HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 2006 0802 CC REG ITEM 09CITEM CI . C.
CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA
City Council Meeting
of_ aoo�
ACTION.
BY:
MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Honorable City Council
FROM: Yugal Lail, City Engineer / Public Works Director
BY: Ken Gilbert, Public Works Consultant
DATE: July 20, 2006 (CC Meeting of 08/02/06)
SUBJECT: Underground Utility Project Priorities
BACKGROUND
1. The City Council Goals and Objectives include the following: "Evaluate funding
sources and priorities for undergrounding of utility lines throughout the City."
2. In March of 2005, the City Council received a report which set forth a list of
candidate "undergrounding" projects. The matter was referred to the Public Works,
Facilities and Solid Waste Committee [Mayor Pro Tern Mikos and Councilmember
Parvin], herein the "Committee ", for review and recommendation.
3. The initial recommendations of the Committee were presented to the City Council
on January 18, 2006. At that meeting the City Council made certain suggested
changes and referred the matter back to the Committee for further study.
4. The Committee has met on several occasions since January, to discuss the subject
priority list. This report presents the most recent Committee recommendations on
the matter.
DISCUSSION
A. City Council Direction: January 18 2006
At its meeting of January 18, 2006, the City Council discussed the subject matter and
then referred it back to the Committee for further review, with the following
suggestions:
Underground Priorities-0608 000204
Honorable City Council
August 2, 2006
Page 2
DEVELOP A NEW WORK PLAN PRIORITIZING RESIDENTIAL OVER
COMMERCIAL AND INCREASING POINTS ASSIGNED FOR SAFETY AND
PROXIMITY TO SCHOOLS AND PARKS'.
B. Location of Candidate Undergrounding Projects
Attached as Attachment 1 is a map showing all of the overhead electrical
transmission and distribution lines in the City except the tall high voltage towers.
These facilities identified on Attachment 1 have been grouped into twenty three
separate candidate "undergrounding" projects, identified as Projects A thru T. The
map also identifies the type of overhead utility lines on the poles: a) distribution; b)
distribution & transmission; or c) transmission only. The attached maps also shows
the location of all parks and schools.
C. Description of Candidate Projects
Attached as Attachment 2, is a chart which briefly describes the limits and scope of
each of the twenty three candidate projects.
D. Estimated "Undergrounding" Costs
Attached as Attachment 3, is a chart which provides a preliminary cost estimate for
each of the candidate projects. The total estimated cost for all of the projects listed is
about $56.7 million. It should be noted that these cost estimates are very preliminary
in nature. Although the unit prices cited in Attachment 3 were derived based on
staff's experience and input from the Southern California Edison Company (SCE),
there has been no effort made to ask SCE to perform preliminary engineering and to
develop cost estimates for any of these projects. It is likely, therefore, that cost
estimates developed by such a more in depth and site specific process, would yield
a different cost estimate. Accordingly, the costs listed in Attachment 3 are merely
"ballpark" figures.
E. Evaluation Criteria
1. Evaluation Criteria: The following criteria was considered in evaluating and
ranking he projects:
a. Land Use: Land Use is a good measure of community and "people" impact.
b. Type of Street: The type of street is also an indicator of "people" impact.
Arterial streets were given the highest, followed by collector streets and then
residential streets.
Underground Priorities_0608 000205
Honorable City Council
August 2, 2006
Page 3
c. Safety: Two points are given for poles located on a street and another two
points are given if the project runs past a school or a park.
d. Aesthetics: One to three points are given to certain projects for aesthetic
impacts and /or proximity to sensitive areas.
2. Cost. Project cost was not considered in evaluating and ranking the projects.
Small projects and larger more expensive projects compete on equal footing. In
this way the availability and amount of funding does not affect the priority
ranking.
F. Project Evaluation and Ranking
1. Two Alternative Methodologies: The Committee's previous recommendation
gave Commercial Land Use the highest priority followed by Residential, Industrial
and Open Space. At the January 2006 City Council meeting, the Committee was
asked to review an option giving Residential Land Use a higher priority. Both
methods are discussed below.
