The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAGENDA REPORT 1996 0619 CC REG ITEM 08B9 11 2e-,e C/ AGENDA C= T Y O F • � n t � �E OPRT O OP RARK TO: The Honorable City Council (� FROM: Ken Gilbert, Director of Public Works DATE: May 21, 1996 (Council Meeting 6 -5 -96) SUBJECT: Consider Making Certain Changes to AD85 -1 and Confirming the Assessments for Fiscal Year 1996/97 �iZ ' / _� ' This presents for approval a Resolution making certain changes to Assessment District AD85 -1 and confirming the assessments for Fiscal Year 1996/97. Certain information in support of said proposed changes and proposed assessments is attached hereto and identified as follows: List of Exhibits Exhibit "A": Exhibit "B": Exhibit "C": Exhibit "D": Exhibit "E": Exhibit "F": Exhibit "G": Assessment Summary Fund Activity Summary Preliminary Budget for FY 1996/97 Service Level Comparison Engineer's Report Public Hearing Notice Resolution Assessment District 85 -1 was formed in 1985 pursuant to the provisions of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972." This assessment district was established to allow for the funding of parks maintenance expenses through the levying of assessments as provided for in the act. As set forth in the Engineer's Report (Exhibit "E"), costs are spread to all of the lots in the City by means of a formula designed to spread said costs on the basis of benefit. The formula uses land use as a measure of "people use" in determining the relative amount of benefit received. ed85_97.epr OQCD Assessment District 85 -1 June 5, 1996 Page 2 The City must annually act to levy the parks maintenance assessments. Said assessments have been levied each year since the formation of the district, except for FY 1987/88 and FY 1988/89. In accordance with the requirements of the above mentioned act, the City Council has taken a number of actions in recent months in preparation for considering the levy of assessments for Parks Maintenance for FY 1995/96. Those actions are summarized as follows: 1. On January 17, 1996, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 96- 1175 stating its intent to take the subject actions. 2. Also on that date, the City Council selected the firm of Dwight French and Associates to prepare the Engineer's Reports for AD85 -1. 3. On April 3, 1996, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 96- 1195 making certain findings and taking certain actions including the following: • approving, subject to change, the Engineers' Report for AD85 -1 for FY 1996/97; • stating intent to make certain changes to AD85 -1: • setting 7:00 p.m. on May 20, 1996, as the time and date of a Public Meeting for the purpose of allowing the public an opportunity to meet with City staff to question and discuss the proposed assessments; • setting 7:00 p.m. on June 5, 1996, as the time and date of a Public Hearing to consider the subject actions; and • directing that Notice of said meetings be sent to the owners of all affected properties, stating the amount of the assessment levied for FY 1995/96, the amount of the proposed increase in the assessment amount and the total amount of the assessments proposed for FY 1996/97. 0- '- A. FY 1996/97 Budget Attached as Exhibit 'C' is a copy of the proposed budget for the Parks Department for FY 1996/97. The budget figures set forth in this exhibit have been revised from those shown in the staff report present to the City Council last April. ed85_97.apr 0001%10Z7 Assessment District 85 -1 June 5, 1996 Page 3 B. Service Level Increase Attached as Exhibit 'D' is a chart showing the increase in the service level provided to the City's thirteen (13) parks in recent years. This chart shows that the amount of parks maintenance required will increase from an average of 9.23 months per year (total months of maintenance