Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 2017 1206 CCSA REG ITEM 08A ITEM CITY OF MOORPARK,CALIFORNIA City Councii Meeting of 102-0 6 --.20/1 An — , Go a4 MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT TO: Honorable City Council FROM: David A. Bobardt, Community Development Director DATE: November 22, 2017 (CC Meeting of 12/6/2017—Cont'd from 11/15/2017) SUBJECT: Consider a Resolution Approving Tentative Parcel Map No. 2016-01 and Industrial Planned Development Permit No. 2017-01 for the Subdivision of an Approximately 10.0-Acre Developed Lot into Two Parcels of 7.8 Acres and 2.2 Acres and the Construction of a 35,330 Square-Foot Industrial Building on the Newly-Created 2.2-Acre Parcel at 400 Science Drive, and Making a Determination of Exemption Under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in Connection Therewith, on the Application of Nick Rini for Nearon Enterprises BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION On November 15, 2017, at the request of staff, the City Council opened the public hearing on this item to accept public testimony. There were no speakers. The City Council deferred the staff presentation and continued this item with the public hearing still open to the regular City Council meeting of December 6, 2017. The staff report from the November 15 meeting is attached, with an updated resolution. Staff requested the continuance as a recommended condition was added to the resolution of approval just prior to publication of the Council agenda, and the applicant needed additional time to evaluate the physical and financial feasibility of complying with the proposed condition. The condition (Special Condition No. 29 in the attached resolution) required a sidewalk to be constructed along the entire Science Drive frontage of both parcels. The applicant requested additional time to analyze the physical and financial feasibility of the proposed condition. Although not originally included in the conditions of approval recommended at the Planning Commission meeting, this was a staff oversight. Policy 5.1 of the Circulation Element of the General Plan calls for new development and redevelopment projects to provide safe, separate, and convenient paths for bicycles and pedestrians. Science Drive was dedicated with a 50-foot wide right of way and improved with a 40-foot wide 1 Honorable City Council December 6, 2017 Page 2 roadway. It has five feet on each side of the right-of-way behind the curb that is currently landscaped. There is no sidewalk on either side of Science Drive, and pedestrians currently share the street with vehicles. The subject property, including both the site of the existing building and the site of the new building, have about 1,200 linear feet of frontage. The new building is expected to increase the number of pedestrians on Science Drive. Given that the Parcel Map must be found consistent with the General Plan under State law and the Municipal Code, it is appropriate to require a sidewalk be constructed at this time. On the subject property, 17 trees and grass cover the approximately 1,200 linear feet of street frontage within the right of way. The City Engineer/Public Works Director has estimated the design, engineering, and construction costs to be approximately $160,000.00. The applicant's estimate is slightly over $200,000.00. Although it is unfortunate that this information was provided late in the process to the applicant, street frontage improvement costs are normally borne by the developer. This cost is not exorbitant given the scale of the project, and the sidewalk improvement has a direct nexus to the proposed development. One other item that came out late in the process was additional information that was provided on the proposed windows for the new building at 400 Science Drive. This information was previously provided as a supplement to the November 15, 2017 report. Recommended Special Condition of Approval No. 19 calls for glass to be reviewed by the Community Development Director for exterior reflectance, which shall not exceed 8 percent. The proposed glass, a dark gray, has an exterior reflectance of 6 percent, meeting the standard. A copy of the previously provided information is attached. STAFF RECOMMENDATION 1. Consider staff presentation and continue to accept public testimony and close the public hearing; and 2. Adopt Resolution No. 2017- ATTACHMENTS: A. November 15, 2017 Staff Report and Attachments except Draft Resolution B. Supplemental Information on Proposed Glass C. Draft Resolution with Conditions of Approval S.\Community Development\DEV PMTS\I P D\IPD 2017-01 400 Science Drive\Agenda Reports\20171206 CC Report docx 2 ;-i,•o RPARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT TO: Honorable City Council 11 FROM: David A. Bobardt, Community Development Prepared by Freddy A. Carrillo, Associate Planner I Director,( DATE: November 3, 2017 (CC Meeting of 11/1512017) SUBJECT: Consider a Resolution Approving Tentative Parcel Map No. 2016-01 and Industrial Planned Development Permit No. 2017-01 for the Subdivision of an Approximately 10.0-Acre Developed Lot into Two Parcels of 7.8 Acres and 2.2 Acres and the Construction of a 35,330 Square-Foot Industrial Building on the Newly-Created 2.2-Acre Parcel at 400 Science Drive, and Making a Determination of Exemption Under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in Connection Therewith, on the Application of Nick Rini for Nearon Enterprises BACKGROUND On November 8, 2016, Nick Rini, of Nearon Enterprises, submitted an application for Tentative Parcel Map No. 2016-01 and Industrial Planned Development Permit -No. 2017-01 for the subdivision of an approximately 10.0 acre developed parcel into two parcels of 7.8 acres and 2.2 acres, and to construct a 35,330 square-foot industrial building on a graded pad at 400 Science Drive. A future tenant has not been identified at this time. Currently the site contains an 115,536 square-foot industrial building occupied by Benchmark Electronics Manufacturing Solutions, Inc. An Industrial Planned Development (IPD) Permit is required for any,new construction of more than 2,500 square-feet of industrial building floor area. A Tentative Parcel Map (TPM) is required when subdividing a property under common ownership into four or fewer parcels. Both permits require the Planning Commission's recommendation to the City Council with the City Council being the final decision maker. On October 24, 2017, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution PC-2017-622, recommending approval of the subdivision and construction of a new industrial building. CC ATTACHMENT A 3 Honorable City Council November 15,2017 Page 2 DISCUSSION Project Setting Existing Site Conditions: The approximately 10.0 acre property is located on the northeast corner of Science Drive and Los Angeles Avenue. An undeveloped pad is located to the east side of the existing building. Vehicular access to the property is taken from Science Drive. Currently the property includes 371 parking spaces; however, the applicant is proposing to remove 16 spaces and add 32 new spaces to accommodate the new building's parking requirements. The proposed parking area, including landscaping, is required and is addressed in a condition of approval in the attached resolution. Existing shrubs are located around the property with cluster of trees on the east and south side of the property. Previous Applications: On November 16, 1983, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 83-55, which approved Development Permit (DP) No. 296, for the construction of an approximately 112,000 square-foot industrial building. On April 10, 1984, the Planning Commission approved Minor Modification to DP No. 296, to allow modification on the architecture of the eastern elevation of the building. General Plan and Zoning: GENERAL PLAN/ZONING Direction _ General Plan Zoning Land Use Site Light Industrial (I-1) Industrial Park (M-1) Warehousing Warehousing, Church, North Light Industrial (I-1) Industrial Park (M-1) Manufacturing, and Office South Carlsberg Specific Carlsberg Specific Plan Moorpark Marketplace Plan Shopping Center Warehousing, East Light Industrial (I-1) Industrial Park (M-1) Manufacturing, and Office West Light Industrial (I-1) Industrial Park (M-1) Medical Office General Plan and Zoning Consistency: The applicant's proposal is consistent with the Zoning classification and General Plan land use designation. Permits for future uses will be assessed on a case-by-case basis. S:\Community Development DEV PMTSM P D\IPD 2017-01 400 Science DrivelAgenda Reports\20171115 CC Report.docx 4 Honorable City Council November 15, 2017 Page 3 Project Summary Tentative Parcel Map No. 2016-01 is proposed to subdivide an approximately 10.0 acre parcel into two parcels of 7.8 acres and 2.2 acres. One building would remain on the 7.8 acre parcel and a new building is proposed on the 2.2 acre parcel. Each parcel could subsequently be sold separately. The Industrial Planned Development applies only to the proposed building. Industrial Planned Development Permit No. 2017-01: Parcel No. Proposed Use Building Area (sq. ft.) 2.2 Acres Industrial building with a 32,830 sq. ft. first 35,330 sq. ft. (total) floor and 2,500 sq. ft. mezzanine floor. Building Design: The proposed building design can be described as having contemporary industrial architecture. Concrete tilt-up panels with rectangular tinted "Clerestory" windows are used throughout to give an industrial appearance to the building. "Clerestory" describes a high section of wall that contains windows above eye level. Four roll-up doors are also proposed on the rear (east) side of the building with weathered metal awning canopy above the roll-up doors. A mixture of concrete panels and tinted glass windows with aluminum frames are proposed for the storefront with a corrugated metal frame on top. A weathered metal awning canopy is also proposed in the storefront to match the rear of the building. A concrete panel element extends above the roof line to give the building a unique design. The project massing and scale is appropriate for a typical industrial building and is compatible with the surrounding business campus. Setbacks and Height: The proposed building has a 20-foot setback from Science Drive, which is consistent with the minimum required front setback in the Industrial Park (M-1) Zone. Parking and landscaping are proposed on the east side of the building. All minimum setbacks required by Chapter 17.24 of the Zoning Ordinance are achieved. The overall height of the building is 35 feet, as allowed in the M-1 zone. However, the building includes a proposed architectural feature and tower element exceeding this height. The architectural feature can best be described as a concrete "fin". The maximum height of this architectural feature is 40 feet, 6 inches. The "tower element" defines the architectural front of the building and is proposed at 39 feet in height. Exceptions to building height are discussed in the analysis section below. Circulation / Parking: The subject property is accessed by driveways on Science Drive. Science Drive provides one travel lane in each direction. On-street parking is not permitted along the roadway. The posted speed limit is 25 miles per hour (mph). On-site parking is available on the west and south side of the existing building with 32 additional parking spaces proposed on the east side of the proposed building. S:\Community Development\DEV MATS\I P D\IPD 2017-01 400 