Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 1995 1220 CC REG ITEM 10C1TL.. AGENDA REPORT C = TY OF MOORPARK TO: The Honorable City Council FROM: Kenneth C. Gilbert, Director of Public Works DATE: December 8, 1995 (Council Meeting 12- 20 -95) SUBJECT: Consider Request for the City to Assume the Maintenance of Certain Landscape Improvements within the Mountain Meadows Planned Community [PC -3] OVERVIEW This presents a request from representatives of the Homeowners' Associations within the Mountain Meadows Planned Community (PC -3), that the City assume the maintenance of the certain landscape improvements within PC -3. Last January the City Council directed that the Engineer's Report for AD84 -2 for FY 1995/96 include the provisions to allow for the establishment of a new Zone of Benefit, consisting of all of the properties within PC -3. The purpose for the new Zone of Benefit was to fund City maintenance costs for the parkway landscaping on Tierra Rejada Road between the Arroyo Simi bridge and the Edison Easement. Said Engineer's Report also provided for an increase in the Citywide landscape maintenance assessment to fund City costs for the maintenance of the medians along this segment of Tierra Rejada Road. Subsequent to the public hearings on the matter held in June, it was decided that the City would not assume the maintenance of these improvements, that a new Zone of Benefit would not be established and that these assessments would not be levied for FY 1995/96. I A. Status of Improvements The following is a summary of the status of the improvements within the subject segment of this street corridor. 1. Street Repairs -- CCB has undertaken and completed extensive asphalt removal and replacement along the subject portion of Tierra Rejada Road. tr_ls6 Tierra Rejada Road Landscaping December 1995 Page 2 2. Minor Modification [Landscaping] -- CCB has undertaken and completed modifications to the parkway and median landscaping consistent with the requirements of an approved Minor Modification. 3. Slurry Seal -- In accordance with the requirements approved by the City Council, CCB has paid the City a sum equal to the estimated cost of applying a Type II slurry seal to the subject portion of Tierra Rejada Road. Said payment also included City contract administration costs. 4. Subsurface Drainage System -- The City Council has approved a project for the installation of a sub - surface drainage system along Tierra Rejada Road, as a remedial measure to cope with subsurface water intrusion into the substructure of the roadbed. As a separate item before the City Council on this date, it is requested that this project be advertised for receipt of bids. City Council approval of this project included a requirement that costs related to that portion of the work within PC -3 is to be paid by CCB. The City has received a request from CCB that this requirement be deleted. Staff and CCB are pursuing a resolution of these concerns. 5. Asphalt Overlay -- The plans and specification for the 1995 Asphalt Overlay Project include that portion of Tierra Rejada Road within PC -3. 6. City Acceptance of Street Improvements -- The street improvements along Tierra Rejada Road within PC -3 have not yet been accepted by the City. Acceptance of those improvements by the City would include City acceptance of the median landscaping and City maintenance of same. 7. City Acceptance of Parkway Improvements -- The construction of the Tierra Rejada Road parkway improvements have been completed and approved by the City. 8. City Acceptance of Peach Hill Wash -- Staff is presently working with the developer on the task required to complete the Peach Hill Wash improvements. The improvements being reviewed include both the City -owned main channel and north slope owned by the Mountain Meadows Community Association (MMCA). tT_ls6 Tierra Rejada Road Landscaping December 1995 Page 3 B. Median Maintenance As discussed in previous reports to the City Council, City maintenance of median landscaping is funded by the Citywide landscaping assessment levied by AD 84 -2. The maintenance of the landscaped medians along the subject segment of Tierra Rejada Road (see Exhibit 1) is currently provided by CCB. Said maintenance, when assumed by the City, is proposed to be the AD84 -2 Citywide landscape maintenance assessment. It is assumed that the City take over of these landscape maintenance responsibilities will occur when Tierra Rejada Road is accepted by the City. C. Parkway Maintenance • High School: The parkways on Tierra Rejada Road and Mountain Trail Street along the frontage of the High School (see Exhibit 1) , are situated on High School property. In the past the maintenance of these landscaped areas has been provided by UWC /CCB. The maintenance of these areas is not a responsibility of the MMCA, and is, therefore, not a part of the subject request. However, the question of providing for the future maintenance of these areas is being raised at this time in order to allow the City Council to discuss a number of options in that regard. The options available to provide for this maintenance include the following: • provided by Moorpark Unified School District; • provided the AD84 -2 Citywide assessment; • shared cost between MUSD and City with maintenance to be provided by the City and funded through AD84 -2; • provided by an incremental increase to the assessment to be levied on the properties within PC -3 required to comply with the subject request. It should be noted that if this maintenance is funded by the Citywide AD84 -2 assessment or some other City funding source, such action could be viewed as setting a precedent for City or Assessment District funding of other school properties. In hindsight, it could held that leaving these parkways as a part of the High School property was an error. The applicable subdivision maps should have been segregated those parkway parcels from the High School property and identified them as separate parcels to be conveyed to the MMCA. If that had been done, these areas would have been included in the subject request. tr_ls6 Tierra Rejada Road Landscaping December 1995 Page 4 It should be noted that prerequisites to City maintenance of these parkways include the School District granting to the City an Landscape Maintenance Easement. • Other Parkways: All of the other parkways on Tierra Rejada Road within PC -3 (see Exhibit 1) are located within separate parcels owned by the MMCA. CCB has also been providing for the maintenance of this landscaping. City maintenance of these improvements will also require the owner (MMCA) to grant the City a Landscape Easement. D. Peach Hill Wash • Main Channel: It is anticipated that the Engineer's Report for Assessment District 84 -2 for FY 1996/97, which will be presented to the City Council next April, will include provisions for the establishment of a new Zone of Benefit to fund the maintenance of the central corridor of the Peach Hill Wash. North Slope: The slopes along the north side of the Peach Hill Wash are located within parcels owned by the MMCA. The landscape maintenance responsibilities to be assumed by the MMCA on January 1, 1996, also includes the maintenance of the landscaping on these slopes. The location of both the City and MMCA parcels are shown on the map attached as Exhibit 2. E. Master Association The City has been advised that the Mountain Meadows Community Association (MMCA) has been activated. We are also advised that, effective January 1, 1996, the MMCA will assume the responsibility for providing for the maintenance of both the Tierra Rejada Road parkways (less the High School frontage) and the north slope of the Peach Hill Wash. F. Request for the City to Maintenance At a recent meeting of the Presidents of all of the HOAs within PC -3, questions were raised regarding the feasibility of the City assuming the above described landscape maintenance responsibilities of the MMCA, including both the Tierra Rejada Road parkways (less the High School frontage) and the north slopes of the Peach Hill Wash. The attached letter (Exhibit 3) from CCB outlines some of the questions raised regarding this option. tr_ls6 Tierra Rejada Road Landscaping December 1995 Page 5 An informal meeting between staff, representatives from CCB and the Presidents of all of the HOAs within PC -3 was scheduled for Saturday morning, December 2, at Arroyo Vista Community Park to discuss the questions raised in the attached letter (Exhibit 3). The Presidents of twelve (12) of the eighteen (18) HOAs were present. Subsequent to considerable discussion, nine (9) HOA presidents voted to request that the City Council consider