HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 1994 0420 CC REG ITEM 09Bc117
ITEM
AGENDA REPORT
CITY OF MOORPARK
TO: The Honorable City Council
FROM: Jaime R. Aguilera, Director of Community Developmen'�"�,`
Kathleen Mallory, Associate Planner
DATE: April 14, 1994 (CC meeting of April 20, 1994)
SUBJECT: CONSIDER MAJOR MODIFICATION NUMBER 2 (FILED BY KAUFMAN
AND BROAD) TO RESIDENTIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT
NUMBER 1041 (TRACT 3963 -4 [PHASE 41), FOR THE CONSTRUCTION
OF 87 SINGLE - FAMILY HOMES WITHIN CAMPUS HILLS - MOORPARK
BACKGROUND
Tentative Tract Map 3963 and Residential Planned Development Permit Number 1041
were approved by the City Council on February 18, 1986 (Resolution Number 86 -275,
which has been transmitted to the City Council under separate cover) for the construction
of 484 single - family homes by Griffin Homes The approved project was for construction
of homes in five phases; two housing types wF e i- opcsed, the Classics and the Estates.
The approved square footages, model type. a d home amenities for the entire tract, were
as follows:
"CLASSICS
Square footage Model Type Home Amenities
918 sq. ft. _ ''Berkley' (single- story, 2 -ar garage, 2 bedroom, Den, 2 bath)
1,142 sq. ft. _ "Evanston" (single- story, 1) car garage 3 bedroom, 2 bath)
1,200 sq. ft. = same as above, but inck.�ding a den
1,357 sq. ft. _ ''Palo Alto" (2- story, 2 ca garage 3 bedroom, 2 '/z bath)
1,518 sq. ft. _ "Westwood" (2- story, 2 ar garage, 4 bedroom, 2 1/2 bath)
Staff would like to point out that none of vie aforementioned square footages were
constructed due to Minor Modification Numt r 1
This model type was never constructer.1. Minor Modification Number 1 (March 17,
1986) gave approval to Griffin Homes , change the square footages of the homes
and to construct only four model toes instead of five, which was originally
approved.
KMP- 04- 14- 94(2:35pm)A: \K& B. MAJ`,CC4- 20SF.RPT
The Honorable City Council
April 14, 1994
Page 2
"ESTATES"
Square footage Model Type Home Amenities
1,650 sq. ft. = ''Amherest'' (single - story, car garage, 4 bedroom, 2 1/2 bath)
1,704 sq. ft. = "Dartmouth" (2- story, 3 ca, garage, 3 bedroom, 2 -1/2 bath)
1,892 sq. ft. = "Oxford" (2- story, 3 car ga age, 4 bedroom, 3 bath)
2,149 sq. ft. = ''Wellesley'' (2- story, 3 car garage, 4 bedroom, 3 bath)
(actually 2,460 sq. ft. with bonus room)
Staff would like to point out that none of the aforementioned square footages were
constructed due to Minor Modification Numb( .
1. OVERVIEW
A few years ago, Griffin Homes declared bankruptcy and its assets were recently sold by
the bankruptcy court. At the time that Griffin Homes declared bankruptcy, all of Phase
I, II, III, and 44 -homes in Phase IV had been constructed. Within Phase IV, 87- single
family homes and one private recreational facility remain to be constructed. Kaufman and
Broad has entered into an Option Agreemen' with the trustee of the court to purchase
the final 87 lots in Phase IV, of Campus Hills
For the Council's information, Major Modification Number 2 is a requested modification
to the Planned Development Permit; conditic ns of approval on the Tract may not be
modified without the owner's consent becau, � the Map for the Tract has already been
recorded.
2. PRIOR PERMIT MODIFICATIONS
Since 1986, one Major Modification and eleve, i Minor Modifications have been approved
for Planned Development -1041 and Tract 3963. A summary of the Major and Minor
Modifications which affect this project,t is as )Ilo,.vs�
Major Modification Number 1
Resolution Number 87 -395 modified conditions of approval, which specified the sequence
in which certain public improvements were to be completed. Resolution Number 87 -395
(which has been transmitted to the City Ccuncii under separate cover) specifies the
change in Condition of Approval Number 5F
KMP- 04- 14- 94 (2:35pm)A: \K &B.MAJ\CC4- 20SF.RPT
The Honorable City Council
April 14, 1994
Page 3
Minor Modification Number 1
This modification was filed in order to change the approved building square footage for
the Classics and to construct homes in four phases, instead of five phases. This Minor
Modification was approved on March 17. 1986 by the Director of Community
Development. A summary of the originally apj:)roved and the modified square footages
for the Classics within the entire tract, is as fo lows.
Originally
Approved Sq. Ft.
918
1,142
1,357
1,518
"CLASSICS'
Approved Sq. Ft.
Pursuant to Minor Mod. No. 1
1,084
1,200
1,494
1,680
Actually Constructed
Sq. Ft.
1,054
1,214
1,354 and 1,514
1,640 and 1,767
Staff would like to point out that the homes which were 1,084, 1,200, 1,494, and 1,680 sq.
ft., respectively, were never constructed. Instead homes which were 1,054, 1,214, 1,354,
1,514, 1,640 and 1,767 sq. ft., in size were constructed, though approval in the form of
a modification was never granted for this cha,ige
Minor Modification Number 2
On April 28, 1988, the City Council approved a changes in the square footage of the
Estates. A summary of the originally approveri and the modified square footages for the
Estates within the entire tract, is as follows
Originally
Approved Sq. Ft.
1,650
1,704
1,892
2,149
"ESTATES
Approved Sq. Ft.
Pursuant to Minor Mod No. 2
1,831
2,180
2,290
2.786
Actually Constructed
Sq. Ft.
1,831
2,180
2,410
2,786
Staff would like to point out that the home which was 2,290 square feet in size was never
constructed. Instead a home 2,410 square feet in size, respectively, was constructed,
though approval in the form of a modification was never granted for this change.
KMP- 04- 14- 94 (2:35pm)A: \K &B.MAJ \CC4- 20SF.RPT
The Honorable City Council
April 14, 1994
Page 4
Minor Modification Numbered 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 91 and 11
Minor Modifications Number 3 -6, 8, and 11 were for minor changes in the timing of the
payment of fees, construction of public amenities lot configurations for previous phases
within the tract, and minor additions and mod +icatton�- for existing home owners within
the tract.
Minor Modification Number ,7
In June of 1989, Griffin Homes requested approval for 134 development allotments; 3
allotments were for homes within Phase I, and 131 allotments were for homes within
Phase IV. As part of this request, Griffin Homes asked that Phase IV be modified so that
all 131 units (in Phase IV) would be constructed as Estate homes, as opposed to 60
Classics and 71 Estates, as originally approved. The Council approved the request for
134 allotments and also allowed Griffin to construct 131 Estate Homes within Phase IV.
Approval of the allotments was given so that. E 'Classics'' would be constructed in Phase
I and II "Classics'' would be constructed in Phase IV. in consideration of this change, 5
Classics were sold to first time buyers, based upon a criteria established by the City
Council. In summary, Minor Modification Number 7 amended the size of homes which
were constructed in Phase IV - approval was granted to construct 129 Estates and 2
Classics. Further, 3 Classics were constructs d r P1`1�1se I.
Minor Modification Number 10
On September 23, 1991, the Director o? Community Development approved a
modification to modify the square footages of the homes on lots 477, 478, and 481 within
Phase IV (locate larger units on the larger lots.) and change the trim color on one of the
four approved paint schemes. Paint scheme .amher was changed from Oxford Brown
140 accent to Padre 826 by Decratrend.
KMP- 04- 14- 94 (2:35pm)A:\K &B.MAJ \CC4- 20SF.RPT
The Honorable City Council
April 14, 1994
Page 5
3. SUMMARY OF SQUARE FOOTAGES OF HOMES WHICH HAVE BEEN
CONSTRUCTED
Of the 484 single - family homes approved for construction, to date 397 single - family
homes have been constructed. A summary of the number of homes and square
footages which have been constructed within the entire tract is as follows:
Phase I
18 units at 1,054 square feet - Classic
34 units at 1,214 square feet - Classic
3 units at 1,354 square feet - Classic
41 units at 1,514 square feet - Classic
43 units at 1,767 square feet - Classic
Total: 139 units constructed
Phase II
8 units at 1,354 square feet -
Classic
12 units at 1,640 square feet
- Classic
18 units at 1,767 square feet
- Classic
15 units at 1,831 square feet
- Estate
33 units at 2,180 square feet
- Estate
26 units at 2,410 square feet
- Estate
33 units at 2,786 square feet
- Estate
Total: 145 units constructed
Phase III
17 units at 1,354 square feet - Classic.
20 units at 1,640 square feet - Classic
32 units at 1,767 square feet - Classic
Total: 69 units constructed
KMP- 04- 14- 94 (2:35pm)A: \K &B.MAJ \CC4- 20SF.RPT
The Honorable City Council
April 14, 1994
Page 6
Phase IV
2 units at 1,354 square feet - Classic
1 unit at 1,831 square feet - Estate
15 units at 2,180 square feet - Estate
11 units at 2,410 square feet - Estate
15 units at 2,786 square feet - Estate
Total: 44 units constructed (87 rema � ung to r)e constructed, in completion of
Phase IV)
DISCUSSION
With the filing of Major Modification Number 2, the applicant seeks approval from the
Council, to construct 87 single - family homes based upon the Kaufman and Broad
housing prototype (see Attachment Number ') for lots 376 thru 443 and 466 thru 484.
Specific home prototypes and square fool ages have not been designated on the
remaining lots.
1. PROPOSAL
Kaufman and Broad's construction proposal includes the completion of Phase IV, for the
construction of 87 -lots; lot numbered, 376 thru 443 and 466 thru 484. Three housing
prototypes and building square footages are, oroposed, as follows:
Home Size and Mix
Plan 1 29 homes at 1,730 squa� e feet and single story
Plan 2 29 homes at 2,001 squa! e feet arid two -story
Plan 3 29 homes at 2,227 squa- e feet and two -story
Kaufman and Broad have stated that the afot ementioned square footages of homes will
sell in the present economic market. It should also be noted, that the proposed building
square footages have been increased in size +, om what was originally proposed, in verbal
discussions, by Kaufman and Broad. Accorc: ng to Kaufman and Broad, a home of 2,410
sq. ft. and up, will not sell it the present ec( iori,ic o-,arket.
Elevations / Exteriors
Pursuant to the submitted plans, there will h� three elevation options for each house in
a mediterranean theme, consistent with 'Iic, arcl itectural style and color of the
surrounding tract.
KMP- 04- 14- 94( 2 :35pm)A:',,K &B.MAJ \CC4- 20SF.RPT
The Honorable City Council
April 14, 1994
Page 7
Kaufman and Broad's Presentation to the Homeowner's Association
Kaufman and Broad has met with the Homeowner's Association for the Campus Hills
Tract. In an effort to garner the Association s support, Kaufman and Broad has
committed to the following (see Attachment N.jmher 2 - letter dated March 31, 1994 to
Mr. Ted Martens):
1. Annexation to the Existing Association Kaufman and Broad has agreed to keep
the 87 -lots within the existing homeowr ler s association.
2. Completion of the Pool /Recreation Area Kaufman and Broad has agreed to
construct the pool and recreation area ri the fist phase of construction.
Staff would like to point out that P1 -nned Development Permit Condition of
Approval Number 25 states:
"That two private recreational facilities sriall be provided, in the location shown on
the tentative map. These facilities shall be improved with a pool, jacuzzi, tot lot
with play equipment, fencing (wrought ron and slumpstone), drinking fountains,
barbecues, picnic table, half -court basketball, an area partially enclosed (on two
sides) with a solid roof, kitchen facilities including but not limited to stovetop,
double sink with disposal, drop -in oven and cupboards, and landscaped open
space area. A third private recreatiom3l facility„ to be landscaped only, shall be
provided int he location shown on tie tentative map (Parcel R -3). Prior to
issuance of the first zone clearance fc.), Phase II (Parcel R -3) IV (Parcel R -2) and
V (R -1), the developer shall submit to tl-,e C(,-,mmunity Development Director a plan
of the recreational facility within that p, aye for eview and approval by the Parks
and Recreation Commission
All landscaping and improvements onarcel R -3 shall be completed in conjunction
with the improvements on the "E" Street (now University Drive) /Collins Drive
intersection. Landscaping improver, eats tc Parcels R -2 and R -1 shall be
completed and the facilities available )nci to occupancy of the 299th unit and
409th unit, respective y ''
Staff would like to point out that the ;aforementioned condition requires that the
private park (R -2) be installed prior to issuance of the 409th Certificate of
Occupancy, which would be the 12th _,n t ;, onstructed of the 87 units. However,
Kaufman and Broad is proposing install this recreational amenity at the
beginning of the construction of the 8 ots. ::staff recommends that a condition
of approval be added requiring that t e recreational facility be constructed prior
to issuance of a Zoning Clearance for ;c n >trl_Wtion of the first unit, see the top of
page 12 within this report.
KMP- 04- 14- 94( 2: 35pm)A:',,K &B.MAJ\CC,1- 20SF.RPT
The Honorable City Council
April 14, 1994
Page 8
3. Installation of Block Walls and Front Yard Landscaping: Kaufman and Broad has
agreed to install side and rear yard block walls and front yard landscaping prior
to the close of escrow on each house. The style of the block walls will match the
existing walls in the community.
4. Match Existing Color Palette and Exteriors: Kaufman and Broad has agreed that
the exterior appearance of the new homes will be consistent in all substantial detail
to the existing homes, maintaining the o ,,erall architectural appearance of the tract.
2. REVIEW OF DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL (SEE ATTACHMENT NUMBER 3)
AND STAFF ANALYSIS
Upon initial review of the proposed product type, staff was concerned with the lack of
detail and ornateness of the proposed home: as shown on the plans; however, these
plans were modified and more detail is able tc been seen on the plans (see Attachment
Number 1 - Building Plans). On April 7, 1994 staff met with representatives of Kaufman
and Broad to review the proposed product type and project amenities; staff's comments
and concerns regarding the project were shared with Kaufman and Broad. Kaufman and
Broad agreed with staff's point that the bluepnrits submitted were of poor quality and did
not display enough architectural and design d-_tail abo_it the proposed homes. Kaufman
and Broad then submitted modified bluepr , is vhic h may be found as Attachment
Number 1 (Building Plans), within the Counc z; :.)Jckcts
Product Type
Three product types are proposed;
Plan 1 (Single- Story, 2 -car garage, 4 bedrooms, ' retreat /study ", 2 bath - 1,730 sq. ft.)
Plan 2 (Two- Story, 3 -car garage, 3- bedrooms Den /bedroom, 3 bath - 2,001 sq. ft.)
Plan 3 (Two- Story, 3 -car garage, 4- bedroom- Bonus Boom /bedroom, 3 bathroom
- 2,227 sq. ft.)
Analysis - Architecture and Construction Product Type
In reviewing the architectural detail of the Kaufman and Broad development proposal, compared
to the original Griffin Homes approved develc >oment pi oposal, the approved plans exemplified:
Better window treatment, with more int icate detail which provides visual relief;
More architectural detail which results n a pro)ect which looks ornate;
Utilization of window surrounds, wh ct :Jeplicts a lavish - looking development project.
KMP- 04- 14- 94 (2:35pm)A: \K &B.MAJ \CC4- 20SF.RPT
The Honorable City Council
April 14, 1994
Page 9
On April 7, 1994, staff visited the Kaufman and Broad models in Santa Clarita; the homes in
Santa Clarita are the same floor plan and architecture (excluding building materials) as proposed
in Moorpark. Staff noted the following exterior amenities on the development plans:
• Building elevation relief through the use of varied wall depth
Attractive porches on Plan 1
• Attractive second story balconies on PI ins ',) and 3
• Landscaped runners between the two- ar and )ne -car garage on Plans 2 and 3
• Window surrounds and lintels
• Roof profile relief through the use of va ied oof pitch and direction
It is staff's opinion that if the aforementioned �xter or amenities are provided (see Attachment
Number 9), a more ornate and lavish looking leveJlop dent will ensue.
Staff noted the following standard interior am nitie-
• Mirrored closet doors
• On Plan 3, second floor access to sec: and story from kitchen and living room
Open wood trim railing to the second ` )cr and hallway
Ornate recessed areas in walls
Angled walls /ledges /ct_it- throughs creat iic visual relief
• Angled nooks
Staff noted that the following architectural amen ities shculd be confirmed on the proposed plans:
Window surrounds on all four elevatio,
Stuccoed soffit
Building elevation relief through the us- c,f varied wall depth
Attractive porches on Plan 1
Attractive second story balconies on Pans 2 and 3
Landscaped runners LDetween the two ;a,. and one car garage on Plans 2 and 3
• Window surrounds and lintels
Roof profile relief through the use of v ied rocf pitch and direction
In addition to the exterior architectural amenities, staff recommends that Kaufman and Broad be
conditioned to provide the following interior ar �rities, vhich will assist in increasing the property
value:
Mirrored closet doors
On Plan 3, second floor access to sec )nd story from kitchen and living room
Open wood trim railing to the second `lour and hallway
KMP- 04- 14- 94( 2:35pm)A: \K &8.MAJ',CC4- 20SF.RPT
The Honorable City Council
April 14, 1994
Page 10
Ornate recessed areas in walls
• Angled walls /ledges /cut- through creatinv_f visual relief
• Angled nooks
Where the aforementioned amenities are not provided, staff recommends that Kaufman and
Broad be conditioned (see Attachment Numb-,r 9) to iDrovide the amenities.
Building and Lot Square Footages
As seen within Attachment Number 4 (2 sets of Blueprints), the proposed homes are smaller in
size than that which was approved for Phase IV (129 Estates and 2 Classics) as part of Minor
Modification Number 2; however, the lot size are proposed to remain the same.
Analysis - Building Square Footages
The square footages which were approved, ci,,e to Modification Number 2, for Phase IV, were:
1,831 sq. ft., 2,180 sq. ft., 2,290, sq. ft., and 2, 786 sq. f*,., respectively. However, staff would like
to point out that in actuality comes which arE 2.4' 0 sq ft. in size instead of 2,290 sq. ft. have
been constructed.
The single - family home amenities, such as nL�mber of bedrooms, bathrooms, and the number
of garages are comparable with the existing homes approved for Phase IV. The homes,
proposed as 1,730 sq. ft., 2,001 sq. ft., and 2,227 sq. ft., respectively, are similar in size to the
existing homes within Phase IV; the smallest l.;roposed home (1,730 sq. ft.) is 101 sq. ft. smaller
than that which was approved and partially -wilt, as part of Minor Modification Number 2 for
Phase IV. The largest proposed home (2,2'?7 sq ft )i is 559 sq. ft., or 20% smaller than the
largest home (2,786 sq. ft.) constructed by Hc�»es.
Surrounding Uses
Uses and homes surrounding the proposed prolect are as follows:
North: Open Space - Messenger Devi ,ioomen° Project
West: Residential - The Estates
East: Residential - The Estates
South: Residential - Surrounded by C' +ssics, though removed by elevation and distance
Building Plan - 87 -lots
Kaufman and Broad has informed staff that ' their pt oposed Plan is approved, construction of
the 87 -lots, will occur in phases. An estimated 20 (plus or minus) homes will be constructed
during each phase, with construction of all 8-7 units tentatively planned to be completed in March
of 1995. Kaufman and Broad has stated th --it based upon market demand, they would like a
10% flexibility to change the number of he nes constructed in each Plan. For example, 29
KMP- 04- 14- 94( 2: 35pm)A:`,K &B.MAJ',,CC4- 20SF.RPT
The Honorable City Council
April 14, 1994
Page 11
homes are proposed to be constructed in all three Plans; 29 units / 10 % (requested flexibility)
= 3 units (rounded from 2.9). Therefore, if the Council allows Kaufman and Broad to change
the number of homes proposed to be constructed in each Plan (or 29), Kaufman and Broad
could not deviate by more than three units ,,�ithir each Plan, for a total of 87 homes to be
constructed.
