Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 1995 0906 CC REG ITEM 11AMOOPPAr,X, c _ ary of ACTION' CITY OF MOORPARK ij. AGENDA REPORT TO: THE HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL FROM: DIRK LOVETT, ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER . X DATE: AUGUST 21, 1995 (City Council Meeting of September 6, 1995) SUBJECT: ADRAGNA GRADING PLAN CHECK AND FEES(106 Wicks Rd.) Background: This item is being submitted at the City Council's request as an explanation of the deposits requested for this project along with an accounting and itemization of work performed to date. There is an extensive history with this lot. Rather than include another exhaustive history of the site I have attached, for your review, copies of a January 6th, and a July 13th memorandum to the City Manager (Exhibit 1). The January 6th memorandum provides a brief chronology of events and course of action. The July 13th memorandum provides an explanation of the fees requested to date. Again, the fees are based upon an engineer's estimate of the work. Copies of the engineer's estimate and the applicable section from the Fee Schedule are attached, as part of the July 13th memorandum. Discussion: A complete itemization of all work performed (personnel, date, time, and description) has been prepared and is attached (Exhibit 2). Also attached, as requested, is a copy of all correspondence and documents in the file (Exhibit 3). It should be noted that the initial meetings with the property owner and the preparation of the compliance review punchlist were completed in November. No time was billed to the property owner until December. Engineering has also waived the geotechnical review fee. One of the limitations of the current fee schedule is that fees have not been increased in over 10 years. To offset this deficiency the City approved a revision to the schedule which enables the Engineering Department to collect actual costs should the initial fee be insufficient to cover these costs. Because of the nature of this project, the current owner not being the person responsible for the illegal grading, it was my direction to engineering staff to only collect actual costs as they were incurred, rather than request substantial deposits up front. It was our intent to keep costs down. (YUG,11 Corrective action on illegal grading, such as this, can often require several times the plan check effort of a project that is submitted under normal circumstances. Actual costs are dictated by the quality of plans and responses submitted by the applicant and his engineer. To date plans have been submitted 3 times (including conceptuals) and still require corrections and additional information. Additionally, inspection deposits will be required upon completion of the plan review. This deposit will be based upon the final cost estimates (yet to be determined) and will be similar, in amount, to the initial plan check fee. Conclusion: All fees and deposits requested to date are consistent with the City Fee Schedule. Due to the nature of the project, actual costs can be expected to be several times the cost of a conventional submittal. The Engineering Department has made every effort to keep costs down while facilitating the owners request for an early occupancy of the structure. Costs to date for the plan review are $2520.36 (70% for city Engineering and 30% for City overhead). The City Engineering portion ($1764.25) accounts for roughly 26 hours of work. The request for additional actual costs, in the July 6th letter to Mr. Adragna, is for $1377.88 ($964.52 to City Engineering) or just over 13 hours of engineering work. Additional plan check fees will be required prior to completion of the plan review and an inspection deposit will be required at completion of the plan review. Recommendation: Direct staff as deemed appropriate Attachments W : 1- Exhibit 1 Exhibit 2 3- Exhibit 3 file chron 84.!)40 000156 B(Allkl� 1 M E M O R A N D U M TO: STEVE KUENY, CITY MANAGER FROM: DIRK LOVETT, ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER DATE: JULY 13, 1995 SUBJECT: ADRAGNA GRADING PLAN CHECK AND FEES(106 Wicks Rd.) At your request, I am submitting an explanation of the deposits requested for this project with a brief discussion of the scope of our involvement. There is an extensive history with this lot. Attached for your review is a copy of a January 6th memo to you in which a brief chronology of the process and a course of action was outlined. The problems with this lot were discussed early with Mr. Adragna and were well documented. It was also understood that the City Engineering Departments involvement to bring this lot into conformance with City Standards, would be greater than for a typical project because of the existing illegal and non - standard construction which would need to be remedied. The Engineering Department has, however, made special efforts by allowing the Adragnas' to occupy their home while they addressed these hazardous items. The City also required a security for those items deemed not immediately threatening to the site's or adjacent structures. Mr. Adragna's engineer, Dan Holmes, submitted a conceptual grading plan in the third week of January 1995. A third plan check was completed by our department and returned to the applicant with several corrections the fourth week of May 1995. No further plan check requests have been received by our office to date. It should be noted that in resolving this unpermitted activity, engineering staff has assisted the owner in preparing special agreements with surrounding neighbors, directed the efforts of the soils engineer in preparing the necessary reports and prepared special bond arrangements to guarantee the work. These coordination efforts have been extensively reviewed with City Staff. It is anticipated that additional deposits will be required to cover the costs of additional plan check, preparation of "As- Builts" and staff time to release securities. Upon completion of these tasks the owner will be responsible for the "Actual Costs" of the effort plus any Citv overhead which accrues, as required by the City's fee schedule. 000157 X. 1 2`��1 Addit_onally, inspection deposits will be required upon completion of the plan review. These will be based upon the final cost estimates as required by the City's fee schedule. The initial fee for plan check on this project was calculated by the following formula as it is shown in the fee schedule (attached). (Based on the Engineers Estimate of $6,616.50) The Plan Check Fee = $300 + 15% x $5,616.50 = $1,142 The initial permit deposit will be collected upon completion of the plan check and will equal the initial deposit collected for plan check. The fee schedule also states that if the actual cost (including City overhead) exceeds the total deposits then the owner shall be responsible to pay the actual costs (including overhead to the City) ..- .7._.-.�...-.. ...._:..:.icy. IMUl s Ex. ( P &3e3�5 CONFIDENTIAL MEMORANDUM To: Steve Kueny, City Manager From: Dirk Lovett, Assistant City Engineer Date: January 6, 1995 Subject: 106 Wicks Road Per your request I am forwarding this account of recent events regarding the subject property and the involvement of the Director of Community Development. The new property owners of two parcels at 106 Wicks Road, Matt and Patti Adragna, requested Engineering clearance for the house on the subject property prior to receiving a Building and Safety occupancy clearance. Upon a site review from our office it was discovered that there were several issues that needed to be resolved prior to Engineering approval. These included uncompacted/unapproved fill, lack of proper drainage, non - approved retaining wall, erosion, incomplete access road, encroachments onto adjacent properties, and lack of Geotechnical Engineering evaluation on both parcels. A punch -list of these items was provided the Adragnas on November 29, 1994. Upon receipt of the punch list the Adragnas requested my presence at a field meeting with themselves and their civil engineer to discuss the punch list. On December 5, 1994 Chris Oberender and I attended a meeting at the site which was attended by the Adragnas, Civil Engineer Dan Holmes, and Director of Community Development Jim Aguilera. After my explanation of the punch list and steps required of the Adragnas to obtain occupancy I was asked by Mr. Aguilera _if we might consider a