Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 2017 0719 CCSA REG ITEM 08A ITEM 8.A. CITY OF tv9OORPARK,CALIFORNIA City Council Meeting ACTION:_. u4 , 1452) ___ l x-10 MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT TO: Honorable City Council FROM: David A. Bobardt, Community Development Director Prepared by: Freddy A. Carrillo, Associate Planner I DATE: July 7, 2017 (CC Meeting of 7/19/2017) SUBJECT: Consider Ordinance Approving Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2017-04, an Amendment to Chapter 17.40 (Sign Regulations) and Chapter 17.42 (Wireless Communications Facilities) of Title 17 (Zoning) of the Moorpark Municipal Code to Allow Signage on Certain Wireless Facilities in Certain Locations; and Resolution Approving Conditional Use Permit No. 2016-05, and Modification No. 2 to Commercial Planned Development Permit No. 2004-03, for Construction and Operation of a Major Wireless Communications Facility within a 48-Foot High Tower at 14339 White Sage Road (Warehouse Discount Center Site), with Signage on the Tower, and Determining that These Actions Are Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act, on the Application of Matt Vigil (Vinculums) on Behalf of Verizon Wireless BACKGROUND On December 2, 2016, Matt Vigil (representative of Vinculums for Verizon Wireless), submitted applications for a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) and Modification to a Commercial Planned Development (CPD) Permit for construction and operation of a Major Wireless Communication Facility consisting of 12 panel antennas and installation of an above ground equipment enclosure within a 48-foot high wireless communications tower at 14339 White Sage Road (Warehouse Discount Center site). Signage for the tenants at the site was also proposed on three of the sides of the tower at the request of the property owner. 1 Honorable City Council July 19, 2017 Page 2 The project applications originally were placed on the City Council agenda for its April 19, 2017 meeting. After opening the public hearing (there were no speakers), the City Council continued the agenda item to May 3, 2017, at the request of the property owner, who was unavailable for the meeting. One of the staff-recommended conditions was to prohibit signage on the tower, as this is not allowed by the Zoning Ordinance. The property owner expressed that the proposed signage was essential to his business and on April 26, 2017, requested a Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA) to be considered as part of the applications to allow the proposed signage. On May 3, 2017, the City Council closed the public hearing and referred the applications (with the ZOA) to the Planning Commission for recommendation. The primary purpose of the proposed tower is to screen the proposed wireless antennae, which are considered by the Moorpark Municipal Code to be a "major facility", i.e. a wireless communications or collocation facility that is ground mounted, or is wall mounted, utility mounted, or roof mounted but does not meet the definition of a minor facility. This would be considered a "Stealth Facility". The code requires that when proposed as a "stealth facility" a wireless communications facility must be disguised to appear as another natural or artificial object that is prevalent in the surrounding environment or which is architecturally integrated into a building or other concealing structure. In this instance, the applicant is proposing a 48-foot tower, designed in a style consistent with the adjacent buildings, to conceal the wireless communication facility. A CUP is required for such a facility. A Modification to the CPD Permit for the Warehouse Discount Center site is also required as the tower element was not considered as part of the site development. Since the Zoning Ordinance currently does not allow for signage on wireless facilities or a tower sign at this location, an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance would be required for this project to move forward as proposed. On June 27, 2017, the Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the ZOA, CUP, and CPD Permit. There were no speakers other than the applicant. The Planning Commission recommended approval of all three applications, subject to conditions of approval on the CUP and CPD Permit Modification as recommended by staff. The Planning Commission did express some concern over the amount of signage (200 square feet, 50% coverage, 3 tenant signs plus City Welcome sign) proposed to be allowed on each face of the tower sign under the ZOA. Staff revisited this issue and believes the amount of allowable signage can be reduced to 140 square feet per face and 30% coverage to address the Commission's concern, while still allowing for appropriate scale of the signage. The signage as proposed would meet this reduced size, if adopted. Staff is also recommending reducing the number of signs allowed per face from four signs down to three signs to further address the Planning Commission's concern. With the City Welcome sign, two signs would be available for the three on-site businesses on the property. 2 Honorable City Council July 19, 2017 Page 3 In addition, because the proposed City Welcome sign (as discussed later in this report) would be at the top of the sign tower in front of the hidden antennas, the signage could not be internally illuminated without blocking communication transmission. External spotlights shielded from view could address this issue. The draft ordinance has been revised to incorporate the changes noted above, along with a limitation of signage to three sides of the tower, as is currently proposed. A decision on a Conditional Use Permit is normally made by the Planning Commission; however, because this project also involves City Council consideration of the Modification to Commercial Planned Development Permit for the Warehouse Discount Center site and a Zoning Ordinance Amendment to allow for signage on a wireless facility and a tower sign at this location, staff has elevated the decision on all permits associated with the project to the City Council for consideration, as provided for in Section 17.44.040 of the Municipal Code. DISCUSSION Existing Site Conditions: The proposed tower will be located on an 8.15 acre site, consisting of two lots, located north of White Sage Road and east of California State Route 23. The tower is proposed on the southwest corner of the smaller lot. Two commercial buildings exist on site. The first building Iodated on a 6.11 acre lot on the north side of the property is approximately 115,000 square-feet in area and is approximately 44 feet tall. This building is currently occupied by the Warehouse Discount Center appliance store and warehouse. The second building, a multi-tenant retail commercial building, located on a 2.04 acre lot on the south side of the property is approximately 17,500 square-feet in area and is approximately 36 feet tall. This building is occupied by Ortho Mattress and Innovation Dance Center. Previous Applications: On October 5, 2005, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2005-2398, approving General Plan Amendment No. 2004-04, Commercial Planned Development No. 2004- 03, and Conditional Use Permit No. 2005-04, allowing appliance sales, distribution and warehousing and a multi-tenant retail building. . On December 28, 2012, the City Council considered a conceptual proposal, also submitted on behalf of Verizon Wireless for the same location (see Attachment 4). The proposal was a stealth facility disguised as a City Welcome Sign. The facility was proposed to be used as an entry sign to the City and help freeway travelers be aware of some of the other shopping opportunities adjacent to the freeway that are not on the Moorpark Marketplace sign tower. Staff worked with the applicant on alternative solutions; integrating antenna panels into the building design, or constructing a "monopine" behind the building. The property owner, however, was not in favor of modifying the building, and a monopine behind the building would not provide enough signal coverage desired for this area (vicinity of White Sage Road and 118 Freeway). 3 Honorable City Council July 19, 2017 Page 4 Staff took the idea of a City Welcome Sign for economic development purposes to the Community and Economic Development Committee on December 19, 2012, for. discussion and recommendation. The committee had concerns regarding the visual impacts of the sign, and expressed how it could be designed similar to the tower of the Moorpark Marketplace. After discussion, the committee had no recommendation for the Council. On January 16, 2013, after reviewing the proposal, the City Council voted 3-2 against proceeding with a City Welcome Sign, with Mayor Parvin and Councilmembers Milihouse and Mikos in opposition to the sign, and Councilmembers Pollock and Van Dam dissenting. The applicant did not proceed with a formal application for a wireless facility after this discussion. On December 16, 2014, Verizon Wireless approached the City with a new stealth facility. Community Development staff met with the applicant to discuss the new proposal, along with alternative locations and concepts discussed previously, such as integrating antennas into the building design or constructing a "monopine" behind the building. The applicant did not find the alternative locations to be feasible for them and decided to proceed with the submittal of a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for the major wireless communication facility and Modification to the Commercial Planned Development (CPD) in the form of a stand-alone tower. On December 22, 2014, an application for Conditional Use Permit No. 2014-09 and Modification No. 1 to Commercial Planned Development No. 2004-03 was submitted for a Major Wireless Communication . Facility consisting of 12 panel antennas; and installation of an above ground equipment enclosure within a 48 foot high tower at 14339 White Sage Road. Staff met off-site with Vinculums (representative for Verizon Wireless) and Verizon to review and find more alternative locations. Three locations were identified but needed further evaluation by the applicant. The applicant took over a year to explore the potential locations. Staff attempted to contact applicant several times to determine whether or not the applicant was still proceeding with the project, but applicant was not reachable. Staff rejected the application without prejudice on August 23, 2016 for lack of activity on an incomplete application. General Plan and Zoning Consistency: Disguising a cellular facility within a tower must also comply with all other provisions of Sections 17.42.070.6 and 17.42.070.0 of the Zoning Ordinance. The project site is designated General Commercial (C-2) in the City's General Plan and meets the definition of a "Major Facility" in the Wireless Communications Facilities chapter of the Zoning Ordinance and requires a Conditional Use Permit in the Commercial Planned Development (CPD) zone. Currently, the sign regulations in Chapter 17.40 (Sign Regulations) of the Zoning Ordinance do not include any provisions for signage on wireless facilities or tower signs at this location and Chapter 17.42 (Wireless Communications Facilities) of the Zoning Ordinance prohibit signage on wireless communications facilities except for safety purposes_ A Zoning Ordinance Amendment is proposed to address this as part of the application. 