HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 1996 0417 CC REG ITEM 07G eon.. <. ., -
cxayc- -
of .7/7/7
/7/7
AGENDA REPORT
A ON: oajcgZi
CITY OF MOORPARK ,. �r
y� &) 4v
TO: Honorable City Council - ,
FROM: Deborah S. Traffenstedt, Senior Planner .
�- f� ai .
' /
DATE: April 10, 1996 (CC Meeting of 4-17-96)
SUBJECT: CONSIDER AUTHORIZING PREPARATION OF A TRAFFIC STUDY TO DETERMINE THE
NEED FOR UNIDOS AVENUE, ALLOCATION OF $12,000 FROM FUND 21 (CITYWIDE
TRAFFIC MITIGATION) TO PAY FOR THE STUDY, AND CITY MANAGER APPROVAL
OF A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH AUSTIN-FOUST ASSOCIATES
Background
Unidos Avenue was originally envisioned as an east-west roadway to be located
south of Los Angeles Avenue in the central area of the City. At the time of the
City's Circulation Element update in 1992, the need for the extension of Unidos
Avenue, between a southerly extension of Goldman Avenue at the west end to
Millard Street or Fremont Street to the east, was discussed by the City Council
during the public hearing process. However, because the budgeted work for the
Circulation Element update had not included an analysis of the need for Unidos
Avenue, the City Council removed any reference to Unidos Avenue from the
Circulation Element and determined that further study of the need for Unidos
Avenue to function as an east-west collector roadway was required prior to
inclusion in the Circulation Element. There is an existing segment of Unidos
Avenue, extending from approximately Juarez Avenue to Liberty Bell Road that was
partially constructed and/or right of way was granted, in conjunction with both
the Villa Campesina residential project (Tract No. 4146) and Colin Velasquez
commercial project (Planned Development No. 1065) .
Discussion
Staff has received several inquiries over the last several months regarding
potential projects that will require a determination regarding the need for
Unidos Avenue. Potential projects include a batting cage facility west of Park
Lane, a Burger King restaurant proposed just east of Liberty Bell Road, a
commercial development just west of Liberty Bell Road, and a modification of the
prior approved Westland Residential Project, which was conditioned to construct
Unidos Avenue from Goldman Avenue east to Liberty Bell Road.
Staff had originally prepared a Request for Proposals in 1994 for an Unidos
Avenue Traffic Needs Study, and received a proposal from Austin-Foust Associates
(the City's Traffic Model Consultant) in April 1994 (Attachment 1) . The study
was not pursued in 1994, due to the lack of development proposals for that area
of the City.
Austin-Foust Associates have confirmed that their proposal amount ($12,000) is
still valid, and staff is recommending that the Unidos Avenue Traffic Needs Study
now be completed by Austin-Foust, with a fair share assignment for the study to
be paid by applicants for development projects that require a determination
regarding the need for Unidos Avenue. A draft Professional Services Agreement
is attached. As stated in the draft Professional Services Agreement, Task 6 of
the Austin-Foust proposal is amended by the Agreement to address the four
potential segments of Unidos Avenue to be analyzed as follows: Fremont Street or
00E1
Honorable City Council
April 10, 1996
Page 2
potential segments of Unidos Avenue to be analyzed as follows: Fremont Street or
Millard Street to Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark Avenue to Park Lane, Park Lane to
Liberty Bell Road, and Liberty Bell Road to a Goldman Avenue southerly extension.
The questions to be answered for the four potential roadway segments include:
A. Must the intersection at Park Lane be directly $500
aligned or offset?
B. Is an extension west of Liberty Bell Road required? $500
C. If an extension west of Liberty Bell Road west is $500
required, does the intersection at Liberty Bell Road
need to be directly aligned with existing Unidos Avenue,
or could Unidos Avenue be offset to the south, closer to
the Arroyo Simi, to minimize impacts to the commercial
zoned property west of Liberty Bell Road?
D. Does Majestic Court need to be extended east - and to $500
where?
