The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAGENDA REPORT 1995 0621 CC REG ITEM 09BITEM o._ AGENDA REPORT C = TY O F MOORPARK TO: The Honorable City Counci) FROM: Ken Gilbert, Director of Public Works fr.,,,caMee; DATE: May 23, 1995 (Council Meeting 6 -7 -95) "` �00' . CTIO SUBJECT: Consider Making Certain Changes to AD84 -2 6,/ and Confirming the Assessments for Fiscal Year 1995/96 OVERVIEW This presents for approval a Resolution making certain changes to Assessment District AD84 -2 and confirming the assessments for Fiscal Year 1995/96. Certain information in support of said proposed changes and proposed assessments is attached hereto and identified as follows: List of Exhibits Assessment District 84 -2 was formed in 1984 pursuant to the provisions of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972." This assessment district was established to allow for the funding of street lighting and parkway /median maintenance and improvement expenses through the levying of assessments as provided for in the act. As set forth in the Engineer's Report (Exhibit "G"), there are two types of district expenses, generally described as follows: those expenses determined to be of general benefit to the community, which are spread to a1.1 of the lots in the City; and, those expenses for the construction and maintenance of improvements determined to be of benefit to the properties within a number of identified zones, which are spread to all of the lots within each zone. ad84_96.apr AIX ,, - Exhibit "All: Assessment Summary Councfu Nteu i Z, 2� � Exhibit "B": Fund Activity Summary -194 Exhibit "C" : Zone Activity Summary Exhibit "D ": Preliminary Budget for FY 1995/96 Exhibit "E": Capital Improvement Project Summary Exhibit "F ": Street Light Cost Summary �� Exhibit "G": Engineer's Report Exhibit "H": Public Hearinq Notice Exhibit "I": Resolution Assessment District 84 -2 was formed in 1984 pursuant to the provisions of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972." This assessment district was established to allow for the funding of street lighting and parkway /median maintenance and improvement expenses through the levying of assessments as provided for in the act. As set forth in the Engineer's Report (Exhibit "G"), there are two types of district expenses, generally described as follows: those expenses determined to be of general benefit to the community, which are spread to a1.1 of the lots in the City; and, those expenses for the construction and maintenance of improvements determined to be of benefit to the properties within a number of identified zones, which are spread to all of the lots within each zone. ad84_96.apr Assessment District 84 -2 June 7, 1995 Page 2 The City must annually act to levy the lighting and landscape maintenance assessments. Said assessments have been levied each year since the formation of the district. In accordance with the requirements of the above mentioned act, the City Council has taken a number of actions in recent months in preparation for considering the levy of assessments for Street Lighting and Landscape Maintenance for FY 1.995/96. Those actions are summarized as follows: 1. On January 4, 1995, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 95- 1094 stating its intent to take the subject actions. 2. Also on that date, the City Council selected Dwight French and Associates to prepare the Engineer's Reports for AD84 -2. 3. On April 5, 1995, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 95- 1113 making certain findings and taking certain actions including the following: • approving, subject to change, the Engineers' Report for AD84 -2 for FY 1995/96; • stating intent to make certain changes to AD84 -2: • setting 7:00 p.m. on May 15, 1995, as the time and date of a Public Meeting for the purpose of allowing the public an opportunity to meet with City staff to question and discuss the proposed assessments; • setting 7:00 p.m. on June 7, 1995, as the time and date of a Public Hearing to consider the subject actions; and • directing that Notice of said meetings be sent to the owners of all affected properties, stating the amount of the assessment levied for FY 1994/95, the amount of the proposed increase in the assessment amount and the total amount of the assessments proposed for FY 995,'96 DISCUSSION A. Tentative Assessment Summary The amounts of the proposed assessments for AD 84 -2 for FY 1995/96 are set forth on page 2 of Exhibit 'A'. A summary of that information is as follows: 1. City -Wide Assessment -- A summary of the annual assessment for a single - family resident -al lot is as follows: Actual Proposed Elements FY 1994/95 FY 1995/96 Landscape Maintenance $12.36 $7.92 Street Lighting $20.64 $19.77 Total $33.00 $27.69 adB4_96.apr Assessment District 84 -2 June 7, 1995 Page 3 2. Zone of Benefit Assessments -- Those expenses for the maintenance of improvements determined to be of benefit to the properties within an identified zone, are spread to all of the lots within that zone. A re -cap of the proposed annual assessment for each Zane of Benefit is as follows: B. Fund Activity Attached for your information as Exhibit 'B', is a summary of the Fund Activity for AD 84 -2 for the past several years. C. Citywide Maintenance & Assessments Maintenance expenses for items considered to be of general benefit to the community are spread to all non - exempt parcels. These expenses fall into two categories: 1) street lighting and 2) parkway / median landscape maintenance. ad84_96.apr FY 1994/95 FY 1995/96 Number Total Per Lot Total Per Lot Zone Tract of Lots Assessment Assessment Assessment Assessment 1 2851 �7 4,1'1 56.59 5,939 77.13 2 2865 622 59 _?6r 95.45 60,108 96.64 3 3032 265 4( 19 3,059 11.54 4 3274 129 ( 0 0 5 3019/3525 217 37;'SA :72.06 17,939 82.67 6 3306 22 42 11.00 749 34.05 7 Industrial Park 95 10,181 A1.46 5,420 57.10 NE of L. A. Ave & ac. per acre per acre Gabbert Rd 8a City (T -4340, 497 10.23 2(.86 10,223 20.57 T -4341 & T -4342) 8b Home Acres 200 10,=23 51.86 10,223 51.11 9 Condor Parkway 49 6,60C 121.92 650 13.21 ac. per acre per acre 10 T. R. Rd. Res: 2,401 Res 0 36,994 15.41 Pkwy (PC -3) Comm: 11.81 ac C, 1,506 127.51 /acre B. Fund Activity Attached for your information as Exhibit 'B', is a summary of the Fund Activity for AD 84 -2 for the past several years. C. Citywide Maintenance & Assessments Maintenance expenses for items considered to be of general benefit to the community are spread to all non - exempt parcels. These expenses fall into two categories: 1) street lighting and 2) parkway / median landscape maintenance. ad84_96.apr Assessment District 84 -2 June 7, 1995 Page 4 1. Street Lighting -- Street lighting costs are summarized in Exhibit F. The total street lighting cost projected for FY 1995/96 is $186,000. These costs are distributed to all of the non - exempt properties in the City by means of a formula designed to spread said costs on the basis of benefit. This benefit spread formula identifies a number of factors (including lighting intensity, security, people use, etc.) which are associated with benefits derived, and then weights those factors by land use as a means to determining benefits derived. This formula is explained in more detail on pages 4 and 5 of the Engineer's Report (Exhibit 'G'). 2. Landscape Maintenance -- In the past, citywide landscape maintenance costs were spread evenly to all non - exempt lots in the City. The citywide landscape maintenance assessments set forth in the Engineer's Report (Exhibit 'GI) are based on this prior formula. On April 5, 1995, the City Council approved a change to the method used to spread citywide landscape maintenance costs, to be the same as the benefit spread formula used by AD85 -1 to spread parks maintenance costs. Under this revised formula, twenty -five percent (25 %) of the total citywide landscape maintenance costs are first allocated to non - residential properties. The remaining seventy -five percent (75 %) of said costs are allocated to residential properties. These allocated costs are then spread to non - exempt properties using the People -Use formula used in AD85 -1. A summary of typical assessments for both the prior formula and the revised formula is set forth on pages 3 and 4 of Exhibit 'A.' The net result of this change reduces the single - family residential assessment from $30.20 to $27.69. However, in that non - residential properties comprise less than four percent ( 4 %) of the :Lots in the City, this change to the formula will increase the assessment for a neighborhood commercial center from $:138.93 to $249.61. D. Zones of Benefit. 1. Summary -- Zone maintenance costs for FY 1995/96 are summarized on page 1 of Exhibit 'C.' Both projected costs and assessments are summarized on page 5 of Exhibit 'C.' 2. Parcel Assessment / Acre Assessment -- Except for Zones 7 and 9, the costs for each Zone of Benefit are distributed equally to all of the non - exempt parcels in each zone. In that the size of the lots in Zones 7 and 9 vary considerably, the costs for those zones are spread to each non - exempt parcel via a per acre assessment., The amount of the assessment for each parcel in Zone 7 and Zone 9 is set forth on pages 7 through 9 of E'xhihit 'A.' ad84_96.apr Assessment District 84 -2 June 7, 1995 Page 5 3. Zone Fund Activity -- Attached as Exhibit ICI is a summary of the revenues and expenditures for each Zone of Benefit over the past several years. This exhibit shows the year -end surplus and /or deficit for each zone, carried over to the following year. A discussion of the Fund Activity for each Zone is as follows: Zone 1: The year -end zone balance is anticipated to be a deficit of $2,194. Although next year's costs are expected to go down, the year -end deficit will require an increase in the assessment from $4,131 to $5,939. The City Council is advised that the assessment for FY 1993/94 was $9,776. Zone 2: • Maintenance -- The year -end zone balance for maintenance is anticipated to be a deficit of $7,469. This, combined with an increase in the projected costs, will require an increase in the maintenance assessment from $43,882 to $53,888. These maintenance costs include an amount for the annual cleaning of the storm drain debris basins located on the southern boundary of Tract 2865. • Improvements -- Last year a $10 per lot ($6,220) improvement assessment was levied on the lots in Zone 2 to fund the future construction of parkway improvements on the north side of Tierra Rejada Road west of Spring Road. It is recommended that this assessment be levied again this year. It is