HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 1995 1101 CC REG ITEM 11B'. V L" 1:J1T`R REPORT
A LA
City of Moorpark
%/,;�
ITEM1. 6�
it 7 s
To: The Honorable City Council
From: Jaime Aguilera, Director of Community Development�r1`
Prepared by Craig Malin, Assistant Planner V
Date: October 6, 1995 (City Council meeting October 18,
1995)
Subject: Consider Approval of Minor Modification No. 4 to
Planned Development Permit No. 1072, request to delete a
10' pedestrian easement (UWC Investors).
Background
On November 9, 1987, the City Council approved Resolution No. 87-
430 approving Tract 4342 and Planned Development Plan 1072 for the
construction of 179 homes. A total of 3 Minor Modifications have
been approved for this site. These modifications include changes to
the elevations and floor plans.
Tract 4342 contains a recorded access easement, 10' in width
running from the terminus of Sagewood Drive to the adjacent
commercial site. This easement is depicted on approved street
improvement plan 88- ML- 10319. In addition, the Fence and Wall Plan
for CPD 90 -2, approved on November 29, 1994, also includes the
easement. When lots 64 and 65 of Tract 4342 (which abut the
easement) were completed, the property line wall was completed
without an opening for the easement. This was due to the easement
not being included on the landscape plans which are used to verify
wall and fence compliance at the time of final inspections. This
easement is to provide pedestrian access to and from the commercial
site. CPD 90 -2 was approved with pedestrian access. CPD 90 -2 Major
Mod, submitted by American Stores and currently in process,
includes stairs to Sagewood Drive, which is required by the City.
Discussion
This Minor Modification request is to eliminate the requirement to
provide the access easement between lots 64 and 65, the opening in
the wall, and the walkway down to the commercial site. The
commercial site is located approximately 15' below the level of the
adjacent homes. The two homes on each side of the easement have
been completed with the wall already in place. The applicant has
submitted a letter from the Homeowners Association expressing their
desire that the access be eliminated. A petition was also included
from 10 residents on Sagewood Drive requesting that easement be
eliminated. The contention of the Homeowner Association and the
Applicant is that the access, even when completed, will prove to be
a safety and security hazard.
This proposal has been reviewed by the Director of Community
Development, who is deferring action on this application to the
City Council since it is the Council who will act upon Commercial
Planned Development No. 90 -2 Major Modification No. 1. Staff has
scheduled these items together in order that the Council may make
a decision on both items since they are interrelated.
Recommendation
Direct Staff as Deemed Appropriate
Exhibit: A) Easement location plan
B) Wall location plan
C) Petition
C: \WP51 \CLAIG \PD 1072 #4.SR
00- OVA
n o Tax Rate 4r�ea 45
1 " \ 14.41 ' — 99' by 1 -
4 N32°83'06� \�6 iS 10 (l.
R =1s' 55 A5 j
N6553 '15"E P A
14.41
TRACT 20 4342 -2
C
A.
l B 9 a 56 \
6lp of �` 51
n Uo �y�o� 29
P
14 `cfl 0, 57 O��A
76
\/1 O 6
Pti HGBA 28 /
R -15 78 \6 \\ 58 IA�O
• '� 30 \' �' o A9 hA �� o�+y9 �,y� 49
2 y �6 2 b 75 0 (r X63 2% N7PL;OC "E
N 79 12 �\� 59 IIAg3 9.29'
A `
4 N:d 3 411° C ly Ag ��E 119.15
80 O 74
('n lo& y8, ! I 60
2a� 116''161 .m o IH'St S.,
_ 2
N63 213
O T3 r
p7 36 �Cn ei 10 8129 ;U N = 24 63 64 N
/ - 106 ; 82 F9� 72 14 f 61
lip) Idb 9 n9 2p">r O � A
_ , 2� P� O •� N�H a' � ti • z ■2d.3d "0796'
5� 105 ,+ R. R �� s5'S� , L ■2291
41 \1yti 20 a y O 7! <+2� T; 1 1d y Rs1 R■Z850'
