The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAGENDA REPORT 1996 0619 CC REG ITEM 08AAGENDA REPORT C =TY OF MOORPARK "��N' � -a s TO: The Honorable City Council Tcr FROM: Ken Gilbert Director of Public Works DATE: May 21, 1996 (Council Meeting 6- 5 -96). SUBJECT: Consider Making Certain Changes to AD84 -2 and Confirming the Assessments for Fiscal Year 1996/97 • A: A.I This presents for approval a Resolution making certain changes to Assessment District AD84 -2 and confirming the assessments for Fiscal Year 1996/97. Certain information in support of said proposed changes and proposed assessments is attached hereto and identified as follows: List of Exhibits Exhibit "A": Exhibit "B ": Exhibit "C": Exhibit "D ": Exhibit "E": Exhibit "F ": Exhibit "G" Exhibit "H": Exhibit "I ": Assessment Summary Fund Activity Summary Zone Activity Summary Preliminary Budget for FY 1996/97 Capital Improvement Project Summary Street Light Cost Summary Engineer's Report Public Hearing Notice Resolution Assessment District 84 -2 was formed in 1984 pursuant to the provisions of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972." This assessment district was established to allow for the funding of street lighting and parkway /median maintenance and improvement expenses through the levying of assessments as provided for in the act. As set forth in the Engineer's Report ( Exhibit "G") , there are two types of district expenses, generally described as follows: those expenses determined to be of general benefit to the community, which are spread to all of the lots in the City; and, those expenses for the construction and maintenance of improvements determined to be of benefit to the properties within a number of identified zones, which are spread to all of the lots within each zone. ad84_97. apr 'k.liyl.3� Assessment District 84 -2 June 5, 1996 Page 2 There are two types of Citywide expenses: street lighting costs and certain parkway and median landscape maintenance costs. All street lighting costs are distributed to all of the properties within the City by means of a formula designed to spread said costs on the basis of benefit. The benefit spread formula identifies a number of factors (including lighting intensity, lighting security, people use) which are associated with benefits derived, and then weighs those factors by land use to determining benefits derived. Citywide landscaping costs are spread in a manner similar to the People use formula used by the Parks Maintenance Assessment District (AD85 -1). According to this benefit - spread formula, twenty -five percent (25 %) of the total Citywide landscape maintenance costs is allocated to non - residential properties. The remaining seventy -five percent (75 %) of such costs is allocated and spread to residential properties. These allocated costs are spread to both non- residential and residential properties by a "people -use" benefit formula based on the land use of each parcel being assessed. The maintenance costs for the landscaping funded by each of the Zones of Benefit is assessed to the properties within each of those zones. In addition to these maintenance costs, certain Zones may receive an improvement assessment to fund approved improvements to be funded by those zones. Except for Zones 7 and 9, these zone expenses are distributed equally between the non - exempt parcels within each zone. The costs for the industrial parks covered by Zones 7 and 9 are spread to each non - exempt parcel via a per acre assessment. The City must annually act to levy the lighting and landscape maintenance assessments. Said assessments have been levied each year since the formation of the district. In accordance with the requirements of the above mentioned act, the City Council has taken a number of actions in recent months in preparation for considering the levy of assessments for Street Lighting and Landscape Maintenance for FY 1996/97. Those actions are summarized as follows: 1. On January 17, 1996, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 95- 1174 stating its intent to take the subject actions. 2. Also on that date, the City Council selected Dwight French and Associates to prepare the Engineer's Reports for AD84 -2. 3. On April 3, 1996, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 95- 1194 making certain findings and taking certain actions including the following: • approving, subject to change, the Engineers' Report for AD84 -2 for FY 1996/97; ad84_97.apr t; 6 uiT cJ Assessment District 84 -2 June 5, 1996 Page 3 • stating intent to make certain changes to AD84 -2: • setting 7:00 p.m. on May 20, 1996, as the time and date of a Public Meeting for the purpose of allowing the public an opportunity to meet with City staff to question and discuss the proposed assessments; • setting 7:00 p.m. on June 5, 1996, as the time and date of a Public Hearing to consider the subject actions; and • directing that Notice of said meetings be sent to the owners of all affected properties, stating the amount of the assessment levied for FY 1995/96, the amount of the proposed increase in the assessment amount and the total amount of the assessments proposed for FY 1996/97. DISCUSSION A. FY 1996/97 Budget Attached as Exhibit 'D' is the proposed budget for Parkway Lighting and Landscaping for FY 1996/97. The budget figures set forth in this exhibit have been revised from those shown in the staff report presented to the City Council last April, based on more up to date cost projections. The budget figures for FY 1996/97 are significantly higher than the amounts budgeted last year. Some of the factors which caused these increases are summarized as follows: 1. Street Lighting Costs -- One of the factors requiring an increase in utility costs is an increase in the cost for street lighting. As shown in Exhibit 'F', the street lighting assessment will increase approximately $18,000 to fully fund next year's anticipated costs. 2. Citywide Landscape Maintenance Costs -- A portion of the cost increases for Utilities and for Contract Maintenance is due to an increase in the costs for Citywide landscape maintenance costs (see Exhibit 'D -3' for details). These costs are projected to increase approximately $20,500 to cover the maintenance costs for the addition of the medians on Tierra Rejada Road within PC -3 ($20,555). 3. Zone Costs -- The remainder of the cost increases for Utilities and for Contract Maintenance is due a marked increase in projected costs for Zone maintenance. As a result, total Zone Assessments will increase from $96,000± to $268,000± (an increase of $172,000). The major cause for this increase is the addition of Zone 10. A more detailed description of Zone costs and assessments is set forth in Section D below and in Exhibit C. ad84_97.a r Assessment District 84 -2 June 5, 1996 Page 4 B. Fund Activity Attached for your information as Exhibit the Fund Activity for AD 84 -2 for the Please note that the projected amount of 1 Available Funds ($27,827) is shown as a Assessment Summary (Exhibit "A -111), thus Citywide assessment by that amount. C. Assessment Summary 'B', is a summary of past several years. :he FY1995/96 Year End credit amount on the reducing next year's The amounts of the proposed assessments for AD 84 -2 for FY 1996/97 are set forth on page 2 of Exhibit 'A'. A summary of that information is as follows: 1. City -Wide Assessment -- A summary of the annual assessment for a single - family residential lot is as follows: Actual Proposed Elements FY 1995/96 FY 1996197 Landscape Maintenance $7.92 $11.12 Street Lighting $19.77 $21.50 Total $27.69 $32.62 2. Zone of Benefit Assessments -- A comparison of last year's Zone Assessments (FY 1995/96) to those proposed for next fiscal year ( FY 1996/97) is set forth on Exhibit A-2. A more in depth discussion of Zone costs and assessments can be found in Section D below. D. Zones of Benefit Information pertaining to the expenses and assessments for each of the Zones of Benefit is set forth in Exhibit 'C'. A summary of that data is as follows: Zone l: The proposed assessment of $7,816 includes a projected year end zone deficit of $2,448. Zone 2 a) The proposed assessment of $28,126 maintenance assessment of $21,906 assessment of $6,220. b) The proposed maintenance assessment of next year's estimated maintenance costs estimate year end surplus of $13,997. is comprised of a plus an improvement $21,906 is less than of $35,903, due to an ed84_97.epr XJ�;t) 1.3 Assessment District 84 -2 June 5, 1996 Page 5 c) This will be the third year an additional $10 per lot improvement assessment has been levied upon the lots within Zone 2. When sufficient funds are available from these improvement assessments, the City will proceed with a project to construct parkway landscaping improvements on the north side of Tierra Rejada Road east and west of Southhampton Road. Zone 3: The proposed assessment of $2,003 is significantly less than the $3,059 assessment last year. Last year's assessment was higher than the projected costs in order to fund a deficit in this Zone. Zone 4: The proposed assessment of $9,114 includes an amount required to fund a deficit in this Zone created when the City recently refunded assessments which were levied in error upon lots not within this Zone. Zone 5: The proposed assessment of $25,561 is roughly equal to the project expenditures for next year. Zone 6: The proposed assessment of $1,009 includes a projected year end zone deficit of $273. Zone 7: The proposed assessment of $12,424 includes a projected year end zone deficit of $3,804. Zone 8: As set forth in Exhibit C -9, the report to the City Council dated April 3, 1996, anticipated that the total FY 1996/97 maintenance costs for Zone 8 would only be $4,845 -- an amount less than the anticipated FY 1995/96 year end surplus of $4,845. Accordingly, the maintenance assessment for this Zone for FY1996/97 is zero. The total Zone 8 assessment of $6,540 consists solely of an improvement assessment to fund a projected year end deficit for the total improvement assessments levied over the past several years to fund the construction of the Home Acres Buffer project. This total "ceiling" assessment amount was identified in the Public Hearing Notices. On April 17, 1996, the City Council discussed the issue of security at the Home Acres Buffer. It was decided to provide for the locking and unlocking of gates at this site at certain hours of the day. The additional annual cost to provide these services is anticipated to be $5,000. The final FY1996/97 Budget will include these additional expenses. The City Council has the option of either funding these additional costs from sources other than Zone 8 assessments or directing that these costs be charged to the Zone 8 maintenance costs and that any year end deficit be carried over to FY 1997/98. ad84_97.apr Assessment District 84 -2 June 5, 1996 Page 6 Zone 9: A zero assessment is proposed for this Zone for next year. It is anticipated that the projected FY 1996/97 expenses will be less than the projected FY 1995/96 year end balance and that there will again be a year end surplus at the end of FY 1996/97. Zone 10: See Section E. E. Zone 10 1. Equivalent Residential Unit (ERU): There are 2,443 dwelling units within PC -3. Each is assessed a given amount per ERU per year. The commercial property is assessed an amount equal to 95 ERUs (11.91 acres x 8 dwelling units per acre). The total number of ERU within PC -3 is, therefore, 2,538. 2. Assessment Breakdown: The amount of the Zone 10 landscape maintenance assessment is $68.40 per ERU per year. This amount represents the full amount of the annual assessment required to fully fund the maintenance of the landscape improvements in the following areas: • Peach Hill Wash -- the central corridor of the linear recreational area located east of County Trail Park. • Peach Hill Wash North Slope -- the slope located adjacent to and north of the Peach Hill Wash. • Shadyridge Strip -- a strip of landscaping along the rear of the residential located on the north side of Shadyridge Drive (adjacent to flood control channel). • Tierra Rejada Road Parkways -- all of the parkway parcels along that portion of Tierra Rejada Road within PC -3, except the High School frontage. A breakdown of that annual assessment by these specific areas is set forth in Exhibit C -3. 3. Peach Hill Wash: It is anticipated that the City will not be accepting the Peach Hill Wash landscape improvements until after June 30, 1996. Upon acceptance by the City, California Community Builders (CCB) will fund City maintenance costs for a one year period. It is anticipated, therefore, that there will be zero net costs to the City for these improvements during FY 1996/97. Such net costs will start one year after the date of the acceptance of the improvements. As shown in Exhibit C -3, the amount of the annual Zone 10 assessment pertaining to the Peach Hill Wash is $57,805 ($22.78 per S F Res.). In that no net costs to the City are anticipated during FY 1996/97, it is recommended that the final approved amount of the Zone 10 assessment exclude any amount identified for the Peach Hill Wash. ad9497.apr 0001.39 Assessment District 84 -2 June 5, 1996 Page 7 4. Mountain Meadows Community Association (MMCA): In December of 1995 the City Council approved a request from representatives of the Homeowners Associations within the Mountain Meadows Planned Community (PC -3), to consider accepting certain landscape improvements owned and maintained by the Mountain Meadows Community Association (MMCA). Those areas are three of the four areas identified above and recapped as follows: • Peach Hill Wash North Slope -- the slope located adjacent to and north of the Peach Hill Wash. • Shadyridge Strip -- a strip of landscaping along the rear of the residential located on the north side of Shadyridge Drive (adjacent to flood control channel). • Tierra Rejada Road Parkways -- all of the parkway parcels along that portion of Tierra Rejada Road within PC -3, except the High School frontage. Last April, in response to that request, the City Council approved proposed assessments for Zone 10 sufficient to fund the maintenance of these areas. The Public Hearing notices sent to all affected property owners, including those in PC- 3, included this proposed Zone 10 assessment. Subsequent to receipt of all public input at this public hearing, the City Council may approval or reject this request and then levy a Zone 10 assessment based on that action. 