HomeMy WebLinkAboutAG RPTS 2018 0123 PC REG 'SW
° �� ,zmfi Resolution No. 2018-625
99TFD J�4 n
PLANNING COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
JANUARY 23, 2018
7:00 P.M.
Moorpark Community Center 799 Moorpark Avenue
1. CALL TO ORDER:
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
3. ROLL CALL:
4. PROCLAMATIONS, COMMENDATIONS, AND SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS:
A. Consider Selection of Chair and Vice Chair
Debi Aquino
Mark Di Cecco
Bruce Hamous
Adam Haverstock
Kipp Landis
Staff Recommendation: 1) Open the floor to nominations for a Chair; 2) Once
sufficient nominations have been made, close the nominations and vote; 3) Open
the floor for nomination for a Vice Chair; and 4) Once sufficient nominations have
been made, close the nominations, and vote. (Staff: David Bobardt)
5. PUBLIC COMMENT:
6. REORDERING OF, AND ADDITIONS TO, THE AGENDA:
All writings and documents provided to the majority of the Commission regarding all agenda items are available for
public inspection at the City Hall public counter located at 799 Moorpark Avenue during regular business hours. The
agenda packet for all regular Commission meetings is also available on the City's website at www.moorparkca.gov.
Any member of the public may address the Commission during the Public Comments portion of the Agenda, unless it
is a Public Hearing or a Discussion item. Speakers who wish to address the Commission concerning a Public Hearing
or Discussion item must do so during the Public Hearing or Discussion portion of the Agenda for that item. Speaker
cards must be received by the Secretary for Public Comment prior to the beginning of the Public Comments portion of
the meeting; for a Discussion item, prior to the Chair's call for speaker cards for each Discussion agenda item; and for
a Public Hearing item, prior to the opening of each Public Hearing, or beginning of public testimony for a continued
hearing. A limitation of three minutes shall be imposed upon each Public Comment and Discussion item speaker. A
limitation of three to five minutes shall be imposed upon each Public Hearing item speaker. Written Statement Cards
may be submitted in lieu of speaking orally for open Public Hearings and Discussion items. Any questions concerning
any agenda item may be directed to the Community Development/Planning office at 517-6233.
Regular Planning Commission Meeting Agenda
January 23, 2018
Page 2
7. ANNOUNCEMENTS, FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS, AND REPORTS ON
MEETINGS/CONFERENCES ATTENDED BY THE COMMISSION:
8. PUBLIC HEARINGS: (next Resolution No. PC-2018-625)
A. Consider a Resolution Recommending to the City Council Approval of Tentative
Parcel Map No. 2017-02 for the Subdivision of a 9.61 Acre Developed Lot into
Two Parcels of 9.11 Acres and 0.50 Acres at 800 Los Angeles Avenue (Target
Store) and Making a Determination of Exemption Under CEQA in Connection
Therewith, on the Application of Moorpark Covenant Group LLC. Staff
Recommendation: 1) Open the public hearing, accept public testimony and close
the public hearing; and 2) Adopt Resolution No. PC-2018- recommending to
the City Council conditional approval of Tentative Parcel Map No. 2017-02. (Staff:
Freddy Carrillo)
9. DISCUSSION ITEMS:
A. Consider Regular Meeting Schedule, Time and Place. Staff Recommendation: 1)
Approve the 2018 regular meeting schedule of the fourth Tuesday of each month
starting at 7:00 p.m. at the Moorpark City Hall Community Center, 799 Moorpark
Avenue, Moorpark, CA 93021. (Staff: David Bobardt)
10. CONSENT CALENDAR:
A. Consider Approval of the Regular Meeting Minutes of October 24, 2017. Staff
Recommendation: Approve the minutes.
B. Consider Approval of the Special Meeting Minutes of November 7, 2017. Staff
Recommendation: Approve the minutes.
11. ADJOURNMENT:
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting,
including auxiliary aids or services, please contact the Community Development Department at (805) 517-6233. Upon
request, the agenda can be made available in appropriate alternative formats to persons with a disability. Any request
for disability-related modification or accommodation should be made at least 48 hours prior to the scheduled meeting
to assist the City staff in assuring reasonable arrangements can be made to provide accessibility to the meeting (28
CFR 35.102-35.104;ADA Title II).
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF VENTURA ) ss
CITY OF MOORPARK )
AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING
AGENDA
I, Joyce R. Figueroa, declare as follows:
That I am the Administrative Assistant II of the City of Moorpark and that an agenda of the
Regular Meeting of the Moorpark Planning Commission to be held on Tuesday, January
23, 2018, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Moorpark Community Center, 799
Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, California, was posted on January 19, 2018, at a
conspicuous place at the Moorpark Community Center, 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark,
California.
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed on January 19, 2018.
014). 0(QA
Jo+ce R. Figueroa, Administrative Assistant II
ITEM 4.A.
MOORPARK,CALIFORNIA
Planning Commission
of I- 6
ACTION:\I i‘CC'.C h i r lin t 1 N LS SV(Crl Irl
As (Mir_ CI`inmi.SSinncr AQ U inn
)(J lc Rrt Ac Vice C hair.
BY: . 1(3 I 10 trC_
MOORPARK PLANNING COMMISSION
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Honorable Planning Commission
FROM: David A. Bobardt, Community Development Director
DATE: January 19, 2018 (PC Meeting of 1/23/2018)
SUBJECT: Consider Selection of Chair and Vice Chair
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION
Municipal Code Section 2.36.080 and Section 3.1 of Resolution PC 2017-623 (Rules of
Procedure for Commission Meetings and Related Functions and Activities) require the
Planning Commission to select a Chair and Vice Chair from among the appointed
members at the first regular meeting of each year. Each such selection shall be by three
(3) or more affirmative votes. Additionally, each person so selected shall serve until the
end of a one-year term or until a successor is chosen (at any time) by three (3) or more
affirmative votes.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
1. Open the floor to nominations for a Chair;
2. Once sufficient nominations have been made, close the nominations and vote;
3. Open the floor for nominations for a Vice Chair; and
4. Once sufficient nominations have been made, close the nominations and vote.
S:\Community Development PLANNING COMMISSION\PC Policies\agenda reports\2018\20180123 select chair.docx
ITEM 8.A.
MOORPARK,CALIFORNIA
Planning Commission
of C- -201 6 y�
ACTION:$ rr\wri gtOff 1 GfnrY»))�nr1r►tl�7l.
AMpt rkc$n_ PC- 91)1 R- 2.5.
