HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 1995 0621 CC REG ITEM 11C!zr- F,Rk, CAL, -.y ITEM.
c::,, Councll Meetfnj
.0t 199
action►:
AGENDA REPORTS --_
CITY OF MOORPARK,
A,-- /�,
TO: Honorable City Council
FROM: Jaime Aguilera, Community Development Direct
DATE: 5/18/95 (CC meeting of 6/7/95)
SUBJECT: Consider Resolution to adopt stipulate "approving
authority" for entitlements
Background
`,tOORPARK, CAUFCRN
Gty Coundl Meeting
`� / 199`5`.
J7
^,CTION:
The City Council adopted Resolution 88 -523 on 11/29/88. The purpose
of the resolution was to create a SE't of permit approval processing
standards. Among other things, the resolution states that a "Major
Modification" is to be acted upon by the body which granted the
original approval. Planning staff ',ias followed this mandate since
the resolution's inception, except Ln the case of the Urban West
proposal entitled Major Modificat.icri No. l to TR4637 and RPD 89 -4.
In the case of this modification, the Cit',7 Council felt that the
project should be reviewed by the F= Tanning Commission prior to the
Council's review. The Council was cognizant of the fact that it had
been over 4 years since the original project had been reviewed by
the Planning Commission and approved by the Council. By stipulating
that the Planning Commission r.:-eviEw t:.he project, the processing
time was extended, however, the f:intr =l. prroje -t, as approved, appears
to have warranted the additiontll ! i -r-e .
Staff believes that this change in procedure worked for the benefit
of the project, the citizens and the -ity. . Staff therefore proposes
that Resolution No. 88 -523 be amended. to reflect this change in
policy. The Resolution is also no longer synchronous to the Zoning
Code on various issues. The Zoning Code has gone through a myriad
of changes since 1.988. The Resc:)l -tt _ r,: n a1 sc: contains syntax errors
which should be coi rect=ed, as n he l a.;t I i.ne of Section 2.
jra /aprovath.sr
Staff has amended the resolution u;ing the "legislative amendment
format" so that the Council can reidily see the changes which are
proposed.
Recommendation:
Staff recommends approval of the
95- setting forth procedures
applications.
Attachments:
Resolution 88 -52-
Resolution 95
jra /aprovath.sr
a-A ached City Council Resolution
f - i- t:he processing of entitlement
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY i_OUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK,
CALIFORNIA, DIRECTING THAT ('FR`1'AIN PERMIT APPROVAL PROCESSES BE
PREFORMED BY CERTAIN CITY ) FICIA],5; AND THE REPEALING OF
RESOLUTION NO. 86 -276.
Whereas Resolution No. 80 - -2'�, prescribes the city offices that
approves various permits; and
Whereas, the City Council as w��''_1. as '-he staff have recommended
changes to said approval authority;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY i o4JNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK,
CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Resolution No. 8F- .:'.76, entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY -'OUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK,
CALIFORNIA PRESCRIBE THAT CERTAIN PERMIT APPROVAL PROCESS BE
PREFORMED BY CERTAIN CITY OFFICIALS AND THE REPEALING OF ALL
RESOLUTIONS IN CONFLICT THEREWITH.
adopted February 18, 1986 is hereby resc nded.
Section 2. Where the Planning Commission is authorized to
approve or disapprove an entitlement her-ei.n, such decision is appealable to
the City Council. Where the Director of Community Development is
authorized to approve or disapprove an - -rtitlement and subsequently to the
City Council.
Section 3. A request for a Modification to an entitlement
herein shall be deemed a "Minor Mocification", as determined by the
Director of Community Development, when such a modification does not alter
the intent of the determining bodv. 1 nther modifications are deemed
"Major Modifications".
Section 4. Major Modific�tLons shall be approved or
disapproved by the official of body granting the original approval or an
appeal thereof, and shall be processed ii *hf, same manner as the original
approval.
Section 5. Where the City council Ls the body with approving
or disapproving authority, the action shall fir-st be processed through the
Planning Commission for its recommendatioi.
Section 6. Approval or di-ipprova; shall be performed by the
following City offices of Officials.
a . general P.la,i Ari( p i cn - C ity Council
b. General Plan AmFnlment City Council
C. Ordinance Adoption /Amendment. - City Council
d. Zone Change - C i y Couric i
e. Residential Plarned Development Permits - Planning
Commission for _atoposals of four units or less;
City Council f proposals of for more than four
units.
f. Commercial Planned Development Permits - Planning
Commission for proposals of less than 20,000 square
feet of gross floor area; City Council for
proposals of 20 C00 square feet or more of gross
floor area.
g. Industrial Planned Development Permits - Planning
Commission for proposals containing less than
20,000 square -feet of gross floor area for all
buildings involved; City Council for proposals of
20,000 square ff}et or more of gross floor area for
all buildings irvolved.