Science Drive\Agenda Reports120171115 CC Report.docx Honorable City Council November 15, 2017 Page 4 Parking Requirements Minimum Parking Total Parking Total Parking Building Size Required Based on Gross Floor Area of Building Spaces Required Spaces Provided Existing 115,536 sq. ft. 1 space/500 sq. ft. 231.0 300.0 industrial building Proposed 35,330 sq. ft. 1 space/500 sq. ft. 70.6 87.0 Industrial building Total Parking Spaces 302 Spaces 387 Spaces Required and Provided: Two driveways are located on the north side of the property. Both buildings will have access to use both driveways. A condition of approval is recommended for reciprocal access rights to be provided with this property to enable parking accessibility, anticipating that the buildings will be under separate ownership in the future, so that both buildings will have full parking lot accessibility. Loading Area: Four loading spaces are proposed in the rear yard of the building; two high docks and two on-grade loading spaces. Each loading space is 50 feet deep by 20 feet wide with no overhead obstruction. The code requires a loading area that is a minimum of 50 feet deep and 12 feet wide with a turning radius of 45 feet. Loading areas must be located in rear or side yard areas outside of required setbacks and must be designed so trucks do not back onto public or private streets or alleys. In addition, loading spaces must be designed to prevent interference with vehicular or pedestrian circulation. The proposed loading areas do not conflict with traffic or circulation. Four loading spaces are more than sufficient to accommodate the proposed industrial building. Landscaping / Lighting: To ensure landscaping is installed properly and consistent with the City's Landscape Guidelines, a special condition has been added to submit a landscape and irrigation plan to be reviewed and approved by the Parks and Recreation Director and the • Community Development Director prior to issuance of a zoning clearance. The lighting plan will be subject to review by the City's lighting consultant for consistency with the City's requirements. An additional condition of approval is recommended, requiring that light poles and fixtures be architecturally compatible with the existing poles and fixtures, subject to review and approval of the Community Development Director. National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Requirements: The project has been designed to provide for all necessary on-site and off-site storm drain improvements including the imposition of NPDES requirements. Best Management Practices for drainage facilities are required to be provided so that surface flows are intercepted and treated. These items will be reviewed by the City Engineer/Public Woks Director as part of the permit process. S:\Community Development\DEV PMTS\I P D11PD 2017-01 400 Science Drive\Agenda Reports120171115 CC Report.docx 6 Honorable City Council November 15, 2017 Page 5 Air Quality: All commercial/industrial projects are required to off-set air pollutants consistent with the 2003 Ventura County Air Quality Assessment Guidelines. Staff has included a standard condition requiring the applicant to make contribution to the Moorpark Traffic System Management Fund as a method to meet this requirement. ANALYSIS Issues Staff analysis of the proposed project has identified building height and design as an area for City Council consideration in their decision. The proposed building design is contemporary, complementary to other industrial buildings in the business park. It features construction of smooth concrete tilt-up panels with clerestory windows. The purpose of clerestory windows is to admit light without compromising interior wall space. The façade has a mixture of design elements to enhance its character. The applicant is proposing a horizontal corrugated metal frame above the roof line to screen the roof mechanical equipment. Rectangular "Spandrel glass" windows with aluminum frames are proposed underneath the corrugated metal frame. "Spandrel glass" is an architectural material used to cover construction materials and present a finished, seamless, and sleek exterior to buildings. The applicant is also proposing tinted glass windows with aluminum frames to match the clerestory and spandrel glass windows. Lastly, two weathered metal awning canopies, separated by a 40-foot, 6-inch high concrete panel element, are proposed in the front of the building. Staff has taken consideration into the design of the new building to make sure that the architectural design proposed is compatible with existing adjacent buildings. Conditions of approval are proposed to ensure that the materials, textures and colors of the proposed building are compatible with the existing buildings in the business park. As mentioned in the paragraph above, the building includes a proposed architectural feature exceeding the 35-foot height limitation of the Zoning Ordinance. The architectural feature can best be described as a concrete "fin", located on the north elevation at the building's main entry. The maximum height of this architectural feature is 40 feet, 6 inches. Section 17.24.040(D) of the Zoning Ordinance, allows architectural appurtenances to exceed the maximum building height when appropriate building scale are achieved and maintained. The Planning Commission expressed concern that a future tenant may wish to put signage on this design feature. Any signage above the building's parapet would be considered a roof sign and would not be permitted under the Zoning Ordinance. In addition, the applicant has shown locations for future signs on the elevations. However, to ensure that the fin is maintained as a design feature and not used in the future as a palette for building signage, proposed Condition No. 24 in the attached resolution has been amended to preclude signage on this fin. Four metal roll-up doors are proposed in the rear of the building for loading and unloading. A continuous weathered metal awning canopy is also proposed above the roll-up doors. This provides shade or shelter from weather conditions such as sun or 7 S:\Community Development\DEV PMTS\I P D11PD 2017-01 400 Science Drive\Hgenda Reports120171115 CC Report docx • Honorable City Council November 15, 2017 Page 6 rain. View of the roll-up doors from Los Angeles Avenue would be extremely limited as landscaping on the slope adjacent to Los Angeles Avenue within the Caltrans right-of- way) and the existing building at 400 Science Drive combine to block most of the view of the pad for the new building. Nonetheless, to completely screen any potential public view of the roll-up doors, a condition of approval is proposed to enhance the landscaping on-site and in the Caltrans right-of-way facing Los Angeles Avenue to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director. Findings The following draft findings are provided for City Council consideration: Subdivision Findings: A. The proposed map, including its design and improvements, is consistent with the City's General Plan and Zoning Ordinance as proposed, in that the map has been designed to comply with the requirements of the City's General Plan in providing a new industrial parcel adjacent to existing industrial development and it meets Zoning standards for the Industrial Park (M-1) Zone. B. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed in that the site can be engineered to allow for all required utilities to be brought to the site, adequate ingress and egress can be obtained, and the site can be provided with public and emergency services. C. The site is physically suitable for the proposed intensity of development, in that all•City development standards, including parking, would be.met by the proposed project. D. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage, in that the site has already been graded and improved in anticipation of future industrial development. E. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems, in that adequate sanitation is both feasible and required as a condition of this development. F. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large, for access through, or use of the property within the proposed subdivision, in that full access to and from Science Drive for both parcels have been incorporated in the design of this project. Industrial Planned Development Permit Findings: A. The site design, including structure location, size, height, setbacks, massing, scale, architectural style and colors, and landscaping, is consistent with the provisions of the General Plan, any applicable specific plans, Zoning Ordinance, 8 S:%Community Development\DEV PMTS11 P D11PD 2017-01 400 Science Drive1Agenda Reports\20171115 CC Report.docx Honorable City Council November 15, 2017 Page 7 and any other applicable regulations in that it incorporates design features, including mass, scale, materials, and colors, to enhance the visual character of the industrial park location. B. The site design would not create negative impacts on or impair the utility of properties, structures or uses in the surrounding area in that the building complies with Zoning regulations and sufficient parking is provided on site. C. The future uses would be compatible with existing and permitted uses in the surrounding area, which is part of the Industrial Park (M-1) Zoning designation. PROCESSING TIME LIMITS Time limits have been established for the processing of development projects under the Permit Streamlining Act (Government Code Title 7, Division 1, Chapter 4.5), the Subdivision Map Act (Government Code Title 7, Division 2), and the California Environmental Quality Act Statutes and Guidelines (Public Resources Code Division 13, and California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3). Under the applicable provisions of these regulations, the following timelines have been established for action on this project: Date Application Determined Complete: October 18, 2017 City Council Action Deadline: January 16, 2018 ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION In accordance with the City's environmental review procedures adopted by resolution, the Community Development Director determines the level of review necessary for a project to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Some projects may be exempt from review based upon a specific category listed in CEQA. Other projects may be exempt under a general rule that environmental review is not necessary where it can be determined that there would be no possibility of significant effect upon the environment. A project which does not qualify for an exemption requires the preparation of an Initial Study to assess the level of potential environmental impacts. Based upon the results of an Initial Study, the Director may determine that a project will not have a significant effect upon the environment. In such a case, a Notice of Intent to Adopt a Negative Declaration or a Mitigated Negative Declaration is prepared. For many projects, a Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration will prove to be sufficient environmental documentation. If the Director determines that a project has the potential for significant adverse impacts and adequate mitigation cannot be readily identified, an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) is prepared. The Director has reviewed this project and found it to be Categorically Exempt in accordance with Section 15332 (Class 32 — Infill Development Projects) of the California 9 S:\Community Development1DEV PMTS1I P 011PD 2017-01 400 Science Drive1Agenda Reports120171115 CC Report docx Honorable City Council November 15, 2017 Page 8 Code of Regulations (CEQA Guidelines). The proposed buildings and uses are consistent with the General Plan and Zoning regulations. In addition, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment in that the site has already been graded and improved in anticipation of future development. No further environmental documentation is required. NOTICING Public Notice for this meeting was given consistent with Chapter 17.44.070 of the Zoning Ordinance as follows: 1. Publication. The notice of the public hearing was published in the Ventura County Star on November 4, 2017. 