Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 1995 0607 CC REG ITEM 09BITEM • 6._' AGENDA REPORT C = TY OF MOORPARK TO: The Honorable City Council. FROM: Ken Gil l bert, Director of Public Works Mew DATE: May 23, 1995 (Council Meeting 6 -7 -95) ix 199 . CTION: ' SUBJECT: Consider Making Certain Changes to AD84 -2 and Confirming the Assessments for r> Fiscal Year 1995/96 OVERVIEW This presents for approval a Resolution making certain changes to Assessment District AD84 -2 and confirming the assessments for Fiscal Year 1995/96. Certain information in support of said proposed changes and proposed assessments is attached hereto and identified as follows: List of Exhibits Exhibit "A": Exhibit "B ": Exhibit "C": Exhibit "D ": Exhibit "E": Exhibit "F": Exhibit "G ": Exhibit "H" : Exhibit "I ": Assessment Summary Fund Activity Summary Zone Activity Summary Preliminary Budget for FY 1995/96 Capital Improvement Project Summary Street Light Cost Summary Engineer's Report Public Hearing Notice Resolution Assessment District 84 -2 was formed in 1984 pursuant to the provisions of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972." This assessment district was established to allow for the funding of street lighting and parkway /median maintenance and improvement expenses through the levying of assessments as provided for in the act. As set forth in the Engineer's Report (Exhibit "G"), there are two types of district expenses, generally described as follows: those expenses determined to be of general benefit to the community, which are spread to a I I of the lots in the City; and, those expenses for the construction and maintenance of improvements determined to be of benefit to the properties within a number of identified zones, which are spread to all of the lots within each zone. ad84_95.apr Assessment District 84 -2 June 7, 1995 Page 2 The City must annually act to levy the lighting and landscape maintenance assessments. Said assessments have been levied each year since the formation of the district. In accordance with the requirements of the above mentioned act, the City Council has taken a number of actions in recent months in preparation for considering the levy of assessments for Street Lighting and Landscape Maintenance for FY 1995/96. Those actions are summarized as follows: 1. On January 4, 1995, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 95- 1094 stating its intent to take the subject actions. 2. Also on that date, the City Council selected Dwight French and Associates to prepare the Engineer's Reports for AD84 -2. 3. On April 5, 1995, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 95- 1113 making certain findings and taking certain actions including the following: • approving, subject to change, the Engineers' Report for AD84 -2 for FY 1995/96; • stating intent to make certain changes to AD84 -2: • setting 7:00 p.m. on May 15, 1995, as the time and date of a Public Meeting for the purpose of allowing the public an opportunity to meet with City staff to question and discuss the proposed assessments; • setting 7:00 p.m. on June 7, 1995, as the time and date of a Public Hearing to consider the subject actions; and • directing that Notice of said meetings be sent to the owners of all affected properties, stating the amount of the assessment levied for FY 1994/95„ the amount of the proposed increase in the assessment amount and the total amount of the assessments proposed for FY '995/96, DISCUSSION A. Tentative Assessment Summary The amounts of the proposed assessments for AD 84 -2 for FY 1995/96 are set forth on page 2 of Exhibit 'A'. A summary of that information is as follows: 1. City -Wide Assessment -- A summary of the annual assessment for a single - family residential lot is as follows: Actual Proposed Elements FY 1994/95 FY 1995/96 Landscape Maintenance $12.36 $7.92 Street Lighting $20.64 $19.77 Total $33.00 $27.69 adB4_96.apr Assessment District 84 -2 June 7, 1995 Page 3 2. Zone of Benefit Assessments -- Those expenses for the maintenance of improvements determined to be of benefit to the properties within an identified zone, are spread to all of the lots within that zone. A re -cap of the proposed annual assessment for each Zone of Benefit is as follows: 9 Condor Parkway 49 ac. 10 T. R. Rd. Res: 2,401 Res Pkwy (PC -3) Comm: 11.81 ac B. Fund Activity = Y 1994/95 Total Per Lot Assessment Assessment 4 ; 31 5C. 59 59 „6' 94.45 ,4E .1.9 4 37 3�, 17;.06 4, 1.00 10 1181 1.11.46 per acre FY 1995/96 1 Total Number Zone Tract of Lots 1 2851 77 2 2865 622 3 3032 265 4 3274 129 5 3019/3525 217 6 3306 22 7 Industrial Park 95 NE of L. A. Ave & ac. Gabbert Rd 8a City (T -4340, 497 T -4341 & T -4342) 8b Home Acres 200 9 Condor Parkway 49 ac. 10 T. R. Rd. Res: 2,401 Res Pkwy (PC -3) Comm: 11.81 ac B. Fund Activity = Y 1994/95 Total Per Lot Assessment Assessment 4 ; 31 5C. 59 59 „6' 94.45 ,4E .1.9 4 37 3�, 17;.06 4, 1.00 10 1181 1.11.46 per acre FY 1995/96 1 Total Per Lot Assessment Assessment 5,939 77.13 60,108 96.64 3,059 11.54 0 0 17,939 82.67 749 34.05 5,420 57.10 per acre 10 ,�23 K.86 10,223 20.57 10. 23 51.86 10,223 51.11 6,000 121.92 650 13.21 per acre per acre 0 36,994 15.41 (? 1,506 127.51/acre Attached for your information as Exhibit 'B', is a summary of the Fund Activity for AD 84 -2 for the past several years. C. Citywide Maintenance & Assessments Maintenance expenses for items considered to be of general benefit to the community are spread to all non - exempt parcels. These expenses fall into two categories: 1) street lighting and 2) parkway / median landscape maintenance. ad84_96.apr Assessment District 84 -2 June 7, 1995 Page 4 1. Street Lighting -- Street lighting costs are summarized in Exhibit F. The total street lighting cost projected for FY 1995/96 is $186,000. These costs are distributed to all of the non - exempt properties in the City by means of a formula designed to spread said costs on the basis of benefit. This benefit spread formula identifies a number of factors (including lighting intensity, security, people use, etc.) which are associated with benefits derived, and then weights those factors by land use as a means to determining benefits derived. This formula is explained in more detail on pages 4 and 5 of the Engineer's Report (Exhibit 'G'). 2. Landscape Maintenance -- In the past, citywide landscape maintenance costs were spread evenly to all non - exempt lots in the City. The citywide landscape maintenance assessments set forth in the Engineer's Report (Exhibit 'GI) are based on this prior formula. On April 5, 1995, the City Council approved a change to the method used to spread citywide landscape maintenance costs, to be the same as the benefit spread formula used by AD85 -1 to spread parks maintenance costs. Under this revised formula, twenty -five percent (25 %) of the total citywide landscape maintenance costs are first allocated to non - residential properties„ The remaining seventy -five percent (75 %) of said costs are allocated to residential properties. These allocated costs are then spread to non - exempt properties using the People -Use formula used in AD85 -1. A summary of typical assessments for both the prior formula and the revised formula is set forth on pages 3 and 4 of Exhibit 'A.' The net result of this change reduces the single- family residential assessment from $30.20 to $27.69. However, in that non- residential properties comprise less than four percent (4%) of the lots in the City, this change to the formula will increase the assessment for a neighborhood commercial. center from $138.93 to $249.61. D. Zones of Benefit I. Summary -- Zone maintenance costs for FY 1995/96 are summarized on page 1 of Exhibit 'C.' Both projected costs and assessments are summarized on page 5 of Exhibit 'C.' 2. Parcel Assessment / Acre Assessment -- Except for Zones 7 and 9, the costs for each Zone of Benefit are distributed equally to all of the non - exempt parcels in each zone. In that the size of the lots in Zones 7 and 9 vary considerably, the costs for those zones are spread to each non - exempt parcel via a per acre assessment. The amount of the assessment for each parcel in Zone '7 and Zone 9 is set forth on pages 7 through 9 of Exhi.tdt 'A. °' ad84_96.apr Assessment District 84 -2 June 7, 1995 Page 5 3. Zone Fund Activity -- Attached as Exhibit 'C' is a summary of the revenues and expenditures for each Zone of Benefit over the past several years. This exhibit shows the year -end surplus and /or deficit for each zone, carried over to the following year. A discussion of the Fund Activity for each Zone is as follows: Zone l: The year -end zone balance is anticipated to be a deficit of $2,194. Although next year's costs are expected to go down, the year -end deficit will require an increase in the assessment from $4,131 to $5,939. The City Council is advised that the assessment for FY 1993/94 was $9,776. Zone 2: • Maintenance -- The year -end zone balance for maintenance is anticipated to be a deficit of $7,469. This, combined with an increase in the projected costs, will require an increase in the maintenance assessment from $43,882 to $53,888. These maintenance costs include an amount for the annual cleaning of the storm drain debris basins located on the southern boundary of Tract 2865. • Improvements -- Last year a $10 per lot ($6,220) improvement assessment was levied on the lots in Zone 2 to fund the future construction of parkway improvements on the north side of Tierra Rejada Road west of Spring Road. It is recommended that this assessment be levied again this year. It is anticipated that it will be necessary to levy this assessment two additional years (total of four years) to fully fund these improvements. Zone 3: The year -end zone balance is anticipated to be a deficit of $1,259. Although next year's costs are expected to go down, the year -end deficit will require an increase in the assessment from $846 to 53,059. Zone 4: It was recently determined that in FY 1993/94 a number of properties outside of the boundaries of Zone 4 were levied a Zone 4 assessment. This caused the Zone 4 assessment revenues to be much higher than expected and resulted in a year -end zone surplus. Accordingly, the amount of the assessment levied in FY 1994/95 was zero. In addition, the recommended amount of the assessment cited in the Public Hearing Notice for FY 1995/96 was also zero. It will be necessary to make refunds to the properties assessed in error. Although the total amount of those refunds is not yet known, it is now anticipated that the FY 1995/96 year -end zone balance will not be the $432 shown on Exhibit 'C -3,' but will be a deficit, amount which will have to be recovered from additiona:;; assessments in future years. ad84_96,apr Assessment District 84 -2 June 7, 1995 Page 6 Zone 5: The year -end zone balance is anticipated to be a surplus of $7,115. Although next year's costs are expected to be in excess of $25,000, the amount of the total assessment will be less than $17,000. Zone 6: The amount of the assessment includes sufficient revenues to recover an anticipated year -end zone deficit of $229. Zone 7: The year -end zone balance is anticipated to