Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 1995 0405 CC REG ITEM 11HAGENDA RE PORT C Z TY O F MOORPARK TO: The Honorable City Council FROM: Kenneth C. Gilbert, Director of Public DATE: March 31, 1995 (Meeting of 4 -5 -95) TO ._• 1 -_� `OPPARK, CAL1F©RNIA ;0UnC11 Meeflng 77 -0 Work i -1 t e;;;W0 /�c.. SUBJECT: Consider Approval of the Engineer's Report for Assessment District AD85 -1 for FY .1995/96 and the Scheduling of a Public Meeting and a Public Hearing to Consider Certain Changes to and the Ordering of the Annual Assessments for Said District OVERVIEW This presents for approval a Resolution approving the Engineer's Report for Assessment District AD85 -1 and setting the date of a public meeting to discuss the proposed assessments for AD 85 -1 for FY 1995/96, and a public hearing to consider the levy of assessments for said District for next fiscal year. The amount of the assessments proposed in the Engineer's Report are based on a preliminary budget and fund activity summary which has been developed by staff. That and other related information is attached hereto and identified as follows: List of Exhibits Exhibit "A ": Assessment Summary Exhibit "B": Fund Activity Summary Exhibit "C": Preliminary Budget for FY 1995/96 Exhibit "D ": Engineer's Report Exhibit "E": Public Hearing Notice Exhibit "F ": Resolution Assessment District 85 -1 was formed in 1985 pursuant to the provisions of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972." This assessment district was established to allow for the funding of parks maintenance expenses through the levying of assessments as provided for in the act. As set forth in the Engineer's Report (Exhibit "D "), costs are spread to all of the lots in the City by means of a formula designed to spread said costs on the basis of benefit. The formula uses land use as a measure of "people use" in determining the relative amount of benefit. received. The City must annually act to levy the parks maintenance assessments. Said assessments have been levied each year since the formation of the district, except for FY 1987/88 and FY 1988/89. ad85- 96.rpt 4 0 2 5 8 .4 AD85 -1 Engineer's Report Page 2 DISCUSSION A. Resolution of Intent On January 4, 1995, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 95- 1095 initiating the proceedings required to consider the levy of assessments for the subject assessment district for FY 1995/96. On that date the City Council also selected the firm of Dwight French and Associates to prepare the Engineer's Report for the district. B. Preliminary Budget for FY 1995 L96 Attached as Exhibit 'C' is a copy of the preliminary budget for the Parks Department budget for FY 1995/96. The expenditures set forth in that Exhibit are based on the following assumptions: 1. FY 1995/96 Budget -- As shown in the Budget recap attached as Exhibit 'C', the total proposed budget for the Parks Department for FY 1995/96 is $537,312. It is anticipated that this level of expenditures will be required in order to fund parks maintenance costs next year. A summary of those costs, by park, is as follows: Note: It is anticipated that Campesina Park and Country Trail Park will not be completed and accepted for maintenance until FY 1996/97 or later, and that Poindexter Park will not be ready to accept for maintenance until March of 1996. ad85- 96.rpt. 0 0 ti 5 9 Maint. Park Period Budget (S) 1. Country Trail Park 0 Mos. 0 2. Glenwood Park 12 Mos. 40,534 3. Tierra Rejada Park 12 Mos. 52,598 4. Mountain Meadows Park 1.2 Mos. 65,125 5. Peach Hill Park 12 Mos. 73,517 6. Monte Vista Park 12 Mos. 24,698 7. Campus Park 1.2 Mos. 34,638 8. Campus Canyon Park 1.2 Mos. 63,514 9. Griffin Park 1.2 Mos. 37,594 10. Virginia Colony Park 12 Mos. 17,448 11. Campesina Park 0 Mos. 0 12. Arroyo Vista Comm. Park 12 Mos. 103,015 13. Poindexter Park 4 Mos. 24,631 Total 537,312 Note: It is anticipated that Campesina Park and Country Trail Park will not be completed and accepted for maintenance until FY 1996/97 or later, and that Poindexter Park will not be ready to accept for maintenance until March of 1996. ad85- 96.rpt. 0 0 ti 5 9 AD85 -1 Engineer's Report Page 3 2. FY 1994/95 Budget Vs. Actual -- Also shown in Exhibit 'C' is the approved Budget for the Parks Department for FY 1994/95 along with the anticipated amount of the actual year -end expenditures. A summary of those figures are listed as follows: FY 1994/95 Maint. Projected Park Period Budget (-$I Actual ($) 1. Country Trail Park 0 Mos. 0 0 2. Glenwood Park 1.2 Mos. 36,473 39,228 3. Tierra Rejada Park 3.2 Mos. 51,566 51,292 4. Mountain Meadows Park 12 Mos. 64,421 63,819 5. Peach Hill Park 1.2 Mos. 73,280 71,781 6. Monte Vista Park 7.2 Mos. 22,513 23,736 7. Campus Park 7.2 Mos. 37,360 33,332 8. Campus Canyon Park 1_2 Mos. 62,746 62,208 9. Griffin Park 12 Mos. 35,880 36,288 10. Virginia Colony Park 1.2 Mos. 1.4,857 16,142 11. Campesina Park 0 Mos. 0 0 12. Arroyo Vista Comm. Pk 1_2 Mos. 101,51.1 109,695 13. Poindexter Park C Mos. 00 TotaL 500,607 507,521 Upon determination of actual Year End Revenues and Expenses, if required, a budget amendment and /or an addtional appropriation from the General. Fund will be requested. 3. Significant Budget Variances Between FY 1994/95 and FY 1995/96 -- The proposed FY 1995/96 Budget of $537,312 is $36,705 more than the approved FY 1994/95 Budget. A significant portion of this cost increase is due to the addition of the Poindexter Park to the areas maintained. C. Fund Activity Attached for your information as Exhibit 'B', is a summary of Fund Activity for AD 85 -1 for FY 1991/92, FY 1992/93, FY 1993/94, FY 1994/95 and FY 1995/96 D. Revised Benefit Spread Formula The Assessment Engineer was asked to evaluate and present to the City Council possible alternative Benefit Spread Formulas which would reduce the amount of the assessments to residential properties. 