HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 1996 0207 CC REG ITEM 10DAgenda Report
City o f Moorpark
TO: The Honorable City Council
FROM: Kenneth C. Gilbert, Director of Public Works
January 31, 1996 (Council Meeting 2 -7 -96)
DATE:
SUBJECT: Consider Approval of 1996 NPDES Programs
OVERVIEW
This presents the following information for City Council
consideration and action:
• a summary of efforts undertaken to date by the Ventura
Countywide Stormwater Quality Management Committee (Management
Committee), of which the City of Moorpark is a member, to
develop and implement a Countywide Stormwater Management Program
in order to seek and obtain a Stormwater Discharge Permit from
the California Regional Water Quality Control Board (CRWQCB) to
meet the requirements of the federally mandated National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES);
• a review of the September 1995 Annual Report submitted to the
CRWQCB by the Management Committee, which summarizes the efforts
undertaken by all Co- Permittees (including Moorpark) during the
first year of the Permit, to comply with the requirements of the
said Discharge Permit;
• a summary of the efforts required to be undertaken during the
next year by all Co- Permittees, including the City of Moorpark,
in order to meet the requirements of said permit; and,
• a summary of the resources required for the City to undertake
and complete those efforts.
Attached as Exhibit 'A' is a summary of background information
pertaining to the establishment of the federally mandated National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES).
1. Report Distributed: A copy of the September 1995 NPDES
Annual Report has been provided to each member of the City
Council.
npdes3l O C 02 6 9
NPDES Program Implementation
February 1996
Page 2
2. Executive Summary: A copy
Annual Report is attached
provides an overview of
implementation efforts.
of the Executive Summary of the
as Exhibit 'B'. This summary
the permit requirements and
3. Compliance Efforts: The Annual Report documents permit
compliance efforts completed during the first year since the
permit was issued. This report also describes the compliance
efforts to be undertaken and completed by each Co- permittee
in the months and years to come.
In addition to the specific programs listed below to be
implemented by each Co- permittee, the Ventura County Flood
Control District (VCFCD) administers the Countywide Stormwater
Monitoring Program on behalf of all Co- permittees. Past
accomplishment and future objectives of that program are
described in Section 3 of the Annual Report.
Section 2 of the Annual Report, describes past and future
efforts to implement the Countywide Stormwater Management
Program. That program actually encompasses six different
programs designed to "target" specific areas of concern to
stromwater quality efforts. A brief description of those
programs is set forth in the following exhibits:
Exhibit
Program
for
Residents
C
Programs
D
Programs
for
Industrial/ Commercial Businesses
E
Programs
for
Illicit Discharge
F
Programs
for
Public Infrastructure
G
Programs
for
Land Development
H
Programs
for
Construction Sites
Figure ES -1 (Exhibit B, page 3) clearly summarizes the
requirements of both the initial Implementation Phase (year one)
and the Full Implementation Phase (next three years) of permit
compliance efforts. The first year's efforts focused primarily
on the development of the programs listed above. The
development of these programs has been undertaken by a number of
Sub - Committees to the Ventura County Stormwater Quality
Management Committee (Management Committee). [Note: City staff
npddes3l
01 041,A)
NPDES Program Implementation
February 1996
Page 3
are members of and participate in those Committees.) Most of
the actual implementation efforts were undertaken by larger
cities. The only major program which the City of Moorpark
implemented was the Illicit Discharge Inspection Program. The
Program descriptions set forth in Exhibits C through H include
a brief description of the initial implementation efforts
completed to date.
We have entered the Full Implementation Phase of Permit
compliance efforts. In the next three years, all of the
objectives of the permit are to be implemented and evaluated.
Unlike the first year, in the months and years to come the
smaller cities in Ventura County will be required to
considerably increase their permit compliance efforts. The
purpose of this report is to define the scope of those efforts
and to request approval of sufficient resources to undertake and
complete those efforts.
The Program Descriptions in Exhibits C through H also set forth
brief descriptions of the various compliance efforts to be
undertaken during the next year by both the Countywide Task
Force and by the City of Moorpark.
The Program Descriptions in Exhibits C through H also include an
estimate of the staff time and consultant costs required in the
next eighteen months to undertake and complete these NPDES
program objectives. Those costs are summarized in Exhibit 'I'.
It is recommended that the responsibility for implementing
various NPDES program requirements be allocated to those City
Departments most directly involved with the clientele most
affected by those requirements. The chart attached as Exhibit
"J' lists the required NPDES program tasks along with
anticipated staff costs which have been allocated to various
recommended departments. Absent approval of additional staff,
the time required to accomplish these tasks will have to be
diverted from other programs.
npdes3l
NPDES Program Implementation
February 1996
Page 4
• . . U IT IM.
I. Manpower Cost Accounting: It is recommended that all staff
time spent on the development, implementation and
administration of the many required NPDES programs be
accounted for in the Department established for this purpose
(Department 145).
2. Future Year Costs: Exhibit 'K' summarizes estimated costs
required to implement these programs through June 1997. It
is anticipated that the cost of these programs will remain
the same or increase slightly over several years to come. It
is the intent of staff to request sufficient funding of these
efforts in the budgets to be presented to the City Council
for FY 1996/97 and subsequent years.
3. NPDES Assessment: The City of Moorpark is the only City in
the County of Ventura which does not utilize the VCFCD's
Assessment District to partially fund its NPDES programs.
Should this continue to be the policy of the City, it will be
necessary to divert monies from the Gas Tax Fund, the
Community Development Fund, the General Fund and possibly
other sources, to fund NPDES programs.
I. Summary
1. Goals and objectives: It is recommended that the FY 1995/96
City Council objectives be revised to include the required
NPDES program implementation described in this report, as a
single - asterisk item. This will require some adjustments to
work assignments, schedules and expected completion dates for
certain other objectives, especially those listed in the
Community Development Department and the Public Works
Department.
2. Manpower Allocation: Attached as Exhibit 'J' is a summary of
staff time and costs anticipated to be required to implement
the various elements of this program. It is recommended that
staff be directed to proceed with those efforts.
3. Budget Adjustment: Attached as Exhibit 'K' is a summary of
total anticipated costs required to proceed with the
implementation of these programs through the remainder of
this fiscal year, as well as Fiscal Year 1996/97. It is
recommended that the budget be amended, as required, to
npdes3l
NPDES Program Implementation
February 1996
Page 5
accurately reflect actual manhours expended on these programs
in Department 145: NPDES.