be a surplus of slightly more than $1,000. The amount of the total assessment is, therefore, approximately $1,000 less than next year's anticipated costs. Zone 8 -- Home Acres Buffer Area: • Maintenance -- An amount of $1,200 was levied last year to cover anticipated maintenance costs for a portion of the year. This amount will be carried over and combined with a proposed maintenance assessment of $6,550 to cover next year's maintenance costs.. Improvements -- The City Council awarded a contract for the construction of the planned improvements. That action included the approval of a portion of the project funding from the Citywide AD84 -2 surplus. The Zone 8 assessment proposed for FY 1995/96 includes an improvement assessment of $13,895, an amount anticipated to be sufficient to fully fund all these improvements. Zone 9 -- Virginia Colony Parkway: • Maintenance -- For the first time next year, an amount of $650 is proposed for maintenance. • Improvements -- No additional improvement assessments are proposed. It is anticipated that the $6,000 levied to date will be sufficient to fully fund these improvements. Zone 10: The public hearing notices shows a maximum per lot assessment of $15.41 on all residential properties, plus an assessment of $127.51 on the commercial property, for FY 1995/96 for all the properties within PC -3. These assessments will generate a total Zone 10 assessment of approximately $38,500, an amount equal to the preliminary estimate for the annual maintenance cost for the parkways on Tierra Rejada Road (and the High. School frontage on Mountain Trail Street) within PC-" It is the intent of staff to present a report to the City Council on June 21, 1995, regarding the status of efforts prerequisite to the City assuming the maintenance of the Tierra Rejada Road parkways and medians within PC -3. As you may recall, the City Council. previously took action ad86_96.apr Assessment District 84 -2 June 7, 1995 Page 7 specifically listing those prerequisites. The developer has been working to complete those tasks in time to allow for the consideration of a transfer of these maintenance responsibilities effective July 1., 1995. There has been some questions raised regarding the estimated cost of maintenance for these landscape improvements. Should these costs be revised upward, it would be the recommendation of staff that the date of acceptance of maintenance be deferred. A full analysis of estimated costs and the completion of the tasks prerequisite to the transfer, will be presented to the City CouncP on June 21, 1995. E. FY 1995/96 Budget Attached as Exhibit 'D' is a copy of the preliminary budget for Parkway Lighting and Landscaping for FY 1995/96. These costs include all lighting, landscape and zone maintenance and improvement costs. 1. Operations & Maintenance (O &M) -- The budget amount proposed for O &M for FY 1995/96 ($438,015) is $52,235 more than the approved O &M Budget for FY 1994/95 ($385,780). Approximately $23,600 of that amount is an increase to the Citywide landscape maintenance cost resulting from the addition of the Tierra Rejada Road median within PC -3 ($20,575) and the new parkway and median landscaping on Princeton Avenue and Campus Park Drive ($3,000). In addition, the cost to maintain the landscaping within the Zones of Benefit is anticipated to increase over $50,000. This is primarily due to the addition of the maintenance of new landscaped areas in Zone 8 (Home Acres Buffer), Zone 9 (Condor Parkway) and Zone 10 (Tierra Rejada Road parkway within PC -3) 2. Citywide vs. Zone Costs - -- A line -item listing of both Citywide and Zone costs is set forth in Exhibit D -2. 3. Citywide Landscaping -- A complete list of the Citywide landscaped areas maintained by AD 84 -2 is set forth in Exhibit D -3. 4. Street Lighting -- The cost of street lighting is included in the utility costs listed under Account # 652 on Exhibit 'D'. A detail of street lighting costs is set forth in Exhibit 'F'. The proposed assessment amount for street lighting in FY 1995/96 is $186,000, a $4,000 decrease from the amount assessed last year. ad86_96.apr Assessment District 84 -2 June 7, 1995 Page 8 6. Capital Improvements -- A detail of the proposed district funded landscaping projects for next year is set forth in Exhibit 'E'. Those projects are summarized as follows: • Parkway: East Side of Spring Rd S/O Peach Hill Road • Parkway: South side of L. A. Ave. E/O Tierra Rejada Rd. • Parkway: North Side of Poindexter Ave. F. Capital Improvements Attached as Exhibit 'E' is a summary capital improvement projects funded by prior year Citywide maintenance surpluses. The project proposed for construction next year are summarized as follows: • Parkway: E/S Spring (S /O Peach Hill)..... $5,000 • Parkway: S/S L. A. Ave. E/O T. R. Rd. ... $20,000 • Parkway: N/S Poindexter Ave. ......... $30,000 Total $55,000 Note: * Includes $7,315 from JevPloper G. Engineer's Report The above described expenditure information was provided to the Assessment Engineer to be used as the basis for the preparation of the attached Engineer's Report (Exhibit 'G'). As stated above, said report was previously amended by the City Council when the method used to spread citywide landscape maintenance costs was revised. Although the attached copy of the draft report does not yet reflect these changes, the final report will. Said report (as revised) sets for the proposed amount of the assessment for FY 1995/96 for various land use categories, along with an explanation of the Benefit Assessment Formula and other related information. H. Public Hearing 1. The "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" (Streets and Highways Code) requires a public hearing to be held prior to the annual levy of assessments for the purpose of receiving input and to hear any protests to the proposed assessments. 2. If the amount of the assessments are to remain the same, the law does not require a Notice of public hearing to be mailed to each property being assessed,. However, consistent with past practice, it is recommended that such a notice be mailed to the owners of all of the affected properties. ad84_96.apr Assessment District 84 -2 June 7, 1995 Page 9 3. Notwithstanding the above mentioned policy, State law requires that prior to considering any new or increased assessment, a public hearing notice must be mailed to the owners of the properties to be assessed. Said notice shall state the amount of the existing assessment, the amount of the proposed assessment and the amount of the proposed increase in the assessment. The amount of the approved estimated assessment MAY NOT EXCEED the amounts stated in the notice. Said notice must be mailed at least forty -five (45) days prior to the date of the hearing. In order to meet this deadline, said Notices were postmarked and mailed prior to April 23, 1995. 4. State law also requires that prior to considering any new or increased assessment a Public Meeting shall be convened to allow the public an opportunity to discuss the proposed increased assessment. Such a meeting was convened on Monday, May 15, 1995, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers. This informal meeting was conducted by staff for the purpose of providing answers to questions regarding projected program costs and the methods used to spread those costs to the properties assessed. Only a few people were in attendance. Staff responded to the questions asked. 5. Attached as Exhibit 'H' is &, copy of the Public Hearing Notice for AD84 -2. I. Deferred Action The attached resolution (Exhibit "I ") making certain changes to Assessment District AD84 -2 and confirming the assessments for Fiscal Year 1995/96 must be adopted no later than June 30, 1995, in order for the assessments to be levied. In prior years the City Council has adopted such resolutions concurrently with the adoption of the budget. • , zip � • Staff recommends that the City Council open the public hearing, receive testimony and continue these matters to the date of the Budget Workshops. Subsequent to the budget workshop meetings, but no later than June 30. 1994, staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution No. 95- (Exhibit ' "Ii") making certain changes to AD84 -2 and confirming the assessments for Fiscal Year 1995/96. ad84_96.apr EXHIBIT "A" (page 1) Fiscal Year 1995/96 AD 84 -2 ASSESSMENT SUMMARY -------------------- -------------------- 22- Nay -95 FY 93/94 FY 94/95 FY 95/96 Description Actual Budget Proposed ----- - - - - -- TOTAL ANTICIPATED ANNUAL EXPENSES 467,821 596,815 513,015 LESS TOTAL ANTICIPATED ZONE MAINTENANCE EXPENSES 184,057 (108,437) (134,849) LESS TOTAL ANTICIPATED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT EXPENSES 1100,9241 (192,028) l (55,000) TOTAL CITY -WIDE MAINTENANCE EXPENSES _---- .... -- y82,840 ----- - - - - -- 296;350 ----- -` - - -- 323,166 LESS PRIOR YEAR SURPLUS CARRYOVER 0 (50,658) LESS TRANSFER IN ;j 0 ' 0 CITYWIDE MAINTENANCE EXPENSES LESS CREDITS -- - -__ -- 282,840 ----- - - - - -- 296,350 ----- - - - - -- 272,509 TOTAL CITY -WIDE MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENTS 293,400 296,350 272,509 PLUS CITY -WIDE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ASSESSMENT 0 0 I 0 TOTAL CITY -WIDE ASSESSMENT 293,400 296,350 272,509 PLUS TOTAL ASSESSMENT FOR ALL ZONES 82,520 138,950 152,809 TOTAL ASSESSMENTS 375,920 435,300 425,318 22- Nay -95 EXHIBIT v6" 2\ (page ` ' 22-Nay-95 Fiscal Year 1995/96 AD 84-2 b3SOSG0O0T SUMMARY FY 1994/95 FY 1905/96 ASSESSMENT SUMMARY ------------ '- ------------------------ i C D 8F Res SD Res Description &oomot($) Total S} Aaamot($) Total ($) Notes Sae Citywide &oa000meot ----------- Page | Alt. #l: Prior Your Formula --' | A-} | }].00 296,j00 | ! 6/D C/D C = (Ax0) / D Alt. #]: 6-4 � � 27.69 | 272,509 Zone Assessments ! ---------- Total Assessment Total A000aomeut 0o. ----- ------------ of Lots Aoomot($) Amt Per Aammt(S) Axt (X) Per l 77 | 4,131 56.�q Lot ----------- | 5,939 ---------- 77.13 ----------- Lot % 622 ! 59,367 95.4� Lot } 60,08 06.64 Lot 2 265 | ! 846 ] ' Lot i 3,059 11.54 Lot 4 129 O 0 o Lot � | O 0.00 Lot 5 ID | � 37,338 172,h Lot 17,939 82.67 Lot 6 22 | 242 ll/u Lot 749 34.05 Lot 7 95 ac. 10,581 Ill Acre 5,420 57.10 Acre 8 City 497 10,233 20,81-) Lot 10,223 20.57 Lot Home Acres 200 10,223 50 *` Lot. 10,233 51.11 Lot 9 40 un' 6,000 121 ^ 6oze 650 13.21 Acre 10 Oouideotia 2401 0/& 8/, Lot 36/994 15.41 Lot Commercial 11.81 ac, 1,506 127.51 Acre Total All X000a --------- 138,950 ----------- 152,809 Exhibit 'A' 22- Nay -95 Assessment Summary ALTERNATE #1: Present. Formula Page 3 of 9 AD84 -2 Lighting & Landscaping STREET LIGHTING: spread to all properties based on benifit formula Allocation Res /Non -Res: None CITYWIDE LANDSCAPING: equal spread to all properties Allocation Res /Non -Res: None ---------------------- ASSESSMENT ALLOCATION INFONATION i Land Use Comparison Element - -- Lighting Landscaping Total I Non - Residential - '- "-- ° " " -'- --------- Number of lots 274 Total FY 95/96 Proposed Assessments $186,000 ;36 509 5272,509 Percent of total Lots 3.30% Allocation to: Non - Residential: Percent of Total Non - Residential: Total Assmnts Residential: Percent of Total Residential: Total Assmnts ---------------------- ---------------------- ASSESSMENT CALCULATION None None Residential Number of lots 7,743 Percent of total Lots 93.31% Vacant Number of lots 281 Percent of total Lots 3.39% - ----- ------ --- -------- - - - - -- Land People Lighting Typical Land Use Use Allocated Total unir Use Assessment Catagories Code Cost ($) Units Cost (11. Factor Amount ($) LIGHTING Non - Residential Bank 24 186,000 9,409 l . "'7 3 59.31 Retail 19 186,000 9,409 1' . "'7 4 79.08 Lite Mfg. 31 186,000 9,409 1S d`'7 5 98.85 Neighborhood Cntr. 15 186,000 9,409 It,. "7 6.5 128.51 Regional Cntr. 16 186,000 9,409 L(.