HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 1996 0605 CC REG ITEM 08BN7CM 8• A9•�1
AGENDA REPORT
CITY OF MOORPARK
TO: The Honorable City Council vw
FROM: Ken Gilbert, Director of Public Works
DATE: May 21, 1996 (Council Meeting 6 -5 -96)
SUBJECT: Consider Making Certain Changes to AD85 -1
and Confirming the Assessments for
Fiscal Year 1996/97
r
ZZ
This presents for approval a Resolution making certain changes to
Assessment District AD85 -1 and confirming the assessments for Fiscal
Year 1996/97. Certain information in support of said proposed
changes and proposed assessments is attached hereto and identified
as follows:
List of Exhibits
Exhibit
"A":
Exhibit
"B":
Exhibit
"C":
Exhibit
"D ":
Exhibit
"E":
Exhibit
"F ":
Exhibit
"G":
� _. 1 0) Z)
Assessment Summary
Fund Activity Summary
Preliminary Budget for FY 1996/97
Service Level Comparison
Engineer's Report
Public Hearing Notice
Resolution
Assessment District 85 -1 was formed in 1985 pursuant to the
provisions of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972." This
assessment district was established to allow for the funding of
parks maintenance expenses through the levying of assessments as
provided for in the act. As set forth in the Engineer's Report
(Exhibit "E"), costs are spread to all of the lots in the City by
means of a formula designed to spread said costs on the basis of
benefit. The formula uses land use as a measure of "people use" in
determining the relative amount of benefit received.
ad85_97.apr
00019-7
Assessment District 85 -1
June 5, 1996
Page 2
The City must annually act to levy the parks maintenance
assessments. Said assessments have been levied each year since the
formation of the district, except for FY 1987/88 and FY 1988/89.
In accordance with the requirements of the above mentioned act, the
City Council has taken a number of actions in recent months in
preparation for considering the levy of assessments for Parks
Maintenance for FY 1995/96. Those actions are summarized as
follows:
1. On January 17, 1996, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 96-
1175 stating its intent to take the subject actions.
2. Also on that date, the City Council selected the firm of Dwight
French and Associates to prepare the Engineer's Reports for
AD85 -1.
3. On April 3, 1996, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 96-
1195 making certain findings and taking certain actions
including the following:
• approving, subject to change, the Engineers' Report for
AD85 -1 for FY 1996/97;
• stating intent to make certain changes to AD85 -1:
• setting 7:00 p.m. on May 20, 1996, as the time and date of a
Public Meeting for the purpose of allowing the public an
opportunity to meet with City staff to question and discuss
the proposed assessments;
• setting 7:00 p.m. on June 5, 1996, as the time and date of a
Public Hearing to consider the subject actions; and
• directing that Notice of said meetings be sent to the owners
of all affected properties, stating the amount of the
assessment levied for FY 1995/96, the amount of the proposed
increase in the assessment amount and the total amount of the
assessments proposed for FY 1996/97.
-U. •
.. Budget
Attached as Exhibit 'C' is a copy of the proposed budget for the
Parks Department for FY 1996/97. The budget figures set forth
in this exhibit have been revised from those shown in the staff
report present to the City Council last April.
ed85_97.apr
Assessment District 85 -1
June 5, 1996
Page 3
B. Service Level Increase
Attached as Exhibit 'D' is a chart showing the increase in the
service level provided to the City's thirteen (13) parks in
recent years. This chart shows that the amount of parks
maintenance required will increase from an average of 9.23
months per year (total months of maintenance provided to all
parks, divided by thirteen) in FY 1994/95 to an estimated
average of 10.77 months of maintenance in FY 1996/97. This
increase in service level is one of the reasons for the
anticipated increase in expenditures funded by this District.
C. Staffing Level
The Engineer's Report and accompanying staff report presented to
the City Council last April, showed anticipated expenditures for
FY 1996/97 for parks maintenance (personnel and O &M) totaling
$617,863. This amount included personnel costs at a level
sufficient to fund the addition of a new Maintenance Worker
position.
This added position has been deleted from the final draft budget
to be recommended to the City Council by the City Manager.
Accordingly, the final draft budget attached as Exhibit 'C'
shows a revised total expenditures for parks maintenance
(personnel and O &M) of only $586,841.
The assessment amounts set forth in the Public Hearing Notices
were based on total anticipated expenditures of $617,963. The
revised and reduced budget would require a lower assessment. A
summary comparison of these changes is as follows:
April Revised
Element Report (S) Budget (S)
Total Cost 617,863 586,841
Total Assessments 617,863 586,841
S F Res. Assessment 56.19 $53.36
D. Fund Activity
Attached for your information as Exhibit 'B', is a summary of
Fund Activity for AD 85 -1 for the period from FY 1992/93 through
the proposed budget for FY 1996/97.
adSS_97.apr
000199
Assessment District 85 -1
June 5, 1996
Page 4
E. Assessment Summary
Attached as Exhibit 'A' is a summary of the proposed revised
assessments for FY 1996/97, based on the changes discussed
above. At the bottom of that Exhibit is a comparative list of
estimated assessment amounts for a single family residential
property, given a number of alternative fund transfers to
supplement assessment revenues.