1. Prior Years: The benefit spread formula used in past years allocates and then spreads twenty -five percent (25 %) of the total costs to non - residential properties. The remaining seventy -five percent (75 %) of the total cost is spread to ad85- 96.rpt 0OZ60 AD85 -1 Engineer's Report Page 4 residential properties. The figures presented in the Engineer's Report (Exhibit 'D') are based on this formula. A summary of the required assessments for FY 1995/96 using this formula is attached as Exhibit A -1. Exhibit A -1.1 lists typical assessment amounts using this formula, for a number of residential and non - residential land uses. 2. Alternative Formulas: Two alternative benefit spread formulas have been developed for consideration by the City Council. Alternative #2 increases the proportion of total costs allocated to non - residential properties to thirty -three percent (33 %). A summary of the assessment amounts using this formula is attached as Exhibits A -2 and A -2.1. Alternative #3 increases that allocation to fifty percent (50 %). A summary of the assessment amounts using this formula is attached as Exhibits A -3 and A -3.1. A summary comparison of these three alternatives is as follows: 3. Assessment Engineer's Recommendation: The Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 requires that the formulas used to spread maintenance and improvement costs to properties within an assessment district be based upon the degree of benefits received by those properties. Although there is some degree of latitude which can be exercised by the Assessment Engineer in determining the relative benefits received by (and thus the amount of the assessment levied upon) each property, the formula which is used must be reasonable. The Assessment Engineer has evaluated the above described alternatives in light of these requirements. It is his recommendation that the amount of cost allocated to non - residential properties not exceed thirty -three percent (33 %) of the total. 4. City Council Direction: Consistent with past City Council policy, it is the intent of staff to mail a Public Hearing Notice to the owners of all of the properties being assessed. That Notice will state the amount of the proposed assessments and the amount of any increase in the assessment above the FY ad85- 96.rpt 00261 Amount ($) of Example Percent Fund Transfer of Non- Percent Increase Allocated Required to Residential to the Non -Res. to Non- Reduce S. F. Assessment ($) Assessments Residential S. F. Res.. Res. Assmnt. [Neighborhood Generated by Alt Properties Exhibit Assmnt _to $33.20 Shopping Cntrl Alternate 11 1 25% A -1 49.3' 175,500 752.10 N/A A -1.7 2 33% A -2 43.8s 130,400 1,002.80 33% A -2.1 3 50% A -3 32.88 0 1,504.20 100% A -3.1 3. Assessment Engineer's Recommendation: The Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 requires that the formulas used to spread maintenance and improvement costs to properties within an assessment district be based upon the degree of benefits received by those properties. Although there is some degree of latitude which can be exercised by the Assessment Engineer in determining the relative benefits received by (and thus the amount of the assessment levied upon) each property, the formula which is used must be reasonable. The Assessment Engineer has evaluated the above described alternatives in light of these requirements. It is his recommendation that the amount of cost allocated to non - residential properties not exceed thirty -three percent (33 %) of the total. 4. City Council Direction: Consistent with past City Council policy, it is the intent of staff to mail a Public Hearing Notice to the owners of all of the properties being assessed. That Notice will state the amount of the proposed assessments and the amount of any increase in the assessment above the FY ad85- 96.rpt 00261 AD85 -1 Engineer's Report Page 5 1994/95 assessment. In order to clearly state those figures in the Hearing Notice, it is requested that the City Council select and determine the Benef it Spread Formula to be used in spreading costs to the properties benefitted. 5. Transfer From AD84 -2: In addition to the possible revisions to the Benefit Spread Formulas discussed above, staff has also investigated the possibility of transferring any fund surplus from AD84 -2 to AD85 -1 as a means to further lower the parks maintenance assessment levied upon residential properties. It has been determined that the specific uses stated in the Resolutions which first formed AD84 -2 would not allow such a fund transfer. 6. Consolidation of AD85 -1 and AD84 -2: On several occasions in prior years one Assessment District would experience a funding shortfall while the other would show a surplus. Staff has investigated the feasibility of consolidating the two Assessment Districts as a means to provide for more flexibility in the allocation of assessment revenues to the landscape maintenance needs of the City. It is the opinion of the Assessment Engineer that the co- mingling of assessment revenues generated by different benefit formulas (i.e. lighting, parks, etc.) would probably not be allowed. In addition, changing to one uniform benefit formula as a means to avoid this problem, could raise other concerns with respect to the correlation between the benefits received and the amount of the assessment. For these reasons, it is recommended that the City not pursue this option. E. Fund Transfers As shown on Exhibit W, the total amount of fund transfers into Fund 25 in prior years is summarized as follows: Fiscal Year Gann Fund General Fund Total ($) 1992/93 0 38,591 38,591 1993/94 0 146,866 146,866 1994/95 Budget 67,170 74,610 141,780 Est. Actual 67,170 78,571 145,741 As stated above, using the same benefit spread formula which has been used in prior years, the total amount of the fund transfer to Fund 25 required to maintain the parks assessment at $33.20 would be $175,500. Increasing the percentage of the assessment allocation to non - residential properties will reduce the amount of this fund transfer required. ade5- 96.rpt 0 0 n 6 AD85 -1 Engineer's Report Page 6 F. Engineer's Report The above described expenditure information was provided to the Assessment Engineer and used as the basis for the preparation of the attached Engineer's Report (Exhibit 'D'). Said Engineer's Report sets for the proposed amount of the assessment for FY 1995/96 for various land use categories, along with an explanation of the Benefit Assessment Formula and other related information. As stated above, the assessment amounts set forth in the Engineer's Report were derived by using the Benefit Spread Formula used in prior years. H. Community Center Maintenance The City Council is advised that the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" provides for the use of assessments for the improvement and /or maintenance of Community Centers. Section 22525.5 of the Streets and Highways Code states that assessments may be used for such purposes if approved by owners of at least fifty percent of the land area in the district at an election, called and held in -lieu of any required public notice or public hearing. I. Public Hearing 1. The "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" (Streets and Highways Code) requires a public hearing to be held prior to the annual levy of assessments, for the purpose of receiving input and to hear any protests to the proposed assessments. 2. If the amount of the assessments are to remain the same, the law does not require a notice of the public hearing to be mailed to each property being assessed. However, consistent with past practice, it is recommended that a notice of the public hearing be mailed to the owners of all of the affected properties. 3. Notwithstanding the above mentioned policy, State law requires that prior to considering any new or increased assessment, a public hearing notice must be mailed to the owners of the properties to be assessed. Said notice shall state the amount of the existing assessment, the amount of the proposed assessment and the amount of the proposed increase in the assessment. The approved amount of the approved estimated assessments MAY NOT EXCEED the amounts stated in the notice. Said notice must be mailed at least forty -five (45) days prior to the date of the hearing. Although the Notice may be postmarked April 21, 1995, the content of the notice must be finalized by April 7, 1995, to allow sufficient time for pr•i.nting and handling. ad85- 96.rpt. 00263 AD85 -1 Engineer's Report Page 7 4. State law also requires that prior to considering any new or increased assessment a PUBLIC MEETING shall be convened to allow the public an opportunity to discuss the proposed increased assessment. It is recommended that this PUBLIC MEETING be convened on Monday, May 15, 1995, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers. This will be an informal meeting conducted by staff for the purpose of providing answers to questions regarding projected program costs and the methods used to spread those costs to the properties assessed. 5. Attached as Exhibit 'E' is a copy of the Public Hearing Notice for AD85 -1. Said Notice sets the time and place of both the PUBLIC MEETING (May 15, 1995, at 7:00 p.m.) and the public hearing (June 7, 1995, at 7:00 p. m.). The date of the public hearing is date of the first City Council meeting in June as required by law. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council take the following actions: 1. Determine the parameters of the Benefit Spread Formula to be used for AD85 -1 for FY 1995/96; and, 2. Adopt the attached Resolution (Exhibit "F "): a) approving the Engineer's Report for Assessment District AD85 -1; b) declaring intention to make certain changes to and ordering the annual assessments for said assessment district for FY 1995/96; and, c) setting the dates and times of d Public Meeting and a public hearing to consider said assessments. ad85- 96.rpt 00264 EXHIBIT "A" (Page 1) Fiscal Year 1995/96 AD 85 -1 ASSESSMENT SUMMARY ------------------------------ ------------------------------ FY 1995/96 Description Proposed Remarks 23- Mar -95 Page 1 of 3 TOTAL ANNUAL EXPENSES 537,312 See Exhibit 'C' for Total FY1995/96 Cost Projection LESS CARRY OVERS 0 Less ,'arryover (See Exhibit 'B') LESS TRANSFERS IN 0 TOTAL ASSESSMENTS 537,312 ------------------------------------------------- Total Assessment Detail PRESENT FORMULA: Non - Residential Allocation - 25% of Total (See Exhibit 'A' Pg 1.1) 00265 Assessment ------------------ - - - - -- Plus Total SF Res Trans -In Plus Funds Less Total Remaining Fiscal Year Amount ($) Total ($) & Other Carryover Available Expenditures Carryover 1991/92 Actual 33.20 373,319 1,5h_ 54,91`r 429,797 429,797 0 1992/93 Actual 33.20 354,475 38,54: 393,066 393,066 0 1993/94 Actual 33.20 355,247 i46,8br 502,113 502,113 0 1994/95 Budget 33.20 357,200 1.42,780 499,981 500,981 (1,000) Est. Actual 33.20 361,780 1.45,''41 507,521 507,521 0 1995/96 Budget Options 49.31 537,312 537,312 537,312 0 47.47 517,312 20,00( s 537,312 537,312 0 45.64 497,312 40,00( d 537,312 537,312 0 43.80 477,312 60,00[! 537,312 537,312 0 41.97 457,312 80,000 537,312 537,312 0 40.13 437,312 100,000 537,312 537,312 0 38.30 417,312 1.20,000 537,312 537,312 0 36.46 397,312 1.40,000 537,312 537,312 0 34.55 376,512 160,800 537,312 537,312 0 Prior Years' Assessment >>>> 33.20 361,812 75,50( 537,312 537,312 0 32.79 357,312 180,00( 537,312 537,312 0 30.95 337,312 700,00( 537,312 537,312 0 00265 Exhibit 'A' (Page 1.1) Alternate #1: Present Formula 23- Mar -95 FY 1995/96 Non - residential share ........ 25% AD85 -1 Parks Maintenance - ------------------------------------ ASSESSMENT ALLOCATION INFOMATION ------------------------ - - - - -- Element ------------------ - - - - -- Total FY 95/96 Assessments (Est.) Allocation to: Non - Residential: Percent of Total Non - Residential: Total Assessment Residential: Percent of Total Residential: Total Assessment ---------------------- ---------------------- ASSESSMENT CALCULATION Costs $537,312 25% $134,328 75% $402,984 Remarks ------------------ - - - - -- Land People Use Allocated Total Unit Use Assessment Typical Land Use Catagories Code Cost ($! Units Cost ($) Factor Amount ($) Remarks Non- Residential ---- - - - - -- --------------- - - -- Bank 24 134,328 .1,786 75.21 3 225.63 Unit Cost for Retail 19 134,328 1,786 75.21 6 451.26 Non - Residential Lite Mfg. 31 134,328 1,786 75.21 12 902.52 6.1 times the Neighborhood Cntr. 15 134,328 1,786 75.21 10 752.10 residential rate. Regional Cntr. 16 134,328 1,786 75.21 30 2,256.30 Residential Single - Family 1 402,984 32,688 12.33 4 49.32 Condo 3 402,984 32,688 12.33 3 36.99 Apartment 5 402,984 32,688 12.33 3 36.99 REMARKS ------------------------------------------ - - - - - -- Land Use Comparison ----------------------------------- Non- Residential Number of lots 274 Percent of total Lots 3.42% Residential Number of lots 7,743 Percent of total Lots 96.58% Vacant Number of lots 0 Percent of total Lots 0 OU26& EXHIBIT "A" (Page 2) Fiscal Year 1995/96 AD 85 -1 ASSESSMENT SUMMARY ------------------------------ ------------------------------ FY 1995/96 Description Proposed Remarks 23- Mar -95 Page 2 of 3 TOTAL ANNUAL EXPENSES 537,312 See Exhibit 'C' for Total FY1995/96 Cost Projection LESS CARRY OVERS 0 Less Carryover (See Exhibit 'B') LESS TRANSFERS IN 0 TOTAL ASSESSMENTS 537,312 --------------------------------------------------- Total Assessment Detail ALTERNATE #2: Non - Residential Allocation 7 33 of Total (See Exhibit 'A' Pq 2.1) 51.88 00267 Assessment ------------------ - - - - -- Plus Total SF Res Trans -In Plus Funds Less Total Remaining Fiscal Year Amount ($) Total ($) & Other Carryover Available Expenditures Carryover 1991/92 Actual 33.20 373,319 1.56: 54,9.11, 429,797 429,797 0 1992/93 Actual 33.20 354,475 38,5W 393,066 393,066 0 1993/94 Actual 33.20 355,247 1.46,86E 502,113 502,113 0 1994/95 Budget 33.20 357,200 142,78( 499,981 500,981 (11000) Est. Actual 33.20 361,780 145,741 p 507,521 507,521 0 1995/96 Budget Options 43.83 537,312 537,312 537,312 0 42.20 517,312 20,OOC 537,312 537,312 0 40.57 497,312 40,000 537,312 537,312 0 38.94 477,312 60,OOC 537,312 537,312 0 37.31 457,312 80,00( 537,312 537,312 0 35.68 437,312 1.00,00( 537,312 537,312 0 Prior Years' Assessment >>>> 33.20 406,912 130,40C 537,312 537,312 0 32.41 397,312 140,00[ 537,312 537,312 0 30.78 377,312 160,OOC 537,312 537,312 0 29.96 367,312 170,OOC 537,312 537,312 0 29.15 357,312 180,00c 537,312 537,312 0 27.52 337,312 ;'00,001 537,312 537,312 0 51.88 00267 Exhibit 'A' (Page 2.1) Alternate #2: Increase 23- Mar -95 FY 1995/96 Non - residential share to ........ 