provided to all parks, divided by thirteen) in FY 1994/95 to an estimated average of 10.77 months of maintenance in FY 1996/97. This increase in service level is one of the reasons for the anticipated increase in expenditures funded by this District. C. Staffing Level The Engineer's Report and accompanying staff report presented to the City Council last April, showed anticipated expenditures for FY 1996/97 for parks maintenance (personnel and O &M) totaling $617,863. This amount included personnel costs at a level sufficient to fund the addition of a new Maintenance Worker position. This added position has been deleted from the final draft budget to be recommended to the City Council by the City Manager. Accordingly, the final draft budget attached as Exhibit 'C' shows a revised total expenditures for parks maintenance (personnel and O &M) of only $586,841. The assessment amounts set forth in the Public Hearing Notices were based on total anticipated expenditures of $617,963. The revised and reduced budget would require a lower assessment. A summary comparison of these changes is as follows: April Revised Element Report (S) Budget ($) Total Cost 617,863 586,841 Total Assessments 617,863 586,841 S F Res. Assessment 56.19 $53.36 D. Fund Activity Attached for your information as Exhibit 'B', is a summary of Fund Activity for AD 85 -1 for the period from FY 1992/93 through the proposed budget for FY 1996/97. ed95_97.spr 000P. C Assessment District 85 -1 June 5, 1996 Page 4 E. Assessment Summary Attached as Exhibit 'A' is a summary of the proposed revised assessments for FY 1996/97, based on the changes discussed above. At the bottom of that Exhibit is a comparative list of estimated assessment amounts for a single family residential property, given a number of alternative fund transfers to supplement assessment revenues. F. Fund Transfer 1. Zero Transfer -- The assessment amounts set forth in the Public Hearing Notices will generate sufficient assessment revenues to fully fund the parks maintenance function for FY 1996/97. Should the City Council approve those assessment amounts, there would be no need for a fund transfer from other sources. 2. Transfers in Prior Years -- As shown on Exhibit ' B' , in recent years AD85 -1 assessment revenues have been augmented by transfers from the General Fund to fund the parks maintenance effort. A summary of those fund transfers is as follows: Fiscal Year Total ($) 1992/93 38,591 1993/94 142,769 1994/95 144,722 1995/96 Budget 175,000 Est. Actual 158,039 3. FY 1996/97 -- As shown on Exhibit 'A', it will again be necessary to augment assessment revenues to Fund 25 with funds from other sources if the assessment amount for a single - family residential property is to remain at prior year levels ( ±33.20). The amount of funds required in FY 1996/97 to maintain this assessment is approximately $225,700. ed85_97.epr 0 0(?2 7 Assessment District 85 -1 June 5, 1996 Page 5 G. Engineer's Report As stated above, the cost and assessment figures presented to the City Council last April were the figures used to develop the Engineer's Report. A copy of that report is attached as Exhibit "E." As required by the law, this report was approved by the City Council last April, via the adoption of Resolution No. 96 -1195. Included in the Engineer's Report are the approved boundary maps for this Assessment District. In light of the revised cost and assessment figures discussed above, it will be necessary to amend the Engineer's Report. Such action would be consistent with provisions of Resolution No. 96 -1195. H. Public Meeting Resolution No. 96 -1195 and the Public Hearing Notices stated that a Public Meeting would be held at 7:00 p.m. on May 20, 1996, in the City Council Chambers, for the purpose of allowing the public an opportunity to meet with City staff to question and discuss the proposed assessments. The meeting was held. No one from the public attended. I. Public Hearing 1. The "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" (Streets and Highways Code) requires a public hearing to be held prior to the annual levy of assessments for the purpose of receiving input and to hear any protests to the proposed assessments. 