Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 2017 1115 CCSA REG ITEM 08A ITEM 8.A. CITY OF MOORPARK,CALIFORNIA City Council Meeting of //-/5 a o/7 AC1 :.� a•-it -A017 MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT TO: Honorable City Council FROM: David A. Bobardt, Community Development Director Prepared by Freddy A. Carrillo, Associate Planner I DATE: November 3, 2017 (CC Meeting of 11/15/2017) SUBJECT: Consider a Resolution Approving Tentative Parcel Map No. 2016-01 and Industrial Planned Development Permit No. 2017-01 for the Subdivision of an Approximately 10.0-Acre Developed Lot into Two Parcels of 7.8 Acres and 2.2 Acres and the Construction of a 35,330 Square-Foot Industrial Building on the Newly-Created 2.2-Acre Parcel at 400 Science Drive, and Making a Determination of Exemption Under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in Connection Therewith, on the Application of Nick Rini for Nearon Enterprises BACKGROUND On November 8, 2016, Nick Rini, of Nearon Enterprises, submitted an application for Tentative Parcel Map No. 2016-01 and Industrial Planned Development Permit .No. 2017-01 for the subdivision of an approximately 10.0 acre developed parcel into two parcels of 7.8 acres and 2.2 acres, and to construct a 35,330 square-foot industrial building on a graded pad at 400 Science Drive. A future tenant has not been identified at this time. Currently the site contains an 115,536 square-foot industrial building occupied by Benchmark Electronics Manufacturing Solutions, Inc. An Industrial Planned Development (IPD) Permit is required for any new construction of more than 2,500 square-feet of industrial building floor area. A Tentative Parcel Map (TPM) is required when subdividing a property under common ownership into four or fewer parcels. Both permits require the Planning Commission's recommendation to the City Council with the City Council being the final decision maker. On October 24, 2017, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution PC-2017-622, recommending approval of the subdivision and construction of a new industrial building. 2 Honorable City Council November 15, 2017 Page 2 DISCUSSION Project Setting Existing Site Conditions: The approximately 10.0 acre property is located on the northeast corner of Science Drive and Los Angeles Avenue. An undeveloped pad is located to the east side of the existing building. Vehicular access to the property is taken from Science Drive. Currently the property includes 371 parking spaces; however, the applicant is proposing to remove 16 spaces and add 32 new spaces to accommodate the new building's parking requirements. The proposed parking area, including landscaping, is required and is addressed in a condition of approval in the attached resolution. Existing shrubs are located around the property with cluster of trees on the east and south side of the property. Previous Applications: On November 16, 1983, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 83-55, which approved Development Permit (DP) No. 296, for the construction of an approximately 112,000 square-foot industrial building. On April 10, 1984, the Planning Commission approved Minor Modification to DP No. 296, to allow modification on the architecture of the eastern elevation of the building. General Plan and Zoning: GENERAL PLAN/ZONING Direction I General Plan d Zoning Land Use Site Light Industrial (I-1) Industrial Park (M-1) Warehousing Warehousing, Church, North Light Industrial (I-1) Industrial Park (M-1) Manufacturing, and Office South Carlsberg Specific Carlsberg Specific Plan Moorpark Marketplace Plan Shopping Center Warehousing, East Light Industrial (I-1) Industrial Park (M-1) Manufacturing, and Office West Light Industrial (I-1) Industrial Park (M-1) Medical Office General Plan and Zoning Consistency: The applicant's proposal is consistent with the Zoning classification and General Plan land use designation. Permits for future uses will be assessed on a case-by-case basis. 3 S:\Community Development\DEV PMTS\I P D11PD 2017-01 400 Science Drive\Agenda Reports\20171115 CC Report.docx Honorable City Council November 15, 2017 Page 3 Project Summary Tentative Parcel Map No. 2016-01 is proposed to subdivide an approximately 10.0 acre parcel into two parcels of 7.8 acres and 2.2 acres. One building would remain on the 7.8 acre parcel and a new building is proposed on the 2.2 acre parcel. Each parcel could subsequently be sold separately. The Industrial Planned Development applies only to the proposed building. Industrial Planned Development Permit No. 2017-01: Parcel No. Proposed Use Building Area (sq. ft.) 2.2 Acres . Industrial building with a 32,830 sq. ft. first 35,330 sq. ft. (total) floor and 2,500 sq. ft. mezzanine floor. Building Design: The proposed building design can be described as having contemporary industrial architecture. Concrete tilt-up panels with rectangular tinted "Clerestory" windows are used throughout to give an industrial appearance to the building. "Clerestory" describes a high section of wall that contains windows above eye level. Four roll-up doors are also proposed on the rear (east) side of the building with weathered metal awning canopy above the roll-up doors. A mixture of concrete panels and tinted glass windows with aluminum frames are proposed for the storefront with a corrugated metal frame on top. A weathered metal awning canopy is also proposed in the storefront to match the rear of the building. A concrete panel element extends above the roof line to give the building a unique design. The project massing and scale is appropriate for a typical industrial building and is compatible with the surrounding business campus. Setbacks and Height: The proposed building has a 20-foot setback from Science Drive, which is consistent with the minimum required front setback in the Industrial Park (M-1) Zone. Parking and landscaping are proposed on the east side of the building. All minimum setbacks required by Chapter 17.24 of the Zoning Ordinance are achieved. The overall height of the building is 35 feet, as allowed in the M-1 zone. However, the building includes a proposed architectural feature and tower element exceeding this height. The architectural feature can best be described as a concrete "fin". The maximum height of this architectural feature is 40 feet, 6 inches. The "tower element" defines the architectural front of the building and is proposed at 39 feet in height. Exceptions to building height are discussed in the analysis section below. Circulation / Parking: The subject property is accessed by driveways on Science Drive. Science Drive provides one travel lane in each direction. On-street parking is not permitted along the roadway. The posted speed limit is 25 miles per hour (mph). On-site parking is available on the west and south side of the existing building with 32 additional parking spaces proposed on the east side of the proposed building. 4 S:\Community Development\DEV PMTS\I P D\IPD 2017-01 400 Science Drive\Agenda Reports\20171115 CC Report.docx Honorable City Council November 15, 2017 Page 4 Parking Requirements Minimum Parking Total Parking Total Parking Building Size Required Based on Gross Spaces Required Spaces Provided Floor Area of Building _ Existing 115,536 sq. ft. 1 space/500 sq. ft. 231.0 300.0 industrial building Proposed 35,330 sq. ft. 1 space/500 sq. ft. 70.6 87.0 Industrial building Total Parking Spaces 302 Spaces 387 Spaces Required and Provided: Two driveways are located on the north side of the property. Both buildings will have access to use both driveways. A condition of approval is recommended for reciprocal access rights to be provided with this property to enable parking accessibility, anticipating that the buildings will be under separate ownership in the future, so that both buildings will have full parking lot accessibility. Loading Area: Four loading spaces are proposed in the rear yard of the building; two high docks and two on-grade loading spaces. Each loading space is 50 feet deep by 20 feet wide with no overhead obstruction. The code requires a loading area that is a minimum of 50 feet deep and 12 feet wide with a turning radius of 45 feet. Loading areas must be located in rear or side yard areas outside of required setbacks and must be designed so trucks do not back onto public or private streets or alleys. In addition, loading spaces must be designed to prevent interference with vehicular or pedestrian circulation. The proposed loading areas do not conflict with traffic or circulation. Four loading spaces are more than sufficient to accommodate the proposed industrial building. Landscaping / Lighting: To ensure landscaping is installed properly and consistent with the City's Landscape Guidelines, a special condition has been added to submit a landscape and irrigation plan to be reviewed and approved by the Parks and Recreation Director and the Community Development Director prior to issuance of a zoning clearance. The lighting plan will be subject to review by the City's lighting consultant for consistency with the City's requirements. An additional condition of approval is recommended, requiring that light poles and fixtures be architecturally compatible with the existing poles and fixtures, subject to review and approval of the Community Development Director. National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Requirements: The project has been designed to provide for all necessary on-site and off-site storm drain improvements including the imposition of NPDES requirements. Best Management Practices for drainage facilities are required to be provided so that surface flows are interceptedand treated. These items will be reviewed by the City Engineer/Public Works Director as part of the permit process. 