0.00 10.43 0.00 19.77 30.20 3 4 Condo (per unit) Residential Income 2 -4 units (per unit) 10.43 19.77 30.20 5 Apartments (5 +) (per unit) 10.43 14.83 25.26 6 Single Family - Level 2 10.43 14.83 25.26 9 Mobil Home & Trailer Park (per space) 10.43 14.83 25.26 10 Commercial Vacant Land 10.43 4.94 15.37 89.50 11 Retail Store, single story 10.43 79.07 89.50 12 Store & Office Combination (per parcel) 10.43 79.07 138.92 15 Shopping Centers (Neighborhood) 10.43 128.49 138.92 16 Shopping Centers (Regional) 10.43 128.49 69.37 17 Office Building (one story) 10.43 59.30 18 Office Building (multi- story) (per parcel) 10.43 79.07 89.50 19 Retail Stores (multi- story) (per parcel) 10 43 79.07 89.50 21 Restaurants & cocktail lounges 10 43 98.84 109.27 69.73 24 Banks, Savings & Loans LO 43 59.30 25 Service Stations 1.0 43 79.07 89.50 26 Auto sales, repair, storage & rental 10.43 79.07 89.50 30 Industrial Land Vacant 10.4.; 4.94 15.37 31 Light Manufacturing 10.43 98.84 109.27 32 Warehousing 1.0.4:3 79.07 89.50 33 Industrial Condos, Coops, PUD's 1.0.43 98.84 109.27 38 Mineral Processing 10.4', 59.30 69.73 44 Truck Crops 10.4.3 19.77 30.20 46 Pasture (permanent) 1(.43 19.77 30.20 48 Poultry 1(.43 19.77 30.20 49 Flowers, seed production U.4i 19.77 30.20 51 Orchards 1.(.4? 19.77 30.20 53 Field crops, dry 1i'.4 19.77 30.20 54 Pastures of graze, dry 19.77 30.20 30.20 55 Feed lots b 4 P, 4j 19.77 19.77 30.20 57 Tree farms 1,).4_`, 98.84 109.27 61 70 Theater Institutional vacant land 1).43 4.94 15.37 71 Churches, convent & rectory 1.1.43 4.94 15.37 78 Public Bldqs., Fire Houses, Museums ).00 0.00 0.00 80 Misc, Vacant land 1).43 4.94 15.37 81 Utility, Water Company ),00 0.00 0.00 83 Petroleum & gas 110,43 39.54 49.97 0.00 91 Utility Edison ).0O 0.00 92 Telephone D. 00 0.00 0.00 93 SPRR 0.00 0.00 0.00 94 Undedicated Community Condo Development 0.00 0.00 0.00 99 Exempt 0.10 0.00 0.00 00256 -c Exhibit 'A'(2 of 2) AD 84-2 Summary of Assessments B. Zones of Benefit: In addition to the Citywide assessments listed above by land use, the properties within each of the Zones listed below will be assessed a per lot Zone assessment for the maintenance of certain improvements determined to be of benefit to the properties within those zones. Zone Description Total Number Assessment Amount 1 Tract 2851: Parkways @ Bambi; Assessment 5,939 of Lots_ 77 per Lot per Yr ($) Benwood, Pecan & VCFCD Channel 77.13 2 Tract 2865: Parkways East side 60,108 622 96.64 Peach Hill, north side Tierra Rejada; south slopes & Christian Barrett & Spring 3 Tract 3032: Buttercreek Entry and ;,059 265 11.54 Peppermill parkway 4 Tract 3274: Parkways, north and 0 129 0 south side of Williams Ranch Rd 5 Tracts 3019 & 3525: Parkways: north 1',939 217 82.67 side of Tierra Rejada Road, west side of Peach Hill Rd; south side parkway & slope 6 Tract 3306 (Glenhaven): Parkway @ 749 22 34.05 west end of Inglewood Ave. 7 Industrial Park Northeast of Gabbert 4,420 95 57.10 / ac. & L. A. Ave.: Parkway North side of acres L. A. Ave east of Gabbert 8 West Village Buffer: • City area 10,223 497 25.57 • Home Acres 10,223 200 51.11 9 Condor Drive Industrial Park 650 49 13.21 / ac. acres 10 PC -3: Tierra Rejada Road Parkways Residential 36,994 2401 15.41 / lot Commercial 1,506 11.81 Ac. 127.51 / ac. 00257