a. The following is an estimate of the amount of
interdepartmental budget transfers which may be required
in FY 1995/96 to fully account for the level of staff time
anticipated to be required to undertake these programs:
Amount of From To
Fund Transfer (S) De went Acc I Account
01: General Fund 1,200 Solid Waste 01- 161 -500 NPDES 01- 145-500
41: Community Dev. 20,700 Planning 41- 131 -500 NPDES 41- 145 -500
03: Gas Tax 16.500 P. W. 03- 142-500 NPDES 03-145 -5000
Total 38,400
b. The following is a summary of the total impact of the
above described interdepartmental budget transfers:
Description Chanag ($)
From Solid Waste Department (1,200)
From Community Development (20,700)
From Public Works
(16,500)
To NPDES 38,400
Net Total Budget Increase 0
c. The following is a re —cap of the revised FY 1995/96 Budget
for NPDES (Dept. 145), if all of the above
interdepartmental budget transfers described above are
actually made:
npdes3l O U OZ73
Current
Revised
Account Number
et
Change (
Ndget (5)
Persomel
0
38,400
38,400
0 1 N
Professional Services [641]
0
0
0
All other 0&N Accounts
4100
_ 0
4.500
0 & N Sub -Total
4,500
0
4,500
Total 4,500
38,400
42,900
npdes3l O U OZ73
NPDES Program Implementation
February 1996
Page 6
3. NPDES Assessment: It is recommended that the City Council
reconsider the establishment of an NPDES assessment to
partially fund these programs. Under this program all of the
properties in the City would be assessed an additional amount
by the Assessment District which is administered by the
Ventura County Flood Control District (VCFCD). It is
estimated that an annual NPDES assessment of $5.00 per year
per BAU (Note: a single faiily residential property is assigned 1 UU) would generate
approximately $50,000 for the funding of these federally
mandated programs.
It should be noted that the staff time required to develop
and administer the process required to formally consider an
NPDES assessment are quite considerable. It is not
recommended that the City Council direct staff to proceed
with these efforts if is already the consensus of the City
Council this funding source should not be established.
MMM UDWATTON (Roll Call Vote)
Staff recommends that the City Council take the following actions:
1. Amend the City Council Goals and Objectives for FY 1995/96 to
include, as a single- asterisk item, the following additional
objective: "Develop and implement a number of programs required
by the City's Stormwater Discharge Permit as mandated by the
federal NPDES program."
2. Direct staff to proceed with the work programs described in
Exhibits 'C' through 'H' of this report and summarized in
Exhibit 'J' of this report.
3. Authorize interdepartmental budget transfers, as required, to
accurately account for NPDES related personnel costs incurred
during FY 1995/96 [Note: No additional appropriations or net budget increase is
authorized].
4. Direct staff to include in the FY 1996/97 budget, recommended
expenditures and funding sources necessary to comply with
NPDES program requirements.
5. Direct staff to initiate proceedings required to establish an
NPDES assessment in FY1996/97.
npdes31 0,0474
Exhibit A: NPDES Background Information
Page 1
1. NPDES: The Federal Clean Water Act was amended in 1987 to
require the Federal Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
to establish regulations for the issuance of permits for
storm water discharge. These regulations established the
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
which sets forth policies, regulations and procedures for
the issuance of storm water discharge permits. The
administration of this Federal program has been delegated
to the California Regional Water Quality Control Board
(CRWQCB). The NPDES program applies to both private
organizations and public agencies.
2. Joint Permit: The NPDES requires every public agency in
the country to obtain a permit. The CRWQCB requires
payment of a $50,000 fee for each NPDES permit issued. In
order to reduce costs and streamline the administrative
process, it is common for agencies to coordinate their
efforts and apply for a Joint Permit.
3. Implementation Agreement: In April of 1992, the City
Council approved an Agreement between the City of Moorpark,
all of the other cities in the County, the County of
Ventura and the Ventura County Flood Control District.
This Agreement set forth policies and guidelines to be
followed by all of the co- permittees in pursuing the joint
efforts required to apply for a Countywide NPDES permit and
to implement the requirements of that Permit.
4. Ventura Countywide Stormwater Quality Management Committee:
Representatives from all of the cities in Ventura County,
the County of Ventura and the Ventura County Flood Control
District, have been meeting regularly over the past several
years to manage the development of the Ventura Countywide
Stormwater Quality Program. Those efforts have been
successful. The Ventura Countywide Stormwater Quality
Program has been implemented and a Stromwater Discharge
Permit has been issued by the CRWQCB.
5. Ventura County Flood Control District ( VCFCD): The VCFCD
has served as the Lead Agency in coordinating the permit
application process. VCFCD retained the services of a
consultant, Camp, Dresser & McKee, Inc. (CDM), to assist in
the completion of these efforts.
npdes3l O COZ7 "5
Exhibit A: NPDES Background Information
Page 2
B. City Efforts
1. Consultant: Certain elements of the County -wide Permit
Application had to be provided by each Co- Permittee. In
order to meet these obligations, the City of Moorpark
retained the services of Hawks & Associates to compile and
prepare certain information. The two elements of work
developed by Hawks & Associates to meet these obligations
are a Master Drainage Study and the development of a
Stormwater Management Program.
2. Master Drainage Study: One of the documents required to be
included in the NPDES permit application was a Storm Drain
Atlas of the entire City. This atlas is one of the
elements of the Master Drainage Study. This study also
includes information pertaining to topography, watershed
basins, hydrology, existing storm drain alignments and
sizes and projected future storm drain needs for the entire
City. This document was completed and approved by the City
Council in May of 1995. The City's Master Drainage Study
will serve as a useful resource for both the management of
existing storm drain facilities and for the future
development of vacant properties.
4. Initial Implementation Efforts: Each local agency is also
required to undertake and administer a number of programs
as required by the permit. Included in the Executive
Summary of the September 1995 Annual Report (see Exhibit
'B') is a chart (Figure ES -1) which clearly illustrates
efforts required by the Initial Implementation Phase. The
majority of those efforts have been completed.
5. Full Implementation Efforts: The above mentioned Figure
ES -1 also illustrates the efforts required for Full Program
Implementation. Those efforts are set to commence
immediately and be implemented over the next several years.
The degree of effort required by the smaller cities to meet
the requirements of Full Implementation, is far greater
than that experienced during the Implementation Phase.
Those requirements, time frames and costs are set forth in
the staff report and related Exhibits.
npdes3l
u: 27G
Exhibit A: NPDES Background Information
Page 3
N 4F�-
1. Stormwater Monitoring: The Countywide permit required the
VCFCD to install and manage a number of storm water
monitoring stations at key locations throughout the County.
These stations automatically take water samples during
storm events. The samples are later analyzed to determine
the components and constituents of the storm water runoff.
The locations of the monitoring stations were selected to
provide statistics which will be considered to be
representative of quality of storm water County -wide.
2. other General Services: The VCFCD has also provided a
number of other services to all of the Co- Permittees in
order to coordinate and implement a number of the permit
requirements.
11 • • • ' • u - • u ■ • - u ' ■ • • u
1. Permit Application: Initial efforts of the Ventura
Countywide Stormwater Quality Management Committee was to
direct the efforts of the consultant (CDM) retained by
VCFCD to develop the Stormwater Discharge Permit
Application. The focus of that effort was to develop an
application which adequately meets the requirements of the
NPDES program, but to do so in a manner which kept costs
under control. It is the view of staff that end was
accomplished.
2. Permit: The permit application was submitted in March of
1994. The Permit was issued by the CRWQCB in August 1994.
3. Management Committee: The Management Committee is
comprised of one or more individuals from each local agency
and the VCFCD. This Committee is responsible for
coordinating the various efforts required to manage the
program.
