HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 1994 0629 CC ADJ ITEM 07AITEM
AGENDA REPORT
C = TY O F MOOR PARK
TO: The Honorable City Councl.l.
I
FROM: Ken Gilbert, Director of Public Works J / (G,/ �
DATE: May 23, 1994 (Council Meeting 6 -1 -94)
SUBJECT: Consider Making Certain Changes to AD84 -2
and Confirming the Assessments for ��
Fiscal Year 1994/95
OVERVIEW
q
&12
This presents for approval a Reso.i.ution making certain chaat�ert -e_
Assessment District AD84 -2 and conf firming the assessments fdir isc
Year 1994/95. Certain information in support of said propose 7t�z—
changes and proposed assessments i; attached hereto and identified
as follows:
List of Exhibits
ooWARK.
ary
Exhibit
"A " :
Assessment S u mmary
�r Cf y
-
Exhibit
"B":
Fund Activit/ Summary
A N:
Exhibit
"C":
Zone Activity Summary
Exhibit
"D ":
Preliminary Budget for FY 1994/95
—._�Q
Exhibit
"E":
Capital Improvement Project Summarygy
`0
Exhibit
"F ":
Street Light Cost. Summary
Exhibit
"G":
Engineer's Report.
Exhibit
"H":
Public Heari,,ig Not.1ce
Exhibit
'IT":
Resolution
BACKGROUND
Assessment District 84 -2 was formed in 1984 pursuant to the
provisions of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972." This
assessment district was established to allow for the funding of
street lighting and parkway /median maintenance and improvement
expenses through the levying of assessments as provided for in the
act. As set forth in the Engineer I s Report ( Exhibit "G") , there are
two types of district expenses, generally described as follows:
• those expenses determined to be of general benefit to the
community, which are spread to ill of "-he lots in the City; and,
• those expenses for the constiucti.on and maintenance of
improvements determined to bE. of benefit to the properties
within a number of identified :ones, which are spread to all of
the lots within each zone.
ed84_95.apr
Assessment District 84 -2
June 1, 1994
Page 2
The Citywide expenses are distributed to all of the properties in
the City by means of a formula designed to spread said costs on the
basis of benefit. The benefit spread formula for street lighting
identifies a number of factors (including lighting intensity,
security, people use, etc.) which are associated with benefits
derived, and then weights those factors by land use as a means to
determining benefits derived. The benefit spread formula for
Citywide landscaping distributes costs equally to all non - exempt
properties in the City.
Except for Zones 7 and 9, the zone expenses are distributed equally
between the non - exempt parcels in each zone. In that the sizes of
the lots in bones 7 and 9 vary considerably, the expenses for those
zones are spread to each nors- exempt parcel via a per acre
assessment.
The City must annually act to levy the lighting and landscape
maintenance assessments. Said .assessments have been levied each
year since the formation of the listrict.
In accordance with the requirements of the above mentioned act, the
City Council has taken a number of actions in recent months in
preparation for considering the levy of assessments for Parks
Maintenance for FY 1994/95. Those actions are summarized as
follows:
1. On January 5, 1994, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 94-
994 stating its intent to take the subject actions.
2. Also on that date, the City Council selected Dwight French and
Associates to prepare the Enajineer's Reports for AD84 -2.
3. On April 6, 1994, the City council adopted Resolution No. 94-
1026 making certain findirigs and taking certain actions
including the following:
• approving, subject to change, the Engineers' Report for
AD84 -2 for FY 1994/95;
• stating intent to make certaan changes to AD84 -2:
• setting 7:00 p.m. on May 16, 1994, as the time and date of a
Public Meeting for the purpose of allowing the public an
opportunity to meet with 'it,v staff to question and discuss
the proposed assessments;
• setting 7:00 p.m. on June 1, 1994, as the time and date of a
Public Hearing to consi.dE�- the subject actions; and
ad84_95.apr
Assessment District 84 -2
June 1, 1994
Page 3
• directing that Notice of saJ_d meetings be sent to the owners
of all affected properties, stating the amount of the
assessment levied for FY 1993/94, the amount of the proposed
increase in the assessment amount and the total amount of the
assessments proposed for FY 1994/95.
DISCUSSION
A. Tentative Assessment Summary
The amounts of the proposed assessments for AD 84 -2 for FY
1994/95 are set forth in Exhiba.t 'A'. A summary of that
information is as follows:
1. City -Wide Assessment -- Those expenses considered to be of
general benefit to the community include street lighting
expenses and landscape maintenance expenses for a number of
parkways and medians. A comparison of the annual City -wide
assessment for a single- fam'_ly lot is as follows:
Actual Proposed
Elements _ FY 1993/94 FY 1994/95
Landscape Maintenance $11.45 $16.40
Street Lighting $21.55 $20.64
Total ;33.00 $37.04
2. Zone of Benefit Assessments -- Those expenses for the
maintenance of improvements determined to be of benefit to
the properties within an identified zone, are spread to all
of the lots within that zcme A re -cap of the proposed
annual assessment for each 'on,� oi Benefit is as follows:
ad84_95.apr
Number
Zone
Tract
of Lots
1
2851
73
2
2865
622
3
3032
265
4
3274
129
5
3019;3525
217
ad84_95.apr
FY 1994/95
Total Per Lot
Assessment Assessment
4,131 56.59
59,367 95.45
846 3.20
0 0
37,338 172.06
!— FY 1993/9
To _al
Por Lot
Assessment
Assessment
'6
133.92
611
28.41
40F
5.30
1.8
93.94
34C
79.91
FY 1994/95
Total Per Lot
Assessment Assessment
4,131 56.59
59,367 95.45
846 3.20
0 0
37,338 172.06
Assessment District 84 -2
June 1, 1994
Page 4
[_ ,f'Y 1993/9, FY 1994/95
Number T� -rtal Per Lot Total Per Lot
Zone Tract of Lots Assessment Assessment Assessment Assessment
6 3306 22 t :7� 30.82 242 11.00
7 Industrial Park 92 "08, 33.55 10,581 111.46
NE of L. A. Ave & per acre
Gabbert Rd
8a City (T-4340, 497 j,22_ 20.53
T -4341 S T-4342)
693 10,223 14.75
8b Home Acres 200 ),22: 51.11 10,223 51.11
9 Condor Parkway 11 ( 0 6,000 121.92
per acre
3. New Zone -- On December 15, 1993, the City Council reviewed
an alignment study prepared for Virginia Colony Drive and
decided to leave the alignment as it now exists. As a part
of that action, the City Council directed staff to take steps
to enable the City Council to consider the creation of a new
Zone of Benefit to include the properties within the
Industrial Park located on Condor Drive. Said new Zone of
Benefit was to be established to allow for the levy of
assessments on those properties to fund the improvement and
maintenance of the unimproved. parkway located at the
northwest corner of Los Angeles Avenue and Virginia Colony
Place. As you may recall., the Conditions of Approval for the
Industrial Park required the developer to construct and
maintain landscape improvement's in this parkway and other
areas in the industrial. park complex. However, the POA
established for this area failed to provide for the proper
maintenance of these landscape improvements and the
landscaping eventually dried The Engineer's Report includes
the addition of Zone a to levy assessments for the
improvement and maintenance of thi,a area. It is recommended
that a $6,000 improvement assessment be levied for the
construction and maintenan� :e of the parkway improvements
during FY 1994/95. Please note! that, pursuant to the
provisions of the Act, the p:ropert,y in Zone 9 which is owned
by the Moorpark Unified c : -.hcol Distract is exempt from
assessments.
nd84.,_95. npr
Assessment District 84 -2
June 1, 1994
Page 5
L*M
C.
4. Per Acre Assessment -- There is a considerable variation in
the size of the industrial properties located in Zone 9. It
is recommended, therefore, that the total assessment for
Zone 9 be spread to all of the parcels in Zone 9 on a per
acre basis. It is recommended that the total assessment to
be levied on the industrial properties located within Zone 7
also be spread to the parcels in that Zone in the same
manner. A tentative listing of the assessment amounts for
the parcels in Zones 7 and '9 are listed in Exhibit 'A'.
5. Zone Activity -- A more
Activity for each Zone
SECTION D of this report.
Fund Activity
detailed description of the Fund
of Benefit is set forth below in
Attached for your information as Exhibit 'B', is a summary of
the Fund Activity for AD 84 -2 for FY 1992/93, FY 1993/94 and
FY 1994/95. The amount of the FY 1994/95 revenue identified in
Exhibit 'B' is the amount required to fund the expenditures
summarized in the Preliminary Budget attached as Exhibit 'D'.
[Exhibit 'D' is discussed in more detail below.] This revenue
requirement was the basis for determining the proposed FY
1994/95 assessments summari.ze(� in Exhibit 'A'.
Zone Activity Summary
Attached as Exhibit 'C' is a summary of the revenues and
expenditures for each Zone of Benefit over the past several
years. This exhibit shows the year -end surplus and /or deficit
for each zone, carried over to the following year. A discussion
of the Fund Activity for each Zone is as follows:
Zone l: The amount of the assessment has been reduced from
$9,776 to $4,131. This is due to a $1,944 carry over resulting
in part from an over estimate )rf FY 1993/94 expenses.
Zone 2:
• Maintenance Deficit -- '1he amount of the FY 1992/93
maintenance assessment was $50,500. Last year at this time,
it was thought that this assessment amount was too high and
that it would result in an FY 1993/94 Beginning Balance of
$9,671. Accordingly, the }Y 1993,,94 assessment was reduced
considerably to only $l; 6'? . The actual FY 1993/94
ad84_95.epr
Assessment District 84 -2
June 1, 1994
Page 6
Beginning Balance turned >ut to be only $4,609. This
combined with current year -end expenditures expected to be
more than $4,000 higher than the amount budgeted, is
anticipated to result in a year -end deficit of $9,207. This
deficit, added to the FY 1994/95 projected expenditures will
require a FY 1994/95 assessrent: of $43,882.
• Debris Basin Maintenance --- 1'he projected FY 1994/95 expenses
include an amount of $1,000 for the maintenance of the debris
basins located on the south perimeter of Tract 2865.
• Improvement Deficit -- This year the City undertook and
completed the restoration of the Tierra Rejada Slope east of
Peach Hill Road and the construction of the Sunnyslope Debris
Basin Access Road. The cost. of these two projects exceeded
the amount of the available improvements assessments by
$9,265. Pursuant to the direction of the City Council, it is
proposed that this improvement c of icit be recovered by adding
a like amount to the proposed Zone 2 assessments for FY
1994/95.
• Additional Improvement Assessment -- It is also proposed that
an additional assessment of $10 per lot ($6,220 annual total)
be levied for three years to fund the construction of parkway
improvements on the north side of Tierra Rejada Road west of
Spring Road.
Zone 3: The proposed FY 1994 !95 assessment is slightly less
than last year due to a beginning balance which was higher than
expected.
Zone 4: Last year at this time, it was thought that FY 1993/94
Beginning Balance would show a deficit of $3,685. Accordingly,
the FY 1993/94 assessment was increased to $12,118, a
considerable increase over the prior year assessment of $4,212.
The actual FY 1993/94 Beginning Balance turned out to be a
positive fund balance of $77,, This increase in available
funds, combined with the fact that current year -end expenditures
are expected to be more than $4,400 less than the amount
budgeted, will result in a year-end positive fund balance of
$8,901. In that the estimated FY L994/95 expenditures are only
$4,059, it is anticipated that there will be a FY 1994/95 year-
end balance of $4,806. Accordi 1q: fir, n,c: FY 1994/95 assessment is
proposed.
ed84_95.apr
Assessment District 84 -2
June 1, 1994
Page 7
Zone 5: Based on past year actual costs, the amount budgeted
for Zone 5 expenses in FY 1993'94 was too low. This, combined
with unanticipated irrigation water costs, has resulted in FY
1993/94 expenditures estimated to be approximately $8,000 more
than the amount budgeted. a:i addition, the anticipated FY
1993/94 Beginning Balance is approximately $1,000 less than
expected. It is anticipated that these factors will result in
a FY 1993/94 year -end deficit of $8,993. This deficit added to
the FY 1994/95 projected expenditures will require a FY 1994/95
assessment of $37,338.