Prior Task 6D in the Austin-Foust proposal (analysis of the impact of the
alignment on a pedestrian over-crossing planned at Liberty Bell Road) has been
deleted, because the analysis is no longer required. In addition, to the
modification of Task 6, staff is proposing a 10 percent contingency be allocated
($1,200), which would allow staff the flexibility to require additional work
tasks, if determined to be necessary to fully analyze the need for Unidos Avenue.
Austin-Foust's $12,000 cost for the study, plus the $1,200 contingency, are
proposed to be initially funded by the Citywide Traffic Mitigation Fund (21) ,
with fair share reimbursement to that Fund from applicants for future development
projects along Unidos Avenue. As stated in Austin-Foust's proposal letter, the
draft traffic study will be completed within four to six weeks.
Recommendation (Roll Call Vote)
1. Authorize Preparation of a Traffic Study to Determine the Need for Unidos
Avenue;
2. Appropriate $13,200 from Fund 21 ($12,000 plus 10 percent contingency);
and
3. Authorize the City Manager to Approve a Professional Services Agreement
with Austin-Foust Associates.
Attachment: Draft Professional Services Agreement Between the City and Austin-
Foust Associates (includes proposal letter dated 4-28-94)
0062
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of , 1996, by and
between the City of Moorpark, a municipal corporation located in the County of
Ventura, State of California, hereinafter referred to as "CITY" and Austin-Foust
Associates, Inc. , a California Corporation, hereinafter referred to as "AFA."
WITNESSETH
Whereas, City has the need for professional traffic engineering and
transportation planning services related to the preparation of a Traffic Study
to investigate the need for extending Unidos Avenue and amending the City's
General Plan Circulation Element to include Unidos Avenue as an east-west local
collector roadway; and
Whereas, City desires to contract for such services with a private
consultant in anticipation that said private consultant can provide such services
in a manner acceptable to the City; and
Whereas, AFA is experienced in providing such services and is able to
provide personnel with the proper experience, certifications and background to
carry out the duties involved; and
Whereas, AFA has submitted to City a proposal, for an Unidos Avenue Traffic
Needs Study, which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and hereinafter referred to
as the "Proposal"; and
Whereas, City, wishes to retain AFA for the performance of the services
identified in the Proposal;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants, benefits and
premises herein stated, the parties hereto agree as follows:
I. SCOPE OF WORK
City does hereby retain AFA in a contractual capacity to perform traffic
engineering and transportation planning services, as set forth in Exhibit "A",
the Proposal, which is attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein.
Where said Proposal is modified by this Agreement, the language contained in this
Agreement shall take precedence. Task 6, as identified in the Proposal, is
hereby amended in its entirety as follows:
The four potential segments of Unidos Avenue that will be analyzed are:
Fremont Street or a southerly extension of Millard Street to Moorpark
Avenue, Moorpark Avenue to Park Lane, Park Lane to Liberty Bell Road, and
Liberty Bell Road to a Goldman Avenue southerly extension. The questions
to be answered for each of the four potential roadway segments include:
A. Must the intersection at Park Lane be directly $500
aligned or offset?
B. Is an extension west of Liberty Bell Road required? $500
C. If an extension west of Liberty Bell Road west is $500
required, does the intersection at Liberty Bell Road
need to be directly aligned with existing Unidos Avenue,
or could Unidos Avenue be offset to the south, closer to
the Arroyo Simi, to minimize impacts to the commercial
zoned property west of Liberty Bell Road?
D. Does Majestic Court need to be extended east - and to $500
where?
dst-4-8-96 C:\WP51\Contract\Unidos.AFA 1
II. COMPENSATION
The fees in full compensation to AFA for the services rendered shall be as
set forth in the Proposal, for an amount not to exceed $12,000.00, without the
prior written agreement of the City Manager and AFA of the changes in the scope
of work, which result in the increase of said cost. Payment by the City to AFA
shall be in accordance with the provisions of Article V, Paragraph K, of this
Agreement.
III. TERMINATION OR SUSPENSION
This Agreement may be terminated or suspended with or without cause by City
at any time with no less than ten (10) working days written notice of such
termination or suspension. This Agreement may be terminated by AFA only by
providing City with written notice no less than thirty (30) days in advance of
such termination. In the event of such termination or suspension, AFA shall be
compensated for such services up to the date of termination or suspension. Such
compensation for work in progress shall be prorated as to the percentage of
progress completed at the date of termination or suspension.
IV. TERM OF AGREEMENT
The term of this Agreement shall be the time period required to complete
all of the work tasks identified in Exhibit "A" and for a one-year period
following completion of all such tasks, unless this Agreement is terminated or
suspended pursuant to Article III herein.
V. GENERAL CONDITIONS
A. AFA shall agree not to work on any other public agency or private
development project located within the City limits or its Area of Interest,
without the prior written consent of the City, during the term of this contract.
B. City shall not be called upon to assume any liability for the direct
payment of any salary, wage or other compensation to any person employed by AFA
performing services hereunder for City.
C. AFA is, and shall at all times, remain as to the City a wholly
independent contractor. Neither the City, nor any of its officers, employees,
servants or agents, shall have control over the conduct of AFA or AFA's officers,
employees or agents, except as herein set forth. AFA shall not at any time
or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees or agents
are in any manner employees of the City.
D. At the time of 1) termination of this Agreement or 2) conclusion of
all work, all original documents, designs, drawings, reports, calculations,
diskettes, computer files, notes, and other related materials whether prepared
by AFA or their subcontractor(s) or obtained in the course of providing the
services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole
property of the City. Any word processing computer files provided to the City
shall use IBM compatible, Word Perfect for Windows version 6.1 word processing
software, on a 3.5-inch diskette.
E. AFA shall hold harmless, indemnify and defend the city and its
officers, employees, servants and agents and independent contractors who serve
in the role of City Manager, Deputy City Manager, Director of Community
Development, City Engineer, or City Attorney from any claim, demand, damage,
liability, loss, cost or expense, for any damage whatsoever, including but not
limited to death or injury to any person and injury to any property, resulting
from, or in any way connected with the performance of this Agreement by AFA or
the City, except such damage as is caused by the sole negligence of the City.
The City does not, and shall not, waive any rights that it may have
against AFA by reason of Paragraph E hereof, because of the acceptance by the
dst-4-8-96 C:\WP51\Contract\Unidos.AFA 2
000064
City, or the deposit with the City, of any insurance policy or certificate
required pursuant to this Agreement. This hold harmless and indemnification
provision shall apply regardless or whether or not said insurance policies are
determined to be applicable to the claim, demand, damage, liability, loss, cost
or expense described in Paragraph E hereof.
F. AFA shall secure from a good and responsible company or companies
doing insurance business in the State of California, pay for, and maintain in
full force and effect for the duration of this Agreement the policies of
insurance required by this paragraph and shall furnish to the City Clerk of the
city certificates of said insurance on or before the commencement of the term of
this Agreement. Notwithstanding any inconsistent statement in any of said
policies or any subsequent endorsement attached thereto, the protection offered
by the policies shall:
1. Name the City and its officers, employees, servants and agents and
independent contractors serving in the role of City Manager, Deputy
City Manger, Director of Community Development, City Engineer, or
City Attorney, as additional insured with AFA.
2. Bear an endorsement or have attached a rider whereby it is provided
that, in the event of cancellation or amendment of such policy for
any reason whatsoever, the City shall be notified by mail, postage
prepaid, not less than thirty (30) days before the cancellation or
amendment is effective. AFA shall give city thirty (30) days
written notice prior to the expiration of such policy.
3. Be written on an occurrence basis.
G. Consistent with the provisions of Paragraph F, AFA shall provide
general public liability including automobile liability and property damage
insurance in an amount not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000.00) per
occurrence and annual aggregate.
H. Consistent with the provisions of Paragraph F, AFA shall provide
workers' compensation insurance as required by the California Labor Code. If any
class of employees engaged by AFA in work under this Agreement is not protected
by the workers' compensation law, AFA shall provide adequate insurance for the
protection of such employees to the satisfaction of the City.
I. AFA shall not assign this Agreement, or any of the rights, duties or
obligations hereunder. It is understood and acknowledged by the parties that AFA
is uniquely qualified to perform the services provided for in this Agreement.
J. The language contained in this Agreement shall take precedence over
the language contained in any exhibit to this Agreement.
K. Payment to AFA shall be made by City within thirty (30) days of
receipt of invoice, if the invoice is not contested or questioned by City. If
the City identifies a discrepancy between the invoice amount and the work tasks
or products completed, the City shall within fifteen (15) work days of receipt
of the invoice specify in writing the discrepancy. AFA shall then either 1)
provide support materials to satisfy City stated discrepancy, or 2) revise the
invoice to reflect stated discrepancy. City shall then pay the revised or
documented invoice within thirty (30) days of such revision or documentation.
L. Any notice to be given pursuant to this Agreement shall be in
writing, and all such notices and any other document to be delivered shall be
delivered by personal service or by deposit in the United States mail, certified
or registered, return receipt requested, with postage prepaid, and addressed to
the party for whom intended as follows:
dst-4-8-96 C:\WP51\Contract\Unidos.AFA 3 000065.
To: City Manager
City of Moorpark
799 Moorpark Avenue
Moorpark, California 93021
To: Joe Foust
Austin-Foust Associates, Inc.
2020 North Tustin Avenue
Santa Ana, CA 92701
Either party may, from time to time, by written notice to the other,
designate a different address or contact person, which shall be substituted for
the one above specified. Notices, payments and other documents shall be deemed
delivered upon receipt by personal service or as of the second (2nd) day after
deposit in the United States mail.
M. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall be deemed, construed or
represented by the City or AFA or by any third person to create the relationship
of principal or agent, or of a partnership, or of a joint venture, or of any
other association of any kind or nature between the City and AFA.
N. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement of the parties
concerning the subject matter hereof and all prior agreements or understanding,
oral or written, are hereby merged herein. This Agreement shall not be amended
in any way except by a writing expressly purporting to be such an amendment,
signed and acknowledged by both of the parties hereto.
O. Should interpretation of this Agreement, or any portion thereof, be
necessary, it is deemed that this Agreement was prepared by the parties jointly
and equally, and shall not be interpreted against either party on the ground that
the party prepared the Agreement or caused it to be prepared.
P. No waiver of any provisions of this Agreement shall be deemed, or
shall constitute, a waiver of any other provision, whether or not similar, nor
shall any such waiver constitute a continuing or subsequent waiver of the same
provisions. No waiver shall be binding, unless executed in writing by the party
making the waiver.
Q. In the event any action, suit or proceeding is brought for the
enforcement of, or the declaration of any right or obligation pursuant to this
Agreement or as a result of any alleged breach of any provision of this
Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover its costs and
expenses, including reasonable attorney's fees, from the losing party, and any
judgement or decree rendered in such a proceeding shall include an award thereof.
R. Cases involving a dispute between the City and AFA may be decided by
an arbitrator if both sides agree in writing, with costs proportional to the
judgement of the arbitrator.
S. This Agreement is made, entered into, and executed in Ventura County,
California, and any action filed in any court or for arbitration for the
interpretation, enforcement or other action of the terms, conditions or covenants
referred to herein shall be filed in the applicable court in Venture County,
California.
T. The captions and headings of the various Articles, Paragraphs, and
Exhibits of this Agreement are for convenience and identification only and shall
not be deemed to limit or define the content of the respective Articles,
Paragraphs, and Exhibits hereof.
VI. RESPONSIBLE INDIVIDUAL
The individual directly responsible for AFA's overall performance of the
Agreement provisions herein above set forth and to serve as principal liaison
between City and AFA shall be Joe Foust. Upon mutual written agreement of the
parties, other individuals may be substituted in the above capacity.
000066
dst-4-8-96 C:\WP51\Contract\Unidos.AFA
4
The City's contact persons in charge of administration of this Agreement,
and to serve as principal liaison between AFA and City, shall be the City Manager
and Senior Planner.
VII. IMPLEMENTATION
The City shall provide AFA with written notice in advance of the date at
which these services are to be implemented if different than the date of the
Agreement.
CITY OF MOORPARK: AUSTIN-FOUST ASSOCIATES, INC. :
By: By:
Steven Kueny Joe E. Foust, Principal
City Manager
ATTEST:
By:
Lillian E. Hare, City Clerk
000061
dst-4-8-96 C:\WP51\Contract\Unidos.AFA 5
iligairrAUSTIN-FOIIST ASSOCIATES, INC.