2. Mailing. The notice of the public hearing was mailed on November 2, 2017, to owners of real property, as identified on the latest adjusted Ventura County Tax Assessor Roles, within one-thousand (1,000) feet of the exterior boundaries of the assessor's parcel(s) subject to the hearing. 3. Sign. One 32 square-foot sign was placed on the street frontage on November 3, 2017. STAFF RECOMMENDATION 1. Open the public hearing, accept public testimony and close the public hearing; and 2. Adopt Resolution No. 2017- ATTACHMENTS: 1. Location Map 2. Aerial Photograph 3. Full-Size Project Exhibits (UNDER SEPARATE COVER) 4. Tentative Parcel Map (Reduced) 5. Site Plan (Reduced) 6. Draft Resolution with Conditions of Approval 10 S:\Community Development\DEV PMTS\I P D\IPD 2017-01 400 Science Drive\Agenda Reports120171115 CC Report.docx Location Map -400 Science Drive I. 'al ° 1 ur' 1.1 , . i. I u N \,' -Fli f71A Ave —y - � th . n D �e f j- !. q�s. p4� "."1 - 11 _� �- CV r Ilidi N INTNIJ 1 qt3iNNN / I 1111, Z f-11 ' ' t ; 1 ... { r � W am+-^'+�' _ , Z tr k i — 1 1 n Los AP%gees Avef` /GO - ...._..- • I ' SOD ft i ,1 5 7 TPM No. ;` ar , 1" = 376 ft 2016-01 and IPD 10/18/2017 ' ii rr ,,; . No. 2017-01 .- _ ',r R.` This map represents a visual display of related geographic information.Data provided hereon is not a guarantee of actual field conditions. To be sure of complete accuracy, please contact Moorpark staff for the most up-to-date information. Location Map -400 Science Drive g �!�,�qr u" 55 r= "RS T{' r--.Y,— 1 i„,cF t F;..,•} ],�A. 4# X1 4 d _ 6pP - ,' 1 - 1 kt,?,...i 11 r ,„„,,,_,.4..:.., , 1'1 " eafif r is a`IN vi' ¢A _ a. P \\I J t P IN t ? f 1 fpr l .4 -i 4- �s i C., ,r1 ini ��Lhurht '.-f.-‘ ws Patro4 iif i'; 9 Y r-,L diet C) 1 I , I ., __, *d 11 ,0S1 1111 ,/ },itq”{, ®^14: f dd A. i C �� ��Q4 T � "�fl 1 t` �� d 5 t ` s.-•� a-+e °am �vw.�lja _ Ir`�i� .. I `�1 ht F i' tit ,' i' 4-'` r \ , • 0, _._,_,;__;_.;_, , :--, - - -^ -- I . .niu, i , 1, --1--__ I/ ' limie. , t . .,..., . ‘ 0 r--11-:fr-17.1 r.74-1"?Fl Rill (" ' • i ititii7 i 1.• 7 - --- - .. ,S F M ' HI J''' ,� - tea 'R� .� } ,- � .-.,1:1,:7- 1 �,;�rte,----1- r . �: �,�. . :-' I i *7-,, fir. " .* r 4 ,t q.S x8{,. [y'''. Lc.=s. r` ,p • _ C' +,... f' J i 4,4.o '•a 4rj V`f j- Sla. 9 •�t t r {Br r, 2 i °�; k ,.mss i;(r i4 'G v�' ` as fn;4�1t✓S•n +aal-. .'L1 z rt+ s = .:....ate _ " ` e/ �,if,,...*Al',..,. soots :". R3 "° Googie fa TPM No, ! " = 376 ft 2016-01 and IPD 10/1812017 } r I 1, No. 2017-01 This map represents a visual display of related geographic information. Data provided hereon is not a guarantee of actual field conditions.To be sure of complete accuracy. please contact Moorpark staff for the mast up-to-date information. NJ PROJECT EXHIBITS • Proposed Site Plan • Proposed 1st Floor Plan • Proposed 2nd Floor Plan • Building Elevations (South and West) • Building Elevations (North and East) • Material Board • Landscape Plan • Tentative Parcel Map (Title) • Tentative Parcel Map CC ATTACHMENT 3 13 I— • site legend keyed notes ,�/ 1.----- -- directory ' \ _- -- OYN3t: CML: ARCHITECT: ��: proposed decorative Wolk 0 Existing lb compact stall to be removed / \ • - 2 l2'-0"x50'-0"minimum load) area =>•� neer-on enterprises hardy eng'reerng inc. pk:orchltecture 5126 CLARETON DR SUITE 110 \ .„------------4:40-10"..> 1l 101 ygdcio valley road,suite 450 351 rolling oaks drive,suite 202 A60URA HILLS,CA 91301 proposed new building 9 load' truck turn' templates for reference / - '` ❑ O r'9 r'9 emp \ y / { �I' walnut creek,calHorniq 94596 thousand odes,California 41361 CONTACT:BRIAN POLIOIIIN/ANTHONY radius of 45'-0"min. / / •\ ADJACENT Ppp�Y Co ' 1- (925)855-6314 (818)222-2606 MOLINA(818)584-0051 FA%(818$84-0019 proposed new concrete a 40'-101/2"x 50,0'dockh load mea MN i I4gb"+ o P' ❑ O high I^9 / \ �� alto:nick rni alto:James doss E-MAIL:arolnpark�chltecbrelet ® proposed new finger planter Q 42'-II I/2"x50'-0'on-grade loading ar�q / \ ,' 1' - 6, •,....- . �' I '� project address 6 new concrete orb /y�' ❑ existing curb to be demolished O nen ado romp / /\ \ / / // y'� ,.•.011A0- . '. 400 science chive,moorpork,cotfomb 93021 Qexisting rot a pmt Qe new retaining wall ' \ ADJACENT ♦ // o •''�p'O�Oi�`��/ �_ ffi • legal description • PPOPEIe1Y \ ' '/ °•�a iis 1 `PN°s'�4Oo6 All the certain reel propertysituated In the coon of Ventura,stale of California describe as follows:mm MI•SL}024020 �/ ••`•••i "- Q county/ t / �1 // >;, �mezzani.��.••.••�; � I Pa-cel 8 of parcel mop no.3828,in the city of Moorpark,County of Ventura,State of California,os per mop filed in book 38,pages I though / \ Y/ .2,500 s 4.ii> •Nes - _ 0 5,Inclusive of celand as amended M book 38 39 of I in the office of the recorder of said !•C•pte 0 Por mops, pogo Pince maps, county r county. /' /' e • / ' //t/ ` ��• Iii--- Except one half of 27/40th interest of all oil one mineral rights below 500 feet from the surface,but without the right of surface entry as / , / /La/2•'r'-`r, �� reserved in the deed recorded September II,1963 m document no.53165 in book 2390,page 306 of official records. /‘`• \ M.MeBm \\\ �, 181,:. // `95.617 Sac. Pwo'nery 1.19 ACRES so' _ Also except one half of 13/40tH interest of all oil end mineral ruts below depth of 500 feet below the surface,but without the rig*of • AM•512D24025// / \\ w PAP% N. / II I"I` 4-,6.- I wrFace entry m reserved in the the deed recorded October II,1963 as document no.61148,in book 2410.page 561 of official records. / /' \ • q* / building "b" li i`r i - I Also except 25%of all oil,minerals,coal,oil,petroleum,gos,asphaltum and kindred substances,now or hereafter in order under said land / Footprint: 32,830 sf II -1 ss below a depth of 500 feet from the surface thereof,without the right of surface entry as reserved n the deed recorded December 20,1466 / , \\ / "0. / °�. mezzanine: 2,500 sf I '�� In book 3081,page 331,of official records. / / \\ // / '. total:35,330 s.f. \ '' 1D' w "' I---- flood zone note: / \ •T,�},��r} no-Ob•IO W PMt I •0 flood zone: A0-3' / / p,ybpR \ ///...4, P�•M� zone AO:Areas subject to Inundation by-percent-anrval-chance shallow flooding(usually sheet now on sloping terrain)where average aeptns , FfWCRr \ / ,p ere between one and three feet.Average flood depbls derive from detailed hyd eulic analyses ore shown In the hydrology report and plans. \ Anis samwwa w �p = I li - ��: CoordlMtc with hydroloCj�pions / / ♦ tin-eclenaNL Mlec / '$., i A-.�`:.'_!'1 ,' ,/ """�,a ft' l project statistics: / , N. • ' •- 1' lot 2 site orw gross:H-95,613 s.f.(2.19 acres) • ♦ / ..if `t / 0' net:•/-85,490 sf.(1.96 acres) ' / \ // ,.e / =� ! s� \ building footprint: ./-32.890 s.f.(3433%) • // ' ADJACENT ♦ , —= /t` _- - total landscape: ./-13,311 of. (13.92%) ,col+PROPEIDY .s +oa ♦ / 1. net perking,trucking,walks,°mise: ./-47,412 s.f.(51.15%) ♦ +,r-IIUh1RINL PARK / / / _ \ � totals. (100%1 • /' // ♦\\ \ / M / / / N. 1st floor area IMntrial: 30,330 s.f. / / •\\ >7 — t r 9il ,LY 6404 9 _= � • _A _ I Isl floor office mea: 200 s.f. / ♦ /7/ 9�LQCSGiC�3 .7 �'••%,_ 5 gas ADJACENT mezlmre floor office mea: 2500 s.f. / \ \ -4.. for 1 OpI�O@y 2 _ total building 8'area: 35,330 s.f. / / \\ ,' =1 3.r79.•�, ��4 L•QC�L•3Q4 —1, I -- x-so.Fr sasna,V.PAM wilding construction tape: V-5 ' i PGu3'6Qd k3 _� nsso®w 1/:r 91 `� _-_ lad use/wring: M-I IMrtrial �., � occupancy group: 'B"-orrice /F-I a F-2 Industrial • // / �''b�:'b,� • P a Da 9 \ v-41,‘,2‘‘ ,, ' 1‘ i'i.__'� O number of sterol's: one storey IMntrbl, two storey's office / / �' +;?��' C if.' e t, y� co proposed average wndrg height: 35,0'off. / / Q�O• =G u \ r.r •"J 1 __-- proposed maximum architectural projection height: 40'-6'of}. �/ e y 4 'I Ii, 1,-,,,,- assessor's parcel number:north-left side 512-O-24o-085 / , / � �l� T es I east-rcor side tback: ° 0'-0'lot ire • / / AMAGER / • / j Y `- I south-right side setbpck: o'-0'lot the meq ,t1� EXISTING BUILDING "A" ��`. _ west-front side setback: 20'-0" AIN.itaatocat MOW RAN / •;, -= footprint: 102,260 sf (to• f _ ,I automatic sprinkler system: dully sprnklared ,' `"'1O °N` /' / ..:,= 2nd floor office: 13.776 sf r I . existing site parking calculations / • I' totOI: 115,56 SI' .1.,..*... r. existing lot site area: gross,•/-435,416 sl.(9.99 acres) • / i .l \ // / rP =� *e•-masmur,t PAPE -L� p I existing wlldng'a' 115536 sf 1/500 231 _ reephed / / if0 321 stodtrd spaces \ \ ,: C O i 1 111 0 los I spaces if. +�Q.,c ';i 10 Co^'Pa spaces \ / ,'//S" // _ ^q.0,/ 56.3126•E ) 50 nlotafegeie spaces \ ' 3v / �_ * = , O �i .y r5.al a_; 3TI Existing \\ / w r ' / Me �1. .t� s _s-arr= •-�r • -e• y 0 -'6 co^pect spaces removed at lot 2 • e _ / ` •°tnlesa I-'v 1 •25 standard spaces proposes at lot 2 •\♦\ /' sv � \ . ='^�. �.,' xcl"c 1 sin Nr y; 1 i l l .1 p.T � ^J •a oda spaces proposed of lot 2 - .3 motorcycle spaces proposes at lot 2 " S� SDl new total for lot !lot 2 u w / {/� sem' —_ ,_�« i 0I�h, !SOWN proposed lot 1 parking calculation PROPER, / s 'r /\•-`‘ 'is, �/ , /1b,,, �'r'.t, .� o. 'c•i '*w.,*-.••!I /� I°s in I a swaao elsr lot I site mea: gross:./-339603 al.(T90 acres) ADJACENT s a \ _ e ern I I I all existing building'a' 115,596 sf I/SOO 231 requited MN•51202.0)0 / g ///��� " // I I I 7 •N1•-1Na»ml,v. r` /'jam z 8r / /�•_0,4 �>\ ; , ran• 4, / owrur -oaf 272 standord spaces °.`ii emur / ' ✓' + ,r mom, 10 oda spaces �r - " / mem / e\ .4 \ / 1W e9 I 1 I _ 1 14 motorcycle o spaces b' /ser /'• Air / tor /i, �/r,..0 d`. i k i ,s` 4 toreycle spaces / /: t:.� i e �� / I I i VICINITY MAP Pokb9P parking ration: 300 exists provided • / ,/ / 4• '� �_ '// s'i F�� I I I. 1 I I to sw9 mei P ^9r existing 8 le ,. /7.- -__�. , _� °srwaan °sruose - 300 ovidad/115536 sf=2S9,1,000 p h // _ A�� e /" m e6mso I Iproposed lot 2 parking calculation / d e r ��` / le°I°�• I r 1 1 1 PROJECT SITE p 9 som lig / ` 'e / r / MOS M 1 1 lot 2 site erect: gross:N-95513 sl.(2.19 acres) / w.•�' ."'•' t x er O/// I I proposed building b' 95530 sf. . �/ Nom-' r .�. sry I 0 sw0"e his/elm, ind,stiol: 55550 sr. 1/500 •fl parking recpreed ems I I I ro'LI. - _ to sig -_ I e— © I I I I �:I i r1 sl ,, spaces ,6°wa —T----= °"e-- -- sta 96' —-- Ta ste dorodad spot s I --------------- -- 8 clean ah vehicles /sM-`Z �, Jade' I f r,si AVO f ---- a=aces s�-- -- ••�-'_^ t rr__ - ____ -_ ....•..,-, 3 motorcycle aces r Mow __ -- _J• ... N 56'II76•E -,......a r81 Y 7, •N 395e'1e'IP 2H.5°' - ...��.. parking atbn: 172 total providee 8 mW r / i --1—'----j--- _._..____5.. .___,._._—_!� __—_-��_. F __.._ ow, r w _ T rspe rn°M. ras ^ :..e ' M ■■ 8l 6 of 2 sr1 bi 2. �. rs -- • -. _. pricing provided/35550 sf=2.46/1000 ' %of 81.21 , - )ices requited � m �_- ,�/ _ _.._ w -...v" Pro"' c e 5 / -- _._ term provided 5 • ti NORM fi long term-15%of 81=65 n..