HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 2001 0718 CC REG ITEM 10Hnew Y)9 • e c $
ITEM-1-1/0
••
CITY CAJAFOR�NIA
of '1-lSaool:
ACT 10 n*nvery! 7'0 :1
�Loj mee'hn oo 7 -19 -0
MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Honorable City Council
FROM: Deborah S. Traffenstedt, ATCM /City Clerk
DATE: July 13, 2001 (CC Meeting of 7/18/01)
SUBJECT: Consider Adoption of an Interim Ordinance
Enacting for a Period of Forty -five days a
Moratorium on the Issuance of Permits for
Construction or Placement of Wireless
Telecommunications Facilities in the City, and
Declaring the Urgency Thereof
BACKGROUND
The City Attorney has prepared the attached interim zoning
ordinance, to be adopted as an urgency measure. As an urgency
moratorium ordinance, a four - fifths (4/5) affirmative vote of the
entire City Council is required. The moratorium would preclude City
staff from accepting or processing any application for any land use
entitlement necessary for construction of a wireless
telecommunications facility and from issuing any land use
entitlement for any pending applications already received.
The interim ordinance shall be of no further force and effect 45
days from its date of adoption. After notice and public hearing,
the City Council may extend the interim ordinance for 10 months and
15 days and subsequently extend the interim ordinance for one year.
Any extension also requires a four - fifths vote for adoption. Not
more than two extensions may be adopted.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Adopt Interim Ordinance No.
Attachment: Draft Interim Ordinance
ORDINANCE NO.
AN INTERIM ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, ENACTING
FOR A PERIOD OF FORTY -FIVE DAYS A MORATORIUM
ON THE ISSUANCE OF PERMITS FOR CONSTRUCTION
OR PLACEMENT OF WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS
FACILITIES IN THE CITY, AND DECLARING THE
URGENCY THEREOF
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK DOES ORDAIN AS
FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Findings. The City Council of the City of
Moorpark finds and determines as follows:
A. The City of Moorpark holds the right to make and
enforce all laws and regulations not in conflict with
the general laws, and the City holds all rights and
powers established by state law.
B. The City has received and anticipates numerous
requests by wireless telecommunications providers for
the placement of wireless telecommunications
facilities. However, the provisions of the City
Municipal Code that may regulate the construction and
placement of wireless telecommunication facilities in
the City are inadequate and need review, study, and
revision. The current provisions also fail to fully
take into account the impacts related to the location
and manner of construction of wireless
telecommunications facilities, and the related public
health, safety, and welfare concerns.
C. Additionally, the City Council has recently expressed
grave concerns about the heavy construction and
installation of wireless telecommunications
facilities. The City Council also desires to evaluate
and enhance the public works and aesthetic standards
regarding such facilities, if necessary.
D. Without the enactment of this Ordinance, multiple
wireless telecommunications providers could quickly
receive permits to install wireless telecommunications
facilities that pose a threat to the public health,
Ordinance No.
Page 2
safety, and welfare. The City Council hereby
determines that the Municipal Code is in need of
updating to protect the public against health, safety,
and welfare dangers caused by multiple
telecommunications providers each constructing
separate wireless telecommunications facilities. The
City requires additional time to prepare, evaluate and
adopt reasonable regulations regarding the placement
and construction of wireless telecommunications
facilities so that such regulations are applied to
wireless telecommunications providers in a
nondiscriminatory manner.
E. In order to prevent frustration of these studies and
the implementation of new regulations, the public
interest, health, safety, and welfare require
immediate enactment of this Ordinance. The absence of
this Ordinance would impair the orderly and effective
implementation of contemplated Municipal Code
amendments, and any further authorization of these
uses within the City during the period of the
moratorium may be in conflict with or may frustrate
the contemplated updates and revisions of the
Municipal Code.
F. Due to multiple inquiries for permits allowing the
construction of wireless telecommunications facilities
in the City, the City finds that there is a current
and immediate threat to the public health, safety, or
welfare and that this Ordinance is necessary in order
to protect the City from the potential effects of
uncoordinated and conflicting construction of wireless
telecommunication facilities in the City, multiple
obstructions of traffic and commerce on City streets,
the aesthetic impacts to the City, and other similar
or related effects on property values and the quality
of life in the City's neighborhoods.
G. The City Council further finds that this moratorium is
a matter of local and Citywide importance and is not
directed towards any particular telecommunications
provider that currently seeks the issuance of a public
works permit.
o IL J� --je
Ordinance No.
Page 3
H. The City Council finds that this Ordinance is
authorized by the City's police powers, and is
intended to be in accord with the August 5, 1998
Agreement between the Federal Communications
Commission's Local and State Government Advisory
Committee, the Cellular Telecommunications Industry
Association, the Personal Communications Industry
Association, and the American Mobile
Telecommunications Association relating to moratoria
on the siting of wireless telecommunications
facilities. The City Council further finds that the
length of the moratorium imposed by this Ordinance
will not in any way deprive any person of rights
granted by state or federal laws, because the
moratorium is short in duration and essential to
protect the public health, safety and welfare.
SECTION 2. Interim Regulations. The following provisions
are hereby adopted as interim requirements for the issuance of
permits pursuant to the Moorpark Municipal Code for construction
of certain improvements within the public rights -of -way, and any
construction in the City in conflict with these provisions is
expressly prohibited:
A. Restricted Activities. For a period of forty -five (45)
days following the enactment of this Ordinance, no
person shall be issued a permit or land use
entitlement for the construction or placement of new
wireless telecommunications facilities within the
City. The City Manager or his or her designee shall
review any application for a permit or land use
entitlement to determine compliance with the
provisions of this Ordinance. City staff, including
City boards and commissions, is directed to refrain
from accepting or processing any application for any
land use entitlement necessary for construction of a
wireless telecommunications facility, and to refrain
from issuing any land use entitlement for any pending
applications already received. These prohibitions
shall remain in effect during the forty -five (45) days
following enactment of this Ordinance.
B. Definitions. In addition to the definitions contained
in the City's Municipal Code, the following words and
phrases shall, for the purposes of this Ordinance, be
X0113 —C
Ordinance No.
Page 4
defined as follows, unless it is clearly apparent from
the context that another meaning is intended. Should
any of the definitions be in conflict with the current
provisions of the Municipal Code, the following
definitions shall prevail:
1. "Wireless Telecommunications Facilities" means any
facility, constructed within the City for the
provision of personal wireless services as defined
in 47 USC 332 (c)(7)C, to wit, "(i) the term
'personal wireless services' means commercial mobile
services, unlicensed wireless services, and common
carrier wireless exchange access services; (ii) the
term 'personal wireless service facilities' means
facilities for the provision of personal wireless
services; and (iii) the term 'unlicensed wireless
service' means the offering of telecommunications
services using duly authorized devices which do not
require individual licenses, but does not mean the
provision of direct -to -home satellite services (as
defined in section 303(v) of this title)."
SECTION 3. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause
or phrase of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid
or unconstitutional by a decision of any court of competent
jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the
remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby
declares that it would have passed this ordinance and adopted
this Ordinance and each section, sentence, clause or phrase
thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more section,
subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid
or unconstitutional.
SECTION 4. Notice of Adoption. The City Clerk shall certify
to the passage and adoption of this ordinance; shall enter the
same in the book of original ordinances of said City; shall make a
minute of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the
proceedings of the City Council at which the same is passed and
adopted; and shall publish this ordinance, or the title hereof as
a summary, pursuant to state statute.
SECTION 5. Vote Required. In accordance with Government
Code §65858, as an urgency moratorium ordinance, this Ordinance
requires a four - fifths (4/5) vote of the entire City Council.
--b
Ordinance No.
Page 5
SECTION 6. Urgency Measure - Effective Date. This
Ordinance shall be introduced, passed, and adopted at one and
the same meeting as an urgency measure. As an urgency
moratorium, this Ordinance shall become effective immediately
and shall continue in full force and effect, unless amended or
repealed, for a period of forty -five (45) days. The reasons for
this urgency are declared and set forth in Section 1 of this
Ordinance and are incorporated herein by reference.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 18th day of July 2001.
Patrick Hunter, Mayor
ATTEST:
Deborah S. Traffenstedt, City Clerk
COU L-1- 3-e