4 Honorable City Council July 19, 2017 Page 5 GENERAL PLAN/ZONING Direction General Plan Zoning Land Use Site General Commercial Commercial Planned Development Commercial Buildings North Open Space 11 DU/10-40Ac Open Space 10Ac Arroyo Simi South General Commercial Commercial Planned Development Vacant East Open Space 11 DU/10-40Ac Open Space 40Ac Arroyo Simi West State Route 118-Freeway State Route 118-Freeway Freeway Proposed Project: The applicant is proposing to lease an area 16 feet 4 inches wide by 16 feet and 4 inches long to accommodate the 48 foot high tower. The proposed tower will be divided into three different vertical sections. The top section has a height of approximately 13 feet 3 inches. This section includes the roof and encloses the 12 panel antennas. The roof is proposed to be made of Spanish tile with a cornice element underneath and one smooth column on each corner. Two louvered vinyl circular elements, which are part of the venting system for the facility, are proposed on the east and west wide of the tower wall. The applicant is also proposing a cornice element between the top and center section of the tower. The center section will be approximately 24 feet 4 inches high made of smooth concrete finish plaster. The bottom portion will be 10 feet 4 inches tall and include cultured stone veneer. The mechanical equipment is proposed to be located inside this section. The equipment will operate on a 24 hour, 7 day a week remote sensing basis. This allows Verizon Wireless to make minor adjustments remotely through its headquarters located in Irvine instead of having a technician drive to the site. Equipment associated with the operation of a major facility must be located within an underground vault, or an above-ground building or enclosure in a manner complying with the development standards of the zoning district. Equipment located above ground must be visually compatible with the surrounding buildings and structures and either shrouded by sufficient landscaping to screen the equipment from view, or designed to match the architecture of adjacent buildings. Analysis: Architectural design of the tower and its location are the primary concerns in the analysis of this application. The applicant has proposed the 48-foot tall tower approximately 140 feet east of State Route 23 and 65 feet north from White Sage Road. The design complements the existing commercial buildings and its surroundings, and its location will enhance the wireless communications coverage in the vicinity. 5 Honorable City Council July 19, 2017 Page 6 The tallest commercial building on-site is 44 feet high to the top of the two roof tile tower elements. The second commercial building has a height of 36 feet and has six roof tile tower elements. The applicant is proposing a standalone tower with an overall height of 48 feet, of which the top 4 feet consists of a decorative tile roof and a small finial. All antennas will be hidden within the 4-sided tower (no exterior antenna panels). The material proposed for the exterior of tower is smooth concrete finish plaster painted light brown to match the light brown of the existing buildings. The antenna enclosure is constructed of fiberglass reinforced plastic (FRP) with a plaster finish to be painted to match the structure. The design of the tower is compatible with the overall design of both buildings, and as such, the project would improve the commercial planned development. Conditions of approval are proposed to ensure the colors, materials and textures of the building match to the existing buildings. Staff has discussed alternative locations with the applicant. On March 9, 2016, three new locations were identified in the on-site meeting. Verizon has evaluated these locations and has provided their feasibility as follows: • 864 Los Angeles Avenue (Moorpark Marketplace shopping center) — install antennas inside an existing 66-foot high sign structure. Feasibility: Landlord was not interested in entering an agreement with Verizon Wireless. • 709 Science Drive (Industrial Building) — install a monopine at the bottom of a steep slope (approximately 30-feet below street level). Feasibility: Existing building is 30 feet high. Monopine would need to be over 70 feet high to allow clear antenna line of site. • 14339 White Sage Road (Warehouse Discount Center) — adding a tower onto the existing building. Feasibility: tower would be set back too far from freeway and structurally be too heavy for building. The City's wireless regulations restrict the height of a major facility to the maximum building height for the applicable zoning district in which the facility is proposed to be located. In the case of a Commercial Planned Development, building and structure height is determined by the CPD Permit. The proposed modification, if approved, will allow the tower at the proposed height, which is the height the applicant has indicated is reasonably necessary for operation of the facility. The applicant has indicated Verizon's engineers have determined in order to enhance the service in this area, any new wireless telecommunication facility candidates must provide antenna line-of-sight with a height equal or higher than 44 feet above ground 6 Honorable City Council July 19, 2017 Page 7 and on a location contained within a search area bound by Princeton Avenue on the north; Patriot Drive on the south; Science Drive on the east; and White Sage Road on the west. As previously mentioned, the property owner has requested signs be permitted on the proposed tower. The Sign Regulations in Chapter 17.40 of the Zoning Ordinance do not have a provision for signage on wireless communications facilities or tower signs at this location. However, monument signs and pylon signs are permitted in commercial and industrial zoned properties when meeting the criteria of the Sign Ordinance. The Zoning Ordinance defines "monument sign" as a sign that is completely self-supportive, has its sign face or base on the ground, and has no air space, columns or supports visible between the ground and the bottom of the sign. Monument signs are allowed a maximum of 36 square-feet of area signage per side and cannot exceed 6 feet in height. The 48-foot high tower could not be considered a monument sign. One monument sign currently exists on the White Sage Road frontage of the property. Staff explored the idea of considering the tower a pylon sign. However, the Sign Ordinance defines a "pylon sign" as a freestanding sign, other than a monument sign, in which the sign face is separated from ground level by means of one (1) or more supports such as poles, pole covers or columns. Although the tower could meet the general definition for a pylon sign, it does not meet the criteria for permitting it as a pylon sign. Currently, the Zoning Ordinance allows such signs to be a maximum of twenty-four (24) feet high, and three-hundred (300) square feet in area. The only existing sign in the City that exceed this height is the.Moorpark Marketplace sign which, at 66 feet tall, was subject to specific plan regulations and a settlement agreement. In addition, pylon signs are allowed in shopping centers of 50,000 square feet or larger and located on Los Angeles Avenue. The following table compares the proposed sign to the Moorpark Marketplace sign: TOWER SIGN MOORPARK MARKETPLACE WAREHOUSE DISCOUNT CENTER DIMENSIONS (EXISTING) (PROPOSED) Height of Tower 66 Feet(commercial signage up to 48 Feet(commercial signage up to 60 feet above ground level) 31 feet above ground level) Width of Tower 24 Feet 16.3 Feet Ground Elevation of 585 Feet 625 Feet Tower Foundation Surface Elevation of 620 Feet 615 Feet Adjacent Freeway Area of Signage per Face 279 Square Feet 120 Square Feet(not including City —_ Welcome Sign)_ Number of Signs per 7(not including Moorpark 3 (not including City Welcome Sign) Face Marketplace sign Number of Faces with 2 3 Signage —._.......__ Total Signage Area 558 Square Feet 360 Square Feet(not including City Welcome Sign) 7 Honorable City Council July 19, 2017 Page 8 In summary, the proposed telecommunications/sign tower on the Warehouse Discount Center site, although 18 feet shorter than the Moorpark Marketplace sign tower, would be about 22 feet higher in elevation at its highest point, as the ground level at the Warehouse Discount Center site is 40 feet higher. The Warehouse Discount Center tower would rise 58 feet above the adjacent freeway as its foundation is 10 feet above the freeway, whereas the highest point of the Moorpark Marketplace sign tower is 31 feet above the adjacent freeway, since its foundation is 35 feet below the adjacent freeway (through lanes, not on-ramp). Commercial signage on the Warehouse Discount Center sign would be about 11 feet higher in elevation than the commercial signage on the Moorpark Marketplace sign tower. It should be noted that the proposed design height of the Warehouse Discount Center telecommunications/sign tower is to achieve telecommunications coverage, not signage visibility. An amendment to the Zoning Ordinance would be required to permit signage on the proposed tower. Signage on wireless communications facilities can meet the goals of the general plan for aesthetics if strictly limited. Staff recommends that the Zoning Ordinance be amended to only allow signage on wireless communications facilities designed as tower elements that match existing architectural design and are in the Commercial Planned Development (CPD) zone on sites with freeway frontage that are developed with over 100,000 square feet of commercial development. This would ensure the scale of the signage does not overwhelm the scale of the development on the site. Limitations of signage to 140 square feet per side and signage on 3 sides maximum are also recommended. The proposed facility would meet these criteria. Although three commercial signs and a City Welcome sign are proposed on three of the four sign tower faces, staff is recommending that the Zoning Ordinance limit the number of signs per face to a total of three signs. With the City Welcome sign, that would leave room for two tenant signs. Finally, the original development project was subject to a development agreement which required the developer to provide a location for a City Welcome Sign and a contribution of $25,000.00 toward construction of the sign. A sign location next to the existing monument sign on White Sage Road has been designated for City signage, and the fee has been paid. The proposed signage on the wireless facility is separate from this agreement and therefore, staff recommends a condition that an agreement between the City and Developer be executed to address City Welcome Signage on the wireless communication facility. Exhibit 3 provides examples of how that signage might be completed, though the final wording and design would be subject to City Council approval. The ordinance includes language that the Zoning Ordinance Amendment would not take effect until and unless a sign agreement is executed between the City and applicant. Condition No.. 4 of the draft resolution approving the CUP and Modification to the CPD Permit provides language that the sign would be constructed and maintained at the applicant's expense. This sign agreement is being drafted and would come back at a future meeting for City Council consideration, provided that the project is approved. 8 Honorable City Council July 19, 2017 Page 9 Findings: Prior to approving, conditionally approving, or denying a discretionary permit, the City Council must adopt written findings, by resolution, based upon substantial evidence in view of the whole record to justify the decision. In order for a discretionary permit to be approved, the City Council must find make the affirmative findings required by the Municipal Code. If any of the findings cannot be made, the request must be denied. Zoning Ordinance Amendment Findings Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2017-04 is consistent with the City of Moorpark General Plan and all adopted Specific Plans, in that this ordinance supports one of the goals of the Land Use Element which calls for a variety of commercial facilities which serve community residents and meet regional needs. Viable and aesthetically pleasing wireless communication facilities are an example of commercial facilities that provide important services to community residents and serve regional needs for wireless communications. Conditional Use Permit Findings With amendments to the Zoning Ordinance as proposed by Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2017-04: A. The proposed use, as conditioned, and with the adoption of Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2017-04, is consistent with the provisions of the General Plan, zoning ordinance, and any other applicable regulations, in that the proposed use, height, setbacks and improvements are consistent with City Code requirements. The tower is proposed at 48 feet high and includes a Spanish tile roof and a metal finial. B. The proposed use, as conditioned, and with the adoption of Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2017-04, is compatible with both existing and permitted land uses in the surrounding area, in that the wireless communication facility will provide additional cellular service to the commercial and industrial areas. The proposed tower has been determined to be in an appropriate location for a wireless communication facility by the city. C. The proposed use, as conditioned, and with the adoption of Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2017-04, is compatible with the scale, visual character and design of surrounding properties, in that it is designed so as not to detract from the physical and visual quality of the area. The materials and colors of the tower complement the existing commercial