§::. -�� '\ - - - - - - -- 5%e t=3 bikes required °.9f Mmw t 31 - N r proposed site plan O 4 ong term bikes provided n.,INII,SLCIION°`NOV. clean air/vin Dol stalls red=8 stalls NNV`µn "` `0RIA 001.G." L 0 S ANGELES AVENUE = SLRI E:I'-0•=417-0P read 6rV provided'6 5[4115 Q 1 site plan ® ED noted NERRON ENTERPRISE 400 science drive O moorpark California Q NORTH R1 Jj apo#512-0-240-085 l�J 14 iee-sly 105 4.fie f � ' keyed notes 0new concrete stoop at each exit-typical b O new retaining wall O electrical Q concrete tilt up wall-typical 0 -s Q interior walls-typical 0 - Q = Qs aluminum store front system . Qman door CI roll up door • 5 \y rF:.:4j - ® guard rail and hand rail `� Q steel awning cbove l a.. dote lion`"d¢ Dyd' .6.--:, l / F-+-+-1 I/ 1° euro wen office ncr�Pn Q Q 14A II ®i'U' ®, L—� 5 F-+—+®J I I 9 ona 00,0, 5=e.i Ne •q"-" • / • / 0 0 6.3 W.AIM0 W ..'ilo c jTW ° link,• 1, -.. ,7 m 8° o e — 0050 w 05 00005 area • as- / rl' IN 3 P O ..is, O proposed 1st floor plan a gSCALE:1,-0.=3/32' - 1 gi 1st floor planth NERRON ENTERPRISE ----> sas noted Pe y00 science drive scats � moorpark,California Q -=1. NORTH Bpi#Sl2-O- Io-OBS 2 1 5 9 T Q) 930-0h8-0-21S#ude H.1110N D puJoilieo"iJedJoow 1 Ii) eApp eoueps 00h BSEldizelN3 NOHEIBN I pap.Se DIMS ...'."''.. 7, _i Mi 1 = f g 0 uep„coil pu2 1 1 I gl 1 0 .2EfE=.0-.1 311:17S ueid Jooll pu2 pasodaid 5 / A.r.siA 1 E,1°77 1 r2:g a ,._.., , wta i . / ..* . / ;.. ///4' ., . .• / . • • 40 ..." .: . . . . , - , cl uoda .u.io .., • 03,-re,1 0 1 . I---h—-F- I • \ . • 4 1--+-+--1 .c. • • d•- (..6.4, 4....\ ''''' 1 -:: , IS / .9Yes-eer EXTERIOR FINISHES ❑I STOREFRONT TINTED&LASS II1/4.SOLER x 1/2'AIR x 1/4'CLEAR NO LOW T'COATSS I'INSULATED 6LA55 ALTERNATE-ADD LOW M.COATING • ❑2 SPANDREL&LASS ■1/4'SOLE%TO MATCH STOREFRONT ,SLA-PS El B E 0 C7 H T5❑ © [] ❑i 0 L3 GONGRETE PANEL ACCENT COLOR: PAINTED TO MATCH'DUAN EDWARDS. • 'N DE6561'EASY SEAL' r __ • ` CONCRETE PANEL ACCENT COLOR: p ! TENANT • • • r, � T'o .Y*544- h rsoaF:.N. • V __ ___�_A_ S_.____ ROOF LN. • • T E N A NN A M E F T 05 CONCRETE PANEL FIELD COLOR PAINTED TO MATCH 91MN EDWARDS.DE-5914 Ii--- I C ,� 'SALVER POLISH' ■J []CONCRETEPANELFIELDCoLOR PAINTED TO MATCH'DUNK EDWAROS" DE-651N ELVER LANE. 8 �MEzzAxIN — E FIR.LN :On 1.&O.':;;ti_ o R 0 HORIZONTAL CORRUSATED METAL • • • ®ROOF TOP MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT _ - • ` • NOT EXCEED BVILDIN6 PARAPET 1E1 FRAMES: II I pii T ALUMINUM II/2. N CLEAR ANOD ZAWMINM • $uenO FLR LN _ q —, • - - BPMDftRN� IO LFAIN NTEDOTO MATCH'OUNN®WARS. DEC-166 STEVEARENO BEISE" 4❑ El ❑1 Fri ROLL-UP DOOR PAINTED TO MATCH'DUNK EDWARD'' DEC-166 ETEVEARENO BEIGE" Fil BUILDIN&SI&NA&E HALO LIT REVERSE GMAAEL LETTERS PER DETAIL•c NOTE.SIGN PER SEPARATE PERMIT El STEEL AMINE west front elevation O Ei 42"HI&H GUARD RAIL SCRLE I/B'=I-S' IS ROOF DRAIN AND OVERFLOW WITMN TO SUILDIN6 ii BUILDING SI&NA&E 9/D•THICK ALLMINLM LETTERS ATH PAINT PIR5H PER DETAIL•tl A NOTE:916•1 PER SEPARATE PERMIT • ELEVATION NOTES NOTE, 1.ALL EXTERIOR GLASS INDICATED WITH OT TO BE TEMPERED CLAY. • �� 2.PAINT COLORS REFERENCED FROM"OUAN EDWARD5" 4 o 4 ❑5 © ❑6 0 E EB COLOR SYSTEM. 1 ___,L--,L. S.CLL DOCKS. S,ROLL-LP LLP5DOS. VENTS, CAPS.SCUPPERS,FRAMES FLA DOORS. ETC.TO BE PAINTED SAME COLOR AS RAU_COLOR. I „, R 4.ADJACENTALL REVEALS TO E PAINTED ON THE T•i • r., • FLAT miTOM SURFACE ONLY rllTH THE MACSOT _- .. - •- .�-� 1-I-T _ —r� TPI- - - - - �—.�- OOF I'N'/y S.APPLY ANTI-6RMFITI LOATIN9 T09'O'APY. • V AT ALL EXTERIOR CONCRETE PANELS. • • 6.PROVIDE BUILDING ADDRESS.VERIFY LOCATION C , 2 SIZE AND STYLE WITH LOCAL.LRISDICTION. I , 1.THE USE OF H1G11LY REFLECTIVE WINDOW SLAZINS 1 SHALL BE PROHIBITED THROUeHOUT TIE PRO.CCT, 1 I • • Ill'DEEP FABRICATED*LLMNT®CANNES • r, ° ° a ° W ° SHOTE L®POYEI SLPPLY MTH I • - DSCOIK019HRTW • LOW VOLTAGE VRFE \I 9/14'CLEAR LEXAN W TN MIKE DIFFUSER FILM lig. NCOMIN6 PRIMARY CIRCUIT BY 014ER5 y, MITE LED ELIMINATION MOCK • • HO SCM&L AND SHIELDS TYP(S)PER LTR.WTH I • •dJER 2”SPACER PAINTED _TO MATCH INSt 6 I r ' WMA-TOP) .T- .�. 0 L ....woo SIGNRGE ON BUILDING 0 SCALE I.=1'-0' • S/6'TACK AL MINA LETTERS WITH LETTERS 'a PITH PAINT=1NISH 5.9ARRE ALIMINM TIE L16HTBAR WITH HOCK 1411E LEO ILLUMINATION NO CLEAR LEVAN LENS. (OR APPROVED MAO .. • rl STEEL A14015, ;� CT c 1 J south-right elevation b SIGNRGE ON AWNING d g1 SCALE:1/B'=I'-0' - SCRLE:I'_1'{p O — 1 building elevations E BpE�noted NERRON ENTERPRISE HOD science drive A moorpark.California Qm apn#512-0-2H0-O85 CD 1 7 EXTERIOR FINISHES El STOREFRONT TINTED GLASS ■V4"SOLER I C NG I/2•AIR x I/4•CLEAR N LOW T'COATI I"NSULATED SLAW, ALTERNATE-ADD LOW E.GOATINS O SPANDREL GLASS 11111/4'SOLES TO MATCH STOREFRONT 6LASS '4 L3 CONCRETE PANEL ACCENT COLOR: PAINTED TO MATCH"DUNN ET.ORDS. • _ DE-6561'BABY SEAL' Dco o 0 0 El 0 ©O m D ©O©OCH 5 I 0 ; ® CONCRETE PANEL ACCENT COLOR: r - —c - .' __#— -----_.ii • PAINTED TO MATCH'TANN EDWARDS• _ J , = _ . DE-6935'NOVELTY NAVY. ROC.LN - ---- =� '---- - B t u c.. -' - _ ROOF LN • � F4. - — E5 CONCRETE PANEL FIELD COLOR ..�. p�$ I JC$i'i EEO®MN • _ —� SILVER POLISHTEO TO . 'DIAVIV EDWARDS'DEE974 • ..-01- Ciiiitiii • littMl ■ :O_-_ ■ CONCRETE PANEL R • �j FIELD COLO - - 4 PAINED SI MATCH VIM EDYtA.RpS' -1I 1111111111. DE-6979 SILVER LACE • - 'I 4!!d�sgn+8 ,,� • g _ NELVA.FA LH.60Q HORIZONTAL CORRUGATED METAL • ®ROOF TOP MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT -111 NOT TO ENGEM"BUILDING PARAPET 1£IEAT. 1 - M ALUMINUM STOREFRONT FRAMES: % - \, , .._ 2•R 4 1/2• WM CLEAR ANODIZED AMIN �� • • \ BRnNO U LR - �I - _ I . f 1 �� _. — WOUND ILIE LN,h 1O MAN DOOR V PAINTED TO MAT.'4O NN EDWARDS` DEG-766 STEVEARENO BEIGE' Fri ROLL-UP DOOR PAINTED TO MATCH•WHIN M.A.*" DEC-766 STEVEARBIO BEIGE• 12 BUILDING SIGNAGE HALO LIT REVERSE CHANNEL LETTERS PER DETAIL•c NOTE.SIGN PER SEPARATE PERMIT 13 STEEL AWNING north left elevation O 14 42"HIGH GUARD RAIL SCALE.I/8•=I'-0' RDRAIN IS WITHOOFIN THE BNLDINGAND OVERFLOW IB BUILDING SIGNAGE I .9/6'THICK ALARM LETTERS 48TH PAINT FINISH PER DETAIL*d NOTE:SIGN PER SEPARATE PERMIT • ELEVATION NOTES NOTE: I.ALL EXTERIOR GLASS INDICATED HITHO TO BE TEMPERED GLASS. • 2.PAINT COLORS REFERENCED FROM"WV EDAM.. • COLOR SYSTEM. 0 © p ® D 0 © 0 O O © © © ❑I II m Q T B.ALL DOORS,PRATES.FLASHING,DRIPS.VENT'S. _ CAPS.SCUPPERS.ROLL-UP DOORS. ' ETC.TO BE PAINTED SA.COLOR AS ADJACENT WALL COLOR. _ 4.ALL ACCENT REVEALS TO BE PAINTED ON INC r----411 • -t • 66 FLAT BOTTOM TI SURFACE ONLY WITH E ACCENT • ��F L11 _ -_ -_ _ _ 1 -- _ - -x---� -L RRA�.Y S.APPLY ANTIERAFFITI COATING TO 9'O'APP. • AT ALL EXTERIOR CONCRETE PANELS. �_ • 6.PROVIDE BUILDING L ADDRESS.VERIFY LOCATION, 1.1 • • NI • G MID STYLE WTD LOCAL JJR19DI OC T.TIE USE OF HIGHLY REFLECTIVE WINDOW GLAZING • SHALL BE PROHIBITED THROUGH /1 THE PROJECT. - , I In"OE.PABRICATED AILMINM CRAWL n d PNMT® • -.-- _- _ Nc IC PLR RET OTE LED D19G016ZGT SWITCH - __ • • LCV VOLTAM PINE RI d _ 5/6'CLEAR LEAN 481114881E DIFFUSER FLLM )11"..- WALL A = a INLLMING FIRINGY LIALUIT BY O11EE5 �■ C - -_ ra111 OED "CrT/0 ION 990014 ii A 1111.11111111 905LRPY1 ANO 9NELD9MP3/PER LT0.WITX R • • In•SPACSE PAINT® TO MATOI PULL .-- 111111111- MOM IVJL-N.LFJ • Is BROAD PI.R LN _ - M . BM.u LN 6 • H ID W m �q. m IO Y SIGNAGE ON BUILDING Oc SCALE).=1'-0' 3/6'THICK ALUMINUM LETTERS WITH PANT FINISH 5'STUARE ALIH1N.M TAX LIGNIBAR AIN 9500K WI11TE LED WJE MINATION NO CLEAR LEAN LES. ES. 1S" TCR APPROVED Ea.) ,, ..• 0. STEEL AWE. J%C` 1 east-rear elevation b SIGNAGE ON AWNING d SCALE I/8'=ILIP - SCALE l'=I'-0' - cg•H 1 building elevations Ill! scats as noted NERRON ENTERPRISE 3 LI) H00 science drive moorpark. california QT apo#S12-0-240-085 CO 1 8 an II 111 Kill al .11:11 III 0 © i • w { � • 1 i '-':- ..' - L _,7-- a ' ' de-6361 baby seal steel awning dark glass dunn edwards • ,. r,j, 9 t.r7 --i— ®-- - alb ,t- '� . view from east side • de-56H eames for blue storefront mullions spandrel glass dunn edwards d c 3 b 4 U© II © d © . .. 1!I , •, - mow • i ,,,,,, .,,. „,,,,,, _ :. ,,,• ,..„,,,,,..„. ._ _. „.„,,,,,,„., . .. ,,,,,,0.--- ,,,,': ---,, ___ _ _____ • . , .. - - -- - __,---- ,_ ,____ i I 1b �, t” de-637y silver polish r dunn edwars architectural metal siding n • y / b¢ • joii,'., • view at main entrance de-6379 silver lake bike rack dunn edwards 9 Fill I material board : NERRON ENTERPRISE 400 science drive. moorpark. ca (� Q CO 19 • • EXISTING CANOPY TREE TO BE REMOVED Glesilsie niren.os/Honey Locust ern'replaced Al canopy nee EXISTING CANOPY TREE TOM REMOVED Uterus parvMera/Evergreen Elm we ryYxeC MM camgns ACCENT CANOPY TREE FOUNDATION SHRUB ACCENT TREE ATBUIDING ENTRY 51' ORNAMENTAL BOULDERS . lAnwpEIGSTING..OPYTREEnEBEPROTECTED ./Evergreen Elm ,..' 700 EXIST/NG CANOPY TREE TO BE REMOVED �RNG GOWER TO BE PROTEC r '•� �sckira UYrxre Cendlo'e/Evenyow EM Carey •Rn ACCENT CANOPY TREE SHRUBGROUNMOVER4. - :�A , FLOWERING GROUNOLOVFF MUNDATION SHRUB #A7 '' g: PARKING LOT FOUNDATION PUMA,.AT PERIMETER WALL EXISTING FIREBACNFLOW `.VAIN` �4 t‘-''... .`' , 4. AND METERS a♦�♦... .•�I i#40/ y�I����: S(ICCULEMGROUNOCOVER NATIVE SCREEN VIRUS '�„I`���. ` �I,3 ACCENT SHRUBS TALL SCREENING CANOPY TREE '� � EXISTING GNOPYTREE pJAQMCENi"e '� A. a - �. NARROW'CANOPYTREE IN PERIMETER MANNERS TO BE PROTECTED 41, Euralypn Werorylm Roae'/ReolmMMx EXISTING CANOPY TREE ON ADJACENT PROPERTY '/ iY ” Cl PARKING LOT CANOPY TREE IN FINGER PUNTERS TORE PROTECTED /, g UNrxi perMdie/Evergrem EM r �I 1.". j `i `�1�' \ '11. _ /7"we EEIORAr AMA/ .,e PMJLLAw 1 _ ,, FOUNDATION RANTING AT eeeee " -.. A PERIMETER WALL = oa Me AW i .MAW YA ei PARKING LOT FOUNDATION P.M,.AT PERIMETER WALL A. AW I i " * \t par it t Via— A'r Aw AN G k A iir it, zirc - 7e:>: Jil ... :Lir4r. . ,,�Aff 10Z-4,11 all AN N *s // _ / .,-, I I ru I I I I I 11 I I I I -"- _______ sca,.: 1--30' o 15 og m PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN Jo°"umbe"T00I Ede CO 08 NEARON ENTERPRISES SEM CoteW. sNnBMn�a�AB�,o, 200 SCIENCE DRIVE MOORPARK, CA yew Nee.'IMnPeglgecMi01TP2yn1+)WV Mem EINMAsee1+T.00TCe01+T.OOT In RogRMWeeron ErrlermesAneetslPrelimmuny Lerbscape PanMPL.IPreEmine"LR2$Ca(N PM/.ORg Pb/St T07703.1202PMnun®AcmnwenoarwerrAmy wvereraim®wrvranew.Amon r new.errwam v,wnw metre coo* 20 7) TI TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP No. LOCATED IN THE CITY OF MOORPARK, COUNTY OF VENTURA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA k UTILITY NOTES EXISTING & PROPOSED LOT AREAS TITLE REPORT NOTES. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: EXISTING PARCEL 8...435,416 SO FT 100 ACRES THE EXCEPTIONS IN ADDITION TO DE PRINTED EASEMENTS ANO EXCLUSIONS AS SHOWN IN FIRST AMERICAN ALL THAT CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY MAW IN INE COUNTY OF WNW%STATE OF CALIFORNIA DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS CN3 E TV: PHONE.' TIRE COMPANY PRELIMINARY REPORT ORDER Na NGS-767404-CC OILED NOIEM@R 12,2015 ARE DELINEATED NE WARNER CABLE AFT . IERIAN UNLESS ODffRWSE NOTED: PARCEL 8 Cr PARCEL MAP NO.3818 IN THE CITY OF MOORPARK,,COUNTY OF VENTURA STATE OF CALIFORNIA AS PER ANP RUED 2323 TELLER ROAD 3851 OVERLAND AVENUE PROPOSED LOT'1 339,803 SO.FT 7.80 ACRES . IN BOCK 38,PAGES 1 THROUGH 5,IELI/AE OF PARCEL AMPS,MD AS AMENDED IN BOOK 36.RILE 39 OF PARCEL MAPS,IN THE NEWBURY PARK,CALIFORNIA 91320 CULVER CITY,CALIFORNIA 90132 PROPOSED LOT 95,673 50.FT.239 ACRES OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SMD LOUVIY. (888)892-2253 (350)559-2019 O M EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC URGE AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES,RECORDED.NILE 26,1984 As INSTRUMENT M. EXCEPT ONE IWC OF 27/40185 INTEREST OF AFL OIL AND MNERIL RIGHTS BELOW 500 FEET FROM THE SURFACE BUT W6)401/T WATER ELECTRIC 8251/OF OFHCW RECORDS. DHE RIGHT OF SURFACE ENTRY AS RESERIED H THE DEED RECORDED SEPTEMBER Il,1963 AS DOLMAN?'AV..57165 IN BOOK VENTURA WATERWORKS DISTRICT/F SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EOISON 2390,PAGE 306 OF OFFMIML RECORDS 6767 SPRING ROAD P0.80X 800 IN FAVOR Or SIXRNERI CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY 6767 SPRING GMJPAP/8A 93021 R05EAlFAO.CALIFORNIA 91770 A01ECIS AS DESCRIBED THEREIN ALSO EXCEPT ONE/W1 OF r3/40TH5 MRE7ESST OF HL 00 AAD MINE%Roo BELOW DEPTH OF 500 FEET BELOW DE SWAGE MOO ARK-3005 (800) AD,CRL5DUI MOUT THE RIGHT BOCK ALT+1o1 8 56/OF ENTRY AS RESERVED BY THE DEED RECORDED OCTOBER 17,/963 AS DOCUMENT NO.61146 © M F SFMFNT FOR PUBLIC unarms IDS Alp MCILCNTAL PURPOSES RECORDED N MBER 75,7984 ASOFRECORDS INSTRUMENT No.118300 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY SEVER 150 EXCEPT 25%OF ALL DE MINERALS CML,OL PETROEM 015 ASPHALTUM AND KIU%ED SUBSTANCES NOW 0R HEREAFTER IN FAV90 O:. PACIFIC BELL M OR UNDO?SAID/AAD BELOW A DEPTH OF 500 FEET FROM THE SURFACE 7HEREOR MTE4UT TIE RIGHT OF SURFACE ENTRY AS P.O.BOX C 6767VENTSE WATERWORKSGRON) DISTRICT/1 RESERVE)IN THE DEED RECORDED DDEIIBLR 20 1966 IN BOOP 3081,PAGE 337 OF OFTXCLAL RECORDS. O MONTEREY PARK,CALIFORNIA 6767 SPRING R'MN AFFECTS- AS DESCRIBED THEREIN 2 (800)305-8261 MOORPARK,CALIFORNIA 9302/ Fg (805)378-3005 APIA 511-0-140-085SUBJECT NE EFFECTS OF TAXES AND ASSESSMENTS,LENS,OL&GAS LEASES 1191545 TERMS AND PROVISIONS,INTEREST$ CLAIMS OR UNRECORDED LEASES AS DISCLOSED BY REM NO'S 1-3,AND 7-9 ARE NOT SHOW ON DIS,SURVEY, RICIN/TY MAP: PROPERTY N 0 FLOOD ZONE NOTES. . ' •s . --' C 2 FLOOD ZONE 40 3' - LLL Cc Cc COMMUNITY NINE MOORPARK,CYO 4 j' •e LLL IL CLMYUWIY NUMBER- 06onz L ,�I4 � W W U AMP NUMBER 06151LY83BE I '� MAP DATE JANUARY 20 2010 f1 -. / Q� Ill CC AREAS SUBJECT 10 NONMTKN BY 1-PERCENT-MNUNL-CHANCE SHALLOW FLOODING(USUALLY 57007 Xi r ~N O POI ON SLOFWI.TER NN)MER`AVENGE DEPTHS ARE BE141174 ONE AND THEE FEE/ASR/GE FLOOD R.• LYPlll5 DERIVED FROM LIETANLD N10&WC,NNLYSES ARE SHOW IN INS ZONE M4YMTORR•FF0G0 INSURANCE Y W - ti Z PURGNR RE0/947A/OS AMID FLOODPWN MAMGEMEER STANDARDS APPLY _ ZONING NOTES 4�, i. �� y g SUBJECT PROPERTY:200 SCIENCE ERNE MOORPARK 04 93021 . WI CURRENT ZONING 6 PER CITY OF MOORPARK IONIC ORDINANCE LOCAL ZOOID: MI-AMOUSRNL PARK BASIS OF BEARINGS: SETBACK AND HOW RS/RKRDNS THE BEARING NORTH 10 J0'33'EAST BEING THE CENTERLINE OF SCIENCE DRIVE AS SHOWN ON PARCEL ANP NO.3928,RECORDED AS MAP BOOK 38 PAGES 1-5,IN THE COUNTY OF VENTURA TINT 20 FT STATE OF CALIFORNA,WAS TAKEN AS THE 8495 OU BEARINGS SHOWN ON THIS NAP. SIE 5 FT REAR HEIGHT:30 FT BOUNDARY DATUM: ti_a ESTABLISHED FROM THE LOCAL CRY OR COUNTY SURVEY AND/OR PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENTS AVFD?AI/D9V COIECTED FROM CRY OF MOORPARK MUNICIPAL GOOF/724.0.75 BOUNDING MONUMMENTED CENTERLINES OR FROM PUNTS OF RECORD AS SHOWN. F ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN,THEY ARE FOR INFORMATION ONLY AND ARITNOQNFOR CER/IICARKON OF GRADE DRAINAGE OR 5!.:).Wc ApCA, ANY OTHER ITEM WHICH AMY BE CONNECTED TO INRTIOIC DATUM. O SHE CLN/A/S(SUBJECT TD CASEMENTS AND RESIRCRON5 OF RECORD) Q 0 GROSS AREA.4354/1 50 FT.1000 AC LEGEND: W PROPERTY/BON04F'IME I..5-U BU/LD/NG "A"PARKING Waif""UNE SETBACKw-4 .STANDARD SPACES 272 — — CENTER LAVE Q)LU COMPACT SPACE: 14 HANDICAP SPACES ID EASEMENT O MOTORCYCLE SPACES. x ODE LIN RACE Q VOTAL SPACES 3 00 EDGE OF ASPHALT I jAiiAAAAAAiAi BU PRINT 2 (SPE ES) '',C BUILDING B'PARKING ADAA ORAN 5-....3 B BO/AR7Q STANDARD SPACES: M EPB ELECTRICAL PAL BOX O COMPACT SPACES 0 FP RAG POLE HANDICAP SPACES: 4 M TIRE MORAN MOTORCYCLE SPACES I 3 LT LIGHT CLEAN AR ENCLES 8 RAR BACKFLOW MEANIE? TOTAL SPACES 87 S SIGN g IB IRRIGATION BOX IPV WATER VHW REFERENCE NOTES: wIRRIGATION VALVE RE W (R) RECORD INFORMATION FROM DATA SHOWNGM GAS MEIER (R I) RECORD INFORMATION FROM PARCEL AMP 3828 RECORDED AS MMP BOOK 38,PACES 1-5 SSW SWARTT SEWER MANHOLE R AND AS AMENDED IN BOOK 38,PAGE 39 CANT COMMUNICATION MANHOLE (C) CALCULI TED INFORMATION SOW ROWER POLESTORM DRAIN 'OLE 2 N r' RHINO CONTROL POINT(LEAD 1 TACK,UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED) TS TRAFFIC sow • '6;-'';'2' ^bi RSPB TRAFFIC W 0 WI/HOARY CORNER OF SURVEYED PROPERTY MBX MAILBOX SIGNAL P(AlBOX >'. m N FDC RBE DEPAR/MBNR CONNECTOR o UB UTU/TY BOX > vYc,,i-N! IE . HANDICAP PARING SPACE ct] o A w MC . MOTORCYCLE PARKING SPACE h STD STANDARD PARKING SPACE(S) 0/ 2 2 2 Ely EASTERLY .,/, NETT FACE 3 p Q Q PROPERTY LINE 'et' I W W W SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT tCSS�R`D`At,s t p P OHO SAA WAS PREPARED BY C OR UNDER RT DIRECT T SUPERVISIONTITLEP AND * F SHOWS ALL EASEMENTS OF RECORD AS REPORTED IN THE TITLE REPORT * °777&� * ^( PREPARED BY FIRST AMERICAN TITLE COMPANY,DATED NOVEMBER 12,2015. Gpiy OA OF CAL, ' Cr 14 ICC NOTES: MARK O.HARDY L.S.5440 EXP.9/30/2018 DATE 6' 1)BOUNDARY WAS ESTABLISHED HOLD/NG MONUMENTATION FOUND ON SCIENCE DRIVEI2 BUSED ON RECORD INFORMATION FROM PARCEL AMP 3828,RECORDED AS AWP BOOK W 38,PAGES 1-5 AND AS AMENDED IN BOOK 38,PAGE 39. 2)SEE SHEET 1 OF 1 FOR SITE IMPROVEMENTS 3)ALL MEASUREMENTS ARE BASED ON COLLECTED FIELD MIA UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED SNFFT 4)SYMBOLS ON SURVEY ARE FOR GRAPHICAL PURPOSES ONLY AND DO NOT REPRESENT THE ACTUAL SIZE OF SITE CULTURE. 5)TRUNK OAMEIEHS ARE REPRESENTATIVE OF CONDITIONS MEASURE AT CHEST HEIGHT 6)BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE MEASURED FROM EXTERIOR FOOTPRINT OF BUILDING AT GROUND LEVEL. .I.w. ww,• x,,=ww w., IN. >.II xI-Nw-01SI-5,16/2017 Iv,.AI 2 1 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP No. __ __ MATCH UNE — SEE RIGHT __ __ a LOCATED IN THE CITY OF MOORPARK, COUNTY OF VENTURA,VENTURA4, STATE OF j �,. ;,�N° CALIFORNIA % wc..,. ,� // •:; 0. /-`. ir -- •.9r. � I� W B �,,n,. M 4.il• '6 /� BUILDING$" I 0.1 e� /� '�'_� FOOTPRINT.32$30 S.F. -�+�i / `3'- / MEZZANINE-.2500 S.F. / RV ,.., 1i IYJ / / iii /V /i a. 2.19 ACRES k Nc . / /`a � i/ ■ / � *,,0 •( �. �s R // j/ / IN '. /M/ LINE - SEELEFT Ala 4 / Y' / // N ., LEGEND: Cl. 4, , AWING SEMEN/ / xti / ^• - WEER WE U Q CC / ��/ '4-,PANNING 6PfNLi - --K EASEWIT OWN LIN MOM Z U x� L Lot H WC CF WNW PMKA: Q �LLI� ,.„..,,•,,,,:,,,,,,• d1E1NCramnstTOE 1.1.114.1 U / .S.`, ,1>, r., ` // + ” mu POE MBEs) 6/ A9 Neu OWN co Y / ,L. PROPOSED L LNE B AD/AO ~ T. WV' N actad 6 \ P, PFRE WIWI � z a b�/ Aw PGS 9 � M co 1.1'N'O �1 'P a ssSr PREWITW p // A• QJ�P Lie \ 5 sw LOT 1 «+ ,k 1� W INAR MK IMIDIRON/ ,• ' ` // J37.80 ACRE9.803 saS 24',y'� Aa LT IB,,AIS r� 1 �v MU T r NW K W �p 3' W MUTT WNW / / SSW WORT SETER WM! & 4 \ 1 R WIN CLYVNAIAY YWKII / SCIENCE DRIVE .. / i�` SLW STORM OWN MEYvaE PP PGN'N POLE b • SINGLE STORY / yp t, '5 nw'Pr OWL / /'. MANUFACTURING FACILITY / eT �Q� ,� IWAIWA' / WITH SECOND STORY a5 _,4�' / /aB / OFFlCE •COMPONENT '' } y1rF ��^"1 ° EDC noa-WIRY Bad COVEmur 'I' h / o / 102.260 50. FT.t — � ���� le r714N0154;PAWING braac�xl .� b �� mc STB srN4lPD PAwnc s7+Ns(s) tW a, EASIRLY gC // / % �' / a. ,',i e� *sr FACE LYE Cr o o //ock / t<Nr. `"1 N MIMI C) 56.31'' HIT/ / ,o. e1N` / _ \1 MC Z ,/7. „,,„.- 4%•.4/ /14V/41111k1"46/ N ill 1 I rg- — — ic / AO ASPIMLT ,Ah, ,8 \Ig\ /+ 5 ,, /:/// A T Nb c / x.V /g. �' . PALOT '4 \ / / 1' / LOT ' _/ y /U2f” �. .TCT LOT �. W 1,, '�j NY / 11. 1. / 'AI Q OJS i r 4�: `-_ `? 3' �j 1F' �LI. ST r ■ g iPN . N ,',': 4gel,-/// d' i. • _ i"•�'� // ■ „Si ' 1 llue4 Y ilibili • 44111 //S06/D.h v / / `r& • ,b ao .. 45 , ' • w ft Mo ja;, 1 .� j 1,ST i-O iN ST r_—_� - -� 40 BO I / OOP : GRASS r 1, ' --- am'BAR¢7�'7! _ VVV m © ',' rIST �' —__ s __ c� SIA99' - z5 Bo 1'a - If -- _— — -�—_---� SCALE: 1"=40' 't\ n •veva 1 _ 5 _ — \daY35.52”R_2930.07• Lr cr+Ass s�B L98.75'(R1) — mass mass �— V ,o'REAL±SETBACK — — —— — �-7r N'5 '26'•E 2 PP TSPEIPS TSPS S .-- N59'S8'26•W 1 t SSB sSSW s _ 3 1 5 1SPB 75IB 6 APB 75 TS 1 t— _ R >8 ` ` Tspa .b iSPB ,w W [Lil WOWS .c _ — - - ���y/ /��+ ��y��/�+ ��/ COTE �59.o TABLE Noor LIAG0' Z d.TII'31'RaT000.00'L�529.43'OH) _ - _ n NEW LO ANGLE A VUE - _ _ - - - - - C1 37 IY 29• 52500' 3.110' W Ia.SSM PER 25CR75;r0.&FOR ENT 5.94'NORTH - - - N dl'ld'S7"E(Ri)727J.13'(RI) e EASTERLY OF RECORD MIER5ECTr34 OF NOY LOS ANGELES ! AMIE AND SCIENCE ORDS BUYING N 47 14'20"E N6': I TPM-02 22 .\.. I--,,m—.+.1....,\—.., „5,e,em+,.« TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP No. _ MATCH LINE-SEE RICHT -- _ _ g LOCATED/N THE CITY OF MOORPARK,COUNTY OF VENTURA,STATE OF / // / / '.1 o s.k F4 . 1 i\,,:,..:4( p CALIFORNIA ✓r` ,n i/ / \� Ns, v/ %. �, 4 _^ '"----- 7, _ /� KY, '• / 801.40 V' ra ISSINS 12es S.F. �I — G1E�C. pFo - / w G3 u rorty 35,330 s.r. S •�-,_ ^ / �„' \��' LOT 2 9ii a acs _ �1l =g\- ` + ////',¢ _ G _ it /' :'.'� �Iy�f Ott ry \l, �. 22 a /// //tiwkin • MATCH LINE-SEE WT g al COM CC gtr I . / . "�. _014.N IT ARAI OM. _LK Ca o !UM MIR `yl ,} 1,6 atf.1 016,1 ... numIllil.a NI HN ti, C NI MI'MOW rn / p�.t'"� SCI PK 9 RR .02.,.mvmi illp �/ 339 0]50.Fr. ..- 4 tr/ /.eo/txEs Z OR4.110,0 reef. / R.I 4191 El s / _ i • 3333.. // r/ / ym sprm-r rcms �1.; 3 3 3 3 /` SINGLE sroRris g„ NAM ACTLISN9 FAautt RR. ,::: fRIL9 Rif M SGLE ST STOW �� y p 1„ ..// /q / OFFICE CONMnENr Iii • 333.. ansmr ,f / / 102,2e0 SQ.R.S •�I'— m. .rur ear mgraircoawr MI'Ner e • //// - - / •� ,-.1 1c1W4t) N SS]I1 Z Y1 y: / / !w°a ] / *'G-.< �`/ '8 �� m 'r 1 �t �w r / �'. o�`' ,,sty., ! pi S y " I //k/4: „.ey/o , �+��� t='7��4,. F ��• I• r ' `L NI I r.. aRs t "°_ °� 1/ __ lusr __ —'— _�oua__ -_ sass•.. e.l. 2 WO �'__—s _ scn�.r • 15'S2'R.291p.a°' —.— ill 7]SSI -x 56117f-E A 2 • x 5s5aae•u - a U I m ] 5 S �2 k• g �a am m mm m m mm ,F., I R ® �fil A. W r NEW LOS ANGELES AVENUE 71' r/m: I MPH,E•1 s. I ANNX MO x.T,.z F ESE I TPM-02 . ...........1.—.............J.....-.••••..d N GJ • • • site legend keyed notes ,<. '� `�_ directory decorative.alk e.blbg 16.mpdcl.tall to be foram �+��� __ d.QEIl LNa.. ARCHITECT Ir-0'.SO'-0'trxhl'.n lomxg area - )y' Marc.. �/ane 119 Inc. pbaWt.bre 9126 CLAFETox 011.115 1. ..�' prop...nem Wltlhg a I00am buck bmhg tery.lolef re rofdbKO/' / \`\ r).• ...- _f� f-,.:_, IoiygV:a1TDlby lo'4"'YA SSI 1.9117 atl..=',']02 AfgAA a 9OD1 I H'-0•mil. .f ..abut R.Iwnb 99596 aYMarN a ,aallamb 91%1 Ary PoLlolel/I9tDtae ❑prop...ne.aarcrob 90,10 IA•.50,0.mac lap loafing ° �"i 14 5 p.925)L55fiS1 p,(DDb2246o6HOLM(6DA0ITOI PAWMD 01 W19 prop..am ager,planar 41.11 In•s 50'-0•ongom I...9 `\ ne-.mn...nwt / \ / I 111 men,salt rw am.pre•mare a-t1Au.arml..pbav6aeetwrce En concrete owe • 'y project address 12 existing art ter mmaleroa k- � 0 I'19 w Dae rery ,\ •N •+ 400 sclerae afro,more*=Var.9501 ewng rat a pet . 'N^9 wall /'' .`\„ � —. / / / I legal description \��//-/ ,��i'a j; `;: +'_O' All lee wwnrmlp.opa-y.nwlea etna y.rvewnMao.f Gallon.,m...x.mrom�.,. C) .oar. r.a SSS��� / • z4t�1 } - 1 I PaaleapuiOl mlr..9��.nme eM1ymet.,,..W IZ LaNyavarc«o.swt.wraw.r.nm 009�� O S,KNeNa of pool udm alaMdn bwkSD.pe]e S9a I Pe^•'gyp lbs xbook b.p.ge>I r ♦ /// V O mp., par.arq•h ma mix.i me racy 149,.1 a ere=4! C) /,' ` \`N /J� 'I" /// !//� i4%��yt `` iro '�� mow,wrmTl/NAn xtero.t er ml of ala mtwalrgrt.mwsoo Net N.ml.4916..bt wuonfro rlata wrta.enxy as //\ I / -. / / y� • ea h the mea recorded svpbmnr 11.1965 as awnmt..55165 h book 2212 coca 506 of of tidal Pore.. .. mmu.tr..t• j /4 %/i j /f} / I - -. • AI.a except an liar a w+am Merest aI woe Da mwrel ettD p a SP Poet arbor w..too.brt.m.we b"nap or • /'' ``\ l I ,j /// %��V I mimeo ante,.ra.evea x W W a.a revaea at.an IRO m t..ella.10x.14U•pace 961 m andel rearm. J1; /�/N.Ilding'b / //i I A..,., 2111°dn al,mKrob,cootot ban / i }aotprint 32 30 Df 1 °P' 9P'. � kxaea.wta...ad b bre.... n emr ebc'eb lea a.DN 506 roe rmm iro vt¢ tbrol.wYwt Itb enby m ad x IM e.ea b orb.tibia i.r 71.1966 / \ n '�••'� ';; m.zzanlnm 21`00• f �r In to 6 pogo 5910 awls roan... ' / •�\• \//`//t Fele/s P•/ ° flood zone note: y \\/ ���If / / / rllbooa tee. AO-5- sans AO. r eFRantitrr oawre cera ``N • /,. \� ''':''''/ /f! ...;;;.7:7::.:.