33% AD85-1 Parks Maintenance ASSESSMENT ALLOCATION INFOMATION ------------------------ - - - - -- Element ------------------ - - - - -- Total FY 95/96 Assessments (Est.) Allocation to: Non - Residential: Percent of Total Non - Residential: Total Assessment Residential: Percent of Total Residential: Total Assessment ---------------------- ---------------------- ASSESSMENT CALCULATION Costs Remarks $537,31.2 33% $179,10`1. 6?% $358,204 ------------------ - - - - -- Land People Use Allocated Total Unit Use Assessment Typical Land Use Catagories ---------------------- - - - Code Cost ($ Units Cost ($) Factor Amount ($) Remarks - -- Non- Residential - - - -- ----------- _ __ _ _... - - - - -- - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- --------------- - - -- Bank 24 179,102 1,786 100.28 3 300.84 Unit Cost for Retail 19 179,102 1,786 100.28 6 601.68 Non - Residential Lite Mfg. 31 179,102 1,786 100.28 12 1,203.36 9.1 times the Neighborhood Cntr. 15 179,102 1,786 100.28 10 1,002.80 residential rate. Regional Cntr. 16 179,102 1,786 100.28 30 3,008.40 Residential Single - Family 1 358,204 32,688 10.96 4 43.84 Condo 3 358,204 32,688 10.96 3 32.88 Apartment 5 358,204 32,688 10.96 3 32.88 REMARKS ---------------------------------- Land Use Comparison ----------------------------------- Non- Residential Number of lots 274 Percent of total Lots 3.42% Residential Number of lots 7,743 Percent of total Lots 96.580 Vacant Number of lots 0 Percent of total Lots 0 11 si EXHIBIT "A" (Page 3) Fiscal Year 1995/96 AD 85 -1 ASSESSMENT SUMMARY FY 1995/96 Description Proposed Remarks 23- Mar -95 Page 3 of 3 TOTAL ANNUAL EXPENSES 537,312 See Exhibit 'C' for Total FY1995/96 Cost Projection LESS CARRY OVERS 0 Less Carryover (See Exhibit 'B') LESS TRANSFERS IN 0 TOTAL ASSESSMENTS 537,312 Total Assessment Detail ALTERNATE #3: Non - Residential Allocation = 50 of Total (See Exhibit 'A' pg 3.1) 51.88 00269 Assessment ------------------ - - - - -- Plus Total SF Res Trans -In Plus Funds Less Total Remaining Fiscal Year Amount ($) Total ($) & Other Carryover Available Expenditures Carryover 1991/92 Actual 33.20 373,319 1,56,' 54,911 429,797 429,797 0 1992/93 Actual 33.20 354,475 38,5E j 393,066 393,066 0 1993/94 Actual 33.20 355,247 146,866 ! 502,113 502,113 0 1994/95 Budget 33.20 357,200 142,780 499,981 500,981 (11000) Est. Actual 33.20 361,780 145,741 507,521 507,521 0 1995/96 Budget Options 32.88 537,312 J C 537,312 537,312 0 31.65 517,312 20,000 ( 537,312 537,312 0 30.43 497,312 40,000 f 537,312 537,312 0 29.20 477,312 60,000 ( 537,312 537,312 0 27.98 457,312 80,000 C 537,312 537,312 0 26.76 437,312 100,000 ( 537,312 537,312 0 25.53 417,312 120,000 C 537,312 537,312 0 24.31 397,312 1.40,000 C 537,312 537,312 0 23.09 377,312 160,000 537,312 537,312 0 22.47 367,312 170,000 537,312 537,312 0 21.86 357,312 180,000 537,312 537,312 0 20.64 337,312 200,000 537,312 537,312 0 51.88 00269 Exhibit `A` (Page 3.1) Alternate #2: Increase 23- Mar -95 FY 1995/96 Non - residential share to ........ 50% AD85 -1 Parks Maintenance --------------------------------------- ASSESSMENT ALLOCATION INFOMATION ------------------------ - - - - -- Element ------------------ - - - - -- Total FY 95/96 Assessments (Est.) Allocation to: Non - Residential: Percent of Total Non - Residential: Total Assessment Residential: Percent of Total Residential: Total Assessment ASSESSMENT CALCULATION Costs Remarks $537,31'. 50% $268,656 50% $268,656 ------------------ - - - - -- Land People Use Allocated Total Unit Use Assessment Typical Land Use Catagories Code Cost ($) Units Cost ($) Factor Amount ($) Remarks Non- Residential - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- --------------- -- Bank 24 268,656 11,786 150.42 3 451.26 Unit Cost for Retail 19 268,656 1,786 150.42 6 902.52 Non - Residential Lite Mfg. 31 268,656 1,786 150.42 12 1,805.04 18.3 times the Neighborhood Cntr. 15 268,656 11786 150.42 10 1,504.20 residential rate. Regional Cntr. 16 268,656 ''786 150.42 30 4,512.60 Residential Single - Family 1 268,656 32,688 8.22 4 32.88 Condo 3 268,656 32,688 8.22 3 24.66 Apartment 5 268,656 32,688 8.22 :{ 24.66 REMARKS Land Use Comparison ----------------------------------- Non- Residential Number of lots 274 Percent of total Lots 3.42% Residential Number of lots 7,743 Percent of total Lots 96.58% Vacant Number of lots 0 Percent of total Lots 0 00270 EXHIBIT "B" 30- Mar -95 Fiscal Year 1994/95 Assessment District 85 -1 Fund Activity (025) ---------------------- ---------------------- 00271 FY 1994/95 FY 1995/965 FY FY FY -------------- - - - - -- Proposed Description 1991/92 1992/93 1.993194 Budget Proj Actual Budget Notes: BEGINNING BALANCE 54,915 0 0 0 REVENUE ASSESSMENTS 373,319 354,475 355,24' 357,200 361,780 537,312 INTEREST 1,204 1,000 MISCELLANEOUS 2,89: TRANSFER IN GAB 67,110 67,170 GENERAL fUND 1,563 38,591 142,76u 74,610 78,571 0 The Projected FY1994/95 Transfer is slightly AVAILABLE FUNDS 429,797 393,066 502,11; 499,981 507,521 537,312 more than the budget. If required, subsequent EXPENSES to determination of Personnel 111,000 118,043 127,38f 147,9:3: 148,952 155,705 Year End Actual Revenues and Expenses, 0 & M 318,797 275,023 ;74,721 353,050 358,569 381,607 an additional appropriation will be Capital Improvements 0 0 0 0 requested. Adjustment Less TOTAL EXPENSES 429,797 393,066 502,h 500,98 507,521 537,312 YEAR END BALANCE 0 0 1,000) 0 0 00271 EXHIBIT "C" 03/23/95 Department 147 Budget Summary FY 1995/96 FY 94'95 FY 92/93 FY 93/94 Estimated FY 95/96 Code Description ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET Actual BUDGET SALARIES & BENEFITS 118,043 127,388 1.4`7,431 148,952 155,705 MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS 623 Supplies 2,837 7,130 (4,500 9,500 10,000 626 423 629 Special Supplies 1,951 8,800 x),000 5,000 5,000 632 Meetings 520 24, 0 0 633 Publications 365 34� 300 300 300 634 Membership / Dues 0 0 0 0 636 Education 80 48' 0 0 400 637 Travel & Milage 49 ( 0 0 0 638 Uniforms 1,490 1,730 1,400 1,400 1,500 641 Professional Services 3,267 4,861 5000 3,840 5,000 642 Contractual Services 163,522 219,642 222,756 222,756 235,457 648 Insurance 20,000 20,434 23, ?50 26,249 26,250 651 Equip. Maint. 