2. If the amount of the assessments are to remain the same, the law does not require a Notice of the public hearing to be mailed to each property being assessed. However, consistent with past practice, a notice of the public hearing was mailed to the owners of all of the affected properties. 3. Notwithstanding the above mentioned policy, State law requires that prior to considering any new or increased assessment, a public hearing notice must be mailed to the owners of the properties to be assessed. Said notice shall state the amount of the existing assessment, the amount of ad85_97.apr 000228 Assessment District 85 -1 June 5, 1996 Page 6 the proposed assessment and the amount of the proposed increase in the assessment. The amounts of the approved assessments MAY NOT EXCEED the amounts stated in the notice. Said notice must be mailed at least forty -five (45) days prior to the date of the hearing. In order to meet this deadline, said Notices were postmarked and mailed prior to April 19, 1996. 4. Attached as Exhibit 'F' is a copy of the Public Hearing Notice mailed for AD85 -1. Attached to the public hearing notice is a chart showing the maximum amount of the assessments which could be levied. J. Deferred Action The attached resolution (Exhibit "G") making certain changes to Assessment District AD85 -1 and confirming the assessments for Fiscal Year 1996/97, must be adopted no later than June 30, 1996, in order for the assessments to be levied. In prior years the City Council has deferred action and has adopted such resolutions concurrently with the adoption of the annual budget. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council open the public hearing, receive testimony and continue these matters to the date of the Budget Workshops. Subsequent to the budget workshop meetings, but no later than June 30, 1996, staff recommends that the City Council take the following actions: a) determine the source and amount, if any, of a budget transfer to reduce the total amount of the assessments; b) in the event of such budget transfer, reduce the amount of the total assessment for FY 1996/97, as required; and, c) adopt the attached Resolution No. 96- (Exhibit "G") making certain changes to AD85 -1 and confirming the assessments for Fiscal Year 1996/97. ad85_97.apr 0W221,4 EXHIBIT "A" fiscal Year 1996/97 AD 85 -1 ASSESSMENT SUMMARY ------------------------------ ------------------------------ FY 1996/97 Description Proposed Remarks TOTAL ANNUAL EXPENSES 586,841 See Exhibit 'C' for Total FY1995/96 Cost Projection LESS CARRY OVERS 0 See Exhibit 'B' LESS TRANSFERS IN 0 LESS OTHER (Interest, Etc.) 0 NET TOTAL ASSESSMENTS 586,841 21- May -96 ------------------------------------------------------ - - ---- Total Assessment Detail 0 00 ?: C, Assessment ------------------ - - - - -- Plus Total SF Res Trans -In Plus Funds Less Total Remaining Fiscal Year Amount ($) Total ($) & Other Carryover Available Expenditures Carryover 1992/93 Actual 33.20 354,475 38,591 0 393,066 393,066 0 1993/94 Actual 33.20 355,247 146,866 0 502,113 502,113 0 1994/95 Actual 33.20 365,855 175,757 0 541,612 541,612 0 1995/96 Budget 33.20 371,780 179,198 0 550,978 550,978 0 Est. Actual 33.20 361,118 159,239 0 520,357 520,357 0 1996 /97 Budget Options 53.36 586,841 0 0 586,841 586,841 0 49.36 536,841 50,000 0 586,841 586,841 0 44.76 486,841 100,000 0 586,841 586,84f--- 0 40.16 436,841 150,000 0 586,841 586,841 0 35.56 386,841 