// / Ao.woo.feat m b.raaum Is,1-pacconb nD1+Av. amw.rwmg f"waiy.lnm Ib.t m.loprg tarn./the Dvaoge area. [\/ ''� ( J \\ I/ w bet.e.n ad arae I.I.Ara boa horn.mare. dor.x an Ina. // \/ + - I J: J°r mpae mm. lyaalx ma'pa.aro I.Po'a41 �P / \/ � ` \ \ / ;i�.'n-li r�.renata.rotIger olay ciao. /' , /s.,\\\ \� 6\ /// I7: n project statistics: /' • \ \�>= \\ / �� be2 am g"mta..e 22490.i:r roQuest ail N /' (((' -,\\\ • \\\\ .,/ A�'i1 � .}[,`-•�° ��f°e4rM' .,-51dJ0.l.ls.'�AI '\ •\` \ .mss\q.� / W 10;1 ' .,-6911 a.(D.,]\I /'' ' n eam.strrr.t / ' 11 /. \: / \ \� \ \\ \ Aq��1 �1.� y.)It`t. rot tote, Yvl Wa'a4 wb.'ml'c ./-19M1 J.ALISM / / 6' air \ \ \ ..WW '�O.'° '9\ '�4_ 1700 IQ \\\ `�' ./ • �!.. - ` 1st floor area nontrial YY '//r \ > \\ \ \\\• �� \9 \• \d�`S`t' +� _ lit rm awe car .i: z / N /r ./ \\\ \\\\ \\\ \ N . \\ \ 9„..„, TN!l em..wrR m0amg%mea.a. s :�. \-�" • E ��y�i)� "\ \` >\ w ®l m\`\: k�T— .\\\ �:� • ` s II II .` \\\ \ a �� \ t 41119 r.itt• \ • ` \ \ \\ \ LLcrk 61.n / / ! \ C.; .\\\ \\ ` \ \\ \ 1D-} I .ale-rlrt am.mock. ow•b�a. / \'\,�\ \\\ EXI5TIN68UILDIN6"A"' \ � \ \ \ \ ..i01 $i= oast-rma.be.meck. m•a• ,y >,..\ footprint,102.260 of\ �� • �\ \ ,y'P "\ i.,..0 - ar^ommla wrl+w'.ylam' N9wru++alea 1H 1QO1"41 eP\ \ \ Mrd floor office. 13216 of \� \\ ''\'' ,:'''r � 1 _ existing site parking calculations / /'' /' \ total 115576 DPN\ .:•\ \\: .'\,,,S..,'.::1 ° . V Wlxg loo alb an.. gob e1.(9.99 aril ' . \ ` \ • \\`\ Ik.q+ wt�\�. \\ \\\ \\ \.-.1.d. _ O e,anrg bnlang•a 1z55e a lrsoo x11 sp.. \ ♦ C \ ` \ \ \ \ ,,•\\\\\ a`� \\ ' I♦_ 1 510 .Intl do spaces 50 carpool epacca • / \ \ Q \ \ I 0 10 Dm apse. 4 mita..Nae. It ��` \\ \\ \• „ ,,•,_,,‘ ,.;. ,,,\,...,, \ �-: n <.r O 9.1 wntg \`\ //�I\\/ 's ' \ \\ \NIC '\\-:„...N:,.:,--.,,, \ \ •rte • Au±: \ "i.- \ ! -6 an...aces ropoed.wta • ,,,,,,;,„,:),.,...,..,:\ \ .e.♦ \\ \ \ • l l\ \ S �x • Nave proposed lot.I \\\\\ \\ ..\ ,\4 ..K ` \ \\ ” sfS!`'! .5 mobKodo spacei proposed a11of 2 \ \ \ �\ \\\ \\\\\ \ !.1 •52-I nem total fa bt le 101 « # `•' t;' \\ ---,_\,, >..�.4\ w r\ � 1\,,)1\,, ,L . . r \, \\ �~ proposed lot 1 parking celculetlan v/\ \ /� \ .. \ \\`'\ \\ ���✓lr \ a \ \ \\! I \: �V ye..V-»9oo5.l 1111.error) • 5 ; \\\\�r �®� \ _\ / \'I, \ \' t \\\ ae.g og 956.rinas a ape... tr..... ^ # I\ 'i \ \- \ \4 \�\\-\\X.'•: \ \ '' S. .lame Nae. / ,.;','\ •l''.-4.%t;' :i...,-,11._: \\� A \\ . ��\p 6\\< \\\ �.\I\\ \ \I I\;. '5' \�— f O "Lt4 pay.. 4 '.� �T\ b Tr „:,,, ,,..,.,,,••••„. \i k✓ \/ I P N `\ Mbn. 500 an'ay pwbea Q .-/''' - /119556.1.269/400 1 / \\\�6# 4 6A` \ \ w I - VICINITY MAP r�+gr..lot / J 44,10 1. . �� �`�\\\ \�j \\ t� `B\ N . ', \ \�• .. \\ l PROJECT SITE proposed lot 2 parking calculation / / \ �`,` �\\ . \ ®\ \� \\\\ \ \ \ \ j ....c. proposed Wurng v 95550 0. are. gee../-956..1.DA.crest \ \ \ \......1::::::\‘: \\ \ \\2:1 \ \ . _1'I' _ enl� D5A5o.!. Iso. n Paw'9•'T'te (k$i fib\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ �\, .e+ SL p`Cte \ \ \ \ \I I't�0, p . \ t •\.-amu _-�l°:„,,,_,„_ ,4N____,-- are• -- -, n .laraaa.pea. y ---./ rnsioreir.spa. _ 3tv.e-num . a"_' ��--_� •_. s rba.Dr yd.. . amp.space ,ie..a. yy..e '-"--taro -.xvnx[ P.-.E 1.4911. al prodaa ! Ll`-'.. poll.pe"boa/9566..1 el 2A6i400 • 4 "----'-J1--.__....__}-_- .-j _r_ T --' — -�. ... �.._ ° e �, Sa 61.1 bees etake G e tg3%3%7 - -- ,^--..j =(�_.ti— • Mil 2Wt tam pro. gig 1 1 lag lam-nAm D1.e5 fig -- _ 56 a 65 a 50xes rent. • - — proposed site plan . lbg um bkc'pwbd I RI./A gilei 09 611111.r LW IMII 11111111,1,P912 MEZIEN erle.MI "are LOS ANGELES AVENUE STALEr�_�� \ bmaNmp.l.ma .Dib1LL P norprortdad d • site plan ! ...nand NERRON ENTERPRISE 400 science drive NOHnt moorpar k California Ct.epn#512-0-240-Ce5 , CD ill N pA • From: David Bobardt Monday, November 13,2017 5:17 PM City Council&City Manager Cc: Blanca Garza; Maureen Benson;Freddy Carrillo Subject: FW:400 Science Drive Glass color.(Solarban 60(2) Solargray� Clear) Attachments: Solarban specs.pdf Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers, FYI. This email and attachment are supplemental information to the staff report for Agenda Item 8A—400 Science Drive, set for the regular Council meeting of November 15,2017. This supplemental information provides more detail on the glass proposed for the new building, which is shown as Number 5 on the material board included with the agenda report. Please let me know if you have any questions. Vmued PV. Ski/at Community Development Director City ofMr rk 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021 (805)517-6281 u0000not /mvvrparkCx.gov From: Jose Tamayo [maUbratamayo©okanchitacLure'net] Sent: MondayNovember 13, 2017 4:30 PM v. David Bobardt Anthony Molina; Nick Rini; Brian Poliquin subject: 400 Science Drive-Glass color(Solarban 60 y2lSo|a,gray + Clear) Dave, • We are proposing on using the Vitro Architectural Glass Solarban® 60 (2) Solangray() + Clear. CC /& �w��@������� B *—no o ,��»oHnO0��uv3 o t I. • Please see attached PDF for glass specs. http://samples.vitroglazings.com/solarban-60-2-solargray-clear-3 Best Regards, Jose Tamayo pk:architecture 5126 dareton drive: suite 110 agoura hills . california : 91301 jtamavoft pkarchitecture.net 818.584.0057 866.800.1289 pkarchitecture,net 2 26 0 SOLARBAN'60ilia 6Q1ea5Gapey® Solar Control Low-E Glass Glass•Coatings• Paint Solarban®60 solar control, low-e glass by PPG was engineered to `.. control solar heat gain,which is essential to minimizing cooling costs. , Pit „„,- In a standard one-inch insulating glass unit(IGU), Solarban®60 glass _ `*.- offers an exterior appearance similar to clear, uncoated glass. ..e_ - With a very good Solar Heat Gain Coefficient(SHGC)of 0.39, �„ / Solarban®60 glass blocks 66 percent of the total solar energy �� -24114111k: while allowing 70 percent of the visible light to pass through. '�' This combination produces an excellent Light to Solar Gain (LSG) r-• r. ratio of 1.79, along with exceptional insulating performance, as I fi` evidenced by its 0.29 winter nighttime U-value. . ti i',t - Aesthetic Options Solalban®60 glass can be coated on Starphire®glass and paired with Starphire®glass to produce an IGU with exceptional 1'2'/ . clarity and solar control characteristics. For even more color and ,V / 4. \,, performance options, it can be coated on the second(#2)surface 't /414.,, "-'t"----{ .,vo 1,;,%,.4 of nearly all PPG's wide range of tinted glasses, or combined %-gdr-...La < en,," ' in an IGU with any PPG tinted glass, Solarcool®reflective Location:Newark,NJ glass or Vistacool®subtly reflective, color-enhanced glass(see Product:Solarban 60 Glass performance data on back page). Architect:Morris Adjmi Architects Glass Contractor:Josloff Glass Solarban"60 Glass and Sustainable Design Glass Fabricator:I.E.Berkowitz,LP An energy modeling study conducted by an independent energy design and consulting firm showed that architects and building I - A owners can potentially save millions of dollars during a buildings lifetime by specifying Solarban®60 glass instead of less advanced i architectural glazings. -__ a For instance,the study showed that, by substituting Solarban® j_I 60 glass in place of dual-pane tinted glass, the owners of a 3 INAN�I1 mss ' typical glass-walled, eight-story office building in Boston could ■ 1 lower their initial HVAC equipment costs by nearly$350,000 YMIrN" - . - while realizing annual energy savings of more than $80,000. 1� ' __. Corresponding carbon emissions from the same building were !■ Ili also also reduced by more than 300 tons per year,which eclipses the 11111 total carbon emissions generated by 31,000 gallons of gasoline. PPPIIIjIn addition to making products that support sustainable design, '— � is - PPG has pioneered innovative technologies that reduce energy consumption during the glass-making process. PPG promotes Streeter Place environmentally responsible manufacturing by recovering and Location:Chicago,IL reusing virtually all of its glass manufacturing by-products and by Product:Solarban 60 Glass shipping its materials on reusable steel racks. PPG also facilitates Architect:Solomon CordwellBuenzandAssociates Owner/Developer:Golub and Company regional sourcing through its nationwide network of certified glass Glass Fabricator:Northwestern Industries,Inc. fabricators and laminators. Glazing Contractor:Custom Windows and J&D Erectors With Solarban®60 glass, sustainable design and LEED®credit opportunities are provided according to the following criteria: LEED/Green Design Category Feature Benefit Optimizing Energy Performance Excellent SHGC,U-value,and Tvis performance Enhance energy performance of building design Daylight&Views High VLT Connectivity to natural lighting and the outdoors Innovation in Design Cradle to Cradle Certification"" Selection of environmentally-focused product evaluation 27 I , 1 1 0 SOLARBAN°60 Solar Control Low-F..Glass 0 Solarban®60 glass is just one of many ecological Fabrication and Availability Ecological Solutions from PPGrM. For solutions from PPO Solarban®60 glass is available eel.PPG Certified more information, or to obtain samples exclusively through the FABRICATOR® NETWORK of this product, call -4332), or visit www. PPG Certified Fabricator®Network. PPG Certified Fabricators ppgldeascapes.corn. can meet tight construction deadlines and accelerate the PPG is the first U.S. float glass manufacturer to have its delivery of replacement glass before, during and after products recognized by the Cradle to Cradle Certifiedcm construction. Solarban®60 glass is manufactured using the program, and it offers more C2C-certified architectural sputter-coating process and is available for annealed, heat- glasses than any other float glass manufacturer. strengthened and tempered applications. PPG IdeaScapes®Integrated products,people and services to inspire your design and color vision. Additional Resources i Solarban®60 Glass Performance-Commercial Insulating Glass Unit Comparisons Using 1/4" (6mm)Glass Insulatin Vision Unit Performance Com)arisons 1-inch(25mm)units with 1/2-inch(13nun)airs pace and two 1/4-inch(Gmm)lites:as shown below Transmittance U-Value(Imperial) Solar Heat Light to Ultra- Total Visible Total Winter Summer European Shading Gain Solar Visible Solar Solar U-Value Coefficient Gain ! violet Energy Light Energy Night- Day- Coefficient time time (LSG) SOLARBAN60 Solar Control Low-E Glass • SOLARBAN 60(2)Clear+Clear 18 70 34 11 28 0.29 0.27 1.6 0.45 0.39 1.79 • SOLARBAN 60(2)STARPHIRE* 24 74 39 11 41 0.29 0.27 1.6 0.48 0.41 1.80 1111 SOLARBAN 60(2)ATLANTICA+Clear 5 53 20 8 7 0.29 0.27 1.6 0.32 0.27 1.96 Ei SOLARBAN 60(2)AZURIA+Clear 13 54 21 8 6 0.29 0.27 1.6 0.32 0.28 1.93 )wj= SOLARBAN 60(2)OPTIGRAY+Clear 10 50 23 8 14 0.29 0.27 1.5 0.35 0.30 1.67 [,, SOLARBAN60(2)PACIFICA+Clear 5 34 15 6 6 0.29 0.27 1.6 0.26 0.22 1.55 Ei SOLARBAN 60(2)SOLARBLUE+Clear 10 45 21 7 12 0.29 0.27 1.6 0.33 0.28 1.61 SOLARBAN 60(2)SOLARBRONZE+Clear 8 42 21 7 15 0.29 0.27 1.6 0.32 0.28 1.50 ■ SOLARBAN60(2)SOLARGRAY+Clear 8 35 18 6 12 0.29 0.27 1.6 0.29 0.25 1.40 • SOLARBAN60(2)SOLEXIA+Clear 10 61 25 9 10 0.29 0.27 1.6 0.37 0.32 1.91 El ATLANTICAe+SOLARBAN 60(3)Clear 5 53 20 9 7 0.29 0.27 1.6 0.36 0.31 1.71 FA AZURIAe+SOLARBAN 60(3)Clear 13 54 21 9 7 