buildings. D. The proposed use, as conditioned, and with the adoption of Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2017-04, would not be obnoxious or harmful, or impair the utility of neighboring property or uses, in that the proposed use has been designed to 9 Honorable City Council July 19, 2017 Page 10 eliminate any negative visual impacts. The proposed tower will not eliminate parking spaces, obstruct driveways, or disrupt vehicular or pedestrian circulation. E. The proposed use, as conditioned, and with the adoption of Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2017-04, would not be detrimental to the public health, safety, convenience, or welfare, in that conditions of approval have been added to protect the public. Conditional Use Permit for Wireless Facilities Findings A. The proposed facility, as conditioned, and with the adoption of Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2017-04, will not create any significant blockage to public views, in that the tower will be placed on the corner of an existing commercial site, away from driveways and traffic line-of-sight. B. The proposed facility, as conditioned, and with the adoption of Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2017-04, will be an enhancement to the City due to its ability to provide additional communication capabilities in the eastern part of the City and along California State Route 23. C. The proposed facility, as conditioned, and with the adoption of Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2017-04, will be aesthetically integrated into its surrounding land uses and natural environment, in that it will be constructed of materials, painted in a manner, and constructed in a style that will complement the existing commercial buildings. D. The proposed facility will operate in compliance with all other applicable Federal regulations for such facilities, including safety regulations, in that AT&T operates its wireless network in compliance with its FCC license and FCC rules and regulations concerning frequency emissions and/or radio frequency interference. The transmission densities emanating from the facility will not exceed current American National Standards Institute (ANSI) recommended maximum exposure levels for wireless transmission frequencies which do not have the potential to significantly impact the community. In all cases, Effective Radiated Power (ERP), and its associated electromagnetic (EM) radiation power densities are a small fraction of the maximum permissible exposure set by ANSI, or the more restrictive exposure standard put forth by the National Commission on Radiation Protection and Measurement (NCRP). E. The public need for the use of the cellular facility has been documented consistent with California law, in that the proposed cell site will provide a substantial increase in the coverage area. F. The applicant will provide at its own expense a field survey or other method consistent with Federal law to provide written verification that the facility is in 10 Honorable City Council July 19, 2017 Page 11 compliance with applicable Federal regulations regarding electromagnetic frequency emissions. This radio-frequency (RF) report shall also include signal strength exhibits, including calculations and measurements under maximum loading conditions. Such field survey shall be provided to the City upon request, not to exceed one such request in any 24-month period. Planned Development Findings A. The site design, as conditioned, and with the adoption of Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2017-04, including structure location, size, height, setbacks, massing, scale, architectural style and colors, and landscaping, is consistent with the provisions of the general plan, any applicable specific plans, zoning ordinance, and any other applicable regulations in that the proposed facility has been designed to complement the surrounding built and natural environment; B. The site design, as conditioned, and with the adoption of Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2017-04, would not create negative impacts on or impair the utility of properties, structures or uses in the surrounding area in that the facility has been designed in a manner consistent with the character of the community; C. The proposed use, as conditioned, and with the adoption of Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2017-04, is compatible with existing and permitted uses in the surrounding area in that a wireless communication facility is not unexpected in the Commercial Planned Development zone. PROCESSING TIME LIMITS This project involves a Zoning Ordinance Amendment, a legislative act, which is not subject to time limits under the Permit Streamlining Act. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION The Community Development Director preliminarily determined the project is Categorically Exempt from the provisions of CEQA pursuant to Section 15311(Class 11 -Accessory Structures) of the California Code of Regulations (CEQA Guidelines) in that the project is consistent with the applicable general and specific plan designation and all applicable general and specific plan policies as well as with the applicable zoning designation and regulations if amended by Zoning Ordinance No. 2017-04; the proposed development occurs within city limits on a project site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses; the project site has no value, as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species, approval of a project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality; and the site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. No further environmental documentation is required. 11 Honorable City Council July 19, 2017 Page 12 STAFF RECOMMENDATION 1. Open the public hearing, accept public testimony, and close the public hearing. 2. Introduce Ordinance No. , approving Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2017-04, for first reading, which includes the determination of exemption under the California Environmental Quality Act, waive full reading, and place this ordinance on the agenda for an adjourned regular meeting to be held at 6:30 p.m. on July 26, 2017, for purposes of providing second reading and adoption of the ordinance. 3. Adopt Resolution No. 2017- . ATTACHMENTS: 1. Location Map 2. Aerial Map 3. Project Exhibits (UNDER SEPARATE COVER) • T-1 Title Sheet • LS-1 Site Survey • A-1 Overall Site Plan • A-2 Enlarged Site Plan, Equipment & Antenna Layout • A-3 East and West Elevations, Tower Elevation (West) • A-4 North and South Elevations • City Welcome Signage Concepts 4. January 16, 2013 City Council Agenda Report and Minutes 5. Ordinance No. 6. Resolution No. 2017- 12 • Location Map - 14339 White Sage Road --� f ;' ( o zAss„taa c p, . -'..-....-1:::'.'':::'A.:...-'.:,S,:l::.:-,-‘7Ic • , .! Legend • ..-.•.-.,..,-_,.f,-•:;'I:.,.'L,-.-•.!.-'.'7.':..':;--,0..-....,, .2:':-:.':,; t. \_ -c ;; -+-~ City Boundary , MoorparkArea Of Interest ate= 0 i —, Iil , \ \ ' n - ,...7\ „, Proposed Tower Location ,_ • : , c zooms k�° ° f . ..:. ...-------------A I 1,„4. `, 1181 „ j/ ' -___/ / ft Pc� w 5 5 { CUP 2016-05 4'��i , 1” = 376 ft amd Mod 2 to 01/10/2017 i ''!ille "ii CPD 2004-03 :. f ‘ This map represents a visual display of related geographic information. Data provided hereon is not a guarantee of actual field conditions. To be sure of complete accuracy. please contact Moorpark staff for the most up-to-date information. w Aerial Map - 14339 White Sage Road r t --c k y 'i-T A k6 k ,a. y i �' r ilk.*^Ri' .w^"'_, l *..k r ✓ _ s , 4 a II s '� ,t t `., �' i ' : 1: __ :tiik,,-,4„,.. Legendr .. .t of $ °+ Parcels 440 ' j'414 -f 4 • i J City Boundary. r.st } ti i '1" ` _ Moorpark Area Of Interest ll r ' _g}y'. ff �' *. .,: . . : til ••r r– –_-- T ,. r...., A y_.... y 0 i -mss 1 a y •'' ' ''tl k , •1 'r ~Y �t ISS ' $ - ‘n♦ # 'It .7 �r r a s w X + t - � _ 0 .. ,A, . + i - l �' �. yrte . � �` t I 1 ...,..„ ,r, I IF! y i. r / � � fi .'"'.-""% .� � {_-' sir..,-�` " - Il ", , �S � � . Z =1 } i. y"4 • tv r' Proposed Tower Location �, _ at„ , r r v L r Ilik ,.k -.,_:------?:>,1 i,it `' !� t 1.. F M tit , y_: J �•� ------ , , . r f ��', .. s 1 t - s ifs V r f. '. -,;. ,- lt tir jR!-. s t 14 r I S l '' \4 • +mfn . f" 500 ft I Li CUP 2016-05 :` '' 1" = 376 ft amd Mod 2 to 01/1012017 -. ; CPD 2004-03 k This map represents a visual display of related geographic information, Data provided hereon is not a guarantee of actual field conditions. To be sure of complete accuracy, please contact Moorpark staff for the most up-to-date information. 1'SUE STATUS \. REV. DATE DESCRIPTION BY 0 04/30/15 90%TD 1 05104115 10011 20 • 2 03114/17 100%CD j ITEM 8.A. 3 06120117 100%CD v- erizon vrr ,dDELTA i INGINMING.MC 2362 MCGAW AVE.IRVINE,CA 92614 TEL 949.622-0333 FAX:949.417-2663 TIE RRA BAJADA OGEJOB #1FOR6A `PROPRIETARY INFORMATION THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET OF DRAWINGS IS PROPRIETARY a CONFICENTIAL TO VERIZON WIRELESS MT/' ^ / BSC3 ANYTO VE IZON WIRELESS IS STRICN.TLY IGGM0S rr A0 yll I; VERIZON WIRELESS IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED MACRO CELL EV•LU ITI®f-' DESIGN 14339 AN! i ITE SAGE ROAD 1 OVERALL HEIGHTPER'1-A LETTER:49°-0' IV1OORPARK, CA 93021 C W ___ 0 z PROJEC u u EAM PROJECT I ESCRIPTION PROJECT SUMMARY SHEET DESORIPTIA N REQ THIS PROJECT IS A VERIZON HARM FCS UNMANNED TELECOMMUNICATION WIRELESS 3 O U FACILITY.IT WILL CONSIST OF THE FOLLOWING: APPLICANTILPSSEE ASSESSOR'S PARCEL MEMBER T-9 TITLE SHEET Z SITE ACQUISITION PLANNING ._ U z VINCULUMS SERVICES,INC VINCULUMS SERVICES,INC. APR.513-0-050-375 ` T-2 GENERAL NOTES,CONSTRUCTION NOTES A:LEGEND 3 10 PASTEUR,STE 100 10 PASTEUR,STE. 100 ° NEW VERIZON WIRELESS 16'-10°:I 1E-10°LEASE AREA MT IRVINE,CA 92618 RVINE.CA 92610 ° (2)NEW VERIZON WIRELESS PACE CABINETS T-3 CONDTIIONS OF APPROVAL 3 CONTACT: PAUL ANTHONY CONTACT:ALBERT SANDOVAL = (1)NEW VERIZON WIRELESS STANDBY GENERATOR MOUNTED ON 15505 SAND CANTON AVENUE.D1 < PHONE (310)367-2939 PHONE(949)322-4863 A NEW CONCRETE SLAB IRVINE,CA 92610 LS-1 SITE SURVEY 3 In EMAIL panthony0ainculums.com EMAIL:accndovalOvinculuns.corn ° (12)NEN VERLZON WIRELESS 8'TALL PANEL ANTENNAS OFFICE(949)286-7000 0 ▪ (12)NEW 159120N WIRFI ECS RRUS72+A2 A-1 OVERALL SITE PLAN 3 F • (2)NEW VERIZON WIRE MS RAYCAPS APPLICANTS REPRESENTATIVE (9)NEW 969120N WIRFI FOR 48'-0°HIGH MONUMENT SIGN STRUCTURE VINCULUMS SERVICES,INC. 8-2 ENLARGED SITE PLAN,EQUIPMENT&ANTENNA LAYOUT 3 o (7)NEW VERIZON WIRFI FOR mumFEDESTAL 10 PASTEUR,SIE 900 • ARCHITECT: SURVEYOR8-3 EAST&WEST ELEVATIONS,TOWER ELEVATION(WEST) 1 IRVINE,CA 928183 COLE^.C-DCUPS EXON<SFING,INC. AMER CONSULTING COTTA T:AJ301T SANCOVA! p_4 MIRTH,$SOUTH ELEVATIONS 3 2362 McGAW AVE. P.O.BOG 9182 PHONE(949)322-4863 IRVINE,CA 92614 CHANDLER HEIGHTS.AZ 35127 OWL acandovalORIEDEIune.cam CONTACT: WILLIAM DESMOND PHONE(602)463-0472 11-5 DETAILS 3 - PHONE(949)622-0333 PROPERTY OWNER: FAN:(949)622-0331 A-6 DETAILS 3 OWNER: NLA14339 LLC ADDRESS: 14349 WHITE SAGE RD. 4-7 DETAILS 3 MOORPARK,CA 93021 CONTACT: TOM SCHLEUDER A-8 TOWER SECTION&DETAILS 3 I TELEPHONE (805)222-1380 :I 2712 UTILITY COORDINATOR: PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER: • _ I 0-9 DETAILS 3 TRIAD GROUP DELTA GROUPS ENGINEERING,1120- VICINITY MAP PROPERTY INFORMATION: 8-10 RF DESIGN 3 PLAZA CENTER50- 2362[:SCA 0 AVE _ _ 10900 NE WA EST.,SUITE 1500 CONTIRVINE,CA 92614 SITE MME TERRA BAJADA CONTACT: UE,WA 98004 CONTACT:ALBERT TEND I SITE ADDRESS:14339 WHITE SAGE ROAD S-1 STRUCTURAL NOTES ar MATERIAL SPECIFICATIONS 3 CONTABRIAN E-CHOFF PHONE(949)622-0333 / 4 MOORPARK,CA 93021 PHONE (425)454-0282 AX:(949)622-0337 JURISDICTION: CIN OF MOORPARK 0-2 FOUNDATION PLAN,EQUIPMENT ANCHOR BOLT LAYOUT A DETAILS 3 FEDI:(425)454-57$4 j CONSTRUCTION INFORMATION 5-3 TOWER ROOF FRAMING PLAN,31MOEN%LEVEL PLAN DA DETAILS 3 PRINCETON AVE 5-4 TOWER FRAMING SECTION,PLANS A DETAILS 3 TAPE OF CONSTRUCTION: V-B \ eillirSTTE CURRENT ZONING COMMERCIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT(CPD) S-5 DETAILS 3 .. - .7. CURRENT USE: RAW LAND PROPOSED USE TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITY,OCC:B S-6 TYPICAL LIGHT C--AGE STEEL DETAILS 3 3 ADA COMPLIANCE FACILITY {S UNMANNED AND NOT FOR HUMAN SI HABITATION. 5-7 TYPICAL LIGHT GAGE STEEL DETAILS 3 MACHINERY SPACES ARE EXEMPT FROM ACCESSIBILITY 0LOS ANGELES AVE. REQUIREMENTS PER THE CBC SECTION 115-203.5. E-1 ELECTRICAL NOTES&SINGLE LINE DIAGRAM 3 q2 E-2 UTILITY ROUTING FLAN.ELECTRICAL LIGHTING&ALARM FLAN 3 a' = EQUIPMENT&ANTENNA C-ROUNDING FLAN,NOTES,PANEL•01ST-1', � iU',I ���mmm E-3 PANEL'NCE'SCHEDULE 3 UCi61NG FRAME SChr'OULE ' 3) _- - 'PtySc.T E-4 ELECTRICAL DETAILS 3 W �. .. a TIERRA REJAQA RD. SP-7 SPECIFICATIONS 3 i. L'I VERIZON WIRELESS SION�T�1 E BLOC o / SP-2 SPECIFICATIONS 3 v �° DISCIPLINE: SIGNATURE - DATE: -a W' �✓/\ FIRE DEPARTMENT NOTES SAFI TEM 180 NI-Cd ?' ' J I \\ ®® - _ @ATIER'f INFORMATION 5t RE VENDOR: NOT TO SCALE / NOM GENE AL CONTRACTOR NITS ( ca 0 iPALE VENDOR: _..