All new constriction, regardless of gross floor
area size that is within three hundred feet (300')
of a residential zone )r use shall require City
Council approval
h. Administrative - earance - Director of Community
Development..
i. Director Cond:tLonal Use Permit - Planning
Commission.
j. Planning Commission Condition Use Permit - Planning
Commission..
k. Tentative and F_nal. Tract Map - City Council.
1. Parcel Map and Parce: Map Waiver - Planning
Commission.
M. Lot Line Adj�istment. and Lot Consolidation -
Director of Community Development.
November
ATTEST:
n.. Minor Modific• t ion
Development.
PASSED, APPROVED AND A)()P'rFD
. of 1988.
Director of Community
this 29th day of
1� ` (34(
hn Patrick Lane, Mayor
JOHN GALLOWAY
Mayor
ELOISE BROWN
Mayor Pro Tem
;LINT HARPER, Ph.D.
Councilmember
JOHN PATRICK LANE
Councilmember
MAUREEN W. WALL
City Clerk
THOMAS P GENOVESE
City Treasurer
MOORPARK
STEVEN KUENY
City Manager
CHERYL J. KANE
City Attorney
PATRICK RICHARDS, A.I.C.P.
Director of
Community Development
R. DENNIS DELZEIT
City Engineer
JOHN V. GILLESPIE
Chief of Police
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF VENTURA ) SS.
CITY OF MOORPARK )
9
m
I, Maureen W. Wall, City Clerk of the City of Moorpark, California, do
hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing Resolution No.
88 -523 was adopted by the City Council of the City of Moorpark at a
meeting held on the 29th day of Nov_ember 1988, and that the
same was adopted by the following vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Brown, Harper. -erez and Mayor Lane.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Councilmember Galloway.
ABSTAIN: None.
WITNESS my hand and the official seal of said City this 7th day of
December 1988
`))q'a'UA'00
Maureen W. Wall
City Clerk ,
(seal)
-
799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 (805) 529 -6864
RESOLUTION N.). 95
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK.
Whereas Resolution No. 83 &fig— prescribes the city
officials that approve-a various pe �mi t s and
Whereas, the City Council � well as the staff have
recommended changes to said appro,,; i -- a,ut h(-, r i ty;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUN(' F' THE CITY OF MOORPARK,
CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOW:
Section 1. � of c Na. 8 5: as e e i.n ":A
Resel,dtien Ne. 86��-
= -- -
- -
- -- - - �.
2:3 2
majel- Medi€ieat = ens ter- e-
t ei-eef, and shall b a reecssed �iq
the ae-f=-Ien shall: first be
preeessed thredglct the Planning Ge s :-F-e-- , eeefRTM_ Wien.
tyre —fie ll e w i n g Git= f effi e e s e f—E�€�
ENTITLEMENT
a. General Plan Adoption
b. General Plan Amendment
C. Zoning Code Adoption 'Amezdmen?
d. Zone Change
e. Residential Planned
Development. Permits
523 2
APPROVING AUTHORITY
City Council
City Council
City Council
City Council
Planning Commission
for proposals of
four units or less;
City Council for
proposals of more
than four units.
f. Commercial Planned
Development Permits
g. Industrial Planned
Development Permits
Planning Commission
for proposals of
less than 20,000
square feet of gross
floor area; City
C o u n c i l f o r
proposals of 20,000
aquare feet or more
of gross floor area.
Planning Commission
for proposals
containing less than
20,000 square feet
of gross floor area
for all buildings
involved; City
C',)unc i 1 f or
proposals of 20,000
square feet or more
Of gross floor area
for all buildings
Involved.
h. Administrative Clearance D _i r e c t o r o f
C o m m u n i t y
Development.
. – Bir-eczer Genditi6icr –v4 ac Pe i rx-L -- — Planning ne ffi..
,
C�c�ari Pry �ria� s .'
j. Tentative and
Final Tract Map
k. Parcel Map
and Parcel Map Waiver
X 852 2
City Council.
Planning Commission.
1. Lot Line Adjustment
and Lot. Consolidation
M. Minor Modification
'0$232
.. .... .. .
D i r e c t o r o f
C o m m u n i t y
Development.
D i r e c t o r o f
Community
Development.