HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 1994 0420 CC REG ITEM 08D •
{ ---�R4;_a 7 ITEM 8. 0.
AGENDA REPORT
CITY OF MOORPARK .
cs "7/�1 169_g
TO: Honorable City Council ciio /f..�,' •,//
FROM: Steven G. Hayes, Economic Development Manager
By ! --
DATE: April 8, 1994 (CC meeting of 04/20/94)
SUBJECT: A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Moorpark Approving and
Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Cooperation Agreement by and
between the Moorpark Redevelopment Agency and the City of Moorpark
(Metrolink Block Wall)
BACKGROUND:
On April 6, 1994, the Agency approved participation in the funding and appropriated $9,650,
(1/2 of the estimated cost from bond proceeds) for construction of the block wall separating the
Metrolink Station from the residential area located to the south of the station as described in the
attached staff report dated March 29, 1994.
DISCUSSION:
The attached Resolution and Cooperation Agreement is being presented to the City Council of
the City of Moorpark for approval in accordance with Section 33670 of the California
Community Redevelopment Law and for auditing purposes for filing the Annual Statement of
Indebtedness.
The City of Moorpark has agreed to construct, or cause to be constructed, a block wall on the
south side of the Metrolink Station as depicted in the above mentioned staff report for the MRA.
The total estimated cost of construction (MRA portion $9,650, City portion $9,650 paid with
TDA Funds) is $19,300.
FUNDING:
On April 6, 1994, the Agency agreed to fund this project from the 1993 bond proceeds.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Moorpark City Council adopt Resolution No. 94-_ authorizing the
City Manager to execute the attached Cooperation Agreement by and between the City of
Moorpark and the Moorpark Redevelopment Agency.
Attachments: Resolution No. 94-_
Cooperation Agreement
Staff Report - 02/22/94
ITEM
AGENDA REPORT
CITY OF MOORPARK
TO: Honorable Moorpark Redevelopment Agency Board
FROM: Mary K. Lindley, Assistant to the City Manager
DATE: March 29, 1994 (Agency Meeting of 4/6)
SUBJECT: Consider Amending the Moorpark Redevelopment
Agency's 1993/94 Budget by Appropriating $19,300
for the Construction of a Block Wall Located at the
Northern Property Line of Dorothy Avenue
Residences, South of the Metrolink Station
Background
On March 16, 1994, the City Council approved the demolition and
construction of the block wall located on the northern property
line of six Dorothy Avenue residences, just south of the City's
Metrolink Station. The Council/Agency will fund the construction
of a new wall without financial contributions from the residential
property owners. An appropriation of $6,800 from the City's
Transportation Development Act fund was approved for the cost to
demolish the wall, repair damaged landscaping, and install a
temporary fence. No action was taken to appropriate funds for the
reconstruction of the block wall.
The wall is six feet high. The portion to be demolished and
reconstructed measures 460 feet long (see exhibit A) . Construction
costs are estimated to be $19, 288, which includes a 10%
contingency.
While staff continues to pursue the use of special emergency
Community Development Block Grant funds made available by HUD, it
appears unlikely that these funds will be awarded to this project.
At the March 16 Council meeting, staff recommended the use of
Moorpark Redevelopment Agency (MRA) funds for the construction of
the wall. The wall is within the MRA's project area.
Reconstruction of the wall will benefit six residents on Dorothy
Avenue, several of whom are believed to be low income, and enhance
the downtown area.
Construction of Block Wall
March 28, 1994
Page 2
The Council also expressed some interest in using TDA funds since
the wall reconstruction project benefits the Metrolink Station.
The City receives approximately $512, 000 annually in TDA funds in
1993/94. Council allocates approximately $.121, 600 to the City's
transit budget to cover bus operating expenditures and repairs and
maintenance at the Metrolink Station. The remaining funds are
allocated to the City's street maintenance and improvement budget.
If the City Council chooses to use TDA funds, the revenue will come
from the street budget.