200,000 0 586,841 586,841 0 Prior Years' Assessment >>>> 33.20 361,141 225,700 0 586,841 586,841 0 30.97 336,841 250,000 0 586,841 586,841 0 28.67 311,841 275,000 0 586,841 586,841 0 0 00 ?: C, EXHIBIT "B" Fiscal Year 1996/97 Assessment District 85 -1 Fund Activity (025) ---------------------- ---------------------- Description --------------- - - - -- BEGINNING BALANCE REVENUE ASSESSMENTS INTEREST MISCELLANEOUS TRANSFER IN GENERAL fUND AVAILABLE FUNDS EXPENSES Personnel 0 &N Capital Outlay Capital Improvements Adjustment Less TOTAL EXPENSES YEAR END BALANCE 21 -MF * Formula (Imported number) 00 ();> FY 1995/96 FY 1996/97 FY FY FY -- ------------ - - - - -- Proposed 1992/93 1993/94 1994/95 Budget Proj Actual Budget Notes: 0 0 0 0 0 0 354,475 355,247 365,855 371,780 361,118 586,841 1,204 632 1,198 1,200 2,893 30,403 3,000 0 38,591 142,769 144,722 175,000 158,039 0 393,066 502,113 541,612 550,978 520,357 586,841 118,043 127,388 136,132 153,479 149,000 160,048 275,023 374,725 399,062 397,499 371,357 426,793 0 0 6,418 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ----- - - - - -- 393,066 --- - - - - -- 502,113 --- - - - - -- 541,612 --- - - - - -- 550,978 --- - - - - -- 520,357 ------ - - - - -- 586,841 0 0 0 0 0 .0 * Formula (Imported number) 00 ();> PRELIMINARY ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF MOORPARK PARKS MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. AD -85 -1 LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 Prepared By: DWIGHT FRENCH & ASSOCIATES, INC. 1470 S. Valley Vista Drive Suite 140 Diamond Bar, CA 91765 March 1996 000 ?.34 TABLE OF CONTENTS Pare Section 1 Authority for Report 1 Section 2 Description of Improvements to be Maintained 1 Section 3 Assessment Roll 2 Section 4 Estimate of Cost 2 Section 5 Method of Assessment 3 Appendix "A" Parks Maintenance Formula Appendix "B" Budget Estimate Appendix "C" Boundary Map Appendix "D" Assessment Roll Appendix "E" Resolutions Appendix "F" Rebate Procedure OW02 ?C CITY OF MOORPARK Engineer's Report Parks Maintenance Assessment District No. AD -85 -1 Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 For Fiscal Year 1996 -97 SECTION 1 AUTHORITY FOR REPORT This report is prepared pursuant to City Council action taken at their regular meeting of January 17, 1996 to extend this District for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 1996 and ending June 30, 1997 in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, "Landscaping Act of 197211, being Part 2 of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code. This report is an update of an existing City -wide Assessment District. The purpose for the district is to provide operating funds for the continued maintenance and improvements of existing and planned City operated public parks. SECT — ION _� DESCRIPTION OF TH3 IMPROVEMENTS TO BE MAINTAINED The following City Parks are to be maintained under this District effective July 1, 1996: 1. Country Trail Park 8. Campus Canyon Park 2. Glenwood Park 9. Griffin Park 3. Tierra Rejada Park 10. Virginia Colony Park 4. Mountain Meadows Park 11. Campesina Park 5. 6. Peach Hill Park Monte Vista Park 12. Arroyo Vista Community Park 7. Campus Park 13' Poindexter Park The maintenance and improvement of all above mentioned parks shall include but not be limited to the following: 1. Mowing and edging of all turf areas. 2. Removing litter. 1 ��0) k� 3. Weeding as required. 4. Irrigating as required. 5. Fertilizing of all vegetation as each species requires. 6. Pruning so as to not inhibit the natural growth characteristics of the plant. 7. Cleaning existing facilities to be clear and free of all debris. Minor repairs as needed. 8. Eradicating- vector at the first indication of existence. 9. Maintaining lights, playground equipment, playcourts and public restrooms. 