HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 1994 0601 CC REG ITEM 09CAGENDA REPORT
C ='I'Y O F MOOR PARK
TO: The Honorable City Counct.1
FROM: Ken Gilbert, Director of Public Works
DATE: May 23, 1994 (Council Meeting 6- -1 -94)
SUBJECT: Consider Making Certain Changes to AD84 -2
and Confirming the Assessments for
Fiscal Year 1994/95
OVERVIEW
ITEM
ACT1oN:
This presents for approval a Resolution making certain changes to
Assessment District AD84 -2 and confirming the assessments for Fiscal
Year 1994/95. Certain information in support of said proposed
changes and proposed assessments is attached hereto and identified
as follows:
List of Exhibits
Exhibit
"A ":
Exhibit
"B ":
Exhibit
"C":
Exhibit
"D":
Exhibit
"E ":
Exhibit
"F":
Exhibit
"G ":
Exhibit
"H" :
Exhibit
"I ":
BACKGROUND
Assessment Summary
Fund Activity Summary
Zone Activity Summary
Preliminary Budget for FY 1994/95
Capital Improvement Project Summary
Street Light Cost Summary
Engineer's Report
Public Hearing Notice
Resolution.
Assessment District 84 -2 was formed in 1984 pursuant to the
provisions of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972." This
assessment district was established to allow for the funding of
street lighting and parkway /median maintenance and improvement
expenses through the levying of assessments as provided for in the
act. As set forth in the Engineer's Report (Exhibit "G"), there are
two types of district expenses, generally described as follows:
• those expenses determined to be of general benefit to the
community, which are spread to ,:11 of the lots in the City; and,
• those expenses for the construction and maintenance of
improvements determined to be of benefit to the properties
within a number of identified zones, which are spread to all of
the lots within each zone.
ad84_95.apr
Assessment District 84 -2
June 1, 1994
Page 2
The Citywide expenses are distributed to all of the properties in
the City by means of a formula designed to spread said costs on the
basis of benefit. The benefit spread formula for street lighting
identifies a number of factors (including lighting intensity,
security, people use, etc.) which are associated with benefits
derived, and then weights those factors by land use as a means to
determining benefits derived. The benefit spread formula for
Citywide landscaping distributes :roosts equally to all non - exempt
properties in the City.
Except for Zones 7 and 9, the zone expenses are distributed equally
between the non - exempt parcels in each zone. In that the sizes of
the lots in Zones 7 and 9 vary considerably, the expenses for those
zones are spread to each non - exempt parcel via a per acre
assessment.
The City must annually act to levy the lighting and landscape
maintenance assessments. Said assessments have been levied each
year since the formation of the district.
In accordance with the requirements of the above mentioned act, the
City Council has taken a number of actions in recent months in
preparation for considering the levy of assessments for Parks
Maintenance for FY 1994/95. These actions are summarized as
follows:
1. On January 5, 1994, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 94-
994 stating its intent to take the subject actions.
2. Also on that date, the City Councii selected Dwight French and
Associates to prepare the Engineer's Reports for AD84 -2.
3. On April 6, 1994, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 94-
1026 making certain findings and taking certain actions
including the following:
• approving, subject to chance, the Engineers' Report for
AD84 -2 for FY 1994/95;
• stating intent to make certain changes to AD84 -2:
• setting 7:00 p.m. on May 16, 1994, as the time and date of a
Public Meeting for the purpose of allowing the public an
opportunity to meet with City staff to question and discuss
the proposed assessments;
• setting 7:00 p.m. on June 1, 1994, as the time and date of a
Public Hearing to consider tfte subject actions; and
ad8495.apr
Assessment District 84 -2
June 1, 1994
Page 3
• directing that Notice of said meetings be sent to the owners
of all affected properties, stating the amount of the
assessment levied for FY 1993/94, the amount of the proposed
increase in the assessment amount and the total amount of the
assessments proposed for FY 1994/917.
DISCUSSION
A. Tentative Assessment Summary
The amounts of the proposed assessments for AD 84 -2 for FY
1994/95 are set forth in Exhibit: A summary of that
information is as follows:
1. City -Wide Assessment -- Those expenses considered to be of
general benefit to the community include street lighting
expenses and landscape maintenance expenses for a number of
parkways and medians. A comparison of the annual City -wide
assessment for a single - family Lot is as follows:
Actual Proposed
Elements FY 1993/94 FY 1994/95
Landscape Maintenance $11.45 $16.40
Street Lighting �U.55 $20.64
Total $ 3.00
$37.04
2. Zone of Benefit Assessments - -- Those expenses for the
maintenance of improvements determined to be of benefit to
the properties within an identified zone, are spread to all
of the lots within that zone. A re -cap of the proposed
annual assessment for each Zone of Benefit is as follows:
ad84_95.apr
FY 1993%94
Tot(:,i
Pei Lot
Number
Zone
Tract
of Lots
1
2851
73
2
2865
622
3
3032
265
4
3274
129
5
3019/3525
217
ad84_95.apr
FY 1993%94
Tot(:,i
Pei Lot
Assessment
Assessment
L33.92
1 t >7
28.41
40!1,
5.30
L ih
93.94
1 4
79.91
C_ FY 1994/95
Total Per Lot
Assessment Assessment
4,131 56.59
59,367 95.45
846 3.20
0 0
37,338 172.06
Assessment District 84 -2
June 1, 1994
Page 4
E— FY 1993/94----] FY 1994 95
Number Total Per Lot Total Per Lot
Zone Tract of Lots Assessment Assessment Assessment Assessment
6 3306 22 6`8 30.82 242 11.00
7 Industrial Park 92 08 33.55 10,581 111.46
NE of L. A. Ave & per acre
Gabbert Rd
8a City (T -4340, 497 223 20.53
T -4341 & T -4342)
693 10,223 14.75
8b Home Acres 200 223 51.11 10,223 51.11
9 Condor Parkway 11 0 6,000 121.92
per acre
3. New Zone -- On December 15, 1993, the City Council reviewed
an alignment study prepared for Virginia Colony Drive and
decided to leave the alignment as it now exists. As a part
of that action, the City Council directed staff to take steps
to enable the City Council to consider the creation of a new
Zone of Benefit to include the properties within the
Industrial Park located on Condor Drive. Said new Zone of
Benefit was to be established to allow for the levy of
assessments on those properties to fund the improvement and
maintenance of the unimproved parkway located at the
northwest corner. of Los Angeles Avenue and Virginia Colony
Place. As you may recall, the Conditions of Approval for the
Industrial Park required the developer to construct and
maintain landscape improvements in this parkway and other
areas in the industrial park complex. However, the POA
established for this area failed to provide for the proper
maintenance of these landscape improvements and the
landscaping eventually died. The Engineer's Report includes
the addition of Zone 9 to levy assessments for the
improvement and maintenance of this area. It is recommended
that a $6,000 improvement assessment be levied for the
construction and maintenance of the parkway improvements
during FY 1994/95. Please note that, pursuant to the
provisions of the Act, the property in Zone 9 which is owned
by the Moorpark Unified Schoot District is exempt from
assessments.
nd94_95. apr
Assessment District 84 -2
June 1, 1994
Page 5
4. Per Acre Assessment -- There is a considerable variation in
the size of the industrial properties located in Zone 9. It
is recommended, therefore, that the total assessment for
Zone 9 be spread to all of the parcels in Zone 9 on a per
acre basis. It is recommended that the total assessment to
be levied on the industrial properties located within Zone 7
also be spread to the parcels in that Zone in the same
manner. A tentative listing of the assessment amounts for
the parcels in Zones 7 and 14 are listed in Exhibit 'A'.
5. Zone Activity -- A more detailed description of the Fund
Activity for each Zone of Benefit is set forth below in
SECTION D of this report.
B. Fund Activity
Attached for your information as Exhibit 'B', is a summary of
the Fund Activity for AD 84 -2 for FY 1992/93, FY 1993/94 and
FY 1994/95. The amount of the FY 1994/95 revenue identified in
Exhibit 'B' is the amount required to fund the expenditures
summarized in the Preliminary Budget attached as Exhibit 'D'.
[Exhibit 'D' is discussed in more detail below.] This revenue
requirement was the basis for determining the proposed FY
1994/95 assessments summarized in Exhibit 'A'.
C. Zone Activity Summary
Attached as Exhibit 'C' is a summary of the revenues and
expenditures for each Zone of Benefit over the past several
years. This exhibit shows the year -end surplus and /or deficit
for each zone, carried over to the following year. A discussion
of the Fund Activity for each Zone is as follows:
Zone 1: The amount of the assessment has been reduced from
$9,776 to $4,131. This is due to a $1,944 carry over resulting
in part from an over estimate of FY 1993/94 expenses.
Zone 2:
• Maintenance Deficit -- The amount of the FY 1992/93
maintenance assessment was $50,500. Last year at this time,
it was thought that this assessment amount was too high and
that it would result in an FY 1993/94 Beginning Balance of
$9,671. Accordingly, the FY 1993/94 assessment was reduced
considerably to only $:_'7,�7;., The actual FY 1993/94
ad84_95.epr
Assessment District 84 -2
June 1, 1994
Page 6
Beginning Balance turned out to be only $4,609. This
combined with current year -end expenditures expected to be
more than $4,000 higher than the amount budgeted, is
anticipated to result in a year -end deficit of $9,207. This
deficit, added to the FY 1994/95 projected expenditures will
require a FY 1994/95 assessment of $43,882.
• Debris Basin Maintenance -- The projected FY 1994/95 expenses
include an amount of $1,000 for the maintenance of the debris
basins located on the south perimeter of Tract 2865.
• Improvement Deficit -- This year the City undertook and
completed the restoration of the Tierra Rejada Slope east of
Peach Hill Road and the construction of the Sunnyslope Debris
Basin Access Road. The cost of these two projects exceeded
the amount of the available improvements assessments by
$9,265. Pursuant to the direction of the City Council, it is
proposed that this improvement deficit be recovered by adding
a like amount to the proposed Zone 2 assessments for FY
1994/95.
• Additional Improvement Assessment - -- It is also proposed that
an additional assessment of $10 per lot ($6,220 annual total)
be levied for three years to fund the construction of parkway
improvements on the north side of Tierra Rejada Road west of
Spring Road.
Zone 3: The proposed FY 1994/95 assessment is slightly less
than last year due to a beginning balance which was higher than
expected.
Zone 4: Last year at this time, it was thought that FY 1993/94
Beginning Balance would show a deficit of $3,685. Accordingly,
the FY 1993/94 assessment was increased to $12,118, a
considerable increase over the prior year assessment of $4,212.
The actual FY 1993/94 Beginning Balance turned out to be a
positive fund balance of $774. This increase in available
funds, combined with the fact that current year -end expenditures
are expected to be more than $4,400 less than the amount
budgeted, will result in a year -end positive fund balance of
$8,901. In that the estimated FY 1994/95 expenditures are only
$4,059, it is anticipated that there will be a FY 1994/95 year-
end balance of $4,806. Accordingly, no FY 1994/95 assessment is
proposed.
ad84_95.apr
Assessment District 84 -2
June 1, 1994
Page 7
Zone 5: Based on past year actual costs, the amount budgeted
for Zone 5 expenses in FY 1993/94 was too low. This, combined
with unanticipated irrigation water costs, has resulted in FY
1993/94 expenditures estimated to be approximately $8,000 more
than the amount budgeted. In addition, the anticipated FY
1993/94 Beginning Balance is approximately $1,000 less than
expected. It is anticipated that these factors will result in
a FY 1993/94 year -end deficit of $8,993. This deficit added to
the FY 1994/95 projected expenditures will require a FY 1994/95
assessment of $37,338.