The Agency may also wish to consider splitting the cost of the wall
between MRA and TDA funds. Since the wall benefits both private,
residential property and a public facility, either or both funding
sources would be appropriate. If the Agency takes action to
approve the use of MRA funds, in whole or in part, staff will draft
an agreement to reimburse the City's General Fund for consideration
at the Agency meeting.
Recommendation (Roll Call Vote)
Staff recommends that the Agency amend the MRA 1993/94 Budget and
appropriate $19,300 from bond proceeds for the construction of a
block wall located on the northern property line of six Dorothy
Avenue residences, just south of the Metrolink Station.
wpdocs/mra.agd
attachment
t y ,\1401 T rt
r ^ POR.•. TRA • .j
S.I?-RR. RJW
•
Z.
Portion of block wall to be demolishe.
V 13 01 ,roi,n k\ PcAt ac-I
•
- =ou«o,-mos • `1 N 29:4•513. 45- E 1311 39 Colic. to. Rsc , 44
11111.- T42 36• "�I - T -NCS' - - • - q.QO.-r -43'- -=+S - - -se- ..-- es- } 'S -1 ''-may._
ral
iO4 !2 39' . :v.,. 16 g ,. • 14,0 7 1$ tl 19 •� 20 .e 21 4, 23 :III 1244 ,�
!LI 10La N . ��f,.. • iSSd. 45' ; t 43' _ 43' _ iS' 65' I 6S'�R"�i1`65'
2 is
V) 4f2 AZ. •'t5O c --44 -DG OT+1 «s9•ss'ao'£- 973 to.
N
;;ti1.2 •- 1 ' ' I �esso' i 165 . , sT •sem .,t s� •a� :11 as' -1
•w'442_45' • -.. 1 •• - ter"53 52 •+ 5 4 50 49 - 48 47 .:J: 45
h L .54. _ _ AD.
wi �4 °4 :+• ><3' - _ss•fo' l_ !h -' - S5' _JIi45_ I: _ •_4 AD.' : sa'
' ! M t 7 Wt. ( - -i 4 — 1 .. .' 7'_
', : SZ +Ni 1 13 28i ZSI
1{n'Pwuc luriut• c+> o•••J[ 1
ft
: , • 1:8 • 56 '01 5d -7.1 56 1 56 &p tp.--ii -.• 141
Il
- „ 401 6., 1 fr'24_ .,
:as • g�51 3 s• 2@( -V ..l ;'N se.eo' ! 43 6s' 1 65 I a',- �- y 6s' 11. 6s'
'=` ' , 0 9 o 24 N
RUTH w O9°'.5a•3o"E 973 10
0.8 t 22 34r-j�i I 11 10j O _ 3!! 60 6 '--•- J ---65-1--65r----- - • 1sT' 6 5' '� 63�
.., -,�`� 9s� _,. (:)
® m T ® i OM 143 a
O7 T • ,: 81 80 a 7�9 78 w T7`! T -75 0, 74 0.
..,�' � s 2.57 I
a 1�r IOC) 10 3C 6 ,
.•*� N19.5eN E ' O Q3 ID' 6.3' 6 55' � .4' t ,, 4� 63' : 63
as : `-..a 8 8 �l se9`S8'30-K J �s' ;rti"...ve yr,.:re t&*.U(.*;.
( '- o 1a) 9O � ;• 8 • 8 �' 8 w 8 86 ti aA8,.... .._ 89
,[ .`n 29' 2s'. CJ I ® '` C7' af 21
0 9i. ..•* u _ 43 1 i 5' I 43 ; _ 5_3'____.-__�_-.
• GIR2 ,t SECOND 945 10"
rouuo ,-IRON •11..- 0
N 19° 51' 30- E
. rr418c0 R Ir 411/1 e N t9.30' 25'E 1371 71
Q. '
m � 13 _
•
NOTE-A
A
%/7_4.— I/-_ .,- - - _• •I_ elk n •• .-. ....