10. Installing park or recreational improvements, including but not limited to drains and sidewalks. Maintaining and servicing said improvements. Plans and specifications for the irrigation, landscaping, and other authorized improvements within the City.are on file in the Department of Public Works. Reference is hereby made to said plans and specifications for the exact location and nature of the landscape improvements. Said plans and specifications by reference are hereby made a part of this report. SECTION _1 ASSESSMENT ROLL All parcels of real property affected are listed on the "Assessment Roll ", Exhibit "A ", which will be on file in City Hall with the City Clerk, and is made a part hereof by reference. These parcels are more particularly described in maps prepared in accordance wi -th Section 327 of the Revenue and Taxation Code which are on file in the office of the Ventura County Assessor in the County Government Center Administration Building, 800 South Victoria Avenue, Ventura, California and which are also made a part hereof by reference. The City staff recommendation for the District budget is shown in Appendix "B" of this report. 3 ®02v f SECT�_2 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT The Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, in Section 22573, states that "The net amount to be assessed upon the lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the new amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." - The method and formula of benefit spread recognizes that every property within the City of Moorpark benefits from public parks and recreation facilities. The method of spreading maintenance costs is based upon the "people use" attributed to each land use within the City. This method was chosen because the benefit received by having park facilities is directly proportionate to the number of people generated by each land use. Recognizing that residential land uses within the City derive a higher degree of benefit than non - residential land uses, the formula was subdivided into two main groups, with residential land uses contributing in 75% of the assessment and non - residential uses being assessed for the remaining 25W of the maintenance costs. The benefits to residential land uses are clear. The residents of the City utilize the parks during their leisure hours. Benefits to non- residential property include such items as offering employees the opportunity to utilize the parks during lunch time and after hours, as well as providing an aesthetic environment which attracts potential employees into the area. The "people use" factors utilized in the assessment district spread formula are shown in Appendix "A ". The City Council approved a rebate procedure for disadvantaged citizens on November 1989. The procedure shall be followed as described in Appendix "F." In conclusion, it is our opinion that the assessments within Parks Maintenance Assessment District No. AD -85 -1 are apportioned by a formula that fairly distributes the net cost to each lot or parcel in accordance with the benefits that are received. \rpt \050ad851.945 4 APPENDICES () 0. �.k�4 Annual Assessment $ 0.00 $ 56.19 $ 0.00 $ 42.15 $ 42.15 $ 42.15 $ 56.19 $ 42.15 $ 0 --00 $ 252.67 $ 252.67 $ 842.23 $2,526.70 A -1 000 ?4th APPENDIX "A" CITY OF MOORPARK Parks Maintenance Assessment District NC AD -85 -1 Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 Table 1 Parks Maintenance Formula Use People Code Description Use 0 Residential Vacant 0 1 Single Family - 4.00 Level 1 2 Mobile Home 0 3 Condo 3.00 4 Residential Income 3.00 (2 -4 Units) 5 Apartments (5 +) 3.00 6 Single Family - 4.00 Level 2 9 Mobile Home and 3.00 Trailer Parks 10 Commercial Vacant 0 11 Retail Stores, 3.00 Single Story 12 Store & Office 3.00 (Combination) 15 Shopping Centers 10.00 (Neighborhood) 16 Shopping Centers 30.00 (Regional) Annual Assessment $ 0.00 $ 56.19 $ 0.00 $ 42.15 $ 42.15 $ 42.15 $ 56.19 $ 42.15 $ 0 --00 $ 252.67 $ 252.67 $ 842.23 $2,526.70 A -1 000 ?4th 17 18 19 21 24 25 26 30 31 32 33 38 44 46 48 49 51 Describ on People -� Annual Office Building Asse sment (1 Story) 3.00 $ 252.67 Office Stores (Multi- Story) 6.00 $ 505.34 Retail Stores (Multi - Story) 6.00 $ 505,34 Restaurants & Cocktail Lounge 3'00 $ 252.67 Banks, Savings & Loans 3.00 $ 252.67 Service Stations 3.00 Auto Sales Re Repair $ 252.67 1.00 Industrial Vacant $ 84.-22 Land 0 $ 0.00 Light Manufacturing 12.00 Warehousing $1,010.68 4.00 Industrial Condos, $ 336.89 s CO-OPS, , PUD s 3.00 $ 252.67 Mineral Processing 3.00 Truck Crops $ 252.67 2.00 Pasture (Permanent) $ 168.45 2.00 Poultry $ 168.45 2.00 Flowers, Seed $ 168.45 Production 2.00 $ 168.45 Orchards 2.00 $ 168.45 A -2 Use cad= Description r�tion ople Annual Use Asses_ sment 53 Field Crops, Dry 2.00 $ 168.45 54 Pasture of Graze, 2.00 Dry $ 168.45 55 Feed Lots 2.00 $ 168.45 S7 Tree Farms 2.00 $ 168.45 61 Theater 2.00 $ 168.45 69 Parks 0 $ 0.00 70 Institutional 0 Vacant Land $ 0.00 71 Churches, Convent, Rectory 0 $ 0.00 72 Schools 0 $ 0.00 73 Colleges 0 $ 0.00 78 Public Bldgs., 0 Firehouses, Museums, $ 0.00 etc. 79 Flood Control 0 $ 0.00 80 Misc. Vacant Land 0 $ 0_.00 81 Utility Water 0 Company $ 0.00 83 Petroleum & Gas 1.00 $ 84.22 86 Water Rights, Pumps 0 $ 0.00 88 Highways & Streets p $ 0.00 91 Utility Edison 0 $ 0.00 A -3 000;!4;� Use People Annual Code Description use Assessment 92 Telephone 0 $ 0.00 93 S.P.R.R. 0 $ 0.00 94 Undedicated 0 $ 0.00 Community Condo Development 95 State Property 0 $ 0.00 96 County Property 0 $ 0.00 97 City Property p $ 0.00 Actual Assessment amount may vary due to discrepancies between use codes and actual property uses. A -4 O(A)Z a APPENDIX "B" CITY OF MOORPARK Parks Maintenance Assessment District No. AD -85 -1 Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 BUDGET ESTIMATE FY 1996 -97 Park Sites Maintenance and Operations $ 419,713.00 Maintenance and Operation Personnel Costs 198.150 00 Total Annual Expenses 617,863.00 general Fund Contribution 0 00 Total Amount to be Funded by District (FY 1996 -97) $ 617,863.00 B -1 APPENDIX "C" BOUNDARY MAP 000?a _- a iii 1 a 1 r , I ` 1 • � ri.lrr. . .. p. .. - ... _ _ .- - - r - - - - - - - - - - - ° I i i ..i 1 ►rat ±._.... " I- A -------- I-- -- - - -- -�, List Of City Perks - - -- '` r l• `i;``\ , 2. Cory Trail Park Glenwood ood Park I ft ' � }' - - - - - + - I 3• Tierra Asjada Park 4• Mountain Meadows Park 1 r� r , t I 6, Peach Hill Park Monte Visa park 1 t 1 1n,, f7 • campus Park 1 /1, � a go • Campus Canyon Park - -- 1 9. Gri!!in Park - - + - -- -- - - - - -i•. !!' lo. Virginia Colony Park ' .�, i � t •r I - - - -- I - -- - - -- s�fK•:, Po 1 1 MO 11• Campesina Park 3 - ? -•== - _ n 12. Arroyo Vista Communit 13. Downtown Park Y Perk SII� VALLL� �' -- . •sin '�. !� ,. ��RW �.•f>_ — •I � %ANGELES Ali , :��;•.�' , ELF- SOS 1 A$ ,,� In ' ►' I - ---- T+' -------- i--� 1 1 ' 0 3 b ice' ` TIERRA pE, DA O b R PA R K A i - - - - - - - - - - - , hr Lghtln 1►�ap,[Clty of Moorpark i - - - - g and Mulntentinco Assessmrnt _ I ► P= ( Dlsertld No.'AD 842 - - a� ACRES 1 1 APPENDIX "D" Appendix "D ", the Assessment Roll, shows the assessment upon each lot or parcel (approximately 8119 parcels) within this District and is on file in the Office of the City Clerk and County Assessor. The Ventura County Assessor's office no longer lists public utility easements on the Assessor's Roll. 000247 APPENDIX "E" RESOLUTIONS 000248 APPENDIX "F" REBATE PROCEDURE 000A,11 4' IF IOLNT NrrrrCE OF A P[ i(' Mt7F••r•rw... u w a't��LIC HEA_RiN► PUBLIC NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the Ci Resolution No. 9 1195 fixing the date and time of a ublic meet(n ty of Moorpark, California, oa April 3, 1996, 7:00 p.m in the Council Chamtxrs of the Moo p 8 to be held on the 20th day of MaY. 1996, at the hourtr said prrblte meaing is to allow the public an orpark City Hall, located at 799 Moorpui; Avenue, Moorpuic. The asarsameats for the' 'MAGARK PARK t�I tO meet s City staff to question and discuss the ptoposedP emu` commencing on July 1 f 1996 sad eadin oa Jun 997' which would EIVT DISTRICT NO. AD -85-1' for the fiscal year and rocrewoaal facalinea wit�ia the aaidgCity, sad to quesnon and discuaaPtiOhe de forthe maintenance and improvetneat of parks levied for said District in PY 1995 /96. Proposed increases is said assessments over those PUBLIC NOTICE IS ALSO HEREBY GIVEN that said Resolution No % -1195 also M the Mao arft City Council to be held am the 5th day of June, 19% at the wed the data and time of a lio hprin Moor 96 yty Ha , located at 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpa& at �thuer �hoouosuer of 7:00 p.m. in the Council of the DISTRICT NO. A and to order fi hell annual i i for the Mt70RPARKf said public heart■ is to consider melon CE for the main Y commencing on July It 19% and endu �M 3AIOIVTIEA>� maintenance and improvement of parks and recreational facilities within the would provide Wf A�copy of Resolution No. 96 -1195, which is �'YCity. CITY OF MOORPARK CALIFORNIA, tinned as follows: 'A RBSOLUTTON OF INTENTION TO MAKE CERTAIN CHANGEROVING AND O THE ORDERG HEER'S REPORT FOR AND DELL ARINQ THE MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. AD -85 -1' FOR THE FISCAL YEAR COMMENCING JUI,y 1 19% AND ENDING TUNE S 1EN PURSUANT TO ANNUL' ASSESSMENTS FOR THE -PARKS THE TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC MEET Ili O D'SCUS A AND LIGHTING ACT OF COMMENCING AND 19% OBJECTIONS THERETO,' is on file with the City Clerk and A PUBLIC HEARING TO RECEIVE 1 .� open to inspection. A summary of said Resolution is as follows: Engraoer's Report Prepared for Asseaameat District No- AD85 -1 for FY 1996/97 is approved. 2. That said Engineer's Report may be further modified or changed, pursuant to applicable State law. 3. That the amount of the assessments for Assessment District No. AD85 -1 for FY 19%/97 are proposed to increase from the amount of the assessments levied for said district it FY 1995/ %. 4. That it is the intention st the City Council a�e dung" to t District No. AD 85 -1, which oona>ab of a single city -wide district for the main paw to order the extension of the annual assaameae for and district for FY and recreational facilities within the City, b) for such parks maintenance and improvement. 1996/97; and, c) to levy and collect aaseastnent, 5. That aid maintenance asseeameat district include the Park and included vtzthin Assessment District No. AD 85 -1. sites with all improvements located therein, described by 6. d0°crib,d foainaP 1°�t�IC ti Qerk a office. f located within Assessment District No. AD 85 -1, the of boundary which is 7. That said proposed maintenance and improvement is of benefit to, and B. That a frill and detailed descri expense for which are chargeable upon, the district. ption of the inuprw the boundaries of t District and any zones therein, and tl Report ono � C assessable ParrtIs within said istrict, is set forth in a copy of t aforementioned EngiaeK', open to inspection. 