2. Commercial Land Use Priority. Designating Commercial Land Use as the
higher priority, yields the following scoring criteria:
Scoring
Highest
Criteria Factor
Score Score
Land Use Commercial
4 4
Residential
3
Industrial
2
Open Space
1
Type of Street Arterial
3 3
Collector
2
Residential
1
Satety School /Park and Street 4 4
School /Park 3
Street only 2
Aesthetics Proximity to a 1 -3 3
sensitive area
14
Note: Attachment 4 sets forth preliminary project scoring and ranking
using this scoring system.
3. Residential Land Use Priority. Designating Residential Land Use as the higher
priority, yields the following scoring criteria:
Underground Priorities 0608
(10U206
Honorable City Council
August 2, 2006
Page 4
Scoring
Highest
Criteria Factor
Score Score
Land Use Residential
4 4
Commercial
3
Industrial
2
Open Space
1
Type of Street Arterial
3 3
Collector
2
Residential
1
Safety School /Park and Street 4 4
School /Park 3
Street only 2
Aesthetics Proximity to a 1 -3 3
sensitive area
14
Note: Attachment 5 sets forth preliminary project scoring and ranking
using this scoring system.
G. Committee Recommendations
The recommendation of the Public Works, Facilities and Solid Waste Committee is
similar to that presented to the City Council last January. It is the view of the
Committee that "undergrounding" projects in commercial districts should be given a
higher priority than projects in residential districts (the ranking set forth in Attachment
4). This view is based, in large part, on the conclusion that the aesthetic benefits of
such a project would have a greater impact in "higher traveled" commercial areas.
It should be noted that, in comparing the rankings in Attachments 4 and 5, the top
five projects are almost identical.
The committee recognizes that even with an established priority list that funding will
be a continuing challenge and the City will face potential situations where the
Council may want to deviate from its established list. These may include locations
where the City could leverage money contributed by a private developer or combine
work in conjunction with a private development requirement, or a public
improvement project could be enhanced by making undergrounding a part of such
project. Two current projects that are examples of possible exceptions to a priority
list are the proposed Essex Project/Civic Center Expansion and Poindexter Park
Expansion.
Underground Priorities_0608 000207
Honorable City Council
August 2, 2006
Page 5
H. Project Funding Sources
The aforementioned citation from the City Council Goals and Objectives direct staff
to evaluate both project priorities and possible project funding sources.
1. List of Possible Sources: The following is a list of possible funding sources for
future utility undergrounding projects:
a. Rule 20A: The City only accrues about $65,000 per year in PUC Rule 20A
allocations. Currently our Rule 20A accrual is approximately $15,000 as of
January 1, 2006.
b. City Funds: If deemed appropriate, the City Council could consider using
monies from the General Fund or Endowment Fund for this purpose.
c. Land Development: Development Agreements crafted for future land
development projects could include payment of fees for future
"undergrounding" projects.
d. Improvement Assessment Districts: An improvement assessment district
could be formed to fund an "undergrounding" project. Formation of such an
assessment district would require approval of the assessed property owners,
as required by Proposition 218.
e. Moorpark Redevelopment Agency (MRA): If found to be consistent with the
purposes and objectives of the Redevelopment Plan, the Redevelopment
Agency could fund an "undergrounding" project located within the
Redevelopment Project Area, or benefiting the Project Area.
2. Recommended Sources: No recommendations regarding preferred funding
sources are being provided at this time. Discussion of funding for Project C (Los
Angeles Avenue — Shasta Avenue to Moorpark Avenue) is discussed below.
I. Ongoing /Upcoming Developer Projects
a) Pardee Homes: As part of this development, a portion of Project R from High
Street to Charles Street will be underground. Additionally, Pardee is currently
undergrounding Project G1 along their project frontage.
b) William Lvon Homes Tract 5187/5405: As part of this development,
undergrounding is currently under construction for Project G1 along their project
frontage of Walnut Canyon Road from Pardee Development (Tract 5045) to
William Lyon Development (Tract 5405) (High Density Development).
Underground Priorities_0608
000208
Honorable City Council
August 2, 2006
Page 6
c) Suncal Tract 5130: As part of this development, undergrounding will be
constructed for Project G1 from William Lyon Development (Tract 5405) (High
Density Development) to Casey Road.
J. Project C: Los Angeles Avenue: Shasta Ave to Millard St
Project C calls for the "undergrounding" of the high voltage lines along the frontage
of the City's central business on Los Angeles Avenue between Shasta Avenue and
Moorpark Avenue. That project is ranked number one in both Attachment 4 and
Attachment 5. A project of similar scope and purpose was added to the Capital
Improvement Budget a number of years ago, prior to these efforts to identify and
priorities possible "undergrounding" projects. Consistent with City Council direction
at that time, staff had been working with SCE on efforts to form a new Underground
Utility District for the purpose of undergrounding the high voltage transmission lines
along Los Angeles Avenue. The funding strategy for the project identified at that
time, was to use of available funds from Improvement District 92 -1: Mission Bell
Plaza (approximately $427,000), certain MRA monies and future Rule 20A accruals.
Work on the project was deferred until after the City Council considers these
"underground project priorities ".
It should be noted that the FY 2006/07 Budget provides funding for this project as
follows:
Funding Source
2330: AD92 -1
2501: L A Ave AOC
Total
Prior Years Costs
0
240
240
FY 06/07 Budget
Total Project
426,447
426,447
299,761
300,001
726,208
726,448
The actual project costs, including the degree and amount of funding by SCE from
Rule 20A monies, has not yet been determined. A rough estimate places total
project costs at approximately $2 million.
K. Work Plan
The following is a suggested work plan for proceeding with development and
implementation of utility "undergrounding" projects:
1. Approve a Project Priority List.
2. Direct staff to continue to work with the developers of properties in the vicinity of
Los Angeles Avenue and Miller Parkway on efforts to "underground" the
overhead utilities on Los Angeles Avenue west of Science Drive.
Underground Priorities_0608
000209
Honorable City Council
August 2, 2006
Page 7
3. Should the Priority List approved by the City Council warrant it, direct staff to re-
initiate efforts with the Southern California Edison Company (SCE) to develop the
design and project cost estimate for Project C: Los Angeles Avenue — Shasta
Avenue to Moorpark Avenue, and report back to the City Council project scope,
cost and timing.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Approve the Work Plan set forth in Section K of this report.
Attachments:
Attachment 1: Project Location Map
Attachment 2: List [Description] of Projects
Attachment 3: Project Cost Estimates
Attachment 4: Project Priority List — Commercial Land Use Priority
Attachment 5: Project Priority List — Residential Land Use Priority
Underground Priorities-0608
��00210
c
c
N
Attachment 2: List of Candidate Undergrounding Projects
Page 1
The Underground Projects shown on Attachment 1 are listed and described as
follows:
Area
A
_. _..... _ _..........
B
......__......_.__....
C
....._ ...................
D
...._............
E
F1
_....._.__........
F2
...........................
F3
G1
G2
...............
H
Note: T = Transmission & D = Distribution
Description
Type
Los Angeles Avenue west of Tierra Rejada Road
T/D
. ...........
Los Angeles Avenue: Shasta Ave. to Gabbert Rd.
T
.................................... .. ............................... .
Los Angeles Avenue: Moorpark Ave. to Shasta Ave.
._.....__.
T
..... ... ...
Los Angeles Avenue: Millard St. to Moorpark Ave.
T
Los Angeles Avenue: Spring Rd. to Millard St.
D
Poindexter Avenue. Gabbert Road to Gisler Road
_._..... _......_.
T/D
Poindexter Avenue. Gisler Road to Chaparral School
TO
. . ..........................
From Chaparral School north then east to Charles Street, then
T/D
East on Charles to Spring Road, then north and east to the
Route 118 Freeway, then east along the freeway and the
railway to the easterly City Limit
. ............................... ...
Walnut Canyon Road: Casey to City Limit
D
.. ........ ......_ ..
Moorpark Avenue: High Street to Casey Road
p
Terra Rejada Rd from a point about 700' west of Spring Road . T/D
easterly to the east side of the freeway
{Note: Some of these poles are not within the City Limits.}
Underground Priorities 0608
T/D
000212
Attachment 2: List of Candidate Undergrounding Projects
Page 2
Area
...........
.............. ..... .. ...... .... ........... . Note: T = Transmission & D - Distribution
Description
M
Downtown neighborhoods south of the rail tracks: Harry Ave.
Type
D
to Cornett Ave.
N
...... ........ ............
Everett St. and the lines at the rear of lots on the north side of
D
High St.
.... ..... ........................ . .............
Princeton Avenue from High Street easterly to the freeway
D
P
...... _
Virginia Colony
D
Q
_.
L. A. Ave. at the Arroyo Simi bridge
p
R
....................... ............................
Spring Rd. from L. A. Ave. south to the Arroyo Simi
p
S
.... .... .... .. ... ........... .........
Bella Vista neighborhood
........
D
T
._ ....... ................. ... . ..............
Spring Road north of Los Angeles Ave.
p
Underground Priorities 0608
000213
Attachment 3
Underground Utility Projects List 07/19/06
Project Cost Estimate
[File # Underground x3_0606]
Area
Trans Dist
Total
LF
Cost Per
LF (S)
Total
Total Cost
Cost $
O
By Area ($)
A
L A Ave West of T. R. Rd.
x
3,250
550
1,787,500
x
3,250
280
910,000
2,697,500
B
L A Ave: Shasta to Gabbert
x
3,000
550
1,650,000
1,650,000
C
L A Ave: Mrpk to Shasta
x
3,200
550
1,760,000
1,760,000
D
L A Ave: Millard to Mrpk Ave
x
1,000
550
550,000
550,000
E
L A Ave: Spring to Millard
x
1,250
280
350,000
350,000
Fl
Poindexter: Gabbert > Gisler
x
3,750
550
2,062,500
X
3,750
280
1,050,000
3,112,500
F2
Poindexter: Gisler to School
x
750
550
412,500
x
750
280
210,000
622,500
F3
Chap. School to East C. L.
x
24,500
550
13,475,000
x
24,500
280
6,860,000
20,335,000
G1
Walnut Canyon Road:
Casey Rd. to City Limit
x
7,300
280
2,044,000
2,044,000
G2
Moorpark Ave.: High St
to Casey Road
x
1,200
280
336,000
336,000
H
Tierra Rejada Rd
x
6,000
550
3,300,000
East of Spring Rd
x
6,000
280
1,680,000
4,980,000
1
Peach Hill Line
x
6,500
550
3,575,000
L A Ave to South C. L.
x
6,500
280
1,820,000
5,395,000
.1
Maureen / Beltramo
x
4,000
280
1,120,000
1,120,000
K
Shasta Neighborhood
x
7,000
280
1,960,000
1,960,000
L
Leta Yanev Rd
x
1,000
280
280,000
280,000
M
Downtown
South of RRTracks
x
19,000
280
5,320,000
5,320,000
N
Downtown: N/O Rail Tracks
x
4,500
280
1,260,000
1,260,000
O
Princeton Ave E/O High
x
3,000
280
840,000
to Freewav
840,000
P
Virginia Colony
x
3,000
280
840,000
840,000
Q
New L A Ave Birdge
x
1,000
280
280,000
280,000
R
Spring Rd S/O L A Ave
x
1,000
280
280,000
280,000
S
Bella Vista Tract
x
1,750
280
490,000
490,000
56,502,500
00021,4
Attachment 4 (Page 1)
Underground Project Ranking
Commercial Land Use Priority
0
7/19/06
Criteria
Description
Points Allowed
Res. -Ind. / Arterial / City Entry / Street
Land Use:
Commercial
Land Use Street Type
Aesthetics Safety Total
[Note: Less than 10% not recognized]
Residential
4
Residential / Arterial / City Corridor / Street
F1 - Poindexter - West
Industrial
3
Residential / Collector-/ Nil / Street plus School & Park (500' +)
F3 - Chprl Sch to Charles to E. City Limit
Open S ace
2
Com - Res - OS / Arterial / Civic Center / Street
Type of Street:
Arterial
1
I - Peach Hill Line
Residential / Collector / nil / Street plus Park (500' +)
Collector
3
K - Shasta / Sierra
Residential / Local / nil / no poles on a street
Local
2
M - Downtown, s/o rail
Safety:
Street plus School or Park frontage exceeding 500 feet
1
O - Princeton
Ind. - Res / Arterial / Connector Coridor / street
P - Virginia Colony
Street plus School or Park frontage less than 500 feet
Q - L A Ave @ Bridge
4
R - Spring Rd at Bride
Street Only
S - Bella Vista
3
Aesthetics:
Proximity to
0.0
2
7.0
Sensitive Areas
3.0
1 -3
2.0
Highest Score
3.5
3.0
Ranked by Alpha Code
2.0
4 3
3 4 14
Project
Description
A - L A Ave W/O T R Rd
Res. -Ind. / Arterial / City Entry / Street
B - L A Ave: Shasta to Gabbert
Res. -Ind. / Arterial / City Corridor / Street
C - L A Ave: Shasta to Moorpark Ave
Commercial / Arterial / Commercial Core / Street
D L A Ave. Moorpark Ave to Millard St
Residential / Arterial / City Corridor / Street
E - L A Ave: Millard to Spring Rd
Residential / Arterial / City Corridor / Street
F1 - Poindexter - West
Res. -Ind. / Collector / Nil / Street
F2 - Poindext Park to Chaparal School
Residential / Collector-/ Nil / Street plus School & Park (500' +)
F3 - Chprl Sch to Charles to E. City Limit
Res. - OS / Local / OS - Fwy Exposure / Part Street
G1 - Walnut Canyon Rd: Casey to City Lir
Com - Res - OS / Arterial / Civic Center / Street
G2 Moorpark Ave. High St to Casey Rd
Com. - Res. - OS / Arterial /Civic Center / Street
H - Tierra Rejada: W/O Spring to Freeway Res. - Open Space / Arterial / Open Space / Part in street
I - Peach Hill Line
Residential / Collector / nil / Street plus Park (500' +)
J - Maureen
Residential / No Street / nil / no street, Park only
K - Shasta / Sierra
Residential / Local / nil / no poles on a street
L - Leta Yancy
Residential / Local / nil / Street plus Park
M - Downtown, s/o rail
Residential / Local / nil / Street plus School (500' +)
N - Everett
Residential / Local / nil / Street plus futute Park
O - Princeton
Ind. - Res / Arterial / Connector Coridor / street
P - Virginia Colony
Residential / Local / nil / Street plus Park
Q - L A Ave @ Bridge
Commercial / Arterial / Business District / street
R - Spring Rd at Bride
Com. - Res / Arterial part in Business Dist. / street
S - Bella Vista
Residential / Local / nil / no street
T - Spring Rd: N/O L A Ave
Res. - Ind. / Arterial / Police Station / street
Score
O.0
a.0
Land Use Street Type
Aesthetics Safety
Total
2.5 3.0
2.0 2.0
9.5
2.5 3.0
1.0 2.0
8.5
4.0 3.0
3.0 2.0
12.0
3.0 3.0
1.0 2.0
9.0
3.0 3.0
1.0 2.0
9.0
2.5 2.0
0.0 2.0
6.5
3.0 2.0
0.0 4.0
9.0
2.0 1.0
1.0 1.0
5.0
2.5 3n
11 f) on
-
a.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 4.0
2.5 3.0 3.0 2.0 10.5
": Collector on Circulation Element
O.0
a.0
Z.0
10.5
2.0
3.0
3.0
1.0
9.0
3.0
1.0
0.0
4.0
8.0
3.0
0.0
0.0
1.0
4.0
3.0
1.0
0.0
0.0
4.0
3.0
1.0
0.0
3.0
7.0
3.0
1.0
0.0
4.0
8.0
3.0
1.0
0.0
3.0
7.0
2.5
3.0
1.0
2.0
8.5
3.0
1.0
0.0
3.0
7.0
4.0
3.0
3.0
2.0
12.0
3.5
3.0
2.0
2.0
10.5
a.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 4.0
2.5 3.0 3.0 2.0 10.5
": Collector on Circulation Element
Attachment 4 (Page 2)
Underground Project Ranking
Commercial Land Use Priority
.D
7/19/06
Criteria
Description
Points Allowed
Commercial / Arterial / Commercial Core / Street
Land Use:
Commercial
Land Use Street Type
Aesthetics Safety Total
[Note: Less than 10% not recognized]
Residential
4
Com. - Res / Arterial / part in Business Dist. / street
T - Spring Rd: N/O L A Ave
Industrial
3
Res. - Ind. / Arterial / City Entry / Street
D - L A Ave: Moorpark Ave to Millard St
Open S ace
2
Residential / Arterial / City Corridor / Street
Type of Street:
Arterial
1
B - L A Ave: Shasta to Gabbert
Res. - Ind. / Arterial / City Corridor / Street
Collector
3
I - Peach Hill Line
Residential / Collector / nit / Street plus Park (500' +)