BY: 1. Voli c rr a_
MOORPARK PLANNING COMMISSION
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Honorable Planning Commission
FROM: David A. Bobardt, Community Development Director x`
Prepared by Freddy A. Carrillo, Associate Planner I
DATE: January 8, 2018 (PC Meeting of 01/23/2018)
SUBJECT: Consider a Resolution Recommending to the City Council Approval
of Tentative Parcel Map No. 2017-02 for the Subdivision of a 9.61
Acre Developed Lot into Two Parcels of 9.11 Acres and 0.50 Acres at
800 Los Angeles Avenue (Target Store) and Making a Determination
of Exemption Under CEQA in Connection Therewith, on the
Application of Moorpark Covenant Group LLC
BACKGROUND
On October 10, 2017, Moorpark Covenant Group LLC submitted an application for
Tentative Parcel Map No. 2017-02 for the subdivision of a 9.61 acre parcel developed
with the Target store at 800 Los Angeles Avenue and adjacent parking in the Moorpark
Marketplace Shopping Center into two parcels of 9.11 acres and 0.50 acres. The parcel
map would create separate parcels for the Target Store and its former garden center
and will include portions of the parking lot in each parcel. A Permit Adjustment was
recently approved to convert 8,000 square-feet from the former Target garden center
into a leasable building. A Tentative Parcel Map (TPM) is required when subdividing a
property under common ownership into four or fewer parcels. The permit will require the
Planning Commission's recommendation to the City Council with the City Council being
the final decision maker.
DISCUSSION
Project Setting
Existing Site Conditions:
The 9.61 acre lot is located on the south side of Los Angeles Avenue, east of Miller
Parkway and west of the SR-23 freeway. It is improved with the Target store and
parking lot as part of the Moorpark Marketplace Shopping Center.
2
Honorable Planning Commission
January 23, 2018
Page 2
Previous Applications:
On March 20, 2002, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2002-420 for Commercial
Planned Development No. 2001-01, to construct the 357,621 square-foot Moorpark
Marketplace shopping center and Vesting Tract Map No. 5321 for subdivision of
approximately 29 acres into 8 lots.
On June 13, 2017, the Community Development Director approved Permit Adjustment
No. 6 to Commercial Planned Development No. 2001-01 to allow a conversion of
Target's unused 8,000 square-feet garden center to leasable building area, add a new
trash enclosure, and add two outdoor dining areas .
General Plan and Zoning:
The proposed subdivision is consistent with the Zoning classification and General Plan
land use designation. Permits for future uses will be assessed on a case-by-case basis.
GENERAL PLAN/ZONING
Direction General Plan Zoning Land Use
Carlsberg Carlsberg Specific Plan,
Site Specific Plan Sub-Regional Commercial/ Shopping Center
Business Park
North Light Industrial Industrial Park (M-1) Business Park
Carlsberg Carlsberg Specific Plan,
South Specific Plan Sub-Regional Commercial/ Business Park
Business Park
Carlsberg Carlsberg Specific Plan,
East Specific Plan Sub-Regional Commercial/ Shopping
in Center
Business Park
Carlsberg Carlsberg Specific Plan,
West Specific Plan Sub-Regional Commercial/ Shopping Center
Business Park
Project Summary
Tentative Parcel Map No. 2017-02 is proposed to subdivide an approximately 9.61 acre
parcel into two parcels of 9.11 acres and 0.50 acres. Currently, the parcel is occupied
by an existing 125,737 square-foot Target store, with an entitled 8,000 square foot
building proposed to replace the former Target garden center. The Target building
would remain on the 9.11 acre parcel and the new building will remain wholly on the
0.50 acre parcel. Each new parcel will include a portion of the parking lot that is part of
the existing parcel, but parking will be shared and will not be assigned to each building.
Each parcel could subsequently be sold separately. It is not uncommon for buildings in
shopping centers to be under separate land ownership for tax and financing purposes.
S:\Community Development DEV PMTS\T P M\2017\2017-02 800 Los Angeles(Target)\Agenda Reports\20180123 PC Rpt docx
3
Honorable Planning Commission
January 23, 2018
Page 3
ANALYSIS
The proposed subdivision will not affect or change the architecture, setbacks, building
height, or access of the site as approved under CPD 2001-01. The primary intent of the
subdivision is for tax and financing purposes for a future owner, should Target choose
to sell the new building. CPD 2001-01 project was originally conditioned to provide for
reciprocal access and parking between parcels. This is recorded in an Operation and
Easement Agreement on all properties in the Moorpark Marketplace Shopping Center.
This agreement will continue to apply to the proposed parcel map. This will ensure
adequate parking remains in place for all users of the buildings based on the gross floor
area of the shopping center and not on individual tenant requirements.
Findings
The following draft findings are provided for Planning Commission consideration:
Subdivision Findings:
A. The proposed map, including its design and improvements, is consistent with the
City's General Plan and Zoning Ordinance as proposed, in that the map has
been designed to comply with the requirements of the City's General Plan in
providing a new commercial parcel within existing commercial development and
it meets Zoning standards for the Commercial Planned Development (CPD)
Zone.
B. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed in that the
site has been engineered to allow for all required utilities to be brought to the site,
adequate ingress and egress exist, and the site is provided with public and
emergency services.
C. The site is physically suitable for the proposed intensity of development, in that
all City development standards, including parking, have been met by the
proposed project.
D. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements are not likely to
cause substantial environmental damage, in that the site has already been
developed.
E. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements are not likely to
cause serious public health problems, in that adequate sanitation exists.
F. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements will not conflict with
easements acquired by the public at large, for access through, or use of the
property within the proposed subdivision, in that full access to and from Los
Angeles Avenue and Miller Parkway exists.
S:\Community Development\DEV PMTS\T P M\2017\2017-02 800 Los Angeles(Target)\Agenda Reports\20180123 PC Rpt.docx
4
Honorable Planning Commission
January 23, 2018
Page 4
PROCESSING TIME LIMITS
Time limits have been established for the processing of development projects under the
Permit Streamlining Act (Government Code Title 7, Division 1, Chapter 4.5), the
Subdivision Map Act (Government Code Title 7, Division 2), and the California
Environmental Quality Act Statutes and Guidelines (Public Resources Code Division 13,
and California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3). Under the applicable
provisions of these regulations, the following timelines have been established for action
on this project:
Date Application Determined Complete: December 12, 2017
Planning Commission Action Deadline: March 3, 2018
City Council Action Deadline: 30 Days from Receipt of Planning Commission Report
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
In accordance with the City's environmental review procedures adopted by resolution,
the Community Development Director determines the level of review necessary for a
project to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Some projects
may be exempt from review based upon a specific category listed in CEQA. Other
projects may be exempt under a general rule that environmental review is not
necessary where it can be determined that there would be no possibility of significant
effect upon the environment. A project which does not qualify for an exemption requires
the preparation of an Initial Study to assess the level of potential environmental impacts.
Based upon the results of an Initial Study, the Director may determine that a project will
not have a significant effect upon the environment. In such a case, a Notice of Intent to
Adopt a Negative Declaration or a Mitigated Negative Declaration is prepared. For
many projects, a Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration will prove to be
sufficient environmental documentation. If the Director determines that a project has
the potential for significant adverse impacts and adequate mitigation cannot be readily
identified, an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) is prepared.
The Director has reviewed this project and found it to be Categorically Exempt in
accordance with Sections 15301 (Class 1: Existing Facilities) and 15315 (Class 15:
Minor Land Divisions) of the CEQA Guidelines. The proposed subdivision is consistent
with the General Plan and Zoning regulations. In addition, there is no substantial
evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment in that the site
has an existing building. No further environmental documentation is required.