assuming the maintenance of the landscaping on the above described MMCA parcels, effective July 1, 1996. Two (2) voted against the request and one abstained. G. Engineer's Report Should the City Council decide to approve the above request, it is recommended that the Assessment Engineering services for AD84 -2 for FY 1996/97 include provisions for the levy of assessments for such maintenance. Consistent with the schedule followed in prior years, it is anticipated that the City Council will take action in January 1996 to direct that said report be prepared. Said report will be completed and presented to the City Council for possible revision and approval in April. Subsequent to public hearings in June and after final amendments by the City Council, the report will be confirmed and the assessments will be levied. H. Annual Cost Projections Attached as Exhibit 4 is a summary of the anticipated City costs for providing for the maintenance of the following landscaped areas: Future City Maintenance Page 1: Tierra Rejada Road Medians; Page 2: Parkways at High School frontage; Page 3: Peach Hill Wash (City); and, MMCA Maintenance Page 4: Tierra Rejada Road Parkways Less High School; Page 5: Peach Hill Wash north slope. On pages 4 and 5, cost projections of the MMCA (based on historic costs incurred by CCB) are shown for comparison. These comparative cost figures are summarized as follows: Element City ($) MMCA Pg 4: Parkways (H.S. not included) 37,110 190,090 Pg 5: Peach Hill Wash Slope 49,790 86.910 Total 86,900 277,000 tr_ls6 Tierra Rejada Road Landscaping December 1995 Page 6 I. Projected Assessments An estimate of the amounts of the annual assessments required to fund City Maintenance of all of the above described landscaping is as follows: 1. Medians: The present Citywide Assessment for a Single Family Residential property is $27.69. Adding the Tierra Rejada Road Medians within PC -3 will cause the assessment to increase as follows: • Citywide Landscape Current Assessment $ 7.92 / yr / SF Res Increase 2.60 Sub -Total $10.52 • Lighting Assessment 19.77 Total Citywide Assessment $30.29 Notes: * [86,509 + 28,410 = 114,919] [(7.92 x 114,919) / 86,509 = 10.52] 2. High School Parkway: As discussed earlier in this report, City maintenance of school property could be precedent setting and should be discussed thoroughly prior to the City Council taking such an action. However, if approved, the additional cost of such maintenance added to either Zone 10 or to the Citywide assessment is summarized as follows: • Total Cost $13,000 • Amount of increase to the SF residential assessment • if spread Citywide: 1.19 • if spread to PC -3 only: 5.28 ** Notes: * (10.52 x 127,919) / 114,919 = 11.71 / /// 11.71 - 10.52 = 1.19 ** 13,000 / 2,460 = 5.28 3. Peach Hill Wash (City): It is recommended that maintenance cost for the City -owned portion of the Peach Hill Wash be funded by a new Zone of Benefit consisting of all of the properties within PC -3 [Zone 10] An estimate of the amount of the assessment for these costs is as follows: • Total Cost $44,800 • Amount assessed to lots within Zone 10 $44,800 • Number of Lots * 2,548 • S F Residential Assessment (per year) $ 17.58 Notes: * 2,460 lots plus an assessment on the commercial property equal to 88 single family lots (2,460 + 88 = 2,548). tr_ls6 Tierra Rejada Road Landscaping December 1995 Page 7 4. Tierra Rejada Road Parkways: An estimate of the amount of additional Zone 10 assessment required to fund maintenance of the parkways if administered by the City, is as follows: • Total Cost $37,110 • Total Assessment $37,110 • Number of Lots 2,548 • S F Res. Assessment (per year) $ 14.56 Re -cap of total estimated Zone 10 Assessment is as follows: SF Res Total Assessment Assessment ($) • Peach Hill Wash (City) 17.58 44,800 • Tierra Rejada Road Parkways 14.56 37,110 Total 32.14 81,910 5. Peach Hill Wash Slope: An estimate of the amount of additional Zone 10 assessment required to fund City maintenance of the north slope of the Peach Hill Wash (owned by the Mountain Meadows Community Association) is as follows: • Total Cost $49,790 • Total Assessment $49,790 • Number of Lots 2,548 • S F Res. Assessment (per year) $ 19.54 Re -cap of total estimated Zone 10 Assessment is as follows: SF Res Total Assessment Assessment $) • Peach Hill Wash (City) 17.58 48,800 • Tierra Rejada Road Parkways 14.56 37,110 • Peach Hill Wash Slope 19.54 49,800 Total 51.68 137,710 Adding the High School frontage to the Zone 10 assessment is summarized as follows: SF Res Total Assessment Assessment ($) • Zone 10 Assessment 51.68 137,710 • High School frontage 5.28 13,000 Total 56.96 150,710 tr_le6 Tierra Rejada Road Landscaping December 1995 Page 8 J. Summary Comparison Attached as Exhibit 5 is a summary comparison of the cost of maintenance for all of the above landscaped areas, except the Tierra Rejada Road medians. That Exhibit is summarized as follows: Tierra Rejada High School Peach Hill Parkways Peach Hill Maintained by Frontage Wash [City] WO H. S.1 Wash NNW CCB 22,260 44,760 102,240 49,260 MMCA N/A N/A 190,090 86,910 City 12,690 44,000 37,110 55,000 Note: All costs are estimates. Actual costs may vary slightly. K. Prerequisites to Assessment District Funding Prior to City acceptance of the maintenance of the Tierra Rejada Road parkways and /or the Peach Hill Wash slope (and the funding of the maintenance of those improvements via a City Landscape Maintenance Assessment District) a number of tasks must be undertaken and completed. A summary of those tasks, along with a status of the efforts required to completed those tasks,is attached a Exhibit 6. L. Summary: Areas to be Considered It is recommended that all of the landscaped areas discussed in this report be included in the cost figures included, for discussion, in the Engineer's Report for Assessment District 84- 2 for Fy 1996/97. Those area are summarized as follows: • the central corridor of the Peach Hill Wash, which is to be assumed by the City in the near future; • the High School frontage (Tierra Rejada Road and Mountain Trail Street); • the parkways on Tierra Rejada Road within PC -3, excluding the High School Frontage (subject request); and, • the north slope of the Peach Hill Wash (subject request). tr_ls6 Tierra Rejada Road Landscaping December 1995 Page 9 RECONNENDATION Direct staff to have included in the Engineer's Report for AD84 -2 for FY 1996/97 provisions which would allow the City Council to consider the possible levy of additional assessments to fund City maintenance costs for the properties described in this report. tr_ls6 K �. I I ivy v PARK MOUNTAIN MEADOWS COMMUNITY ASSOC. p PEACH HILL CHANNEL 2 SHADYRIDGE DRIVE r VCFCDIST. (FEE PARCEL) c TRADITIONS CONDO SITE S �Q TRACT 4792 PGA ���. , . � G�� vN� P \N ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SITE 4 SCALE 1" = 200' All RETENTION BASIN COUNTRY TRAILS PARK C0 MpUNTA�N MOUNTAIN MEADOWS COMMUNITY ASSOC. LANDSCAPE EXHIBIT LANDSCAPE PARCELS TO BE PREPARED BY: MAINTAINED BY MOUNTAIN MEADOWS WESTLAND CIVIL, INC. COMMUNITY ASSOC. 100 N. RANCHO ROAD, SUITE 5 THOUSAND OAKS, CA 91362 PH: (805) 495 -1330 NOV. 13, 1995 ID#: CCB.LDSPESMT C• \ACRD \DWG \6165 \MMCA EXB DWG A SHT. 1 OF 3 November 15, 1995 Mr. Ken Gilbert Director of Public Works CITY OF MOORPARK 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021 Re: Mountain Meadows Community Association (Master Association) Dear Ken: Fu ,3 �D t cl n,!�OO�a�ac�r y1� fv� a P As we discussed by telephone, I provided the Mountain Meadows Homeowners' Associations Presidents with information regarding the Master Association. Some of the questions and concerns that were raised are: 1) What would the assessment be to each homeowner if the City were to maintain the area? 2) What are the remedies available if the maintenance by the City is not to the acceptable standards of the homeowners? 3) Will the City guarantee that monies assessed for this maintenance are not used for other purposes? 4) Is the cost of street lighting part of this assessment? If not, how is the lighting paid for? 5) Is it reasonable to expect the Mountain Meadows Homeowners to pay for this maintenance when other communities that use Tierra Rejada also benefit from this landscape area? 6) What is the earliest date the City could take over maintenance and what action must be taken to do so? 7) Because the developer, L WC- Moorpark Investors, Ltd., is not willing to subsidize beyond December 31, 1995, is there a way the City could take over on January 1, 1996? 8) If the Master Association takes over maintenance on January 1, 1996, would the City be willing to take over at some date in the future? 233 Wilshire Boulcv ird, Suite S20, Smita \1miic.t, C ditorni.i 90401 310 393 -0317 Ex 3 ( Z) November 15, 1995 Page 2 Re: Mountain Meadows Community Association 9) Is the City confident that the maintenance cost estimate is accurate so that a dramatic increase in the assessment will not occur? I am enclosing the revised DRE budget summary prepared by Steve Besser & Associates and a map of the Master Association areas for your use and information. I look forward to meeting with you and the President's group on December 2, 1995 at 10:00 AM. My assistant has faxed the names and addresses of the Presidents to you for the meeting notice. Sincerely, UWC- MOORPARK INVESTORS, LTD. by California Community Builders, Inc., Agent J. Terrell Kirsch Sr. Vice President Enclosures CC: R. Goss S. Stone HOA Presidents Mark Lamken Brad Winner JTK:pk master 1.115 11/13/1995 14:58 FROM TO 13103931460 P_..02. tx - 3 RE 623 Page 3 of BUDGET SUMMARY Phase Number Date of Budget DRE File Number Build-Out 11/13/95 Number of Units Tract Number/Name, of Project 2460 Mountain Meadows Comntuni ty Master Association Per Unit Total Total Per Month Monthly Annual 100 Fix ed Costs 101. Property Taxes 102. Corporation Franchise Taxes 0.03 66.67 800,00 103. Insurance 0.51 1,250.00 15, .00 104. Local License & Inspection Fees 105. Estimated Income Taxes 100 - SU TA►L. 0.54 1,316.67 15,800. 200 Operating Costs 201. Electric/ (attach work sheet) ZSv u 0.48 200.00 2,400.00 Lighting (Leased 202. Gas (attach work sheet) 203. Water (attach work sheet) , t, 2.85 7,000.00 84, .0 204. Sewer/Septic Tanks (include if not in 203) ble TV/Master Antenna 207. Custodial Area: Number of Resuvoms: 208. Landsca a Arta: Z C, 3.46 8,500.00 1 ,000.00 209. Refuse Disposal Vendor Name: Telephone No. 210. Elevators Number: Type: 211. Private Streets, Driveways, Parldng Arras Area: 212. Heating & Air Conditioning Maintenance Area: 213. Swimming Pool: Number: Size: Spa Number: Size: 214. Tennis Court Number: 215. Security Guard hours per day: No. of motorized gates: Type: No. of Intercoms/Telephone Entry: 11/13/1995 14:58 FROM TO 13183931460 P.03 RE 623 Fx -3 Pap 4 of S # DRE regulations allow the use of va nabie assessments # against units only if one unit will derive as much as 10 percent more than another unit in the value of common goods and sc mccs supplied by the association. After determining the percent of benefit derived from services provided (page 14) by the association, an easy chart to follow would be: Less than 10% .............equal assessments from 10% to 20% .......... variable or equal Over 20% ... __ ........ _ .... variable assessments The budget and management documents indicate (check appropriate box): 0 equal assessments variable assessments The invemalry and quantities used im the preparation of this budget am normally derived from plans completed prior to construction at may vary slightly from actual field conditions. The calenlated budget is a good faith estimate of the projected costs and should be deemed reliable far no mote than one year. The Board of Directors should conduct an annual review of the Association's actuai casts and revise the budget accordingly. Dependo g upon the level of service selected by the Association. the amount shown may be 4amrwient to cover the cost and may be higher. Per Unit Per Month Total Monddy Total Annual 216. Reserve Strdy 0.02 41.7 500.00 217. Miscellaneous Mirror Repairs 0.20 500.00 6,000.00 Pest Control 0 500.00 61000.00 Snow Removal Lakes/Waterwa s 2 - SUB TOTAL 6.81 16,741.67 200,900.00 300 Reserves 301 - 313 (attach work sheet) 0.41 1,000.00 12,000.00 300 - SUB TOTAL 0.41 1,000.00 12,000.00 400 Administration * 401. Management 1.00 2,460.00 29520.00 402. I.e al Services 0.08 208.33 2,500.00 403. Accounugg 0.10 250.00 , W. Education 0.10 250.00 3,000.00 40. Miscellaneous, office expenses 0.08 200.00 2,400.00 400 - SUB TOTAL 1.37 3,368.33 40,420.00 TOTAL (100 -400) 9.12 22,426.67 269,120.00 5 oatiu>< ent 361. New Canstruction 3% 027 672.80 8,073. 502. Conversions 5% 505. Revenue sets (attach docutnentation) TOTAL BUDGET 9.39 $23,099.47 $277,193. # DRE regulations allow the use of va nabie assessments # against units only if one unit will derive as much as 10 percent more than another unit in the value of common goods and sc mccs supplied by the association. After determining the percent of benefit derived from services provided (page 14) by the association, an easy chart to follow would be: Less than 10% .............equal assessments from 10% to 20% .......... variable or equal Over 20% ... __ ........ _ .... variable assessments The budget and management documents indicate (check appropriate box): 0 equal assessments variable assessments The invemalry and quantities used im the preparation of this budget am normally derived from plans completed prior to construction at may vary slightly from actual field conditions. The calenlated budget is a good faith estimate of the projected costs and should be deemed reliable far no mote than one year. The Board of Directors should conduct an annual review of the Association's actuai casts and revise the budget accordingly. Dependo g upon the level of service selected by the Association. the amount shown may be 4amrwient to cover the cost and may be higher. 11/13/1995 14:59 FROM TO 13103931460 P.04 Ex VAQ' � 3 RE 623 -- Page 5 of S RESERVES WORKSHEET DRE Me- Number Tract Number Mountain Meadows Community MmLctcr Aesr�r�atinn Item Paint Wood Sidin (aint/stain) ,(1) Sq. FL or Number ,(2) Unit Cost HOA Manual ,(3) Repkcei=nt Cost �(4) Remaining Life '(5) --- Columns I x 2 or 3 + 4 ..... Cost.. Per Unit Per Month Roof - Type Roof - T Water Heaters Exterior Lights Hard Floors - Type: Carpets Elevators Sums & Drives Heating & Cooling Pool Re /aster Pool Hewer Pool Filter Spa Erplaster Heater Spa Filter Pool/Spa. Pum s - No: Tennis Courts - No: Furnishin ui utent (paint/stain) Fences( 1) -T Walls Wrt. Iron - Paint Wrt. lron (re !!E/ L} Automated Gates ood Decldn Laadsca in - Contin enc I2 .00 0.41 TOT AA RESERVE 12,-0- W--. W $0A1 * Use either Columns 1 and 2 or 3 and 4, but not both for a particular item. TOTAL P.04 Exhibit 4 Comparative Analysis of Projected Maintenance Costs for the Median and Parkway Landscaping on Tierra Rejada Road within PC -3 [File:pc3_lsl] -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- MEDIANS Maintenance by City Contractor Description: width: 10, length: 5,280' Quantity SF: 52,800 sf (freq. or Unit Cost per Task / Element ------------------------- - - - - -- number / yr) ---- - - - - -- Units - - - -- Cost ($) ----- - - - - -- year ($] ---- - - - - -- ------------------------------- CONTRACT COSTS ---- - - - - -- - - - -- ----- - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- --------------- - Trees Triming 0.3 all 5,000.00 1,500.00 Shrubs General Maintenance 104.0 Hrs 20.00 2,080.00 Turf Mowing, edging, etc. 0.0 0.00 Ground cover General Maintenance 208.0 Hrs 20.00 4,160.00 Replanting / fertilizing 80.0 Hrs 20.00 1,600.00 Weeding / debris removal 105.5 Hrs 20.00 2,110.00 Irrigation General Maintenance 208.0 Hrs 20.00 4,160.00 Other Hardscape maintenance, etc. 97.0 Hrs 20.00 1,940.00 NON - CONTRACT COSTS --------------- - - - - -- Sub -Total 17,550.00 Utilities Water costs -- -- -- 9,500.00 Electrical costs -- -- -- 360.00 Hardscape & Other Maintenance -- -- -- 200.00 Maintenance by City Crews Labor -- -- -- 700.00 Materials -- -- -- 100.00 Contract and other Admin cost -- -- -- Insurnace / admin / overhead /Etc -- -- -- Total Median Cost 28,410.00 b Remarks -------------------------- Separate Tree Contractor 1/3 of all trees each year 2 hr /wk x 52 4 hr /wk x 52 4 hr /wk x 52 To be added to the Citywide L/S Maintenance Assessment O1- Dec -95 Page 1 of 5 Exhibit 4 Comparative Analysis of Projected Maintenance Costs for the Median and Parkway Landscaping on Tierra Rejada Road within PC-3 [File:pc3_lsl] ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PARKWAYS @ High School Maintenance by City Contractor Description: width: 10, length: 2,600' Quantity SF: 26,000 sf (freq. or Unit Cost per Task / Element ------------------------- - - - - -- ------------------------------- number / yr) ---- - - - - -- Units - - - -- CONTRACT COSTS ---- - - - - -- - - - -- --------------- - Trees Triming 0.3 all Shrubs General Maintenance 40.00 Hrs Turf General Maintenance 40.0 Hrs Ground cover General Maintenance 40.0 Hrs Replanting / fertilizing 30.0 Hrs Weeding / debris removal 40.0 Hrs Irrigation General Maintenance 80.0 Hrs Other Hardscape maintenance, etc. 40.0 Hrs NON - CONTRACT COSTS Sub -Total --------------- - - - - -- Utilities Water costs -- -- Electrical costs -- -- Hardscape & Other Maintenance -- -- Maintenance by City Crews Labor -- -- Materials -- -- Contract and other Admin cost -- -- Insurnace / admin / overhead /Etc -- -- Cost ($) year ($) ----- - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- ----------- ---- - - - - -- 2,400.00 720.00 20.00 800.00 20.00 800.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 800.00 600.00 800.00 1,600.00 800.00 6,920.00 5,600.00 170.00 40.00 -- 0.00 -- 140.00 Total High School Parkway Cost 12,870.00 01-Dec -95 Page 2 of 5 Remarks --------------------------------------- 20% of total Parkway bid by Sunridge Separate Tree Contractor 1/3 of all trees each year .75 hr /wk x 52 .75 hr /wk x 52 .75 hr /wk x 52 .75 hr /wk x 52 1.5 hr /wk x 52 .75 hr /wk x 52 13,080.00 .....ref: CCB costs 9,180.00 .....ref: CCB costs 18,000.00 .....ref: CCB costs (est) 40,260.00 .....ref: CCB costs Exhibit 4 Comparative Analysis of Projected Maintenance Costs for the Median and Parkway Landscaping on Tierra Rejada Road within PC -3 [File:pc3 -lsl] ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PEACH HILL WASH (City) Maintenance by City Contractor Description: width: 50' length: 3,276' Quantity SF: 163,800 sf (freq. or Unit Cost per Task / Element ------------------------- - - - - -- number / yr) ---- - - - - -- Units - - - -- Cost ($} ----- - - - - -- year ($} ---- - - - - -- ------------------------------- CONTRACT COSTS ---- - - - - -- - - - -- ----- - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- --------------- - Trees Triming 40.0 Hrs 20.00 800.00 Shrubs General Maintenance 40.0 Hrs 20.00 800.00 Turf General Maintenance Ground cover General Maintenance 80.0 Hrs 20.00 1,600.00 Replanting / fertilizing 160.0 Hrs 20.00 3,200.00 Weeding / debris removal 80.0 Hrs 20.00 1,600.00 Irrigation General Maintenance 400.0 Hrs 20.00 8,000.00 Other Hardscape maintenance, etc. 400.0 ---- - - - - -- Hrs 20.00 8,000.00 ---- - - - - -- Sub -Total 1,160.00 Hrs NON - CONTRACT COSTS --------------- - - - - -- 2500 Utilities Water costs -- -- Electrical costs -- -- Hardscape & Other Maintenance -- -- Maintenance by City Crews Labor -- -- Materials -- -- Contract and other Admin cost -- -- Insurnace / admin / overhead /Etc -- -- 24,000.00 19,000.00 1,080.00 160.00 0.00 560.00 O1- Dec -95 Page 3 of 5 Remarks --------------------------------- - - - - -- 24,228.00 .....ref: CCB costs 20,532.00 .....ref: CCB costs 36,000.00 .....ref: CCB costs (est) Total Parkway Cost [H.S. NIC] 44,800.00 80,760.00 .....ref: CCB costs Exhibit 4 Comparative Analysis of Projected Maintenance Costs for the Median and Parkway Landscaping on Tierra Rejada Road within PC -3 [File:pc3_lsl] PARKWAYS (High School Not Included) Maintenance by City Contractor Description: width: 50, length: 8,400' Quantity SF: 420,000 sf (freq. or Unit Cost per Task / Element number / yr) Units Cost ($) year ($) -- -- - - - - -- CONTRACT COSTS ---- - - - - -- - - - -- ----- - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- Trees Triming 416.0 Hrs 20.00 8,320.00 Shrubs General Maintenance 83.0 Hrs 20.00 1,660.00 Turf General Maintenance Ground cover General Maintenance 83.0 Hrs 20.00 1,660.00 Replanting / fertilizing 83.0 Hrs 20.00 1,660.00 Weeding / debris removal 83.0 Hrs 20.00 1,660.00 Irrigation General Maintenance 166.0 Hrs 20.00 3,320.00 Other Hardscape maintenance, etc. 166.0 Hrs 20.00 3,320.00 NON - CONTRACT COSTS Sub -Total 21,600.00 --------------- - - - - -- Utilities Water costs -- -- -- 14,250.00 Electrical costs -- -- -- 540.00 Hardscape & Other Maintenance -- -- -- 160.00 Maintenance by City Crews Labor -- -- -- 0.00 Materials -- -- -- 560.00 Contract and other Admin cost -- -- -- Insurnace / admin / overhead /Etc -- -- -- Total Parkway Cost [H.S. NIC] 37,110.00 Maintenance by Mountain Meadows Community Association I -------- - - - - -- 52,320.00 49,920.00 0 0 87,850.00 190,090.00 01-Dec -95 Page 4 of 5 Remarks 80% of total Parkway bid by Sunridge Exhibit 4 Comparative Analysis of Projected Maintenance Costs for the Median and Parkway Landscaping on Tierra Rejada Road within PC -3 [File :pc3 lsl] PEACH HILL WASH NORTH SLOPE (HOA) Maintenance by City Contractor Description: width: 401- 140' length: 3276' Quantity SF: 192,816' (freq. or Unit Cost per Task / Element number / yr) Units CONTRACT COSTS --------------- - Trees Triming 100.0 Hrs Shrubs General Maintenance 100.0 Hrs Turf General Maintenance Hrs Ground cover General Maintenance 140.0 Hrs Replanting / fertilizing 160.0 Hrs Weeding / debris removal 120.0 Hrs Irrigation General Maintenance 400.0 Hrs Other Hardscape maintenance, etc. 400.0 Hrs NON - CONTRACT COSTS --------------- Sub -Total - - - - -- Utilities Water costs -- -- Electrical costs -- -- Hardscape & Other Maintenance -- -- Maintenance by City Crews Labor -- -- Materials -- -- Contract and other Admin cost -- -- Insurnace / admin / overhead /Etc -- -- Cost ($) year ($) 20.00 2,000.00 20.00 2,000.00 20.00 0.00 20.00 2,800.00 20.00 3,200.00 20.00 2,400.00 20.00 8,000.00 20.00 8,000.00 28,400.00 -- 20,000.00 -- 670.00 -- 160.00 -- 0.00 -- 560.00 Total Parkway Cost [H.S. NIC] 49,790.00 Maintenance by Mountain Meadows Community Association 28,740.00 20,520.00 0 0 37,650.00 86,910.00 Remarks 01- Dec-95 Page 5 of 5 Exhibit 5 Summary 01- Dec -95 [File:pc3_lsl] CO Historic Costs T. R. Rd. Parkways T. R. Rd. High School Peach Hill Parkways s Excluding Peach Hill Element Frontage Wash High School Wash - Only City Owned Frontage North Slope Total L/S Contract 13,080 24,228 52,320 28,740 118,368 Utilities 9,180 20,532 49,920 r 20,520 100,152 Sub -Total 22,260 44,760 - - - -- 102,240 r -------- - - - - -- 49,260 ------- - - - - -- 218,520 ProjectedCost ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- When Assumed by the City ------------------------- - - - - -- Contract / Util. 12,690 44,760 Other Costs 180 500 ---- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- Total 12,690 45,260 ProjectedCost by NNCA ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------ - - - - -- ------------- - - - - -- 0.70 0.30 Contract / Util. 102,240 r 49,260 151,500 Other Costs 87,850 37,650 125,500 -- - - - - -- -------- - - - - -- Total -- __ ___________ 190,090 86,910 277,000 Projected Cost if Assumed by the City -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------- Contract / Util. 36,390 49,070 85,460 Other Costs 720 720 1,440 Total---- - - - - -- -------- - - - - -- ------- - - - - -- 37,110 49,790 86,900 Exhibit 6 PREREQUISITES TO CITY ACCEPTANCE AND ASSESSMENT DISTRICT FUNDING OF PARKWAY IMPROVEMENTS ON TIERRA REJADA ROAD WITHIN PC -3. The following is a list of the tasks required to be completed prior to City acceptance of the subject parkways and the funding of the maintenance of said parkways via AD84 -2. Also shown is the current status of the efforts required to complete those tasks. Task _ Status Design and construct any alterations to the Scope of effort to be determined. CCB may irrigation systems, controls, water supplies and have to install new water meters and /or sub - electrical supplies required to transfer to the meters. City only those irrigation systems required. Transfer all required water and electrical services to the City. - Provide list of water and electrical meter Tierra Rejada Road completed numbers and account numbers. - Provide map of the location of all electrical Tierra Rejada Road completed and water meters. Prepare any easement deeds required to convey to Deed to be provided. the City the ownership of any water and /or electrical service laterals which are not located within the street right -of -way. Prepare and execute (by CCB & affected HOAs) deeds Deeds being prepared by CCB. Title work to conveying to the City the parcels in question. assure current vesting to be provided by CCB. Deeds not yet approved by City staff or presented to the City Council for acceptance. Prepare and have executed by the Moorpark Unified Deed to be prepared by CCB. CCB to have deed School District, easement deeds conveying to the executed by School District and then conveyed City the maintenance responsibility for the to the City. sidewalks and parkway landscaping on Mountain Trail Street and Tierra Rejada Road along the frontage of Moorpark High School. Establish a zone of benefit, to include all of To be included in the Engineer's Report for the properties within PC -3, to fund parkway AD84 -2 for FY 1996/97. maintenance costs. Pay all City costs for Assessment Engineering Costs not yet determined or paid. services related to revision to AD 84 -2 for FY 1996/97 required to levy assessments (including a zero assessment) for the maintenance of the subject landscaping and related improvements. tr_1S6