conditional occupancy of the subject property since most of the punch list involved work done on the easterly parcel that did not contain the house. I explained that my concerns were not just for the safety of the occupants of 106 Wicks Road but also for those properties which have been or could potentially be impacted by the items on the punch list. It was then agreed that should the punch list items that directly impact the safety of the subject building 00015 ��ey�9 and adjacent properties be satisfactorily resolved that Engineering would give a conditional release for occupancy, subject to the City's receipt of a surety, with time limit, for the remaining corrections. Because Mr. Aguilera had also recently purchased the property adjacent to and west of the subject property I, subsequently, expressed my concern to the Adragnas and Mr. Aguilera of a possible public perception of a conflict of interest in Mr. Aguilera's role in decision making on this property. Even though Mr. Aguilera felt that there was no conflict of interest he deferred all decision making on the City's behalf to the Deputy City Manager Richard Hare. As a result, I met with Mr. Hare on December 19, 1994 to confirm the City's position and receive direction regarding our Departments course of action with respect to the above agreement. Mr. Hare confirmed that the arranged agreement above was acceptable and that no formal covenant or agreement would be necessary if an acceptable surety, equal to 150% of the remaining corrections, is held by the City which would state that all improvements be complete, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, within 2 -6 months. This information was passed on to the owners and we are currently awaiting conceptual plans and a cost estimate from the owner's engineer. cc: Charles Abbott HO LMES ENTE Structural and C 2710 West Kelly Road • Newbury PROJECT A ,o4aMa ZG S, LOCATION 1060 I cllGl�' L x• a } L' ti r W ' A ., N 5 i •Y' j y ' ti *� - °IJN ToTA- TEfti i'76`5 GZ/ JoT(ON QUitiNT !T``•j' D'S T A/O.�a 2 k (ST, 4 • D P-A /n/ K VIA - 1 Z E� [�. ,am QGY o 1S . — S ' (� EkT�/VD 8•' 'D241N ZO L• F "' "'r 7. y. � swE�cy his• 1 cA. =�� . r CAP L/NE—A /¢ e- 460. Y. ow ' �8 /FL,4NT Zo G'aNG �= � s wAc.•c.� F r •�w Y' >. of T - a } L' ti r W ' A ., N 5 i •Y' j y ' ti *� EXHIBIT °B^ CITY OF MOORPARK SUBDIVISION FINAL PROCESSING FEE SCHEDULE 1. MAPS a. Tract or Parcel Nap Issuance Fee: $34.00 b. Final Hap Parcel Nap Check Fee: A Fixed Quality Control fee of $1,671.00 per map plus $34.00 per lot for the first three map checks and quality control only. C. Additional Checks: Actual Costs including City overhead. A refundable deposit of {ONO.t�cj $465.90 per map plus $9.59 per lot shall be required for the fourth and each subsequent map check. d. General Provisions: • Any alterations to the exterior boundary or redesign of any interior lots after the initial map check will be considered as a new submittal. • All fees shall be paid at the time of submittW4(. • If the Actual Cost (including the City overhead) of map checking exceeds the total deposits, the developer shall pay the Actual Cost (including City overhead) to the City. E Actual Cost shall include: staff labor costs (plus City overhead) an contract labor costs (plus City overhead), plus reimbursable expenses (i. e. blueprinting reproduction, etc.). 2. PLAN CHECKS a. Subdivision and other Najor Improvements: A fixed fee based upon the Fee Schedule set forth in Section 5 of this Exhibit. b. Subdivision and other Najor Improvement Plan Changes: An Improvement Plan Change Fee of 31 of the estimate of costs of additional improvements including work for which a Grading Permit must be obtained. C. Revisions to Approved Tentative Subdivision Hap: Any substantial revisions (i. e. street alignments, pad sizes, pad elevation changes in excess of two feet) to approved tentative subdivision maps shall require City Council approval. A fee of $685.00, not including any required planning fees, shall be required for any request for any such application of map revision. d. General Provisions: • The number of plan checks covered by the above described fees shall be limited to three. The third plan submittal shall be checked to confirm that said plan submittal is correct and complete. Any additional plan checking efforts required to approve said plans shall be subject to additional fees based upon Actual Cost plus City overhead. • All fees shall be paid at the time of submitted. MOIL Exhibit 'B' Page 2 3. 4. Ex. I ?r 9 P-(--4 If the Actual Cost (including the City overhead) of dap checking exceeds the total deposits, the developer shall pay the Actual Cost (including City overhead) to the City. Actual Cost shall include: staff labor costs (plus City overhead) and /or contract labor costs (plus City overhead), plus reimbursable expenses (i. e. blueprintinq reproduction, etc.). INSPECTION a. Subdivision and Other Ka'o I verve t C g City overhead. A refundable fee deposit shall be paid based upon the Fee Schedule set forth in Section 5 of this Exhibit. b. Subdivision Time Extension of Improvement Agreement: A $411.00 processing fee, plus a refundable deposit of 101 of the fee deposit made under 3a above. The Time Extension deposit shall be collected for the purpose of off setting all costs associated with the requested time extension. Any costs associated with a tine extension shall not be charged to the remaining portion of the inspection deposit. Upon completion and acceptance of the improvements, any balance remaining after deducting the Actual Costs of inspection (including City Overhead) shall be refunded to developer. In the event Actual Cost exceeds available deposit funds, the developer shall pay balance due upon receipt of invoice therefor. C. Deferred Construction Agreement: A fixed fee of $411.00 shall be required for processing this agreement. d. Guarantee Period Inspection: Actual Cost, including city overhead. 1 fee deposit of $1,000.00. Upon acceptance of improvements after guarantee period, any balance remaining after deducting Actual Cost of inspection (including City overhead) shall be refunded to the developer. In the event Actual Costs exceed the $1,000.00 deposit, developer shall pay the balance due upon receipt of invoice therefor. GEOLOGY AND SOIL ENGINEERING REVIEW The fees set forth below shall be required for the review and processing of geology and soil engineering reports by outside geotechnical consultants, when and if such review is required by the City Engineer as determined by City or State guidelines: Single lot 2 -6 lot subdivision 7 -50 lot subdivision Subdivision over 50 lots - for each lot over 50 Geotechnical $1600.00 $1600.00 $2100.00 $2100.00 $3000.00 $3000.00 $3000.00 $3000.00 $ 200.00 $ 200.00 Special_ submittal, investigations, reports, or reviews will require deposits based on the actual or anticipated ac-U41 cost including City overhead. The above fees will cover one review and one follow - up review. Fees for additional reviews are to paid on a actual time basis plus City overhead. (AMIG3 Ex. I go Exhibit 'B' Page 3 5. FEE SCHEDULE The following schedule shall be used to calculate the Nap Checking Fee ( Paragtaph 1b), the Plan Checking Fee (Paragraph 2a) and the Inspection Fee Deposit (Paragraphs 3a). Said fee schedule is based upon the estivate of improvement costs. 