NOTICING
Public Notice for this meeting was given consistent with Chapter 17.44.070 of the
Zoning Ordinance as follows:
S:\Community Development\DEV PMTS\T P M\201712017-02 800 Los Angeles(Target)\Agenda Reports\20180123 PC Rpt.docx
5
Honorable Planning Commission
January 23, 2018
Page 5
1. Publication. The notice of the public hearing was published in the Ventura County
Star on January 14, 2018.
2. Mailing. The notice of the public hearing was mailed on January" 12, 2018, to
owners of real property, as identified on the latest adjusted Ventura County Tax
Assessor Roles, within one-thousand (1,000) feet of the exterior boundaries of
the assessor's parcel(s) subject to the hearing.
3. Sign. One 32 square-foot sign was placed on the street frontage on January 12
2018.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
1. Open the public hearing, accept public testimony and close the public hearing;
and
2. Adopt Resolution No. PC-2018- recommending to the City Council
conditional approval of Tentative Parcel Map No. 2017-02
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Location Map
2. Aerial Photograph
3. Tentative Parcel Map TPM 1 and 2
4. Draft PC Resolution with Conditions of Approval
•
S:\Community Development\DEV PMTS\T P M12017\2017-02 800 Los Angeles(Target)\Agenda Reports\20180123 PC Rpt.docx
6
0
t
«.•
( C0 PI
roc # ° ' 0
;mm de 1: 4) a
COCO cor
co co
hu ed In m
C
in -, a
co ar m
oo 00 E
CO 0
M 0
N 4+'S m00 0
1 CC CC
W ,.co N N q`�
9 CO co
o
C
O
t L10 1:0
r-, COLs
IP
r e
CU 0 CO rn Q I
ts
cz 41C c
VI
g 40 NM
es
in co
a
0
0 c
Co r4 o
00 M
i pp t
co
-r iV
0.
to r
go
U's r d w
c
7 l'''' 0
`ray) o�\C�` G
,..-0 F
kr, at
r5 a
�,�� fa
fir+ 00 v E
C `s ,^) N0 v
ea'U. 0,® C 'v io
ej,
cc m 44
Co +e X.
Celt -- II0
CCE fr, V,Z
Y Q
O M �� c-
or��,
1 11. inP.'.
N w E W
N er
un Co l65
4G t .a c
tri Lo r-1^1 tl7 —to
PC ATTACHMENT 1 7
w
5
to
c
0
99
It t% ti
LG
.. QS'� ;mow to
to
- 0011IP .
10
CO
lc ..
_ ,
ri....,::
...
C4 01 8E
o
I-
0
o
CO c
nO
A a. G3. �rq t'
a,
co 4r--
m r
vto
Cm ,to
E Q
.moi : a d
aa
' \'P4''''''' '''''' V.
DO
la
tocn
o
4 4ar o.
0 ID
1:: A rt a'" , oi a
•
«� 1.h
u
.c
a
0
41 ar
a
i to
m 0
e Ti.,JN:,.. ,
to
of
m es
, $ n 0 v
'0m
m
w. U
n
[-- II?=
er? 0 tri
II '°
%E
iu
•• a9 e
E0
0 to Ft
E
n te0 CL
a,
PC ATTACHMENT 2 8
M
I— rn
Z
W
2
x
•
E
1 r-C)
1 0
1 4r.-, f�
•i [I i II I I� 1 i P 7 �6 C.)
O l W 56601 M�rn sr�i\ 1 s
Ls.
1 \ I,
ill -i - -----
1 M1S.F1'.[IN 1. __-_ --- _ •- Y .-_ -1
4 ly��'T A. _--n,.Crl Mdrd.CZN,4 4 _ o
, j
0 1 ,t-7-.....„
_ cn
0 \ . 1 7)--/ � b G L 91 sly L 01! I®.,I' I ;' II m
LU 110 i, D
v \ ',,\v ill , ▪[ 3 :,, ',,,,. [ 41,==Na ' ! [-"-' 1 illO
Ili l � ,E:, 1 I dill 1 1 I ff i -„,i ❑ 'I ��QI LL
� Is \ ,a0 II 0 II 1 ILS i1 i 55111111
20 p I • X11 I 1111
®, a1 4'
gry I ' '' ® ill
�� � 6 Ir � � i ' hion ' Iiy
If
• # I -O i O 1I 4 ! i ',IISII
�o I 1 ..1I � J` I 1.J J,l 10 I d ; ill ill l
1 _-J,1- 1 Jew McPq.L f ; Q4 I I 11/y ,1110 11
'��.i II g '-1 r F-7 -1..-p j 1 ®11 rR gig
'j 1�;(�
I Q \/
(~ 11 -_a� -t O� I-0 I 1 1 1'� 4 7 1 . , Z L j AV `! 11 .
I1I9.9 Cc
�'I, 'i' � � �. Is?.''''' O
` I =1 4* 1O 10' R> 1 Ot DI 11 rOIO/ ��+�� gga a
CA CAE H; ick I „ . Q . i ' 11111 . ' ,l1 L IQ /i p 0tx
.
G. ] y1 ii1, 1 i € O)4 I �1 O i l: %' Z §§
W 'I i{ O O. 0 p-1 31 1. 1 U s �� I
D
O J U 9 1 � 3
I t. 11 i o Z_ 1.5 "mak 1 ;
I Ul _J 1 I I� 1 , (1 ,'l 1 „4/1'
+11. 17-
- a M
��7] 1!R 1BiI t
N � I I ® 711 I --_ 1 1 11 i. u) b
I V. 1' �� l� "In l `s
0O 1 .. 11 ( �,-0 10 !; , . .p 2, , 'QI ;•;>•1, � b I��i�
(n M I a # u �� 1.iirl I ,
CV W I`� !t =1.4 � E
co O ¢ ' =I T 1
00 O h�q�.�;.�1 CC1 17�.@1t':�:, . IUWII
11 i Z 3,.
zaY �, 1.m 31 .�,_Lt `:� I� I ;rl�. ,_b 1 ' ^ g1.