Analysis - Building Plan
If the City Council approves Major Modification No. 2, staff recommends that in addition to the
conditions of approval in Resolutions Number 86 -275 and 87 -395, a condition of approval (see
Attachment Number 9) be added which stipulates that construction of each sub - phase, of Phase
IV, shall not interfere with the new homes whicf are constructed and occupied within Phase IV.
Homeowner's Association (HOA)
Presently, only one homeowner's association exists for she entire tract. Kaufman and Broad has
affirmed to residents within the tract that �ney will keep the 87 lots within the existing
homeowner's association instead of creating a -epae ate homeowner's association for the 87 lots.
Analysis - HOA
If the City Council approves Major Modificatior No. 2, staff recommends that in addition to the
conditions of approval in Resolutions Number 86 -275 and 87 -395, a condition of approval (see
Attachment Number 9) be added which stip�,lates that the 87 lots shall be annexed to the
existing homeowner's association prior to issu,-ice of a Zoning Clearance for occupancy of the
first of the 87 units.
Commitment to Building Recreational Amenities
Within the entire tract, one public park (Campc,s Canyon Park), two private active recreational
areas and one private passive park were apps oved; staff considers the two active sites to be
private active recreational facilities. Thus far, �, rely one private active recreational park and the
passive park have been constructed. One t i ivate active recreational facility remains to be
constructed at Borges Drive. The amenities ;.:proposed within the private active recreational
facility which Kaufman and Broad propose tc kr i!t as part of the first set of building permits, will
include: a basketball /multi- purpose court, poc: ,so,_ , tot lot, picnic tables and barbecue. The
proposed amenities are consistent with the oric< iially proposed recreational amenities within the
park, as seen within Condition of Approval rjc ,it e ?5
KMP- 04- 14- 94 (2:35pm)A:1K &B.MAJ \CC4- 20SF.RPT
The Honorable City Council
April 14, 1994
Page 12
Staff would like to point out that Planned Development Permit Condition of Approval Number 25
requires that a recreational amenity plan be submitted to the Director of Community
Development, for review by the Parks and Recreation Commission, for the construction of the
recreational facility prior to issuance of a Zoning Clearance for construction of the first unit within
that phase. The condition of approval further states that required landscaping and recreational
facilities shall be completed and available prior to occupancy of the 409th unit; therefore, the
recreational facility would be built upon construction of the 12 unit (409 - 397 = 12), of the 87
units.
Analysis - Recreational Amenities
In order to insure that the builder complies with their promise to the HOA, staff recommends that
in addition to the Conditions of Approval in Resolutions Number 86 -275 and 87 -395, a condition
of approval be added (see Attachment Number 9) which requires that the private active
recreational park be completed prior to issuance of a Zoning Clearance for issuance of a
building permit for the construction of the first unit within the 1st Phase, instead upon
construction of the 409th (12th - based upon the construction of the 87) unit. Furthermore,
Condition of Approval Number 25 should be modified because subsequent to 1986 the Council
has directed that the Parks and Recreation Commission not review private recreation facilities.
Therefore, based upon staff's recommendatic� condition of approval number 25 should read
as follows:
''That two private recreational facilities shall be provided in the location shown on the
tentative map. These facilities shall be improved with a pool, jacuzzi, tot lot with play
equipment, fencing (wrought iron and slumpstone), drinking fountains, barbecues, picnic
table, half -court basketball, an area partially enclosed (on two sides) with a solid roof,
kitchen facilities including but not limiteci to stovetop, double sink with disposal, drop -in
oven and cupboards, and landscaped open space area. A third private recreational
facility, to be landscaped only, shall be provided int he location shown on the tentative
map (Parcel R -3). Prior to issuance of the first none clearance for Phase II (Parcel R -3)
Phase IV (Parcel R -2) and V (19-1), tie developer shall submit to the Community
Development Director a plan of the rec! F_�ational facility within that phase for review and
approval by the Parks and Recreation � orn[�Iiss or,.
All landscaping and improvements on p heel R shall be completed in conjunction with
the improvements on the "E" Street (now University Drive /Collins Drive intersection).
Landscaping improvements to Parcels R 2 and R -1 shall be completed and the facilities
available prior to occupancy of the 2991, rinit and 409th respectively."
KMP- 04- 14- 94(2:35pm)A:`,K& B. MAJ\CC4- 20SF.RPT
The Honorable City Council
April 14, 1994
Page 13
Pursuant to Major Modification Number 2, staff recommends that Condition of Approval Number
25 (Planned Development Permit) be modified to read as follows: The private recreational facility
shall be approved by the Director of Community Development and installed prior to issuance
of a Zoning Clearance for the issuance of a building permit for the construction of the 12th
(409th) of the 87 units to be constructed
Trim and Roof Color and Shape
The proposed building and trim colors are complementary to what was approved in 1986 and
modified as part of Minor Modification Number 10; the original building colors included a navaho
white, navaho pink, beige, and camel beige. The building and trim color proposed includes: a
light brown, with dark and light brown accent trim as well as green trim; white /grey, with a green
and white accent trim; and a dark brown, with brown and green accent trim. The proposed
colors do not appear to be in conflict with the building and trim colors which were built within
the tract. The proposed roof title also appears to be complementary to the S -shape tiling that
has been constructed. The only proposed roofing tile is a clay /brown color.
Analysis - Trim and Roof Color and Shape
The proposed color palette for the remaining 87 single-family homes is complementary to the
approved colors for the entire tract. Staff recommends that if Major Modification Number 2 is
approved, that in addition to the Conditions of Approval in Resolutions Number 86 -175 and 87-
395, a condition of approval (see Attachment Number 9) be added which stipulates that
S- shaped clay tile roofing shall be installed, cc- mplementary to the approved tiling for the tract,
which is complementary with the existing roo' ,olors
Trail System
The approved pedestrian trail system, as seen within Attachment Number 5, has not been
completed. Discussions with the Campus HMIs Homeowner's Association indicate that the
association does not support the approved tra l system for the entire tract. In September 1990,
Griffin Homes and the homeowner's association worked together to develop an acceptable
agreement in lieu of Griffin Hornes installing the trails. As may be seen from Attachment Number
6, the homeowner's association and Griffin Homes agreed to delete the proposed trail plan for
the entire tract (which totaled $15,700.00 [21) at ,d use the money which would have been spent
2 This estimate was based upon a 1991 cost estimate. The President of the HOA
has indicated that he is skeptical of the accuracy of the cost estimate based upon
the cost of inflation and that this estimate may be the total cost to construct the
entire trail system.
KMP- 04- 14- 94(2:35pm)A:',K &B.MAJ�,CC4 -2o SF.RPT
The Honorable City Council
April 14, 1994
Page 14
constructing the trail system for other recreational amenities. Kaufman and Broad has stated
that if Major Modification Number 2 is approved, they will be filing a request for a modification
to delete any trails within the entire tract.
Analysis - Trail System
In 1991, resolution between the HOA and Griffin Homes appeared to have been reached by
Griffin Homes (on the filing of a Minor Modification) deleting the proposed trail plan for the tract
and utilizing this money for the construction of other private park amenities. The apparent
resolution between the HOA and Griffin Homes, as mentioned above, was never completed.
Staff's recommendation is that if the Council approves Major Modification Number 2, Kaufman
and Broad be conditioned to reach resolution with the HOA regarding this matter prior to
issuance of a Zoning Clearance for the issuance of a building permit for the construction of the
20th unit of the 87 homes. Should resolution between the HOA and Kaufman and Broad not
occur by the issuance of a Zoning Clearance for the issuance of a building permit for the 20th
unit, the trails shall be installed as originally approved with the trail to be completed prior to
issuance of the 30th Zoning Clearance for the issuance of a building permit. In addition, if the
trail is not constructed the applicant shall plant 30 fifteen (15) gallon trees and install an
approved irrigation system on the slope adjacent to Campus Canyon Park to the satisfaction of
the City Manger. Further, Kaufman and Broad should be required to file an application for a
Modification to the Planned Development Permit (1041) for the deletion of the trail system from
the tract and the addition of other recreational amenities in lieu of providing the trail system.
Landscaping and Block Walls
The landscaping and block walls proposed are consistent with the approved landscape and wall
plan for the tract. Minor Modification Number 5 authorized Griffin Homes to construct a
slumpstone block wall with wrought iron a top, he minimum fence height approved was five (5)
feet and the maximum height was six (6) feet
Analysis - Landscaping and Block Walls
Should Major Modification Number 2 be approved, in addition to the Conditions of Approval in
Resolutions Number 86 -275 and 87 -395, staff recommends the addition of a condition of
approval in Resolutions Number 86 -275 and 87 -395, a condition of approval be added (see
Attachment Number 9) which stipulates that all landscaping and block wall /fences shall be
installed consistent with the approved plans fo the tract. Staff recommends that no walls be
allowed to be five (5) feet in height (see Attachment Number 9). Staff further recommends that
a Zoning Clearance be obtained for the installation of the remaining landscaping and block walls
to ensure that the installation and construction is consistent with the original approved landscape
and fencing plans for the tract. For the Councils information, the proposed modified language
for Condition of Approval Number 25 (see page 12 of this report) will require the landscaping
to be completed by the issuance of occupancy for the 409th or 12th of the 87 units.
KMP- 04- 14- 94( 2 :35pm)A:�,K &B.MAJICC4- 20SF.RPT
The Honorable City Counciii
April 14, 1994
Page 15
3. GENERAL INFORMATION
Environmental Review
In compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) an addendum was done to
the Environmental Impact Report, which was certified in 1986 as part of the approval of the
Development Permit Number 1041 and Tract 3963. An addendum to an EIR does not require
a public hearing or public review of the envir, rimentai document.
The existing site has been graded and limited public facilities have been provided to existing
graded pads. In 1986, when the EIR was certified, impacts were mitigated by conditions of
approval. Based upon a review of the currew project it has been determined that:
a). There are no new significant environim ital mpacts not considered in the previous EIR;
b). No substantial changes have occurred .r-lth espect to the circumstances under which the
project was undertaken; and
C) . There is no new information of substarr- :al importance to the project.
Mitigation Measures
As seen within the Attachment Number 7, the addendum identifies mitigation measures which
are on -going and which will be required for construction of the 87 homes in completion of Phase
IV. Consistent with Assembly Bill 3180 (January 1989). all mitigation measures are required to
be monitored. For Major Modification Number 2, no new mitigation measures have been
established because there are no new significant impacts for the current project. In 1986, when
the EIR was certified, there was no requiren�ent for a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting
Program. However, the mitigation measures are also the conditions of approval which Kaufman
and Broad are required to comply with.
Fees
Discussions with the City Engineer and City Accounting Department indicate that the deposits
submitted for inspection of the remaining lots and plan check, as needed, have been exhausted.
Therefore, if Major Modification Number 2 is approved, staff recommends that in addition to the
Conditions of Approval in Resolutions Number 86 -275 and 87 -395, the following conditions (see
Attachment Number 9) be required for Major 1`.lodif�cation Number 2:
KMP- 04- 14- 94 (2:35Pm)A: \K &B.M AS, CC4- 20SF.RPT
The Honorable City Council
April 14, 1994
Page 16
• The applicant shall be required to submit a deposit for fine grading, paving and final
inspection of the 87 lots.
• Any fees which are required to be paid and noted in Resolutions Number 86 -275 and 87-
395, shall be paid prior to issuance of ,a Zoning Clearance for construction of the first of
the 87 units.
• All required public improvements which have not yet been constructed, shall be
constructed prior to issuance of a Zoning Clearance for construction of the first of the 87
units.
• All deposits for staff time which may have been exhausted or which are now required,
shall be made prior to issuance of a Zoning Clearance for construction of the first of the
87 units.
• All outstanding case processing of this Major Modification shall be reimbursed, prior to
issuance of a Zoning Clearance of coritructior of the first unit of the 87 units.
• A deposit for condition compliance sriall be made to the Department of Community
Development and shall be calculated as follows. the total cost, based upon the City's
current fee schedule, for a Tentative Tract Map, Planned Development Permit, and
Environmental Impact Report shall be .Jivided by the number of units within the entire
tract (484 units); this amount will total the cost for condition compliance per lot. This cost
shall be multiplied by the number of units within this proposal (87 units). This amount
represents the applicant's cost for condition corpliance. This deposit shall be made with
the Department of Community Develop Yient prior to issuance of a Zoning Clearance for
a building permit for construction of the fist ml" of the 87 units.
• Traffic Mitigation Fee of $3,000.00 for a urinaid lots (87).
City Engineering Conditions of Approval
The City Engineer has reviewed the original conditions of approval for Planned Development
Permit Number 1041 and, as seen within Attachment Number 8, has recommended conditions
for Major Modifications Number 2. The tract c anditions are not able to be modified, given that
a final map has been recorded for the entire ti =ict, rncl_lding all 131 lots within Phase IV.
Community Development Department Conditions of Approval
Staff's recommended conditions of approval - �v r,.e fc:und within Attachment Number 9.
KMP- 04- 14- 94(2:35pm)A:\K &B.MAJIC C4- 20S F.RPT
The Honorable City Council
April 14, 1994
Page 17
SUMMARY
In summary, if Kaufman and Broad submit modified building plans which provide enough detail
to assess the proposed construction and if the construction plans show more intricate detail and
ornate development accents, staff recommends that the Council approve Major Modification
Number 2. Staff recommends that in addition to the Conditions of Approval within Resolutions
Number 86 -275 and 87 -395, the Council condition Kaufman and Broad as stipulated within this
report under analysis.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Open the public hearing and receive �, ;blic testimony;
2. Approve Major Modification Number I with conditions of approval as noted within
Attachment Number 9
3. Direct staff to prepare a Resolution of Approval to be presented to the Council at the
Council meeting of May 4, 1994
KMP- 04- 14- 94 (2:35Pm)A: \K &B.MAJ \CC4- 20SF.RPT
The Honorable City Council
April 14, 1994
Page 18
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS
• Resolution Number 86 -275 - provided to the City Council under separate cover
• Resolution Number 87 -395 - provided to the City Council under separate cover
1. Building Plans
2. Correspondence dated March 31, 1994 to Mr. Ted Martens
3. Proposal from Kaufman and Broad to City staff, filed on March 25, 1994
4. Site Plan for entire tract - 2 blueprints
5. Original Griffin Trails Network, including map for entire tract (2 pages)
6. Correspondence dated March 19, 1993 to Mr. Ted Martens from Steven Kueny
7. Addendum to Environmental Impact RE,port
8. Conditions of Approval from City Engir eer
9. Conditions of Approval from Commun,ty Development Department
KMP- 04- 14- 94 (2:35pm)A: \K &B.MAJ \CC4- 20SF.RPT
ATTACHMENT NUMBER 2
Kaufman and Broad- I:oasial Inc.
21'40O Burbank N-,u uP�ari. �uire Ai j,
u„eedland Hill. California 1413b'
TPI 818 88" -5594 Fax 1318 'fl4_ "13
Via Facsimile (818) 591 -0708
March 31, 1994
Campus Hills Homeowners
c/o Ted Martens
15749 Swift Place
Moorpark, CA 93021
Kaufman A Broad
Re: Kaufman and Broad's purchase of the remaining 87 finished lots in Campus Hills
Dear Homeowners:
Kaufman and Broad has entered into an Option Agreement with the Griffin Bankruptcy
Trustee to purchase the final 87 lots in your community. In the interest of keeping an open
dialogue and trying to meet your expectations to the best of our abilities, we wanted to
provide an update as to our proposals for the completion of the remaining lots.
PROGRESS TO DATE
We first met with your Board of Directors on March 10, 1994. At this meeting, we
discussed a number of issues of importance to the community, answered questions regarding
our plans, and presented our proposed house plans for the site.
As a result of these discussions Kaufman and Broad has committed to the following:
1. Annexation to the Existing Association: Kaufman and Broad agrees to keep the 87
lots within the existing homeowners association;
2. Completion of the Pool /Recreation Area: Kaufman and Broad agrees to construct
the pool and recreation area in the first phase of construction. Assuming a smooth
construction schedule, this should allow for opening of the pool and recreation center
to the association members by fall of 1994
3. Installation of Block Walls and Front Yard Landscaping: Kaufman and Broad agrees
to install side and rear yard block walls and front yard landscaping prior to the close
of escrow on each house. The style of the block walls will match the existing walls
in the community;
4. Match Existing Color Palette and Exteriors: The exterior appearance of the new
homes will be consistent in all substantial details to existing homes, maintaining the
overall architectural appearance of the community. The Kaufman and Broad homes
will be all stucco exteriors with S -tile roofs and will conform to the existing color
palette of the communitv.
Kaufman and Broad is ready to draft and execute a binding agreement that guarantees our
performance of these items' hope this addresses a majority of the concerns that have
been voiced during our on -going discussions.
DISCUSSION OF PROPOSED HOMES
At your General Membership meeting on March 22, Kaufman and Broad presented the
above commitments and discussed the homes we proposed to build. We presented our plan
to build three different house plans ranging from 1,600 to 2,000 square feet, homes in many
ways similar to the Classics homes in the community. Given today's difficult market
environment, we felt this alternative optimized the values in the community for the following
reasons:
Active Market Se ment: By targeting this active market segment more buyers are
available, pushing up sales prices and avoiding stagnant sales and price discounting
that depress surrounding property values as well;
Not Direct Comparable : A smaller house is not a direct comparison to the newer
homes in the community. As such, the price for this house will not be used by
realtors and banks to set value for these larger homes. A house that is a direct
comparable (i.e. the same size as the other larger homes in the community) selling
at a lower price in today's market, would hurt values of all homes in the community;
Boosts Prices from Below: A smaller house than the Estates with a sales price
increased by view premiums forms a base sales price that pulls up the value of
houses of the same size and boosts the minimum price of those houses which are
larger.
Several of those present still voiced concerns over the size of the homes proposed. In
response to the comments received that evening, we reviewed our market studies and looked
at the viability of other alternatives that may be more attractive to the existing residents.
NEW PROPOSAL FOR HOMES TO BE BUILT
Taking the community's concerns into account, yet still bounded by existing market
conditions and the need to develop an economically viable project, K&B proposes to
increase the house sizes as follows:
Plan 1 1,730 square feet
Plan 2 2,001 square feet
4BR /2Bath /2 -car garage
4BR /3Bath /3 -car garage
Plan 3 2,227 square feet
5BR /3Bath /3 -car garage
This bridges the gap between the original Classics homes planned for the community and
the larger Estates homes built in the most recent phases. Attached is a rendering of the
proposed homes. As discussed above, the homes are designed to blend in with the
community in architectural style and color and will include block walls and landscaping with
the original construction.
CONCLUSION
We feel the proposals above represent the best compromise between the community's
desires and the reality of the marketplace. We have incorporated your input and concerns
in order to involve the existing homeowners and create a positive sales environment that will
guarantee the success and future value of the community. We believe it is in all of our best
interests to work together to create a reasonable solution that maximizes the community's
value in today's depressed real estate market.
In return for the resolution of the issues outlined above, Kaufman and Broad would also
like your support as we develop the remaining lots. Although we may look at various
aspects of the issues from different perspectives, we do share the common goal of
maximizing the value of the community. I hope these proposals represent a common.ground
that will allow us to proceed to solution that is viable for both of us.