1_morovement Costs M 0 - 999 1,000 - 9,999 10,000 - 49,999 50,000 - 99,999 100,000 - 999,999 1,000,000 and over Deposit M • 420.00 _300.00 + 151 of cost over 1,650.00`+ 10t of cost over 5,650.00 + 51 of cost over 8,150.00 + 21 of cost over 26,150.00 + it of cost over 1,000 10,000 50,000 100,000 1,000,000 6. GRADING PERMIT AND PLAN CHECKING FEE SCHEDULE QUANTITY CUBIC YARDS 50 or less 51 - 100 101 - 200 201 - 300 301 - 400 401 - 500 501 - 600 601 - 700 701 - 800 801 - 900 901 - 1,000 1,001 - 2,000 2,001 - 3,000 3,001 - 4,000 4,001 - 5,000 5,001 - 6,000 6,001 - 7,000 7,001 - 8,000 8,001 - 9,000 9,001 - 10,000 10,001 - 20,000 20,001 - 30,000 30,001 - 40,000 40,001 - 50,000 50,001 - 60,000 60,001 - 70,000 70,001 - 80,000 80,001 - 90,000 90,001 - 100,000 100,001 OR ABOVE PLAN CHECK FEES (S 7 38.00 59.00- 86.00 112.00 140.00 167.00 193.00 221.00 249.00 277.00 292.00 292.00 292.00 292.00 292.00 292.00 292.00 292.00 292.00 292.00 312.00 393.00 353.00 374.00 395.00 415.00 436.00 456.00 477.00 Note A INSPECTION FEES ( S ) 41.00 62.00 89.00 116.100 144.00 171.00 199.00 226.00 253.00 281.00 308.00 332.00 355.00 378.00 401.00 425.00 448.00 471.00 495.00 518.00 610.00 726.00 830.00 934.00 1,038.00 1,143.00 1,247.00 1,351.00 1,455.00 Note B TOTAL 79.00 121.00 175.00 228.00 24.00 338.00 492.00 447.00 502.00 558.00 600.00 624.00 647.00 669.00 693.00 717.00 740.00 763.00 787.00 810.00 922.00 1,059.00 1,183.00 1,308.00 1,433.00 1,558.00 1,683.00 1,807.00 1,932.00 July 6, 1995 Mr. Paul Adragna 106 Wicks Road Moorpark, CA 90501 MOORPARK Building and Safety, City Engineering 18 High Street, Moorpark, California 93021 (805) 529 -6864 ext 421 Re: 106 Wicks Road Grading Plan Check Dear Paul: Below I have listed the amount of deposits received versus costs incurred on the above mentioned project. As you can see there is a balance on this account: Projec Amt Received Costs to-Date Amount Due 85.040 $ 1,142.48 $ 2520.36 $ 1,377.88 Total as of 5/30/95 $ 1,377.88 The original amount received was a deposit taken in at the time your plans were submitted to this office. Since that time, additional work has been performed, incurring additional costs. Please submit payment to this office within 30 days to cover these costs. Your prompt attention to this matter is greatly appreciated. Sincerely, Chris Oberender, Associate Engineer cc: City Clerk Ken Gilbert, Director of Public Works chron 85.040 0706952.1tr .' -City Hall 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California (805) 529 -6864 u'5 PAUL W. LAWRASON JR. PATRICK HUNTER JOHN E. WOZNIAK BERNARDO M. PEREZ SCOTT MONTGOMERY Mayor Mayor Pro Tem Councilmernber Councilmefnber Counedn1e^ief Prinred on Recycoo Ploor 106 Wicks Costs Date I Time(Hours) IPersonnel - Work Description 12/5/95 0.75 Chris O. - site evaluation 1/9/95 0.2 5 Chris O. - research 1/10/95 0.25 Chris O. - monitored erosion on site during rain storm 1/26/95 0.25 Chris O. - Telecommunication with Dan Holmes re: conceptual plans 1/31/95 0.25 Chris O. - Telecommunication with Dan Holmes re: conceptual plans 2/6/95 0.25 Chris O. - not documented 2/8/95 0.5 Chris O. - Meeting w/ Mr. Adragna 2/9/95 1 Chris O. - Review engineer's estimate, Telecomm. w/ Dan Holmes, Telecomm. w/ Mr. Adragna. Meeting w/ Mr. Adragna 2/10/95 0.25 Chris O. - Telecomm. w/ bank re: surety 2/9/95 1 Dirk L. - Research and in -house meeting 2/13/95 0.5 Chris O. - Meeting w/ Mr. Adragna re: bonds 2/14/95 0.5 Dirk L. - In -house meeting 2/14/95 0.75 Chris O. - Meeting w/ Mr. Adragna re: bonds 2/15/95 3.5 Chris O. - 2 meetings w/ Mr. Adragna, Telecomm. w/ Dir. of Comm. Dev., Plan Check 2/15/95 0.25 Elizabeth W. - Filing 2/15/95 1.5 Dirk L. - Meeting w/ Mr. Adragna, Provided punchlist 2/16/95 0.5 Dirk L. - Telecomm. w/ bank, Provided information for surety 2/17/95 0.5 Dirk L. - Received surety and forwarded to City Clerk, Prepared MOU 2/17/95 0.25 Chris O. - In -house discussion re: grading and bond requirements 2/21/95 0.25 Chris O. - Preparation of status report 2/23/95 0.75 Chris O. - Meeting w/ Mr. Adragna, Inspection of sewer and slope repairs 2/24/95 0.75 Dirk L. - Prepared occupancy release, In -house discussion 2/24/95 3.5 Chris O. - Meeting w/ Mr. Adragna re: occupancy release, hold harmless, letters of easement and MOU 2/27/95 0.5 Chris O. - Plan Check, submittal of all documents to the City 2/27/95 0.5 Dirk L. - Plan Check, In -house discussion 2/28/95 0.25 Dirk L. - Discussed and provided status to the Deputy City Manager 3/7/95 0.25 Alan C. - Not documented 5/25/95 1 Chris O. - 3rd plan check 5/26/95 1.5 Chris O. - Plan check 5/27/95 0.25 Chris O. - Plan check 5/30/95 0.5 Dirk L. - Plan check 5/30/95 0.75 Chris O. - Plan check 6/19/95 0.25 Chris O. - Plan check follow -up 6/30/95 2 Elizabeth W. - File research, accounting, in Total 26 00016` Show a vicinity sketch. This shall include roads, adjoining a'✓ ' subdivisions, towns, creeks, railroads or other means of adequately r� indicating the site location. . Show a distinctive border as a boundary for subdivided area. Show this border on all details and do not obliterate other data 1 . Show each parcel of land into which the site is proposed to be divided. XY. List all of the proposed uses of the site and, if the site is to be divided, the proposed use of each lot or parcel of land. 1 Show the location of any existing buildings or structures on the property , and the location of any buildings or structures on adjacent land within 15 feet of the property line. Also show any trees having a trunk diameter of 4" or more. Structures to be removed shall be so marked. 0 14'. Show accurate contours showing the topography of existing ground. o Also show contours far enough (100' minimum) beyond project �ZJ6 1- boundaries to enable any cross drainage problems to be identified. Existing contours shall be shown as dashed lines. Czfer-;do yJAJ S� 15 Provide elevations, location, extend and slope of all proposed Qrading —shawl contours, gross sections and location of any rock ' .l,�j�,(�.dis osal pasbuttre- ss fills or other special features, if such features r re —prop a be included in the work. Y��G rte' . tate the volumes of the cut and fill as well as any import and export quantities. 1ti1a�. ' Vdlvw-" QC.CArc(� Ly • . A statement of the estimated starting and completion dates for work c overed by the permit. 18. Statement signed by the owner saying that a civil engineer, soils engineer and /or geologist will be employed to give technical supervision or make inspections of the work, whenever approval of the plans and issuance of the permit are to 'be based on the condition that such professional persons be so employed. lJ The recommendations of the Soils /Geology Report have not been provided for in the plans UOUI '(926etailed plans of all drainage devices, walls cribbing or other protective devices to be constructed or as a l part of the proposed work shall be shown. }� r oJ� .c. �� SI +P�'QW' C,_(c Lo` ('-ri'""' ?. Provide a Hydrology Study . Provide a drainage plan for that portion of a lot or parcel to be utilized as a building site (building pad). Include elevations of floors and garages with respect to finished site grade and locations of proposed stoops, slabs, and fences that may affect drainage. Z Show "Sheet of sheet(s) "., with the title sheet first. 2y� Show the title on all sheets. Grading Plan Tract No. In the City of . Cuts and fills shall not be steeper in slope than 2 horizontal to 1 vertical unless approved by planning and the owner has submitted a soils /geology report stating that the site has been investigated and gives support that a steeper slope will be stable and not create a hazard to public or private property. . Cut slopes more than 40 feet in height or fill slopes more than 30 feet in height shall have drainage terraces provided at vertical intervals not exceeding 25 feet. Such terraces shall not be less than (8) feet in width. When the total slope height exceeds 100 feet,.then an additional terrace near mid height will be added and shall not be less than 20 feet wide. 27. nclude all General, Concrete and Rip -Rap notes as shown. (see handout). All drainage shall be designed to carry surface waters to the nearest �•�`�"' practical street, storm drain or natural watercourse as approved by the city engineer. . o Show all natural drainage courses. '()'MAL Graded building sites shall have a minimum slope of two percent XX- towards a public street or other drainage structure approved to receive storm waters. 3 . Show locations of all downspouts where applicable. erms, swales or other devices shall be located at the top of cut or fill � 4s slopes to prevent surface waters from damaging slopes. y OSubmit an "Erosion Control Plan "; grading will occur between October 1 and April 15. This plan must be signed and stamped by a 7 registered civil engineer. ./ Show /modify /correct detail. C tyli— ubmit bonds. A+ . Import/Export exceeds 10,000 C.Y.. Please submit a traffic control plan. . See "Comments" attachment for additional corrections. Grading notes should contain all information listed for other applicable Ventura Co. Standards. Comments .-4 ag- fiv al-L d, ir 4jUU . 