5 S:\Community Development\DEV PMTS\I P D\IPD 2017-01 400 Science DriveWgenda Reports\20171115 CC Report.docx Honorable City Council November 15, 2017 Page 5 Air Quality: All commercial/industrial projects are required to off-set air pollutants consistent with the 2003 Ventura County Air Quality Assessment Guidelines. Staff has included a standard condition requiring the applicant to make contribution to the Moorpark Traffic System Management Fund as a method to meet this requirement. ANALYSIS Issues Staff analysis of the proposed project has identified building height and design as an area for City Council consideration in their decision. The proposed building design is contemporary, complementary to other industrial buildings in the business park. It features construction of smooth concrete tilt-up panels with clerestory windows. The purpose of clerestory windows is to admit light without compromising interior wall space. The façade has a mixture of design elements to enhance its character. The applicant is 'proposing a horizontal corrugated metal frame above the roof line to screen the roof mechanical equipment. Rectangular "Spandrel glass" windows with aluminum frames are proposed underneath the corrugated metal frame. "Spandrel glass" is an architectural material used to cover construction materials and present a finished, seamless, and sleek exterior to buildings. The applicant is also proposing tinted glass windows with aluminum frames to match the clerestory and spandrel glass windows. Lastly, two weathered metal awning canopies, separated by a 40-foot, 6-inch high concrete panel element, are proposed in the front of the building. Staff has taken consideration into the design of the new building to make sure that the architectural design proposed is compatible with existing adjacent buildings. Conditions of approval are proposed to ensure that the materials, textures and colors of the proposed building are compatible with the existing buildings in the business park. As mentioned in the paragraph above, the building includes a proposed architectural feature exceeding the 35-foot height limitation of the Zoning Ordinance. The architectural feature can best be described as a concrete "fin", located on the north elevation at the building's main entry. The maximum height of this architectural feature is 40 feet, 6 inches. Section 17.24.040(D) of the Zoning Ordinance, allows architectural appurtenances to exceed the maximum building height when appropriate building scale are achieved and maintained. The Planning Commission expressed concern that a future tenant may wish to put signage on this design feature. Any signage above the building's parapet would be considered a roof sign and would not be permitted under the Zoning Ordinance. In addition, the applicant has shown locations for future signs on the elevations. However, to ensure that the fin is maintained as a design feature and not used in the future as a palette for building signage, proposed Condition No. 24 in the attached resolution has been amended to preclude signage on this fin. Four metal roll-up doors are proposed in the rear of the building for loading and unloading. A continuous weathered metal awning canopy is also proposed above the roll-up doors. This provides shade or shelter from weather conditions such as sun or 6 S:\Community Development\DEV PMTS\I P D\IPD 2017-01 400 Science Drive\Agenda Reports120171115 CC Report.docx Honorable City Council November 15, 2017 Page 6 rain. View of the roll-up doors from Los Angeles Avenue would be extremely limited as landscaping on the slope adjacent to Los Angeles Avenue within the Caltrans right-of- way) and the existing building at 400 Science Drive combine to block most of the view of the pad for the new building. Nonetheless, to completely screen any potential public view of the roll-up doors, a condition of approval is proposed to enhance the landscaping on-site and in the Caltrans right-of-way facing Los Angeles Avenue to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director. Findings The following draft findings are provided for City Council consideration: Subdivision Findings: A. The proposed map, including its design and improvements, is consistent with the City's General Plan and Zoning Ordinance as proposed, in that the map has been designed to comply with the requirements of the City's General Plan in providing a new industrial parcel adjacent to existing industrial development and it meets Zoning standards for the Industrial Park (M-1) Zone. B. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed in that the site can be engineered to allow for all required utilities to be brought to the site, adequate ingress and egress can be obtained, and the site can be provided with public and emergency services. C. The site is physically suitable for the proposed intensity of development, in that all City development standards, including parking, would be met by the proposed project. D. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage, in that the site has already been graded and improved in anticipation of future industrial development. E. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems, in that adequate sanitation is both feasible and required as a condition of this development. F. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large, for access through, or use of the property within the proposed subdivision, in that full access to and from Science Drive for both parcels have been incorporated in the design of this project. Industrial Planned Development Permit Findings: A. The site design, including structure location, size, height, setbacks, massing, scale, architectural style and colors, and landscaping, is consistent with the provisions of the General Plan, any applicable specific plans, Zoning Ordinance, 7 S:\Community Development\DEV PMTS\I P D\IPD 2017-01 400 Science Drive\Agenda Reports\20171115 CC Report.docx Honorable City Council November 15, 2017 Page 7 and any other applicable regulations in that it incorporates design features, including mass, scale, materials, and colors, to enhance the visual character of the industrial park location. B. The site design would not create negative impacts on or impair the utility of properties, structures or uses in the surrounding area in that the building complies with Zoning regulations and sufficient parking is provided on site. C. The future uses would be compatible with existing and permitted uses in the surrounding area, which is part of the Industrial Park (M-1) Zoning designation. PROCESSING TIME LIMITS Time limits have been established for the processing of development projects under the Permit Streamlining Act (Government Code Title 7, Division 1, Chapter 4.5), the Subdivision Map Act (Government Code Title 7, Division 2), and the California Environmental Quality Act Statutes and Guidelines (Public Resources Code Division 13, and California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3). Under the applicable provisions of these regulations, the following timelines have been established for action on this project: Date Application Determined Complete: October 18, 2017 City Council Action Deadline: January 16, 2018 ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION In accordance with the City's environmental review procedures adopted by resolution, the Community Development Director determines the level of review necessary for a project to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Some projects may be exempt from review based upon a specific category listed in CEQA. Other projects may be exempt under a general rule that environmental review is not necessary where it can be determined that there would be no possibility of significant effect upon the environment. A project which does not qualify for an exemption requires the preparation of an Initial Study to assess the level of potential environmental impacts. Based upon the results of an Initial Study, the Director may determine that a project will not have a significant effect upon the environment. In such a case, a Notice of Intent to Adopt a Negative Declaration or a Mitigated Negative Declaration is prepared. For many projects, a Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration will prove to be sufficient environmental documentation. If the Director determines that a project has the potential for significant adverse impacts and adequate mitigation cannot be readily identified, an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) is prepared. a The Director has reviewed this project and found it to be Categorically Exempt in accordance with Section 15332 (Class 32 — Infill Development Projects) of the California 8 S:\Community Development\DEV PMTS\I P D\IPD 2017-01 400 Science Drive\Agenda Reports\20171115 CC Report.docx Honorable City Council November 15, 2017 Page 8 Code of Regulations (CEQA Guidelines). The proposed buildings and uses are consistent with the General Plan and Zoning regulations. In addition, there is no substantial evidence that.the project will have a significant effect on the environment in that the site has already been graded and improved in anticipation of future development. No further environmental documentation is required. NOTICING Public Notice for this meeting was given consistent with Chapter 17.44.070 of the Zoning Ordinance as follows: 1. Publication. The notice of the public hearing was published in the Ventura County Star on November 4, 2017. 2. Mailing. The notice of the public hearing was mailed on November 2, 2017, to owners of real property, as identified on the latest adjusted Ventura County Tax Assessor Roles, within one-thousand (1,000) feet of the exterior boundaries of the assessor's parcel(s) subject to the hearing. 3. Sign. One 32 square-foot sign was placed on the street frontage on November 3, 2017. STAFF RECOMMENDATION 1. Open the public hearing, accept public testimony and close the public hearing; and 2. Adopt Resolution No. 2017- ATTACHMENTS: 1. Location Map 2. Aerial Photograph 3. Full-Size Project Exhibits (UNDER SEPARATE COVER) 4. Tentative Parcel Map (Reduced) . 5. Site Plan (Reduced) 6. Draft Resolution with Conditions of Approval • 9 S:\Community Development\DEV PMTS\I P D\IPD 2017-01 400 Science Drive\Agenda Reports/20171115 CC Report.docx Location Map - 400 Science Drive 4c'4 ti tQ •�. � '� _� �_ 1_. tom' t ) \ �rz,-_...„....,.,....,...___ a' f t 4 \\23 ' (-------- 1111_..A1).4 : t }Lii '. :14., : il C1 z" r f C.) . L' --7-'' 4.0 .."-.. . > . , ' .:,...}..,!:-,,': ' `i-Ir y".-- ..'-'-'\\ \i I - 5}GAi 1 � 118V imj ,N.--ilj NNEREA N_EIN 0-ffig% 1 '.i -- ieov .....---c ------- M Z Id X � 1 Id _% 1 1 --, , __ -74 "E__----------- _.1{.;13'' ........-% -----\\\...„.„)\-'-- ti - ,,,,4,17441E/111113' ..,. 118: 23p , .g7•Yigete6 r !er"2-".- -- 1 r../'� \ 290 m � � _ �- ril �ti I sad k I y~ `L �r ' c \\ s TPM No. " .. 111 = 376 ft 2016-01 and IPD 10/18/2017 , - L Ig .4 No. 2017-01 '.,. °► 'Jr. This map represents a visual display of related geographic information.Data provided hereon is not a guarantee of actual field conditions.To be sure of complete accuracy, please contact Moorpark staff for the most up-to-date information. 1-1 0 Location Map - 400 Science Drive �p� , �. ----'1.". i,.1 E}—'+r'"?'"TYT.