5. Conveyance of Property: As previously discussed, one way to allow for City maintenance of the MMCA properties is via the granting of a landscape easement to the City. Another way is for the MMCA to actually convey these properties to the City via a Grant Deed. Staff is advised that it is the wish of the MMCA to grant these properties to the City. Although Deeds have been prepared for this purpose, they have not yet been provided to the City for acceptance and recordation. 6. Prerequisites: As discussed in previous reports on this matter, a number of technical issues must be resolved prior to the City accepting the maintenance of these properties. Representatives of CCB have been working with the City, on behalf of the MMCA, to resolve these matters. The issues to be resolved include: - acceptance of the landscape improvements in good order; - transmittal of "As- Built" drawings; - modifications to certain water services; - modifications to certain electrical services; - a complete list of all water and electrical services to facilitate transfer to the City; and, - conveyance of Easement or Grant Deeds to the City. nd84_97.e r pp � P V; JVA O Assessment District 84 -2 June 5, 1996 Page 8 Most of these issues have been resolved. It is anticipated that all of these prerequisites will be met prior to July 1, 1996. 7. Temporary Right of Entry Permit: In addition to the above list of prerequisites, if the City is to accept these improvements on July 1, 1996, it will be necessary for the MMCA to grant the City a Temporary Right of Entry Permit. This permit is required in order to allow the City to perform maintenance during the period between July 1 and the date of the recordation of the deeds. 8. Diagram: A diagram of the areas to be conveyed to the City by the MMCA is included in the Boundary Maps set forth in Appendix 'E' of the Engineer's Report (Exhibit 'G'). The diagram for the Peach Hill Wash, Peach Hill Wash North Slope and the Shadyridge Strip is page 19 of those maps. 9. Partial Conveyance: Staff has been advised that the MMCA may be considering amending their request by excluding the Tierra Rejada Road parkways from the properties to be conveyed to the City. One of the goals of the initial request from the MMCA was to allow the Association to divest itself of all of its properties to allow the MMCA to dissolve. Such an amendment to the initial request brings into question the entire matter of transferring properties and maintenance responsibilities to the City. Should the City Council agree to allow the MMCA to retain the maintenance responsibilities for the Tierra Rejada Road parkways, it is the recommendation of staff that the City Council require the MMCA to also retain the responsibility for the maintenance of the Shadyridge strip (see page 19 of the maps in Exhibit 'G'). If requested by the MMCA, staff would recommend City agree to accept the Peach Hill Wash North Slope. This is due to the fact that this property is adjacent to the Peach Hill Wash which is to be maintained by the City via a Zone 10 assessment. 10. High School Frontage -- The parkways along the frontage of the High School are maintained by the City. However, the cost of this maintenance is not funded by the Zone 10. City costs for this maintenance is reimbursed by the Moorpark Unified School District. 11. Parkway North of Park Entry -- The parkway on the east side of Tierra rejada Road between the bridge and the entrance to Arroyo Vista Community Park is owned by the City. It is recommended that the cost of this maintenance be funded by the Zone 10 assessment. ed84_57. apr 000141 Assessment District 84 -2 June 5, 1996 Page 9 12. Debris Basin Maintenance -- An additional assessment for storm drain debris basin maintenance is levied upon certain properties within Zone 10 (see Section F for additional information) . 13. Summary of Zone 10 Assessment Options -- As discussed above, the City Council may be considering a number of different options regarding the scope of the improvements to be maintained. The following is a summary of those options: Notes: a) Maximum amount of the Zone 10 landscape assessment as set forth in the Public Hearing Notice. Actual cost estimate for these areas is $175,937 ($69.32 / S F Res.). 14. Medians -- As you may recall, the City took over the maintenance of the Tierra Rejada Road medians within PC -3 on March 1, 1996, subject to certain conditions [City costs for this maintenance was paid by CCB through July 1, 1996]. One of those conditions was a requirement that CCB undertake certain additional modifications required to render the irrigation systems for the medians totally independent of the parkways, in the event the City did not assume the maintenance of the parkways. As previously discussed, the irrigation systems for the parkways and the medians are integrated. Sub - meters have been installed to segregate the median costs from the parkway costs. ad84_97.apr AWAZ S. F. Res. Total Options Assmnt ($) Assmnt ($) A. Peach Hill Wash a) 68.40 173,587 T.R. Parkway N/O Park Entry Peach Hill Wash Slope Shadyridge strip T.R. Rd Parkways (MMCA) B. T.R. Parkway N/O Park Entry 46.54 118,132 Peach Hill Wash Slope Shadyridge strip T.R. Rd parkways C. T.R. Parkway N/O Park Entry 34.27 86,984 Peach Hill Wash Slope Shadyridge strip D. T.R. Parkway N/O Park Entry 27.93 70,884 Peach Hill Wash Slope E. T.R. Parkway N/O Park Entry .93 2,350 Notes: a) Maximum amount of the Zone 10 landscape assessment as set forth in the Public Hearing Notice. Actual cost estimate for these areas is $175,937 ($69.32 / S F Res.). 14. Medians -- As you may recall, the City took over the maintenance of the Tierra Rejada Road medians within PC -3 on March 1, 1996, subject to certain conditions [City costs for this maintenance was paid by CCB through July 1, 1996]. One of those conditions was a requirement that CCB undertake certain additional modifications required to render the irrigation systems for the medians totally independent of the parkways, in the event the City did not assume the maintenance of the parkways. As previously discussed, the irrigation systems for the parkways and the medians are integrated. Sub - meters have been installed to segregate the median costs from the parkway costs. ad84_97.apr AWAZ Assessment District 84 -2 June 5, 1996 Page 10 In the event the MMCA retains the parkways, it will be necessary to install additional water meters, electrical services and irrigation controllers to completely separate the medians from the parkways. Some of this work will require excavations in Tierra Rejada Road. A contract has been awarded to construct an asphalt overlay on Tierra Rejada Road. That work is set to commence within the next several weeks. If these irrigation system changes are to be made, the work must be done as soon as possible. For these reasons it is recommended that a decision regarding the acceptance of the Tierra Rejada Road parkways be made on June 5th. F. Debris Basin Maintenance It has been determined that certain properties within Zone 2, Zone 5 and Zone 10 benefit from, and are therefore assessed an additional amount for the maintenance of certain storm drain debris basins. A summary of those costs and the method of distribution of same is set forth at the bottom of Page 2 of Exhibit "C." The location of those facilities, and the lots assessed for the maintenance of same, are set forth in the appropriate District Boundary Maps in the Engineer's Report (Exhibit "G"). G. Capital Improvements A detail of the proposed district funded landscaping capital improvement projects for next fiscal year is set forth in Exhibit 'E'. Those projects are summarized as follows: 1. Citywide -- Consistent with prior year actions of the City Council, it is recommended that certain parkway landscaping improvements be funded by a portion of the prior year maintenance assessment surplus. It is recommended that four such projects be approved for next fiscal year, briefly described as follows: • Parkway: South side of Los Angeles Avenue east of Tierra Rejada Road [partially funded by a deposit fron the developer of the adjacent Tract] • Parkway: West Side of Tierra Rejada Road South of Los Angeles Avenue. • Parkway: North Side of Poindexter Ave. • Parkway: Location to be determined- 2. Zones of Benefit -- As discussed in Section D above, it is proposed that the City undertake a future project to construct parkway landscaping on the north side of Tierra Rejada Road east and west of Southhampton Road. This work ad84_97.apr 0001.43 Assessment District 84 -2 June 5, 1996 Page 11 would be funded by improvement assessments levied upon the properties within Zone 2. There are no expenditures budgeted for this project during FY 1996/97. Actual construction is anticipated to take place in FY 1998/99. H. Engineer's Report The costs and assessment information presented to the City Council last April were used by the Assessment Engineer to develop the Engineer's Report (Exhibit 'G'). Included in that report are the Boundary Maps for Assessment District AD84 -2. As required by law, the Engineer's Report was approved by the City Council last April, via the adoption of Resolution No. 96- 1194. As stated in that Resolution, the City Council may revise or amend the Engineer's Report at any time prior to the adoption of the Resolution levying the assessments for FY 1996/97. I. Public Meeting Resolution No. 96 -1194 and the Public Hearing Notices stated that a Public Meeting would be held at 7:00 p.m. on May 20, 1996, in the City Council Chambers, for the purpose of allowing the public an opportunity to meet with City staff to question and discuss the proposed assessments. The meeting was held. No one from the public attended. J. Public Hearing 1. The "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" (Streets and Highways Code) requires a public hearing to be held prior to the annual levy of assessments for the purpose of receiving input and to hear any protests to the proposed assessments. 2. If the amount of the assessments are to remain the same, the law does not require a Notice of the public hearing to be mailed to each property being assessed. However, consistent with past practice, a notice of the public hearing was mailed to the owners of all of the affected properties. 3. Notwithstanding the above mentioned policy, State law requires that prior to considering any new or increased assessment, a public hearing notice must be mailed to the owners of the properties to be assessed. Said notice shall state the amount of the existing assessment, the amount of the proposed assessment and the amount of the proposed increase in the assessment. The amounts of the approved ade4_97.apr 'jo()1.4 Assessment District 84 -2 June 5, 1996 Page-12 assessments MAY NOT EXCEED the amounts stated in the notice. Said notice must be mailed at least forty -five (45) days prior to the date of the hearing. In order to meet this deadline, said Notices were postmarked and mailed prior to April 19, 1996. 4. Attached as Exhibit 'H' is a copy of the Public Hearing Notice mailed for AD84 -2. Attached to the public hearing notice is a chart showing the maximum amount of the assessments which could be levied. I. Deferred Action The attached resolution (Exhibit "I ") making certain changes to Assessment District AD84 -2 and confirming the assessments for Fiscal Year 1996/97 must be adopted no later than June 30, 1996, in order for the assessments to be levied. In prior years the City Council has adopted such resolutions concurrently with the adoption of the budget. Staff recommends that the City Council take the following actions: wti q�v-"✓ 1) open the public hearing, receive testimony and clued eethe public hearing; ti 2) make a determination regarding the scope of improvements to be�1F accepted by the City and maintained by the Zone 10 assessment (see page 9 for options); 3) direct staff to fund anticipated costs related to the locking and unlocking of gates at the Home Acres Buffer from the Zone 8 maintenance assessment and to carry over any year end def icit to the FY 1997/98 Zone 8 maintenance assessment (see page 5 for discussion of this issue) ; and, 3) continue all other matters to the date of the Budget Workshops. Note: Subsequent to the budget workshop meetings, but no later than June 30, 1996, staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution No. 96- (Exhibit "I ") making certain changes to AD84 -2 and confirming the assessments for Fiscal Year 1996/97. ed84_97.apr EXHIBIT "A" (page 1) Fiscal Year 1996/97 AD 84 -2 ASSESSMENT SUMMARY -------------------- -------------------- Description Expense Summary ---------------------------------------------------- TOTAL ANTICIPATED ANNUAL EXPENSES LESS TOTAL ANTICIPATED ZONE MAINTENANCE EXPENSES Less Deleted Zone 10 LESS TOTAL ANTICIPATED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT EXPENSES TOTAL CITY -WIDE MAINTENANCE EXPENSES LESS PRIOR YEAR SURPLUS CARRYOVER LESS TRANSFER IN Less Deferred Capital Improvements CITYWIDE MAINTENANCE EXPENSES LESS CREDITS FY 94/95 FY 95/96 Actual Budget 478,144 585,865 (80,697) (96,348) (38,500) (120,352) (120,550) 277,095 330,467 0 0 0 0 (34,117) 277,095 296,350 ---------------------- ---------------------- Assessment Summary ---------------------------------------------------- TOTAL CITY -WIDE MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENTS manual >> 293,400 296,350 <<< PLUS CITY -WIDE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ASSESSMENT 0 0 TOTAL CITY -WIDE ASSESSMENT 293,400 296,350 PLUS TOTAL ASSESSMENT FOR ALL ZONES >> 138,950 114,309 --- - - - - -- ----- - - - - -- TOTAL ASSESSMENTS 432,350 410,659 * Formula (Imported Number ** Maximum allowed by Public Hearing Notice 22- May -96 FY 96/97 Proposed 719,816 (263,688) (90,000) 366,128 (27,827) 0 338,301 >> 326,879 ** 0 326,879 268,061 594,940 ijotc EXHIBIT "A" (page 2) Fiscal Year 1996/97 AD 84 -2 ASSESSMENT SUMMARY FY 1995/96 ASSESSMENT SUMMARY --------------------- ____________________ A B SF Res Description ------------------------------- ------------------------------------- - - - - -- Assmnt($) --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- Total ($) --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- Citywide Assessment -------------------- 27.69 296,350 No. of FY1996/97 of Lots Zone Assessments Ass'ed for -------- -- - - - - -- Total Debris Total Assessment No. Lots - - - -- Basins Assmnt($) Amt ($) --- Per - - - - -- - - - - - -- 1 77 - - - -- --- - - - - -- 51939 --- - - - - -- 77.13 Lot 2 622 60,108 96.64 Lot 48 3 265 3,059 11.54 Lot 4 129 0 0.00 Lot 5 217 171939 82.67 Lot 75 6 22 749 34.05 Lot 7 95 ac. 5,420 57.10 Acre 8 City 497 10,223 20.57 Lot Home Acres 200 10,223 51.11 Lot 9 49 ac. 650 13.21 Acre 10 * ** 2538 0 0.00 EDU 680 Total All Zones 114,309 Notes: * ** Residential 2443 Commercial 95 [11.81 ac. x 8 du /ac = 95] 2538 22- Nay -96 FY 1996/97 ------------------------ C D SF Res Assmnt($) Total ($) Notes ----- - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- ---------------------- ----------- ---- - - - - -- ---------------- - - - - -- 32.62 326,879 A/B : C/D C = (AXD) / B Total Assessment Amount ($) Assmnt($) ---------------------------------- L/S * L/S L/S & Basins ** Only Basins Per ----- - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- ----- - - - - -- - - - - - -- 7,816 * 101.51 - -- Lot 271773 * 44.65 52.00 Lot 353 ** 2,003 * 7.56 - -- Lot 9,114 * 70.65 - -- Lot 24,795 * 114.26 121.32 Lot 529 ** Lot 1,009 * 45.86 - -- Lot 12,424 * 130.88 - -- Acre 3,270 * 6.58 - -- Lot 3,270 * 16.35 - -- Lot 0 * 0.00 - -- Acre 173,587 * 68.40 71.51 EDU 2,118 ** 268,061 .J w r-1 `% EXHIBIT "B" AD 84 -2 Fund 23 Activity FY FY Description 1992/93 1993/94 -------------- - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- -------------------- ---- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- BEGINNING BALANCE 256,185 315,355 REVENUE 449,164 ASSESSMENTS INTEREST MISCELLANEOUS TRANSFERS IN AVAILABLE FUNDS EXPENSES Personnel 0 &M Capital Improvements Less TOTAL EXPENSES YEAR END BALANCE 05/22/96 FY 1995/96 FY 1996/97 FY ---------------- - - - - -- Proposed 1994/95 Budget Proj Actual Budget Notes: -- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- ----- - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- ---------------------- -------- --- - - - - -- ----- - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- ---------------- - - - - -- 224,527 152,891 192,762 140,980 LESS SET ASIDES: Zone 2 Improvements Zone 8 Improvements Zone 9 Improvements Surplus Zone Maint. Assmnts Future Capital Improvements Future Capital Improvements YEAR END AVAILABLE FUNDS 0 374,909 440,237 431,317 441,000 594,940 (33,055) 1,436 668 1,200 1,000 1,000 0 648 5,474 1,000 0 (432) ---- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- 0 --- - - - - -- ----- 0 - - - - -- 0 ---- - - - - -- ---------- 705,349 --- - - - - -- 692,348 --- - - - - -- 670,906 --- - - - - -- ---- 586,408 - - - - -- 634,762 ---- - - - - -- 736,920 16,727 19,360 * 20,972 * 19,300 * 20,009 * 30,473 324,031 347,537 * 336,820 * 446,015 * 416,900 * 599,343 49,236 100,924 * 120,352 * 120,550 * 56,873 * 90,000 ---- - - - - -- 389,994 --- - - - - -- 467,821 --- - - - - -- 478,144 --- - - - - -- ----- 585,865 - - - - -- 493,782 ---- - - - - -- 719,816 ---- - - - - -- 315,355 --- - - - - -- 224,527 --- - - - - -- 192,762 --- - - - - -- ----- 543 - - - - -- 140,980 ---- - - - - -- 17,104 LESS SET ASIDES: Zone 2 Improvements Zone 8 Improvements Zone 9 Improvements Surplus Zone Maint. Assmnts Future Capital Improvements Future Capital Improvements YEAR END AVAILABLE FUNDS 0 (5,955) (12,175) (12,175) (18,395) (34,890) (33,055) 0 0 0 0 (3,020) 0 (3,020) (2,512) 0 0 (432) (7,958) (79) (25,360) (42,030) 0 (90,000) 0 164,277 108,702 (12,064) 27,827 (3,882) ,�, .,,%.;1.4*s Exhibit 'C' (Page 1 of 10) Zone of Benefit Maintenance Cost Summary FY 1996/97 22- May -96 Remarks ** Paid by Performance Nursury 12 Months Maint. ;oJI. -19 642 652 661 500 Contract Equip. Total Total Total Maintenance Utility Rental Personnel Maint. Zone - - - -- Lots - - - - -- Acres - - - -- Cost ($) ------- - - - - -- Cost ($) -- - - - - -- Cost ($) -- - - - - -- Cost ($) --- - - - - -- Cost ($) ------ - - - - -- 1 77 - -- 2,218 3,150 5,368 2 622 - -- 23,518 12,150 118 118 35,903 3 265 - -- 1,597 300 1,897 4 129 - -- 3,167 1,128 4,295 5 217 - -- 19,748 5,460 176 176 25,561 6 22 - -- 576 160 736 7 - -- 95 41920 3,700 8,620 8 497 City 3,690 1,350 5,040 200: Nome Acres 9 - -- 49 308 450 758 10 2,538 - -- 104,553 69,740 706 706 175,705 Total ------- - - - - -- 164,295 -- - - - - -- 97,588 -- - - - - -- 1,000 --- - - - - -- 1,000 ------ - - - - -- 263,883 22- May -96 Remarks ** Paid by Performance Nursury 12 Months Maint. ;oJI. -19 Exhibit 'C' (Page 2 of 10) FY 1996/97 Zone of Benefit Maintenance Cost Detail LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE 200 : Home Acres 9 - -- 49 10 2,538 - -- 0 Total DEBRIS BASIN MAINTENANCE 25.20 308 350 100 758 15.40 103,847 68,000 1,740 173,587 68.40 ------- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- 163,295 94,618 21970 260,883 22- May -96 Remarks ------------------ - - - - -- ** Paid by Performance Nursury 12 Months Maint. 642 661 500 Total Number of Percent Contract Equip. Total Per Lot (ac.) Total Lots Debris of Maint. Rental Personnel Basin Maint. Basin Maint. Zone Lots Ass'ed Basins Total Cost ($) Cost ($) Cost ($) Cost ($) Assm'nt ($) Remarks 2 622 48 2 11.80 642 652 3 17.6% 10 2,487 680 12 70.6% Amount of Landscape --------------- - -- Landscaping Contract Utility Costs ($) Total Total L/S Total Total Maintained Maintenance ------------ - - -- -- L/S Maint. Cost ($) Zone - - - -- Lots - - - - -- Acres - - - -- [Sq. Ft.] ----- - - - - -- Cost ($) ------- - - - - -- Water -- - - - - -- Electric -- - - - - -- Cost ($) --- - - - - -- Per Lot (ac.) ------ - - - - -- 1 77 - -- 6,000 2,218 3,000 150 5,368 69.71 2 622 - -- 970,000 23,400 12,000 150 35,550 57.15 3 265 - -- 3,000 1,597 300 0 11897 7.16 4 129 --- 5,640 31167 1,008 120 41295 33.29 5 217 - -- 91,920 191572 5,100 360 25,032 115.35 6 22 - -- 500 576 160 0 ** 736 33.45 7 - -- 95 101000 4,920 3,500 200 8,620 90.81 8 497 : City 65,340 31690 1,200 150 5,040 10.14 200 : Home Acres 9 - -- 49 10 2,538 - -- 0 Total DEBRIS BASIN MAINTENANCE 25.20 308 350 100 758 15.40 103,847 68,000 1,740 173,587 68.40 ------- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- 163,295 94,618 21970 260,883 22- May -96 Remarks ------------------ - - - - -- ** Paid by Performance Nursury 12 Months Maint. 642 661 500 Total Number of Percent Contract Equip. Total Per Lot (ac.) Total Lots Debris of Maint. Rental Personnel Basin Maint. Basin Maint. Zone Lots Ass'ed Basins Total Cost ($) Cost ($) Cost ($) Cost ($) Assm'nt ($) Remarks 2 622 48 2 11.80 5 217 75 3 17.6% 10 2,487 680 12 70.6% Total 803 118 118 118 353 176 176 176 529 706 706 706 2,118 - - -- -- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- ------ - - - - -- 17 100.0% 1,000 1,000 1,000 3,000 7.35 7.06 3.11 ILSIJ Exhibit 'C' (Page 3 of 10) FY 1996/97 Zone of Benefit Zone 10 L/S Maintenance Detail LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE Area Description a Peach Hill Wash (center portion) b Peach Hill Wash (north slope) Sub -Total c Shadyridge Area Sub -Total d Tierra Rejada Rd Parkways (except H. S. frontage) Sub -Total e Tierra Rejada, Rd Parkways E /S: north of Park Entry Sub -Total 642 652 Landscape --------------- - -- Contract Utility Costs ($) Total Per Lot (ac.) Maintenance ---- -------- - - - - -- L/S Maint. L/S Maint. Cost ($) Water Electric Cost ($) Assm'nt ($) 351205 22,000 600 57,805 22.78 391034 29,000 500 68,534 ------- - - - - -- 74,239 -- - - - - -- 51,000 -- - - - - -- 1,100 --- - - - - -- 126,339 91000 ------- - - - - -- 7,000 -- - - - - -- 100 -- - - - - -- 16,100 --- - - - - -- 83,239 58,000 1,200 142,439 201608 10,000 540 31,148 -- - - - - -- 103,847 -- - - - - -- 68,000 -- - - - - -- 1,740 -- - - - - -- 173,587 27.00 49.78 6.34 56.12 12.27 68.40 1,500 800 50 2,350 0.93 ------- - - - - -- 105,347 -- - - - - -- 68,800 -- - - - - -- 1,790 --- - - - - -- ------ - - - - -- 175,937 69.32 29- Hay -96 Remarks 163,800 sf 190,400 sf 40,000 sf 80,000 sf <<<< Maximum amount of assessment per Public Hearing Notice Exhibit 'C' Page 4 of 10 Summary Zones of Benefit Expenses & Assessments PY1996/97 22- Nay -96 Assessments ---------------------------------------------------------- Expenses --------------------------------------------------------- Maintenance ------ - - - - -- ------------ Zone - - - -- ----- Maintenance ------ - - - - -- ------ - - - - -- Improvements ------ - - - - -- ------ - - - - -- Total --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- 1 5,368 0 5,368 2 35,903 0 35,903 3 1,897 0 1,897 4 4,295 0 4,295 5 25,561 0 25,561 6 736 0 736 7 8,620 0 8,620 8 4,845 0 4,845 9 758 0 758 10 175,705 --- - - - - -- 0 --- - - - - -- 175,705 --- - - - - -- Total 263,688 0 263,688 22- Nay -96 Assessments ---------------------------------------------------------- Maintenance ------ - - - - -- ------------ Improvements ------ - - - - -- ------ - - - - -- Total ---- - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- 7,816 0 71816 21,906 6,220 28,126 2,003 0 2,003 9,114 0 9,114 25,324 0 25,324 1,009 0 1,009 12,424 0 12,424 0 6,540 6,540 0 0 0 175,705 --- - - - - -- 0 --- - - - - -- 175,705 ---- - - - - -- 255,301 12,760 268,061 �.# %J1.52 Exhibit 'C' Page 5 of 10 Summary Zones of Benefit Summary of Surpluses and Reserves Summary of Zone Surplus Maintenance Assessments (Funds not a part of Citywide Surplus carryover). ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - -- FY 95/96 --------------- - - - - -- Zone FY 93/94 FY 94/95 Budget Actual FY 96/97 1 (987) (4,223) 0 (2,448) 0 2 (15,519) (5,495) 0 13,997 0 3 538 (1,396) 0 (106) 0 4 8,125 4,038 432 (4,819) 0 5 (7,542) 6,235 0 237 0 6 294 (307) 0 (273) 0 7 (3,279) (899) 0 (3,804) 0 8 0 1,200 0 4,924 79 9 0 0 0 250 0 10 0 --- - - - - -- 0 --- - - - - -- --- 0 - - - - -- 0 --- - - - - -- --- 0 - - - - -- Total (18,370) (847) 432 7,958 79 Remarks -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary of Zone Reserves for Future Capital Improvements: Funds not a part of Citywide Surplus carryover. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - -- FY 95/96 --------------- - - - - -- Zone FY 93/94 FY 94/95 Budget Actual FY 96/97 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 (9,530) 5,955 12,175 12,175 18,395 3 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 8 34,890 33,055 (63,000) (6,540) 0 9 0 3,020 0 3,020 2,512 10 0 --- - - - - -- 0 --- - - - - -- 0 --- - - - - -- 0 --- - - - - -- 0 --- - - - - -- Total 25,360 42,030 (50,825) 8,655 20,907 Remarks ---------------------------------------------------------- Reserved for Parkway Project: N/S T. R. Rd @ Southhampton Buffer Area Construction Costs Parkway construction: L. A. Avenue @ Condor Drive 116t: 11 )Rgql!( iliff DI E.Aki 1, E16moodc/,11 -'F"bDd( XD�tkl 'tainpC ------------------- --------------------------------------- Ti3v. 1 ian I AG, nttl 1 I 6sm "tan E Ka I kESOBSBECt", JNA!h'hk2 RT'OBf;eR I WA va,c ? ---------- AMY 0 " 1155173:, 51j-, 773 5,491 Lt�UZ 5 92) 9 i 1:,;29,1 1 5,w , ),D Q]EIR)) )97�14 (@:,E n1) 'GMI, 7,1S1957 1 (S'837) IV 51 (5937) I'll' 3:11441 7' 36' 222 tall 16 1 FYI' Okryno-n ?is,essame.t. JuiJf-.hAn b4opnom, WiLua 0 (3 yvet (" ru ie, U�ssesr arl lxwaikhi� Trposass I dArvz mt. 4 23 3 ,931 1,., 1 t 5 IEdi �'f 14 8 3 )SO? (E,,4 w) "?,Asap I 5!j, 663 ! 5;136! N A! i"tbanallac I I Nta 1 7n 390 n,) - -- - - - - -- ---------- Otssesmd ....... "NaD, :,>>>>) > » » » »» »»; 7', ER 5 22'.FAYH9 I - ------------------------------------------------------ - I ffel, Pnlua; 116zha, 1es ; ) tan 161 (le"myne, AssesRead ?mnih@Lo Tppoiw E.Slkmre(� .-Imprinaeattl ; ------------- - <(((<<<<<<<(< 0', N 41i[IbEMUM � Ntl L IfiYD+P9 37 ------------- - -------- Assesseart .... , 2 L )961, .» >>)>>>>>>>))>>>>>x o,.ne 3 ------------- Eljb 2'0' J ],M Mead 111.1ill u Phi 1,,,1,bDpe;1 k,!' hlt.,Lpir Nmrcttt Ka SpAq� 61 ----------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------- Tix ian I Aac NSA I I ass "tan Er a J I kin fter Pnl.us; r io, ites �M' tall 16 1 FYI' Okryno-n ?is,essame.t. JuiJf-.hAn b4opnom, WiLua 0 (3 yvet (" ru ie, U�ssesr arl lxwaikhi� Trposass I dArvz :12,{4.11! Q'r, 1111) 11 0 1 111 K )Q-W C9 (Ali, 610D) L ' KA01 Di 1 (C 3 151! I - 1',' 8s) i2� A(l) !&Aco 0, �2� Ao I q'i 5 8�93 11'70;01: ?2',(00) It 3 7!,iF7 (B!"Em 12; 0 0) 5@:,, 110: (11 All) lu 231f:633 3 3,*T, 6!j4 S 9,5) 01 X) 1 ISE i5 )l551 i 03) 33 b). 20' g7!; P!!i (6!j4 155) 15311881 1411-,533 :41;1')5( .3:,E9'31 il. )155!1 Eli; 20' 1, L3:j S 97 7 ;21'39 o" Sol) 3 31',03: J)Z 16,20, 1 01 p5! N 41i[IbEMUM � Ntl L IfiYD+P9 37 ------------- - -------- Assesseart .... , 2 L )961, .» >>)>>>>>>>))>>>>>x o,.ne 3 ------------- Eljb 2'0' J Exhibit 'C' Page 7 of 10 Zone 3: Tract 3032: Buttercreek Entry ** Peppermill Parkway Maintenance --------------------------------------------------------- Prior Year Plus Total Less Year End FY Carryover Assessment Available Expenses Balance - - - -- --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- ----- --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- 91/92 0 2,978 2,978 2,052 926 92/93 926 2,321 3,247 1,811 1,436 93/94 1,436 1,405 2,841 2,303 538 94/95 538 846 1,384 2,780 (1,396) 95/96 5,930 3,485 2,445 92/93 2,445 Budget (1,259) 3,059 1,800 1,800 0 Est. (1,396) 3,059 1,663 1,769 (106) 96/97 (106) 2,003 1,897 1,897 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Maintenance Budget Total FY1996/97 4,342 ------ - - - - -- 432 Est. --- - - - - -- Assessment ...... 2,003 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2,003 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Zone 4: Tract 3274: Williams Ranch Rd Barrier ** HIS Parkway ** S/; Maintenance --------------------------------------------------------- Prior Year Plus Total Less Year End FY - - - -- ----- Carryover --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- Assessment --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- Available --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- Expenses --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- Balance --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- 91/92 0 5,930 5,930 3,485 2,445 92/93 2,445 4,212 6,657 5,883 774 93/94 774 12,118 * 12,892 4,767 8,125 94/95 8,125 0 8,125 4,087 4,038 95/96 Budget 4,342 0 4,342 3,910 432 Est. 4,038 0 4,038 8,857 ** (4,819) 96/97 (4,819) 9,114 4,295 4,295 0 ---------------------------------------------------------------- Maintenance Total FY196/97 ------ - - - - -- -- - - - - -- Assessment ...... 9,114 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 9,114 Notes: * Includes over assessment due to lots assessed in error ** Includes $4,803.21 refund of over assessment 22- Hay -96 Capital Improvements ---------------------------------------------------------- Prior Year Plus Total Less Year End Carryover Assessment Available Expenses Balance --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- --------- --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- 0 0 0 0 0 --------------------------------------------------- Improvements «««««« 0 > Parkway Capital Improvements ---------------------------------------------------------- Prior Year Plus Total Less Year End Carryover Assessment Available Expenses Balance --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- --------- --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- I 0 0 0 0 0 -------------------------- Improvements «««««« 0 0®01.55 Exhibit 'C' 0 1,452 1,452 777 22- May -96 Page 8 of 10 879 1,554 832 722 93/94 Zone 5: Tract 3019 & Tract 3025: N/S T R Rd Parkways ** S/S T R Rd Slopes ** W/S Peach Hill Parkway 242 Maintenance --------------------------------------------------- 843 (307) 95/96 - - - - -- Capital Improvements ---------------------------------------------------------- Prior Year Plus Total Less Year End Prior Year Plus Total Less Year End FY - - - -- ----- Carryover --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- Assessment --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- Available --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- Expenses --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- Balance --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- Carryover Assessment Available Expenses Balance --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- 91/92 0 24,355 24,355 38,842 (14,487) 92/93 (14,487) 40,737 26,250 24,581 1,669 93/94 1,669 17,340 19,009 26,551 (7,542) 94/95 (7,542) 37,338 29,796 23,561 6,235 95/96 Budget 7,115 17,939 25,054 25,054 0 Est. 6,235 17,939 24,174 23,937 237 96/97 237 25,324 25,561 25,561 0 0 0 0 0 0 ------------------------------- Maintenance FY1996/97 ----- - - - - -- Assessment ...... 25,324 Total »»»»»» » »»»> 25,324 Improvements «««««« 0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zone 6: Tract 3306: West end of Inglewood (Glenhaven) Maintenance Capital Improvements --------------------------------------------------- - - - - -- ---------------------------------------------------------- Prior Year Plus Total Less Year End Prior Year Plus Total Less Year End FY Carryover Assessment Available Expenses Balance Carryover Assessment Available Expenses Balance 91/92 0 1,452 1,452 777 675 92/93 675 879 1,554 832 722 93/94 722 678 1,400 1,106 294 94/95 294 242 536 843 (307) 95/96 Budget (229) 749 520 520 0 Est. (307) 749 442 715 (273) 96/97 (273) 1,009 736 736 0 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Maintenance Total FY196/97 ------ - - - - -- --- - - - - -- Assessment ...... 1,009 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1,009 0 0 0 0 0 --------------------------------------------------------- Improvements «««««« 0 vWL% Exhibit 'C' 0 0 0 0 Page 9 of 10 0 0 0 0 Zone 7: Tract N/S L. A. Ave. E/0 Gabbert [Industrial Park] 0 Maintenance 94/95 0 1,200 1,200 0 Prior Year Plus Total Less Year End FY - - - -- Carryover --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- Assessment --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- Available --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- Expenses --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- Balance ========= --- - - - - -- 91/92 91/92 0 720 720 0 720 92/93 720 3,527 4,247 3,305 942 93/94 942 3,087 4,029 7,308 (3,279) 94/95 (3,279) 10,581 7,302 8,201 (899) 95/96 -- - - - - -- Assessment ...... 0 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Budget 1,080 5,420 6,500 6,500 0 Est. (899) 5,420 4,521 8,325 (3,804) 96/97 (3,804) 12,424 8,620 8,620 0 Maintenance Total FY1996/97 ------ - - - - -- --- - - - - -- Assessment ...... 12,424 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 12,424 22- May -96 Capital Improvements Prior Year Plus Total Less Year End Carryover Assessment Available Expenses Balance --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- --------- --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- 0 0 0 0 0 Improvements «««««« 0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zone 8: Home Acres Buffer Area Maintenance Capital Improvements --------------------------------------------------- - - - - -- ---------------------------------------------------------- Prior Year Plus Total Less Year End Prior Year Plus Total Less Year End FY Carryover Assessment Available Expenses Balance Carryover Assessment Available Expenses Balance 91/92 0 0 0 0 0 92/93 0 0 0 0 0 93/94 0 0 0 0 0 94/95 0 1,200 1,200 0 1,200 95/96 33,055 13,895 46,950 53,490 (6,540) Budget 1,200 6,550 7,750 7,750 0 Est. 1,200 6,550 7,750 2,826 4,924 96/97 4,924 0 4,924 4,845 79 ---------------------------------------------------------------- Maintenance Total FY196/97 ------ - - - - -- -- - - - - -- Assessment ...... 0 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 6,540 0 0 0 0 0 0 20,445 20,445 0 20,445 20,445 20,445 40,890 6,000 34,890 34,890 19,245 54,135 21,080 33,055 (13,895) 13,895 0 63,000 (63,000) 33,055 13,895 46,950 53,490 (6,540) (6,540) 6,540 0 0 0 Improvements «««««« 61540 jo) ;1.5'7. Exhibit 'C' Page 10 of 10 Zone 9: Condor Drive / L. A. Ave. Parkway [Condor Industrial Park] Maintenance --------------------------------------------------------- Prior Year Plus Total Less Year End FY Carryover Assessment Available Expenses Balance 91/92 0 0 0 0 0 92/93 0 0 0 0 0 93/94 0 0 0 0 0 94/95 0 0 0 0 0 95/96 0 0 0 0 Budget 0 650 650 650 0 Est. 0 650 650 400 250 96/97 250 > 0 758 758 0 From Imp 508 / 95/96 ----------------------------------------------------------------- 0 Maintenance Budget 0 Total FY1996/97 0 ------ - - - - -- --- - - - - -- Assessment ...... 0 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0 22- May -96 Capital Improvements ---------------------------------------------------------- Prior Year Plus Total Less Year End Carryover Assessment Available Expenses Balance --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6,000 6,000 2,980 3,020 0 0 0 0 0 3,020 0 3,020 0 3,020 3,020 (508) 2,512 0 2,512 move to maint. 0 0 0 ------------------------------------------------------------ Improvements 95/96 «««««« 0 Budget 0 0 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zone 10: PC -3: T.R Rd Parkways ** H.S. Frontage ** Peach Hill Wash ** Peach Hill Wash North Slope Maintenance --------------------------------------------------- - - - - -- Capital Improvements ---------------------------------------------------------- Prior Year Plus Total Less Year End Prior Year Plus Total Less Year End FY Carryover - - - -- --- - - - - -- ----- --- - - - - -- Assessment --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- Available --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- Expenses --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- Balance --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- Carryover Assessment Available Expenses Balance --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- 91/92 0 0 0 0 0 92/93 0 0 0 0 0 93/94 0 0 0 0 0 94/95 0 0 0 0 0 95/96 Budget 0 0 0 0 0 Est. 0 0 0 0 0 96/97 0 175,705 175,705 175,705 0 0 0 0 0 0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Maintenance Total Improvements FY196/97 ------ - - - - -- --- - - - - -- ------ - - - - -- Assessment ...... 175,705 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 175,705 <<<<<<<<<<<< 0 �':'JU+i.�B EXHIBIT "D" (1 of 3) 084 -2 Budget Department 143 Budget Summary SALARIES & BENEFITS MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS 623 Supplies 624 Postage 626 Printing 629 Special Supplies 637 Travel & Hilage 638 Uniforms 641 Professional Services 642 Contract Services 648 Insurance 651 Equip Maint 652 Utilities 654 Vehicle Maint 655 Fuel 656 Lubricants 657 Small Tools 658 Maint & Repair 661 Equip Rental M &O Total 903 Capital Projects TOTAL FY 93/94 FY 94/95 Actual Actual 19,360 20,972 903 1,077 810 188 200 0 307 0 0 0 0 0 5,190 8,210 118,620 116,928 0 0 0 0 216,814 205,647 218 10 756 1,173 0 0 0 0 2,913 3,101 806 -- 486 - - - - -- 347,537 -- - - - - -- 336,820 100,924 -- - - - - -- 120,352 -- - - - - -- 467,821 478,144 Adj. Total FY 1995/96 ---------------- - - - - -- Budget Proj Actual 19,300 20,009 500 500 2,100 2,100 0 0 0 0 13,600 13,600 159,152 155,000 0 0 266,613 240,500 200 200 250 1,200 0 1,800 1,800 1,800 1,800 0 200 ---- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- 446,015 416,900 120,550 * 56,873 ---- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- 585,865 493,782 38,500 547,365 FY 96/97 Proposed Budget 30,473 500 2,100 0* 0* 0* 0* 13,600 247,670 0* 0* 330,423 200 250 0* 1,800 1,800 1,000 599,343 * 90,000 * 719,816 22- May -96 Remarks: ----------------- - - - - -- See Pg 2 See Pg 2 See Exibit E EXHIBIT "D" (2 of 3) AD84 -2 Budget Department 143 Budget Summary SALARIES & BENEFITS MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS 623 Supplies 624 Postage 626 Printing 629 Special Supplies 637 Travel & Milage 638 Uniforms 641 Professional Services 642 Contract Services 648 Insurance 651 Equip Maint 652 Utilities 654 Vehicle Maint 655 Fuel 656 Lubricants 657 Small Tools 658 Maint & Repair 661 Equip Rental M &O Total 903 Capital Projects TOTAL FY 1996/97 Budget -------------------------------------- Zones Citywide Total ---- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- ----- - - - - -- ---------- --- - - - - -- ----- - - - - -- 1,000 29,473 30,473 0 500 0 2,100 0 0 0 0 0 13,600 164,295 * 83,375 * 0 0 97,588 * 232,835 * 0 200 0 250 0 0 1,800 0 1,800 1,000 ---- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- 262,883 336,460 0 * 90,000 ---- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- 263,883 455,933 500 2,100 0 0 0 0 13,600 247,670 0 0 330,423 200 250 0 1,800 1,800 1,000 599,343 90,000 719,816 22- May -96 Remarks: ----------------------- ----------------------- For Zone Cost Detail see Exhibit C -1 For Citywide Cost Detail see Exhibit D -3 See Exibit E 0001.60 Exhibit D (3 of 3) 22-May -96 AD84 -2: Citywide Landscape Maintenance Cost Analysis Contract and Utility Cost Detail FY 1996/97 642 652 Amount of ------ - - - - -- -------------------- - - - - -- Total Landscaping Contract Utility Costs ($) Contract & Maintained Maintenance - --- -------- ---- --- ---- - -- Utility Map - - - -- Description ------------------------------------ - - - - -- [Sq. Ft.] ----- - - - - -- Cost ($) ------ - - - - -- Water - - - - -- Electric -- - - - - -- Total -- - - - - -- ------ Cost ($) - - - - -- A Campus Park Dr Ned: Princeton to Julliard 8,000 932.00 262 200 462 1,394 B Campus Park Dr Ned: Julliard to Marquette 19,712 2,328.00 606 200 806 3,134 C Campus Park Dr Ned: Marquette to Collins 19,712 2,328.00 606 200 806 3,134 Campus Park Prky (N /S): Channel to Collins 12,240 1,794.00 391 100 491 2,285 Collins Prky (W /S: Benwood to Campus Park Dr 3,600 1,282.00 391 100 491 1,773 D Moorpark Ave Prkwy (W /S): N/0 High 400 308.00 63 12 75 383 E Poindexter Prky (S /S): @ Sierra 2,112 615.00 314 0 314 929 F L. A. Ave Prkwy (N /S): Millard to Spring 4,752 1,230.00 345 0 345 1,575 G Spring Rd Prkwy (E /S): S/0 Peach Hill 15,820 1,025.00 2,377 0 2,377 3,402 S/W Corner of Peach Hill & Spring 2,400 820.00 314 0 314 1,134 H I Tierra Rejada Median N/0 Bridge 29,568 2,035.00 314 100 414 2,449 T.R Rd Prkwy (E /S): L.A. to Harvester 1,600 553.00 366 100 466 1,019 J &K T. R. Rd Median: Spring to Peach Hill 76,032 7,257.00 9,405 200 9,605 16,862 L T. R. Rd Ned: Peach Hill to Edison Easement 16,896 3,813.00 523 100 623 4,436 P & Q Princeton Medians & Parkways 2,500 1,025.00 314 100 414 1,439 Campus Park Dr Parkway (W /0 Penn) 3,000 1,230.00 345 100 445 1,675 Sub -Total Existing Areas ------ - - - - -- 28,575 -- - - - - -- ------ 18,448 - - - - -- 47,023 Areas Added This Year ------------------------------------- M,N & 0 T. R. Rd Ned: Bridge to Edison Easement 84,480 1 10,800.00 9,500 255 9,755 20,555 Sub -Total New Areas ------ - - - - -- 10,800 ------ - - - - -- -- - - - - -- ------ 9,755 -- - - - - -- ------ - - - - -- 20,555 - - - - -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sub -Total All Areas 39,375 28,203 67,578 Miscellaneous Contract Costs 44,000 44,000 Street Lights 204,632 * 204,632 GRAND TOTAL ------ - - - - -- ------------ 83,375 -- - - - - -- ------ -- - - - - -- ------ iu( - - - - -- - - - - -- 316,210 EXHIBIT "E" Capital Improvements 0 22- May-96 AD84 -2 Budget 8 Home Acres Buffer Area - 000350 63,000 53,490 Department 143 Budget Summary 9 Prkwy: L. A. Ave @ Virgina Colony - 000344 FY 1995/96 0 0 ------------------- - - - - -- FY 1996/97 ---- - - - - -- 0 GRAND TOTAL Capital Improvements Projected Proposed No. Description Acc. # Budget Actual Budget Remarks Citywide Capital Improvements -------------------------------------- Prkwy: W/S Spring S/0 Pch Hill - 000280 7,550 3,383 Prkwy: 1 1 - 000353 30,000 Prkwy: S/S L.A. E/0 Tierra Rejada - 000218 20,000 0 20,000 Includes $7,315 from develope Prkwy: W/S T. R. Rd S/0 L. A. Ave - 000226 10,000 Prkwy: N/S Poindexter - 000001 30,000 0 30,000 Sub -Total Citywide Improvements ----- - - - - -- ----- - - - - -- 57,550 3,383 ---- - - - - -- 90,000 Zone Capital Improvements 2 Prkwy: N/S T. R. @ Southampton 0 0 0 8 Home Acres Buffer Area - 000350 63,000 53,490 0 9 Prkwy: L. A. Ave @ Virgina Colony - 000344 0 0 0 Total Zone Capital Improvements ----- - - - - -- 63,000 ----- - - - - -- 53,490 ---- - - - - -- 0 GRAND TOTAL Capital Improvements ----- - - - - -- ----------- 120,550 ----- - - - - -- ----- - - - - -- 56,873 ---- - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- 90,000 EXHIBIT 'F' Street Lighting Cost Analysis AD84 -2: FY 1996/97 FY 1995/96 Summary ---------------- - - - - -- Projected FY 1995/96 Street Light Costs FY 1995/96 Street Lighting Assessment Ref. FY 1995/96 Street Lighting Surplus FY 1996/97 Street Lightin Assessment ----------------------------- - - - - -- Total 15,975.49 15,265.30 18,921.73 11,763.94 20,612.00 16,300.97 98,839 x2 197,679 186,000 (11,679) Last Year's Projected Cost (see above) .......... 197,679 Contingency for rate adjustment ............... 3,954 Estimated Anual Cost for added lights .......... 3,000 Total 204,632 05/22/96 Remarks Six month cost Projected Annual Cost Street Traffic Signal Date Lights Safety Lighting July 1995 15,975.49 0.00 Aug 1995 15,265.30 0.00 Sept 1995 18,921.73 0.00 Oct 1995 11,763.94 0.00 Nov 1995 20,612.00 0.00 Dec 1995 16,300.97 0.00 Six Month Costs 98,839.43 0.00 Projected FY 1995/96 Street Light Costs FY 1995/96 Street Lighting Assessment Ref. FY 1995/96 Street Lighting Surplus FY 1996/97 Street Lightin Assessment ----------------------------- - - - - -- Total 15,975.49 15,265.30 18,921.73 11,763.94 20,612.00 16,300.97 98,839 x2 197,679 186,000 (11,679) Last Year's Projected Cost (see above) .......... 197,679 Contingency for rate adjustment ............... 3,954 Estimated Anual Cost for added lights .......... 3,000 Total 204,632 05/22/96 Remarks Six month cost Projected Annual Cost f)(v 6. , ( ' PRELIMINARY ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF MOORPARK LIGHTING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. AD -84 -2 LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 Prepared By: DWIGHT FRENCH & ASSOCIATES, INC. 1470 S. Valley Vista Drive Suite 290 Diamond Bar, CA 91765 March 1996 ()(j()'1„fa4 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section 1 Authority for Report Section 2 Description of Improvements to be Maintained Section 3 Assessment Roll Section 4 Method of Assessment Section 5 Estimate of Cost Appendix "A" Street Lighting Formula - Table 1 Appendix "B" Landscape Formula - Table 2 Appendix "C" Assessment Summary - Table 3 Appendix "D" Budget Estimate Appendix "E" Boundary Map Appendix "F" Assessment Roll Appendix "G" Resolutions Appendix "H" Rebate Procedure Pae 1 1 4 4 CITY OF MOORPARK Engineer's Report Parks Maintenance Assessment District No. AD -84 -2 Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 For Fiscal Year 1996 -1997 SECTION 1 AUTHORITY FOR REPORT This report is prepared pursuant to City Council action taken at their regular meeting of January 17, 1996 to extend this District for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 1996 and ending June 30, 1997 in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, "Landscaping Act of 197211, being Part 2 of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code. The District will provide electrical energy for public lighting facilities and for operation and maintenance of public lighting within the City. In addition, the District will provide for installation and /or maintenance of public landscaping within the public right -of -way. SECTION 2 DESCRIPTION OF THE IMPROVEMENTS TO BE MAINTAINED This report covers the period of July 1, 1996 through June 30, 1997. An updated report is prepared each year to reflect updated annual costs and changes in parcelization. The City of Moorpark Lighting Maintenance District is proposed to create a new zone of benefit for the maintenance of the landscaping improvements along the Peach Hill Wash, which will be designated as Zone 10. The improvements to be maintained in this District include all City -owned and Southern California Edison (S.C.E.) -owned street lights as well as all medians and street trees within public rights -of -way within the boundaries of the City. Lighting maintenance shall include, but is not limited to, energy costs, removal, repair, replacement or relocation of light standards, poles, bulbs, fixtures and all appurtenances. Servicing of S.C.E. owned lights as defined in Section 22538 of the Streets and Highways Code shall be furnished by the Southern California Edison Company or its successors, 1 UU ()jGr0 SENT BY :DWIGHT FRENCH & ASSOC.; 5 -22 -96 ; 2 :22PM ;D%IIGHT FRENCH & ASOC - 805 529 8270:# 7!14 or this servicing shall be as authorized by the Public Utiiities Commission, State of California. Maintenance of City -owned lighting improvements shall be furnished by the City. Landscape maintenance shall include, but is not limited to, watering, fertilizing, mowing, weed control, shrubbery, tree removal and pruning, removal and replacement of dead growth, maintenance of irrigation facilities and other necessary work. in addition, the coot to maintain improved areas within an easement will he borne by owners within that project. These easement areas are: 1. Tract No. 2851 Maintenance costs associated with landscaping along a portion of the Ventura County Flood Control Easement immediately north of Campus Park Drive, as well as parkway landscaping at the entrance to and within the interior of Tract 2851. The obligation upon these 77 lots is pursuant to a condition of development. 2. Tract No. 2865 Cost for maintenance of specific landscape areas and debris basins within the tract, including landscaping at Christian Barrett & Spring Roads; Tierra Rejada landscaping, and Peach Hill Road landscaping on east side between Christian Barrett and Tierra Rejada Roads, and the entry monument sign at Christian Barret and Spring Road. The obligation upon the 622 lots within this tract is pursuant to a condition of development. Also, an additional $10 assessment will be levied upon each lot to fund the future construction of parkway landscape improvements on the north side of Tierra Rejada Road east and west of Southhampton Road. 3. Tract No. 3032 Maintenance costs associated with landscaping and an entry monument at Buttcrcre3ek Road and Los Angeles Avenue and landscaping on the south sides of Peppermill Street. This cost to be spread to the 265 lots within the tract. 4. Tract No. 3274 Maintenance costs associated with the landscaped barrier in Williams Ranch Road at the Edison power lines, and the parkway landscaping on both sides of Williams Ranch Road east and west 2 MAY 22 '96 03:14 000TU ff 714 860 3476 PAGE.07 SENT BY:DWIGHT FRENCH & ASSOC.; 5-22 -96 : 2 :22PM DWIGHT FRENCH & ASOC 805 529 8270:# 8/14 of the Edison Easement. This cost will be borne by the 129 lots within the tract. S. Tract Nos. 3019, 3525 Maintenance costs associated with debris basins and landscaping on the Tierra Rejada Road slope and parkway areas, including the entry statements at Pheasant Run Street, and parkway on the wesC side of Peach Hill Road between Williams Ranch and Tierra Rejada Roads within Tract Nos. 3019 and 3525. The cost. is to be spread to the 21'7 lots within the tracts. 6. Tract 3306 Cost for landscape areas within Tract 3306 at the westerly terminus of Inglewood Street. The cost is to be spread to the 22 lots within the tract. 7. Loa Angeles Avenue Parkway Maintenance costs associated with landscaping the parkway on the north side of Los Angeles Avenue between Gabbert Road and a point just east of Shasta Avenue will be borne by all industrial lots northerly of Los Angeles Avenue, southerly of Poindexter Avenue, eaeterly of Gabbert Road, and westerly of Shasta Avenue, via a per acre assessment. 8. Home Acres Buffer Area Maintenance costs associated with the buffer area at the west end oL Uhe West Ranch area, is to be split SU -50 between the residential properties within the West Ranch area and the area outside the City {mown as Home Acres. That portion of this Zone of Benefit within the City consists of the residential areas within Tract 4340, 4341, 4792 and a portion of Tract 4342. This area is bounded on the north by the Arroyo Simi, on the east by Tierra Rejada Road and the Commercial property at the corner of Tierra Rejada Road and Mountain '1'rail Street, on the south by Tracts 4637, 4342 -5 and the City boundary and on the west by the City Boundary. 9. Condor Drive Industrial Park Maintenance costs associated with the parkway located at the northwest corner of Los Angeles Avenue and Virginia Colony P1acc will be borne by the developed parcels within the Industrial Park on Condor Drive (Tract 3492 ). vva W 3 MAY 22 '96 03:14 714 860 3476 PAGE.08 SENT BY:DWIGHT FRENCH & ASSOC.; 5 -22 -96 ; 2 :23PM ;DWIGHT FRENCH & ASOC 805 529 8270;# 8/14 10. PC -3 Maintenance costs associated with landscaping and debrie basin within this area will be borne by all properties within the Mountain Meadows Planned Community (PC -3). The landscaping to be maintained consists of the Peach Hill Wash Linear Park, the slope along the north side of the Peach Hill Wash and the downstream tiood control facility located just east of Mountain Trail Street and certain parkways on Tierra Rejada Road. Plans and specifications for the irrigation, landscaping and lighting of streets, parks and easements, and other authorized improvements within the City are on file in the Department of Public works. The lighting locations and specifications for Edison -owned lights are on file with the Southern California Edison Company. Reference is hereby made to said plans and specifications for the exact location and nature of the landscape and lighting improvements. Said plans and specifications by reference are hereby made a part of this report. All parcels of real property affected are listed on the "Assessment Roll ", Exhibit "A," which will be on file in City Hall with the City Clerk, and is made a part hereof by reference. These parcels are more particularly described in maps prepared in accordance with Section 327 of the Revenue and Taxation Code which are on file in the office of the Ventura County Assessor in the County Government Center Administration Building, 800 S. Victoria Avenue, Ventura, California and which are also made a part hereof by reference. SECTION 4 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT The Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, in Section 22573, states that "The net amount to be assessed upon the lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the new amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." Lighting The primary benefits of street lighting are for the convenience, safety and protection of people and the security or protection of property, property improvements and goods. The intensity or degree of illumination provided can have a bearing on both. The single family home - Level 1 has been selected as the base unit for the spread of assessments. By definition, the single family home odaG 4 MAY 22 '96 03:15 714 860 3476 PAGE.09 SENT BY :DWIGHT FRENCH & ASSOC.; 5 -22 -96 ; 2 :23PM DWIGHT FRENCH & ASOC- 805 529 8270;#10/14 1 is a single family home located on a street that has existing street lights. A factor of 1.00 has been assigned to the base unit, which is composed of benefit factors which correspond to the following types of benefit: People Use - People related benefits 0.50 Security Benefit - Property protection 0.25 Intensity - Degree of illumination 0.25 1.00 Parcels in other land use categories were then rated by comparison with the basic unit. (See Table 1) People Use - people related benefits 1. Reduction in night accidents and attendant human misery. 2. Reduced vulnerability to criminal assault during hours of darkness. 3. Promotion of business operations during evening hours. 4. Increased safety on roads and highways. Security Benefit - Property Protection 1. Reduction in vandalism and other criminal acts, and damage to improvements. 2. Reduction in burglaries. Intensity Intensity or degree of illumination provided on streets varies with type of street, date of installation and the use of the property adjacent thereto. Landscaping The landscaping element of the spread formula recognizes that all properties within the City benefit from the maintenance of the landscaping within public rights -of -way and easements. These benefits 5 '-y MAY 22 '96 03:15 714 860 3476 PAGE.10 SENT BY :DWIGHT FRENCH & ASSOC.; 5 -22 -96 ; 2:23PM ;DWIGHT FRENCH & ASOC-a 805 529 8270; #11!14 include aesthetic enjoyment, creation of a placement living and working environment, an increase in general property values, improved safety resulting from a regular tree trimming program and improved street sweeping capabilities resulting from trimming trees which may otherwise interface with street sweeping operations. The method of spreading maintenance coats is based upon the "people use" attributed to each land use within the- City. This method was rbosen because the benefit received is directly proportionate to the number of people generated by each land use. Recognizing that residential land uses within the City derive a higher degree of benefit than non- residential land uses, the formula was subdivided into two main groups, with residential land uses contributing in 75% of the assessment and non- residential uses being assessed for the remaining 25* of the maintenance costs. The "people use" factors utilized in the assessment district spread formula are shown in Appendix "B ". Rebate The City Council approved a rebate procedure for disadvantaged property owners. The procedure shall be followed as described in Appendix "H." The City staff recommendation for the District budget is shown in Appendix "D" of this report. The costs attributed to landscaping and the costs attributed to lighting will be separately appointed, according to the formula, and added together to constitute the total assessment for each parcel. Conclusion In conclusion, it is our opinion that the assessments within Lighting Maintenance Assessment District No. AD -84 -2 are apportioned by a formula that fairly distributes the net cost in accordance with the benefits that are received. \rpt \050ad842.dc2 6 MAY 22 '96 03:16 714 860 3476 PAGE.11 APPENDICES r� APPENDIX "A" CITY OF MOORPARK Lighting Maintenance Assessment District AD -84 -2 Lighting and Landscape Act of 1972 Table 1 Street Lighting Formula Use People Lighting Total Annual Code Description Use Intensity Security Units Assessment 0 Residential Vacant 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.25 $ 5.37 1 Single Family - Level 1 0.50 0.25 0.25 1.00 $ 21.50 2 Mobile Home 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $ 0.00 3 Condo (Per Unit) 0.50 0.25 0.25 1.00 $ 21.50 4 Residential Income (2 -4 Units) 0.50 0.25 0.25 1.00 $ 21.50 (Per Unit) 5 Apartments (5 +) 0.50 0.05 0.20 0.75 $ 16.12 Per Unit 6 Single Family- 0.50 0.05 0.20 0.75 $ 16.12 Level 2 9 Mobile Home & 0.50 0.05 0.20 0.75 $ 16.12 Trailer Park (Per Space) 10 Commercial Vacant 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.25 $ 5.37 Land 11 Retail Stores, 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 $ 85.99 Single Story (Per Parcel) 12 Store & Office 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 $ 85.99 Combination 15 Shopping Centers 4.00 1.00 1.50 6.50 $139.74 (Neighborhood) 16 Shopping Centers 4.00 1.00 1.50 6.50 $139.74 (Regional) 17 Office Building 1.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 $ 64.50 (1 Story) 18 Office Building 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 $ 85.99 (Multi- Story) (Per Parcel) 19 Retail Stores 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 $x855.99 OWIL `.3 A -1 (Multi- Story) (Per Parcel) Use People Lighting Total Annual Code Description Use Intensity SecuritX Units Assessment 21 Restaurants & 3.00 1.00 1.00 5.00 $107.49 Cocktail Lounges 24 Banks, Savings & 1.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 $ 64.50 Loans 25 Service Stations 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 $ 85.99 26 Auto Sales, Repair 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 $ 85.99 Storage, Rental 30 Industrial land 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.25 $ 5.37 Vacant 31 Light Manufacturing 3.00 1.00 1.00 5.00 $107.49 32 Warehousing 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 $ 85.99 33 Industrial Condos, 2.00 1.50 1.50 5.00 $107.49 Co -Ops, PUD's 38 Mineral Processing 1.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 $ 64.50 44 Truck Crops 0.50 0.25 0.25 1.00 $ 21.50 46 Pasture (Permanent) 0.50 0.25 0.25 1.00 $ 21.50 48 Poultry 0.50 0.25 0.25 1.00 $ 21.50 49 Flowers, Seed Products 0.50 0.25 0.25 1.00 $ 21.50 51 Orchards 0.50 0.25 0.25 1.00 $ 21.50 53 Field Crops, Dry 0.50 0.25 0.25 1.00 $ 21.50 54 Pasture of Graze, Dry 0.50 0.25 0.25 1.00 $ 21.50 55 Feed Lots 0.50 0.25 0.25 1.00 $ 21.50 57 Tree Farms 0.50 0.25 0.25 1.00 $ 21.50 61 Theater 3.00 1.00 1.00 5.00 $107.49 69 Parks 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $ 0.00 70 Institutional Vacant 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.25 $ 5.37 71 Churches, Convent Rectory 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.25 $ 5.37 72 Schools 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $ 0.00 73 Colleges 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $ 0.00 78 Public Buildings, 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $ 0.00 Museums, Firehouses, Etc. 79 Flood Control 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $ 0.00 80 Misc. Vacant Lots 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.25 $ 5.37 81 Utility Water Company 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $ 0.00 A-2 Use People Lighting Total Annual Code Description Use Intensity Securitv Units Assessment 83 Petroleum & Gas 1.00 0.50 0.50 2.00 $ 43.00 86 Water Rights, Pumps 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $ 0.00 88 Highways & Streets 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $ 0.00 91 Utility- Edison 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $ 0.00 92 Telephone 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $ 0.00 93 S.P.R.R. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $ 0.00 94 Undedicated Community Areas (Condos) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $ 0.00 95 State Property 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $ 0.00 96 County Property 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $ 0.00 97 City Property 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $ 0.00 99 Exempt 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $ 0.00 A -3 000175 APPENDIX "B" CITY OF MOORPARK Lighting Maintenance Assessment District AD -84 -2 Lighting and Landscape Act of 1972 Table 2 Landscape Maintenance Formula Use People Annual Code Description Use Assessment 0 Residential. Vacant 0.00 $ 0.00 1 Single Family - Level 1 4.00 $ 11.12 2 Mobile Home 0.00 $ 0.00 3 Condo (Per Unit) 3.00 $ 8.34 4 Residential Income (2 -4 Units) 3.00 $ 8.34 (Per Unit) 5 Apartments (5 +) 3.00 $ 8.34 Per Unit 6 Single Family- 4.00 $ 11.12 Level 2 9 Mobile Home & 3.00 $ 8.34 Trailer Park (Per Space) 10 Commercial Vacant 0.00 $ 0.00 Land 11 Retail Stores, 3.00 $ 49.99 Single Story (Per Parcel) 12 Store & Office 3.00 $ 49.99 Combination 15 Shopping Centers 10.00 $166.64 (Neighborhood) 16 Shopping Centers 30.00 $499.92 (Regional) 17 Office Building 3.00 $ 49.99 (1 Story) 18 Office Building 6.00 $ 99.98 (Multi- Story) (Per Parcel) 19 Retail Stores 6.00 $ 99.98 (Multi- Story) (Per Parcel) 0001716 B -1 Use People Annual Code Description Use Assessment 21 Restaurants & 3.00 $ 49.99 Cocktail Lounges 24 Banks, Savings & 3.00 $ 49.99 Loans 25 Service Stations 3.00 $ 49.99 26 Auto Sales, Repair 1.00 $ 16.66 Storage, Rental 30 Industrial land 0.00 $ 0.00 Vacant 31 Light Manufacturing 12.00 $199.97 32 Warehousing 4.00 $ 66.66 33 Industrial Condos, 3.00 $49.99 Co -Ops, PUD's 38 Mineral Processing 3.00 $ 49.99 44 Truck Crops 2.00 $ 33.33 46 Pasture (Permanent) 2.00 $ 33.33 48 Poultry 2.00 $ 33.33 49 Flowers, Seed Products 2.00 $ 33.33 51 Orchards 2.00 $ 33.33 53 Field Crops, Dry 2.00 $ 33.33 54 Pasture of Graze, Dry 2.00 $ 33.33 55 Feed Lots 2.00 $ 33.33 57 Tree Farms 2.00 $ 33.33 61 Theater 2.00 $ 33.33 69 Parks 0.00 $ 0.00 70 Institutional Vacant 0.00 $ 0.00 71 Churches, Convent Rectory 0.00 $ 0.00 72 Schools 0.00 $ 0.00 73 Colleges 0.00 $ 0.00 78 Public Buildings, 0.00 $ 0.00 Museums, Firehouses, Etc. 79 Flood Control 0.00 $ 0.00 80 Misc. Vacant Lots 0.00 $ 0.00 81 Utility Water Company 0.00 $ 0.00 83 Petroleum & Gas 1.00 $ 16.66 86 Water Rights, Pumps 0.00 $ 0.00 88 Highways & Streets 0.00 $ 0.00 91 Utility- Edison 0.00 $ 0.00 92 Telephone 0.00 $ 0.00 93 S.P.R.R. 0.00 $ 0.00 U00177 B -2 SENT BY :DWIGHT FRENCH & ASSOC.; 5 -22 -96 : 2 :24PM ;DWIGHT FRENCH & ASOC 805 529 8270: #12/14 Use People Annual Code Use Assessment 94 Undedicated 0.00 $ 0.00 Community Areas (Condos) 0.00 $ 0.00 95 State Property 0.00 $ 0.00 96 County Property 0.00 $ 0100 97 City Property 0.00 $ 0.00 99 Exempt 0.00 $ 0.00 Notes: 1. In addition to the pLbove landscape charge, 77 lots within Tract No. 2851 are assessed an additional landscape maintenance cost for a portion of the Ventura County Flood Control Easement immediately north of Campus Park Drive, as well as portions of the parkway landscaping at the entrance to and within the interior of Tract 2851. The additional cost per lot is $1ul.51. The obligation upon these lots is pursuant to a condition of development. 2. In addition to the above landscape charge, 622 lots within Tract 2865 are assessed an additional landscape maintenance charge for the maintenance of specific landscape areas and debris basins within the tract. The landscaped areas include certain parkways, the Tierra Rejada Road slope and street scape areas, and the monument sign within the tract. Also, an additional $10 assessment will be levied upon each lot to fund the future construction 'of parkway landscape improvements on the north side of Tierra Rejada Road east and west of Southhampton Road. The additional cost per lot is $44.65. Forty -eight (48) lots are assessed for an additional $7.35 per lot for the maintenance of the debris basins. The obligation upon these lots is pursuant to a condition of development. 3. in addition to the above landscape charge, 265 lots within Tract No. 3032 are assessed an additional landscape maintenance charge for the maintenance of an entry monument at Buttercreek Road and Los Angeles Avenue and landscaping on the south side of Peppermill street. The additional cost per lot is $7.56. B -3 0001.78 MAY 22 '96 03:16 714 860 3476 PAGE.12 SENT BY :DWIGHT FRENCH & ASSOC.; 5 -22 -96 : 2 :24PM :DWIGHT FRENCH & ASOC 805 529 8270, #13/14 4. Tn addition to t)ip above landscape charge, 129 lots within Tract No. 3274 are assessed an additional landscape maintenance charge for the maintenance of the landscaped barrier in Williams Ranch Road at the Edison power lines, and the parkway landscaping on both sides of Williams Ranch Road east and west of the Edison Easement. a'he additional cost per lot is $70.65. The obligation upon these lots is pursuant to a condition of development. S. In addition to the above landscape charge, 217 lots within Tract Nos. 3019 and 3525 are assessed an additional landscape maintenance charge for the maintenance of the Tierra Rejada Road slope and parkways, including the entry statements at Pheasant Run Street, acid Lhe parkway on the west side of Peach Hill Road between Williams Ranch and Tierra Rejada Roads. The additional.. cost per lot. is $114.26. Seventy -five (75) lots are assessed for an additional $7.06 per lot for the maintenance of the debris basins.The obligation upon these lots is pursuant to a condition of development. 6. In addition to the above landscape charge, 22 lots within Tract No. 3306 are assessed an additional landscape maintenance charge for the maintenance of landscape area at the westerly terminus of Inglewood Street. The additional cost per lot is $45.86. The obligation upon these lots is pursuant to a condition of development. 7. In addition to the above landscape charge, 93 lots northerly of Los Angeles Avenue southerly of Poindexter Avenue, betwccn Gabbert and Shasta Avenues are assessed an additional landscape maintenance charge for the maintenance of the parkway on the northside of Los Angeles Avenue Parkway. The additional cost is $130.88 per acre. S. In addition to the above landscape charge, 497 zesidential units within Tracts 4340, 4341, 4792 and a portion of Tract, 4342 are assessed an additional $6.58 for fifty percent (50W) of the improvement and maintenance costs for the Home Acres Buffer area. The remaining fifty percent (50k) of such costs are recovered via an assessment upon the properties in the Home Acres area, in the amount of $16.35. This is the total amount of the assessment on the lots wiClliu [come Acres. Said lots are not assessed for Citywide lighting or landscaping. 