anticipated that it will be necessary to levy this assessment two additional years (total of four years) to fully fund these improvements. Zone 3: The year -end zone balance is anticipated to be a deficit of $1,259. Although next year's costs are expected to go down, the year -end deficit will require an increase in the assessment from $846 to `'a?' , 059 . Zone 4: It was recently determined that in FY 1993/94 a number of properties outside of the boundaries of Zone 4 were levied a Zone 4 assessment. This caused the Zone 4 assessment revenues to be much higher than expected and resulted in a year -end zone surplus. Accordingly, the amount of the assessment levied in FY 1994/95 was zero. In addition, the recommended amount of the assessment cited in the Public Hearing Notice for FY 1995/96 was also zero. It will be necessary to make refunds to the properties assessed in error. Although the total amount of those refunds is not yet known, it is now anticipated that the FY 1995/96 year -end zone balance will. not be the $432 shown on Exhibit 'C -3,' but will be a deficit amount which will have to be recovered from additionall. assessments in future years. ad84_96.npr Assessment District 84 -2 June 7, 1995 Page 6 Zone 5: The year -end zone balance is anticipated to be a surplus of $7,115. Although next year's costs are expected to be in excess of $25,000, the amount of the total assessment will be less than $17,000. Zone 6: The amount of the assessment includes sufficient revenues to recover an anticipated year -end zone deficit of $229. Zone 7: The year -end zone balance is anticipated to be a surplus of slightly more than $1,000. The amount of the total assessment is, therefore, approximately $1,000 less than next year's anticipated costs. Zone 8 -- Home Acres Buffer Area • Maintenance -- An amount of $1,200 was levied last year to cover anticipated maintenance costs for a portion of the year. This amount will be carried over and combined with a proposed maintenance assessment of $6,550 to cover next year's maintenance costs. • Improvements -- The City Council. awarded a contract for the construction of the planned improvements. That action included the approval of a portion of the project funding from the Citywide AD84 -2 surplus. The Zone 8 assessment proposed for FY 1995/96 includes an improvement assessment of $13,895, an amount anticipated to be sufficient to fully fund all these improvements. Zone 9 -- Virginia Colony Parkway: • Maintenance -- For the fIirst time next year, an amount of $650 is proposed for maintenance. • Improvements -- No additional improvement assessments are proposed. It is anticipated that the $6,000 levied to date will be sufficient to fully fund these improvements. Zone 10: The public hearing notices shows a maximum per lot assessment of $15.41 on all residential properties, plus an assessment of $127.51 on the commercial property, for FY 1995/96 for all. the properties within PC -3. These assessments will generate a total. Zone 10 assessment of approximately $38,500, an amount equal to the preliminary estimate for the annual maintenance cost for the parkways on Tierra Rejada Road (and the High School frontage on Mountain Trail Street) within PC -1 It is the intent of staff to present a report to the City Council on June 21, 1995, regarding the status of efforts prerequisite to the City assuming the maintenance of the Tierra Rejada Road parkways and medians within PC -3. As you may recall the City Council previously took action ad84_96.apr Assessment District 84 -2 June 7, 1995 Page 7 specifically listing those prerequisites. The developer has been working to complete those tasks in time to allow for the consideration of a transfer of these maintenance responsibilities effective July 1, 1995. There has been some questions raised regarding the estimated cost of maintenance for these landscape improvements. Should these costs be revised upward, it would be the recommendation of staff that the date of acceptance of maintenance be deferred. A full analysis of estimated costs and the completion of the tasks prerequisite to the transfer, will be presented to the City Counci' on June 21, 1995. E. FY 1995/96 Budget Attached as Exhibit 'D' is a copy of the preliminary budget for Parkway Lighting and Landscaping for FY 1995/96. These costs include all lighting, landscape and zone maintenance and improvement costs. 1. Operations & Maintenance (O &M) -- The budget amount proposed for O &M for FY 1995/96 ($438,015) is $52,235 more than the approved O &M Budget for FY 1994/95 ($385,780). Approximately $23,600 of that amount is an increase to the Citywide landscape maintenance cost resulting from the addition of the Tierra Rejada Road median within PC -3 ($20,575) and the new parkway and median landscaping on Princeton Avenue and Campus Park Drive ($3,000). In addition, the cost to maintain the landscaping within the Zones of Benefit is anticipated to increase over $50,000. This is primarily due to the addition of the maintenance of new landscaped areas in Zone 8 (Home Acres Buffer), Zone 9 (Condor Parkway) and Zone 10 (Tierra Rejada Road parkway within P('- 3) .. 2. Citywide vs. Zone Costs - A line -item listing of both Citywide and Zone costs is set forth in Exhibit D -2. 3. Citywide Landscaping -- A complete list of the Citywide landscaped areas maintained by AD 84 -2 is set forth in Exhibit D -3. 4. Street Lighting -- The cost oi" street lighting is included in the utility costs listed under Account # 652 on Exhibit 'D'. A detail of street lighting costs is set forth in Exhibit 'F'. The proposed assessment amount for street lighting in FY 1995/96 is $186,000, a $4,000 decrease from the amount assessed last year. ed84_96.epr Assessment District 84 -2 June 7, 1995 Page 8 6. Capital Improvements -- A detail of the proposed district funded landscaping projects for next year is set forth in Exhibit 'E'. Those projects are summarized as follows: • Parkway: East Side of Spring Rd S/O Peach Hill Road • Parkway: South side of L. A. Ave. E/O Tierra Rejada Rd. • Parkway: North Side of Po,..ndexter Ave. F. Capital Improvements Attached as Exhibit 'E' is a summary capital improvement projects funded by prior year Citywide maintenance surpluses. The project proposed for construction next year are summarized as follows: • Parkway: E/S Spring (S /O Peach Hill)..... $5,000 • Parkway: S/S L. A. Ave. E/O T. R. Rd. ... $20,000 • Parkway: N/S Poindexter Ave. $30,000 Tota, $55,000 Note: * Includes $7,315 from developer G. Engineer's Report The above described expenditure information was provided to the Assessment Engineer to be used as the basis for the preparation of the attached Engineer's Report (Exhibit 'G'). As stated above, said report was previously amended by the City Council when the method used to spread citywide landscape maintenance costs was revised. Although the attached copy of the draft report does not yet reflect these changes, the final report will. Said report (as revised) sets for the proposed amount of the assessment for FY 1995/96 for various land use categories, along with an explanation of the Benefit Assessment Formula and other related information. H. Public Hearing 1. The "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" (Streets and Highways Code) requires a public hearing to be held prior to the annual levy of assessments for the purpose of receiving input and to hear any protests to the proposed assessments. 2. If the amount of the assessments are to remain the same, the law does not require a Notice of public hearing to be mailed to each property being assessed. However, consistent with past practice, it is recommended that such a notice be mailed to the owners of all of the affected properties. ad84_96.apr Assessment District 84 -2 June 7, 1995 Page 9 3. Notwithstanding the above mentioned policy, State law requires that prior to considering any new or increased assessment, a public hearing notice must be mailed to the owners of the properties to be assessed. Said notice shall state the amount of the existing assessment, the amount of the proposed assessment and the amount of the proposed increase in the assessment. The amount of the approved estimated assessment MAY NOT EXCEED the amounts stated in the notice. Said notice must be mailed at least forty -five (45) days prior to the date of the hearing. In order to meet this deadline, said Notices were postmarked and mailed prior to April 23, 1995. 4. State law also requires that prior to considering any new or increased assessment a Public Meeting shall be convened to allow the public an opportunity to discuss the proposed increased assessment. Such a meeting was convened on Monday, May 15, 1995, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers. This informal meeting was conducted by staff for the purpose of providing answers to questions regarding projected program costs and the methods used to spread those costs to the properties assessed. Only a few people were in attendance. Staff responded to the quest_..ons asked. 5. Attached as Exhibit 'H' Notice for AD84 -2. I. Deferred Action .is a copy of the Public Hearing The attached resolution (Exhibit "I ") making certain changes to Assessment District AD84 -2 and confirming the assessments for Fiscal Year 1995/96 must be adopted no later than June 30, 1995, in order for the assessments to be levied. In prior years the City Council has adopted such resolutions concurrently with the adoption of the budget. Staff recommends that the City Council open the public hearing, receive testimony and continue these matters to the date of the Budget Workshops. Subsequent to the budget workshop meetings, but no later than June 30, 1994, staff recommends that the City Council da oRt the attached Resolution No. 95- _ (Exhibit "I ") making certain changes to AD84 -2 and confirming the assessments for Fiscal Year 1995/96. ad84_96.apr EXHIBIT "A" (page 1) Fiscal Year 1995/96 AD 84 -2 ASSESSMENT SUMMARY -------------------- -------------------- Description TOTAL ANTICIPATED ANNUAL EXPENSES LESS TOTAL ANTICIPATED ZONE MAINTENANCE EXPENSES LESS TOTAL ANTICIPATED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT EXPENSES TOTAL CITY -WIDE MAINTENANCE EXPENSES LESS PRIOR YEAR SURPLUS CARRYOVER LESS TRANSFER IN CITYWIDE MAINTENANCE EXPENSES LESS CREDITS TOTAL CITY -WIDE MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENTS PLUS CITY -WIDE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ASSESSMENT TOTAL CITY -WIDE ASSESSMENT PLUS TOTAL ASSESSMENT FOR ALL ZONES TOTAL ASSESSMENTS FY 93/94 FY 94/95 Actual. Budget 467,821 596,815 14,057 (108,437) 1001924 (192,028) /'82,840 296.350 0 _ - - - -IJ ----- - - - -0- 282,840 296,350 293,400 296,350 ----- - - - -0- 793,400 296,350 82,520 138,950 X75,920 435,300 FY 95/96 Proposed 513,015 (134,849) (55,000) 323,166 (50,658) ----- - - - -0- 272,509 272,509 ----- - - - -0- 272,509 152,809 425,318 22-May -95 EXHIBIT "A" (page 2) Fiscal Year 1995/96 AD 84 -2 ASSESSMENT SUMMARY ASSESSMENT SUMMARY Description --- -- - --- See Citywide Assessment Page Alt. #1: Prior Year Formula A -3 Alt. 13: A -4 Zone Assessments FY 1994/95 A B SF Res Assmnt($) Total a 33.00 296,30! 