4. Best Management Practices (BMP): The approved NPDES permit
recognizes that the most cost effective way of improving
storm water quality is not through extensive analysis,
testing and treatment, but through the development and
implementation different ways of doing things. These
improved methods cover a broad spectrum of activities
including planning, construction, maintenance and
operations. These "improved ways of doing" things are
generally referred to as Best Management Practices or BMPs.
The Management Committee, through its Sub - Committees has
and will continue to develop all necessary BMPs.
npdes3l 0 6%3P OZ77
Exhibit A: NPDES Background Information
Page 4
5. Sub - Committees: A number of Sub - Committees have been
formed to develop and implement specific program
requirements by the permit. A list of those Sub -
Committees, along with a brief descriptions of duties, is
as follows:
Residential / Public Outreach: Development of Public
Information resources.
Business Outreach / Illicit Discharge Program:
Development of a number of programs "targeted" toward
specific businesses (gas stations, restaurants, etc.).
Also development of the parameters of an inspection
program aimed at preventing illicit discharge of
pollutants into storm drains, etc.
Public Infrastructure: Development of a number of Best
Management Practices (BMP) pertaining to the maintenance
and management of streets, storm drains and public
facilities.
Planning & Land Development: Review and revise General
Plans, zoning requirements, municipal ordinances and
development standards necessary to provide adequate
municipal police powers to require land development
projects to meet program objectives.
Construction: Development of standards and requirements
for construction sites to prevent siltation and related
stormwater quality problems.
npdesn (J C- .t);,>.'7S,
Exhibit B
NPDES Annual Report 1995
Executive Summary
npdes3l (3 C 1);!'74-1
Executive Summary
Overview
The Ventura Countywide Stormwater Quality Management Program (the
Program) was established pursuant to Section 402(p) of the federal Clean
Water Act, which requires that all point source discharges of pollutants into
waters of the United States, including municipal storm drain systems, be
regulated by a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System ( NPDES)
permit.
On August 22, 1994, the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Los
Angeles Region (Regional Board), issued the Ventura County Flood Control
District (VCFCD), the County of Ventura, and the cities of Camarillo, Fillmore,
Moorpark, Ojai, Oxnard, Port Hueneme, San Buenaventura, Santa Paula, Simi
Valley, and Thousand Oaks, an NPDES permit for discharges from municipal
storm drain systems in Ventura County. This is the annual report on permit
compliance for the first permit year: September 1, 1994 through August 31,
1995.
Administration
The Program is managed collectively by a Management Committee
(Committee), composed of one representative from each co- permittee and
chaired by VCFCD. Meeting
monthly, the Committee reviews all
program materials and provides
direction for all aspects of the
program. Five subcommittees, each
chaired by a member of the
Committee, also meet on a monthly
basis. The subcommittee members
develop standard countywide
procedures for each program, review
the results of co- permittee activities,
and sponsor countywide events such
as workshops and training sessions.
To fund program activities, co-
permittees draw on a number of
sources. VCFCD utilizes a portion of
the Benefit Assessment Program (BA) for Flood Control to fund its permit
activities. Co- permittees, responsible for the cost of program implementation
Ventura Countywide
Annual Report Stonnwater Quality
September 1, 1995 Management Program
oub% e ,
Executive Summary
within their own jurisdictional boundaries, may use the BA to supplement
funds from other sources. Some co-permittees fund their entire stormwater
program with BA funds, while others use a combination of funding sources.
The first permit year, the total amount assessed for NPDES activities through
the BA was approximately $3 million.
To carry out program activities, the co-permittees utilize legal authority
derived from wastewater, solid waste, and hazardous materials regulations,
and various public nuisance ordinances. To specifically and conjointly address
stormwater quality, the co-permittees are developing a model stormwater
ordinance.
The activities that must be conducted under the terms of the permit are
organized into two distinct plans: the Stormwater Management Plan and the
Stormwater Monitoring Plan. These two plans are discussed in the following
sections.
Stormwater Management Plan
The Stormwater Management Plan comprises six program areas:
■ Programs for Residents
■ Programs for Industrial /Commercial Businesses
■ Programs for Public Infrastructure
■ Programs for Illicit Discharge Control
■ Programs for Land Development
■ Programs for Construction Sites
Figure ES-1 depicts these six areas and the programs that were proposed in the
permit application. These programs are being implemented in two stages: an
initial implementation phase from September 1, 1994 through February 28,
1996; and a full implementation phase from March 1, 1996 through the end of
the permit term in August 1999.
Ventura Countywide
Annual Report Stormwater Quay
September 1, 1995 1 Management prWam
,,_._..LL �. W
Executive Summary
Programs for Residents
During the first permit year, the Public Outreach Subcommittee focused on:
General Public Information/ Participation. This program provides
residents with information and education on the general nature of
stormwater pollution.
Refuse Disposal Practices. This program builds on existing solid waste
management programs such as hazardous waste collection events, used
oil recycling, green waste collection, composting, and curbside recycling
service.
During the second permit year, the subcommittee will begin working on
additional programs to address yard /landscape and vehicle maintenance
practices.
General Public Information/ Participation
Numerous materials have been developed for these programs, both on a
countywide basis and by individual co-permittees. Beginning in the summer
of 1994, the subcommittee designed and purchased a display and an
Enviroscape Watershed Model, and created informational materials for
countywide use to provide a consistent message about stormwater pollution
prevention. The materials developed
throughout the year include a
general information stormwater fact
sheet, children's coloring sheets,
bookmarks, door hangers, and a full-
color brochure that captures the
beauty of the county while
conveying an easy -to -read message
about stormwater pollution. The
subcommittee also purchased
disposable pooper scoopers with the
program logo and slogan, "You're
the solution. Stop stormwater
pollution." To evaluate the
effectiveness of the program
materials and other outreach efforts,
a written "Test Your Knowledge"
questionnaire was designed to be
administered at display events.
The displays have been used at sixteen events around the county between
September 1, 1994 and August 31, 1995. These events included the Pollution
Prevention Week celebration in September 1994, the Ventura County Science
Fair exhibit for Earth Day in April 1995, and the recent Ventura County Fair in
Ventura Countywide
Annual Report StOrrilwater Quak
September 1. 1995 1 M^ Management Program
4j%
4
Executive Summary
August 1995. The co- permittees exhibited the display and watershed model
and distributed the promotional items related to stormwater pollution
prevention, including oil recycling containers and beverage mugs featuring the
program logo. At the Ventura County Fair, the co- permittee representatives
administered the stormwater "Test Your Knowledge" questionnaires. Almost
1,000 attendees completed the questionnaire in exchange for a container (940 +)
or mug (40). Co- permittee representatives scored the questionnaires and
discussed any misconceptions about stormwater with the participants.
Subcommittee members are tallying the results of the questionnaires and will
continue to use and refine this effective educational tool.
Another task for the subcommittee
was to develop an inlet stenciling
program that could be used
countywide. Subcommittee
members designed a stencil that
would maintain a consistent look
throughout the county, while
interchanging the words "ocean,"
"river," "creek," "arroyo," and "lake"
to accommodate the needs of each
co permittee. By July 1994, the
subcommittee had created a
stenciling instruction packet that
included directions for stencil
placement, photographs, safety
considerations, evaluation forms,
volunteer permission slips, and
release forms. They also assembled stenciling kits consisting of spray paint, a
stencil, gloves, masks, safety vests, traffic cones, trash bags, rags, and pencils.