Zone 6: Although the projected expenses are over $800, the
assessment amount is only $242 due to a carry over surplus from
last year.
Zone 7: FY 1993/94 expenditures are anticipated to be
approximately $3,000 more than the amount budgeted. This
combined with an anticipated FY 1993/94 Beginning Balance which
is approximately $300 less than expected, will result in a FY
1993/94 year -end deficit of $3,206. This deficit, added to the
FY 1994/95 projected expenditures will require a FY 1994/95
assessment of $10,581, a considerab.�e :increase over prior years.
Zone 8: This Zone provides for the construction and maintenance
of the Buffer Area at the west end of Tract 4341. The costs are
shared on a fifty -fifty basis between the properties in the Home
Acres area and all of the residential property in Tracts 4340,
4341 and 4342. Commercial property has been excluded from the
boundaries of this Zone.
• Addition of Multi - Family Residential Units -- In prior years
only the single - family residential lots in Tracts 4340, 4341
and 4342 were assessed. Consistent with the original intent,
it is recommended that the City portion of the Zone 8
assessment be spread to all of the approved residential units
in the affected area. The total number of residential units
approved for this area is as follows:
* Sin g le Family residential........ 497
• Multi - family residential........_ _196
Total 693
• Improvement Assessments - It is proposed that the total
assessment remain unchanged, but that $1,200 of that
assessment be identified as a maintenance assessment. The
remainder of the improvement assessment is anticipated to
provide sufficient funds to construct the proposed
ede495.apr
Assessment District 84 -2
June 1, 1994
Page 10
would need to be written similar to the City's agreement with
the same standards that the City currently has in its
contract. The HOA would need to _indemnify the City and
provide insurance coveraqe.
3. Continue as is, with the City assessing the homeowners in
that zone of benefit per the conditions of approval.
4. Allow the maintenance responsibilities to revert back to the
individual property owners.
5. Some combination of #1 and A4,, above.
If the Zones of Benefit were allowed to withdraw from AD 84 -2,
the individual zones and the overall. City maintenance program
would lose the benefits of economy of scale. Currently the City
requires only about 10% of one person to administer the contract
for all of the landscaped areas in AD 84 -2. The quality of
maintenance would also be more difficult to maintain. Two
slopes maintained by an HOA along Campus Park Drive and Spring
Road are examples of a lower level of maintenance compared to
City administered areas. Also, when there is a problem such as
a slope failure, the City administrated district has a built -in
mechanism to provide for repairs In addition, if there is a
funding shortfall to make a major repair, the City can more
easily resolve such a situation as was the case with the slope
failure on the Tierra Rejada Road slope.
Usually, the Zones of Benefit are created as a result of a
condition of development. The primary purpose is to insure
consistent and quality maintenance to mitigate the impact of
development and insure continued maintenance to the individual
property owner, the neighborhood of the development and the
overall community. Removing areas from the assessment district
would most likely reduce the level of maintenance and negate the
desired benefits of well maintainers landscape.
Staff does not recommend a chan,,je from the present system.
F. Capital Improvements
Attached as Exhibit 'E' is a summary proposed capital
improvement projects funded by AD 84 -2.
ad84_95.apr
Assessment District 84 -2
June 1, 1994
Page 11
1. FY 1993/94: Proposed year -end capital project expenditures
are listed on page 1 of Exhibit 'E'.
a. City -wide Capital Construction: The projects to be
constructed in FY 1993/94 are listed as follows:
• L. A. Ave. / Millard St.;
• L. A. Ave. / Shasta Ave.;
• Poindexter / Sierra Ave.; and,
• Spring Rd / Peach Hill Rd
b. Design: In addition, design costs for future projects are
included in the year -end anticipated expenditures.
c. Total City -wide Capital Improvement Costs: The total
year -end City -wide capital improvement costs are
anticipated to be $57,450 This leaves an estimated year-
end capital project carry over -)f $46,365.
d. Zone of Benefit Capital Improvement Costs: Also recapped
here are the total Zone capital improvements costs for FY
1993/94, amounting to $6',901),
e. Total Capital Improvement Costs: The total year -end
capital improvement costs for ALA 84 -2 is estimated to be
$125,355 (57,450 + 67,9011.
f. Remaining Budgeted Funds: The total amount budgeted for
Citywide capital improvements was $103,815. As stated
above anticipated year -end expenses are $57,450, leaving
a balance of $46,365 to arr }7 over to next fiscal year.
2. FY 1994/95: Proposed capital project expenditures for next
year are listed on page 2 of Exhibit 'E'.
a. City -wide Ca,
proposed to
follows:
• Medians:
• Parkway:
• Parkway:
• Parkway:
• Parkway:
Note: **
ad84_e5_apr
pital Construction Projects: The projects
be constructed next year are listed as
Princeton Ave., $40,000
Princeton Ave. $37,000
S/S Campus Drive E/O Princeton; $30,000
E/S Peach Hill S/O Mesa Verde; $35,000
S/S L. A. Ave.: E/O T. R. Rd.; $20,000 **
$162,000
This project is )artially funded by a prior Griffin Homes deposit.
Assessment District 84 -2
June 1, 1994
Page 12
b. Total City -wide Capital Improvement Costs: The total
recommended FY 1994/95 Budget for the above listed Capital
improvement projects is $162,000. The funding for this
level of effort is as follows:
• Prior Year Carry Over $46,365
• Prior Year Capital Project Set Aside $97,576
• Other Remaining Maintenance Surplus $18,224
$162,165
C. Deferred Projects: The following projects are recommended
to be deferred due to lack of funding:
• Parkway: Campus Park Drive, W/O Princeton Ave.;
• Parkway: Peach Hill E/O Mesa Verde;
• Parkway: W/S Spring, S/O Peach Hill Rd.; and,
• Parkway: W/S Tierra Rejada Rd, S/O L. A. Ave.
d. Zone of Benefit Capital Improvement Costs: Also recapped
here is the proposed construction of the Home Ares Buffer
Area (Zone 8) for an estimated amount of $54,135. Any
surplus improvement assessments will be used to fund
future maintenance costs
e. Zone of Benefit Capital Carry Overs: The Zone 2
improvement assessment of $6,220 for future parkway
improvements to the south side of Tierra Rejada Road will
be carried over and combined with future improvement
assessments to fund these future improvements.
The above described expenditure information was provided to the
Assessment Engineer to be used as the basis for the preparation
of the attached Engineer's Report (Exhibit 'G'). Said report
sets for the proposed amount of the assessment for FY 1994/95
for various land use categories, along with an explanation of
the Benefit Assessment Formula and other related information.
H. Public Hearing
1. The "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" (Streets and
Highways Code) requires a public hearing to be held prior to
the annual levy of assessments for the purpose of receiving
input and to hear any protests to the proposed assessments.
eda4_95.apr
Assessment District 84 -2
June 1, 1994
Page 13
2. If the amount of the assessments are to remain the same, the
law does not require a Notice of public hearing to be mailed
to each property being assessed. However, consistent with
past practice, it is recommended that such a notice be mailed
to the owners of all of the affected properties.
3. Notwithstanding the above mentioned policy, State law
requires that prior to considering any new or increased
assessment, a public hearing notice must be mailed to the
owners of the properties to be assessed. Said notice shall
state the amount of the existing assessment, the amount of
the proposed assessment and the amount of the proposed
increase in the assessment. The amount of the approved
estimated assessment MAY NOT EXCEED the amounts stated in the
notice. Said notice must be mailed at least forty -five (45)
days prior to the date of the hearing. In order to meet this
deadline, said Notices were postmarked and mailed prior to
April 15, 1.994.
4. State law also requires that prior to considering any new or
increased assessment a Public Meeting shall be convened to
allow the public an opportunity to discuss the proposed
increased assessment. Such a meeting was convened on Monday,
May 16, 1994, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers. This
informal meeting was conducted by staff for the purpose of
providing answers to questions regarding projected program
costs and the methods used to spread those costs to the
properties assessed. Only a few people were in attendance.
Staff responded to the questions asked.
5. Attached as Exhibit 'H' i= a copy of the Public Hearing
Notice for AD84 °2.
I. Deferred Action
The attached resolution (Exhibit "I") making certain changes to
Assessment District AD84 -2 and confirming the assessments for
Fiscal Year 1994/95 must be adopted no later than June 30, 1994,
in order for the assessments to be levied. In prior years the
City Council has adopted such resolutions concurrently with the
adoption of the budget.
ad84_95.apr
Assessment District 84 -2
June 1, 1994
Page 14
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council open the public hearing,
receive testimony and continue these matters to the date of the
Budget Workshops.
Subsequent to the budget workshop meetings, but no later than June
30, 1994, staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached
Resolution No. 94- — (Exhibit "I ") making certain changes to
AD84 -2 and confirming the assessments for Fiscal Year 1994/95.
ad89_95.apr
EXHIBIT "A" (pace 1)
Fiscal Year 1994/95
AD 84 -2 ASSESSMENT SUMMARY
--------------------
--------------------
Description
------------------------------------- - - - - --
TOTAL ANNUAL EXPENSES
LESS TOTAL ANTICIPATED ZONE EXPENSES
LESS TOTAL ANTICIPATED CITY -WIDE CAPITAL IMPROVENENST
PLUS PROPOSED CITYWIDE IMPROVEMNET ASSESSMENTS
LESS RESERVES
NET CITY WIDE COSTS
TOTAL CITY -WIDE ASSESSMENTS
TOTAL ASSESSMENT FOR ALL ZONES
FY 92/93 FY 93/94
Actual Budget
670,763 533,912
(69,149) (84,057)
(223,455) (156,455)
0 0
(77,845) 0
300,314 293,400
300,314 293,400
128,806 82,520
FY 94/95
Proposed
630,815
(144,590)
(162,000)
0
0
324,225
324,225
138,950
TOTAL ASSESSMENTS 429,120 375,920 11 463,175
31- Mar -94
EXHIBIT "A" (page 2)
Fiscal Year 1994/95
AD 84 -2 ASSESSMENT SUMMARY FY 1993/94
ASSESSMENT SUMMARY ------- - - - - -- _
A B
SF Res
Description Assmnt($) Total Sj
Citywide Assessment
--------------- - - - --
33.00 293,44
Zone Assessments
18- May -94
FY 1994/95
------------------------
C D
SF Res
Assmnt($) Total ($) Notes
37.04 324,225 A/B : C/D
C = (AxD) / B
--------------
-
- - - --
Per Lot
Tota.
Per Lot
Total
No.