1 `9 July 6, 1995 Mr. Paul Adragna 106 Wicks Road Moorpark, CA 90501 MOORPARK Building and Safety, City Engineering 18 High Street, Moorpark, California 93021 (805) 529 -6864 ext 421 Re: 106 Wicks Road Grading Plan Check Dear Paul: Below I have listed the amount of deposits received versus costs incurred on the above mentioned project. As you can see there is a balance on this account: Project Amt Received 85.040 $ 1,142.48 $ 2520.36 $ 1,377.88 Total as of 5/30/95 $ 1,377.88 The original amount received was a deposit taken in at the time your plans were submitted to this office. Since that time, additional work has been performed, incurring additional costs. Please submit payment to this office within 30 days to cover these costs. Your prompt attention to this matter is greatly appreciated. ;Sincerely, Chris Oberender, Associate Engineer cc: City Clerk Ken Gilbert, Director of Public Works chron 85.040 0706952.1tr "City Hall 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California (805) 529 -6864 PAUL W. LAWRASON JR. PATRICK HUNTER JOHN E. WOZNIAK BERNARDO M. PEREZ SCOTT MONTGOMERY Mayor Mayor Pro Tem Councilmember Councilmember Councilmember Printed on Recycled Paper TO: -,, . 1 N� iQ: R F 1 KX u M SUBJECT C" DATE Z.(l /I MESSAGE REPLY SIGNED Lr SIGNED DATE RMFORM SEND PARTS I AND 3 INTACT. CARBONLESS SPEEDISET PART 3 WILL BE RETURNED WITH REPLY. 4S472/4P472 POLYPAK (50 SETS) DETACH AND FILE FOR FOLLOW-UP 10001 IL I ' URFACE DRAINAW FOR GUMPAG MU J"Xi. FAMISH COMPACTED FILL r A S REOLNRED .RAL NOTES AND 7 s-. E AFTER N -OUT M� • .r Flt TER MATERIAL AS- SPECIFIED W SOIL S REPORT AIL 8 RECEIVED MAY 0 8 1995 DEPTH OF CLEAN -OUT TO FARM EARTH MATERIAL AS EXAMINED AND APPROVED BY THE SOILS ENGWEER MUD ENGWEERNVG GEOLO- ©IST, WNERE EMPLOYEDI. SUBSURFACE DRAIN LOCATION SEE DETAILS 84-OR OR B -t _7 SURFACE AFT CLEAN -OUT ; 7 DETAIL 8•? A SUBSURFACE DRAIN LOCATION SEE DETAILS 84-OR OR B -t _7 SURFACE AFT CLEAN -OUT ; 7 DETAIL 8•? M O O R P A R K C I T Y C L E R.K ' 8 D E P A R T M E N T Performance Surety Date: Name: M ct{{" %Aug ONAraq via v Entitlement (Application) No. r cr'wi� -ilt 3Z Location of Project: to6 UJtc�-s W, �koyf pGf lL CA -1302.1 Type of Surety: J-1- <.:. -e. OJP i Date: ���„r u, r.. (7 �193S _ Amount: 4 13, bow Bond /Surety Number:_ 101a373 822. EXPIRATION DATE, IF NOT A PUBLIC PROJECT: P &P: = - Performance 6 Payment Bond X = Monument Bond GR = Grading Bond CC = Cashier's Check 9CD = Certificate of Deposit C = Irrevocable Letter of Credit PB = Passbook AA = Assignment of Account File# / (LEAVE BLANK - FOR CITY CLERK'S DEPT.USE) r1 13L, 0001x73 „fa. 1 — Original: For Assignee ASSIGNMENT AS SECURITY FOR PAYMENT OF 'ALL BILLS, STATEMENTS OR CHARGES FOR ANY SERVICES ASSIGNMENT to (NAME) hereinafter called ASSIGNOR, whose principal place of business is (CITY) (STREET) , California, (do) (does) hereby assign and set over to the whose address is ' ” (NAME OF ASSIGNEE) (STREET) , California, hereinafter referred to as the ASSIGNEE, all right, title and interest of (CITY) any kind whatsoever owned or held by Assignor in and to the insured account of Assignor in the (STREET) amount of (NAME OF SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION) (CITY) whose address is California, as evidenced by an account in the dollars ($ . ` " "' ), identified as account number , which account is delivered by the Assignor to the Assignee. Assignor agrees and stipu- lates that this Assignment carries with it the right in and to the insurance of this account by the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation and includes and gives the right to the Assignee to redeem, collect, and withdraw the full amount of such account at any time WITHOUT NOTICE TO ASSIGNOR. This Assignment is given as security for the payment of all bills, statements or charges for any services furnished or rendered at any time from and after , 19 , and at any and all premises at which service has been or may (MONTH) (DAY) be ordered or contracted for by the Assignor. Assignor hereby notifies the above -named savings and loan association of this Assignment. Dated this day of 19. at - California. ASSIGNOR ----------------------------------------------------------- ------------ -------- - - - - -- FIRST ENDORSEMENT — RECEIPT FOR NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT Receipt is hereby acknowledged to the Assignee of written notice of Assignment of the above - identified account. We have noted our records to show the interest of the Assignee in said account. We hereby certify that we have not received any notice of lien, encumbrance, hold, claim, or other obligation against the above- identi- fied account prior to its Assignment to the Assignee. We certify that the account is fully insured by the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation. We agree to make payment to the Assignee upon written request in ac- cordance with the savings and loan laws applicable to this association. Dated this day of 19 at , California. COAST FEDERAL BAN ' " 't I_aS Tun DnVe r NAME OF SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION I °.t�V By _ ri .Tt Cabriel, CA 9776 SIGNATURE OF OFFICER TITLE OF OFFICER ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ SECOND ENDORSEMENT — RECEIPT FOR SECURITY AND DIRECTION TO PAY EARNINGS Receipt is acknowledged of the Assignment above and the account identified in the Assignment above. The savings and loan association named in the Assignment above is hereby authorized and directed to pay any earn- ings on the above - identified account to the above -named Assignor. Dated this _ ____ day of ___-- __________, 19.___ at __ _ __, California. ASSIGNEE By - By Distributed by the California Savings and Loan League, Pasadena, California — 9/70. 0001.74 SV 0012 11 -75 TO: �L 1 R � tr tS UPI Pr SUBJECT._ MESSAGE / J l r ,-.-,,4 0 'dA (-Q �-� e. _ ( �' P tvv' V SIGNED REPLY SIGNED DATE NMRAM SEND PARTS 1 AND 3 INTACT. CARBONLESS SPEEDISET 4S472/4P472 POLYPAK (50 SETS) PART 3 WILL BE RETURNED WITH REPLY. DETACH AND FILE FOR FOLLOW -UP 000175 OOPOPpK C�� O' F t • 0 090 p X40 � r`Le MOORPARK Building and Safety, City Engineering 18 High Street, Moorpark, California 93021 (805) 529 -6864 ext 421 February 24, 1995 Matt Adragna 106 Wicks Rd. 93021 Moorpark, CA Dear Mr. Adragna, We are in receipt of your security #122373822 (Coast Federal Bank), in the amount of $13,000, for proposed grading and site improvements at 106 Wicks Rd. Release of the security will be contingent upon completion of the work per the approved grading plans and adherence to the requirements of our November 29, 1994 letter to you (attached). Also be advised that the Fire Department has required that the driveway to the site be paved prior to the release of this security. Our office will require that all necessary offsite stormwater and sewer easements be recorded and delivered to us prior to our release of the security. Please contact me if you have any further questions. ZS y, C hris Oberender Associate Engineer CC:Richard Hare co:Adragna Bond lt.r,r 22495 Attachments(1) City Hall 'p`I: 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California (805) 529 -6864 PAUL W. LAWRASON JR. PATRICK HUNTER JOHN E. WOZNIAK BERNARDO M. PEREZ SCOTT MONTGOMERY Mayor Mayor Pro Tem Councilmember Councilmember Councilmember Printed on Recycled Paper TEMPORARY RIGHT OF ENTRY PERMIT AND AGREEMENT I hereby grant to the City of Moorpark, a right of entry permit to go in, on, over, under and across my property for the purpose of completing grading and appurtenant improvements on my property and covered by grading security #122373822 (Coast Federal Bank). I certify that /we amAjoe the legal owner(s) of this property and that this permit shall be valid upon all successors and assigns for a period of one (1) year or until the completion of the work and release of said security by the City of Moorpark. I also agree to increase the grading security, at the direction of the City Engineer, an appropriate increment to cover any additional work required as a result of erosion, geotechnical, geologic or other reasons which may arise that present a danger to the public health, safety or welfare. Executed this 2 I-/Tb- day of � s 1, 1995. —J Name of Grantor Temp ESMT 2/24/95 Address 11 !_ 0001!77 Matteo S. Adragna my property to the at 106 Wicks Road, Mr. G. Br' geman (805) 565 -5912 had my permission +& grade and dig on South and East of his property located Moorpark, CA. 93021. ()O K,O,u MOORPARK r-� Building and Safety, City Engineering 18 High Street, Moorpark, California 93021 (805) 529 -6864 ext 421 February 24, 1995 Matt Adragna 106 Wicks Rd. Moorpark, CA 93021 Dear Mr. Adragna, We are in receipt of your security #122373822 (Coast Federal Bank), in the amount of $13,000, for proposed grading and site improvements at 106 Wicks Rd. Release of the security will be contingent upon completion of the work per the approved grading plans and adherence to the requirements of our November 29, 1994 letter to you (attached). Also be advised that the Fire Department has required that the driveway to the site be paved prior to the release of this security. Our office will require that all necessary offsite stormwater and sewer easements be recorded and delivered to us prior to our release of the security. Please contact me if you have any further questions. Sincere i Chris Oberender Associate Engineer CC: d re co: dragna Bond -lttr 22495 Attachments(1) City Hall 0003:-r!) 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California (805) 529 -6864 PAUL W. LAWRASON JR. PATRICK HUNTER JOHN E. WOZNIAK BERNARDO M. PEREZ SCOTT MONTGOMERY Mayor Mayor Pro Tem Councilmember Councilmember Councilmember Printed on Recycled Paper Ar �• q .. t (I tb%.3 v-t L' `ts. C7M R O M SUBJECT t4, v MESSAGE 4. 1 a C J I -yi SIGNED REPLY SIGNED DATE RMFMM. 4S472/4P472 POLYPAK (50 SETS) SEND PARTS I AND 3 INTACT. PART 3 WILL BE RETURNED WITH REPLY. DETACH AND FILE FOR FOLLOW -UP CARBONLESS SPEEDISET 0MV-1 .. CITY OF MOORPARK FEE RECEIPT FORM BUILDING & SAFETY RECEIVED OF TELEPHONEn1¢�� =� y PAYER: t r _ 1 ADDRESS: \7\7-\g � `-���`r-� CITY ZIP JOB ADDRESS I .10R OWNER: Y A f,-7— 0IZ -ING M "- OR TRACT NO.: OWNER'S ADDRESS: �� %�� � �S.,�S— v(p �C USE ONLY) RECEIPT FOR AMOUNT Tp� F� RECEIPT FOR, AMOUNT ACCOUNT OR TRUST FUND PLAN REVIEW INVESTIGATION 7' SHERIFF FACILITIES 1 Z„ g �0 FIRE FACILITIES ADMINISTRATION FLOOD CONTROL ASSESSMENT ZONE CLEARANCE Check No. TOTAL REINSPECTION' Calculated by C) G _ Received by WHITE - Finance / YELLUW - Building PINK - rife UULU - owner o ld CITY OF MOORPARK CITY ENGINEER GRADING PLAN CORRECTION LIST ENGINEER/SURVEYOR u• fAlAW -44- FIRST SUBMITTED 1-2b Date PHONE # PLAN CHECKER e' • d 40'eKzou. SUBMITTAL NO0 ❑ PLANS APPROVED ❑ PLANS REJECTED. 3 4 5 6 _ Date lop.-IN Your map has been checked and the necessary corrections, additions, and instructions are shown below. All numbers that are circled require corrections. The attached check print(s) and corrections list must be returned when submitting for recheck. Please indicate any changes or corrections on the attached check print(s) that you have made in addition to those requested by the plan checker.(Show these in red.) Write any comments and questions you might have on the check prints or correction list where it would be the most relevant. `D lease pay Grading Plan Check Fee. 2. Please Xay Site Inspection Fee.(As required by engineer) PY Provide a co of the ConditionV Of Approval for this plan. Plans must be signed, stamped and dated by a registered civil engineer t Sd try \� Submit (3) copies of the soils /geology report. Show correct map scale Show a north arrow V Provide a Bench Mark note. Show a vicinity sketch. This shall include roads, adjoining subdivisions, towns, creeks, railroads or other means of adequately indicating the site location. . Show a distinctive border as a boundary for subdivided area. Show this border on all details and do not obliterate other data 1 . Show each parcel of land into which the site is proposed to be divided. . List all of the proposed uses of the site and, if the site is to be divided, the proposed use of each lot or parcel of land. Show the location of any existing buildings or structures on the property , and the location of any buildings or structures on adjacent land within 15 feet of the property line. Also show any trees having a trunk diameter of 4" or more. Structures to be removed shall be so marked. 14. Show accurate contours showing the topography of existing ground. Also show contours far enough (100' minimum) beyond project boundaries to enable any cross drainage problems to be identified. Existing contours shall be shown as dashed lines. -ree 41Z ') Q B+'- 15 Provide elevations, location, extend and slope of all proposed grading shown by contours, crncc sP&ions and location of any rock sposal areas, buttress fills or other special features, if such features are proposed to be included in the work. 2 16. tate the volumes of the cut and fill as well as any import and export quantities. 1^�1a.�.y Vdlvw�.v� Qc"re(� L� • V . A statement of the estimated starting and completion dates for work covered by the permit. 18. Statement signed by the owner saying that a civil engineer, soils engineer and /or geologist will be employed to give technical supervision or make inspections of the work, whenever approval of the plans and issuance of the permit are to be based on the condition that such professional persons be so employed. dS 1. The recommendations of the Soils /Geology Report have not been provided for in the plans Detailed plans of all drainage devices,_ walls, cribbing or other protective devices to be constructed or as a part of the proposed work shall be shown. Provide a Hydrology Study . Provide a drainage plan for that portion of a lot or parcel to be utilized as a building site (building pad). Include elevations of floors a and locations of and garages with respect fences finished site may affect drainage. proposed stoops, slabs, a nd 2 . Show "Sheet of sheet(s) "., with the title sheet first. 'n 130e- Show the title on all sheets. Grading Plan Tract No. In the City of . Cuts and fills shall not be steeper in slope than o horizontal r has to 1tted a vertical unless approved by planning and the soils /geology report stating that the site has eand estig ted a d gives support that a steeper slope will be stable hazard to public or private property. . Cut slopes more than 40 feet in height or fill slopes more than 30 feet in height shall have drainage terraces pr vidednot bevertical than intervals not exceeding 25 feet. Such ten (8) feet in width. When the total slope height exceed and shall not be an additional terrace near mid height will be added less than 20 feet wide. S 27. nclude all General, Concrete and Rip -Rap notes as shown. (see handout). 8 All drainage shall be designed to carry surface waters to the nearest practical street, storm drain or natural watercourse as approved by the city engineer. ?V1_ Show all natural drainage courses. tml&53 XX. Graded building sites shall have a minimum slope of two percent towards a public street or other drainage structure approved to receive storm waters. X 3 . Show locations of all downspouts where applicable. 63'Berms, swales or other devices shall be located at the top of cut or fill slopes to prevent surface waters from damaging slopes. 33. Submit an "Erosion Control Plan "; grading will occur between October 1 and April 15. This plan must be signed and stamped by a registered civil engineer. &Show/modify/correct detail. �ubmit bonds. X& - Import/Export exceeds 10,000 C.Y.. Please submit a traffic control plan. . See "Comments" attachment for additional corrections. . Grading notes should contain all information listed for other applicable Ventura Co. Standards. Comments Mt TREATMENT AS NGI TUDWAL SLOPE REOlARED B Y T OP Of ALL BE NOT LESS GENERAL MOTES C T P/L 'HAN 19 - e AND 113 DETAk A SETBACK GROUND ORIGINAL f SLOPf1 sr e. I DOWAORAAVS SMALL BE DESIGN AND MATERIAL SYMMETRICAL AND 1e' AS REOLARRED BY GENERAL MW. DEPTH NOTES 17 AND fe TOP OF CUT WTERCEPTOR DRAWS SHALL BE FOUNDED W F14M EARTH MATERW AS DETERMINED BY THE SOILS ENGINEER, TO RESIST EROSION, SLOUGHWG OR CREEP WHICH COLI<D DAMAGE THE DRAIN DETAIL D !" �p,JFESSIa, _ "u PH' E V 04 4 �5/ No. 2476! 11 Op ,z 31-97 CMS - \ q NAP �OF GAU`� P L •) O N OF ilTEWORK , SHEET_ �flCl Si ROAD MOORPARk RA G A/Ay of /-1 -�--- S,�R IO�sO DRA WINO NO. Y �yC Ij I Pave driveway per origional plans (1800 S.F.). 14. 8xi8ting 661 sewer and 2M galvanized line- cap in place. 1S, .Fill and rocompact erod od trench per Geotechnical Engineer's requirements f% n y LG Wstinv 611 sever to 17 so vye to rft* WCPbee for building inspector. ope Uith L Cr tIC* co"tal mixture" consisting of 30% clov 1 4 wildflowers ( 2500 S.F.); Irloato and maintaiii7=44.grass Is 3" high. VI Ohl .scope With'0c'"Itint Coastal mixture" consisting of rtigto* 30* ClOverdli a 10.4 wildflowers ( 2500 S.F.); -ate, and' maintai*­until grass is 311 high. 0, Tritf-jili' 30it _Ic. i6i 60% 60% %�&W ..6wale-D.enind wall; Swale to drain into drain (so L. Ir drain n 9 a, qj.,_,dji0 in place 1 EA.). Provide 1' high Xi wide earth berm to divert runoff swat* (134 I. f _1"� tiil I new 12'x12' gram tdr 8 drain (I ea.) . I ION OF 'SIT-EWORK K'S.ROAD R A Can //So 14?