- r t o -r°, i. • I. 7,...7-77---A\,. '' ' 1 I , Ift, ,"a �•�r r •11r W ,40 1 'e' •, it"�^ I' f .' i'''''.(, ��wei, & c9.t.�15 I i I,' O` 4 '1 ;.I a ., 99 l ;tip ie r � 1LL t y ,, " �, • y J .. r • z yA f -------5 6721'''''t:71:(.....'' s....Z__' � t 'CaIIfornla - r+ �, i i 4 W f _ +' �Ny '8,GD , vI4i hwe Patrol .• oI C. nerstonet9'�i+ °ti_rg. y fl ' e. i f � + 1 'omrriu`4 y Church .' - , �I, t � I �, ALS ��* �r I ._ ,t , i/ `ik,', •� '` t �"f t I t,f '4I ��( w'11,"4,' "ttl' ', ' _ 1;..� ' ,fd(( t ,i 1 i '� t i i `",il,---- *4r arf q x r. , �' �� �7, I y 5 kf � _ y BP 'aMw'�' - � #''"fir "v'Y d ,�', �t t4 ?1 eio .r .I `ter •. ��.. i _ �.w r r w3I It,tt i 1,t, .t, ,z, frWrlq .. . _, cs, _ �, `+, >�.i f F�., i :'�� :- �� ] �� !s. rr�i� �;I / iF`; � ' t�`'„"^-�� ��'v, 'Fr �� 7 ,• `.� '1 f�, '. ";r. If��WW i 3 it 1n ' a nt 1.i f Yz { .t �k _lj * µ< di r ,1 y,nth:i;J, ' I9..4A ui ,1; .„ �' '' �' :,F 4+ :� r Ift : •e �r ^c v"''15'1,5'..'' �l.�`"�"' .^C + = 1 ` a �" eat qr- '• .a S" fi"' `� ku - "! I r:* ,. ''� err ��?�' 1 • ,1 '} rar ,,.a�E .,'',7-.--7'.e. ? s ` _�� ,� ,. t;�' W �� rx ff'? f D y ��� 1. ,.p1ir ,l % j�1■11i1�11=i� l =Ii IZZi c u , : {. J1h1. J ka. ..� 0 I aviii i •)) r '�i ., `", + .r' 4 ,a ' 3"' i lit,?.'::: d 1.--..1.. i i '5:?' ' :,... , , •,1-' ,,,,,$,N, -A-,'1;,, ,'-',.,V•`' -.,-(''. kc,',),\ ,,t, ,:.---,--,,,...4 11/4,,.1 -,, . , Mf I -OP"- bimilrAIM`i-- ti]-,-ii,..r f-T.,F,it, N 1::;:,. ,,., , I.,: ,,,,, 1,t.--...,__L il Z IA s �„y,,;,; I j Z�:. r + .^ ,: -,i s"A , ?"'4,4!?r L�lt e,'' '" oY, .[R] :14: { tens "*rf vII1 ' r u F '..t f k,�""T,f, r s ~,e� .A.... . 4 t .: ♦ Vie".`" -, >w _ ,.� I r r f f :r I --..--*"--!:.:e0",..-;- "� '�r' y `'' 1,�'—'- 1 `�•. \,,,,,,,„,,,,...„, N •%.' n r} III h%c�* 4if aar rF�X�'r ,yl °-'� ti {a e ""OM1= YDS , ? ~ t .''i is "`r , g'�P eye t9 k . '1 �I t g' �� '/ \g 4.k...1 �� 9t` • i•'I pi P I 3MI is,h > v7/- 5 .g nge /� + � l 7 ,,. r. + ', T,,, , 1.,,I , ` eN v�wV-O'�p�° , rc +ar ,t++� "� + "" V Nes k' ,� " Fsn r 1y , ,l'1,'v'`i'e" a,' n' ,i,,C""p .a � :�+e+i,'',,a4,,,., '''''r'-4-7";,;:3.7....',.-!4'°1H---- „ s ,, J y.. )A'� .1,,_..„',A. . r 1,`i{ f x'' { .:1 ,.,,�- - i•'aaC .P,..e��o- "a'e�,,' 1 *Ya�rJS�� 1 .�.yam/ LL�,�t� r' � � i1,1 ` �,,,'k”} *�+ fNew Los Angeles Ave iao�—". - + +� :x / �� '3' .; ,,w ; 4 i1 , ,1 t i�. rSk} n !f'e I+ {1 <,,,{V t „-'', _ •'t— 1• r '. '',. 1� S r ' t,^ '1'" ,{ ' r�'+ ,S tr,LA a , N ' .,'. �ti' SOD(} Ih �"` k., ^.>+ { 1s, } .. A i " rr� S; �A .4). i;G ogre I•' �,' ' ... ,+;.- v . , 'i,+', .,• �, ltaI dta©791-Google II Iery©^_rJ 17,Diyftalolnl„,,I i- c,colrrn c,I w+rye,i; -f afyn'Awl�xr `9 =Y, TPM No. „", h�k� �"' 1" = 376 ft 2016-01 and IPD 10/18/2017 •,,, -- . No. 2017-01 This map represents a visual display of related geographic information. Data provided hereon is nota guarantee of actual field conditions.To be sure of complete accuracy, please contact Moorpark staff for the most up-to-date information. I--, N PROJECT EXHIBITS • Proposed Site Plan • Proposed 1St Floor Plan • Proposed 2nd Floor Plan • Building Elevations (South and West) • Building Elevations (North and East) • Material Board • Landscape Plan • Tentative Parcel Map (Title) • Tentative Parcel Map (UNDER SEPARATE COVER) COPIES OF THE EXHIBITS ARE AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST OF THE PROJECT PLANNER 12 CC ATTACHMENT 3 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP No. __ MACH�-�RIG —_ 1 LOCATED IN THE CITY OFMOORPARK,COUNTY OF VENTURA,STATE OF / ,/�'.�z'�'a sr 7K CALIFORNIA ' ,�'. /N., \.1 :111:1 i i� 4 --- .. a. / I. rorty QFvo sr. y. � / r� ANT St1 FT. t.f8 ACRE - ., ry� 0),^"�t ; .- ''''‘::11' / ''''- '2T:* * 4 . MATCH LINE-•SEE LEFT g ' 1 y ,`'?„/ ' # § �' ry'fyY / '.+k.,+mar - __ .. �4 w ria.x ^g v] 2222 2 222 Nat Mr , m 414,4/417,� m� � 1. g WI Z • Z / M 339.803 SO.ft AGn ACAYS �d •bwK // + / a)cant axvv il. .. ...ae /�� smut slam' / 'I ......nwcm°p"'w..aeu ti , Y wxwAcrtmma rAcwrr t c3 / .' /,,44- 444PA i‘y % 1:1 ..64 j /7" mraa SP.a<Ma 0,00vOit ••r-""' 'X K .4.'APE sty' " j ," iwoo MOO MOM Fla 1 .. 4 11 .' ��, _ �3 . 4. , 4. , , 1 ' ' i 1 '4 ur „.� y ,II, IA . ll a INN „j '' '/ /,.$•' W �' .,! � . � b . ditiltbA, .11: It ts • / 114 f0`" aj a / 1 IP "/ „ Y/. M• - ....-1 • -_— b J _ ___ • .coarr -1t Ate_ -4.7a:::::::-:::;"- ------ ^'-';i"3"."- :: ✓1 w, ;751"7---6.1 !6']1x6•f n ram nsex]•R 1 I. -k' •• ' �S n rs Iw n Mtn n r>m X f/ k1I QW i b ry --+� tont n PA,l i Z ,�_�t_y` ..3,x:w-..,n—r •_--_—_ J`. NEW LOS ANGELES AVENUE - r -—-—-—..— -- •r°'1'�°' I ,nb 1 mg.41y>V]]cuYm wu.Rxpow t+V Ira-r mDim,t'tni lmul'NO .UOlm V M.".�r'n•m•r PM I TPM-02 F-] w . • • • • site legend keyed notes / `, �� '_" directory pmpo.sd aecaaw.walk ee.tYg*Ka..Nen to be remeied _ Q6Hl.i civil., ARCHITECT• Irv.30'v..stall bad.sea ``\ a , emerP•l+ee �l a.yW.rny k• pwawlecwe 31]5 G.ARtOM Oft 5118 Ib �' propo•en new Mldng $ 17-0. true-.orad W.I..For rareroe/' swear /^' ---._K j' OI,.�)1 2 :..to na4 w41s0 'AI rota mann a HW mn. ,! /'/ ` ���''''••• •rd k.N forNa 9H96 dodo.,.Ilfanb 11 A9eueA weaty3iAN SiMblal /AN.MOMf prnpo.d row moron. 0 b'-b V2'.60'9'dock n 1'n°�9 ' w.Oaa. / °'fie. ,',�,1�1 t qq 0 SM561214 ,05000]-0ett MUM reteAM-ao61 e•011051501-00O E]proposed...Waco plaex O a>'-n N•.moa•o-gar laodtg/e5 /�' ``N x-rlwrvwt �'�/ 04..- /i r1�tli I'R ax,ecNod ml awe pros m.. e-Iaw,areuwpromlr«a...t • O nom saw..Sorb .t�. d y O project address ewtrg.actaaae.lwad O row oar,rasp `•\ . /,�'r• ♦- ,'X - 400gl de cri tion seldom.Vale Q eenwg not o pat 0 row teWrg wan / /' / / !�) legal description ``\ `/f�/ , ' /, •9.�'�•- O 10 roe urbn real pnopaly NYvrW n qe wly or vsR*4.bte a(romans,m.abs se folk.l C ``\ > ,/' 1.�>' -, I pamleapa.al mp n.902a.nwclga.napak canal a vencn.smtaamluanleopa aapnnanma:9e.pa.3n l ww.y� � / e •••[• 0 s,nc.M W pool mom..w a.menmd n boon De. 'A a coaly raraeer a mon tang. �," am preel eMy.,n the area a w (/ '�a ~ / - ./''.-:/,,.,'/•,;',!•7,44'...V/ i O ro.ary an Ian a rrlotn nta..t a ar a an nnaoi rq6s donw soo feet Prom Sr Wore,OA waw as VI a wean.nay do /'/\ ``\ / / / / '1 .n Ina do.roues. 1.1.5 a d.ca.nt no 55165 n book 1310. gee or orals]rota.. r f/i.. pas. `�\ x.•oeawewa . J' //,%`f///:„' / Ane prem mraa.ea.masea al on an na...ln�d.e.la,dopuaaro.dost.1....1..a,alt sawwryd or • ( ✓ / //fl"/,1, . %' I Maraentry dorose,.n V bn deed recorded October n,des.rbrumR soon..n boat 2e0.pap 661..500 room. '/, • / /� /AlwildIg b'/i// r Also e,. 25 e al al a6 m..•.•...0 eq trolwn /�/ N "• ,/�/ %'/f/I� r3200A // 11— b =nawolMlranueMornl�.r.a.N�u a axl ueeadaa.e..maaawnaa. mwewn pegs ul ar ar10 r.r:. "'1' a^n do r...r.•sd n•w a..rocarmd oanr,m 20.Iwo ��\ / /://,,, ,••,,,,,••: ..... flood zone note: D ,/ ( ' .4-...\.. , , f,, ` l�p zone e: vaaM 1 / 4, f yd / • Jae by pamrrt-awl-avre swlnw rnomrg rwaly moa floe co Mop.I.r.aN wan assay.dap w / x-Nr.Rlert ``� +` •\ \ `'/•,...r/•,,,, .f..,„.;....77// /�//.//./.../"....•% �, Load 1 ad u..e loot Average Magid dam.mm.Men dotal.Nona.onto.as Onen n re nP'e'nb roverrt w plan. ' ''� ,\ '.....".,>;,:/...4%,” aa� �»o plan _ /• �X \\ 4444. V. project etatiatica: /, ``\ /./ {.y, '���_\ \ \ \\ i fawl.raaea gross .(-15en. rola.o \ \ \ \\ \ \� /l t �l�+r y_ 0 rnq.m, •r.1-5.20.0 sl(3435 Ill u /', \ \\\ C 'A_ lonscdpe• •h 0550 el n5.n u \• / \ \ \ \ \ O G'S `C i p hg,leoc lno..mbc. 4-14012 el(5.15 AU (///`���___\\\\\\ \ +`'�1+�1p -a •�\ }� rat A. '' // \'`` „:".'"•=r4. ``�:��,\ \\�\. \\\\\\ \\ �\ `��n f/ yV``f S�-� ,t tltlddraea Maanl nal tl • \ • � .trip4,-' 1 0floaOf.area. w5w a. /� N , /AY."' ' \�� � \ p an . two a. ries ane area w /3 \ \ \. \\\ O\\ �\ , 1116, ra'e moral cdwg s•aea. :f. XS, �' a \a/6DOm m\ \ \\ 0 \\is !�� s wsa.aa.rn: Ian neis rg��e°' +1 nao-e / moa 5 Av A� ',_' /' '1411 � • \ \ \\\\\ \ \\ \ \\\\ � 1_ ° nnra.a Na..y. trni ae.vq halo-,too•.-.•all. }�/w�' o ///�/r, ... \�A V�� \ ,, vA\ 2\ �� � yv ,O F.F.wd. •ave.9,l eon. 3sw•vel. ,/,' / _ / _ \ \ \ K _ meteor parcel pnl Was ab•osis f r /�\ \\\ '' \ \ _A�� .� \ \\ 1� 11-y , assn.telt Oda setback eu0 5.-0. /,� ''/4'\ / \ � \\ \ \ \ \\l IC 11__I nen-eV Hie.ttuR a-O•Flt M / .reAP...r / \ \ EXI5TIN5 eUILDIN6 A • .'1.-..1V, ...t Mad•Ido setback me . ' •< X '''"\'''',. \ Footprint.102.260 et \' � ���® '�.. r.. O I Ma...,.rola•y.wm ro g spraler+d . / ��\�� �nU floor office, 19716 of \ l \ total.115,76 of\ existing site perking calculations m \ \ .. OOex. 221 / ' \ \\ >\ \ \• \ \` \ \\\\ \ '� es• \ \ .R \Ic-� <:6 >v� P V A �v� V v . ',•'""s',„ = \� �@\A�\ • V ,. xir s ei nylon,*sprues: \`\ ' /��\� dodo,;\\� \\�\\\:N.1 ,,' \'.,,, y� \� ;;;���\ Q� O -Ie • epos.mowed ave2 • \\\ 4r.\ ♦ \ \ \. ,J i„,7----,-7:‘,!:,1‘, ,,,,,,( :ri �4'[�\ '. ,: . \lira .a ado yuan mloti • F \\ \ \ \\\\ \• E.,'n-or \ \ \ \VVagLLL1III .!i m`.`rc'pY new uuibt a lot ] �• • \ �/ \ ro osed lot 1 parking calculation a�f� \ 6, , • '4..•$,s.• 4 . , { \a o. ..•...'"-,,Asv, w \\� a P I P 9 • _ ', J /c \aa ;• \ \ dodo y.\ .,Ns \ lalwaeal _ ♦ ppF' ab ~ l\• \ : I coat 5315.al.(100�n•I sspouts Afte ' \�• � \ ..".,,fp, �� o®��\ \ \ ,*,,,S OYO°Da .i '�\ \1v".�l\ \\�\ \. \., fest. 105xNImo XI to an /t'', \'�? ® •^'., '. , `v� F,�p • , �\. F ���� �Ii. ',‘,..:'''I''''-' \ I..�. \/s . yam. //My \ �\� Lw�'e;3'®3 �,0,'s• A�` \ R„:�V' � • \kph p.� \N � N7 r\, ' VICINITY MAP rot 5an�rla.d(mss5en.15� Iao°w' r�� 41 PROJECT SITE a, i �� ® ���+ � \ \ \ Proposed lot 2 parking calculation \,�'� .. ave \dodo\ y ® \ \ \ I1. of] ya.l N•,5515 0.12 II ace./ 'r :74.i.,",/::\.., / >‘ \\\\ \ .\\ \\ :� �\\ 1I ® kti `t c ......,.a mwM x5w53o Nuxn v valeta nq+r.d 9 J rtr \\ } \ • '�� .�\ �1 lL� >'.-=,-=',...--;4:-..- .....'"7----.,\..-,.. ----� . v .ossa pa.. a,aay. . } ;tipv. sposos ? ns*•sJlr16,y. 't-'T -—--TN \.. ..: .,:el4 `t r e veal at spas. ..arras r .:-^ 1+4-2-•\,,;:--- A do6 Ie I v._�.... i • _ _•-1 dodo pars 0 r , — --_--_----Al2_...i__I__. ..e w pov+5,nuns ra530.r. dodo._. .• Ol 2.1./1000 dodo. ' w s.q r w e: dodo-doss•• ” -2540 el•2! q� -dodo soon, —`_ ' -___.__ 7 l— l w dodo 1^ �� 514 i2owel moo�"ree ' NORM 10^9 ram-13.0 M.6S 11 '�L—_ _ 3,.M bZs rogwso • proposed site plan O bn `Oce p.n. a LOS ANGELES AVENUE ��r-0_oa clewaa.•mpool.tad navy.:6itall: d. I !MIMI site pan NERRON ENTERPRISE NORTH ®� 400 science drive CD Q moorpai-k californie epn#S12-0-240-085 4 . RESOLUTION NO. 2017- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 2016-01 AND INDUSTRIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 2017-01 FOR THE SUBDIVISION OF AN APPROXIMATELY 10.0-ACRE DEVELOPED LOT INTO TWO PARCELS OF 7.8 ACRES AND 2.2 ACRES AND CONSTRUCTION OF A 35,330 SQUARE-FOOT INDUSTRIAL BUILDING ON THE NEWLY-CREATED 2.2-ACRE PARCEL AT 400 SCIENCE DRIVE, AND MAKING A DETERMINATION OF EXEMPTION UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) IN CONNECTION THEREWITH, ON THE APPLICATION OF NICK RINI FOR NEARON ENTERPRISES WHEREAS, Nick Rini, for Nearon Enterprises, submitted applications for Tentative Parcel Map (TPM) No. 2016-01 on November 8, 2016, and Industrial Planned Development (IPD) Permit No. 2017-01 on April 12, 2017, for the subdivision of an approximately 10.0-acre developed lot into two parcels of 7.8 acres and 2.2 acres and construction of a 35,330 square-foot industrial building on the newly-created 2.2 acre parcel; and WHEREAS, at a duly noticed public hearing on October 24, 2017 for TPM No. 2016-01 and IPD Permit No. 2017-01, the Planning Commission considered the agenda report and any supplements thereto and written public comments; opened the public hearing and took and considered public testimony both for and against the proposal; closed the public hearing and adopted Resolution No. PC-2017-622, recommending to the City Council approval of the Tentative Parcel Map and Industrial Planned Development Permit; and WHEREAS, at a duly noticed public hearing on November 15, 2017 for TPM No. 2016-01 and IPD Permit No. 2017-01, the City Council considered the agenda report and any supplements thereto and written public comments; opened the public hearing and took and considered public testimony both for and against the proposal; closed the public hearing and reached a decision on this matter; and WHEREAS, the Community Development Director has determined that TPM No. 2016-01 and IPD Permit No. 2017-01 are categorically exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15332 (Class 32: In-fill Development Projects) of the CEQA Guidelines. The proposed building is consistent with the General Plan and Zoning regulations. In addition, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment in that the site has already been graded and improved in anticipation of future development. No further environmental documentation is needed. CC ATTACHMENT 6 15 Resolution No. 2017- Page 2 • NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION: The City Council, based on its own independent analysis and judgment, concurs with the Community Development Director's determination that the project is categorically exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15332 (Class 32: In-fill Development Projects) of the CEQA Guidelines. The proposed building and is consistent with the General Plan and Zoning regulations. In addition, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment in that the site has already been graded and improved in anticipation of future development. No further environmental documentation is needed. SECTION 2. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP PERMIT FINDINGS: Based upon the information set forth in the staff report(s), accompanying studies, and oral and written public testimony, the City Council makes the following findings: A. The proposed map, including its design and improvements, is consistent with the City's General Plan and Zoning Ordinance as proposed, in that the map has been designed to comply with the requirements of the City's General Plan in providing a new industrial parcel adjacent to existing industrial development and it meets Zoning standards for the Industrial Park (M-1) Zone. B. The site is physically suitable for°the type of development proposed in that the site can be engineered to allow for all required utilities to be brought to the site, adequate ingress and egress can be obtained, and the site can be provided with public and emergency services. C. The site is physically suitable for the proposed intensity of development, in that all City development standards, including parking, would be met by the proposed project. D. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage, in that the site has already been graded and improved in anticipation of future industrial development. E. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems, in that adequate sanitation is both feasible and required as a condition of this development. F. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large, for access through, or use of the property within the proposed subdivision, in that full access to and from Science Drive for both parcels have been incorporated in the design of this project. 16 Resolution No. 2017- Page 3 SECTION 3. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT FINDINGS: Based upon the information set forth in the staff report(s), accompanying studies, and oral and written public testimony, the City Council makes the following findings in accordance with City of Moorpark, Municipal Code Section 17.44.030: A. The site design, including structure location, size, height, setbacks, massing, scale, architectural style and colors, and landscaping, is consistent with the provisions of the General Plan, any applicable specific plans, Zoning Ordinance, and any other applicable regulations in that it incorporates design features, including mass, scale, materials, and colors, to enhance the visual character of the industrial park location. B. The site design would not create negative impacts on or impair the utility of properties, structures or uses in the surrounding area in that the building complies with Zoning regulations and sufficient parking is provided on site. C. The future uses would be compatible with existing and permitted uses in the surrounding area, which is part of the Industrial Park (M-1) Zoning designation. SECTION 4. APPROVAL OF PROJECT: Based on all of the findings contained herein and all the evidence in the record of this matter, the City Council approves TPM No. 2016-01 and IPD Permit No. 2017-01 subject to the Standard and Special Conditions of Approval included in Exhibit A (Standard and Special Conditions of Approval), attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. SECTION 5. FILING OF RESOLUTION: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution and shall cause a certified resolution to be filed in the book of original resolutions. PASSED, AND ADOPTED this 15th day of November, 2017. Janice S. Parvin, Mayor • ATTEST: Maureen Benson, City Clerk Exhibit A— Standard and Special Conditions of Approval 17 Resolution No. 2017- Page 4 EXHIBIT A STANDARD AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 2016-01 AND INDUSTRIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 2017-01 STANDARD CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL The applicant shall comply with Standard Conditions of Approval for Subdivisions and Planned Developments as adopted by City Council Resolution No. 2009-2799 (Exhibits A), except as modified by the following Special Conditions of Approval. In the event of conflict between a Standard and Special Condition of Approval, the Special Condition shall apply. SPECIAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. The applicant's acceptance of this permit and/or commencement of construction and/or operations under this permit is deemed to be acceptance of all conditions of this permit. 2. The Conditions of Approval of this permit, City of Moorpark Municipal Code and adopted city policies at the time of the permit approval supersede all conflicting notations, specifications, dimensions, typical sections and the like which may be shown on plans. 3. The Final Map must include the final Conditions of Approval and a reference to the adopted City Council resolution in a format acceptable to the Community Development Director. 4. This subdivision expires two (2) years from the date of its approval. The Community Development Director with the City Engineer's concurrence may, at his/her discretion, grant up to one (1) additional one-year extension for map recordation, if there have been no changes in the adjacent areas and if the applicant can document that he/she has diligently worked towards Map recordation during the initial period'of time. The request for extension of this Map must be made in writing, at least thirty calendar (30) days prior to the expiration date of the map and must be accompanied by applicable entitlement processing deposits. 5. This Industrial Planned Development permit expires one (1) year from the date of its approval unless the use has been inaugurated by issuance of a building permit for construction. The Community Development Director may, at his/her discretion, grant up to two (2) additional one-year extensions for use inauguration of the development permit, if there have been no changes in the adjacent areas 18 Resolution No. 2017- Page 5 and if the applicant can document that he/she has diligently worked towards use inauguration during the initial period of time. The request for extension of this planned development permit must be made in writing, at least thirty (30) days prior to the expiration date of the permit and must be accompanied by applicable entitlement processing deposits. The Conditions of Approval of this entitlement and all provisions of the Subdivision Map Act, City of Moorpark Municipal Code and adopted City policies at the time of the entitlement approval, supersede all conflicting notations, specifications, dimensions, typical sections and the like which may be shown on said Map and/or plans or on the entitlement application. This language shall be added as a notation to the Final Map and/or to the final plans for the planned development. 6. Conditions of this entitlement may not be interpreted as permitting or requiring any violation of law or any unlawful rules or regulations or orders of an authorized governmental agency. 7. The applicant shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City and its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action or proceeding against the City or its agents, officers or employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul any approval by the City or any of its agencies, departments, commissions, agents, officers, or employees concerning the permit, which claim, action or proceeding is brought within the time period provided by the California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6 and Government Code Section 65009. The City will promptly notify the applicant of any such claim, action or proceeding, and if the City should fail to do so or should fail to cooperate fully in the defense, the applicant shall not thereafter be responsible to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City or its agents, officers and employees pursuant to this condition. a. The City may, within its unlimited discretion, participate in the defense of any such claim, action or proceeding, if both of the following occur: The City bears its own attorney fees and costs; and ii. The City defends the claim, action or proceeding in good faith. b. The applicant shall not be required to pay or perform any settlement of such claim, action or proceeding unless the settlement is approved by the applicant. Thee applicant's obligations under this condition shall apply regardless of whether a building permit is ultimately obtained, or final occupancy is ultimately granted with respect to the permit. 8. If any of the conditions or limitations of this approval are held to be invalid, that holding shall not invalidate any of the remaining conditions or limitations set forth. 19 Resolution No. 2017- Page 6 9. The development must be in substantial conformance with the plans presented in conjunction with the application for Tentative Parcel Map No. 2016-01 and Industrial Planned Development No. 2017-01, except any modifications as may be required to meet specific Code standards or other conditions stipulated herein. Any future changes to the parking layout shall require review and approval as determined by the Community Development Director consistent with Chapter 17.44 of the Zoning Ordinance. 10. Industrial Planned Development No. 2017-01 may be revoked or its use suspended by the City, if any of the causes listed in Section 17.44.080.6 of the Zoning Code are found to apply, including if the use for which the permit was granted has not been exercised for at least twelve (12) consecutive months, has ceased to exist, or has been abandoned. The discontinuance for a period of one hundred eighty (180) or more days of a nonconforming use or a change of nonconforming use to a conforming use constitutes abandonment and termination of the nonconforming status of the use. 11. Tentative Parcel Map No. 2016-01 and Industrial Planned Development No. 2017-01 is granted or approved with the City's designated approving body retaining and reserving the right and jurisdiction to review and to modify the permit—including the conditions of approval—based on changed circumstances. Changed circumstances include, but are not limited to, major modification of the business; a change in scope, emphasis, size, or nature of the business; the expansion, alteration, reconfiguration, or change of use; or the fact that the use is negatively impacting surrounding uses by virtue of impacts not identified at the time of application for the conditional use permit or impacts that are much greater than anticipated or disclosed at the time of application for the conditional use permit. The reservation of right to review any permit granted or approved under this chapter by the City's designated approving body is in addition to, and not in lieu of, the right of the City, its Planning Commission, City Council and designated approving body to review and revoke or modify any permit granted or approved under this chapter for any violations of the conditions imposed on such permit. 12. Prior to issuance of a Zoning Clearance for a building permit, the applicant shall submit a color and material board for review and approval of the Community Development Director. Materials, textures and colors of the building shall be compatible with the existing buildings in the business park. 13. Prior to issuance of a Zoning Clearance for a building permit, the applicant shall submit a lighting and landscaping plan for review and approval by the Community Development Director, Parks and Recreation Director, and Police Chief that demonstrates. compliance with the City's Zoning Ordinance, Landscape Standards and Guidelines, and Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance, and provides a safe and secure environment for the building occupants. 20 Resolution No. 2017- Page 7 14. Existing landscaping along the site's Los Angeles Avenue frontage shall be enhanced and existing landscaping in the parking lot shall be restored to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director. All enhanced landscaping shall be installed prior to Certificate of Occupancy for the new building on the 2.2- acre parcel. 15. None of the prohibited plants indicated in the Provisionally Acceptable Plant List and the Invasive and Prohibited Plant List contained in the City's Landscape Standards and Guidelines shall be used on the development site. 16. Prior to the issuance of a Zoning Clearance for a building permit, the applicant shall submit a plan for a fully-covered trash enclosure, with materials and colors to match the building, for review and approval by the Community Development Director and City solid waste manager. 17. Prior to the issuance of a Zoning Clearance for occupancy, the applicant shall submit a Developer Waste Reduction and Recycling Plan to the satisfaction of the City's Solid Waste and Recycling Division. 18. All necessary permits must be obtained from the Building and Safety Division and all construction shall be in compliance with the Moorpark Building Code and all other applicable regulations. 19. Prior to the issuance of each building permit, the applicant shall provide a sample of the glass to be used, along with the manufacturer's specifications for exterior reflectance, for review and approval by the Community Development Director. Glass used along the Los Angeles Avenue frontage shall not exceed 8% exterior reflectance. 20. Concurrent with the lighting review to determine compliance with Chapter 17.30 of the Moorpark Municipal Code, the applicant shall provide the Community Development Director exhibits demonstrating that all lighting fixtures across both properties are architecturally compatible with the buildings and landscaping. LED lighting is encouraged to conserve electricity. 21. Parking areas must be developed and maintained in compliance with the Moorpark Municipal Code, and surfaced with asphalt, concrete, or other surface acceptable to the Community Development Director, City Engineer/Public Works Director, and must include adequate provisions for drainage, National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) compliance, striping and appropriate wheel blocks or curbs in parking areas adjacent to landscaped areas. All parking space striping must be maintained to be clearly visible during the life of the development. 21 Resolution No. 2017- Page 8 22. The number of parking spaces shall be maintained consistent with Chapter 17.32 of the Zoning Ordinance. 23. Reciprocal access through parking lots and publicly accessible outdoor areas shall be required and incorporated into the Final Parcel Map and Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and shall be maintained by both property owners to enable accessibility to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director, City Engineer/Public Works Director and City Attorney 24. A separate sign permit application is required for all proposed signs, which are subject to the review and approval of the Community Development Director. No signage is permitted on the architectural fin on the north façade of the new building. 25. No outdoor storage, including vehicle storage, is allowed under this approval. Any request for outdoor storage shall be subject to the application requirements in place at the time of such request. 26. Prior to issuance of a Zoning Clearance for a building permit, the applicant shall submit all fees, including, but not limited to Los Angeles Avenue Area of Contribution Fee, Air Quality Fee, Tree and Landscape Fee, Fire Protection Facilities Fee, Police Facilities Fee, and Library Facilities Fee. All entitlement processing fees must be paid up prior to the issuance of a Zoning Clearance for a building permit. 27. Prior to issuance of a Zoning Clearance for a building permit, applicant shall either submit an in-lieu art fee or indicate a location for on-site public art in compliance with Chapter 17.50 of the Zoning Ordinance. If on-site public art is approved, it must be installed and completed prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. Engineering / Public Works 28. Prior to Final Parcel Map approval and recordation, the Final Parcel Map shall include an irrevocable offer to dedicate property at the northeast corner of Science Drive and Los Angeles Avenue for future intersection improvements. Future intersection improvements are for one dedicated right-turn lane (southbound), one dedicated left-turn/through lane (southbound), and one travel lane (northbound) at the northern leg of Science Drive at Los Angeles Avenue. The irrevocable offer to dedicate shall be to the satisfaction of the City Engineer/Public Works Director and Community Development Director. 22 Resolution No. 2017- Page 9 29. Prior to Final Parcel Map approval and recordation, the Final Parcel Map shall include an irrevocable offer to dedicate property along the entire Science Drive frontage of both parcels for a public sidewalk of width consistent with County Road Standards. The irrevocable offer to dedicate shall be to the satisfaction of the City Engineer/Public Works Director and Community Development Director. The sidewalk shall be constructed to City standards to the satisfaction of the City Engineer/Public Works Director prior to occupancy of the new building on the 2.2-acre parcel. 30. Prior to Final Map approval and recordation, the Final Parcel Map and Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) shall provide drainage covenants across both parcels to the satisfaction of the City Engineer/Public Works Director. 31. The project shall incorporate post-construction storm water Best Management Practices (BMPs) and Low Impact Development design, including a technical feasibility report, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer/Public Works Director. -End- 23 Re. ITEM 8.A. From: David Bobardt Sent: Monday, November 13, 2017 5:17 PM To: City Council &City Manager Cc: Blanca Garza; Maureen Benson; Freddy Carrillo Subject: FW:400 Science Drive - Glass color,(Solarban 60 (2) Solargray + Clear) Attachments: Solarban specs.pdf Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers, FYI. This email and attachment are supplemental information to the staff report for Agenda Item 8A—400 Science Drive, set for the regular Council meeting of November 15, 2017. This supplemental information provides more detail on the glass proposed for the new building, which is shown as Number 5 on the material board included with the agenda report. Please let me know if you have any questions. Daa4t 4 &Akindt Community Development Director City of Moorpark 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021 (805)517-6281 dbobardte.Moorpa rkCA.gov From: Jose Tamayo [mailto:jtamayo@pkarchitecture.net] Sent: Monday, November 13, 2017 4:30 PM To: David Bobardt Cc: Anthony Molina; Nick Rini; Brian Poliquin Subject: 400 Science Drive - Glass color (Solarban 60 (2) Solargray + Clear) Dave, We are proposing on using the Vitro Architectural Glass Solarban® 60 (2) Solargray® + Clear. 1 OXYYX SI Please see attached PDF for glass specs. http://samples.vitroglazings.com/solarban-60-2-solargray-clear-3 Best Regards, Jose Tamayo pk:architecture 116 laretor drive : suite 110 Agoura hills california ' 91301 jtamayo@Dkarchitecture.net 818.584.0057 866.800.1289 pkarchitecture.net 2 SOLAR BAN°60 i 12 `G,I��SG���y, 0Solar Control Low-E Glass Glass•Coatings• Paint Sola/ban®60 solar control, low-e glass by PPG was engineered to •.� ,. . control solar heat gain,which is essential to minimizing cooling costs. ' ``\ `+`` _ , Al In a standard one-inch insulating glass unit(IGU), Sola/ban®60 glass offers an exterior appearance similar to clear, uncoated glass. ��``�W '''llik. 4110 With a very good Solar Heat Gain Coefficient(SHGC)of 0.39, err .T " __ Solarban®60 glass blocks 66 percent of the total solar energyNY — .64 while allowing 70 percent of the visible light to pass through. <'�• ' t ,r. This combination produces an excellent Light to Solar Gain (LSG) arrifitZ2 ratio of 1.79, along with exceptional insulating performance, as -'I `' evidenced by its 0.29 winter nighttime U-value. r.;. , Aesthetic Options -°,, , ,` Solarban®60 glass can be coated on Starphire®glass and = /+' �,/ paired with Starphire®glass to produce an IGU with exceptional \ �. +`t clarity and solar control characteristics. For even more color and / r'' performance options, it can be coated on the second (#2)surface X AS, / `�" 1 of nearly all PPG's wide range of tinted glasses, or combined Prudential Center in an IGU with any PPG tinted glass, Solarcool®reflective Location:Newark,NJ glass or Vistacool®subtly reflective, color-enhanced glass(see Product:Solarban 60 Glass performance data on back page). Architect:Morris Adjmi Architects Glass Contractor:Josloff Glass Solarban®60 Glass and Sustainable Design Glass Fabricator:J.E.Berkowitz LP An energy modeling study conducted by an independent energy design and consulting firm showed that architects and building _1111I11111111`�, owners can potentially save millions of dollars during a building's �Iiii���-.140 lifetime by specifying Solarban®60 glass instead of less advanced 01���1 ----__ 1' architectural glazings. �I i----__ architectural For instance,the study showed that, by substituting Solarban® ��;� 1411111!!1g1'Alit 1 i 60 glass in place of dual-pane tinted glass,the owners of a 0.��j1N111:g��1!ll��1� 1 I typical glass-walled, eight-story office building in Boston could �:i/glia; 1 SOLARBANk60 Solar Control Low-E Glass Solarban®60 glass is just one of many ecological Fabrication and Availability _ Ecological Solutions from PPGTM. For Solutionsn„�„.9Y, ® more information, or to obtain samples Solarban 60 glass is available •PPG Certified of this product, call 888-PPG-IDEA (774-4332), or visit www. exclusively through the • FABRICATOR® NETWORK ppgideascapes.com. PPG Certified Fabricator® Network. PPG Certified Fabricators can meet tight construction deadlines and accelerate the PPG is the first U.S. float glass manufacturer to have its delivery of replacement glass before, during and after products recognized by the Cradle to Cradle Certified"' construction. Solarban® 60 glass is manufactured using the program, and it offers more C2C-certified architectural sputter-coating process and is available for annealed, heat glasses than any other float glass manufacturer. strengthened and tempered applications. PPG IdeaScapes® Integrated products, people and services to inspire your design and color vision. Additional Resources Solarban®60 Glass Performance-Commercial Insulating Glass Unit Comparisons Using 1/4" (6mm) Glass Insulatin Vision Unit Performance Com arisons 1-inch(25mm)units with 1/2-inch(13mm)airspace and two 1/4-inch(6mm)lites;as shown below Transmittance Reflectance U-Value(Imperial) Light to Solar Heat Ultra- Total Visible Total Winter Summer European Shading Gain Solar Visible Solar Solar U-Value Coefficient Gain violet Light Night- Day- Coefficient Energy Energy time time (LSG) SOLARBAN®60 Solar Control Low-E Glass ■ SOLARBAN 60(2)Clear+Clear 18 70 34 11 28 0.29 0.27 1.6 0.45 0.39 1.79 . SOLARBAN 60(2)STARPHIRE` 24 74 39 11 41 0.29 0.27 1.6 0.48 0.41 1.80 . SOLARBAN 60(2)ATLANTICA+Clear 5 53 20 8 7 0.29 0.27 1.6 0.32 0.27 1.96 . SOLARBAN 60(2)AZURIA+Clear 13 54 21 8 6 0.29 0.27 1.6 0.32 0.28 1.93 SOLARBAN 60(2)OPTIGRAY+Clear 10 50 23 8 14 0.29 0.27 1.5 0.35 0.30 1.67 ;U SOLARBAN 60(2)PACIFICA+Clear 5 34 15 6 6 0.29 0.27 1.6 0.26 0.22 1.55 SOLARBAN 60(2)SOLARBLUE+Clear 10 45 21 7 12 0.29 0.27 1.6 0.33 0.28 1.61 arirstau rain. rsarairnrrt.!r4wm.I IIIM'lllllllllllll!'llllllllJlllll.IM6=lllllETM MIEMAIWISTM U= I • IIMMIMI • SOLARBAN 60(2)SOLARGRAY+Clear 8 35 18 6 12 0.29 0.27 1.6 0.29 0.25 1.40 , • SOLARBAN60(2)SOLEXIA+Clear 10 61 25 9 10 0.29 0.27 1.6 0.37 0.32 1.91 . ATLANTICA°+SOLARBAN 60(3)Clear 5 53 20 9 7 0.29 0.27 1.6 0.36 0.31 1.71 111 AZURIA®+SOLARBAN 60(3)Clear 13 54 21 9 7 0.29 0.27 1.6 0.36 0.31 1.74 GRAYLITEe II+SOLARBAN 60(3)Clear 1 7 4 4 5 0.29 0.27 1.6 0.14 0.13 0.54 ite OPTIGRAY®+SOLARBAN 60(3)Clear 10 50 23 8 15 0.29 0.27 1.5 0.40 0.35 1.43 PACIFICA®+SOLARBAN 60(3)Clear 5 34 15 6 7 0.29 0.27 1.6 0.29 0.25 1.36 SOLARBLUEe+SOLARBAN 60(3)Clear 10 45 21 7 13 0.29 0.27 1.6 0.38 0.33 1.36 SOLARBRONZE®+SOLARBAN 60(3)Clear 8 42 21 7 16 0.29 0.27 1.6 0.37 0.32 1.31 SOLARGRAY®+SOLARBAN 60(3)Clear 8 35 18 7 13 0.29 0.27 1.6 0.33 0.29 1.21 . SOLEXIAu+SOLARBAN 60(3)Clear 10 61 25 10 10 0.29 0.27 1.6 0.42 0.37 1.65 VISTACOOL®Glass with SOLARBAN°60 Solar Control Low-E(3) VISTACOOL(2)AZURIA+Low-E 11 42 16 20 11 0.29 0.27 1.6 0.30 0.26 1.62 VISTACOOL(2)PACIFICA+Low-E 4 26 12 11 9 0.29 0.27 1.6 0.25 0.21 1.24 SOLARCOOL"Glass(Reflective)with SOLARBAN®60 Solar Control Low-E(3) roti SOLARCOOL(2)AZURIA+Low-E 4 21 8 19 10 0.29 0.27 1.6 0.19 0.17 1.24 SOLARCOOL(2)PACIFICA+Low-E 2 13 6 10 8 0.29 0.27 1.6 0.17 0.15 0.87 SOLARCOOL(2)SOLARBLUE+Low-E 3 17 9 14 15 0.29 0.27 1.6 0.21 0.18 0.94 SOLARCOOL(2)SOLARBRONZE+Low-E 2 17 9 14 18 0.29 0.27 1.6 0.21 0.18 0.94 SOLARCOOL(2)SOLARGRAY+Low-E 2 14 8 11 14 0.29 0.27 1.6 0.20 0.17 0.82 SOLARCOOL(2)SOLEXIA+Low-E 3 24 10 24 15 0.29 0.27 1.6 0.22 0.19 1.26 *Data based on using STARPHIRE®glass for both interior and exterior lites. All performance data calculated using LBNL Window 6.3 software,except European U-value,which is calculated using WinDat version 3.0.1 software.For detailed information on the methodologies used to calculate the aesthetic and performance values in this table,please visit www.ppgideascapes.com or request our Architectural Glass Catalog. ©2014 PPG Industries,Inc.All rights reserved.Atlantica,Azuria,Azurlite,Graylite,IdeaScapes,Oceans of Color,Optiblue,Optigray,Pacifica,Solarban,Solarblue,Solarbronze, Solarcool,Solargray,Solex,Solexia,Starphire,Sungate,Vistacool,the PPG logo and the PPG Certified Fabricator Network and the PPG Certified Programs are registered trademarks of PPG Industries Ohio,Inc.Cradle to Cradle Certified is a certification mark licensed by the Cradle to Cradle Products Innovation Institute. Ecological Solutions from PPG is a trademark of PPG Industries Ohio,Inc. CERTIFIED Printed in U.S.A. °fOd�'O � Ea Ideaap �o 7071 09/14 10M SILVER Glass•Coatings• Paint PPG Industries,Inc. Glass Business&Discovery Center 400 Guys Run Road Cheswick,PA 15024 1-888-PPG-IDEA www.ppgideascapes.com , , site legend keyed notes ,� _ directory existing , // I6 compact stall to be removed v � ��� _ OWNER : CIVIL : ARCHITECT V proposed decorative walk 0I I p is-c- / nearon enterprises hardy engineering inc. pk:architecture 5126 CLARETON DR. SUITE 110 Oz 12 -O x 50 -O minimum loading area / \ / y> 5 -ss' 455 101 ygnacio valley road, suite 450 351 rolling oaks drive, suite 202 AGOURA HILLS, GA 41301 / proposed new building ® loadingtruck turningtemplates for reference - p \ ADJACENT 1 e walnut creek, california 44546 thousand oaks, california 41361 CONTACT: BRIAN POLIGUIN / ANTHONY radius of 45 -O min. PROPERTY ,' ,"� N w_ D1 _ (425)855-6374 (818)222-2606 MOLINA (818)584-0057 PAX(818)584-0014 new concrete \ / /� 0 p` p` proposed 0 40 -10 1/2 x 50 -O dock high loading area APN 5120240141 I 1 attn: nick rini attn: James doss E-MAIL: amolina®pkarchitecture.net s 42'-II 1/2 " x 50'-0" on-grade loadingar a MI" = INDUSTRIAL PARK , / / s _`� �1 �1 proposed new finger planter 0 9 / \ � K �o A.f ; 1 ;r w project address 6 new concrete curb \ / '� O ; G,4 existing curb to be demolished ao O new ada ramp e441 .aa 400 science drive, moorpark, california 13021 N ADJACENT o i o�� s 1 1 I" `� Fh— . existing not a part 0 new retaining wall /// v / ° c , PROPERTY \ <\, 5S legal description NNN APN 512024026 r _ " 4"‘--- „...a. %?I ® All the certain real property situated in the county of Ventura, state of California, describe as follows: IP MI” - INDUSTRIAL PARK // � / / �� / >`/ ����G141"N:41:::::::;:Cir I Parcel 8 of parcel map no. 3828, in the city of Moorpark, County of Ventura, State of California, as per map filed in book 38, pages 1 through h 11 / o 52 500 S 4. O 5, inclusive of parcel maps, and as amended in book 38 page 34 of parcel maps, in the office of the count recorder of said count / \ / � � p p - p 9 p P y y� / , / \ i°/B / / 188'-5/2" 103' 41'-ry2" 44'-a)2" keyed notes O e k CP O new concrete stoop at each exit - typical . - 1 f . .. . ;r ♦ ♦ ♦ new r a ® retaining w electrical O concrete tilt up wall - typical O O 0 = O interior walls - typical ii 0 �� zo O aluminum store Front system • a - O man door n O roll up door N, 0 O8 guard rail and hand rail Osteel awning above office office a orr .21 omen' men's \ omen' men's �� E�o�feran0 Joi 44' 3J'2" / H - - - - 0 m r oa ace tion ��— stairs open office p r O —I 149-FIS-Fitt -1L H I ■ office p19s TIa-Fa- N Ooffice 4 r V • ::: .:. J / 58 / I- 0 • warehouse - o N s 0 gii Fci7 ,,a APS O N ;h 7 I ■ e 4„. .. :3. e'7 .„. ... .. .., ., , .:: — :...,. • • ■ 4ry b 0 t. ■ v 0 0 O ■ shipping $ receivingN © shipping $ receiving Ililjiij jiijlijllL v illjdjii A \OrliMilli' A iiIii \ a ■ o o � / dock high on grade \ ` " \ / loading area / loading area / `� up R 6:: 5: \ / 4o'-IOy2" \ / ,,' 1 / 42'-IIY2:: \ / 5'-02:: 4" K/_yo 2:: v / v / 1 / 1 / / / 1 / \ / \ / \ / 8q:--y:: n J 1 / , / qT-b" , / v / / 2 / 61-3" / E2' x 50' min. 2' x %0I min. F 12' x 50' ruin. 12' x 50' min. E • d oadine are. oadin0 are. µn loading area loading area C m / 1 / \ / \ / \ le-�2 N co I 1 / 1 / \ / \ CD t co iv / \ / 1 / 1 / \ o / \ / \ / \ / 1 oll t-3 • / / / / Q 2 , ID ill If Cr 0 2 / • v l/ vv i vv proposed 1st floor plan _ �, . , , , SCRLE: 1' 0" = 3/32" M �] ��I 1� A c o ® L Q , N 1111111 INMI 1111 11111■1 a co foo N O m 0 O o CD N U Q7 c 5120 clareton dove suits 110 cb Fp o agoura hills cahtornia 9301 1st floor plan -------> 01 818'TRH' Jn; f 818 584 008 scale: as noted ru NEARON ENTERPRISE co co Lb Eii c p[ al HOD science drive moorpark, california Q Q NORTH apo # 512-0-2H0-085 CO 0 / 188'-55/6" / 1031-Oke," 41'-4i1%' 44'-Oy2" / / / / • AAP4 r T ZO r T N .±.::::!:- 11 IIS office office • o �wome�s rryen's i _ (C,o eros , - 44'-3X6" - H " I/ _ JO / u _� Wit, — P me H - 1 0 m ■ • xI - stairs open office open to below LItT�T J H L �J-al J-g J office N office ■ '-73/4��1I- open to I //J"'''' below I • I = APS TT s N • e . .,, ..r. . 4 :. .. . , ... . / . • .c. ... „, 40, ,.: .? . ... ., .# , .. ,.., .. • .. ..... ,, 400 . .fr.\\\to :.: ,. : 40, • .. I ,, :, or ..,.,,,,z:..,, ■ ,-,.. „. ... ..,, .. m o a ...,- o I ., ■ B D N - APS Na) o 0 I- C 0) .0 C') CU / q I' 513{g” / sq'--2" / 6'-3" / '- p o o co t- a Q 4- r E • a / Ig3'-45/6"o / ,o proposed 2nd floor plan fl �, co EL SCALE: 1'-0" = 3/32" c Mo a cn fo N 0 m 0 m C C o N U m a) 5126 claretun drove su1tu 110 oru II agoura hills California 913D1 2nd floor plan co oQD . 818 584 0057 f 818 584 0018 scale as noted ------> NERRON ENTERPRISE u pkanchltacturenet HOD science drive H CC o moorpark, california Q :21, a NORTH apn # 512-0-2H0-085 CO 0 EXTERIOR FINISHES I STOREFRONT TINTED GLASS 1/4" SOLEX x 1/2" AIR x 1/4" CLEAR NO LOW 'E' COATING I" INSULATED GLASS ALTERNATE - ADD LOW 'E' COATING • 2 SPANDREL GLASS 1/4" SOLEX TO MATCH STOREFRONT GLASS 1 13 1 Ib 3 2 1 5 6 5 Ib b 7 7 5 CONCRETE PANEL ACCENT COLOR: PAINTED TO MATCH "DUNN EDWARDS" ■ DE-6361 "BABY SEAL" 4 CONCRETE PANEL ACCENT COLOR: PAINTED TO MATCH "DUNN EDWARDS" ARDS"i TEN A N T • • , II DE-6335 "NOVELTY NAVY" ROOF LN. I j ii_-- :- . , #-NISM — \ ROOF LN. • T E N A N T N A M E 5 CONCRETE PANEL FIELD COLOR PAINTED TO MATCH "DUNN EDWARDS" DE-6374 II "SILVER POLISH" 'MS111 C i n O 6 GONCRETE PANEL FIELD COLOR PAINTED TO MATCH "DUNN EDWARDS" O m DE-63-19 "SILVER LAKE" * a m MEZZANINE FLA. LN. • I • -- _V 7�_ o 7 HORIZONTAL CORRUGATED METAL ■ r • • • --- r • °: 9 g ROOF TOP MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT • NOT TO EXCEED BUILDING PARAPET HEIGHT. • 11 1 ile MA A GI ALUMINUM STOREFRONT FRAMES: 2" x 4 1/2" CLEAR ANODIZED ALUMINUM • GROUND FLR. LN. L - - / \ \ GROUND FLR. LN. 01 1 O MAN DOOR PAINTED TO MATCH "DUNN EDWARDS" DEC-166 "STEVEARENO BEIGE" 4 3 I 10 II ROLL-UP DOOR I PAINTED TO MATCH "DUNN EDWARDS" DEC-166 "STEVEARENO BEIGE" • 12 BUILDING SIGNAGE HALO LIT REVERSE CHANNEL LETTERS PER DETAIL * c NOTE: SIGN PER SEPARATE PERMIT 13 STEEL AWNING west - front elevation C 14 42" HIGH GUARD RAIL SCALE: 1/8" = l'-0" ROOF DRAIN AND OVERFLOW • 5 WITHIN THE BUILDING 16 BUILDING SIGNAGE 3/8" THICK ALUMINUM LETTERS WITH PAINT FINISH PER DETAIL * d NOTE: SIGN PER SEPARATE PERMIT • ELEVATION NOTES NOTE: 1. ALL EXTERIOR GLASS INDICATED WITH O TO BE TEMPERED GLASS. • 2. PAINT COLORS REFERENCED FROM "DUNN EDWARDS" 8 15 4 5 b 8 15 5 6 3 COLOR SYSTEM. 3. ALL DOORS, FRAMES, FLASHING, DRIPS, VENTS, CAPS, SCUPPERS, ROLL-UP DOORS, ETC. TO BE PAINTED SAME COLOR AS ADJACENT WALL COLOR. _ 4. ALL ACCENT REVEALS TO BE PAINTED ON THE • I • • 7 FLAT BOTTOM SURFACE ONLY WITH THE ACCENT t17 7 Lri-, • • 1 1 •1 1 a ROOF LN. 0, 5. APPLY ANTI-GRAFFITI COATING TO 9'-O" A.F.F. AT ALL EXTERIOR CONCRETE PANELS. 6. PROVIDE BUILDING ADDRESS. VERIFY LOCATION, SIZE AND STYLE WITH LOCAL JURISDICTION. I. I . , I . I I ? I ! 1. THE USE OF HIGHLY REFLECTIVE WINDOW GLAZING I SHALL BE PROHIBITED THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT. N 0 N m ? -j. -j. m 1 1/2" DEEP FABRICATED ALUMINUM CHANNEL • ? ._ PAINTED \ I ._ it, ._ REMOTE LED POWER SUPPLY WITH P I DISCONNECT SWITCH • 0 LOW VOLTAGE WIRE III 3/16" CLEAR LEXAN WITH WHITE DIFFUSER FILM INCOMING PRIMARY CIRCUIT BY OTHERS . �M, WHITE LED ILLUMINATION 3500K ' • #10 SCREW AND SHIELDS TYP (3) PER LTR. WITH a I 1/2" SPACER PAINTED TO MATCH HALL ly„ HALL - (V.I.F.) -1 -1 \GROUND PLR. LN. 0, • SIGNAGE ON BUILDING SCALE: 1" = l'-0" - / • 3/8" THICK ALUMINUM LETTERS WITH LETTERS a WITH PAINT FINISH LL R 3" SQUARE ALUMINUM TUBE LIGHTBAR WITH 3500K Ho WHITE LED ILLUMINATION AND CLEAR LEXAN LENS. o (OR APPROVED EQUAL ■ III E o It g oa STEEL AWNING .c co CO o W o s r m co o Q O 3 • a wi. south - right elevation Ci SIGNAGE ON AWNING DSCALEa : 1/8" = 1' 0" / SCALE: 1" = l'-0" _ / c o .c Q , a CO N 0 m 0 > O o C N UEl o Q 5128 slanston dove suis 110 ifit scours hills �al�to�n�a �� �� building elevations 0a Q� 8183830037 t 8183830018 scale: as noted NEARON ENTERPRISE comLOin H c w ii,di HOD science drive T moorpark, california Q apcw coa g apn # 512-0-2H0-085 CO 0 EXTERIOR FINISHES I STOREFRONT TINTED GLASS 1/4" SOLEX x 1/2" AIR x 1/4" CLEAR NO LOW 'E' COATING 1" INSULATED GLASS ALTERNATE - ADD LOW 'E' COATING • 2 SPANDREL GLASS 1/4" SOLEX TO MATCH STOREFRONT GLASS 5 CONCRETE PANEL ACCENT COLOR: PAINTED TO MATCH "DUNN EDWARDS" ■ DE-6561 "BABY SEAL" & 6 2 1 0 0 q 1 , © 0 12 8 © 6 1 \ :.• 4. CONCRETE PANEL ACCENT COLOR: aillill _______ "Is I'I lledCuIMI a1 lel I 'm— aREEMMEl - . -1. 171"1. PAINTED TO MATCH "DUNN EDWARDS" _ �■r���/r�r+ TEN.ANT DE-6335 "NOVELTY NAVY" ROOF LN. 1 `~ 1�1-y- ROOF LN. - - CONCRETE PANEL FIELD COLOR ` • Ea N - PAINTED TO MATCH "DUNN EDWARDS" DE-6374 • ■ il ■ "SILVER POLISH" 6 CONCRETE PANEL FIELD COLOR PAINTED TO MATCH "DUNN EDWARDS" r+ o v DE-6311 "SILVER LAKE" • i - 1 I w w I _ al a =ice N_ m MEZZANINE FLR. LN. 7 HORIZONTAL CORRUGATED METAL ■ CM i I l l 1 - 8 ROOF TOP MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT I _ . MIS S N l NOT TO EXCEED BUILDING PARAPET HEIGHT. • I ;Kr01 STOREFRONT FRAMES: • 2" x 4 1/2" CLEAR ANODIZED ALUMINUM • • It ` • � 4 ,I I 1 1 ■ • • GROUND FLR. LN. I . _ I V GROUND FLR. LN. 1 O MAN DOOR • a • • $ \ • • PAINTED TO MATCH "DUNN EDWARDS" DEG-166 "STEVEARENO BEIGE" 14 13 5 10 6 13 q q I 13 10 6 5 II ROLLI DOOR I PAINTEO MATCH "DUNN EDWARDS" DEG--16TEVEARENO BEIGE" • 12 BUILDSIGNAGE HALO LEVERSE CHANNEL LETTERS PER DE # c NOTE: PER SEPARATE PERMIT 13 STEEWNINGnorth - left elevation C 1442" HGUARD RAIL SCALE: 1/8" = l'-0" ROOF DRAIN AND OVERFLOW ■ 5 WITHIN THE BUILDING 16 BUILDING SIGNAGE 3/8" THICK ALUMINUM LETTERS WITH PAINT FINISH PER DETAIL # d NOTE: SIGN PER SEPARATE PERMIT ■ ELEVATION NOTES NOTE: I. ALL EXTERIOR GLASS INDICATED WITH OT TO BE TEMPERED GLASS. • 2. PAINT COLORS REFERENCED FROM "DUNN EDWARDS" 5 13 6 8 6 5 iE, I 6 1 0 13 0 COLOR SYSTEM. • 3. ALL DOORS, FRAMES, FLASHING, DRIPS, VENTS, CAPS, SCUPPERS, ROLL-UP DOORS, ETC. TO BE PAINTED SAME COLOR AS ADJACENT WALL COLOR. 1•:t - - -_ - 4. ALL ACCENT REVEALS TO BE PAINTED ON THE P • P 7 • • FLAT BOTTOM SURFACE ONLY WITH THE ACCENT ROOF LN. ■ s ROOF LN. I m I 5. APPLY ANTI-GRAFFITI COATING TO 1'-O" A.F.F. 1 • • • AT ALL EXTERIOR CONCRETE PANELS. rtmr.:=1 F6. PROVIDE BUILDING ADDRESS. VERIFY LOCATION, 1 + SIZE AND STYLE WITH LOCAL JURISDICTION.ern= W� �. .1 • a 1. THE USE OF HIGHLY REFLECTIVE WINDOW GLAZING SHALL BE PROHIBITED THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT. • fl O • ll 1- 1 1/2" DEEP FABRICATED ALUMINUM CHANNEL \ I m • • •tilaillit -Lie • PAINTED Mr 1 11.11 MEZZANINE FLR. LN. IF REMOTE LED POWER SUPPLY WITH _...__. I 1 1.1DISCONNECT SWITCH • + • IMAMLOW VOLTAGE WIRE qm i 3/16" CLEAR LEXAN WITH WHITE DIFFUSER FILM A it'qiNic D_ 7. aNie INCOMING PRIMARY CIRCUIT BY OTHERS . t- —r WHITE LED ILLUMINATION 3500K ' #10 SCREW AND SHIELDS TYP (3) PER LTR. WITH a " ' • I/2" SPACER PAINTED TO MATCH WALL vi, i i - -_ = \` WALL (V.1.F.) GROUND FLA. LN. _ - I I I ill _ ` GROUND FLA. LN. 14 10 14 H H114 11 11 1Q SIGNAGE ON BUILDING SCALE: 1" = l'-0" - / m 3/8" THICK ALUMINUM LETTERS WITH LETTERS a WITH PAINT FINISH 0 a 3" SQUARE ALUMINUM TUBE LIGHTBAR WITH 3500K 0 WHITE LED ILLUMINATION AND CLEAR LEXAN LENS. o (OR APPROVED EQUAL) I ■ PL N co o STEEL AWNING � 'c o E W o s r m as o Q O 3 a id E w east - rear elevation C1- SIGNAGE ON AWNING d , o SCALE: 1/8" = V-0" _ / SCALE: 1" = V-0" _ / c o 6 Q a (0N N 0 m 0 N C O o CDN U Q7 c 5128 rlareton drove suits 110 age��ra hills eal1tern�a �� �� building elevations L. o tiPP 28183830037 f 818 584 0018 scale: as noted NEARON ENTERPRISE cocochco-H U pkarchltsrturenet HOD science drive in U 0 moorpark, california Q aCO t apn # 512-0-2H0-085 0 gr d d 5 gr 5 6 b 2 3 a (t`,: ,z, !li _;iiiiiiiiiiiiiiir de-6361 baby seal steel awning dark glass dunn edwards • K , 1 Y rte r _ - S� b� _ _.-IL, ._ • s _______ _____, __ .._._ 4._ r ____ • _ _ ,=_ gni . . . view from east side de-564 eames for blue storefront mullions spandrel glass dunn edwards d c 3 b 4 1 3 a 5 d c 1 L . 7 1111111111 • 4 _-�` 1 de-637H silver polish • r dunn edwards architectural metal siding -.--T-1 I "s 4 y d . • view at main entrance de-6379 silver lake bike rack dunn edwards FIPI material board : NERRON ENTERPRISE 1-100 science drive. moorpark. ca (- C _ CO EX/STING CANOPY TREE TO BE REMOVED Gleditsia tricanthos/Honey Locust liri‘ and replaced with canopy tree EXISTING CANOPY TREE TO BE REMOVED Ulmus pare/flora/Evergreen Elm and replaced with canopy tree ACCENT CANOPY TREE FOUNDATION SHRUB ACCENT TREE AT BUILDING ENTRY =, Os % ORNAMENTAL BOULDERS / • EX/STING CANOPY TREE TO BE PROTECTED \-\\--: and decorative cobble groundcover0*4, Ulmus parviflora/Evergreen Elm :i 4 10!"-, LI_ 4 EXISTING CANOPY TREE TO BE REMOVED Ulmus parviflora/Evergreen Elm EXISTING CONIFER TR TO BE PROTECTEi � � Pinus canariensis/Canary Isl.•d Pine — I ACCENT CANOPY TREE SHRUB GROUNDCOVER . e'tA �I /4,40.w.f♦ ''• , FLOWER/NG GROUNDCOVER FOUNDATION SHRUB Ip 44..!....!./ :� � � 114 • 4. �����'' ® PARKING LOT FOUNDATION PLANTING AT PERIMETER WALL EX/STING FIRE BACKFLOW � w��♦14,7) \ �AND METERS •* / . ,- 't1b#1.64 �•• •�® ® ; SUCCULENT GROUNDCOVER 4.. „„,,-. , 1 NAT/VE SCREEN SHRUB #v ;� :���®'`��� ���♦��\® 1 �I ACCENT SHRUBS /at AA, TALL SCREENING CANOPY TREE V 114 :: 4/,. • • . t4 !! 