—..._._ .__I_�__pp.. .-.. ____- _____ DO NCL S IE BEallNGS -- __ -_ -_ - y gl MeE COORDINATOR: DRIVING DIRECTIONS CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL PLANS AND FASTING DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS ON THE gL 9Ap JOB SITE AND SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY TWE AP.CHTTECT IN WRITING OF ANY DISCREPANCIES CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS w FROM:VEPJZON OFFICE T0: 74339 WHITE SAGE ROAD BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK OR BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE SAME. I 1 UTILITY VENDOR: MOORPARK,CA 93021 I 1. TAKE I-5 NORTH TO EDT 156A. �; TO UOBTAINNDERGROUND LOCATION OF PARTICIPANTS SHED-I TITLE: �� 2. MERGE ONTO CA-11$WEST. UNDERGROUND FACILITIES BEFORE a 3. TAKE ENT TOE AND TURN LEFT ONTO EAST LOS ANGELES AVENUE. YOU DIGIN CALIFORNIA(SOUTH).CALL A 4. CONTINUE ONTO WHITE SAGE ROAD- CODE�a COMPLIANCE ��oo DIGALERT 855.2 ' 5. ARRIVE 14339 WHITE SAGE ROAD,MOORPARK,CA 93021 ON THE LEFT ®AeO S'IoIAN�rE ° TOLL FREE:1-600-227-2600 OR CETITLE SHEET = 2016 CALIFORNIA ENERGY CODE ° 2016 CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE CALIFORNIA STATUTE 2016 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE ° 2016 CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODSIs REQUIRES MIN OF 2 2016 CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE !Snow What's DellOYY. WORIQNG DAYS NOTICE a EE: ° 2016 CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE Call before you coo. BEFORE YOU EXCAVATE g -- ° 2016 CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING CODE v TRANSPORT: Y T_1 o) CC ATTACHMENT 3 1 93 6'ELECTRICAL ASEMENT /'' \\ -- / 1 I PER INET. t2oD60s._100971 // \\ 19. -""---•-• \ o /1 ,I/2.�a _ [ \ , _____ \\\ 1s i_ 15505 SRO CANTON AVENUE NORIN _�.�.,.• , II LDING --t,-. - - 1 IRKIE,G1.IFORNV.62696 SCAM f•Si ;,Y OVERALL DETAL v \ ! �� TREE 4A W97if6.7006 I • , \BUI \a , \\ <g /I GRAPHIC SCALE _ - =PROJECT INFORMATION: . \ CII io m BLDG TREE •_`.I /� .\ \ Illa. it I TIERRA RAJADA - ` \\ \ I inch-.100)1t fHLZ AGE ROAD \ LOG CID._ MOORPARK,WHITE CALIFORNIAS93021 \ 4/116/141: • '24 , I� 1,� VENTURA COUNTY ,0�'g�5 foe /�` \ 41`` �F:yc°Fc moo -4.RIGINAL ISSUE DATE 0 [St1:519' �o � ♦ ' , I .;��•; 61"- , 6 FC 10/21/2 014 4 ———— _i ' v..1 J t / \` 0211 \\\ EV.:�ATE uESCRIPTION: BY: FC �. • �+ c 0 10 i 21 i 2wa INITIAL SUBMITTAL RC 41 . - I \ �j fr ' BU)G_- 6224 lti c. FC I \\ / - I -r:- 6360 y i Ir / \ y03 ' / /. / I�ATRIGHT ON THIS SHEET \ `\ ��\ _,v, TREE' , :.AP \ \ - / O V LESSOR'S LEGAL DESCRIPTION \\ �° '., \NG\•4 FC // Is) 'ME LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN BELOW IS SITUATED IN THE CITY OF `2'• \ �'i 62 /6 MOORPARK, COUNTY OF VENTURA,STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AND IS DESCRIBED \ ( FC r t? ` / \6 APARCEL k \sib \ \�\ Mc'PN� A2zG ./// / 1 i PARCEL 2 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 5532, IN THE CITY OF MOORPARK, COUNTY OF NG \ t\ // // / /6°�6 I I�'r RD= VENTURA, STATE OF CAUFORNIA, AS SHOWN ON A PARCEL MAP FILED IN BOOK \ \ \ ` /% / / A 65 PAGES 7, 8 AND 9 OF PARCEL MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY •/ / / / ,6� RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY. \ \ \i \\ cs Ni -VER RECESS /// // /,,,/ // / , VICINITY YAP EXCEPT ONE-HALF OF 24/40THS INTEREST OF ALL OIL AND MINERAL RIGHTS \ \ N.T.S. BELOW 500 FEET FROM THE SURFACE, BUT WITHOUT THE RIGHT OF SURFACE '\ / LEASE AREA j / // / //• ENTRY, AS RESERVED BY VIVIAN \ \ \�' \ /,g CF/ / // / / 6\0 AGOURE ESCAWER. ET AL-.IN DEED RECORDED SEPTEMBER 11, 1963 IN BOOK \ \ Z 533'48'43 / -'W�+'/ / /;' / / / i . 11011 2390 PAGE 305. OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. \ \ \ \\ \ I AP r .ace / /.•••• // .0. / /// ///6�� 'LAMS PREPARED BY; ALSO EXCEPT ONE-HALF OF 13/40THS INTEREST OF ALL OIL AND MINERAL \ POSITION OF -,/ / // //// //// RIGHTS BELOW 500 FEET FROM THE SURFACE, WITHOUT THE RIGHT OF ENTRY, \ I \ , AS RESERVED BY PETER VAI,AS GUARDIAN OF THE ESTATE OF ARGUE \6, \ \ \. / \ \‘' GEODETICFC DIRECTIONS TO SITE AGOURE VAIL,AN INCOMPETENT PERSON,IN DEED RECORDED OCTOBER 17, \ COORDINATES .+ '/ / `. / TAKE I-5 NORTH 70 DIrT 156A. MERGE ONTO 1963 IN BOOK 2410, PAGE 561 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. �\ \ \ \ \ ' -i �_����� AP / /-� // _/// / /� / „40"- CA-118 „2„_ CA-118 WEST. TAKE EXIT 186 AND TURN LEFT ALSO EXCEPT 25X OF ALL MINERALS, COAL• OIL, PETROLEUM. GAS. ASPHALTUM \ \ r — IR- ALVE , ../ / / / // / / EUS 1pp / ,i / i / / ONTO EAST LOS ANGELES AVENUE. CONTINUE AND KINDRED SUBSTANCES,NOW OR HEREAFTER IN OR UNDER SAID LAND ,o \ \ \ fir, �/ �/ ;\ I-- :r% ✓ �, / /”. / ONTO WHITE SAGE ROAD. SITE WILL BE ON THE BELOW A DEPTH OF 500 FEET FROM THE SURFACE THEREOF WITHOUT THE \ r�• •1 �\ / / . !E y✓ / // // �/ / / RIGHT OF SURFACE ENTRY,AS RESERVED IN DEED DATED DECEMBER 13, 1966 \ ,r�',_ - �'� '� - A / LEFT SDE Cf THE ROAD. \ I 3'1TE \ ''.. - \ .! / / / / / /> / / // / / / / FROM MILAN ROVER AND ABRAHAM SPIEGEL. RECORDED DECEMBER 20, 1988, \ �• - t / s/ -Li i' / / / //j / g4•, IN BOOK 3081, PAGE 337 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS \ \ i• \ / / / b SUR Y DATE ALSO EXCEPT ALL OIL, OIL RIGHTS, MINERALS, MINERAL RIGHTS, NATURAL GAS, \ P.O.B. / /'• ��f / 1 r�"-'' /�' / - - // // / / 10/1777 014 NATURAL GAS RIGHTS AND OTHER HYDROCARBON SUBSTANCES BY \ \ \ \ _ \. v.4 `/'. // / / ® // / / / // WHATSOEVER NAME KNOWN THAT MAY BE \ \ 11NL \ •{•\ - '� -f / // /de / / ../ /•/ -TART= BASIS OF BEARING BELOW THE UPPER 100 FEET OF THE SUBSURFACE OF SAID LAND, WITHOUT, \ \ `ttL��Q - -/ „/ r` / d' / /."' / / // / //' BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED UPON U.S. HOWEVER. THE RIGHT OF SURFACE ENTRY. AS EXCEPTED IN DOCUMENT \ \ IIP ›. .T - / / /�// / / // / STATE PLANE ND83 COORDINATE SYSTEM RECORDED MAY 22. 1969.IN BOOK 3492°PAGE 234 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. LLAy \ \ \ ®® / r .'/ � / /// / / de', • it CALIFORNIA STATE PLANE COORDINATE ZONE FIVE° PARCEL B: Gj \ SIGN \ �• /' / // /n _r -" // // / // //'. A DETERMINED BY GPS OBSERVATIONS. AN EASEMENT FOR ACCESS.INGRESS AND EGRESS, PUBUC UTIUTIES ANDrj-W / /% / / / .... / / / INCIDENTAL PURPOSES OVER THAT PORTION OF LOT 3 OF TRACT NO. 5004• IN z\ \ \ 1 \../.--, / / / i / do' / / - / N0 - THE CITY OF MOORPARK,COUNTY OF VENTURA. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER \ \ // / // / '� /� / / // // ///' -1=pL��� BENCHMARK MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 137.PAGES 97 TO 102 INCWSIVE OF MAPS. IN THE \ / / / / - /�, •/ / / / / '." =A PROJECT ELEVATIONS ESTABLISHED FROM ORS OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY,SHOWN AND DELINEATED \ \ /\�8178 j-- / / / / / / // // / // / / �U, 22--•'' DERIVED ORTHOMETRIC HEIGHTS BY APPUCATION ON THE MAP OF SAID TRACT AS"WHITE SAGE ROAD(PRIVATE STREET)'. \ \ / N33'46'43'w / // / // /�� // // // i/-••/ Ti.....- : MAIN STREET SUITE 206 OF NGS'GEOID 09° MODELED SEPARATIONS TO \ \ 39.24'. / // / // / //i � / // / / /• HUNTINGTON BEACH.CA 92648 ELLIPSOID HEIGHTS DETERMINED BY RAW STATIC / / / / // //•/ // // // // / PHONE (480)859-4072 GPS DATA PROCESSED ON THE NGS OPUS LEASE AREA LEGAL DESCRIPTION \ \ / WEBSITE. ALL ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE A PORTION OF PARCEL 2 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 5532. IN THE CITY OF \ / •/ // / // / ' //// •"."/ "••••/ // / 1 RAWN BY:—CHK.:—APV.: REFERENCED TO NAVD88. MOORPARK, COUNTY OF VENTURA. STATE OF CALIFORNIA.AS SHOWN ON A \ // // // //// / / // // / E16.2 PARCEL MAP FILED IN BOOK 65 PAGES 7, 8 AND 9 OF PARCEL MAPS,IN THE j/ / / _.,// /i� / / •/ / / / /rxG RC MF JG FLOOD ZONE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY; AND BEING MORE I \ �% /- // P-yw // // // /- // / PARTCULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: / / / a THIS PROJECT APPEARS TO BE LOCATED WITHIN \ \ / // /// // /i •// // f,.F`- // // .,/ LEGEND FLOOD ZONE"X". AREAS DETERMINED TO BE COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 2 OF SAID PARCEL \ / / / / / / / �- OUTSIDE THE 0.2X ANNUAL CHANCE FLOODPLAIN MAP NO. 5532, AND PROCEEDING NORTH 33'46'43' WEST ALONG THE WEST W \ /de''''''' // / // / • // // / AP ASPHALT C2 TELEPHONE MANHOLE ACCORDING TO FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT LINE Cr SAID PARCEL 2,A DISTANCE OF 39.24 FEET; THENCE DEPARTING SAID •W //de'''. // // / // / / // �, / BLDG TOP OF BUILDING FIRE HYDRANT AGENCY FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP(S),MAP ID WEST UNE NORTH 5693'17"EAST. A DISTANCE OF 5.00 FEET FOR A PONT OF 61y7� �� / / / / / / / CLF CHAIN UNK FENCE LIGHT POLE #00000000000. DATED 00/00/0000 BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 5613'17'EAST A DISTANCE OF 20.00 \ s-, Y /// // __ �/ // // ../ / ......e" /. SW.�� CMU CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT E ELECTRICAL TRANSFORMER FEET; THENCE 561317 SOUTH33'46'43" A•DISTANCE OF 20 00 FEET; F 20.00 THENCE NOR H 33'46'4.3' \ \ i// // • ///, / // // / // //S( 'Of / D{W EDGE OFDCONCRETE • UTILITY PEDESTAL SURVEYOR'S NOTES ../ / unuTY VAULT WEST A DISTANCE OF 20.00 FEET TO THE PONT OF BEGINNNG. •W y/ / //d / / / / / / v� FC FACE OF CURB POSITION OF SURVEYOR HAS NOT PERFORMED A SEARCH OF •"'',,,/ •/ / / / / // LP LIGHT POLE PUBUC RECORDS TO DETERMINE ANY DEFECT IN CONTAINING 400 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS. / / / / / /' GEODETIC COORDINATES TITLE ISSUED. \�/ / / / // -/ . // // // // // • NO SW SIDEWALK GRADE SPOT ELEVATION THE BOUNDARY SHOWN HEREON IS PLOTTED FROM RESERVING NONEXCLUSIVE RIGHT OF USE ACROSS LESSOR'S PROPERTY FOR \,per/ -^/.01P'' • / // // // / ...e.de TOE TOE OF SLOPE TREES RECORD INFORMATION AND DOES NOT CONSTITUTE NECESSARY APPURTENANCES TO CONSTRUCT,OPERATE, AND MAINTAIN A •6 / N'ti / / / // // TOP TOP OF SLOPE A BOUNDARY SURVEY OF THE PROPERTY. W / J - // /'' / /j.• WALL TOP OF WALL COMMUNICATION FACILITY FOR ITEMS SUCH AS, BUT NOT UNITED TO INGRESS, / may, r:i EGRESS. PARKING, VEHICULAR MANEUVERING.EQUIPMENT, AND UTILITIES 6p / / / /-' INC CMU WALLS HEFT Till F UTILITY NOTES , i' • / // / // /-/ 1 0 o e o 0 o a CHAIN UNK FENCE SURVEYOR DOES NOT GUARANTEE THAT ALL SCHEDULE "B" NOTE le. // / / / /•// GRADE BREAK UNES UTILITIES ARE SHOWN OR THEIR LOCATIONS ARE / / // / // 5P VEGETATION UNITS DEFINITE IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE REFERENCE IS MADE TO THE TITLE REPORT ORDER,{997-23053192-PP2, / / / / /.• a CURBUNES SITE SURVEY CONTRACTOR AND DEVELOPER TO CONTACT OWE SSUED BY F1DEIJT'NATIONAL TITLE COMPANY, DATED SEPTEMBER 16. 2014. 6125 i / j'^' STAKE AND ANY OTHER INVOLVED AGENCIES TO ALL EASEMENTS CONTAINED WITHIN SAID TITLE REPORT AFFECTING THE CLF 6� // // // �•/ 4(3° CONCRETE UNITS LOCATE ALL UTILITIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. MMEDIATE AREA SURROUNDING THE LEASE HAVE BEEN PLOTTED. �AIER y...rfs( /// EXISTING BUILDINGS REMOVAL. RELOCATION AND/OR REPLACEMENT IS TEMIZED SCHEDULE'B' NOTES: &. /7"""/ //• POSITION OF GEODETIC COORDINATES PARKING STRIPES THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. TEM #'S 3, B, 11 &13 ARE SHOWN AND NOTED ON THE DRAWING. —- - - -—STREET CENTERLINES TEM S 7&10 ARE BLANKET IN NATURE OVER THE ENTIRE PARCEL / / LATITUDE 34'16'58.3"NORTH(NAD83) --—--—--—SUBJECT PROPERTY UNE TEN S 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 9, 12, 14-20 HAVE NO EFFECT IN THE AREA OF THIS bpp // // / ELEVATION 0 622.3' (RAYON)LONGITUDE 11E1'51' 45.2' WEST(ND83) --—--—-- ADJACENT PROPERTY LINESURVEY. EET NUMBER. 0) / -.- EASEMENT UNES S — /� THE SURVEYORS OPINION IS THAT NO SCHEDULE'B'ITEMS PROVIDED BY SAID 5 � , TIE UNES L J\ REPORT AFFECT THE PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS PREMISES SHOWN HEREON. <3. NC --—--—-- LEASE AREA LIMITS PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS FIBER ` ISSUE STATUS, REV. DATE D T1OX BY 0 CONDUITS ROUTING U/G W/ 5'-0' a 0QGN1s FOS CD ny WIDE ROUTE (1220' FROM 3'X5' MH ` ..,,"-1 1 GSIOIA6 100%CD "A" HOP TO (N) 2'X3' HH) \ I 2 02114117 100%CD 11 3 00/20/17 100%CD (E) SUB'S MH A" 3'X5 HOP ..\---- �� –– –– –– –– –– –– – – –– (E) 6'-0"t WIDE .- I 1 (E) GATE – ELEC ESMT. DOC. ...'' l.s:•;a.•;;; I (E) GATE :, ""' ' ,I ii ''g65 I I <`;;: DELTA GROUTS 1 1 SINIINIIAIBP INC. 11 PROPOSED 2382 McGAW AVE.IRVINE,CA 02014 " Ti , 7 �r. _ {::y VERIZON WIRELESS X 9-622-0333 FAX, 417-2ssa Jr I( C':;:;. DGE JOB F111VWWSA iffla \� `::;#. 