TRAFFIC ENG/NEER/NG AND TRANSPORTATION PLANNING
2020 NORTH TUSTIN AVENUE • SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92701 • TELEPHONE (714) 667-0496
FAX (714) 667-7952
April 28, 1994
City of Moorpark
799 Moorpark Avenue
Moorpark, CA 93021
A1"1'ENTION: Ms. Debbie Traffenstedt
SUBJECT: PROPOSAL - UNIDOS AVENUE TRAFFIC NEEDS STUDY
Dear Debbie:
Austin-Foust Associates, Inc. (AFA) is pleased to respond to your RFP to investigate the need for
extending existing Unidos Avenue and including it in the Circulation Element. As you know, AFA
is quite familiar with the City's Circulation Element and the issues surrounding Unidos Avenue,
having been involved in preparation of that element which included a citywide traffic model. Since
you are acquainted with our work and credentials we will limit our promotion remarks to this brief
introduction and proceed directly to the scope of services.
SCOPE OF SERVICES
AFA feels the following tasks are needed to complete the scope of work:
TASK 1. Conduct an initial orientation meeting with City Staff to assimilate existing information,
review and • iscuss issue.: and coni:pct an on-site inspection.
$750
TASK 2. Collect additional traffic data as deemed appropriate. AFA will review the available data
from our existing files (and the traffic model), along with site specific data obtained in Task 1, and
determine supplemental data needs. A tentative data collection program will be formulated and
submitted to City Staff for their review prior to commencement of actual field counts. A study
budget of $2,000 has been anticipated. This cost could be adjusted, depending upon assistance in
data collection by City Staff. - -
$2,000 (Est)
,00066
Tjp-VED
1994
Lily of Moorpark
•
City of Moorpark
April 28, 1994
Page 2
TASK 3. A trip generation distribution and assignment for the area to be served by Unidos Avenue
will be prepared. Information on the potential development type and density for the area on a block-
by-block basis will be discussed with City Staff in Task 1.
$2,250
TASK 4. A highway capacity analysis of Unidos Avenue and intersecting streets within the project
limits will be conducted to determine the need for this roadway to serve local development.
$ 500
TASK 5. A supplemental capacity analysis utilizing the City's traffic model will be conducted to
determine any capacity deficiencies along Los Angeles Avenue and the role of Unidos
Avenue/Majestic Court in relieving any such deficiencies. These analyses will be conducted for both
year 2000 and 2010. This task will also address Item 6 (discussion of the relationship between Los
Angeles Avenue and Unidos Avenue) in the RFP.
$2,000
TASK 6. If it is determined that any extension of either or both roadways is required, additional
analyses will be performed to address several issues. These questions are:
A. Must the intersection at Park Lane be directly aligned or offset? $500
B. Is an extension west of Liberty Bell Road required? $500
C. Does Majestic Court need to be extended east - and to where? $500
D. What is the the impact of the alignment on a pedestrian
overcrossing planned at Liberty Bell Road? $500
TASK 7. In the event Unidos Avenue needs not be extended, recommendations for the appropriate
street design characteristics, typical section, etc. will be provided which will enable Unidos Avenue
to adequately function as a local service road.
$500
TASK 8. The traffic study costs will be kept separately to allow a "fair share" assignment of those
costs to the future development projects along Unidos Avenue. A "fair share" assignment of those
costs will be provided as a final product of the study.
$500
TASK 9. Preparation of draft and final study reports documenting the methodology, along with
findings and recommendations.
$1,500
TOTAL FEE $12,000
0,000
A •
City of Moorpark
April 28, 1994
Page 3
Since the study involves a level of effort which can only be determined once the study is under way
(i.e., certain tasks may not be necessary), AFA proposes to complete the study on a time and
materials basis, with maximum amounts not to exceed each task as noted.
AFA will assign myself as Project Manager,with assistance from Mr.Kendall Elmer for modeling and
Catherine Lawrence, P.E. for capacity analysis. The initial draft study will require four to six weeks
to complete.
If you have any questions, please call. We look forward to working with you on this very interesting
study which combines the traffic model's capability with conventional engineering experience.
Sincerely,
oe E.' o t, P.E
s