HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 1995 0621 CC REG ITEM 08PAGENDA REPORT
City of Moorpark
ITEM S--
ps
?PAP k, Cr k F
y Council Mee E;r g
- ,wa_
ON:L
4.
To: The Honorable City Counch.]
From: Jaime Aguilera, Director of Community Developmeni/
Prepared by Craig Malin, Assistant Planner
Date: June 8, 1.995 (City Counca.] meeting June 21, 1995)
Subject: Consider Approval of Minor Modification No. 1 to
Residential Planned Development Permit No. 91 -2 (UWC
Moorpark Investors).
Background
On February 5, 1992 the City Counci i. approved Resolution No. 92 -828
to allow the construction of l96 townhomes in Tract 4792
(Traditions). As of June 7, 1995 a total of 139 of the 196 units
have been completed, including models. This is the first Minor
Modification filed for the development:.
Discussion
This Minor Modification request is to change the approved design of
the fence on the eastern project boundary, adjacent to the
commercial site. As approved, the design consisted of a 4' wrought
iron fence over a 2' slumpstone wall. This proposal is to change
the design to a 2' wrought iron fence over a 4' slumpstone wall.
The purpose of this modification is to provide additional screening
of automobile headlights and noise from the parking spaces at the
adjacent commercial property which would be visible from this
development. The overall height of the fence will not be changed.
This Minor Modification request meets all applicable Zoning Code
requirements. This Minor Modification request has been conditioned
to require that the fence shall have identical materials and colors
as required by the fence plan.
This proposal has been reviewed by the Director of Community
Development who approved the application on June 6, 1995. This
matter is being presented to the Council as a courtesy. Should the
Council, or any other party, desire to appeal the Director's
decision, a hearing should be scheduled. The last day for an appeal
to be filed is June 22, 1995. The next available hearing date is
July 5, 1995. If the Council. takes no action, the Director's
decision will become effective on Ttine ?2: 1.995.
Recommendation
Receive and File the Report.
Exhibit: A) Site plan
B) Section plan
C) Design plan
D) Minor Modification approval form
cc: R91 -2 Minor Mod. No. 5 File
Ns I
>
5�
.54 0
+
EXIT
0
484.o +
4 8 3 3-5 u 0 F-
483,7
0.40/0 d
CD
SITE
00
co
V, 488 +
'"RECREATION ARE-A"
?�, JR.
L
��EJE LA , HD,5CAPF- 0
PLAYS
48&.o go
r
48(o.o
cc
+
1r I I
I I
11 D
0
co
fn
IL
e.
(BLDG. B)
45.000 S. F
494.5 F.F.
EXIT
il
492.5 F.F. rt
50
a
486.o
00 11 L-�;2 oa-es- At
N,'U- f-U If 55-E 14,5�7—
Z—F
�,4.EXHIBIT A
�---S. D.
I r o.d ► f-( ftj
m
x
x
MEOW
o�
ntiw�'
y w%
yr iWN +r1*'J.4
r
r
RL
1, <k
Cy t� VI
tz
IK
�.zi
•I
w
i
W �,a
�J
i
1
I
I .
?A.
k r
Yi.`aa
•r
� r
Y rr
� t
f'� Z
\VAcLLS C`LEI )C1 C . �E—c1 N It�Gf I;V�/�•LL�
e- - f �-A�T
F--- .L ;_ IoNJ
EXHIBIT C
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
APPROVAL OF A MINOR MODIFICATION
June 6, 1.995
Minor Modification No. L
Residential Planned Development Permit No.: 92 -1
Filed by: California Community Builders
Address /Location: Tract 4792
Approved by the Director on: June f, 1995
For: Modify change the approved design of the fence on the eastern
project boundary, adjacent to the commercial site. As
approved, the design specified a 4' wrought iron over a 2'
slumpstone wall. This proposal is to change the design to a 2'
wrought iron fence over a 4" slumpstone wall. The overall
height of the fence will not be changed.
As shown on Exhibit "A". The land involved is Assessor's Parcel
No.: 505 -0- 270 -48 in the RPD zone
Categorically exempt from CEQA requirements as a Class 1,
Exemption for Minor Alterations.
Ordinance Compliance: Based upon the information and findings
developed by staff, it has been determined that this application,
with the attached conditions, meets the requirements of Moorpark
Ordinance Code Section 81.11- 2.1.2 Permit Standards, in that;
a. The Minor Modification is consistent with the intent and
provisions of the City's General. Plan and the Zoning
Ordinance;
b. The Minor Modification is compatible with the character of
surrounding development;
C. The proposed. Minor Modification would not be obnoxious or
harmful, or impair the utility of neighboring property or
uses;
d. The Modification would not be detrimental to the public
interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare; and
e. The conditionally permitted lase is compatible with existing
and planned land uses in the general area where the
development is to be located
EXHIBIT D
Appeals: As stated in Section 17.44.090, within 16 calendar days
after the permit has been approved, conditionally approved or
denied, any aggrieved person may file an appeal of the approval,
conditional approval or denial with the Community Development
Department who shall set a hearing date before the Planning
Commission to review the matter at the earliest convenient date.
This Minor Modification request h -):> been conditioned to require
that:
1) All requirements of the approved Fence Plan and associated
permits shall be met.
2) Failure to inaugurate this
months or less from the date
Modification nul and void,
Jaime R. Aguilera
Director of Community Development
Date:
cc: Honorable City Council
City Manager
Minor Modification in twelve
of" approval will render this