The kits were placed in easy -to -carry buckets labeled with the program logo.
On July 21, 1994, the co- permittees officially kicked off the stenciling program
with an event in Oak Park attended by the media. Co- permittee stenciling was
then initiated by Thousand Oaks and the County of Ventura in the area that
drains to Malibu Creek. Other co- permittees soon followed. Some worked
with groups of volunteers, turning the training into an educational
opportunity. Some used city employees, and combined stenciling with a
survey of inlet maintenance needs.
The County of Ventura also worked with youth in the Juvenile Restitution
Program and Boy Scouts of America. The Boy Scouts prepared their own
instructional video for additional training purposes.
All co -pem- ittee stenciling programs are ahead of schedule. Cities with the
fewest inlets have completed stenciling, while larger cities and those that had
Ventura Countywide
Annual Report Stormwater Quality
September 1, 1995 1 Management Program
Executive Summary
to coordinate activities between several departments still have several months
before completion.
Refuse Disposal Practices
After reviewing a number of San Buenaventura's solid waste educational
materials, the subcommittee recommended revisions to incorporate stormwater
pollution prevention issues. San Buenaventura then conducted the pilot
activities for this program by modifying two publications — "Recycle
Automotive Products /Safe Alternatives" and "Resource- Efficient Yard
Care " — distributing them as part of their regular solid waste programs. The
yard care brochure was made available at the Ventura County Fair stormwater
booth and will be used by San Buenaventura Waste Management staff in all
composting workshops after August 1995.
Following the lead of the pilot program, several co- permittees began revising
their own local solid waste /hazardous waste materials to address stormwater
issues. Many combined the stormwater message with the used oil recycling
message to promote an "oil and water don't n-dx" campaign.
Programs for Industrial /Commercial Businesses
During the first permit year, the Business and Illicit Discharge Subcommittee
focused on:
■ Specific Business Outreach. This collection of programs allows business
owners and municipalities to work together to define appropriate,
acceptable stormwater pollution controls.
The program focused initially on automobile service businesses for its outreach
program, and will add restaurants during the second permit year. Because
these are retail businesses, the
countywide program evolved as a
Clean Business Program: a program
that would promote "dean
businesses" to the public. This may
be amended in future years as
different types of businesses respond
to different incentives.
Ventura Countywide
Annual Report Stonnwater Quality
September 1, 1995 Management Program
In the spring of 1995, the cities of
Simi Valley and Thousand Oaks
each conducted a pilot Clean
Business Program in two small
areas. They visited a combined total
of 34 businesses — conducting an
initial visit to explain the program
and suggest appropriate best
4 ,0%851
Executive Summary
management practices (BMPs). A follow -up visit evaluated how the facilities
had implemented the BMPs. Both cities discovered that the keys to a
successful program lay in educating businesses in the objectives of the Clean
Business Program, offering clear solutions to waste problems, and offering
valuable incentives.
Based on this year's results, the subcommittee is revising the program and
developing a comprehensive educational handout that can be mailed out to
businesses before program inspectors arrive. All materials from the program
will be updated and made available to other co- permittees as they begin
similar programs in 1996. Also in 1996, the subcommittee will begin working
on additional programs to integrate stormwater pollution control objectives
with existing programs such as code enforcement, hazardous materials control,
and pretreatment /source control.
Programs for Public Infrastructure
During the first permit year, the Public Infrastructure Subcommittee focused
on:
■ Education for Public Agencies. This program educates municipal
employees about illicit discharges and stormwater pollution, and
provides them with standard reporting and evaluation procedures to
track observations.
The subcommittee members discovered there were great differences in
operations and maintenance (O&M) procedures between the co-permittees.
After discussion, they developed a series of one -page fact sheets that outlined
suggested BMPs for typical municipal O&M activities.
San Buenaventura used these fact sheets in a pilot
San Buenaventura used program to train field crews in several small "tailgate"
countywide O &M fact sessions. Results of the pilot training sessions will be used
to refine the fact sheets for use by all co-permittees
sheets in a pilot
beginning in 1996.
program to train field The subcommittee also developed a form that allows all
crews in several small co-permittees to report O&M activities that may effectively
control stormwater pollution. Beginning in 1996, the co-
"tailgate" sessions. permittees will use this form to collect information on
existing drainage system, roadway, and landscape O&M
program effectiveness. They will also begin working on
additional programs that review stormwater pollution control measures for co-
permittee corporation yards, wastewater collection systems, and solid waste
collection and disposal.
In addition to this program, several co-permittees have been updating their
municipal drainage maps. To accomplish this and to prepare for next year's
Ventura Countywide
Annual Report StOrmwwer Qua: M),
September 1. 1995 Management Program
7
t�'� 028
Executive Summary
permit activities, Santa Paula developed a stormwater inlet reporting form,
which was later adapted for use by San Buenaventura. The form is being used
by these crews to survey all inlets and report maintenance needs.
Programs for Illicit Discharge Control
During the first permit year, the Business and Illicit Discharge Subcommittee
focused on:
with a business
Illicit Discharge Investigations.
This program involves locating
illicit connections and evidence
of illegal dumping, identifying
the source of the discharges,
and controlling them through
education and /or enforcement
of current municipal code.
On April 5, 1995, Simi Valley Source
Control staff organized and
conducted a one -day workshop for
all co- permittees. It consisted of a
presentation with slides and
overheads, and hands -on
demonstrations for measuring flow,
using a pH meter, taking samples,
filling out forms, and following up
After the training, the other co- permittees began their
investigations in pre - selected priority drainage basins.
Table ES -1
Illicit Discharge Program
Investigation Results
Accomplishment
Sites inspected
(outfalls, storm drains)
Illicit discharctes observed
(evidence or flow)
Illicit discharges (flow only)
Field samples collected
Sources identified
Number of Occurrences
343
54
42
21
50
Corrections made 10
Ventura Countywide
Annual Report Stor)nwater Qualify
September 1, 1945 a Management Program
Table ES -1 displays the results of the illicit
discharge investigations. Over 300 sites
were inspected. Evidence of an illicit
discharge was observed at approximately
15% of the sites. Evidence refers to stains,
debris, or standing or flowing liquid at the
site.
In most cases, sources of illicit discharges
were identified directly during the field
inspections. If evidence of an illicit
discharge was observed in a channel or
subsurface storm drain, then an
investigation of the upstream storm drain
system was conducted to determine the
likely source. Because this year's
investigations were primarily conducted in
M oz
8
Executive Summary
watersheds with a high concentration of automotive service facilities, sources
of illicit discharges included activities such as car washing and improper
handling of vehicle fluids. Several other sources included residential activities
such as landscape overwatering.
When a business was identified as a source of an illicit discharge, co-permittee
response included distributing BMP brochures, verbally explaining the
problem and potential solutions, and conducting follow -up inspections. In
many cases, the business owner was cooperative and the problem was
corrected that day or before the follow -up inspection was conducted.