F. Fund Transfer
1. Zero Transfer -- The assessment amounts set forth in the
Public Hearing Notices will generate sufficient assessment
revenues to fully fund the parks maintenance function for FY
1996/97. Should the City Council approve those assessment
amounts, there would be no need for a fund transfer from
other sources.
2. Transfers in Prior Years -- As shown on Exhibit 'BI, in
recent years AD85 -1 assessment revenues have been augmented
by transfers from the General Fund to fund the parks
maintenance effort. A summary of those fund transfers is as
follows:
Fiscal Year
Total (S)
1992/93
38,591
1993/94
142,769
1994/95
144,722
1995/96
Budget
175,000
Est. Actual
158,039
3. FY 1996/97 -- As shown on Exhibit 'A', it will again be
necessary to augment assessment revenues to Fund 25 with
funds from other sources if the assessment amount for a
single - family residential property is to remain at prior year
levels ( ±33.20). The amount of funds required in FY 1996/97
to maintain this assessment is approximately $225,700.
ed85_97.epr
000200
Assessment District 85 -1
June 5, 1996
Page 5
G. Engineer's Report
As stated above, the cost and assessment figures presented to
the City Council last April were the figures used to develop the
Engineer's Report. A copy of that report is attached as
Exhibit "E."
As required by the law, this report was approved by the City
Council last April, via the adoption of Resolution No. 96 -1195.
Included in the Engineer's Report are the approved boundary maps
for this Assessment District.
In light of the revised cost and assessment figures discussed
above, it will be necessary to amend the Engineer's Report.
Such action would be consistent with provisions of Resolution
No. 96 -1195.
H. Public Meeting
Resolution No. 96 -1195 and the Public Hearing Notices stated
that a Public Meeting would be held at 7:00 p.m. on May 20,
1996, in the City Council Chambers, for the purpose of allowing
the public an opportunity to meet with City staff to question
and discuss the proposed assessments. The meeting was held. No
one from the public attended.
I. Public Hearing
1. The "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" (Streets and
Highways Code) requires a public hearing to be held prior to
the annual levy of assessments for the purpose of receiving
input and to hear any protests to the proposed assessments.
2. If the amount of the assessments are to remain the same, the
law does not require a Notice of the public hearing to be
mailed to each property being assessed. However, consistent
with past practice, a notice of the public hearing was mailed
to the owners of all of the affected properties.
3. Notwithstanding the above mentioned policy, State law
requires that prior to considering any new or increased
assessment, a public hearing notice must be mailed to the
owners of the properties to be assessed. Said notice shall
state the amount of the existing assessment, the amount of
ed85_97.spr
F � f
Assessment District 85 -1
June 5, 1996
Page 6
the proposed assessment and the amount of the proposed
increase in the assessment. The amounts of the approved
assessments MAY NOT EXCEED the amounts stated in the notice.
Said notice must be mailed at least forty -five (45) days
prior to the date of the hearing. In order to meet this
deadline, said Notices were postmarked and mailed prior to
April 19, 1996.
4. Attached as Exhibit 'F' is a copy of the Public Hearing
Notice mailed for AD85 -1. Attached to the public hearing
notice is a chart showing the maximum amount of the
assessments which could be levied.
J. Deferred Action
The attached resolution (Exhibit "G") making certain changes to
Assessment District AD85 -1 and confirming the assessments for
Fiscal Year 1996/97, must be adopted no later than June 30,
1996, in order for the assessments to be levied. In prior years
the City Council has deferred action and has adopted such
resolutions concurrently with the adoption of the annual budget.
i' • FYI',, � •
Staff recommends that the City Council open the public hearing,
receive testimony and continue these matters to the date of the
Budget Workshops.
Subsequent to the budget workshop meetings, but no later than June
30, 1996, staff recommends that the City Council take the following
actions:
a) determine the source and amount, if any, of a budget transfer to
reduce the total amount of the assessments;
b) in the event of such budget transfer, reduce the amount of the
total assessment for FY 1996/97, as required; and,
c) adopt the attached Resolution No. 96- (Exhibit "G") making
certain changes to AD85 -1 and confirming the assessments for
Fiscal Year 1996/97.