` 6.5 128.51 Residential Single - Family 1 186,000 9,409 1 <. '7 1 19.77 Condo 3 186,000 9,409 1 <.'' 1 19.77 Apartment 5 186,000 9,409 li.` 0.75 14.83 Plus Lighting Assessment LANDSCAPING L/S Assmnt Assut ($) Total ($) Non - Residential ---- - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- Bank 10.43 59.31 69.74 Retail 10.43 79.08 89.51 Lite Mfg. 10.43 98.85 109.28 Neighborhood Cntr. 10.43 128.51 138.93 Regional Cntr. 10.43 128.51 138.93 Residential Single - Family 10.43 19.77 30.20 Condo 10.43 19.77 30.20 Apartment 10.43 14.83 25.26 Exhibit 'A' Assessment Summary ALTERNATE #3: 084 -2 Lighting & Landscaping 22- Nay -95 Page 4 of 9 STREET LIGHTING: spread to all properties based on benifit formula Allocation Res /Non -Res: None CITYWIDE LANDSCAPING: costs spread based on Parks People Use formula Allocation Res /Non -Res: 75% - 25% ASSESSMENT ALLOCATION INFONATION I Land Use Comparison ` ------------------------------------ Element Lighting Landscaping Total Non - Residential ---------- - - - - -- --------- ___ .._._ -------- If Number of lots 274 Total FY 95/96 Proposed Assessments $186,000 386.509 $272,509 Percent of total Lots 3.30% Allocation to: None Non - Residential: Percent of Total .25 Non - Residential: Total Assmnts 21.627 Residential Number of lots 7,743 Percent of total Lots 93.31% Residential: Percent of Total .'15 j Vacant Residential: Total Assmnts 64 882 ! Number of lots 281 l Percent of total Lots 3.39% ASSESSMENT CALCULATION - - - - -. _ _..------------------------------------- --- --------------- ----------------------------- Land People Lighting Typical Land Use Use Allocated Total oni, Use Assessment Catagories Code Cost ($) Units Cost (o Factor Amount ($) LIGHTING ---- - - - - -- Non - Residential Bank 24 186,000 9,409 3 59.31 Retail 19 186,000 9,409 1'a,'`7 4 79.08 Lite Mfg. 31 186,000 9,409 1 .'i 5 98.85 Neighborhood Cntr. 15 186,000 9,409 1', "7 6.5 128.51 Regional Cntr. 16 186,000 9,409 1`.'" 6.5 128.51 Residential Single - Family 1 186,000 9,409 1 °.'T 1 19.77 Condo 3 186,000 9,409 1 19.77 Apartment 5 186,000 9,409 0.75 14.83 Plus Lighting Assessment LANDSCAPING L/S Assmnt Assmnt ($) Total ($) Non - Residential -- -- - - - --- ---- - - - --- ---- - -- - -- Bank 24 21,627 1,786 1; .i1 3 36.33 59.31 95.64 Retail 19 21,627 1,786 l,.11 6 72.66 79.08 151.74 Lite Mfg. 31 21,627 1,786 1'.11 12 145.32 98.85 244.17 Neighborhood Cntr. 15 21,627 1,786 1..11 10 121.10 128.51 249.61 Regional Cntr. 16 21,627 1,786 P<.11 30 363.30 128.51. 491.81 Residential Single - Family 1 64,882 32,688 98 4 7.92 19.77 27.69 Condo 3 64,882 32,688 ..98 3 5.94 19.77 25.71 Apartment 5 64,882 32,688 1.98 3 5.94 14.83 20.77 EXHIBIT "A" (page 7) Fiscal Year 1994/95 AD 84 -2 ASSESSNENT SUN NARY Summary of Acreage Assessments Total Total Per Acre Total Zone Assessment Acres Assessment A P Acres Assessment 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0 -061 -015 1.680 95.92 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0 -061 -025 1.160 66.23 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0- 061 -035 1.160 66.23 7 5,420.00 94.9?' 57.10 511 -0- 061 -045 1.160 66.23 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0- 061 -055 1.160 66.23 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0- 061 -065 1.130 64.52 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0- 061-075 1.060 60.52 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0 -061 -085 1.060 60.52 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0- 061 -115 1.060 60.52 7 5,420.00 94.9? 57.10 511 -0- 061 -145 1.170 66.80 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0- 061 -155 2.130 121.62 7 5,420.00 94.9:; 57.10 511 -0 -062 -065 1.170 66.80 7 5,420.00 94.9' 57.10 511 -0- 062 -075 1,270 72.51 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0- 062 -165 2.750 157.02 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0- 062 -175 2.830 161.58 7 5,420.00 94.9? 57.10 511-0- 062 -215 2.940 167.86 7 5,420.00 94.9:1 57.10 511 -0 -062 -235 1.227 70.06 7 5,420.00 94.9: 57.10 511 -0- 062-245 3.072 175.40 7 5,420.00 94.9j 57.10 511 -0 -062 -255 5.000 285.48 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0 -062 -265 0.547 31.23 7 5,420.00 94.9, 57.10 511 -0- 062 -275 1.100 62.81 7 5,420.00 94.9 57.10 511 -0 -062 -285 1.080 61.66 7 5,420.00 94.9:3 57.10 511 -0- 062 -295 1.260 71.94 7 5,420.00 94.9:: 57.10 511 -0- 062 -305 1.330 75.94 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0- 062 -315 1.150 65.66 7 5,420.00 94.9' 57.10 511 -0 -062 -345 3.080 175.86 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0- 062 - 375 3.930 224.39 7 5,420.00 94.9, 57.10 511 -0- 062 -385 2.020 115.33 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0- 070 -030 2.530 144.45 7 5,420.00 94.9: 57.10 511 -0- 070 -040 5.180 ** 295.76 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 51.1 -0 -070 -450 3.300 188.42 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0 -070 -485 2.550 145.60 7 5,420.00 57.10 511-0 -070 -490 0.500 28.55 7 5,420.00 94.9' 57.10 511-0 -070 -500 0.490 27.98 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0- 070 -51.0 0.490 27.98 7 5,420.00 94.9:, 57.10 511 -0 -070 -520 0.520 29.69 7 5,420.00 94.9:1 57.10 511 -0- 070 -530 0.950 54.24 7 5,420.00 94.96 57.10 511-0- 070 -540 0.710 40.54 7 5,420.00 94.9 57.10 511 -0 -0770 -555 1.670 95.35 7 5,420.00 94.9; 57.10 511 -0 -070 -565 0.860 49.10 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0 -070 -575 0.339 19.36 7 5,420.00 94.9: 57.10 511 -0 -070 -585 0.239 13.65 7 5,420.00 94.9, 57.10 511 -0 -070 -595 0.239 13.65 7 5,420.00 94.9 57.',10 511- n -0'10 -605 1.100 62.81 Page 5 & 6 omitted 22- Hay -95 Remarks ----------- - - - - -- EXHIBIT "A" (page 8) Fiscal Year 1994/95 AD 84 -2 ASSESSMENT SUMMARY Summary of Acreage Assessments 22- May -95 Remarks ----------- - - - - -- Total Total Per Acre Total Zone Assessment Acres Assessment A P Acres Assessment 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0- 070 -615 0.800 45.68 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511-0- 070-625 1.169 66.75 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0- 070 -635 0.610 34.83 7 5,420.00 94.9:'. 57.10 511 -0 -070 -645 0.339 19.36 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511-0- 070 -655 0.530 30.26 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0 -070 -665 0.469 26.78 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0 -070 -675 0.469 26.78 7 5,420.00 94.9.1 57.10 511 -0 -070 -685 0.469 26.78 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0- 070 -695 0.469 26.78 7 5,420.00 94.9:; 57.10 511 -0 -070 -705 0.469 26.78 7 5,420.00 94.9' 57.10 511 -0- 070 -715 0.480 27.41 7 5,420.00 94.9:' 57.10 511 -0- 070 -780 0.839 47.90 7 5,420.00 94.9: 57.10 511 -0- 151 -065 0.510 29.12 7 5,420.00 94.9" 57.10 511 -0- 151 -075 0.180 * 10.28 7 5,420.00 94.9:j 57.10 511 -0- 151 -085 0.600 34.26 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0 -151 -095 0.700 39.97 7 5,420.00 94.9:; 57.10 511 -0- 151 -105 0.580 33.12 7 5,420.00 94.9{ 57.10 511 -0- 151 -115 0.680 38.83 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0- 151 -125 0.550 31.40 7 5,420.00 94.9: 57.10 511 -0 -151 -135 0.650 37.11 7 5,420.00 94.9:; 57.10 511 -0- 151 -145 0.200 11.42 7 5,420.00 94.9, 57.10 511 -0 -151 -155 0.550 31.40 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0 -161 -025 0.412 23.52 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0 -161 -045 0.464 26.49 7 51420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0 -161 -055 0.324 18.50 7 5,420.00 94.9j 57.10 511 -0 -161 -065 0.292 16.67 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0 -161 -085 0.329 18.78 7 5,420.00 94.9; 57.10 511-0 -161 -095 0.295 16.84 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0 -161 -105 0.274 15.64 7 5,420.00 94.9; 57.10 511 -0 -161 -115 0.261 14.90 7 5,420.00 94.9: 57.10 511 -0 -161 -125 0.292 16.67 7 5,420.00 94.9: 57.10 511 - 0-161 -135 0.534 30.49 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0- 161 -155 0.580 33.12 7 5,420.00 94.9: 57.10 511 -0- 161 -165 0.387 22.10 7 5,420.00 94.9, 57.10 511 -0 -161 -175 0.287 16.39 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511-0- 161 -185 0.287 16.39 7 5,420.00 94.9: 57.10 511 -0 -161 -195 0.287 16.39 7 5,420.00 94.9: 57.10 511 -0 -161 -205 0.414 23.64 7 5,420.00 94.9; 57.10 511 -0 -161 -215 0.492 28.09 7 5,420.00 94.9: 57.10 511 -0- 161 -225 0.440 25.12 7 5,420.00 94.9; 57.10 511 -0 -161 -255 1.240 70.80 7 5,420.00 94.91 57.1.0 511 -0 -162 -015 0.687 39.23 7 5,420.00 94.9' 57.10 511 -0.162 -045 0.704 40.20 22- May -95 Remarks ----------- - - - - -- EXHIBIT "A" (page 9) Fiscal Year 1994/95 AD 84 -2 ASSESSMENT SUMMARY Summary of Acreage Assessments Smallest Parcel �* Largest. Parcel Remarks 22- May-95 Total Total Per Acre Total Zone Assessment Acres Assessment A P # Acres Assessment 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0- 162 -055 0.340 19.41 7 5,420.00 94.9' 57.10 511 -0- 162-065 0.530 30.26 7 5,420.00 94.93 57.10 511 -0- 162 -075 0.330 18.84 7 5,420.00 94.933 57.10 511-0 - 162 -085 0,440 25.12 7 5,420.00 144,9 511 -o- 162 -095 0. 340 19.41 Zone total 94,927 5,420.00 9 650.00 49.21 13.21 513 -o -060 -035 1.000 13.21 9 650.00 49.21 13.21 513 -0- 060 -075 11.780 155.59 9 650.00 49.21 13.21 513 -0 -060 -085 0.000 Exempt 9 650.00 49.21 13.21 513 -0 -060 -095 3.860 50.98 9 650.00 49.21 13.21 513 -0- 060 -125 1.020 13.47 9 Exempt -- 0 513 -0 -060 -1.35 0.000 Exempt 9 Exempt -- 0 513 -0 -060 -145 0.000 Exempt 9 Exempt -- 0 513 -0 -060 -155 0,000 Exempt 9 650.00 49.21 13.21 513 -0 -060 -175 1,860 24.57 9 650.00 49.21 13.21 513 -0- 060 -185 1360 17.96 9 650.00 49.21 13.21 513 -o -060 -245 4.980 65.77 9 650.00 49.21 13.21 513 -0 -060 -255 5380 71.06 9 650.00 49.21 13.21 513 -0- 060 -265 16.080 ** 212.38 9 650.00 49.21 13.21 513 -0 -060 -275 0389 * 11.74 9 650.00 49.21 13.21 51.3 -o- 060 -285 1.005 13.27 Zone ) 'bt:al 49.214 650.00 Smallest Parcel �* Largest. Parcel Remarks 22- May-95 EXHIBIT "B" AD 84 -2 Fund 23 Activity Description -------------------------------- BEGINNING BALANCE REVENUE ASSESSMENTS INTEREST MISCELLANEOUS TRANSFERS IN AVAILABLE FUNDS EXPENSES Personnel 0 &M Capital Improvements Less TOTAL EXPENSES YEAR END BALANCE --------------------- - - - - -- LESS SET ASIDES: Reserved for Zone 2 Improvements Reserved for Zone 8 Improvements Reserved for Zone 9 Improvements Surplus Zone Maint. Assessments Future Capital Improvements FY 1994/95 FY 1995/96 FY FY ----------------------- Proposed 1992/93 1993 94 Budget Proj Actual Budget Notes: 256,185 315,:=')5 179,326 224,527 119,183 449,164 (52,640) (6,220) (5,955) (12,175) (20,445) (34,890) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (8,113) (4,806; (2,586) f431) (55,000) ----- - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- YEAR END AVAILABLE FUNDS 234,157 189,63" 2,835 55,642 19,880 Less Street Light Carryover Deducted from Future Lighting Assessment (4,984) Net Surul.s 50,658 05/22/95 374,9(J9 430,350 435,300 425,318 x,416 1,000 1,000 1,000 E4k 0 0 0 705,349 692,:48 610,676 660,827 545,501 16,727 19,360 19,007 * 20,000 * 20,000 324,031 347,',V 385,780 * 348,005 * 438,015 49,236 100,'x,,A 192,028 * 173,639 * 55,000 389,994 467,x'- 596,815 541,644 513,015 315,355 224, ~r' 13,861 119,183 32,486 (52,640) (6,220) (5,955) (12,175) (20,445) (34,890) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (8,113) (4,806; (2,586) f431) (55,000) ----- - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- YEAR END AVAILABLE FUNDS 234,157 189,63" 2,835 55,642 19,880 Less Street Light Carryover Deducted from Future Lighting Assessment (4,984) Net Surul.s 50,658 05/22/95 Exhibit 'C' Zone of Benefit Maintenance Cost Analysis FY 1995/96 22- Nay -95 Page 1 of 5 Remarks ** Paid by Performance Nursury 12 Months Maint. Amount of Landscaping Contract Utility Costs (5( Total Total Total Maintained Maint. ------------ - - - - -- Maint. Zone - - - -- Lots - - - - -- Acres - - - -- [Sq. Ft.] ----- - - - - -- Cost ($) ------------- Water -- - - - - -- Electric _ _._ Other _ _- - Cost ($) ------ - - - - -- 1 77 - -- 6,000 3,245.00 350 50 C 3,745 2 622 - -- i 970,000 23,919.00 22,350 50 C 46,419 3 265 - -- 3,000 1,557.48 243 0 1,800 4 129 - -- 5,640 3,089.64 700 211 C 3,910 5 217 - -- 91,920 19,094.40 5,600 6o G 25,054 6 22 - -- 500 270.00 250 520 7 - -- 95 10,000 4,800.00 1,500 Oti C 6,500 8 497 City 65,340 l 3,600.00 4,000 5c 0 7,750 50 200 : Hoge Acres 9 - -- 49 300.00 250 00 0 650 10 2,487 - -- I 528,000 21,600.00 16,500 A0 0 38,500 51,743 - f3(' Total 81,475.52 7: 134,849 1ota ('t .1 ties 22- Nay -95 Page 1 of 5 Remarks ** Paid by Performance Nursury 12 Months Maint. EXHIBIT "C ": Zone Activity 05/22/95 Page 2 FY 1994/95 FY 1995/96 FY FY FY ------------------ - - - - -- Proposed FY95/96 Description 1991/92 1992/93 1.993/94 Budget Proj Actual Budget Assessment ZONE 1: Tract 2851: Bambi / Benwood / Flood Control Channel ------------------------------------------- Maintenance ------------------------------ Prior Year Carry Over 0 1,2`5 (1,819) 1,944 (987) (2,194) Plus Assessments 6,773 6,185 9,776 4,131 4,131 5,939 5,939 Budgeted Expenditures 6,773 7,460 7,957 6,075 --- - - - - -- ----- 3,144 - - - - -- 3,745 Less Actual Expenditures 5,498 9,2?G 8,944 6,075 5,338 3,745 Zone 1 Balance 1,275 (1,8:)9 1987 - 0 ---- - - - - -- ----- (2,194) - - - - -- 0 ----------------------------------------------- ZONE 2: Tract 2865: E/S Peach Hill Rd, N/0 T R Rd ** N/S T R Rd Parkway ** S/S T R Rd Slopes ** Christain Barrett & Spring ---------------------------- Maintenance ------------------------------ Prior Year Carry Over 0 (14,360) 4,389 (9,207) (15,519) (7,469) Plus Assessments 32,419 50,500 17,671 43,882 43,882 53,888 53,888 Budgeted Expenditures 32,419 36,141) ----- 22,060 - - - - -- 34,675 ---- - - - - -- ----- 28,363 - - - - -- 46,419 Less Actual Expenditures 46,779 31,751 37,579 34,675 35,832 46,419 Zone 2 Maint. Balance (14,360) 115,°,)19 0 - -- ----- (7,469) - - - - -- 0 Improvements ------------------------------ Prior Year Carry Over 52,640 52,640 52,640 (9,265) (9,530) 5,955 Plus Assessments 0 0 15,485 15,485 6,220 6,220 --- - - - - -- - - - - -- _- - - -- -- ----- - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- ----- - - - - -- $10 /lot Total Improvement Assmnts to Date 52,640 52,60 52,640 6,220 5,955 12,175 Less Actual Expenditures S/S T. R. Rd Parkway 0 Peach Hill Slope 0 34,141 Sunnyslope Debris Basin 0 28,029 Zone 2 Improv. Balance 52,640 52,640 (9,530) --- - - - - -- 6,220 ---- - - - - -- ----- 5,955 - - - - -- 12,175 ------- 60,108 ZONE 3: Tract 3032: Buttercreek Entry ** Peppermill Parkway Maintenance ------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------ Prior Year Carry Over 0 926 1436 1,009 538 (1,259) Plus Assessments 2,978 2,32 1,405 _ 846 846 3,059 3,059 Budgeted Expenditures 2,978 3,24" -- ----- .2 ,841 ' - - - - -- 1,855 ---- - - - - -- ----- 1,384 - - - - -- 1,800 Less Actual Expenditures 2,052 1,8i 2,303 1,855 2,643 1,800 Zone 3 Maint. Balance 926 L a F - - ----- 3f3 - - - - -- 0 ---- - - - - -- ----- (1,259) - - - - -- (0) EXHIBIT "C ": Zone Activity 05/22/95 Page 3 FY 1994/95 FY 1995/96 FY FY FY ------------------ - - - - -- Proposed FY95/96 Description 1991/92 1992;93 1993/94 Budget Proj Actual Budget Assessment ZONE 4: Tract 3274: Williams Ranch Rd Barrier ** N/S Parkways ** S/S Parkway ---------------- - - - - -- Maintenance ------------------------------------- ------------------------------ Prior Year Carry Over 0 2,445 774 8,901 8,125 4,342 Plus Assessments 5,930 4,212 12,118 0 0 0 0 Budgeted Expenditures 5,930 6,6� ;7 12,892 8,901 8,125 4,342 Less Actual Expenditures 3,485 '>,883 4,767 4,095 3,783 3,910 Zone 4 Maint. Balance 2,445 4 8,125 4,806 4,342 432 ZONE 5: Tracts 3019 & 3025: N/S T R Rd Parkways ** S/S Slopes ** W/S Peach ------------------------------------------------- Hill Parkway Maintenance ------------------------- ------------------------------ Prior Year Carry Over 0 (14,487) 1,669 (8,993) (7,542) 7,115 Plus Assessments 24,355 40,'? -7 17,340 37,338 37,338 17,939 17,939 Budgeted Expenditures 24,355 26,250 19,009 - -- 28,345 ---- - - - - -- 29,796 ----- - - - - -- 25,054 Less Actual Expenditures 38,842 24,53 26,551 28,345 22,681 25,054 Zone 5 Maint. Balance (14,487) 1,����? 17,542 0 7,115 (0) ZONE 6: Tract 3306: West end of Inglewood (Glenhaven) Maintenance ---------------------------------------------- ------------------------------ Prior Year Carry Over 0 r'7 122 593 294 (229) Plus Assessments 1,452 °, a 678 242 242 749 749 Budgeted Expenditures 1,452 1,5i4 1,400 835 536 520 Less Actual Expenditures 777? 1,106 835 765 520 Zone 6 Maint. Balance 675 ;!94 0 (229) 0 ZONE 7: N/S of L A Ave E/O Gabbert (West America) Maintenance ------------------------------------------ ------------------------------ Prior Year Carry Over 0 2r) 942 (3,206) (3,279) 1,080 Plus Assessments 720 3,52' 3,087 10,581 10,581 5,420 5,420 Budgeted Expenditures 720 4,24" -- 4,029 ----- - - - - -- 7,375 ---- - - - - -- 7,302 ----- - - - - -- 6,500 Less Actual Expenditures 0 3,301:1 7,308 7,375 6,222 6,500 Zone 7 Maint. Balance 720 1 3,.179 0 ----- ----- 1,080 ----- - - - - -- 0 EXHIBIT "C ": Zone Activity 20,445 34,890 34,890 05/30/95 Page 4 FY 1994/95 0 20,445 20,445 FY 1995/96 19,245 13,895 FY FY FY ------------------ - - - - -- Proposed FY95/96 Description 1991/92 1992/93 1993/94 Budget Proj Actual Budget Assessment ZONE 8: Home Acres Buffer Area - -- ---- - - - - -- ---------------- - - - - -- Maintenance 0 (13,895) 0 ----- - - - - -- ------------------------------ Prior Year Carry Over 0 0 1,200 Plus Assessments 1,200 ----- 1,200 6,550 6,550 Budgeted Expenditures - - - - -- ---- 1,200 - - - - -- 1,200 ----- - - - - -- 7,750 0 Less Actual Expenditures 1,200 0 7,750 Zone 8 Maint. Balance - - - - -- - - -- ---- 0 - - - - -- 1,200 ----- - - - - -- 0 Budgeted Expenditures Improvements Prior Year Carry Over 20,445 34,890 34,890 (13,895) Plus Assessments 0 20,445 20,445 19,245 19,245 13,895 13,895 Total Improvement Assmnts to Date 0 20,445 40,890 54,135 54,135 0 Less Actual Expenditures 0 6,000 54,135 68,030 0 Zone 8 Improv. Balance 0 20,44 34,890 0 (13,895) 0 20,445 ZONE 9: Condor Drive / L A Ave Parkway ---------------------------------------- Maintenance --------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------ Prior Year Carry Over 0 0 0 Plus Assessments 0 0 650 650 Budgeted Expenditures ----- - - - - -- 0 ---- - - - - -- ----- 0 - - - - -- 650 Less Actual Expenditures 0 0 650 Zone 9 Maint. Balance 0 0 0 Improvements ------------------------------ Prior Year Carry Over 0 0 0 Plus Assessments 6,000 6,000 0 0 Total Improvement Assmnts to Date ----- - - - - -- 6,000 ---- - - - - -- ----- 6,000 - - - - -- 0 Less Actual Expenditures 6,000 6,000 0 Zone 9 Improv. Balance ----- - - - - -- 0 ---- - - - - -- ----- 0 - - - - -- 0 -- - - - - -- 650 EXHIBIT "C ": Zone Activity 05/22/95 Page 5 FY 1994/95 FY 1995/96 FY FY FY ------------------ - - - - -- Proposed FY95/96 Description 1991/92 1992 93 1.993/94 Budget Proj Actual Budget Assessment -------------------------- - - - - -- ZONE 10: Tierra Rejada Rd Parkways in PC -3 Maintenance ------------------------------ Prior Year Carry Over Plus Assessments Budgeted Expenditures Less Actual Expenditures Zone 10 Maint. Balance Improvements ----------------- - - - - -- Prior Year Carry Over Plus Assessments Total Improvement Assmnts to Date Less Actual Expenditures Zone 10 Improv. Balance TOTAL ZONE ACTIVITY SUMMARY FY 1995/96 Expenses Assessments Zone 1 4 F: 8 Q 10 Total 0 38,500 38,500 38,500 38,500 0 ----------------------- Maint I2pro4 ----------- Total ------------------------------------- Maint. Improv. Total 3,745 3,745 5,939 0 5,939 46,419 46,419 53,888 6,220 60,108 1,800 1,800 3,059 0 3,059 3,910 3,910 0 0 0 25,054 25,054 17,939 0 17,939 520 520 749 0 749 6,500 6,500 5,420 0 5,420 7,750 7,750 6,550 13,895 20,445 650 650 650 0 650 38,500 38,500 38,500 0 38,500 134,849 134,849 132,694 20,115 152,809 EXHIBIT "D" (1 of 3) AD84 -2 Budget Department 143 Budget Summary SALARIES & BENEFITS MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS 623 Supplies 624 Postage 626 Printing 629 Special Supplies 637 Travel & Milage 638 Uniforms 641 Professional Services 642 Contract Services 648 Insurance 651 Equip Maint 652 Utilities 654 Vehicle Maint 655 Fuel 656 Lubricants 657 Small Tools 658 Maint & Repair 661 Equip Rental 49,235 M &O Total 903 Capital Projects TOTAL FY 92/93 FY 93/94 Actual Actual 16,728 19,360 1,617 903 0 810 495 200 G 307 0 0 i 0 0 3,267 5,190 100,862 118,620 0 0 0 213,931 216,814 260 218 2,109 756 0 0 0 0 1,166 2,913 324 806 324,031 347,537 49,235 100,924 389,994 467,821 FY 1994/95 Budget Proj Actual 1. a,d,i0 r 20,000 550 550 ,a.00 2,025 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,625 3,480 3 ,L26 116,746 0 0 0 % ,465 221,480 50 135 764 189 0 0 "50 1,700 50 1,700 ~85,780 348,005 %,028 * 113,639 `�9E , 815 541,644 FY 95/96 Proposed Budget 20,000 Remarks: ` See Pq 2 500 * 2,100 * 0 *I 0* 0* 0 *� 5,600 159,152 *� 0 0 *I 266,613 200 250 *I� 0 *i 1,800 *I,' 1,800 i 0 *I ----- - - - - -- j 438,015 * See Pg 2 55,000 * See Exibit E 513,015 22- Nay -95 EXHIBIT "D" (2 of 3) AD84 -2 Budget Department 143 Budget Summary SALARIES & BENEFITS MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS 623 Supplies 624 Postage 626 Printing 629 Special Supplies 637 Travel & Milage 638 Uniforms 641 Professional Services 642 Contract Services 648 Insurance 651 Equip Maint 652 Utilities 654 Vehicle Maint 655 Fuel 656 Lubricants 657 Small Tools 658 Maint & Repair 661 Equip Rental M &O Total 903 Capital Projects TOTAL FY 1995/96 Budget Zones Citywide Total 20,000 0 500 0 2,100 i t C, f LW i 0 5,600 l 8,,476 * 77,676 G I 0 i 5,373 213,240 0 200 250 0 0 1,800 0 1,800 0 .34,849 303,166 0 * 55,000 34,849 178,166 20,000 500 2,100 0 0 0 I 0 I) 5,600 159,152 0 0 266,613 200 i 250 0 1,800 II, 1,800 0 438,015 55,000 513,015 Remarks: See Ex 'D' Pg. 3 See Ex 'D' Pg. 3 See Exibit E 22- May -95 Exhibit D (3 of 3) AD84 -2: Citywide Landscape Maintenance Cost Analysis Contract and Utility Cost Detail FY 1995/96 642 652 Amount ot - - - - - -- - - -- --------------------------- Landscaping Contract Utility Costs ($) Maintained Maintenance -------------------- - - - - -- Map Description (Sq. Ft Cost i$) Water Electric Total A Campus Park Dr Med: Princeton to Julliard 8,00t 908.5 - 250 -- - - - - -- 165 -- - - - - -- 415 B Campus Park Dr Med: Julliard to Marquette 19,7! -,,271.30 580 170 750 C Campus Park Dr Med: Marquette to Collins 19,71, ,271.30 580 170 750 Campus Park Prky (N /S): Channel to Collins 12,24) 1,750.00 375 85 460 Collins Prky (W /S: Benwood to Campus Park Dr 3,600 1,250.00 375 85 460 D Moorpark Ave Prkwy (W /S): N10 High 40, 30(.00 60 10 70 E Poindexter Prky (S /S): @ Sierra 2,1; 600.00 300 0 300 F' L. A. Ave Prkwy (N /S): Millard to Spring 4,71;. 1,200.00 330 0 330 G Spring Rd Prkwy (E /S): S/0 Peach Hill 15,821; 1,000.00 2,275 0 2,275 S/W Corner of Peach Hill & Spring 2,40e 800.00 300 0 300 H I Tierra Rejada Median N/0 Bridge 29,56e 1,985.26 300 85 385 T.R Rd Prkwy (E /S): L.A. to Harvester 1,601 540.00 350 85 435 J &K T. R. Rd Median: Spring to Peach Hill 76,0:3 "1,080.00 9,000 170 9,170 L T. R. Rd Med: Peach Hill to Edison Easement 16,89r 3,720.00 500 85 585 Sub -Total Existing Area. r?5,676 16,685 Areas Added This Year ------------------------------------- M,N & 0 T. R. Rd Med: Peach Hill to Edison Easement 84,481 10,800.00 9,500 P & Q Princeton Medians & Parkways 2,500 1,000.00 300 Campus Park Dr Parkway (W /O Penn) 3,00+ 1,200.00 330 R Peach Hill Rd Parkways 0.00 0 Sub -Total New Areas 13,000 Sub -Total All Areas 38,376 Miscellaneous Contract :osi.s ±9.000 Street Lights GRAND TOTAL 77,676 255 9,755 85 385 85 415 0 0 10,555 27,240 186,000 213,240 EXHIBIT "E" AD84 -2 Budget Department 143 Budget Summary Capital Improvements No. Description Acc. # Citywide Capital Improvements -------------------------------------- 74,,500 a Prkwy: Poindexter @ Sierra - 000001 b Prkwy: W/S Spring S/0 Pch Hill - 000280 c Prkwy: E/S Spring S/0 Pch Hill d Prkwy: Peach Hill Rd (S /S & E /S) - 000353 e Prkwy: S/S L.A. E/O Tierra Rejada - 000218 d Prkwy & Median: Princeton - 000221 g Prkwy: S/S Campus Park Dr - 000354 h Prkwy: W/S T. R. Rd S/0 L. A. Ave - 000226 i Prkwy: N/S Poindexter Sub -Total Citywide Improvements Zone Capital Improvements -------------------------------------- 2 Prkwy: N/S T. R. @ Southampton 8 Home Acres Buffer Area - 000350 9 Prkwy: L. A. Ave @ Virgin Colony - 000344 Total Zone Capital Improvements GRAND TOTAL Capital Improvements FY 994 95 Projected Budget Actual 35, 3K 87 87" FY 1995/96 Proposed Budget Remarks 5,000 Completed 22- May -95 18,754 0 20,000 20,000 Includes $7,315 from develope 37,00( 3'',000 49,00(:; 49,000 5,914 5,914 30,000 131,89.1 93,13E 55,000 Total Accumulated Improvement Assessments thru FY 1995/96 ----------------------------- 12,175 (6,470 0 9: 0 54,134 74,,500 0 6,00( 6,000 0 60,13" 80,501 0 192,02E 173;639 55,000 Total Accumulated Improvement Assessments thru FY 1995/96 ----------------------------- 12,175 (6,470 0 EXHIBIT 'F' Street Lighting Cost Analysis AD84 -2: FY 1995/96 FY 1994/95 Summary ---------------- - - - - -- 05/22/95 Street Traffic Signal Date Lights Safety Lighting Total Remarks July 1994 15,268.66 0.00 1.5,,268.66 Aug 1994 15,330.21 1,.00 15,330.,1 Sept 1994 15,397.43 x.00 15,39''.43 Oct 1994 15,468.58 (.00 15,468.1,8 Nov 1994 15,565.15 {}.00 15,565.15 Dec 1994 15,477.90 (:,.00 15,47.90 Six Month Costs 92,507.93 .00 92508 Six month cost n2 Projected FY 1994/95 Street Light Costs 185,016 Projected Annual Cost FY 1994/95 Street Lighting Assessment 190,000 Revenue Shortfa ) Revenue Surplus 4,984 FY 1995/96 Estimate ------------------------------------- Last Year's Projected Cost (see above) .......... 185,016 Contingency for rate adjustment ............... 3,700 Estimated Anjual Cost for added lights ..... .. 3,000 Sub -Total 191;71.6 Plus Prior Year Lighting Assessment Shortfall Less Prior Year Lighting Assessment Surplus (4,984) Total 86,732.04 Say.. i86,000.00 it G -Z PRELIMINARY ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF MOORPARK LIGHTING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. AD -84 -2 LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 Prepared By: DWIGHT FRENCH & ASSOCIATES, INC. 1470 S. Valley Vista Drive Suite 290 Diamond Bar, CA 91755 March 1995 i 00218 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section 1 Authority for Report: Section 2 Description of Improvements to be Maintained Section 3 Assessment Roll Section 4 Method of Assessment. Section 5 Estimate of ;.'ost Appendix "A" Street Lighting Formula - Table 1 Appendix "B" Landscape Formula - Table 2 Appendix "C" Assessment Summary - Table 3 Appendix "D" Budget Estir.ate Appendix "E" Boundary Ma Appendix "F" Assessment Roll Appendix "G" Resolutions Appendix "H" Rebate Proce ,dure -2 Pane 1 1 4 4 6 00219 j�� 4 rm ON CITY OF MOORPARK Engineer's Report Parks Maintenance Assessment District No. AD -84 -2 Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 For Fiscal Year 1995 -1996 SECTION 1 AUTHORITY FOR REPORT:" This report is prepared pursuant to City Council action taken at their regular meeting of January 4, 1995 to extend this District for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 1995 and ending June 30, 1996 in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, "Landscaping Act of 1972 ", being Part 3 of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code The District will provide electric: -a�_ energy for public lighting facilities and for operation and maintenance of public lighting within the City. In addition, t: ::he District will provide for installation and /or maintenance of public Landscaping within the public right -of -way. to SECTION 2 DESCRIPTION OF THE IMPROVEMENTS TO BE MAINTAINED 0 This report covers the period of _1uly 1, 1995 through June 30, 1996. An-updated report is prepared each year to reflect updated annual costs and changes in parcelizati.on. The City of Moorpark Lighting Maintenance District is proposed to create a new zone of benefit for the maintenance of the parkway landscaping on Tierra Rejda Road' wi..thin PC -3, which will be designated as Zone 10. The District is also proposed to adjust the boundary of Zone 1 to include certin lots within Tract 2851 which had in the past omitted in error. The District is alo proposed to adjust. the benefit formula for landscaping and /or for lighting. The assessments shown in apppendices A, B and C are based on the current formulas. These assesments will be changed upon f.rther directions by the City Council. The improvements to be maintained in this District include all City -owned and Southern California Edison (S.C.E.) -owned street lights as well as all medians an(l street: trees within public rights -of -way within the boundaries cf the .ity. 1 0020 Lighting maintenance shall include, but is not limited to, energy costs, removal, repair, replacement or relocation of light standards, poles, bulbs, fixtures and all appurtenances. Servicing of S.C.E. owned lights as defined in Section 22538 of the Streets and Highways Code shall be furnished by the Southern California Edison Company or its successors, or this servicing shall be as authorized by the Public Utilities Commission, State of California. Maintenance of City -owned lighting improvements shall be furnished by the City. Landscape maintenance shall include, but is not limited to, watering, fertilizing, mowing, weed control, shrubbery, tree removal and pruning, removal and replacement of dead growth, maintenance of irrigation facilities and other necessary work. In addition, the cost to maintain improved areas within an easement will be borne by owners within that project, These easement areas are: 1. Tract No. 2851 Maintenance costs associated with landscaping in the Ventura County Flood Control Easement and portions of the interior tract entry areas.. The obligation upon these 77 lots is pursuant to a condition of development. 2. Tract No. 2865 Cost for maintenance of specific landscape areas within the tract, including landscaping at Christian Barrett & Spring Roads; Tierra Rejada landscaping, and Peach Hill Road landscaping on east side between Christian Barrett and Tierra Rejada Roads, and the entry monument sign at Christian Barret and Spring Road. The obligation upon these 622 lots within this tract is pursuant to a condition of development 3. Tract No. 3032 Maintenance costs associated with landscaping an entry monument at Buttercreek Road and Los Angeles Avenue. This cost to be spread tc� the 265 lots within the tract. 4. Tract No. 3274 Maintenance costs associated with landscape areas along Williams Ranch Road parkway adjacent to Peach Hill drain channel and Edison entries within PC -3. This cost will be borne by the 129 lots within the tract. 2 G-4 00221 1 5. Tract Nos. 3019, 3525 iMaintenance costs associated with landscaping the Tierra Rejada Road slope and parkway areas and parkway on the west side of Peach Hill Road between Williams Ranch and Tierra Rejada Roads within Tract Nos. 3019 and 3525. The cost is to be spread to the 21? lots within the tracts. 6. Tract 3306 Cost for landscape areas within Tract 3306 at the westerly terminus of Inglewood Street. The cost is to be spread to the 22 lots within the tract. 7. Los Angeles Avenue Parkway Maintenance costs associated with landscaping the parkway on the north side of Los Angeles Avenue between Gabbert Road and Shasta Avenue will be borne by all industrial lots northerly of Los Angeles Avenue, southerly of Poindexter Avenue, easterly of Gabbert Road, and westerly of Shasta Avenue. 8. West Village Buffer Area Improvement and maintenance costs associated with the buffer area within Tracts 4340, 4341, 4342, the commercial and multi- family areas bounded by Tierra Rejada to the east, Mountain Trail to the South, Countryhill Road to the west_, Tract 4342 to the north and Home Acres. The costs are to be split 50 -50 between the area within the City (Tracts 4340, 4341, 4342 and multi- family areas and the Home Acres. 