22- Nay -95 FY 1995/96 ------------------------ C D SF Res Assmnt($) Total ($) Notes A/B : C/D C = (AxD) / B 2;.69 272,509 - ---- ------ --- -- - --- Total Assessment Total Assessment No. # of Lots Assmnt($) Amt i$a Per Assmnt($) Amt ($) Per 1 77 4,131 56.5 Lot 5,939 i 77.13 Lot 2 622 59,367 X5.4-; Lot 60,108 i 96.64 Lot 3 265 846 3. Lot 3,059 11.54 Lot 4 129 0 O,o, Lot 0 0.00 Lot 5 217 37,338 172.0- Lot 17,,939 82.67 Lot 6 22 242 11 Lot 749 i 34.05 Lot 7 95 ac. 10,581 111.4+ Acre 5,420 57.10 Acre 8 City 497 10,223 20.8 Lot I 10,223 20.57 Lot Home Acres 200 10,223 50.31 Lot { 10,223 51.11 Lot 9 49 ac. 6,000 121 + Acre 650 13.21 Acre 10 Residentia 2401 N/A N/= Lot ! 36,994 15.41 Lot Commercial 11.81 ac. 1,506 i 127.51 Acre Total All Zones 138,950 152,809 Exhibit 'A' 22-May -95 Assessment Summary ALTERNATE #1: Present. Formula Page 3 of 9 AD84 -2 Lighting & Landscaping STREET LIGHTING: spread to all properties based on benifit formula Allocation Res /Non -Res: None CITYWIDE LANDSCAPING: equal spread to all properties Allocation Res /Non -Res: None ASSESSMENT ALLOCATION INFOMATION Land Use Comparison ---------------- - - - - -- Element Lighting Landscaping Total Non - Residential ---------- - - - - -- --------- - -_ __._..__ __ Number of lots 274 Total FY 95/96 Proposed Assessments $186,000 536 509 5272,509 Percent of total Lots 3.30% Allocation to: None None Non - Residential: Percent of Total Non - Residential: Total Assmnts Residential: Percent of Total Residential: Total Assmnts ---------------------- ---------------------- ASSESSMENT CALCULATION ----------------------- - - - - -- Land People Typical Land Use Use Allocated Total Unit Use Catagories Code Cost ($i Units Cost C) Factor LIGHTING Non - Residential Bank 24 186,000 9,409 .'7 3 Retail 19 186,000 9,409 1c . "7 4 Lite Mfg. 31 186,000 9,409 14' . "'? 5 Neighborhood Cntr. 15 186,000 9,409 lG." 6.5 Regional Cntr. 16 186,000 9,409 6.5 Residential Single - Family 1 186,000 9,409 1 Condo 3 186,000 9,409 iu.?? 1 Apartment 5 186,000 9,409 0.75 LANDSCAPING Non - Residential Bank Retail Lite Mfg. Neighborhood Cntr. Regional Cntr. Residential Number of lots 7,743 Percent of total Lots 93.31% Vacant Number of lots 281 Percent of total Lots 3.39% --------------------------------------- Lighting Assessment Amount ($) 59.31 79.08 98.85 128.51 128.51 19.77 19.77 14.83 Plus Lighting Assessment L/S Assmnt Assmnt ($) Total ($) ---- - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- 10.43 59.31 69.74 10.43 79.08 89.51 10.43 98.85 109.28 10.43 128.51 138.93 10.43 128.51 138.93 Residential Single - Family 10.43 19.77 30.20 Condo 10.43 19.77 30.20 Apartment 10.43 14.83 25.26 Exhibit 'A' Assessment Summary ALTERNATE #3: AD84-2 Lighting & Landscaping 22-May-95 Page 4 of 9 STREET LIGHTING: spread to all properties based on beuiIit formula Allocation Res/Non-Res: None CITYWIDE LANDSCAPING: costs spread based on Parks People Use formula Allocation Res/Hon-Res: 750 - 25% ASSESSMENT ALLOCATION INFON&TIO0 Cuud use comparison ------- _____-_ --------------- t Lighting Landscaping Total Non-Residential --------- ----- --- -'--- ------ Number of lots 274 Total FY 95/96 Proposed Assessments $186,000 $36 509 872,509 \| Percent of total Lots ].]00 Allocation to: None Non-Residential: Percent of Total 1'25 Non-Residential: Total &aomots 911 6,27 Residential Number of lots 7,742 Percent of total Lots 93.31% Residential: Percent of Total /.`5 Vunuot Residential: Total 6oumuto 5^4 882 Number of lots 281 Percent of total Lots 3.390 ASSESSMENT CALCULATION --------------- Land People o Typical Land Use Use Allocated Total Uuit Use 6amoomont Catagorioo --------------- Code -_- Cost ($) --------- Units Coot <|\ Factor Amount ($) LIGHTING --------- ------ _-___- Non-Residential Bank 24 186/000 9,409 } 59.31 Retail 10 186/000 9,409 4 79.08 Lite Nbo, ]l 186,000 9,400 5 08,85 Neighborhood CDtr. 15 186/000 9,409 6.5 128.51 Regional Cxtr. 16 186/000 9,409 6.5 128.51 Residential Single-Family l 186/000 9,409 l 19.77 Condo ] 186,000 9,409 l 19,77 Apartment 5 186,000 9,400 0.75 14.83 Plus Lighting 8aoeoamout LANDSCAPING L/3 Amomot ' ' &momut ($) Total ($) Non-Residential _____ ----- ---``- Bank 24 31,627 1,786 ] 36.33 59.31 95.64 Retail 19 21,627 1,786 6 72.66 79.08 151.74 Lite 0fn, ]l 21,627 1,786 12 145,32 98.85 244.17 Neighborhood . 15 21,637 1,786 l0 121.10 138.51 249,61 Regional xntr. 16 21,627 1,786 \O 363.30 128.51 491.81 Residential Single-Pamily l 64,882 32/688 11.98 4 7.92 19.77 27,69 Condo ] 64,882 32/688 ].98 } 5.94 19.77 25.71 Apartment 5 64,882 32,688 1.98 ] 5.94 14.83 30.77 EXHIBIT "A" (page 7) Fiscal Year 1994/95 AD 84 -2 ASSESSMENT SUMMARY Summary of Acreage Assessments Total Total Per Acre Total Zone Assessment Acres Assessment A P # Acres Assessment 7 51420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0 -061 -015 1.680 95.92 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0 -061 -025 1.160 66.23 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0- 061 -035 1.160 66.23 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0- 061 -045 1.160 66.23 7 51420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0 -061 -055 1.160 66.23 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0- 061 -065 1.130 64.52 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0 -061 -075 1.060 60.52 ? 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 - 0--061 -085 1.060 60.52 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0- 061-115 1.060 60.52 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0- 061 -145 1.170 66.80 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 51.1 - 0-061-155 2.130 121.62 .7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0- 062 -065 1.170 66.80 7 5,420.00 94.9; 57.10 511 - 0-062-075 1.270 72.51 7 5,420.00 94.9' 511 -0- 062 -165 2.750 157.02 7 5,420.00 94.9:3 57.10 511 -0- 062 -175 2.830 161.58 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511-0- 062 -215 2.940 167.86 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 - 0-062 -235 1.227 70.06 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0- 062 -245 3.072 175.40 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511-0- 062 -255 5.000 285.48 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0 -062 -265 0.547 31.23 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0- 062 -275 1.100 62.81 7 5,420.00 94.9? 57.10 511- 0--062 -285 1.080 61.66 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511-0- 062 -295 1.260 71.94 7 5,420.00 94.9,s 57.10 511- 0-062 -305 1.330 75.94 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0- 062 -315 1.150 65.66 7 5,420.00 94.9' 57.10 511-0-062 -345 3.080 175.86 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0- 062 -375 3.930 224.39 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0- 062 -385 2.020 115.33 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0 -070 -030 2.530 144.45 7 5,420.00 94.9, 57.10 511 - 0-070-040 5.180 * 295.76 7 5,420.00 94.9a 57.10 511 -0- 070 -450 3.300 188.42 7 5,420.00 94.9; 57.10 511 -0 -070 -485 2.550 145.60 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0- 070 -490 0.500 28.55 7 5,420.00 94.9? 57.10 511 -0- 070 -500 0.490 27.98 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0- 070 -510 0.490 27.98 7 5,420.00 94.9:3 57.10 511- 0.070 -520 0.520 29.69 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0- 070 -530 0.950 54.24 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 51:1- 0.070-540 0.710 40.54 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0- 070-555 1.670 95.35 ? 5,420.00 94.9? 57.10 '51:1 -0 -070 -565 0.860 49.10 7 5,420.00 94.9 , 57.10 511-0- 070 -575 0.339 19.36 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511-0- 070 -585 0.239 13.65 7 5,420.00 94.9,3 57.10 51:1 - 0•-070-595 0.239 13.65 5,420.00 94.cf 5 7,10 ill- 0°-0'0 -605 1'100 62.81 Page 5 & 6 omitted 22- May -95 Remarks EXHIBIT "A" (page 8) Fiscal Year 1994/95 AD 84 -2 ASSESSMENT SUMMARY Summary of Acreage Assessments Total Total Per Acre Total Zone Assessment Acres Assessment A P Acres Assessment 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0 -070 -615 0.800 45.68 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0 -070 -625 1.169 66.75 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0- 070 -635 0.610 34.83 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0 -070 -645 0.339 19.36 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0- 070 -655 0.530 30.26 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0 -070 -665 0.469 26.78 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0- 070 -675 0.469 26.78 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 - 0-070 -685 0.469 26.78 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0- 070 -695 0.469 26.78 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0 -070 -705 0.469 26.78 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0 -070 -715 0.480 27.41 7 5,420.00 94.9' 57.10 511 -0- 070 -780 0.839 47.90 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0- 151 -065 0.510 29.12 7 5,420.00 94.9; 57.10 511 -0 -°151 -075 0.180 * 10.28 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0 -151 -085 0.600 34.26 7 5,420.00 94.9 ?: 57.10 511 -0•- 151•-095 0.700 39.97 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511-0 - 151-105 0.580 33.12 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 - 0-151- 115 0.680 38.83 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0. 151-125 0.550 31.40 7 5,420.00 94.9. 57.10 511 -0- 151 -135 0.650 37.11 7 5,420.00 94.9' 511-0 -151 -145 0.200 11.42 5,420.00 94.9:? 