HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 1994 1102 CC REG ITEM 11H^� und) Meo .n- ,,
CT;ON:
/�
Y__
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
cf 7.(- '-� ( I I)
ITE.. "_
City of Moorpark
AGENDA REPORT
The Honorable City Council
Christine Adams, Director of Community Serviee�
October 18, 1994 (Meeting of November 2, 1994)
In December, 1993, the City Council and Moorpark Redevelopment
Agency purchased approximately 29 acres of land, which is the
property that is west of the Mission Bell Plaza (K -Mart) extending
west to Moorpark Estates, and from Los Angeles Avenue (118) to
Poindexter Avenue. The home and property owned by the Gisler
family (adjacent to the northwest corner of Chaparral Middle
School) is not part of the land owned by the City.
Approximately 15 acres next to the Mission Bell Plaza is being
planned as an additional commercial center, with a grocery store,
movie theatre complex and restaurant as possible tenants.
Approximately seven acres is being sub - divided into an affordable
housing development with an estimated 50 units being planned.
This project will be located in the north west area, next to the
existing Moorpark Estates. The remaining approximate seven acres
of land which lies adjacent to Chaparral Middle School,
immediately south of the Gisler property is where the downtown
neighborhood park will be located
The City has contracted with Harris & Associates, to serve as the
landscape architect for the preparation of the conceptual master
plan for the park. The Moorpark Redevelopment Agency (MRA) has
contracted with Cabrillo Economic Development Corporation (CEDC)
to serve as project management for the housing project. City
staff, Mr. David Volz, of Harris & Associates, and CEDC have had
several meetings to determine preliminary boundary lines between
the housing and the park, and tc insure that both projects are
complementary with one another
City staff participated in a meeting on Tuesday, September 13,
1994, and invited residents from the downtown area to attend and
provide feedback on the proposed layout of the park and the
housing. While the meeting's primary purpose was to gather
information regarding the overall project concept, staff did
receive some specific feedback on the park.
The residents present at the September 13 meeting expressed
appreciation that the park was finally going to become a reality.
11 �;
They desired passive areas for families to picnic and socialize as
well as sports fields for active play. With the exception of
security lighting, the residents were opposed to any sports field
lighting at the park.
Representatives from Moorpark Little League were also present.
Moorpark Little League is the largest youth baseball organization
in Ventura County, with over 800 youth involved. With the
addition of Carlsberg and some of the other planned development
projects now being reviewed by the City Council, the City's
population will increase, which will affect the charter that
Moorpark Little League has with National Little League. It will
be necessary for Little League to divide into two divisions within
the next five to ten years, depending on the rate of population
growth in the city. It is critical, therefore, that Moorpark
Little League identify the field requirements for their current
participation numbers, as well as those projected for the future.
The inclusion of two baseball fields at the downtown park site,
which will complement the existing fields at Chaparral Middle
School, will solve an immediate need for fields for Moorpark
Little League. If this feature is incorporated in the approved
design, the City and Little League will need to formalize the
League's participation /contribution for construction and
maintenance.
The designs prepared by the landscape architect provided for two
baseball fields, that could also be utilized by neighborhood
residents during the times when Moorpark Little League is not in
season. Moorpark Little League's regular season operates annually
from March through early July.
The City does not need to accommodate adult softball leagues at
this park. One field could be converted to softball fields in the
future if there becomes a need for more adult softball fields.
The City has worked with some of the other youth sports
organizations in the City to assist with their facility needs in
the past (such as AYSO, Moorpark Basketball Association, and Girls
Softball). To date, the City has not been able to assist Moorpark
Little League. Locating two baseball fields at the downtown park
site would benefit Moorpark Little League and help their program.
The Park and Recreation Commission first reviewed the conceptual
design of the downtown park at their meeting of October 3, 1994.
The Commission reviewed the conceptual design, that had been
already modified based on the public testimony on the park design
given at the meeting of September 13.
The design prepared by Harris & Associates reflects a "farm"
theme, to invoke the original heritage of the downtown area. The
picnic pavilion that is designed will resemble a barn and a
windmill will be a focal point at the entrance to the park. The
proposed amphitheater will resemble a raised train platform, with
00249
railroad ties used throughout the passive area of the park to
recreate the relationship of the farming community and the
railroad throughout the City's history.