9. Condor Drive Industrial Park Improvement and maintenance costs associated with the parkway located at the northwest corner of Los Angeles Avenue and Virginia Colony Place will be borne by the developed parcels within r_he Industrial Park. 10. Tierra Rejada Road Parkway within PC -3 Maintenance costs associated with landscaping the parkway along Tierra Rejada Road wi,--hin PC -3 will be borne by the developed parcels withi.r the boundary as shown on the boundary map. Plans and specifications for the irrigation, landscaping and lighting of streets, parks and easements, and other authorized improvements within the City are On file in the Department of Public Works. The lighting locat_.ons and specifications for ,) 3 002 -22 C-, -6 Edison -owned lights are on file with the Southern California Edison Company. Reference is hereby made to said plans and specifications ` for the exact location and nature of the landscape and lighting improvements. Said plans and specifications by reference are hereby made a part of this report, SECTION 3 ASSESSMENT ROLL All parcels of real property affected are listed on the "Assessment Roll ", Exhibit "A," which will be on file in City Hall with the City Clerk, and is made a part hereof by reference. These parcels are more particularly described in maps prepared in accordance with Section 327 of the Revenue and Taxation Code which are on file in the office of the Ventura County Assessor in the County Government Center Administration Building, 800 S. Victoria Avenue, Ventura, California and which are also made ,i part hereof by reference. SECTION 4 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT The Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, in Section 22573, states that "The net amount to be assessed upon the lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the new amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." Lighting The primary benefits of street lighting are for the convenience, safety and protection of people and the security or protection of property, property improvements and goods. The intensity or degree of illumination provided can have a bearing on both. The single family home - Level 1 has been selected as the base unit for the spread of assessments. By definition, the single family home - Level 1 is a single family home located on a street that has existing street lights. A factor of 1.00 has been assigned to the base unit, which is composed of benefit factors which correspond to the following types of benefit: People Use - People related benefits 0.50 Security Benefit -- Property protection 0.25 Intensity - Degree of illumina, -.3on 0.25 1.00 4 00223 y Parcels in other land use categories were then rated by comparison with the basic unit. (See Table '_) People Use - People related benefits 1. Reduction in night idente and attendant human misery. 2. Reduced vulnerabilit,, to criminal assault during hours of darkness. 3. Promotion of business operations during evening hours. 4. Increased safety on :pads and highways. Security Benefit - Property Pr, action 1. Reduction in vandalism and other criminal acts, and damage to improvements 2. Reduction in burglar es Intensity Intensity or degree of illumination provided on streets varies with type of street, date of installation and the use of the property adjacent thereto. - Landscaping The landscaping element of the spread formula recognizes that all properties within the City benefit from the maintenance of the landscaping within public rights -of -way and easements. These benefits include aesthetic enjoyment, creation of a placement living and working environment, an increase in general property values, improved safety resulting from a regular tree trimming program and improved street sweeping capabilities resulting from trimming trees which may otherwise interface with street sweeping operations. Because of the general benefit received, the cost is spread equally along each parcel in t.re City. This amount is shown in the appendix. Rebate The City Council approved a rebate procedure for disadvantaged property owners. The procedure sha_l be followed as described in Appendix "H." 1 5 G -7 00224 I' / 4 SECTION 5 COST ESTIMATE k The City staff recommendation for 'he District budget is shown in Appendix "D" of this report. The costs attributed to landscaping and the costs attributed to lighting will be separately appointed, according to the formula, and added together to constitute the total assessment for each parcel. Conclusion In conclusion, it is our opinion that the assessments within Lighting Maintenance Assessment District No. AD -84 -2 are apportioned by a formula that fairly distributes the net cost in accordance with the benefits that ,ire received. \rpt \050ad842.945 6 00'25 0 APPENDICES u 4 00226 0022 "A" �. APPENDIX CITY OF MOORPARK Lighting Maintenance Assessment District AD -s4 -2 Lighting and Landscape Act of 1972 Table 1 Street Lighting Formula Use People Lighting Total Annual Code Description Use Intensity Security Units Assessment 0 Residential Vacant 0.00 0.0 0.25 0.25 $ 4.94 1 Single Family - Level 1 0.50 0.2, 0.25 1.00 $ 19.77 2 Mobile Home 0.00 0.0' 0.00 0.00 $ 0.00 3 Condo (Per Unit) 0.50 0.2` 0.25 1.00 $ 19.77 4 Residential Income (2 -4 Units) 0.50 0.2` 0.25 1.00 $ 19.77 (Per Unit) 5 Apartments (5 +) 0.50 0.0 0.20 0.75 $ 14.83 Per Unit 6 Single Family- 0.50 0 . l' °` 0 .2 ) 0.75 $ 14.83 Level 2 9 Mobile Home & 0.50 O,C' 0.2J 0.75 $ 14.83 Trailer Park (Per Space) 10 Commercial Vacant 0.00 0.0' 0.25 0.25 $ 4.94 Land 11 Retail Stones, 2.00 l.C' 1.00 4.00 $ 79.07 Single Story (Per Parcel) 12 Store & Office 2.00 1.0':: 1.00 4.00 $ 79.07 Combination 15 Shopping Centers 4.00 1.0?:l 1.50 6.50 $128.49 (Neighborhood) 16 Shopping Centers 4.00 l.C!` 1.50 6.50 $128.49 (Regional) 17 Office Building 1.00 1.C" 1.00 3.00 $ 59.30 (1 Story) 18 Office Building 2.00 1.(11 1.00 4.00 $ 79.07 (Multi - Story) (Per Parcel) 19 Retail Stores 2.00 1.0 '' 1.00 4.00 $ 79.07 (Multi - Story) (Per Parcel) , A -1 0022 4 t pse People code Description Use 21 Restaurants & 3.00 Cocktail Lounges 24 Banks, Savings & 1.00 Loans 25 Service Stations 2.00 26 Auto Sales, Repair 2.00 Storage, Rental 30 Industrial land 0.00 Vacant 31 Light Manufacturing 3.00 32 Warehousing 2.00 33 Industrial Condos, 2.00 Co -Ops, PUD's 38 Mineral Processing 1.00 44 Truck Crops 0.50 46 Pasture (Permanent) 0.50 48 Poultry 0.50 49 Flowers, Seed Products 0.50 51 Orchards 0.50 3 Field Crops, Dry 0.50 4 Pasture of Graze, Dry 0.50 55 Feed Lots 0.50 57 Tree Farms 0.50 61 Theater 3.00 69 Parks 0.00 70 Institutional Vacant 0.00 71 Churches, Convent Rectory 0.00 72 Schools 0.00 73 Colleges 0.00 78 Public Buildings, 0.00 Museums, Firehouses, Etc. 79 Flood Control 0.00 80 Misc. Vacant Lots 0.00 81 Utility Water Company 0.00 8.3 Petroleum & Gas 1.00 86 Water Rights, Pumps 0.00 88 Highways & Streets 0.00 91 Utility- Edison 0.00 0 1. �0 1 .: 0 0.25 0.''5 0 . a'5 0. :5 0 ..:: 5 0. 1 5 0 „ ... 5 0 ... 5 0 ., ,: 5 1„ 0 0„ '0 0.:0 111' 0 �. a; 0 0. 0 0. 0 L.00 L.00 1.50 L.00 0.25 0..25 a.25 3.25 0.25 0..25 0.25 0.25 0.25 1.00 0.00 0.25 0 . () 0 0.00 ).E)0 5.00 4.00 5.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 5.00 0.00 ;1 WA 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual Assessment $ 98.84 $ 59.30 $ 79.07 $ 79.07 $ 4.94 $ 98.84 $ 79.07 $ 98.84 $ 59.30 $ 19.77 $ 19.77 $ 19.77 $ 19.77 $ 19.77 $ 19.77 $ 19.77 $ 19.77 $ 19.77 $ 98.84 $ 0.00 $ 4.94 $ 4.94 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 0 . r10 sighting Total Intensity Security Units '0 0.25 0.25 $ C0 5.00 1. ) C0 3.00 1. 0 L.00 4.00 1. 0 1.. CIO 4.00 0. ) ).:'5 0.25 1. �0 1 .: 0 0.25 0.''5 0 . a'5 0. :5 0 ..:: 5 0. 1 5 0 „ ... 5 0 ... 5 0 ., ,: 5 1„ 0 0„ '0 0.:0 111' 0 �. a; 0 0. 0 0. 0 L.00 L.00 1.50 L.00 0.25 0..25 a.25 3.25 0.25 0..25 0.25 0.25 0.25 1.00 0.00 0.25 0 . () 0 0.00 ).E)0 5.00 4.00 5.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 5.00 0.00 ;1 WA 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual Assessment $ 98.84 $ 59.30 $ 79.07 $ 79.07 $ 4.94 $ 98.84 $ 79.07 $ 98.84 $ 59.30 $ 19.77 $ 19.77 $ 19.77 $ 19.77 $ 19.77 $ 19.77 $ 19.77 $ 19.77 $ 19.77 $ 98.84 $ 0.00 $ 4.94 $ 4.94 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 0 . r10 0 . oo 0.00 $ 0.00 0. '0 0.25 0.25 $ 4.94 0 0.00 0.00 $ 0.00 0.x:0 0.50 2.00 $ 39.54 0."0 0.00 0.00 $ 0.00 0 . � 0 0.00 0.00 $ 0.00 0.`0 0.00 0.00 $ 0.00 A -2 00228 Use 0.0G Code Description $ 92 Telephone 93 S.P.R.R. 94 Undedicated 0.00 Community Areas 0.00 (Condos) 95 State Property 96 County Property 97 City Property 99 Exempt People Lighting Total Use Intensity Security Units 0.00 3.00 0.0G 0.00 0.00 ).0'' 0 OG 0.00 1Z Annual lob \ Assessment \ $ 0.00 $ 0.00 0.00 0.0G 0.00 0.00 $ 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $ 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $ 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $ 0.00 0.00 7.0` 0 00 0.00 $ 0.00 A -3 00-929 1" r_J APPENDIX "B" CITY OF MOORPARK Lighting Maintenance Assessment District No. AD -84 -2 Lighting and Landscape Act of 1972 Landscape Formula The landscaping element of the spread formula is calculated in accordance with the method descr.ibei as follows: Total Annual Cost = $10.4� per parcel Notes: 1. In addition to the above landscape charge, 77 lots within Tract No. 2851 are assessed an additional landscape cost for a Ventura County Flood Control Easement and portions of the interior tract entry areas. The additional cost per lot is $77.13. The obligation upon these lots is pursuant to a condition of development. 2. In addition to the above landscape charge, 622 lots within Tract 2865 are assessed an additional landscape charge for the maintenance of parkways, Tierra Rejada Road slope and street scape areas, and the monument sign within the tract. The additional. cost per lot is $96.64. The obligation upon these Lcts is pursuant to a condition -of development. 3. In addition to the above landscape charge, 265 lots within Tract No. 3032 are assessed an additional landscape charge for the maintenance of an entry monument at Buttercreek Road and Los Angeles Avenue. The additional cost per lot i:s $11.54. 4. In addition to the above landscape charge, 129 lots within Tract No. 3274 are assessed an additional landscape charge for the landscape for the maintenance of parkway areas along Williams Ranch Road and Edison entries within PC -3. The additional cost per lot is $0. The obligation upon these cts is pursuant to a condition of development. ' B -1 G- 1� 00 3 ;) 6.:,( k 5. In addition to the above Landscape charge, 217 lots within Tract Nos. 3019 and 3525 are assessed an additional landscaping charge for maintenance of Tierra Rejada Road slope and parkways and the parkway on the west side of Peach Hill Road between Williams Ranch and Tierra Rejada Roads. The additional cost per lot is $82.67. The obligation upon these lots is pursuant to a condition of development 6. In addition to the above landscape charge, 22 lots within Tract No. 3306 are assessed an additional landscape charge for the maintenance of landscape area at the westerly terminus of Inglewood Street. The additional cost per lot: is $34.05. The obligation upon these lots is pursuant: to a cond.iti)r, of development. 