57.10 511 -0- 151-155 0.550 31.40 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0-161 -025 0.412 23.52 5,420.00 94.9, 57.10 511 -0-161 -045 0.464 26.49 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0 -161 -055 0.324 18.50 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0-161 -065 0.292 16.67 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0 -161 -085 0.329 18.78 5,420.00 94.9' 57.10 511 -0- 161 -095 0.295 16.84 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0-161 -105 0.274 15.64 7 5,420.00 94.9,, 57.10 511 -0 -161 -11.5 0.261 14.90 7 5,420.00 94.9;1 57.10 511 -0 -161 -125 0.292 16.67 7 5,420.00 94.9.3 57.10 511 -0 -161 -135 0.534 30.49 7 5,420.00 94.9:3 57.10 511 -0- 161 -155 0.580 33.12 7 5,420.00 94.9; 57.10 711 - 0-161 -165 0.387 22.10 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0- 161 -175 0.287 16.39 7 5,420.00 94.9s 57.10 511 -0- -161 -185 0.287 16.39 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0 -- 161•-195 0.287 16.39 7 5,420.00 94.9 ) 57.10 511 -0- -161 -205 0.414 23.64 7 5,420.00 94.9.3 57.10 511 -0 -161 -215 0.492 28.09 7 5,420.00 94.9, 57.10 711 -0- 161 -225 0.440 25.12 7 5,420.00 94.9_i 57.10 511 -0-- 161 -255 1.240 70.80 7 5,420.00 94.9; 57.10 511- 0-162 -015 0.687 39.23 7 5,420.00 94.9 "> 57„10 511-0-162--W 0.704 40.20 Remarks 22- May -95 EXHIBIT "A" (page 9) 22- May -95 Fiscal Year 1994/95 AD 84 -2 ASSESSMENT SUMMARY Summary of Acreage Assessments Total Total Per Acre Total Zone Assessment Acres Assessment A P # Acres Assessment Remarks 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0 -162 -055 0.340 ---------------- 19.41 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0 -162 -065 0.530 30.26 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0- 162-075 0.330 18.84 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0 -162 -085 0.440 25.12 7 5,420.00 94.9'> 57.10 511-0 -162 -095 0„340 19.41 Zone "otal 94,927 5,420.00 9 650.00 49.21 13.21 513 -0 -060 -035 1.000 13.21 9 650.00 49.21 13.21 513 -0- 060 -075 11,780 155.59 9 650.00 49.21 13.21 513-0 -060 -085 0.000 Exempt 9 650.00 49.21 13.21 513 -0 -060 -095 3,860 50.98 9 650.00 49.21 13.21 513-0- 060 -125 1.020 13.47 9 Exempt -- 0 513 -0 -060 -135 0.000 Exempt 9 Exempt - 0 513 -0 -060 -145 0.000 Exempt 9 Exempt -- 0 513 -0 -060 -155 0..000 Exempt 9 650.00 49.21 13.21 513 -0 -060- 175 1360 24.57 9 650.00 49.21 13.21 513 -0- 060 -185 1.360 17.96 9 650.00 49.21 13.21 513 -0 -060 -245 4.980 65.77 9 650.00 49.21 13.21 513 -0- 060 -255 5.380 71.06 9 650.00 49.21 13.21 513 -0- 060 -265 16.080 ** 212.38 9 650.00 49.21 13.21 513 -0- 060 -275 0.889 * 11.74 9 650.00 49.21 13.21 513 - 11-060 -285 1.005 13.27 Zone + "btal 49.214 650.00 Smallest Parcel ** Largest Parcel EXHIBIT "B" AD 84 -2 Fund 23 Activity Description FY 1994/95 FY 1995/96 FY FY ---------------- - - - - -- Proposed 1992/93 1993,94 Budget Proj Actual Budget Notes: BEGINNING BALANCE 256,185 315,35'. 179;326 224,527 119,183 REVENUE 449,164 ASSESSMENTS 374,90 430,350 435,300 425,318 INTEREST 1,43 1,000 1,000 1,000 MISCELLANEOUS TRANSFERS IN 0 0 0 AVAILABLE FUNDS 705,349 692,34? 610,6'6 660,827 545,501 EXPENSES Personnel 16,727 19,361 19,007 * 20,000 * 20,000 0 & M 324,031 347,53 385,780 * 348,005 * 438,015 Capital Improvements 49,236 100,921 192,028 * 173,639 * 55,000 Less TOTAL EXPENSES 389,994 46',31-' 596,815 541,644 513,015 YEAR END BALANCE 315,355 224,51 13,861 119,183 32,486 LESS SET ASIDES: Reserved for Zone 2 Improvements (52,640) (6,220) (5,955) (12,175) Reserved for Zone 8 Improvements (20,4451 (34,890) 0 0 0 Reserved for Zone 9 Improvements 0 ) 0 0 Surplus Zone Maint. Assessments (8,113� (4,8061 (2,586) (431) Future Capital Improvements (55,000) YEAR END AVAILABLE FUNDS 234,157 189,63 2,835 55,642 19,880 Less Street Light Carryover Deducted from Future Lighting Assessment 14,984) Net Surolis 50,658 05/22/95 Exhibit 'C` Zone of Benefit Maintenance Cost Analysis FY 1995/96 22- May -95 Page 1 of 5 TwA1. [it is ties Amount of Landscaping Contract Utility Costs (SI Total Total Total Maintained Maint. -------------------- Maint. Zone - - - -- Lots - - - - -- Acres - - - -- [Sq. Ft.] ----- - - - - -- j Cost ($) ...------ - - - - -- Water -- - - - - -- E1?ctric _.___ _ Other . - - - - -- Cost ($) ------ - - - - -- Remarks -------------------------- 1 77 - -- 6,000 3,245.00 350 50 (' 31745 I 2 622 - -- 970,000 23,919.00 22,350 50 (' 46,419 3 265 - -- 3,000 1,557.48 243 0 1,800 I 4 129 - -- 5,640 3,089.64 700 2(1 (' 3,910 I i 5 217 - -- 91,920 19,094.40 5,600 60 0 25,054 i 6 22 - -- 500 270.00 250 ** 0 520 I ** Paid by Performance Nursury 7 - -- 95 10,000 4,800.00 1,500 °00 0 6,500 8 497 City 65,340 3,600.00 4,000 50 0 7,750 12 Months Maint. 200 : Home Acres 9 - -- 49 300.00 250 00 0 650 10 2,487 - -- 528,000 21,600.00 16,500 v0( 0 38,500 51,743 r Y Total 81,475.52 > "73 - 134,849 TwA1. [it is ties EXHIBIT "C"' %ou8 ' Activity " O 34,141 05Y22/95 Page 2 0,09 FY 1994/95 FY 1095/96 53/640 ___-- 52,64'1 FY yy Fy ------------ ZONE ]: Tract 2032: Buttercruak Entry ** ------------------------`----------- Proposed �95/96 Description 1091/92 1992/93 1893/94 Budget �n' Actual ^ 6auuounmot ZONE l: Tract 2851: Bumhi / Boowood / ____________________________________ Flood Control Channel ________________ Prior Year Carry Over O 92, 1426 1/009 Maintenance (1,259) _ ____________________________________ 2,32 1,405 846 846 _______________ Prior Year Carry Over 0 l,27) (1,819/ 1,944 (987) (2,194) ��- 1,800 Plus &uueammooto 6,773 6,185 9,776 -------- 4,131 4/131 5,930 5,939 Budgeted Expenditures 6/772 T,46') 7,957 ----------- 6,075 ---------- 3,144 ----------- 3,745 Laoo Actual Expenditures 5,498 9,27) 8,944 6/075 5,338 3/745 Zone l Balance l,275 1l,81^ <9D7` ------------ 0 ---------- (2,194) ----------- O ZONE 2: Tract 2065: E/S 9omnb Dill Rd, 0/8 T D Rd ** 8/S T D B6 Parkway *+ S/8 T O Rd Slopes +m Cbriutaio Barrett & Spring _____________________________________ _______________________________ Maintenance ________________ Prior Year Carry Over O (14,36v) 4/389 (9,207) (15,510) (7,469) Plus 6saooaNeota 32,419 50,500 111,671 0,882 43/883 53/888 53/888 Budgeted Expenditures Less Actual Expenditures Zone 2 Maint. Balance Improvements ----------------- Prior Year Carry Over Plus Assessments Total Improvement Assmnts to Date Less Actual S/S T. D. Rd Parkway _______ _____ _ ____ ______ 32,419 36,140 22,060 34,675 46,779 31,-75 37/579 34/675 ____ _____ ___ ______ 52,640 52,64i� 52,640 (9/265) 0 O 15,485 _______ ____ ______ ______ 52,648 52'641 52,640 6,20 _____ ________ 28,363 46,419 35/832 46/419 _______ ________ (9/530) 5/955 15,485 6,220 6,220 ------ ------- $10/lot 5/955 12,175 O roaou uou Slope O 34,141 Sunmyslope Debris Basin V --------- 0,09 %ouo 2 Improv. Balance ~=====================~~=====~==~~^~~~^~~=~~~~^=========~~======~======~== 53/640 ___-- 52,64'1 -__ ----------- (9,5301 6/320 _____ ----------- 5,955 ==== 13,176 60/108 ZONE ]: Tract 2032: Buttercruak Entry ** ------------------------`----------- Popparmill Parkway Maintenance '-`------- --------------------------- ________________ Prior Year Carry Over O 92, 1426 1/009 538 (1,259) Plus &ameoumeUta 2,978 2,32 1,405 846 846 2,059 3,059 Budgeted Expenditures 2,978 3,24' ----------- 2,841 1,855 �� I,384 ��- 1,800 Louu Actual Expenditures 2,052 ------- l,Dl� '----- .!,]O2 1,855 2,60 1,800 X000 3 NaiDt. Balance 926 -'------- -----'--- 0 ----- (1,259) ------- (0) EXHIBIT "C ": Zone Activity 1,452 1,55# 1,400 835 536 520 05/22/95 Page 3 83 1,106 835 FY 1994/95 520 FY 1995/96 675 FY FY FY ------------------ - - - - -- Proposed FY95/96 Description 1991/92 1992/93 1.993/94 Budget Proj Actual Budget Assessment ZONE 4: Tract 3274: Williams Ranch Rd Barrier ** N/S Parkways ** S/S Parkway 0 `721 942 (3,206) Maintenance 1,080 Plus Assessments 720 ------------------------------------------------- 3,087 10,581 10,581 ------------------------------ Prior Year Carry Over 0 2,44~ 7`4 8,901 8,125 4,342 - - - - -- 6,500 Plus Assessments 5,930 4,21; 12,11.8 0 0 0 0 Budgeted Expenditures 5,930 6,65 12,892 8,901 8,125 4,342 Less Actual Expenditures 3,485 5,88, 4,767 4,,095 3,783 3,910 Zone 4 Maint. Balance 2, 445 B :L'S - - - - - -- 4,,806 ---- - - - - -- 4,342 ----- - - - - -- 432 ZONE 5: Tracts 3019 & 3025: HIS T R Rd Parkways ** S/S Slopes ** W/S Peach Hill Parkway Maintenance ---------------------------------------- ------------------------------ Prior Year Carry Over 0 (14,481) 1,669 (8,993) (7,542) 7,115 Plus Assessments 24,355 40,73' 17,340 37,338 37,338 17,939 17,939 Budgeted Expenditures 24,355 26,251 - 19,009 ---- - - - - -- 28,345 ---- - - - - -- 29,796 ----- - - - - -- 25,054 Less Actual Expenditures 38,842 24,58 26,551 28,345 22,681 25,054 Zone 5 Maint. Balance (14,487b ,6h� X7,542 0 - - - - - -- 7,115 ----- - - - (o) ZONE 6: Tract 3306: West end of Inglewood (Glenhaven) - -------------------------------------------------- Maintenance ------------------------------ Prior Year Carry Over 0 b' 122 593 294 (229) Plus Assessments 1,452 6,118 242 242 749 749 Budgeted Expenditures 1,452 1,55# 1,400 835 536 520 Less Actual Expenditures ?77 83 1,106 835 765 520 Zone 6 Maint. Balance 675 794 - - - - - - - -- - ----- (229) - - - -- - ZONE 7: N/S of L A Ave E/O Gabbert (West America) Maintenance ------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------ Prior Year Carry Over 0 `721 942 (3,206) (3,279) 1,080 Plus Assessments 720 3,52 3,087 10,581 10,581 5,420 5,420 Budgeted Expenditures 720 4,24 - - -- ----- 4,029 - - - - -- 7,375 ---- - - - - -- ----- 7,302 - - - - -- 6,500 Less Actual Expenditures 0 3,30' 7 308 7,375 6,222 6,500 Zone 7 Maint. Balance '120 t?a: 3 'rq, _-- _ - - - -0- - - -- 1,080- -- - - - - -- 0- EXHIBIT "C": %o8o Activity 05/]U/�� 4 FY 1994/95 �� FY FY FY ----------------- Proposed yY95/96 Description 1991/92 1992/93 1993/94 Budget Pro' Actual Budget Assessment Z00O 8: Home Acres Buffer Area __________________________________________ Maintenance _ _ ______________________________________ ________________ Prior Year Carry Over O O 1/200 Plus 6somoomonto 1,200 --------- 1,300 6,550 6,550 Budgeted Expenditures 1,200 ----- 1,200 ------ 7,750 Less Actual Expenditures 1,200 O 7,750 Zone 8 Haiot. Balance ------- O ------ 1,200 ------ U Improvements _________________ Prior Year Carry Over / 20/445 34,800 34,890 (13/895) Plus &ouaoamoutm O ----- 20,445 -------'- 20,445 -----` 19,245 ------ 19,245 13,895 13,895 Total Improvement Aaumnto to Date V %O,W 40,890 54,135 ----- 54,135 ------ 0 Less Actual Expenditures 0 6/000 54/135 68,030 O Zone 8 Imyrov. Balance 0 20,44` - 34,890 ----------- O _____ (13,895) ----------- O ==== 20/445 ZONE q: Condor Drive / L A Ave DurbwuY ------------------------------------------`---------------` Naiutamuooa - ----------------------------------------------------------- ________________ Prior Year Carry Over 0 O O Plus &uoeummeoto O O 650 650 Budgeted Expenditures ------ 0 ----- O ------ 650 Less Actual Expenditures O O 650 Zone 9 Naiot. Balance ______ O _____ 0 ______ O Improvements _______________ Prior Year Carry Over O O O Plus 6aouaomenta 6,000 6,000 O O Total Improvement 6samots to Date ------- 6,000 ----- 6,000 ------ O Laaa Actual Expenditures 6/000 6,000 0 %oua 9 Improv. Balance ____ 0 _____ 0 ______ 0 ____ 650 EXHIBIT "C ": Zone Activity 05/22/95 Page 5 FY 1994/95 FY 1995/96 FY FY FY ------------------ - - - - -- Proposed FY95/96 Description 1991/92 1.992/93 1993/94 Budget Proj Actual Budget Assessment ZONE 10: Tierra Rejada Rd Parkways in PC -3 Maintenance ------------------------------ Prior Year Carry Over Plus Assessments Budgeted Expenditures Less Actual Expenditures Zone 10 Maint. Balance Improvements ----------------- - - - - -- Prior Year Carry Over Plus Assessments Total Improvement Assmnts to Date Less Actual Expenditures Zone 10 Improv. Balance 0 38,500 38,500 38,500 0 38,500 ---------------------------------------------------- TOTAL ZONE ACTIVITY SUMMARY FY 1995/96 Expenses Assessments Zone ------------------ Maint Improe, - -- - - - - -- Total ------------------------------------- ! Maint. Improv. Total 3,745 3,745 5,939 0 5,939 46,419 46,419 53,888 6,220 60,108 1,800 1.,800 3,059 0 3,059 4 3,910 3,91.0 O 0 0 25,054 25,054 17,939 0 17,939 h 520 520 749 0 749 l 6,500 6,1500 5,420 0 5,420 8 7,750 x,750 6,550 13,895 20,445 (4 650 1650 650 0 650 10 38,500 ------ ---- ------ .. 