2'X3' HANDHOLE I I v, �`: I I 1I I' I PROPRIETARY INFORMATION 1„ L._._:_.I. ._._._._._._._._.� _.—._._._._._. �, 1 TxE AFOFINTOX COXTNX®Il THIS SET OF ORAWFK,S IS PROPRIETARY 1 CMCDENiNL IC / / ` ' ` �• fl I VEMCfi N1RE133 11��4 (E EDISON VAULT—/�/ 11�g \ I �I I Ax TO EOR DISCLOSURE TZON%%LMSIS AS ITPROH ITER 1 ) 1 I (E) ASPHALT PARKING LOT. TYP. ti / TO vERrzaX wtRess sSTRICTLYPRaxetr® 1 (E) 'TRANSFORMER In T t g1 I EDISON VAULT I ' * / I q 1 (� I �� pJII� 4y..,,,,k,..!4,.::::::-..;_.......4 ,// . j C I 41111> I I Ea 1 u PROPERLY LINE ±195.38' _IP b / I I LLT I (E) UT1UTf RISER 1 _m 1 N / 1 (E) PAC BELL v / ;;,;+j C MANHOLE. (E) BUILDING– 1 1III iPROPOS �/ jTON '�i �! I (E) EDISON MANHOLE g 1 APN:513-0450-225 . •. I P _ I .,,,,, at 1 ±35.,. __ (E) TRANSFORMER -I I 1 1 I E2.2t I _ 12-O"i_ ii.„‘ i 544- r�J?'f i jill° III I S;.t• I NI # I II '` PROPOSED VERIZON WIRFI FSS 12`–O' , , (E) TRANSFORMER '' `51 j i WIDE ACCESS ROUTE FROM PUBLIC 4... , P5574023, 225KVA, 16KY ' �!I sl R–O–W TO LEASE AREA 277/480V, 30, PROPOSED �. I �\ es VERIZON WIRELESS POWER ' k;} i_ P.O.C. Illklk, APN:513-0-050315 tFF{�8PROPOSEDVERIZON :: j— I A5 WIRELESS METER PEDE5fAL, �� t PROPOSED VERRON WIRELESS r 1 I FIBER CONDUITS ROUTING U/G W/0 1 100A, 277/480V, 30 .. 5'-0" WIDE ROUTE (±420' FROMAi IIMII 10. 1 I T [,] c@;,•C j_ 1 2'X3' HH TO (N) 17"(30' HH) 1 PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS a '' ,y4::::: ! ;'�\� rl/ — 1 r E4 POWER CONDUITS ROUTING U/G W/ :;'.;•; � . — .,. ¢J•1 � . 0 a ;„ 5–0"WIDE ROUTE (±300' LG.) I (E) BUILDING s.# I 31I I I III I I(1 i M f _ r j-11 11 I I I Ir LLI 0 a> NOTE: X `:o->:i !— 9 Ill O a ,llll VIII/ U) THE GC TO SECURE/HARDEN THE SITE PER FIELD OPS I ;:• ! �, II I CO :d I 1 DIRECTION USING MASTER KEYED HIDDEN SHACKLE PAD . ;.;,f, ,III � I � w I :;•: I I It LOCK W/ HIGH SECURITY HASP I I :?: I— ,' I I 'I 1l/iii/. = a >:4: 1 ' I`I I I 11' PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS�// 3 O. NATE \ I . NON—EXCLUSIVE PARKING (9.X18') L.1. ANTENNAS ARE INSIDE THE TOWER • . . <. :::# 1� 0 r ,.: 1 ... PROPOSED 4' LANDSCAPING BAND –,�,–, ,__r� _ #.•'•••"• AROUND THE CIRCUMFERENCE OF THE ....,.... 6 CO CMU WALL, TYP. . I yk!' SITE (RHAPHIOLEPIS INDICA SHRUBS) LIJ _ r �ll�s1 € – – – ,1 I I I PROPOSED 48'-0' HIGH I PIOPERTY LI(–t20L08'�'__–_. - r. –f. II MONUMENT SIGN TO MATCH —— I I I I (E) BUILDING ARCHITECTURE,OO __ _ _ — 1 �I'I,,I PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS SHEET TITLE: i 2 (E) CHAIN LINK FENCE. TYP. .— 0 -- — — -1 1 111 I I�I€• EQUIPMENTARREAde ANTENNA LEASE 3 © _ — - I I I I I I I 1 OVERALL SITE i I I PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS PLAN s (0 • . .� i 1 III: 17"X30" HANDHOLE :�IJ � 1,,11 A-1 : OVERALL SITE PLAN 11MUM 1 , I 16'-10' ? 4 PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS OPROPOSED 48'-0" HIGH0 FIBER CONDUITS ROUTING U G rISSUE SD TATUS MONUMENT SIGN TO MATCH 16-4',YP. W N 5'-O'WIDE ROUTE (SEE E oDATE mR w BY (E) BUILDING ARCHITECTURE 7•_9• 8•-7' n m PROPOSED SERVICE 2'-8' 2'-8' I 2'-B" PROPOSED VERIZON 1 2 SHEET Al FOR CONTINUATION) LIGHT, TYP. OF (4) _ WIRELESS STANDBY A6 A6 3. g PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS (E) CHAIN 2 mmi,u v 10374 CD 6 10074CD IAA/ • 1ST LEVEL r I -, GENERATOR 12'-0"WIDE ACCESS ROUTE LINK FENCE, s mom to9xm PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS ' !�I - ; g+ FROM PUBLIC R-0-W TO TYP. 0EQUIPMENT CABINETS LEASE AREA. ' ® p ------------_-_-_- - LEASE AREA 1.••••• . .•, f MOUNTED ON (N) CONCRETE PAD `: . FI I AT GROUND LEVEL. TYP. II 1 r—, ,, `' II IT - ' :: ••'� i PROPOSED 20'X20"X9' L-1 ;•+••;••••••I ! �'�� O FIBER CABINET (ABOVE) & \` 135 i PROPOSED INTERIOR© • • ' • I I I llk, CIENNA CABINET (BELOW) M° WALL. . .e g 11 • • • • •1 i DEl7AGLOUMS _i1 .—2:, _-- ' c MI"+.•i•'•+.I 1 ��. ICS �M�i e PROPOSED 3'-0' WIDE PROPOSED LOUVER.e 14 * I•` ''I I ' A5 A9 o io ,•. 'I I I 2882 McGAW AVE.IRVNE 6492814 SIM. DOOR l TYP. t,...•••••••1` `' i Ix , TEL 949sez9s33FAX w9+,72883 o •1-.----_.-.-_ ==-2-1 '`' I 1y PROPOSED �i I I- I ro �I \ " I i-- i `PROPRETARY INFORMATION' • miii /�jSS N ••1 Y/ \ ` I �v THE ilFOxwnaw wn anus�CF ©© PROPOSED HSS POST, • ' • p `— — — — — — — — — — I....::::..:::::::1oRnweasBrROF,OE1 RYamIf flwro N I - .•.•.• • I I vERmTl,RRGJ8S \ 1 VP Ur ,• T1'P. OF (4) L_. --I_I J \ I••••••••••• • •I • l \ I ANY wEoaC IlEoRnel„w,ws RRa�,m © HATCH ( I I IPROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS \ imi ..„. i`«+++.•.•'� t ,oveummtvassIsaTRiertrw�slm�lzr 0r;. , ) 11 1 I / / ` ePROPOSED ACCESS LADDER I h::::':':.:/ I II 11111 1 1 II / / / / 1'-9'1 12'-10' 1'-9 1• . I -� As I 2 � .•`•'•` -•g j i j i I ,i I I I EQUIPMENT LAYOUT AT FIRST FLOOR yr=fir�"� ••' II 1s'-4',YP. APN•513-0-050.315 I;•:•• •••.1 i ; 14 j Ii I i I I ill III 11 \ '� '-s'I 12'.••1 0' 11. , PROPOSED CEILING ��:,2'-0':`� i i i I I i I i I i I I Z I I PROPOSED HSS POST. i='�•■ f;".,••• I! I I I i iII I I I o TYP. OF (4) I....•....+:....:, , �I II I I I III I J I I I ■M. 1 Z s PROPOSED VERIZON ,�\ - ► 1:;:;:;,;.;; I ' Pill 'I I I III I o I e WIRELESS GRATING 1 I —�� :-:-:•:•:•I I _ i l l l I t I I I II I 1 --' :% / 1 ---------------- - PROPOSED 4a•-o' HIGH / (� ASPHALT J i1III I i I I I © PROPOSED 30'X30'ACCESS = %j MATCL. MONH (E) BUILDING (E) BUILDING J \MENT SIGN TO 1-----.........,7-PARKINc LOT. I I I f ;' ) ; ; IiII1_ . II1 l.::,- .... ,, I III I / / ii, „.__:„.„„„ ,. r.•• •.T I _I� i t I 111 I I I A / . 40 e ... •• I 1' ''” I II I • PROPOSED ERRDN e IPA\ r'• •••••••� I ; I I � I WIRELESS TRANSFORMER STEP-DOWN ,� 1..•••• •`•`•:{ i I I I I III 1 II II I ? 4•r © PROPOSED 30"X30" J //// f"' n I _-_-_-_-_-_-_-_- .•+;•;•:+;+I I I` ON WIRELESS i i I (PROPOSED I Imo! I ilii ‘.......****43 Ur ACCESS HATCH (� - ----- -- ` \ i,;.•••••••,•,• •••�1��rl/ I NON-EXCLUSNE PARKING (9'X78') \\ ++• • • • \ I I 1 1 1 1 1 ! 1 1 1 1 4 PROPOSED ACCESS 14'-0' • • _ 3 e LADDER (BELOW) SHRUB RELOCATED I•'•<_+•• .-r 1.l2-'7 U! r ' I 1.-., 11 I . I I I I i/ '�"`� ILimi I III I i I I I 4111 SECOND LEVEL PLAN 71e_rp ' 3 -•- ._.�__._.��_._�._�.�_ .�_._._.�_.�_.__ !As�• _ i I I I 1 I I I 1 I i / - 1s-10•TYP. NOTE '*44/4111111 1 I id I 111 I I 11 I ,C).'` 15.-8.TYP. ANTENNAS ARE INSIDE THE TOWER PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS Q PROPOSED130" HH . - 3I At I I 'I I 1 II i I 1 I I 6 0 0 0 POWER CONDUITS ROUTING L•A E 2.4' Y-4 2'-8• U G W 5'-O'WIDE EASEMENT � (Q �,,-....10 �_ __ y: J I I II 1 , Q fR' I I I III I W NA 1 �' iii 1 m PROPOSED SERVICE - p+ ® -- -- "(...q"'PI PITY L - -- =�1�> __ ` : ' 1k" I I 1 I HIGH"PROPOSED 48'-0' I I� a LIGHIT. TYP. OF (2) t g y ____ R1•-9 �, (E) TREE. TYP. \ J I MONUMENTSIGN TO MATCH a 1 I. ILI i. A85 TIAREI E55 GRATINPROPOSED G �� 111 (kik ��.. — -- , (E) SETBACK UNE `J i I I (E) BUILDING ARCHITECTURE. a - Q ..- -,----_.-.-- - �� -----------------— _ _ - _/ • I PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS a. PROPOSED 48'-0' HIGH ,, Z1 5't r 16'-4' i I I EQUIPMENT Na: ANTENNA LEASE a Ce ! MONUMENT SK;I1 TO \ = I I I AREA NA 0 i MATCH (E) BUILDING €' 400,„„fill. SEcrr»_ I I i I I I P I I f I f O ARCHITECTURE r � s I II 7 - _ --- - I PROPOSED 4' LANDSCAPING <' i AZIMUT({ 1s0 S+ '� _ - -- i ( BAND AROUND THE W e PROPOSED VERIZCWIRELESS ..ft 4111"..* _� I I PROPOSED LINE q -1:2 i I I CIRCUMFERENCE OF THE SITE PANEL ANTENNAS. (4) ANTENNAS & `t o I ET,(4) RRUs WITH A2 PER SECTOR • , OF ROOF. ABOVE - - -- - _ _ _ iI I SHRUBS) IS INDICA aaaI (3) SECTORS TOTAL WITH ♦ ,lI I (2) RAYCAPS, TYP. _� I; - _- - - / 1 I I I 'It' I I I I II SHEET TITLE 441 'p3 _ H^------------------— - i / I III I I I i I i _ r__ ___ �, 4. ENLARGED SITE PLAN, 4' �� I I PROPOSED FRP POSE. N EQUIPMENT& NT1( I �' 1W. OF (4) ANTENNA LAYOUT a I 1G-0' PROPOSED VINYL VENT, y INP.,, I- --1 TYP. OF (2) Wfir A-2 ,,.-.,4rI : 4 ENLARGED SITE PLAN 1 ANTENNA LAYOUT AT THIRD LEVEL I I ,s , I. I $„ X1331151 NOIltlA373 MMOL B l rc x s i s. r a r I a I NMIlVA31'131 133M 3 1 3 0113M)NOLLVA31 i a aM01'SNOLLVA313 S5313NNA NOMA 03S0dOlid i lS3M ONV 1113 i OP' 311LLJ33HS 'did '1[3IV101 03SOddIJd ------------------------- ----------- 11 --- - ------------- ----------- ---- --------------------- --- Y321V 3Sv31 1N3I df03 g SS31310MI NOZQCiA 03S0d01ld 3041!10 ' — 3 rn - - --- - -- - - N - - i °o du•u3Ano1 o350dOHd _ 1 rT � i ---- ______ at "SZtre It 4" i1 a -1-. .........06, i 4 [ )t i 1 ' ....16:.,,... ., . Of In P © - �IiI_ _ 1_- = wins p} : .. ------------ MOW (3) Nada of MIA 1 —' ' gil -- :—Pacrina ¢} ammo H100115 --- 17- �1� tt. 1 _14. HIL% Nes JJi@111N011 a3mOdOnd 11/111 1111 -1-, 1 1 e111mina - - - aim. 1V(3) HaM' dA1•sdVwes (a) HAM 11001 w�� 01 2L3]I A 3NGIS gnaw le SYI1I31Nv (t 'SV11131a) sams 113d Vf ti. rLLino a3sodObd I1 I I I -mad S4[3!1M1 007.213A¢�Dd01Hd ISM IP 1.913 lY 103A IANI►03S0dCmd Mina 30011 9N (3) Ha1V11 01 300H 371 ISMS 03S0dalld /PIP' 1 et 1 I I � Q s x s a< m a r a r NOi.LVA�LSV 1 _ . g Z13.1.1-13D�13a MINI' QL HIM 3.1.11101400 SONN3N35 H-�-VA'8 N3H�1JNl IuooNs MA LAOIS S5313WA NO 03S01S mamas d 14311W4011 0330d011d -. YAW 35431 Itald0103 I 233131101 DOOM03S0d0Nd E 1 t I )( 1 IVI11 'GILL 'BA= 03S0dOW wove re(3) HOLV11 1 OL MN=03110d0tld — s—���` 3011];1 Ili 10 I- 31 ■5---�--• — - _ -_ A p m i 0 II : :, 91flII 8i I - q4 II I 1 I I 'du•JN3A • �- - . - ., d b II (1 }� o 1 —_—_—_-- ,ALAN 03s0d0ad �____� �� �r µ • 1. i 1 i II ,UI,,; I " ' t MS 11 110133S 2134 Vs/HUM WINN 0) 15413 IV 3311-W1 kagmbincialostremahteamol 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 SVW10/11 CO 'SVNNillW mrd I N3d0 a3odoNa monminsuomirierovenomma MIIIMILMININA os,■,■ar■■.a■,oiuoi"■a■xeruo1 i r 1 SS3s3kIVA NOZIII3A 03504001 _ - .sra■aa■o■nm■a■em■■nruOw. _ r 11111100rriryr�f= mono (3} H'JIkM al FISULi lowrsuassas AWJ3tldosd ifil2131SY1d 3)3lCJNOa MOORS __ ,-------------— VICCed ►i r STEW KM NIIS JN3MfN011 03SOd0Nd h I coateurew Wel aacnaero ri®r2'annn 3/arxne I NCB 30021 swine - mossimus (3} HOL 1 01.40011 swims dJLL'Shc►JAYIJ (7•} d a 14110E INI 3111 HS11V'S 03110d011d NN (') (£) ` 1/q ) sus %nl1Zl (t} 8 SVNN3IHV(t} 'SVNN3ll�1V ria 113NVd SS313a1M NOMA 03S0d021d L Al dA1'3015 J53M 7 15Y3 !r.043A UANIA 03S0d08d JOON mama (3) Nam al.JOON 3111 HSINVdS 03S0d0ad m%mI maw t 3015 JSV3 IV JN3A 3111 03SOdO2Id cows !IMRE c CMWAL 9160/I0 1 M3M01 3H1 3ISNI 3NV SVNN3INV m.aa awns o :31.ON Afl NOLIA101130 31Y0 AM `snivis 311sst4 Z Iumu >< ..,ii AL...t I N0I1YA31 141/108 1 -au. fl 1 035OdOad 1 '2E SNOLLYM13 low Mal£r3 ILLf10S OFlV NINON S51313tlIM N4�1 03S0d0tld :31.111.133-10SS3U M N0 O3.S0�dOtldd ill ______------------------______________....._____________-_.....------------_________-____--___________________ °oma - y X 1 it 44 I i -----_____--- ...._____, ... -________-• AMSPONOMO . """"'""""."'.'''.''.....' DDEMD400 kill -� w O1,1.1,111,1.111.111•1.1.1,1";11111.111111 Ifigirteeelxils 0m _ )(J \\ 1 a i O worm CO - ill marline (20 Harm al Med tl3181d31HIOOMS P'1° 41 HIIN HOE O0340340d011:1'dll 'SdVaIN (Z) HM w11 /yii IniiIn!I II — ------ — ---— - 62101036 (s) '!!0!036 2J3d by RUM '//;:71ita °MILL! (f) M. 311vOi31NY(t) 'SYMN3INY T3t1Yd SS3T3lSM NOLi13R 03SOd0QId -OO- mine 00 Ha1YI1 01 AOON 371. H6IPMd6 0360dO0Id /ill 4111 N0I1VA378 HJAI0N wOoO town 30111.0-3, 03S0dotld 1 Mt Wel 12aNd 1103 s 1 SS3IM I NOZ12[3A 021S0dOtld d HELM z • 'du '2!3111107 03SOd0tld SWUMNaQItl311 0IS0610tld ii 1 _ 3' modd 3�[321fA ). " ®SOdOtld0'd 'tl3�YY1 {3) TA ie 1. r C �, o_ -[ L/L1 v iiile, ni � � Vtli �1.. LOBA'1170MYI�f1ii1M®iA0L `�"'r{{°a „ „ , ,,I ' ' M 1111 LNM/l�l0 agrai III tl ' 211111457 '31441514 '11411r45ii DL xeL®macnaNINAIMawlerlo Zx �9/LII�I0DICLLINpM MI IInkiCaLI 1 � Hwaning a) IFOLINIIIJOR41AMV —------------ =TIM (3) 380N I MEM 21211D ld 3L3tl3lOO HL00MS r�aoru�if soma —1 I HUM t S J.H W N0N O3SOd0Nd enrwsaannuseltse� �- tlilrq'3lall Sq Weal Nna — - -- 'clAl'SdV3 (Z) Hata wmau aus"aNIIN rICI Ung CO) It gaM xv (t)) CV S111019 WIG -UNVd SS 13 IM NO21113A allSOdOild l Al Aootl same (3) H iwl 01 40011 31LL HSIM1dS O33OdO2ld =DM AMMO a EMI 3OISNI 321Y SYNH3I.NY manL MOM I -31DN WWI BLOC D AS POLIABIXECI 3200 'Aali `snivis 3nssIJ Welcome to tiVercome to City of Moorpark City of Moorpark • raHALO RETURNS 4"DEEP MATCH LETTERS �`� —ii— ` /� `� ILLUMINATED WITH WHITE LED � ` �it � , '- - �� �� i `V -c-------*cm�'voo-r----- Y iL fi � PROPOSED SIGN SPECIFICATIONS dmE_ . - 1 SET OF REVERSE LIT CHANNEL LETTERS"KITCHEN&BATH CENTER" LETTERS TO BE BLACK 4"DEEP RETURNS PAINTED TO MATCH LETTERS '�_ ILLUMINATED WITH WHITE LEDS Welcome to tiVelco ' e to Q� iSETOFREVERSELITCHANNELLETTER'WDC" 9',8" iti OOYpaYk 9'.8" j �/� City(/(.f�7 �j =II LETTERS TO BE WHITE PLEXIGLAS WITH PREFORATED BRUSHED ALUMINUM OVERLAY 4 ✓,L O O r►J!