0.29 0.27 1.6 0.36 0.31 1.74 GRAYLITEe II+SOLARBAN 60(3)Clear 1 7 4 4 5 0.29 0.27 1.6 0.14 0.13 0.54 • OPTIGRAYe+SOLARBAN 60(3)Clear 10 50 23 8 15 0.29 0.27 1.5 0.40 0.35 1.43 1 ' PACIFICAe+SOLARBAN 60(3)Clear 5 34 15 6 7 0.29 0.27 1.6 0.29 0.25 1.36 el SOLARBLUE®+SOLARBAN 60(3)Clear 10 45 21 7 13 0.29 0.27 1.6 0.38 0.33 1.36 SOLARBRONZEe+SOLARBAN 60(3)Clear 8 42 21 7 16 0.29 0.27 1.6 0.37 0.32 1.31 SOLARGRAY®+SOLARBAN 60(3)Clear 8 35 18 7 13 0.29 0.27 1.6 0.33 0.29 1.21 • SOLEX/A®+SOLARBAN 60(3)Clear 10 61 25 10 10 0.29 0.27 1.6 0.42 0.37 1.65 VISTACOOL" Glass with SOLARBAN 60 Solar Control Low-E(3) 1111 VISTACOOL(2)AZURIA+Low-E 11 42 16 20 11 0.29 0.27 1.6 0.30 0.26 1.62 VISTACOOL(2)PACIFICA+Low-E 4 26 12 11 9 0.29 0.27 1.6 0.25 0.21 1.24 SOLARCOOL- Glass(Reflective)with SOLARBAN 60 Solar Control Low-E(3) IM SOLARCOOL(2)AZUR IA+Low-E 4 21 8 19 10 0.29 0.27 1.6 0.19 0.17 1.24 ' SOLARCOOL(2)PACIFICA+Low-E 2 13 6 10 8 0.29 0.27 1.6 0.17 0.15 0.87 ' _ SOLARCOOL(2)SOLARBLUE+Low-E 3 17 9 14 15 0.29 0.27 1.6 0.21 0.18 0.94 SOLARCOOL(2)SOLARBRONZE+Law-E 2 17 9 14 18 0.29 0.27 1.6 0.21 0.18 0.94 SOLARCOOL(2)SOLARGRAY+Low-E 2 14 8 11 14 0.29 0.27 1.6 0.20 0.17 0.82 Li SOLARCOOL(2)SOLEXIA+Low-E 3 24 10 24 15 0.29 0.27 1.6 0.22 0.19 1.26 *Data based on using STARPHIRE`glass for both interior and exterior lites. All performance data calculated using LBNL Window 6.3 software,except European U-value,which is calculated using WinDat version 3.0.1 software.For detailed information on the methodologies used to calculate the aesthetic and performance values in this table,please visit www.ppgideascapes.com or request our Architectural Glass Catalog. ©2014 PPG Industries,Inc.All rights reserved.Atlantica,Azuria,Azurlife,Graylite,IdeaScapes,Oceans of Color,Optiblue,Optigray,Pacifica,Solarban,Solarblue,Solarbronze, Seismal,Solargray,Soles,Solexia,Starphire,Sungate,V7stacool,the PPG logo and the PPG Certified Fabricator Network and the PPG Certified Programs are registered trademarks of I PPG Industries Ohio,Inc.Cradle to Cradle Certified is a certification mark licensed by the Cradle to Cradle Products Innovation Institute. ii Ecological Solutions from PPG is a trademark of PPG Industries Ohio,Inc. CI' // 12 `alga Gope a _=id„, :r r.7w I Printed in U.S.A. J 7071 09/1410M 5RVE: Glass•Coatings•Paint PPG Industries,Inc. Glass Business&Discovery Center 400 Guys Run Road Cheswick,PA 15024 1-888-PPG-IDEA www.ppgideascapes.com RESOLUTION NO. 2017- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 2016-01 AND INDUSTRIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 2017-01 FOR THE SUBDIVISION OF AN APPROXIMATELY 10.0-ACRE DEVELOPED LOT INTO TWO PARCELS OF 7.8 ACRES AND 2.2 ACRES AND CONSTRUCTION OF A 35,330 SQUARE-FOOT INDUSTRIAL BUILDING ON THE NEWLY-CREATED 2.2-ACRE PARCEL AT 400 SCIENCE DRIVE, AND MAKING A DETERMINATION OF EXEMPTION UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) IN CONNECTION THEREWITH, ON THE APPLICATION OF NICK RINI FOR NEARON ENTERPRISES WHEREAS, Nick Rini, for Nearon Enterprises, submitted applications for Tentative Parcel Map (TPM) No. 2016-01 on November 8, 2016, and Industrial Planned Development (IPD) Permit No. 2017-01 on April 12, 2017, for the subdivision of an approximately 10.0-acre developed lot into two parcels of 7.8 acres and 2.2 acres and construction of a 35,330 square-foot industrial building on the newly-created 2.2 acre parcel; and WHEREAS, at a duly noticed public hearing on October 24, 2017 for TPM No. 2016-01 and IPD Permit No. 2017-01, the Planning Commission considered the agenda report and any supplements thereto and written public comments; opened the public hearing and took and considered public testimony both for and against the proposal; closed the public hearing and adopted Resolution No. PC-2017-622, recommending to the City Council approval of the Tentative Parcel Map and Industrial Planned Development Permit; and WHEREAS, at a duly noticed public hearing on November 15, 2017 and December 6, 2017 for TPM No. 2016-01 and IPD Permit No. 2017-01, the City Council considered the agenda report and any supplements thereto and written public comments; opened the public hearing and took and considered public testimony both for and against the proposal; closed the public hearing and reached a decision on this matter; and WHEREAS, the Community Development Director has determined that TPM No. 2016-01 and IPD Permit No. 2017-01 are categorically exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15332 (Class 32: In-fill Development Projects) of the CEQA Guidelines. The proposed building is consistent with the General Plan and Zoning regulations. In addition, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment in that the site has already been graded and improved in anticipation of future development. No further environmental documentation is needed. CC ATTACHMENT C 29 Resolution No. 2017- Page 2 NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION: The City Council, based on its own independent analysis and judgment, concurs with the Community Development Director's determination that the project is categorically exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15332 (Class 32: In-fill Development Projects) of the CEQA Guidelines. The proposed building and is consistent with the General Plan and Zoning regulations. In addition, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment in that the site has already been graded and improved in anticipation of future development. No further environmental documentation is needed. SECTION 2. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP PERMIT FINDINGS: Based upon the information set forth in the staff report(s), accompanying studies, and oral and written public testimony, the City Council makes the following findings: A. The proposed map, including its design and improvements, is consistent with the City's General Plan and Zoning Ordinance as proposed, in that the map has been designed to comply with the requirements of the City's General Plan in providing a new industrial parcel adjacent to existing industrial development and it meets Zoning standards for the Industrial Park (M-1) Zone. B. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed in that the site can be engineered to allow for all required utilities to be brought to the site, adequate ingress and egress can be obtained, and the site can be provided with public and emergency services. C. The site is physically suitable for the proposed intensity of development, in that all City development standards, including parking, would be met by the proposed project. D. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage, in that the site has already been graded and improved in anticipation of future industrial development. E. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems, in that adequate sanitation is both feasible and required as a condition of this development. F. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements.will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large, for access through, or use of the property within the proposed subdivision, in that full access to and from Science Drive for both parcels have been incorporated in the design of this project. 30 Resolution No. 2017- Page 3 SECTION 3. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT FINDINGS: Based upon the information set forth in the staff report(s), accompanying studies, and oral and written public testimony, the City Council makes the following findings in accordance with City of Moorpark, Municipal Code Section 17.44.030: A. The site design, including structure location, size, height, setbacks, massing, scale, architectural style and colors, and landscaping, is consistent with the provisions of the General Plan, any applicable specific plans, Zoning Ordinance, and any other applicable regulations in that it incorporates design features, including mass, scale, materials, and colors, to enhance the visual character of the industrial park location. B. The site design would not create negative impacts on or impair the utility of properties, structures or uses in the surrounding area in that the building complies with Zoning regulations and sufficient parking is provided on site. C. The future uses would be compatible with existing and permitted uses in the surrounding area, which is part of the Industrial Park (M-1) Zoning designation. SECTION 4. APPROVAL OF PROJECT: Based on all of the findings contained herein and all the evidence in the record of this matter, the City Council approves TPM No. 2016-01 and IPD Permit No. 2017-01 subject to the Standard and Special Conditions of Approval included in Exhibit A (Standard and Special Conditions of Approval), attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. SECTION 5. FILING OF RESOLUTION: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution and shall cause a certified resolution to be filed in the book of original resolutions. PASSED, AND ADOPTED this 6th day of December, 2017. Janice S. Parvin, Mayor ATTEST: Maureen Benson, City Clerk Exhibit A— Standard and Special Conditions of Approval 31 Resolution No. 2017- Page 4 EXHIBIT A STANDARD AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 2016-01 AND INDUSTRIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 2017-01 STANDARD CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL The applicant shall comply with Standard Conditions of Approval for Subdivisions and Planned Developments as adopted by City Council Resolution No. 2009-2799 (Exhibits A), except as modified by the following Special Conditions of Approval. In the event of conflict between a Standard and Special Condition of Approval, the Special Condition shall apply. SPECIAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. The applicant's acceptance of this permit and/or commencement of construction and/or operations under this permit is deemed to be acceptance of all conditions of this permit. 2. The Conditions of Approval of this permit, City of Moorpark Municipal Code and adopted city policies at the time of the permit approval supersede all conflicting notations, specifications, dimensions, typical sections and the like which may be shown on plans. 3. The Final Map must include the final Conditions of Approval and a reference to the adopted City Council resolution in a format acceptable to the Community Development Director. 4. This subdivision expires two (2) years from the date of its approval. The Community Development Director with the City Engineer's concurrence may, at his/her discretion, grant up to one (1) additional one-year extension for map recordation, if there have been no changes in the adjacent areas and if the applicant can document that he/she has diligently worked towards Map recordation during the initial period of time. The request for extension of this Map must be made in writing, at least thirty calendar (30) days prior to the expiration date of the map and must be accompanied by applicable entitlement processing deposits. 5. This Industrial Planned Development permit expires one (1) year from the date of its approval unless the use has been inaugurated by issuance of a building permit for construction. The Community Development Director may, at his/her discretion, grant up to two (2) additional one-year extensions for use inauguration of the development permit, if there have been no changes in the adjacent areas 32 Resolution No. 2017- Page 5 and if the applicant can document that he/she has diligently worked towards use inauguration during the initial period of time. The request for extension of this planned development permit must be made in writing, at least thirty (30) days prior to the expiration date of the permit and must be accompanied by applicable entitlement processing deposits. The Conditions of Approval of this entitlement and all provisions of the Subdivision Map Act, City of Moorpark Municipal Code and adopted City policies at the time of the entitlement approval, supersede all conflicting notations, specifications, dimensions, typical sections and the like which may be shown on said Map and/or plans or on the entitlement application. This language shall be added as a notation to the Final Map and/or to the final plans for the planned development. 6. Conditions of this entitlement may not be interpreted as permitting or requiring any violation of law or any unlawful rules or regulations or orders of an authorized governmental agency. 7. The applicant shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City and its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action or proceeding against the City or its agents, officers or employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul any approval by the City or any of its agencies, departments, commissions, agents, officers, or employees concerning the permit, which claim, action or proceeding is brought within the time period provided by the California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6 and Government Code Section 65009. The City will promptly notify the applicant of any such claim, action or proceeding, and if the City should fail to do so or should fail to cooperate fully in the defense, the applicant shall not thereafter be responsible to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City or its agents, officers and employees pursuant to this condition. a. The City may, within its unlimited discretion, participate in the defense of any such claim, action or proceeding, if both of the following occur: i. The City bears its own attorney fees and costs; and ii. The City defends the claim, action or proceeding in good faith. b. The applicant shall not be required to pay or perform any settlement of such claim, action or proceeding unless the settlement is approved by the applicant. The applicant's obligations under this condition shall apply regardless of whether a building permit is ultimately obtained, or final occupancy is ultimately granted with respect to the permit. 8. If any of the conditions or limitations of this approval are held to be invalid, that holding shall not invalidate any of the remaining conditions or limitations set forth. 33 Resolution No. 2017- Page 6 9. The development must be in substantial conformance with the plans presented in conjunction with the application for Tentative Parcel Map No. 2016-01 and Industrial Planned Development No. 2017-01, except any modifications as may be required to meet specific Code standards or other conditions stipulated herein. Any future changes to the parking layout shall require review and approval as determined by the Community Development Director consistent with Chapter 17.44 of the Zoning Ordinance. 10. Industrial Planned Development No. 2017-01 may be revoked or its use suspended by the City, if any of the causes listed in Section 17.44.080.B of the Zoning Code are found to apply, including if the use for which the permit was granted has not been exercised for at least twelve (12) consecutive months, has ceased to exist, or has been abandoned. The discontinuance for a period of one hundred eighty (180) or more days of a nonconforming use or a change of nonconforming use to a conforming use constitutes abandonment and termination of the nonconforming status of the use. 11. Tentative Parcel Map No. 2016-01 and Industrial Planned Development No. 2017-01 is granted or approved with the City's designated approving body retaining and reserving the right and jurisdiction to review and to modify the permit—including the conditions of approval—based on changed circumstances. Changed circumstances include, but are not limited to, major modification of the business; a change in scope, emphasis, size, or nature of the business; the expansion, alteration, reconfiguration, or change of use; or the fact that the use is negatively impacting surrounding uses by virtue of impacts not identified at the time of application for the conditional use permit or impacts that are much greater than anticipated or disclosed at the time of application for the conditional use permit. The reservation of right to review any permit granted or approved under this chapter by the City's designated approving body is in addition to, and not in lieu of, the right of the City, its Planning Commission, City Council and designated approving body to review and revoke or modify any permit granted or approved under this chapter for any violations of the conditions imposed on such permit. 12. Prior to issuance of a Zoning Clearance for a building permit, the applicant shall submit a color and material board for review and approval of the Community Development Director. Materials, textures and colors of the building shall be compatible with the existing buildings in the business park. 13. Prior to issuance of a Zoning Clearance for a building permit, the applicant shall submit a lighting and landscaping plan for review and approval by the Community Development Director, Parks and Recreation Director, and Police Chief that demonstrates compliance with the City's Zoning Ordinance, Landscape Standards and Guidelines, and Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance, and provides a safe and secure environment for the building occupants. 34 Resolution No. 2017- Page 7 14. Existing landscaping along the site's Los Angeles Avenue frontage shall be enhanced and existing landscaping in the parking lot shall be restored to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director. All enhanced landscaping shall be installed prior to Certificate of Occupancy for the new building on the 2.2- acre parcel. 15. None of the prohibited plants indicated in the Provisionally Acceptable Plant List and the Invasive and Prohibited Plant List contained in the City's Landscape Standards and Guidelines shall be used on the development site. 16. Prior to the issuance of a Zoning Clearance for a building permit, the applicant shall submit a plan for a fully-covered trash enclosure, with materials and colors to match the building, for review and approval by the Community Development Director and City solid waste manager. 17. Prior to the issuance of a Zoning Clearance for occupancy, the applicant shall submit a Developer Waste Reduction and Recycling Plan to the satisfaction of the City's Solid Waste and Recycling Division. 18. All necessary permits must be obtained from the Building and Safety Division and all construction shall be in compliance with the Moorpark Building Code and all other applicable regulations. 19. Prior to the issuance of each building permit, the applicant shall provide a sample of the glass to be used, along with the manufacturer's specifications for exterior reflectance, for review and approval by the Community Development Director. Glass shall not exceed 8% exterior reflectance. 20. Concurrent with the lighting review to determine compliance with Chapter 17.30 of the Moorpark Municipal Code, the applicant shall provide the Community Development Director exhibits demonstrating that all lighting fixtures across both properties are architecturally compatible with the buildings and landscaping. LED lighting is encouraged to conserve electricity. 21. Parking areas must be developed and maintained in compliance with the Moorpark Municipal Code, and surfaced with asphalt, concrete, or other surface acceptable to the Community Development Director, City Engineer/Public Works Director, and must include adequate provisions for drainage, National Pollution • Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) compliance, striping and appropriate wheel blocks or curbs in parking areas adjacent to landscaped areas. All parking space striping must be maintained to be clearly visible during the life of the development. 35 Resolution No. 2017- Page 8 22. The number of parking spaces shall be maintained consistent with Chapter 17.32 of the Zoning Ordinance. 23. Reciprocal access through parking lots and publicly accessible outdoor areas shall be required and incorporated into the Final Parcel Map and Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and shall be maintained by both property owners to enable accessibility to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director, City Engineer/Public Works Director and City Attorney 24. A separate sign permit application is required for all proposed signs, which are subject to the review and approval of the Community Development Director. No signage is permitted on the architectural fin on the north façade of the new building. 25. No outdoor storage, including vehicle storage, is allowed under this approval. Any request for outdoor storage shall be subject to the application requirements in place at the time of such request. 26. Prior to issuance of a Zoning Clearance for a building permit, the applicant shall submit all fees, including, but not limited to Los Angeles Avenue Area of Contribution Fee, Air Quality Fee, Tree and Landscape Fee, Fire Protection Facilities Fee, Police Facilities Fee, and Library Facilities Fee. All entitlement processing fees must be paid up prior to the issuance of a Zoning Clearance for a building permit. 27. Prior to issuance of a Zoning Clearance for a building permit, applicant shall either submit an in-lieu art fee or indicate a location for on-site public art in compliance with Chapter 17.50 of the Zoning Ordinance. If on-site public art is approved, it must be installed and completed prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. Engineering / Public Works 28. Prior to Final Parcel Map approval and recordation, the Final Parcel Map shall include an irrevocable offer to dedicate property at the northeast corner of Science Drive and Los Angeles Avenue for future intersection improvements. Future intersection improvements are for one dedicated right-turn lane (southbound), one dedicated left-turn/through lane (southbound), and one travel lane (northbound) at the northern leg of Science Drive at Los Angeles Avenue. The irrevocable offer to dedicate shall be to the satisfaction of the City Engineer/Public Works Director and Community Development Director. 36 Resolution No. 2017- Page 9 29. Prior to Final Parcel Map approval and recordation, the Final Parcel Map shall include a 5-foot wide sidewalk improvement along the entire Science Drive project frontage within the public right-of-way. The sidewalk shall be constructed to City standards to the satisfaction of the City Engineer/Public Works Director prior to occupancy of the new building on the 2.2-acre parcel. 30. Prior to Final Map approval and recordation, the Final Parcel Map and Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) shall provide drainage covenants across both parcels to the satisfaction of the City Engineer/Public Works Director. 31. The project shall incorporate post-construction storm water Best Management Practices (BMPs) and Low Impact Development design, including a technical feasibility report, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer/Public Works Director. -End- 37