-5 S H EE T OF - CITY OF MOORPARK CITY ENGINEER GRADING PLAN CORRECTION LIST ENGINEER /SURVEYOR �/• �d�N^�• FIRST SUBMITTED 3d 15 Date PHONE # PLAN CHECKER Ir • SUBMITTAL N.' 1„ ~ 3 4 5 6_ ❑ PLANS APPROVED Date ❑ PLANS REJECTED Date Your map has been checked and the necessary corrections, additions, and instructions are shown below. All numbers that are circled require corrections. The attached check print(s) and corrections list must be returned when submitting for recheck.,. Please indicate any changes or corrections on the attached check print(s) that you have made in addition to those requested by the plan checker.(Show these in red.) Write any comments and questions you might have on the check prints or correction list where it would be the most relevant. "fl '*lease pay Grading Plan Check Fee. Please 'pay Site Inspection Fee.(As required by engineer) '?r. a r 4 t St a.a�•+w ' e! , Provide a copy of the Conditioner Of Approval for this plan. `4„ Plans must Abe signed, stamped and dated by a registered civil r � W ok- engineer t Sd P'Lk ` J Submit (3) copies of the soils /geology report. Show correct map scale Show a north arrow 8 Provide a Bench Mark note. any Tar%, ?FACES!? WAGE FOR COMPACTED FILL COMPACTED FILL I S REOL#RED %L NOTES ND 7 I -aR! DEPTH OF CLEAN -OUT TO FARM EARTH MATERIAL AS EXAMINED AND APPROVED BY THE SOILS ENGINEER (AND ENGINEERING GEOL O- OIST, WHERE EMPLOYEDA SUBSURFACE DRAIN LOCATION SEE DETAILS B -t OR 8 -2 AFTER )UT SURFACE AFTER CLEAN -OUT f , FK TER MA TERIAL AS b 7 SPECIFIED IN SOXS _ `�'• REPORT 9 DETAIL 8 -2 -rF Ci rand.,., /I- uoo1Sy y? � r� Tar%, ?FACES!? WAGE FOR COMPACTED FILL COMPACTED FILL I S REOL#RED %L NOTES ND 7 I -aR! DEPTH OF CLEAN -OUT TO FARM EARTH MATERIAL AS EXAMINED AND APPROVED BY THE SOILS ENGINEER (AND ENGINEERING GEOL O- OIST, WHERE EMPLOYEDA SUBSURFACE DRAIN LOCATION SEE DETAILS B -t OR 8 -2 AFTER )UT SURFACE AFTER CLEAN -OUT f , FK TER MA TERIAL AS b 7 SPECIFIED IN SOXS _ `�'• REPORT 9 DETAIL 8 -2 -rF Ci rand.,., /I- uoo1Sy HOLMES ENTERPRISES, INC. Structural and Civil Engineering 2710 West Kelly Road • Newbury Park, CA 91320 • (805) 499 -0461 PAGE t of /3 PROJECT A-eANaA � • LOCATION 100 kIr'ts ElD � '700a ">AZ K DATE Az /4 S /-/yDoOGOGY e/44G' CGC'S/NG VC-;-e PLATF A -/O 7-Y PIE I -g 1, -ZOME Jt� 2. G ,4e-Cu-A-r tP X012 49152 A 'I ���6,crl -r6Ly F -'W" -r ?"6 3 's = S "yNC6 1 ��f Qk2'VfOvS,tIE ss / S /a L[ /KGLc G197-I/Cyr v'se AVA1 drF e�or o�� _14,4 7 of � �' - t 4, F-g4-) ,,7 Pi- 4 aPL,:,E 1't-,5,,vtwzVoQT -1VWL-Y 1 -r-t�,ar �,z► vc w,a y -!5;e-opa fs. /o % U5c V'5 cvc1ri o1- 4- FT�sd-c. 5 , Vj /-rk DB ► k/E I4/Ay /5"7 FE�&'r 1vAve, , %: G.. PMA-7 'R-47r, C -z Ci -5 � / tVTrA(S M/ - 4,3 /N lAr- '7 44 .g �p= 19.94 x .tl� 3 k 0, V91 AC, = t, 17 6, Cr-5 J!�APXA *# is) ,•. Frok7 PZATt F- I 17 V - o. 60 FT A, 'D t s r A NC E = i 8o z.- Tc . • , T = 3 .'> 5 9, FZ!:,lti /ALA C-ZT -T a 4.3 /hd, 44 E- AOSO ea-sr 1pwp or- 25 ALSD 4? : C. 44 k 4.3 X V, 5e A =ZOO C� C�00 l) ltd. Fl Fr-- C4P,4cI-r-/ q d= 8• ", 'S :I% 4'11- :o.0 /3 1 rj�1 S V7 s7 . /59 xo.1 CF!5 FC7a Z1,WN '6 Lo P6, p 7W 2:1 .. llSE /'!= '�= I kO.31 x,02 = ?.4G CPS - 0 k c . HOLMES ENTERPRISES, INC. Structural and Civil Engineering 3 2710 West Kelly Road • Newbury Park, CA 91320 • (805) 499 -0461 PAGE 2 017.! ROJECT d41Ll'14GA 12E5 LOCATION lO kKJIC*6 Ra /"VOZPAMt-' DATE A 7-69 Z 4� 3 Cony 'T A/ O7,,357 ?�eiP5' 1--., Ar1so 4"1 y,q,2D A2A W Pi4G r rY o / 4 " AJ D IZ,,A I N CO 117 : V. 0 05 1 s - e , o r Q = 0,20 GFg A o hleeK d::7 A,:G rri' Or CoNe. -n(� ALC (A./acL Fo'o ,9,F�4 :- x1f -rP-Y - --cTFi1410 AfZ0 `V, TJ ITGN *o=e rUu- -L.)Gr T\-\ I a = z k I � x2.5' = F; -7 5 -r' p _ '2 (1.`OFT� = 3,Z (A-0--c rt = o. m/z CecwG¢£71!5> e� CQ =- z% /Q5k0.14�p:ell2 xt,1.7 1,4 e /OQPOFESS /p„� PH F�c W No.24769 EV. 12.91.97 OFC ()4j r'fz Nil •i ' A.t. b�tivt 4ASLMit Nt Sots -rY -pE 'i LK ( 9; I i 4;1*0 i Ae, . .1 �lix► L1 O' W 1 G 0 W ALL ' - -t 2 1.13 _:;T.- . ".._ :_._ 1- _l . ... . � 8 • •. � . 9 �9tbpc VIM f" Ar _ CV01mss �T1� - X dnferprims kw. �I?C. GENERAL CONTRACTOR 10 W. Kelly Road ewbury Park, CA 91320 805) 499 -0461 TO: G /7-Y O< WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Attached ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Under separate cover via ZI-'rI is ❑ Plans ❑ Change order ❑ 5� n LI U MEW OF �WG,1��IJUllO��G�1� DATE A JOB NO. ATTENTION c� RE: A go N ❑ As requested /b 5 ❑ For review and comment ar5 f' 3A1j t I _- the following items. ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION ❑ As requested /b 5 ❑ For review and comment ar5 ❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 '1 i THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: or Approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 REMARKS ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER TO US COPY TO: ` tip! SIGNED: If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. 00O 4 HOLMES ENTERPRISES, INC. Structural and Civil Engineering 2710 West Kelly Road • Newbury Park, CA 91320 - (805) 499 -0461 PAGE OF / PROJECT A 2a c MA Lc 5. LOCATION 10(o 111 /GILS Q" M00ap s2k DATE � A. 9 S T /A-1 ,a TE [� -rE/1 i7E'SGZl P-`1dN QUANT IT`/ TOTi4-L /VO. G. Y. /c' ,mac M d vCF F!l L Ek rE wry 4" 3o C. F. 6= �G. I &C 4 ESC QGY D 15. Z �E�• Z� ¢cam - I S �) i5" peA,A,, — — –' ' 7. A/E W M S C WA Al V64 Z)eA/Al 17 L Y:� /0- lam^ /0- / I T� /��t S �� �c � 5O �• F- 4 �� Aa 14 Cap GlNE-� - /Do /GO.�IP�cT I f 1 /7 Ex1�T. 45 "' - Exj-b' c 2a Co/vc��;c SwR�Ls ! 3o L.F. E % �• 2f G4� 4" p,eAiAi - �� Eni G 1Al66,21A1a t-4_'4A1 i EA lgcv l4�" 3 i _ t 0,0A/7-WCENcy — 10% 1 / 1 7 HOLMES ENTERPRISES, INC. Structural and Civil Engineering 2710 West Kelly Road • Newbury Park, CA 91320 • (805) 499 -0461 PAGE OF 1 PROJECT A 2A G MA 2t: S . LOCATION 1060 to l laZ5 �7 M�o2�vR x DATE l A. T /ter 4 TE TE/► �E5 cal PTrvN QUINT 1-r OA//r TA -L A/C. C O S T 4; 000 �. Ek TE AJC> IV. NEW e" ZZ,a/A! ' v C WAAIHEL Z),z,41A! 12 4 �°•- 9 65) 111ALL — — - /soNJcOvL J= / cL c. Y. /0 _ TZ /m S��PE �i0 G• F- 4 2c=- l2 eiI&VC`/ D/s. / c,4. /oo.- /00 /3 -?,4 ve Z>R,/ VtF Icliay / S. F. / � LLIL Z iC= 14 CAP LiA/EIS oc Ps Y. 2 75- 1 17 I I& 44ivT �toF�E /6. 2�c� -s. c. f . /2 0_ pq 4 51 o� � �. I= { 1 Z. 45410 I 4 „ p,¢,4 i N 1 - 077./t� SOILS EniG2 / E'!1 / cz� /oc� GOA /T / NG E.A/CY I J% i % I % 2�3z- f Gold Coast GeoServices, Inc. 390 Dawson Drive - Camarillo, CA 93012 - (805) 484 -5070 e FAX (805) 484 -4295 January 5, 1995 File No. GC94 -12620 Matt Adragna 106 Wicks Road Moorpark, CA 93020 SUBJECT: Compaction Test Report on Re. \n' 106 Wicks Road, Moorpark, COL Dear Mr. Adragna: In accordance with your request, this repor (4 _ �t r2 , of our observations and compaction test December 17, 1994, during the filling of an YD�V south facing slope. The slope repair a; locations of compaction tests are shown on the�,41 Plate 1. SLOPE REPAIR PROCEDURE The remedial slope repair involved reconstruction of a 15 to 20 foot wide section of the south facing slope descending from the building pad. The remedial repair was accomplished by filling the erosional scar with compacted earth. The slope was reconstructed to approximately pre- existing slope conditions. The repair work was initiated by excavating a key into firm native soils at the toe of the affected area. The excavated slope failure materials removed from the key area, were stockpiled and subsequently replaced in thin layers or lifts in the key area where they were brought to near optimum moisture content and compacted to at least 90% of the material's maximum dry density with a gasoline powered wacker. The finished slope surface was reconstructed to match the pre- existing slope site conditions. The finished slope surface was compacted using a gasoline powered wacker. WAAW Foundation Engineering - Engineering Geology - Soil Testing ADRAGNA FILE NO. GC94 -12620 106 WICKS ROAD, MOORPARK LABORATORY TESTING Maximum dry density and optimum moisture data were determined at our laboratory for the significant soil types in conformance with ASTM D- 1557 -78. The test results are given below: TABLE I MAXIMUM OPTIMUM SOIL DRY DENSITY MOISTURE TYPE SOIL DESCRIPTION jLBS. /CU.FT ( %1 I Reddish brown silty sand 127.0 8 COMPACTION TESTS Compaction tests and observations of the slope repair work were conducted on a continuous basis by representatives of this office during the slope repair operations. In -place compaction of the slope repair fill mass was determined by conducting sand cone tests in accordance with ASTM D -1556. Test results are shown on Table II. TABLE II COMPACTION TEST RESULTS FOR FILL SLOPE PERCENT TEST TEST MOIST. DRY MAXIMUM SOIL NO. DATE ELEVATION DENSITY DRY DENSITY TYPE (LBS /CU FT 1 12/17/94 530 7.9 115.6 2 12/17/94 532 9.4 115.3 3 12/17/94 534 10.7 120.3 PA 91.3 I 90.4 I 94.7 I 000vjs ADRAGNA FILE NO. GC94-12620 106 WICKS ROAD, MOORPARK CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Based upon our test results and observations during the remedial slope repair work, it is our finding that the slope area was repaired in accordance with our recommendations and is considered to be safe and adequate for the intended usage. Drainage All surface drainage from the building pad above the slope repair area of the residence shall be collected away fron the the descending slope. Precautions shall be taken to avoid excessive watering of the south facing slope area. Any future resident or home owner shall be advised of the above recommendations and shall be responsible for maintenance of drainage control devices. Slope Planting and Maintenance All slopes shall be provided with lightweight, deep rooting ground cover or shrubs. Small boxed trees may be planted. The services of a landscape contractor are recommended to aid in proper plant selection. The groundcover may be irrigated as necessary but over - watering must be avoided. 3 ADRAGNA 106 WICKS ROAD, MOORPARK FILE NO. GC94 -12620 REMARKS Please call this office at ( 805 ) 484 -5070 if you have any questions regarding this report. Thank you for the opportunity to be of professional service. Respectfully submitted, GOLD COAST GEOSERVICES, INC. C / F`�e Scott J. Hogrefe, CEG 1516 Steven R. Thurston, GE 829 cc: addressee (5) OQROFESSlpti o GE000a29 3s # W.12/31,96 �F�tFCH>t�C�� OF CAL10 `��\ 4 0`'JV4! Date: Prom: CITY 07 M00RpA1XK SII = LD =NG AND SASETY REPORT OF COMPLIANCE REVIEW APCD ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH FACILITIES FEES (Bldg /Sfty) FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU FLOOD CONTROL GENERAL SERVICES AGENCY PLANNING DIVISION PWA GRADING /SUBDIVISIONS PWA AREA OF CONTRIBUTING FEE WATER/SANITATION DISTRICT Property Address: Assessor's Parcel f �1 � — O -04;" �5orract Lot Zone Clearance f Other IDf Description -of Project .I F D Completion of the construction project described above is anticipated in the coming weeks. After final inspection, a clearance to occupy will be granted, upon receipt of a completed and signed REPORT OF COMPLIANCE REVIEW form from your agency. Please review this project for compliance with requirements and payment of all fees. Provide informatioA in the appropriate spaces below. Occupancy APPROVED by Date NOT APPLICABLE Date Occupancy DISAPPROVED by Date Reason(s) for disapproval: Remarks: This completed REPORT OF COMPLIANCE REVIEW must be returned to the office of the Division of Building Safety in order to obtain an occupancy clearance and approval for connection of utilities. w Q IV 04110 , v ril- 64- MOORPARK Building and Safety, City Engineering 18 High Street, Moorpark, California 93021 (805) 529 -6864 ext 421 December 13, 1994 Mr. Dan Holmes, 2710 W. Kelley Rd. Newbury Park, CA 91320 Re: 106 Wicks Rd. Dear Mr Holmes, Our department has received your letter and cost estimate describing the grading and drainage correction measures discussed at the December 5, 1994 meeting at the subject site. In order to finish checking your estimate we require that a conceptual plan be provided at this time. The plan shall show all mitigation elements described in your December 7 letter '(attached), discussed at the December 5, 1994 meeting and any items per our telephone conversation of December 12th 1994 There are a few items of the estimate sheet and letter which should be added or clarified at this time. They correspond to your numbering and are as follows: Cost Estimate - Item C - Include the cost of capping the existing drainage and sewer lines to the estimate. Building and Safety will need to inspect the capping of the lines and need to see the wye connection of the sewer systems for both homes. (Although this work is to be done separately from the work covered under the grading and drainage plan please indicate the cost as part of the estimate). _ City Hall � 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California (805) 529 -6864 PAUL W. LAWRASON JR. PATRICK HUNTER JOHN E. WOZNIAK BERNARDO M. PEREZ SCOTT MONTGOMERY Mayor Mayor Pro Tem Councilmember Councilmember Councilmember Printed on Recycled Paper Item F. - A cost for energy dissipators should be included in the estimate. Correction etter- Prob. B. - Show existing and proposed location of sewer and all drainage lines. Prob. D. - Show a drainage swale behind this wall and design drainage to provide that it be carried to the bottom of adjacent slope in a non - errodable device. Prob. F. - Be sure to include grading quantities on your conceptual plan. Use our standard cover sheet for grading. Upon approval of the conceptual plan please provide a grading plan, showing the elements of the approved conceptual plan, for review and approval by the City. An agreement and security will also be required for the improvements. Please contact me if you have any further questions. Sincerely, d Chris Oberender Associate Engineer CO: Aragna grading 12/13/94 CC: Dirk Lovett Richard Hare Attachment IeC 'Ir cvolmes 6niorprinsinc. Inc. (805) 499 -0461 December 7, 1994 Mr. Matt Adragna 106 Wicks Road Moorpark, CA 93020 Re: 106 Wicks Road, Moorpark Dear Mr. Adragna: On December 5, 1994, I met with you at referenced site along with Jim Aguilera, Dirk Lovett and Chris Oberender to discuss the "Building and Safety Compliance Review" letter from the City of Moorpark dated November 29, 1994. It was agreed between yourself and the City that we would provide you and the City with a summary of tentative corrective action along with an estimate for cost of same so that you can provide a bond to insure the work will be completed and receive interim clearance from the Engineering Department to allow utilities to be activated. PROPOSED CORRECTIVE ACTION: (Numbers in parentheses (Pi, Al) refer to problems and required action in reference to the City of Moorpark letter.) A. PROBLEM: Non - permitted fill on south slope (P1). CORRECTION: The amount of fill is less than two cubic yards; it shall be removed and placed in an approved location. This work shall be done prior to City Clearance and no estimate is required. Additionally, owner is to (prior to clearance) plant all bare spots on the south slope with temporary rye grass and irrigate daily until grass has filled in and obtained a height of 311. Planting is to be performed after completion of item B. B. PROBLEM: Broken and exposed utility lines on south slope (P2 and P3). CORRECTION: Owner shall remove, or cap at both ends, all utility lines and fill in old trench and eroded area in conformance with Gold Coast recommendations; Gold Coast to provide City with letter certifying same. This item is to be 2710 W. Kelly Road Newbury Park, California 91320 State License No. 386822 000%05 performed prior to any clearance from City; fill -in area to be planted and irrigated per item A. No estimate is required. C. PROBLEM: Un- compacted fill on east slope of lot 112 and Bridgeman property to the north (P1, P5, A2 and A8). CORRECTION: Loose fill and debris shall be removed and placed in an approved location (recommended) or compacted per Gold Coast recommendations and certification of same. D. PROBLEM: North property line retaining wall not inspected and unapproved fill behind same (P4, P5, A8 and A9). CORRECTION: Remove fill behind wall so that wall is retaining no more than 31- 611 of fill and cut slope back from t14s point @ 2:1 to natural grade; owner has letter from Bridgeman allowing same. E. PROBLEM: Access road and grading has not been completed per plans (P6). CORRECTION: Owner will trim and shape slopes to 2:1 maximum. F. GENERAL: (Al, A3, A4, A5, and A7). Engineer shall locate property corners in the field and shall prepare plans showing prior and finish contours, necessary drainage devices and dissipators, walls, necessary easements, property lines and slope planting. Plans are to be stamped by the Civil and Geotechnical Engineers (Al, A4, A5, A6 and A7). Enclosed