7. In addition to the above landscape charge, 93 lots northerly of Los Angeles Avenue southerly of Poindexter Avenue, between Gabbert and Shasta Avenues are assessed an additional landscaping charge for maintenance of the northside of Los Angeles Avenue Parkway. The additional cost is $57.10 per ac -re. 8. In addition to the above landscape charge, 497 lots within Tract Nos. 4340, 4341 and 4342 are assessed an additional $20.57 per lot:, the and multi- family parcels are assessed an additional $0 per parcel, for the improvement and maintenance of West Village Buffer Area. The Home Acres, not to oe levied for any City -wide lighting and landscape ctarges, are to be assessed for $51.11 per lot for the improvement and maintenance of West Village Buffer Area 9. In addition to the above :Landscape charge, 11 lots within the Industrial Park on Condor Drive are assessed an additional landscape charge for the improvements and maintenance of the parkway located at the northwest corner of Los Angeles Avenue and Virginia Colony Place. The additional cost is $ 3.21 per acre. ZiL01 10. In addition to the above landscape charge, equivalent residential lots within the boundary of the Tierra Rejada Road parkway PC -3 maintenance area are assessed an additiona' landscape charge of 1: - per lot. [(;4( B -2 00231 00232. APPENDIX "C" CITY OF MOORPARK Lighting Maintenance Assessment District AD -84 -2 Lighting and Landscape Act of 1972 Table 3 Assessment Summary Use Landscape sighting Total Code Description Assessment. Assessment Assessment 0 Residential $10.43 4.94 $ 15.37 Vacant 1 Single Family - Level 1 10.43 _9.77 30.20 2 Mobile Home 0.00 0.00 0.00 3 Condo 10.43 _9.77 30.20 4 Residential Income (2 -4 Units 10.43 X9.77 30.20 5 Apartments (5 +) 10.43 .4.83 25.26 6 Single Family - Level 2 10.43 'L4.83 25.26 1;9 Mobile Home and 10.43 L4.83 25.26 Trailer park 10 Commercial Vacant 10.43 4.94 15.37 Land 11 Retail Stores, 10.43 '79.07 89.50 Single Story 12 Store & Office 10.43 '79.07 89.50 Combination 15 Shopping Centers 10.43 128.49 138.92 (Neighborhood) 16 Shopping Centers 10.43 128.49 138.92 (Regional) 17 Office Building 10.43 59.30 69.73 (1- Story) 18 Office Building 10.43 79.07 89.50 (Multi - Story) 19 Retail Stores 10.43 79.07 89.50 (Multi - Story) 21 Restaurants & 10.43 98.84 109.27 Cocktail Lounges 24 Banks, Savings 10.43 59.30 69.73 Loans 25 Service Stations 10.43 79.07 89.50 26 Auto Sales, Repair 10.43 79.07 89.50 Storage, Rental 0 C -1 00232. Use Landscape Lighting Total Code Description Assessment_ Assessment Assessment 30 Industrial Land 10.43 4.94 15.37 Vacant 31 Light Manufacturing 10.43 98.84 109.27 32 Warehousing 10.43 '9.07 89.50 33 Industrial Condos, Co -Ops, PUD's 10.43 98.84 109.27 38 Mineral Processing 10.43 59.30 69.73 44 Truck Crops 10.43L9.77 30.20 46 Pasture (Permanent) 10.43 L9.77 30.20 48 Poultry 10.43 L9.77 30.20 49 Flowers, Seed 10.43 L9.77 30.20 Production 51 Orchards 10.43 L9.77 30.20 53 Field Crops, Dry 10.43 L9.77 30.20 54 Pasture of Graze, 1.0.43 19.77 30.20 Dry 55 Feed Lots 10.43 L9.77 30.20 57 Tree Farms 10.43 19.77 30.20 61 Theater 10.43 98.84 109.27 69 Parks 0.00 0.00 0.00 70 Institutional 10.4" 4.94 15.37 Vacant Land 71 Churches, Convent, 10.43 4.94 15.37 Rectory 72 Schools 0.00 0.00 0.00 73 Colleges 0.00 0.00 0.00 78 Public Buildings, Museums, Firehouses, Etc. 0.00 0.00 0.00 79 Flood Control 0.00 0.00 0.00 80 Misc. Vacant Land 10.43 4.94 15.37 81 Utility Water Co. 0.00 0.00 0.00 83 Petroleum & Gas 10.43 39.54 49.97 86 Water Rights, Pumps 0.00 0.00 0.00 88 Highways & Streets 0.00 0.00 0.00 91 Utility - Edison 0.00 0.00 0.00 92 Telephone 0.0Ci 0.00 0.00 93 S.P.R.R. 0.00 0.00 0.00 94 Undedicated Community Areas (Condos) 0.00 0.00 0.00 95 State Property 0.00 0.00 0.00 96 County Property 0.00 0.00 0.00 97 City Property 0.00 0.00 0.00 99 Exempt 0.00 0.00 0.00 Actual assessment amounts may vary due to discrepancies between use codes and actual property uses. C -2 2 00933 9 ft- APPENDIX "D" CITY OF MOORPARK LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT AD -84 -2 BUDGET ESTIMATE FY 1995 - -96 ZONES OF BENEFIT 1. Tract No. 2851 D - 1. >UBTOTAL $152,809.00 002'34 Interior Parkway & Flood Control Channel 5,939.00 2. Tract No. 2865 Pacifica & Pardee 60,108.00 3. Tract No. 3032 Buttercreek & Peppermill 3,059.00 4. Tract No. 3274 Williams Ranch Road 0.00 5. Tract No. 3019, 3025 Warmington 17,939.00 6. Tract No. 3306 Glenhaven (Inglewood) 749.00 7. Los Ancreles Avenue North Side Parkway 5,420.00 8. West Village Buffer Area 20,445.00 9. Condor Parkway 650.00 10. Tierra Reiada Rd Parkway in PC -.3 38,500.00 D - 1. >UBTOTAL $152,809.00 002'34 BUDGET ESTIMATE FY 1995 -96 Total Annual Expenses Less Zone Maintenance Expene- Less Capital Improvements Total City -Wide Maintenance Less Prior Year Surplus *Total City Wide Assessment Total Zone Assessment Total Assessment *Street Lighting Landscape Total $ 186,000.00 136.509.00 $ . 7::,509.00 D - -1 t $ 513,015.00 (134,849.00) (55,000.00) $ 323,166.00 (50,658.00) $ 272,509.00 152,809.00 $ 425,318.00 00235 a APPENDIX "E" BOUNDARY MAPS 1 °l 0 0?3d ro -` f'?i(-- _- --i-- --I- -_ - -.�_-- -- its--- ________ I 1 ,", I , I A ' See attached pages for Zones 1-9 as shown on map. I — MOORPARK -- � MOORP, rRK t pY. I } i f/ 14..' wA .9- •r. 1 DTI -__— � I _ . Stl�, VALLEYA FR - -- --t i ADS i ANGELES V i 1 e` .�h - •rc. '.ate 1 , ® 4 ObRPARK 1 Boundary Map, City of Moorpark Lighting and I MOOR - Maintenance Assessment District No. AD -84 -2 ,• � MOOR 1 1 Boundary � A 1 J O O �J W �� ZONE. ] - TRACT 2851 r N It • a ( -I I V W e O , n la •. Z 74 n M 276k K 37 ^ 84AC ul IS Q 2 a I.Ol,ec. Q is 76 K LYR N i, t7lk_ O O O 13 i7 C 19 � II n 16 30 O U M O IDWX 1 131 0 17 O m s = © ® t e 4 t 33 u O Z7 µ © 73 fi 72 t� ^ 63 H c K 67 a es ® ® © fJ .; © ®4©® ® 134 f =0 6 O Il ZS O 89 O r S s ZI 7 O q 2a O O � " ® ® ® © ® ® ® 3t � 50 1U m 60 W 31 A M Si 54 ss - 9 Qs ' SAMBI t = ART M ' ~ !! V W 11 PARK 2 , red esaws 8 DRIVE w � ® ® ®� Parkway Maintained r by Zone Assessment 00238 H M 3a !S K 37 38 J! 40 a a= Q is tl K p N O O O O O 11 PARK 2 , red esaws 8 DRIVE w � ® ® ®� Parkway Maintained r by Zone Assessment 00238 Z ON C. 2 - -C 2 gt 5 I N INEEN Parkway Maintained by Zone Assessment 00239 a t I- i� zotIE rl 3= T3032 M OMM Parkway Maintained by Zone Assessment 00�4c? iI Z0t-A C. � = T 330 (► 1 1 W y 7 MENIN. Parkway Maintained by Zone Assessment. 11■ .. I� n 00243 0- to ■ m RT c rr, MAUKLLN = LN. AVE. COMMERCE AVE, SHASTA SHASTA =AVE. --i-OF---T ------ k--) f L7 va L I ." -4 IL W, tit rIV 1. H ML C%l 16 f , cz. o 60 r-j 13 11 U) 4J CA -H M My f co >1 1-4 trz I )VOO )vg&- ' ,� " I C' )YOO 0 6 C�-31 APPENDIX "F" Appendix ' "F ", the Assessment Roll, shows the assessment upon each lot or parcel (approximately 8387 parcels) within this District and is on file in the Office of the City Clerk and County Assessor. The Ventura County Assessor's office no longer lists public utility easements on the Assessor's Roll. APPENDIX °G " RESOLUTIONS 00249 i 7 • kiii APPENDIX °H" REBATE PROCEDURE It C", -1,3 0050 JOINT NOTICE OF A PUBLIC MEETING AND A PUBLIC HEARING�\ 4 ' PUBLIC NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Moorpark, California on April 5, 1995, adoft Resolution No. 95 -1113 fixing the date and time of a public meeting to be held on the 15th day c I�iy 1993 at the hour of 00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Moorpark City Hall, located at 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark. [The purpose of said public meeting is to allow the public an o to meet with City staff to question and discuss the p annual assessments for the "MOORPARK. LIGHTING D LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTR NO. AD- 84-2" for the fiscal year commencing on July 1, 1995 and ending on June 30, 1996, which would provide for the furnishing of power for and the usual maintenance and servicing of street lights and the landscape maintenance of public rights -of -way within [994/95. the said City, and to question and discuss the proposed increases in said assessments over those levied for said District in FY PUBLIC NOTICE IS ALSO HEREBY GIVEN that said Resolution No 95 -1113 also fixed the date and time of a public hearing of the Moorpark City Council to be held on the 7th day of June, 1995, at.the hour of 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Moorpark City Hall, located at 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark. The putpose of said ublic heating is to consider certain changes in, and to order the annual assessments for the "MOORPARKp LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. AD -84 -2" for the fiscal year commencing on July 1, 1995, and ending on June 30, 1996, which would provide for the furnishing of power for and the usual maintenance and servicing of street lights and the landscape maintenance of public rights -of -way within the said City. A copy of Resolution No. 95 -1113, which is captioned as follows: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF' MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR, AND DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO MAKE CERTAIN CHANGES AND TO ORDER THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS FOR THE 'MOORPARK LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. AD -84-2" FOR THE FISCAL YEAR COMMENCING JULY 1, 1995, AND ENDING JUNE 30, 1996 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972, AND FIXING THE TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC MEETING TO DISCUSS AND A PUBLIC HEARING TO RECEIVE OBJECTIONS THERETO," is on file with the City Clerk and open to inspection. A summary of said Resolution is summarized as follows:. 1. That the Engineer's Report prepared tot assessment District No. AD84 -2 for FY 1995/96 is approved. 2. That said Engineer's Report may be further modified or changed, pursuant to applicable State law. 3. That the amount of the assessments for 'assessment District No. AD84 -2 for FY 1995/96 are proposed to increase from the amount of the assessments levied for said district in FY 1994/95. 4. That it is the intention of the City Council a/ to make certain changes to Assessment District No. AD 84 -2, including the benefit formulas; b) to order the extension of the annual assessment for said district for FY 1995/96; and, c) to levy and collect assessments for certain improvemenLs described herein. Said district consists of a single city -wide zone to provide electric current or energy for public lighting within the City, to provide for installation or maintenance of landscapmg and the construction or maintenance of curb, gutter, or sidewalk structures and facilities, to install or construct facilities, which are appurtenant to any of the foregoing, for the maintenance or servicing or both, of any of the forgoing and to provide incidental expenses in connection therewith. Said district also includes assessments for the improvement and maintenance of the above described landscaping and related improvements in a number of zones of benefit. 5. That said lighting and landscaping maintenance assessment district includes the light ingg and landscaping sites with all improvements located therein, described by and included within Assessment District No. % 84 -2. 6. That the foregoing described work is to be located within Assessment District No. AD 84 -2, the boundary of which is described on a map on file in the City Clerk's office. 7. That said proposed maintenance and improvement is if benefit to, and expense for which are chargeable upon, the district. 