HomeMy WebLinkAboutAG RPTS 2017 1204 PR REG aK
°mo4i CITY OF MOORPARK
_ 6o-.
v,��� PARKS,RECREATION&COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPT. 1799 Moorpark Avenue,Moorpark,CA 93021
(, Main City Phone Number(805)517-6200 I Fax(805)532-2550 I moorpark@moorparkCA.gov
1\4...e
.. G •
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
DECEMBER 4, 2017
6:30 P.M.
Moorpark Community Center 799 Moorpark Avenue
1. CALL TO ORDER:
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
3. ROLL CALL:
4. SPECIAL AGENDA ITEMS:
5. PUBLIC COMMENTS:
6. REORDERING OF, AND ADDITIONS TO, THE AGENDA:
(Items to be pulled from the Consent Calendar shall be identified under this section)
7. ANNOUNCEMENTS, FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS AND REPORTS ON
MEETINGS/CONFERENCES ATTENDED BY COMMISSIONERS:
8. PRESENTATIONS/ACTION/DISCUSSION:
A. Consider Splash Pad at Arroyo Vista Community Park. Staff Recommendation:
Recommend to the City Council that a splash pad should not be considered at
AVCP or any other City park at this time. (Staff: Jeremy Laurentowski)
B. Consider Recreation Programs Cost Recovery Summary Fiscal Year 2016-17.
Staff Recommendation: Provide feedback on cost recovery report and direct staff
to present the report to the City Council. (Staff: Stephanie Anderson)
9. CONSENT CALENDAR:
A. Approval of Minutes for the Parks and Recreation Commission Park Tour
Meeting of November 4, 2017. Staff Recommendation: Approve as presented.
10. ADJOURNMENT:
Posted: 12/1/2017
All writings and documents provided to the majority of the Commission regarding all agenda items are available for public
inspection at the City Hall public counter located at 799 Moorpark Avenue during regular business hours.The agenda packet for all
regular Commission meetings is also available on the City's website at www.moorparkca.gov.
JANICE S PARVIN ROSEANN MIKOS,PhD DAVID POLLOCK KEN SIMONS MARK VAN DAM
Mayor Councilmember Councilmember Councilmember Councilmember
Parks and Recreation Commission
December 4, 2017
Page 2
Any member of the public may address the Commission during the Public Comments portion of the Agenda, unless it is a
Discussion item. Speakers who wish to address the Commission concerning a Discussion item must do so during the Discussion
portion of the Agenda for that item. Speaker cards must be received by the Recording Secretary for Public Comment prior to the
beginning of the Public Comments portion of the meeting; and for a Discussion item, prior to the Chair's call for speaker cards for
each Discussion agenda item. A limitation of three minutes shall be imposed upon each Public Comment and Discussion item
speaker. Written Statement Cards may be submitted in lieu of speaking orally for Discussion items. Any questions concerning any
agenda item may be directed to the Parks and Recreation Department at 517-6227.
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to review an agenda or participate in this
meeting, including auxiliary aids or services,please contact the Parks and Recreation Department at(805)517-6227. Upon request,
the agenda can be made available in appropriate alternative formats to persons with a disability. Upon advance notification of the
need for disability-related modification or accommodation, reasonable arrangements will be made by City.staff to provide
accessibility to the meeting(28 CFR 35.102-35.104;ADA Title II).
Parks and Recreation Commission
December 4, 2017
Page 3
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF VENTURA ) ss
CITY OF MOORPARK )
AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING
I, Blanca Garza, declare as follows:
That I am the Deputy City Clerk of the City of Moorpark and that an agenda of the Regular
Meeting of the Parks and Recreation Commission of the City 'of Moorpark to be held on
Monday, December 4, 2017, at 6:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Moorpark
Community Center, 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, California, was posted on December 1,
2017, at a conspicuous place at the Moorpark Community Center, 799 Moorpark Avenue,
Moorpark, California.
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed on December 1, 2017.
Blanca Garza, Deputy City Clerk
ITEM 8.A.
MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA REPORT
TO: The Honorable City Council
FROM: Jeremy Laurentowski, Parks and Recreation Director
DATE: November 27, 2017 (Meeting of December 4, 2017)
SUBJECT: Consider Splash Pad at Arroyo Vista Community Park
BACKGROUND & DISCUSSION
This item was presented to the Parks and Recreation Commission (Commission) on
February 2, 2015. Agenda Item 8.A has been included as an attachment to this report
for your review.
On February 2, 2015, the Commission concurred with staffs recommendation that a
splash pad at the east side of Arroyo Vista Community Park (AVCP) would be the
preferred location for the future splash pad, as the site is large enough to accommodate
a splash pad and the necessary equipment enclosure. It allows ample room for
expansion of the splash pad if warranted in the future, and there are no use conflicts
with future planned projects. The area is within close proximity to existing amenities,
such as restrooms, shade trees, a large picnic pavilion with bar-b-ques, a playground
and a concession building, as well as ample parking. The area also allows for the
opportunity to install additional shade structures that could be rented to generate a
source of revenue, as well as additional bar-b-q's and picnic tables.
FISCAL IMPACT
Staff believes that the construction of a splash pad designed to serve 100 park users at
any given time is appropriate. This equates to a splash pad area of approximately 2,500
sq. ft., with a 2,000 sq. ft. wetted area. Staff has determined that a splash pad of this
size will cost approximately $420,000 to construct. This includes the splash pad area
and associated equipment. It should be noted that according to the maintenance staff
at Rancho Simi Recreation and Parks District (RSRPD) and several maintenance
contractors that staff contacted regarding splash pad maintenance, the splash pad filter
system and water storage tanks should be increased in size to help decrease the
frequency of maintenance procedures throughout the year. RSRPD staff advised City
staff that due to the popularity of their splash pad, significantly more users utilize the
1
Parks and Recreation Commission
December 4, 2017
Page 2
splash pad on a daily basis than they had originally anticipated. The high use causes
the filters to clog with sunblock and other miscellaneous debris, and requires frequent
maintenance and staff time to keep the system running without down time. RSRPD
services their equipment five times a week and requires 4 hours of staff time for each
service. RSRPD's filters and holding tanks are sized to accommodate the minimum
number of users for the size of their splash pad zone. However, according to several
maintenance contractors, the installation of larger filters and holding tanks will reduce
the frequency of service visits to two or three times a week, and will reduce the service
time to approximately two hours each visit. Approximately $40,000 has been included
in the preliminary budget for this type of equipment upgrade.
Most agencies operate a splash pad seven days a week from Memorial Day through
Labor Day, and on weekends from April through early May, and the end of September
through October. Staff has obtained preliminary maintenance costs associated with this
type of amenity from several maintenance contractors and has determined that a splash
pad will cost the City approximately $4,750/month to maintain, or $38,000 annually.
The annual maintenance cost is based on an 8-month operating season, with the
addition of selected weekends. Included in this cost are certain annual maintenance
procedures, such as replacing filter systems and ultra violet lights, rebuilding gear drives
and other costs associated with the actual splash pad amenities. The City of Moorpark
typically contracts for these types of services and staff will obtain competitive bids for
the maintenance work required to sustain the splash pad.
In addition, staff has estimated that approximately 20,000 gallons of water will be
required annually due to evaporation, filling the tanks at the beginning of each season
and other factors during normal use. This is equivalent to approximately $500/month or
$4,000 annually at current water rates. AVCP has two wells within close proximity to
the recommended splash pad location. However staff does not feel that there would be
an opportunity to utilize the well water for this type of use. Based on preliminary
discussions with the splash pad manufacturers, well water may increase long term
maintenance costs due to the fact that the water is high in minerals and may
prematurely clog filters, spray nozzles and cause premature wear on the operating
system. Additionally, the Pool Code requires potable water to serve certain types of
water features where the water is misted or atomized. Staff has also estimated that it
would require an approximately $12,000 per year in electrical costs. It should be noted
that the maintenance contractor has suggested that an additional $10,000/annually will
be required after the first three years of use to cover the costs of wear and tear on the
splash pad water features and equipment.