In the second permit year, the co-permittees will continue their illicit discharge
investigations. They will also begin to examine public reporting options, and
review stormwater pollution control measures that can be utilized in other
programs.
Programs for Land Development
During the first permit year, the Planning and Land Development
Subcommittee focused on incorporating stormwater pollution control objectives
into municipal land development planning and regulation:
■ Education/ Outreach to Land Developers. As programs for land
development are implemented, education is provided through seminars,
presentations, brochures, and other appropriate means.
■ Land Use Planning and Zoning. This program integrates appropriate
stormwater pollution controls into existing land use planning and zoning
instruments.
■ Development Standards and Reviews. This program defines appropriate
development standards and review procedures for stormwater pollution
control.
■ Permits and Inspections. This program incorporates appropriate
stormwater pollution control considerations into existing development
permitting programs.
The subcommittee began the year by conducting an orientation workshop for
municipal planners and engineers and other interested audience members on
January 12, 1995. The subcommittee then broke down the four programs into
eight manageable topics covering stormwater pollution aspects of planning and
land development issues:
Ventura Countywide
Annual Report Stormwater /),,, d ftY
September 1. 1995 ��M Management Program
s 9
• Overview of the Countywide Approach
• General Plans
• Stormwater Quality Master Planning
• Zoning
• Development Proposal Reviews
■ Environmental Reviews
■ Development Standards
■ Inspection Procedures
The subcommittee is
developing standards for
seven types of
Executive Summary
Subcommittee members are now in the process of
developing approach documents and materials on these
issues to help co-permittees incorporate stormwater
pollution considerations into existing municipal land
development regulatory programs. They have phased the
program implementation, and are focusing first on six
priority outdoor activities.
stormwater pollution The subcommittee is developing standards for seven es
controls.
of stormwater pollution controls and incorporating them
into an approach document. The City of Oxnard is
conducting a pilot stormwater quality master plan for a
developing watershed within the city and is also
incorporating the findings into an approach document. As the documents
reach a workable draft state, they will be implemented by Camarillo and
Oxnard in a pilot program. Results of the pilot implementation will be used to
refine the approach documents and materials for countywide use.
Programs for Construction Sites
During the first permit year, the Construction Subcommittee focused on:
VCFCD developed a
real -life example, or
"model SWPPP, " and
presented this at a
workshop held on
December 15, 1994.
■ Education/ Outreach to Construction Site Personnel.
This program uses outreach materials to guide and
educate developer /contractor staff and municipal
construction inspectors on stormwater pollution
prevention and control techniques.
In the fall of 1994, the subcommittee developed a draft
stormwater pollution prevention (SWPPP) form for
contractors and public agencies to use as part of their
compliance with the General Permit for Construction
Activities. Using this form, VCFCD developed a real -life
example, or "model SWPPP," and presented this at a
workshop held on December 15, 1994. Over 70
contractors, public agency engineers and inspectors, and
consultants attended.
Yendtra Countywide
Mnual Report Stormwater Quafify
September 1. 1995 v Management Program
()ZS 10
Executive Summary
Based on feedback from the workshop, VCFCD staff revised the SWPPP form
to increase its flexibility and reduce the duplication of effort required, and the
subcommittee developed several educational handouts. The first of these
handouts, Pollution Control Objectives for Construction Sites, will be published
during the second permit year.
The co-permittees intend to hold a second construction workshop in the
fall/winter of 1995, incorporating the new materials. They will also begin to
address stormwater pollution prevention aspects of public works projects and
public agency /private sector projects during the second permit year.
Stormwater Monitoring Plan
The Stormwater Monitoring Plan is composed of three elements: discharge
characterization, pollutant source identification, and receiving water quality
characterization. These were successfully implemented during the first permit
year's wet season (1994/95). Six monitoring stations collected samples for
discharge characterization from various types of watersheds: two residential,
two industrial, one commercial, and one agricultural. Two additional
monitoring stations, one upstream and one downstream of the urban area
along Dry Canyon in Simi Valley, collected samples for receiving water
characterization.
Monitoring was conducted during five storms including a first flush event, two
early season events, and two late season events. At least three events were
monitored at each urban runoff location except for the agricultural station and
the receiving water stations, where storm event sampling
criteria was met during only two storms. A review of
Ventura County median quality assurance /quality control (QA /QC) procedures
indicated that the data resulting from analyses of the
EMC values were found 1994/95 wet season samples are of adequate quality for
to be similar to runoff further evaluation without significant qualification.
quality for other regional Sampling and analyses of the discharge characterization
and national
programs.
stormwater stations produced data representative of runoff quality for
each watershed. Bioassays performed on the urban runoff
samples resulted in 100% survival of fathead minnows. In
a comparison of Ventura County discharge
characterization data to other compatible databases, the
median event mean concentration (EMC) values were
found to be similar to runoff quality for other regional and national
stormwater programs. Receiving water data were inadequate to allow a
meaningful characterization of stormwater - influenced water quality.
Modifications to the monitoring plan for the second permit year include
focusing monitoring efforts on the sites where compilation of additional data
will be of most value. All of the discharge characterization sites will be
Ventura Couwliy W
Annual Report Stormwaur !),, al ft ,
September 1, 1995 Management Program
A 21� 11
Executive Summary
monitored during the first flush or early season storm. An additional three
storms will be monitored at the commercial and agricultural sites and a total
of three storms will be monitored at the receiving water sites. Modifications
will be made at the upstream receiving water site in order to attempt to collect
an adequate volume of sample. Additional QA /QC samples and analysis will
be included at all sites to provide independent checks on the accuracy and
precision of the analytical laboratories. Due to the 100% survival results
obtained in the first permit year, no bioassays will be conducted in the second
permit year. Analytical methods will be changed to include analysis for
diazinon and chlorinated herbicides:
To identify pollutant sources, the discharge characterization data were
evaluated to detect any locations with higher than normal pollutant
concentrations. With a few exceptions, stormwater runoff quality was not
significantly different among the urban runoff monitoring sites. Under the
Stormwater Management Plan, the co- permittees are identifying businesses
that have a high potential for contributing pollutants to stormwater runoff.
This is achieved through implementation of illicit discharge investigations and
specific business outreach activities. In subsequent years, information obtained
from these programs will be shared among the co-permittees and combined
with monitoring data to identify pollutants of concern and local patterns of
stormwater pollution.
Ventura Countywide
Annual Report St rmwater Quaky
September ,. 1995 1 _2-51b Management Program
G ;N�:I 12
Exhibit C
Programs for Residents
Page 1
Title: PROGRAMS FOR RESIDENTS
Summary Description: Develop and provide information to the
public regarding stormwater quality issues, problems and
solutions.
Elements:
• Public Outreach Information
• Inlet Stenciling Program: Don't Dump
• Refuse Disposal Practices
• Yard / Landscape Maintenance Practices
• Vehicle Maintenance Practices
Initial I- mRlementati on Efforts QUIeted:
• Public Outreach Information:
- The Subcommittee has developed a number of public
educational materials including displays, brochures,
questionnaires, surveys, etc. These materials have been
made available to the public at a number of special
events.