26 223 300 2,524 3,000 652 Utilities 52,116 88,261 65,`i14 65,500 69,000 654 Vehicle Maint 2,865 2,272 ,000 3,000 3,500 655 Fuel 1,917 1,952 k,,00 1,000 1,200 656 Lubricants 0 r 0 0 0 i 657 Small Tools 1401 1,460 830 1,000 1,000 658 Maint & Repair 18,482 13,459 12,000 12,000 15,000 661 Equip Rental 3,712 --- - - - - -- 3,640 --- - - - - -- 2,500 --- 4,500 5,000 M &O Total 275,023 374,725 353,050 --- - - - - -- 358,569 ----- - - - - -- 381,607 903 Capital Projects 0 0 Total 393,066 502,113 0,981 507,521 537,312 Remarks 00272 PRELIMINARY ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF MOORPARK PARRS MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. AD -85 -1 LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 Prepared By: DWIGHT FRENCH & ASSOCIATES, INC. 1470 S. Valley Vista Drive Suite 290 Diamond Bar, CA 91765 March 1995 b._1 00273 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section 1 Authority for Report Section 2 Description of Improvements to be Maintained Section 3 Assessment Ro.;._ Section 4 Section 5 Appendix "A" Appendix "B" Appendix "C" Appendix "D" Appendix "E" Appendix "F" Estimate of Cost Method of Assessment Parks Maintenance Formula Budget Estimat e Boundary Map Assessment Rol.: Resolutions Rebate Procedure Page 1 1 2 2 3 l 2 002,74 CITY OF MOORPARK Engineer's Report Parks Maintenance Assessment District No. AD -85 -1 Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 For Fiscal Year 1995 -96 SECTION 1 AUTHORITY FOR REPORT This report is prepared pursuant to City Council action taken at their regular meeting of January 4, 1995 to extend this District for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 1995 and ending June 30, 1996 in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, "Landscaping Act of 197211, being Part 2 of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code. This report is an update of an existing City -wide Assessment District. The purpose for the district is to provide operating funds for the continued maintenance and improvements of existing and planned City operated public parks. SECTION 2 DESCRIPTION OF THE IMPROVEMENTS TO BE MAINTAINED The District is proposed to adjust the benefit formula. The assessments shown in the appendix are based on the current formula. These assessments will be changed upon further directions of the City Council. The following City Parks are to be maintained under this District effective July 1, 1995: 1. Country Trail Park 2. Glenwood Park 3. Tierra Rejada Park 4. Mountain Meadows Park 5. Peach Hill Park 6. Monte Vista Park 7. Campus Park 8. Campus Canyon Park 9. Griffin Park L0. Virginia Colony Park 11. Campesina Park L2. Arroyo Vista Recreation Ctr. 1.3. Downtown Park The maintenance and improvement of all above mentioned parks shall include but not be limited to the Eoll.owi.ng: 1. Mowing and edging of al turf areas. 2. Removing litter. 1 00275 -�)'4, 3. Weeding as required. 4. Irrigating as required. 5. Fertilizing of all vegetation as each species requires. 6. Pruning so as to not inhibit the natural growth characteristics of the plant. 7. Cleaning existing facilities to be clear and free of all debris. Minor repairs a4 needed. 8. Eradicating vector at the first indication of existence. 9. Maintaining lights, playground equipment, playcourts and public restrooms. 10. Installing park or recreational improvements, including but not limited to drains and sidewalks. Maintaining and servicing said improvements. Plans and specifications for the irrigation, landscaping, and other authorized improvements within the City are on file in the Department of Public Works. Reference is hereby made to said plans and specifications for the exact location and nature of the landscape improvements. Said plans and specifications by reference are hereby made a part of this report, SECTION 3 ASSESSMENT ROLL All parcels of real property affected are listed on the "Assessment Roll ", Exhibit "A ", which will be on file in City Hall with the City Clerk, and is made a part hereof by reference. These parcels are more particularly described in maps prepared in accordance with Section 327 of the Revenue and Taxation Code which are on file in the office of the Ventura County Assessor in the County Government Center Administration Building, 800 South Victoria Avenue, Ventura, California and which are also made a part hereof by reference. SECTION 4 ESTIMATE OF COST The City staff recommendation for r--he District budget is shown in Appendix "B" of this report. 2 00276 SECTION 5 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT The Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, in Section 22573, states that "The net amount to be assessed upon the lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the new amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The method and formula of benefit spread recognizes that every property within the City of Moorpark benefits from public parks and recreation facilities. The method of spreading maintenance costs is based upon the "people use" attributed to each land use within the City. This method was chosen because the benefit received by having park facilities is directly proportionate to the number of people generated by each land use. Recognizing that residential land uses within the City derive a higher degree of benefit than non - residential land uses, the formula was subdivided into two main groups, with residential land uses contributing in 75% of the assessment and non - residential uses being assessed for the remaining 25% of the maintenance costs. The benefits to residential land uses are clear. The residents of the City utilize the parks during their leisure hours. Benefits to non - residential property include such items as offering employees the opportunity to utilize the parks during lunch time and after hours, as well as providing an aest.het Lc environment which attracts potential employees into the area The "people use" factors utilized rithe assessment district spread formula are shown in Appendix "A" The City Council approved a rebate procedure for disadvantaged citizens on November 1989. The procedure shall be followed as described in Appendix "F." In conclusion, it is our opinion that the assessments within Parks Maintenance Assessment District: No. AD -85 -1 are apportioned by a formula that fairly distributes the net cost to each lot or parcel in accordance with the benefits that are received. :3 0W) ( i APPENDICES 00278 APPENDIX "A" CITY OF MOORPARK Parks Maintenance Assessment