Accounting for all the required maintenance procedures, water and electrical costs, the
total cost to operate the splash pad is approximately $54,000 per year, for the first three
years. After the first three years, the annual costs to operate the splash pad would be
increased to approximately $64,000 due to wear on the system components. It should
also be noted that water and electrical costs will most likely continue to rise. Ventura
2
Parks and Recreation Commission
December 4, 2017
•
Page 3
County Waterworks District No. 1 has recently stated that we can expect a 7% increase
in water rates over the next five consecutive years. As a comparison, RSRPD budgets
$100,000 annually to operate their splash pad with in-house staff. RSRPD believes that
the high maintenance costs are due to inadequate equipment and poor initial design of
the system components.
Additionally, this project would require the development of landscape plans to design
the splash pad area. Staff estimates that design fees will cost approximately $35,000
and that the remainder of the site work, which includes walkways, benches, picnic
tables and shade structures, will cost approximately $125,000. This would bring the total
budget for the splash pad project to approximately $580,000.
Currently, there is an aggregate total of approximately $2,523,289 in the Park
Improvement Funds to fund certain park related projects. The Park Improvement Zones
(Zones) have recently been changed from three zones totwo Zones that encompass two
geographic areas within the City's boundary. There is also a Community Wide Park
Improvement Zone. The Zones were originally established by the City Council in 1986
to account for the collection of park fees in lieu of land dedication, consistent with the
Quimby Act for residential subdivisions. The fund also includes fees collected from
apartments, commercial, industrial, and institutional buildings (unless exempt). The City
Council adopted a policy in which 60% of the fees collected in the Park Improvement
Fund would be used for neighborhood park facilities and 40% for community park
facilities. Funding from the Park Improvement Fund can only be used for improvement
projects that are located within the boundaries of the geographic area defined by the
individual Zone. However, funding from the Community Wide Zone can be used for
park facilities and improvements that benefit the City as a whole. These typically
include projects at AVCP or other projects that provide equal benefit to all residents. It
should be noted however, that funding through the Park Improvement Fund is one-time
money and will only be replenished by future development projects within the City.
Currently, there is a balance of approximately $2,500,000 in the Community Wide Park
Improvement Fund (Fund 2010). However, there are several projects that staff feels
should be considered prior to this project. For instance, staff has obtained plans to
install lighting at the soccer and softball fields. The estimated cost for this work is
$2,250,000. Additionally, there is a need to renovate Arroyo Vista Recreation Center
(AVRC) and gym, and potentially expand AVRC to add office space and exercise
rooms. The cost for this work is estimated at $4,600,000. A Capital Improvement
Program (CIP) has recently been presented to the City Council. This document
identifies all future projects planned at AVCP and other City parks, facilities, Landscape
Maintenance Districts and Open Space areas. The combined total for all projects at
AVCP and AVRC is approximately $12,132,700.
The FY 2017/18 budget for park maintenance operations approved by the City Council
is approximately $2,866,041. This represents an increase of approximately 12.9%, as
3
Parks and Recreation Commission
December 4, 2017
Page 4
compared to the FY 2016/17 adopted budget. Revenue generated from the Special
Benefit Assessment, will generate an estimated $797,100, and it is anticipated that the
General Fund will be required to supplement park maintenance operations by
approximately $2,043,941. The Special Benefit Assessment is paid by property owners
that reside within the City limits for park maintenance operations. The City fund for
these assessments is the Park Maintenance Assessment District Fund (2390). As
mentioned previously, the Park Improvement Funds are used to fund certain one-time
park improvement projects and the replacement of certain park equipment as part of the
park maintenance budget.
As mentioned previously, the splash pad would cost approximately $54,000 annually to
operate and maintain during the first three years and it is estimated that maintenance
costs will increase to approximately $64,000 after the first three years. However, any
increases in park maintenance operations will require additional funding from the
General Fund to support such operations. There may be an opportunity to generate a
portion of the revenue needed to sustain the splash pad through paid admission or
rentals of certain facilities, such as gazebos. However, staff does not feel that paid
admission for a facility of this size is appropriate. Generally agencies charge for
admission in larger facilities, such as a community pool or large spray park. These
facilities require a large number of staff to operate, such as lifeguards, facility attendants
and admission staff. Staff estimates that rentals would only cover approximately 25% of
the needed revenue. Therefore, staff does not recommend building a splash pad at
AVCP, or another park in the City at this time.
It should be noted that Moorpark Unified School•District (MUSD) is currently looking at
the option of building a pool on the High School property. The City has made a
commitment to MUSD to provide a portion of the funding required to build the pool. In
exchange, MUSD will open the pool for use by the public during the summer months.
Additionally, MUSD will provide a recreational component to the pool design. Staff
believes that this pool would provide a benefit to the community and provide a similar
amenity to the splash pad.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Recommend to the City Council that a splash pad should not be considered at AVCP or
any other City park at this time.
Attachment: Agenda report from the February 2, 2015 Parks and Recreation
Commission meeting (Item 8.A)
4
ATTACHMENT 1 - ITEM 8.A. FEBRUARY 2, 2015 P&R COMMISSION MEETING
ITEM 8.A
CITY OF MOORPARK
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT
TO: The Parks and Recreation Commission
FROM: Jeremy Laurentowski, Parks and Recreation Director
DATE: January 29, 2015 (Meeting of February 2, 2015)
SUBJECT: Consider Location for Splash Pad at Arroyo Vista Community Park
(AVCP)
BACKGROUND
The Parks and Recreation Master Plan prepared by Moore lacofano Goltsman, Inc. in .
2009, identifies deficiencies as they relate to park grounds and infrastructure. Section
3.7 of the Master Plan, Facility Needs Analysis, identifies a list of park facilities that
were requested by the community and that reflect the current trends in park and
recreation facility development established by the National Recreation and Parks
Association (NRPA). According to Table 3.1 of the Master Plan, a splash/water play
pool (splash pad), is a facility that is desirable and should be available to the residents
of Moorpark. With a current population size of 35,000 residents, the City of Moorpark
should have two splash pads within the City park system per NRPA standards.
In recognition of this recommendation, a water spray attraction has been on the City
Council's adopted Goals and Objectives for several years. It is listed in the current
document, approved May 21, 2014, under Section V:
V. Reinforce and enhance Moo►park's attractive community character and
safeguard it's desirable resources
7. Select location, design, and construct a water spray attraction at one or
more selected City parks."
On August 26, 2013, staff presented to the Parks and Recreation Commission
(Commission) a list of criteria that should be considered when evaluating possible
locations for a future splash pad, such as visibility, parking, environmental exposure,
existing facilities, etc., and the Commission determined that Arroyo Vista Community
Park (AVCP), Tierra Rejada Park, Peach Hill Park, College View Park, and the
downtown area on High Street were the locations that should be considered for this type
of amenity.
5
Parks and Recreation Commission
February 2, 2015
Page 2
On September 28, 2013, the Commission took a tour of the five proposed locations and
on November 4, 2013, the Commission determined that AVCP would be the preferred
location for a splash pad and that several areas surrounding the Arroyo Vista
Recreation Center (AVRC) would be the preferred locations for the splash pad. The
Commission also agreed that College View Park would be a suitable location, but could
not recommend this location until a determination has been made regarding the
proposed development of a fire station by the Ventura County Fire Department on the
north side of the park. In addition, the Commission felt that a splash pad would be
appropriate on High Street if this use could be incorporated into the overall design and
circulation concept for the future redevelopment of the downtown area. However, due
to the uncertainty of City owned properties on High Street, the Commission felt that this
area should be considered at a future date.