Ce ¢ I 4 X11v _ 11 I I G? $
Qii
( L I Q '_.1.�y1 �-0 l 6 ' I O h I �. 01 1 i 1 ..1 I P # - i1i Ir)1 / k i S2 Iga
i
O 1
Z I I '�. �) I I �� I H , I G,1.� 11 I I Iiip
1 ' I III` 1 CA •r
- _� I as.a . ,, g ( O air .°�� 1 P" 5 12 4 O j i I II r I
1Will j
✓ N Q I \\ ,'\il�_ I i I -_S (I 1 �1 I �I-~ \-------
_ =T_ -- ®I 1.I¢ � °a a
N 1 1 %� I
CC I I :\I
11 i�� Li._.)j J
Q0Lii -.. _._ . _ _ _ -- -- _.7,777::::::,77:::7717:77-17777777777.7177:77727:7-:__— --
11 CCI UJ 1
W Q1— ce 8 I 5 Z;mtm
1 y S _ ZI FIB M1SZZ.fZN - _ _ _ _ _ _—Io
x
F— o UHRLIS Omand) Mad x IiNI
W
09 «I a o
I-- NI
Y
I Q
Q
O0-
• J Q
gg
6 41z a
101
D" li 1 1 Fi
$m
LLJ
a�I� ct u�I3}QQy{{ 7u�ggt
a it Nb� le,s, giK �1( I § g � P t V yJ 91.N Y 4�
7 � 41 1411
W 8P gl I$1. g§ iW1 40 .p m
0B lw8 4 1 btr61/ fig R. gEaYs lie _ opo 4§
\404)\00000<,.../3')cd°
Z m g �� ' ° E&'i 8':t sg �a '� Z Y� s w u Z Soli. s
O �s azC �j8� z8�z � < mii peg
�"Y 16 r� ~ ` 0 �u • ary N co g
'8n
li li
4w 1
,,,,..0.-,-- (75.! 1 , xp Li ng ii-e srb sN t6 tg t 1 . V_ d M V. (C < 11.1 g
4 ...c.o, 5'I ce ig aw. Va VIM,: g 8 2 v 1 ,„, ' 4- o •0 a
() / ge .;.,% 6-Xi II. 3 le co Eg 1g '6t ikg 1 li si 11 li o.
47.----(.. 16 4E 4.-! lq18 citrg I I§ L.L.i
< :£- b-1 MR
. d tS€7I@ §V,„ 3 m b11Pag LU a 3 8 1 . O w g m 6° Z - w g3�� " g ER 1
111
w 2 a �_ -5 CO 'e1$ 'ea8 Sag 3 5 'eR 'ilia �a w I- S 'd il 2 O i > lEg i :m 4 4
Jn Oi hi§ 51113>� lo LL51:16 O O ❑a O O d < Cl) A s� 6 1; 111N c ��x � vg 1
CO Han 3, 41
CO PI
1
9
.A........r a.-,.w.....,a........, .a...a.«..ON a..-...a...w1.1...ON a....a,.NMI.1.........4,,,a w exam....r.r. ...aa......m.NINN.I 1.14.09..11.1.....N tow.... MINN, ..a NI ..
.W ,.ea,_N,...,.L ��
.119'.......1S'.119'.......1 Al .690 I...wd900 LW 'Cl ION 9NLLSIX3 6x.P'13314S-11l\Wl\0NIddVM5...D u9Pro6 qmd W-000CC9880VNNS-0NS\-N :owo0 6555.01.6
0
--
1N
T 1 6 6
1
Q .lC III Q '
V.
ae I i
:g i tt n I
, . 2-sl ' ' a a di,, ,,,,
41 iss,,,,„,,„„,___,„...s.erocz I !
em
�� f?-22 gg w w' dal II I'
g __IU
U
0 .,.,.. ill!
0 -.....,
L11 I
Si 11: I ` ,- �
W
�I, ` �. I
u k a
Q
nF
i tp_
,i : k § q LL', / , : A bg-.3 1 „ ,..,_,
r tI ,•0Y1I A16111 ELM ♦,��,, SN����,,. , \�Kl�`
I"
tp
t_ ----.11'[11 MAIL,ZN l ar [f' ,,
I
' J I
Vir
I I i ' i I z 15,
Yi-. Ie..+e •MIEeee .y. emJ
. g
00
;5z
a g 1 9
g 9
071i: 1
N Q
N I I1 I 7
a O 1 IC $
� � � SOI
e e l ♦_'L .� e e . ... 6'..1 Mb,LM1EA�, -
r U) M t j,At "N 11 1 R 1 3 v 0'
W � g.2 I rl S A � s}� IV Y\� L �i
N Q ,a Z t ; 1 , r �,,I, I .I 0
1 r - e I� i i , 1 S
Y \ �KisErLIN i'1 - LIia=01101, .° s , r.. _ '. 1 1 e. i
Z Q t, _ ,. . %!i � i O' i j ..,".. r. 1 I i..'' .11
n
iik-
CI- D a- 1 .....c,_z_.7..--_-_-_-.„----.- __ laljpgrW,
2 egg
< a. w \
It 1 i ''
Z as —L Rat Z r j
W CO > & 8 Lir
z s _2,..L.,,,...,..,....,,,:\ I '101 �,e b
ill _ a 1 R , rd iA ..2r.rt 1 1 �r,,I� s1
Ce > 1 ill I F ( t. I te, 1-ti a~ A I, � Q til i 'I
< 0 �� fl11 ., ® _� �� '� I I 4 a OI II '''
qI
' ❑ - I 4 0 Y Y
8
. II; Q
_, �.6VEI L6: Jg� I 6 II 1111 111`1 d $
_ w 1 1 II , 1
j1 1
J 1- I ELN
Q rl 1 I `Y' � I 711
Z ado [ -rt oy OrI To ,I 1 I ® ��3E j 1111�I E
H 11_ O I o
U 1 1 I ' z a,
E 0• '-1,,-,I.:1;:.
i 11:,
r \ ��I 1 A a s
\ 59 .)
�� 00
i � o o F 0 j �ct��o {1 I to�o ! �I a 8$
lig
o
a.
1 :741
I � d '�O 9 Q� Ot _\:.
I �OIy� ��1:=1,\IT:1-7,-/i
�) t
I 1,1 £ 1X1111 I.
I i -1,1,±], I , I \\� 1,111111/11'
\ cf, I
-,
1 III 1g , ' O 10 , , 1 ' O�r- »r��: 1 i I Y I GAFU Is :,--- ; Illl11[111 L P- I
W' 1 A , v N....._.,1.,,___ 1:,._:.,4
. 1_I i!P--1 -, SLI ' h I
1 °'1:.. . 11 f(
'CA ��f�l _�- 11 \�\ifl1 i.i, W
j 1
pI 11111 i
ili- H Gt
IIII ‹> �'I � 'Q ' 1 1 ' ip Q! ,v Ilo
I ��� I �L� - III 'ia;
ILsa I .i. n, �. 11
I0
—ii ' El h irel -- QR�i R if 1 Ii
1 y> I 'I rL `r te~ _ __,-----°(,--
_ , :'i
a
' L Y -__ __. - —
I '%' 1ry
-J
a
I
;. 1111 �..�......... �,
L 4
.4
.4, I
., - IiTjLc,zii± .zeaN
I (,LaRILLS Dizand) AMxd I IIPJ
r.1 I
h� :m11 �F1I
7.10 1 11
,...a.....».,N-r.uul.,L...,.....ow ..W I..wx-..N�',..i.,...pm.,I.. I.wlw I..w., ..,'...,'.'...d M..I. ow it.'w a w......mu*.VI ......'.I�.1 MOM I.IMP....'..P..,.o,I.�.I w.,.w.,..I pp....�.b,1.•••••0 MP,
� '
o66S'0I..10906%C9 .od90t LIOL'CI.oN 039OdONd 6..p133Hs-MINIAONIddYVIV61u.0 u.p.0 ymd.00N-000CC9660\AVIS-ONS\:H :'°"6u1'..0
RESOLUTION NO. PC-2018-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE
CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO.
2017-02 FOR THE SUBDIVISION OF A 9.61 ACRE DEVELOPED
LOT INTO TWO PARCELS OF 9.11 ACRES AND 0.50 ACRES AT
800 LOS ANGELES AVENUE (TARGET STORE), AND MAKING A
DETERMINATION OF EXEMPTION UNDER CEQA IN
CONNECTION THEREWITH, ON THE APPLICATION OF
MOORPARK COVENANT GROUP LLC
WHEREAS, on October 10, 2017, Moorpark Covenant Group LLC submitted an
application for Tentative Parcel Map (TPM) No. 2017-02 for the subdivision of a 9.61
acre developed lot into two parcels of 9.11 acres and 0.50 acres at 800 Los Angeles
Avenue (Target Store); and
WHEREAS, at a duly noticed public hearing on January 23, 2018, for TPM No.
2017-02, the Planning Commission considered the agenda report and any supplements
thereto and written public comments; opened the public hearing and took and
considered public testimony both for and against the proposal; closed the public hearing
and reached a decision on this matter; and
WHEREAS, the Community Development Director has determined that TPM No.
2017-02 is categorically exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Sections 15301 (Class 1: Existing Facilities) and 15315
(Class 15: Minor Land Divisions) of the CEQA Guidelines. The proposed development
is consistent with the General Plan and Zoning regulations. In addition, there is no
substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment in
that the site exists.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION: The Planning
Commission, based on its own independent analysis and judgment, concurs with the
Community Development Director's determination that the project is categorically
exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
pursuant to Sections 15301 (Class 1: Existing Facilities) and 15315 (Class 15: Minor
Land Divisions) of the CEQA Guidelines. The proposed development is consistent with
the General Plan and Zoning regulations. In addition, there is no substantial evidence
that the project will have a significant effect on the environment in that the site has
already been graded. No further environmental documentation is needed.
PC ATTACHMENT 4
11
Resolution No. PC-2018-
Page
C-208Page 2
SECTION 2. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP PERMIT FINDINGS: Based upon the
information set forth in the staff report(s), accompanying studies, and oral and written
public testimony, the Planning Commission makes the following findings:
A. The proposed map, including its design and improvements, is consistent with the
City's General Plan and Zoning Ordinance as proposed, in that the map has
been designed to comply with the requirements of the City's General Plan in
providing a new commercial parcel within existing commercial development and
it meets Zoning standards for the Commercial Planned Development (CPD)
Zone.
B. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed in that the
site has been engineered to allow for all required utilities to be brought to the site,
adequate ingress and egress exist, and the site is provided with public and
emergency services.
C. The site is physically suitable for the proposed intensity of development, in that
all City development standards, including parking, have been met by the
proposed project.
D. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements are not likely to
cause substantial environmental damage, in that the site has already been
developed.
E. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements are not likely to
cause serious public health problems, in that adequate sanitation exists.
F. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements will not conflict with
easements acquired by the public at large, for access through, or use of the
property within the proposed subdivision, in that full access to and from Los
Angeles Avenue and Miller Parkway exists.
SECTION 3. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: The Planning
Commission recommends to the City Council approval of TPM No. 2017-02 subject to
the Special and Standard Conditions of Approval included in Exhibit A (Standard and.
Special Conditions of Approval), attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.
12
Resolution No. PC-2018-
Page 3
SECTION 4. FILING OF RESOLUTION: The Community Development Director
shall cause a certified resolution to be filed in the book of original resolutions.
The action of the foregoing direction was approved by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
PASSED, AND ADOPTED this 23rd day of January, 2018.
Kipp Landis, Chair
David A. Bobardt, Community Development Director
Exhibit A— Standard and Special Conditions of Approval
13
Resolution No. PC-2018-
Page 4
EXHIBIT A
STANDARD AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
FOR TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 2017-02
STANDARD CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
The applicant shall comply with Standard Conditions of Approval for Subdivisions and
Planned Developments as adopted by City Council Resolution No. 2009-2799 (Exhibit
A), except as modified by the following Special Conditions of Approval. In the event of
conflict between a Standard and Special Condition of Approval, the Special Condition
shall apply.
SPECIAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
1. The applicant's acceptance of this permit and/or commencement of construction
and/or operations under this permit is deemed to be acceptance of all conditions
of this permit.
2. The Conditions of Approval of this permit, City of Moorpark Municipal Code and
adopted city policies at the time of the permit approval supersede all conflicting
notations, specifications, dimensions, typical sections and the like which may be
shown on plans.
3. The Final Map must include the final Conditions of Approval and a reference to
the adopted City Council resolution in a format acceptable to the Community
Development Director.
4. This subdivision expires two (2) years from the date of its approval. The
Community Development Director with the City Engineer's concurrence may, at
his/her discretion, grant up to one (1) additional one-year extension for map
recordation, if there have been no changes in the adjacent areas and if the
applicant can document that he/she has diligently worked towards Map
recordation during the initial period of time. The request for extension of this Map
must be made in writing, at least thirty calendar (30) days prior to the expiration
date of the map and must be accompanied by applicable entitlement processing
deposits.
5. All Conditions of Approval for Commercial Planned Development (CPD) No.
2001-01 and as may be amended are incorporated by reference in this approval
and shall continue to apply.
14
Resolution No. PC-2018-
Page 5
6. The Conditions of Approval of this entitlement and all provisions of the
Subdivision Map Act, City of Moorpark Municipal Code and adopted City policies
at the time of the entitlement approval, supersede all conflicting notations,
specifications, dimensions, typical sections and the like which may be shown on
said Map and/or plans or on the entitlement application. This language shall be
added as a notation to the Final Map and/or to the final plans for the planned
development.
7. Conditions of this entitlement may not be interpreted as permitting or requiring
any violation of law or any unlawful rules or regulations or orders of an authorized
governmental agency.
8. The applicant shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City and its agents,
officers and employees from any claim, action or proceeding against the City or
its agents, officers or employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul any approval
by the City or any of its agencies, departments, commissions, agents, officers, or
employees concerning the permit, which claim, action or proceeding is brought
within the time period provided by the California Code of Civil Procedure Section
1094.6 and Government Code Section 65009. The City will promptly notify the
applicant of any such claim, action or proceeding, and if the City should fail to do
so or should fail to cooperate fully in the defense, the applicant shall not
thereafter be responsible to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City or its
agents, officers and employees pursuant to this condition.
a. The City may, within its unlimited discretion, participate in the defense of
any such claim, action or proceeding, if both of the following occur:
The City bears its own attorney fees and costs; and
ii. The City defends the claim, action or proceeding in good faith.
b. The applicant shall not be required to pay or perform any settlement of
such claim, action or proceeding unless the settlement is approved by the
applicant. The applicant's obligations under this condition shall apply
regardless of whether a building permit is ultimately obtained, or final
occupancy is ultimately granted with respect to the permit.
9. If any of the conditions or limitations of this approval are held to be invalid, that
holding shall not invalidate any of the remaining conditions or limitations set forth.
10. The development must be in substantial conformance with the plans presented in
conjunction with the application for Tentative Parcel Map No. 2017-02, except
any modifications as may be required to meet specific Code standards or other
conditions stipulated herein. Any future changes to the parking layout shall
require review and approval as determined by the Community Development
Director consistent with Chapter 17.44 of the Zoning Ordinance.
15
Resolution No. PC-2018-
Page 6
11. Parking areas must be maintained in compliance with the Moorpark Municipal
Code, and surfaced with asphalt, concrete, or other surface acceptable to the.
Community Development Director, City Engineer/Public Works Director, and
must include adequate provisions for drainage, National Pollution Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) compliance, striping and appropriate wheel blocks
or curbs in parking areas adjacent to landscaped areas. All parking space
striping must be maintained to be clearly visible during the life of the
development.
12. The number of parking spaces shall be maintained consistent with Chapter 17.32
of the Zoning Ordinance.
13. The Operation and Easement Agreement between Target Corporation, Kohl's
Department Stores, Inc. and Zelman Moorpark, LLC, recorded on December 24,
2002 in the Office of the County Recorder of the County of Ventura as Document
No. 2002-0327559-00 shall continue to apply to both parcels created by
Tentative Parcel Map No. 2017-02 subject to approval by the Community
Development Director, City Engineer/Public Works Director, and City Attorney.
Engineering / Public Works
14. Prior to Final Map approval and recordation, provide drainage covenants from
adjacent property subject to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
15. Prior to Final Map approval and recordation, provide access agreements and
covenants from adjacent property subject to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
-End-
16
ITEM 9.A.
MOORPARK,CALIFORNIA
Planning Commission
of 1-25-2,61E3
ACTION: ' p r1 vvc 3�Zl2
'V�( MY)h1P Y)Ci a-hkC�Yl
2v Cnn5eYt,Slt5•
BY: -. 1 l 9 l 1 E YO 0-
MOORPARK PLANNING COMMISSION
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Honorable Planning Commission
FROM: David A. Bobardt, Community Development Director "
DATE: January 19, 2018 (PC Meeting of 1/23/2018)
SUBJECT: Consider Regular Meeting Schedule, Time and Place
BACKGROUND
Municipal Code Section 2.36.080 and Section 12.1 of Resolution No. PC-2017-623
(Rules of Procedure for Commission Meetings and Related Functions and Activities), call
for the Planning Commission to hold regular monthly or bi-monthly meetings as
determined by the Commission. As this is the first meeting of 2015, it is appropriate to set
the Planning Commission calendar for the year. Moorpark Municipal Code Section
2.36.100 deems a regular meeting to be one that is set by law, rule of the Planning
Commission, or any regularly advertised public hearing.
DISCUSSION
Planning Commission regular meetings for the past 12 years have been held the fourth
Tuesday of each month, starting at 7:00 p.m. with additional special meetings as
needed to accommodate heavier work loads, or to address Permit Streamlining Act
constraints. Staff recommends that this schedule be maintained through 2018, with no
meeting scheduled for December 25, 2018. A calendar reflecting this recommendation
is attached. The calendar also indicates the dates of regularly scheduled City Council
meetings for reference.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Approve the 2018 regular meeting schedule of the fourth Tuesday of each month
starting at 7:00 p.m. at the Moorpark City Hall Community Center, 799 Moorpark
Avenue, Moorpark, CA 93021.
ATTACHMENT:
1. Recommended Regular Planning Commission Meeting Calendar
S:\Community Development\PLANNING COMMISSION\PC Policies\agenda reports\2018120180123 pc calendar.docx 1
ARK CITY COUNCIL AND
CO
2018 MOOR REGULAR MEETING SCHEDUMEISSION
JANUARY FEBRUARY MARCH
su moi Tu, w3 I
TH F SA SU MO TU W TH F SA SU MO TU W TH F SA
4 5 6 1 2 3 1 2 3
11 12 13 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
14 15 16 17 18 19 20 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
21 22 23 24 25 26 l 27 18 19 20 21'" 22 23 24 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
28 29 30 31 25 26 27 28 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
APRIL MAY JUNE
SU
TU W TH F SA SU MO F SA SU MO TU W TH F SA
3 4 5 6 7 4 5 1 2
10 11 12 13 14 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
15 16 17 18 19 20 21 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
22 23 24 l 25 f 26 27 28 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
29 ' 27 28 29 30 31 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER
SU MO TU W TH F SA SU MO TU W TH F SA SU MO TU W TH F SA
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 3 4 1
8 9 10 11 12 13 14 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
15 16 17 18 19 20 21 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
22 23 24 25 26 27 28 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
29 30 31 1 26 27 28 29 30 31 23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30
OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER
SU MO TU W TH F SA -. SU MO TU W TH F SA SU MO TU W TH F SA
1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 1
7 8 9 10 11 12 13 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
14 15 16 17 18 19 20 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
21 22 23 24 25 26 27 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
28 29 30 31 25 26 27 28 29 30 23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31
CITY COUNCIL ` : `s PLANNING COMMISSION PARKS &REC COMMISSION
1ST&3RD Wednesdays 6:30 PM 4TH Tuesdays 7:00 PM 1ST Mondays 6:30 PM
ARTS COMMISSION LIBRARY BOARD OVERSIGHT BOARD
i 3RD Tuesdays Quarterly 6:00 PM 2ND Tuesdays 6:00 PM 3RD Tuesdays 3:30 PM(through June) I
PC ATTACHMENT 1 18
MOORPARK,Ck�IRAI O.A.
Planning Commission
of I -23-2,01 R
ACTION: ry �S
RM'(`rnr71C r rintion
BY: 1. TV Iv iron_
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
Moorpark, California October 24, 2017
A Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Moorpark was held on
October 24, 2017, in the Council Chambers of said City located at 799 Moorpark
Avenue, Moorpark, California.
1. CALL TO ORDER:
Chair Landis called the meeting to order at 7:02 p.m.
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
Commissioner Haverstock led the Pledge of Allegiance.
3. ROLL CALL:
Present: Commissioner Di Cecco, Commissioner Haverstock, Vice
Chair Hamous, and Chair Landis.
Absent: Commissioner Aquino.
Staff Present: David Bobardt, Community Development Director; Joseph
Fiss, Economic and Development Manager, Freddy A.
Carrillo, Associate Planner I; and Joyce Figueroa,
Administrative Assistant II.
4. PROCLAMATIONS, COMMENDATIONS, AND SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS:
None.
5. PUBLIC COMMENT:
None.
6. REORDERING OF, AND ADDITIONS TO, THE AGENDA:
None.
7. ANNOUNCEMENTS, FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS, AND REPORTS ON
MEETINGS/CONFERENCES ATTENDED BY THE COMMISSION:
None.
19
Minutes of the Planning Commission
Moorpark, California Page 2 October 24, 2017
8. PUBLIC HEARINGS: (next Resolution Na PC-2017-621)
A. Consider Resolution Approving Conditional Use Permit (CUP) No. 2017-
01, to Allow the Operation of a Restaurant and Outdoor Dining Area with
On-Site Service of Beer and Wine at 313 High Street, and Making a
Determination of Exemption Under CEQA in Connection Therewith, on the
Application of Marco Baldieri. Staff Recommendation: 1) Open the public
hearing, accept public testimony and close the public hearing; and 2)
Adopt Resolution No. PC-2017-621 approving Conditional Use Permit No.
2017-01 with conditions of approval and making a determination of
exemption under CEQA in connection therewith. (Staff: Freddy Carrillo)
Vice Chair Hamous announced, due to his company (NAI Capital)
representing the owner of 313 High Street and to avoid a potential conflict
of interest, he would recuse himself and left the dais at 7:04 p.m.
Mr. Carrillo gave the staff report.
A discussion followed among the Commission and staff, which focused
on: 1) Stamp Page 16, Condition 20, separating this item into two
separate conditions regarding outdoor fencing and furniture and signage;
2) Hours of operation; and 3) Concentration of uses.
Chair Landis opened the public hearing.
Marco Baldieri, applicant, discussed the project and stated the restaurant
would be a good asset to Moorpark.
In response to Chair Landis, Mr. Bobardt stated there were no additional
speaker cards or written cards for this item.
Chair Landis closed the Public Hearing.
A discussion followed among the Commissioners supporting the project.
MOTION: Commissioner Di Cecco moved and Commissioner Haverstock
seconded a motion to approve staff recommendation, including adoption of
Resolution No. PC-2017-621. The motion carried by voice vote 3-0,
Commissioner Aquino and Vice Chair Hamous absent.
The Planning Commission has final approval authority for this project.
Vice Chair Hamous returned to the dais at 7:18 p.m.
20
Minutes of the Planning Commission
Moorpark, California Page 3 October 24, 2017
B. Consider a Resolution Recommending to the City Council Approval of
Tentative Parcel Map No. 2016-01 and Industrial Planned Development
Permit No. 2017-01 for the Subdivision of an Approximately 10.0 Acre
Developed Lot into Two Parcels of 7.8 Acres and 2.2 Acres and the
Construction of a 35,330 Square-Foot Industrial Building on the Newly-
Created 2.2-Acre Parcel at 400 Science Drive, and Making a
Determination of Exemption Under CEQA in Connection Therewith, on the
Application of Nick Rini for Nearon Enterprises. Staff Recommendation:
1) Open the public hearing, accept public testimony and close the public
hearing; and 2) Adopt Resolution No. PC-2017-622 recommending to the
City Council conditional approval of Tentative Parcel Map No. 2016-01
and Industrial Planned Development Permit No. 2017-01. (Staff: Freddy
Carrillo)
Mr. Carrillo gave the staff report.
A discussion followed among the Commission and staff, which focused
on: 1) Calculation of parking requirements; 2) Would applicant be allowed
to put signage on the fin or façade; and 3) The Condition of Approval for
the enhanced landscaping remains with the project map (Tentative Parcel
Map No. 2016-01) and the property owner of the larger parcel would be
responsible for maintaining landscaping.
Chair Landis opened the public hearing.
Nick Rini, Nearon Enterprises, applicant, and Brian Poliquin, PK
Architecture, designer, thanked staff for the presentation and stated they
were available to answer any questions.
A discussion followed among the Commission and Mr. Rini and Mr.
Poliquin regarding the type of finish on the corrugated metal.
In response to Chair Landis, Mr. Bobardt stated there were no additional
speaker cards or written cards for this item.
Chair Landis closed the public hearing.
A discussion followed among the Commissioners supporting the project.
MOTION: Commissioner Haverstock moved and Commissioner Di Cecco
seconded a motion to approve staff recommendation, including adoption of
Resolution No. PC-2017-622. The motion carried by voice vote 4-0,
Commissioner Aquino absent.
The City Council has final approval authority for this project.
21
Minutes of the Planning Commission
Moorpark, California Page 4 October 24, 2017
C. Consider a Resolution Recommending Approval to the City Council of
General Plan Amendment No. 2015-02, Zone Change No. 2015-03,
Residential Planned Development No. 2015-02, Vesting Tentative Tract
Map No. 5972, and Development Agreement No. 2015-01; a Request to
Develop 95 Townhouse Condominiums and a Recreation Facility on
Approximately 8.3 acres at 4875 Spring Road and 384 Los Angeles
Avenue, and Recommending Adoption of a Mitigated Negative
Development Under CEQA in Connection Therewith; on the Application of
Spring Road LLC (Mike Ashley, Don Duncan). Staff Recommendation: 1)
Open the public hearing, accept public testimony and continue the item to
a special Planning Commission meeting at 7:00 p.m. on November 7,
2017 with the public hearing still open; 2) Continue to accept testimony at
a special Planning Commission meeting at 7:00 p.m. on November 7,
2017 and close the public hearing; and 3) Adopt Resolution No. PC-2017-
recommending to the City Council conditional approval of
Residential Planned Development No. 2015-02, General Plan Amendment
No. 2015-02, Zone Change No. 2015-03, Vesting Tentative Tract Map No.
5972, Development Agreement No. 2015-01. (Staff: Joseph Fiss)
Mr. Fiss gave the staff report.
A discussion followed among the Commission and staff, which focused
on: 1) Clerestory windows; 2) Existing block wall along the western
boundary and landscaping between the homes and block wall to provide
privacy; 3) Clarification regarding zoning on the site from Commercial
Planned Development (CPD) to Residential Planned Development (RPD-
15) and (RPD-16.5U); 4) How many units allowed per acre on high
density; 5) Stamp Page 45 will the site be raised to the proper elevation to
remove it from the flood zone; 6) Right turn only from Los Angeles Avenue
and exiting Spring Road right turn only; 7) Parking requirements; and 8)
Location of sound wall on Spring Road.
Chair Landis opened the public hearing.
Don Duncan, 02 D2 Partners, LLC, applicant and Scott Uhles, Delane
Group, Engineer, discussed the project and stated they were available to
answer any questions.
A discussion followed among the Commission Mr. Duncan and Mr. Uhles,
which focused on: 1) Walkways for residents to get to their units and
recreational areas; and 2) How many on-street guest parking spaces are
proposed.
22
Minutes of the Planning Commission
Moorpark, California Page 5 October 24, 2017
The Commission expressed concerns regarding the following:
• Pedestrian walkways and how pedestrians get to their units and
recreational areas;
• Landscaped Plans;
• How does this project meet the Arroyo;
• What happens at the edge of the Arroyo;
• Is it walled off from the Arroyo;
• If it is walled off, how do you deal with the graffiti on the back side;
• Has this project been vetted through the Fire Department;
• Paseos and landscaping;
• Appearance of the sound wall;
• What happens between the buildings or how this project presents
itself to the City is an important project for the City;
• The City Council and Planning Commission try to integrate the
affordable units so that they don't look any different or isolated. All
the affordable units dedicated on this plan are identified by their
location on the site. The majority all lean up against the Ivy Lane
project or commercial building;
• To alleviate the concern about the five feet, did applicant look at the
opportunity to have the drive aisle between the project and Ivy Lane
run straight and create a 60 foot buffer between the two projects;
• Location of trashcans on trash day and pick up procedures;
• How is someone going to exit the project and travel west on Los
Angeles Avenue; and
• Circulation of the diagram of the proposed entrance and exit to the
project.
23
Minutes of the Planning Commission
Moorpark, California Page 6 October 24, 2017
Mr. Uhles stepped forward to the lectern and addressed the Commission
stating that they are not raising the grade along Los Angeles Avenue and
Spring Road. The easement is a landscaped area and the wall would be
on the east side of the easement.
Chair Landis announced the public hearing will remain open.
MOTION: Commissioner Di Cecco moved and Vice Chair Hamous seconded a
motion to continue this item with the public hearing open to the special meeting
of November 7, 2017. The motion carried by voice vote 4-0, Commissioner
Aquino absent.
The City Council has final approval authority for this project.
9. DISCUSSION ITEMS:
A. Consider Resolution Adopting Revised Rules of Procedure for
Commission Meetings and Related Functions and Activities and
Rescinding Resolution No. PC-2008-529. Staff Recommendation: Adopt
Resolution No. PC-2017-623. (Staff: David Bobardt)
MOTION: Chair Landis moved and Commissioner Di Cecco seconded a motion
to approve staff recommendation, including adoption of Resolution No. PC-2017-
623. The motion carried by voice vote 4-0, Commissioner Aquino absent.
10. CONSENT CALENDAR:
None.
11. ADJOURNMENT:
MOTION: Chair Landis moved and Commissioner Di Cecco seconded a motion
to adjourn the meeting. The motion carried by voice vote 4-0, Commissioner Di
Aquino absent. The time was 8:31 p.m.
Kipp Landis, Chair
David A. Bobardt, Community Development Director
24
I ■ EM 10.B.
MOORPARK,CALIFORNIA
Planning Commission
of 1-23-7- 1 F;
ACTION: ( IVVu1 S- n-
prome. (trtion .
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COM SSIO, (nu_
Moorpark, California November 7, 2017
A Special Meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Moorpark was held on
November 7, 2017, in the Council Chambers of said City located at 799 Moorpark
Avenue, Moorpark, California.
1. CALL TO ORDER:
Chair Landis called the meeting to order at 7:05 p.m.
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
Commissioner Aquino led the Pledge of Allegiance.
3. ROLL CALL:
Present: Commissioner Di Cecco, Commissioner Haverstock, Vice
Chair Hamous, and Chair Landis.
Absent: Commissioner Aquino.
Staff Present: David Bobardt, Community Development Director;• and
Joyce Figueroa, Administrative Assistant II.
4. PROCLAMATIONS, COMMENDATIONS, AND SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS:
None.
5. PUBLIC COMMENT:
None.
6. REORDERING OF, AND ADDITIONS TO, THE AGENDA:
None.
7. ANNOUNCEMENTS, FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS, AND REPORTS ON
MEETINGS/CONFERENCES ATTENDED BY THE COMMISSION:
Commissioner Aquino announced that in preparation for this meeting she viewed
the October 24, 2017, regular meeting video.
25
Minutes of the Planning Commission
Moorpark, California Page 2 November 7, 2017
At this point in the meeting, Commission Haverstock arrived at 7:12 p.m.
8. PUBLIC HEARINGS: (next Resolution No. PC-2017-624)
A. Consider a Resolution Recommending Approval to the City Council of
General Plan Amendment No. 2015-02, Zone Change No. 2015-03,
Residential Planned Development No. 2015-02, Vesting Tentative Tract
Map No. 5972, and Development Agreement No. 2015-01; a Request to
Develop 95 Townhouse Condominiums and a Recreation Facility on
Approximately 8.3 acres at 4875 Spring Road and 384 Los Angeles
Avenue, and Recommending Adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration
Under CEQA in Connection Therewith; on the Application of Spring Road
LLC (Mike Ashley, Don Duncan). (continued open public hearing from
October 24, 2017) Staff Recommendation: 1) Continue to accept
testimony and close the public hearing; and 2) Adopt Resolution No. PC-
2017-624 recommending to the City Council conditional approval of
Residential Planned Development No. 2015-02, General Plan Amendment
No. 2015-02, Zone Change No. 2015-03, Vesting Tentative Tract Map No.
5972, and Development Agreement No. 2015-01. (Staff: Joseph Fiss)
Mr. Bobardt gave the staff report.
A discussion followed among the Commission and staff, which focused on
the applicant contacting the management company regarding circulation
and shared driveway on Spring Road.
Scott Uhles, Delane Engineering, Engineer, discussed the project and
stated he was available to answer any questions.
A discussion followed among the Commission and Mr. Uhles regarding: 1)
Fence and Wall Plan; how people are going to get to the Arroyo; 2)
Condition for pilasters in new sound wall and is the existing wall going to
remain or be removed; 3) Fence and Wall Details Plan shows the
monument will be 10 feet tall. The correct height is three feet. Wall plan
shows individual garden walls will be 6 feet tall. The correct height is 42"
tall; 4) Pedestrian pathways and accesses; 5) Circulation egress onto
Spring Road; 6) Negotiations with management company to propose
shared access; 7) Traffic Study; 8) Extension for the Conditional Use
Permit (CUP) for the RV storage; and 9) Was an EIR conducted on all of
the projects on Los Angeles Avenue corridor for residential projects and
does this project require an EIR.
In response to the Commission, Mr. Bobardt stated staff will have the
Fence and Wall Details Plan corrected to reflect the correct height of the
monument as 3 feet tall and the garden wall height as 42" tall.
•
26
Minutes of the Planning Commission
Moorpark, California Page 3 November 7, 2017
In response to Chair Landis, Mr. Bobardt stated there were no additional
speaker cards or written cards for this item.
Chair Landis closed the Public Hearing.
A discussion followed among the Commissioners regarding preference
that the Spring Road wall have a return and that it slightly curve; the
Community Development Director should approve the landscaping on the
sound wall; and discussed concerns regarding the conceptual landscape
plan; parking; and right turn on Los Angeles Avenue and Spring Road,
and their support of the project.
In response to the Commission, Mr. Bobardt stated staff will enhance the
condition to require a landscape screening of the sound wall.
MOTION: Commissioner Di Cecco moved and Commissioner Haverstock seconded a
motion to approve staff recommendation, with changes as proposed by the
Commission, including adoption of Resolution No. PC-2017-624. The motion carried by
unanimous voice vote.
The City Council has final approval authority for this project.
9. DISCUSSION ITEMS:
None.
10. CONSENT CALENDAR:
MOTION: Commissioner Haverstock moved and Commissioner Di Cecco seconded a
motion to approve the Consent Calendar. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote.
A. Consider Approval of the Regular Meeting Minutes of August 22, 2017.
Staff Recommendation: Approve the minutes.
11. ADJOURNMENT:
MOTION: Chair Landis moved and Commissioner Aquino seconded a motion to adjourn
the meeting. The motion carried by unanimous voice. The time was 7:43 p.m.
Kipp Landis, Chair
David A. Bobardt, Community Development Director
27