District No. AD -85 -1 Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 Table 1 Parks Maintenance Formula Use People Annual Code Description Use Assessment 0 Residential Vacant 0 $ 0.00 1 Single Family - 4.0( $ 49.31 Level 1 2 Mobile Home 0 $ 0.00 3 Condo 3.00 $ 36.98 4 Residential Income 3.00 $ 36.98 (2 -4 Units) 5 Apartments (5 +) 3.001 $ 36.98 6 Single Family - 4.0(; $ 49.31 Level 2 9 Mobile Home and 3.0() $ 36.98 Trailer Parks 10 Commercial Vacant CI $ 0.00 11 Retail Stores, 3.00 $ 225.63 Single Story 12 Store & Office 3.0pt; $ 225.63 (Combination) 15 Shopping Centers 10.0) $ 752.12 (Neighborhood) 16 Shopping Centers 30.0) $2,256.35 (Regional) 17 Office Building 3.0(1 $ 225.63 (1 Story) A -1 00279 Use People Annual Code Description Use Assessment 18 Office Stores 6.00 $ 451.27 (Multi - Story) 19 Retail Stores 6.00 $ 451.27 (Multi - Story) 21 Restaurants & 3.00 $ 225.63 Cocktail Lounge 24 Banks, Savings & 3.00 $ 225.63 Loans 25 Service Stations 3.00 $ 225.63 26 Auto Sales, Repair 1.00; $ 75.21 30 Industrial Vacant 0 $ 0.00 Land 31 Light Manufacturing 12.00 $ 902.54 32 Warehousing 4.00 $ 300.85 33 Industrial Condos, 3.0(' $ 225.63 Co -Ops, PUD's 38 Mineral Processing 3.0; $ 225.63 44 Truck Crops 2.00 $ 150.42 46 Pasture (Permanent) 2.O(1 $ 150.42 48 Poultry $ 150.42 49 Flowers, Seed 2.O;j $ 150.42 Production 51 Orchards 2.0? $ 150.42 53 Field Crops, Dry 2.Oc $ 150.42 54 Pasture of Graze, 2.O0 $ 150.42 Dry 55 Feed Lots 2.00 $ 150.42 57 Tree Farms 2.O0 $ 150.42 A -2 O00.0$0 `)-fl Use People Annual Code Description Use Assessment 61 Theater 2.00 $ 150.42 69 Parks 0 $ 0.00 70 Institutional 0 $ 0.00 Vacant Land 71 Churches, 0 $ 0.00 Convent, Rectory 72 Schools 0 $ 0.00 73 Colleges 0 $ 0.00 78 Public Bldgs., 0 $ 0.00 Firehouses, Museums, etc. 79 Flood Control 0 $ 0.00 80 Misc. Vacant Land 0 $ 0.00 81 Utility Water 0 $ 0.00 Company 83 Petroleum & Gas 1.00 $ 75.21 86 Water Rights, Pumps 0 $ 0.00 88 Highways & Streets C $ 0.00 91 Utility Edison C $ 0.00 92 Telephone C $ 0.00 93 S.P.R.R. C $ 0.00 94 Undedicated 0 $ 0.00 Community Condo Development 95 State Property 0 $ 0.00 96 County Property 0 $ 0.00 97 City Property 0 $ 0.00 99 Exempt 0 $ 0.00 Actual Assessment amount may vary due to discrepancies between use codes and actual property uses. A -3 0081 APPENDIX "B" CITY OF MOORPARK Parks Maintenance Assessment District No. AD -85 -1 Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 BUDGET ESTIMATE FY 1995 -96 Park Sites Maintenance and Operations $ 381,607.00 Maintenance and Operation Personne_ Costs 155,705.00 Total Annual Expenses 537,312.00 Total Amount to be Funded by District (FY 1995 -96) $ 537,312.00 B -1 028#2 APPENDIX "C" BOUNDARY MAP 00283 9 ch 1 I,I•r^{ f I m , I'S•j��Oy����iIIr4 r:�ir ,1 a � i , "•.'i�1�' I av YID'• .i _. ~O tl � ' • aC U • f I� , I � C , le r y M 1 1 NAI Mr- �:_ I - ,!nrtlf CL } �•'_ -• 7r .i•ht-C- I 111Yrrr I 1 cr � _' � _- -_ - .-+ -`}f '.-- '' ___ _..- ._•�_ -•- �c� o__ •�! �t� }_ -_mss.; I ''--- _ - - - -a I J , ♦ r Vi t `r 1 NMI • (11 1 I O 14 N ss J ablxia A' Y t _ a px x Ix+vaI I --- o x .1 O0. ^7tlC.1�1x/ICk0A.43 1 - -- u 3rn�g r• a o". - ----- g ti A R H•. "I f S o AI�F�PIkf,JfJa>u.t ` I 11 on • + _ _ � 1• - 1-i .•1 N n ♦ In V n 10 01 .°t .''1 .Ni ;•. I . � I •�� ty ' , � L N I :5; o 4 APPENDIX "D" 13 Appendix "D ", the Assessment Roll, shows the assessment upon each lot or parcel (approximately 7893 parcels) within this District and is on file in the Office of the City Clerk and County Assessor. The Ventura County Assessor's office no longer lists public utility easements on the Assessor's Roll 00285 APPENDIX "E" RESOLUTIONS 1+ 00?86 APPENDIX "F" REBATE PROCEDURE 00 ?8'7 JOINT NOTICE OF A PUBLIC MEETING AND A PUBLIC HEARING PUBLIC NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Moorpark, California, on April 5, 1995, adopted Resolution No. 95 -aaaa fixing the date and time of a public meeting to be held on the 15th day of May, 1995, at the hour of 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Moorpark City Hall, located at 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark. The purpose of said public meeting is to allow the public an opportunity to meet with City staff to question and discuss the proposed annual assessments for the "MOORPARK PARK MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. AD -85 -1" for the fiscal year commencing on July 11 1995, and ending on June 30, 1996, which would provide for the maintenance and improvement of parks and recreational facilities within the said City, and to question and discuss the proposed increases in said assessments over those levied for said District in FY 1994/95. PUBLIC NOTICE IS ALSO HEREBY GIVEN that said Resolution No 95 -aaaa also fixed the date and time of apublic hearing of the Moorpark City Council to be held on the 7th day of June, 1995, at the hour of 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Moorpark City Hall, located at 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark. The ppurpose of said nu is hearing cAsider E n certain changges in, and to order the annual assessments for the "MQO ARK P DISTRICT NO. AD -85 -1" for the fiscal year commencing on July 1, 1995, and ending on June 30, 1996, which would provide for the maintenance and improvement of parks and recreational facilities within the sai& City. A copy of Resolution No. 95 -aaaa, which is captioned as follows: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR AND DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO MAKE CERTAIN CHANGES AND TO ORDER THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS FOR THE "PARKS MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. AD -85 -1" FOR THE FISCAL YEAR COMMENCING JULY 1 1995 AND ENDING JUNE 30, 1996, PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972, AND I'tDfINCtr THE TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC MEETING TO DISCUSS AND A PUBLIC HEARING TO RECEIVE OBJECTIONS THERETO," is on file with the City Clerk and open to inspection. A summary of said Resolution is as follows: 1. That the Engineer's Report prepared for Assessment District No. AD85 -1 for FY 1995/96 is approved. 2. That said Engineer's Report may be further modified or changed, pursuant to applicable State law. 3. That the amount of the assessments for Assessment District No. AD85 -1 for FY 1995/96 are proposed to increase from the amount of the assessments levied for said district in FY 1994/95. 