The play areas will include a standard play equipment structure
for more active play, as well as a sand and water play area for
more passive and manipulative play.
Proposed off street parking in this original design was for
approximately 30 spaces.
The City has received to date over 50 letters of support from
Moorpark Little League parents for the inclusion of two baseball
fields on the park site. These letters were shared with the Parks
and Recreation Commission as part of the discussion.
Following the presentation on the conceptual design by Mr. Volz,
the Commission took public comment from the audience in
attendance. Residents from the Moorpark Estates, the existing
housing development that will be to the west of the new
residential development and park site were present to address the
Commission. The comments from those present were positively in
favor of the park and the proposed design, but overall had a
concern regarding adequate parking at the site. There was
additional concern regarding the space required for baseball
fields and the available acreage that would still be retained for
passive play and picnicking.
Representatives from Little League were also present. Little
League reiterated the need for additional fields, and expressed
that two smaller fields than those proposed would satisfy their
needs, thus creating more square feet area for passive
recreational uses. Little League also indicated financial and in-
kind support for the development of this park site.
The Commission voted to table this item to a special meeting on
October 17. Prior to that meeting, the Commissioners were to meet
at the downtown park site on Sunday, October 9, in conjunction
with their scheduled park tour, to make modifications to the park
site based on public input.
On October 9, the Parks and Recreation Commission met at the
downtown park site with some of the local neighbors and made the
following changes to the park conceptual design:
• Reduce the size of the south baseball field infield (90
ft. bases) to that of the size of the north field (60
ft. bases).
Move the north field so that the backstop would also be
near the Chaparral Middle School property fence,
enabling this field to have a 300' radius from home
plate to the outfield to accommodate adult softball.
00250
Neither field will accommodate adult or high school
baseball level teams.
• Increase open space on the west side of park.
• Retain the amphitheater design.
• Create an additional parking lot to the southwest of the
park site with approximately 30 additional spaces. This
will bring a grand total of available parking spaces at
the park to approximately 63 spaces, utilizing both the
proposed north and south parking lots.
• One soccer field which will overlap the two baseball
fields.
• Include a pedestrian path around the perimeter of the
park.
This information was forwarded to Mr. Volz who incorporated these
changes into a design for the Commission to view and to recommend
to the City Council.
The Commission reviewed the park conceptual design as presented
and took additional input from the public regarding their desires
for the park on October 17.
The only changes to the attached plan involves the amphitheater
design. The Commission was concerned about the realistic amount
of use that the proposed stage would have. After some discussion,
the Commission recommended to modify the amphitheater design,
whereby the stage platform would be covered with a structure
similar to the planned picnic shelter awning. This would allow it
to serve as an additional covered area for picnicking, although
there would be no tables in this area, and could also function as
a covered open air stage for small performances. The Commission
also recommended moving the amphitheater about 15 feet east to
open up the play area some more. There was also a recommendation
to reduce the number of picnic tables within the park by five, for
a total of 15 picnic tables throughout the park, in addition to
the primary picnic shelter which will have available seating for
50. With these changes, the Parks and Recreation Commission
voted on October 17, 1994 to recommend this park design to the
City Council for approval.
Staff has been in discussion with Ventura Pacific Capital
Group, (VPCG), the developer for the commercial site, regarding
shared parking at the commercial site for the park, and access
from the south parking lot into the commercial center. The
developer for Ventura Pacific Capital Group has expressed concern
regarding park users parking in the parking lot near the movie
theaters. VPCG is agreeable to overflow parking for the park
utilizing the parking spaces behind the proposed market. A
greenbelt and pedestrian access will be designed from the east end
00251
of Lassen to the park. VPCG will be building a wall along the
property line between the commercial development and the park,
with the only access from the commercial development being from
the end of Lassen, at the southwest corner of Chaparral School.
There will also be pedestrian access from the Moorpark Estates,
into the park along the new housing development. Vehicular access
to the second parking lot will only be possible from the proposed
road between the new housing development and the park.
Staff is recommending that the City Council accept the recommended
park design for the downtown park, as recommended by the Parks and
Recreation Commission, with the exception of the amphitheater
concept, which may be more appropriately located at Arroyo Vista
Community Park. Based on the construction cost estimates for the
downtown park site, staff estimates that by excluding the
amphitheater design in the park, there would be an estimated
$50,000 savings.