# of Lots
Assmnt($)
Assmnt )
Assmnt($)
Assmnt($)
1
73
133.92
56.59
4,131
2
622
28.41
11.,
95.45
59,367
3
265
5.30
., `>
3.20
846
4
129
93.94
12, .r
0.00
0
5
217
79.91
17, w
172.06
37,338
6
22
30.82
11.00
242
7
92
33.55
**
10,581
8
20,«.15
20,445
(City)
498
20.53
693
14.75
(Home
Acres 200
51.11
51.11
9
11
N/A
U,
**
6,000
Total
All Zones
82,. °._�i
138,950
** See per parcel
Acreage Assesment on ?ages .,
4 x 5.
EXHIBIT "A" (page 3)
Fiscal Year 1994/95
AD 84 -2 ASSESSMENT SUMMARY
Summary of Acreage Assessments
---------------------------------
---------------------------------
Total Total Per Acre Total
Zone Assessment Acres Assessment A P Acres Assessment
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
51i -0- 061 -015
1.680
187.26
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
5L-0-061-02',
1.160
129.30
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
51i -0- 061 -035
1.160
129.30
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
51.1 -0- 061 -045
1.160
129.30
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
511 -0- 061 -055
1.160
129.30
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
511 -0- 061 -065
1.130
125.95
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
511 -0- 061 -075
1.060
118.15
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
511 -0- 061 -085
1.060
118.15
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
511-0- 061 -115
1.060
118.15
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
51i -0- 061 -14"I
1.170
130.41
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
511 -0- 061 -155
2.130
237.42
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
5L -0- 062-065
1.170
130.41
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
511 -0- 062 -075
1.270
141.56
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
51i -0- 062 -165
2.750
306.53
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
511 -0- 062 -175
2.830
315.44
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
511 -0-062 -215
2.940
327.71
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
511 -0- 062 -235
1.227
136.77
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
511 -0- 062 -245
3.072
342.42
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
511 -0- 062 -255
5.000
557.32
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
511 -0- 062 -265
0.547
60.97
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
511 -0- 062 -275
1.100
122.61
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
51.1 -0- 062 -285
1.080
120.38
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
511 -0- 062 -295
1.260
140.45
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
511 -0- 062-305
1.330
148.25
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
511 -0 -062 -3:15
1.150
128.18
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
511 -0- 062 -345
3.080
343.31
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
511 -0- 062 -375
3.930
438.06
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
511 -0 -062 -385
2.020
225.16
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
51 -0- 070 -030
2.530
282.01
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
51i -0- 070 -04()
5.180
577.39
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
51 -0- 070 -450
3.300
367.83
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
5:1 -0 -070 -485
2.550
284.23
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
51` -0- 070 -490
0.500
55.73
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
51 -0- 070 -500
0.490
54.62
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
511- 0-070 -5117
0.490
54.62
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
51 -0- 070 -520
0.520
57.96
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
511 -0- 070 -530
0.950
105.89
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
5liL -0- 070 -540
0.710
79.14
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
511 -0- 070 -555
1.670
186.15
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
51. -0 -0'70 -565
0.860
95.86
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
511 -0- 070 -5'75
0.339
37.79
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
51: -C -0'70 -585
0.239
26.64
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
5!, -0- 070 -595
0.239
26.64
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
5 .-C- 0'70 -60`
1.100
122.61
Remarks
31- Mar -94
EXHIBIT
"A" (page 4)
Fiscal
Year 1994/95
AD 84 -2
ASSESSMENT SUN MAR Y
Summary
---------------------------------
of Acreage Assessments
---------------------------------
Total
Total
Per Acre
Total
Zone
Assessment
Acres
Assessment
A P #
Acres
Assessment
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
511-0- 070 -615
0.800
89.17
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
511 -0- 070 -625
1.169
130.30
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
511 -0- 070 -635
0.610
67.99
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
511-0- 070 -645
0.339
37.79
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
511 -0- 070 -655
0.530
59.08
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
511 -0- 070 -665
0.469
52.28
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
511 -0 -070 -675
0.469
52.28
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
511-0- 070 -685
0.469
52.28
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
511 -0- 070 -695
0.469
52.28
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
511 -0- 070 -705
0.469
52.28
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
511 -0- 070 -715
0.480
53.50
7
101581.00
94.93
111.46
511 -0- 070-780
0.839
93.52
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
511 -0- 151 -065
0.510
56.85
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
511 - 0-151 -075
0.180
20.06
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
511 -0- 151 -085
0.600
66.88
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
511 -0- 151 -095
0.700
78.03
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
511 -0- 151 -105
0.580
64.65
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
511 -0- 151 -115
0.680
75.80
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
511 -0 -151 -125
0.550
61.31
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
511 -0- 151 -135
0.650
72.45
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
511--0-151-145
0.200
22.29
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
51i -0- 151 -155
0.550
61.31
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
511 -0- 161 -025
0.412
45.92
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
511 -0 -161 -045
0.464
51.72
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
51:. -0 -161 -055
0.324
36.11
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
711 -0- 161 -065
0.292
32.55
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
511--0- 161 -085
0.329
36.67
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
514 -0 -161 -095
0.295
32.88
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
51 -0- 161-105
0.274
30.54
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
51.1 -0- 161 -115
0.261
29.09
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
51i -0- 161 -125
0.292
32.55
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
511 -0- 161 -135
0.534
59.52
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
511 -0- 161 -155
0.580
64.65
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
51 -0- 161 -1.65
0.387
43.14
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
51,--0 -16 -175
0.287
31.99
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
51, -0- 161 -185
0.287
31.99
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
511 -0- 161-195
0.287
31.99
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
511 -0- 16:1-205
0.414
46.15
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
511 -0- 16:1 -215
0.492
54.84
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
51. -0- 161-225
0.440
49.04
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
51,•-0 -161 -255
1.240
138.22
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
51,--0 -16) -015
0.687
76.58
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
)`- -U- 16:-045
0.704
78.47
Remarks
31- Mar-94
EXHIBIT
"A" (page 5)
111.46
Fiscal Year 1994/95
111.46
AD 84 -2
ASSESSMENT SUMMARY
511--0-162--075
Summary
of Acreage Assessments
111.46
Total
Total
Zone
Assessment
Acres
7
10,581.00
94.93
7
10,581.00
94.93
7
10,581.00
94.93
7
10,581.00
94.93
7
10,581.00
94.93
Per Acre
Assessment
A P #
111.46
511-0 -162 -055
111.46
511 -0 -162 -065
111.46
511--0-162--075
111.46
511-0- 162 -085
111.46
511-0 - 162-095
Zone 7 Total
9 6,000.00
49.21
121.92
513 -0- 060 -035
9 6,000.00
49.21
121.92
513 -0- 060 -075
9 6,000.00
49.21
121.92
513 -0- 060 -085
9 6,000.00
49.21
121.92
51"0- 060 -095
9 6,000.00
49.21
121.92
513-0- 060 -125
9 Exempt
--
0
51,-0-060-135
9 Exempt
--
0
51. -0 -060 -145
9 Exempt
--
0
51 -0 -06C -155
9 6,000.00
49.21
121.92
51 -0 -06C -175
9 6,000.00
49.21
121.92
51s -0 -06C -1.85
9 6,000.00
49.21
121.92
51-0 -060 -245
9 6,000.00
49.21
121.92
51 -0 -060 -255
9 6,000.00
49.21
121.92
51� -0 -06C -265
9 6,000.00
49.21
121.92
51s -0 -06o -275
9 6,000.00
49.21
121.92
51 - 0 -06(-285
ve `a Total
Acres
0.340
0.530
0.330
0.440
0.340
94.927
1.000
11.780
0.000
3.860
1.020
0.000
0.000
0.000
1.860
1.360
4.980
5.380
16.080
0.889
1.005
49.214
Total
Assessment
37.90
59.08
36.78
49.04
37.90
10,581.00
121.92
1436.18
Exempt
470.60
124.35
Exempt
Exempt
Exempt
226.76
165.81
607.14
655.91
1960.42
108.38
122.53
6,000.00
31- Mar -94
Remarks
----------- - - - - --
EXHIBIT "B" AD 84 -2
Fund 23 Activity
Description
BEGINNING BALANCE
TRANSFERS IN
REVENUE
AVAILABLE FUNDS
EXPENSES
Personnel
0 &R
Capital Improvements
Less TOTAL EXPENSES
YEAR END BALANCE
03/31/94
LESS SET ASIDES:
Reserved for Buffer Impr. (Zone 8)
Future Capital Improvements
Unexpendid Budgeted Capital Projects
Reserved Zone 2 Impr. Assmnt (N /S T. R. Rd. Prkway)
Surplus Zone 4 Maintenance Assessment
YEAR END AVAILABLE FUNDS
(2( 445) (40,890) (34,890)
97 576) (97,576)
(46,365)
(6,220)
(4,806)
294,91 " 0 0 165
FY 1993/94
FY 1994/95
FY
FY
---------------
- - - - --
Proposed
1991/92
1992
93
Budget
Proj Actual
Budget Notes:
264,973
256.
85
315,:62
315,362
178,831
0
0
0
332,679
449,164
357,006
354,413
463,175
597,652
705
349
672,368
669,775
642,006
18,250
16
'21
18,346
20,000
22,900
323,217
324
131
359,111
345,589
3851780
0
49
235
156,445
125,355
222,135
341,467
38G
987
533,902
490,944
630,815
256,185
31')
362
138,466
178,831
11,191
LESS SET ASIDES:
Reserved for Buffer Impr. (Zone 8)
Future Capital Improvements
Unexpendid Budgeted Capital Projects
Reserved Zone 2 Impr. Assmnt (N /S T. R. Rd. Prkway)
Surplus Zone 4 Maintenance Assessment
YEAR END AVAILABLE FUNDS
(2( 445) (40,890) (34,890)
97 576) (97,576)
(46,365)
(6,220)
(4,806)
294,91 " 0 0 165
EXHIBIT "C ": Zone Activity
Page 1
Description
03/31/94
FY 1993/94 FY 1994/95
FY FY _ --------------- - - - - -- Proposed
1991/92 1992,'43 Budget. Proj Actual Budget FY 1994/95 Assessment
ZONE 1: Tract 2851: Bambi / Benwood
/ Flood Control
Channel
4,609
32,419
50 "i00
Maintenance
17,671
32,419
36 L40
27,342.
22,280
------------------------------
Prior Year Carry Over
0
1,.75
(211)
(1,819)
1,944
Plus Assessments
6,773
6,.85
9,776
9,776
4,131
Budgeted Expenditures
6,773
7,460
9,565
7,957
6,075
Less Actual Expenditures
5,498
9, 79
9,565
6,013
6,075
Zone 1 Balance
1,275
11.'19
0
1,944
0
>>>>>>>>>>> 4,131
ZONE 2: Tract 2865: E/S Peach Hill Rd, N/0 T R Rd ** N/S T P Rd Parkway ** S/S T R Rd Slopes ** Christain Barrett & Spring
Maintenance
Prior Year Carry Over
Plus Assessments
Budgeted Expenditures
Less Actual Expenditures
Zone 2 Maint. Balance
Improvements
------------------------------
Prior Year Carry Over
Plus Assessments
Budgeted Expenditures
Less Actual Expenditures
S/S T. R. Rd Parkway
0
(14,.160!