ad85_99.apr
000202
EXHIBIT "A"
Fiscal Year 1996/97
AD 85 -1 ASSESSMENT SUMMARY
------------------------------
------------------------------
FY 1996/97
Description Proposed Remarks
TOTAL ANNUAL EXPENSES 586,841 See Exhibit 'C' for Total FY1995/96 Cost Projection
LESS CARRY OVERS 0 See Exhibit 'B'
LESS TRANSFERS IN 0
LESS OTHER (Interest, Etc.) 0
NET TOTAL ASSESSMENTS 586,841
Total Assessment Detail
21- Hay -96
000203
Assessment
------------------
- - - - --
Plus
Total
SF Res
Trans -In
Plus
Funds
Less Total
Remaining
Fiscal Year
Amount ($)
Total ($)
& Other
Carryover
Available
Expenditures
Carryover
1992/93
Actual
33.20
354,475
38,591
0
393,066
393,066
0
1993/94
Actual
33.20
355,247
146,866
0
502,113
502,113
0
1994/95
Actual
33.20
365,855
175,757
0
541,612
541,612
0
1995/96
Budget
33.20
371,780
179,198
0
550,978
550,978
0
Est.
Actual
33.20
361,118
159,239
0
520,357
520,357
0
1996/97
Budget Options
53.36
586,841
0
0
586,841
586,841
0
49.36
536,841
50,000
0
586,841
586,841
0
44.76
486,841
100,000
0
586,841
586,841
0
40.16
436,841
150,000
0
586,841
586,841
0
35.56
386,841
200,000
0
586,841
586,841
0
Prior
Years' Assessment
>>>> 33.20
361,141
225,700
0
586,841
586,841
0
30.97
336,841
250,000
0
586,841
586,841
0
28.67
311,841
275,000
0
586,841
586,841
0
21- Hay -96
000203
EXHIBIT "B"
Fiscal Year 1996/97
Assessment District 85 -1
Fund Activity (025)
Description
BEGINNING BALANCE
REVENUE
ASSESSMENTS
INTEREST
MISCELLANEOUS
TRANSFER IN
GENERAL fUND
AVAILABLE FUNDS
EXPENSES
Personnel
0 &M
Capital Outlay
Capital Improvements
Adjustment
Less TOTAL EXPENSES
YEAR END BALANCE
FY 1995/96 FY 1996/97
FY FY FY -------------- - - - - -- Proposed
1992/93 1993/94 1994/95 Budget Proj Actual Budget Notes:
0 0 0 0 0 0
354,475 355,247
1,204
2,893
38,591 142,769
----- - - - - -- --- - - - - --
----------- --- - - - - --
393,066 502,113
365,855 371,780 361,118 586,841 *
632
1,198
1,200
30,403
3,000
0
144,722
175,000
158,039 0
541,612
550,978
520,357 586,841
118,043
127,388
136,132
153,479
149,000
160,048
275,023
374,725
399,062
397,499
371,357
426,793
0
0
6,418
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
----- - - - - --
393,066
--- - - - - --
502,113
--- - - - - --
541,612
--- - - - - --
550,978
--- - - - - --
520,357
------ - - - - --
586,841
0
0
0
0
0
0
* Formula (Imported number)
21- May-96
000204
EXHIBIT "C"
Department 147 Budget Summary
FY 1996/97
Code Description
SALARIES & BENEFITS
MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS
623 Supplies
626
629 Special Supplies
632 Meetings
633 Publications
634 Membership / Dues
636 Education
637 Travel & Milage
638 Uniforms
641 Professional Services
642 Contractual Services
648 Insurance
651 Equip. Maint.
652 Utilities
654 Vehicle Maint
655 Fuel
656 Lubricants
657 Small Tools
658 Maint & Repair
661 Equip Rental
M&0 Total
Capital Outlay
903 Capital Projects
Total
FY 93/94 FY 94/95
ACTUAL ACTUAL
127,388 136,132
7,130
5,708
8,800
4,135
25
0
349
187
0
0
487
239
0
0
1,730
1,564
4,861
6,748
219,642
233,619
20,434
26,249
223
2,689
88,261
74,392
2,272
4,722
1,952
3,791
0
0
1,460
1,700
13,459
27,620
3,640
--- - - - - --
5,699
--- - - - - --
374,725
399,062
6,418
0
--- - - - - --
0
--- - - - - --
502,113
541,612
FY 95/96
Estimated
BUDGET Actual
153,479 149,000
10,000 8,058
5,000 4,900
0
0
300
300
0
0
400
393
0
0
1,500
1,500
18,000
5,000
235,462
230,506
26,250
22,500
3,003
2,000
69,000
70,000
4,499
2,500
2,596
2,600
0
0
198
600
16,291
14,000
5,000
--- - - - - --
6,500
--- - - - - --
397,499
371,357
0
--- - - - - --
0
--- - - - - --
550,978
520,357
FY 96/97
- BUDGET - --
160,048
9,000
5,000
0
300
0
680
0
1,500
13,200
251,033
26,000
2,000
92,380
2,000
2,700
0
500
14,000
6,500
426,793
0
586,841
05/21/96
Remarks
From other Sources
000205
Exhibit "D"
085 -1: FY 1996/97
Scope of Park Maintenance
05/21/96
00020PO
FY 1994/95
FY 1995/96
FY 1996/97
Actual
--------------- - - - - --
Projected
---------------
Actual
- - - - --
Proposed
-----------------------
No.
of Kos.
Total
of Kos.
Total
of Kos.
Total
Park FY93/94
Maint.
Exp. ($)
Maint.
Exp. ($)
Maint.
Expenses
1
Country Trail Park
0
0
0
0
8
51,518
2
Glenwood Park
12
49,238
12
55,644
12
37,098
3
Tierra Rejada Park
12
51,292
12
45,750
12
50,098
4
Mountain Keadows Park
12
63,819
12
58,875
12
62,877
5
Peach Hill Park
12
71,781
12
74,754
12
71,987
6
Konte Vista Park
12
27,736
12
25,798
12
17,608
7
Campus Park
12
33,332
12
34,617
12
30,522
8
Campus Canyon Park
12
62,208
12
63,990
12
61,170
9
Griffin Park
12
46,288
12
51,527
12
34,575
10
Virgina Colony Park
12
16,142
12
13,571
12
19,003
11
Campesina Park
0
0
0
0
0
0
12
Arroyo Vista Community Park
12
119,776
12
95,831
12
101,887
13
Poindexter Park
0
--- - - - - --
0
---- - - - - --
4
--- - - - - --
0
12
48,498
Total Konths of Kaintenance
120
----
124
- - - - --
--- - - - - -- ----
140
- - - - --
Average [total months / 13]
9.23
9.54
10.77
Total Cost
541,612
520,357
586,841
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FY93/94
Total Actual 502,113
541,612
Total Budget
550,978
586,841
Total Est. Actual
520,357
00020PO
PRELIMINARY
ENGINEER'S REPORT
CITY OF MOORPARK
PARKS MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
NO. AD -85 -1
LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972
Prepared By:
DWIGHT FRENCH & ASSOCIATES, INC.
1470 S. Valley Vista Drive
Suite 140
Diamond Bar, CA 91765
March 1996
�X�1���� 1, ,
00020'7
f�
C-)
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section 1 Authority for Report
Section 2 Description of Improvements
to be Maintained
Section
3
Assessment Roll
Section
4
Estimate of Cost
Section
5
Method of Assessment
Appendix
"A"
Parks Maintenance Formula
Appendix
"B"
Budget Estimate
Appendix
IIC"
Boundary Map
Appendix
IUD"
Assessment Roll
Appendix
"Ell
Resolutions
Appendix
CIF"
Rebate Procedure
1
1
2
2
3
000208
CITY OF MOORPARK
Engineer's Report
Parks Maintenance Assessment District No.
AD -85 -1
Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972
For Fiscal Year 1996 -97
SECTION 1 AUTHORITY FOR REPORT
This report is prepared pursuant to City Council action taken at their
regular meeting of January 17, 1996 to extend this District for the
fiscal year commencing July 1, 1996 and ending June 30, 1997 in
compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, "Landscaping
Act of 197211, being Part 2 of Division 15 of the California Streets and
Highways Code.
This report is an update of an existing City -wide Assessment District.
The purpose for the district is to provide operating funds for the
continued maintenance and improvements of existing and planned City
operated public parks.
SECTION 2 DESCRIPTION OF THE IMPROVEMENTS TO BE MAINTAINED
The following City Parks are to be maintained under this District
effective
July 1, 1996:
1.
Country Trail Park
8.
Campus Canyon Park
2.
Glenwood Park
9.
Griffin Park
3.
Tierra Rejada Park
10.
Virginia Colony Park
4.
Mountain Meadows Park
11.
Campesina Park
5.
Peach Hill Park
12.
Arroyo Vista Community Park
G.
Monte Vista Park
13.
Poindexter Park
7.
Campus Park
The maintenance and improvement of all above mentioned parks shall
include but not be limited to the following:
1. Mowing and edging of all turf areas.
2. Removing litter.
1
000209
3. Weeding as required.
4. Irrigating as required.
5. Fertilizing of all vegetation as each species requires.
6. Pruning so as to not inhibit the natural growth
characteristics of the plant.
7. Cleaning existing facilities to be clear and free of all
debris. Minor repairs as needed.
8. Eradicating vector at the first indication of existence.
9. Maintaining lights, playground equipment, playcourts and
public restrooms.
10. Installing park or recreational, improvements, including but
not limited to drains and sidewalks. Maintaining and
servicing said improvements.
Plans and specifications for the irrigation, landscaping, and other
authorized improvements within the City.are on file in the Department of
Public Works. Reference is hereby made to said plans and specifications
for the exact location and nature of the landscape improvements. Said
plans and specifications by reference are hereby made a part of this
report.
SECTION -1 ASSESSMENT ROLL
All parcels of real property affected are listed on the "Assessment
Roll ", Exhibit "A ", which will be on file in City Hall with the City
Clerk, and is made a part hereof by reference. These parcels are more
particularly described in maps prepared in accordance with Section 327
of the Revenue and Taxation Code which are on file in the office of the
Ventura County Assessor in the County Government Center Administration
Building, 800 South Victoria Avenue, Ventura, California and which are
also made a part hereof by reference.
SECTION 4 ESTIMATE OF COST
The City staff recommendation for the District budget is shown in
Appendix "B" of this report.
3
000210
SECTION 5 METHOD OF ASS E MENT
The Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, in Section 22573, states that
"The net amount to be assessed upon the lands within an assessment
district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly
distributes the new amount among all assessable lots or parcels in
proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or
parcel from the improvements." -
The method and formula of benefit spread recognizes that every property
within the City of Moorpark benefits from public parks and recreation
facilities.
The method of spreading maintenance costs is based upon the "people use"
attributed to each land use within the City. This method was chosen
because the benefit received by having park facilities is directly
proportionate to the number of people generated by each land use.
Recognizing that residential land uses within the City derive a higher
degree of benefit than non - residential land uses, the formula was
subdivided into two main groups, with residential land uses contributing
in 75% of the assessment and non - residential uses being assessed for the
remaining 25W of the maintenance costs.
The benefits to residential land uses are clear. The residents of the
City utilize the parks during their leisure hours. Benefits to non-
residential property include such items as offering employees the
opportunity to utilize the parks during lunch time and after hours, as
well as providing an aesthetic environment which attracts potential
employees into the area.
The "people use" factors utilized in the assessment district spread
formula are shown in Appendix "A ".
The City Council approved a rebate procedure for disadvantaged citizens
on November 1989. The procedure shall be followed as described in
Appendix CIF."
In conclusion, it is our opinion that the assessments within Parks
Maintenance Assessment District No. AD -85 -1 are apportioned by a formula
that fairly distributes the net cost to each lot or parcel in accordance
with the benefits that are received.
\rpt \050ad851.945
4
o0021*1
APPENDICES
000212
Use
Code
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
9
10
11
12
15
16
APPENDIX "A"
CITY OF MOORPARK
Parks Maintenance Assessment District N
AD -85 -1
Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972
Table 1
Parks Maintenance Formula
People
Description Use
Residential Vacant 0
Single Family - 4.00
Level 1
Mobile Home
Condo
Residential Income
(2 -4 Units)
Apartments (5 +)
Single Family -
Level 2
Mobile Home and
Trailer Parks
Commercial Vacant
Retail Stores,
Single Story
Store & Office
(Combination)
Shopping Centers
(Neighborhood)
Shopping Centers
(Regional)
0
3.00
3.00
3.00
4.00
3.00
0
3.00
3.00
10.00
30.00
A -1
Annual
Assessment
$ 0.00
$ 56.19
$ 0.00
$ 42.15
$ 42.15
$ 42.15
$ 56.19
$ 42.15
$ 0.00
$ 252.67
$ 252.67
$ 842.23
$2,526.70
00 ®21.3
Use
People
Annual
Code
Description
Use
Assessment
17
Office Building
3.00
$
252.67
(1 Story)
18
Office Stores
6.00
$
505.34
(Multi- Story)
19
Retail Stores
6.00
$
505.34
(Multi- Story)
21
Restaurants &
3.00
$
252.67
Cocktail Lounge
24
Banks, Savings &
3.00
$
252.67
Loans
25
Service Stations
3.00
$
252.67
26
Auto Sales, Repair
1.00
$
84.•22
30
Industrial vacant
0
$
0.00
Land
31
Light Manufacturing
12.00
$1,010.68
32
Warehousing
4.00
$
336.89
33
Industrial Condos,
3.00
$
252.67
Co -Ops, PUD's
38
Mineral Processing
3.00
$
252.67
44
Truck Crops
2.00
$
168.45
46
Pasture (Permanent)
2.00
$
168.45
48
Poultry
2.00
$
168.45
49
Flowers, Seed
2.00
$
168.45
Production
51
Orchards
2.00
$
168.45
A-2 0002141
Use
Code
Description
People
P
___Ua_Q-
Annual
Assessment
53
Field Crops, Dry
2.00
$
168.45
54
Pasture of Graze,
Dry
2.00
$
168.45
55
Feed Lots
2.00
$
168.45
57
Tree Farms
2.00
$
168.45
61
Theater
2.00
$
168.45
69
Parks
0
$
0.00
70
Institutional
Vacant Land
0
$
0.00
71
Churches,
Convent, Rectory
0
$
0.00
72
Schools
0
$
0.00
73
Colleges
0
$
0.00
78
Public Bldgs.,
Firehouses, Museums,
0
$
0.00
etc.
79
Flood Control
0
$
0.00
80
Misc. Vacant Land
0
$
0.00
81
Utility Water
Company
0
$
0.00
83
Petroleum & Gas
1.00
$
84.22
86
Water Rights, Pumps
0
$
0.00
88
Highways & Streets
0
$
0.00
91
Utility Edison
0
$
0.00
A -3 000215
Use
People
Annual
Code
Description
Use
Assessment
92
Telephone
0
$
0.00
93
S.P.R.R.