9. That t existing assessments, t assessments and the is Exhibit A attached hereto and made a put hereof. Proposed increase in the assessment amounts are set forth 10 That a public meer(n shallobpepoconvened on May 20, 19996, at 7 :00 Hall Assessment District No AD85- fturrt FY 1996/9 anCdt the4ff to question and the Council proposed annual Mssseasm�ente�foty r 1995/ %. Proposed increases to said assessments over those levied in FY 11 That a ppuud�ic rk City H the o consider maaouncil shall be held on June 5, 19%, at 7:00 p.m. is t Council Chambers at the Ivlaorpark City Hal! to District No. AD85 -1 for FY 1996/97. g Certain changes in, and to order the annual assessments for Assessment 12 That this Joint Notice of Public Meeting and public H is given, is order that an the work or extant of the assessment district maY appear g, Y persons havinY say objections to why acid district should not be extended for the fiasfl �0 why �d `u'' J d not be done a � out Protaats twat be is writing and mist be filed �byy the p Year July 1, 1996, and ending Jame 30, 1997. owner haring. Pr state may be mailed to the Cite Cerk. Cxtlr nth City Clerk prior to the conclusion of the Proust shall state an grotmds forto� ecyaa and ahaII ooh' 799 M Axeltta, Ma ly CA 93021: assessed- A majority Protest will cause +�es<mmt incrra to be eat to identiffyy the proper b i I Proceedings or assessments contact Ken Gil bert at (805) 529M6864, Ext. t For additional infirmation about these 13 That all the work §=.d shall be done in Division 15 of the Streets and Hi aof the ce with the Landscaping sad L'ghting Act of 1972, being Part 2 of Highways Code of t State of California 14 That the City C1eck shall causepnotice of said public nreuing and public hu& to be gtvea by a»sin this Mary RCade �Ca�b°54954.6s of t and Government in the mdrtner required 6Y Part 2 of IivisionS of i ofd ernment Code of the State of California. 15 That the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution. ATTEST: CLEF e ; a . wrasoa it., Mayor THIS NOTICE IS GIVEN pursuant the Streets and Highway Code of the State to of Cali provisions of the Landscaping and Li Ming Act of 1972, Section 22500 et. sec. -of the fornia, and is dated this 3rd day of April, 1996. sty er 0 O0a '. C� r') )�bit'A Use =d4 Description 0 Residential Vacant 1 Single Family - Level 1 2 Mobil ffome 3 Condo 4 Residential Income 2-4 units 5 Apartments (5 +) 6 Single Family - Level 2 9 Mobil Home & Trailer Parfr 10 Commercial Vacant 11 Retail Store, single story 12 Store & Office Combination 15 Shopping Centers (Neighborhood) 16 Shopping Centers (Regional) 17 Office Building (one Story) 18 Office Building (multi-anry) 19 Retail Stores (multiitwy) 21 Restaurants & cocktail lounges 24 Banks, Savings & Loans 25 Service Stations 26 Auto sales, repair, storage & rental 30 Industrial Land Vacant 31 Light Manufacturing 32 Warehousing 33 Industrial Condos, Coops, PUD'a 38 Mineral Processing 44 Truck Crops 46 pasture (permanent) 48 Poultry 49 Flowers, seed production 51 Orchards 53 Field crops, dry 54 Pastures of graze, dry 55 Feed lob 57 Tree farms 61 'Theater 70 Insdbitional vacant land 71 Churches, convent & rectory 78 Public Bldg. Fire Houses, Museums, etc. 80 Misc, Vacant land 81 Utility Water Company 83 Petroleum & gas 91 Utility Edison 92 Telephone 93 SPRR 94 Undedicated Community Condo Development 99 Exempt wArpt\adss- 96.not Ezit851 FY 1f96/97 A&MMLw ProPosr+ �c 0.00 0.00 0'w 33.20 56.19 22.99 0.00.- 0.00 0.00 24.90 42.15• 17.25 24.90 42.15 17.25 24.90 42.15 33.20 56.19 17.25 24.90 42.15 22.99 0 17.25 .00 149.28 0.00 252.67 103.39 149.28 252.67 103.39 497.60 842.23 344.63 1,492.80 2,526.70 1,033.90 149.28 252.67 103.39 298.56 505.34 206.78 298.56 505.34 206_78 149.28 252.67 103.39 149.28 252.67 103.39 149.28 252.67 103.39 49.76 84.22 34.46 0.00 0.00 0.00 597.12 1,010.68 413.56 199.04 336.89 137.85 149.28 252.67 103.39 149.28 252.67 103.39 99.52 168.45 68.93 99.52 168.45 68.93 99.52 168.45 68.9? 99.52 168.45 68.9. 99.52 168.45 68.93 99.52 168.45 68.93 99.52 168.45 68.93 99.52 168.45 68.93 99.52 168.45 68.93 99.52 168.45 68.93 0 � 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 49.76 84.22 34.46 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - --0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 000 r1