HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 1995 1004 CC REG ITEM 11F1TEA
CITY OF MOORPARK of �� /-�5 _ 1995
ACL-
AGENDA REPORT
BY
TO: The Honorable City Council
FROM: Christine Adams, Director of Community Services
DATE: September 26, 1995 (Meeting of October 4, 1995)
SUBJECT: Consider Additional Information Regarding the
Maintenance Program for Elm Trees Along McFadden
and Cornett Streets
BACKGROUND
Staff presented an informational item to the City Council on
September 20, 1995, regarding the condition of the English
Elm trees along McFadden and Cornett Streets. At that
meeting, the City Council requested that staff provide
additional information regarding the proposed maintenance and
removal program.
Tree Removal
Staff recommends that every other tree be removed, removing
those that are in worse condition first. Seven trees per
street would be removed during the first year, and seven
trees per street could be removed two years later.
The City has a list of appropriate trees that could be used
as replacement trees, and could allow each resident to make a
selection, to provide a variety mix along the street, or the
City could make a determination of the one tree species it
prefers to replace the elm trees. Staff intends to select a
one tree variety for each street unless otherwise directed by
Council. A copy of trees suitable for use as street trees
has been previously provided to the Council.
The cost of tree removal is $350.00 per tree, which is $4,900
for each year of removal. This can be accommodated in the
current tree trimming / removing contract, which is part of
the AD 84 -2 budget for each fiscal year.
The tree replacement costs only include staff time, as the
trees can be acquired from Boething Treeland Nursery as part
of the City's lease agreement. Staff would recommend
replacing all of the elm trees with either a 24" or 36" box
tree. The market value of the replacement trees is
approximately $200 per tree, depending on size and species.
The annual Boething lease provides for Boething to provide
the City, at no cost, two hundred 15 gallon trees each year.
010OW(A'
One 24" box tree is the equivalent of four 15 gallon trees,
as defined in the Boething lease. Therefore, 56 of the 200
trees would be used for this project in Year One and 56 trees
would be used in Year Three.
Tree Maintenance
Of the remaining 14 trees (seven per street) staff would
recommend utilizing the "banding" process which was described
in the Council report on September 20. The purpose of the
banding treatment is to reduce the defoliation of the elm
trees and the subsequent leaf debris in the street caused by
the elm leaf beetle. The banding treatment will cost $75.00
per tree for pesticide material and labor to apply. This is
a total of $700 for two years, which would be the total
amount of time needed to band the remaining 14 trees once a
year, prior to the second phase of elm tree removal in 1997-
98. This cost is also included as part of the maintenance
costs in the AD 84 -2 budget for FY 1995 -96.
Unless the City Council directs otherwise, staff will proceed
with the phased tree removal plan, and will band the
remaining trees in the spring, which is consistent with the
recommendations made by Certified Arborist Paul Rogers.
RECOMMENDATION
Direct staff to proceed with program as outlined in this
report and to select one appropriate tree for each street.
4
STREET TREES /COMMERCIAL Ci 1TEiVi
Lo uat
_ 9
Japouica Deflexa
1 Yrr ur
NAMES
I HABIT OF1
AVG.
J F
SPECIA.
TYPE r, O.x..�c SO R
* {
=t. WIDrIH
ISPFtFAp IREE.
�.
Evez reen
_ g
COt410N NAME
BOTANICAL
:'TREE
GROWTH --
CNT�1
;fA..:
"�"#r _Ii.
RE
USE
8
30
Reco.
40 -50
Sugar Gum
-
Rounded
0 en
F Y �
dtOS T
I BIND � '
ITLIA T'I
I.
f -
Araucaria.-
Lehmann
Eucalyptus
�
13064
h #'
Loam
Sand r
SC3r Pine
Excelsa
Conifer
ramidal
40 -60
r `-
Rounded
eedi
Lod►_ - Loam? =�v Y
�tesi �
Hardy - 8 -10
25 -35 Recomm.
0 -60
No[
Ceratonia
=
Rounded
a`
Reco_ `
--
carob
Siliqua
Evergreen
Com act
20 -30
Ho er$ Ie y
Fda� R
Sm. _
Low -- >: �z
M f Deep Resist
;6 -8
20 -25 Recomm.
Carrotvood
upaa a ;
Anacardioides Evergreen
Oval
Spreading
20 -30
HoderaLe
Sta ]
-
-.- --- I
Hed: - Yr
My Deep �ies- ist
,Resist
j
Res 6
20 -30 "
30 -40
Recomm
Not
Posted
<.-
-
r
-8
Recomm.`
30 -40
.- ° - - - --
r o otrya
-_ -
_ nT-Pa 1no
Semi-
Rounded
,test
Reco ®.
Lo uat
_ 9
Japouica Deflexa
Evergreen
Rounded
20 -30 de - -Lr Hed:
�- r 8
M Ay es_ st. Resist
Y $
6 8.
15 Recomm
`20 -30
tenon
��
Gu
uca yp us
Citriodora
j:C1
�.