It should also be noted that during the November 4, 2013, Commission meeting, the
Commission requested additional information on the different types of water spray
features and confirmation on the type of water feature being considered. Due to the
differences in installation and infrastructure costs, overall maintenance and staffing
costs, and certain potential liabilities, staff feels that a `splash pad', as opposed to a
`water park', is the type of feature being considered at this time. The two water spray
features differ as follows:
According to Wikipedia, "A splash pad is a recreation area, often in a public park, for
water play that has little or no standing water. This is said to eliminate the need for
lifeguards or other supervision ..."
According to Wikipedia, "A water park is an amusement park that features water play
areas, such as water slides, splash pads, spraygrounds (water playgrounds), lazy
rivers, or other recreational bathing, swimming, and barefooting environments."
The major difference between the two types of water spray features is in regards to the
water level of the water feature. Splash pads generally do not have standing water,
thus do not require supervision. Water parks are generally larger water features, with
water depth commonly exceeding 12" and require higher infrastructure costs, staffing
and supervision per current Health and Safety Code requirements.
DISCUSSION
On March 3, 2014, staff presented to the Commission several locations that could be
considered for the future location of the splash pad at AVCP. The sites were selected
based on recommendations by the Commission during the November 4, 2013, meeting,
as well as standard design criteria such as visibility, available parking, proximity to
existing facilities, circulation, and future proposed uses, particularly as they relate to the
areas adjacent to the recreation center. The future uses are shown on Attachments 1
6
Parks and Recreation Commission
February 2, 2015
Page 3
through 5 and consist of an aquatic center, the expansion of the AVRC gym and a
recreational trail system. They are identified below with the related objectives approved
by the City Council for FY 2014/15.
IV.B.1. Consider options for funding construction and maintenance of a
community aquatic facility.
The original master plan for AVCP included an aquatic facility located south/east of the
AVRC gym. The approximate location of the facility is where the existing tennis courts
are currently located. However, in 2002, the City Council approved a conceptual plan,
prepared by Martinez Amador Architects, Inc., for the aquatic facility. The approved
facility location encompasses the majority of the area on the east side of AVRC,
between the recreation center and parking lot B. Due to budgetary constraints, primarily
related to long term maintenance costs, the project was postponed until a partnership
could been established with a local interest group that would commit to the long term
maintenance of the facility. The aquatic facility included a competition lap pool, a small
wading pool for young children, and an auxiliary restroom/concession building. It should
be noted that the splash pad that is being considered in this report is not intended to
replace the future aquatic facility planned for AVCP in the future.
IV.C.1. Expand Arroyo Vista Community Park gym.
The plans and specifications for the gym expansion project were completed in 2007.
The project generally consists of the expansion of the gym area to include a second full
basketball court and bleachers, and encompasses the area east of the existing gym.
V.A.19. Upon formal approval of grant funding, complete design and construct
multi-use trail and road widening and install outdoor exercise equipment at
Arroyo Vista Community Park (AVCP).
The City recently had plans and specifications prepared for the bicycle trail extension
from the pedestrian bridge on the east end of the park, to the connection of the existing
bicycle path north of AVRC along the access road, as well as a one mile recreation trail
that extends around the perimeter of AVCP. The plans and specifications were
approved by City Council on February 5, 2014, and the City has been awarded a Land
and Water Conservation Fund grant from the National Park Service in the amount of
approximately $500,000 to complete this project.
The following options were presented to the Commission on March 3, 2014:
Option A (Attachment 1): The splash pad is located south of the multi-use court and
east of the tennis courts.
7
Parks and Recreation Commission
February 2, 2015
Page 4
Option B (Attachment 2): The splash pad is located where the future pool site is located,
north of the multi-use court.
Option C (Attachment 3): The splash pad is located where the multi-use court is
currently located.
Option D (Attachment 4): The splash pad is centrally located between the gazebo and
tot lot.
Option E (Attachment 5): The splash pad is located north of the Arroyo Vista Recreation
Center (AVRC).
Staffs recommended option for the splash pad location at that time was Option D. Staff
preferred Option D due to its location to compatible uses, such as the picnic pavilion
and playground, and due to the fact that there is ample parking within close proximity.
Staff also preferred this option as it exhibited the least impact on current uses or future
amenities.
The Commission recommended Option E. The Commission preferred this option due to
the fact that the splash pad would be highly visibility as visitors entered the park and
was within close proximity to the restroom facilities at AVRC, as well as the future pool
location. Staff did not feel that this option was ideal, as it would impact recreational
programming, since this area is used on a regular basis by many camp programs, and it
would over-use the space once the pool area was built-out. Staff also felt that the splash
pad would impact parking needed for the recreation center within Lot A, and it would
limit staffs options to expand AVRC if warranted in the future.
However, after further analysis, it is staffs opinion that all the options presented to the
Commission on March 3, 2014, could ultimately create potential future conflicts with the
amenities planned for the areas immediately surrounding AVRC, such as the future
aquatic facility and expansion of the gym. In addition, staff feels that the area to the
north of AVRC should be preserved, as there may be a need to expand AVRC in the
future for additional office space or possibly a teen center. In addition, although the
conceptual plans for the proposed pool were approved by the City Council in 2002,
current trends in pool programming may necessitate a different location for the aquatic-
center, as the original layout and amenities may not be adequate to meet the needs of
the community. These factors will need to be re-evaluated if the aquatic center comes
to fruition. For these reasons, staff does not recommend the installation of the splash
pad at any of the areas surrounding AVRC at this time, as it would conflict with existing
and future uses, and create too much congestion around AVRC, particularly after the
proposed projects are built-out.
In consideration of these factors, staff has determined that an area at the east end of
the park, south west of the Pepper Tree Pavilion would make the ideal location for the
8
Parks and Recreation Commission
February 2, 2015
Page 5
future splash pad (See Attachment 6, Option F). This site is large enough to
accommodate the splash pad and the necessary equipment enclosure. It allows ample
room for expansion of the splash pad and parking, if warranted in the future, and there
are no use conflicts with future projects. In addition, the area is within close proximity to
existing amenities, such as restrooms, shade trees, a large picnic pavilion with
barbecues, a playground and a concession building, as well as ample parking. The
area also allows for the opportunity to install additional shade structures that could be
rented to generate a source of revenue, as well as additional barbecues and picnic
tables.
Staff has contacted several manufacturers that specialize in the construction of splash
pads and has determined that on average, a mid-size splash pad is typically located
within an area approximately 2,500 square feet (s.f.). The industry standard is one user
for every twenty-five square feet. Based on this information, a 2,500 s.f. splash pad can
accommodate up to approximately 100 users at any given time. Staff has also
determined that the structure that houses the pumps and filtration equipment vary in
size, but generally consist of a walled structure approximately 15' x 20'. This size will
generally accommodate three pumps with accessory equipment, such as filters and
piping. Staff has graphically represented the splash pad options shown in Attachments
1 through 6 utilizing these sizes as a general guide for discussion purposes. It should
also be noted, that along with the splash pad, a certain amount of space needs to be
provided for accompanying structures and amenities, such as a shade structures, picnic
tables, shade trees and walkways. In addition, current State code requires that a
recirculating water system, where the water source is filtered and treated in
underground storage tanks and recycled back through the system for use in the facility,
are utilized for this type of amenity.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
1. Recommend to the City Council the splash pad location at the east end of AVCP
as described in the staff report.
Attachments:
1. Option A
2. Option B
3. Option C
4. Option D
5. Option E
6. Option F
9
„,„„r„.....0.`` ARROYO VISTA COMMUNITY PARK ATTACHMENT 1
,,!4„ PROPOSED SPLASH PAD LOCATION
OPTION 'A'
-1 `'4� s. t ;1111.. t i , A�IR A S{3y� 9•; A* w,�'-+ i�ti i '.- I
a.e.1' ��.4:4:-1-1:;-
'� i' � - 1. • t , :.... 1� � Y V f ,.4.- 4 r',
} �$.-r n t FIA,... FUT,RU BICYCLE PATH F � /
' . . F�� ��;5c1 CGESS Rpgp ��
;t.- ..0QraV;'-r 4E�' .. *�' - �- . __ * .-R` .,ii ate- , t, ' ;.
' 4 0-
111111
m n , .1,,,. '••gill)4°1 -�t� ` FUTURE POOL � ��� ,_�
,v,” # /iz. LOCATION /�� / /j . ;) •
Y
o- K
!AVRC ice, ///, f 'T • 'Ail;. 40#4=' "_
L ‘,1-.74t, : �\ 1
_ �a MUL I-USE lk
FUTURE I
k
' i \ WALKWAY
`�/ �it C T /. 4 TO SOFTS v
-n °y Jam•,, ‘10.04% =3Y�„as'i-``�1��� i'.11 q �tj,
I.
/ _ ^ • ., ! ' FUTURE FITNESS/�!�
� - i• '! � � R .' ;�,,' LOOP TRAIL
Virte .� 14 r YG•�UND
�E
- a .y rc c4`
or-
t . - - PROPOSE) PLASH PAD LOCATION
,
4t. ..f" W/SHADE S "UCTURE & PICNIC TABLES
J_,-�"� 4'' . ,.. 1 ,%. _ PROPOSED S PLAS "414
EQUIPMENT ENCLOSURE
City of iMoopark oii. %\
t 799 MOORPARK AVE
( ii�
MOORPARK CA,93021 Siii
PREPARED BY: JEREMY LAURENTOWSKI :CITE 1"=300-0"(APPROX.)
PARKS AND RECREATION DIRECTOR IIIiE February 26,2014
e `'m ARROYO VISTA COMMUNITY PARK ATTACHMENT 2
rr���
PROPOSED SPLASH PAD LOCATION
OPTION 'B'
Fes. ,_,'�, '- d ,,--flat
`iP}�Tkv
y,• T` •t : �� r y,1` 1 1 41 g y.�: w.,
i t K. i 4 k
1
it „'S n s, t o tr'1"4 l. ., F tom- � — I
r+ 4 'i_ "^� *b .''.i '*-'r _ e s' FUTURE BICYCLE PATH
I ; " . .OPOSED SPLASH - - -
4°�i4 LOT
LT sr6 ' n,. LOCATION W/SHADE-
STRUCTURE & PICNIC y a
,,.
1 414' TABLES , „ ,� 1 14
••••• .16 T ' FUTURE.POOL-
ur 1,. a \ .� ,,. 1 . r ' _ f'..1 LOCATION x �lsl / -
3,� :7' - VRC ' ,_ i k aY� � - _ Fir
•
} Y,
�A,;'' :. ` r .rsA1 ` TAULtl-USE ,�
r . ' 1 .4,i4',.;•?''''' 3, \ . FUTURE I
r .� '1- 1, \COUi\T \ WALKWAY ., #
d" fC;Y `1
R� T FT
g 4 + � � s O SOFTBALL FIELDS �'
„S 'r'� FUTURE FITNESS
NT I - , I ,.,.. 1_ LOOP TRAIL
• '54.'''L '''Sr- '''''''''' - -,. -', ' ,, NI.I.'- OURI1S V, '
PROPOSED SPLAS PAD
9
EQUIPMENT ENCLO' , RE 1
City of S loopark Ills F/=�
I 799 MOORPARK AVE SIE
MOORPARK CA,93021
PREPARED BY: JEREMY LAURENTOWSKI :CUE 1"=300'-0"(APPROX.)
PARKS AND RECREATION DIRECTOR
MITE February 26,2014
„rte. ATTACHMENT 3
ARROYO VISTA COMMUNITY PARK
=off ,,.a PROPOSED SPLASH PAD LOCATION cs,
OPTION 'C'
rte 7 ,
,..----.-•,-;.-,---- ,,..„--•,...
-?-- 'y1q”.•r ;, i d' + 6 ilty T � tj +. -�.,,.. � .;..!1 `' I• .,..-1.;:=,,,,'
•
�e�. K ;' plrAtr� -- -_ FUTURE BICYCLE PATH vy.,T/
— �,r
,tits ' FUTURE POOL '% '� �T/J� Ft
:.,. it:Vi 7 , . ,, - LOCATION , r;.7./.. /� B� /
E
'' /////)'''?:':'r.'./t:',.!''.1•'/Y:///,'"""'''. . :':.\.._...-,....r.,..-,,,,r,:,'.' ,..,..._ '___._,. :, .4
j, r .:a .• A .4:56.:, � ♦ -- ' r� ,ION
'
':1 i' :i 4
p.� --t :1)3;1;
V, r� — FUTURE .. e 4,,
:1,, �r"'� ®1tWALKWAY 1a?ry �I � i $ ��. 4 : ?�C ten= \ TO SOFTBALL,f? ,t7 �?
ION
— FUTURE FITNESS
�"'z +. j�L y. eJ LOOP TRAIL
x� $ .� _ e. ..YG UND
'Ti`!' •
, tr ,,� •URTS PROPOSED LASH PAD LOCATION
j3 -f:. ,Ty
: ::' '1d ''' ' ' : W/SHADE STR\ TURE & PICNIC TABLES
.z ,,
! PROPOSED SPLA D-<
,\
� t EQUIPMENT ENCLOS
•
City of Moopark 11171 %\
,tiif 799 MOORPARK AVE
gia
MOORPARK CA,93021
PREPARED BY:JEREMY LAURENTOWSKI ICALE 1"=300'-0"(APPROX.)
PARKS AND RECREATION DIRECTOR
111E February 26,2014
• ATTACHMENT 4
P. -4,
ARROYO VISTA COMMUNITY PARK
��. PROPOSED SPLASH PAD LOCATION M
OPTION 'D'
•
yl'._ � . � . _„ _, 3 �nP ` , — . �Y etii £i e 1 ch , , a_.,.3
x
X* ,, ,n. •,, (,,tilt r" , j
.. •
_ paj ��cam" "$9 f..dmp--
,
�. �/�/
, t��tiS. ;eviiy- ` FUTURE POOL �/%•/ `r .:_ ,,
f LOCATION LOT B
•
��
r
.�-+
urs F" ':.. �� FUTURE IM Re 1
N.
_.:.. ISR..
�, WALKWAY PAtI �r
t MULI USE i
TO SOFTBALL
k COURT
i -
C
‘,._'.
N
Pe SED SPLA
' ff 6
', , k
l LOT A r o_ i LOCATION W/SHADE °
�' ' ! A A.
4 % ` ,• STRUCTURE & PICNIC TABLES
,:,., ;...1-4:---,„'5,2' - : •''' . •-:''-: .-1 -
•
�y. � i '�, ` ,I�'�I ._ \____ PROPOS LIZ SPLASH PAD
y IOURTS
` . i '.: ` ° -' EQUIPME 1 ENCLOSURE
f4 FUTURE FITNESS
t � 4 L i LOOP TRAIL
�,
City of 91�toopark Inn %='
�i0 799 MOORPARK AVEEia
MOORPARK CA,93021
PREPARED BY:JEREMY LAURENTOWSKI IME 1"=300'-0"(APPROX.)
PARKS AND RECREATION DIRECTOR AM February 26,2014
`c ATTACHMENT 5
P,�r ARROYO VISTA COMMUNITY PARK
Ii 7- PROPOSED SPLASH PAD LOCATION Tr
OPTION 'E'
».'f � ;, bt! 'fel 1.` ' 1 \ ,: 'S A
xl1 l hFy4��S� }. ...40`4. 10,A.� _ �'t'/ `,EQUIPMENTEN LO. F1:k..fail, �,'.#u � j;_. `t, ' '°
ENC
LO*
-
"_ _' UTURE BICYCLE PATH
PROPOSED SPLASH '- access
READ w ;- �
•
N%SHADE STRUCTURE 'l --------------7....
r
// / /
. ..