/LYI� i. 4"DEEP RETURNS TO MATCH LETTERS ILLUMINATED WITH WHITE LEDS J PROPOSED WDC KITCHEN&BATH=42 SQ.FT. - I . um I 12' I / 11111 f 7 I ga• I T I T 5Sc`3.8. 8 Welcome to 12' 12' WDC Will 1i _Moorpark "KITCHEN & BATH+. 48, KITCHEN & BATH 1KITCHEN & BATH CENTER?. - i Welcome to CENTER 48' CENTER City of 141 vloorpark Ono MATTRESS' Oh*-MATTRESS' 22.75IOh `0 MATTRESS' I.- 1 �, Innovation Innovation I 10'.10" I Dance 12' Dance Center Center ,_____ 8'8' __ .. __..., "IlingDOwSTIuO i] t3•ID&InQci 42.25' a El , ,q-rli--1 --1°L l_o_o,ile'L 11111114 1M! ' CUM=WISERW ■11 - °Oil- STCNIE DAM II I — =11II---11-11 II Ii PROPOSED ©MU' D MOW VEMIEEM TO WPM OE, AT CAROM • f== - Ili Lim LI MI 11.,====.1I v om— 11''''''''11I WAN Ill n• - .{y }."ryA••Y{�•• .';ei.;Q`�'.."" - gyp` . •. . _ =III=1f-:. I :... ...-`�" '¢ ..�.�.w•=.,. o • .• • ...i' ''. N. • • •r' c s •. . c ffi`4 X m-0 !Qi'•• WO £3 SIV-0`• 0 PER !;�.•i i Tom. 5 vP, C4.)• f• Ill .i. C;t1 Cow-ct i;eefina C.'.- /-4 a0/, ACTrON: 4.€4d ,atter MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT TO: Honorable City Council FROM: David A. Bobardt, Community Development Director DATE: December 28, 2012 (CC Meeting of 1116/2013) SUBJECT: Consider Potential City Welcome Sign on State Route-23 Freeway at Los Angeles Avenue BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION Consultants for Verizon have approached City staff recently about the need to construct a new cell tower adjacent to the State Route (SR)-118 freeway on the Warehouse Discount Center property near Los Angeles Avenue. Community Development staff has worked with them on a number of concepts to comply with the City's wireless communications facilities ordinance, including integrating antenna panels into. the building design or constructing a "monopine" behind the building. Their transmission needs, however, called for a tower as close to the freeway as possible, so while these alternatives were viable, they were not optimal for coverage. Separately, one idea being contemplated by staff was to create, as part of the City's economic development efforts, a City welcome sign in this location that would help freeway travelers be aware of some of the other shopping opportunities adjacent to the freeway that are not on the Moorpark Marketplace sign tower (e.g. Staples, Dick's and Petco). Verizon consultants agreed to consider a City sign tower that would hold their antenna panels and equipment inside the tower element, and have submitted an initial concept (attached). Such a sign would require an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance as"off-premise"signs are currently not permitted anywhere in the City. Property managers of the Moorpark Marketplace and Village at Moorpark have not been contacted to gauge their or their tenants' current interest in such a sign, although interest was expressed in the past. Property owners for the Village at Moorpark had worked with staff on a sign tower at the corner of Miller Parkway and Los Angeles Avenue, but have not been actively pursuing permits for such a sign recently. This sign tower would help the visibility of their location from the freeway, but not to the extent of a sign immediately adjacent to the freeway. • 16 CC ATTACHMENT 4 Honorable City Council January 16, 2013 Page 2 Although premature to evaluate the specific design of the sign as it would currently not be permitted, staff took the idea of a City sign for economic development purposes to the Community and Economic Development Committee (Councilmembers Mikos and Pollock) on December 19, 2012 for discussion. The committee also considered the conceptual sign design submitted by Verizon. While understanding the economic development benefits of such a sign, the committee expressed concerns over the visual impact of a sign tower, and noted that the sign could be designed more like the sign tower for the Moorpark Marketplace, rather than what was proposed. After discussion, the committee had no recommendation for the Council as a whole. • As noted above, a sign at this location advertising the centers on the other side of the freeway would require an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance. Staff believes that an ordinance can be drafted that would permit such a sign without leading to a proliferation of off-premise signs elsewhere in the City, due to the unique size and location of the centers. If the City Council wishes staff to prepare such an amendment for consideration and recommendation by the Planning Commission, the City Council may direct staff to return with a resolution to initiate consideration of a Zoning Ordinance amendment. FISCAL IMPACT None. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Direct staff as deemed appropriate Attachment: 1. Conceptual Cell Tower/City Welcome Sign • S:\Community Development\ADMIN\Agenda Reports,Misc\City Welcome Sign\City Welcome Sign.docx 17 it I ' 40 Os , a 1Wek, omes 'Mu - / IICENTER. 7 I". .. . . • . . - . • '. ' - '. .. •' ' ' - ORTHO MATTRESS : . , TENANT SIGN . - TENANT SIGN - . . , TENANT SIGN .. . - I .. .. - „.-: .-.: . . -.:.-.- :z. - . .- .- - ... : : .. Moorpark Marketplace . .• The Village at Moorpark - CC ATTACHMENT 1 18 Minutes of the City Council/Successor Agency Moorpark, California Page 7 January 16,2013 service exclusively to the city and not to any person, business, or entity located in the city.° Section 5.08.010 B 8. modified to read: "Businesses engaged in providing professional design work, including but not limited to architecture or landscape archtecture services, provided such work does not involve on-site work within the city. There were no speakers. Mr. Ennis read the title of Ordinance No. 417, MOTION: Councilmember Pollock moved and Counclimember Van Dam • seconded a motion to waive further reading, declare Ordinance No. 417, as amended, read for the first time, and schedule second reading and adoption for February 6,2013. The motion carried by unanimous roll call vote. 10O110N: Counclmember Mikos moved and Councilmember Pollock seconded a motion to adapt Resolution No.2013-3153,adopting a revised fee schedule for services rendered pursuant to the Moorpark Municipal Code relating to Business Registration Fees and rescinding Resolution No.2011-1994. The motion carried by unanimous roll call vote. ' D. Consider Potential City Welcome Sign on State Route-23 at Los Angeles Avenue. Staff Recommendafon; Direct staff as deemed'appropriate. Mr.Bobardt gave the staff report Counclimember Mims reported she and Councilmember Pollock serving on the Community and Economic Development committee could not come up with a unified recommendation for this signage. A discussion followed among the Coundimecers and staff focused on: 1) Recognition of economic development potential of the sign;2)Concern regarding the conal design; 3) Not wanting to set a precedence for signage along State Route 23 corridor; 4) Consider siting the cell tower within an architectural structure rather than signage; 5) City retains control of tower sites if coverage can be obtakted elsewhere;and 6) Desire to explore more options. There were no speakers. MOTION: Counclimember henhouse moved and Mayor Parvin seconded a motion not to proceed with the City Welcome Sign on State Route-23 at Los Angeles Avenue. The motion carried by voice vote 3-2,Councilmembers Pollock and Van Dam dissenting. 19 Honorable City Council • January 16,2013 Page 2 Although premature to evaluate the specific design of the sign as it would currently not be permitted, staff took the idea of a City sign for economic development purposes to the Community and Economic Development Committee (Counalnem hers Nirkos and Pollock) on December 19, 2012 for discussion. The committee also considered the conceptual sign design slmnu'fted by Verizon. While understanding the economic development benefits of such a sign.the committee expressed concerns over the visual impact of a sign tower, and noted that the sign could be designed more like the sign tower for the Moorpark Marketplace. rather than what was proposed.After discussion, the committee had no recommendation for the Council as a whole. • As noted above, a sign at this location advertising the centers on the other side of the freeway would require an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance. Staff believes that an ordinance can be drafted that would permit such a sign without leading to a proliferation of off-premise signs elsewhere,in the City, due to the unique size and location of the centers. If the City Counal wishes staff to prepare such an amendment for consideration and recommendation by the Planning Commission, the City Council may direct staff to return with a resolution to initiate consideration of a Zoning Ordinance amendment FISCAL IMPACT None. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Direct staff as deemed appropriate Attachment 1. Conceptual Cell Tower/City Welcome Sign . • S. nay DevetopmentMADMINAgenda Reports.Mcsclaly Welcome SitmTdyWekome Sign door 20 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. 2017-04, AN AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER 17.40 (SIGN REGULATIONS) AND CHAPTER 17.42 (WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES) OF TITLE 17 (ZONING) OF THE MOORPARK MUNICIPAL CODE TO ALLOW SIGNAGE ON CERTAIN WIRELESS FACILITIES IN CERTAIN LOCATIONS, AND DETERMINING THAT THIS ACTION IS EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT WHEREAS, On December 2, 2016, Matt Vigil, on behalf of Vinculums Services, LLC, submitted an application for Conditional Use Permit No. 2016-05 and Modification No. 2 to Commercial Planned Development Permit No. 2004-03 to construct and operate a major wireless facility within a stand-alone 48-foot high tower structure at 14339 White Sage Road; and WHEREAS, on April 27, 2017, Tom Schlender, representing NLA 14339 LLC, the owner of the property at 14339 White Sage Road, amended the application in order to request an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance to allow signage on the proposed tower structure (Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2017-04); and WHEREAS, at a duly noticed public hearing on June 27, 2017, the Planning Commission considered Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2017-04, an amendment to Chapter 17.40 (Sign Regulations) and Chapter 17.42 (Wireless Communications Facilities) of Title 17 (Zoning) of the Moorpark Municipal Code to allow signage on certain wireless facilities in certain locations; and WHEREAS, at its meeting of June 27, 2017, the Planning Commission considered the agenda report and any supplements thereto and written public comments, opened the public hearing and took and considered public testimony both for and against the proposal, closed the public hearing, and after discussion, adopted Resolution No. PC-2017-619, recommending approval of Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2017-04; and WHEREAS, at a duly noticed public hearing on July 19, 2017, the City Council considered Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2017-04, opened the public hearing and took and considered public testimony both for and against the proposal, closed the public hearing, and discussed and reached a decision on this matter; and WHEREAS, the Community Development Director preliminarily determined that Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2017-04 is Categorically Exempt from the provisions of CEQA pursuant to Section 15311 (Class 11 - Accessory Structures) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations (CEQA Guidelines) in that Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2017-04 allows signage on certain wireless facilities in certain locations, and on-premises signs are included in Section 15311 of the CEQA Guidelines as an example of a project eligible for this exemption. 