0
$
0.00
94
Undedicated
0
$
0.00
Community Condo
Development
95
State Property
0
$
0.00
96
County Property
0
$
0.00
97
City Property
0
$
0.00
Actual Assessment amount may vary due to discrepancies
between use
codes and actual
property
uses.
A-4 QOO:I.(;
APPENDIX "B"
CITY OF MOORPARK
Parks Maintenance Assessment District No.
AD -85 -1
Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972
BUDGET ESTIMATE
FY 1996 -97
Park Sites Maintenance and Operations $ 419,713.00
Maintenance and Operation Personnel Costs _198.150.00
Total Annual Expenses 617,863.00
General Fund Contribution 0 00
Total Amount to be Funded by
District (FY 1996 -97) $ 617,863.00
B-1 Or 217
APPENDIX "C"
BOUNDARY MAP
00021.8
. _ _ — _ — _ _ _ _ _
I I e° r -h ' 1 1 •"' 1 -C? i •I F;.GIAm . `•�5.�'Ir ~ .. .,,Q_,.j I i
1 W
II _.� __ ` I ' � I i Z CANY(aV • I 1 I I
--- -- ---�— +- --- --- —•f
List o! City Parks - - -- - - - -" - - - - -- - - - -� --
' 1. Coun r --------- - - I try Trail Park (95) f fir�r� 1
2. Glenwood Park
1 3• Tierra Rejada Park i
' 1 • Mountain Meadows Park
5. Peach Hill Park
A
o.
I 6. Monts Vista Park -
7. Campus Park
8. Campus Canyon Park - - - - +- -;-� - - - _ _ 1.
I. 9• Griffin Park I ; -- 1 - - -- - - - -- - -- - - -- ,��;;�...
' . • 10. Virginia Colony Park
P 1 = I► A O f 11. Campesina Park b 1 0
i _ t 12• Arroyo Vista Community Park 1
'
I� 13. Downtown Park •,,,`P
.•(r �,.
VALL _ 1 L� ANGEIES 1 r
k� I
.�I` ` =I ' /� a,■ I SOS Ir GELES
� ,�{•.�� +— i I < 1 , I art r• 4 �. \i
/4 ' .A I — — — — I---- --- ---- '
' a
0
1 ••1 artgln ' � .. ' �1�0► R I
.L I
' j I AV
AV
3 TIENRA REJ �A
MOOR ( a �� OORPARK - I
-+ ' - -- -- -L+_ -- _ , Boundary j4iaph CItTIAf Moorpark 1
`'� I ✓' -- t---- - -- --- Ilr --
- UShting Mn MsYntenince Assessment '
(J A „ ' nG D(atr'tlet No. + - - -
V
ACR,E�
APPENDIX "D"
Appendix "D ", the Assessment Roll, shows the assessment upon each lot or
parcel (approximately 8119 parcels) within this District and is on file
in the Office of the City Clerk and County Assessor. The Ventura County
Assessor's office no longer lists public utility easements on the
Assessor's Roll.
APPENDIX "E"
RESOLUTIONS
000-221
APPENDIX "F"
REBATE PROCEDURE
000222
IF
� t,� , apt± .i � .�� �-! �tr�. .1! : � : •t • t
PUBLIC NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the Ci of Moorpark California on April 3, 1996, adopt,, _
Resolution No. 96 -1195 fisting the date anti time of a lie meeting ty
7:00 p.m in the Council Chambers of the M 8 to be held on the 20th day ol May, 1996, at the hour.
said public meeting is to allow the blic an�r —"' Hall, located at 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark. The purpose
assessments for- 1ke' "MOORPARKARR to with Ci staff to question and discuss the proposed aoaud
commencing on July 11 1996 and ending on Jua 997 hS�d E DISTRICT NO. AD-85 -1" for the fiscal year
sad recreational facilities within the said City, and to question sad discuss de forthe maintenance and improvement of parka
levied for said District in FY 1995 /96. proposed increases in said assessments over those
MPUBLIC NOTICE IS ALSO HEREBY GIVEN that said Resolution No 96 -1195 also fated the date and time of a he baring
the M City Council to be held on the 5th day of Juae, 1996 at the hour of 7:00 d the to the Council _ptrb
oo?puk CSty Hall, located at 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark.he Clrambps of the
m, and to order the annual asaeaamenta {or the M of said public hearing is to consider mak6
DISTRICT NO, ,AI% -85 -1" for the fiscal year commencing on July lR 19% PQ R June 30, M7 Cch Sd UM
for the maintenance and improvement of Parka and recreational my 1, 1 within the said City. Provide
Cr CI Y yOF MResolution O0 ARNI{, CA1 OR1vIA a�ODW as follows: •A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
[NTENTfnxr Tn v w va i.n,,....... r _ _ __ ROVING THE ENGINP.RR •c t1i7Dnn a. _
.- 0 .,114n w ivvt, PURSUANT TO THE LAND$CApINO-ANILIGHTING �� UUMMENCING JULY 1 1996
OBJECTIONS
TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC MEETING TO DISCUSS AND PA UBL C HEARING' TOR RECEIVE
OBJECTIONS THERETO," is on file with the City Clerk and open to inspection. A summary of said Resolution is as follows:
1. That the Engineer's Report prepared for Assessment District No. AD85 -1 for FY 1996/97 is approved.
2. That said Engineer's Report may be further modified or changed, pursuant to applicable State law.
3. That the amount of the assessments for Assessment District No. AD85 -1 for FY 1996/97 are proposed to increase from the
amount of the assessments levied for said district in FY 19951%.
4. That it is the intention of the City Council a) to make certain changes to Assessment District No. AD 85 -1, which consists
of a eiagle city-wide district for the maintenance and imprrnemeat of parks and recreational facilities within the City, b)
to order the maintenance of the annual assessment for said district for FY 1996/97; and, c) to levy and collect assessments
�' �h P� maintenance and improvement.
S. That ' parks maintenance assessment district includes the park sites with all improvements located therein, by
and included within Assessment District No. AD 85-1. by
6. That the foregoing described work to be Clerk's located within Assessment District No. AD 85 -1, the boundary of which is
That on a �,
7. That said proposed maintenance and improvement is of benefit to, and expense for which are chargeable upon, the district.
8. Proposed assessments and detaileudpodnescription of the improvements the boundaries of the District and any zone therein, and tt
Report on file the City Claude open widrind�d District, is set forth in a copy of the aforementioned n, and
9. That the existing attached hereto and made a part hereof. assessments, the Proposed assessments
in Exhibit 'A' and the proposed increase in the assessment amounts are set forth
10 That a public meeting shall be convened on May 20, 1996, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at the Moorpark
Hall to allow the public an rtuaity to meet with City staff to question and discuss the proposed annual aseaaaen or
Assessment Distnct No. AD S -1 for FY 1996 /97, and t]ta proposed increases to said assessments over those levied in FY
1995/96.
11 That a public hearing of the Moorpark City Council shall be held on June 5, 1996, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers
Diat�ric No X85 1 foHall 1� consi r �°ng certain changes m, and to order the annual assessments for Amt
12 That this Joint Notice of public Meeting and Public Hearin is given, in order that sea
the work or extent of the assessment district y Y ppeesrsoons having any objections to
may and show cause why said work should not be done or married out
or why said district should not be extended for the Sscal year commencinY July 1, 1996, and ending June 30, 1997.
Protests must be is writing and must be filed by thep owner with the Q Clerk
haring. Protests may be mailed to the City CLS th Ci Moorpark, 7 City Prior to the conclusion of the
Protest dull state all grounds for the ohh*�action and ahaD � 99 M TU t Avenue, Moorpark, CA 93021.
scanned. A majority Protest will cause the contain a descriphon sufficient to identify the property beiag
Proceedings or assessments contact Ken Gilbert increase to be abandoned. For additional information about there
(805) 529 -6864, Ext. 256.
13 That all the work B ahail be done in soconMce with the Lan in and Division 15 of the tracts and Highways Code of the State of Californa'�p g Lighting Act of 1972, being part 2 of
14 That the City Clerk shall cause notice of said public meeting and public heaein to be ven b causing this
Resolution of Intention to be publis ied and mailed in the manner y gt y g
Highways Code and Section 54954.6 of the Government Code of the S� ed of 4y 2 of Division 15 of the Se�treetss and
15 Tbat the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution.
ATTEST:
rC•fy ClerTt Paul W.
wrason r., Mayor
—
THIS NOTICE IS GIVEN pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Li kiting Act of 1972, Section 22500 et. sec. 'of the
Streets and Highway Code of the State of California, and is dated this 3rd day of April, 1996.