&PICNIC TABLES �� e e� - 9,‘lt. l �,,_ ' r .i74 {' �` "/..'i"....,:-4" `
•
,p• 1, (\-v.,, ,,. -2y-.,-.:::-,,4.!,-- -_, �,. _
CC ,
'. 1'r. y q//�O� /�� �q MTI . "T � .
r.
,. l
K
•
. ti // r
I Iv
s .
1 \
• _ \ fns ' e �
q
p . 4, ,,
`
Y
s
rnjFUTURE I
' � " 1q' ' % % � CO RT
1t ,. ,,,:',::70N40'''
14 WALKWAY-
TO SOFTS- m
- FUTURE FITNESS
� 6T A ,, LOOP TRAIL
t <!I � k 9 G UND
key„• , t . - �,' I'- t /
of ;I 7 1' �' "
•`'•
• • • ' ; '\-..TNN,t'- OURTjS
, —� j
. - '' tl•
- "
City of toopark, NMI %\
ti 799 MOORPARK AVEiliai
MOORPARK CA,93021
PREPARED BY:JEREMY LAURENTOWSKI SCALE 1"=300'-0"(APPROX.)
PARKS AND RECREATION DIRECTOR NATE February 26,2014
r ARROYO VISTA COMMUNITY PARK ATTACHMENT 6
_' PROPOSED SPLASH PAD LOCATION
OPTION 'F' - EAST END
•
_ — — -_ �_.—_a d ` \- --! " r�F f,,�c +ray
r FUT LO •
OP TRAIL' * n
h
n 4V
r tl
r
FUTUTRE PARKING LOT \
1, s -- — EXPANSION _
,nl (APPROX.50 STALLS)
04 -
i- Yc
. . TING - „ _itc 1 & - t
STORAGE ` _ SOCCER FIELDS
Ls
EXISTING EXISTING
FOOTBALL CONCE SIONS m
FIELD 1 TOT I_uT j PAVILION
• ` '
PROP(pSED SPLASH PAD 1� _
EQUIPMENT ENCLOSURE` ,,. ,. _PROPOSED SPLASH PAD LOCATION W/SHADE
:!• i;, STRUCTURES/BBQ'S & PICNIC TABLES
rr s lc 0• /
f\ .,o-, i. ) iii
FUTURE LOOP TRAIL
0
,. �
.k
— -I e4 ?+ • w it ( ii 0/MOOJhll/\ 'Min :'
�, LM
PREPARED BY:JEREMY LAURENTOWSKI BCALE 1"=300'-0"(APPROX.)
PARKS AND RECREATION DIRECTOR
BATE October 24,2014
15
ITEM 8.B.
MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA REPORT
TO: The Parks and Recreation Commission
FROM: Jeremy Laurentowski, Parks and Recreation Director
BY: Stephanie Anderson, Recreation Services Manager
DATE: November 28, 2017 (Meeting of 12/4/17)
SUBJECT: Consider Recreation Programs Cost Recovery Summary
Fiscal Year 2016-2017
BACKGROUND
On January 18, 2012, the City Council approved the Recreation Programs and Services
Cost Recovery Policy (Policy.) Although the Policy was revised in 2016 to include
certain Active Adult Center programs and was renamed "Recreation and Active Adult
Programs and Services Cost Recovery Policy", this report will include only Recreation
Division programs.
The Policy defines costs, revenue sources, program categories, and recovery levels.
Costs currently reported include direct costs (costs charged to the programs' line item
budget and part-time staff costs) and indirect costs (full-time staff costs and overhead
costs such as facility use and general department supplies.)
Each program offered by the Recreation Division is assigned a program category,
based on factors including type, purpose, and program structure. Program categories
are each placed into a recovery level. There are five recovery levels, ranging from level
1 (high subsidy) to level 5 (minimal subsidy). The Policy establishes both the minimum
cost recovery and target cost recovery requirements for each program category. Both
the minimum and target amounts are noted in the cost recovery summaries in this
report.
Programs are expected to reach their minimum recovery goal within a period not to
exceed one year. Programs that are unable to meet the minimum cost recovery will be
reviewed for consideration of appropriate action, including restructuring or eliminating
the program. The City Manager is also authorized to exclude individual programs from
the requirements of the Policy.
16
Moorpark Parks and Recreation Commission
December 4, 2017
Page 2
The Policy requires an annual reporting to the Parks and Recreation Commission and
Moorpark City Council, including whether programs met their cost recovery goals.
Attached for reference is the Policy.
DISCUSSION
This report serves as a financial summary of Recreation Division programs for the fiscal
year 2016-2017. The seasons included are Summer 2016 (June through August), Fall
2016 (September through November), Winter 2017 (December through February), and
Spring 2017 (March through May). Included in this report are financial summaries for
each program, including comparison figures from the prior two fiscal years; a summary
listing of programs based on their status of meeting cost recovery goals; and staff
recommended action plans for those programs not meeting their minimum recovery
goals. All figures in this report are rounded to the nearest dollar. The full-time staff
costs for the 2016/2017 fiscal year programs are estimated and based on the
percentage of staff time spent on each program.
Cost Recovery Goal Summaries
Programs meeting target Programs meeting minimum Programs not meeting
cost recovery goal cost recovery goal minimum cost recovery goal
3rd of July Fireworks Halloween Fest N Films Movies in the Park
Extravaganza Breakfast with Santa Teen Events
Camp Moorpark Moorpark Has Talent Adult Basketball League
Easter Egg Hunt Adult Softball League
Community Yard Sale
Recreation Classes
Youth Basketball League
Financial and Cost Recovery Summaries for Recreation Programs
3rd of July Fireworks Extravaganza
Sunday, July 3, 2016 from 4:00 to 10:00 p.m. at AVCP. Admission $5.00 per person.
Fireworks Extravaganza Financial Summary FY 15/16 FY 14/15
Participation 13,300 11,800 11,700
Revenue $71,246 $61,948 $63,133
Direct Costs $55,458 $49,842 $49,236
Indirect Costs
F/T Staff $23,855 $17,047 $18,803
Overhead Costs $1676 $2,340 $1,881
Total Costs $80,989 $69,229 $69,920
Gross Profit / (Loss) $15,788 $12,106 $13,897
Net Profit/ (Loss) ($9,743) ($7,281) ($6,787)
17
Moorpark Parks and Recreation Commission
December 4, 2017
Page 3
Cost Recovery summary (Category: Community Event)
Recovered Minimum Target
Percent Direct Costs Recovered: 100% 25% 100%
Percent Division Indirect Costs Recovered 62% 0% 25%
Minimum Recovery Met: Yes
Target Recovery Met: Yes
Movies in the Park
Friday, July 22 and August 5 from 7:00-10:00 p.m. at Peach Hill Park. Free admission.
Movies in the Park Financial Summary FY 15/16 FY 14/15
Participation 750 Not offered Not offered
Revenue $282
Direct Costs $1 ,788
Indirect Costs
F/T Staff
$2,756
Overhead Costs $175
Total Costs $4,720
Gross Profit / (Loss) ($1,506)
Net Profit/ (Loss) ($4,437)
Cost Recovery summary (Category: Community Event)
Recovered Minimum Target
Percent Direct Costs Recovered: 16% 50% 100%
Percent Division Indirect Costs Recovered 0% 0% 50%
Minimum Recovery Met: No
Target Recovery Met: No
Halloween Fest N' Films (formerly Trick or Treat Village)
Saturday, October 29, 2016 from 5:00 to 8:30 p.m. at AVCP. Free admission to movie;
small fee for activity wristbands.
Halloween Event Financial Summary FY 15/16 FY 14/15
Participation 100 325 300
Revenue $1,562 $2,211 $4,605
Direct Costs $2,218 $1,739 $2,952
Indirect Costs
F/T Staff $8,059 $6,771 $7,226
Overhead Costs $339 $857 $891
Total Costs $10,615 $9,367 $11,069
Gross Profit / (Loss) ($656) $472 $1,653
Net Profit I (Loss) ($9,054) ($7,156) ($6,464)
18
Moorpark Parks and Recreation Commission
December 4, 2017
Page 4
Cost Recovery summary (Category: Special Event):
Recovered Minimum Target
Percent Direct Costs Recovered: 70% 50% 100%
Percent Division Indirect Costs Recovered 0% 0% 50%
Minimum Recovery Met: Yes
Target Recovery Met: No
Breakfast with Santa
Saturday, December 17, 2016 with seatings at 8:30 a.m. and 10:00 a.m. at AVRC.
Registration fee $10.00 per person, infants 1 and under free.
Breakfast with Santa Financial Summary FY 15/16 14/15
Enrollments 204 157 199
Revenue $1,930 $1,530 $1,920
Direct Costs $3,865 $3,027 $2;089
Indirect Costs
FIT Staff $3,874 $3,790 $3,485
Overhead Costs $256 $481 $394
Total Costs $7995 $7,298 $5,968
Gross Profit / (Loss) ($1 ,935) ($1,497) ($169)
Net Profit/ (Loss) ($6,065) ($5,768) ; ($4,048)
Cost Recovery summary (Category: Special Event):
Recovered Minimum Target
Percent Direct Costs Recovered: 50% 50% 100%
Percent Division Indirect Costs Recovered 0% 0% 50%
Minimum Recovery Met: Yes
Target Recovery Met: No
Moorpark Has Talent
Friday, March 17, 2017 from 7:00 to 9:00 p.m. at HSAC. Tickets $10.00 each pre-sale,
$12.00 each at the door. Audition fee $10. Acts auditioned: 16. Total tickets sold: 239.
Moorpark Has Talent Financial Summary FY 15/16 FY 14/15
Attendance 255 205 258
Revenue $3,862 $2,026 $3,744
Direct Costs $2,716 $1,000 $1,915
Indirect Costs
F/T Staff $6,068 $5,404 $4,585
Overhead Costs $157 $340 $274
Total Costs $8,941 $6,744 $6,774
Gross Profit / (Loss) $1,146 $1,026 $1,829
Net Profit I (Loss) ($5,079) ($4,718) ($3,030)
19
Moorpark Parks and Recreation Commission
December 4, 2017
Page 5
Cost Recovery summary (Category: Special Event)
Recovered Minimum Target
Percent Direct Costs Recovered: 100% 50% 100%
Percent Division Indirect Costs Recovered 18% 0% 100%
Minimum Recovery Met: Yes
Target Recovery Met: No
Easter Egg Hunt
Saturday, April 15, 2017 from 10:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. at AVCP. General admission
wristband $5.00 each; all access wristband $10.00 each. Total wristbands sold: 500.
Easter Egg Hunt Financial Summary FY 15/16 FY 14/15
Attendance 1,000 1,000 1,250
Revenue $4,190 $3,395 $3,376
Direct Costs $3,618 $3,255 $2,693
Indirect Costs
F/T Staff $6,882 $5,085 $4,366
Overhead Costs $432 $644 $375
Total Costs $10,932 $8,984 $7,435
Gross Profit / (Loss) $572 $140 $6831
Net Profit/ (Loss) ($6,742) ($5,589) ($4,058)
Cost Recovery summary (Category: Special Event)
Recovered Minimum Target
Percent Direct Costs Recovered: 100% 50% 100%
Percent Division Indirect Costs Recovered 08% 0% 50%
Minimum Recovery Met: Yes
Target Recovery Met: No
Community Yard Sale
Saturday, May 6, 2017 from 8:00 a.m. to 11:00 a.m. at AVCP. Free admission; vendor
fee $15.00 per space. Total vendors: 30. Event closed early due to rain.
Community Yard Sale Financial Summary FY 15/16 FY 14/15
Attendance 300 950 934
Revenue $480 $630 $630
Direct Costs $180 $164 $816
Indirect Costs
FIT Staff $3,311 $2,571 $2267
Overhead Costs $124 $401 $189
Total Costs $3,615 $3,136 $3,272
Gross Profit / (Loss) $300 $466 ($186)
Net Profit I (Loss) ($3,135) ($2,506) ($2,642)
20
Moorpark Parks and Recreation Commission
December 4, 2017
Page 6
Cost Recovery summary (Category: Special Event)
Recovered Minimum Target
Percent Direct Costs Recovered: 100% 50% 100%
Percent Division Indirect Costs Recovered 9% 0% 50%
Minimum Recovery Met: Yes
Target Recovery Met: No
Teen Events and Volunteer Program
TEEN PROGRAMS: Summer 2016 to Spring 2017
Teen Events
PROGRAM DATE Fee(s) PARTICIPANTS REVENUE DESCRIPTION
Skate Night 6/11/2016 Free 0 $ - cancelled
Skate Night 8/13/2016 Free 0 $ - cancelled
Cupcake
Challenge 7/16/2016 $10/team 0 $ - cancelled
Cupcake
Challenge 10/21/2016 $10/team 24 $ 60.00 Halloween theme
Cupcake
Challenge 2/11/2017 $10/team 24 $ 50.00 Valentine theme
Cupcake
Challenge 5/12/2017 $10/team 12 $ 30.00 Spring theme
SUBTOTAL TEEN EVENTS 60 $ 140.00
Teen Workshops
None offered $ -
SUBTOTAL TEEN WORKSHOPS 0 $ -
Teen Volunteer Days
PROGRAM DATE Fee(s) PARTICIPANTS REVENUE DESCRIPTION
Volunteer Day 6/25/2016 Free 0 $ - cancelled
Volunteer Day 10/22/2016 Free 8 $ - Clean AVRC storage
Volunteer Day 10/29/2016 Free 16 $ - Fest N Films
Breakfast w/Santa
Volunteer Day 12/16/2016 Free 11 $ - prep
Volunteer Day 12/17/2016 Free 12 Breakfast w/Santa
Volunteer Day 2/25/2017 Free 6 $ - Egg Hunt prep
Volunteer Day 4/8/2017 Free 13 $ - Egg Hunt prep
Volunteer Day 4/15/2017 Free 20 $ - Egg Hunt
Volunteer Day 4/22/2017 Free 5 $ - Park Improvements
SUBTOTAL VOLUNTEER PROGRAM 91 $ -
GRAND
TOTALS 151 $ 140.00
21
Moorpark Parks and Recreation Commission
December 4, 2017
Page 7
General Teen Event Financial Summaries FY 15/16 FY 14/15
Participation (Total) 151 134 228
Revenue $140 $60 $496
Direct Costs $361 $314 $1,361
Indirect Costs
F/T Staff $5,653 $21,786 $23,874
Overhead Costs $1,911 $3,308 $2,795
Total Costs $7,925 $25,408 $28,130
Gross Profit / (Loss) ($221) ($254) ($865)
Net Profit/ (Loss) ($7,785) ($25,348) ($27,534)
Cost Recovery summary (Category: Special Event)
Recovered Minimum Target
Percent Direct Costs Recovered: 39% 50% 100%
Percent Division Indirect Costs Recovered 0% 0% 50%
Minimum Recovery Met: No
Target Recovery Met: No
Recreation Classes
Recreation Classes Summer Fall Winter Spring Total FY FY 15/16 FY 14/15
Financial Summary 2016 2016 16/17 ' 2017 16/17
Classes Offered 152 113 83 111 459 461 479
Classes Run 92 73 46 67 278 312 303
Classes Canceled 60 40 37 44 181 149 176
Cancelation Rate 39% 35% 45% 40% 39% 31.25% 36.4%
Enrollments 486 448 361 488 1783 2153 2162
Revenue $41,660 $56,722 $51,558 $60,288 $210,228 $226,429 $222,211
Direct Costs $29,257 $41,168 $37,572 $43,936 $151,933 $159,519 $156,086
Indirect Costs 0
F/T Staff $12,819 $12,819 $12,819 $12,819 $51,276 $79,764 $76,124
Overhead Costs $4,796 $7,287 $4,642 $6,378 $23,103 $25,609 $21,603
Total Costs $46,872 $61,274 $55,033 $63,133 $226,312 $264,892 $253,809
Gross Profit / (Loss) $12,403 $15,554 $13,986 $16,352 $58,295 $66,910 $66,125
Net Profit/ (Loss) ($5,212) ($4,552) ($3,475) ($2,845) ($16,084) ($38,463) ($31,602)
Cost Recovery summary (Category: Recreation Classes):
Recovered Minimum Target
Percent Direct Costs Recovered: 100% 100% 100%
Percent Division Indirect Costs Recovered 78% 75% 100%
Minimum Recovery Met: Yes
Target Recovery Met: No
22
Moorpark Parks and Recreation Commission
December 4, 2017
Page 8
Camp Moorpark
CAMP MOORPARK PROGRAM SUMMARY
Summer 2016 through Spring 2017
Annual registration fee: $35/$25; theme park pass: $100
PROGRAM DATES HOURS DAIILY FEES
Summer Camp Monday-Friday 7:00 a.m.
