HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 1995 0802 CC REG ITEM 08GAGENDA REPORT
(= = TY OF MOORPARK
TO: The Honorable City Council
FROM: Kenneth C. Gilbert, Director of Public
DATE: July 21, 1995 (Council Meeting 8 -2 -95)
IT[ -1 A
"aORPARK, CAUFORNIA
City Il�leeting
-:f 199
ACTION:
Works l
SUBJECT: Consider Change to the Estimated Cost for the 1995 Street
Reconstruction Project
On June 21, 1995, the City Council approved the award of a contract
to Security Paving Company, Inc. for the rehabilitation of the
following streets:
• Poindexter Avenue between Moorpark Avenue and Gabbert Road;
• Everett Street between Moorpark Avenue and Magnolia Avenue;
• Magnolia Avenue between Everett Street and Charles Street;
• Bard Street between High Street and Charles Street; and,
• Walnut Street between High Street and Everett Street.
The project plans call for the complete reconstruction of
certain streets. On Poindexter Avenue, however, the method of
rehabilitation calls for a combination of techniques ranging
from complete reconstruction to a simple asphalt overlay,
depending on the condition of the street.
At the time the project design was prepared, the design
engineers had made an attempt to keep construction costs under
control by limiting, where ever possible, the amount of street
reconstruction by specifying the less costly approach of only
constructing an asphalt overlay. Upon commencement of
construction activities it was noticed that the current
condition of the pavement in certain areas which had been
designated to receive only an asphalt overlay, had deteriorated
significantly since the time the pavement analysis was performed
and the design was prepared. It was determined that the most
cost effect approach to use in resurfacing this street would be
to amend the plans by increasing the amount of pavement removal
and replacement by including these distressed areas.
reoon95.co j)0 ()0G5
Street Reconstruction Project
August 1995
Page 2
B. Fiscal Impact
1. Cost Increase: The above described field change will have
the effect of decreasing the quantities for certain bid items
pertaining to only the construction of an asphalt overlay,
and increasing the quantities for bid items pertaining to
complete removal and reconstruction. It is anticipated that
the net effect of this change will increase the total
contract costs approximately $50,000.
2. Construction Cost Estimate: A summary of the anticipated
increase in the final contract cost resulting from this
change is summarized as follows:
Item Bid Amt. (S)
Contract Price 901,569.75
Contingency 93,430.00
Total Constr. 994,999.75
50,030.25
Revised
Total (S)
951,600.00
M�-'-*Ykn
55,000.25 1,050,000.00
3. Total Project Cost Estimate: An estimate of the revised
total project costs is as follows:
Element
Design
Misc. Costs
Construction
Contingency (10 %)
Contract Admin. &
Inspection (15 %)
Total
172,143
1,857
0
0
174,000
0
0
951,600
98,400
1,140,000
172,143
1,857
951,600
98,400
90,000
1,314,000
4. Budget: It is not recommended that the budget for the
project be revised at this time. Other factors could result
in increases or decreases to the final project costs. As you
are aware, the City retains ten percent (10 %) of the cost of
the work completed until after the project has been accepted.
Keeping these deferred costs in mind, it is the intent of
staff to bring a report to the City Council requesting any
required adjustment to the budget and the appropriations for
this project, prior to the date total expenditures exceed the
amount now approved.
reoon98.eo
0000ss
Street Reconstruction Project
August 1995
Page 3
A re -cap
of the required
budget resulting from
the change
described
in this report,
is as follows:
Current
Proposed
Revised
Account bo
et
C n
o t
15-142-903 -0356
[SB-821 Grant]
411000
0
41,000
14- 142-903 -0356
[STTPP Grant]
171,000
0
171,000
01- 170- 903 -0356
[Local Share]
78 8,000
- 50,000
928,000
Total
1,090,000
50,000
1,140,000
LION
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the increase in the
scope and cost of work as described in this report.
r®ccn95.co MOM?