4. That it is the intention of the City Council a) to make certain changes, including the benefit formula, to Assessment District No. AD 85 -1, which consists of a single city -wide district for the maintenance and improvement of parks and recreational facilities within the City, b) to order the extension of the annual assessment for said district for FY 1995/96; and, c) to levy and collect assessments for such parks maintenance and improvement. 5. That said parks maintenance assessment district includes the park sites with all improvements located therein, described by and included within Assessment District No. AD 85 -1. 6. That the foregoing described work is to be located within Assessmem District No. AD 85 -1, the boundary of which is described on a map on file in the City Clerk's office. 7. That said proposed maintenance and improvement is of benefit to, and expense for which are chargeable upon, the district. 8. That a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable parcels within said District, is set forth in a copy of the aforementioned Engineer's Report on file with the City Clerk and open to inspection. 9. That the existing assessments, the proposed assessments and the proposed increase in the assessment amounts are set forth in Exhibit 'A' attached hereto and made a part hereof. 10. That a public meeting shall be convened on May 15, 1995, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at the Moorpark City Hall to allow the public an opporttmity to meet with City staff to question and discuss the proposed annual assessments for Assessment District No. AD85 -1 for FY 1995/96, and the proposed increases to said assessments over those levied in FY 1994/95. 11. That a public hearing of the Moorpark City Council shall be held on June 7, 1995, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at the Moorpark City Hall to consider making certain � hanges in, and to order the annual assessments for Assessment District No. AD85 -1 for FY 1995/96. 12. That this Joint Notice of Public Meeting and Public Hearing is given, and that any persons having any objections to the work or extent of the assessment district may appear and show cause why said work should not be done or carried out or why said district should not be extended for the Fiscal year commencing July 1, 1995, and ending June 30, 1996. Protests must be in writing, and must be filed by the property owner with the Ciy Clerk prior to the conclusion of the hearing and such protest shall state all grounds of the objection and shall contain at description sufficient to identify the property. A majority protest will cause the assessment increase to be abandoned. For additional information about the assessments contact the Public Works Department at 799 Moorpark Avenue or by calling (805) 529 -6864 [Ext. 2561. 13. That all the work proposed shall be done in accordance. with the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. 14. That the City Clerk shall cause notice of said public meeting and public hearingg to be given by cousing this summary of the Resolution of Intention to be published and mailed in the manner required by Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code and Section 54954.6 of the Government Code of the State of California. 15. That the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this .e.soluti n. ATTEST: rty er au mason -Vayoi THIS NOTICE IS GIVEN pursuant to the provisions of the landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Section 22500 et. sec. of the Streets and Highway Code of the State of California, and is dated this 6th day of April, 1995. itC—y UFer c- 00288 Exhibit 'A' AD 85 -1 Stnnmaa of Assessments Use FY 1994/95 Proposed FY 1995/96 Proposed Code Description Assmnt M Assmnt M rease 0 Residential Vacant 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 Single Family - Level 1 33.20 49.31 16.11 2 Mobil Home 0.00 0.00 0.00 3 Condo 24.90 36.98 12.08 4 Residential Income 2 -4 units 24.90 36.98 12.08 5 Apartments (5 +) 24.90 36.98 12.08 6 Single Family - Level 2 33.20 49.31 16.11 9 Mobil Home & Trailer Park 24.90 36.98 12.08 10 Commercial Vacant 0.00 0.00 0.00 11 Retail Store, single story 151.92 225.63 73.71 12 Store & Office Combination 151.92 225.63 73.71 15 Shopping Centers (Neighborhood) 506.40 752.12 245.72 16 Shopping Centers (Regional) 1 519.20 2,256.35 737.15 17 Office Building (one story) 151.92 225.63 73.71 18 Office Building (multi -story) 303.84 451.27 147.43 19 Retail Stores (multi -story) 303.84 451.27 147.43 21 Restaurants & cocktail lounges 151.92 225.63 73.71 24 Banks, Savings & Loans 151.92 225.63 73.71 25 Service Stations 151.92 225.63 73.71 26 Auto sales, repair, storage & rental 50.64 75.21 24.57 30 Industrial Land Vacant 0.00 0.00 0.00 31 Light Manufacturing 607.68 902.54 294.86 32 Warehousing 202.56 300.85 98.29 33 Industrial Condos, Coops, PUD's 151.92 225.63 73.71 38 Mineral Processing 151.92 225.63 73.71 44 Truck Crops 101.28 150.42 49.14 46 Pasture (permanent) 101.28 150.42 49.14 48 Poultry 101.28 150.42 49.14 49 Flowers, seed production 101.28 150.42 49.14 51 Orchards 101.28 150.42 49.14 53 Field crops, dry 101.28 150.42 49.14 54 Pastures of graze, dry 101.28 150.42 49.14 55 Feed lots 101.28 150.42 49.14 57 Tree farms 101.28 150.42 49.14 61 Theater 101.28 150.42 49.14 70 Institutional vacant land 0.00 0.00 0.00 71 Churches, convent & rectory 0.00 0.00 0.00 78 Public Bldg. Fire Houses, Museums, etc. 0.00 0.00 0.00 80 Misc, Vacant land 0.00 0.00 0.00 81 Utility Water Company 0.00 0.00 0.00 83 Petroleum & gas 50.64 75.21 24.57 91 Utility Edison 0.00 0.00 0.00 92 Telephone 0.00 0.00 0.00 93 SPRR 0.00 0.00 0.00 94 Undedicated Community Condo Development 0.00 0.00 0.00 99 Exempt 0.00 0.00 0.00 up \rpt \ad85- 96.not V -2 Exhibit F RESOLUTION NO., 95- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR, AND DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO MAKE CERTAIN CHANGES AND TO ORDER THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS FOR THE "PARKS MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. AD -85 -1" FOR THE FISCAL YEAR COMMENCING JULY 1, 1995, AND ENDING JUNE 30, 1996, PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972, AND FIXING THE TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC MEETING TO DISCUSS AND A PUBLIC HEARING TO RECEIVE OBJECTIONS THERETO. WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 95 -1095, the City Council ordered the City Manager to cause to be prepared an Engineer's Report for Assessment District 85 -1 for FY 1995/96, in accordance with Article 4, Chapter 1, Part 2, Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code; and WHEREAS, pursuant to said Resolution, the said Engineer's Report was filed with the City Clerk on the 24th day of March 1995; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed said Engineer's Report and wishes to take certain actions relative to said report and the levy of the assessments recommended therein. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The Engineer's Report for "PARKS MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. AD -85 -1" for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 1995, and ending June 30, 1996, filed with the City Clerk on the 24th day of March 1995, is hereby approved. SECTION 2. That said Engineer's Report may be further modified or changed, pursuant to the provisions of Section 22630 of the Streets and Highways Code. SECTION 3. That the amount of the assessments for FY 1995/96 are proposed to increase over the amount of the assessments levied in FY 1994!95 00290 Resolution No. Page 2 fZ SECTION 4. That the public interest and convenience require and it is the intention of the City Council of the City of Moorpark to make certain changes, including the Benefit formula, to the "PARKS MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. AD -85 -1" consisting of a single city -wide district for the maintenance and improvement of parks and recreational facilities within the City and to order the extension of the annual assessment for said district for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 1995, and ending June 30, 1996, pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, and to levy and collect assessments for such parks maintenance and improvement in accordance with said Act. SECTION 5. That said parks maintenance assessment district shall specifically include the park sites with all improvements located therein, described by and heretofore included within "PARKS MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. AD- 85-1." SECTION 6. That the foregoing described work is to be located within said Assessment District, the boundary of which is more particularly described on a map on file in the City Clerk's office, and entitled "Boundary Map, City of Moorpark Lighting and Landscaping Maintenance Assessment District No. AD- 85 -111, filed in the office of the City Clerk on the 27th of January 1995. SECTION 7. That the contemplated maintenance and improvement of parks and recreational facilities, in the opinion of said City Council, is of benefit to, and the said City Council hereby makes the expense of the said maintenance and improvements chargeable upon, the district. SECTION 8. That a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the Assessment District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within said District, is set forth in a copy of the above mentioned Engineer's Report, a copy of which is on file with the City Clerk and open to inspection. SECTION 9. That the proposed assessment amounts are set forth in Exhibit 'A' attached hereto and made a part hereof. SECTION 10. That a Public Meeting shall be convened on the 15th day of May 1995, at the hour of 7:00 p.m., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall of said City, located at 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, for the purpose of allowing the public an opportunity to meet with City staff to question and discuss the proposed assessments for FY 1994/95. 00291 Resolution No. Page 3 SECTION 11. That a public hearing of the Moorpark City Council shall be convened on the 7th day of June 1995, at the hour of 7:00 p.m., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall of said City, located at 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, for the purpose of receiving oral and written testimony regarding the proposed assessments for FY 1995/96. SECTION 12. That Joint Notice of said Public Meeting and public hearing is hereby given. All persons interested in learning more about the proposed assessments and the basis for same are invited to attend said Public Meeting. All persons having any objections to the work or extent of the assessment district may appear at the public hearing and show cause why said work should not be done or carried out or why said district should not be extended for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 1995, and ending June 30, 1996. Protests must be in writing, and must be filed by the property owner with the City Clerk prior to the conclusion of the public hearing and such protest shall state all grounds of the objection and shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property. A majority protest will cause the assessment increase to be abandoned. SECTION 13. All the work herein proposed shall be done in accordance with the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. SECTION 14. The City Clerk shall cause a Joint Notice of Public Meeting and public hearing to be given by causing a summary of this Resolution to be published and mailed in the manner required by Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code and Section 54954.6 of the Government Code of the State of California. SECTION 15. The City Clerk shal. ! certify to the adoption of this resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED 'THIS 5th day of April, 1995. ATTEST: City Clerk Paul W. Lawrason Jr . , Mayor 00292 Resolution No. Exhibit 'A' AD 85 -1 Summary of Assessments Use Total Code Description _ Assessment (S1 0 Residential Vacant 0 1 Single Family - Level 1 49.31 2 Mobil Home 0 3 Condo 36.98 per unit 4 Residential Income 2 -4 units 36.98 per unit 5 Apartments (5 +) 36.98 per unit 6 Single Family - Level 2 49.31 9 Mobil Home & Trailer Park 36.98 per space 10 Commercial Vacant 0 11 Retail Store, single story 225.63 per parcel 12 Store & Office Combination 225.63 per parcel 15 Shopping Centers (Neighborhood) 752.12 16 Shopping Centers (Regional) 2,256.35 17 Office Building (one story) 225.63 18 Office Building (multi- story) 451.27 per parcel 19 Retail Stores (multi- story) 451.27 per parcel 21 Restaurants & cocktail lounges 225.63 24 Banks, Savings & Loans 225.63 25 Service Stations 225.63 26 Auto sales, repair, storage & rental 75.21 30 Industrial Land Vacant 0 31 Light Manufacturing 902.54 32 Warehousing 300.85 33 Industrial Condos, Coops, PUD's 225.63 38 Mineral Processing 225.63 44 Truck Crops 150.42 46 Pasture (permanent) 150.42 48 Poultry 150.42 49 Flowers, seed production 150.42 51 Orchards 150.42 53 Field crops, dry 150.42 54 Pastures of graze, dry 150.42 55 Feed lots 150.42 57 Tree farms 150.42 61 Theater 150.42 70 Institutional vacant land 0 71 Churches, convent & rectory 0 78 Public Bldgs, Fire Houses, Museums, etc. 0 80 Misc, Vacant land 0 81 Utility Water Company 0 83 Petroleum & gas 75.21 91 Utility Edison 0 92 Telephone 0 93 SPRR 0 94 Undedicated Community Condo Development 0 99 Exempt 0 00293