Moorpark
d
6/13- (46(46 6:00 p.m. $30-$57
Monday-Friday 7:00 a.m.
Adventure Camp 6/13-8/16 (46 6:00 p.m. $27-$57
days)
10/3, 10/12,
Fall Camp Moorpark 10/31, 11/21-23 8:00 a.m. $30-$42
(6 days) 6:00 p.m.
Winter Camp Moorpark
12/27-30, 1/3-6, 8:00 a. .-m $30-$42
1/23 (9 days) 6:00 p.m.
3/13, 3/20-24, 8:00 a.m.
Spring Camp Moorpark 4/14, 4/17 (8 6:00 p.m. $30-$42
days)
Program held at AVRC,with off-site field trips during the summer.
Camp Moorpark Summer Fall Winter Spring Total FY FY 15/16 FY 14/15
Financial Summary 2016 2016 16/17 2017 16/17
Participants (unduplicated) 323 64 57 61 505 449 387
Total Enrollments 4342 156 213 239 4950 4762 4,468
Average Daily Attendance 94.4 26 23.7 29.9 71.7 70.0 62.9
Revenue $196,028 $5,634 $7,230 $7,520 $216,412 $175,279 $151,581
Direct Costs $130,659 $4,361 $4,960 $6,181 $146,161 $134,167 $129,108
Indirect Costs
F/T Staff $48,587 $1,383 $723 $1,095 $51,788 $75,710 $74,044
Overhead Costs $13,718 $965 $1,491 $1,257 $17,431 $21,373 $19,810
Total Costs $192,964 $6,709 $7,174 $8,533 $215,380 $231,250 $239,372
Gross Profit / (Loss) $65,369 $1,273 $2,270 $1,339 $70,251 $41,112 $22,473
Net Profit/ (Loss) $3,064 ($1,075) $56 ($1,013) $1,032 ($55,971) ($71,291)
Cost Recovery summary (Category: Day Camps):
Recovered Minimum Target
Percent Direct Costs Recovered: 100% 100% 100%
Percent Division Indirect Costs Recovered 100% 50% 75%
Minimum Recovery Met: Yes
Target Recovery Met: Yes
23
Moorpark Parks and Recreation Commission
December 4, 2017
Page 9
Adult Softball Leagues
Men's divisions on Thursday nights and coed divisions on Friday nights. Games played
at AVCP and PHP. Registration fee $425.00 per team.
Summer Fall Spring Total FY FY 1516 FY 14/15
Adult Softball 2016 2016 2017 16/17
Teams 20 16 21 57 55 65
Players 337 258 309 904 896 1,069
Revenue $8,500 $6,800 $8,925 $24,225 $23,375 $27,625
Direct Costs $3,824 $3,412 $2,550 $9,786 $11,917 $13,785
Indirect Costs
FIT Staff $5,209 $5,209 $5,209 $15,627 $12,091 $11,958
Overhead Costs $2,326 $2,845 $2,481 $7,652 $9,047 $10,787
Total Costs $11,359 $11,466 $10,240 $33,065 $33,055 $36,530
Gross Profit / (Loss) $4,676 $3,388 $6,375 $14,439 $11,458 $13,840
Net Profit/ (Loss) ($2,859) ($4,666) ($1,315) ($8,840) ($9,680) ($8,905)
Cost Recovery summary (Category: Adult Sports Programs):
Recovered Minimum Target
Percent Direct Costs Recovered: 100% 100% 100%
Percent Division Indirect Costs Recovered 62% 75% 100%
Minimum Recovery Met: No
Target Recovery Met: No
Adult Basketball Leagues
Monday and Thursday nights, games at AVRC. Registration fee $375.00 per team in
Summer/Fall/Spring, $325 per team in Winter.
Summer Fall Winter Spring Total FY FY 15/16 FY 14/15
Adult Basketball 2016 2016 16/17 2017 16/17
Teams 14 14 14 12 54 54 54
Players 132 135 139 119 525 549 510
Revenue $5,250 $5,250 $4,550 $4,500 $19,550 $19,550 $19,550
Direct Costs $1,738 $1,709 $1,440 $1,816 $6,703 $6.742 $5.392
Indirect Costs
F/T Staff $3,861 $3,861 $3,861 $3,861 $15,444 $12,780 $10,696
Overhead Costs $1,600 $1,594 $1,601 $1,908 $6,703 $9.493 $7.603
Total Costs $7,199 $7,164 $6,902 $7,585 $28,850 $29,015 $23,690
Gross Profit / (Loss) $3,512 $3,541 $3,110 $2,684 $12,847 $12,808 $14,158
Net Profit/ (Loss) ($1,949) ($1,914) ($2,352) ($3,085) ($9,300) ($9,465) ($4,140)
24
Moorpark Parks and Recreation Commission
December 4, 2017
Page 10
Cost Recovery summary (Category: Adult Sports Programs):
Recovered Minimum Target
Percent Direct Costs Recovered: 100% 100% 100%
Percent Division Indirect Costs Recovered 58% 75% 100%
Minimum Recovery Met: Yes
Target Recovery Met: No
Adult Soccer Leagues
Adult soccer leagues were not offered during the 2016/2017 fiscal year.
Not FY 15/16 FY 14/15
Adult Soccer offered
Teams 25 41
Players 373 609
Revenue $8,750 $10,470
Direct Costs $4,688 $7,350
Indirect Costs
F/T Staff $7,014 $9,642
Overhead Costs $3,754 $5,595
Total Costs $15,456 $22,569
Gross Profit / (Loss) $4,062 $6,720
Net Profit/ (Loss) ($6,706) ($8,517)
Youth Basketball League
Saturdays games with weekly practices. Games and weekly practices at AVRC.
Registration fees $79.00 to $94.00 per player.