Thank you for your time, and please feel free to call me or Drew Kusnick at (818) 887 -5599
if you have any questions. In addition, we would be happy to meet with the general
membership again to show you the elevations and materials for the new homes and to
discuss any remaining concerns you may have. I hope to have the opportunity to discuss
these issues with all of you in greater detail.
Sincerely,
Mark Beisswanger
President I
Kaufman and Broad - Coastal Valleys, Inc.
ATTACHMENT NUMBER 3
Kaufman and Broad - Coastal kalleis. Inc.
21900 Burbank Boulevard. Suite 300
Woodland Hill.,, California 9130"
TeL 818 88? -5599 Fax 818 '04 - "]:1
March 25, 1994
Paul Porter / Senior Planner
City of Moorpark
799 Moorpark Avenue
Moorpark, Ca 93021
Kaufman A Broad
RE. Proposed Development Plan, Tract No 3963 -4, Major Modification:
Dear Mr. Porter:
The purpose of this letter is to outline what Kaufman and Broad - Coastal Valleys, Inc.
proposes to develop on the remaining 87 lots of Tract No. 3963 -4. The mix will be as
follows:
Three Floor Plans: Kaufman and Broad proposes to develop 1 single story floor
plan and 2 two -story floor plans with three exterior elevations per model.
Home size and Mix.
Plan 1 Approximately 29: 1,730 sq. ft. single story homes.
Plan 2 Approximately 29. 2,001 sq. ft. two -story homes.
Plan 3 Approximately 29: 2,227 sq. ft two -story homes.
Elevations / Exterior: There will be 3 elevation options for each house in a
mediterranean theme consistent with the architectural style and color of the
surrounding community.
If you need any additional information please do not hesitate to call Drew Kusnick or
Teresa Sousa at (818) 887 -5599.
Cordially,
!Kau"an a d Broad - Coastal Valleys, Inc.
Darin Ha sen
Planning Project Coordinator
ATTACHMENT NUMBER 5
CHARACTERISTICS OF CHOICES
PLAN 1. NO TRAILS.
Common -area hillsides will be left the same as they are now,
except for some plantings for beautification, which have been
intended for some time. Weeds will continue to be cut within 100
ft of all houses, and homeowners and their families will continue
to be free to walk on the common areas. Griffin has unofficially
offered to apply the money savers (roughly $5,000 minimum) to
provide some other amenity for Campus Hills.
PLAN 2. ORIGINAL GRIFFIN -CITY NETWORK,
This network plan (modified only where lot boundaries have pre-
. f
vented installation of a common walkway between Lot 320 and Lots
317 -319) dates back to discussions between City officials and
Griffin in 1985 -6. Its rationale was to provide peripheral paths
around the outer boundary of the tract as well as interior paths
and shortcuts to the public park at the corner of Hearon and
Collins.
Analysis. The layout is consistent with its rationale, and it
provides ample connections to the active and passive Homeowners
Association parks as well. The layout has some engineering
problems built into it, particularly opposite Lots 213 -206 where
it is routed along a steep grade and opposite Lots 140 -149 where
it is routed through very unstable soil. The routing is within
roughly 50 ft from the rear lot boundaries of Lots 320 -332 which
are bordered with open iron fences. Behind Lots 364 -390 and 403-
408 the trail is routed along a grade above the lots, providing a
clear view of less than 100 -ft distance between pedestrians and
residents. The same is true for Lots 65, 66, 121, 122, 130, 140-
161, 213 -206, and 466 -470. Installation would cost Griffin the
maximum budgeted amount. Maintenance of this network to repair
rain erosion could amount to several thousand dollars per year,
roughly $10 -20 per Homeowner pex- year. Insurance would be a
maximum of $200 /yr, $0.50 per Homeowner per year.
PLAN 3. ORIGINAL HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION CONCEPT
This is a 1.5 -mi network developed in mid -1989, independently of
the Original Griffin -City Network (Plan 2). Its rationale was to
meet perceived City Government requirements and perceived Home-
owner desires for a usable trail network and at the same time to
minimize visual intrusions and maIntenance difficulties in plans
already submitted.
Analysis. This concept, Plan 3, is nearly as extensive as Plan
2. Plan 3 tends to avoid routing close to lots and above them,
but not completely. Engineering problems are less than those of
3
' b
_ r
a
z
PECAN AVE ►6 4 N
e► o pe
b
,�►� 6 �bbi! e4 e0 aee
COLLEGATE '� •O 6• t ' •! pa e6 apa ape aS4 K 2 n o
CIRCLE 6 • * e 10 p1 a01 aea 30 e
H .Z1
� Jt t •• °` 111 �s1 3ee apt apt H �-+
� �° 41 •0 60 ` a Leo t ae° ��` aee �-C G7
'� 6 O •` 4e e° O 1 • aee r X10 3eC ape
H
66 11 •p •1 p6 9 7 ee r 61 10 • Z Z
O
JJJ0 1e 3e T •p 01e GZ 1,p �p1 9 a1 ; �1e p ae TIVE H r
Jt 6 ° a6 a 10 a 11 aee a1 • all a PARK O1
J J 1 0 is a1 ~ 60 °e T e O•
aee a1 i e ► ► an
J
J 1 • Z ao ae p/ 0• p4 a1e a ►Oe X1 ,i7
J J ♦0 1a a` a0 61 0a 1 ° a °♦ p1 ►Oe 1 iC H
A
� a ► ♦ O
2 J ?s 4 `° 11♦ p aaa a• OR1VE p0 ••• • ►1 7O1 •O O • 06 'i7
JJ?e `• � ♦;e 1 a 100 104 e1 •6
je• • ►'0 •••♦ 009 36�• ►;66 9//r. • •060 \ \ F�-I
r� 13 tbP 1 0 Its <7 10p tOa p2 e3 ► ►1 ►• 4 ' 66 66 • ` Z
J7 1 .4 ♦e 111 tj6 G 101 `01 e3 • '► ° • p ao F 6 6e � •` 1
J? ° SOSNA — e 1
♦ ♦ i 1t0 11. 9 jp6 ♦0 ♦O e•° ••6` OG9 •• ►60 ► ►331 630 •1e 1 •, ♦6
,72te CT 6 O ` 12e i 110 t 10 t 09 �O O 6 • °Oe •0 ♦ ► e 16 '1F • �•
J ?J ` P01, 111 126 2 110 112 1 f0 6e OG °et ►° a ►b M1 •336 •11 ► 1• •
JJ7J � 1e IIF'' ,1e 12• � 111 X11 °e1 9� ee° Lb1 ••bb ••'�•,� ►1° ••1a •16
J J' `aa 12e 12a Ye° °60 ►•b °° ► •6 1 •16 •11 •i° GRIFFITH \
JeQ JO _ t 1 =� 131 a0 122 qb a ►b� ►b •6 •a0 421 •`1 717 LANE \
e, - 431 420 t7 214\
r eo o3 62 410 4t0 7tt 71e
• rj J7t � O° e e ♦3° l a • t
°O lr.O e7J b M1 `a1 STANLEY THIONNET re ' t� �0 • °6e1 FRET C f 710 217 OURtE
s° Jl ♦ COURT PLACE 1 t r�2 t� s ► 700 v
as •e°
20J 70 t. : �+ SOPHOMORE 0 °
204 Joe' t61 ° 46 * '•i �1e G� • °6 PF COURT 2.
IseJO 1 Og7S ! tP2 . '•e t,° �6► ,° •6• Toe 276 ,J
776
?06 JO7 `e ea ° b b 6`��t t° •' I� ♦ ° : .0
797 30e PUBLIC PARK ` Ie ♦61 t� J ♦.• t'e ° PIJE ACTIVE y
298 306 \ COIIINS 't' ~ °b O , ►6 ° 1 101 PARK t77 2 27
304 ►
\ ' , ♦ °10 OG,9r �M1► U 1 14 16a 1S• t 20• 776
3pJ ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SITE 204 I e
Jot ♦113 PASSIVE te7 tee j °1 `00 100 243 720
301 ` 1'> PARK 177 167 to 101 Ito 1� sJ0
.100 ♦;► lie 101 Ise P i6o ♦6/ 11a ?Ir JJ r
see \ °: ITO ISO lay
! 160 111 274 J °o J,►J
DRIVE
TROLLOPE C' — 1 p6 4 c0
1
6 10♦1e6p 2�1, "
• 1 6 JJJO
1101 1s 1 1 e '
J
tb ls e
e•
1 1p6 , ?J °61 �� 1 00
Op b♦ J, ?
It 1•e �! Jt, J
Jr ?J•J
we
.l
ATTACHMENT NUMBER 6
March 19, 1993
MOORPARK
799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 (805) 529 -6864
Mr. Ted Martens
23801 Calabasas Rd., Ste. 2033
Calabasas, CA -91302
Re: Trail System in Tract 3693
Dear Mr. Martens:
Please excuse the delay in responding to your recent request
pertaining to the planned trail system in Tract 3693. With
the departure of the former Director, the Community
Development Department's working file on this matter was
apparently misplaced. I believe we have been able to
reconstruct pertinent documents except for the meeting notes
of the former Director of Community Development.
As I recall, the City Council Public Works /Facilities
Committee (Committee) suggested that the Campus Hills
Homeowners' Association (HOA) and Griffin Homes reach an
agreement on the amenities that would be proposed to be
substituted for the trail system. This would then be
presented to the City as part of a modification to the
project. With the filing of the modification, including the
payment of the requisite fee, the City would process the
modification. As part of our prior discussions, Griffin
Homes was also to plant trees and shrubs and provide
irrigation to them for the slope area adjacent to Campus
Canyon Park. I believe there was a subsequent meeting on
this between the City's former Director of Community Services
and Griffin's representative. To my knowledge, there was no
closure on this matter.
At this time, the HOA and Griffin should arrange for filing
of the modification request includng__doc_umentation of the__
mu ual_.agreement for the amenities_proposed to be provided in
lieu of the trail_sy_stem. Upon filing of the modification, r
it will be reviewed by the Committee before processing by
City staff. In addition, Griffin Homes needs to contact me
concerning the slope planting. I will then arrange for the fK
appropriate City staff person to work on this matter with
them. This planting, as well as any remedial grading to the
trail system, will need to be done as part of the
modification approval.
PAUL W. LAWRASON JR. SCOTT MONTGOMERY PATRICK MGWER �3ERNARDO M f'EREZ JOHN E WOZNIAK
Mayor Mayor P-r 'em
..„xrnc..merr�[W, (.ouncomemper COUnctImem06r
w
Mr. Ted Martens
March 19, 1993
Page 2
For your convenience, I have enclosed copies of the documents
in the City's working file on this subject. I hope this
information answers your questions.
Questions about the modification process should be directed
to Jim Aguilera, Director of Community Development, or you
may contact me.
Sincerely,
Steven Kueny
City Manager
SK:db
Enclosures
cc: Honorable City Council (with enclosures)
Jim Aguilera, Director of Community Development (without
enclosures)
Elaine Freeman (with enclosures)
c: \wp51 \citymgr \Marten93.19
U
October 2, 1991
2509 E. THOUSAND OAKS BLVD. • THOUSAND OAKS, CA 91362 • (805) 494 -1336
Mr. Steve Kueny, City Manager
City of Moorpark
799 Moorpark Avenue
Moorpark, CA 93021
Subject: Trails - Campus Hills
Dear Steve:
Thank you for setting the meeting for October 9th at 5 :30 PM.
Jim Keenan, Association Manager, has notified members of the
HOA and there seems to be no confls.cts.
Enclosed is a copy of a bid in the amount of $15,700.00. This
is the bid which was discussed with the Association Board on
September 24th. The Board has a list of improvements they would
prefer Griffin Homes install; such as, the second pool to be
the same size as the one now in operation, improvements to the
park at University and Collins, etc
The trails came about at the request of the Parks Commission
and were intended to be more natural than what has involved.
I can recall many discussions with the Parks Commission, Planning
Commission and Council primarily relating to the parks use.
Since there is no desire on the part of the homeowners, it seems
reasonable to spend the dollars whe e t:hev will be more enjoyed.
incerely,
E1 �iine L. Freeman
EL�:dr
cc: Jim Keenan
Paul Griffin, III
Encl.
^!T\/
Addendum to the EIR for Tract 3963 and PD 1041
April 7, 1994
Page 4
80. Prior to issuance of a building permit for any unit within each phase,
all structures which are in a hazardous fire area, shall meet Fire Zone
4 building code requirements.
83. Prior to issuance of a Zoning Clearance for occupancy of any unit
within each phase, a 100 foot buffer zone shall be established and
maintained between the dwelling units and open space areas.
Planned Development Permit Number 1041 Conditions 14, 15, 16, 175
18, 19, 20, 23, 25, as Mitigation Measures
Monitoring:
14. Prior to issuance of a Zoning Clearance, the building plans shall be
submitted for review and approval by the Director of Community
Development so that a variety of unit placement is ensured.
15. Prior to issuance of a Zoning Clearance for construction of the
Kaufman and Broad project, a landscape plan shall be submitted for
review and approval by the Director of Community Development.
16. Prior to issuance of a Zoning Clearance for construction of each
phase, a fence plan shall be submitted for review and approval by
the Planning Commission
17. Prior to issuance of a Zoning Clearance for construction of each
phase, a mail box plan shall be submitted for review and approval
by the Director 'of Community Development and Moorpark
Postmaster.
18. Prior to issuance of a Zoning Clearance for each phase of
construction, said building plans shall be submitted for review and
approval by the Director caf Community Development in compliance
with conditions 1 -7 listed ..inder 18.
19. Prior to issuance of a Zoning Clearance, plans demonstrating how
gutters and downspouts will be provided over all garage doors and
front entryways, unless covered, shall be submitted for review and
approval by the Director -7f Community Development.
KMP- 04- 07- 94(2:13pm)A:1K &B.MAJ',ADDEt :)UM.RPT
Addendum to the EIR for Tract 3963 and PD 1041
April 7, 1994
Page 5
20. Prior to issuance of a Zoning Clearance, building plans shall be
review for compliance with the required 20 foot front and rear yard
setback.
23. A Zoning Clearance shall be obtained, prior to construction of any
Model Home within the Tract.
25. Prior to issuance of a Zoning Clearance for each phase of
construction, a plan shall be submitted, reviewed and approved for
the completion of the private active recreational facility on Borgess
Drive.
All conditions of approval for Tract 3963 (attached) and as approved
through previous modifications, shall be made conditions of approval on the
tract to ensure that visual, environmental, circulation, and land use impacts
are minimized.
Findings were adopted when the original EIR was certified. Additional
findings are not required.
Aguilera Date
Director of Community Development
Attachments:
Map of remaining homes to be constructed as part of Major Modification Number 2
Original Conditions of Approval for Tract 3963 and Planned Development 1041
KMP- 04 -07 -94 (2:13pm)A: \K&B.MAJ \ADDENDUM.RPT
RANCHO SIMI POR. TRACT J
Tox Rate Area
10023
514-36
C3; T
386
ip0
32 385 �
13187 O 1
388 036
qy''�b 389 X37!
(3 7�
II 31 384
364 12 383 Nay,R(j�
30� 382
L A � ot,
361 365 13 29 387 �� �.•._N_
/ 380
366 14 28? -
(��77,, 379 '°• %q,6j 3;2
367 15 C2J 378
26 O s -ti
368 16 @ 377
369 24 376
8
37f7 0 `_ �9 Q� N•rozs.ay
�Ig 231 ,ti
371
O
� 443
363 �� bnor. 37. 20 442
N QnY w 373 2f O 441 440
+o•
r 39
If
10 362 361 374 22 4
37 �•0 10 438 437 43c
0
5 ' e >' 12
O 360 f3 /4 IS
359
6) 363
�
.e3er /
w l
6) 358 357 38
O 356 C6> O D O
45
355 { 446 447 448
449 450 951 ._.. <s3
354
f Q�
ej' N)a'aa'aO�W
�j� �{, �IO.ea'
TRACT `z2 3963 -1 . N'ro ? � .y \. ^ c °roa°' COURT
y, 465 1 Nra^,3yow alo aV
3 ,3s3 -FD Q 7 ( ��., O / s4` i1 / 3--62 461 46o CITY OF MOORPARK
'I"12 3y3q 959 459 Ventura County Assessor's Map.
ewes BbeM Nwnaers SMWn in EUipsea
Asaeawrs Porcel Nwnaen SnoWn in Crclsa.
..._ "rabz'ae -w _. —�--� Asaeaa4+'s MneraJ Numasrt SMWn n Sauorts
2 2Bo
I aay.az' DRAWN OS ICHECKED
r- --�- -- REDRAWN DATE
Nm¢i ASSESSOR d9l NESM RLY wnor/TNS rec[ INKED 0.1 EFFECTIVE 90 =91 ROLL
CHECK WTTH COIIiN SSUNRVEy0R3 O`FFICEOOR PREVIOUS BK. 500, PG. 28
Por. Tract 3963 -4, M.R.Bk.116, Pg.88. o NING DWISION TO VERIFY.
Compiled By Ventura County Afaeasars Office
RANCHO SIMI POR TRA(,-- J Tox tease Area 514 -37
I )023
Bk
I
= IDo'
I3
7� 14
J 403 5�
404 — �6 37
OS -30 405 ' 17
YOrcm OS-31
406 I 18 I9 a
407 Za
408
409 410
< =rQr a.. -
�
M27°24 SYW
402 zes.sy �. 4I4/ TRACT
401 � 25
40o j �� " �.z 28
8 ! 399 7>�'dw !/ �, 415
0� 398 Q 26 3963-2
W 426 1 •' 416 xz9�7'ss'w
1 425 r
391 O O , ! y j;' O / �,9�� e \2D
� N2Yr w
392 3 417 s63!' (�)
4 393 /
394 1 33 122 H3s'Ora'lo'w
a 9j� 395 / 3Z' 1 �
'28 1-- 32 421
4111 28
ti 'I•r q i31) � saz
azo
441 DRj � \T� /\ C30) �-
419 re°2F.r
435 458 427 4 /
i � HIPo!
i'OrcN ^.S -3'
c6
TF, 3q6 ; 38
3 C) '-f 7)2--313q CITY OF MOORPARK
Ventura County Assessor's Mop.
2
LBO) O) Assesses 's Bbd Numbers Slwwn in Ellipses.
L U Assessor's Porcel Numoen S. in CYcbs.
AsseSsWs Mmerol Numbers Sr w M Suuores
DRAWN D.T ICHECKED
REDRAWN IDATE
lwre:sssESSOausiawmoxmsrwc INKED D.T EFFECTIVE 90 =91 ROLL
� tl4I Necesw(nr ca+srrt� �ccu Lon.
Por. Tract 3963,4, M.R.8k. 116, Pg.88. CHEG N TM couxrr SURVEYORS OFFIO( OA PREaous BK. 500, PG. 28.