The established City policy states that forty percent (40 %) of the
in lieu park fees (developer contributions) and land lease income
for each zone shall go to the Community Zone of the Park
Improvement Fund for the construction and improvements at other
community type facilities. The other sixty percent (60 %) of the
funds from those sources is to remain in the zone in which it is
generated, for the construction and improvements of neighborhood
park facilities. It should be noted that at the City Council
meeting of May 26, 1993, the City Council took action to transfer
40% of park improvement funds from the Central Zone (downtown
area) to Arroyo Vista Community Park improvements. The original
transfer to Arroyo Vista Community Park from the Central Zone was
$946,337, which represents approximately 38% of the fund balance
in May, 1993, of $2,454,966 in the Central Zone. This was fully
spent on the Arroyo Vista Recreation Center construction. Another
$500,000 was used for the land purchase in December, 1993, leaving
an estimated balance of $1,228,885, as of June 30, 1994.
Mr. Volz has prepared a preliminary construction cost estimate,
utilizing City force account where possible, financial and in -kind
assistance from Moorpark Little League, and utilizing the Boething
Treeland Nursery lease agreement for the trees and shrubs needed
for the landscaping. The Boething lease agreement could represent
a decrease of some portion of the cost for trees and shrubs in the
preliminary construction cost estimate. Cost estimates listed in
the attached summary do not include costs for the preparation of
plans, specifications, and related documents for construction.
The City Council appropriated $1,100,000 for the downtown park
design and construction in the 1994/95 budget. $5,400 of this has
already been paid to the landscape architect for the preliminary
design phase.
Staff is in the process of soliciting proposals from selected
landscape architects, including Harris & Associates, to prepare
the plans and specifications and related documents for
00252
construction. Staff expects to present a contract to the City
Council for consideration on December 7, 1994.
That the City Council take the following action: Approve the
conceptual design for the downtown park site as recommended by the
Parks and Recreation Commission, with deletion of the
amphitheatre.
00253
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
MOORPARK DOWNTOWN PARK SIT$
Preliminary Construction Cost Budget
Grading and Utilities
Parking Areas
Sidewalks, Paths, and other Concrete Work
Restroom Building
Picnic Barn
Landscape*
a. Irrigation and Turf
b. Ground Cover 8000 SF
C. Big Trees (100) (48 "box)
d. Small Trees (120)(15 gal)
e. Shrubs (1,500)
Play Areas
Picnic Areas
Sportfield Improvements **
Theme Fencing, Drinking Fountains, Misc.
Security Lighting
North fencing
Amphitheater
SUB TOTAL
Less
Amphitheater
Trees, Shrubs
TOTAL
Plus Conceptual Design Fee
Analysis * **
GRAND TOTAL
80,000
45,000
90,000
80,000
28,000
419,000
2,000
45,000
30,000
9,000
105,000
14,000
16,000
15,000
22,000
8,000
50,000
1,058,000
and Noise and Lighting
50,000
42,000
966,000
11,400
Grand Total does not include environmental, design, preparation of
plans and specifications, and contract administration.
* Most of the trees and shrubs can be provided through Boething
Lease.
** Infield turf, and possibly dug outs or one backstop may be
provided by Little League.
* ** Noise and Lighting Analysis required only as determined by
Community Development Department initial study. Cost for
analysis represents $6,000 of the $11,400.
00254
" �!- �' ��' �= t��1�ll itltlUlliI: IG121ttt :IIGLL7x:�.1_.C�L].:_� —�.= �__..•_.r= .7.S= S`..]]
mrmmrmrmrmrrrmrt,- rrr- r-r-r• r-rr rrrrrh7
POINDOM AVENUE
ARM
0 Fkft ban hr
rew .w
X04
. rr.r
' 8" Ama HOME i
.1rw -0. PARCEL • �
•�
• wi.. •4
9WAhW
4 °0
t
WS" BELL PLAZA NIASE I
CRy of Moorpwk
;Downtown Park Site
in
nil
114
1 `
o
i
• wy.r .s,y
•Trr.�rw
. aw..
•wr
• Trlw
w
ww
own
• =•T
•BRA"I
MIDDLE
SCHOOL
wo w
uo ■ we uw.
r SAweopw
TWO
i
1
t
f
Ad pu�
C C �f ' p"p"
• VA%"
•=1.1
rw ww
AVE.
am~ fors
i Amddu
00255