Summer Fall Winter Spring Total FY FY 1516 FY 1415
Youth Basketball 2016 2016 16/17 2017 16/17
Enrollments 131 138 190 143 602 596 542
Revenue $10,979 $11,533 $16,686 $12,742 $51,940 $49,513 $41,209
Direct Costs $6,061 $5,600 $8,418 $6,390 $26,469 $27,390 $20,744
Indirect Costs
F/T Staff $5,446 $5,446 $5,446 $5,446 $21,784 $16,916 $17,523
Overhead Costs $3,103 $3,369 $4,621 $3,807 $14,900 $20,193 $15,318
Total Costs $14,610 $14,415 $18,485 $15,643 $63,153 $64,499 $53,585
Gross Profit / (Loss) $4,918 $5,933 $8,268 $6,352 $25,471 $22,123 $20,465
Net Profit/ (Loss) ($3,631) ($2,882) ($1,799) ($2,901) ($11,213) ($14,986) ($12,376)
25
Moorpark Parks and Recreation Commission
December 4, 2017
Page 11
Cost Recovery summary (Category: Youth Sports Programs):
Recovered Minimum Target
Percent Direct Costs Recovered: 100% 100% 100%
Percent Division Indirect Costs Recovered 69% 50% 75%
Minimum Recovery Met: Yes
Target Recovery Met: No
Staff Recommended Actions for Programs Not Meeting Minimum Cost
Recovery Goals
Movies in the Park
This new event was highly successful, with 750 total attendees. However, the only
revenue source utilized was food sales, which was insufficient to raise the revenue
needed to meet the minimum cost recovery requirement. For the 2017 event, staff
implemented a sponsorship program, which raised over $1,300. It is anticipated that
sponsorships will increase, and the program will be able to meet the minimum cost
recovery requirement in the future.
Teen Events
Overall, teen participation increased this year. However, the participation increase in
teen events for which fees are charged was not sufficient to bring in enough revenue to
meet the minimum cost recovery requirement. Staff will continue to focus on building
teen programs and exploring other new recreational programs for the teen population.
Adult Softball League
Although the overall number of teams, and subsequently revenue, increased slightly this
year compared to last year, the softball league has not been able to meet its minimum
cost recovery requirement. The league has not met the minimum requirement for the
past four years, due to a decline in team enrollment that began in the 13/14 fiscal year,
as summarized in the chart below:
Fiscal Year 2011/2012 2012/2013 2013/2014 2014/2015 2015/2016 2016/2017
#of Teams 83 81 67 65 55 57
Staff have worked to reduce the direct costs for the league. Overhead costs have been
stable for the past two years. If costs remain stable, a minimum of 65 teams would be
needed to meet the minimum cost recovery requirement for 2017/2018. Based on team
enrollment from Summer 2017 (20 teams) and Fall 2017 (19) teams, it is unlikely the
league will reach 65 teams for the 2017/2018 fiscal year (26 teams would need to
participate in Spring 2018.) Based on enrollment trends for softball, staff will work on
implementing new and additional sports programs and leagues in order to defray the
full-time staff costs associated with each sports program. With less overhead costs, the
softball league should be able to meet the minimum cost recovery requirement with the
number of teams that have been participating for the past two years.
• 26
Moorpark Parks and Recreation Commission
December 4, 2017
Page 12
Adult Basketball League
The basketball league was able to meet its minimum cost recovery requirement two
years ago. However, it did not meet the minimum this year or last year, as a result of
increases in both direct and indirect costs, but no correlating increase in revenue. If
costs remain stable, the league would need at least 60 teams per fiscal year to meet the
minimum cost recovery requirement. Registration trends indicate it is unlikely
enrollments will increase to this number, therefore, like softball, staff will work on
implementing new and additional sports programs and leagues in order to defray the
full-time staff costs associated with each sports program.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Provide feedback on the cost recovery report and direct staff to present the report to the
City Council.
Attachment 1 — Recreation and Active Adult Programs and Services Cost Recovery
Policy
27
ITEM 9.A.
MINUTES OF THE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
SEMI-ANNUAL PARK TOUR
Moorpark, California November 4, 2017
A Special Meeting of the Parks and Recreation Commission of the City of Moorpark was
held on November 4, 2017, with the meeting called to order at the Moorpark Community
Center, 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, California.
1. CALL TO ORDER:
Chair Morgan called the meeting to order at 9:06 a.m.
2. ROLL CALL:
Present: Commissioners George Estrella, Jesse Norwalt, Thomas
Pflaumer, Sandra Thompson, and Chair Steve Morgan.
Staff Present: Parks and Recreation Director Jeremy Laurentowski and
Landscape/Parks Maintenance Superintendent Jason La Riva.
Recreation Services Manager Stephanie Anderson was present
during the tour of the Arroyo Vista Recreation Center.
3. PUBLIC COMMENTS:
None.
4. REORDERING OF, AND ADDITIONS TO, THE AGENDA:
Chair Morgan announced that he attended the Haunted High Street event and
that it was a good event and very popular.
5. ANNOUNCEMENTS, FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS- AND REPORTS ON
MEETINGS/CONFERENCES ATTENDED BY COMMISSIONERS:
Commissioner Pflaumer requested a future agenda item regarding the splash
pad.
6. PRESENTATIONS/ACTION/DISCUSSION:
A. Parks Tour. Staff Recommendation: The Commission and staff
toured and discussed the following parks in the order listed below:
1. Mammoth Highlands Park
28
P&R Commission Meeting •
Park Tour— November 4, 2017
Page 2
The Commission and staff discussed the recent turf removal
project and the installation of new drought tolerant
landscaping. Staff also pointed out the need to replace the
Mammoth Country sign and the high cost of poured-in-place
surfacing and future funding concerns.
2. Miller Park
The Commission and staff discussed potential uses of the
open field turf area. Staff commented that the area is
currently not used by the youth sports groups due to parking
availability. The Commission discussed the option of a
future dog park.
3. Tierra Rejada Park
The Commission and staff toured the new pickleball courts
and discussed the success of the decomposed granite
pathways that were installed several years ago. The
Commission commented that the trails are popular and well
used. Staff commented that a project to improve access to
the park facilities that will meet the requirements of the
American with Disabilities Act (ADA) will be completed prior
to the end of the fiscal year.
4. Arroyo Vista Community Park
(Recreation Center and Multi-Use Court)
The Commission and staff toured the Arroyo Vista
Recreation Center and gym and discussed future revenue
opportunities, improvements to the facility to encourage
class participation, particularly related to rentals, exercise
classes, dance classes, and improvement to the kitchen to
increase community use. The Commission discussed the
fact that Pine Crest School was closed and could be
purchased to expand future recreational needs. The
Commission and staff also toured the newly remodeled
multi-use court.
5. Glenwood Park
The Commission and staff discussed the fact that the 2-5
year old play structure at Glenwood Park was scheduled for
replacement during the current fiscal year. The Commission
•
29
P&R Commission Meeting
Park Tour— November 4, 2017
Page 3
and staff discussed the desire to install new playground
equipment that has a higher quantity of ADA compliant
components, as well as the addition of a mommy-and-me
swing.
6. Poindexter Park
The Commission and staff toured the skate park and park
grounds. Staff stated that there are no proposed
improvements at this time.
Following Item 6.A., Parks Tour, the Parks and Recreation Commission will
continue their meeting at the Community Center located at 799 Moorpark
Avenue.
The Commission stated that overall the parks looked well maintained and
that maintenance costs should not be increased.
B. Consider Revised Rules of Procedure for Parks and Recreation
Commission Meetings and Related Functions and Activities. Staff
Recommendation: Adopt revised Rules of Procedure for Parks and
Recreation Commission Meetings and Related Functions and
Activities.
Jeremy Laurentowski gave a brief overview of the changes to the
Rules of Procedure for Parks and Recreation Commission
Meetings and Related Functions and Activities (Rules).
MOTION: Commissioner Thompson moved and Commissioner Estrella
seconded a motion to adopt the revised Rules. The motion was carried by voice
vote 5-0.
7. CONSENT CALENDAR:
A. Approval of Minutes for the Parks and Recreation Commission
Regular Meeting of October 2, 2017. Staff Recommendation:
Approve as presented.
MOTION: Commissioner Thompson moved and Commissioner Pflaumer
seconded a motion to approve the Consent Calendar as presented. The motion
was carried by voice vote 5-0.
30
P&R Commission Meeting
Park Tour—November 4, 2017
Page 4
8. ADJOURNMENT:
The meeting was adjourned at 11:55 a.m.
APPROVED:
STEVE MORGAN, CHAIR
Respectfully submitted:
Jeremy Laurentowski, Parks and Recreation Director
31