a
Z0� �OC' a. N Ipl L +2403 ,n
0,3 O 4 7124 J R,��,,.p LfS*y -22261
,A .. 104 NT 84 �As.)Q (7' 2j 0 N' 17'_ 'N
0 Tp Q •O=,� 0 4 1427°Q.
,A9 NT2ot2 0 65
�� G L` _
'\ °�0,320 A,'�Y :D.14T?A.A\ ik. QT c ; 67 m
�/ ro3 N I A��'E 1 �; 68 g "0 21 1z N
�39� a � Av �2z ` 69 0 19 Q
\V' 85 frt 70 3 ; j8 t Z Z 58wE �t
} '< AlA 60 yC5 0 1% A SSp9
0
IV tk
86
2�2 - 1s �
� 1z
�ptag E
19 'Ai
I
\K6t2
14.41f'
ya
, 15 60,
z
tA�G-
02391
Qj N2erod34"W
II
Nyjg6
(
87
14.43'
14 ta W
E
E. NZrf930 "W
-,a
&I N3404tVIV
F. "31°11'32 "W
830'
88
2dDd
Q N OBE
and
U. N#6027'01 "W
Id.04
F1. R -1100
4
O
33 23
J. Nerw38 "E
a-id
"70°32'33 E
X11
L1 4
11
14.43'
X Nf2'29'1d"E
14.12'
L N39wW'414'
14.43'
Y 34 "E
19.00'
IA NW*40 E
14.43'
JZJ N6~08"W
10.33'
EXHIBIT A
4 S'4 "F N82o31�30"E
SS
N54°2T'39"E
38'
CITY OF MOORPARK
Aj
Ventura
County Assessor's Mop.
73308 PARCELS snow" ON THIS PAGE
"CESSARILY CONSTITUTE LEGAL LOTS.
-)4 COUNTY SURVEronrS OFFICE OR
'WtS10N TO VERIFY.
SCHEDULE
SCHEDULE (Cart)
N23■bdb3"W
14.41'
N. N24�24'IB "W
14.43
8. N10°49'OB'y1'
14.41f'
P. N60'b74 / "E
17.79
c. R- 1s.00'
02391
Qj N2erod34"W
4930
0, N12444�30"W
14.43'
R.1 NOenft "W
14.43'
E. NZrf930 "W
Md
&I N3404tVIV
F. "31°11'32 "W
830'
T.1 N840f7'03"E
2dDd
Q N OBE
and
U. N#6027'01 "W
Id.04
F1. R -1100
L ■2103'
V. N67'39'46 "E
33 23
J. Nerw38 "E
a-id
"70°32'33 E
14.06'
K. NI 1°8440'1Y
14.43'
X Nf2'29'1d"E
14.12'
L N39wW'414'
14.43'
Y 34 "E
19.00'
IA NW*40 E
14.43'
JZJ N6~08"W
10.33'
Assessor's Beck NwnbrrS Shown in Ellipses.
Asoof's Patel Numbers Shown in Circles.
Asasssor's Mhwrnf Numbers Shown in Sovm n
DRAWN
0.T. CHECKED
REDRAWN
DATE
INKED
D.T. EFFECTIVE 902 ROLL
PREVIOUS
SK. 505 Pg. 12.
Compiled
By Ventura County Assomm Offict
1I81HX� -
r.. :� q `� ,� �' �I TRACT 43 ; 4� 432:s3
TRACT 4�4
D
0 Q
o rx
- � N +COI q
i.
IN STA. 1i16.
� TI�DN1
ro D. C71
;no �-
'n r 43
F.L. 6 c.F. s+oo CEDARDA
a s SSE SH
cri v
STA. 12 +13,24
�' TI 1 o i STA. 11+-99.00 e-
0
O rn of o
rnv o
v
cn
< fat I
v m y .
r
65
OI �
p STA.12 -'
n'
Y 'y
� R F�piO� STA.12#�3f,$f E.0 12 +67.67 g.C.0)
Z 2 0
c71 tU
Cj
N cn y Ol STA. 12+93.07
p o o w Ex.
+ -q cn 01
��'20 O
�
a'� O
W
C� "K .
7W Ro•
Ui
TRACT
4342-1
kt,�T
r
MOORPA
88- ML -
*3 'DRAWING N0.
r]
Randy Goss
Verona Project Manager
California Community Builders
233 Wilshire Blvd.
Suite 820
Santa Monia, CA. 90401
Dear Mr. Goss:
G
I appreciate your notifying the Verona Board of Directors of the City of Moorpark's
requirement that you complete the access between Sagewood and the pending commercial
site. At a recent board meeting we informed the homeowners that this access was
required by the city to complete the approved plan
As a result of this meeting the Verona homeowners unanimously voiced their desire to
have this free access changed and that no access be allowed. It is the opinion of the board
that this access would lead to more problems than it would be beneficial.
The Verona Board of Directors is therefore requesting that California Community
Builders begin the necessary process to have the City change this plan to eliminate the
access. Should you need any further assistance from the Board or myself please call meat
my office (818) 715 -5258 or at home (805) 529 -4215.
Thank you for your quick attention to this matter.
BOARD MEMBFRS
Board Presid t
S
2ND Vice President
ecre ary
5/20/95
EXHIBIT C
01001,)'?
Homeowners most affected by the access to the commercial property from Sagewood.
CIr
ei
5/20/95
0 V13S