9. in addition to the above landscape charge, 11 lots within the Industrial Park on Condor Drive are assessed an additional landscape maintenance charge for the maintenance of the parkway located at the northwest corner of Los Angeles Avenue and Virginia Colony Place. The additional cost is $0.00 per acre. role f B -4 001 r MAY 22 '96 03:17 714 860 3476 PAGE.13 SENT BY :DWIGHT FRENCH & ASSOC.; 5 -22 -96 ; 2 :25PM ;DWIGHT FRENCH & ASOC 805 529 8270: #14/14 10. In addition to the above landscape charge, 2443 residential units and one Commercial property within the Mountain Meadows Planned Community (PC -3)are assessed an additional landscape maintenance charge for the maintenance of the landscaping within the Peach Hill Wash Linear Park, on the slope along the uorLh side of the Peach Hill Wash and the downstream flood control facility located just east of Mountain Trail Street and within certain parkways along Tierra Rejada Road. The additional cost is $68.40 per equivalent dwelling unit. Six hundred and eighty (680) lots are assessed for an additional $3.11 per lot for the maintenance of debris basins. The obligation upon these lots is pursuant to a condition of development. MAY 22 196 03:17 714 860 3476 PAGE.14 rulimm C -1 APPENDIX "C" CITY OF MOORPARK Lighting Maintenance Assessment District AD -84 -2 Lighting and Landscape Act of 1972 Table 3 Assessment Summary Use Landscape Lighting Total Code Description Assessment Assessment Assessment 0 Residential $0.00 $ 5.37 $ 5.37 Vacant 1 Single Family - Level 1 11.12 21.50 32.62 2 Mobile Home 0.00 0.00 0.00 3 Condo 8.34 21.50 29.84 4 Residential Income (2 -4 Units 8.34 21.50 29.84 5 Apartments (5 +) 8.34 16.12 24.46 6 Single Family - Level 2 11.12 16.12 27.24 9 Mobile Home and 8.34 16.12 24.46 Trailer park 10 Commercial Vacant 0.00 5.37 5.37 Land 11 Retail Stores, 49.99 85.99 135.99 Single Story 12 Store & Office 49.99 85.99 135.99 Combination 15 Shopping Centers 166.64 139.74 306.38 (Neighborhood) 16 Shopping Centers 499.92 139.74 639.66 (Regional) 17 Office Building 49.99 64.50 114.49 (1- Story) 18 Office Building 99.98 85.99 185.98 (Multi- Story) 19 Retail Stores 99.98 85.99 185.98 (Multi- Story) 21 Restaurants & 49.99 107.49 157.48 Cocktail Lounges 24 Banks, Savings 49.99 64.50 114.49 Loans rulimm C -1 Use Landscape Lighting Total Code Description Assessment Assessment Assessment 25 Service Stations $49.99 $ 85.99 $ 135.99 26 Auto Sales, Repair 16.66 85.99 102.66 Storage, Rental 30 Industrial Land 0.00 5.37 5.37 Vacant 31 Light Manufacturing 199.97 107.49 307.46 32 Warehousing 66.66 85.99 152.65 33 Industrial Condos, Co -Ops, PUD's 49.99 107.49 157.48 38 Mineral Processing 49.99 64.50 114.49 44 Truck Crops 33.33 21.50 54.83 46 Pasture (Permanent) 33.33 21.50 54.83 48 Poultry 33.33 21.50 54.83 49 Flowers, Seed 33.33 21.50 54.83 Production 51 Orchards 33.33 21.50 54.83 53 Field Crops, Dry 33.33 21.50 54.83 54 Pasture of Graze, 33.33 21.50 54.83 Dry 55 Feed Lots 33.33 21.50 54.83 57 Tree Farms 33.33 21.50 54.83 61 Theater 33.33 107.49 140.82 69 Parks 0.00 0.00 0.00 70 Institutional 0.00 5.37 5.37 Vacant Land 71 Churches, Convent, 0.00 5.37 5.37 Rectory 72 Schools 0.00 0.00 0.00 73 Colleges 0.00 0.00 0.00 78 Public Buildings, Museums, Firehouses, Etc. 0.00 0.00 0.00 79 Flood Control 0.00 0.00 0.00 80 Misc. Vacant Land 0.00 5.37 5.37 81 Utility Water Co. 0.00 0.00 0.00 83 Petroleum & Gas 16.66 43.00 59.66 86 Water Rights, Pumps 0.00 0.00 0.00 88 Highways & Streets 0.00 0.00 0.00 91 Utility - Edison 0.00 0.00 0.00 92 Telephone 0.00 0.00 0.00 93 S.P.R.R. 0.00 0.00 0.00 94 Undedicated Community Areas (Condos) 0.00 0.00 0.00 OOGILSZ C-2 Use Landscape Lighting Total Code Description Assessment Assessment Assessment 95 State Property 0.00 0.00 0.00 96 County Property 0.00 0.00 0.00 97 City Property 0.00 0.00 0.00 99 Exempt 0.00 0.00 0.00 Actual assessment amounts may vary due to discrepancies between use codes and actual property uses. C-3 IV 183 APPENDIX "D" CITY OF MOORPARK LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT AD -84 -2 BUDGET ESTIMATE FY 1996 -97 ZONES OF BENEFIT 1. Tract No. 2851 Interior Parkway & Flood Control Channel 7,816.00 2. Tract No. 2865 Pacifica & Pardee:Landscape 27,773.00 Debris Basins 353.00 3. Tract No. 3032 D -1 000184 Buttercreek & Peppermill 2,003.00 4. Tract No. 3274 Williams Ranch Road 9,114.00 S. Tract No. 3019, 3025 Warmington: Landscape 24,795.00 Debris Basins 529.00 6. Tract No. 3306 Glenhaven (Inglewood) 1009.00 7. Los Angeles Avenue North Side Parkway 12,424.00 8. West Village Buffer Area 6,540.00 9. Condor Parkwav 0.00 10. Peach Hill Wash: Landscape 187,277.00 Debris Basins 2,118.00 SUBTOTAL $281,751.00 D -1 000184 BUDGET ESTIMATE FY 1996 -97 Total Annual Expenses Less Zone Maintenance Expenes Less Capital Improvements Total City -Wide Maintenance Less Prior Year Surplus *Total City Wide Assessment Total Zone Assessment Total Assessment *Street Lighting Landscape $ 204,632.00 122,247.00 Total $ 326,879.00 D -2 $ 723,933.00 (277, 378.00) (90,000.00) $ 356,555.00 (29,676.00) $ 326,879.00 281,751.00 $ 608,630.00 OWILSS APPENDIX "E" BOUNDARY MAPS 00®188, Mr' n 1 _-- i`�•,nw,d , iy nr i 1 �� 1 _��. -, ' ,... u , 1i 1 car••. rrryi , "°- •' 1 I ``Oyu � 'rfna,rw ' 1' • � ; I ---- - - -i -- - - - - - - - - t - - - - -- �'u - - -- ' ,11. I Ii ` 1 ::1:•, )1�",5 <.;Y.. 1 - t- - -y, L• 1 � � I See attached pages for Zones 1 -9 as shown on map. - - - - --- - - NN" ,w*,.," 1 .._ OORPARK .. I O O 1 Y 1 1' I "� 1 1 w ii N •.t. a: _� RK 1 ; f pRP K' . �— 1 • .17 + � L• 111. i � t 1 I woo� '...T a. ♦ ♦ 1 1 ' 1 S ~ANGELES I I I 1 - -% ------ ---- +_- -- -- - + \: 1 , ORPARK MOOR Boundar y Ma p, City of Moorpark Lighting and Maintenance Assessment District No. AD -8q -2 1 , I Boundary • 1 li g ' O �y+' a` – – – – – – • - • –ter , `t�, *' `. / �t 1 � r N Z01uV--- 1 TRACT 2BSI 9 N 3 i. ,p o 37 36 3! o W N �e Z It s3 I 75 2t � 276Ac W 13 13 Q 2 I.OIAC. 76 nF 1.17AC. !9 i34 132 l0 b 1 � � O 29 131 ffi O% 17 O f f1 S O O Z7 N O7 Iti O 26 63 N 63 p i7 p O 6 6 O 0 ©® © 20 6o I7 O Lu 9 N 3 O 4 22 56 W O 3 BAMB! 'r COCR?T. 2 Z:. Of a U (D i. ,p o 37 36 3! .0 L1 .2 s3 I t3 � A r nF !9 i34 O 4 22 56 W O 3 BAMB! 'r COCR?T. 2 Z:. Of a U (D i. 33 K 37 36 3! .0 v .2 s3 i. t3 .6 A of U 2 (f Off/1 MOW PARK 8 OR1VE- MERLE Parkway Maintained by Zone Assessment - ZONE. 2" -T 2 9L 5 E } 'N Parkway Maintained by Zone Assessment f N I®®®® Or� �I► Parkway Maintained by Zone Assessment 0001.90 5 1 rl. n r rq ryr' C t �r J: m. f N I®®®® Or� �I► Parkway Maintained by Zone Assessment 0001.90 5 ,� k or t Ilk '�, 506) r� PORTION TRACT M L� s Asrw9 4e 4. O500 Bk 000191, F i p I r- r'• v 33 "RCP MOF }i VENTURA ?orr\1a-YN ca � 2 sla� �7 Zpt4F 3 : T 3032 'ENEW Parkway Maintained i by Zone Assessment 14 000193 %.L AN. _7 . ` 1 dam' IPW J �o n• .r�.yiAi _�adl�iw -, 004 ,, ,.. :i ICA �pd� ter. J We. s= 74am ' ilk �1 506 ) DQb�: Fj- " . PORTION TRACT M 000I.!97 0 a 0 33'RCP 13 CITY OF M VENTURA 000:195 ZotA C. �, = T 330 M i Parkway Maintained -by Zone Assessment 14 t, N-- J � u =AVE. � Sr HASkA�I \, ® _ f Z Now �� ba 1b b1St1QN3 = "!% 'DZ 51 tr ro (D 'C W 0) N W (D :1 N � (A W :3 (D ct $1 lyi o� � w\ 1 • • � 0 `• t �.I Ia v sod ve . � ,ti r' � Nei ,•• •• �r r� Al ND a. Pot , r • Ito' •y• _ ,♦ + �:•S •»tf', • • ,. •� .$; a) rl ,yeu� ' •� t in J p ®t lu to tool i` •• •� _ 4 -�,�- `'" Ive� �t *• A ,• r :►.+e« Y >. +• I ",ram+ 1 c4 ?I NOO Go C-r o= J Y ilz• ' i �� (may rrCO1 . _w. Yr, ' q•N '1 of nor . PARK MOUNTAIN MEADOWS COMMUNITY ASSOC. , PEACH HILL CHANNEL LOT "M" TRACT 4341 -2 118 RM 24 -25 SHADYRIDGE DRIVE d N 0 GPI' VCFCDIST. (FEE PARCEL) RETENTION BASIN COUNTRY TRAILS PARK mooN1p,IN If-- ti D r P'DO,�s ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SITE lmr!l M�vN� PAN �Rp,�L SCALE 1 MOUNTAIN MEADOWS COMMUNITY ASSOC. LANDSCAPE EXHIBIT PEAVA AILL Woi; W PREPARED BY: No RT iIk S 14 F E WESTLAND CIVIL, INC. 100 N. RANCHO ROAD, SUITE 5 THOUSAND OAKS, CA 91362 S h \ �X� _ PH: 3, 19 495-1330 : C r � NOV. 13, 1995 ID CCB.LDSPESMT l C: \ACRD \DWG \6165 \MMCA EXB DWG SH T. 1 OF 3 /PARCEL "E, TRACT 3274 -3 • /�� J _� �LE MEN ip12Y ScNODL \ r .�. , ``' 32� ► , a 32'1 � b 0 0. a � 4CT3 PC fin` / � •s l » �1 ,� /r + • e ,o� /� ,d PARCEL „J'. PARCEL TRACT 3274_3 ACT 41wp'2 �� •� 414 * � yes` SC PLC r ew 1 %�r4Hr or PPRCC� MOUNTAIN MEADOWS COMMUNITY ASSOC. LANDSCAPE EXHIBIT LANDSCAPE PARCELS PPRK w m S It I/ i O s SGP� COMMERCIAL SITE E�- p rn / 16 RpR G M � ISo Z 3 epRCE`I,�Rpc � c I� -,15 PP�� SOV \N z l MOUNTAIN MEADOWS COMMUNITY ASSOC. LANDSCAPE EXHIBIT LANDSCAPE PARCELS PART <Wfl�S -..... N 11 Q3002(Y. i 1 77 44 F �NIv�.l IV 'j I IVII PORTION TRACT M • W W j J J Z6 600 504 , 42-6 01 20 434TM. 17 Bk. 03 Tt+ ' 21 p "f 4sAO-2 w s� 1a 16 �� a3� 506 ;rn 12 04 4343404 18 19 A , t TR 43401 CITRUS A DRIVE r Vr �•[Y B TRACT J y 1 7 24 4341 -1 1218 DALAWAY . TER DRIVE DRIVE I 1, 08 11 12 r y O O p 43x1 -i 434J-4 - TRACE 2016 -5 TRACT 2016-2 INDEX -2 BOOK 505 516 *ntm County Assasa's Mop. ' � �� Agrww� Bbci MrnMrt Slaiwl n EKipwa Auawr� ~ Mwwwv Slmn w Ciwa Arworti Yirrd NurMOrt Slbwl w Sauvvt • DRAWN peCKl0 ��•� REDRAWN B.W. IDATE 10-5-81 IiKED B.W EFFECTWIVE.ME__ROLL PREVIOUS SK. 517, POR. OF INDEX CanP'NA VanMo Cawty Awrwt 011ie "V N TM� z rIU4�4r%Q4 %oA�� VVAVATW*0�� 507 i0b C IT'r PAGE INDEX I BOOK 506 CITY OF MOORPARK °. sod often 2EiprEO PWORMN D.Y. DA _n "TO QV. FPEC7NE RO« PftVMS SI[.3I7 PM. PAW INDEX wnMo A...uen Wr or � N N `:y �11`� MOORPARK C • ��``�jvi� :� — ��`v'�.i`i�i1 • • .... Moorpark, inue California 0 d0a„t,Z d0a.96 Id ` --d38.Z l— MOS 10 0311NS 3d dOa. ,VZ 111 �nsy d0a.t+Z O�� eo �►� dDJZ d0 Z— d a.ss Z 0a.9* 1 _ d38.Z -V d0a.C£ ;u M31A 0 z d08.0 12 0 r rn d08.6� o 0 d38.19 '13 N�3d0 _.. _. 38 1S dNa.O I d0a.ssJ © d38.Z d0a.9£ PAUL W. LAWRASON JR. Mayor d'% Z .IS E. �� 10 'N hi NTER fiber d38.9 I. d0a.'rZ ✓ '10 -o om o� ,w ` S RCP -7 AM lia uo SPIPIR NIP 7Z Ar-, APPENDIX "F" Appendix "F ", the Assessment Roll, shows the assessment upon each lot or parcel (approximately 8577 parcels) within this District and is on file in the Office of the City Clerk and County Assessor. The Ventura County Assessor's office no longer lists public utility easements on the Assessor's Roll. 00U ?l " APPENDIX "G" RESOLUTIONS APPENDIX "H" REBATE PROCEDURE MOORPARK i i I r r i i i 1 i i i i ELOISE BROWN Mayor •' ;1 :STEVEN KUENY BERNAR0O M. PEREZ f � t . City Manager . Mayor Pro Tom , , , . CHERYL J. KANE . City City Atlomey CLINT HARPER, Ph. D. i o Councilmember RICHARDS, A.I.C.P. o PAUL UIWRASON ' , Director of " ' Community Development Councilmember R. DENNIS' DELZEIT SCOTT MONTGOMERY :, City Engineer Councilmember JOHN V. GILLESPIE RICHARD T. HARE �, , �, t. , :. ; • - Chief of Police City Treasurer .. ; 1. . . H E H O R A N D U H TO: The Honorable City Council FROM: Budget and Finance Committee DATE: November 1, 1989 SUBJECT: Procedures for Rebate of Assessments Pursuant to the Council's direction in July, 1989, the Budget'tand Finance Committee has developed proposed procedures to implement rebates for the annual assessments for AD 84 -2 and AD 85 -1. The proposed procedures are as follows: 1. Owner occupant with rebate only on property granted a* homeowner's exemption. i• 2. Demonsti:ate that there is no tax delinquincy on the property and the assessment(s) for which the rebate is requested have been paid. 3. Gross fetaily income may not exceed two - thirds of the then current County median income; the most recent state and federal tax return must be presented to verify family income and family size. Regardless of the above, persons who feel that special hardship circumstances exist and who meet other applicable criteria may apply for a rebate. The City Council's Budget and Finance Committee shall make a determination on all such requests with a confidential report to Council on all approved requests. 4. Persons granted property tax assistance under the Gonsalves - Deukmejian- Petris Property Tax Assistance Law upon presentation of proof of such assistance and meeting items 1 and 2, above, shall be eligible for rebate. 799 Mooraark Avenue EMME i i i 1 I 1 I I I I 1 The Honorable City Council November 1, 1989 Page 2 5. A rebate may be requested between January 1 and May 31 of any fiscal year for assessment due and payable during that samb fiscal year consistent with the above criteria. No rebate will be granted for delinquent assessments paid during any subsequent fiscal year. 6. Staff will issue press releases concerning the rebate process in January, April and July of each year. The rebate procedure will also be contained in the Engineer's Report for both Assessment Districts. 7. Rebates of City -wide assessments of both Assessment Districts will be funded by the City's General Fund. Rebates of special zone of benefit assessments will be funded by the respective zone,of benefit for that District. 8910319 MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA City Council Meeting of 198-L AC71ONI_ ;3�1% ,,, WI PUBLIC NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Moorpark, California on April 3, 1996, adopted Resolution No. 96 -1194 fixing the date and time of a public meeting to be held on the 20th day of Way 1996 at the hour of 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Moorpark City Hall, located at 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark. tfhe purpose of said public meeting is to allow the public an oppo mty to meet with City staff-to question and discuss the po annual assessments for the "MOORPARK LIGHTII�TCI AND LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTPRICI'sNO. AD- 84-2" for the heal year commencing on July 1, 1996 and ending on June 30, 1997, which would provide for the furnishing of power for and the usual maintenance and servicing of street lights and the landscape ,maintenance of public rig. f- -way within the said City, and to question and discuss the proposed increases in said assessments over those levied for sad District in FY 1995/96. PUBLIC NOTICE IS ALSO HEREBY GIVEN that said Resolution No 96 -1194 also fixed the date and time of a public hearing of the Moorpark City Council to be hold on the 5th day of June, 1996, at the hour of 7:00 p.m. in the Cgouncil Chambers of the Moorpark City Hall, located at 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark The purpose Hof i pulGHTING AND LANDS�E certain changes in, and to order the annual assessments for the ARK MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. AD -84 -2" for the fiscal year commencing on July 1, 1996, and ending on June 30, 1997, which would provide for the furnishing of power for and the usual maintenance and servicing of street lights and the landscape maintenance of public rights -of -way within the said City. A copy of Resolution No. 96 -1194 which is captioned as follows: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFbRNIA, APPROVING THE ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR, AND DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO MAKE CERTAIN CHANGES AND TO ORDER THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS FOR THE 'MOORPARK LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. AD -84 -2" FOR THE FISCAL YEAR COMMENCING JULY 1, 1996, AND ENDING JUNE 30, 1997 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972, AND FIXING THE TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC MEETING TO DISCUSS AND A PUBLIC HEARING TO RECEIVE OBJECTIONS THERETO," is on file with the City Clerk and open to inspection. A summary of said Resolution is summarized as follows: 1. That the Engineer's Report prepared for Assessment District No. AD84 -2 for FY 1996/97 is approved. 2. That said Engineer's Report may be further modified or changed, pursuant to applicable State law. 3. That the amount of the assessments for Assessment District No. AD84 -2 for FY 1995196 are proposed to increase from the amount of the assessments levied for said district in FY 1995/96. 4. That it is the intention of the City Council a) to make certain charges to Assessment District No. AD 842, b) to order the extension of the annual assessment for said district for FY 1996/97; and c) to levy and collect assessments for certain improvements described heroin. Said district consists of a single city -wi�e zone to provide electric currant or energy for public lighting within the City, to install, construct or maintain any authorized improvements under the Act including but not limited to one or more of street lights, public lighting facilities, landscaping, statuary, fountains, and oler ornamental structures and facilitieat and any facilities which are appurtenant to any of the aforementioned or which are necessary or convenient for the maintenance or servicing thereof, including irrigation, electric current and energy; and to provide incidental expenses in connection therewith. Said district also includes assessments for the improvement and maintenance of the above described landscaping and related improvements in a number of zones of benefit. 5. That said lighting and landscaping maintenance assessment district includes the lighting and landscaping sites with all improvements located therein, described by and included within Assessment District No. AD 84 -2. 6. That the foregoing described work is to be located within Assessment District No. AD 84 -2, the boundary of which is described on a map on file in the City Clerk's office. 7. That said proposed maintenance and improvement is of benefit to, and expense for which are chargeable upon, the district. S. That a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the W. assessments upon assessable parcels within said District, is set forth in a copy of the afore mentioned Engineer's Report on file with the City Clerk and open to inspection. 9. That the existing assessments, the proposed assessments and the proposed increases to the assessment amounts are set forth in Exhibit 'A' attached hereto and made a part hereof. 10. That a public meeting shall be convened on May 20, 1996, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at the Moorpark City Hall to allow the public anop rtum to meet with City staff to question and discuss the proposed annual assessments for Assessment District No. AD82 for Y 1996/97, and Ute proposed increases to said assessments over those levied in FY 1995/96. 11. That a public hearing of the Moorpark City Council shall be held on June 5, 1996, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at the Moorpark City Hall to consider making certain changes in, and to order the annual assessments for Assessment District No. AD84 -2 for FY 1996/97. 12. That this Joint Notice of Public Meeting and Public Hearing is given, in order that any persons having any objections to the work or extent of the assessment district may appear and show cause why said work should not be done or carried out or why said district should not be extended for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 1996, and ending June 30, 1997. Protests must be in writing and must be filed by the property owner with the City Clerk prior to the conclusion of the hearing. Protests may be mailed to the City Clerk, City of Moorpark 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark CA 93021. Protest shall state all grounds for the objection and shaIl contain a description sufficient to identify the property being assessed. A majority protest will cause the assessment increase to be abandoned. For additional information about these proceedings or assessments contact Ken Gilbert at (805) 529 -6864, Ext. 256. 13. That all the work proposed shall be done in accordance with the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. 14. That the City Clerk shall cause notice of said public meeting and public hearingg to be given by causing this summary of the Resolution of Intention to be published and mailed in the manner required by Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code and Section 54954.6 of the Government Code of the State of California. 15. That the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution. ATTEST: City Clerk Paul W. Lawrason r., ayor THIS NOTICE IS GIVEN pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Section �.tgac,ioe Streets and Highway Code of the State of California, and is dated this 3rd day of April, 1996. f..ea..f�4 City Clerk Exhibit 'A' AD 84-2 Summary of en A. City Wide Assessments u Use Exisitng P sad FY�96/97 Proposed Increase de Description Assmnt Assmnt (Decrease) 0 1 Residential Vacant Single Family - Level 1 4.94 27.69 5.37 32.62 0.43 2 Mobil Home 4.93 3 4 Condo Residential Income 2-4 units 0.00 25.71 0.00 29.84 0.00 4.13 5 Apartments (5 +)) 25.71 29.84 24.46 4.13 3.70 6 9 Single Family - Leve12 Mobil Home & Trailer Park -20.77 ,- 22.75 27.24 4.49 10 Commercial Vacant 20.77 4.94 24.46 5.37 3.70 0.43 11 12 Retail Store, single story Store & Office Combination 114.69 135.99 21.30 15 Shopping Centers a borhood 114.69 247.20 135.99 306.38 21.30 59.17 16 17 Shoopppping Centers egtonal) Oftiice Building (one 484.60 639.66 155.05 18 story) Office Building (multi -story) 94.92 150.30 114.49 185.98 19.57 35.66 19 21 Retail Stores (multi -story) Restaurants & cocktail lounges 150.30 185.98 35.66 24 Banks, Savings & Loans 134.46 94.92 157.48 114.49 23.02 19.57 25 26 Service Stations Auto sales, repair, storage & rental 114.69 90.95 135.99 102.66 21.30 11.71 30 31 Industrial Land Vacant Light Manufacturing Warehousing 4.94 241.29 5.37 307.64 0.43 66.17 32 33 Industrial Condos, Coops, PUD's 126.56 134.46 152.65 157.48 26.09 23.02 38 44 Mineral Processing Truck Crops 94.92 114.49 19.57 46 Pasture (permanent) 43.51 43.51 54.83 54.83 11.32 11.32 48 49 Poultry Flowers, seed production 43.51 43.51 54.83 54.83 11.32 51 53 Orchards Field crops, dry 43.51 54.83 11.32 11.32 54 Pastures of graze, dry 43.51 43.51 54.83 54.83 11.32 11.32 55 57 Feed lots Tree farms 43.51 54.83 11.32 61 70 Theater Institutional vacant land 43.51 122.59 54.83 140.82 11.32 18.23 71 78 Churches, convent & rectory Public Bldgs. Fire Houses, Museums, 4.94 4.94 5.37 5.37 0.43 0.43 80 etc, Misc, Vacant land 0.00 4.94 0.00 5.37 0.00 0.43 81 83 Utility Water Company Petroleum & 0.00 0.00 0.00 91 gas Utility Edison 51.41 0.00 59.66 0.00 8.25 0.00 92 93 Telephone SPRR 0.00 0.00 0.00 94 Undedicated Community Condo Development 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 99 Exempt 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 B. Zone of Benejlt: In addition to the Citywide Assessments listed above by land use categories, the properties within each of the Zones listed below will be assessed a per lot Zone assessment for the improvement and maintenance of certain improvements determined to be of benefit to the properties within those Zones, Proposed Zone �- D do pact • P ar ays C Bambi; FY 1995/96 stunt FY 996/97 Assmnt Increase (Decrease) Benwood, Pecan and VCFCD Channel 2 Tract 2865: Parkways East side 96.64 * 52.00 * (44.64) Peach Hill, N. Side Tierra Rejada; South slopes & Christian Barrett and Spring 3 Tract 3032: Buttercreek Entry and 11.54 * 7.56 * (3.98) Peppermill parkway 4 Tract 3274: Parkways, north and 0.00 70.65 * 70.65 south side of Williams Ranch Rd. 5 Tracts 3019 & 3525: Parkways: north 82.67 * 121.32 * 38.65 side of Tierra Rejada Road, west side of Peach Hill Rd; south side parkway & slope 6 Tract 3306 (Glenhaven): Parkway ® 34.05 * 45.86 * 11.81 west end of glewood Ave. 7 Industrial Park Northeast of Gabbert 57.10 ** 130,88 *+ 73.78 & L.A. Ave.: Parkway North side of L.A. Ave east of Gabbert 8 West Village Buffer: • City area • Home Acres 25.57 * 51.11 * 6.58 * 16.35 * (18.99) r (34.76) 9 Condor Drive 13.21 ** 0.00 ** (13.21) 10 Mountain Meadows Planned Community Residential Commercial 0.00 * 71.51 * 71.51 0.00 * 6,460.50 * 6,460.00 Note: * Per parcel Assessment ** Per Acre Assessment AGENDA RE PORT C = TY OF MOORPARK TO: The Honorable City Council FROM: Ken Gilbert, Director of Public Works DATE: June 19, 1996 SUBJECT: Supplemental Report RE: Consider Making Certain Changes to AD84 -2 and Confirming the Assessments for Fiscal Year 1996/97 The following are revised staff recommendations for the subject Item. 1) make a determination regarding the scope of improvements to be accepted by the City and maintained by the Zone 10 assessment and determine the amount of the Zone 10 assessment for FY 1996/97 (see page 9 for options); 2) if MMCA properties are to maintained by the City, direct staff to undertake and /or determine the following: a) whether or not the ownership of said properties is to be transferred to the City [Note: In the event the ownership of the Tierra Rejada Road parkways are not transferred to the City it will be necessary for CCB to undertake and complete additional modifications to the median irrigation systems]; b) confirm that all necessary irrigation system modifications are undertaken and completed within thirty ( 30 ) days [Note: All street excavations in Tierra Rejada Road must completed as soon as possible to avoid delaying the City's Asphalt Overlay Project]; c) review grant deeds (City ownership) or maintenance easements (MMCA ownership) and, when in order, present same to the City Council for approval of Certificates of Acceptance; and, d) secure from MMCA a Temporary Maintenance Easement for said properties applicable to the period the City would maintain said properties prior to the recordation of the aforesaid documents. 3) if MMCA properties are to maintained by the City, accept said properties for maintenance effective July 1, 1996, subject to MMCA completion of all of the prerequisites previously approved by the City Council; 4) approve the funding of costs related to the locking and unlocking of gates at the Home Acres Buffer from the Zone 8 maintenance assessment and direct staff to carry over any year end deficit to the FY 1997/98 Zone 8 maintenance assessment (see page 5 for discussion of this issue); ad86_97.apr AD84 -2 Supplemental Report June 19, 1996 Page 2 5) Confirm the proposed FY 1996/97 assessment for Citywide lighting and landscaping maintenance to be $32.62 per Single family residence [ see page 4 for discussion] ; Note 1: In order to maintain the citywide assessment at last year's level it will be necessary to provide additional maintenance funds in the amount of $43,000. If the City Council wishes to fund all or any part of this maintenance cost increase from sources other than the FY 1996/97 Citywide maintenance assessment, it is recommended that the approved amount come from the amount recommended for future parkway landscape improvement projects. Note 2: The City Council is advised that if total FY1996/97 revenues and expenditures for this activity equal the figures set forth in the budget, the year end fund balance will be a negative $11,500 ±. This is due to the fact that the final proposed expenditure budget for Dept. 143 is higher than the preliminary amount used to determine the maximum assessments set forth in the public hearing notices. As mentioned in Recommendation #6 below, it is the intent of staff to determine the total amount of funds available prior to proceeding with any capital improvement projects. 6) Defer all proposed capital improvement projects until after the completion of the year end audit of Fund 23; 7) direct the Assessment Engineer to revise the Engineer's Report as necessary to reflect these actions; and, 8) adopt the attached Resolution No. 96- (Exhibit "I ") making certain changes to AD84 -2 and confirming the assessments for Fiscal Year 1996/97. ad84_97.spr