PLAHNe1G dVIS10R 10 VERIFY. Compiled By Ven NrO GOUnIy AsslSSars OF /ice
RANCHO SIMI
POR. TRACT
J
Tax Rate Area
•'
-•�,
!0023
�
7
4cu �i 'ems
y `
396
/
'' �'�• T°. �
q
� 4
459
26
C3 436'
457 0
452
435
27
456
453
434
433
i
2
�
418
455
22
454 Cj
28
/A�
\`"�
63-1
_
29 432
429
X383
2
20
w 430
Cr
S90 9
P.—I OS -34
C
a11 I G
0
476
477
ar9
O
55 \ 469
4 470 \ 17
i
13 471 466
12 472 B•so
p. 467
I ! 473
10 �+ qT 6
474 � `at? i � 466
475 a E
g�.G� 493
CT� Pg o J
494 0o gg'C9
TRACT 3963 -2
479
O
482
O 3 2
491
490
Porcel OS -32
0
U
ti
2 R, Ht) °IOiK'W 4]lopi 39E
yy]9
22E M�3 °I)tTE II )J6 p'�aii0
MI! °!!'23 E 220.57
27 3 q53 P0 10y/ -R 3y3q 28
Z Z6ol
Par. Tract 3963 -4, MRBk. II6, P9.88. 5 CO—TS'
E WI OOU sURVErOR3 OFFICE OR
` DIYI±IOM TO VERIFY.
514 -38
0
1. OS-3;
166.52
CITY OF MOORPARK
Ventura County Assessor's Mop.
As�els'uOfors P sl Numberr< Shorn n Ellfpaea
A= MNWONun Mera Shorn M CrWl.
Numperc Shown „ s4uerei
ElDRAWN ED.T CHECKED
DATE
=. 28.
ount y assessors 011ic e :�
RESOLUTION NO. 86 -275
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE LAND USE ELEMENT
OF THE GENERAL PLAN OF SAID CITY BY APPROVING
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. GPA -85 -1; APPROVING
TENTATIVE TRACT NO. TR -3963; AND APPROVING RESIDENTIAL
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. RPD -1041, ON APPLICATION
OF GRIFFIN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY.
WHEREAS, at duly noticed public hearings on October 10 and 16, 1985
the Moorpark Planning Commission considered the application filed by Griffin
Development Company for approval of the following:
° General Plan Amendment No. GPA -85 -1 - An Amendment to
the Moorpark General Plan (Land Use Element) to redesignate
approximately 253.7 acres from Rural High Density Residential
(one dwelling unit per acre) to Medium Low Density Residential
(2.6 dwelling units per acre average) ;
° Zone Change No. Z -2801 - A zone change of the property
from "R- E -lAc" (Rural Exclusive, one acre minimum) to
"R- P -D -2U" (Residential Planned Development, two dwelling
units per acre) ;
° Tentative Tract No. TR -3963 - A tentative tract map to
subdivide the property into 484 single family lots, 5 estate
lots, and park and school sites; and
° Residential Planned Development Permit No. RPD -1041 - A
residential planned development permit for the construction
of the single family units;
said property being located north of Campus Park Drive, north of the present
terminus of Collins Drive, adjacent to and northwest of Moorpark College, in
the City of Moorpark, and encompassing Assessor Parcels Nos. 500- 28 -87, -88, -89,
90, -91, -40 and 500- 42 -27; and
WHEREAS, after careful consideration, the Planning Commission reached
its decision in the matter, as set forth in its Resolution No. PC- 85 -65, adopted
November 14, 1985, and has recommended approval of all of the foregoing entitle-
ments for which application had been filed by Griffin Development Company; and
WHEREAS, public notice having been given in time, form and manner
as prescribed by law, the City Council of the City of Moorpark has held a public
hearing, has received testimony regarding said property, has duly considered
said proposed entitlements, and -has reached its decision; and
WHEREAS, the City -Council after careful review and consideration,_
has certified that the environmental effects are adequately addressed in -the
Environmental Impact Report prepared for the project and, pursuant
15091 and 15092 of State CEQA Guidelines, has found that the propos to Sections
proposed project,
-1
i
with modifications presented and with conditions approved by said Council,
adequately mitigates the significant environmental impacts of the project
addressed in the Environmental Impact Report;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That the findings contained in the staff reports
dated October 10 and December 2, 1985, and January 6, 1986, are hereby
adopted, and said reports are incorporated herein by reference as though
fully set forth.
SECTION 2. That the City Council hereby approves General Plan
Amendment No. GPA -85 -1 on application of Griffin Development Company, and
does hereby amend the Land Use Element of the Moorpark General Plan to
redesignate approsimately 217.4 acres from Rural High Density Residential
(one dwelling unit per acre) to Medium Los Density Residential (2.6 dwelling
units per acre average) and approximately 36.3 acres from Rural High Density
( one dwelling unit per acre) to Open Space (10 -40 acres per dwelling unit) ,
on property located north of Campus Park Drive, north of the present terminus
of Collins Drive, adjacent to and northwest of Moorpark College, in the City
of Moorpark, as designated on the map attached hereto, marked EXHIBIT A
and incorporated herein and made a part hereof, which amendment is General
Plan Amendment No. GPA -85 -1.
SECTION 3. That the City Clerk is instructed to transmit to the
planning agency of. the County of Ventura a copy of this amendment to the
Moorpark Land Use Element. pursuant to Government Code Section 65360.
SECTION 4. That Tentative Tract No. Tr -3963 and Residential
Planned Development Permit No. RPD -1041 are hereby approved conditionally,
subject to compliance with all the conditions attached hereto, and does hereby
find, determine and resolve that violation of any of such conditions shall be
grounds for revocation of said permits.
SE -CTION 5. That this resolution shall take effect immediately.
SECTION 6. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and
adoption of this resolution.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 18th day of February, 1986.
ATTEST:
D-60 ZY11-
Ma of the City of Moorpark, California
-2-
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF VENTURA ) SS.
CITY OF MOORPARK )
I, DORIS D. BANKUS , City Clerk of the City of Moorpark,
California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 86 -275
was adopted by the City Council of the City of Moorpark at a regular
meeting thereof held on the 18th day of February
and that the same was adopted by the following roll call vote: 19 86
AYES: Councilmembers Woolard, Prieto, and Mayor Weak;
NOES: None;
ABSENT: Councilmember Yancy- Sutton;
ABSTAIN: Councilmember Ferguson.
WITNESS my hand and the official seal of said City this 18th day of
February 19 86
City Ulerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
_ COUNTY OF VENTURA ) - SS _
CITY OF MOORPARK ) -
I, Maureen W. Wall City Clerk of the City of Moorpark,
California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 86-275
was adopted by the City Council of the City of Moorpark at a regular
meeting thereof held on the 18th day of February
and that the same was adopted by the following roll call vote: 19 86
AYES: Councilmembers Woolard, Prieto, and Mayor Weak.
NOES: Councilmember Ferguson.
ABSENT: Councilmember Yancy - Sutton.
WITNESS my hand and the official sea] of said City this 10th
February ) lg 86 day of
NOTE: The original certification sheet attached to Resolution No. 86 -275
incorrectly recorded the vote cast on this resolution. This
certification sheet is intended to correct this error.
1
U I y
: :;E'`x�: i3. �:``� : -:: %` : • ;:; ; � �� �. � % °mss,.
poll
-� OS -1 (10 -40 AC /DU)
u �� _ / \` �\''•� .• }i.�' %,00•• •.° =" vim- 'i <^ �.; ��, .' _ 4�..°••�C
PECAN SAVE.
'ujiittrcroir"
DR.
\
CAMPUS PARK DR. , ery� � � t` J•.
f
PRINCETON , ^'� �' DR-
COLLEGE' EGE'
AVE. --' '.1, .; •r•` .
LOS ANGELES AVE. AVE. �/ .. SIAM VALLEY FREEWAY"
35 Well6
-u: co
' ti!. i
` < < /y
Yom _�•, �.,° .
*well
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. GPA -85 -1
APPROVED FEBRUARY 18, 1986, by RESOLUTION NO. 86-_21_L—
EXHIBIT
A
APPLICANT: Griffin Development
CONDITIONS FOR: Tentative Tract Map APP Company
No. 3963
PAGE: 1 of 15
CITY COUNCIL RES. NO. 86 -275
FEBRUARY 18, 1986
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS:
of approval of this tract map supersede all con-
1. That the conditions
flicting notations, specifications, dimensions, typical sections and the
like which may be shown on said map and that all of the provisions of
the Subdivision Map Act, City of Moorpark Subdivision Ordinance, and
adopted City policies apply.
2. That all requirements of any law or agency of the State, Ventura County,
and City of Moorpark and any other governmental entity shall be met, and
all such requirements and enactments shall, by reference, become condi-
tions of this entitlement.
3. That no condition of this entitlement shall be interpreted as permitting
or requiring any violation of law, or any lawful rules or regulations or
orders of an authorized governmental agency. In instances where more
than one set of rules apply, the stricter ones shall take precedence.
4. That if any of the conditions or limitations of this entitlement are
held to be invalid, that holding shall not invalidate any of the remain-
ing conditions or limitations set forth.
5. That no zoning clearance shall be issued for the companion entitlement
until each phase of. the final map that includes the units for which the
clearances have been requested has been recorded. Prior to construc-
tion, a zoning clearance shall be obtained from the Community Develop-
ment Department and a building permit shall be obtained from the Build-
ing and Safety Division.
6. That applicant agrees as a condition of issuance (or renewal) for the
sole expense, any action brought
use of this permit, to defend, at his
against the City because of issuance (or renewal) of this wplpm reimburse
the alternative, to relinquish this permit. APP
the City for any court costs and /or attorney's fees which .he City may may
be required by a court to pay as a result of any
at its sole discretion, participate in the defense of any such action,
but such participation shall clot relieve applicant of his obligations
under this condition.
7. That applicant's recordation of this map and /or commencement of con-
struction and /or operations as a result of this map shall be deemed to
be acceptance by applicant of all conditions o-f this map. _
8. As of the date of recordation of the final map, the lots depicted
} thereon shall meet the requirt_-ments of the zoning ordinances and General
Plan then applicable to the property. Compliance with this condition
59018E /E -1
CITY COUNCIL RES. NO. 86 -275
FEBRUARY 18, 1986
Page 2 of 15
shall be required even if the zoning and General Plan requirements in
effect as of the date of recordation are different from sCoin effect
as of the date the tentative map is conditionally approved.
approval of the tentative map shall neither limit the power of the
legislative body to amend the applicable zoning ordinances and /or
General Plan nor compel the legislative body to make any such amend-
ments.
9. That the single family portion of the project shall be subject to all
applicable regulations of the "R- P- D -2.5U" (Residential Planned Devel-
opment, two and one -half dwelling units per acre) zone. The area shown
Lot: 492 on the tentative map shall esub-
as estate lots and Open Space 440
ject to the applicable regulations of the "O -S -1" (Open Space, 10 t
acres per dwelling unit) zone.
10. That all on -site utilities shall be placed underground.
11. That prior to obtaining a grading permit, grading plans shall be sub-
mitted to the Community Development Director for approval to ensure that
they meet with the intent expressed in the tentative map and architect's
conceptual plans.
12. That prior to issuance of a grading permit for Phase I, the developer
shall obtain the appropriate permits for construction within all the
on -site "blue- line" streams from the State Department of Fish and Game.
Copies of these permits shall be provided to the City Engineer and
Community Development Director.
13. Prior to recordation of Phase I, a Homeowner's Association shall be
created. Copies of the By -laws, Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions
(CC and Rs) shall be submitted to the Community Development Director for
approval. The purpose of the Homeowner's Association shall be to over-
see and maintain the on -site private recreational facilities (Parcels
R -1, R -2, and R. -3); the open space area within Lots 490 through 495, and
5A; the pedestrian hiking trail within the open space areas; the man-
made slope adjacent to and west of the school site; on -site drainage
facilities, with the exception of the County Flood Control District
channel; the secondary access between Pecan Drive and 5th Circle; and to
review any construction of accessory structures, patio covers or remod-
eling within the project for its architectural compatibility with the
existing units. Lots 490 through 49_ and 5A shall be dedicated to the
Homeowner's Association, and shall be preserved in undeveloped open
space. No motorized vehicles shall be permitted on the pedestrian/
hiking trails. The secondary access road between Pecan Drive and 5th
Circle shall be gated at bo °h ends and shall have chainlink fencing
along both sides. The location of the fencing shall be approved by the
Community Development Director. These responsibilities and restrictions
shall be indicated in the CC ind Rs.- Upon approval-by both the Commun-
- ity -Development Director and Stat( Department of Real Estate, the
CC and Rs shall. then be recoriied.
14. That City Assessment District No. 85 -1 shall provide for the maintenance
of all on-site open space at,�as. tc be activated as necessary at the
59018B/E -2
CITY COUNCIL RES. NO. 86 -275
FEBRUARY 18, 1986
Page 3 of 15
City's option, should the homeowner's association not maintain these
areas in a satisfactory manner. Total cost of the maintenance shall be
borne by the lot owners within Tract 3963. Prior to recordation of each
phase, the subject area shall be annexed to the assessment district.
15. The tentative map shall expire three years from the date of its
with the County Recorder prior
approval. Failure to record a final map
to expiration of the tentative map shall terminate all proceedings, and
any subdivision of the land shall require the filing and processing of a
new tentative map.
16. If the tentative map is recorded in phases, then it shall be recorded in
the order of phases shown on Exhibit "A."
connection is made, cross connection con-
17. That at the time water service
trol devices shall be installed`ounty Division y
a county Environmen al Health•
the requirements of the Ventur
18. Prior to recordation of the final map for each phase, the developer
shall obtain a "District Release" from the Calleguas Municipal titer
District indicating financial arrangements have been made for payment
the District's Capital Construction charges for that phase.
19. Prior to recordation of the final map for each phase, an "Unconditional"
Will -Serve Letter shall be obtained from County Waterworks District
No. 1 for sewage and water service for each lot created. Said letter
t. If said
shall be filed with the Community Development Departmen
"Unconditional" Will -Serve Letter in a form satisfactory
cannot be obtained from the County Waterworks District, the to the City
developer
shall execute a Subdivision Sewer Agreement in a form satisfactory to
the City. Said agreement will permi.t deferral of the unconditional
guarantee for sewer and water service until issuance of a building
permit for each lot in the subdi.vi =ion
20. That the developer shall construct any necessary lot -to -lot drainage
facilities, including brow ditch and slope bench drainage channels, with
a permanent earthtone color(s) so as to minimize visual impacts. Said
colors shall be submitted in conjunction with the grading plans for each
phase of the final map, and scull be approved by the Director of Com-
munity Development.
21. That in r shall toconstdruct all slopes with cas "ro undeds off" gtopland toe
develope
and shall blend graded slopes in with natural slopes.
22. That a slough wall shall be constructed adjacent to the slope east of
Collins Drive, and other slope areas, as determined necessary by the
Director of Community Development. _
23. That prior to recordation of_the final map for and IV, the
_Phases I, II,
oil drilling easements withn�yF, those
fere phases th de eloped areas or st reetsocor
tions where they will not
59018B/E -3
CITY COUNCIL RES. NO. 86 -275
FEBRUARY 18, 1986
24.
25.
9M
Page 4 of 15
shall be eliminated from the property, as approved by the Director of
Community Development.
That if archaeological or historical artifacts are uncovered during
grading operations, the developer shall ensure the preservation of the
site; shall obtain the services of a qualified archaeologist to recom-
mend proper disposition d of the site;
written concurrence of the obtain Community
recommended dis-
Development Dir
position before undertaking development.
That during grading of on -site roads and building pads, regular watering
of unpaved areas shall occur to reduce fugitive dust emissions.
That the following measures shall be completed by the developer to miti-
gate the air quality impacts of the project:
a. Construction of two bus turn -outs along Collins Drive to accom-
modate any future extension of transit service.
b. Construction of a Class I bike lane east of the Collins Drive
right -of -way to encourage bicycle transportation to Moorpark
College.
C. Prior recordation
Computer to fund the formation / of contribution
f carpools.
$10,000 0 to
27.
28.
29.
That in conjunction with the recordation of Phase I, an approximate shall 6.0
acre park site in the location shown on the tentative map
dedicated to the City to partially meet the requirements of the
park oshark
Municipal Code, Sections 8279 -4 et. seq. The
permit no overlap between a standard size soccer field and softball/
baseball diamond with a 240 foot outfield radius. Lots 486 through 489
shall be eliminated. Some or ill of these lots may be relocated south
of 1st Circle, if a park site of approximately 6 acres can still be pro-
vided. The improvements identified in Section 8297 -4.3 of the code
shall be required of the developer. At. the City's option, any remaining
land dedication requirement shall be met by the developer with one of
the following: a) payment of in -lieu fees; b) improvements to the park
pursuant to the development p'.ar, approved by the City; or c) a combi-
nation of a and b above.
That prior to issuance of the first zone clearance for Phase II, a park
development plan prepared by the developer shall be approved by the City
Parks and Recreation Commission. The plan shall indicate the recrea-
tional facilities to be provided by the developer. Prior to issuance of
the 181st zone clearance, the developer shall enter into an agreement
with the City for completion of the facilities, including one year main-
_ tenance of the completed park, and construction shall commence. Prior
to issuance of the 245th zone clearance, the park improvements shall be
completed and the park opened *o_the public._
That Lots 271 through 274 shall -eetr ear f flag accesses, conform in size
le.with
the adjacent lots and to elimllna t
59018B/E -4
CITY COUNCIL RES. NO. 86 -275
FEBRUARY 18, 1986
Page 5 of 15
30. That all flag lots shown on the tentative map shall be deleted and
replaced with non -flag lots, if feasible,
31. That the cul-de-sac tt1P shall relocated north
loca-
tion shown n tentative map nd Lots350and 351redesigned, to
eliminate their flag accesses.
32. That Lots 1 through 5 (estate lots) as shown on the tentative map shall
be eliminated. This portion of the subdivision shall be recorded as a
remainder parcel in Phase II.
33. That Lots 323 through 341 shall he retained in the project.
34. That the required lot depth /width ratio (Section 8213 of the Subdivision
Ordinance) shall be waived for those lots within the tract with lengths
in excess of three times their widths, due to the site topography and
project design.
35. That Parcel R -3 shall be located in Phase II.
CITY ENGINEER CONDITIONS:
36. That prior to recordation of the final map for any phase, the developer
shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, a grading
plan prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer; shall obtain a grading
permit; and shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing com
37. That prior to recordation of the final map for any phase, the developer
shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, a detailed
geotechnical report: The grading plan shall incorporate the recommenda-
tions of the approved geotechnlcal report.
38. That prior to recordation of the final. map for any phase, the developer
shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, street
improvement plans prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer; shall enter
into an agreement with the City of Moorpark to complete the improve-
ments; and shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing the construction of
the improvements.
The improvements shall include concrete curb and gutter, sidewalk,
streetlights, striping and signing, and paving in accordance with the
Ventura County Road Standards. The applicable Road Standard Plates are
as follows:
o All storm drains (except for the Ventura County Flood Control
Channels) , that are not within the public right -of -way, shall be
cones dered private - drains and shall -be privately maintained by the
Homaowner's Association. _
o A Class I bike path shall be provided on the east side of Collins
Drive within the tract.
59018B/E -5
ATTACHMENT NUMBER 7
MOORPARK
orpark, California 93021
799 Moorpark Avenue MO
ADDENDUM
(805) 529 -6864
L IMPACT REPORT
TO THE FINAL ENVIRO A EN TANNED DEVE OPMENT ERMIT 1041
FOR TRACT 3963 AND RESIDEN
SUBJECT:
On March 28, 1994, Major Modification Number 2 to Tract 3963 - Phase 4,
Residential Planned Development Permit Number 1041 was filed with the
City of Moorpark on behalf of Kaufman and Broad, for the construction of
87 single - family homes on Lots 376 thru 443 and 466 thru 484. The project
site is located within the Campus Park area, north of Mallory Court, south
of the City limits, west of University Drive and east of the City limits.
I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
In 1986 approval was granted to Griffin Homes for the construction of 484
single - family homes; said development is referred to as Campus Hills. Of
the 484 single - family homes approved to be constructed, 87 single - family
homes within phase 4 (see attached map) remain to be constructed. A
total of 29 homes will be constructed in each oft thesfolllowing square
footages; 1,730 sq. ft., 2,001 F:1. ft., and 2,227 sq. . in
II. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING:
Within the Campus Hills Tract (Tract 3963), 397 homes ranging in size from
1,054 to 2,786 square feet have already been constructed. The subject site
has been graded, and limited public facilities have been provided to existing
graded pads.
KMP- 04- 07- 94(2:13pm)A \K &B.MAJ`ADDENDUM RPT
BERNARDO M. PEREZ SCOTT MONTGOMERY
PATRICK HUNTER JOHN E. WOZNIAK counctimember Councilmember
Mayor
PAUL W. Mayor ON JR. Mayor Pro Tem Concilmember
Panted on RsgUed Paper
Addendum to the EIR for Tract 3963 and PD 1041
April 7, 1994
Page 3
Tract Conditions 38, 54, 73, 77, 78, 79, 80, and 83, as Mitigation
Measures
Monitoring:
38. Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the first unit on
Borgess Drive, a sign shall be posted, in the following locations:
a. On the westerly end of Borgess Drive;
b. At the northwesterly intersection of Imbach Place and Borgess Drive;
c. On the southeasterly intersection Harte Lane and Alumni Way.
Said sign shall indicates a Class III bikepath and the final location shall be
approved by the Director of Community Development,
54. Prior to energizing of the street light system for the streets not yet
energized, the developer shall agree to pay all energy costs
associated with the street lighting for a period of one year from the
initial energizing of the street lights.
73. Prior to issuance of (3 Zoning Clearance for occupancy of any unit
within each phase of construction, all street signs shall be installed.
77. Prior to issuance of a building permit for any unit within each phase,
all brush exposing any structures shall be cleared for a distance of
100 feet.
78. Prior to issuance of a building permit for any unit within each phase,
an approved spark a,rester shall be installed on the chimney of any
structure.
79. Prior to issuance of a Zoning Clearance for occupancy, all address
numbers shall be installed and shall be of contrasting color to the
background, and shall be readily visible at night. Where structures
are set -back more than 150 feet from the street, larger numbers will
be required so that they are distinguishable from the street. In the
event the structure(s) is not visible from the street, the address
numbers shall be posted to the driveway entrance.
KMP- 04- 07- 94 (2:13pm)A:\K &B.MAJIADDENDUM.RPT
CONDITIONS FOR: Tentative Tract Ma})
No. 3963
CITY COUNCIL RES. NO. 86 -275
FEBRUARY 18, 1986
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS:
APPLICANT: Griffin Development
Company
PAGE: 1 of 15
1. That the conditions of approval of this tract map supersede all con -
flicting notations, specifications, dimensions, typical sections and the
-like which may be- ,shown on said map and that all of the provisions of
the Subdivision Map Act, City of Moorpark Subdivision Ordinance, and
adopted City policies apply.
2. That all requirements of any law or agency of the State, Ventura County,
and City of Moorpark and any other governmental entity shall be met, and
all such requirements and enactments shall, by reference, become condi-
tions of this entitlement.
3. That no condition of this entitlement shall be interpreted as permitting
or requiring any violation of law, or any lawful rules or regulations or
orders of an authorized governmental agency. In instances where more
than one set of rules apply, the stricter ones shall take precedence.
4. That if any of the conditions or limitations of this entitlement are
held to be invalid, that holding shall not invalidate any of the remain-
ing conditions or limitations et forth.
5. That no zoning clearance shall be issued for the companion entitlement
until each phase of. the final map that includes the units for which the
clearances have been requested has been recorded. Prior to construc-
tion, a zoning clearance shall be obtained from the Community Develop-
ment Department and a buildinq permit. shall be obtained from the Build-
ing and Safety Division.
6. That applicant agrees as a condition of issuance (or renewal) for the
use of this permit, to defend, at his sole expense, any action brought
against the City because of issuance (or renewal) of this permit, or in
the alternative, to relinquish this permit. Applicant will reimburse
the City for any court costs and /or attorney's fees which the City may
be required by a court to pay as a result of any such action. City may,
at its sole discretion, participate in the defense of any such action,
but such participation shall]. ,.)t rel (>Ve applicant of his obligations
under this condition.
7. That applicant's recordation )f this map and /or commencement of con-
- _ -struction and /or operat -ions as a resu3 t of this map shall be deemed_ to
_ be acceptance by applicant :)f all conditions of this map.
i 8. As of the date of recordation of the final map, the lots depicted
thereon shall meet the requirements of the zoning ordinances and General
Plan then applicable to the f) )petty.. Compliance with this condition
59018B/E -1
CITY COUNCIL RES. N0. 86 -275
FEBRUARY 18, 1986
Page 2 of 15
shall be required even if the zoning and General Plan requirements in
effect as of the date of recordation are different from those in effect
as of the date the tentative map is conditionally approved. Conditional
approval of the tentative map shall neither limit the power of the
legislative body to amend the applicable zoning ordinances and /or
General Plan nor compel the legislative body to make any such amend-
ments.
9. That the single family portion of the project shall be subject to all
applicable regulations of the "R- P- D -2.5U" (Residential Planned Devel-
opment, two and one -half dwelling units per acre) zone. The area shown
as estate lots and Open Space Lot 492 on the tentative map shall be sub-
ject to the applicable regulations of the "0 -5 -1" (Open Space, 10 to 40
acres per dwelling unit) zone.
10. That all on -site utilities sha.,l be placed underground.
11. That prior to obtaining a grading permit, grading plans shall be sub-
mitted to the Community Development. Director for approval to ensure that
they meet with the intent expressed in the tentative map and architect's
conceptual plans.
12. That prior to issuance of a grading permit for Phase I, the developer
shall obtain the appropriate permits for construction within all the
on -site "blue- line" streams from the State Department of Fish and Game.
Copies of these permits shalt be provided to the City Engineer and
Community Development Director
13. Prior to recordation of Phase I, a Homeowner's Association shall be
created. Copies of the By- law:, Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions
(CC and Rs) shall be submitted to the Community Development Director for
approval. The purpose of 1-he Homeowner's Association shall be to over-
see and maintain the on -site private recreational facilities (Parcels
R -1, R -2, and R -3) ; the open space area within Lots 490 through 495, and
5A; the pedestrian hiking tra_l wIthin the open space areas; the man-
made slope adjacent to and west cf the school site; on -site drainage
facilities, with the exception of the County Flood Control District
channel; the secondary access 1 >etween Pecan Drive and 5th Circle; and to
review any construction of accessory structures, patio covers or remod-
eling within the project for i.ts architectural compatibility with the
existing units. Lots 490 :hrcugh 495 and 5A shall be dedicated to the
Homeowner's Association, and shall be preserved in undeveloped open
space. No motorized vehicles shall be permitted on the pedestrian/
hiking trails. The secondary access road between Pecan Drive and 5th
Circle shall be gated at boti, ends and shall have chainlink fencing
along both sides. The locatioi of the fencing shall be approved by the
Community Development Director. These responsibilities and restrictions
_shall be indicated in the- c C aid R� . Upon approval-by both the Commun-
ity -aevelopment. Director and State Department of Real-Estate, the
CC and Rs shall --hen be re(- _)rde 1.
14. That City Assessment District h:,. �r5 -1 shall provide for the maintenance
of all on -site open space arc t,,e activated as necessary at the
59018B/E -2
CITY COUNCIL RES. NO. 86 -275
FEBRUARY 18, 1986
Page 3 of 15
City's option, should the homeowner's association not maintain these
areas in a satisfactory manner. Total cost of the maintenance shall be
borne by the lot owners within Tract 3963. Prior to recordation of each
phase, the subject area shall k)e annexed to the assessment district.
15. The tentative map shall expire three years from the date of its
approval. Failure to record a final map with the County Recorder prior
to expiration of the tentative map shall terminate all proceedings, and
any subdivision of the land shall require the filing and processing of a
new tentative map.
16. If the tentative map is recorded in phases, then it shall be recorded in
the order of phases shown on Exhibit "A."'
17. That at the time water service connection is made, cross connection con-
trol devices shall be installed on the water system in accordance with
the requirements of the Ventura County Division of Environmental Health.
18. Prior to recordation of the final map for each phase, the developer
shall obtain a "District Release" from the Calleguas Municipal Water
District indicating financial arrangements have been made for payment of
the District's Capital Construction, charges for that phase.
19. Prior to recordation of the final map for each phase, an "Unconditional"
Will -Serve Letter shall be obtained from County Waterworks District
No. 1 for sewage and water service for each lot created. Said letter
shall be filed with the Community Development Department. If said
"Unconditional" Will -Serve Letter in a form satisfactory to the City
cannot be obtained from the County Waterworks District, the developer
shall execute a Subdivision Sewer Agreement in a form satisfactory to
the City. Said agreement will permit: deferral of the unconditional
guarantee for sewer and water service until issuance of a building
permit for each Lot in the _ubd I V I S ion
20. That the developer shall .onstrs<• *_ any necessary lot -to -lot drainage
facilities, including brow ditch and slope bench drainage channels, with
a permanent earthtone color(s) so as to minimize visual impacts. Said
colors shall be submitted in conjunction with the grading plans for each
phase of the final map, an l sf.al l be approved by the Director of Com-
munity Development.
21. That in order to reduce the visual impacts of on -site grading, the
developer shall construct all slopes with a "rounded -off" top and toe
and shall blend graded slopes it with natural slopes.
22. That a slough wall shall be constructed adjacent to the slope east of
Collins Drive, and other _Jopa areas,, as determined necessary by the
Director of Community _Devel,zpment. -
23. That prior to recordation of_t_he final map for _Phases I, II, and IV, the
oil drilling easements within _hose phases shall be relocated to loca-
tions where they will not interfere with developed areas or streets, or
59018B/E -3
CITY COUNCIL RES. NO. 86 -275
FEBRUARY 18, 1986
Page 4 of 15
shall be eliminated from the }property, as approved by the Director of
Community Development.
24. That if archaeological or historical artifacts are uncovered during
grading operations, the developer shall ensure the preservation of the
site; shall obtain the services of a qualified archaeologist to recom-
mend proper disposition of the site; and shall obtain the Community
Development Director's wr::Ltten concurrence of the recommended dis-
position before undertaking development.
25. That during grading of on -site roads and building pads, regular watering
of unpaved areas shall occur tc reduce fugitive dust emissions.
26. That the following measures shall be completed by the developer to miti-
gate the air quality impacts of the project:
a. Construction of two bus turn -outs along Collins Drive to accom-
modate any future extensic,r, of transit service.
b. Construction of a Class ]: bike lane east of the Collins Drive
right- of -wav to enccura(re bicycle transportation to Moorpark
College.
C. Prior to recordation of the final map for Phase I, contribution of
$10,000 to Commuter Computer to fund the formation of carpools.
27. That in conjunction with the recordation of Phase I, an approximate 6.0
acre park site in the location shown on the tentative map shall be
dedicated to the City to partially meet the requirements of the Moorpark
Municipal Code, Sections 8279 -4 et. seq. The size of the park shall
permit no overlap .between a standard size soccer field and softball/
baseball diamond with a 240 foot outfield radius. Lots 486 through 489
shall be eliminated. Some or 11 of these lots may be relocated south
of 1st Circle, if a park si_e c)f approximately 6 acres can still be pro-
vided. The improvements ,denrifi(_d in Section 8297 -4.3 of the code
shall be required of the developer. At the City's option, any remaining
land dedication requirement sh ill be met by the developer with one of
the following: a) payment Df .,ri -lieu fees; b) improvements to the park
pursuant to the developmen�, p:Y ;An ,pproved by the City; or c) a combi-
nation of a and 1 � above.
28. That prior to issuance of the first zone clearance for Phase II, a park
development plan prepared by the developer shall be approved by the City
Parks and Recreation Commissic)�j. The plan shall indicate the recrea-
tional facilities to be provided by the developer. Prior to issuance of
the 181st zone clearance, the developer shall enter into an agreement
with the City for completion of the facilities, including one year main-
- tenance of the completed park, and construction shall commence. Prior
to issuance jaf the 245th zone clearance, the park improvements shall be
completed and the park opened t th(, public.
29. That Lots 271 through 274 _,hal :)e redesigned to conform in size with
the adjacent lot! and to el:m:ir. t« -heir flag accesses, if feasible.
59018B/E -4
CITY COUNCIL RES. NO. 86 -275
FEBRUARY 18, 1986
Page 5 of 15
30. That all flag lots shown on the tentative map shall be deleted and
replaced with non -flag lots, if feasible.
31. That the cul -de -sac at 16th Circle shall be relocated north of the loca-
tion shown on the tentative neap, and Lots 350 and 351 redesigned, to
eliminate their flag accesses.
32. That Lots 1 through 5 (estate lots) as shown on the tentative map shall
be eliminated. This portion of the subdivision shall be recorded as a
remainder parcel in Phase 7I.
33. That Lots 323 through 341 shall be retained in the project.
34. That the required lot depth /width ratio (Section 8213 of the Subdivision
Ordinance) shall be waived for those lots within the tract with lengths
in excess of three times thei7 widths, due to the site topography and
project design.
35. That Parcel R -3 shall be located in Phase II.
CITY ENGINEER CONDITIONS:
36. That prior to recordation of the final map for any phase, the developer
} shall submit to the City of- Moorpark for review and approval, a grading
plan prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer; shall obtain a grading
permit; and shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing completion.
37. That prior to recordation of the final map for any phase, the developer
shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, a detailed
geotechnical report: The grading plan shall incorporate the recommenda-
tions of the approved geote- :hnic,al report.
38. That prior to recordation of the final map for any phase, the developer
shall submit to the City 7f Moorpark for review and approval, street
improvement plans prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer; shall enter
into an agreement with the City of Moorpark to complete the improve-
ments; and shall post suffi.-7ien1- surety guaranteeing the construction of
the improvements.
The improvements shall include concrete curb and gutter, sidewalk,
streetlights, striping and signing, and paving in accordance with the
Ventura County Road Standards. The applicable Road Standard Plates are
as follows:
o All storm drains (except for the Ventura County Flood Control
Channels), that are not within the public right -of -way, shall be
`
considered private - drains ind shall-be privately maintained by the
Homeowner's Associatioi. --
o A Class I bike path s}Lall be. provided on the east side of Collins
Drive within the tract.
59018B/E -5
RANCHO SIMI POR, TRACT J
Tox Rote Areo 514-36
10023
C�
366 O ( -� loci
32 385 3B7 O
388 � 36,
h.� >�o• 389 �.
4Ja,
II 3114 ,� hJy� Sy
364 383 vJ'r�j`F
!2 M S
30 .3132
361 365 13 29 381 A
366
380
14 28
379
367 15 16 (27 26 378
368 :577 RSV 3�e
369 17 25 II''GG
8 % )
370 C�1 a,rozc.Ja
371 x.19 -,) lQ 443 �•zrczo'
37
363 �,.QRY�, � ? 373 21 / (o ) 442 441 440
362 +ma 374
r/ �� ; �� 10 /� 439
la '✓ 436
VII I 437 438
O 361 , / �? ° 1 � 12
360 � ;;i/ r l3 14
"
359 ' °__.;1. 363
a�
'e w 7 0 3511 357 a �d,;W 38
356 r 4 5 C_> O O 30 2 O
3 l 355 / 446 I 447 4411 449 450
451
� (2 35-4 A ;
�o�
p a,a.eJ
TRACT `�2 3963 -1 . �-� t ,P .Z >o.n COURT a
46'. T'� wn^xa'adw
4 4t2 3�
j o 7 ( � �� �� 362 46 460 �C1TY OF MOORPARK
T12 3y3q 459 4 9 Ventura County Assessor's Mop.
_ 0 OI
Assessor's Block Numbers Shown n Ellipses
- I (.� Assessor's Portal Numbcra Shown rn CrCles. or
Assessor's Mvwof Numbers Shown n Swn
`' 8 d I saa.sY DRAWN D.T. CHECKED
r- REDRAWN DATE
N 11 wssessOR1ARC11SSNO --GAL rAoE INKED D.T. EFFECTIVE 90 =91 ROLL sUWj_rORj 00 W1 NECESSARILY CONSTMnf IE'M LO S,
COUKTY Por. Tract 3963-4, M.R. Bk. 116, Pg. 88. �P Fl/)WWG OhnS TO WINF . OFFICE OR PREVIOUS BK. 500, P0. 28.
Compiled By Venivra Counly Assessors 011i[c
RANCHO SIMI POP. TRAC j Tax Rate Area 514 -37
()023
5 k
13
14
403
r
a04 6
os -3o 405 � 17
406 1 18 P—, OS -31
407
408 I !21
F 409
410
r,
.,�. yqR u� w
402 'el. '�r9y' ze,T.9>• - _� /:14 401 TRACT
1„ � � 25
!� O 400 399 �r:e -R �'O i i 415 , 28
8 9
10 396 Q �a _ 26 3963 -2
g 416 N29^2739`W
/ ,� 426 �I \
5 12 �, � W '
�
4.5
391 4 3 J x 36 <-q, �'r C�� N2z'77'o2 ,3
w
sa 392 �� I Q £ F 417 sass'
w 393 � ��
q. 394 33 422 N.wMee'Id
s� 0 395 ;z, -- i s7.. ,
=26 _ 421
418 28 x23°3
^ <•zzeo�. `e 13-i �� sa
N3•Z,zJ M / 420
441 �R �
so ss
44C i 419 \ .7w.
4� 9
HIRY
Pnrce; ^5v2
po 1 Dy ?lz 3Y31 CITY OF MOORPARK
Ventura County Assessor's Mop.
ZAs9essor's BIOOM Numbers Snown o Ellipse&
2 S Q 1 An �', MPonwal NUmb t Sl�wrnrl'i CS `tee&
DRAWN OX ICHECKED
REDRAWN DATE
NOTE' ssbR rNRCEts sl+owN ON THIS rNCF INKED D.T IEFFECTIVE 9O -91ROE
DD [1Qj NECESSMILY Por Tract 3963 -4, M.R.Bk. 116, Pq.88. OON$TR
PREVIOUS BX. 500, PG. 28.
PLANNING DM$lON TO VERIFY.
Compiled By Ven/uro County Assessors O/ /ice
RANCHO SIMI POR. TRACT J
Tax Rate Area
.9
10023
\` - 396 i
7
4 G� <<
597
b a 436
25 ��0 � •6 26 pL ,i�
457 OG ` ` 452 11 43s
24 i) 32
w 27 434 '
456 453 /
23 31���
42e
433
455 O �
22 454 3
732 .x/ 429 0
i o 383 ti 430
L0
n
Parcel OS- 34
1) 477
C5) 469
14) 470 17
t3 an
466
O 18 i y
472
467
12 � Q.6i5�
1 473
_ C i
O py1a e /
la 474 .. �d ?6 s � 466 �c
475 a; E
483 svC,
0
476
48!
482 (2) 464 v �g
� t5
460 4
O
4TB 479 O
N
% O n
TRACT 3963 -2
Porcel OS -32
C1
514 -38
100,
000�
O.S -31
CITY OF MOORPARK
t
Ventura County Assessor's Mop.
Mt] °I7IT C � � 21 )JF
"— zzasr' Hs7°zz'sb E As s �7 NumDSrs 57wrn n Ellipses.
Numbers Shorn n CrWS.