Zone 6: Although the projected expenses are over $800, the
assessment amount is only $242 due to a carry over surplus from
last year.
Zone 7: FY 1993/94 expenditures are anticipated to be
approximately $3,000 more than the amount budgeted. This
combined with an anticipated F� 1993/94 Beginning Balance which
is approximately $300 less than expected, will result in a FY
1993/94 year -end deficit of $3,206. This deficit, added to the
FY 1994/95 projected expenditures will require a FY 1994/95
assessment of $10,581, a considerable increase over prior years.
Zone 8: This Zone provides for the construction and maintenance
of the Buffer Area at the west end of Tract 4341. The costs are
shared on a fifty -fifty basis between the properties in the Home
Acres area and all of the residential property in Tracts 4340,
4341 and 4342. Commercial prc,i:ez- .y his been excluded from the
boundaries of this Zone.
• Addition of Multi - Family Residential Units -- In prior years
only the single- family residential lots in Tracts 4340, 4341
and 4342 were assessed. Consistent with the original intent,
it is recommended that tYue city portion of the Zone 8
assessment be spread to all f the approved residential units
in the affected area. The ?otal number of residential units
approved for this area is a,; 1 "()alaws:
• Single Family resident: i.al........ 497
• Multi- family rE";:identi. il.......... 196
Tot- ] 693
Improvement Assessments -- It is proposed that the total
assessment remain unchanged, but that $1,200 of that
assessment be identified as a maintenance assessment. The
remainder of the improvement assessment is anticipated to
provide sufficient f u ;-I dE t,) 7onstruct the proposed
ad8495.apr
Assessment District 84 -2
June 1, 1994
Page 8
improvements. Any surplus improvement assessment will be
used to fund future maintenance costs.
• Maintenance Assessment -- 11 is proposed that a maintenance
assessment in the amount of $1,200 be levied on the
properties in this Zone for the first time. This amount is
based on an estimated maintenance and utility cost for a
three (3) month period.
Zone 9: As discussed above, an improvement assessment in the
amount of $6,000 is proposed to be levied on the properties
within the Condor Drive Industrial Park. It is proposed that
these parkway improvements be -onstriicted during FY 1994/95.
D. Preliminary Budget for FY 1994'95
Attached as Exhibit 'D' is a copy of the preliminary budget for
Parkway Lighting and La.ndscapi•xg for FY 1994/95.
1. Operations & Maintenance (O &M) - -- The budget amount proposed
for O &M for FY 1994/95 ($385,780) is $26,669 more than the
approved O &M Budget for FY .99:x/94 ($359,111). This amount
of increase is roughly comparable to the proposed increase in
the Citywide assessment shown on page 2 of Exhibit W. Said
increase in expenditures i.> the result of adding four new
landscaped parkways to the mprovements to be maintained by
AD 84 -2. Those added area= are 1:i.3ted as follows:
• Prkwy: L. A. Ave. / Millard St.
• Prkwy: L. A. Ave, / Shas�_a Ave.:
• Prkwy: Poindexter / SLer�la Ave.; and,
• Prkwy: E/S Spring Rd.„ E � Peacn Hill Rd.
2. City -wide
City -wide
listed as
• Prkwy:
• Prkwy:
• Prkwy:
• Prkwy:
• Prkwy:
• Median:
• Median:
• Prkwy:
• Prkwy:
• Median:
ed84_.95.epr
Landscape Improvements - A complete list of the
landscape improvements maintained by AD 84 -2 is
follows:
L. A. Ave. / Mi_r l,.trd St.:
L. A. Ave. / Shas-a Ave.;
Poindexter / Sierta Ave.; and,
E/S Spring Rd., S'O Peach Hill Rd.
W/S Collins NIO C,rmpus Park Dr.;
Campus Park Dr. Coa.lins to Pecan);
Campus Park Dr. Pecan t:o Jul l iard) ;
S/W Cor. Sprinq & Peach rii11;
E/S :Peach Hill N/ Monte vista Park;
Tierra Rejada Pc ;q >r 1 r.X to L. A. Ave. )
Assessment District 84 -2
June 1, 1994
Page 9
3. Street Lighting -- The cost of street lighting is included in
the utility costs shown in Exhibit 'D`. The proposed cost
for street lighting for FY ..994/95 is $190,000 (see Exhibit
'F' for details).
4. Zones of Benefit -- The cost of maintaining the landscaping
funded by Zones of Benefit are included in the total budget
set forth in Exhibit 'D'. For details regarding costs refer
to Exhibit 'C'.
PROM711"M .[. 2 -TWO 611,014 i�
During the public hearings to consider the 1993/94 assessments
for the Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District (AD 84 -2),
the City Council directed staff to identify alternatives for
performing landscaped maintenance in identified zones of
benefit. This direction was given as a result of input from a
resident within one of the zones of benefit who inquired whether
it would be feasible for the homeowners in a particular zone of
benefit to contract for their awn landscape maintenance in the
identified areas.
The specific area in question is Zone of Benefit #5, which
includes Tract 3019 and 3025, the north and south Tierra Rejada
parkways, the south slopes and the west side parkways on Peach
Hill Road. The City conditioned the original development to be
included in AD 84 -2 as a Zone >f } Benefit.
The available alternatives are
1. Vacate the maintenance easement and allow the HOA to be
responsible for the maintenance of all identified landscaped
areas. If the City wants t.o reserve the ability to retake
responsibility for maintenance, the City could include
language in the deed so that the property could revert back
to the city if the landscaping was not maintained as the City
determined appropriate (power of germination clause).
2. It would be possible to enter
with the HOA for them to be
landscaped maintenance, whereby
landscape maintenance company
insure consistency in the le -lel
ed8495,epi
into a maintenance agreement
responsible for their own
the HOA would sub - contract a
to do the actual labor. To
of maintenance, the agreement
Assessment District 84 -2
June 1, 1994
Page 10
would need to be written sim-ilar to the City's agreement with
the same standards that the City currently has in its
contract. The HOA would need to indemnify the City and
provide insurance coverage.
3. Continue as is, with the C:..ty assessing the homeowners in
that zone of benefit per th.- conditions of approval.
4. Allow the maintenance resporsi.hilit.ies to revert back to the
individual property owners.
5. Some combination of #1 and =4, above.
If the Zones of Benefit were a..lowed to withdraw from AD 84 -2,
the individual zones and the c_verall City maintenance program
would lose the benefits of economy of scale. Currently the City
requires only about 10% of one person to administer the contract
for all of the landscaped areas in AD 84 -2. The quality of
maintenance would also be more difficult to maintain. Two
slopes maintained by an HOA al.(:)ng Campus Park Drive and Spring
Road are examples of a lower level of maintenance compared to
City administered areas. Also, when there is a problem such as
a slope failure, the City administrated district has a built -in
mechanism to provide for repairs. In addition, if there is a
funding shortfall to make a major repair, the City can more
easily resolve such a situation are was the case with the slope
failure on the Tierra Rejad-i P)a(l s 1c:i,7e.
Usually, the Zones of Benefit are created as a result of a
condition of development. the primary purpose is to insure
consistent and quality mainterianc:e t:-.,o mitigate the impact of
development and insure continued maintenance to the individual
property owner, the neighborhood of the development and the
overall community. Removing :areas from the assessment district
would most likely reduce the l.evei of maintenance and negate the
desired benefits of well mairt Mi:rve d lindscape.
Staff does not recommend a Yea age from the present system.
F. Capital Improvements
Attached as Exhibit 'E' is a summary proposed capital
improvement projects funded by, AD 84- 1? .
ed84_95.epr
Assessment District 84 -2
June 1, 1994
Page 11
1. FY 1993/94: Proposed year. -o:Md capital project expenditures
are listed on page 1 of Exh..bi� 'F'.
a. City -wide Capital Construction. The projects to be
constructed in FY 1993/94 are _listed as follows:
• L. A. Ave. / Millard ;t.!
• L. A. Ave. / Shasta Aae.
• Poindexter / Sierra A, ,,e.; and,
• Spring Rd / Peach Hal RA.
b. Design: In addition, design costs for future projects are
included in the year -end anticipated expenditures.
c. Total City -wide Capital Improvement Costs: The total
year -end City -wide capital improvement costs are
anticipated to be $57,45( . "his leaves an estimated year-
end capital project canr,/ over Df $46,365.
d. Zone of Benefit Capital .improvement Costs: Also recapped
here are the total Zone s:apital improvements costs for FY
1993/94, amounting to
e. Total Capital Improvement Costs: The total year -end
capital improvement cost;; fir AD 84 -2 is estimated to be
$125,355 (57,450 + 67, `)(' `) .
f. Remaining Budgeted Funds The total amount budgeted for
Citywide capital improvements was $103,815. As stated
above anticipated year -end expenses are $57,450, leaving
a balance of $46,365 to -airy (,ver to next fiscal year.
2. FY 1994/95: Proposed capital project expenditures for next
year are listed on page 2 , :t Exhibit 'E'.
a. City -wide Capital Construction Projects: The projects
proposed to be constructed next year are listed as
follows:
• Medians:
Princeton
Aae.
$40,000
• Parkway:
Princeton
iNie.
$37,000
• Parkway:
S/S Campus
.)rive E/O Princeton;
$30,000
• Parkway:
E/S Peach
1IL11 SIO Mesa Verde;
$35,000
• Parkway:
S/S L. A.
,, re .: E,'O T. R. Rd.
$20,000 **
$162,000
Note: * *
This project
i. part.ally *unded by a prior Griffin
Homes deposit.
ade4_95_apr
Assessment District 84 -2
June 1, 1994
Page 12
b. Total City -wide Capital Improvement Costs: The total
recommended FY 1994/95 Budget for the above listed Capital
improvement projects is $162,000. The funding for this
level of effort is as fo.lows:
• Prior Year Carry Over $46,365
• Prior Year Capital Project Set Aside $97,576
• Other Remaining Maintenance Surplus $18,224
$162,165
c. Deferred Projects: The following projects are recommended
to be deferred due to lack of funding:
• Parkway: Campus Park Drive, W/O Princeton Ave.;
• Parkway: Peach Hill E/O Mesa Verde;
• Parkway: W/S Spring, S/O Peach Hill Rd.; and,
• Parkway: W/S Tierra Rejada Rd, S/O L. A. Ave.
d. Zone of Benefit Capital Improvement Costs: Also recapped
here is the proposed construction of the Home Ares Buffer
Area (Zone 8) for an estimated amount of $54,135. Any
surplus improvement assessments will be used to fund
future maintenance costs
e. Zone of Benefit Capital Carry Overs: The Zone 2
improvement assessment of $6,220 for future parkway
improvements to the south side of Tierra Rejada Road will
be carried over and combined with future improvement
assessments to fund theso future improvements.
_ • - - • -
The above described expenditure information was provided to the
Assessment Engineer to be used as the basis for the preparation
of the attached Engineer's Report (Exhibit 'G'). Said report
sets for the proposed amount of the assessment for FY 1994/95
for various land use categories, along with an explanation of
the Benefit Assessment Formula and other related information.
H. Public Hearing
1. The "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" (Streets and
Highways Code) requires a public hearing to be held prior to
the annual levy of assessments for the purpose of receiving
input and to hear any protests to the proposed assessments.
M8a_95.apr
Assessment District 84 -2
June 1, 1994
Page 13
2. If the amount of the assessments are to remain the same, the
law does not require a Notice of public hearing to be mailed
to each property being assessed. However, consistent with
past practice, it is recommended that such a notice be mailed
to the owners of all of the affected properties.
3. Notwithstanding the above mentioned policy, State law
requires that prior to considering any new or increased
assesFment, a public hearing notice must be mailed to the
owners of the properties to be assessed. Said notice shall
state the amount of the existing assessment, the amount of
the proposed assessment and the amount of the proposed
increase in the assessment. The amount of the approved
estimated assessment MAY NO`I EXCEED the amounts stated in the
notice. Said notice must be mailed at least forty -five (45)
days prior to the date of the hearing. In order to meet this
deadline, said. Notices were postmarked and mailed prior to
April 15, 1994.