38,1500 _ - -- .._.. 38,500 ----- 0 38,500 Total 134.849 134,84'9 - - - - -- 132,694 ---- - - - - -- 20,115 ----- - - - - -- 152,809 EXHIBIT "D" (1 of 3) AD84 -2 Budget Department 143 Budget Summary SALARIES & BENEFITS MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS 623 Supplies 624 Postage 626 Printing 629 Special Supplies 637 Travel & Milage 638 Uniforms 641 Professional Services 642 Contract Services 648 Insurance 651 Equip Maint 652 Utilities 654 Vehicle Maint 655 Fuel 656 Lubricants 657 Small Tools 658 Maint & Repair 661 Equip Rental M &O Total 903 Capital Projects TOTAL FY 199495 FY 95/96 FY 92/93 FY 93/94 - - --------- Proposed Actual Actual Budget Proj Actual Budget 16,728 19,360 11,00 20,000 20,000 Remarks: See Pg 2 1,61 903 550 550 500 * 0 810 100 2,025 11 2,100 * 495 200 0 0 * 0 307 0 0 * 0 0 0 0* G 0 ( 0 0 i 3,267 5,190 ,,625 3,480 5,600 100,862 118,620 3 ,].26 116,746 159,152 0 0 0 0* i 0 0 0 0* 213,931 216,814 1,411,465 221,480 � 266,613 *�I 260 218 50 135 200 *� 2,109 756 1"64 189 250 *� J 0 0 0* 0 0 J 0 1,800 1,166 2,913 ,`50 x,700 1,800 324 806 1750 1,700 0 324,031 347,537 81,780 348,005 438,015 *'! See Pg 2 49,235 100,924 90,028 * 1 73,639 * 55,000 *' See Exibit E 389,994 467,821 9E,815 541,644 513,015 22- May -95 EXHIBIT "D" (2 of 3) AD84 -2 Budget Department 143 Budget Summary SALARIES & BENEFITS MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS 623 Supplies 624 Postage 626 Printing 629 Special Supplies 637 Travel & Milage 638 Uniforms 641 Professional Services 642 Contract Services 648 Insurance 651 Equip Maint 652 Utilities 654 Vehicle Maint 655 Fuel 656 Lubricants 657 Small Tools 658 Maint & Repair 661 Equip Rental M &O Total 903 Capital Projects TOTAL FY 1995/96 Budget pones citywide 20,000 1 C 500 G 2,100 r, II I f 5,600 I 8;,476 * 77,676 I 5: ,373 * 213,240 200 250 1 1,800 1,800 34,849 303,166 ') 55,000 14,849 '18,166 Total Remarks: 20,000 j 500 2,100 0 0 0 0 5,600 159,152 See Ex 'D' Pg. 3 p 0 266,613 I See Ex 'D' Pg. 3 200 250 0 1,800 1,800 0 438,015 55,000 See Exibit E 513,015 22- May -95 Exhibit D (3 of 3) AD84 -2: Citywide Landscape Maintenance Cost. Analysis Contract and Utility Cost Detail FY 1995/96 642 652 Amount of ------ - - - - -- -------------------------- Landscaping Contract Utility Costs ($) Maintained Maintenance -------------------- - - - - -- Map Description [Sq. Ft. Cost. i$) Water Electric Total A Campus Park Dr Ned: Princeton to Julliard 8,00( - 250 -- - - - - -- 165 -- - - - - -- 415 B Campus Park Dr Ned: Julliard to Marquette 19,71, 2)7:.30 580 170 750 C Campus Park Dr Ned: Marquette to Collins 19,71 2,271.30 580 170 750 Campus Park Prky (N /S): Channel to Collins 12,240 1,750.00 375 85 460 Collins Prky (W /S: Benwood to Campus Park Dr 3,60( 1,,:!50.00 375 85 460 D Moorpark Ave Prkwy (W /S): N10 High 40( ,00.00 60 10 70 E Poindexter Prky (S /S): @ Sierra 2,1L 600.00 300 0 300 F L. A. Ave Prkwy (N /S): Millard to Spring 4,751 1,200.00 330 0 330 G Spring Rd Prkwy (E /S): S/0 Peach Hill 15,820 1,000.00 2,275 0 2,275 S/W Corner of Peach Hill & Spring 2,401 800.00 300 0 300 H I Tierra Rejada Median N/0 Bridge 29,568 1,985.26 300 85 385 T.R Rd Prkwy (E /S): L.A. to Harvester 1,600 "40.00 350 85 435 J &K T. R. Rd Median: Spring to Peach Hill 76,03, 7,080.00 9,000 170 9,170 L T. R. Rd Ned: Peach Hill to Edison Easement 16,89h 3, "•20.00 500 85 585 Sub -Total Existing Areas '5,676 16,685 Areas ------------------------------------- Added This Year M,N & 0 T. R. Rd Ned: Peach Hill to Edison Easement 84,481 10,800.00 9,500 255 9,755 P & Q Princeton Medians & Parkways 2,500 1,000.00 300 85 385 Campus Park Dr Parkway (W /0 Penn) 3:001 1,200.00 330 85 415 R Peach Hill Rd Parkways 0.00 0 0 0 Sub -Total New Areas 1.3 , O00 10,555 Sub -Total All Areas 38,,176 27,240 Miscellaneous Contract ;rusts ?9,J00 Street Lights 186,000 GRAND TOTAL 77,hh76 2131240 EXHIBIT "E" AD84 -2 Budget Department 143 Budget Summary Capital Improvements No. Description Acc. Citywide -------------------------------------- Capital Improvements 0 a Prkwy: Poindexter @ Sierra - 000001 b Prkwy: W/S Spring S/0 Pch Hill - 000280 c Prkwy: E/S Spring S/0 Pch Hill d Prkwy: Peach Hill Rd (S /S & E /S) - 000353 e Prkwy: S/S L.A. E/0 Tierra Rejada - 000218 d Prkwy & Median: Princeton - 000221 g Prkwy: S/S Campus Park Dr - 000354 h Prkwy: W/S T. R. Rd S/0 L. A. Ave - 000226 i Prkwy: N/S Poindexter Sub -Total Citywide Improvements ------------------------------------------------------- Zone Capital Improvements -------------------------------------- 2 Prkwy: N/S T. R. @ Southampton 8 Home Acres Buffer Area - 000350 9 Prkwy: L. A. Ave @ Virgina Colony - 000344 Total Zone Capital Improvements GRAND TOTAL Capital Improvements FY 1994'95 Projected Budget Actual 35�! 35, FY 1995/96 Proposed Budget Remarks 5,000 18"154 0 Completed 22- Hay -95 20,000 c 20,000 Includes $7,315 from develope ;17,000 3 ',000 49,000 49,000 5,91u � »,u.la 30,000 131,89-- 93,13- 55,000 ----------------------------- Total Accumulated Improvement Assessments thru FY 1995/96 ----------------------------- 12,175 (6,470 0 0 54,1.3' 74,50( 0 6,000 6,000 0 60,13'3 80,50(; 0 192,028 173,634 55,000 ----------------------------- Total Accumulated Improvement Assessments thru FY 1995/96 ----------------------------- 12,175 (6,470 0 EXHIBIT 'F' Street Lighting Cost Analysis AD84 -2: FY 1995/96 FY 1994/95 Summary ---------------- - - - - -- 05/22/95 ----------------------------------------------- FY 1995/96 Estimate ---------------------- - - - - -- Last Year's Projected Cost (see above) 185,016 Contingency for rate adjustment ............. , 3,700 Estimated Anjual Cost for added lights 3,000 Sub -Total Plus Prior Year Lighting Assessment Shortfall Less Prior Year Lighting Assessment Surplus (4,9841 Total 186,732.04 Say... 186,000.00 Street Traffic Signal Date Lights Safety Lighting Total Remarks July 1994 15,268.66 0.00 15,268.66 Aug 1994 15,330.21 0.00 15,330.e1 Sept 1994 15,397.43 (x.00 15,39',43 Oct 1994 15,468.58 01.00 15,468.58 Nov 1994 15,565.15 (.00 15,565.15 Dec 1994 15, 477.90 0.00 15,47';.90 Six Month Costs 92,507.93 92,508 Six month cost .;7 Projected FY 1994/95 Street Light Costs 1.85,016 Projected Annual Cost FY 1994/95 Street Lighting Assessment 190,005) Revenue Shortfai Revenue Surplus 4,984 ----------------------------------------------- FY 1995/96 Estimate ---------------------- - - - - -- Last Year's Projected Cost (see above) 185,016 Contingency for rate adjustment ............. , 3,700 Estimated Anjual Cost for added lights 3,000 Sub -Total Plus Prior Year Lighting Assessment Shortfall Less Prior Year Lighting Assessment Surplus (4,9841 Total 186,732.04 Say... 186,000.00 zllz� v PRELIMINARY ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF MOORPARK LIGHTING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. AD -84 -2 LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 Prepared By DWIGHT FRENCH & ASSOCIATES, INC. 1470 S. Valley Vista Drive Suite 29( Diamond Bar, CA 91761-) March 1.99 =) G -Z 00,918 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section 1 Authority for Report Section 2 Description of Improvements to be Maintained Section 3 Assessment Roll Section 4 Method of Assessment Section 5 Estimate of ,,'ost Appendix "A" Street Lighting hcrmula - Table 1 Appendix "B" Landscape F.--nuii - Table 2 Appendix "C" Assessment Summary - Table 3 Appendix "D" Budget Estimate Appendix "E" Boundary Mai Appendix "F" Assessment Roll Appendix "G" Resolutions Appendix "H" Rebate Procz::ure G-z Page 1 1 4 00219 j,\ i am G -1� CITY OF MOORPARK Engineer's Report Parks Maintenance Assessment District No. AD -84 -2 Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 For Fiscal Year 1995 -1996 SECTION 1 AUTHORITY FOR REPORT This report is prepared pursuant tc_ City Council action taken at their regular meeting of January 4, 1995 to extend this District for the fiscal year commencing Jule 1, 1995 and ending June 30, 1996 in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, "Landscaping Act of 197211, being i>art 2 of Division 1_5 of the California Streets and Highways :'od�, The District will provide electrictil energy for public lighting facilities and for operation and maintenance of public lighting within the City. In addition, the District will provide for installation and /or maintenance of public Landscaping within the public right -of -way. 0 SECTION 2 DESCRIPTION OF THE IMPROVEMENTS TO BE MAINTAINED This report covers the period of �_uly 1, 1995 through June 30, 1996. An-updated report is prepared each year to reflect updated annual costs and changes in parceli;:atior_ The City of Moorpark Lighting Maintenance District is proposed to create a new zone of benefit for tie maintenance of the parkway landscaping on Tierra Rejda Road within PC -3 which will be designated as Zone 10. The District is also proposed to adjust the boundary of Zone 1 to include certin lots within Tract 285` which had in the past omitted in error. The District is alo proposed to adjust the benefit formula for landscaping and /or for lighting. The assessments shown in apppendices A, B and C are based on the current formulas. These assesments will be changed upon fiirt.her directions by the City Council. The improvements to be maintained in this District include all City -owned and Southern California Edison (S.C.E.) -owned street lights as well as all medians an(j street trees within public rights -of -way within the boundaries )f the City. it 1 0 0?20 Lighting maintenance shall include, but is not limited to, energy costs, removal, repair, replacement or relocation of light standards, poles, bulbs, fixtures and all appurtenances. Servicing of S.C.E. owned lights as defined in Section 22538 of the Streets and Highways Code shall be furnished by the Southern California Edison Company or its successors, or this servicing shall be as authorized by the Public Utilities Commission, State of California. Maintenance of City -owned :Lighting improvements shall be furnished by the City. Landscape maintenance shall include, but is not limited to, watering, fertilizing, mowing, weed control, shrubbery, tree removal and pruning, removal and replacement of dead growth, maintenance of irrigation facilities and other necessary work. In addition, the cost to maintain improved areas within an easement will be borne by owners within r.hat. project. These easement areas are: 1. Tract No. 2851 Maintenance costs associated with landscaping in the Ventura County Flood Control Easement and portions of the interior tract entry areas. The obligation upon these 77 lots is pursuant to a condition of development. 2. Tract No. 2865 Cost for maintenance of specific landscape areas within the tract, including landscaping at Christian Barrett & Spring Roads; Tierra Rejada landscaping, and Peach Hill Road landscaping on east side between Christian Barrett land Tierra Rejada Roads, and the entry monument sign at Christian Barret and Spring Road. The obligation upon these 622 lots within this tract is pursuant to a condition of development 3. Tract No. 3032 Maintenance costs associated with landscaping an entry monument at Buttercreek Road and Los Angeles Avenue. This cost to be spread to the 265 lots within the tract. 4. Tract No. 3274 Maintenance costs associated with landscape areas along Williams Ranch Road parkway adjacent to Peach Hill drain channel and Edison entries within PC -3. This cost will be borne by the 129 lots within the tract. K C', - 4 00221 7 5. Tract Nos. 3019, 3525 it Maintenance costs associated with landscaping the Tierra Rejada Road slope and parkway areas and parkway on the west side of Peach Hill Road between Williams Ranch and Tierra Rejada Roads within Tract Nos. 3 019 and 3525. The cost is to be spread to t7 he 217 lots within the tracts. 6. Tract 3306 Cost for landscape areas within Tract 3306 at the westerly terminus of Inglewood Street. The cost is to be spread to the 22 lots within the tract. 7. Los Angeles Avenue Parkway Maintenance costs associated with landscaping the parkway on the north side of Los ,, Angeles Avenue between Gabbert Road and Shasta Avenue will be borne by all industrial lots northerly of Los t�ngeles Avenue, southerly of Poindexter Avenue, easterly of Gabbert Road, and westerly of Shasta Avenue. 8. West village Buffer Area Improvement and maintenance costs associated with the buffer area within Tracts 4340, 4341, 4342, the commercial and multi - family areas bounded by Tierra Rejada to the east, Mountain Trail to the South, Countryhill Road to the west -, Tract 4342 to the north and Home Acres. The costs are to be split 50 -50 between the area within the City (Tracts 4340, 4341, 4342 and multi- family areas' and the Home Acres. 9. Condor Drive Industrial Park Improvement and maintenance costs associated with the parkway located at the northwest corner of Los Angeles Avenue and Virginia Colony Place will be borne by the developed parcels within -lie Industrial Park. 10. Tierra Rejada Road Parkway within PC -3 Maintenance costs associated with landscaping the parkway along Tierra Rejada Road wi -hin PC -3 will be borne by the developed parcels within the boundary as shown on the boundary map. Plans and specifications for the irrigation, landscaping and lighting of streets, parks and easements, and other authorized improvements within the City are )n file in the Department of Public Works. The lighting locat,..ons and specifications for 3 L1- 5 002 -22 c, -6 Edison -owned lights are on file with the Southern California Edison Company. Reference is hereby made to said plans and specifications for the exact location and nature of the landscape and lighting improvements. Said plans and specifications by reference are hereby made a part of this report, SECTION 3 ASSESSMENT ROLL All parcels of real property affected are listed on the "Assessment Roll ", Exhibit "A," which will be on file in City Hall with the City Clerk, and is made a part hereof by reference. These parcels are more particularly described in maps prepared in accordance with Section 327 of the Revenue and Taxation Code which are on file in the office of the Ventura County Assessor in the County Government Center Administration Building, 800 3. Victoria Avenue, Ventura, California and which are also made i part hereof by reference. SECTION 4 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT The Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, in Section 22573, states that "The net amount to be assessed upon the lands within an assessment district may be which fairly distributes th e or parcels in proportion to by each such lot or parcel Lighting apportioned by any formula or method new amount among all assessable lots the estimated benefits to be received from the improvements." The primary benefits of street lighting are for the convenience, safety and protection of people and the security or protection of property, property improvements and goods. The intensity or degree of illumination provided can have a bearing on both. The single family home - Level 1 has been selected as the base unit for the spread of assessments. By definition, the single family home - Level 1 is a single family home located on a street that has existing street lights. A factor of 1.00 has been assigned to the base unit, which is composed of bene "it factors which correspond to the following types of benefit: People Use - People related be :aef'its 0.50 Security Benefit - Property prc)t.ection 0.25 Intensity - Degree of illumina: -on 0.25 1.00 4 0 k 00223 Parcels in other land use categories were then rated by comparison with the basic unit. (See Table 1.) People Use - People related ben,�fits 1. Reduction in night -i uident:s and attendant human misery. 2. Reduced vulnerability to criminal assault during hours of darkness. 3. Promotion of business operations during evening hours. 4. Increased safety an r_)ads and highways. Security Benefit - Property Pratec:tion 1. Reduction in vandalia:n and other criminal acts, and damage to improvement: 2. Reduction in burglar.e3 Intensity Intensity or degree of illumination provided on streets varies with type of street, date of installation and the use of the property adjacent thereto. - Landscaping The landscaping element of the spread formula recognizes that all properties, within the City benefit from the maintenance of the landscaping within public rights -cf -way and easements. These benefits include aesthetic enjoyment, creation of a placement living and working environment, an increase in general property values, improved safety resulting from a regular tree trimming program and improved street sweeping capabilities resulting from trimming trees which may otherwise __nterface with street sweeping operations. Because of the general benefit received, the cost is spread equally along each parcel in the City. This amount is shown in the appendix. Rebate The City Council approved a rebate procedure for disadvantaged property owners. The procedure sha'1 be followed as described in Appendix "H." 1 5 G -7 00224 IOC E T S C ION 5 COST ESTIMATE C4 The City staff recommendation for the District budget is shown in Appendix "D" of this report. The costs attributed to landscaping and the costs attributed to lighting will be separately appointed, according to the formula, and added together to constitute -.he total assessment for each parcel. Conclusion In conclusion, it is our opinion that the assessments within Lighting Maintenance Assessment District No. AD -84 -2 are apportioned by a formula that fairly distributes the net cost in accordance with the benefits that are received. \rpt \050ad842.945 6 000-25 J� APPENDICES it 'I.I � -I 00 226 APPENDIX "A" CITY OF MOORPARK Lighting Maintenance Assessment District AD -84 -2 Lighting and Landscape Act of 1972 Table 1 Street Lighting Formula Use Lighting Code Description 0 Residential Vacant 1 Single Family - 0.00 Level 1 2 Mobile Home 3 Condo (Per Unit) 4 Residential Income 0.00 (2 -4 Units) 0.00 (Per Unit) 5 Apartments (5 +) 0.25 Per Unit 6 Single Family - 0.25 Level 2 9 Mobile Home & 0.20 Trailer Park 0.50 (Per Space) 10 Commercial Vacant 0.50 Land 11 Retail Stores, 0.00 Single Story 0.25 (Per Parcel) 12 Store & Office 1.00 Combination 15 Shopping Centers 1.00 (Neighborhood) 16 Shopping Centers 1.50 (Regional) 17 Office Building 1.50 (1 Story) 18 Office Building 1.00 (Multi- Story) 2.00 (Per Parcel) 19 Retail Stores 2.00 (Multi- Story) 1.00 (Per Parcel) People Lighting Total Use Intensity Security Units 0.00 0.0! ": 0.25 0.25 0.50 0.2 0.25 1.00 0.00 0.0c 0.00 0.00 0.50 0 2` 0.25 1.00 0.50 0.2` 0.25 1.00 0.50 0.0` 0.20 0.75 0.50 0.0` 0.20 0.75 0.50 0.01 0.20 0.75 0.00 0.0( 0.25 0.25 2.00 1 0: 1.00 4.00 2.00 1.0( 1.00 4.00 4.00 1.0( 1.50 6.50 4.00 :L. O( 1.50 6.50 1.00 1.0( 1.00 3.00 2.00 1.0( 1.00 4.00 2.00 1.0 1.00 4.00 A -1 �s Annual Assessment $ 4.94 $ 19.77 $ 0.00 $ 19.77 $ 19.77 $ 14.83 $ 14.83 $ 14.83 $ 4.94 $ 79.07 $ 79.07 $128.49 $128.49 $ 59.30 $ 79.07 $ 79.07 00227 0 n Ose People :ode Description Use 21 Restaurants & 3.00 Cocktail Lounges 24 Banks, Savings & 1.00 Loans 25 Service Stations 2.00 26 Auto Sales, Repair 2.00 Storage, Rental 30 Industrial land 0.00 Vacant 31 Light Manufacturing 3.00 32 Warehousing 2.00 33 Industrial Condos, 2.00 Co -Ops, PUD's 38 Mineral Processing 1.00 44 Truck Crops 0.50 46 Pasture (Permanent) 0.50 48 Poultry 0.50 49 Flowers, Seed Products 0.50 51 Orchards 0.50 3 Field Crops, Dry 0.50 4 Pasture of Graze, Dry 0.50 55 Feed Lots 0.50 57 Tree Farms 0.50 61 Theater 3.00 69 Parks 0.00 70 Institutional Vacant 1 0.00 71 Churches, Convent Rectory 0.00 72 Schools 0.00 73 Colleges 0.00 78 Public Buildings, 0.00 Museums, Firehouses, Etc. 79 Flood Control 0.00 80 Misc. Vacant Lots 0.00 81 Utility Water Company 0.00 83 Petroleum & Gas 1.00 86 Water Rights, Pumps 0.00 88 Highways & Streets 0.00 91 Utility - Edison 0.00 0 Lighting Total Annual Intensity Security Units Assessment C0 5.00 $ 98.84 1. C0 3.00 $ 59.30 00 4.00 $ 79.07 1. L.00 4.00 $ 79.07 C.; - 5 0.25 $ 4.94 1.0)) L.00 5.00 $ 98.84 L.00 4 .00 $ 79.07 1,50 5.00 $ 98.84 1.00 L.00 3.00 $ 59.30 0.25 0.25 1.00 $ 19.77 0.21) 3.,25 1.00 $ 19.77 0.25 0.12 1.00 $ 19.77 0.25 0.25 1.00 $ 19.77 0.25 0.25 1.00 $ 19.77 0.. 