Assssaor's MinKn! Numbers SMrn n Sworn
2� 3q,63 RD oL{ f 1yZ 3y39 28
DRAWN D.T
CHECKED
Z ZQO REDRAWN DATE
POr Tract 3963 -4, MR.Bk 116, Pg. 88 W nnI KEQSSARiII COf/57IME LEGAL pn INKED D.T. EFFECTIVE 9 =9/ ROLL
ATE ASSES5071 VA71(�LS SHOWH OM TW S VALE
PREVIOUS BK. 500, P0. 28.
au:ac MrTx tourm w7rvEroxs orricE os
71AW11NG orvmoEl TO VEniEY. Compiled BY Vanluro Cwnty Assessors OHKt 5
i
RESOLUTION NO. 86 -275
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE LAND USE ELEMENT
OF THE GENERAL PLAN OF SAID CITY BY APPROVING
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. GPA -85 -1; APPROVING
TENTATIVE TRACT NO. TR -3963; AND APPROVING RESIDENTIAL
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. RPD -1041, ON APPLICATION
OF GRIFFIN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY.
WHEREAS, at duly noticed public hearings on October 10 and 16, 1985
the Moorpark Planning Commission considered the application filed by Griffin
Development Company for approval of the following:
° General Plan Amendment No. GPA -85 -1 - An Amendment to
the Moorpark General Plan (Land Use Element) to redesignate
approximately 253.7 acres from Rural High Density Residential
(one dwelling unit per acre) to Medium Low Density Residential
(2.6 dwelling units per acre average);
° Zone Change No. Z -2801 - A zone change of the property
from "R- E -lAc" (Rural Exclusive, one acre minimum) to
"R- P -D -2U" (Residential Planned Development, two dwelling
units per acre) ;
° Tentative Tract No. TR -3963 - A tentative tract map to
subdivide the property into 484 single family lots, 5 estate
lots, and park and school sites; and
° Residential Planned Development Permit No. RPD -1041 - A
residential planned development permit for the construction
of the single family units,
said property being located north of ('ampus Park Drive, north of the present
terminus of Collins Drive, adjacent to and northwest of Moorpark College, in
the City of Moorpark, and encompassing Assessor Parcels Nos. 500-28-87, -88, -89,
90, -91, -40 and 500- 42 -27; and
WHEREAS, after careful consideration, the Planning Commission reached
its decision in the matter, as set forth in its Resolution No. PC- 85 -65, adopted
November 14, 1985, and has recommended approval of all of the foregoing entitle-
ments for which application had been filed by Griffin Development Company; and
WHEREAS, public notice having been given in time, form and manner
as prescribed by law, the City Council of the City of Moorpark has held a public
hearing, has received testimony regarding said property, has duly considered
said proposed entitlements, and -has reached its decision; and
WHEREAS, the City - Council after careful review and- consideration,-
has certified that the environmen -fal effects are adequately addressed in -the
Environmental Impact Report prepared for the project, and, pursuant to Sections
15091 and 15092 of State CEQA Guidelines has found that the proposed project,
i
with modifications presented and with conditions approved by said Council,
adequately mitigates the significant environmental impacts of the project
addressed in the Environmental Impact Report;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That the findings contained in the staff reports
dated October 10 and December 2, 1985, and January 6, 1986, are hereby
adopted, and said reports are incorporated herein by reference as though
fully set forth.
SECTION 2. That the City Council hereby approves General Plan
Amendment No. GPA -85 -1 on application of Griffin Development Company, and
does hereby amend the Land Use Element of the Moorpark General Plan to
redesignate approsimately 217.4 acres from Rural High Density Residential
(one dwelling unit per acre) to Medium Los Density Residential (2.6 dwelling
units per acre average) and approximately 36.3 acres from Rural High Density
(one dwelling unit per acre) to Open Space (10 -40 acres per dwelling unit),
on property located north of Campus Park Drive, north of the present terminus
of Collins Drive, adjacent to and northwest of Moorpark College, in the City
of Moorpark, as designated on the map attached hereto, marked EXHIBIT P_
and incorporated herein and made a part hereof, which amendment is General
Plan Amendment No. GPA -85 -1.
SECTION 3. That the City Clerk is instructed to transmit to the
planning agency of-the County of Ventura a copy of this amendment to the
Moorpark Land Use Element pursuant to Government Code Section 65360.
SECTION 4. That Tentative Tract No. Tr -3963 and Residential
Planned Development Permit No. RPD -1041 are hereby approved conditionally,
subject to compliance with all the conditions attached hereto, and does hereby
find, determine and resolvol that violation of any of such conditions shall be
grounds for revocation of said permits
SECTION 5. That this resolution shall take effect immediately.
SECTION 6. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and
adoption of this resolution.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 18th day of February, 1986.
ATTEST:
Ma of the City of Moorpark, California
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF VENTURA ) Is S S.
CITY OF MOORPARK )
1, DORIS D. BANKUS City Clerk of the City of Moorpark,
California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 86 -275
was adopted by the City Council of the City of Moorpark at a regular
meeting thereof held on the 18th day of February
and that the same was adopted by the following roll call vote: 19 86
,
AYES: Councilmembers Woolard, Prieto, and Mayor Weak;
NOES: Nona;
ABSENT: Councilmember Yancy - Sutton;
ABSTAIN: Councilmember Ferguson.
WITNESS my hand and the official seal of said City this 18th
,
February 19 .86 day of
City erk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
_ COUNTY OF VENTURA ) _ Ski.
CITY OF MOORPARK -
I, Maureen W. Wall , City Clerk of the City of Moorpark,
California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 86 -275
was adopted by the City Council of the City of Moorpark at a regular
meeting thereof held on the 18th day of February
and that the same was adopted by the following roll call vote: 19 86
AYES: Councilmembers Woolard, Prieto, and Mayor Weak.
NOES: Councilmember Ferguson.
ABSENT: Councilmember Yancy- Sutton.
WITNESS my hand and th19 official seal of said City this 10th day of
February
NOTE: The original certification sheet attached to Resolution No. 86 -275
incorrectly recorded the vote cast on this resolution. This
certification sheet is intended to correct this error.
1
AV
� w: �. l •:
VT
-1 (10 -40 AC /DU) ` . �`` '�'':3.<'" z=: ^' ♦+ /
''C _��•,.; __--� :�: �;;�':_ ML ( DU /AC) •.any? -: z � — - ��-_�;.
G ice_ r, . I. •�.. ,'. '`':• •�•••..•- � v h �- '�ry. Y �j� �1t:. _ _ ~ --
134 �
-1 \ ';►5.'^ : o. • ' o_ .. : - _ •, ':`.' V. /%' _ -
��.
I � � ✓ •�•..:• µt `A l _ Il CJ... �. �. � "` •f in,. '�Tj •'. - off- \
�i PECAN AVE. Z 4l' ► r
\ COLLINS
i CAMPUS PARK DR. DRJ
PRINCETON CO 1 . j� '�`? s
AVE. ^.,\ LLEGE '! yi, . ' f 1.
VIEW ,
ANGELES / J'n
LOS ANG S AVE. AVE.
y wens r... SIM1� 'r /
VALLEY FREEWAY`,
Pe ed OS
k ` '� He
Well _-
JI
"--
�\ =✓ ♦ tip = v�� / (f —� rl l/ - ��
0
_ �:. _
_ _ GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. GPA -85 -1
_ APPROVED FEBRUARY 18 1986, by RESOLUTION NO. 86- 275
EX'HIBiT A --
CITY COUNCIL RES. NO. 86 -275
FEBRUARY 18, 1986
Page 6 of 15
o Class III bike paths shall be provided in the following locations:
on Pecan Avenue, from the tract boundary to "B" Street; all of
"B" Street; on "C" Street from Collins Drive to "D"
"D" Street from "C" Street to "E" Street; and all of "E" Street.
o The following roads rhaii be per Ventura County Standard Plate
B -5A:
Pecan Avenue from southerly tract boundary to intersection
with "B" Street, "C" Street, and "D" Street..
o The western segment of "1:" Street between Collins Drive and 13th
Circle -shall be constructed per Plate B -5A, with the minimum curve
radius for the street. being 250 feet (instead of the 300 feet
specified in the Standard Plate). The remainder of "E" Street
shall be constructed Per Plat(, B -5B.
o All remaining interior strt}ets, including cul -de -sacs, shall be per
Plate B -5B.
o Collins Drive (see attached figure for cross sections):
a. From the connection with Campus Road at the north end of
Moorpark College to 200 feet north of the southerly tract
boundary - shall be constructed to have (from west to east), a
6 -1/2 foot parkway with a 5 foot sidewalk adjacent to the
curb, an 8 foot parking lane, a 12 foot travel lane (south-
bound), a 10 foot median lane, a 12 foot travel lane (north-
bound), a 14 foot travel lane (northbound), a 5 foot parkway,
an 8 foot Class I bike path, a 2 foot graded area, and 4 feet
of additional right. -(f-way for possible future improvements
(Total R/W = 81.5 fee').
b. From 200 feet north ;f the southerly tract boundary to the
southerly tract bcund.ry -- shall be constructed to have (from
west to east) , a 6 -1. .'2 foot parkway with a 5 foot sidewalk
adjacent to the curb, an B foot parking/bike lane, a 12 foot
travel lane (southbound) , a 10 foot median lane, two 12 foot
travel lanes ( northbound), a 5 foot bike lane, a 1 -1/2 foot
public service easemer.t, and 9 feet of additional right -of -way
for possible future improvements (Total R/W = 76 feet).
Final design of th,� above segments of Collins Drive is subject
to the approval o:` tht_ City Council at the time improvement
plans for the roadway ire reviewed by the City Engineer.
C. From the southerly tract boundary to Benwood Drive - shall be
constructed to havt, (from west to east), a 6 -1/2 foot parkway
with a 5 foot sidewalk adjacent_ to the curb (existing), an
8 foot parking/b, lane, a 12 foot travel :Lane (southbound)
a 10 foot median line, two 12 foot travel lanes (northbound },
a 5 foot bicycle lant, a -6 -1/2 foot parkway with a 5 foot
sidewalk adjacent to the curb, and 9 feet of additional
right -of -way for >os�,.ble future improvements (Total R/W =
81 feet) .
59018B/E -6
CITY COUNCIL RES. NO. 86 -275
FEBRUARY 18, 1986
Page 7 of 15
d. From just south of Benwood Drive to intersection with Campus
Park Drive - shall be constructed to have (from west to east),
a 10 foot parkway with a 5 foot sidewalk adjacent to the curb
(existing), a 14 foot travel lane (southbound - through/
right) , a 12 foot travel lane (through /left) , a 10 foot left
turn lane, two L2 foot travel lanes (northbound) , a 5 foot
bike lane, and a 6 -1/2 foot parkway with a 5 foot sidewalk
adjacent to the curb (Total R/W = 81.5 feet.)
The additional right -of -way required pursuant to this condition to
provide sufficient right -of -way to allow future widening of Collins
Drive from the southerly tract boundary to Campus Park Drive shall
be reimbursed to the developer if permitted by State law and City
Ordinance by the developer(s) of adjacent property that would take
access by means of Collins Drive. The developer shall be responsi-
ble to adhere to the direction of the City Attorney to insure that
said right -of -way is acquired in a manner that permits the City to
enter into a reimbursement agreement. Reimbursement cost shall
include the fair market value of the land plus appraisal costs and
City staff processing costs but not interest on the amount to be
reimbursed and shall be for a period of fifteen (15) years from the
date of recordation of the final map for the fist phase of Tract
No. 3963. Developer shall pay the City for costs to prepare said
agreement and to implement this condition.
o Developer is responsible for constructing double left turn lanes on
College View Avenue at Campus Park Drive. The developer shall bond
for these improvements prior to issuance of the first zone clear-
ance for Phase I. As an interim measure, prior to issuance of the
first zone clearance for Phase I, the developer shall prepare full
improvement plans for the double left turn lanes on College View
Avenue and shall re- stripe the existing center lane on College View
Avenue, making it an optional left- turn /right -turn lane. This
interim condition will be checked periodically by the City Engi-
neer. If the City Engineer determines that the interim condition
is inadequate for smooth traffic :flows, the developer shall be
required to improve Ccalege View Avenue to include an additional
left turn lane. If these :improvements are not required within two
years of final occupancy oi` Phase V, the bond shall be exonerated.
o That prior to issuance of the first zone clearance for Phase I, the
developer shall either deposit $75,000 cash or shall bond for the
construction of the traffic signal at Collins Drive and Campus Park
Drive, with construction of the signal to take place at the time of
the Collins Drive Freeway :connection, or when deemed necessary by
the City Engineer.
o Site distances _for turning movements into and out of Twelfth Circle
shall meet the City's requirements and are subject to the approval
_of the City Engineer-
59018B/E-7
CITY COUNCIL RES. NO. 86 -275
FEBRUARY 18, 1986
Page 8 of 15
39. That in conjunction with the recordation of the final map for each
phase, the developer shall offer to dedicate on the final map to the
City of Moorpark for public use, all the public street rights -of -way
shown on the final map.
40. That in conjunction with the recordation of the final map for each
phase, the developer shall offer to dedicate on the final map to the
City of Moorpark access easements over all private streets shown on the
final map to provide access, for all governmental agencies providing the
public safety, health and welfare.
41. That prior to recordation of the final map for Phases I and III, the
developer shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval,
street improvement plans for the temporary access road from 7th Circle
to 20th Circle and the access road from Pecan Avenue to 5th Circle,
respectively, prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer; shall enter into
an agreement with the City of Moorpark to complete these improvements;
and shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing the completion of the
improvements. A 60 -foot wide easement shall be provided for the access
road between Pecan Avenue and 5th Circle.
42. That prior to any work being conducted within the State or City right of
way, the developer shall ohtair an encroachment permit from the appro-
priate agency.
43. That in conjunction with recordation of the applicable phases of the
final map, the developer shall dedicate on the final map to the City of
Moorpark the access rights adjacent to Collins Drive, "C" Street, and
the western segment of "E" Street between Collins Drive and 16th Circle,
except for approved access roads.(s) as delineated on the approved tenta-
tive map.
44. If any grading occurs within the rainy season (between October and
April), then erosion control plans shall be submitted along with the
grading plan. Concurrently with erosion control, hydroseeding of all
graded hillside shall occur within thirty days of completion of the
rough grading.
45. That prior to recordation of the final map for each phase, the developer
shall demonstrate feasible access with adequate protection from a ten
year frequency storm to the Satisfaction of the City of Moorpark.
46. That prior to recordation of the final map for each phase, the developer
shall demonstrate legal access for each parcel to the satisfaction of
the City of Moorpark.
47. That prior to recordation of the final map for any phase, the developer
shall indicate in writing to the City-of Moorpark, any water wells that
may- exist within the site. If any wells are - -proposed to be abandoned,
or if_they are abandoned and have not been properly sealed, they must be
destroyed per Ventura County Ordinance No. 2372.
59018B/E -8
CITY COUNCIL RES. NO. 86 -275
FEBRUARY 18, 1986
Page 9 of 15
48. That prior to the submittal of the final map for each phase, the devel-
oper shall transmit by certified mail a copy of the conditionally
approved tentative map together with a copy of Section 66436 of the
State Subdivision Map Act to each public entity or public utility that
is an easement holder of record. Written compliance shall be submitted
to the City of Moorpark.
49. If any of the improvements which the subdivider is required to construct
or install is to be constructed or installed upon land in which the sub-
divider does not have title or interest sufficient for such purposes,
the subdivider shall do all of the following at least 60 days prior to
the filing o-f each phase of the final map for approval pursuant to
Government Code Section 66457.
a. Notify the City of Moorpark (hereafter "City ") in writing that the
subdivider wishes the City to acquire an interest in the land which
is sufficient for such purposes as provided in Government Code
Section 66462.5;
b. Supply the City with (i) a legal description of the interest to be
acquired, (ii) a map cr diagram of the interest to be acquired
sufficient to satisfy the requirements of subdivision (e) of
Section 1250.310 of the Code of Civil Procedure, (iii) a current
appraisal report prepared by an appraiser approved by the City
which expresses an opinion as to the current fair market value of
the interest to be acquired; and (iv) a current Litigation Guaran-
tee Report;
C. Enter into an agreement with the City, guaranteed by such cash
deposits or other security as the City may require, pursuant to
which the subdivider will pay all of the City's costs (including,
without limitation, attorney's fees and overhead expenses) of
acquiring such an interest .n the land.
50. That prior to recordation of the final map for each phase, the developer
shall submit to the Moorpark City Engineer and County Flood Control Dis-
trict for review and approval, drainage plans, hydrologic, and hydraulic
calculations prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer; shall enter into
an agreement with the City of Moorpark to complete the improvements and
shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing the construction of improve-
ments. The drainage plans and calculations shall indicate the following
conditions before and after development:
51.
Quantities of water, water flow rates, major water courses, drainage
areas and patterns, diversions, ,ollection systems, flood hazard areas,
SUMPS, drainage courses, and ais analysis of the potential need for
on -site retention basins so '_hat there is no increase in off -site peak
flow volumes following projects c(,nstruction.
That in conjunction with recordation, the developer shall delineate on
the final map for each phase areas subject to flooding as a "Flowage
Easement" and then offer the easement for dedication to the City of
Moorpark. Lot to lot drainage easements, flood hazard areas and secon-
dary drainage easements shall a ls , !)e delineated on the map.
59018B/E -9
CITY COUNCIL RES. NO. 86 -275
FEBRUARY 18, 1986
Page 10 of 15
52. That prior to any work being conducted within the Strathern Canyon
Drain, the developer shall obtain a Ventura County Flood Control Dis-
trict Watercourse Encroachment Permit. The subject easements shall be
identified based on hydrologic and hydraulic methodology approved by the
Ventura County Flood Control District.
53. That prior to recordation of the final map for each phase, the developer
shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, evidence
that all the buildable sites in the subdivision will be protected from
flooding.
54. That the developer shall pay all energy costs associated with street
lighting for a period of one year from the initial. energizing of the
street lights.
55. That two bus turnouts shall be : onstructed along Collins Drive, at loca-
tions subject to the approval cf the City Engineer.
56. That prior to recordation of Phase IV, the developer shall post a bond
with the City Engineer to guarantee the provision of signage along
"E" Street and its intersecting cul -de -sacs. Said signage shall be pro-
vided by the developer whet: determined necessary by the City Engineer
and shall be posted with parking restrictions during the hours of
8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., or as otherwise required. The purpose of these
restrictions is to eliminate parking On the affected streets by Moorpark
College students. The bond shall be held for two years, at which time,
r if no parking problem develops from College traffic, it shall be exon-
erated and no signage shall be required to be provided by the developer.
57. That in order to provide two means of access to Phase I, a 24 foot wide
temporary access road, to meet County standards, connecting the easterly
cul -de -sac of 7th Circle with 20th Circle shall be provided in conjunc-
tion with the construction :)f Phase 1. In addition, 24 feet of paved
roadway per Moorpark City standards, centered about the centerline of
proposed 20th Circle and Collins Drive, from 20th Circle to the northern
right -of -way of "C" Street, shall also be constructed in conjunction
with Phase I. Collins Drive from the northerly right -of -way of
"C" Street to the southerly tract boundary shall be fully improved with
the development of Phase I. Pl,ins for the above improvements shall be
submitted to the city Engineer prior to recordation of the final map for
Phase I. These improvements shall be completed to the satisfaction of
the City Engineer prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy
for the first unit of the project. The temporary roadway shall be gated
at the 7th Circle cul- de -:;ac and at the northern right -of -way of
"C" Street. The temporary access road shall be maintained by the devel-
oper until Pecan Avenue and the access road between it and 5th Circle
are constructed (in Phase III), At that time, the temporary access road
shall be-removed and the area landscaped to the satisfaction of the
Community— Development Direct,)r. Since the temporary access road shall
be constructed over Lot 159, development of this lot shall be delayed
/1 until the access road is eliminated. The developer shall also maintain
the temporary improvements along 20th Circle and Collins Drive until the
roadways are fully improved anti o cepted by the City.
59018B/E -10
i
CITY COUNCIL RES. NO. 86 -275
FEBRUARY 18, 1986 Page 11 of 15
58. That Pecan Avenue to "B" Street and "B" Street to "C" Street shall be
constructed prior to the opening of the elementary school, or in con-
junction with Phase III, whichever occurs first.
59. That prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the first unit
of the project, a signal shall be installed by the City at the Princeton
Avenue /Los Angeles Avenue (Highway 1.18) intersection.
60. That prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the 70th unit
of the project, the developer shall acquire the additional offsite
right -of -way, submit plans for all onsite and offsite improvements to
Collins Drive for the review and approval of the City Engineer, and
shall construct and open to the public all offsite and onsite improve-
ments to Collins Drive, in accordance with Tract Condition No. 38.
61. That prior to recordation of the final map for the first phase of the
project, the developer shall provide the City with a letter stating
agreement with the following requirements:
a. That prior to recordation c)f the final map for the first phase, the
developer shall deposit: with the City an amount equivalent to the
then current applicable rage for the Los Angeles Avenue Improvement
Area of Contribution (AOC), but not less than $1200.00 per dwelling
unit, for the number of residential lots in that phase. The City
may, upon thirty (30) says written notice, request that the devel-
oper pay the then current 4pplicable AOC rate for all the remaining
dwelling units in Tract No 3'4 3.
b. That prior to issuance of t -he zone clearance for the first unit of
the project, the developez shall deposit with the City an amount
equivalent to the then current applicable rate of the Los Angeles
Avenue Improvement AOC but not less than $1200.00 per dwelling
unit, for a total of rot ess than 138 dwelling units, including
those paid pursuant to "a" above. The City may, upon thirty (30)
days written notice,' request that the developer pay the then
current applicable AOC .-ate fcr all the remaining dwelling units in
Tract No. 3963.
C. That prior to recordation of. the final map for each of the remain-
ing phases, the developer shall deposit with the City an amount
equivalent to the then current applicable rate for the Los Angeles
Avenue Improvement AOC, but not less than $1200.00 per dwelling
unit, for the remaining number of approved dwelling units in each
phase. The City may, upon °hirty (30) days written notice, request
that the developer pay the '_hen current applicable AOC rate for all
the remaining dwelling snit in Tract No. 3963.
d. The_ monies deposited pursuant to "a," "b" and "c" above shall be in
lieu_ of contributions t_> the existing Los---Angeles Avenue Improve-
ment AOC fund and shall be placed_in a separate fund by the City
for the purpose of studyin and improving an alternate route to
existing Los Angeles Avenue. All or part of these funds may be
used for the purposes of tl e Los Angeles Avenue AOC upon a four -
fifths (4/5) vote of the Ci• C( unci L.
59018B/E -11
a
l
CITY COUNCIL RES. NO. 86 -275
FEBRUARY 18, 1986
Page 12 of 15
e. Prior to issuance of the certificate of occupancy for the first
unit of the project, the developer shall deposit $200,000.00 with
the City to be placed in a separate fund for the purpose of study-
ing and improving as alternate route to existing Los Angeles
Avenue. The use of these funds shall include, but not be limited
to, alignment studies, environmental review, slope analyses, area
of benefit/ contribution determinations, traffic projections,
design and engineerinc including the Arroyo Simi bridge(s), financ-
ing and right -of -way alternatives. Any of the $200,000.00 paid by
the developer but not used for studying or improving an alternate
route to existing Los Angeles Avenue shall be returned to the
developer upon four- fLfths (4/5) vote of the City Council not to
continue with the study or improvement of said alternate route.
62. That prior to issuance of i certificate of occupancy for the first unit
of the project, and following the installation of the signal at the
Princeton Avenue /Los Angeles Avenue (Highway 118) intersection, the
developer shall make a directional traffic count on Los Angeles Avenue
(Highway 118) between Princeton Avenue and College View Avenue, for the
morning and afternoon peak hours. Following the issuance of a certifi-
cate of occupancy for the 70th, but prior to the 100th, dwelling unit, a
second traffic count shall be made. Following the issuance of a certi-
ficate of occupancy for the 1 74th, but prior to the 281st, dwelling
unit, a third traffic count shall be made. The purpose of these traffic
counts shall be to assist the •'ity in determining the need for a second
eastbound lane on Los AnjelES Avenue between Princeton Avenue and
College View Drive.
63. That prior to the issuance of a zone clearance for the 281st unit of the
project, either the City shall have added the fourth (westbound) lane on
Los Angeles Avenue between, Princeton Avenue and High Street, or the
Highway 23/118 connection shall be made, but not both. However, prior
to the issuance of a zone learance for the 100th and the 281st unit,
the developer shall make a directional traffic count at the above loca-
tion on Los Angeles Avenue, for the morning and afternoon peak hours, to
verify the actual traffic volumes. The purpose of the directional count
taken prior to the issuance of the 100th zone clearance is to inform the
developer of the potential future need for either installation of the
fourth (westbound) lane o:- the Highway 23/118 connection. If the
directional volumes obtained from the count taken prior to the issuance
of the 281st zone clearance dc: not equal or exceed 1130 vehicles per
hour per lane, or 2260 vehicle. , per hour per direction on the two lane
portions, the developer may construct and occupy additional units
consistent with Level of Servi, - -e "C" operation on Los Angeles Avenue
between Princeton Avenue ani High Street (capacity is considered to be
1880 vehicles per hour per lane, and Level of Service "C" is 60 percent
of capacity). If the direc�.ional volumes obtained from the count taken
prior to issuance of the gone clearance for the 281 -st unit equal or
exceed the above vehicles pe-
r hour ;Level of Service "D" or less), then
no - additional units within thc= project will be permitted to be con-
structed until the fourth -( westbound) lane on Los Angeles Avenue between
Princeton Avenue and High 3tr,,t r ±he Highway 23/118 connection is
constructed.
59018B/E -12
CITY COUNCIL RES. NO. 86 -275
FEBRUARY 18, 1986 Page 13 of 15
VENTURA COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT CONDITIONS:
64. That prior to construction within the on -site County Flood Control
District channels, an encroachment permit shall be obtained from the
District.
65. That the site is subject to acreage assessment fees for flood control
purposes. Prior to recordation of the final map for each phase, the
Ventura County Flood Control acreage assessment fee requirement must be
satisfied.
VENTURA COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS:
66. That a 24 foot wide secondary access road, to meet County access stand-
ards, shall be provided between Pecan Avenue and 5th Circle.
67. That the private access roads shall be installed with an all- weather
surface, suitable for access, by fire department apparatus.
68. That the temporary access road between 7th and 20th Circles, and second-
ary access road between Pecan Avenue and 5th Circle shall be certified
by a registered civil engineer as having an all- weather surface in con-
formance with the City Engineer's standards. This certification shall
be submitted to the Ventura County Bureau of Fire Prevention, prior to
` occupancy of Phases I and III, respectively.
69. That all drives shall have a minimum vertical clearance of 13 feet,
6 inches (13'6 ").
70. That the access roadway shall be extended to within 150 feet of all
portions of the exterior wally of the first story of any building.
Where the access roadway cannot be provided, an approved fire protection
system or systems shall be installed as required and acceptable to the
Bureau of Fire Prevention.
71. That approved turn - around areas for fire apparatus shall be provided
where the access road is 15C feet or farther from the main thoroughfare.
72. That prior to recordation cf the final map for each phase, the street
names within that phase shall bF submitted to the Bureau of Fire Preven-
tion for review.
73. That street signs within any phase of the project shall be installed
prior to occupancy of any unit within the phase.
74. That prior to construction, the applicant shall submit plans to the
Ventura County Bureau of Fire Prevention for the approval of the loca-
-tion of fire hydrants. Show existing hydrants on plan within 500 feet
- of the development.
75. That a minimum fire flow of 100( gallons ! g per minute shall be provided at
this location.
59018B/E -13
CITY COUNCIL RES. NO. 86 -275
FEBRUARY 18, 1986
Page 14 of 15
76. That fire hydrants shall be installed and in service prior to combusti-
ble construction and shall conform to the minimum standards of the
County Water Works Manual.
a. Each hydrant shall be a ( inch wet barrel design, and shall have
one 4 inch and one 2 -1/2 inch outlet.
b. The required fire flow shall be achieved at no less than 20 psi
residual pressure.
C. Fire hydrants shall be spaced 500 feet on center, and so located
that no structure will "e farther than 250 feet from any one
hydrant.
77. That all grass or brush exposing any structures shall be cleared for a
distance of 100 feet prior to framing, according to the Ventura County
Weed Abatement Ordinance.
78. That an approved spark arrester shall be installed on the chimney of any
structure (California Administrative Code, Title 24, Section 2- 1217).
79. That address numbers, a minimum of 4 inches high, shall be installed
prior to occupancy, shall be of contrasting color to the background, and
shall be readily visible a*. night. Where structures are set -back more
than 150 feet from the street, larger numbers will be required so that
they are distinguishable from tfie street. In the event the structure(s)
is not visible from the street, tt,e address number(s) shall be posted
adjacent to the driveway entrar, -e.
80. That portions of this developm -nt may be in a hazardous fire area that
those structures shall meet fiyF zone 4 building code requirements.
81. That any structure greater thar 5,000 square feet in area and /or 5 miles
from a fire station shall be 1rov.i.ded with an automatic fire sprinkler
system in accordance with Venti_ra County Ordinance #14.
82. That no parking shall be allowed on the access roads between Pecan
Avenue and 5th Circle and 7th ,�nd 20th Circles.
83. That a 100 foot buffer zone sh,�11 be established and maintained between
the dwelling units and open space areas.
VENTURA COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS:
84. That all residential streets ai<, to be a minimum 30 feet in width.
MOORPARK UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT CONDITIONS:..
85. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for any dwelling unit, pay-
ment of School Facility Fee_ shall be made pursuant to Article 4,
Chapter 9 of the Moorpark Cr.diiar f Code.
59018B/E -14
CITY COUNCIL RES. NO. 86 -275
FEBRUARY 18, 1986
Page 15 of 15
86. That prior to recordation of the final map for Phase I, the developer
shall enter into an agreement with the Moorpark Unified School District
to lease the elementary school site in the location shown on the ten-
tative map to the District, and to provide drainage and grading improve-
ments to the site. The agreement shall also require the developer to
transfer title to the school site, with terms and conditions satisfac-
tory to the School District.
87. That Pecan Avenue to "B" Street. and "B" Street to "C" Street shall be
constructed prior to the opening of the elementary school, or in con-
junction with Phase III, whichever occurs first.
59018B/E -15
COLL IQS DR. FRO&I CoualEGTlOM x),n -f RD. 4T- �JoeTN END OF COLLEr,,-F-
TO 200 PT, JJOR774 OF T}+E
W L'( F %j If 15,t_Y P/w
SI.S
Crass _ 2
le
J�5 TRw
ExrRA F,Lo f:o •�
FU7UR -- IMRPOvEMtfj)
COLLItiJS DR. F?OM 200' JQOJZT}f OF 7 WF- 61LY
TRAe—T .60WJDARY 7a 7I-fE 'SLY 7i4RG7- SOGcsJCF,4Ay'
IA) SLY �(w _ �� LY R/w
7 (0
P1?o w se
A► lx� H EOv o j R--TA ,u : NE
i EXTRA P /u,, FOR POSoSA &.L
. Fc;7URE 1MP�6vEN��S
G}CLLIIVS DR. FROM 7� s'Ly 7�?AGT
- W ,LY � E c.Y R /&j
EMO ST. ojzt4&j PMT I.5 o►.: C►�u L./ j' DIt1
EXTRA w Foy
�ThM -
1 ?(ZpPOSE AJ ^^-i Lul
kl 6UsT. R�1nl \ RKSt�t.E uruRE
C J� IHPRpUF�IE,CJTS
COLLI AU DR. FROM BE -Ajaj L > Lao. 7a /,U7Z�p'5C7 "r7ox1
14� i i
— 6P, 5.9
�XI5T S'
1•s' P s ��Pf�OPOSEI� iC-SECrlo�1 S OF C-O(- rl �J S
DRIv�
CONDITIONS FOR: Planned Development Permit APPLICANT: Griffin Development
No. 1041 (Single Family Company
Units)
CITY COUNCIL RES. NO. 86 -275 PAGE: 1 of 6
FEBRUARY 18, 1986
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS:
1. That the permit is granted for the Land as described in the application
and any attachments thereto, an(? as shown on the plot plan submitted,
labeled Exhibits "A" and 16.
2. That the permit is granted for all of the buildings, fences, signs,
roadways, parking areas, landscaping and other features which shall be
located substantially as shown on Exhibits "A ", 16 through 18, except or
unless indicated otherwise hcreir.
3. That the elevations and floor plans of all buildings shall be substan-
tially in conformance with the elevation plans and floor plans labeled
Exhibits 5 through 15 inclusi.vel..
4. That subsequent to occupancy, minor changes or additions to approved
structures, fences, etc., �r the construction of patio covers and
accessory structures may be approved by the Community Development
C Director through issuance of a zone clearance provided that the minor
change a) is consistent with the Conditions, Covenants and Restrictions
(CC and Rs) for the project; f;) has been approved by the applicable
Homeowners Association; c) clearly does not affect the design, integ-
rity, or quality of the development; and d) is consistent with the
regulations of the City Zoning Ordinance. Minor changes which do not
meet these criteria will requir+� a minor modification of the permit to
be considered by the Communi,.y Development Director. Any changes
determined to be major by tl. Community Development Director will
require the filinq of a modific-fi.oc application to be considered by the
Planning Commissi�)n.
5. That the final design of ail
ational facilities, walls and fences including materials and colors, is
subject to the approval of the 'community Development Director.
6. That all requirements of any la,-1 or agency of the State, Ventura County,
and City of Moorpark, and any other governmental entity shall be met.
7. That applicant agrees as a condition of issuance (or renewal) for the
use of this permit, to defend, at his sole expense, any action brought
against the City because of issuance (or - renewal) of this permit, or in
the-alternative, to relinquish this permit. Applicant will reimburse
the City for any court costs acid_ /or attorney's --fees-which the City may
be required by a court to pa.y a:L, a result. of any such action. City may,
at its sole discretion, participatfr in the defense of any such action,
but such participation sha 1 - t :eLieve applicant of his obligations
under this condition.
59018B/F -1 --
CITY COUNCIL RES. NO. 86 -275
FEBRUARY 18, 1986
Page 2 of 6
8. That prior to construction, a zone clearance shall be obtained from the
Community Development Department_ and a building permit shall be obtained
from the Building and Safety Division.
9. That no zone clearance shall be issued for this permit until the appro-
priate phase of Tract Map Nc. 3963 has been recorded.
10. That unless a zone clearance for a unit within each phase is issued
within thirty -six (36) months after the date the permit is granted, this
permit shall automatically expire on that date. The Community Develop-
ment Director may, in hiE, discretion, grant two separate 12 month
extensions for issuance of a zone clearance for a unit in each phase,
provided: a) the application for extension is made prior to the expir-
ation of the initial thirty--six (36) months; b) there has been no change
in the approved plans; c) there has been no change of circumstance which
will prevent the preservata..on of t:he integrity, character, utility or
value of the property in th-2 zone and the general area in which the use
is proposed to be located or will. be detrimental to the public health,
safety or welfare; and d) the permittee has diligently worked toward
initiation of construction of (rach phase of the development during the
initial thirty -six (36) month por.aod.
11. That signs are subject to the regulations of Article 25 of the Moorpark
Ordinance Code.
12. That a transfer of this permit shall not be effective until the name and
address of the transferee and date when such transfer shall be effec-
tive, together with a letter from the new owner certifying agreement to
comply with all conditions of the permit is filed with the Community
Development Director.
13. That the single family portion of the project is subject to all appli-
cable regulations of the "R -P -12.5U" (Residential Planned Development,
two and one -half dwelling units per acre) zone.
14. If any of the residential units are to be constructed as a tract devel-
opment (simultaneous constriicti.)n), a plan shall be developed to create
a variety in unit placement, with the intent of eliminating the pos-
sibility of side to side and /or front to front unit elevation repeti-
tion. The plot plan shall indicate building locations, yard setbacks
and the number of stories c each unit prior to the issuance of a zone
clearance. This plan shall be subject to Community Development Director
approval, upon review by tl.e P 1 ann_ng commission (if determined neces-
sary) .
15. That prior to issuance of the first zone clearance for each phase, a
landscaping, planting and irrigation plan for that phase, together with
specifications and a maintenance_ program, shall be prepared by a state-
_ licensed landscape architect. The Ventura County—Guide to Landscape
Plans, dated July 1982, shall be used. The landscaping plan shall show
planting within the front yards of all residential lots in the sub-
division; within the open spa c� areas (Lots 490 through 495) ; within
59018B/F -2
1
CITY COUNCIL RES. NO. 86 -275
FEBRUARY 18, 1986
Page 3 of 6
Parcel 5A; within the private recreational areas (Parcels R -1, R -2 and
R -3); along the man -made slopes adjacent to the developed areas, west of
the school site, and within the rear yards of certain lots; and along
the slope to the east of Collins Drive. Landscaping in these areas
shall incorporate drought resistant and native plant materials as
feasible, and shall be chosen to insure adequate erosion control, and to
mitigate the visual impacts of all man -made slopes three feet or more in
height. Landscaping shall also be provided at the entrance to the proj-
ect and within Open Space Lot 495, to buffer the project's visual impact
on the adjacent residential development to the south. The existing
mature trees located in Open Space Lot 495 and east of Collins Drive at
the entrance to the project shall be incorporated into the landscape
plan, as feasible. In addition, trees that reach a minimum height of 10
to 15 feet upon maturity shall be planted within Open Space Lots 492 and
493 to provide perch sites for raptors. All of the landscaping
described above, with the exception of that within individual lots,
shall be maintained by a homeowners association.
Prior to preparation of the landscaping plan, the landscape architect
shall consult with the Director of Community Development regarding
species to be planted and the c;verall landscape concept to be used.
Three sets of plans shall oe submitted for approval to the Director of
Community Development.
The applicant shall bear --he total cost of such review and of final
installation inspection. All landscaping installation described above
(with the exception of the private recreational facilities) shall be
completed prior to issuance of the last certificate of occupancy for the
affected phase. Landscaping of the private recreational facilities
shall be completed in accordance with Condition 25.
Hydroseeding of brush cleared areas is subject to the standards of the
Ventura County Fire Protection ,District.
16. That prior to issuance of the first zone clearance for each phase, the
developer shall submit a plan showing fencing along the side and rear
yards of each residential lot. Said fencing plan shall identify the
location and materials to be used (wrought iron, pilasters, slumpstone,
etc., but no wood) and shall 'be approved by the Planning Commission.
Said fencing shall be completed prior to the issuance of a certificate
of occupancy for the affected ',ct.
17. Prior to the issuance of the first zone clearance for each phase, a plan
showing the location of ma Ll b)xes shall be submitted to the Community
Development Director for 3ppr�val upon review by the Moorpark Post-
master.
59D18B/F -3
CITY COUNCIL RES. NO. 86 -275
FEBRUARY 18, 1986
Page 4 of 6
18. That all residential units shal': be constructed employing energy saving
devices as may be appropriate *.o the State of the Art. These are to
include, but are not limited to, the following:
1) Low flush toilets (not to (xceed 1 -1/2 gallons).
2) Shower controllers.
3) Stoves, ovens and ranges, when gas fueled, shall not have contin-
uous burning pilot lights.
4) All thermostats connected 1.o the main space heating source to have
night setback features.
5) Kitchen ventilation system to have automatic dampers to insure
closure when not in use.
6) Solar panel stubouts.
7) Floor plans to demonstrate reservation of space for solar equipment
adjacent to furnace.
19. That gutters and downspouts shall be provided over all garage doors and
front entryways, unless covered.
20. That the distance between the rear property line or toe of slope (which-
ever is more restrictive) and the residential unit and any room addi-
tions shall be a minimum 20 feet. The distance between the residential
unit and front property line shall be a minimum 20 feet.
21. That patio covers shall conform to the "Patio Cover Policy" adopted by
the City Council on May 15„ 1985. The required patio cover setback of
10 feet shall be measured from the rear property line or toe of slope
(whichever is more restrictive). Accessory structures shall be located
a minimum 5 feet from the tear property line or toe of slope (whichever
is more restrictive) , and side property line. Patio covers and acces-
sory structures shall cover ii,) more than 40 percent of the required
minimum rear yard area (20 feet in Length multiplied by the width of the
lot measured at: 20 feet from he rear property line or toe of slope,
whichever is more restricti�7e)
22. That patio covers, accessory buildings and room additions shall be
reviewed and approved by the Homeowners Association prior to the issu-
ance of a zone clearance.
23. A model home complex shall. bE permitted within the tract boundaries,
subject to issuance of a zone clearance. A site plan shall be submitted
which indicates the location cf dwelling units,- sidewalks, landscaping,
fencing, p-atios, direction it rid advertising signs, par -king and light-
ing.
590I8B/F -4
CITY COUNCIL RES. NO. 86 -275
FEBRUARY 18, 1986
Page 5 of 6
24. The the undeveloped areas within Lots 490 through 495 and 5A shall be
retained in open space, and shall be dedicated to the Homeowners Asso-
ciation (see Tract Conditions Nos. 13 and 14).
25. That two private recreational facilities shall be provided in the
location shown on the tentative map (Parcels R -1. and R -2). These
facilities shall be improved with a pool, jacuzzi, tot lot with play
equipment, fencing (wrought iron and slumpstone) , drinking fountains,
barbeques, picnic tables, half -court basketball, an area partially
enclosed (on two sides) with a solid roof, kitchen facilities including
but not limited to stovetop, double sink with disposal, drop -in oven and
cupboards, and landscaped open space area. A third private recreational
facility, to be landscaped only, shall be provided in the location shown
on the tentative map (Parcel R• -3). Prior to issuance of the first zone
clearance for Phases II (Parcel. R -:), IV (Parcel R -2), and V (R -1) , the
developer shall submit to the Community Development Director a plan of
the recreational facility within that phase for review and approval by
the Parks and Recreation Commission.
All landscaping and improvements on Parcel R -3 shall be completed in
conjunction with the improvement of the "E" Street /Collins Drive inter-
section. Landscaping and improvements to Parcels R -2 and R -1 shall be
completed and the facilities available prior to occupancy of the 299th
unit and 409th unit, respect:ivfy.
26. That prior to issuance of the first zone clearance for each phase, an
"Unconditional" Will -Serve Letter for water and sewer service for that
phase shall be obtained from Ve,ritura County Waterworks District No. 1.
27. That pedestrian /bicycle trails shall be provided within the open space
areas. Prior to issuance of he first zone clearance for each phase,
three sets of a landscaping elan showing the location of the trails
within the phase shall be °3ubmi.tted to the Planning Director for review
and approval by the Parks and Recreation and Planning Commissions. The
Sheriff's Department shall also review the proposed location of the
trail system. Installatiol of the trails shall be completed prior to
the issuance of the last certiticate of occupancy for the affected phase
(see Tract Condition Nos. 13 ail 14).
28. That the developer shall construct improvements to the dedicated public
park pursuant to the developmcrnt plan approved by the City (see Tract
Condition Nos. 27 and 28).
29. That prior to occupancy of the first unit of the project, the developer
shall construct children's play equipment valued at $10,000 and a full
basketball concrete court at the existing Paul E. Griffin, Sr., Park, or
equivalent facilities. Th(, to -ation of the facilities shall be subject
to the approval of the City +arks and Recreation Commission prior to
issuance of the first zone cle,:ranc:e for the project.
59018B/F -5
CITY COUNCIL RES. NO. 86 -275
FEBRUARY 18, 1986 Page 6 of 6
VENTURA COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT �20NDITIONS
30. That a licensed security auar(3 shall be provided on -site during con-
struction of each phase.
31. That construction equipmert, tools, etc., will be properly secured
during non - working hours.
32. That all appliances (microwave ovens, dishwashers, trash compactors,
waterheaters, etc.) will be properly secured prior to installation
during non - working hours. All serial. numbers will be recorded for
identification purposes.
33. That landscaping will not cover any door or window.
34. That landscaping at entrarces /exits or at any intersection will not
block or screen the view of a seated driver from another moving vehicle
or pedestrian.
35. That prior to issuance of the first zone clearance for each phase of the
project, landscaping plans foT that phase shall be submitted to the
Sheriff's Department for reviev, and approval.
36. That addresses will be clearly •aisible to approaching emergency vehicles
and mounted,against a contrasts -Lg color.
37. That address numbers will be minimum of 4" in height and capable of
being illuminated during hours ,f darkness.
38. That front door entrances will •)e visible from the street.
39. That all exterior doors will 1,e constructed of solid wood core with a
minimum thickness of 1 -3/4 ".
40. That doors utilizing a cylinder lock shall have a minimum five (5)
pintumbler operation with the locking bar or bolt extending into the
receiving guide a minimum of or- inch.
41. That all exterior sliding glass doors or windows will be equipped with
metal guide tracks at the top ,ind bottom and be constructed so that the
window cannot be lifted from the track when in the closed or locked
position.
42. That prior to occupancy by the owner or proprietor, each single unit in
the tract shall have locks using combinations which are interchanged
free from locks used in all other separate dwellings, proprietorships,
or similar distinct occupancie,
59018B/F -6
ATTACHMENT NUMBER 8
RESIDENTIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT MOORPARK NO:RPD -1041 Mod.
APPLICANT :Griffin Homes
DATE :04 -11 -94
+.n
CITY ENGINEER CONDITIONS
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A ZONE CLEARANCE, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS
SHALL BE SATISFIED:
1. The developer shall provide tn addendum to the original
soils report which addresses the presently graded site
and makes recommendation: a t -,o any remedial measures
required to ready the sitf� fcr continued construction.
All recommendations must be addressed and any remedial
measures taken prior to i :3SU -nice of the zone clearance.
2. All Improvement Agreements and Bonds shall be revised to
provide correct coverage nor the remaining improvements
and estimated length of consrruc '_i.or.
3. City Ordinance No. 100 and the Federal Emergency Management
Agency (FEMA), require updating of the National Flood
Insurance Program maps foz affected areas whenever any
alteration of the watercourse ii:nade. If a FIRM map revision
is necessary, all material. required by FEMA for a map
revision shall be provided c he City Engineer's office.
This material will demons za e the new 10, 50, 100, and 500
year flood plain locations fo_.lowing development. This
information will be forwarded by -he City Engineer to the FEMA
for review and updating of the National Flood Insurance
Program maps. A condit._on {,L !eater of map revision (if
required by FEMA) shall b(- provided to the City. The
applicant will be responsib: f)r :ill costs charged by the
FEMA and the City' s admini s r 1t i 're •osts .
4. Prior to any work being co-idu ted within any State, County or
City right -of -way, the applicant sha11 obtain an encroachment
permit from the appropriate
5. The applicant shall submit; a design to be approved, by the
City Engineer, for an 1811 ;lough wall to be constructed
directly behind the back )f he sidewalks where slopes over
four feet high exist. The wcll shall be designed so as to
reduce debris and silt from enterinq streets and convey run-
off to approved crainage cev �es
6. Construction activities 3ha t he Limited to between the
RESIDENTIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT MO)RPARK NO:RPD -1041 Mod.
APPLICANT:Griffin Homes
DATE:04 -11 -94
following hours: a) 7:00 a.1. and 7 :00 p.m. Monday through
Friday, b) 9:00 a.m. to 5:0) p.m. Saturday. No work to be
ar,complished on Sunday pursuant. to Ord. #149. Truck noise
shall be minimized by the requ :.cement that. "Jake Brakes" shall
not be used within the City
7. Construction equipment shall be fitted with modern sound
reduction devices. The contractor shall insure proper
maintenance and operation of all construction equipment.
Direct injection diesel or ga�olzne powered engines shall be
used if feasible
8. A 6 -foot high chain link fence shall be constructed around the
construction site or an on site security guard shall be
provided during non- working 1�[ un.
9. During the smog season (May October) the developer shall
order that construction cease during Stage III alerts to
minimize the number of vehicles and equipment operating, lower
ozone levels and protect equipment. operators from excessive
smog levels upon notification; by the City. The City, at its
discretion, may also limit. c or 't r_ct. , -on during a Stage II smog
alert.
10. A regular watering prograi to reduce dust shall be
implemented. Water shall he applied to the graded portions of
the project site as determ,_nec; by the City Engineer. This is
estimated to redr:ce the am :nan ,f dust generated by up to 50
percent.
During periods of high wind (i e. sustained winds 20 mph
or greater in one hour) , the ontractor shall cease all
clearing, fine grading or excavation operations
a. All active portions of construction site shall be watered
sufficiently to prevent Excessive amounts of dust. Non -
potable water shall be used if determined feasible by the
Director of 'Community Development, the City Engineer and
the applicant. Complete :overage watering shall occur at
least twice daily, preferable in the late morning and
after work is done for t',e day.
b. All material excavation Dr grading shall be
sufficiently watered t prevent excessive
amounts of dust.
C. All clearing, fine grading or excavation
activities shall cease during periods of high
L
RESIDENTIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PIOORPARK NO:RPD -1041 Mod.
APPLICANT:Griffin Homes
DATE:04 -11 -94
winds greater than 2 miles per hour- (mph)
averaged over one hour
d. All unimproved areas with vehicle traffic shall be
watered periodically cnd the vehicle speed shall be
limited to 10 mph.
e. Street, private parkins adjacent to the area being graded
shall be swept as aee(ied to remove silt or blown dust
which may have accuriul,:t ed fr,)m construction activities.
11. Advise, in writing, all employees involved in fine grading
operations to wear face masks during all periods of any
grading to redi..ice inhalat (n of dust which may contain the
fungus which causes the San 7c >aquin Valley Fever.
12. Remove silt, dust or othe _ cc nst fuct ion materials, as directed
by the City Engineer, which may have accumulated from
construction activities al)ng the streets or on private
property in the vicinit,, c the site. Periodically sweep
streets and parking areas, is per the City Engineer in the
vicinity of the site to remo� c s ; 1 t= 1.e_ fine earth material
transported from the site by vind, vehicular activities, water
run -off, etc.) which ma avC accumulated from the
construction project.
13. If any hazardous waste is en,ountered during the construction
of this project, all work shall l_:,e immediately stopped and the
Ventura County Environmental Health Department, and the City
Construction Observer shall be notified immediately. Work
shall not proceed until clearance has been issued by all of
these agencies. Contamin�cte(, anc-1 hazardous soil as defined by
Department of Health Serv_: ce ma \✓ not- be used for on -site soil
fill or roadway subgradc uile:s the Department of Health
Services determines in w" :-I( that said material has been
treated to a level that i, rio longer considered a public
health risk or requires pub1_, d 1 scIoser by the Department of
Real Estate. Any contan:ind- ed �_)r hazardous soil shall be
removed to be approved la -idf 1
DURING CONSTRUCTION THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED:
14. Backfill of any pipe or condu ?- shall be in 4" fully compacted
layers unless otherwise sees Fied by the City Engineer.
15. Soil testing for compacticn to be performed on all
conduit placement . The ini:er, al )f testing shall be less sthan
3
RESIDENTIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT MOORPARK NO:RPD -1041 Mod.
APPLICANT:Griffin Homes
DATE:04 -11 -94
once every 4 feet of l_ft and 100 lineal feet of pipe or
conduit placed.
PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AND BOND EXONERATION
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED:
16. Original "as- built" plans wiLl be signed and certified by the
applicant's civil engineer and submitted with two sets of blue
prints to the City Engineer's office. Although grading plans
may have been submitted fcr checking and construction on
sheets larger than 22" X 96" they must be resubmitted as "as-
builts" in a series of 22" X 36" mylars (made with proper
overlaps) with a title klocc on each sheet. Submission of
"as- built" plans is reqiuire: i before a final inspection for
approval and release of ec,,rlt LeS will be scheduled.
17. Reproducible centerline tie dieets shall be submitted to the
City Engineer's office.
18. Copies of the recorded Tract Map 3963 shall be provided
to the City Engineering Lepa-tment
4
ATTACHMENT NUMBER 9
ATTACHMENT NUMBER 9
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TO
MAJOR MODIFICATION NUMBER 2 TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 1041
In addition to the Conditions of Approval it Re::olut on Number 86 -275 and 87 -395, Kaufman and
Broad shall comply with the following Co idit ins of Approval-
1 . Window surrounds and lintels shal be G_)rov,ded on all four elevations.
2. Stuccoed soffits shall be provided on r !I elevations.
3. All closet doors within bedroom doors ;hall be mirrored.
4. Building elevation relief shall be prE�vidr-d thrcugh the use of varied wall depths.
5. For Plan 2 and 3, a landscaped runner shall be provided between the two car and one
car garage. If, in the future, the homeov, ner's would like to remove this landscaped area,
no modification to the developmen, pe -nit needed.
6. The following internal amenities sh�.dl b( provided:
• Mirrored closet doors
• On Plan 3, second floor access to iecc rid story from kitchen and living room
• Open wood trim railing to the seco ci fl )or -end hallway
• Ornate recessed areas in walls
• Angled walls /ledges /cut- through crE�atir, , visual relief
• Angled nooks
7. Roof relief shall be provided througri thf use of varied roof pitch and direction.
8. Condition Number 25, Planned Develop vent Permit shall be modified as follows:
Pursuant to Major Modification Numoer staff recommends that Condition of Approval
Number 25 (Planned Development Pern ut) be modified to read as follows: The private
recreational facility shall be approved L, the Director of Community Development and
installed prior to issuance of a Zonin _ C -at at ice for the issuance of a building permit for
the construction of the 12th unit (409t1l,, if tf e 87 units to be constructed.
9. All landscaping consistent with the approved iandscape plan for Tract 3963 and Planned
Development 1041, shall be installed by .!e is uance of a Zoning Clearance for the 409th
unit (12th unit of the 87 lots).
10. The 87 lots shall be annexed to the exist ng nomeowner's association prior to issuance
of a Zoning Clearance f )r occupancy Df 'ne f rst ref the 87 units.
KMP- 04- 14- 94 (2:35pm ) A: \K &B.MAJ \CC4- 20SF.RPT
11. Minor Modification Number 9 (May 2, 990) is null and void.
12. S -shape clay tile roofing shall be installed, consistent with the approved tiling for the tract.
All colors for roofing, trim and the wilding shall be approved by the Director of
Community Development.
13. Resolution with the HOA regarding the issue of the installation of trails or other public
amenities, shall be reached prior to issuance of a Zoning Clearance for the issuance of
a building permit for the 20th unit of the 87 homes. If not agreed upon, applicant shall
construct the trails as originally required by applicable Tract and Planned Development
Permit conditions. Construction of the trail shall be completed prior to issuance of the
30th Zoning Clearance for the issuance of a building permit. Further, Kaufman and Broad
shall file an application for a Modification to the Planned Development Permit (1041) for
the deletion of the trail system from the tract and the addition of other recreational
amenities in lieu of providing the trail systern. Said request for modification to PD 1041
shall include a construction appraisal i eport which is no more than one year old and
which specifies total cost to construct the entire trail system for the tract. Improvements
which approximate the value within the report shall be provided within the private
recreational (active and passive) parks as mutually agreed upon by the HOA and the
applicant. The applicant shall also plant 30 fifteen (15) gallon trees and appropriate
irrigation, with species approved by the City, on the hillsides adjacent to Campus Canyon
Park to the satisfaction of the City r,langer Installation of these improvements shall be
made within sixty days of City apps -)va' )f ti-e mY :)dification.
14. Landscaping and block wall /fences shw be installed consistent with the approved plans
for the tract; however, all of the blcck , %alls that mill be installed shall be six (6) feet in
height.
15. Of the 87 single - family homes to be con�;tructed within Phase IV, 29 homes shall be built
of each building plan.
16. Construction of each sub -phase of Phase IV, shall not interfere with the new homes which
are constructed and occupied within Ph ise 'V
17. Single- family homes 2,221 square feet in size shall be built along the southerly boundary
of the said project area - on Borgess Dr ve and Imbach Place
18. The applicant shall submit a deposit, a required by the City' Fee Schedule, for fine
grading, paving, and final inspection , f the 87 lots prior to issuance of a Zoning
Clearance for a building permit for the fi, _,t o+ the 87 units.
19. Any fees which are required to be pad ar d noted in Resolutions Number 86 -275 and 87-
395 and other applicable City fees required, shall be paid prior to issuance of a Zoning
Clearance for construction of the first ,)f hF 87 uopts
KMP- 04- 14- 94 (2:35Pm)A:\K &B.MAJICC4- 20SF.RPT
20. All required public improvements which have not yet been constructed, shall be
constructed prior to issuance of a Zoninf Clearance for construction of the first of the 87
units.
21. All deposits for staff time which may have been exhausted or which are now required,
shall be made prior to issuance of a Zo+, ng Clearance for construction of the first of the
87 units.
22. All outstanding case processing of this Major Modification shall be reimbursed, prior to
issuance of a Zoning Clearance of construction of the first unit of the 87 units. If payment
is not received within 30 -days of the City's issuance of a correspondence requesting
reimbursement for outstanding case or >cessing Major Modification Number 2 shall be
null and void.
23. A Zoning Clearance be obtained for tl-,e installation of the remaining landscaping and
block walls to ensure that the instal atio and construction is consistent with the original
approved plans for the tract.
24. The required Traffic Mitigation Fee of $3,300.00 shall be paid for 87 units prior to issuance
of a Zoning Clearance for issuance of 3 hu lding permit for the construction of homes
within the first phase.
25. A deposit for condition compliance sl all be made to the Department of Community
Development and shall be calculated ors follows: the total cost, based upon the City's
current fee schedule, for a Tenta,ive Tract Map, Planned Development Permit, and
Environmental Impact Report shall be iivided by the number of units within the entire
tract (484 units); this amount will total thy: cost for condition compliance per lot. This cost
shall be multiplied by the number of u! its within this proposal (87 units). This amount
represents the applicant's cost for cond tien compliance. This deposit shall be made with
the Department of Community Develop rent prior to issuance of a Zoning Clearance for
a building permit for construction cf th. f!,sr unit of the 87 units.
26. Kaufman and Broad shall be respon° ble for tulfilling all original Tract and Planned
Development Permit conditions of appr ���✓��I, ncll, ding all bond obligations for the 87 lots
and previously constn -,cted improv.�mc it
27. All conditions of prior Resolutions of Approval for Minor and Major Modifications, except
as amended due to Major Modification Nur,iber 2, shall be in full force and effect and
shall be complied with
KMP- 04- 14- 94(2:35pm)A:1K &B. MAY, CC4- 20SF.RPT