- Moorpark has distributed NPDES information materials and
set up NPDES displays at City events to assist in the
education of the public regarding stormwater run -off
problems.
• Inlet Stenciling Program: Moorpark has completed the
stenciling of approximately 90% of its storm drain inlets.
• Refuse Disposal Practices: The Sub - Committee is developing
brochures explaining BMPs pertaining to the proper handling
of residential waste materials.
Countywide:
• Public Outreach Information: Sub - Committee to continue to
develop additional public education materials and programs.
Refuse Disposal Practices: Sub- Committee to complete its
update of effective public education and outreach efforts.
Yard / Landscape Maintenance Practices:
- Sub - Committee to develop an effective public educational
and outreach strategy pertaining to improved controls
over pesticides, herbicides, fertilizer, erosion, green
waste, etc. [Due 12/951
- Sub - Committee to implement this program on a trial basis
in selected areas. [Due 7/96]
npdes3l
U 0 `Ji!!);!
Exhibit C
Programs for Residents
Page 2
• Vehicle Maintenance Practices:
Sub- Committee to develop an effective public educational
and outreach strategy pertaining to improved controls
over home vehicle maintenance, including repairs,
oil /fluid changes, washing, etc. [Due 12/95]
Sub- Committee to implement this program on a trial basis
in selected areas. [Due 7/96]
City_of.,00rgark•
• Public Outreach Information: Continue to disseminate
brochures and other information as opportunities become
available.
• Inlet Stenciling Program: Complete inlet stenciling
program.
• Refuse Disposal Practices:
- Distribute public education materials as they become
available. [Due 9/95]
- City has and will continue to administer a number of
other programs impacting on stormwater quality,
including Household Hazardous Waste and automotive oil
recycling.
• Yard /Landscape Maintenance Practices: Distribute public
education materials when available. [Due 10/96]
• Vehicle Maintenance Practices:
- Distribute public education materials when they become
available. [Due 10/96]
- City has and will continue to provide used oil
containers.
_ ,
npdes3l
In -House
Consultant
Element
Man Years Manhours
Cos Total
Public Education
20
0
Inlet Stenciling
40
0
Refuse Disposal Practices
80
0
Yard Maintenance
40
0
Vehicle Maintenance
40
0
Sub-Committee Involvement
40
_ 0
Subtotal In -House Time
0.13 260
Manhour Costs (per hour)
30
Total Cost
7,800
0 7,800
npdes3l
Exhibit D
Programs for Industrial / Commercial Businesses
Page 1
Title: PROGRAMS FOR INDUSTRIAL / COMMERCIAL BUSINESSES
Summary Description: Develop and provide information to
industrial and commercial businesses designed to educate business
owners and managers about sources of stormwater pollution on their
property or from their business activities.
Elements:
• Specific Business Outreach Programs
• Enforcement Programs
• Hazardous Materials Control Programs
• Pretreatment / Source Control Programs
Initial IRRIOMtatign Effortra Cgwleted:
• Specific Business Outreach Programs: Thousand Oaks and
Simi Valley implemented a "pilot" Clean Business Program.
Their experience will be used to refine such programs.
Countywide:
• Specific Business Outreach Programs:
Automotive: Sub - Committee to develop training materials
for Clean Business Programs. [Due 10/95]
Restaurants:
- Sub - Committee to develop BMPs for restaurant owners /
operators. [Due 9/95]
- Thousand Oaks to conduct a pilot program. [Due 3/96]
Sub - Committee to revise and refine program. [Due 8/96]
• Enforcement Programs: Sub - Committee to develop model
stormwater ordinance for co- permittees to use to develop
and implement an enforcement program. [Due 3/96]
• Hazardous Materials Control Programs: Sub - Committee to
develop recommendations to resolve conflicts between
existing hazardous material control measures and potential
stormwater pollution control measures. [Due 8/96]
• Pretreatment / Source Control Programs: Sub - Committee to
develop recommendations to resolve conflicts between
existing pretreatment /source control measures and potential
stormwater pollution control measures. [Due 4/96]
nP&S31 V 0294k
Exhibit D
Programs for Industrial / Commercial Businesses
Page 2
City of Moorpark:
specific Business Outreach Programs:
Automotive: Implement Clean Business Program. [Due 3/96]
Restaurants: Distribute BMPs and implement other program
requirements. [Due 9/96]
• • a - • • Wiff
In-House Consultant
Element Nan Years ads Costs ($) Total 01
Automotive Business Programs 120 0
Restaurant Programs 120 5,000
Sub - Committee Involvement 40 0
Sub -total In -House Time 0.13 280
Manhour Costs (per hour) 30
Total Cost 8,400 5,000 13,400
npdes3l 'U UZ
Exhibit E
Programs for Illicit Discharge
Page 1
Title: PROGRAMS FOR ILLICIT DISCHARGE
Summary Description: Develop and implement programs designed to
locate and abate illegal discharges to the storm drain system.
Elements:
Public Reporting
• Illicit Discharge Investigations
Spill Control Programs
Water Conservation / Reuse
Initial Implementation Efforts Completed:
- Illicit Discharge Investigations
- The Sub - Committee developed training materials,
procedures, check lists, questionnaires and other tools
used to implement this program.
- Moorpark undertook and completed the following:
- purchase sampling and testing equipment;
- contacted the owners and managers of the properties
in the study area (the industrial area northeast of
Gabbbert Road and Los Angeles Avenue) to advise them
of the objectives of the program; and,
- performed on -site inspections upon request.
..
Countywide:
• Public Reporting: Sub - Committee to develop a mechanism for
the reporting of illicit discharges. [Due 3/96]
Spill Control Programs: Sub - Committee to review existing
spill prevention, response and clean -up programs and
provide summary to Management Committee. [Due 9/96]
• Water Conservation / Reuse: Sub - Committee to review
existing water conservation and reuse programs and provide
summary to Management Committee. [Due 9/96]
City of MoorRaark:
• Illicit Discharge Investigations:
- Establish priorities for future illicit discharge
investigations. [Due 3/96]
- Conduct illicit discharge investigations in other
selected areas of the City. [Due: ongoing]
npdes3l UUZZWI
Exhibit E
Programs for Illicit Discharge
Page 2
Element
Illicit Discharge Investigations
Sub - Committee Involvement
Sub -total In -House Time
Kanhour Costs (per hour)
Total Cost
npdes3l
In -House Consultant
Nan Years Hanhours Costs (s) Total
320 0
0 0
0.17 360
30
10,800 0 10,800
00%97
Exhibit F
Programs for Public Infrastructure
Page 1
Title: PROGRAMS FOR PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE
,Sy Description: Develop and provide BMPs related to
operation, maintenance and repair efforts performed by public
agencies.
Ele=ents
• Education for Public Agencies
• Drainage System Operation & Maintenance
• Roadway Operation & Maintenance
• Landscape Maintenance
• Co- Permittee Corporation Yards
• Wastewater Collection Systems
• Solid Waste Collection and Disposal
Initial al Imnl ementati n Efforts QQ=I_eted :
• Education for Public Agencies
- The Sub- Committee developed suggested BMPs for municipal
O &M activities which impact upon stormwater run -off.
countywide:
• Education for Public Agencies
- Sub - Committee to finalize stormwater pollution reporting
forms. [Due 10/95]
- Sub - Committee to finalize stormwater pollution control
training materials for O &M personnel. [Due 10/95]
- Sub - Committee to develop and implement outreach efforts
to non -co- permittee public agencies. [Due 2/96]
• Co- Permittee Corporation Yards: Sub - Committee to develop
model BMPs for these purposes. [Due 5/96]
• Solid Waste Collection and Disposal: Sub - Committee to
identify and test alternative procedures designed to reduce
stormwater pollution caused by solid waste collection
practices. [Due 7/96]
City of MoorR k :
• Education for Public Agencies: Implement personnel
training related to stormwater pollution control. [Due
11/95]
• Drainage System Operation & Maintenance: Begin collecting
data required to evaluate effectiveness of various O &M
practices in controlling and /or reducing stormwater
pollution. [Due 1/96]
npd%31 ou'u%'W
Exhibit F
Programs for Public Infrastructure
Page 2
City of Moorpslr ( on 1:
• Roadway Operation & Maintenance: Begin collecting data
required to evaluate effectiveness of street sweeping,
pavement management and other street maintenance
activities, in controlling and /or reducing stormwater
pollution. [Due 1/96]
• Landscape Maintenance: Begin collecting data on existing
landscape maintenance practices to determine potential
conflicts with objectives of stormwater pollution control
efforts. [Due 7/96]
• Co— Pernittee Corporation Yards: Identify stormwater
pollution sources at the Corporate Yard, and those BMPs
which most effectively prevent or control same. [Due 1/96]
• Wastewater Collection Systems: Confirm that County
Waterworks District #1 is developing procedures which
control or reduce seepages, spills and overflows at or from
the Sewage collection system and /or treatment plant. [Due
7/96]
npdes3l M 3 ?9+c
In7iouse
Consultant
Ele nit _
Man Yegs Kanhours
costs M. _To _.
Maintenance Staff Education
160
0
Data Collection: Storm Drains
100
0
Data Collection: Streets
40
0
Data Collection: Landscape Maint.
40
0
Corporate Yard Assessment
10
0
Wastewater Interface
10
0
Solid Waste Assessment
10
0
Sub - Committee Involvement
40
_ 0
Subtotal In -House Time
0.20 410
Manhour Costs (per hour)
30
Total Cost
12,300
0 12,300
npdes3l M 3 ?9+c
Exhibit G
Programs for Land Development
Page 1
Title: PROGRAMS FOR LAND DEVELOPMENT
Sumesary rip,ion: Develop information to assist public
officials and developers in implementing Stormwater Quality
objectives in land use and land development decisions.
Elements:
• Education / Outreach to Land Developers
• Land Use Planning and Zoning
• Development Standards and Reviews
• Permits and Inspections
Initial Implementation Efforts Completed:
• Education / Outreach to Land Developers: Sub -- Committee is
developing a number of educational materials to assist City
Councils, Planning Commissions, Department Heads and
developers to understand and implement required stromwater
pollution controls, including Oyeriew of the Countywide
Approach.
• Land Use Planning and Zoning: Sub - Committee developing
three documents to assist City Councils, Planning
Commissions, Department Heads:
- Stormwater Pollution Considerations for General Plans;
- Stormwater Quality Master Planning Kethodology and
Criteria; and,
Development Standards and Reviews: Sub - Committee developing
three documents to assist planning, engineering, public
works and developers:
Storer Pollution Aspects of Development Propgsal
Reviews of Priority Outdoor Activities;
Stormwater nua ity Consideration for Environmental
Reviews for Priority Outdoor Activities; and,
Suggested Development Standards for Priority outdoor
Activities.
Permits and Inspections: Sub - Committee developing
to
assist municipal inspectors contractors and engineers.
- - 1
Countywide:
• Education /Outreach to Land Developers: Sub- Committee to
complete draft of a document for City Councils, Planning
Commissions, Department Heads and developers, entitled
Overview of the Countywide And. [Due 1/96]
• Land Use Planning and Zoning: Sub - Committee to complete
documents pertaining to stromwater quality aspects of a)
General Plans, b) Master Planning and c) Zoning. [Due 5/96]
npdes3l
1 0e'
Exhibit G
Programs for Land Development
Page 2
Development Standards and Reviews: Sub - Committee to
complete documents pertaining to stromwater quality aspects
of a) Development Proposals, b) Environmental Reviews and
c) Development Standards. [Due 12/95]
Permits and Inspections: Sub- Committee to complete
documents pertaining to Inspection procedures. [Due 2/96]
City of Moorpark:
• Education / Outreach to Land Developers: Begin to use
Overview-pt.the Countywide Appzgach to educate land
development community.
• Land Use Planning and Zoning
- Begin using Stormwater Pollut- on Considerations for
General Plans in evaluating and developing General Plan
Updates. [Due 9/95]
- Define areas where stormwater quality master plans will
be required. [Due 5/96]
- Begin using Stoomwater Pollution Considerations for
Zoning fo_r Priority outdoor Activities in land
development reviews. [Due 1/96]
• Development Standards and Reviews: Begin to review and
refine standards and procedures in documents pertaining to
stromwater quality aspects of a) Development Proposals, b)
Environmental Reviews and c) Development Standards. [Due
12/95]
• Permits and Inspections: Begin to review and refine
Inspection procedures in document provided. [Due 2/96]
Manbour Costs (per hour) 30
Total Cost 19,800 0 19,800
npdes3l
I_;'10�1101
In -House
Consultant
Element
Min Yea Manhours
Costs Total (S1
Informational J Educational Programs
30
0
General Plan Updates
30
0
Stonwater Quality Master Plans
100
0
Implement Suggested Zoning Standards
180
0
Reviewing Development Proposals
80
0
Environmental Impact Reports
80
0
Development Standards
80
0
Inspection Procedures
40
0
Sub- Coamittee Meetings (* by P.W. Staff)
* 40
_ 0
Sub -total In -House Time
0.31 * 660
Manbour Costs (per hour) 30
Total Cost 19,800 0 19,800
npdes3l
I_;'10�1101
Exhibit H
Programs for Construction Sites
Page 1
Title: PROGRAMS FOR CONSTRUCTION SITES
Summary Description: Develop and provide information to the public
and private sectors pertaining to stormwater quality problems
associated with major construction sites.
E eaents
• Education / Outreach to Construction Site Personnel
• Co- Permittee Public Works Projects
• Public Agency and Private Sector Projects
Initial In2lementation Eff Efforts Completed:
Education / Outreach to Construction Site Personnel: Sub -
Committee developed draft Stormwater Pollution Prevention
Plan (SWPPP) forms and procedures to be used by both private
contractors and public agencies. The Sub - Committee also
hosted workshops to educate those required to comply with
these regulations.
