HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 1995 0201 CC REG ITEM 09AA,' t w f= I Lug 7 2 (44 Yl
)RPARK. CALF
'--
✓l
Co.:n li Meel..ng : ty Council McEP::
199-5- ,
f,CTION: —�
1 AGENDA REPORT ~LION:
The Honorable City Council
BY By ACTION:
FROM: Jaime Aguilera, Director of Community Developme
Prepared by Paul Porter, Senior Planner By
DATE: December 6, 1994 (CC meeting of January 4, 1995)
SUBJECT: CONSIDER REVISIONS TO ORDINANCE NO. 189 (ZONING
ORDINANCE) AS DIRECTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL REGARDING
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR DOWNTOWN AND THEATER PARKING
Background
At the City Council meeting of September 7, 1994, the City Council
directed the Planning Commission to study, set a public hearing and
provide a recommendation to the City Council pertaining to the
proposed changes to the Zoning Ordinance pertaining to: a) allow
no more than 150 of the parking requirements for theaters to be
compact parking spaces; and b' .o reduce setbacks, landscaping
requirements, and parking requ_.rerrents i- the downtown area.
At a duly noticed meeting held on November 28, 1994, the Planning
Commission held a public hearing Dn this matter and adopted the
attached resolution recommending t c) t Ze C` Lty Council the following
changes to the City's Zoning Ordinance:
PP12:06:9419: S5amA:AIJAN91,. L
00205
Sec. 8108 -1 - 1 - PARKING
ff. Recreational Uses:
(14) Theaters, Amphitheaters, and similar spectator -type
enterprises and establishments:
i. Without, fixed seats: 1 space per 21
square feet, of gross floor area.
ii. With fixed seats: 1 space per 3.5
fixed seats.
Discussion
Reduction in Setback Parking and Landscaping Requirements in the
Downtown Area
Due to the requirements outlined in the City's Zoning Ordinance and
given the proposed Mayflower Market reconstruction project, the
reconstruction of the Mayflower_ market would require the approval
of a Variance in order to allow a reduction in landscaping and
setback requirements. The filing _A a Variance seems onerous given
the prevalence of non - existing landscaping and zero setbacks for
existing buildings in the downtown area. Further, justification of
a variance would prove difficult given that the building could be
redesigned to meet all ordinance requirements. Therefore, the
imposition of the existing Zoning Ordinance requirements in the
downt =own area seems contrary to planned enhancement for this area.
The reconstruction of the Mayflower Market, to the pre- earthquake
footprint and square footage st,aradards could occur without the
filing of a Variance if the previ i;lv ot:,t]_ined modifications are
made to the Zoning Ordinance.
Commercial Planned Development Pe.:tma.t
In terms of the effect these ord_i_ lance changes will have on the
Mayflower Market, those are issues that will be resolved as part of
their application for a CPD at thy- Planning Commission level. The
Council should be cognizant of thi fact that the proposed changes
to the ordinance will allow the Approval Authority (Planning
Commission in this case) wide d.screti.on in terms of setback,
landscape and parking requirements decisions by the Commission may
be seen as precedent by futile level pens. The ordinance as
FF12:06:9419:55amA:A4JAN95.
00206
proposed provides parameters for parking. The Council may want to
consider giving the Planning Commission direction as to similar
limits for landscaping and setbacks.
Notwithstanding the aforementioned, staff expects that the Market
will be the only major project to avail itself of these new
standards before more comprehensive standards are developed as part
of the Downtown Plan. As the Council may be aware, staff is
currently awaiting responses to an informal RFP process meant to
secure the services of a consultant to produce the Downtown Plan.
Current Setback Parking and Landscaping Standards (C -2 Zone)
Setbacks:
Parking:
5' from each property t.-ie
Generally 1 space per 30C, sq. ft. of building area (this
requirement varies depending on actual use)
Landscaping:
10 0 of lot (which woula be part of the setback square
footage in most cases)
Compact Parking
Ventura Capital Group
applied for a Variance with
the
application
for Major Modification No. 2 (CPD 89 -1) to allow
compact parking
spaces for a theater
use in conjunction with
the
commercial
development of Mission
Bell Plaza II. The City Council
determined
that a Variance was
justification for the
inappropriate based on
Variance
the
fact that
dici not exist.
The City Council determined that another approach to allow compact
parking for the theater uses woui.3 be t.o adopt an amendment to
Article 8 of the Zoning OrdinancE Lo allow compact parking for
theater uses only. At the publi: hearing held on November 28,
1994, the Planning Commission proposed that an amendment to the
Zoning Ordinance be made stating that the approving authority may
allow up to 15% of the required parking spaces for theaters to be
compact parking spaces (as previc3us.y described). The Planning
Commisssion also questioned the size :-)f_ the proposed compact spaces
and staff responded that the ordina�.:ce required that compact spaces
be no less than 7.5 feet by 15. ": -'t in size. Upon further review
of the new City Zoning Ordinance staff has discovered that the
Ordinance no longer describes the s i z�_� of - ompact spaces. Therefore
staff also recommends that the C' urlr.i1 consider adding section
8108- 1.4.1.d of t_he Zoning Ordiriar is t .) _lows:
Sec. 8108 -1.4.1 - Parking Space Size_ - Thr size of each off - street
parking space shall be an unobstr_lc t ed minimum of 9 feet wide by 20
feet long, except that:
PP12: 06: 9419:15a111A: A4JA109',..
3
00207
a. On legal lots less than 26 feet wide requiring two parking
spaces, the Director of Community Development may reduce the
width requirement of the parking spaces to no less than eight
feet.
b. Where a concrete curb around a planter in a parking lot
functions as a wheel stop, the required length of a parking
space abutting such curb may be reduced by a maximum of 2
feet, provided that the planter is at least 5 1/2 feet wide
where vehicles overhang one side of the planter, or least
eight feet wide where vehicles overhang both sides of the
planter; and further provided that the overhang will not
damage or interfere with plant growth or irrigation systems.
C. The minimum size of a parallel parking space shall be 8 1/2
feet by 24 feet. Each space shall be provided with adequate
ingress and egress.
City Attorney Review
The proposed changes to the Zoning Drdinance were forwarded to the
City .Attorney for review on 12/28/99. Any changes will be forwarded
to the City Council as soon as the-,, are available.
Recommendations:
1. Open the public hearing, accent public testimony, and close
the public hearing.
2. Determine that the modifications to the City's Zoning
Ordinance are categorically exempt pursuant to State CEQA
Guidelines Section 15061 (b) 3'
3. Introduce the attached Ordina -ce for first reading.
Attachments: 1. Planning Commis�lan Res)lution
2. Draft Ordinance
PP22:06:9419:55amA:,4JAN95.- 4
00208
RESOLUTION NO. PC -94-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA MAKING A
RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL PERTAINING
TO PROPOSED CHANGES TO THE CITY'S ZONING
ORDINANCE RELATED TO DOWNTOWN PARKING,
LANDSCAPING AND SETBACK STANDARDS, AND PARKING
STANDARDS FOR THEATERS
Whereas, on February 20 1991, the City Council rescinded
the previous Zoning Ordinance as well as Ordinance Nos. 74
(Parking /Setbacks), 76 (Maximum Density), 113 (Signs), 83 (Produce
Stands), 112 (Day Care Facilities), 121 (1,000 foot notification),
and 130 (RPD Zones) in their entirety; and
Whereas, the Council adopted the then current County
Ordinance with several modifications; and
Whereas, in using the Ordinance, staff has noted that
there has been a need to make several minor modifications in order
to clarify certain sections of the Ordinance and to better fit the
needs of the City; and
Whereas, on September 7, 1994, the City Council directed
the Planning Commission to study, set a public hearing and provide
a recommendation to the City Council pertaining to modification to
the City's Zoning Ordinance; and
Whereas, at a duly noticed hearing on November 28, 1994,
the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter; and
Whereas, the Planning Commission determined that the
modifications to the City's Zoning Ordinance is categorically
exempt pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines pursuant to Section 15061
(b) (3) in that the proposed amendments to the Zoning Ordinance
does not have the potential for causing a significant effect on the
environment.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. On November 28, 1994, the Planning Commission
studied, held a public hearing, and recommended the City Council
make the modifications described in Section 3 to the City's Zoning
Ordinance in order to clarify certain sections of the Ordinance and
to better fit the needs of the City.,
ATTACHMENT 1
00209
SECTION 2. That the Planning Commission finds:
That the modifications to the City's Zoning Ordinance is
categorically exempt pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines
pursuant to Section 15061 (b) (3) in that the proposed
amendments to the Zoning Ordinance does not have the
potential for causing a significant effect on the
environment.
SECTION 3.
Sec. 8108 -1 - 1 - PARKING
ff. Recreational Uses:
(14) Theaters, Amphitheaters, and similar spectator -type
enterprises and establishments:
i. Without fixed seats: 1 space per 21
square feet of gross floor area.
ii. With fixed seats: 1 space per 3.5
fixed seats.
00210
€<
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1994.
AYES:
NOES:
ATTEST:
Celia LaFleur, Secretary
Chairman:
Michael H. Weisner Jr.
00211
ORDINANCE
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK,
CALIFORNIA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 137 PERTAINING TO: A)
ALLOWING NO MORE THAN 155 OF THE PARKING REQUIREMENTS FOR
THEATERS TO BE COMPACT PARKING SPACES; AND B) REDUCING
SETBACKS, LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS, AND PARKING
REQUIREMENTS IN THE DOWNTOWN AREA
Whereas, on November 28, 1994, the Planning Commission
studied, held a public hearing, and recommended the City Council
make the modifications described in Section 3 to the City's Zoning
Ordinance in order to clarify certain sections of the Ordinance and
to better fit the needs of the ri y, and
Whereas, the City Ccurrc_1 opened and closed the public
hearing on January 4, 1995; and
Whereas, the City ouncil determined that the
modifications to the City's Zoning Ordinance is categorically
exempt pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 (b) (3) in
that the proposed amendments tc thF Zoning Ordinance does not have
the potential for causing a sign-if 'ca,it effect on the environment;
and
Whereas, requested changes to the Zoning Ordinance as
directed by the City Council have been made to the Ordinance.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK,
CALIFORNIA, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That the modi f i c,it ions t:o the City's Zoning
Ordinance are categorically ex, =mpt pursuant to State CEQA
Guidelines Section 15061 (b) ( ")
SECTION 2. That the Current Z(,Iiny Ordinance No. 137 is hereby
amended as found in Section 3.
PP12: 06: 94110:13amA:A CC. ORf
00212
Sec. 8108 -1 - 1 - PARKING
ff. Recreational Uses:
(14) Theaters, Amphitheaters, and similar spectator -type
enterprises and establishments:
i. Without fixed seats: 1 space per 21
squ.irre feet of gross floor area.
ii. Witt; f__xed seats: 1 space per 3.5
fixF l seats .
Sec. 8108 - 1.4.1 - Parking Space Size The size of each off - street
parking space shall be an unobstruc t.ea mi;r imum of 9 feet wide by 20
feet long, except that:
a. On legal lots less than 26 teet wide requiring two parking
spaces, the Director of CommU,lity Development may reduce the
width requirement of the pai},c n,3 spares to no less than eight
feet.
b. Where a concrete curb around a planter in a parking lot
functions as a wheel stop, the required length of a parking
space abutting such curb mad he reduced by a maximum of 2
feet, provided that the planter is at least 5 1/2 feet wide
where vehicles overhang one sl_de of the planter, or least
eight feet wide where vehicle" overhang both sides of the
planter; and further provid('d tha? the overhang will not
damage or interfere with LLt t brow?h or irrigation systems.
C. The minimum size of a paral 1, _ park _ng space shall be 8 1/2
feet by 24 feet. Each space ha l_ 1, provided with adequate
ingress and egress.
PP1 ?:06:94 /10:13amA:ACC OR1 ...
00213
SECTION 4. That if any section, subsection, sentence, clause,
phrase, part or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held to
be invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent
jurisdiction, such decision shall. not affect the validity of the
remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council declares
that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section,
subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, part or portion thereof,
irrespective of the fact that:, any one or more sections,
subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, parts or portions be
declared invalid or unconstitutic��a
SECT -ION 5. This Ordinance shall become effective thirty (30)
days after the passage and adoption.
SECTION 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and
adoption of this Ordinance; shall enter the same in the book of
original ordinances of said city; shall make a minute of the
passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of
the City Council at which the same is passed and adopted; and
shall, within fifteen (15) days ifter the passage and adoption
thereof, cause the same to be pub - _;shed once in the Moorpark News,
a weekly newspaper of general cix+:,ulaticn, as defined in Section
6008 of the Government Code, for- tl -� City Df Moorpark, and which is
hereby designated for that purpos,
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of , 1995.
Paul
Mayor
ATTEST:
Lillian E. Hare
City Clerk
PP12: 06 r 94/10:13amA: AC(. CRl 3
W. I,awrason, Jr.
00214