4. State law also requires that prior to considering any new or
increased assessment a Public Meet -ling shall be convened to
allow the public an opportunity to discuss the proposed
increased assessment. Such `1 meeting was convened on Monday,
May 16, 1994, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers. This
informal meeting was conducted by staff for the purpose of
providing answers to quest-ions. regarding projected program
costs and the methods use�-0 t-) spread those costs to the
properties assessed. Only i few people were in attendance.
Staff responded to the isked.
5. Attached as Exhibit 'H'
Notice for AD84 -2.
I. Deferred Action
i � copy of the Public Hearing
The attached resolution ( Exhibit "I ") making certain changes to
Assessment District AD84 -2 and confirming the assessments for
Fiscal Year 1.994/95 must be adopted no later than June 30, 1994,
in order for the assessments t.-) be levied. In prior years the
City Council has adopted such °esolut ons concurrently with the
adoption of the budget.
ed84_95.epr
Assessment District 84 -2
June 1, 1994
Page 14
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council, open the public hearing,
receive testimony and continue those matters to the date of the
Budget Workshops.
Subsequent to the budget workshop meetings, but no later than June
30, 1994, staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached
Resolution No. 94- _ (Exhibit "I ") making certain changes to
AD84 -2 and confirming the assessme ?,ts for Fiscal Year 1994/95.
eA84_95 -pz
EXHIBIT "A" (pace 1)
Fiscal Year 1994/95
AD 84 -2 ASSESSMENT SUMMARY
--------------------
--------------------
FY 42/93 FY 93/94
Description Actual Budqet
TOTAL ANNUAL EXPENSES 6 �!, "'63 533,912
LESS TOTAL ANTICIPATED ZONE EXPENSES Rt >u,149) (84,057)
LESS TOTAL ANTICIPATED CITY -WIDE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENST 22:,455) (156,455)
PLUS PROPOSED CITYWIDE IMPROVEMNET ASSESSMENTS C p
LESS RESERVES !7',845) 0
NET CITY WIDE COSTS 30(' ,314 293,400
TOTAL CITY -WIDE ASSESSMENTS 30(.314 293,400
TOTAL ASSESSMENT FOR ALL ZONES :28,806 82,520
TOTAL ASSESSMENTS 42-1,120 375,920
FY 94/95
Proposed
630,815
(144,590)
(162,000)
0
0
324,225
324,225
138,950
463,175
31- Mar -94
EXHIBIT "A" (page 2)
Fiscal Year 1994/95
AD 84 -2 ASSESSMENT SUMMARY
ASSESSMENT SUMMARY
Description
Citywide Assessment
------------- - - - - --
Zone Assessments
--------------------
No. $ of Lots
- - - -- ------ - - - - --
1 73
2 622
3 265
4 129
5 217
6 22
7 92
8
(City) 498
693
(Home Acres 200
9 11
FY 1993'94
r.
SF Res
Assmnt($) Tota
33.00 293 100
Per Lot
Total
Assmnt($)
kssmn' $'
133.92
9 ,6
28.41
1
5.30
1 ?5
93.94
12 .8
79.91
17 t0
30.82
3
33.55
10,581
20 s5
r
20.53
51.11
N/A N!
18- May -91
FY 1994/95
C D
SF Res
Assmnt($) Total ($) Notes
37.04 324,225 A/B : C/D
C = (AXD) / B
Per Lot
Total
Assmnt($)
----- - - - - --
Assmnt ($ )
---- - - - -
56.59
--
4,131
95.45
59,367
3.20
846
0.00
0
172.06
37,338
11.00
242
**
10,581
20,445
14.75
51.11
* 6,000
Total All Zones 82 138,950
** See per parcel Acreage Assesment on :;Qe 4 b 7.
EXHIBIT "A" (page 3)
Fiscal Year 1994/95
AD 84 -2 ASSESSMENT SUMMARY
Summary of Acreage Assessments
Total Total
Zone Assessment Acres
Per Acre Total
Assessment A a Acres Assessment
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
U -0- 061 -01,
1.680
187.26
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
.1 -0- 061-02ti
1.160
129.30
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
l -O- 061 -03`>
1.160
129.30
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
1-0- 061 -04`'
1.160
129.30
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
1 -0- 061 -05�
1.160
129.30
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
1 -��- 061 -06��
1.130
125.95
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46.1
-��- 061 -U75
1.060
118.15
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
1 -F)- 061 -08`
1.060
118.15
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
1 -)- 061 -1flC;
1.060
118.15
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
1- 0- 1)61-14`
1.170
130.41
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
1 -0- 061 -155
2.130
237.42
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
i -0- 062 -064
1.170
130.41
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
1- U-i)62 -0`r
1.270
141.56
7
10,581.00
94.93
11.1.46
1- 0-062 -16"
2.750
306.53
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
1 -0- 062 -17.`.
2.830
315.44
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
1-0- 062 -2h,
2.940
327.71
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
1 -0- 062 -23`-
1.227
136.77
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
ll -C- 062 -245
3.072
342.42
7
10,581.00
94.93
11.1.46
]-0-062 -25�
5.000
557.32
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
; -0- 062 -26 -:;
0.547
60.97
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
1..1
-0- 062 -27'a
1.100
122.61
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
`_,1-
0- G62 -'28`
1.080
120.38
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
0- G62 -29'>
1.260
140.45
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
-0-062-sOli
1.330
148.25
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
G
; -0- 062 -.�11
1.150
128.18
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
..- 0-062 -:'S4'
3.080
343.31
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
F:.-
0- 062 -3'?!
3.930
438.06
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
5.
-0-062 -381
2.020
225.16
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
5.
- 0- 0 "70 -C1:3(
2.530
282.01
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
5
-0 -0 10-(.14(
5.180
577.39
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
5
-0- 070 -4`,i(
3.300
367.83
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
5
- 0 -0'10-488
2.550
284.23
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
0.500
55.73
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
0.490
54.62
7
10,581.00
94.93
11;.46
5
- 00''0 -51C
0.490
54.62
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
0.520
57.96
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
5,
0- '.) "'0 -530
0.950
105.89
7
10, 581.00
94.93
111.46
0 --) 4;}
0. 710
79.14
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
;:
)- i ";0 -> 5
1.670
186.15
7
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
;l
0.860
95.86
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
I- );) -(,'';
0.339
37.79
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
.1
0.239
1.6.64
7
10,581.00
)4.93
111.45
1
�� -! ) �� °a r!1
0.239
26.64
10,581.00
a4.9�
ll1.4e
- "') -t ��°
1.1_00
122.61
Remarks
31-Mar -94
EXHIBIT "A" (page 4)
Fiscal Year 1994/95
AD 84 -2 ASSESSMENT SUMMARY
Summary of Acreage Assessments
Total Total
Zone Assessment Acres
---- - - - - -- --- - - - - --
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
10,581.00
10,581.00
10,581.00
10,581.00
10,581.00
10,581.00
10,581.00
10,581.00
10,581.00
10,581.00
10,581.00
10,581.00
10,581.00
10,581.00
10,581.00
10,581.00
10,581.00
10,581.00
10,581.00
10,581.00
10,581.00
10,581.00
10,581.00
10,581.00
10,581.00
10,581.00
10,581.00
10,581.00
10,581.00
10,581.00
10,581.00
10,581.00
10,581.00
10,581.00
10,581.00
10,581.00
10,581.00
10,581.00
10,581.00
10,581.00
10,581.00
10,581.00
10,581.00
94.93
94.93
94.93
94.93
94.93
94.93
94.93
94.93
94.93
94.93
94.93
94.93
94.93
94.93
94.93
94.93
94.93
94.93
94.93
94.93
94.93
94.93
94.93
94.93
94.93
94.93
94.93
94.93
94.93
94.93
94.93
94.93
°4.93
94.93
94.93
94.93
94.93
94.93
94.93
94.93
91.93
94.93
9 ".93
Per Acre
Assessment
A P
111.46
51
-0 -0'0 -615
111.46
51
- 0 -0''0 -625.
111.46
51
-0 -0`'0 -635.
111.46
5.
-0 -070 -645
111.46
5..
-0- 070 -655
111.46
51.
-0- 070 -665
111.46
51.1
-0- 070 -675
111.46
51,
0- 070 -685
111.46
51,-•0-
070 -695
111.46
51.-0-
070 -''05
111.46
51
-0- 070 -715
111.46
5L-0-070-"80
111.46
5L
-0- 151 -065
111.46
51
-0- 151 -(i7',
111.46
51.1
-0 -15 -085
111.46
;11
11-15: -095,
111.46
li
0 -15 -7.05
111.46
X1.1
�J -:i51 -115
111.46
;l.i
J -:L 5:i -145
111.46
x:11
)- ].51-135
111.46
111.46
=:11.
!)-151 -1�5
111.46
511
)- 161
111.46
511
)- 161 -015
111.46
l i
)- 161 -055
111.46
5i.:i
1- 161 -0i,5
111.46
11
1- 161-045
111.46
511 -
� -161 -0': +5
111.46
511
- 161-10
111.46
5.1-
- 161-1:':
111.46
511-
- 16.1- :1.;:5
111.46
] 1
- 161- 1:.'::
111.46
111.46
111.46
5:.1
- 161 1 ",
111.46
111.46
195
111.46
51i
-161- 2(;':,
111.46
111.46
111.46
!: _ x
:6 --21; .
111.46
Acres
0.800
1.169
0.610
0.339
0.530
0.469
0.469
0.469
0.469
0.469
0.480
0.839
0.510
0.180
0.600
0.700
0.580
0.680
0.550
0.650
0.200
0.550
0.412
0.464
0.324
0.292
0.329
0.295
0.274
0.261
0.292
0.534
0.580
0.387
0.287
0.287
0.287
0.414
0.492
0.440
1.240
0.687
i). 704
Total
Assessment
89.17
130.30
67.99
37.79
59.08
52.28
52.28
52.28
52.28
52.28
53.50
93.52
56.85
20.06
66.88
78.03
64.65
75.80
61.31
72.45
22.29
61.31
45.92
51.72
36.11
32.55
36.67
32.88
30.54
29.09
32.55
59.52
64.65
43.14
31.99
31.99
31.99
46.15
54.84
49.04
138.22
7x.58
78.47
Remarks
31- Mar -94
EXHIBIT "A" (page 5)
Fiscal Year 1994/95
AD 84 -2 ASSESSMENT SUMMARY
Summary of Acreage Assessments
Remarks
31- Mar -94
Total
Total
Per Acre
Total
Zone
Assessment
Acres
Assessment
---- - - - -
A P j
Acres
Assessment
7
10,581.00
94.93
--
111.46
-
51
-- _ _ - -- - --
-0-1.)2-051
-- -
- -- -
37.90
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
51
- 0 -1n2 -W
0.530
59.08
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
5.l
-0- 11:72 -07'
0.330
36.78
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
51
-0 --h 2 -08t
0.440
49.04
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
5.
0 lr2 -pa'
0.340
---
37.90
Z,�
- - - - --
94.927
---- - - - - --
10,581.00
9
6,000.00
49.21
121.92
51
-0- 060 -035
1.000
121.92
9
6,000.00
49.21
121.92
51
-0- 060 -075
11.780
1436.18
9
6,000.00
49.21
121.92
51
-0 -060 -085
0.000
Exempt
9
6,000.00
49.21
121.92
51
-0- 060 -095
3.860
470.60
9
6,000.00
49.21
121.92
51
-0 -060 -125
1.020
124.35
9
9
Exempt
Exempt
--
--
0
51
-0 -060 -135
0.000
Exempt
9
Exempt
--
0
51..
-0- 060 -.45
0.000
Exempt
9
6,000.00
49.21
0
121.92
51
1:
0- 060 -.55
0.000
Exempt
9
6,000.00
49.21
121.92
:
,)- .i60 -]7',
Fi - ^i60 -185
1.860
1.360
226.76
9
6,000.00
49.21
121.92
1:
- 6i -4`
4.980
165.81
607.14
9
9
6,000.00
49.21
121.92
60 -i5
5.380
655.91
9
6,000.00
49.21
121.92
16.080
1960.42
6,000.00
49.21
121.92
1:
i- 55t1 -?,
0.889
108.38
9
6,000.00
49.21
121.92
1
- +6i -:'?'
1.005
--- - -
122.53
:011
ta,
- - --
49.214
---- - - - - --
6,000.00
Remarks
31- Mar -94
EXHIBIT "B" AD 84 -2
Fund 23 Activity
03/31/94
- -- _-
FY 1993/94
FY 1994/95
Description
FY
1991/92
f
?2;93
- -------------
Budget
- - - - --
Proj Actual
Proposed
Budget Notes:
BEGINNING BALANCE
264,973
1'5
, 362.
315,362
178,831
TRANSFERS IN
0
0
0
REVENUE
332,679
44
<,1t)4
35 ",006
354,413
463,175
AVAILABLE FUNDS
597,652
7
349
;;,368=
= == 669,775
== 642,006
EXPENSES
Personnel
18,250
721
18,346
20,000
22,900
0 & M
323,217
3,
,031
359,111
345,589
385,780
Capital Improvements
0
4
235
15x),445
125,355
222,135
Less TOTAL EXPENSES
341,467
384,
98"
53; 902
490,944
630,815
YEAR END BALANCE
256,185
31
- - --
16. :,
---------
138,466
----- - - - - --
178,831
-------------------------------------
11,191
LESS SET ASIDES:
Reserved for Buffer Impr. (Zone 8)
Future Capital Improvements
2(
4450
40,890)
(34,890)
Unexpendid Budgeted Capital Projects
97,576)
(97,576)
Reserved Zone 2 Impr. Assmnt (N /S T. R.
Rd. Prkway)
(46,365)
Surplus Zone 4 Maintenance Assessment
(6,220)
(4,806)
YEAR END AVAILABLE FUNDS
294
17
0
165
EXHIBIT "C ": Zone Activity
Page 1
>0, 00
'Y
17,671
03/31/94
Maint Asmt:
43,882
Budgeted Expenditures
1993/94
36, 40
FY 1994/95
Description
1991/92 1911,
9:
Budget Proj
Actual
Proposed Budget FY 1994/95 Assessment
ZONE 1: Tract 2851: Bambi / Benwood /
-----------------------------------------------------------
Flood Control Channe
31,487
34,675
Maintenance
------------------------------
(14,360)
4 '�9
------------------------------
(9,207)
---- - - - -0-
Prior Year Carry Over
Plus Assessments
0
Improvements
(1,819)
1,944
6,773
--- -_ -- __.
18t>
_ -__
9,'76
9,776
4,131 >>>>>>>>>>> 4,131
,
Budgeted Expenditures
6,773
460
9,565
7,957
6,075
Less Actual Expenditures
5,498
- - - - - - --
279
9,565
6,013
6,075
Zone 1 Balance
__.
1,275 !1
... - --
ii9l
--- - - - - -------------
U
1,944
---- - - - - --
0
ZONE 2: Tract 2865: E/S Peach Hill Rd, N/0 T R Rd ** NIS I Rd Parkway ** S/S T R Rd Slopes ** Christain Barrett 6 Spring
Maintenance
-----------------------------------------------------
------------------------------
Prior Year Carry Over 0 (14, 601 9,i,71 4,609 (9,207)
Plus Assessments 32 419
>0, 00
- ,t�71
17,671
43,882
Maint Asmt:
43,882
Budgeted Expenditures
32,419
36, 40
Z7,J42
22,280
34,675
Less Actual Expenditures
46,779
1 1
'7,.42
31,487
34,675
Zone 2 Maint. Balance
(14,360)
4 '�9
t�
(9,207)
---- - - - -0-
Improvements
------------------------ - - - - --
* Prior Yr.
Prior Year Carry Over
52 ,640
F 2, MO
52,040
52,640
(9,265)
deficit >>
9,265
Plus Assessments
0
)
0
0
15,485
* S/S T. R. Rd
Budgeted Expenditures
Less Actual Expenditures
52,640
52,E +)
-----------
52,,10
52,640
--- - - - - --
6,220
Prkwy $10 /lot
for 4 Years
S/S T. R. Rd Parkway
>>>>>>>
6,220
Peach Hill Slope
Sunnyslope Debris Basin
0
0
sl,u�)0
32,077
0
-----------
Impr Asmnt:
15,485
;'l n.0
29,828
p
Zone 2 Improv. Balance
--- - - - - --
52,640
- - - ---
5��
__.. -- -----------
3
- --
---- - - - - --
Total >>>
59,367
(9,265)
6,22.0
ZONE 3: Tract 3032: Buttercreek
Entry ** Peppermill Park4a,,
Maintenance
------------------------------
--------------------------------------
--- -----
- - - - --
Prior Year Carry Over
0
Plus Assessments
2,978
41`
1,436
1,009
,
i,4.5
1,405
846
>>>>>>>>>>>
846
Budgeted Expenditures
2 9 -8
-
- -- 1.855_
Less Actual Expenditures
G
2,02
34
2,841
1,855
1,832
1,855
?one 3 Maint. Balance
�-
- ---. -
__ -- 1 111
-- 1111 11 11--
1111 --
009
0
EXHIBIT "C ": Zone Activity 03 /31/94
Page 2 'Y 19931/94 FY 1994/95
FY --------------- - - - - -- Proposed
Description 1991/92 191 -2/93 Budget Proj Actual Budget FY 1994/95 Assessment
ZONE 4: Tract 3274: Williams Ranch Rd Barrier ** N/S arkwnrs ** S'S �irkway
Maintenance
Prior Year Carry Over
0
44�,
685)
774
Plus Assessments
5,930
212
118
12,118
Budgeted Expenditures
5,930
- _
h5
r - - -- -----
433
- - - - --
12,892
Less Actual Expenditures
3,485
88
f 433
3,991
Zone 4 Maint. Balance
- - --
2,445
- _ -
'7,
- - -- ----- -----
0
- - - - --
8,901
8,901
0 »»» »»>
8,901
4,095
4,806
0
ZONE 5: Tracts 3019 & 3025: N/S T R Rd Parkways ** S/5 Slcr.es ** W/S Peach Hill Parkway
-------- - - - - -- -..-- ------------------------------------------------------------
Maintenance
------------------------------
Prior Year Carry Over 0 (14 487) 2,783 1,670 (8,993)
Plus Assessments 24,355 40 73? 17,340 17,340 37,338 >>>>>>>>>>> 37,338
Budgeted Expenditures
---- - - - - --
24,355 2t 250 20,123
----- - - - - --
19,010
---- - - - - --
28,345
Less Actual Expenditures
38,842 24 `8C 20,:23
- - --
28,003
28,345
Zone 5 Maint. Balance
-- -_ - _ ._..-
(14,487) -7( o
----- - - - - --
(8,993)
---- - - - --
0
ZONE 6: Tract 3306: West end of Inglewood (Glenhaven)
--------- - - - - -- - . ------- - - - - --
-----------------------------
-----------
Maintenance
------------------------ - - - - --
Prior Year Carry Over
0
-5
88
722
593
Plus Assessments
1,452
--- -- - --
-9
- - -- _
,78
678
242 >>>>>>>>>>> 242
Budgeted Expenditures g P
1,452
1 54
- --
66
----- - - - - --
1,400
835
Less Actual Expenditures
777
32
66
807
835
Zone 6 Maint. Balance
----- - - - - --
593
----------
0
ZONE 7: N/S of L A Ave E/0 Gabbert
(West America)
Maintenance
.._..----------------------------------
------------------
------------------------------
Prior Year Carry Over
0
0
-,,�'8
942
(3,206)
Plus Assessments
;20
--- ---LO-
1 17
. - -� -.
87
--'-'
3,087
10,581 » » » » > » 10,81
Budgeted Expenditures
;.7-
-- -- -----
!;;5
- - - ---
4,029
7,315
Less Actual Expenditures
0
5
7,235
7,375
:.one 7 Maint. Balance
- - - --
X20
- - -. _
- -- -----
0
-/ - - --
f3,206)
---- - - - - --
0
EXHIBIT "C ": Zone Activity
Page 3
03/31/94
FY
FY
1993/94
FY 1994/95
Description
----------
1991/92
FY
�92 9
- - -
Bridget
- - -- -- - - - - --
Proj Actual
Proposed
Budqet
FY
- -----
ZONE 8: Home Acres Buffer Area
__ _ _
_ ___
__-
1994/95
Assessment
--------------------
Maintenance
------------------------------
__._ ---
- -...- ---------------
- --
________ ___________
----------------
Prior Year Carry Over
Plus Assessments
0
1,200
Mnt. Asmt:
1,200
Budgeted Expenditures
-- -- - - - - --
Less Actual Expenditures
1,200
1,200
Zone 8 Maint. Balance
---- - - - - --
0
Improvements
Prior Year Carry Over
Plus Assessments
20,445
20,445
34,890
0
-- - - - - -�
445
20,445
20,445
19,245
Impr Asmnt:
19,245
Budgeted Expenditures
- '--- °----
----------
Less Actual Expenditures
445
4i1 890
40,890
54,135
-----
Total:
- -----
20,445
0
6,000
54,135
Zone 8 Improv. Balance
---- -------
0
2 44+..
390
34,890
ONE 9: Condor Drive / L A Ave Parkway
----------
- -
Maintenance
------------------
-----------------------------
Prior Year Carry Over
Plus Assessments
0
Budgeted Expenditures
----
0 >>>>>>>>>>>
- - - - --
0
Less Actual Expenditures
0
Zone 9 Maint. Balance
----
- - - - --
Improvements
-----------------------------
0
Prior Year Carry Over
Plus Assessments
0
Budgeted Expenditures
----
6,000 >>>>>>>>>>>
- - - - --
6,000
Less Actual Expenditures
6,000
_____
Total:
6,000
6,000
Zone 9 Improv. Balance
----
- - - - --
0
TOTAL
FY 1994.9` ix.�e�ses 144,590
.. 194 9 .�o ^e �sessnents ....
138,950
EXHIBIT "D"
AD84 -2 Budget
Department 143 Budget Summary
SALARIES & BENEFITS
MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS
623 Supplies
624 Postage
626 Printing
629 Special Supplies
637 Travel & Milage
638 Uniforms
641 Professional Services
642 Contractual Services
648 Insurance
651 Equip Maint
652 Utilities
654 Vehicle Maint
655 Fuel
656 Lubricants
657 Small Tools
658 Maint & Repair
661 Equip Rental
M &O Total
903 Capital Projects
TOTAL
FY 91/92 FY 92,93
.,ctual Actual
18,248 16,7 1-8
1,226 1,617
0 )
0 495
0
0
2,958 3,26
93,939 100,W-
0
0
215,284 213,931
70 260
1,579 2,109
0
0
3,522 1,166
0 324
318,578 324,031
49,235
336,326 389,994
31- tsar -94
'.'Y :+93194
FY 94/95
----- ------------
- - - - --
Proposed
Budget
Proj Actual
1,
Budget Remarks:
8 34'
I
20,000
22,900
i
400
550
I
2,30`
2,025
2,100
I�
- --
0 '
0
I
0
0
C
0 I
0
0
0
5,500
I
3,480
5,6251
2� "'14
116,746
I
133,126
0
I
0
0
0
2 ,137
221,480 I
2401465
200
135 I
150
30
189 i
'I
264
0
0
0
0 l
1,5o
92.
I
7
1, 50
it
0o
342 (
1,750
31,9 11.
345,589
385,780
�I
1;6 4�5
125,355
222,135!
5 3 141
190,944
630,815 d
i
i,
EXHIBIT "E" (Page 1)
AD84 -2 Budget
Department 143 Budget Summary
Capital Improvements
------------------------------
Acc.
Oriqlnal
Less Est.
Balance
No.
Description
#
FY 9394
Year End
FY93/94
Allocated
Budget
Expenses
Adjustments
Funds
Prkwy: Millard /Los Angeles Ave
1
Prkwy: Shasta /Los Angeles Ave
404
A i,(C
:00
L A AOC
(17,500)
0
2
Prkwy: Poindexter @ Sierra
405
3
Prkwy: W/S Spring S/O Pch Hill
903
22,000
1
0
3
j
0
4
Prkwy: E/S Spring S/0 Pch Hill
409
2700
Prkwy: EIS Pch Hill S/0 Mesa Verd
412
27,000
0
0
6
Prkwy: Pch Hill E/0 Mesa Verde
411
0
0
15,050 !
15,050
0
2,450
2,450
0
7
Prkwy: S/S L. A. E/0 Tierra Rejad
408
?'sl5
8
Prkwy Mod: T. R. S/0 L. A. Ave
402
��
7,315
9
Prkwy: Princeton
47
0
..6
5,)'0
3,000
p
12,000
10
Median: Princeton
��
11
Prkwy: S/S Cmps Prk E/0 Princeton
??
0
3,000
{
12,000
12
Prkwy: N/S & S/S C. P. W/0 Prncto
??
3
0
Unallocated
1
0
13
Prkwy: N/S T. R. Pch Hill to Sprn
413
--
High Street Landscaping
414
0
0
Sub -Total Citywide Assessments
103,81.)
- - - - --
---- ---- --
-
- --
57,450
0
46,365
Plus Zone Capital Expenses
Zone 2 [32,077 + 29,828 = 61,905] ............ .........
Zone 8 [Design Only] ..............
......
............
61,905
...........
... ............
6,000
Total Capital Expenditures
125,355
EXHIBIT "E" (Page 2)
AD84 -2 Budget
Department 143 Budget Summary
Capital Improvements
Total
Proposed
L(
LESS
___ ---- - -'' -'
Acc.
Project
,s
:)r :r
Balance
Total
----------------
Inter
- - - - --
FY 93/94
TOTAL
ADDITIONAL
No.
Description
Cost
Estimate
reae ~s'
Expe;,se�
Project
Expenses
FY 94/95
Project
Carry
FY 1993/94
-- -- --------------- - -
- - --
Budget
Transfer
Over
ASSESSMENT
Prkwy: Millard /Los Angeles Ave
1
Prkwy: Shasta /Los Angeles Ave
404
LA AOC
0
0 I
0
LA ADC
0
0
0
2
Prkwy: Poindexter @ Sierra
405
22,000
�-2 00
0
1 0
3
Prkwy: W/S Spring S/0 Pch Hill
403
5,000
5,�)�10
� O
0
0 1
0
f 0
0�
0
4
Prkwy: EIS Spring S/0 Pch Hill
409
27,000
27 JO
0
0
!
5
6
Prkwy: E/S Pch Hill S/0 Mesa Verd
Prkwy: Pch Hill E/0 Mesa Verde
412
35,000
,)
15 0i1 0
35,000
0
I 19,950
0
15,050
0
0
411
40,000
7
8
Prkwy: S/S L. A. E/O Tierra Rejad
Prkwy Mod: T. R. S/0 L. A. Ave
408
20,000
20,000
12,685
7,315
0
9
Prkwy: Pri„ vton
402
416
5,000
40,000
0
�!�,
0
�
0 i
0
��
;�,[ <<�0
37,000
25,000
12,000 j
0
10
11
Median: Princeton
Prkwy: S/S Cmps Prk E/0 Princeton
??
??
44,000
�)
41,O1N
40,000
28,000
12,000
0
12
Prkwy: HIS S S/S C. P. W/0 Prncto
??
30,000
18 000
30,0['0
30,000
30,000
0
0
]8,0(x)
i 0
0
O
1)
13
Prkwy: HIS T. R. Pch Hill to Sprn
413
60,000
b1 Oi)tl
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sub-Total Citywide Assessments
346,000
62,4' �
Z83,5�)�
162,000
--------
115,635
------- - - -0-
46 365
,365
v
v
City -wide Capital Improvement Funds Available
v
v
FY 1993/94 Carry Over ...........,
v
Prior Year Reserve Allocated to
Capital
Projects .•.....
`�" �`�<<<<<<<<<<<
« «
Other Surplus .....................
Less Total Proposed City -wide Capital
Improvements
Total
62,16
00
««
Year End Surplus ...................
Citywide Capital Expenditurs ........
-----------------------------------
Zone Capital Expenses
" '"
162,000
Zone 8: Home Acres Buffer
Zone 9: Virgina Colony Parkway
...................
..
54,135
6,000
L to
22,135
EXHIBIT 'F'
AD84 -2
FY 1994/95 Cost Analysis
Street Lighting Cost Analysis
---------------------------- - - - - --
03/29/94
FY 1993/94 Summary
Street Traffic Sign;l
Date Lights Safety Lighting
July 1993
Auq 1993
Sept 1993
Oct 1993
Nov 1993
Dec 1993
14,723.00
14,790.00
14,858.00
14,854.00
14,894.00
14,894.00
89,013.00
FY 1994/95 Estimate
0.
0.;
0.o
Total Remarks
14.723.00
14,790.00
14,858.00
14.854.00
14 894.00
14,894.00
89,313.00 Six month cost
z2
'78,)26.00 Projected Annual Cost
Last Year's Cost ......
Contingency for rate adjustment
. .... 5,;30. "3
Estimated Anjual Cost for added lights 00.00
Total 190,:i6.78
Say— 190,0(10.00
EX4►,b;� c,
PRELIMINARY
ENGINEER''S REPORT
CITY OF MOORPARK
LIGHTING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
NO. A,) -84 -2
LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972
Prepa: ed B,,./
DWIGHT FRENCH & ASSOCIATES, INC.
1470 S. Vall« y Vist,, Drive
Suit I 1 iC
Diamond rya C i, 1765
Marc 9.t
DWIGHT FRENCH & ASSOCIATES
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section 1
Authority fc- Report 1
Section 2
Description �)f Improvements
to be Maintzi ined 1
Section 3
Assessment 1.711 4
Section 4
Method of A:_�essmert 4
Section 5
Estimate of 'cst 6
Appendix
"A"
Street Lighting Formula - Table 1
Appendix
"B"
Landscape -(- -mule Table 2
Appendix
"C"
Assessment ,..-lmma-..-y - Table 3
Appendix
"D"
Budget Estinite
Appendix
"E"
Boundary Mal
Appendix
"P "
Assessment i x,11
Appendix
"G"
Resoluticns
Appendix "H" Rebate Prociiure
DWIGHT FRENCH & Asso(,l,,vTEs
CITY OF W )ORPARR
Engineer'; Repor,
Parks Maintenance A,,sessmert District
No. AD 84 -2
Landscape and Ligbl.inq Act of 1972
For Fiscal Ye r, 1994-1995
SECTION 1 AUTHORITY FOR REPOT
This report is prepared pursua_it
their regular meeting of January
for the fiscal year commencing J
1995 in compliance with the reclAi
"Landscaping Act. of L972 ', be1II(,
California Streets an(i Highway,
The District will provide electr
facilities and for operation �n:3
within the City. In addition
installation and /or maintenanc_
public right.-- of-,,Tay.
o 'itv Council action taken at
L994 to extend this District
y L, 1-994 and ending June 30,
�PiEnt :7 of Article 4, Chapter 1,
Fart of Division ]S of the
tt
,c:I energy for public lighting
maintenance of public lighting
1.F District will provide for
c Landscaping within the
SECTION 2 DESCRIPTION OF ' "HE IMPROVIMENTS TO BE MAINTAINED
This report covers the period ):
1995. An updated report is pr"[ -d
annual costs and changes in pa c
The City of Moorpark Ligh ing 14ai
create a new zone of benefit fog-
the parkway located at the nor-.lo
and Virginia Co].onv -Lace, whi }
The District is also proposed I�
for Zone of benef:�_t ? , the nor` 1;
between Gabbert Road and Shasti
basis. The commercial area c.,f
Buf fer Area, i:; exc Luded f rom th,
The improvements to oe maintaii<<
City -owned and Southern Calif - :ri
lights as well as all media:::
rights -of -way w_th:n _lie
C, - I
Lj , 1994 through June 30,
t e L year to reflect updated
t, ianc District is proposed to
impr vement and maintenance of
:czier of Los Angeles Avenue
1 -- designated as Zone 9.
l.anye the method of assessment
:t ; i i )s Angeles; Avenue Parkway
tI]E1, from per lot to per acre
8, the West Village
t,,i�t with the original intent.
i,i t rl � District= include all
ct on (S.C.E.) -owned street
it E_et tree; within public
1(, City.
DWIGHT FRENCH & ASSOCIATES
Lighting maintenance shall inclule, but is not limited to, energy
costs, removal, repair, replacement or relocation of light
standards, poles, bulbs, fixtures and alL appurtenances. Servicing
of S.C.E. owned lights as define', in Section 22538 of the Streets
and Highways Code shall be furnished t :y the Southern California
Edison Company or its successor.;, or this servicing shall be as
authorized by the Public Utilities Commission, State of California.
Maintenance of City -owned lighti°g improvements shall be furnished
by the City.
Landscape maintenance shall include, but is not limited to,
watering, fertilizing, mowing, weed control, shrubbery, tree
removal and pruning, removal and replacement of dead growth,
maintenance of irrigation facil -ies and other necessary work.
In addition, the cost to maintain improved areas within an easement
will be borne by owners withi.-i t at prc ect. These easement areas
are:
1. Tract No. 2851
Maintenance costs associated with landscaping in the
Ventura County Flood C, nti of Easement and portions of the
interior tract entry ai ea:.. `I"he obligation upon these 73
lots is pursuant tc a - cnd:t.:on of development.
2. Tract No., 2865
Cost for maintenance ;:f specific landscape areas within
the tract, including ` andscaping at Christian Barrett &
Spring Roads; Tierra rejada landscaping, and Peach Hill
Road landscaping on e,:st: side between Christian Barrett
and Tierra Rejada Roa<is, and the entry monument sign at
Christian Barret and ',pr._ng Road. The obligation upon
the lots within this t ac:. i.; pursuant to a condition of
development.
3. Tract No. 3032
Maintenance costs ass,�ci<ated. with landscaping an entry
monument at Buttercr,ek Roa,l and Los Angeles Avenue.
This cost to be sprear tD the 265 Lots within the tract.
4. Tract No. 3274
Maintenance costs ass,:ciated with landscape areas along
Williams Ranch Road parkway adjacent to Peach Hill drain
channel and Edison erl T- E's within PC -3. This cost will
be borne by the 121 1 t_s, w.i t7!!.in the tract.
DWIGHT FRENCH & ASSOCIATES
5. Tract Nos. 3019, 3525
Maintenance costs asso,-at, -3d with landscaping the Tierra
Rejada Road slope and arkway areas and parkway on the
west side of Peach Hi.l. Read between Williams Ranch and
Tierra Rejada Roads Nit _in Tract Nos. 3019 and 352. The
cost i.s to be sprea(: t t e :_' : 7 lots within the tracts.
6. Tract 3306
Cost for landscape ate,, within Tract 3306 at the
westerly terminus of Ir tlewood Street. The cost is to be
spread to the 22 lot::, thin, • he tract.
7. Los Angeles Avenue Parkway
Maintenance costs as:;oc.
on the north side of
Road and Shasta Aveiiu(e
lots northerly of To
Poindexter. Avenue, e,i:, t
of Shasta Avenue.
8. West Village Buffer Area
_it ed with landscaping the parkway
Angeles Avenue between Gabbert
41 be,, borne by all industrial
kage.ies Avenue, southerly of
r (,f Gabbert Road, and westerly
Improvement and maintenance costs associated with the
buffer area within Trac ~s 4340, 4341, 4342, and multi-
family areas bounded ,y Tierra Rejada to the east,
Mountain Trail to the Soi th, Countryhill Road to the west,
Tract 4342 to the north ind Home Acres. The costs are to
be split 50 -50 between he area within the City (Tracts
4340, 4341, 4342 an<`I multifamily areas) and the
unincorporated Home Pcr, are, :l
9. Condor Drive Industria: Pa: -k
Improvement_ and maintE ('.)sts associated with the
parkway located at ri,' ,c rt.'zwest corner of Los Angeles
Avenue and Virginia c n_� ice will be borne by the
developed parcels ,, - ij, rciustrial Park.
Plans and specific�_O_ions foe r
lighting of streets,
parks a!_d
improvements wi,hir.
he sir_,; :c
Public Works. The
lighting
Edison -owned lights are on fi1c� wi
Company. Reference ,-,
hereby m-idt
for the exact beat i._on and na ; l
improvements. Said
plan: r:l
hereby made a p,:, rr- DE
C,,
:r- gation, landscaping and
i :�tmtr. s, and other authorized
*,le in the Department of
a' ll., and specifications for
th- outhern California Edison
plans and specifications
tie landscape and lighting
F 1t ions by reference are
DWIGHT FRENCH & ASSOCIATES
SECTION 3 ASSESSMENT ROLL
All parcels of real property afft�cted are listed on the "Assessment
Roll", Exhibit "A," which will be on Eile in City Hall with the
City Clerk, and is made a part hereof by reference. These
are more particularly described :n ma s are
Section 327 of the Revenue and "Paxatpon Code which are on nce
lelin
the office of the Ventura County Assessor in the County Government
Center Administration Building, 800 S. Victoria Avenue, Ventura,
California and w "-.ich are also m de a part hereof by reference.
SECTION 4 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT'
The Landscaping and Lighting Act. of 1972, in Section 22573, states
that "The net amount to be assessed upon the lands within an
assessment district may be apps, :- tioned by any formula or method
which fairly distributes the new amount among all assessable lots
or parcels in proportion to the ystimated benefits to be received
by each such lot or parcel fr_-)m he improvements."
Lighting
The primary benefits of street 'Ightinq are for the convenience,
safety and protection of people ,nd the securit or
property, property improvements aid (oods, y Protection degree
Of illumination provided can hay. �i. bearing on both sity or degree
The single family home - Level 1 t:as been selected as the base unit
for the spread of assessments. 3y 3efinition, the single family
home - Level 1 is a single family some lc :cated on a street that has
existing street lights. A factor of 1.0:1 has been assigned to the
base unit, which is composed of bE- ee E i t lt'tors which correspond to
the following types of benefi,
People Use - People related )en�fi ~s 50
Security Benefit - Proper��, r,� ,E cr ion
0.25
Intensity - Degree of ill sm -.
0.2.5
1.00
(.'�• 4
DWIGHT FRENCH & Ass O CIATES
Parcels in other land use categoi es wei then rated by comparison
with the basic unit.. (See Table
People Use - People related I:)ene.f it s
1 -
Reduction in nigt acc i cents and attendant human
Misery.
2. Reduced vulnerabi _t; - criminal assault during
hours of darkness,
3. Promotion of :_nls Mess operations during evening
hours.
4. Increased safety c rDad_: and highways.
Security Benefit - Property 'ro.ec - ion
1. Reduction in vanda ism ant other criminal acts, and
damage to improvers- nt3.
2. Reduction in burg: :rri �E ,.
Intensity
Intensity or degree of 111mination provided on streets
varies with type of str+ et., (late of installation and the
use of the property adj cent t-iereto.
Landscaping
The landscaping element of the sp :eaci formula recognizes that all
properties within the City benef_t from the maintenance of the
landscaping within public right:_ -of -way and easements. These
benefits include aesthetic enjoyment, creation of a pleasant
living and working environment, -1 "crease in general property
values, improved safety result in -cm a regular tree trimming
program and improved street sweep..n., i, :aj-abilities resulting from
trimming trees which may otherwis« interlace with street sweeping
operations. Because of the gener. Ceneiit. received, the cost is
spread equally a-1.ong each p, -irce. amount is
,mown
in the a ppendix.
Rebate
The City Council approved a reba -e procedure for disadvantaged
property owners. The procedure s} ell 1'rt followed as described in
Appendix "H."
117-t. -a
DWIGHT FRENCH & ASSOCIATES
SECTION 5 COST ESTIMATE
The City staff recommendation "Dr the District budget is shown in
Appendix "D" of this report.
The costs attributed to landscaping and the costs attributed to
lighting will be separately app, >ointed, according to the formula,
and added together to constit.te the total assessment for each
parcel.
Conclusion
In conclusion, it is our opinion that the assessments within
Lighting Maintenance Assessment District No. AD -84 -2 are
apportioned by a formula that fairly distributes the net cost in
accordance with the benefits th,:t ire received.
\rpt \050ad842.945
G • f.
DWIGHT FRENCH & ASSOCIATES
APPENDICES
M
DWIGHT FRENCH & ASSOCIATES
APPENI ;IX "All
CITY OF MOORPARK
Lighting Maintenance Assessment District
AD -84 -2
Lighting and Landscape Act of 1972
Tai- 1 e 1
Street Light:. incq Formula
Use
People
Lighting
Total
Annual
Code
Description
Use
Intensity
Security
Units
Assessment
0
Residential Vacant
0.00
?.00
0.25
0.25
$
5.16
1
Single Family -
Level 1
0.50
J.25
0.25
1.00
$
20.64
2
Mobile Home
0.00
1-00
0.00
0.00
$
0.00
3
Condo (Per Unit)
0.50
.25
0.25
1.00
$
20.64
4
Residential Income
(2 -4 Units)
0.50
�.25
0.25
1.00
$
20.64
(Per Unit)
5
Apartments (5 +)
0.50
.C`_>
0.20
0.75
$
15.48
Per Unit
6
Single Family-
0.50
.CS
0.20
0.75
$
15.48
Level 2
9
Mobile Home &
0.50
C`
0.20
0.75
$
15.48
Trailer Park
(Per Space)
10
Commercial Vacant
0.00
C0
0.25
0.25
$
5.16
Land
:11
Retail Stores,
2.00
C0
1.00
4.00
$
80.64
Single Story
(Per Parcel)
12
Store & Office
2.00
C0
1.00
4.00
$
80.64
Combination
15
Shopping Centers
4.00
CO
1.50
6.50
$134.16
(Neighborhood)
16
Shopping Centers
4.00
CC!
1.50
6.50
$134.16
(Regional)
17
Office Building
1.00
C0
1.00
3.00
$
61.92
(1 Story)
18
Office Building
2.00
CO
1.00
4.00
$
80.64
(Multi - Story)
(Per Parcel)
19
Retail Stores
2.00
co
1.00
4.00
$
80.64
(Multi- Story)
(Per Parcel)
G
DWIGHT FRENCH & ASSOCIATES
Use
Total
People
Code
Description
Use
21
Restaurants &
3.00
5.00
Cocktail Lounges
1.00
24
Banks, Savings &
1.00
4.00
Loans
1.00
25
Service Stations
2.00
26
Auto Sales, Repair
2.00
0.00
Storage, Rental
0.00
30
Industrial land
0.00
'Co
Vacant
0.00
31
Light
Manufacturing
3.00
32
Warehousing
2.00
33
Industrial Condos,
2.00
Co -Ops, PUD's
38
Mineral Processing
1.00
44
Truck Crops
0.50
46
Pasture (Permanent)
0.50
48
Poultry
0.50
49
Flowers, Seed
Products
C.50
51
Orchards
0.50
53
Field Crops, Dry
0.50
54
Pasture of Graze,
Dry
0.50
55
Feed Lots
0.50
57
Tree Farms
0.50
61
Theater
3.00
69
Parks
C.00
70
Institutional
Vacant -,
0.00
71
Churches, Convent
Rectory
0.00
72
Schools
0.00
73
Colleges
0.00
78
Public Buildings,
0.00
Museums, Firehouses,
Etc.
79
Flood Control
0.00
80
Misc. Vacant Lots
0.00
81
Utility Water
Company
0.00
83
Petroleum & Gas
1.00
86
Water Rights, Pumps
0.00
88
Highways & Streets
0.00
91
Utility - Edison
0.00
Lighting
Total
Intensity
Security
Units
').CO
0.25
L.00
1.00
5.00
..00
1.00
3.00
1.00
1.00
4.00
i.00
1.00
4.00
).CO
0.25
0.25
1.00
1.00
1.50
1.00
0.25
.25
L5
25
L
x.25
).25
C0
cc)
0
).00
f7 .
co
).CO
c0
1.00
1.00
1.50
1.00
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
1.00
0.0C
0.25
0.25
0.00
0.00
0.00
5.00
4.00
5.00
3.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
5.00
0.00
0.25
0.25
0.00
0.00
0.00
Annual
Assessment
$103.20
$ 61.92
$ 80.64
$ 80.64
$ 5.16
$103.20
$ 80.64
$103.20
$ 61.92
$ 20.64
$ 20.64
$ 20.64
$ 20.64
$ 20.64
$ 20.64
$ 20.64
$ 20.64
$ 20.64
$103.20
$ 0.00
$ 5.16
$ 5.16
$ 0.00
$ 0.00
$ 0.00
').CO
0.00
0.00
$
0.00
').CO
0.25
0.25
$
5.16
J.CO
0.00
0.00
$
0.00
:).50
0.50
2.00
$
41.28
).CO
0.00
0.00
$
0.00
).C'0
0.00
0.00
$
0.00
'Co
0.00
0.00
$
0.00
� _2
DWIGHT FRENCH & ASSOCIATES
Use
Code Description
92 Telephone
93 S.P.R.R.
94 Undedicated
Community Areas
(Condos)
95 State Property
96 County Property
97 City Property
99 Exempt
People
Lighting
Total
Annual
Use
Intensity
Security
Units
Assessment
0.00
J.00
0.00
0.00
$
0.00
0.00
00
0.00
0.00
$
0.00
0.00
3.00
0.00
0.00
$
0.00
0.00
3.00
0.00
0.00
$
0.00
0.00
13.00
0.00
0.00
$
0.00
0.00
}.00
0.00
0.00
$
0.00
0.00
1.00
0.00
0.00
$
0.00
G
_3
DWIGHT FRENCH & ASSOCIATES
APPENDIX "B"
CITY OF MOORPARK
Lighting Maintenance Assessment District
No. AD -84 -2
Lighting and Landscape Act of 1972
Landscape Formula
The landscaping element of the spread formula is calculated in
accordance with the method descr. bed as follows:
Total Annual Cost = $1 ; . 41) per parcel
Notes:
1. In addition to the above landscape charge, 73 lots within
Tract No. 2851 are assessed an additional landscape cost
for a Ventura County F ood Control Easement and portions
of the interior tract ?ntry areas. The additional cost
per lot is $56.59. T!Te obligation upon these lots is
pursuant to a condit-i.c � o= development.
2. In addition to the above landscape charge, 622 lots
within Tract 2865 are assessed an additional landscape
charge for the maintenanc =e of parkways, Tierra Rejada
Road slope and street ,cape areas, and the monument sign
within the tract. The additional cost per lot is $95.45.
The obligation upon th- se lct , is pursuant to a condition
of development.
3. In addition to the aDlove landscape charge, 265 lots
within Tract No. 3(,32 are assessed an additional
landscape charge fog. tk e maintenance of an entry monument
at Butterereek Road anc! Lc�s Angeles Avenue. The
additional cost per
4. In addition to the landscape charge, 129 lots
within Tract No. 3 '1:'4 are assessed an additional
landscape charge for t'± e landscape for the maintenance of
parkway areas alorig ai l li.aiT,s Ranch Road and Edison
entries within PC -3. hfy additional cost per lot is $0.
The obligation upon the E 1.ot �s pursuant to a condition
of development.
`A
DWIGHT FRENCH CY Asset_; ,,� rl -:s
5. In addition
to the Ubo
and >c:ape
charge, 217 lots
within Tract_
Nos. =01
anti 3525
are assessed an
additional landscaping ci
:119e t(.)r maintenance
of Tierra
Rejada Road
slope and p
rkways and
the parkway on the
west side of
Peach hill
- )acs between
Williams Ranch and
Tierra Rejada
Roads.
ional
cost per lot is
$172.07. The
obligation .
.cn th� se lo,-s
i..,_ pursuant to a
condition of
development
6. In addition to the abov(,,
tZic�s -:at e charge, 22
lots within
Tract No. 3306
are a:.:
ss.:�d, to additional
landscape
charge for the
mainten,::ice
c>A landscape area at the
wester .'y terminus
of
Street. The
additional
cost per lot is
$11.0�).
T )t;'Ligation upon
these lots
is pursuant t o a
coedit I
1 c t. c w,, lopment .
7. In addition to the ab
northerly of Los AngelF
Avenue, between Gabber-t
an additional landscapii
northside of Los Angele.
cost per
•sc- landscape charge, 92 lots
southerly of Poindexter
in,3 Sh�ista Avenues are assessed
•iar(je for maintenance of the
Parkway. The additional
8. In addition to the at, �ve Landscape charge, the 693
residential units within» Tract Nos. 4340, 4341 and 4342
are assessed an addit )na1 ;!_4.75 per lot, for the
improvement. and maint, ?n<= c,e c" +lest Village Buffer Area.
The Home Acres, not
lighting and landscape
$51.11 per lot for th
west v.1lag- Buffer -`i-
9. In addit -ion to the above.
the Industrial Park of
additional landscape -1
maintenance of the p<i
corner of :Los Angeles;
The arit io•.al cost
I�
1 -vied for any City -wide
IlaI ge_ are to be assessed for
rn1 r ment and maintenance of
a.nd: -c, pe charge, 11 lots within
ccndoc hrive are assessed an
.rce the improvements and
;:way 1�cated at the northwest
r,l E 1: c:: Virgini i •'olonv Place.
acre -
DWIGHT FRENCH & ASSOCIATES
APPENDIX "C"
CITY OF MOORPARK
Lighting Maintenance Assessment District
AD -84 -2
Lighting and Landscape Act of 1972
Tab. le 3
Assessment :. Summary
Use
Landscape
Lighting
Total
Code
Description
Assessment
Assessment
Assessment
0
Residential
$16.40
$ 5.16
$ 21.56
Vacant
1
Single Family -
Level 1
16.40
20.64
37.04
2
Mobile Home
0.00
0.00
0.00
3
Condo
16.40
20.64
37.04
4
Residential
Income (2 -4 Units
16.40
20.64
37.04
5
Apartments (5 +)
16.4C
15.48
31.88
6
Single Family -
Level 2
16.4C
15.48
31.88
9
Mobile Home and
16.4C
15.48
31.88
Trailer park
10
Commercial Vacant
16.40
5.16
21.56
Land
11
Retail Stores,
16.40
80.64
97.04
Single Story
12
Store & Office
16.10
80.64
97.04
Combination
15
Shopping Centers
16.40
1.34.16
150.56
(Neighborhood)
16
Shopping Centers
16.40
134.16
150.56
(Regional)
-17
Office Building
16.10
61.92
78.32
(1- Story)
18
Office Building
16.40
80.64
97.04
(Multi- Story)
19
Retail Stores
16.40
80.64
97.04
(Multi -Story
21
Restaurants &
16.40
1.03.20
119.60
Cocktail Lounges
24
Banks, Savings &
Loans
16.40
61.92
78.32
;Y
c" 1
DWIGHT FRENCH & ASSOC=IATES
Use
Landscape
Lighting
Total
Code
Description
Assessmf,nt.
Assessment
Assessment
30
Industrial Land
16.40
5.16
21.56
Vacant
31
Light Manufacturing
16.40
103.20
119.60
32
Warehousing
16.40
80.64
97.04
33
Industrial Condos,
Co -Ops, PUD's
16.40
103.20
119.60
38
Mineral Processing
16.40
61.92
78.32
44
Truck Crops
16.40
20.64
37.04
46
Pasture (Permanent)
16.40
20.64
37.04
48
Poultry
16.40
20.64
37.04
49
Flowers, Seed
16.40
20.64
37.04
Production
51
Orchards
16.40
20.64
37.04
53
Field Crops, Dry
16.40
20.64
37.04
54
Pasture of Graze,
16.40
20.64
-37.04
Dry
55
Feed Lots
16.40
20.64
37.04
57
Tree Farms
16.40
20.64
37.04
61
Theater
16.40
103.20
119.60
69
Parks
0.00
0.00
0.00
70
Institutional
16.40
5.16
21.56
Vacant Land
71
Churches, Convent,
16.10
5.16
21.56
Rectory
72
Schools
0.00
0.00
0.00
73
Colleges
O.CO
0.00
0.00
78
Public Buildings,
Museums, Firehouses,
Etc.
0.00
0.00
0.00
79
Flood Control
0.00
0.00
0.00
80
Misc. Vacant Land
16.40
5.16
21.56
81
Utility Water Co.
O.CO
0.00
0.00
83
Petroleum & Gas
16.40
41.28
57.68
86
Water Rights, Pumps
O.C.O
0.00
0.00
88
Highways & Streets
0.00
0.00
0.00
91
Utility - Edison
0.(0
0.00
0.00
92
Telephone
OJI0
0.00
0.00
93
S.P.R.R.
0.(0
0.00
0.00
94
Undedicated
Community Areas
(Condos)
0.00
0.00
0.00
95
State Property
0.00
0.00
0.00
96 -
County Property
0.00
0.00
0.00
97
City Property
0.00
0.00
0.00
99
Exempt
O.oC
0.00
0.00
Actual assessment amounts may vary due to disci nc :ies i ;,�ween use codes and actual property uses.
"'7
DWIGHT FRENCH & ASSOC',IATES
APPENDIX "D"
CITY OF MOORPARK
LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
AD_.34-2
BUDGET BSTIMATE
FY 1994 -95
ZONES OF BENEFIT
1. Tract No. 2851
Interior Parkway & Flood G_nt.rol Channel 4,131.00
2. Tract No. 2865
Pacifica & Pardee 59,367.00
3. Tract No. 3032
Buttercreek & Peppermil:. 846.00
4. Tract No. 3274
SUBTOTAL $ "13g, 950.00
G
D -1
Williams Ranch Road
0.00
5.
Tract No. 3019, 3025
Warmington
37,338.00
6.
Tract No. 3306
Glenhaven (Inglewood)
242.00
7.
Los Angeles Avenue
North Side Parkway
10,581.00
8.
West Village Buffer Area
20,445.00
9.
Condor Parkway
6,000.00
SUBTOTAL $ "13g, 950.00
G
D -1
DWIGHT FRENCH & ASSOCIATES
BUDGET ESTIMATE
FY 1994 -95
City Wide Street Lighting $ 190,000.00
City Wide Maintenance 296,225.00
Zones of Benefit 1",590.00
Total Annual Expenses $ 636,815.00
Less City Wide Capital Improvemer' s "(162,000.00)
Less Funds from Other Sources ( 5,640.00)
Total Amount Funded by Dist.ict (F)' 1994 -95) $ 463,175.00
Less Zones of Benefit Assessment (135,950.00)
*Total City Wide Assessment $ 324,225.00
*Actual proportion to assessed:
Street Lighting
L 90,000.00
Maintenance __,'34,225.0,
^24,22` .00
W
X � %e
DWIGHT FRENCH & ASSOCIATES
APPENDIX "E"
BOUNDARY MAPS
1
C 1
1 ) D I R --- ter..._ ._�._►�ilfr 1 , �a L � 1 .
1
I ..•y S; 1
1
. .YD ��
b o
f
I I a
•i►
um f f : 1.
Ufa >> ta ® ! , • • , V
_
1 ! 7 A --
I �../ X11 ;-� �w�r�� � 11.• li °���s_`a'y��a:_� ..�'+�r�.lr,-
i
IV I 7
---------------------
p 0
Ia
+ - - -- - -_ .. - -_ 1
'f' --- - - - - --
yb
Ce t4 it
OW
co
__. �,
z %5
OD
Q
sj�
A COOMN-30
&
ca
-e G e
te ti
NV03d
-3nN3AV
(:�k: AD-84-2 (Page 2 of %
Z�t�C
R
2 «-
C-i. AD -84 -2 (Page 3 of D)
J
J J�
'. O NC a- T- 3Z? 4
c O
° �• nN M
c
1
- D at 3 'T • 303 Z y
ff
of %)
Omt 5
'T 3 019
735Z'S
TRA
L
7
H
J
�.I
2
vi
0
G: AD -84 -2 (Page 6 of g)
i_�=
%: � '8
�!
:,
W
a:.
�ptJ�. �
P �" .r
��
DWIGHT FRENCH & ASSOCIATES
APPENDIX "F"
Appendix "F", the Assessment Roil, shows the assessment upon each
lo-t -or parcel (approximately 8387 parcels) within this District and
is on file in the Office of the City Clerk and County Assessor.
The Ventura County Assessor's office no longer lists public utility
easements on the Assessor's FW .
C�
DWIGHT FRENCH & ASSOCIATES
APPENDIX "G"
RESOLUTIONS
90
DWIGHT FRENCH & ASSOCIATES
APPENDIX "H"
REBATE PROCEDURE
tAvzl A VN
JOINT NOTICE t +F A Pt'BI,IC 1IEETiNG.AND A PUBLIC NEARING
PUBLIC NOTICE iS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Moorpark, California, on April 6, 1994, adopted
Resolution No. 94- fixing the date and time of a public meeting to be held on the 16th day of May, 1994, at the hour of 7:00
p.m. in the CounciFMambers of the Moorpark City Hall, located at 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark. The purpose of said
public meeting is to allow the public an oft ortumty to meet with City, staff to question and discuss the proposed annual
assessments for the 'MOORPARK LIGHTING; AND LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. AD-
84-2" for the fiscal year commencing on Jul'. 1, 1994 and ending on June 30, 1995, which would provide for the furnishing it of
power for and the usual maintenance and servicing of street lights and the landscape maintenance of public rights -of -way within
the said City, to question and discuss the topnsrcl mcrt�a.ses in said assessments over those levied for said District in FY
1993/94.
PUBLIC NOTICE 1S ALSO HEREBY GIVEN that said Rc.solunon No 94- also fixed the date and time of a public hearing
of the Moorpark City Council to he held on the Ist day of .fune, 1994, at thee our of 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the
Moorpark City Hall, located at 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark. The purrppoose of said public hearing is to consider making
certain changes in, and to order the annual assessments for the "MOORPARK LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO AD -84 -2" for the fiscal year commencing on July 1, 1994 and ending on
June 30, 1995, which would provide for the furnishing of power for and the usual maintenance and servicing of street lights and
the landscape maintenance of public rights -w was within thin said City.
A copy of Resolution No. 94- which is ca tioned as follows: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR, AND DECLARING ITS INTENTION
TO MAKE CERTAIN CHANGES AND Ti) ORDER THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS FOR THE "MOORPARK LIGHTING
AND LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. AD-84-2" FOR THE FISCAL YEAR
COMMENCING JULY 1, 1994 AND ENDING JUNE 30, 1995 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING
ACT OF 1972, AND FIXING THE TiME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC MEETING TO DISCUSS AND A PUBLIC
HEARING TO RECEIVE OBJECTIONS "TtIERE'TO,' i, ron file with the City Clerk and open to inspection. A summary of
said Resolution is summarized as follows
1. That the Engineer's Report prepared t r A.srsment tistnct No. AD84 -2 for FY 1994/95 is approved.
2. That said Engineer's Report may he thei rutdifieAt or changed, pursuant to applicable State law.
3. That the amount of the assessments I, A,,se,sment [,istinct No. AD84 -2 for FY 1994/95 are proposed to increase from the
amount of the assessments levied for =aid .lisiric( in F Y 1993/94
4. That it is the intention of the City Council al to make certain changes to Assessment District No. AD 84 -2, b) to order the
extension of the annual assessment for said distinct for FY 1994195; and, c) to levy and collect assessments for certain
improvements described herein Said district consists of a single city -wide zone to provide electric current or energy for
public lightingg within the City, to rovide for installation or maintenance of landscaping and the construcUOn or
maintenance of curb, butter, or sidewalk stnictures and facilities, to install or construct facilities, which are appurtenant to
any of the foregoing, for the maintenance or servicing or both of any of the forgoing and to provide incidental exppeenses in
connection therewith. Said district ako includes assessments for the improvement and maintenance of the above descnbed
landscaping and related improvement, win a niimh- �,' names of benefit.
5. That said lighting and landsea in6 eiami ranee a� xssment district includes the lighting and landscaping sites with all
improvements located therein.�es.nf d by rid inc'i ded within .Assessment District Rio. AD 84 2.
G. That the foregoing described .Ii �K o a„ within Assessment District No. .AD 84 -2, the houndary of «hich +s
described on a map on file in i:' T 1 � itic
7. That said proposed mruntename v r,pi is m"ni ,I benefit to, and expense for which are chargeable upon, the district
8. That a full and detailed descnptx,in .t tf:e imprincments, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the
proposed assessments upon assessable parcels within said District, is set forth in a copy of the afore mentioned Engineer's
Report on file with the City Clerk an � pen to mspe; tinn.
9. That the existing assessments, the pry ro,rd asse.snrnrnts and the proposed increases to the assessment amounts are set forth
in Exhibit 'A' attached hereto and r , 1, le + I art her --f
10. That a public meeting shall bin c;)ro ned on May .6, 1994, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at the Moorpark City
Hall to allow the public an opp0ttun ry ti, meet with City staff to question and discuss the proposed annual assessments for
Assessment District No. AD84 -' f,,. il' 1',94195', end the proposed increases to said assessments over those levied in FY
1993/94.
11. That a public hearing of the Moorp.i +k ( its Counci[ shall be- held on June 1, 1994, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers
at the Moorpark City Hall to con,si;Rer rwkmg ci,itam changes in, and to order the annual assessments for Assessment
District No. AD84 -2 for FY 1994 /0'
12. That this Joint Notice of Public iv1e,ehng and Public Hearing is given, and that any persons having any objections to the
work or extent of the assessment der trict may apptr and show cause why said work should not he done or tamed out or
why said district should not he extended for the fiscal year commencin Jul 1 1994 and ending June 30, 1995. Protests
must be in writing, and must he file i by the property owner with the City Clerk prior to the conclusion of the hearing and
such protest shall state all ggrounds ,t the objection and shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property. A
majonty protest will cause the asses neni I icrease 'o he abandoned.
13. That all the work proposed shall he dome n acconlance with the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Part 2 of
Division 15 of the Streets and High -ays, Cade of °he State of California.
14. That the City Clerk shall cause nou, :, of said puhii nieeririg and public hearing to be given by causin this summary of the
Resolution of Intention to be publi hed and mailed in the manner required by Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and
Highways Code and Section `,t954 �f 'hr Giivernment Code of the State of California.
15 That the -ity Clerk shall ceit 'ro —solution.
ATTEST
�fy CiCrk i "aIC, W aIWWon r., : ayor
THiS NOTICE IS GiVEN pursuant to pros, -ions o: the landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Section 22500 et. sec, of the
Streets and Highway Code of the Mate Alf( T111 ar is dated this 20th day of May, 1992.
Tiiv L
i
AD 84 -2
Summary of Asst'Ssrmants
A. City Wide Assessments
Proposed
FY 1993194
FY 1994/95
Proposed
Use
Assmnt L
Assmnt
increase
Code
Description
21.56
4.72
0
Residential Vacant
16.84
33 00
37.03
4.04
1
Single Family - Level 1
(1.00
0,00
0.00
2
Mobil Home
33.00
37.03
4.04
3
Condo
33.00
37.03
4.04
4
Residential Income 2 -4 uni's
27.61
31,88
4.27
5
Apartments (5+
31.88
4.27
6
Sin le Family - level 2
Trailer Park
27.61
31.88
4.27
4.72
9
Mobil Home &
16.84
21.56
10
Commercial Vacant
97.64
98,94
1.31
11
Retail Store, sin de story
97.64
98,94
1.31
12
Store & Office combination
151,50
150.53
(0.97)
15
Shopping Centers (Neighborhoo.
151.50
150.53
(0.97)
16
Shopping Centers (Regional)
story)
76.09
78.31
2.22
1.31
17
office Building (one
97 64
98.94
I8
Office Building (multi- stor) )
97.64
98.94
1.31
19
Retail Stores (multi- story)
119 AS
119.58
0.40
21
Restaurants & cocktaillourees
76.0(1
78.31
2.22
24
Banks, Savings & Loans
97.64
98,94
1.31
25
Service Stations
97 64
98.94
1.31
ZG
Auto sales, repair, storage ti ri
16.84
21.56
4.72
30
IndL mal Land Vacant
119.1:1
119.58
0.40
31
Light Manufacturing
97.64
98.94
1.31
32
Warehousing
''1
119.18
119.58
0.40
33
Industrial Condos, Coop, P
76.09
78.31
2.22
38
Mineral Processing
33,00
37.03
4.04
44
Truck Crops
33.W
37.03
4.04
46
Pasture (permanent)
33.00
37.03
4.04
48
Poultry
33.Cr0
37.03
4.04
49
Flowers, seed production
33.(10
37.03
4. "4
51
Orchards
33 00
37.03
4.04
53
Field crops, dry
3 3. 00
37.03
4.04
54
Pastures of graze, dry
33.00
37.03
4.04
55
Feed lots
33.00
37.03
4 (A
57
Tree farms
;19,18
119.58
0.40
61
Theater
16'134
21.56
4.72
70
Institutional vacant land
16.34
21.56
4.72
71
Churches, convent & rectory
0.1)()
0 -00
0.00
78
Public Bldgs. Fire Houses, M1
rums, etc 1(i R4
21.56
4.72
80
Misc, Vacant land
r) K)
0.00
0.00
81
Utility Water Company
54.14
57.77
3.13
83
Petroleum & gas
0.1)0
0.00
0.00
91
Utility Edison
0 K)
0.00
0.00
92
Telephone
0 ,)0
0.00
0.00
9l
94
SP RR
Undedicated Community C gym'
0. )0
Dave optnew 0 r�
0.00
0_
0,00
0.00
94
Exempt
B.
Zone of Benefit: In addirtor
en the Citywide Assessments listed above by land use categories, the
for the improvement and
properties wtihm
maintenance of
the Zones listed hel-
will he assessed a per lot Zone assessment
each o
certain improvements dr'termu
-d t„ he of henefit to the properties within those Zones.
FY 1993194
Proposed
FY 1994/95
Proposed
Zone
Descri lion
Assmnt
Assmnt
Increase
i i ST_
��1
i
ract mays (:k Bann
t" -
Bellwood, Pecan and VCFCI'
harin -1
Tract 2865: Parkways Fast s
28.41
95.45
67.04
Peach Hill, N. Side Tierra
Rejada; South slopes A Chr,
in
Barrett and Spring
3
Tract 3032: Buttercreek For
anti 5.30
3.20
(2.10)
Peppermill parkway
4
Tract 3274: Parkways, north end
93 94
0.00
(93.94)
south side of Williams Rancr
Rd
5
Tracts 3019 & 3525: Parkwa
s. north 79 91
172.06
92.15
side of Tierra Rejada Road,
est sice
of Peach Hill Rd: south sld,
ark.v:ry
& slope
6
Tract 3306 (Glenhavenj: Pay
as 30 82
1 1.00
(19.82)
west end of Ingiewood A :'e
7
lhdustrial Park Northeasr
Gat,oe r 33. 55
20.06
to
& L.A. Ave.: Parkway North
ae )f
557 -39
L.A. Ave east of Gabbe-
8
west Village Buffer:
20.53
14.75
(5.78)
• city a+ee
51.11
51.11
0.00
Hom. A; �r
{
..
9
C,�ndor Drive
to
. Gi80+ii
A'Y
Note: ` flat wet
Assessment
to be assessed for this zone has
Increased from 53,087
to 510,581. the
•• hr roia',
amount
f1' 1994195 wilt be a per acre assessment
of $111.46. Depending on the size of
assessme•.r
for
from a tow of f20.06
to a high of $557.39.
ire .ot
the assessment amount ranges
assessment of S60.e6. Depending
on the site of the
tot, the assessment
. +• -Is zone
nriourt
has a per acre
"ges `rom a ,w of 554.19 to a high of 5980,21.
amount of the assessment
is an increase over test year.
•,,, , •' -e^
is i' a 'ew one, the entire
.io,rct�ad85- 95.nct
� � r
RESOLUTION NO. 94 - - -
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITE COUNCIL OF THE
CERCITY
OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA,
CHANGES TO THE "MOORPARK LIGHTING AND
LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE IISTRICT NO. AD -84 -2"
AND CONFIRMING THE A -3
SESSMENT FOR SAID
DISTRICT THE FISCAL YEA' COMMENCING JULY 1,
1994 AND ENDING JUNE 30,
WHEREAS,
the City Council of the City of Moorpark, by
Resolution No. 94 -994, adopted January 5, 1994, declared its
intention to make certain changes to the "MOORPARK LIGHTING
AND LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE fp'N�he DISTRICT NO.
assessments 11 for and said
order the extension district for the fiscal commencing July 1, 1994 and
ending June 30, 1,995; and,
WHEREAS, said "MOORPARK LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE
DISTRICT NO. AD- 84 -211 consisl: s of for single
c city-wide zone to
provide electric current or energy
the City, to provide for �nstal.lation or maintenance of
landscaping and the construction or maintenance iof curb,
gutter, or sidewalk structures and facilities, of the
construct facilities which are appurtenant to any
foregoing,
for the maintenanc: e or servicing or both, of any of
the foregoing and to provide nc i.derital expenses in connection
therewith; and,
WHEREAS, said "MOORPARK 'LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. AD- 84-2" also consists of a number of
specific zones in order to provide for the assessment of the
properties within said zones, for the cost of mronertiesg
certain specified improvemert, wh:�i,'h benefit said properties;
and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to the germs of a Joint Powers Agreement
(JPA) between the City of Moorpark and the County of Ventura,
No. the City Council of the City � of annexed certain unincorporated
P
- 860 adopted on June 29, 1 9` 2 , to the
area just west of the Cis :y known as Home Acres,
"MOORPARK LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. AD -84 -2" in order to implement those provisions
of the JPA pertaining to tl^e construction and maintenance of
a buffer area between s:� i d unincorporated area and and,
West
Ranch area of PC -3 (Tracts 4:40; 341 and 4342) .
WHEREAS, in accordance with the provisions of the aforesaid
JPA, it has been determined that:. said buffer area provides
benefit to both the afore�. ad. c3 IjlojneBenef t ncompassing said
Ranch area of PC -3, and :i Zone
areas was established to a low f0l the levy of assessments on
of
the properties within s,iid Zane of Benefit for the purpose
developing and maintains Ml s.3ic' 1offer area; and,
Resolution No. 94-
Page 2
by
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of a °O roved the
Resolution No. 94 -1026, adopted April 6, 1994, pp
Engineer's Report pertaining o : ;uct matters; and,
WHEREAS,
said Resolution No. 94 -1.026 also set 7:00 p.m. , May
16, 1994, as the time and date of a public moe inginor allow
the public an opportunity to di._�,cus.; the p r posed
assessment with City staff 1d
WHEREAS, said public meeting was convened on May 16, 1994,
at 7:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers for the purpose of
allowing the public an opportunity to discuss with City staff
the proposed increased asses- ments,r and,
WHEREAS, said Resolution t,wo. 94 -X026 also set 7:00 p.m.,
June 1, 1994, as the time nd date of a public hearing to
consider such matters; and,
WHEREAS, on June 1, 1994, thf? City Council held a public
hearing to determine whether- said changes to said district
should be made, and whether -he annual assessments should be
ordered and confirmed for tr:2 fiscal year commencing July 1,
1994 and ending June 30, 1"Y:); and
WHEREAS, the City Counc l- Finds that written protests
against the proposed work or assessment have not been made by
owners representing more of the area of land to
be assessed: and,
WHEREAS, the City Council, having duly received, considered
evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the jurisdictional
facts in this proceeding anc concerning the necessity for the
contemplated work and benefits to be derived therefrom,
and
the City Council entsnforc� tt e gf as c,��l jurisdiction to
commencing dulytle
proposed asses
1994 and ending June 30, )5
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY OUNCII OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK,
CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE A FOLLO�%S:
SECTION 1. The Engineer': Report for "MOORPARK LIGHTING the
LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE DI'u "'rRICT NO. AD- 84 -2", filed with
City Clerk on April 1, 199-, as amended or revised byaaction
of the City Council, is hereby approved and adopted,
improvements, changes to and extension accord nce annual
assessments in the Assessrent. District,
said report, as revised, an i :i_rr ac
ordance sihereb Y Resolution
levied for
94 -1026 approving said Fn(l deport,
the Fiscal Year 1994!)`
Resolution No. 94-
Page 3
SECTION 2. The City Clerk shall cause the diagram and
assessment, or a certified -,()pi there()f, , to be filed with the
County Auditor.
SECTION 3. The City Clerk spa i certify to the adoption of
this resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS _ ___
,iav of _, 1994.
Pau', W. _Lawrason Jr., Mayor
ATTEST: _. ---
City Clerk