Evez reen
_ g
pen
Y lindrica 50 -70
L�aon -
Rap 3i Hed._,
.. s
:. A' j
`Resist. =15
Iv
.20
w No -t t
_Scented
MyS ocr esYsr
8
30
Reco.
40 -50
Sugar Gum
uca yp us
ada calyx
Evergreen
Rounded
0 en
r 50
Ra `
pidr Hed.
, _
Low
San
Shallow -ender Resist:
10 -15 r 30
Lehmann
Eucalyptus
>_ ,
�a
Loam
Sand r
Recomm,
40-50
-Euca tus
Lehmanni
Evergreen
Rounded
15 -20
Sloe _ �� • Sm z.
:�.
Lov
-: Loamy end Resist_':"
.8 -10
20 -25
No[
1 15
maidenhair
n o o a -
'Autucrn
a`
Reco_ `
-
.ree
Gold'
Dec idlous
Pyramidal
50
Slov° f_< Fo11a a
g - -Hed..
Low
vY Dee -Bard Hard Y
Loam y��
6 -15
30
;veer
Shade
ymenosporum
Flavusa
Evergreen
Oval
10 =30
Hodes Flower Hed
LOW
- :x�e F -
Light "''.
Recomm
Not
Posted
„� - ,
- Av t Resist.
Loam. g
6 -8
10 -20
25 -30
z.vergrn.
en a router a
Semi-
Rounded
,test
Reco ®.
?3lntree
Bi innata
p
D d
Spreading
20-,30,-
0-30,
Moderate- g. -
_ 4 �iower5 Lr
- -
Low
Li ht }
`` g _ A� t' -
Av 8t�is lender
Loam
8 -10
30 '
Not .•
_
`25 30
'.Ter can -
Liqui am ar
iLiriodendron
-
Moderate -F�li
.Lrg'-
_
Light = < '�y
Recomm
Weet Gum
Scyraciflua
Decidious
Conical
r 50;
�. :•
Slob `� Color `
Low
Loam Deep ��` Resiat�'- Resist.
6 -8
30�
� - - -�-
-40 -50
.0 p
Recomm.
Free
2ulipfera
Decidious
Rounded
35 -40,
�Hod� rate° FFlower`>': Lrg.
Med.
Any Deep lard► hardy. °, -
6 -8.
30 -35_a
40 -50
ran
ra
-. s�
Recomm.
southern
•_. nolia
'Majestic Beauty' Evergreen
Rounded
r 50
F
Nodera[e Flower Lrg.
Low
Heavy
Loam Deep Hardy_ Resist.
6 -10
40 -50
40 -50
'- iycens
Haytens
Rounded
r =- 1.:
Recomm
Boa ria
Evergreen
Spreading
20-30
Moderate, Sm.
Med.
r
Any '° Deep Hardy_ Hardy
4 -6
15 -20
-
20 -30
:angry
inua
y },
Recomm.'
island Pine
Canariensis
Conifer 1Pyrimidal
50
Rapid. Sm.
LOW
an y Deep Resist. Resist.
oam
8 -15
Ovr 30
Not
40 -50
lisaop
nus
Rec
line
Hurieata
Conifer
Conical
40 -SO
Rapid eedl
Hed_
any Avg.. Resist. Resist_
8 -15
Over 30
Not
40 -50
cone
nu
ompact
Loam
72-n
Pines
Conifer
Rounded
30 -40
Moderate eedl
Low
Any Avg_ Hardy Hdy
8 -15
Over 30
Not
40 -50
ey
nue
yram a
- __
Radiata
Conif41Ci ompact
er 50
Rapid eedi
Med.
My Shallow Resist. Resist.
5-)ver
Over30
Not
30 -40
spanese
aus
—
Conifaphazar d
10 -20 Slow iOVt eedi
Loer
Avrg_
mm
Lack Plne
ihunbergl
— -
-
Pattern
Avg, Resist. Resist.
4 -6
15 -20
Not <40
-57
a •
STREET TREES/ COi'.21ERICAL
].`s'i0N NAME
BOTANICAL
NAME
TYPE OF
T
HABIT 0
AVG.
RATE OF
SPECIA
TYPE
s41"
Y. /.
SOIL
ROOT
FROST
WIND
PRIKidY
SPRE D
feet)SI'ILIA
USEFUL
IFF
Mese
-Aache
Pistacia
Chinesis
Decidious
Rounded
S read in
20 -30
Moderate
Fall
Color
Small
Low
Any
Average
Hardy
Resist.
4 -8
5 -30
Optional
35 -40
:ocean
roman
Plantanus
Acerifoila
Decidlous
Rounded
Over 50
Average
Fall
Large
Med.
Heavy
Average
Resist.
Hardy-
6 -10
er 30
Not
Reccmm
40 -50
ra
.:e
Podocar u9
Elongata
Conifer
Rounded
20 -50
IModerate
Small
Low
Light
Average
Resist.
Resist.
8 -15
er 50 lRecomm.
30 -40
y
x
Quercus
Ilex
Evergreen
Rounded
20 -50
Slow
Small
Med.
Any
Deep
Hardy
Hardy
4 -8
er 30
Reco®.
40 -50
ti �e;M