The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAGENDA REPORT 1995 0906 CC REG ITEM 11B ITEM 11. Bs "c O2DA^K, CALL'''—"" Cty C u H M�:,: 1 CITY OF MOORPARK of 1995 AGENDA REPORT ACTION: , TO: The Honorable City Council gy FROM: Christine Adams, Director of Community Services DATE: August 5, 1995 (Meeting of September 6, 1995) SUBJECT: Consider Alternative Location for Roller Hockey / Multi-Use Court and Future Aauatics Facility at Arroyo Vista Community Park. BACKGROUND At their meeting of July 19, 1995, the City Council directed the Public Works, Facilities, and Solid Waste Committee (Montgomery and Wozniak) to review schematic design alternatives for Phase II of Arroyo Vista Community Park, specifically the area (s) directly east of the gymnasium and the Recreation Center. The purpose of this directed study was to provide the City Council with more technical information about the most appropriate locations for the proposed aquatics facility, and the approved multi-use court . At this meeting, the City Council also approved the size of the multi-use court to be 200 ' x 100 ' (20, 000 square feet) in size. Staff contracted with T. I . Maloney, who designed the plans and specifications for Phase I of the park, to prepare three (3) alternative studies, incorporating both elements in a harmonious design. Study A shows the aquatics facility that BSI, the landscape architect who had been contracted to do the original park master plan, had proposed as a future location. This study shows how the pool in this location can be complemented with a multi-use court to the south of the gymnasium. The aquatics facility is adjacent to the gymnasium, rather than across the walkway, which allows both users of the gym and the pool to utilize the shower and locker facilities . The pool area can be accessed by both the first parking lot, and from behind the gym. Study B locates the multi-use court behind the expanded gymnasium, and relocates the aquatics facility to the south of the gymnasium. In Study A and B the pool shown is 150 ' x 75 ' . This is a very large, Olympic size pool, much larger than the pool at Thousand Oaks High School or at Rancho Simi Park. This size 'OMJ%:i6 of pool is comparable to the pool at USC, and fits NCAA standards . The Public Works, Facilities, and Solid Waste Committee concurred that a pool of this size would be beneficial to the City, as the City would potentially be able to generate revenue from regional youth and collegiate swim meets . The aquatics facility, shown in Study C, includes a 75 ' x 75 ' competition lap pool , which is conducive to competitive swimming programs, including high school programs, but would not be large enough to accommodate college level competition. It also incorporates a shallow pool area for instructional classes and recreational swim. This conceptual design also includes a water slide area as an option, which would provide additional revenue to the City, should this be considered in the future. Study C locates the aquatics facility to the south of the gym, as in Study B. The Public Works, Facilities, and Solid Waste Committee preferred the design and location of Study B. The aquatics facility, in its final design, is probably years away from completion, due to funding limitations . Locating the multi- use court to the south of the gym at this time, would create considerable additional costs in grading and reconfiguration of the drainage, as this location for the multi-use court is directly on a major swale in the landscaping. When the aquatics facility is ready to be designed, the additional grading and drainage improvements can be included in the costs for the pool . Additionally, the location for the multi-use court shown on Study B already has acceptable soils conditions pursuant to a recent soils test, and this site has the necessary compaction for the court, and will require no additional subsurface preparation at this time, other than removal of the sod and moving irrigation lines, which can be done by City staff at a minimal cost . As indicated in a recent survey, the land elevation in this area will provide the necessary drainage with little or no grading. Staff also prefers Study B for parking. By locating the court behind the expanded gymnasium footprint, more users for the multi-use court will park in the second lot, and balance the overall parking at this facility. When the aquatics facility is finally built, parking for the pool can be accessed by both of these parking lots . The Public Works, Facilities, and Solid Waste Committee also indicated that when a final design is created for the aquatics facility, that Study B should be modified to include a separate wading pool for pre-school children, and an extension to the south of the larger pool for a competitive diving area. 000%17 RECOMMENDATION Adopt Design Alternative B as presented for siting of the roller hockey / multi-use court and future pool, and direct staff to proceed with installation of a 200 ' x 100 ' roller hockey / multi-use court, as previously approved by the City Council . Attached T. I . Maloney Inc . , Study A, B, C 100021,S • Pi AY_Ara. A6)4147) ( •. . • 0 _ a o • • ,0. ' 00 7 . • .. .. ._.:. . MIIV ••• '• ‘.. . Do ,=,00. / • - 1 \ • • • 7 '. \ ' . alk ... ) • • 41. , ._ . .,o .. . .\,". . .. ,,. ..,. .. .- • :. .- O' . /1111\ • 4,01/4 • .it., , le air 411/4 . , A IIIM le • . 4„ ._‘/ -,-,-,•,•:.=•--i,i-•,--•••-5. .:• • . 'i.4.4_ NIL.,-, Sb, _uavll IG r ," ... r ,,, , .,..,. ,.., m ,,_ ...,,,,,, 4.,,,,,„,.. iiiiii.,,. . �Tj... ( //� J{1/ 1 f ,—< �7j �1 �'•IIW1 . 00- I' • 'II • 004111 , , ,,, will :,:--- .P.. ."."--. I ...) • • • • I lg 7: ��`►� '1 ' I • • . ipoeri!.e.„ , fad -,,• 1 , . Vb - \'‘;:s s , - AAA-114/7 eti74, iill ,.,. ,,, , Oa! _ . . .. . IX \t. VP L,.-- glialliki • .. lip4W*. ''VVV11111"iiir • . \to,4,c 141. -,-; .>„----------„*. :-.. . • • • Igo •*, ` _. �XIfINCt ilLOG• • �� to et . _ rAW1N� III _-_it malony, in-_ • iiin u.i M......ti;;;-171 • Ilbw•db,I:A/MT _1.M.(1pH4. hu74.--._.. Atzroy0 k/Kfik fACts • rT I-hC4T-A Mile.* .. 1t I `rub^r 4A • ()00;41:1) . tl AtrA(ex1sr o ''' • •. • ...)\---11-K--•0 n'Stratteit :,..A j`i►V� 2.`�el-` i •ems' P 1 • ! �� Tr a j . ,� 57 . r a .. 0 „ _- lbcxt1. ` • `; I" to.(�. .1.. it "" �� 33l1Wiltrs , e • till \ �� • • 1---- , . . . .___..„ . . . .. . , , k • rvims it-t--K. ( ri► Au bl-76. r`, ( . tiyi_ r___IaitZ. __..__bsL5._Vta.(.t._..1)_1% or _ ....„ 4.11116 -,... prow . -1/4 .s. . .. 0 Alipl'-:-.141‘..*; .oir //Illllli��>` , t. i. mnloney, inc. %4- WOo L - ... __,.p.„„74.4_7_....„..,..,_,,,;:_,_,,,._,,,_•.i_,,..... iiioa.ii. ...0�n...,,.,.F.m,ns • ni...1.-ii:,cn isoi AtC1C0f0 Vi4TA a KIS . rAicK1144 °V :. etW" •f",1112c '513 1 ----60- I ) :•. • • 1 i • . .• \ • • o�opt, v0®o • : : . 1: • • ry • • • �• • 1 _ -------- __-_.�__ • • •• _ . • : ; .---.‘,,E—.-,..cit--t.......wr sr,z?,,1-' •i.-!,15., 0 . , _ , . „ .r•., , . .. _.. Niv--Li. I . 1 - I 1, il JAN-Lg.. ? .. O p . .--� GLIG�vt, _gl�wv O` .(31CK11trs. I i I i I � 1 r' a ------ --- • '� • III } . • • ,.t.r>ANL.1.-G1-) .- ° 1 1-ir-,r1„,tzp.t- . O wilt 'I / -- 9 Milt( ► .ft 1 �.� : 1 i Firtms 11-1A . 1 \\N1A/ ht. Nill i'rJ aav � �t-t�G `.. 44, irs' �►. •Ø111111ffJ4 4511r malOneInc, p `—'' is if Aero �yrA i F �G ° �\•• 1' ilik . -1iu.r.r- ou<'-r-A6. w. -7r�uf 4}'G leg ) ) :. • • 011-