21 CC ATTACHMENT 5 Ordinance No. Page 2 NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: The City Council concurs with the determination of the Community Development Director that Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2017-04 is Categorically Exempt from the provisions of CEQA pursuant to Section 15311 (Class 11 - Accessory Structures) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations (CEQA Guidelines) in that Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2017-04 allows signage on certain wireless facilities in certain locations, and on- premises signs are included in Section 15311 of the CEQA Guidelines as an example of a project eligible for this exemption. No further environmental documentation is required. SECTION 2. GENERAL PLAN AND SPECIFIC PLAN CONSISTENCY: The City Council finds Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2017-04 to be consistent with the City of Moorpark General Plan and all adopted Specific Plans, in that this ordinance supports one of the goals of the Land Use Element which calls for a variety of commercial facilities which serve community residents and meet regional needs. Viable and aesthetically pleasing wireless communication facilities are an example of commercial facilities that provide important services to community residents and serve regional needs for wireless communications. SECTION 3. The City Council hereby approves Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2017-04, which amends Chapter 17.40 (Sign Regulations) and Chapter 17.42 (Wireless Communications Facilities) of Title 17 (Zoning) of the Moorpark Municipal Code to allow signage on certain wireless facilities in certain locations, as shown in Exhibit A attached, with the effective date of this approval subject to the provisions of Sections 5 and 6 of this Ordinance. SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, part or portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. The City Council declares that it would have adopted this ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, part or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more section, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, parts or portions be declared invalid or unconstitutional. SECTION 5. Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2017-04, including the amendment to the City's Sign Regulations, shall not take effect unless and until an agreement has been approved and executed between the City and the applicant by which "City Welcome Signs" are permitted to be installed and maintained on the tower element of the structure that meets the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2017- 04. SECTION 6. This ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days after its passage and adoption. 22 Ordinance No. Page 3 SECTION 7. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance; shall enter the same in the book of original ordinances of said City; shall make a written record of the passage and adoption thereof in the minutes of the proceedings of the City Council at which the same is passed and adopted; and shall publish notice of adoption in the manner required by law. PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of , 2017. Janice S. Parvin, Mayor ATTEST: Maureen Benson, City Clerk Exhibit A—Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2017-04 23 Ordinance No. Page 4 EXHIBIT A ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. 2017-04 AN AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER 17.40 (SIGN REGULATIONS) AND CHAPTER 17.42 (WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES) OF TITLE 17 (ZONING) OF THE MOORPARK MUNICIPAL CODE Letter "I" is added to table in Section 17.40.110 (Commercial/industrial zones) of Chapter 17.40 (Sign Regulations) of Title 17 (Zoning) of the Moorpark Municipal Code as follows: Sign Type Sign Location Maximum Sign Area, Other Regulations Height, and Width I. Wireless communication facilities. Signs on a stealth Location must comply Area: One-hundred forty Number: One (1)tower facility designed as a with standards in (140)square feet element with signage tower element on Chapter 17.42 (Wireless maximum per each side per eligible site. private property Communications of tower element, but Maximum three (3) (Only permitted in the Facilities)and CPD not to exceed 30% of signson each side of Commercial Planned Permit. the surface area of any Tower element. Development(CPD) one side of tower Maximum three (3) zone on a site element. sides of Tower element developed with 100,000 Height and Width: Per with signage. square feet or more of Chapter 17.42 (Wireless Design: Tower element building area and Communications must meet definition of adjacent to a freeway.) Facilities) and CPD stealth facility in Permit. Signage may Chapter 17.42 (Wireless not extend beyond the Communications edges of the tower Facilities) and have an element. approved CPD Permit with a design, including materials, colors, architectural style and details, and proposed signage to match • existing site architecture as determined by the City Council. Illumination: Internal or spotlights, but no exposed neon lighting or exposed bulb. Landscaping: Four(4) foot wide planter surrounding tower element. 24 Ordinance No. Page 5 Section 17.42.050 (Development requirements for all wireless communications facilities) of Chapter 17.42 (Wireless Communications Facilities) of Title 17 (Zoning) of the Moorpark Municipal Code is amended as follows: 17.42.050 Development requirements for all wireless communications facilities. A. General Development Requirements. The facility shall comply with each of the following requirements: 1. Any signs or advertising devices other than certification, public safety, warning, or other required seals or required signage are prohibited, except as provided for in Chapter 17.40 (Sign Regulations). 2. Any and all accessory equipment, or other equipment associated with the operation of a minor facility, including but not limited to transmission cables, when not located within an existing above-ground building in a manner that is not visible from the outside, in association with a stealth facility, must be located within conduit or in an underground vault. Any and all accessory equipment, or other equipment associated with the operation of a major facility, including but not limited to transmission cables, must be located within conduit, an underground vault, or an above-ground building or enclosure in a manner that complies with the development standards of the zoning district in which such equipment is located. Equipment located above ground must be visually compatible with the surrounding buildings and structures and either shrouded by sufficient landscaping to screen the equipment from view, or designed to match the architecture of adjacent buildings. 3. The wireless communications facility's exterior finish shall be comprised of non- reflective material(s) and painted, screened, or camouflaged to blend with the materials and colors of surrounding buildings, structures, topography and vegetation. 4. Wireless communications facilities and/or support equipment that are accessible to pedestrians shall be covered with a clear anti-graffiti material of a type approved by the planning commission or community development director. The planning commission or community development director may grant an exception to this requirement if the applicant demonstrates to the satisfaction of the planning commission or community development director that there is adequate security around the facility to prevent graffiti. 5. All screening used in connection with a wall mounted and/or roof mounted wireless facility must be compatible with the architecture, color, texture, and materials of the building or structure to which it is attached, and must be maintained to the satisfaction of the community development director. 6. Wireless facilities may not be illuminated unless specifically required by the Federal Aviation Administration or other governmental agencies with appropriate jurisdiction, or to illuminate signage as allowed by Chapter 17.40 (Sign Regulations). 7. The applicant, and the property owner if different from the applicant, shall not enter into any exclusive agreement which prohibits future collocation of other facilities on or with the applicant's facility, unless technological requirements preclude that collocation. B. Setback Requirements. All .facilities must comply with the main structure- setback requirements for the zone in which they are located as specified in Chapter 25 Ordinance No. Page 6 17.24 of the Moorpark Municipal Code, with the exception of utility mounted facilities, if all other requirements in Sections 17.42.070(B) and 17.42.070(C) can be met. In all instances, the determination of need for a larger setback for the facility may be considered by the city in connection with the processing of the applicable permit. (Ord. 396 § 3, 2011) - END - 26 RESOLUTION NO. 2017- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2016-05 AND MODIFICATION NO. 2 TO COMMERCIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 2004-03 FOR CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF A MAJOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY WITHIN A 48-FOOT HIGH TOWER AT 14339 WHITE SAGE ROAD (WAREHOUSE DISCOUNT CENTER SITE), WITH SIGNAGE ON THE TOWER, AND DETERMINING THAT THIS ACTION IS EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT, ON THE APPLICATION OF MATT VIGIL (VINCULUMS) ON BEHALF OF VERIZON WIRELESS WHEREAS, On December 2, 2016, an application was filed for Conditional Use Permit (CUP) No. 2016-05 and Modification No. 2 to Commercial Planned Development (CPD) Permit No. 2004-03 by Matt Vigil (Vinculums) for a major wireless communications facility on a 48-foot high tower located at 14339 White Sage Road (Warehouse Discount Center); and WHEREAS, at duly noticed public hearings held on April 19, 2017, and May 3, 2017, the City Council opened the public hearing, and without speakers, closed the public hearing, and referred this matter to the Planning Commission for a recommendation along with Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2017-04, which was requested by the property owner on April 26, 2017 to allow for signage on the wireless communication facility; and WHEREAS, at a duly noticed public hearing on June 27, 2017, the Planning Commission considered Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2017-04, Conditional Use Permit (CUP) No. 2016-05 and Modification No. 2 to Commercial Planned Development (CPD) Permit No. 2004-03, and adopted Resolution No. PC-2017-619, recommending approval of these applications, subject to conditions; and WHEREAS, at a new duly noticed public hearing on July 19, 2017, the City Council considered Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2017-04, Conditional Use Permit (CUP) No. 2016-05 and Modification No. 2 to Commercial Planned Development (CPD) Permit No. 2004-03; and WHEREAS, at its meeting of July 19, 2017, the City Council considered the agenda report and any supplements thereto and written public comments; opened the public hearing and took and considered public testimony both for and against the proposal, closed the public hearing, and discussed and reached a decision on this matter; and CC ATTACHMENT 6 27 Resolution No. 2017- Page 2 WHEREAS, The Community Development Director has preliminarily determined the project is Categorically Exempt from the provisions of CEQA pursuant to Section 15311(Class 11 - Accessory Structures) of the California Code of Regulations (CEQA Guidelines) in that the project is consistent with the applicable general and specific plan designation and all applicable general and specific plan policies as well as with the applicable zoning designation and regulations if amended by Zoning Ordinance No. 2017-04; the proposed development occurs within city limits on a project site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses; the project site has no value, as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species, approval of a project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality; and the site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. No further environmental documentation is required. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION: The City Council concurs with the Community Development Director's determination that this project is Categorically Exempt from the provisions of CEQA pursuant to Section 15311 (Class 11 - Accessory Structures) of the California Code of Regulations (CEQA Guidelines) in that the project is consistent with the applicable general and specific plan designation and all applicable general and specific plan policies as well as with applicable zoning designation and regulations if amended by Zoning Ordinance No. 2017-04; the proposed development occurs within city limits on a project site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses; the project site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species; approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality; and the site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. No further environmental documentation is required. SECTION 2. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FINDINGS: Based upon the information set forth in the staff report(s), accompanying studies, and oral and written public testimony, the City Council makes the following findings in accordance with City of Moorpark; Municipal Code Section 17.44.040: A. The proposed use, as conditioned, and with the adoption of Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2017-04, is consistent with the provisions of the General Plan, zoning ordinance, and any other applicable regulations, in that the proposed use, height, setbacks and improvements are consistent with City Code requirements. The tower is proposed at 48 feet high and includes a Spanish tile roof and a metal finial. B. The proposed use, as conditioned, and with the adoption of Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2017-04, is compatible with both existing and permitted land uses in the surrounding area, in that the wireless communication facility will provide additional cellular service to the commercial and industrial areas. The 28 Resolution No. 2017- Page 3 proposed tower has been determined to be in an appropriate location for a wireless communication facility by the city. C. The proposed use, as conditioned, and with the adoption of Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2017-04, is compatible with the scale, visual character and design of surrounding properties, in that it is designed so as not to detract from the physical and visual quality of the area. The materials and colors of the tower complement the existing commercial buildings. D. The proposed use, as conditioned, and with the adoption of Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2017-04, would not be obnoxious or harmful, or impair the utility of neighboring property or uses, in that the proposed use has been designed to eliminate any negative visual impacts. The proposed tower will not eliminate parking spaces, obstruct driveways, or disrupt vehicular or pedestrian circulation. E. The proposed use, as conditioned, and with the adoption of Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2017-04, would not be detrimental to the public health, safety, convenience, or welfare, in that conditions of approval have been added to protect the public. Wireless Facilities Findings: A. The proposed facility, as conditioned, and with the adoption of Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2017-04, will not create any significant blockage to public views, in that the tower will be placed on the corner of an existing commercial site, away from driveways and traffic line-of-sight. B. The proposed facility, as conditioned, and with the adoption of Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2017-04, will be an enhancement to the City due to its ability to provide additional communication capabilities in the eastern part of the City and along California State Route 23. C. The proposed facility, as conditioned, and with the adoption of Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2017-04, will be aesthetically integrated into its surrounding land uses and natural environment, in that it will be constructed of materials, painted in a manner, and constructed in a style that will complement the existing commercial buildings. D. The proposed facility, as conditioned, will comply with FCC regulations regarding interference with the reception or transmission of other wireless service signals within the City and surrounding community. E. The proposed facility, as conditioned, will operate in compliance with all other applicable Federal regulations for such facilities, including safety regulations, in that AT&T operates its wireless network in compliance with its FCC license and FCC rules and regulations concerning frequency emissions and/or radio frequency interference. The transmission densities emanating from the facility will 29 Resolution No. 2017- Page 4 not exceed current American National Standards Institute (ANSI) recommended maximum exposure levels for wireless transmission frequencies which do not have the potential to significantly impact the community. In all cases, Effective Radiated Power (ERP), and its associated electromagnetic (EM) radiation power densities are a small fraction of the maximum permissible exposure set by ANSI, or the more restrictive exposure standard put forth by the National Commission on Radiation Protection and Measurement (NCRP). F. The public need for the use of the cellular facility has been documented consistent with California law, in that the proposed cell site will provide a substantial increase in the coverage area. G. The applicant will provide at its own expense a field survey or other method consistent with Federal law to provide written verification that the facility is in compliance with applicable Federal regulations regarding electromagnetic frequency emissions. This radio-frequency (RF) report shall also include signal strength exhibits, including calculations and measurements under maximum loading conditions. Such field survey shall be provided to the City upon request, not to exceed one such request in any 24-month period. Planned Development Findings A. The site design, as conditioned, and with the adoption of Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2017-04, including structure location, size, height, setbacks, massing, scale, architectural style and colors, and landscaping, is consistent with the provisions of the general plan, any applicable specific plans, zoning ordinance, and any other applicable regulations in that the proposed facility has been designed to complement the surrounding built and natural environment; B. The site design, as conditioned, and with the adoption of Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2017-04, would not create negative impacts on or impair the utility of properties, structures or uses in the surrounding area in that the facility has been designed in a manner consistent with the character of the community; C. The proposed use, as conditioned, and with the adoption of Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2017-04, is compatible with existing and permitted uses in the surrounding area in that a wireless communication facility is not unexpected in the Commercial Planned Development zone. SECTION 4. CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL: The City Council hereby approves Conditional Use Permit No. 2016-05 and Modification No. 2 to Commercial Planned Development (CPD) Permit No. 2004-03, subject to the special and standard Conditions of Approval included in Exhibit A (Special and Standard Conditions of Approval), attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. 30 Resolution No. 2017- Page 5 SECTION 5. EFFECTIVE DATE: The effective date of this resolution shall be concurrent with the effective date of Ordinance No. approving Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2017-04. SECTION 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution and shall cause a certified resolution to be filed in the book of original resolutions. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 19th day of July, 2017. Janice S. Parvin, Mayor ATTEST: Maureen Benson, City Clerk Exhibit A - Special and Standard Conditions of Approval for Conditional Use Permit (CUP) No. 2016-05 and Modification No. 2 to Commercial Planned Development (CPD) Permit No. 2004-03 31 Resolution No. 2017- Page 6 EXHIBIT A STANDARD AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) No. 2014-09 AND MODIFICATION NO. 2 TO COMMERCIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 2004-03 STANDARD CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL The applicant shall comply with Standard Conditions of Approval for Conditional Use Permits as adopted by City Council Resolution No. 2009-2799 (Exhibit B), except as modified by the following Special Conditions of Approval. In the event of conflict between a Standard and Special Condition of Approval, the Special Condition shall apply. SPECIAL CONDITIONS 1. This Conditional Use Permit is granted or approved with the City's designated approving body retaining and reserving the right and jurisdiction to review and to modify the permit—including the conditions of approval—based on changed circumstances. Changed circumstances include, but are not limited to, major modification of the business; a change in scope, emphasis, size, or nature of the business; the expansion, alteration, reconfiguration, or change of use; or the fact that the use is negatively impacting surrounding uses by virtue of impacts not identified at the time of application for the conditional use permit or impacts that are much greater than anticipated or disclosed at the time of application for the conditional use permit. The reservation of right to review any permit granted or approved under this chapter by the City's designated approving body is in addition to, and not in lieu of, the right of the City, its Planning Commission, City Council and designated approving body to review and revoke or modify any permit granted or approved under this chapter for any violations of the conditions imposed on such permit. 2. The development must be in substantial conformance with the plans presented in conjunction with the application for Conditional Use Permit No. 2014-09 and Modification No. 1 to Commercial Planned Development No. 2004-03, except any modifications as may be required to meet specific Code standards or other conditions stipulated herein. 3. Approval of a Zoning Clearance is required prior to the issuance of any new Building Permits. All contractors must have valid City of Moorpark Business Registrations. 4. Prior to issuance of a building permit for the wireless communications facility, the property owner and City shall enter into an agreement to provide City Welcome signage on the tower at the applicant's expense including perpetual maintenance, with a design, materials, colors, and illumination to be reviewed and approved by the City Council. Any future change to the City Welcome signage would require City Council approval. 32 Resolution No. 2017- Page 7 5. This facility is approved as an unstaffed operation. Following construction of the facility, traffic generated by this use shall be limited to periodic and emergency maintenance of the facility. Required parking and loading spaces on the site shall be maintained in compliance with Zoning Ordinance. 6. The applicant will provide, at its expense, a field survey or other method consistent with Federal law to provide written verification that the facility is in compliance with applicable Federal regulations regarding electromagnetic frequency emissions. This radio-frequency (RF) report shall also include signal strength exhibits, including calculations and measurements under maximum loading conditions. Such field survey shall be provided to the City upon request, not to exceed one (1) such request in any 24-month period. 7. Prior to the issuance of a Zoning Clearance for any new building permits, the applicant shall submit all construction plans for review and approval by the Community Development Director. 8. The wireless facilities under this permit shall be maintained so that the materials and colors remain compatible with the rest of the building. Failure to maintain these facilities to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director shall result in the scheduling of a revocation hearing. 9. In the event that this antenna array is abandoned, the applicant shall remove the facility within ninety (90) days at the request of the Community Development Director. Should the facility owner fail to remove the facility upon abandonment, the property owner shall be responsible for its removal. 10. In the event that the uses under this Conditional Use Permit are determined to be abandoned, the City of Moorpark may, at its discretion, initiate revocation procedures for cause per the provisions of Section 17.44.080. For purposes of this condition, "abandoned" shall mean a cessation of a business or businesses which would render the use unavailable to the public for a period of 180 or more consecutive days. Initiation of revocation procedures may result in the revocation of the permit or modification of the permit, based upon the evidence presented at the hearing. 11. Prior to the issuance of a Zoning Clearance for building permit, all landscape deficiencies must be corrected, and a landscape maintenance plan shall be submitted for review and approval of the Community Development Director and Parks and Recreation Director. 12. Prior to the issuance of a Zoning Clearance for building permit, hedge plants shall be planted on the north side of the property, adjacent to the parking lot to the satisfactory of the Community Development Director. -End- 33