HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 1994 1207 CC REG ITEM 08CAGENDA RE FORT
C = TY OF MOORPARK
TO: The Honorable City Council
4�6 �
ITEKI $• •
Kenneth C. Gilbert, Director of Public Works (k
DATE: November 21, 1994 (Council Meeting 12 -7 -94)
SUBJECT: Consider Resolution No. 94- Approving an Application
for Grant Funds Under the Environmental Enhancement and
Mitigation Program, for the Construction of the Los
Angeles Avenue / Freeway Slope Landscaping Project
A. Background
Caltrans recently completed the construction of the Route 23 -118
freeway connector project. That construction effort will not be
totally completed until Caltrans undertakes and completes the
construction of landscaping along the freeway corridor. It is
the intent of Caltrans to undertake this work as soon as funds
are available. This project was recently deferred along with
many other Caltrans projects, in order to facilitate the
construction of a great number of bridge seismic retrofit
projects.
B. Freeway Landscaping Project Design
The approved design for the freeway landscaping concentrates the
landscaping effort on the areas visible from vehicles traveling
on the freeway and the interchange streets of Collins Drive and
Princeton Avenue. This project includes only sparse landscaping
for the area under the freeway bridges on the north side of Los
Angeles Avenue.
C. Grant Application
It is the recommendation of staff that the City apply for grant
funds under the subject program in order to construct a
supplemental landscaping project which will more adequately
address the needs of the area.
eegrnt95
00034
Environmental Enhancement Grant
December 1994
Page 2
D. Project Location
The proposed landscaping project includes approximately thirty -
three acres ( 33 ac.) of vacant land on the north side of Los
Angeles Avenue, within Caltrans right -of -way located under the
Route 118 freeway bridge structures. See Exhibit A for location
and site maps.
E. Project Scope and Purpose
The project will provide for the design and construction of
irrigation and landscaping improvements in the project area.
The purpose of the project is to significantly enhance the level
of landscaping now proposed for this area by Caltrans. The
subject area is presently a "cut slope ", which is presently
denude of vegetation. The future freeway landscaping project
will provide only minimal landscaping in this area. Additional
landscaping is required to assist in the restoration of the
plant materials in this area, improve the aesthetic nature of
the immediate area and provide a degree of erosion control and
mitigation which is now lacking.
F. Grant Amount
The amount of the grant application is $90,000. This amount is
requested for construction costs only. It is recommended that
the City fund all costs for the project design, construction
contract administration and construction inspection. Said
effort will serve as the City's local matching funds.
G. Caltrans Support
The grant application includes a letter from Caltrans (see
Exhibit B) in support of the project goals.
H. Design
If the grant application is approved, the project design will be
developed by the City's consultant under the close supervision
of Caltrans. Caltrans approval of the design will be required.
eegrnt95
00035
Environmental Enhancement Grant
December 1994
Page 3
I. Maintenance
Upon completion of project construction, the improvements will
be conveyed to, and be maintained by Caltrans.
J. Schedule
If the grant is approved, it is anticipated that the design
could be completed within one hundred twenty (120) days.
Construction could then proceed as soon as the bidding process
would allow. Completion of the project could be achieved within
one year of the receipt of the approval of the grant.
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached
Resolution approving an application for grant funds for the
Environmental Enhancement and Mitigation Program for the
construction of the Los Angeles Avenue / Freeway Slope Landscaping
Project.
eegrnt95
00036
"
jTr
NE
L ........... . .......
•
LacPAT,oi
TRA ELEI
0
Z-
kp.F�
00038
/ I � �\ 71 1 Ii 2 ^•_
4'
y�Y�L
f /
1 W
1 y
•s �Z �._1 � G
\Wr
f I I
f )
1 ' / \ �• J
• rr o j' 4S. j;
i
lit
lit
iA
-- • : ::: -- mil!' -lt -- - ^l. _ S .
�
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
a3o'u^
�
Approx. O.G. along
right edge of dock—
o""/ 7n
�
�mw
-------------------
ill�ERFO
ENGINEER
CIVIL.
M, OULST
CIVIL
\
Cr
PLANS APPROVAL OATE
�
C�Of
aas'n^ ' | /rs'o^
-/'
|
'
2054_��_��
ELEVATIONw�/^N"*" ,"» "Structure p/""
m" 2 (L°") "^^"/'
UM
� .
CONN. R
..
--' --�� zoso /
� .
|
08 |
� 2. 17��_-_''_-�__'____''
/
/
,00'
22 § OLD L.A. AVE.
Structure ^p,'"""^
O /
��
TRANS DIST 07 X11 -14 -84 ; 4 :11P4
DEPARTMENT OF TF
DISTRICT 7, 120 $0. SPRING ST.
LOS ANGELES, CA 90012
4212) 807 -3d¢E
AGENCY
RTATION
Rmv DEVELOPMENT-►
805 528 8270 +# 2
ex kQa g
P2Ii WILSON, Oownwr
0
secretary or Resources ,
1416 Ninth St., Suite 1311
Sacramento, California 95814
Pub j eat: 10 VIROWKWAL EURANCEMENT & MITIGATION PROJECT
The follow' g information is provided regarding the construction of
a new Iran ortation facility, or the enhancement of an existing
trans rta 'on facility, in order to assist in the review of a
propos d E ironmental Enhancement and Mitigation Program (EEMP)
grant ro j e t ent it 1 ed : LQs AWeles Avenue / Fresymv 91026
Descri tion of related transportation project: Route 188 Fre2M
0—vervals.
Lpcati n of transportation project: State Route 188 107- VEN -18$
S
Txanspc1rtat on project construction start date 1992
1. D s Id part of the proposed environmental grant project
pzjvvithe same environmental mitigation of enhancements i
rejqui of the transportation project? (If "yes ", please
e la) No. The Route 118 / 23 freeway connector project
rslpithe construction of landscaping improvements along
th fway corridor, as as identified mitigation measure.
Th p ect proposed to be funded by the environmental grant
wo ld gnificantly augment the level of landscaping is this
ar,a improve erosion prevention and mitigation measures.
2. is'•the proposed mitigation project compatible with the
triLnsp rtation facility, or does it interfere with the
tr nep rtation facility operation or safety? (if incom-
pa ibl please explain.) The proposed project is
e at ble with the transportation facility.
3. Dols t e proposed mitigation project limit or interfere with
pl,nne or anticipated future improvements to the
tr nap rtation facility? (If it interferes, please explain.)
Not
I
i
PAGE. 002
,r :CALTRANS DIST 07 ;11 -14 -94 ; 4:12P4 ROJECI DEVELOPMENT-
805 529 8270;# 3
4. Descr be any concerns about the proposed environmental
proje t (e.g., design, safety, tree density, other EEMP
proje t previously undertaken to mitigate the impact of this
ti rtation project, etc.). This project is located
I thi the Caltrans right -of -Kay and if constructed and
efftab shed, maintenance would be assumed by Caltrans. As
discus ed with the applicant the design for this project
shoul be developed with close involvement of Caltrans and
b41 subJOct to the approval of Caltrans. The applicant has
stiated their concurrence with these requirements.
i
i
I
I
ansportat on Proj ct Lead Agent
Title sca Architect
Dated: 11_,14.94
t
S
i