is an estimate of costs for the above items. Very truly yours, A4_64�1r� Dan P. Holmes RCE 24769 %gipFESSIpw c�� Np�'y�Fy P Cz �� F No.24769 7D EW 12 -31.97 \l9�OF�� TS HOLMES ENTERPRISES, INC. Structural and Civil Engineering 2710 West Kelly Road, Newbury Park, CA 91320 • (805) 499-0461 PAGE / / of / r1,�F-A G n1 A4 ) oco i.Ci 1G�S t'Zp f-1 ooP-'P Z(L DATE I Z /& l94 rCT LOCATION '�T FS'T'Il`7A'T� 2E2 /-MM 2"F . a Ea/C.eA L 1, C11c Tani D 2 'p 2A I A( S - 6. a t- P4,4N7- E, 'S(-C Pt —40-1 JrO- d , C/Va 1AA!:ae/N G P1-^V-1 /0 : GC=- O'C- -7 ¢ Zo - 14 oo- Tc? _(, = * 4� 9 70 •t� W' G �'s s �� . ors 7 E4 'D (TEP'1 � C , �MDYc' Coo�� F(r C.. - /- �i'P�.Ok 1S0 C.Y• 1. GDAa�� • V;ro,4TDz me. Ca 6o I%LWr D IZ�MDV� `�D ►L lb�N �ti�D GUALL x 5' = 'SG C- V. 6 10 -/�•Y. Svr-JTV..rAL� ezoo•_ 1. S�QPt �coPEs a N,2G� gyp' 3�- Z. ZIcoto sz , ¢ . /NSTALL 2A 'A-) icL-;'(:9 G &00 �v Z5-ro -M L 4z 7o - /-MM 2"F . a Ea/C.eA L 1, C11c Tani D 2 'p 2A I A( S - 6. a t- P4,4N7- E, 'S(-C Pt —40-1 JrO- d , C/Va 1AA!:ae/N G P1-^V-1 /0 : GC=- O'C- -7 ¢ Zo - 14 oo- Tc? _(, = * 4� 9 70 •t� W' G �'s s �� . ors 7 I -t 3 -1:4 S-- r 'rte -nzs I l it o 4 u i rA- 9 1 J HOLMES ENTERPRISES, INC. Structural and Civil Engineering 2710 West Kelly Road • Newbury Park, CA 91320 • (805) 499-0461 PAGE of PROJECT AD LOCATION I oto t-j IGk- --::, (2-D . ti OOP-? A 2-K- DATE /14 94 2E �i2 'TO Ova LcT�2 �� -r� D �cG . � � -9 4 M 0 C ) 0VC 1r= C, Y. l7�P? *D �MD1lG: Z�o�L lbr= N �tirD GvAL` r !. is)-14 Pt --5 c-op1C S N/2 0 `)O " 2. ;P4 vE Z)p-1 v 0 /0,)o So, - 18a7 3 . /Al 57y9 LG 0&57R-) -1 /!50' @ 3 I , C�c^T�ND Z 'p•2A I&I S - GO,e /C 3. rte' Gf}Ar7- L, Sc.cw PG -4 a'0- NJ �l SS ar; Z P-r� t L `J U i�'rthL moo 3lam- Z� � � So (000 2.4.n 4Z70- 4vvxs !4 W' iDdt� �ut7r�� 320_ T� = X970 cony; in /Gc/vc/ Cis %� 997 ` i - _ '?G,...' . --, rP �.:. Dui - � ,•h � -� � ! ��. �.: -F... U Gtr/ �.( rz3n a j � l _ l �� �jw�' � �H ✓if � Ole View C7 cvvlmas �- 6nierprijosinc. t DEC 0 sggL inc. (805) 499.0461 December 7, 1994 Mr. Matt Adragna 106 Wicks Road Moorpark, CA 93020 Re: 106 Wicks Road, Moorpark Dear Mr. Adragna: On December 5, 1994, I met with you at referenced site along with Jim Aguilera, Dirk Lovett and Chris Oberender to discuss the "Building and Safety Compliance Review" letter from the City of Moorpark dated November 29, 1994. It was agreed between yourself and the City that we would provide you and the City with a summary of tentative corrective action along with an estimate for cost of same so that you can provide a bond to insure the work will be completed and receive interim clearance from the Engineering Department to allow utilities to be activated. PROPOSED CORRECTIVE ACTION: (Numbers in parentheses (PI, Al) refer to problems and required action in reference to the City of Moorpark letter.) A. PROBLEM: Non - permitted fill on south slope (P1). CORRECTION: The amount of fill is less t:ian Lwo cubic yards; it shall be removed and placed in an approved location. This work shall be done prior to City Clearance and no estimate is required. Additionally, owner is to (prior to clearance) plant all bare spots on the south slope with temporary rye grass and irrigate daily until grass has filled in and obtained a height of 311. Planting is to be performed after completion of item B. B. PROBLEM: Broken and exposed utility lines on south slope (P2 and P3). CORRECTION: Owner shall remove, or cap at both ends, all utility lines and fill in old trench and eroded area in conformance with Gold Coast recommendations; Gold Coast to provide City with letter certifying same. This item is to be 2710 W. Kelly Road Newbury Park, California 91320 State License No. 386822 DIECD811994 performed prior to any clearance from City; fill -in area to be planted and irrigated per item A. No estimate is required. C. PROBLEM: Un- compacted fill on east slope of lot 112 and Bridgeman property to the north (P1, P5, A2 and A8). CORRECTION: Loose fill and debris shall be removed and placed in an approved location (recommended) or compacted per Gold Coast recommendations and certification of same. D. PROBLEM: North property line retaining wall not inspected and unapproved fill behind same (P4, P5, A8 and A9). CORRECTION: Remove fill behind wall so that wall is retaining no more than 31- 6" of fill and cut slope back from t.11s point @ 2:1 to natural grade; owner has letter from Bridgeman allowing same. E. PROBLEM: Access road and grading has not been completed per plans (P6). CORRECTION: Owner will trim and shape slopes to 2:1 maximum. F. GENERAL: (Al, A3, A4, A5, and A7). Engineer shall locate property corners in the field and shall prepare plans showing prior and finish contours, necessary drainage devices and dissipators, walls, necessary easements, property lines and slope planting. Plans are to be stamped by the Civil and Geotechnical Engineers (Al, A4, A5, A6 and A7). Enclosed is an estimate of costs for the above items. Very truly yours, Dan P. Holmes RCE 24769 Qp�OfESSlp,� c� � No. 24769 � *\ Exp. 12.31.9' J CM1- FCW r04jii , Z'e' Gold Coast GeoServices, Inc. 390 Dawson Drive a Camarillo, CA 93012 • (805) 484 -5070 • FAX (805) 484 -4295 Matt Adragna 106 Wicks Road Moorpark, CA 93020 SUBJECT: City of Moorpark. Dear Mr. Adragna, December 3, 1994 File No. GC94 -12620 , 106 Wicks Road, This report presents the findings of our foundation investigation of the existing single family residence located on the subject property. The purpose of the investigation was to evaluate the adequecy of the existing foundation system supporting the two -story residence; and to determine the factor of safety against failure of the slopes descending along the south side of the residence. SCOPE OF WORK The scope of work for this investigation included the completion of the following: 1) Excavation of two (2) manually dug test pits adjacent to the footings along the southerly side of the residence to measure footing dimensions, and to obtain relatively undisturbed samples of the bearing earth materials; and one (1) 25 -foot deep exploratory boring. 2) Testing at our laboratory to determine certain engineering properties of the retrieved samples. 3) Engineering geologic and geotechnical engineering analysis of 1 Foundation Engineering • Engineering Geology a Soil Testing � T41-1 Matt and Patti Adragna c/o 106 Wicks Road Moorpark, CA Subject: Building and Safety Compliance Review November 29, 1994 DEC S i J94 A site visit was performed on 11/29/94. Listed below are Grading /Drainage issues requiring attention along with items required to be submitted to and approved by the City Engineering Department prior to site clearance. Problems: 1. Non - permitted, uncompacted fill has been placed on the south and east slopes. 2. Drain and sewer lines on the south slope are exposed and /or broken. 3. Drain lines on both the south and east slopes are eroding soil. 4. North property line retaining wall has not been approved or inspected by the City. 5. Grading on Bridgeman property, to the north, has not been approved by the City. Has it been approved by Mr. Bridgeman? 6. Access road and grading has not been completed per the approved plans. 7. Fill east of the property extends beyond the property line. Required action: 1. Prepare an engineered grading and drainage plan showing all grading(previous and proposed contours), drainage devices, drain water energy dissipators, grading quantities, property lines, easements, slope landscaping, etc.. Plans should be stamped by a Civil and Geotechnical Engineer. 2. Remove all debris from slopes and toe of slopes. am DEC 0 8 1994 3. All drainage devices to be in place upon final inspection. 4. Final grading, per the approved grading plan, shall be certified by the contractor, Civil Engineer and Geotechnical Engineer. 5. The Geotechnical Engineer shall approve the location of the walls /fences and certify certify the stability of the slopes. 6. Easements shall be obtained where grading has taken place on adjacent properties. Upon completion final clearances will be required of affected property owners. 7. Locate property corners in field. 8. If uncertified fill is to remain on "Lot" 112 a notice of uncertified fill shall be filed with the County Recorders office. y 9. Provide structural calcs and details for the retaining wall. Other items may be required pursuant to the submittal of each of the above, as deemed necessary. , Assistant City Engineer cc: chron Jim MacDonald 00;415