W. • ' -" ' 9 •.� _ • Y_- t Ott.._ ti• . .
CCountywide
• Education / Outreach to Construction Site Personnel
- Sub - Committee to continue to develop training materials
and conduct workshops. [Due 12/95]
- Sub - Committee to prepare draft guidelines for
construction site stromwater pollution control measures
as well as the inspection of same. [Due 12/95]
• Co- Permittee Public Works Projects
- VCFCD to prepare standard language for Public Works
contracts related to SWPPP requirements. [Due 12/95]
• Public Agency and Private Sector Projects
- Sub - Committee to develop policies regarding public and
private construction sites. [Due 7/96]
City of Moorpark:
• Education / Outreach to Construction Site Personnel
- Begin training staff on the implementation of these
requirements. [Due 12/95]
- Begin to distribute outreach materials. [Due 12/95]
- Begin to document observed stormwater pollution control
problems and actions taken. [Due 12/951
• Public Agency and Private Sector Projects
- Begin verifying that contractors /developers have
submitted an NOI (Notice of Intent) to the State prior to
issuance of City permits. [Due 11/95]
- Consider adoption of policies regarding public and
private construction sites. [Due 10/96]
npdes3l U(; 0302
Exhibit H
Programs for Construction Sites
Page 2
Program 1nRjmentatiQn Costs f FY 1995Z96 & FY 1996f971 :
In -HQM Consultant
Element Kan Years Nanhours (S, Total lfi�
Staff Training 100 0
Contractor Outreach 60
Documenting Offenses 100
NOI Verification 60
Adopt policies 100
Sub - Committee Involvement _40 _0
Sub -total In -House Time 0.22 460
Nanbour Costs (per hour) 30
Total Cost 13,800 0
npdes3l
13,800
00030"W?
Exhibit I
Program Cost Summary
Page 1
The following chart summarizes all of the program costs described
in Exhibits C through H, plus program administration costs.
U, PrMams for.,.
C Residents (Public outreach)
D Industrial / Commercial Businesses
E Illicit Discharge Control
F Public Infrastructure
G Land Development
H Construction Sites
- General Administration
Total 1996 Program Costs
Total Reg. FY 1995/96 Costs
Total Est. FY 1996/97 Costs
npdes3l
In -House
Cis (S)
Consultant
Costs (St
Total (Sl
Nan Years
.13
7,800
0
7,800
.13
8,400
0
8,400
.17
10,800
0
10,800
.20
12,300
0
12,300
.31
19,800
0
19,800
.21
13,800
0
13,800
.06
3.600
0
3,600
1.21
76,500
0
76,500
0.61
38,400
0
38,400
0.60
38,100
0
38,100
Exhibit J
In —House Staff Hours
Page 1
It is recommended that the responsibility for implementing various
NPDES program requirements be allocated to those City Departments
most directly involved with clientele affected by those
requirements. The following charts list the required program tasks
along with anticipated staff costs allocated to recommended
departments.
npdes3l
OU, G -30
Total
Solid
Engin. /
Code
Public
Ex.
Pumas for:
Ilan Hours
Waste ($)
Bldg, r s
Tina ( $)
Fnf. . ($)
Works M
C
Residents
20
600
Public Education
10
300
Inlet Stenciling
40
1,200
Refuse Disposal
40
1,200
Yard Maintenance
0
Vehicle Maintenance
0
D
Businesses
20
600
Automotive
60
1,800
Restaurant
60
1,800
E
Illicit Discharge Control
200
3,000
3,000
F
Public Infrastructure
20
600
Staff Training
120
3,600
Storm Drain Data
80
2,400
Street Data
20
600
Landscape Data
0
Corporate Yard Data
10
300
Wastewater Coord.
10
300
Solid Waste
0
G
Land Development
20
600
Educational Programs
10
300
General Plan Updates
10
300
Stormwater Master Plans
40
1200
Zoning Standards
80
2400
Development Proposals
30
900
EIRs
30
900
Development Standards
30
900
Inspections
10
300
H
Construction Sites
20
600
Staff Training
60
1,800
Contractor Outreach
40
11200
Documenting Offenses
80
2,400
NOI Verification
30
900
Adopt Policies
20
600
-
General Administration
_ 6¢
1,8M
Total FY 95/96 Costs
1,280
1,200
6,900
7,200
6,600
16,500
npdes3l
OU, G -30
Exhibit J
In —House Staff Hours
Page 2
D Businesses
Total
PrqXa
Man Hours
Restaurant
C Residents
20
Public Education
10
Inlet Stenciling
0
Refuse Disposal
40
Yard Maintenance
40
Vehicle Maintenance
40
D Businesses
20
Automotive
60
Restaurant
60
E Illicit Discharge Control
160
F Public Infrastructure
20
Staff Training
40
Storm Drain Data
20
Street Data
20
Landscape Data
40
Corporate Yard Data
0
Wastewater Coord.
0
Solid Waste
10
G Land Development
20
Educational Programs
20
General Plan Updates
20
Stormwater Master Plans
60
Zoning Standards
100
Development Proposals
50
EIRs
50
Development Standards
50
Inspections
30
B Construction Sites
20
Staff Training
40
Contractor Outreach
20
Documenting Offenses
20
NOI Verification
30
Adopt Policies
80
General Administration _600
Total FY 96/97 Costs 1260
Solid Engin. / Code Public
Waste Bldg, i$1 P a Enf. (0 works
600
300
1,200
1,200
600
600
900
2,400
600
600
1800
3000
1500
1500
1500
900
1,200 5,700 11,400
1,200
1,200
600
1,800
1,800
2,400
2,400
600
1,200
600
600
1,200
300
600
600
1,800
8,400 11,400
npdes31
01%21, 030
Exhibit K
Program Funding Summary
Page 1
The following charts lists all of the identified NPDES Program
costs along with recommended funding sources.
i ..
npdes3l
General
Comm
Staff Consultant
fjL
Program
Time (S) Tice ( $ )
C
Residents
3,300
D
Businesses
4,200
E
Illicit Discharge Control
6,000
F
Public Infrastructure
7,800
G
Land Development
7,800
H
Construction Sites
7,500
-
General Administration
1,800
7,800
Total FY 95/96 Costs
38,400 0
npdes3l
General
Comm
Staff
Consultant
LL
PrMam
Time
- _
1,200
.LS1
3,300
C
Residents
4,500
4,200
D
Businesses
4,200
5,000
E
Illicit Discharge Control
4,800
7,800
F
Public Infrastructure
4,500
7,800
G
Land Development
12,000
7,500
H
Construction Sites
6,300
1,800
-
General Administration
1,800
38,400
Est. FY 96/97 Costs
38,100
5,000
npdes3l
General
Comm
Gas
8,600
Fund
Dev (S)
To-j_t
Total (Sl
1,200
2,100
3,300
11,400
3,600
600
4,200
600
3,000
3,000
6,000
11800
1,200 30,500
7,800
7,800
7,200
600
7,800
6,900
600
7,500
11800
1,800
1,200
20,700
16,500
38,400
General Comm Gas
Fund (S) W-1 1 Tax f51 Total
1,200 2,400
900
4,500
8,600
600
9,200
2,400
2,400
4,800
4,500
4,500
11,400
600
12,000
5,700
600
6,30/0
0
1,800
11800
1,200 30,500
11,400
43,100
Est. Two Year Total 62,700 22,000 2,400 51,200 27,900
81,500
rr �i�•�
Of�.o% 0