8. That a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable parcels within said District, is set forth in a copy of the afore mentioned Engineer's Report on file with the City Clerk and open to inspection, 9. That the existing assessments, the proposed assessments and the proposed increases to the assessment amounts are set forth in Exhibit A i attached hereto and made it part hereof 10. That a public meeting shall be convened on May 15, 1995, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at the Moorpark City Hall to allow the public an oppppoortunityy to meet with City staff to question and discuss the proposed annual assessments for Assessment District No AD84-2 fur F, 19 «5/96, and the proposed increases to said assessments over those levied in FY 1994/95, 11. That a public hearing of the Moorpark t, ity Council shall be held on June 7, 1995, at 7:00 p.in in the Council Chambers at the Moorpark City Hall to consider making, certain changes in, and to order the annual assessments for Assessment District No. AD84 -2 for FY 1995/96 12. That this Joint Notice of Public Meeting and Public Hearing is given, in order that any persons having any objections to the work or extent of the assessment district may appear an d show cause why said work should not be done or carried out or why said district should not be extended for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 1995, and ending June 30, 1996. Protests must be in writing and must be filed by the pprope rty owner with the City Clerk prior to the conclusion of the hearing. Protests may be mailed to the City lerk, Ci o£ Moo t} ty rpark, 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, CA 93021. Protest shall state all grounds for the ob'echon and shag contain a description sufficient to identify the property being assessed. A majority protest will cause �e assessment increase to be abandoned. For additional information about these proceedings or assessments contact Ken Gilbert at (805) 529 -6864, Ext. 256. t3. That all the work proposed shall be done in accordance with the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. 14. That the City Clerk shall cause notice of said public meeting and public hearing to be given byy causing this summary of the Resolution of Intention to be published and mailed in the manner required by Part 2 of Division 15 0£ the Streets and Highways Code and Section 54954.6 of the Government Code of the State of California. #' 15. That the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution. ATTEST: c ��tf � e Paul. wrason r., ayor THIS NOTICE IS GIVEN pursuant to the pprovisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Section 22500 et. sec. of the Streets and Highway Code of the State of Californin and is dated this 6th day of April, 1995. tlxmbit A AD 842 Summary of Assessments A. City Wide Assessments Use Proposed Proposed FY 1994/95 1'Y 1995/96 Increase Code Description Assmnt ($) ksmnt Decrease 0 Residential Vacant 17.87 4.94 (12.93 1 Single Family - Level 1 33.01 27.71 (5.31 2 3 Mobil Home Condo 0.00 33.01 0.00 25.72 0.00 7.29) 4 Residential Income 2 -4 units 33.01 25.72 7.29 5 Apartments (5 +)) Level 27.96 20.78 7.18 J7.181 6 9 Single Family - 2 Mobil 27.96 22.77 5.20 10 Home & Trailer Park Commercial Vacant 27.96 17.87 20.78 4.94 (12.93) 11 12 Retail Store singgle story Store 93.59 115.40 21.81 15 & 0;k.' Cor'=. ion Shopping Centers (Neighborhood) 93.59 144.07 115.40 249.58 21.81 105.51 16 17 Shooppppm Centers (Regional) Otiice 144.07 491.77 347.70 Bguilding (one story) 73.40 95.63 22.23 18 19 Office Buildin (multi- story) Retail Stores 93.59 1.51.73 58.14 21 (g multi -story) Restaurants & cocktail lounges 93.59 113.78 151.73 135.17 58.14 21.38 24 Banks, Savings & Loans 73.40 95.63 22.23 25 Service Stations 93.59 115.40 21.81 26 Auto sales, repair, storage & rental 93.59 91.18 (2.41) 30 Industrial Land Vacant 17.87 (12.93) 31 Light Manufacturing 113.78 '44.15 130.37 32 33 Warehousing Industrial Condos, Coops, PUD's 93.59 113.78 127.51 135.1-7 33.92 21.38 38 Mineral Processing 73.40 95.63 22.23 44 Truck Crops 33.01 43.99 10.97 46 Pasture (permanent) 33.01 43.99 10.97 49 Flowers, seed production p 33.01 33.01 43.99 43.)) 10.97 10.97 5l 53 Orchards Field crops, dry 33.01 43.99 10.97 54 Pastures of graze, dry 33.01 33.01 43.99 43.99 10.97 10.97 55 57 Feed lots Tree farms 33.01 43.99 10.97 61 Theater 33.01 43.99 10.97 70 Institutional vacant land 113.78 17.87 123.06 4.94 9.27 (12.93 71 78 Churches, convent & rectory Public Bldgs. Fire Houses, Museums, 17.87 4.94 (12.93) 80 etc. Misc, Vacant land 0.00 17.87 0.00 4.94 0.00 (,12.93) 81 Utility Water Company 000 000 000 83 91 Petroleum & gas Utility Edison 53.21 0.00 51.64 0.00 (1.56) 0.00 92 93 Telephone SPRR 0.00 0.00 0.00 94 Undedicated Community Condo Development 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 99 Exempt 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 B. Zone of Benefit: In addition to the Citywide Assessments listed above b) land use categories, the properties within each of the Zones listed below will be assessed a per lot Zone assessment for the improv -ment and maintenance certain improvements determined to be of benefit to the properties within those T,n -, of 'ro )os, Zone Descri lion FY 1994/95 � 1 145/90 Proposed �- ract aairkways (2 Bambi; AAssmnt � asmnt I Increase - Benwood, Pecan and VCFCD Channel 2 2 Tract 2865: Parkways East side 95.45 Peach Hill, N. Side Tierra 64 1 19 Rejada; South slopes & Christian Barrett and Spring 3 Tract 3032: Buttercreek Entry and 3.19 * It 45 ^ 8.26 Peppermill parkway 4 Tract 3274: Parkways, north and 0.00 south side of Williams Ranch Rd. J.0) . 0.00 5 Tracts 3019 & 3525: Parkways: north 172.06 * side of Tierra Rejada Road, west side 82.67 . (89.39) of Peach Hill Rd; south side parkway & slope 6 Tract 3306 (Glenhaven): Parkway 11.00 * west end of Inglewood Ave. 34.05 » 23.05 7 Industrial Park Northeast of Gabbert 111.46 ** & L.A. Ave.: Parkway North side of 5'.10 (54.36) L.A- Ave east of Gabbert 8 West Village Buffer: • City area • Home Acres 20.86 * 25.57 4.71 50.86 * 51.11 0.25 9 Condor Drive 121.92 ** �'�.2' '� X108.71) 10 Mountain Meadows Planned Community Residential Commercial 0.00 1')•4" * 15.41 ^ 00 ** 2'.'51 *" 127.51 Note; Per parcel Assessment *" Per Acre Assessment wplrpt \ad85- 96.not N'2 l (0 RESOLUTION NO, ')5- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, MAKING CERTAIN CHANGES TO THE "MOORPARK LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. AD -84 -2" AND CONFIRMING THE ASSESSMENT FOR SAID DISTRICT THE FISCAL YEAR COMMENCING JULY 1, 1995 AND ENDING JUNE 30, 1996. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Moorpark, by Resolution No. 95 -1094, adopted January 4, 1995, declared its intention to make certain changes to the "MOORPARK LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. AD- 84 -211, and to order the extension of the annual assessments for said district for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 1995 and ending June 30, 1996; and, WHEREAS, said "MOORPARK LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. AD -84 -2" consists of a single city -wide zone to provide electric current or energy for public lighting within the City, to provide for installation or maintenance of landscaping and the construction or maintenance of curb, gutter, or sidewalk structures and facilities, to install or construct facilities which are appurtenant to any of the foregoing, for the maintenance or servicing or both, of any of the foregoing and to provide incidental expenses in connection therewith; and, WHEREAS, said "MOORPARK LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. AD -84 -2" also consists of a number of specific zones in order to provide for the assessment of the properties within said zones for the cost of maintaining certain specified improvements which benefit said properties; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to the terms of a Joint Powers Agreement (JPA) between the City of Moorpark and the County of Ventura, the City Council of the City of Moorpark, by Resolution No. 92 - 860 adopted on June 29, 1992, annexed certain unincorporated area just west of the City known as Home Acres, to the "MOORPARK LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. AD -84 -2" in order to implement those provisions of the JPA pertaining to the construction and maintenance of a buffer area between said unincorporated area and the West Ranch area of PC -3 (Tracts 4340, 4341 and 4342); and, WHEREAS, in accordance with the provisions of the aforesaid JPA, it has been determined that said buffer area provides benefit to both the aforesaid Home Acres area and the West Ranch area of PC -3, and a Zone of Benefit encompassing said areas was established to allow for the levy of assessments on the properties within said Zane of Benefit for the purpose of developing and maintaining said buffer area; and, Resolution No. 95- Page 2 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Moorpark, by Resolution No. 95 -1113, adopted April 5, 1995, approved the Engineer's Report pertaining tc such matters; and, WHEREAS, said Resolution No. 95 -1113 also set 7:00 p.m. , May 15, 1995, as the time and date of a public meeting to allow the public an opportunity to discuss the proposed increased assessment with City staff; arid, WHEREAS, said public meeting was convened on May 15, 1995, at 7:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers for the purpose of allowing the public an opportunity to discuss with City staff the proposed increased assessments; and, WHEREAS, said Resolution No. 95 -1113 also set 7:00 p.m., June 7, 1995, as the time and date of a public hearing to consider such matters; and, WHEREAS, on June 7, 1995, the City Council held a public hearing to determine whether said changes to said district should be made, and whether the annual assessments should be ordered and confirmed for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 1995 and ending June 30, 1996 and, WHEREAS, the City Council. finds that written protests against the proposed work or assessment have not been made by owners representing more than one -half of the area of land to be assessed: and, WHEREAS, the City Council, having duly received, considered evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the jurisdictional facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the contemplated work and benefits to be derived therefrom, and the City Council having now acquired jurisdiction to order the proposed assessments for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 1995 and ending June 30, 199( NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The Engineer's Report for "MOORPARK LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. AD- 84 -211, filed with the City Clerk on March 24, 1995, as amended or revised by action of the City Council, is hereby approved and adopted, and the improvements, changes to, and extension of the annual assessments in the Assessment District, in accordance with said report, as revised, and in accordance with Resolution No. 95 -1113 approving said Engineer's Report, is hereby levied for the Fiscal Year 1995/96. I (Z) Resolution No. 95- Page 3 1(3� SECTION 2. The City Clerk shall cause the diagram and assessment, or a certified copy thereof, to be filed with the County Auditor. SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS day of _ , 1995. Paul W. Lawrason Jr., Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk