HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 1995 0719 CC REG ITEM 11Ap. IVA
AGENDA REPORT
G = TY OF MOORPARK
TO: The Honorable City Council
FROM: Kenneth C. Gilbert, Director of Public Works
DATE: July 7, 1995 (Council Meeting 7- 19 -95)
SUBJECT: Consider Report Pertaining to the Establishment of a
Three -Way STOP at the Intersections of a) Laurelhurst Road
and Rolling Knoll Road; and, b) Shadyridge Road and
Mountain Trail Street
On June 7, 1995, the City Council considered a report pertaining to
the installation of STOP signs at the subject intersections. On
that date the City Council adopted Resolution No. 95 -1126 placing
one STOP sign at the intersection of Rolling Knoll Road and
Laurelhurst Road for southbound traffic. The City Council also
directed the City Traffic Engineer to perform a Stop Sign Warrant
Study to evaluate requests to designate these intersections Three -
Way STOP intersections.
The City has received requests from local residents for the
placement of STOP signs at all three entrances to the subject
intersections (Exhibit 1). These requests were first discussed
by the Transportation and Streets Committee and then forwarded
to the City Council. On June 7, 1995, the City Council took the
actions noted above..
•• .1
As the attached (Exhibit 2) Advisory Notice discusses, STOP
signs are not meant to be used for speed control. STOP signs
are to assist drivers in determining which driver has the right -
of -way at an intersection. Traffic engineering warrants used to
evaluate intersections and determine if the installation of a
STOP is justify. None of those warrants pertain to vehicular
speed.
lrlhst2
w �l
Stop Signs
July 19, 1995
Page 2
C. Stop Sign Warrant Study
Attached as Exhibit 3 and 4 are copies of the Stop Sign Warrant
Studies prepared by the City Traffic Engineer for the subject
intersections. Those studies assessed traffic count data,
accident history information and other relevant sources to
determine if the installation of either single STOP or multiple
STOP traffic controls at these intersections is needed. Those
studies concluded that none of the warrants for either single or
multiple STOP signs had been met at either of the subject
intersections. As previously discussed, an intersection only
meets warrants for the installation of STOP signs when there is
sufficient traffic volume or other factors which require traffic
controls to assist drivers in determining which vehicle has the
right of way.
D. Traffic Safety
Contrary to common belief, th e
not always improve traffic
addition of a STOP sign could
than it was before.
installation of a STOP sign does
safety. In many instances the
render the intersection less safe
The Police Department concurs with the findings of the City
Traffic Engineer and recommends that the subject intersections
not be designated Three -way STOP intersections.
F. Notice
Mr. Ray Ashton, who resides on Shadyridge Road, has been advised
that the City Council would be considering this matter at its
July 19th meeting.
Mr. David Walsh has also been advised that this matter would be
considered by the City Council on July 19th. Mr. Walsh resides
on and has corresponded to the City on behalf of many of his
neighbors regarding traffic safety issues on Laurelhurst Road.
It is recommended that the City Council not designate either of the
subject intersections a three -way STOP intersection.
lrlhst2
1195
r- "
WARNING: THIS MAP WAS CREATED BY THE VENTURA COUNTY COMPUTER -AIDED MAPPING SYSTEM (CAMS), WHICH IS DESIGNED AND OPERATED
SOLELY FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE COUNTY AND RELATED PUBLIC AGENCIES. THE COUNTY DOES NOT WARRANT THE ACCURACY OF THIS
MAP AND NO OFCISION INVOLVING A RISK OF ECONOMIC LOSS OR PHYSlr.A( INJURY SHOULD BE MADE IN RELIANCE TIIFREON.
E \N LNELL AMBFRWICK
A LJ.
I
R' INWQQD.
�q L'N.'
� r
ROL INC, KNO
,
G
I
1 a
c;TOP 6IGN8
WHY DON'T THEY PUT IN MORE STOP SIGNS?
A stop sign is one of our most valuable and effective control devices when used at the
right place and under the right conditions, It is intended to help drivers and pedestrians at
an intersection decide who has the right -cd way.
One common misuse of stop signs is to arbitrarily interrupt through traffic, either by
causing it to stop, or by causing such an ,r convenience as to force the traffic to use other
routes. Where stop signs are installed as )uisances" or "speed breakers," there is a high
incidence of intentional violation. In those locations where vehicles do stop, the speed
reduction is effective only in the immerJiate vicinity of the stop sign, and frequently
speeds are actually higher between inters- ;tic r . For these reasons, it should not be used
as a speed control device
A school crossing may look dangerous for children to use, causing parents to demand a
stop sign to halt traffic. Now a vehicle v hich had been a problem for 3 seconds while
approaching and passing the intersection 7ecomes a problem for a much longer period.
A situation of indecision is created as to ,,,, -ien to cross as a pedestrian or when to start as
a motorist. Normal gaps in traffic through tivhich crossings could be made safely no longer
exist. An intersection which previously v%:. „ nozz busy now looks like a major intersection.
It really isn't — it just looks like it. It does 1 t even look safer and it usually isn't.
Most drivers are reasonable and prudent ke th no intention of maliciously violating traffic
regulations; however, when an unreasoi,,�ble restriction is imposed, it may result in
flagrant violations. In such cases, the stc;_ sign can create a false sense of security in a
pedestrian and an attitude of contem,Dt i motorist These two attitudes can and often
do conflict with tragic results.
Well- developed, nationally recognized guidelines help to indicate when such controls
become necessary. These guidelines take in:c consideration, among other things, the
probability of vehicle-- z,.-riving at an mte sec:.t on at the same time, the length of time
traffic must wait to enter, and the availabi . V � ;af'.� :.rossing opportunities.
SLOP
00009b
29
SENT BY: DWIGHT FRENCH & ASSOC. 7- 6 -95 ;12 :48PM ;D %IGHT FRENCH & ASOC-
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
MEMORANDUM
Ken Gilbert
Public Works Director
John Whitman
Traffic Engineer
805 529 8270;# 7/11
Ex x:6:1 3
I o;- S
DATE: July 5, 1995
Stop Sign Warrant Study - Intersection Rolling Knoll Drive and
Laurelhurst Road
Charles Abbott Associates was engaged to perform a stop sign warrant study for the
intersection of Rolling Knoll Drive and Laurelhurst Road. This Is a tee intersection with
Rolling Knoll being a two (2) lane residential street. The street forms a loop. Rolling
Knoll is north -south at the Intersection wkh a median with one lane in each direction
serving houses adjacent to its right of way. LauraMurst provides land aooess and also
serves some commuter traffic which cuts through the area. There is an adequate sight
distance for all three approaches to the Intersections.
Residents in the area have complained about accidents caused by excessive speeds.
The following documents the results of a warrant study to determine if stop sign(s) are
warranted:
[2#7&--1, t- Z•.•
1. On the less important road where application of the
normal right -of -way rule is unduly hazardous --
(accident records show no accidents susceptible to
correction by stop sign. Only two ao*Wft are
recorded in the area over the past three (3) years --
neither at intersection, neither correctable by stop
sign).
2. City street intersection with state highway.
3. Intersection of two (2) main highways -- not met.
4. Street entering a legally established Through street.
5. Minor street where the safe approach speed is less
than 10 mph -- (safe approach speed on Rolling
Knoll is 20 mph).
6. Unsignalized intersection in a signalized area, --
(most intersections in the vicinity are unsignalized).
JUL 6 '95 11:52
WARRANT
MET
or ngl
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
0W OW)
714 860 3476 PAGE.007
SENT BY:DWIGHT FRENCH & ASSOC. 7- 6 -95 ;12 :48PM .D %1GH1' FRFNCH & ASOC- 805 529 8270:# 8/11
7. Combination of
accident record
speeds, views
accidents).
WARRANT
MET LX
lure or no)
high speed, restricted view and NO
-- (intersection has slightly higher
are somewhat restricted, and 0
1. Traffic signals are warranted and urgently needed,
stop signs can be an interim measure — (Traffic
signals are not warranted).
2. Five or more woklents in twelve (12) months of a
type susceptible to correction by multi -way stop --
(No accidents during twelve (12) months).
3. Minimum traffic volumes
a. Total vshiole volume entering iroarsection from
all approaches must arrange 500 veh/hour for
any eight (8) hour period •• (the highest eight
(8) hour period equals an average of 76
vehicles/hour for the period 1 pm to 9 pm).
b. Combined vehicle and pedestrian volume from
the minor street must average 200 units per
hour for the same period ( total vehicles on
Rolling Knoll for the eight (8) hours equals
285). Total pedestrians on Rolling Knoll
estimated at 200. Average combined volume
per hour equals 80 trips/hour for the period 1
Pm to 9 pm..
C. When 85 percentile approach speed on major
street exceeds 40 mph, the minimum
vehicular warrant is 70 peroent of A and B. If
the average speed on L.aurelhurst is assumed
to be above 40 mph and test is warranted.
Average vehiclee/hour for eight (8) hours --
(highest sight hours of vehicles is 76
vehicles/hour)-
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
Based on this warrant study for stop signs at Rolling Krwli Drive and Laurelhurst Road
intersection neither single nor multiple stop signs are warranted.
Attachment: (1) Traffic counts -- 24 hour OMILOO
JUL 6 '95 11:53 714 860 3476 PAGE.008
SENT BY:DWIGHT FRENCH & ASSOC.
7- 6-95
;12:49PM ;D%[Gffl' FRENCH & ASOCj 805 529 8270;# 9/11
S% 3
SITE CODE : MOORPARK
24
HOUR MACHINE
COUNTS•BY TRAFFIC COUNTS
PACE: I
W-S STREET, ROLLING KNOLL
FILE: E9506094
E-V STREET: LAURELHURST ROAD
WENT : CHARLES ABWTT
------------------------------------------
---------------
----
DATES 6/29/95
TINE TOTAL
---
----------------------------------------
BEGIN COUNTED
...................................
SB
ES
--------------------------
we
----
12:00 AN 2
1
0
1
------------------ ----------------------
--
12:15 1
1
0
0
1200 1
0
1
0
12.45 3
2
1
0
MR TOTAL 7
4
2
1
1100 Am 3
2
i
0
1-15 6
4
1
1
1:30 1
v
1
0
1;45 4
1
Z
2
MR TOTAL 14
7
4
3
5
2:00 AN 1
0
1
0
205 1
0
0
1
2:30 6
1
2
3
L
2.45 a
7
1
0
MR TOTAL 16
8
4
4
3:00 m 0
0
0
0
3:15 0
0
0
0
3-.30 3
1
2
0
3:45 0
0
0
0
MR TOTAL 3
1
7
0
4:00 AM 0
0
0
a
405 7
0
4
3
4;30 3
1
0
2
4:45 3
0
3
0
1"
MR TOTAL 13
1
5
5:00 AN 7
0
7
0
to P, )c
40.s
5:15 4
0
3
1
#t LL
5.30 4
5:45 a
0
1
3
5
1
2
ra 15 AtL -
�� /t�
NR TOTAL 23
1
la
4
6.OD AN 11
1
7
3
6.15 6
2
A
0
6130 11
1
9
1
M X
6;45 6
2
4
0
A4 Z
MR TOTAL 34
6
24
4
4
7:00 AN 7
0
6
1
7:15 is
1
12
1
J 14
7-.30 16
3
10
3
7:45 20
0
15
5
MR TOTAL 59
4
43
12
0WILOIL
JUL 6 '95 11 53 714 860 3476 PAGE.009
SENT BY:DWIGHT FRENCH & ASSOC,; 7- 6 -95 ;12 ;49PM ;DWIGHT FRENCH & ASOC- 805 529 8270; #10/11
rc-x 3 (4)
SITE CODE : MOORPARK
24 HOUR MACHIIA< COUMTS-V TRAM C, COUNTS PAGE2 2
M -S STREET: ROLLING KWDLL
FILE: E95NO94
E -W STREET: LAURELHURST ROAD
CLIENT : CHARLES ABBOTT
DATE: 6/29/95
TIME TOTAL
. ....
BEGIN COUNTED
SR
Ell
% N$
8:00 AM 11
1
8
... ......... .................. .----------
2
8:15 10
a
6
0
8 :30 16
3
8
5
8:45 13
2
11
0
HR TOTAL 50
10
33
7
92D0 AM 13
4
7
2
9:15 8
3
3
2
9230 3
0
3
0
9:45 7
2
4
1
MR TOTAL 31
9
17
5
10:00 AM 9
4
5
0
10:15 10
1
7
2
10 :30 13
3
6
4
10145 14
6
5
3
MR TOTAL 46
14
23
9
11:00 AM 11
3
5
3
11.15 20
7
11
2
11:30 14
4
7
3
11.45 17
5
9
3
OR TOTAL 62
19
32
11
12:00 PM 13
9
4
0
12115 11
4
6
1
12230 21
9
10
2
12245 11
5
3
3
HR TOTAL 56
27
23
6
1100 PH 13
4
5
4
1215 21
12
7
2
1:30 13
3
5
5
1:45 17
9
6
2
MR TOTAL 64
28
23
13
2200 PM 11
4
5
2
2115 12
5
5
2
2230 9
5
4
0
2:45 8
2
6
0
HR TOTAL 40
16
20
4
3200 PM 22
9
8
5
3:15 17
6
7
4
3.30 17
g
5
4
3:45 16
6
6
4
MR TOTAL 72
29
26
17
(Ml ()Z
JUL 6 '95 11:53 714 860 3476 PAIE.010
SENT BY:DWIGHT FRENCH & ASSOC.:
7- 6-93 ;12:49PNI ;DWIGHT FRENCH & ASOC-
805 529 8270411/11
f- Y. 3
SITE CODE : MOORPARK
24 H= mum COUNTS -BY TRAFFIC COWTS
PAGE:
M-8 STREET: ROLLING KNOLL
FILE: E9506094
E-W STREET: LAURELKURST ROAD
WENT - CHARLES ANWTT
-------------------------------------------
............
DATE: 6129/95
TINE TOTAL
..... .......................................
-- •- --- - -- - --
KCIN COUNTED
----------------- -----------------------
so
EB
Vid
4:00 P14 13
6
5
-------------- --------
2
............ - --- - - - - --
4-15 16
6
7
3
4.30 21
11
a
2
4,45 23
12
6
5
MR TOTAL 73
35
26
12
5;00 PH 29
Is
7
7
505 19
13
5
1
5:30 25
13
5
7
5.-45 218
$
11
5
MR TOTAL 97
49
29
20
6,00 PH 30
16
4
10
6:15 31
14
10
7
6:30 34
22
7
5
6,45 23
11
9
3
MR TOTAL Ila
63
30
25
7.00 PN 15
6
7
2
705 26
12
12
2
7;30 20
11
5
4
7;45 is
5
10
3
MR TOTAL 79
34
34
11
8:00 PN 19
9
4
6
8:15 Is
9
3
3
8:30 17
a
7
2
8g45 11
5
1
5
MR TOTAL 62
31
Is
16
9:00 PH 22
10
a
4
905 9
5
4
0
9:30 11
7
1
3
9:45 1z
3
4
5
MR TOTAL 54
25
17
12
10300 PM 8
4
3
1
10.15 5
2
2
1
10:30 9
5
4
a
10:45 5
3
2
0
MR TOTAL 27
14
11
2
11:00 PH 4
2
0
2
11,15 4
3
11:30 4
2
11;45 5
4
HR TOTAL 17
11
2
4
---------------------------------------------------------
DAY TOTAL 1117
4"
4"
------ ---- .................
207
----------------------------
"M103
JUL 6 195 11:54 714 RAO 747A Pore (All
SENT BY :DWIGHT FRENCH & ASSOC. 6 -95 :12:46PM ;DWIGHT FRENCH & ASOC-
MEMORANDUM
805 529 8270;* 2/11
TO: Ken Gilbert DATE: July 5, 1995
Public Works Director
FROM: John Whitman
Traffio Engineer
SUBJECT: Stop Sign Warrant Study - Intersection Shadyridge Drive and
Mountain Trail Street
Charles Abbott Associates was engaged to perform a stop sign warrant study for the
Intersection of Shadyridge Drive and Mountain Trail Street. This is a tee intersection with
Mountain Trail Street being a collector loop running north -south at the intersection.
Shadyridge Drive is a very short east -west street which serves a residential area under
construction. There is a sight distance problem for Shadyrkfgo traffic. The City has
installed a stop sign and is in the process of having the developer move a monument wall
to improve sight distance.
The following documents the results of a stop sign warrant study:
WARRANT
EQr Single Stop Scans MET
r no
1. On the less Important road where application of the NO
normal right -of -way rule is unduly hazardous --
(accident records show no accidenrts susceptible to
correction by stop sign).
2. City street intersection with state highway. NO
3. Intersection of two (2) main highways. NO
4. Street entering a legally established through street. NO
5. Minor street where the safe approach speed is less NO
than 10 mph — (safe approach speed on Shadyridge
is less than 10 mph).
6. Unsignalized intersection in a signalized area. NO
7. Combination of high speed, restricted view and YES
accident record — (southbound Mountain Trail may
have hlgher speeds due to steep grade, views are
restricted, and no accidents).
0001U4
JUL 6 '95 11:51 714 960 3476 PAGE.002
SENT BY :DWIGHT FRENCH & ASSOC. 7- 6 -95 :12 :47PM :DWIGHT FRENCH & ASOC
F r b&&-Way Stop Aloe
1. Traffic signals are warranted and urgently needed,
stop signs can be an interim measure. -- (Traffic
signal are not warranted)
2. Five or more accidents in twelve (12) months of a
type susceptible to correction by muki-way stop --
(no accidents during twelve (12) months).
3. Minimum Traffic Volumes
a. Total vehicle volume entering intersection from
all approaches must arrange 500 veh/hour for
any eight (8) hour period -- (the highest eight
(8) hour period equals an average of 68
vehicles/hour for the period 8 am to 4 pm).
b. Combined vehicle and pedestrian volume from
the minor street must average 200 units per
hour for the same period -- (total vehicles on
Shadyrbdge for the might (8) hours equals 187.
Total pedestrians on Shadyrldpe estimated at
80. Average combined volume per hour
equals 34 trips/hour for the period 8 am to 4
pm).
C. When 86 percentile approach speed on major
street exceeds 40 mph, the minimum
vehicular warrant is 70 percent of A and B.
The average speed on Mountain Trail
probably exceeds 40 mph therefore, test
warranted. Average vehickwftur for eight (8)
hours -- (highest eight hours of vehicles is 68
vehiclesihour).
805 529 82704 3/11
WARRANT
MET
fyos or no)
NO
,A#
NO
Eel
Based on this warrant study for stop signs, a single stop sign is warranted on Shadyridge
Drive at its intersection with Mountain Trail Street. Multiple stop signs are not warranted.
Attachments:
WMft* "7 -6.Jew
(1) Pedestrian volume estimates
(2) Traffic counts -- 24 hour
OW10 5
JUL 6 '95 11:51 714 860 3476 PAGE.003
SENT BY:DWIGHT FRENCH & ASSOC. 7-
6-05
;12:47PM :DWIGHT FRENCH & ASOC- 805 529 8270;# 4/11
Fix 4 (3)
SITE OWE ; N=PARK
24 HOM MACHINE COUNTS -BY TRAFFIC COURTS
PAGE:
1
N-5 STREET: NWMTAIN TRAIL STREET
FILE: E9506M
E-U STREET: SMADYRIDGE DRIVE
CLIENT CNARLES ABBOTT
.......... — ---------------------------
-----------------
........
DATE-. 6/29/"
TINE TOTAL
.
---------------------._..._-_----
Rolm COWED
............. -------------------------
Ni
sa
Es
12:00 AN 3
0
— -----
3
--------------------
0
-------------------------------------------
12:15 0
0
0
0
12-.30 1
1
0
0
12-45 A
1
3
n
HR TOTAL a
2
6
0
1:00 AM 1
1
0
0
1:15 3
2
0
1
100 0
0
0
0
1;45 0
0
0
0
Ht TOTAL 4
3
0
2.00 AN 0
0
0
0
21
2115 0
0
0
0
2:30 2
1
0
1
2;45 1
a
I
HR TOTAL 3
1
3100 AM 10
3
4
3
3.,15 0
0
0
0
3:30 0
0
0
0
3:45 1
0
1
0
HN TOTAL 11
3
5
3
4.100 AN 0
a
0
0
4:15 5
1
1
3
4:30 0
0
0
0
4:45 0
a
0
0
HR TOTAL 5
1
1
3
5:00 AM 0
0
0
0
5:15 2
1
0
1
5:30 3
0
1
2
5145 2
1
0
1
HR TOTAL 7
2
1
4
6:00 AN 4
0
1
3
6:15 5
2
0
3
6:30 7
2
0
5
6:45 11
MR TOTAL 27
3
7
3
4
5
16
Aft tiONr
7:00 AN 12
7.05 7
6
2
3
1
3
4
0
At.
S 4
L.
730 16
7,45 23
4
6
2
5
10
12
A vra A j_
HR TOTAL sa
18
11
29
P1 A,
Avi;
00010%
JUL 6 '95 11 51 714 860 3476 PAGE.004
SENT BY.,DWIGHT FRENCH & ASSOC.
7- 6-95
;12:47PM ;D%IGM FRENCH & ASOC-
805 529 8270;# 5/11
fix 4 (4)
SITE OWE , MWPARK
24 HOUR MACHINE COUNTS-ST TRAFFIC COUNTS
PAGE: 2
N-S STREET: MOUNTAIN TRAIL STREET
FILE: E9506093
E-W STREET: 3 HAD YRIDGE DRIVE
CLIENT : CHARLES ABBOTT
-----------------------------
DATE: 6/29/95
TIME TOTAL
-----------------
----------------
----- --------------
---------------------------
BEGIN COUNTED
--------------------------
ME
so
------------------------
Eft
...........
6.00 AN 24
B
10
6
--------------------
--------- .............
3-15 14
4
6
4
8:30 22
4
11
7
8-45 15
6
1
a
OR TOTAL 75
22
28
25
9:00 AN 6
3
3
0
905 is
6
7
5
9;30 is
2
2
11
9:45 51
15
?
9
OR TOTAL 70
26
19
25
10:00 AN 14
1
8
5
10-15 24
a
10
6
10-30 12
7
1
4
10.45 IT
5
a
4
MR TOTAL 67
21
27
19
11:00 AN 21
7
a
6
11:15 10
3
2
5
11:30 23
7
a
a
11t45 19
12
3
4
MR TOTAL 73
29
21
23
12.-00 PH 6
2
4
0
12-.15 15
2
7
6
12:30 19
0
9
10
12-.45 is
a
3
7
MR TOTAL 58
12
23
23
i.-Oo Pm 17
5
4
8
1-15 17
7
5
5
1-30 13
5
s
3
1-45 40
is
10
is
MR TOTAL 87
32
24
31
2:00 PN 21
9
6
6
205 12
2
5
5
2130 21
3
9
9
2:45 It
3
4
4
MR TOTAL 65
17
24
24
3:00 PM 14
f*
7
3
305 14
3
6
5
3:30 13
5
3:45 is
3
MR TOTAL 59
Is
27
17
(molo,7
JUL 6 '95 11 52 714 860 3476 PAGE.005
SENT BY:DW[GHT FRENCH & ASSOC. 7- 6 -95 ;12:48PM ;[)RIGHT FRENCH & ASOC -+ 805 529 8270;# 6/11
a x + (15)
$ITE CODE 1 NOORPARK
24 HOUR MACHINE COUNTS-9, TRAFFIC COUNTS PAGE: 3
N -S STREETS MOUNTAIN TRAIL STREET
FILE: E9506093
E-W STREETi SNADYRIDCE DRIVE
CLIENT : CHARLES AgOTT
DATE: 6/29/95
TINE TOTAL
--- --- - -- ---------------- -- -. -. --
BEGIN COUNTED
NR
SB
ER
4100 PH 13
4
5
- ----- -- --° ---------------------
4
4:15 19
3
10
6
4:30 18
9
6
3
4145 9
4
2
3
HR TOTAL 59
20
23
16
5:00 PN 15
4
9
2
5115 20
5
9
6
5:30 15
2
9
4
5:45 20
5
e
7
HR TOTAL 70
16
35
19
6:00 PH 19
6
9
4
6115 18
3
6
9
6.,30 10
8
2
0
6:45 13
3
7
3
HR TOTAL 60
20
24
16
* 7WO PH 11
4
6
1
7:15 21
9
7
5
7:30 26
6
11
9
7145 22
4
13
5
HR TOTAL 80
23
37
20
8:00 PM 16
4
10
2
8:15 16
3
7
6
8:30 6
1
5
0
8:45 14
4
2
8
NR TOTAL 52
12
24
16
9:00 PM 2
0
1
1
9:15 10
3
6
1
9:30 7
1
6
0
9:45 7
3
2
2
HR TOTAL 26
7
15
4
10:00 PM 5
1
n
0
10:15 3
0
2
1
10:30 5
2
3
0
10:45 0
0
0
0
HR TOTAL 13
3
0
1
11:00 PH 6
2
3
1
11:15 4
z
2
0
11:30 4
1
z
1
11:45 3
0
3
0
HR TOTAL 17
5
10
2
DAY TOTAL 1054
317
399
338
000108
JUL 6 '95 11:52 714 860 3476 PAGE.006