Local
2
L - Leta Yancy
Safe
Safety:
Street plus School or Park frontage exceeding 500 feet
p
1
P - Virginia Colony
F1 P '
Residential / Local / nil / Street plus Park
9.5
Street plus School or Park frontage less than 500 feet
3.0
4
2.0
Street Only
3.0
3
Aesthetics:
Proximity to
9.0
2
2.0
Sensitive Areas
4.0
1 -3
2.0
Highest Score
_
1.0
Ranked by Total Score
Project
Description
C - L A Ave: Shasta to Moorpark Ave
Commercial / Arterial / Commercial Core / Street
Q L A Ave @ Bridge
Commercial / Arterial / Business District / street
G1 - Walnut Canyon Rd: Casey to City Lir
Com - Res - OS / Arterial / Civic Center / Street
G2 Moorpark Ave. High St to Casey Rd
Com. - Res. - OS / Arterial / Civic Center / Street
R - Spring Rd at Bridge
Com. - Res / Arterial / part in Business Dist. / street
T - Spring Rd: N/O L A Ave
Res. - Ind / Arterial / Police Station / street
A L A Ave W/O T R Rd
Res. - Ind. / Arterial / City Entry / Street
D - L A Ave: Moorpark Ave to Millard St
Residential / Arterial / City Corridor / Street
E - L A Ave: Millard to Spring Rd
Residential / Arterial / City Corridor / Street
F2 Poindext Park to Chaparal School
Residential / Collector/ Nil / Street plus School & Park (500' +)
H - Tierra Rejada: W/O Spring to Freeway Res. - Open Space / Arterial / Open Space / Part in street
B - L A Ave: Shasta to Gabbert
Res. - Ind. / Arterial / City Corridor / Street
O - Princeton
Ind. - Res / Arterial / Connector Coridor / street
I - Peach Hill Line
Residential / Collector / nit / Street plus Park (500' +)
M - Downtown, s/o rail
Residential / Local / nil / Street plus School 500' +)
L - Leta Yancy
Residential / Local / nil / Street plus Park
N - Everett
Residential / Local / nil / Street plus futute Park
P - Virginia Colony
F1 P '
Residential / Local / nil / Street plus Park
- omdexter - West Res. - Ind. / Collector / Nil / Street
F3 - Chprl Sch to Charles to E. City Limit Res. - OS / Local / OS - Fwy Exposure / Part Street
J - Maureen Residential / No Street / nil / no street, Park only
K - Shasta / Sierra Residential / Local / nil / no poles on a street
S - Bella Vista Residential / Local / nil / no street
14
Land Use Street Type
Aesthetics _ Safety
Total
4.0
3.0
3.0
2.0
12.0
4.0
3.0
3.0
2.0
12.0
2.5
3.0
3.0
2.0
10.5
2.5
3.0
3.0
2.0
10.5
3.5
3.0
2.0
2.0
10.5
2.5
3.0
3.0
2.0
10.5
2.5
3.0
2.0
2.0
9.5
3.0
3.0
1.0
2.0
9.0
3.0
3.0
1.0
2.0
9.0
3.0
2.0
0.0
4.0
9.0
2.0
3.0
3.0
1.0
9.0
2.5
3.0
1.0
2.0
8.5
2.5
3.0
1.0
2.0
8.5
3.0
1.0
0.0
4.0
8.0
3.0
1.0
0.0
4.0
R n
3.0 1.0 0.0 3.0 7.0
3.0 1.0 0.0 3.0 7.0
3.0 1.0 0.0 3 n 7 n
2.5 2.0 0.0 2.0 6.5
2.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 5.0
3.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 a n
3.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 4.0
3.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 4.0
": Collector on Circulation Element
Attachment 5 (Page 1)
Underground Project Ranking
Residential Land Use Priority
P-
7/19/06
Criteria
Aesthetics Safety
Points Allowed
3.0 3.0
Land Use:
Residential
Land Use Street Type
Aesthetics Safety Total
[Note: Less than 10% not recognized]
Commercial
4
11.0
4.0 3.0
Industrial
3
4.0 3.0
1.0 2.0
Open Space
2
0.0 2.0
Type of Street:
Arterial
1
10.0
2.5 1.0
Collector
3
2.5 3.0
3.0 9 0
Local
2
1.0
Safety:
Y�
Street plus School or Park frontage exceeding 500 feet
3.0
3.0
Street plus School or Park frontage less than 500 feet
2.0
4
3.5
Street Onl
2.0
3
Aesthetics:
Proximity to
2
Sensitive Areas
1 3
Highest Score
Ranked by Alpha Code
Project Description
A - L A Ave W/O T R Rd Res. - Ind. / Arterial / City Entry / Street
B - L A Ave: Shasta to Gabbert Res. - Ind. / Arterial / City Corridor / Street
C - L A Ave: Shasta to Moorpark Ave Commercial / Arterial / Commercial Core / Street
D L A Ave. Moorpark Ave to Millard St Residential / Arterial / City Corridor / Street
E - L A Ave: Millard to Spring Rd Residential / Arterial / City Corridor / Street
F1 - Poindexter -West Res. - Ind. / Collector / Nil / Street
F2 - Poindext Park to Chaparal School Residential / Collector / Nil / Street plus School & Park (500' +)
F3 Chprl Sch to Charles to E. City Limit Res. - OS / Local / OS - Fwy Exposure / Part Street
G1 - Walnut Canyon Rd: Casey to City Lir Com. - Res - OS / Arterial / Civic Center / Street
G2 Moorpark Ave. High St to Casey Rd Com. - Res. - OS / Arterial / Civic Center / Street
H - Tierra Rejada: W/O Spring to Freeway Res. - Open Space / Arterial / Open Space / Part in street
I - Peach Hill Line Residential / Collector / nil / Street plus Park (500' +)
J - Maureen
K - Shasta / Sierra
L - Leta Yancy
M - Downtown, s/o rail
N - Everett
O - Princeton
Q
R
S
T
Virginia Colony
L A Ave @ Bridge
- Spring Rd at Bridge
Bella Vista
Spring Rd: N/O L A Ave
Residential / No Street / nil / no street, Park only
Residential / Local / nil / no poles on a street
Residential / Local / nil / Street plus Park
Residential / Local / nil / Street plus School (500' +)
Residential / Local / nil / Street plus futute Park
Ind. - Res / Arterial / Connector Coridor / street
i�-Iu 'Wdi i LUI;GI / nil Jtreet pius rarK
Commercial / Arterial / Business District / street
Com. -Res /Arterial
LL part in Business Dist. / street
Mesioential / Local / nil / no street
Res. - Ind. / Arterial / Police Station / street
14
Land Use Street Type
Aesthetics Safety
Total
3.0 3.0
2.0 2.0
10.0
3.0 3.0
1.0 2.0
9.0
3.0 3.0
3.0 2.0
11.0
4.0 3.0
1.0 2.0
10.0
4.0 3.0
1.0 2.0
10.0
3.0 2.0
0.0 2.0
7.0
4.0 2.0
0.0 4.0
10.0
2.5 1.0
1.0 1.0
5.5
2.5 3.0
3.0 9 0
in r
2.5 3.0 3.0 2.0 10.5
2.5 3.0 3.0 1.0 9.5
4.0 1.0 0.0 4.0 9.0
4.0
0.0
0.0
1.0
5.0
4.0
1.0
0.0
0.0
5.0
4.0
1.0
0.0
3.0
8.0
4.0
1.0
0.0
4.0
9.0
4.0
1.0
0.0
3.0
8.0
3.0
3.0
1.0
2.0
9.0
4.0
1.0
0.0
3.0
8.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
2.0
11.0
3.5
3.0
2.0
2.0
10.5
4.0 I.0 0.0 0.0 5.0
3.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 11.0
": Collector on Circulation Element
Attachment 5 (Page 2)
Underground Project Ranking
Residential Land Use Priority
h�
7/19/06 Z
Criteria
Description
Points Allowed
Commercial / Arterial / Commercial Core / Street
Land Use:
Residential
Land Use Street Type
Aesthetics Safety Total
[Note: Less than 10% not recognized]
Commercial
4
D - L A Ave: Moorpark Ave to Millard St
Res. Ind. / Arterial / City Entry / Street
Residential / Arterial / City Corridor / Street
Industrial
3
F2 - Poindext Park to Chaparal School Residential / Collector / Nil / Street plus School & Park (500' +)
H - Tierra Rejada: W/O Spring to Freeway Res. - Open Space / Arterial / Open Space / Part in street
B - L A Ave: Shasta to Gabbert
I - Peach Hill Line
O en S ace
2
Residential / Collector / nil / Street plus Park (500' +)
Type of Street:
Arterial
1
Ind. - Res / Arterial / Connector Coridor / street
L - Leta Yancy
Collector
3
Residential / Local / nil / Street plus futute Park
P - Virginia Colony
Local
2
Res. - Ind. / Collector / Nil / Street
Safety:
Street plus School or Park frontage exceeding 500 feet
1
Residential / No Street / nil / no street, Park only
K - Shasta/ Sierra
Street plus School or Park frontage less than 500 feet
S - Bella Vista
4
4.0
Street Only
0.0
3
Aesthetics:
Proximity to
1.0
2
0.0
Sensitive Areas
4.0
1 - 3
0.0
Highest Score
5.0
Ranked by Total Score
Project
Description
C - L A Ave: Shasta to Moorpark Ave
Commercial / Arterial / Commercial Core / Street
Q L A Ave @ Bridge
T - Spring Rd: N/O L A Ave
Commercial / Arterial 1 Business District / street
Res. - Ind / Arterial / Police Station / street
G1 Walnut Canyon Rd Casey to City Lir Com. Res. - OS / Arterial / Civic Center / Street
G2 - Moorpark Ave: High St to Casey Rd
Com. - Res. - OS / Arterial / Civic Center / Street
R - Spring Rd at Bride
A L A Ave W/O T R Rd
Com - Res / Arterial / part in Business Dist / street
D - L A Ave: Moorpark Ave to Millard St
Res. Ind. / Arterial / City Entry / Street
Residential / Arterial / City Corridor / Street
E - L A Ave: Millard to Spring Rd
Residential / Arterial / City Corridor / Street
F2 - Poindext Park to Chaparal School Residential / Collector / Nil / Street plus School & Park (500' +)
H - Tierra Rejada: W/O Spring to Freeway Res. - Open Space / Arterial / Open Space / Part in street
B - L A Ave: Shasta to Gabbert
I - Peach Hill Line
Res. - Ind. / Arterial / City Corridor / Street
3.0
Residential / Collector / nil / Street plus Park (500' +)
M - Downtown, s/o rail
Residential / Local / nil / Street plus School (500' +)
O - Princeton
Ind. - Res / Arterial / Connector Coridor / street
L - Leta Yancy
Residential / Local / nil / Street plus Park
N - Everett
Residential / Local / nil / Street plus futute Park
P - Virginia Colony
Residential / Local / nil / Street plus Park
F1 - Poindexter-West
Res. - Ind. / Collector / Nil / Street
F3 - Chprl Sch to Charles to E. City Limit
Res. - OS / Local / OS - Fwy Exposure / Part Street
J - Maureen
Residential / No Street / nil / no street, Park only
K - Shasta/ Sierra
Residential / Local / nil / no poles on a street
S - Bella Vista
Residential / Local / nil / no street
Land Use Street Type
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
2.5
3.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
3.0
3.0
3.0
4.0
3.0
4.0
3.0
4.0
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.0
3.0
14
Aesthetics Safety
Total
3.0
2.0
11.0
3.0
2.0
11.0
3.0
2.0
11.0
3.0
2.0
10.5
3.0
2.0
10.5
2.0
2.0
10.5
2.0
2.0
10.0
1.0
2.0
10.0
1.0
2.0
10.0
0.0
4.0
10.0
3.0
1.0
9.5
1.0
2.0
9.0
4.0
1.0
0.0
4.0
9.0
4.0
1.0
0.0
4.0
9.0
3.0
3.0
1.0
2.0
9.0
4.0
1.0
0.0
3.0
800
4.0
1.0
0.0
3.0
8.0
4.0
1.0
0.0
3.0
8.0
3.0
2.0
0.0
2.0
7.0
2.5
1.0
1.0
1.0
5.5
4.0
0.0
0.0
1.0
5.0
4.0
1.0
0.0
0.0
5.0
4.0
1.0
0.0
0.0
5.0
': Collector on Circulation Element