5 0.25 1.00 $ 19.77 0.25 0.25 1.00 $ 19.77 0.25 0.25 1.00 $ 19.77 0.25 0.25 1.00 $ 19.77 .40 1.00 5.00 $ 98.84 C . _ 0 0.10 0.00 $ 0.00 0. 0.25 0.25 $ 4.94 O.CO 0.25 0.25 $ 4.94 0.4'0 0.00 0.00 $ 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $ 0.00 0 0.x30 0.00 $ 0.00 O.(_O 0.00 0.00 $ 0.00 O.CO 0..25 0.25 $ 4.94 O.CO 0.00 0.00 $ 0.00 0.c0 0.50 2.00 $ 39.54 O.CO 0.00 0.00 $ 0.00 0 C0 0.)0 0.00 $ 0.00 C ,D .')0 0.00 $ 0.00 A -2 00228 Use Code Description 92 Telephone 93 S.P.R.R. 94 Undedicated Community Areas (Condos) 95 State Property 96 County Property 97 City Property 99 Exempt People Lighting Total Use Intensity Security Units 0.00 ).00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ) 01 0, 0(1 0.00 (Z Annual ' \ Assessment $ 0.00 $ 0.00 0.00 x).00 0.00 0.00 $ 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $ 0.00 0.00 ).00 0.00 0.00 $ 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $ 0.00 0.00 ).V 0 00 0.00 $ 0.00 A -3 0029 15 J i f 0 APPENDIX "B" CITY OF MOORPARK Lighting Maintenance Assessment District No. AD -84 -2 Lighting and Landscape Act of 1972 Landscape Formula The landscaping element of the spread. formula is calculated in accordance with the method describei as follows: Total Annual Cost = $L0.4? per parcel Notes: 1. In addition to the above landscape charge, 77 lots within Tract No. 2851 are assessed an additional landscape cost for a Ventura County Flood Control Easement and portions of the interior tract entry areas. The additional cost per lot is $77.13. The obligation upon these lots is pursuant to a condition o1L development. 2. In addition to the above landscape charge, 622 lots within Tract 2865 are assessed an additional landscape charge for the maintenance of parkways, Tierra Rejada Road slope and street scape areas, and the monument sign within the tract. The additional cost per lot is $96.64. The obligation upon these lots is pursuant to a condition -of development. 3. In addition to the above landscape charge, 265 lots within Tract No. 3032 are assessed an additional landscape charge for the maintenance of an entry monument at Buttercreek Road anc Los Angeles Avenue. The additional cost per 1c: >t i:> $11.54.. 4. In addition to the above landscape charge, 129 lots within Tract No. 3274 are assessed an additional landscape charge for the landscape for the maintenance of parkway areas along Williams Ranch Road and Edison entries within PC -3. 'The additional cost per lot is $0. The obligation upon these ct.s is pursuant to a condition of development. • B -1 G. 13 00 -' (, C; -,( k ��1 5. In addition to the above landscape charge, 217 lots "h within Tract Nos. 3019 and 3525 are assessed an additional landscaping charge for maintenance of Tierra Rejada Road slope and parkways and the parkway on the west side of Peach Hill Road between Williams Ranch and Tierra Rejada Roads. The additional cost per lot is $82.67. The obligation upcn these lots is pursuant to a condition of development 6. In addition to the above landscape charge, 22 lots within Tract No. 3306 are assessed an additional landscape charge for the maintenance of landscape area at the westerly terminus of Inglewood Street. The additional cost per lot. is $34.05. The obligation upon these lots is pursuant to a conditi<)r of development. 7. In addition to the above landscape charge, 93 lots northerly of Los Angeles Avenue southerly of Poindexter Avenue, between Gabbert and Shasta Avenues are assessed an additional landscaping charge for maintenance of the northside of Los Angeles Avenue Parkway. The additional cost is $57.10 per acre 8. In addition to the above landscape charge, 497 lots within Tract Nos. 4340, 4341 and 4342 are assessed an additional $20.57 per lot., the and multi - family parcels 0 are assessed an additi. +anal $0 per parcel, for the improvement and maintenance of West Village Buffer Area. The Home Acres, not to oe levied for any City -wide lighting and landscape czarges, are to be assessed for $51.11 per lot for the ,_ mprovement and maintenance of West Village Buffer Area 9. In addition to the above landscape charge, 11 lots within the Industrial Park on Condor Drive are assessed an additional landscape charge for the improvements and maintenance of the parkway located at the northwest corner of Los Angeles Avenue and Virginia Colony Place. The additional cost i.s $13.21 per acre. -7 iLo 10. In addition to the a.00ve landscape charge, equivalent residential lots within the boundary of the Tierra Rejada Road parkway PC -3 maintenance area are assessed an additional landscape c:;harge of !: - per lot. I G AI B -2 00231 APPENDIX "C" CITY OF MOORPARK 0 023?. Lighting Maintenance Assessment District AD -84 -,2 Lighting and Landscape Act Of 1972 Table 3 Assessment Summary Use Landscape Lighting Total Code Description Assessment. Assessment Assessment 0 Residential $10.43 7 4.94 $ 15.37 Vacant 1 Single Family - Level 1 10.43 9.77 30.20 2 Mobile Home 0.00 0.00 0.00 3 Condo 10.43 :_9.77 30.20 4 Residential Income (2 -4 Units 10.43 X9.77 30.20 5 Apartments (5 +) 10.43 4.83 25.26 6 Single Family - Level 2 10.43 X4.83 25.26 9 Mobile Home and 10.43 '!4.83 25.26 Trailer park 10 Commercial Vacant 10.43 4.94 15.37 Land 11 Retail Stores, 10.43 79.07 89.50 - Single Story 12 Store & Office 10.43 79.07 89.50 Combination 15 Shopping Centers 10.43 1.28.49 138.92 (Neighborhood) 16 Shopping Centers 10.43 128.49 138.92 (Regional) 17 Office Building 10.43 59.30 69.73 (1- Story) 18 Office Building 10.43 79.07 89.50 (Multi - Story) 19 Retail Stores 10.43 79.07 89.50 (Multi- Story) 21 Restaurants & 10.43 ' ?8.84 109.27 Cocktail Lounges 24 Banks, Savings 10.43 59.30 69.73 Loans 25 Service Stations 10.43 79.07 89.50 26 Auto Sales, Repair 10.43 79.07 89.50 Storage, Rental • C -1 0 023?. Use Landscape Lighting Total Code Description Assessment_ Assessment Assessment 30 Industrial Land 10.43 4.94 15.37 Vacant 31 Light Manufacturing 10.43 98.84 109.27 32 Warehousing 10.43 '19.07 89.50 33 Industrial Condos, Co -Ops, PUD's 10.43 98.84 109.27 38 Mineral Processing 10.43 59.30 69.73 44 Truck Crops 10.43 19.77 30.20 46 Pasture (Permanent) 10.43 19.77 30.20 48 Poultry 10.43 L9.77 30.20 49 Flowers, Seed 10.43 L9.77 30.20 Production 51 Orchards 10.43 L9.77 30.20 53 Field Crops, Dry 10.43 19.77 30.20 54 Pasture of Graze, 1.0.43 19.77 30.20 Dry 55 Feed Lots 10.43 L9.77 30.20 57 Tree Farms 10.43 19.77 30.20 61 Theater 10.43 98.84 109.27 69 Parks 0.0C 0.00 0.00 70 Institutional 10.43 4.94 15.37 Vacant Land 71 Churches, Convent, 10.43 4.94 15.37 Rectory 72 Schools 0.0c 0.00 0.00 73 Colleges 0.0c 0.00 0.00 78 Public Buildings, Museums, Firehouses, Etc. 0.00 0.00 0.00 79 Flood Control 0.00 0.00 0.00 80 Misc. Vacant Land 10.43 4.94 15.37 81 Utility Water Co. 0.00 0.00 0.00 83 Petroleum & Gas 10.43 39.54 49.97 86 Water Rights, Pumps 0.00 0.00 0.00 88 Highways & Streets 0.00 0.00 0.00 91 Utility - Edison 0.00 0.00 0.00 92 Telephone 0.00 0.00 0.00 93 S.P.R.R. 0.00 0.00 0.00 94 Undedicated Community Areas (Condos) 0.00 0.00 0.00 95 State Property 0.00 0.00 0.00 96 County Property 0.00 0.00 0.00 97 City Property 0.00 0.00 0.00 99 Exempt 0.00 0.00 0.00 Actual assessment amounts may vary due to discrepancies between use codes and actual property uses. C-2 4 00933 9 41, APPENDIX "D" CITY OF MOORPARK LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT AD -84 -2 BUDGET ESTIMATE FY 1.995 -96 ZONES OF BENEFIT 1. Tract No. 2851 Interior Parkway & Flood Control Channel 5,939.00 2. Tract No. 2865 Pacifica & Pardee 60,108.00 3. Tract No. 3032 Buttercreek & Peppermill 3,059.00 4. Tract No. 3274 Williams Ranch Road 0.00 5. Tract No. 3019, 3025 Warmington 17,939.00 6. Tract No. 3306 Glenhaven (Inglewood) 749.00 7. Los Ancreles Avenue North Side Parkway 5,420.00 8. West Villacre Buffer Area 20,445.00 9. Condor Parkway 650.00 10. Tierra Reiada Rd Parkway in P,v -3 38,500.00 D -1. SUBTOTAL $152,809.00 00234 BUDGET ESTIMATE FY 1995 -96 Total Annual Expenses Less Zone Maintenance Expenes Less Capital Improvements Total City -Wide Maintenance Less Prior Year Surplus *Total City Wide Assessment Total Zone Assessment Total Assessment *Street Lighting Landscape Total $ 136,000.00 36.509.00 D- 1 $ 513,015.00 (134,849.00) (55,000.00) $ 323,166.00 (50,658.00) $ 272,509.00 152,809.00 $ 425,318.00 00235 r APPENDIX "E" BOUNDARY MAPS is 1 1 \q 002363 r - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ♦1 - - - - - - - i-- - -1--- ------------+--- See attached pages for Zones 1-9 as shown on map. MOORPARK �MOORPh K' �RK VALLEY FR guy t L EL v '7Y o....00 S 1"samm ffffr ANGELES 41 4 IVORPARK Boundary map, City of Moorpark Lighting and M�RlqR Maintenance Assessment District No. AD-84-2 Boundary -4, O ZONE 1 � TRACT 2BS1 N o (�_If V OW r a 0 a \ » w n 4s Z76& 34 \ +&4 w 1} t Q 2 f./76C. I.OId[. 42 47 76 43 46 47 40 00000 132 �,ee,� ©0000 Q 1 �� ®oo ®o c �7 C 19 \ 11 it .70 y \ O 29 020 131 e 4 0 0 n 14 © n 72 O 7 n » V o ,W K 47 i/ O 70 1 41 fj 11 � u � m 6O u n o ®09 0 � s Op so W. m 60 59 JN A 36 '3 53 0 ' BAMBI } c COURT. r '0 I L V OW r a PARK ertaws +wew.• $ o�rvE ® ® ®C Parkway Maintained by Zone Assessment �I 4s M 34 73 K A u 40 42 47 44 43 46 47 40 00000 ©0000 �� ®oo ®o PARK ertaws +wew.• $ o�rvE ® ® ®C Parkway Maintained by Zone Assessment �I ZoNIL 2 - -T 2gt5 N ® ®�® Parkway Maintained by Zone Assessment a t 00239 • Zpt")E 3= T3032 M WEE Parkway Maintained by Zone Assessment Oo�4c? Zota e- (.0 = T 330 I®®®m. Parkway Maintained by Zone Assessment 'k , n 00243 GAB E R �T 0 AVE. COMMERCE AVE MAUREEN LN. rg c-> ATLANTIS _LVE fA m j D H CR. G OLDIVIAN AVE, C AZUKO ra HA r"AVE. SHASTA 7,ATA 6 }z1v \i I \ )� § eke ff- 4 Y RD C%l C) '0 4-) 04 \fir L_ J 6 C� -31 APPENDIX '" F" Appendix "F ", the Assessment Roll, shows the assessment upon each lot or parcel (approximately 8387 parcels) within this District and is on file in the Office of the Cty Clerk and County Assessor. The Ventura County Assessor's office no longer lists public utility easements on the Assessor's Roll. APPENDIX "G" RESOLUTIONS e7 00249 i IM 1 `► APPENDIX R" REBATE PROCEDURE 1) 9 0025o JOINT NOTICE OF A PUBLIC MEETING AND A PUBLIC HEARING f' PUBLIC NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Moorpark, California, on A'1 5, 1995, adopted Resolution No. 95 -1113 fixing the date and time of a public meeting to be held on the 15th day of May 199 at the hour of 700 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Moorpark City Hall, located at 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark. 1&e purpose of said public meeting is to allow the ppublic an opportunity to meet with City staff to uestion and discuss the annual assessments for the "MOORPARK LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. AD- 84-2" for the fiscal year commencing on July 1, 1995 and ending on June 30, 1996, which would provide for the funishino of power for and the usual maintenance and servicing of street lights and the landscape maintenance of public rights -0f - -way within the said City, and to question and discuss the proposed increases in said assessments over those levied for said District in FY 1994/95. PUBLIC NOTICE IS ALSO HEREBY GIVEN that said Resolution No 95 -1113 also fixed the date and time of a public hearing of the Moorpark City Council to be held on the 7th day of June, 1995, at.the hour of 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Moorpark City Hall, located at 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark. The purpose of said blic hearing is to consider making certain charges in, and to order the annual assessments for the "MOORPARIC LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. AD -84 -2" for the fiscal year commencing on July 1, 1995, and ending on June 30, 1996, which would provide for the furnishing of power for and the usual maintenance and servicing of street lights and the landscape maintenance of public rigbts -of -way within the said City. A copy of Resolution No. 95 -1113 which is boned as follows: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF' MOORPARK, CALIFbRNIA, APPROVING THE ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR, AND DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO MAKE CERTAIN CHANGES AND TO ORDER THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS FOR THE *MOORPARK LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. AD -84 -2" FOR THE FISCAL YEAR COMMENCING JULY 1, 1995, AND ENDING JUNE 30, 1996 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972, AND FIXING THE TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC MEETING TO DISCUSS AND A PUBLIC HEARING TO RECEIVE 013JECTIONS THERETO," is on file with the City Clerk and open to inspection. A summary of said Resolution is summarized as follows: 1. That the Engineer's Report prepared for yssessment Distnct No. AD84 -2 for FY 1995196 is approved. 2. That said Engineer's Report may be further nodified of changed, pursuant to applicable State law. 3. That the amount of the assessments for assessment District No. AD84 -2 for FY 1995/96 are proposed to increase from the amount of the assessments levied for said district in FY 1994/95. 4. That it is the intention of the City Council a) to make certain changes to Assessment District No. AD 84 -2, including the benefit formulas,- b) to order the extension of the annual assessment for said district for FY 1995/96; and, c) to levy and collect assessments for certain improvements described herein. Said district consists of a single city -wide zone to provide electric current or energy for public lighting within the City, to provide for installation or maintenance of landscaping and the construction or maintenance of curb, gutter, or sidewalk structures and facilities, to install or construct facilities, which are appurtenant to any of the foregoing, for the maintenance or servicing or both, of any of the forgoing and to provide incidental expenses in connection therewith. Said district also includes assessments for the improvement and maintenance of the above described landscaping and related improvements in a number of zones of benefit. S. That said lighting and landscaping maintenance assessment district includes the lighting and landscaping sites with all improvements located therein, described by and included within Assessment District No. AD 84 -2. 6. That the foregoing described work is to be located within Assessment District No. AD 84 -2, the boundary of which is described on a map on file in the City Clerk's office.. 7. That said proposed maintenance and impr wement is of benefit to, and expense for which are chargeable upon, the district. 8. That a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable parcels within said District, is set forth in a copy of the afore mentioned Engineer's Report on file with the City Clerk and open to inspection. 9. That the existing assessments, the proposed assessments and the proposed increases to the assessment amounts are set forth in Exhibit 'A' attached hereto and made a part hereof 10. That a public meeting shall be convened on May, 15. 1995, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at the Moorpark City Hall to allow the public an oppppoortunityy to meet with City staff to question and discuss the proposed annual assessments for Assessment District No AD 84-2 f,r F '," 19'15/96, and the proposed increases to said assessments over those levied in FY 1994/95. 11. That a public hearing of the Moorpark City Council shall be held on June 7, 1995, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at the Moorpark City Hall to consider riaking, certain changes in, and to order the annual assessments for Assessment District No. AD84 -2 for FY 1995/96 12. That this Joint Notice of Public Meeting and Public Heanng is given, in order that any persons having any objections to the work or extent of the assessment district may appear and show cause why said work should not be done or carried out or why said district should not be extended for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 1995, and ending June 30, 1996. Protests must be in writing and must be filed by the property owner with the City Clerk prior to the conclusion of the hearing. Protests may be mailed to the City Clerk, City of Moorpark, 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, CA 93021. Protest shall state all grounds for the ob'ection and shaIl contain a descri ption sufficient to identify the property being assessed. A majority protest will cause a assessment increase to be abandoned. For additional 'information about these proceedings or assessments contact Ken Gilbert at (805) 529 -6864, Ext. 256. 13. That all the work proposed shall be done in accordance with the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. 14. That the City Clerk shall cause notice of said public meeting and public hearing to be given by causing this summary of the Resolution of Intention to be published and mailed in the manner required by part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code and Section 54954.6 of the Government Code of the State of California. 15. That the City Clerk shall certify tc the adopti:rn of this resolution. ATTEST: q °C�ljL�rC" Paull j(wrason r., ayor THIS NOTICE IS GIVEN pursuant to the provisions of the Landsca in and Lighting Act of 1972, Section 22500 et. sec, of the Streets and Highway Code of the State of California, and is dated thT 6th day of April, 1995. hxlublt A AD 84-2 Stm mare of Assessments A. City Wide Assessments Pro xis.. Zone Descri lion p Proposed Use �- FY 1994/95 f Y 199 5/96 Increase Code Description Assmnt M %ssmnt (Decrease) 0 Residential Vacant t7.87 4.94 (12.93 1 Single Family - Level l 33.01 27.71 (5.31 2 Mobil Home 0.00 0.00 0.00 3 Condo 33.01 25.72 (7.29) 4 Residential Income 2-4 units 33.01 25.72 7.29 5 Apartments (5 +) 27.96 20.78 7.18 6 Single Family - Level 2 27.96 22.77 5.20 9 Mt bil Home & Trailer Park 27.96 20.78 7.18 10 Commercial Vacant 17.87 4.94 (12.93 11 Retail Store single story 93.59 115.40 21.81 12 Store & Office Combination 93.59 115.40 21.81 15 Shopping Centers eighborhood) 144.07 249.58 105.51 16 17 Shoppmg Centers regional) Office Building (one story) 144.07 73.40 491.77 95.63 347.70 22.23 18 19 Office Building multi- story) Retail Stores (gnulti -story) 93.59 93.59 151.73 151.73 58.14 58.14 21 Restaurants & cocktaillounges 113.78 135.17 21.38 24 Banks, Savings & Loans 73.40 95.63 22.23 25 Service Stations 93.59 115.40 21.81 26 Auto sales, repair, storage & rental 93.59 91.18 (2.41) 30 Industrial Land Vacant 17.87 4.94 (12.93) 31 Light Manufacturing 113.76 244.15 130.37 32 Warehousing 93.59 t2Z51 33.92 33 Industrial Condos, Coops, PUD's 13.7E 135. 1 "' 21.38 38 Mineral Processing 73.4( 95.63 22.23 44 Truck Crops 33.01 43.99 10.97 46 Pasture (permanent) 33.01 43.99 10.97 48 Poultry 33.01 43.99 10.97 49 Flowers ' seed production 33.01 43.99 10.97 51 Orchards 33.01 43.99 10.97 53 Field crops, dry 33.01 43.99 10.97 54 Pastures of graze, dry 33.01 43.99 10.97 55 Feed lots 33.01 43.99 10.97 57 Tree farms 33.01 43.99 10.97 61 Theater 113.78 123.06 9.27 70 Institutional vacant land 17.87 4.94 (12.93 71 Churches, convent & rectory 17.87 4.94 (12.93) 78 Public Bldgs. Fire Houses, Museums, etc. 0.00 0.00 0.00 80 Misc, Vacant land 17.87 4.94 (12.93) 81 Utility Water Company 0.00 0.00 0.00 83 Petroleum & gas 53.21 51.64 (1.56) 91 Utility Edison 0.00 0.00 0.00 92 Tel 0. 00 0.00 0.00 93 SPRR 0.00 0.00 0.00 94 Undedicated Community Condo Development 0.00 0.00 0.00 99 Exempt 0.0( 0.00 0.00 B. Zone of Benefit: In addition to the Citywide Assessments listed above h) land use categories, the properties within each of the Zones listed below will be assessed a per lot Zone assessment for the .mprov-nient and maintenance of certain improvements determined to be of benefit to the properties within 010SC' 7( %I - wp \rpt \ad85- 96.not N - Z Pro xis.. Zone Descri lion FY 1994195 Assmnt ($ 95196 ssmnt ) Proposed Increase �- 7 act ar ays [@ Bambi; 5.59 't + I' * 2fT53- Benwood, Pecan and VCFCD Channel 2 Tract 2865: Parkways East side 95 45 * r :4 1 <, Peach Hill, N. Side Tierra Rejada; South slopes & Christian Barrett and Spring 3 Tract 3032: Buttercreek Entry and 3.19 * i 1.45 * 8.26 Peppermill parkway 4 Tract 3274: Parkways, north and 0.00 0.00 * 0.00 south side of Williams Ranch Rd. 5 Tracts 3019 & 3525: Parkways: north t72.06 * ^32.67 * (89.39) side of Tierra Rejada Road, west side of Peach Hill Rd; south side parkway & slope 6 Traci 3306 (Glenhaven): Parkway C 11.00 * 14.05 * 23.05 west end of Inglewood Ave. 7 Industrial Park Northeast of Gabbert 111.46 ** 57.10 *" (54.36) & L.A. Ave.: Parkway North side of L.A. Ave east of Gabbert 8 West Village Buffer: • City area 20.86 * 25.57 * 4.7' • Home Acres 50.86 * 51.11 ' 0.25 9 Condor Drive 121.92 ** t: °.21 «� (108.7') 10 Mountain Meadows Planned Community Residential Commercial 0.00 * 15.41 * 15.4' n.00 ** 127.51 *" 127.5' Note: * Per parcel Assessment ** Per Acre Assessment wp \rpt \ad85- 96.not N - Z