Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 1995 0104 CC REG ITEM 11DTO: FROM: DATE: A G E N D A R E P O R T C I T Y O F M 0 0 R P A R K The Honorable City Council ITEM-11-9 Jaime Aguilera, Director of Community Development`s Deborah S. Traffenstedt, Senior Planner December 12, 1994 (CC Meeting of 1 -4 -95) SUBJECT: CONSIDER STAFF'S REQUEST TO SCHEDULE A JOINT CITY COUNCIL /PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP FOR THE BOLLINGER DEVELOPMENT PROJECT (MOORPARK COUNTRY CLUB ESTATES) -- GPA-94-1, Z -94 -1, CUP -94 -1, VTT -4928, PM -94 -1 BACKGROUND The Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Bollinger Development Project is currently being prepared. Potentially significant environmental impacts have been identified through the Notice of Preparation of a Draft EIR and scoping process. Staff is working with the environmental consultant, the Planning Corporation, to develop site plan alternatives to minimize or avoid impacts. Both staff and the Community Development Committee support the scheduling of a joint City Council /Planning Commission workshop, at this stage of the planning process, to assist with the development of feasible project alternatives. DISCUSSION Staff is recommending the scheduling of a joint City Council/ Planning Commission workshop as the preferred means of providing the applicant with preliminary City Council, Planning Commission, and public input on site plan alternatives. If the City Council concurs, it is staff's intention to schedule a joint workshop for January 25, 1995. Alternate dates in January 1995, include Monday - January 16, Monday - January 23, (in conjunction with the Planning Commission regular meeting which is expected to have a light agenda), or Monday - January 30, 1995. RECOMMENDATION Direct staff to schedule a joint City Council /Planning Commission public workshop for the Bollinger Development Project for January 25, 1995, or other date as determined by the Council. 00230 EVERETT L. CRAWFORD 4635 PARK MIRASOL CALABASAS, CA 91302 November 30, 1994 Mr. Paul Lawrason, Mayor City of Moorpark 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, CA. 93021 Re: Card Club in the City of Moorpark California Dear Mr. Lawrason: At the suggestion of Mr. Steve Kuen. discuss the possibilities of creating a cardrelubginotheocity Of Moorpark. I will set forth the Pues anOf an improvement and touch on the antlsdssuch would be generated for the City, cpated revenue s evenue that Our proposal is really quite simple, We desire to open a card club for the community as well as fcr others interested. We would limit the games to Bridge and Pan and would exclude all other legal games which include Poker, Backgammon, and Gin Rummy, We think that 30 tables would he optimum both from a control point of view and from an ii,c:orrie standpoint. We would Provide a restaurant but serve no 1 1ucr• open 14 hours per day and would k'e would want to be c,lo�� or;e .day per week. Concerning location, we would be aw,a, from from all schools and churches, ols Our preliminary t}ii nPt i ng is to locate in an area which would be acceptable (,o lx `,h the Cit y nd to us maybe i_n a commercial or` light indusIrial area with ample parking and freeway convenient. We 1 ")U11 e,iCher build remodel; we would either own or 1(1, � -,, or The positive aspects are to first �)f a.11 recognize gambling is allowed in the ma 'or t,( that approximately 300 California locatiWis �.h `'Cates and in future appears to be that card claks willhcontinueftohe flourish nationwide as communitie:�; c�Qntinue to approve their construction. Cities and Muni ties need this revenue to support constantly incrc�a:; i rl services and have found this a 9 ("'sts of on -going forced to either raise taxes orptc,ac. j t'e1 t.er than being community. `' j s• rvices to the ReCEIVED DEC 1 %4 City of *OrAar c ReCEIVED DEC 1 %4 City of *OrAar -2- The establishment of our club would generate to City which could reduce taxes and whiichwouldlincrease the services. We would negotiate a financially rewarding agreement wherein the City would receive an annual Of our gross income. Our percentage revenue from 30 tables ofP Pan ewould s Indicate that gross of 20 million dollars annuall generate in the vicinity Payment of 10% to the City y' Assuming an agreed upon 2 million dollars annually. °f Moorpark, this would generate We would also contribute to many worthwhile causes in the area; hospitals, schools, fire, police, etc. We would employment to many local residents. Provide We would create and provide a clean, warm environment. We would provide ful_I a and friendly premises and throughout the parking areaectss. `er both inside the . Ownership and management We would welcome the strongest nand � °uld be beyond reproach, business background search. Anyone i,roisandownership or personal and management position would have to bf, approved by you. We wish to do this because it would oe financially to ownership, would provide a form (.!' g the rewarding Players, and would Pleasant relaxation to provide emt 1(:.vment =, to local residents. Please understand that Management w_il take no the area of gambling. Our revenue wo,, Position in Paying a certain fee to the ld be from each player Playing. This fee is he "house' or the privilege of Y Pai d r, " Per hand" basis. The financial rewards realized by (i i(, card clubs has been Overwhelming! which have approved itself fact that the CommerceeClub in the,r� f and of PI oc�r request but the oexcess of i million dollars annuall of Commerce remits not be taken lightly. Further y to the City should 3,00o the — 1limerce Club employs People and will gross in ex((,;; over dollars in 1994. of t;wo hundred million Concerning the negative aspects of ;;tic h ,3 to think these through and offer t;h(, club I have tried o1(owing: _ -- 1. The residents did not bargain f Moorpark. We believe th -isg of ht'' when they moved to It negati� rill become a 2. The perception of a rather undefined card club is o„E} cf' crime, noise Of "what's ��, 1 /bad element,"'"' _lement, aI1�3 a continuing � a next. There will be t„ i question certainly no "bad no noise „bad element.,, and -3- 3. The introduction of rather unsavory individuals in ownership and management positions. This will not occur. 4. Congestion on streets, parking areas, and freeway ramps clogging the City due to the Cluk)'s popularity. The right location will prevent this. Also, being a rather small club, we do not view this as a problem. 5. Not really the neighborhood influence parents want for their children. We would not locate near, residential. I believe that most of the above stated negatives deal in the area of "perception." Once we can overcome this (as I'm sure we can), we can then address the other areas of possible concern which are primarily "local iorial . " If you feel that this development; has a possibility of Council approval, then I would welcome the opportunity to meet with you and other members of tr)e C'tc Council to discuss this further. Thank you for taking the time to react this; I look forward to hearing from you. I 591- 2107. can be reache,j most, any time at (818) Very truly yours, Everett L. Crawford cc: Mr. Steve Kueny