1111 I NARROW CANOPY TREE IN PERIMETER PLANTERS EX/STING CANOPY TREE ON ADJACENT PROPS" TO BE PROTECTED o Eucalyptus sideroxylon 'Rosea'/Red Ironbark �; EX/STING CANOPY TREE ON ADJACENT PROPERTY ' PARKINGLOT CANOPY TREE IN FINGER TO BE PROTECTED �• . O C O G PLANTERS Ulmus parvifolia/Evergreen Elm 1; m 1 ,I AI t;L Aw --___\ .... '*"Niumileft, • 447\A:4146_4' „, 1 EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT Alr , Ail /2/ \ 1 EXISTING LIGHT POLE, TYPICAL Aar Alr V / / ‘N‘ EX/STING PARK/NG LOT FOUNDATION PLANTING AT PER/METER WALL III COO • AI AMI AI Al#19, Aro IV /II II Al/ Al/ Air 4 AV AMPF 4 ) Aw Air IV AV ® Aar AI PARKING LOT FOUNDATION PLANTING AT PERIMETER WALL III IV III II o AMI AI AI AMI i AI 1 Air. AT io 0 r ) g _ III Arr_/ / �/ AI AI b 4 TI: A I r 0 i- 1 -' III _ • /III /II �_ AI AlW Al/ III 4EL 0 Alw NE 0 . eNN\ , , 0 , , Mr 4 Al/ III III O ® ° _*. III AI 4. 4 IV 4111111- \, / AI gi v t” III Ari______, O NE\ /I/ % P,44Awilfff#41 `MI\ AMI A ...._ 8 ...-_-704 �_ _� III OCk1014 O G G G G 1��1� G NEIN _ rrApIrr4G mc mc G G G G G G G , ck) \PW AV r... A _4) - ..141... ... IIIIIICII IE Aar III Nil ° C1014 N IV J - AI iiiii , AMI 0 N 11111 NIN i , � � � � Scale: * ..., // No. AMI \ II II \ \ \ I 0 �„= 30' 0 15 30 60 PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN Job Number: 17.007 � Date: 09.06.17 NEARON ENTERPRISES 202 East Cota Street Santa Barbara, CA 93101 1 .....1~ • 200 SCIENCE DRIVE tel 805.962.9055 ' ' • fax 805.962.5658 M E J R PA R K CA arcadiastudio.com landscape architectur wing Name: I larcadia I Projects 12017 Projects 117.007 Nearon Enterprises 117.007 Cad 117.007 In Progress I Nearon Enterprises(sheets I Prelimininary Landscape Plan I PL-1 Preliminary Landscape Plan.dwg Plot date: 2017-09-06 2:02 PM THIS ISA COPYRIGHTED DOCUMENT AND MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED IN PART OR WHOLE WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION OFARCADIA STUDIO INC. COPYRIGHT, 0 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP No. L OCA TED IN THE CITY OF MOORPARK, COUNTY OF VENTURA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA 4 W O UTILITY NOTES EXISTING & PROPOSED LOT AREAS TITLE REPORT NOTES: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: EXISTING PARCEL 8: 435,416 SQ. FT. 10.0 ACRES THE EXCEPTIONS IN ADDITION TO THE PRINTED EASEMENTS AND EXCLUSIONS AS SHOWN IN FIRST AMERICAN ALL THAT CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF VENTURA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: CABLE TV PHONE TITLE COMPANY PRELIMINARY REPORT ORDER N0. NCS-761404-CC DATED NOVEMBER 12, 2015 ARE DELINEATED TIME WARNER CABLE ATTPROPOSED LOT "1 SQ. FT. 780 ACRES HEREON UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED: PARCEL 8 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 3828, IN THE CITY OF MOORPARK, COUNTY OF VENTURA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP FILED 2323 TELLER ROAD 3851 OVERLAND AVENUE 339,803IN BOOK 38, PAGES 1 THROUGH 5, INCLUSIVE OF PARCEL MAPS, AND AS AMENDED IN BOOK 38, PAGE 39 OF PARCEL MAPS, IN THE NEWBURY PARK CALIFORNIA 91320 CULVER CITY, CALIFORNIA 90232 PROPOSED LOT 2": 95,613 SQ. FT. 2.19 ACRES OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY. (888) 892-2253 (310) 559-2019 EXCEPT ONE HALF OF 27/40771.5 INTEREST OF ALL OIL AND MINERAL RIGHTS BELOW 500 FEET FROM THE SURFACE, BUT WITHOUT WATER: ELECTRIC 82541 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. O5 AN EASEMENTFOR PUBLIC S77LlTY AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, RECORDED JULY 26, 1984 AS INSTRUMENT No. THE RIGHT OF SURFACE ENTRY AS RESERVED IN THE DEED RECORDED SEPTEMBER 11, 1963 AS DOCUMENT NO. 53165 IN BOOK VENTURA WATERWORKS DISTRICT/1 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2390, PAGE 306 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS 6767 SPRING ROAD P.O. BOX 800 IN FAVOR OF.: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY 2 6767 RCALIFORNIA 93021 ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA 91770 AFFECTS: AS DESCRIBED THEREIN ALSO EXCEPT ONE HALF OF 13/40THS INTEREST OF ALL OIL AND MINERAL RIGHTS BELOW DEPTH OF 500 FEET BELOW THE SURFACE, OO 378-3005K, CALL 655-4555LIBUT WITHOUT THE RIGHT OF SURFACE ENTRY AS RESERVED IN THE DEED RECORDED OCTOBER 17, 1963 AS DOCUMENT NO. 61148, N (805) (800) O6 AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC UTILITIES AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, RECORDED NOVEMBER 15, 1984 AS IN BOOK 2410, PAGE 561 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. INSTRUMENT No. 128300 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY SEWER ALSO EXCEPT 25% OF ALL OIL, MINERALS, COAL, OIL, PETROLEUM, GAS, ASPHALTUM AND KINDRED SUBSTANCES, NOW OR HEREAFTER P.O. BOX C VENTURA WATERWORKS DISTRICT 11 IN FAVOR OF.: PACIFIC BELL IN OR UNDER SAID LAND BELOW A DEPTH OF 500 FEET FROM THE SURFACE THEREOF, WITHOUT THE RIGHT OF SURFACE ENTRY AS • MONTEREY PARK, CALIFORNIA 6767 SPRING ROAD AFFECTS: AS DESCRIBED THEREIN RESERVED IN THE DEED RECORDED DECEMBER 20, 1966 IN BOOK 3081, PAGE 337 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. 2 (800) 305-8261 MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA 93021CO (805) 378-3005 APIC• 512-0-240-085 SUBJECT ° THE EFFLCTS OF TAXES AND ASSESSMENTS, LIENS, OIL & GAS LEASES, WAIVERS, TERMS AND PROVISIONS, INTERESTS, VICINITY MAP: PROPERTY cv la-- THE CLAIMS OR UNRECORDED LEASES AS DISCLOSED BY ITEM NO'S 1-3, AND 7-9 ARE NOT SHOWN ON THIS SURVEY. M FLOOD ZONE NOTES: 7� QFLOOD ZONE.• A0-3' L . _ It s U CC Q l'COMMUNITY NAME: � I .,i . ". r . _ - OMOORPARK, Cl1Y OF COMMUNITY NUMBER.• 060712 .. r 1~ s /r F' ir J ii': , • i ; WU MAP NUMBER: 06111C0836E ,1 Y a /r _1.. ..z • f T� a � c pb / U MAP DATE JANUARY 20, 2010 / ' ,�'--� 1� O ZONE AO: l „,.; .:,I,. , f { ,.�_.,_. t. Z N AREAS SUBJECT TO INUNDATION BY 1-PERCENT-ANNUAL-CHANCE SHALLOW FLOODING (USUALLY SHEET v.- -�! p f ��� om` ,. = SJ Q FLOW ON SLOPING TERRAIN) WHERE AVERAGE DEPTHS ARE BETWEEN ONE AND THREE FEET. AVERAGE FLOOD .4 J ' , - _ ; TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP No. � _ _ _ MATCH LINE — SEE RIGHT — — - - — _ O / MEZZANINE: • �° HC LOCATED IN THE CITY OF MOORPARK, COUNTY OF VENTURA, STATE OF woo / .,2,500 S.F. ��° HC41 Z CALIFORNIA w ° ' = cz - G�CMMH ' 'a1 s. / — J W �C •BFP %% digi 50 I Ct. / � WV BFP t IMP tri cco ® I :� B•/ �.� B ...... — WV / „ 'la \1 o SDMH 2 w �' sQy / BUILDING "B" �C ssMH FOOTPRINT: 32,830 S.F. • G oW o / MEZZANINE =: 2,500 S.F./1; TOTAL: 35,330i T.)iii i " / mss. y� __ / / c", ��,° LOT 2 I i 0 / / ,, / -9 J 95,613 SQ. U. ! / II N o11� Cod :'.� 2.19 ACRES 1\ I jlit G• cN / <il / o / 7 i CC INT se / ��� /GF �� Z 77........ / 4 II\A --, A 03 i „ / w �o`fi \ II It 'in 1 / LOT 2 — <z_/ �B ' 95,613 SQ. FT1 03 / °/ # : ti ' I / , 2.19 ACRES °;211-EIG- TH2 _ �' / / � re ���� GM \ 'N.* / AD �' 0 ® r. D— — S w " / ;Le/ — aMATCH LINE — SEE LEFT •z/ n 4 °° �' / ,' �' O o / / /s/ / e��// wv T ,`itcN / LEGEND:IM AT// / '- 4 — — PROPERTY/BOUNDARY LINE Q 01 / "' (Si� — — STREET R/W LINE ; Q P NSC? ;l/ ®WM CNO / � BUILD/NG SETBACK J CC lX / ^ / / 4 — CENTER LINE / WV / / `�S ASPHALT ® U O O �/ EASEMENT / •,� PR5 '96- PARKING X CHAIN LINK FENCEEDGE OF ASPHALT PAVING Q V WV C �a /GLOTyBUILD/NG FOOPR/NT LINEZQ' :.% IV? WALL (SIZE VARIES) ; W V / ♦4� F' / AD AREA DRAIN Y PROPOSED L LINE -+ / ��jr g1�� is I B BOLLARD CC 4, 1 EPB ELECTRICAL PULL BOX Q O Q z ® FP FLAG POLE Po 5•, �� pLaGC�Cd s N A Z N ,,� oy,• M �. FH ARE HYDRANT O �� of / 3 PM w LT LIGHT 0 / 'V / \� ‘/s / i ei BFP BACKFLOW PREVENTER / ,0P�4h�1 B IS IRRIGATION BOX WATER VALVE ,♦ 18/1// / LOT 1 M # 4 /V IRRIGATION VALVE / 339,803 SQ. U. orj 4 AD �y ® UV UnumVALUE 7.80 ACRES o P N \ I B ®D 1 WM WATER METER iu .� 9 /IB / / / N 0 GM GAS METER / / NC) N' ' / / / WP } N. Si A SSMH SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE CMMH COMMUNICATION MANHOLE 200 SCIENCE DRIVE - / V ik SDMH STORM DRAIN MANHOLE / Z �5 c?` / PP POWER POLE SINGLE STORY / TS TRAFFIC SIGNAL / MANUFACTURING FACILITY AD / / PAS 75P8 TRAFFIC SIGNAL PULLBOX O to / WITH SECOND STORY GC / A I MBX MAILBOX ." CI) / tie / OFFICE COMPONENT .4 } / 1t / �� FDC UB UIRLITYEBOXU.1 ist TMENT CONNECnON / HCMC HANDICAP PARKING SPACE MOTORCYCLE.� / 102,260 SQ. FT.f � / �� B ® / pRQ�� / gi 74 �'�n �_ STD NG SPACE STANDARD PARKING SPACE(5) �U co il > / / Ury f'Ly EASTERLY Q CC / // / /6 F1 N. / / r e W F WEST FACE kl...PROPERTY LINE Q / .�/� / FP N / �� / N / ® /DI*, j W >- Q 5R / N AD / �� / P� sr v / •� k- / // q / Mex n 9�° 04 v / - N 56'31'26" v / .� s ��o�� / BLu 4 75.01N. Q oIBbtesi1 CC 0 it WV ,/,( �° // / F BIBN IV S, CONCRETE WALK 8 CO P T � il\ilLE: W , N/cK a cnMP'cT / �� 9 i �/ �� .TD MC MC ,_� I C7 / W i , co \HC HC ` on bl o s .• .� B 2 Q �, 2 S 5 R��55 6' �55 R 2� 4 �o / 7 C ole T _ VB c,��D / Ig °O -� �F •/ Lr �o oil lob 2S UV S 9.0 ��� le 8 ST)ND'RD Na1 Q. WV ' / / �\/ G / AFH 6 'TAMARA 8 ST°NDA'D �S a 72" 55 S `>. y IB IV EPB \ C_, 2s / O C'' N /V 8 ST°NDA'D - 1, N j 90 ' 9�, loc c D 8 STA DA'D Capc / / I 4$ 6/ �FTF. s — GRASS 8 ST'NDA'D - it 1 / 19' AD IoB N B a °.IVIB 2 S �� ASPHALT ® o I, g 16' '`' ASPHALT .W o •TO IB 5 '� PARKING AD ti 0 19 7 PARKING '2� S o N �P5 LOT z i�" O / W4, /�z1" / Air �� '� LOT Po G s G D �� • 0 oe' / B 404 9,6) 11 S'ANI RD ide Fr � g N co / B1STNDA'D IB°1 Hm / fr ' /5" 5 �R� 55 .7 _______________ `Vy0 ��� S�AN4ARe B 9 •TANJARP m p�//4" 4D G� ♦ �� �O .. 'R GRASS Ric /00 ST'ND'"D 101 W N Q 7'rr ,p�^^`�' /IB r 9�Ga / Lr 9 ANnARe ® "' OS N O 9 / / SD i/ / S� 09 ♦ / O g9 0 / 99 99 °IB GRAS IB 0 oIB GRASS EPB AD I cc03 c o ww / s GRASS 4 I - / S , "CK (4, o 0 40 80 20 � T V S 10 SP ND'RD co ti MM' c,��'T10 STNDDIL LD — - - =0GRASS ( -- _ REAR SETBACK _10 STA DA'D 20 60_ 510.96's— _ _ SCALE: 1"=40'z STANDARD 1 S `ND'R — _ — � — — —il — _552 11 S ANSARG — _TSPS R=2930.00' - — — — LT GRASS t4 L=98.75' (R1) — — _ — GRASS 10' REAR SETBAC — __ _ N 56°31'26" E V PP TSPe � --- N 59'58'26" W 235.54' Off°TS �TSPB S • I �TSPB S t 10 rp O SSMH o {S 2 Os ^ {S TSPB TSPB TS rSPB TS TS rSPB ®®TSPB SPB Ln co A EqADWV CURVE TABLE 2 `� ._ —/ CURVE DELTA RADIUS LENGTH Ci 46' 59' 09" 40.00' 32.80' (� — C2 37 17" 29" 525.00' 341.70' v — NEW_ LOS ANGELES AVENUE _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 2 4= 71;751" R- 0003 0 0 L=379.48' (R i) — — - �_. I11 FD. SSM PER 25CR75; FD. MONUMENT 0.94' NORTH - N 61' 18' 52" E (RI) 1233.45' (RI) W EASTERLY OF RECORD INTERSECTION OF NEW LOS ANGELES AVENUE AND SCIENCE DRIVE BEARING N 47 14' 20" E SHEEP I TPM-02 erisho,ed\docoments\7 723 neuron enterprises\plonning\tentotiveA7723—tpm-02dwg — 70/3/2077 9:02:49 AM