9,671
4,609
32,419
50 "i00
17,671
17,671
32,419
36 L40
27,342.
22,280
46,779
31 )31
27,542
31,487
(14,360)
4 -19
0
(9,207)
52,640
52 640
52,640
52,640
0
('
0
0
52,640
52 640
52,640
52,640
(9,207)
43,882 Maint Asmt: 43,882
34,675
34,675
0
* Prior Yr.
deficit >> 9,265
(9,265)
15,485 * S/S T. R. Rd
---- - - - - -- Prkwy $10 /lot
6,220 for 4 Years
»»»> 6,220
Peach Hill Slope
0
j
31,000
32,077
0 Impr Asmnt: 15,485
Sunnyslope Debris Basin
0
(,
21,640
29,828
0
--- - - - - --
- - -- - - --
--- - - - - -- -----
- - - - --
---- - - - - -- Total >>> 59,367
Zone 2 Improv. Balance
52,640
52 640
0
(9,265)
6,220
ZONE 3: Tract 3032: Buttercreek Entry
** Peppermill
Parkwa,
Maintenance
------------------------------
Prior Year Carry Over
0
926
441
1,436
1,009
Plus Assessments
2,978
321
405
1,405
846 >>>>>>>>>>> 846
Budgeted Expenditures
2,978
24 "'
846
2,841
1,855
Less Actual Expenditures
2,052
81:
846
1,832
1,855
Zone 3 Maint. Balance
926
s3a
0
1,009
0
EXHIBIT "C ": Zone Activity
0
(14 487)
2,783
Page 2
(8,993)
Plus Assessments
FY 1993/94
40 '37
- - -- - - --
FYFY
17,340
- - - - --
----------------------
Description
1991/92
1992 93
Budget Proj Actual
ZONE 4: Tract 3274: Williams Ranch
Rd Barrier ** N/S
Parkways*
S S Parkway
Maintenance
20,123
28,003
28,345
------------------------------
Prior Year Carry Over
0
2,445
(3,685) 774
Plus Assessments
5,930
4,112
12,118 12,118
Budgeted Expenditures
Less Actual Expenditures
Zone 4 Maint. Balance
5,930 6,,)57
3,485 5,383
2,445 -4
8,433 12,892
8,433 3,991
0 8,901
------------------------------------------
ZONE 5: Tracts 3019 & 3025: N/S T R Rd Parkways ** S/S Slopes ** W/S Peach Hill Parkway
Maintenance
03/31194
FY 1994/95
Proposed
Budget FY 1994/95 Assessment
8,901
0 >>>>>>>>>>>
8,901
4,095
4,806
0
Prior Year Carry Over
0
(14 487)
2,783
1,670
(8,993)
Plus Assessments
24,355
40 '37
- - -- - - --
17,340
--- - - - - -- -----
17,340
- - - - --
37,338 >>>>>>>>>>> 37,338
---- - - - - --
Budgeted Expenditures
--- - - - - --
24,355
26,250
20,123
19,010
28,345
Less Actual Expenditures
38,842
24 580
20,123
28,003
28,345
Zone 5 Maint. Balance
(14,487)
r7r
0
(8,993)
0
ZONE 6: Tract 3306: West end of
Inglewood (Glenhaven)
Maintenance
------------------------------
Prior Year Carry Over
0
675
88
722
593
Plus Assessments
1,452
879
678
678
242 >>>>>>>>>>> 242
Budgeted Expenditures
1,452
554
766
1,400
835
Less Actual Expenditures
777
832
766
807
835
Zone 6 Maint. Balance
675
22
0
593
0
ZONE 7: N/S of L A Ave E/0 Gabbert (West America)
Maintenance
------------------------------
Prior Year Carry Over 0 720 1,278 942 (3,206)
Plus Assessments 720 527 '_,087 3,087 10,581 >>>>>>>>>>> 10,581
Budgeted Expenditures
720 ,247
4,365
4,029
7,375
Less Actual Expenditures
0 305
4,365
7,235
7,375
Lone 7 Maint. Balance
720 942
0
(3,206)
0
EXHIBIT "C ": Zone Activity
Page 3
Description
ZONE 8: Home Acres Buffer Area
--------------------------------
Maintenance
------------------------------
Prior Year Carry Over
Plus Assessments
Budgeted Expenditures
Less Actual Expenditures
Zone 8 Maint. Balance
Improvements
-------------------- - - - - --
Prior Year Carry Over
Plus Assessments
Budgeted Expenditures
Less Actual Expenditures
Zone 8 Improv. Balance
03/31/94
FY 1993/94 FY 1994/95
FY FY' ---------------- - - - - -- Proposed
1991/92 1992 93 Budget Proj Actual Budget FY 1994/95 Assessment
0
1,200 Mnt. Asmt: 1,200
1,200
1,200
11
0 20,445 20,445 34,890
0 20 445 20,445 20,445 19,245 Impr Asmnt: 19,245
--- - - - - -- - - -- - - -- --- - - - - -- ----- - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- --- - - - - --
0 20 445 40,890 40,890 54,135 Total: 20,445
0 0 6,000 54,135
0 2( 445 40 890 34,890 0
ZONE 9: Condor Drive / L A Ave Parkway
---------------------------------------------------- - - - - -- __..._ - - -- ------------------------------------------------------
maintenance
Prior Year Carry Over
Plus Assessments
Budgeted Expenditures
Less Actual Expenditures
Zone 9 Maint. Balance
Improvements
------------------------------
Prior Year Carry Over
Plus Assessments
Budgeted Expenditures
Less Actual Expenditures
Zone 9 Improv. Balance
TOTAL
0
0 >>>>>>>>>>> 0
0
0
0
6,000 >>>>>>>>>>>
6,000 Total:
6,000
0
6,000
6,000
FY 1944;95 Expenses ................ 144,590
FY19x4 95 -,one assessments ... ............................... 138,950
* see E!hibit F.
31- Har -94
EXHIBIT "D"
AD84 -2 Budget
FY 1993/94
FY 94/95
Department 143 Budget Summary
FY 91/92
Actual
FY 92/93
Actual
-- ---- ------
Budget
------ ----
Proj Actual
Proposed
Budget Remarks:
SALARIES & BENEFITS
18,248
16,728
18,346
20,000 �I
I
22,900
MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS
623 Supplies
1,226
1,617
1 760
400
11
550
624 Postage
0
0
2.300
2,025
2,100
626 Printing
0
495
---
0 I
0
629 Special Supplies
0
0
0 `
0 �I
637 Travel & Hilage
0
C
0
0
0 II
I
638 Uniforms
0
0
0 1
641 Professional Services
2,958
3,267
`:,500
3,480
5,625
642 Contractual Services
93,939
100,862
12::,714
116,746
133,126 II
648 Insurance
0
0
0 �I
0
651 Equip Maint
0
C
0
0
652 Utilities
215,284
213,93L
223,137
221,480
240,465
654 Vehicle Haint
70
260
300
135
150
655 Fuel
1,579
2,109
300
189
264
656 Lubricants
0
++
0
0
657 Small Tools
0
>
0
0
658 Maint & Repair
3,522
1,166
1,500
792
11750 �I
661 Equip Rental
0
324
600
---- - - - - --
342
--- - - - - --
11 1,750
----- - - - - --
M &O Total
-- - - - - --
3181578
-- - - - - --
324,0'1
319,111
345,589
385,780 II
903 Capital Projects
0
49,2:95
1`)6,45
125,355
i�
222,135�
TOTAL
336,826
389,914
13,91,
490,944
1 630,815
* see E!hibit F.
EXHIBIT "E" (Page 1)
AD84 -2 Budget
Department 143 Budget Summary
Capital Improvements
Original.
Less Est.
Balance
______________________________
Acc.
FY 93/94
Year End
FY93/94
Allocated
No.
___
Description
__________________________=
#
Budget
_:==
Expenses
Adjustments
- Funds -_ --
Prkwy: Millard /Los Angeles Ave
I L A AO(' 17 500
L A AOC
(17,500)
O
1
Prkwy: Shasta /Los Angeles Ave
404
I
2
Prkwy: Poindexter @ Sierra
405
22,000
22,000
0
0
3
Prkwy: W/S Spring S/0 Pch Hill
403
`, 0
4
Prkwy: E/S Spring S/0 Pch Hill
409
27,000
0
27,000
0
0
15,050 I
0
15,050
5
Prkwy: E/S Pch Hill S/0 Mesa Verd
412
0
2,450
2,450
0
6
Prkwy: Pch Hill E/0 Mesa Verde
41.1
7
Prkwy: S/S L. A. E/0 Tierra Rejad
408
7,315
7,315
0
8
9
Prkwy Mod: T. R. S/O L. A. Ave
Prkwy: Princeton
402
416
0
15,000
3,000
0
I 12,000
10
Median: Princeton
??
15,000
'�
3,000
I 12,000
0
11
Prkwy: S/S Cmps Prk E/O Princeton
??
0
I 0
12
Prkwy: N/S & S/S C. P. W/0 Prncto
??
0'
Unallocated
0
13
Prkwy: N/S T. R. Pch Hill to Sprn
413
0
--
High Street Landscaping
414
('
Sub -Total Citywide Assessments
103 � -,1`i
57,450
0
I 46,365
Plus Zone Capital Expenses
Zone 2 [32,077 + 29,828 = 61,905]
...............,....
... ..... ..............
61,905
Zone 8 [Design Only] ...........................
.... ....
....................
6,000
Total Capital Expenditure.
125,355
EXHIBIT 'F' 03/29/94
AD94 -2
FY 1994/95 Cost Analysis
Street Lighting Cost Analysis
----------------------- - - - - --
FY 1993/94 Summary
FY 1994/95 Estimate
Last Year's Cost ............................. 178,026.00
Contingency for rate adjustment ...... 5,340.78
Estimated Anjual Cost for added lights -7,000.00
Total 190,366.78
Say.. 190,000.00
Street
Traffic Signal
Date
Lights
Safety Lighting
Total Remarks
July 1993
14,723.00
14 723.00
Aug 1993
14,790.00
O.oO
14,790.00
Sept 1993
14,858.00
14,858.00
Oct 1993
14,854.00
0. °,?0
14,854.00
Nov 1993
14,894.00
0.j0
14,894.00
Dec 1993
14,894.00
0.,0
14,894.00
----- - - - - --
89,013.00
- - - - - -- --
0. '0
89,013.00 Six month cost
x2
178,026.00 Projected Annual Cost
FY 1994/95 Estimate
Last Year's Cost ............................. 178,026.00
Contingency for rate adjustment ...... 5,340.78
Estimated Anjual Cost for added lights -7,000.00
Total 190,366.78
Say.. 190,000.00
E.jrV O C
PRELIMINARY
ENGINEER'S REPORT
CITY OF MOORPARK
LIGHTING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
NO. AD-84-2
LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972
Prepared By:
DWIGHT FRENCH & ASSOCIATES, INC.
1470 S. Valley Vista Drive
Suitt 140
Diamond Bar, CP 91765
Marcl. 1994
DWIGHT FRENCH & ASSOCIATES
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section 1
Authority for Report
Section 2
Description of Improvements
to be Maintained
Section 3
Assessment Roll.
Section 4
Method of Assessment
Section 5
Estimate of (ast
Appendix
"A"
Street Lighting Formula - Table 1
Appendix
"B"
Landscape Formula - Table 2
Appendix
"C"
Assessment Sijmmary Table 3
Appendix
"D"
Budget Estimct.e
Appendix
"E"
Boundary Map
Appendix
"F"
Assessment Rc11
Appendix
"G"
Resolutions
Appendix
"H"
Rebate Procedure
G C��
Page
1
1
4
4
6
DWIGHT FRENCH & ASSOCIATES
CITY OF MOORPARK
Engineer's Report
Parks Maintenance Assessment District
No. AD -84 -2
Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972
For Fiscal Year 1994 -1.995
SECTION 1 AUTHORITY FOR REPORT
This report is prepared pursuant t,
their regular meeting of January 5
for the fiscal year commencing Jtil
1995 in compliance with the requirF
"Landscaping Act of 1972 ", being
California Streets and Highways "o,
t'i�y ('ouncil action taken at
1_994 _o extend this District
1, 1994 and ending June 30,
iient s � -f Article 4, Chapter 1,
lart , of Division 15 of the
The District will provide electrL,.A energy for public lighting
facilities and for operation and t °ainrenance of public lighting
within the City. In addition, ,tie District will provide for
installation and /or maintenance (-A p- landscaping within the
public right -of -way.
SECTION 2 DESCRIPTION OF THE iMPROVEMENTS TO BE MAINTAINED
This report covers the period )f:
luly 1 1994 through June 30,
1995. An updated report is prepar�J
each year to reflect updated
annual costs and changes in parcel
The City of Moorpark Lighting Main�ena:Zce
District is proposed to
create a new zone of benefit for th,
improvement and maintenance of
the parkway located at the northwe
(:� ? -ner of Los Angeles Avenue
and Virginia Colony Place, whic;i
iesignated as Zone 9.
The District is also proposed to
ttange th.e method of assessment
for Zone of benefit '7, the norths i�
- )f Lc;s Angeles Avenue Parkway
between Gabbert Road and Shasta A-.
-nut,, from per lot to per acre
basis. The commercial area of ton
cf Berefit 8, the West Village
Buffer Area, is excluded from the zon
< >7 ,,iste:nt with the original intent.
The improvements to be maintainer
:n this District include all
City -owned and Southern Californi
Edis,__n (S.C.E.) -owned street
lights as well as all median:_ a
> treet trees within public
rights -of -way within the boundari E
-h -, City.
C1. 1
DWIGHT FRENCH & ASSOCIATES
Lighting maintenance shall include, but is not limited to, energy
costs, removal, repair, replacement or relocation of light
standards, poles, bulbs, fixtures and all appurtenances. Servicing
of S.C.E. owned lights as defined in Section 22538 of the Streets
and Highways Code shall be furnished by the Southern California
Edison Company or its successors, or this servicing shall be as
authorized by the Public Utilities Commission, State of California.
Maintenance of City -owned lighting improvements shall be furnished
by the City.
Landscape maintenance shall include, but is not limited to,
watering, fertilizing, mowing, weed control, shrubbery, tree
removal and pruning, removal and replacement of dead growth,
maintenance of irrigation facilities and other necessary work.
In addition, the cost to maintain improved areas within aA easement
will be borne by owners within the +t. project. These easement areas
are:
1. Tract No. 2851
Maintenance costs associated with landscaping in the
Ventura County Flood Control Easement and portions of the
interior tract entry areas. The obligation upon these 73
lots is pursuant to a rondi.tion of development.
2. Tract No. 2865
Cost for maintenance of specific landscape areas within
the tract, including landscaping at Christian Barrett &
Spring Roads; Tierra Rejada landscaping, and Peach Hill
Road landscaping on east side between Christian Barrett
and Tierra Rejada Roads, and the entry monument sign at
Christian Barret and Spring Road. The obligation upon
the lots within this tract is pursuant to a condition of
development_.
3. Tract. No. 3032
Maintenance costs associated with landscaping an entry
monument at Buttercreek Road and Los Angeles Avenue.
This cost to be spread to the 265 lots wiE.hin the tract.
4. Tract No. 3274
Maintenance costs asso<.;iated with landscape areas along
Williams Ranch Road parkway adjacent to Peach Hill drain
channel and Edison entries within PC -3. This cost will
be borne by the 129 lots within the tract.
(n. )
DWIGHT FRENCH & ASSOCIATES
5_ Tract Nos. 3019, 3525
Maintenance costs associated with landscaping the Tierra
Rejada Road slope and parkway areas and parkway on the
west side of Peach Hill E ,,oad between Williams Ranch and
Tierra Rejada Roads within Tract Nos. 3019 and 3525. The
cost is to be spread -o ht? 217 lots within the tracts.
6. Tract 3306
Cost for landscape areas within Tract 3306 at the
westerly terminus of Inglewood Street. The cost is to be
spread to the 22 lots w;: ' h it the tract.
7. Los Angeles Avenue Parkway
Maintenance costs associ -t-ed with landscaping the parkway
on the north side of Lo: Angeles Avenue between Gabbert
Road and Shasta Avenue ;L1 -1 be borne by all industrial
lots northerly of Los Angeles Avenue, southerly of
Poindexter Avenue, east E L�',, )f Gabbert Road, and westerly
of Shasta Avenue.
8. West Village Buffer Area
Improvement and maintenance costs associated with the
buffer area within Tracts 4340, 4341, 4342, and multi-
family areas bounded by Tierra Rejada to the east,
Mountain Trail to the South, Countryhi l l Road to the west,
Tract 4342 to the north end Home Acres. The costs are to
be split 50 -50 between the area within the City (Tracts
4340, 4341, 4342 and multifamily areas) and the
unincorporated Home Acre,, irea.
9. Condor Drive Industrial Park
Improvement and mainte iilc� costs associated with the
parkway located at the ric;rt,hwest corner of Los Angeles
Avenue and Virginia Cc )rry Place will be borne by the
developed parcels with I e Industrial Park.
Plans and specifications for t
lighting of streets, parks and
improvements within the City al
Public Works. The lighting L
Edison -owned lights are on file w.
Company. Reference is hereby mad,
for the exact location and natu
improvements. Said plans and
hereby made a part of this reF ( -o-
Cam'
to irrigation, landscaping and
,ast- ments, and other authorized
f,_le in the Department of
at:on: and specifications for
r, r he Southern California Edison
t said plans and specifications
c` the landscape and lighting
p >< ifi -ations by reference are
DWIGHT FRENCH & ASSOCIATES
SECTION 3 ASSESSMENT ROLL
All parcels of real property affected are listed on the "Assessment
Roll ", Exhibit "A," which will be on file in City Hall with the
City Clerk, and is made a part hereof by reference. These parcels
are more particularly described in maps prepared in accordance with
Section 327 of the Revenue and Taxation Code which are on file in
the office of the Ventura County Assessor in the County Government
Center Administration Building, 800 S. Victoria Avenue, Ventura,
California and which are also made a part hereof by reference.
SECTION 4 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT
The Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, in Section 22573, states
that "The net amount to be assessed upon the lands within an
assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method
which fairly distributes the new amount among all assessable lots
or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received
by each such lot or parcel from the improvements."
Lighting
The primary benefits of street lighting are for the convenience,
safety and protection of people and the security or protection of
property, property improvements and goods,. The intensity or degree
of illumination provided can have° a bearing on both.
The single family home - Level 1 has been selected as the base unit
for the spread of assessments. By definition, the single family
home - Level 1 is a single family home located on a street that has
existing street lights. A factor of 1.00 has been assigned to the
base unit, which is composed of bc-nef it factors which correspond to
the following types of benefi-
People Use - People relates! benefdts 0.50
Security Benefit - Property protection 0.25
Intensity - Degree of illumination 0.25
1.00
C - 4
DWIGI -IT FRENCH & ASSOCIATES
Parcels in other land use categoric; wf =re then rated by comparison
with the basic unit. (See Table 1)
People Use - People related benefits
1. Reduction in night accidents and attendant human
misery.
2. Reduced vulnerabilat_y to criminal assault during
hours of darkness.
3. Promotion of busiless operations during evening
hours.
4. Increased safety oz roads and highways.
Security Benefit - Property protect-on
1. Reduction in vandalism anc, other criminal acts, and
damage to improvem-nt :, .
2 . Reduction in burgl ,r i es .
Intensity
Intensity or degree of illumination provided on streets
varies with type of street, date of installation and the
use of the property adj -acer,t - hereto.
Landscaping
The landscaping element of the spread formula recognizes that all
properties within the City benefit from the maintenance of the
landscaping within public rights -of -way and easements. These
benefits include aesthetic enjoyment, creation of a pleasant
living and working environment, an increase in general property
values, improved safety resulting from a regular tree trimming
program and improved street sweeping capabilities resulting from
trimming trees which may otherwise interface with street sweeping
operations. Because lonq each parcel t benefit received, This amount- is is cost
shown
spread equally
in the appendix..
Rebate
The City Council approved a rebate procedure for disadvantaged
property owners. The procedure shall fe followed as described in
Appendix "H."
IC
't • 5
DWIGHT FRENCH & ASSOCIATES
SECTION 5 COST ESTIMATE
The City staff recommendation for the District budget is shown in
Appendix °D" of this report.
The costs attributed to landscaping and the costs attributed to
lighting will be separately appointed, according to the formula,
and added together to constitute the total assessment for each
parcel.
Conclusion
In conclusion, it is our opinion that the assessments within
Lighting Maintenance Assessment District No.
apportioned by a formula that. fairly distributes theme 4 cost are
accordance with the benefits that are received.
\rpt \050ad842.945
C-6
DWIGHT FRENCH & ASSOCIATES
APPENDICES
G
DWIGHT FRENCH & ASSOCIATES
APPENDIX "A11
CITY OF MOORPARK
Lighting Maintenance Assessment District
Lighting and Landscape Act of 1972
Table 1
Street Lighting Formula
Use
Code Description
People
Use
Lighting
Intensitv
Total
Annual
0
Residential
Security
Units
Assessment
1
Vacant
Single Family-
0.00
•00
0.25
0.25
$
Level 1
0.50
5.16
2
3
Mobile Home
Condo (Per Unit)
p,�p
`•25
x'.00
0.25
0.00
1.00
0.00
$ 20.64
4
Residential Income
25
0.25
1.00
$ 0.00
$ 20.64
(2 -4 Units)
(Per Unit)
0'S0
25
0.25
1.00
5
Apartments (5 +)
0'S0
$ 20.64
6
Per Unit
Single Family-
05
0.20
0.75
$ 15.48
Level 2
0.50
C
05
0.20
0.75
9
Mobile Home &
0 50
$ 15.48
Trailer Park
0
0`'
).20
0.75
$ 15.48
(Per Space)
10
Commercial Vacant
0.00
0
11
Land
Retail Stores,
00
0.25
0.25
$ 5.16
Single Story
2.00
1
)0
.00
4.00
$ 80.64
(Per Parcel)
12
Store & Office
2.00
Combination
1.00
.
400
$ 80.64
15
Shopping Centers
4.00
16
(Neighborhood)
1
70
�• 50
6.50
$134.16
Shopping Centers
4.00
17
(Regional)
Office Building
1.
'0
1.50
6.50
$134.16
(1 Story)
1. 00
1
�0
1.00
3.0 0
$ 61.92
18
Office Building
2.00
(Multi - Story)
1.
'0
1 00
4.00
$
(Per Parcel)
80.64
19
Retail Stores
2'00
(Multi - Story)
1.10
1 00
4.00
$ 80.64
(Per Parcel)
G
A -1
DWIGHT FRENCH & ASSOCIATES
Use
Total
Units
Code _Description
People
Use
21
Restaurants &
3.00
1.00
Cocktail Lounges
5.00
24
Banks, Savings &
1.00
3.00
Loans
1...0c
25
Service Stations
2.00
26
Auto Sales, Repair 2.00
4.00
Storage, Rental
1.00
30
Industrial land
0.00
00
1.00
Vacant
5.00
31
Light
1.00
1.50
4.00
Manufacturing
3.00
32
Warehousing
2.00
33
Industrial Condos,
2.00
$ 61.92
CO-OPS, PUD's
0.25
38
Mineral Processing
1.00
-44
46
Truck Crops
0.50
48
Pasture (Permanent)
0.50
49
Poultry
Flowers, Seed
0.50
51
Products
0.50
53
Orchards
Field Crops, Dry
0.50
0.50
54
Pasture of Graze,
1.00
55
Dry
Feed Lots
0.50
0.50
5
61 1
Tree Farms
0.50
69
Theater
3.00
70
Parks
Institutional
0.00
71
Vacant , - -
Churches, Convent
0 .00
72
Rectory
Schools
0.00
73
Colleges
0.00
0.00
78
Public Buildings,
0.00
$ 0.00
Museums, Firehouses,
.00
0.00
Etc.
79
80
Flood Control
0.00
81
Misc. Vacant Lots
Utility Water
0.00
83
Company
0.00
86
Petroleum & Gas
1.00
88
Water Rights, Pumps
Highways &
0.00
91
Streets
Utility- Edison
0.00
$ 41.28
0.��)0
0.00
Lighting
Intensity Security
Total
Units
Annual
Assessment
1.00
1.00
5.00
$103.20
1.00
1.00
3.00
$ 61.92
1...0c
1.00
4.00
$ 80.64
:•00
1.00
4.00
$ 80.64
1.00
0.25
0.25
$ 5.16
00
1.00
1.00
5.00
$103.20
•50
1.00
1.50
4.00
$ 80.64
5.00
$103.20
x.00
(.25
1.00
0.25
3.00
$ 61.92
1%.25
0.25
1.00
1.00
$ 20.64
25
0.25
1.00
$ 20.64
$ 20.64
25
0.25
0.25
0.25
1.00
$ 20.64
(1 - 25
0.25
1.00
1.00
$ 20.64
$ 20.64
0 25
0 25
0.25
0.25
1.00
$ 20.64
0 25
0.25
1.00
1.00
$ 20.64
1 00
0
i.00
5.00
$ 20.64
$103.20
00
).00
0.00
$ 0.00
0 9 C;
25
0.25
$ 5.16
0 00
0 00
0.25
(x.00
0.25
$ 5.16
0 00
0.00
0.00
0.00
$ 0.00
0 00
.00
0.00
$ 0.00
$
0.00
0.)0
0 . )0
0.00
�) 25
0.00
$ 0.00
.
6.25
$ 5.16
0.;.)0
0.50
0.00
0.50
0.00
$ 0.00
0.10
0.00
2.00
0.00
$ 41.28
0.��)0
0 . 00
0.00
$ 0.00
$
0. 0
a 00
0.00
0.00
$ 0.00
G
A -2
DWIGHT FRENCH & ASSOCIATES
Use
Code Description
92 Telephone
93 S.P.R.R.
94 Undedicated
Community Areas
(Condos)
95 State Property
96 County Property
97 City Property
99 Exempt
People
Use
Lighting
Intensity Security
Total
Annual
0.00
�) . 00
Units
Assessment
0.00
0.90
o.00 0.00
).00 0.00
0.00
$ 0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
$ 0.00
0.00
0.00
J-00
0.00
0.00
0.00
�) . 00
0.00
0.00
0.00
; .00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
a0
0.00
0.00
U
A• -3
$ 0.00
$ 0.00
$ 0.00
$ 0.00
$ 0.00
DWIGHT FRENCH & ASSOCIATES
APPENDIX "B"
CITY OF MOORPARK
Lighting Maintenance Assessment District
No. AD -84 -2
Lighting and Landscape Act of 1972
Landscape Formula
The landscaping element of the spread formula is calculated in
accordance with the method described as follows:
Total Annual Cost -
- $16.40 per parcel
Notes:
1. In addition to the above landscape charge, 73 lots within
Tract No. 2851 are assessed an additional landscape cost
for a Ventura County Flood Control Easement and portions
of the interior tract: entry areas. The additional cost
per lot is $56.59. The obligation upon these lots is
pursuant to a condition of development.
2• In addition to the above landscape charge, 622 lots
within Tract 2865 are assessed an additional landscape
charge for the maintenance of parkways, Tierra Road slope and street scape areas, and the m numentesign
within the tract. The additional cost per lot is $95.45.
The obligation upon these lots i s
of development., pursuant to a condition
3. In addition to the
within Tract No.
above Landscape charge, 265 lots
3032
landscape charge for
are assessed
the maintenance
an additional
at Buttercreek Road
additional
of an
and Los Angeles
entry monument
Avenue.
cost per
t :s
lo $3.2i
The
4. In addition to the
within Tract No.
above landscape charge,
3274
129 lots
landscape charge for
are assessed
the landscape for
an additional
the maintenance of
parkway areas along Williams Ranch Road and Edison
entries within PC -3.
The obligation upon these
The additional cost
lot.
Per lot $p,
of development,
is pursuant
to a condition
G
B - -1
DWIGHT FRENCH & ASSOCIATES
5. In addition to the above landscape charge, 217 lots
within Tract Nos. 3011, and 3525 are assessed an
additional landscaping charge for maintenance of Tierra
Rejada Road slope and parkways and the parkway on the
west side of Peach Hill Road between Williams Ranch and
Tierra Rejada Roads. Tlie additional cost per lot is
$172.07. The obligation a ;)on th(,;e lots is pursuant to a
condition of development:.
6. In addition to the above 1 ind. cape charge, 22 lots within
Tract No. 3306 are assessed an additional landscape
charge for the maintenance of landscape area at the
westerly terminus of Inglewo=,ci .street. The additional
cost per lot is $11.00. !'he obligati
to upon these lots
is pursuant o a condi_is de, ;elopment.
7- In addition to the abo %( Landscape charge, 92 lots
northerly of Los Angeles %veriue ;outherly of Poindexter
Avenue, between Gabbert: a Ld Shay, a Avenues are assessed
an additional landscaping charge for maintenance of the
northside of Los Angeles Pven_e Iirkway. The additional
cost is $111.46 per acre.
.
8. In addition to the above landscape charge, the 693
residential units within Tract Nos. 4340, 4341 and 4342
are assessed an additional $14.75 per lot, for the
improvement and maintenance -)f We:St Village Buffer Area.
The Hoine Acres, not to >e 1.ev ed for any City -wide
lighting and landscape ch,Arge._ ;, ire to be assessed for
$51.11 per lot for the irrl rn em nt and maintenance of
West Village Buffer Area
9. In addition to the above l.a"d ;capE• charge, 11 lots within
the Industrial Park or. C')ndor Drive are assessed an
additional landscape charge i -or the improvements and
maintenance of the parkw-Y 1 oc jt.ed at the northwest
corner of Los Angeles Aven ;.e c;nd 'irginia Colony Place.
The additional cost is ;60 �� ���r icre.
i
G
B -2
DWIGHT FRENCH & ASSOCIATES
APPENDIX "C"
CITY OF MOORPARK
Lighting Maintenance Assessment District
AD -84 -2
Lighting and Landscape Act of 1972
Table 3
Assessment Summary
Use
Landscape
Lighting
Total
Code
Description
Assessment
Assessment
Assessment
0
Residential
$16.40
$ 5.16
$ 21.56
Vacant
1
Single Family -
Level 1
16.40
20.64
37.04
2
Mobile Home
0.00
0.00
0.00
3
Condo
16.413,
20.64
37.04
4
Residential
Income (2 -4 Units
16.40
20.64
37.04
5
Apartments (5 +)
16.40
15.48
31.88
6
Single Family -
9
Level 2
16.40
15.48
31.88
Mobile Home and
16.40
15.48
31.88
Trailer park
10
Commercial Vacant
16.40
5.16
21.56
Land
11
Retail Stores,
16.40
80.64
97.04
Single Story
12
Store & Office
16.40
80.64
97.04
Combination
15
Shopping Centers
16.40
134.16
150.56
(Neighborhood)
16
Shopping Centers
16.40
134.16
150.56
(Regional)
17
Office Building
16.40
61.92
78.32
(1- Story)
18
Office Building
16.40
80.64
97.04
(Multi - Story)
19
Retail Stores
16.40
80.64
97.04
(Multi -Story
21
Restaurants &
16.40
103.20
119.60
Cocktail Lounges
24
Banks, Savings &
Loans
16.40
61.92
78.32
i� -1
DWIGHT FRENCH & ASSOCIATES
Use
Landscape
Lighting
Total
Code
Description
Assessment
Assessment
Assessment
30
Industrial Land
16.4C
5.16
21.56
Vacant
31
Light Manufacturing
16.40
103.20
119.60
32
Warehousing
16.40
80.64
97.04
33
Industrial Condos,
Co -Ops, PUD's
16.40
103.20
119.60
38
Mineral Processing
16.40
61.92
78.32
44
Truck Crops
16.40
20.64
37.04
46
Pasture (Permanent)
16.40
20.64
37.04
48
Poultry
16.40
20.64
37.04
49
Flowers, Seed
16.40
20.64
37.04
Production
51
Orchards
16.40
20.64
37.04
53
Field Crops, Dry
16.40
20.64
37.04
54
Pasture of Graze,
16.40
20.64
37.04
Dry
55
Feed Lots
16.40
20.64
37.04
57
Tree Farms
16.40
20.64
37.04
61
Theater
16.40
103.20
119.60
69
Parks
0.00
0.00
0.00
70
Institutional
16.40
5.16
21.56
Vacant Land
71
Churches, Convent,
16.40
5.16
21.56
Rectory
72
Schools
0.00
0.00
0.00
73
Colleges
0.00
0.00
0.00
78
Public Buildings,
Museums, Firehouses,
Etc.
0.00
0.00
0.00
79
Flood Control
0.00
0.00
0.00
80
Misc. Vacant Land
16.40
5.16
21.56
81
Utility Water Co.
0.00
0.00
0.00
83
Petroleum & Gas
16.40
41.28
57.68
86
Water Rights, Pumps
0.00
0.00
0.00
88
Highways & Streets
0.00
0.00
0.00
91
Utility - Edison
0.00
0.00
0.00
92
Telephone
0.00
0.00
0.00
93
S.P.R.R.
0.00
0.00
0.00
94
Undedicated
Community Areas
(Condos)
0.00
0.00
0.00
95
State Property
0.00
0.00
0.00
96
County Property
0.00
0.00
0.00
97
City Property
0.00
0.00
0.00
99
Exempt
0.00
0.00
0.00
Actual assessment amounts may vary due to discrepancies between use codes and actual property uses.
C
C -2
DWIGHT FRENCH & ASSOCIATES
APPENDIX "D"
CITY OF MOORPARK
LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
AD -84 -2
BUDGET ESTIMATE
FY 1994 -95
ZONES OF BENEFIT
1. Tract No. 2851
Interior Parkway & Flood Control. Channel
2. Tract No. 2865
Pacifica & Pardee
3. Tract No 3032
Buttercreek & Peppermill
4. Tract No. 3274
Williams Ranch Road
5. Tract No. 3019, 3025
Warmington
6. Tract No. 3306
Glenhaven (Inglewood)
7. Los Angeles Avenue
North Side Parkway
8. West Village Buffer Area
9. Condor Parkway
G
D -1
4,131.00
59,367.00
846.00
0.00
37,338.00
242.00
10,581.00
20,445.00
6,000.00
SUBTOTAL $13$,950.00
DWIGHT FRENCH & ASSOCIATES
BUDGET ESTIMATE
FY 1994 -95
City Wide Street Lighting
City Wide Maintenance
Zones of Benefit
Total Annual Expenses
Less City Wide Capital Improvements
Less Funds from Other Sources
Total Amount Funded by DistrLct (FY 1994 -95)
Less Zones of Benefit Assessment
*Total City Wide Assessment.
*Actual proportion to assessed:
Street Lighting $ 190,000.00
Maintenance 134,225.00
3,!4, 225.'0
C,
D -2
$ 190,000.00
296,225.00
1",590.00
$ 636,815.00
- (162,000.00)
( 5,640.00)
$ 463,175.00
(135,950.00)
$ 324,225.00
DWIGHT FRENCH & ASSOCIATES
APPENDIX "E"
BOUNDARY MAPS
6
t G I 1 i I
1
, •� -- _ _ - _ _ - ,�, _ - ..: f ..•� Lam.,•,.,— ,�,�,�.I_ I _ _ y'�
t
j� r
fin
rt
11C °� i F
, 1 m
di � 1
1
Wt
I i — ,.� •1 —� ,O 1
jp
r) 4 1 r f 00 I • �_• , ,
..�' 1, 1 Y 1 I ,.,•
..hJ '1 � / I ern � �' - �t 72. �:'•��;� +'+.��a.'!M�, •� I
-- - - - - - - - - - -
-_
a s .. I •�� 1 I
1 I ;
I I t7 4#p l�
rt
Ll
1 1 9 f/'•
00 M x K A 1 ,' r. /
M u J;17���.
co
1 ,•, »,;t a �, I I
N
i
0.00
t'1
04
N
r�
2
N
1 '
as Y8Vd
1 .a
1 I
u v k
F'• u
� u
IWO s.
1
u
rr 'r C IT 61 BI L► '
s l8wrG
a O �J u
rt q� 0 ,z
u , 09i
OZ u
�O
a
z : O
't (D9
I ► G
r O
s �9
n (D
s 0
1£1
a Q
if tl
II O
tt
Z
C ►' ►t
� lsJ
# )
w
0
N
Q)
M
m
a
v
N
I
00
ZateL P. -r 2 EL 5
Cl 1 AD -84 -2 (Page 3 of $)
_onm.
T- 32?
s
D t�L'E 3 � 'T • 3�3 Z
J J
C: AD -84 -2 (Page 4 of V
,out ,166
ONE 5
'T 3 019
'i' 3 5 ZS
`( r, -2) Lzr-)wl �
7
h
J
�I
2
vi
C)
•J
C,: AD -84 -2 (Page 6 of g)
I�
M
t •
i
7-21
L
V
�G
DWIGHT FRENCH & ASSOCIATES
APPENDIX "F"
Appendix "F ", the Assessment Roll, shows. the assessment upon each
lot-or parcel (approximately 8387 parcels) within this District and
is on file in the Office of the City Clerk and County Assessor.
The Venturw-County Assessor's office no longer lists public utility
easements on the Assessor's Rol:.
G
DWIGHT FRENCH & ASSOCIATES
APPENDIX "G"
RESOLUTIONS
ca
DWIGHT FRENCH & ASSOCIATES
APPENDIX "H"
REBATE PROCEDURE
f A ) A V�
JOINT NOTICE OF A PUBLIC MEETING AND A PUBLIC HEARING
PUBLIC NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Moorpark, California, on April 6, 1994, adopted
Resolution No. 94- fixing the date and time of a public meeting to be held on the 16th day of May, 1994, at the hour of 7:00
p.m, in the CounciMambers of the Moorpark City Hall, located at 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark. The purpose of said
public meeting is to allow the public an o portumty to meet with Cit staff to question and discuss the proposed annual
AD-
assessments for the "MOORPARK LIGHTI G AND LANDSCAPING MAAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. AD-
84-2" for the fiscal year commencing on July I, 1994 and ending on June 30, 1995, which would provide for the furnishing of
power for and the usual maintenance and servicing of street lights and the landscape maintenance of public rights -of -way within
the said City, to question and discuss the proposed increases in said assessments over those levied for said District in FY
1993/94.
PUBLIC NOTICE IS ALSO HEREBY GIVEN that said Resolution No 94- also fixed the date and time of a public hearing
of the Moorpark City Council to be held on the 1st day of June, 1994, at the–Four of 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the
Moorpark City Hall, located at 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark. The purpose of said public hearing is to consider making
certain changes in, and to order the annual assessments for the "MOORPARK LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. AD -84 -2" for the fiscal year commencing on July I, 1994 and ending on
June 30, 1995, which would provide for the furnishing of power for and the usual maintenance and servicing of street lights and
the landscape maintenance of public rights -of way within the ;aid City.
A coppyy of Resolution No. 94- which is captioned as follows: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR, AND DECLARING ITS INTENTION
TO
AND LANDSCAPING INTENANCE MAKE CERTAIN CHANGES AND TO ORDER THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS FOR THE "MOORPARK LIGHTING
COMMENC NG JULY 1, M 19A94 AND ENDING JUNE 30,T199 ISPURSUANT TO DTHE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING
ACT OF 1972, AND FIXING THE TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC MEETING TO DISCUSS AND A PUBLIC
HEARING TO RECEIVE OBJECTIONS TFIERFTO " is on file with the City Clerk and open to inspection. A .summary of
said Resolution is summarized as follows:
I. That the Engineer's Report prepared to Assessment Du.trict No. AD84 -2 for FY 1994/95 is approved.
2. That said Engineer's Report may he turner mod fed (.t changed, pursuant to applicable State law.
3. That the amount of the assessments. for 'rssessmrtnt District No. AD84 -2 for FY 1994195 are proposed to increase from the
amount of the assessments levied for sae ! district in FY 1993/94.
4. That it is the intention of the City Coun, it a) to make certain changes to Assessment District No. AD 84 -2, b) to order the
extension of the annual assessment for said district for FY 1994/95; and c) to levy and collect assessments for certain
improvements described herein. Said district consists of a single city -wide zone to pprovide electric current or energy for
public lighting within the City, to provide for installation or maintenance of landsca ing and the construction or
maintenance of curb, gutter, or sidewalk structures and facilities, to install or construct facilities, which are appurtenant to
any of the foregoing, for the maintenance or servicing or both, of any of the forgoing and to provide incidental expenses in
connection therewith Said district also includes assessments for the improvement and maintenance of the above described
landscaping and related improvements in a numh,-r of zones of benefit.
5. That said lighting and landseappmg nr,intenancr assessment district includes the lighting and landscaping sites with all
improvements located therein, describer! ',� and includtnl within Assessment District t o. AD 84 -2.
6. That the foregoing described work is he lo—ted v: 'hin Assessment District No. AD 84 -2, the boundary of which is
described on a map on file in the City ( irk ot,icc-
7. That said proposed maintenance and unt vruux t i, of benefit to, and expense for which are chargeable upon, the district.
8. That a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the
proposed assessments upon assessable parcels within said District, is set forth in a copy of the afore mentioned Engineer's
Report on file with the City Clerk and t on t, inspection.
9. That the existing assessments, the propo,t -d assessment, and the proposed increases to the assessment amounts are set forth
in Exhibit 'A' attached hereto and mad, t part h -roof.
10. That a public meeting shall be convened m Na. 16, 1994, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at the Moorpark City
Hall to allow the public an o ortumt, to meet with City staff to question and discuss the proposed annual assessments for
Assessment District No. AD 84 -2 f'or Fs 11994/9 and 'he proposed increases to said assessments over those levied in FY
1993/94.
11. That a public hearing of the Moorpark ,ty Council shall be held on June 1, 1994, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers
at the Moorpark City Hall to consider nakung :ertain changes in, and to order the annual assessments for Assessment
District No. AD84 -2 for FY 1994/95
12. That this Joint Notice of Public Meeting and Public Hearing is given, and that any persons having any objections to the
work or extent of the assessment district may appear and show cause why said work should not be done or carried out or
why said district should not be extended for the fiscal year commencing July I 1994 and ending June 30, 1995. Protests
must be in writing, and must be filed by the property owner with the City Clerk prior to the conclusion of the hearing and
such protest shall state all grounds of the objection and shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property. A
majority protest will cause the assessment increase to be abandoned.
13. That all the work proposed shall he don, in accordance with the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Part 2 of
Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California.
14. That the City Clerk shall cause notice of ,aid public meeting and public hearingg to be given b, causing this summary of the
Resolution of Intention to be published and mailed in the manner required by Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and
Highways Code and Section 54954 6 of the Government. Code of the State of California.
15. That the City Clerk shall certify to the a, Oiwi this solution.
ATTEST
t y er 'ate W. Uawrason r., ayor
THIS NOTICE IS GIVEN pursuant to the PProvisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Section 22500 et. sec. of the
Streets and Highway Code of the State of Califomia and is dated this 20th day of May, 1992.
City er
Exhibit 'A'
Ex a
2`
I
AD 84 -2
Summary of Assessments
A. City
Wide Assessments
Use
Code
Description
FY 1993/94
Proposed
FY 1994/95
Proposed
Assmnt ($)
Assmnt ($)
Increase
0
1
Residential Vacant
Single Family - Level 1
16.84
33.00
21.56
37.03
4.72
4.04
2
3
Mobil Home
Condo
0.00
33.00
0.00
37.03
0.00
4.04
4
Residential Income 2 -4 units
33.00
37.03
4.04
5
6
Apartments (5 +))
Sinble Family Level
27 6]
31.88
4.27
9
- 2
Mobil Home & Trailer Park
27.61
31.88
4.27
t0
Commercial Vacant
27.61
16.84
31.88
21.56
4.27
4.72
11
12
Retail Store, single story
Store & Office Combination
97.64
98.94
1.31
15
16
Shopping Centers (Neighborhood)
97.64
151.50
98.94
150.53
1.31
(0.97)
17
Shopping Centers (Regional)
Office Building
151.50
150.53
(0.97)
18
(one story)
Office Building (multi - story;
76.09
78,31
2.22
19
Retail Stores (multi- story)
97.64
97.64
98,94
98,94
1.31
21
Restaurants & cocktail lounges
119.18
119.58
131
0.40
24
Batiks, Savings & Loans
76.09
78.31
2.22
25
26
Service Stations
Auto sales, repair, storage & rentu
97.64
97.64
98.94
1.31
30
Industrial Land Vacant
16.84
98.94
21.56
1.31
4.72
31
32
Light Manufacturing
Warehousing
1 19.18
119.58
0.40
33
Industrial Condos, Coops, Pi;I)'s
97.64
119.18
98.94
119.58
1.31
0.40
38
44
Mineral Processing
Truck Crops
76.09
78.31
2.22
46
Pasture (permanent)
33.00
33.00
37.03
37.03
4.04
48
49
Poultry
Flowers, seed production
33.00
33.00
37.03
4.04
4.04
51
53
Orchards
Field crops, dry
33.00
37.03
37.03
4.04
4.04
54
Pastures of graze, dry
33.00
33 00
37.03
37.03
4.04
4.04
55
57
Feed lots
Tree farms
33.00
37.03
4.04
61
70
Theater
33.00
119.18
37.03
119.58
4.04
0.40
71
Institutional vacant land
16.84
21.56
4.72
78
Churches, convent & rector}
Public Bldgs. Fire Houses, Museur
16.84
21.56
4.72
80
rtc.
Misc, Vacant land
0.00
16.84
000
21.56
000
81
Utility Water Company
0.00
0.00
4.72
0.00
83
91
Petroleum & gas
Utilitty Edison
54.54
000
57.77
000
3.13
000
93
Tele ne
R
0.00
0.00
0.00
94
Undedicated Community Condo Dr elopment
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
99
Exempt
000
000
0.00
000
B.
Zone of Ben e it: In addition to the Citywide Assessments listed above by land use categories, the properties within
each of the ones listed below be
will assessed a per
certain improvements determined t, be of benefit to the
lot Zone assessment for the improvement and
properties within those Zones.
maintenance of
Proposed
Zone
7-
Descri lion
i act ar ways ® Bambi,
FY 1993/94
Assmnt
FY 1994/95
Assmnt
Proposed
Increase
Benwood, Pecan and VCFCD Chao icl
(77-33
2
Tract 2865: Parkways East side
28.41
95.45
67.04
Peach Hill, N. Side Tierra
Rejada; South slopes & Chrr,nan
Barrett and Spring
3
Tract 3032: Buttercreek Entry and
5,30
3.20
(2.10)
Peppermill parkway
4
Tract 3274: Parkways, north and
93.94
0.00
(93.94)
south side of Williams Ranch Rd.
5
Tracts 3019 & 3525: Parkways: north
79.91
172.06
92.15
side of Tierra Rejada Road, west side
of Peach Hill Rd; south side park, +a
& slope
6
Tract 3306 (Glenhaven): Parkway
30.82
11.00
(19.82)
west end of (Inglewood Ave.
7
Industrial Park Northeast of Gabbe
33.55 *
20.06
**
& L.A. Ave.: Parkway North side c!
to
L.A. Ave east of Gabbert
557.39
8
West Vitiage Buffer:
• City area
20.53
14.75
(5.78)
• Home Acres
51.11
51.11
0.00
9
Condor Drive
0
.54-42.j*.
* **
Vv' taAn nq�
Note: * Flat Rate Assessment
^/
llf�• /
** The total amount to be assessed for this zone has
increased from $3,087 to
$10,581. The
assessment for FY 1994/95 will be a per acre assessment of $111.46. Depending on the size of
the lot, the assessment amount ranges
from a tow of $20.06
to a high of $557.39.
* *' This Zone has a per acre assessment
of $60.96. Depending
on the size of the lot,
the assessment
amount ranges from a low of $54.19 to a high of $980.21.
* * *' In that thiis i< , new zone, the entire
amount of the assessment
is an increase over
last year.
'?
wD \rot
\ad85.95.not
~r..)K
RESOLUTION NC. 94-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, MAKING CERTAIN
CHANGES TO THE "MOORPARK LIGHTING AND
LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. AD -84 -2"
AND CONFIRMING THE ASSESSMENT FOR SAID
DISTRICT THE FISCAL YEAR COMMENCING JULY 1,
1994 AND ENDING JUNE 30 1995.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Moorpark, by
Resolution No. 94 -994, adopted January 5, 1994, declared its
intention to make certain changes to the "MOORPARK LIGHTING
AND LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. AD- 84 -211, and to
order the extension of the annual assessments for said
district for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 1994 and
ending June 30, 1995; and,
WHEREAS, said "MOORPARK LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE
DISTRICT NO. AD -84 -2" consists of a single city -wide zone to
provide electric current or energy for public lighting within
the City, to provide for installation or maintenance of
landscaping and the construction or maintenance of curb,
gutter, or sidewalk structures and facilities, to install or
construct facilities which Are appurtenant to any of the
foregoing, for the maintenance or servicing or both, of any of
the foregoing and to provide incidental expenses in connection
therewith; and,
WHEREAS, said "MOORPARK LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. AD- -84 -2" also consists of a number of
specific zones in order to provide for the assessment of the
properties within said zone: for the cost of maintaining
certain specified improvement which benefit said properties;
and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to the terms of a Joint Powers Agreement
(JPA) between the City of Moorpark and the County of Ventura,
the City Council of the City of Moorpark, by Resolution No. 92
- 860 adopted on June 29, 1992, annexed certain unincorporated
area just west of the City known as Home Acres, to the
"MOORPARK LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT
DISTRICT NO. AD -84 -2" in order to implement those provisions
of the JPA pertaining to the ;construction and maintenance of
a buffer area between said unincorporated area and the West
Ranch area of PC -3 (Tracts 4 40, 4341 and 4342); and,
WHEREAS, in accordance with the provisions of the aforesaid
JPA, it has been determined that- said buffer area provides
benefit to both the aforesaid Home Acres area and the West
Ranch area of PC -3, and a Zone of Benefit encompassing said
areas was established to allow for the levy of assessments on
the properties within said Zane of Benefit for the purpose of
developing and maintaining t_Nuffer area; and,
Resolution No. 94-
Page 2
S7.1(2)
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Moorpark, by
Resolution No. 94 -1026, adopted April 6, 1994, approved the
Engineer's Report pertaining to such matters; and,
WHEREAS, said Resolution No. 94 -1026 also set 7: 00 p.m., May
16, 1994, as the time and date of a public meeting to allow
the public an opportunity to discuss the proposed increased
assessment with City staff; sand,
WHEREAS, said public meeting was convened on May 16, 1994,
at 7:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers for the purpose of
allowing the public an opportunity to discuss with City staff
the proposed increased assessments; and,
WHEREAS, said Resolution No. 94 -1.026 also set 7:00 p.m.,
June 1, 1994, as the time and date of a public hearing to
consider such matters; and.,.
WHEREAS, on June 1, 1994, the City Council held a public
hearing to determine whethei said changes to said district
should be made, and whether the annual assessments should be
ordered and confirmed for the fiscal year commencing July 1,
1994 and ending June 30, _199", arid,
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that written protests
against the proposed work or assessment have not been made by
owners representing more than one -half of the area of land to
be assessed: and,
WHEREAS, the City Council, having duly received, considered
evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the jurisdictional
facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the
contemplated work and benefit's to be derived therefrom, and
the City Council having now acquired jurisdiction to order the
proposed assessments for the fiscal year commencing July 1,
1994 and ending June 30, 199!1'
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK,
CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The Engineer's Report for "MOORPARK LIGHTING AND
LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. AD- 84 -211, filed with the
City Clerk on April 1, 1994, as amended or revised by action
of the City Council, is hereby approved and adopted, and the
improvements, changes to,, and extension of the annual
assessments in the Assessment. District, in accordance with
said report, as revised, and in accordance with Resolution No.
94 -1026 approving said Engineer's Report, is hereby levied for
the Fiscal Year 1994/95.
Resolution No. 94-
Page 3
.'I(3)
SECTION 2. The City Clerk shall cause the diagram and
assessment, or a certified copy thereof, to be filed with the
County Auditor.
SECTION 3. The City Clerk ;hall certify to the adoption of
this resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS __ day of 1994.
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Pau W. Lawrason Jr., Mayor
RESOLUTION NC. 94-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, MAKING CERTAIN
CHANGES TO THE "MOORPARK LIGHTING AND
LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. AD -84 -2"
AND CONFIRMING THE ASSESSMENT FOR SAID
DISTRICT THE FISCAL YEAR COMMENCING JULY 1,
1994 AND ENDING JUNE 30 ]995.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Moorpark, by
Resolution No. 94 -994, adopted January 5, 1994, declared its
intention to make certain changes to the "MOORPARK LIGHTING
AND LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. AD- 84 -211, and to
order the extension of ithe annual assessments for said
district for the fiscal year, commencing July 1, 1994 and
ending June 30, 1995; and,,
WHEREAS, said "MOORPARK LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE
DISTRICT NO. AD -84 -2" consists of a single city -wide zone to
provide electric current or energy for public lighting within
the City, to provide for 2.nstallation or maintenance of
landscaping and the cons t:ruc-tion or maintenance of curb,
gutter, or sidewalk structures and facilities, to install or
construct facilities which are appurtenant to any of the
foregoing, for the maintenance or servicing or both, of any of
the foregoing and to provide i is iclental expenses in connection
therewith; and,
WHEREAS, said "MOORPARK LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. AD -84 -2" also consists of a number of
specific zones in order to provide for the assessment of the
properties within said zone:, fc:,,r the cost of maintaining
certain specified :improvement. which benefit said properties;
and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to the terms of a Joint Powers Agreement
(JPA) between the City of Moorpark and the County of Ventura,
the City Council of the City of Moorpark, by Resolution No. 92
- 860 adopted on June 29, 1992, annexed certain unincorporated
area just west of the City known as Home Acres, to the
"MOORPARK LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT
DISTRICT NO. AD -84 -2" in order tc implement those provisions
of the JPA pertaining to the :,onstruction and maintenance of
a buffer area between said unincorporated area and the West
Ranch area of PC -3 (Tracts 4,-1,10, 4341 and 4342); and,
WHEREAS, in accordance with the previsions of the aforesaid
JPA, it has been determined that said buffer area provides
benefit to both the aforesaid Home Acres area and the West
Ranch area of PC -3, and a Zone of Benefit encompassing said
areas was established to allow for- the levy of assessments on
the properties within said Zone of Benefit for the purpose of
developing and maintaining sail buffer area; and,
Resolution No. 94-
Page 3
SECTION 2. The City Clerk shall cause the diagram and
assessment, or a certified copy thereof, to be filed with the
County Auditor.
SECTION 3. The City Clerk ,ha1.1 certify to the adoption of
this resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS _ _ -_ day of 1994.
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Paul W. Lawrason Jr., Mayor