HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 1996 0807 CC REG ITEM 10C''v..
Moorpark Police Department
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Honorable City Council
FROM: Marty Rouse, Captain
Richard Hare, Deputy City Mar a
DATE: July 23, 1996 (CC Mtg. 8/5/96)
CONSIDER: Consider Ordinance No. , Amending Section 9.16.020 of the
Municipal Code Related to Curfews and Loitering by Minors.
Proposed Ordinance
0 AW
The proposed ordinance is classified as a misdemeanor or infraction and would not only regulate late
night loitering activities of minors but would extend the regulations to include daytime loitering
during school hours and restrict minors from loitering on private property without the owners
permission. For purposes of routine enforcement this proposed ordinance would be prosecuted as
an infraction.
The proposed ordinance includes a parental liability component for those parents who fail to exercise
appropriate control of their minor child. This failure to ensure the minor child is at home or at school
could result in civil liabilities for the costs of a deputy's time spent with the minor due to repeated
curfew violations and/or those circumstances where a deputy was required to stay with the minor for
an extended period of time.
Background
Curfew
Moorpark Municipal Code section 9.16.020 currently makes it unlawful for minors under the age of
18 years to loiter in or about any public place between the hours of 10:00 p.m. to 6:00 a.m. Under
current policy, minors who are arrested for this section will receive a citation for a misdemeanor
violation and are later notified by the Corrections Services Agency (CSA) for a disposition meeting.
Once the CSA receives the citation, the case is assigned to a Youth Services Officer who schedules
a meeting with the juvenile and the parents. Generally, most violators are informally counseled and
released. Community work is an option for those who are repeat offenders. In rare instances the
minor may be prosecuted with a misdemeanor offense usually in conjunction with a violation of
probation.
U00207
Truancy
Education Code 48200 states that every person between the ages of 6 and 18 years is subject to a
compulsory full time education. If a minor is found to be truant, the police officer will return the
student to the school. There is no arrest and the contact is considered as a detention only. Discipline
is handled by the school administrators who can request, in severe cases, an officer to issue a citation
(Education Code 48262 - Habitual Truant). The student is generally referred to the School
Attendance Review Board (SARB) who makes a determination as to consequences. SARB may
place the juvenile on a contract informing him/her of the obligation to attend school or suffer the
consequences of being turned over to Juvenile Probation.
Discussion
The City of Moorpark has adopted a community oriented policing philosophy. One of the great
areas of concern and emphasis is gang activities, along with juvenile crime including violence and
vandalism. It is also a priority to ensure that our youngsters receive a quality education. This can
only be accomplished by regular school attendance. In an effort to provide patrol officers with more
effective options to deal with these problems, a daytime curfew is proposed during those times minors
should be at school (exceptions are noted in the ordinance).
On some occasions police detain gang members or other suspicious juveniles who are from other
schools or school districts that may be "cruising" our schools for a variety of reasons. Along with
this, each year there are documented crimes, mostly of a residential nature, where investigation
reveals the suspect(s) were most probably juveniles. These crimes usually occur when the
homeowners are working during the daytime hours.
In some instances officers make daytime contacts with a minor who may be on home and independent
study or who have been suspended or expelled from school. The current truancy procedures are not
effective in these instances. Many of our problems are with minors who fall into these categories.
Under the current policy, most youths referred to CSA for counseling purposes do not meet with a
CSA representative for several months after the incident due to much higher priority cases and
workload issues. It is not effective to address a regulatory issue with a youth after such a long delay.
Proposed Ordinance
The Presiding Judge of the Ventura County Courts has recently authorized adjudication of curfew
ordinances (infractions) in the Traffic Court. These violations would be handled exactly like any
traffic violation classified as an infraction.
The current curfew ordinance addresses nighttime violators only. The proposed amendment to the
curfew ordinance closes the loophole with the Education Code and allows deputies to cite any minor
under the age of 18 who is found to be loitering between 9:00 a.m. and 1:30 p.m. when school is
normally in session (exceptions are listed in the ordinance). Those minors who are on independent
study or who are suspended or expelled from school would not be exempt. It also adds the restriction
000208
that minors are not to be on private property not open to the general public without the permission
of the owner.
Within the provisions of this ordinance, deputies will have probable cause to contact juveniles who
appear to be violating curfew. If found in violation, the juvenile will be given a written citation to
appear at the Simi Traffic Court. The issuance of a citation allows a deputy to forgo the booking
process required for a misdemeanor unless proper identification cannot be obtained or in the event
of more serious crimes or criminal gang related activity. Disposition hearings held in Traffic Court
occur within fifteen to thirty days as compared to two to three months for a meeting with a CSA
representative.
Any juvenile who fails to appear in Traffic Court after giving a written promise to appear is reported
to the Department of Motor Vehicles and the driver's license is suspended until the citation is
adjudicated. If the minor does not have a drivers license, the right to a license will be suspended. The
issuing officer will only be required to testify in court if the citation is appealed.
The fine will be imposed based upon the Moorpark Municipal Code (MMC) bail/fine schedule. Based
upon the current fine schedule plus court costs, a first time offender would be fined approximately
$135 ($50.00 fine along with the State mandated penalty assessments). The City's fine schedule is
a guideline for judges. The actual fine imposed is determined by the judge's discretion and any
evidence presented. A juvenile may appear in court to plead not guilty, request court reconsideration
of the fine amount, or set up a payment plan to the court.
This ordinance would not only give officers additional opportunity to make contacts but would also
allow for enforcement and a swift resolution. The proposed ordinance would be used as a tool and
ensures for additional incentive to stay in school. During subsequent contact with the parents, a
determination could be made as to whether the parents are in violation of the section for permitting
the juvenile to violate the law. If this determination was made, a citation would also be issued to the
parent.
The City Attorney has reviewed the ordinance and her comments have been incorporated.
Recommendation
Staff recommends adoption of the proposed Ordinance and a bail schedule of $50.00 for those
violations prosecuted as an infraction.
960723.039
000205