sty e t
040223
r�
Exhibit
AD 85-1
&
C=., as r
Use
Code
Description
Z: BS)
FY 1 Proposed
996/97
Assmn (Sl
0
Residential Vacant
I
Single Family - Level 1
0.00
0.00
2
Mobil $ome
33.20
56.19
3
Condo
0.00
0.00
4
Residential Income 2-4 units
24.90
42.15
5
Apartments (5 +)
24.90
42.15
6
Single Family - Leve12
24.90
42.15
9
Mobil Home & Trailer Park
33.20
56.19
10
Commercial Vacant
24'90
42.15
11
Retail Store, single story
0.00
0.00
12
Store & Office Combination
149.28
252.67
15
Shopping Centers (Neighborhood)
149.28
252.67
16
Shopping Centers (Regional)
497.60
842.23
17
Office Building (one story)
1,492.80
2,526.70
18
Office Building (multi- story)
149.28
252.67
19
Retail Stores (multi - story)
298.56
505.34
21
Restaurants & cocktail lounges
298.56
505.34
24
Banks, Savings & Loans
149.28
252.67
25
Service Sons
149.26
252.67
26
Auto sales, repair, storage &rental
149.28
252.67
30
Industrial Land Vacant
49.76
84.22
31
Light Manufacturing
0.00
0'00
32
Warehousing
597.12
1,010.68
33
Industrial Condos, Coops, PUD's
149'28
336.89
38
Mineral Processing
149.28
252.67
44
Truck Crops
149.28
252.67
46
Pasture (permanent)
99.52
168.45
48
Poultry
99.52
168.45
49
Flowers, seed production
99.52
168.45
51
Orchards
99.52
168.45
53
Field crops, dry
99'52
168.45
54
Pastures of graze, dry
99'52
168.45
55
Feedlots
99.52
168.45
57
Tree farms
99.52
168.45
61
Theater
99.52
168.45
70
Institutional vacant land
99.52
168.45
71
Churches, convent & rectory
0.00
0.00
78
Public Bldg. Fire Houses, Museums, eta
0'00
0.00
0.00
80
Mime, Vacant land
0.00
81
Utility Water Company
0.00
0.00
83
Petroleum &gas
0.00
0.00
91
Utility Edison
49.76
84.22
92
Telephone
0.00
0.00
93
SPRR
0.00
0.00
94
Undedicated Community Condo Development
0.00
0.00
99
Exempt
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
wP \rpt \4M -%.not
f
0.00
22.99
0.00
17.25
17.25
17.25
22.99
17.25
'0.00
103.39
103.39
344.63
1,033.90
103.39
206.78
206.78
103.39
103.39
103.39
34.46
0.00
413.56
137.85
103.39
103.39
68.93
68.93
68.93
68.93
68.93
68.93
68.93
68.93
68.93
68.93
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
34.46
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
000224
RESOLUTION NO. 96-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, MAKING CERTAIN
CHANGES TO THE "MOORPARK PARKS MAINTENANCE
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. AD- 85 -111; AND
CONFIRMING THE ASSESSMENT FOR SAID DISTRICT
THE FISCAL YEAR COMMENCING JULY 1, 1996 AND
ENDING JUNE 30, 1997.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Moorpark, by
Resolution No. 96 -1175, adopted January 17, 1996, declared its
intention to make certain changes to the "MOORPARK PARKS
MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. AD- 85 -111, and to order the
extension of the annual assessments for said district for the
fiscal year commencing July 1, 1996 and ending June 30, 1997;
and,
WHEREAS, said "MOORPARK PARKS MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT
DISTRICT NO. AD -85 -1" consists of a single city -wide zone for
the maintenance and improvement of parks and recreational
facilities within the City; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Moorpark, by
Resolution No. 96 -1195, adopted April 3, 1996, approved the
Engineer's Report pertaining to such matters; and,
WHEREAS, said Resolution No. 96 -1175 also set 7:00 p.m., May
20, 1996, as the time and date of a public meeting to allow
the public an opportunity to discuss the proposed increased
assessment with City staff; and,
WHEREAS, said public meeting was convened on May 20, 1996,
at 7:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers for the purpose of
allowing the public an opportunity to discuss with City staff
the proposed increased assessments; and,
WHEREAS, said Resolution No. 96 -1175 also set 7:00 p.m.,
June 5, 1996, as the time and date of a public hearing to
consider such matters; and,
WHEREAS, on June 5, 1996, the City Council held a public
hearing to determine whether said changes to said district
should be made, and whether the annual assessments should be
ordered and confirmed for the fiscal year commencing July 1,
1996 and ending June 30, 1997; and,
000225
�_ , G,
(2- C3 21
Resolution No. 96-
Page 2
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that written protests
against the proposed work or assessment have not been made by
owners representing more than one -half of the area of land to
be assessed: and,
WHEREAS, the City Council, having duly received, considered
evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the jurisdictional
facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the
contemplated work and benefits to be derived therefrom, and
the City Council having now acquired jurisdiction to order the
proposed assessments for the fiscal year commencing July 1,
1996 and ending June 30, 1997.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK,
CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The Engineer's Report for "MOORPARK PARKS
MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. AD- 85 -111, filed with the
City Clerk on March 29, 1996, as amended or revised by action
of the City Council, is hereby approved and adopted, and the
improvements, changes to, and extension of the annual
assessments in the Assessment District, in accordance with
said report, as revised, and in accordance with Resolution No.
96 -1195 approving said Engineer's Report, is hereby levied for
the Fiscal Year 1996/97.
SECTION 2. The City Clerk shall cause the diagram and
assessment, or a certified copy thereof, to be filed with the
County Auditor.
SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of
this resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS day of , 1996.
Paul W. Lawrason Jr., Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk