HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 1996 0821 CC REG ITEM 08BIT 'vi-
AGENDA REPORT 2--
CITY OF MOORPARK
TO: Honorable City Council
FROM: Nelson Miller, Director of Community Developm
Deborah S. Traffenstedt, Senior Planner
DATE: August 15, 1996 (CC Meeting of 8- 21 -96)
SUBJECT: CONSIDER PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF
MOORPARK AND SPECIAL DEVICES, INC. (DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
NO. 96 -1), AND A DRAFT ORDINANCE APPROVING THE
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
BACKGROUND
Ordinance No. 59 sets forth the processing requirements for
Development Agreements. At its August 7, 1996, regular meeting,
the City Council directed staff to proceed with the public hearing
process for the Development Agreement by and between the City and
Special Devices, Inc. The Planning Commission held a public
hearing for Development Agreement No. 96 -1 on August 12, 1996, and
recommended approval.
The draft Development Agreement (to be provided under separate
cover) was prepared with the involvement of a City Council
appointed Ad Hoc Committee consisting of Councilmember Brown and
Mayor Lawrason.
DISCUSSION
The draft Development Agreement has the same format and general
language as was used in the recent Development Agreement between
the City and Bollinger Development, Inc. The Developer agreements,
which are unique to Development Agreement 96 -1, are contained in
Section 6. The City agreements are contained in Section 7.
C: \1- m \sdi \cc8- 2196.da
(M079 9
Development Agreement No. 96 -1
To: Honorable City Council
August 15, 1996
Page 2
A draft ordinance approving Development Agreement No. 96 -1 is
included as an attachment to this staff report.
RECOMMENDATION
Introduce first reading of Ordinance No. - . approving a
Development Agreement between the City of Moork and Special
Devices, Inc. (Development Agreement No. 96 -1), and waive full
reading.
Attachment: Draft Ordinance
C: \1- m \sdi \cc8- 2196.da
(xfcweo
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
TO: Honorable City Council
FROM: Nelson Miller, Director of Community Development
Deborah S. Traffenstedt, Senior Planner -3�5-r
DATE: August 21, 1996
SUBJECT: REVISIONS TO SPECIAL DEVICES, INC., DRAFT MITIGATION
MONITORING PROGRAM
Attached are three pages (23, 31, and 40) of the draft Mitigation
Monitoring Program that require minor revisions, as indicated by
hand written corrections. These minor corrections should be
incorporated into the Mitigation Monitoring Program that will be
attached to the City Council's resolution certifying the Final
Environmental Impact Report.
Attachments: Pages 23, 31, and 40
cc: Steve Kueny, City Manager
Drainage, Sediment Transport,
and Flood Control Planning
Condition of Approval
Reference
Timing /Actions/
Frequency
Monitoring Staff
Measure of Compliance
Flood Control Bank Protection Along the Arroyo
Simi
(1) If deemed necessary by the City Engineer
Vesting Map
One time activity
City Engineer
Receipt and approval
upon review of final grading and /or
Condition (105)
prior to issuance
(or designee) and
of plans. Plan check
building plans, a Bank Protection Plan
of building permits
and Community
verification and
shall be prepared to address potential
and reevaluation of
Development
field verifications
direct and indirect flooding related hazards
the need for bank
Director
by City Engineer
to Lots 3, 4 and the a ad linking
protection when
(or designee)
Inspection staff.
these two lots his Plan shall be
priof Lo-E
development proposals
prepared after review and approval of
r
are submitted for
the Master Drainage and Flood Control
L-{ and oc�c�55
lots (1) and (2)
Improvement Plan (Mitigation Measure 1
rods.
above). The bank protection devices
no t4-)
incorporated into this Plan shall,
Lo
to the degree feasible, emphasize
the use of "soft" surface improvements
(such as gabions, erosion control
matting, buried retention features such
as subsurface retaining walls, and
similar devices) to minimize modifications
to the existing channel.
Potential locations for hazard remediation
shall be identified in the Plan.
Modifications to the Plan required by
the City Engineer or the Ventura
County Flood Control District shall be
made as requested. The Bank Protection
Plan shall also be reviewed by
the Department of Fish and Game
for compliance with 1603 Permit requirements.
An approved Bank Protection Plan shall
be completed prior to issuance of
rough grading permits or any building
permits for commercial or manufacturing
structures. Construction of any required
bank protection along the Arroyo Simi
must be completed before issuance of
Building Permits or occupancy approval.
Mitigation Monitoring Program - 23 moon 16, 1996
Biological Resources
Condition of Approval
Reference
Timing /Actions/
Frequency
Monitoring Staff
Measure of Compliance
L/ 13
(4) Lot 7 (now LotA shall either (1) be
Vesting Map
Same as #(1) above
Same as #(1) above
Same as #(1) above
retained in applicant ownership, (2)
Condition (53)
conveyed either to the City of Moorpark
or (3) conveyed to the Ventura County
Flood Control District with deed
restrictions prohibiting the construction
of environmentally destructive
drainage conveyance or management devices.
At the time of recordation, a note shall
be made on the Final Map that future
development is unconditionally prohibited
on Lot 7.
(5) The development or physical improvement of
Vesting Map
Same as #(1) above
Same as #(1) above
Same as #(1) above
Lots 8 and 9 (now Lot C) shall be prohibited
Condition (54)
by deed restriction with the exception of
the installation drainage conveyance devices.
An irrevocable dedication of all
development rights and deed restriction
prohibiting all forms of development
(other than minor drainage control or
conveyance devices and necessary
environmental restoration) shall be placed
on these Lots at the time of recordation.
Further, at the time of recordation, a note
shall be made on the Final Map that future
development is unconditionally prohibited
on Lots 8 and 9 (now Lot C), with the noted
exceptions.
Mitigation Monitoring Program - 31 August 16, 1996
s, Fire Suppression and
et Conditions
Condition of Approval
Timing /Actions/
Reference
Frequency Monitoring Staff
Measure of Compliance
the modification zone, native and
M
ive high -fuel vegetation will be
d and replaced with low -fuel
ion. The height of plant
ls will be kept to a minimum.
requirements should include a
combination of trees, shrubs,
and groundcover. Irrigation should not
be provided unless necessitated by the
plant materials selected.
(2) All structures adjacent to open space
and structures with blow -out walls shall
Same as #(1) above
Same as #(1) above
Same as #(1) above
Same as #(1) above
be designed to satisfy fire retarding
architectural and building code requirements
of tfie City and the County Fire
Protection District.
Adequacy of Dual Access
(1) Provisions for adequate all weather dual
access to Lots 1 and 2 shall be
Refer to #(1) above
The Vesting Map
Community
Revisions are comps {
incorporated into future submittals for
has been revised
Development
for Lot 3. f
Commercial or Industrial Planned Development
to reflect
recommendations
Director or
designee
Lots 1 and 2
Permits. Approval of adequate dual access
in the Draft EIR
dual access to be
plans for both of these lots shall be
determined by
required prior to Final Vesting Map
and Alternatives
future CPD
approval. An acceptable primary and
Analysis regarding
Lot 3 (prior Lot
Permit.
dual access plan for Lot 4 (now flag area
4 was deleted).
of Lot 3) shall be prepared prior to
Dual access to Lots
certification of the Final EIR.
'
and)2 to be
If such a plan, acceptable to the
established by
County Fire Prevention District,
future CPD
cannot be conceived, then Lot 4 should
Permits.
be deleted from the Vesting Map and the
land within Lot 4 should be incorporated
into Lot 3 (this revision was made).
Program - 40
Mitigation Monitoring
Aug t 16, 1996
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
TO: Honorable City Council
FROM: Nelson Miller, Director of Community Developme
DATE: August 20, 1996
SUBJECT: DRAFT MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM AND REVISED ZONE
CHANGE EXHIBIT FOR SDI PROJECT (AGENDA ITEM 8A FOR CC
MEETING OF 8/21/96)
The City Council was provided with a FAX copy of the draft
Mitigation Monitoring Program, yesterday. The transmittal
memorandum identified that due to late receipt, staff had not
proofread the FAX document. Unfortunately, several pages were
missing (pages 2, 9, 12, 13, 19, 24, 25, 27, 43, 44, and 52) .
Attached is a clean copy of the complete draft Mitigation
Monitoring Program. Also attached is a copy of the draft Zone
Change Ordinance exhibit. The map provided with Attachment 3 of
the staff report did not correctly identify the proposed zone
change for Lots B and C.
If you have any questions regarding the attachments, please contact
me.
Attachments:
Draft Mitigation Monitoring Program
Zone Change Ordinance Exhibit
cc: Steve Kueny, City Manager
Cheryl Kane, City Attorney
Ed Ball, Ball Properties
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
AND
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN (EQAP)
for the
Special Devices Incorporated Regional Headquarters,
Manufacturing Plant Facilities, and Commercial Development
Plan
(State Clearinghouse No. 95071057)
Vesting Tentative Tract No. 5004
Industrial Planned Development Permit No. 95 -2
General Plan Amendment No. 95 -1
Zone Change No. 95 -3
Development Agreement 96 -1
Prepared for:
THE CITY OF MOORPARK
799 Moorpark Avenue
Moorpark, California 93021
Planner: Debbie Traffenstedt
(805) 529 -6864
Prepared by:
THE PLANNING CORPORATION
P.O. Box 20250
Santa Barbara, California 93120
(805) 962 -1157
Revised. August 1996
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM FOR THE
SPECIAL DEVICES INCORPORATED REGIONAL HEADQUARTERS, MANUFACTURING
PLANT FACILITIES, AND COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN
(GPA -95 -1, ZC -95 -3, VTM -5004, DA 96 -1)
Introduction
The City of Moorpark is in the final stages of reviewing and adopting Conditions of Approval for
the proposed Special Devices Incorporated project. An EIR is proposed to be certified on the
project on August 21, 1996.
In response to comments on the EIR received from the public and inputs from the City Planning
Department and City Engineer, the applicant proposed to amend the project description. A public
hearing for the Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and proposed project entitlements was
held on June 10, 1996. At that meeting, the public hearing on the Draft EIR was closed, and the
public hearing on the requested project entitlements was continued to July 1, 1996, and then
subsequently continued (without discussion) to July 15, 1996. At the June 10 public hearing, the
applicant disclosed a willingness to amend the project description to conform, to the degree
feasible, with the recommendations contained in the designated Environmentally Superior
Alternative. A description of project revisions is provided in Chapter 21 of the Final EIR; this
section of the document also contained an analysis of the impacts of this alternative. This
alternative was projected to result in impact reductions in all non - population dependent impacts
(biology, cultural resources, etc.).
Among the actions required for approval of the project, it is necessary to adopt a Mitigation
Monitoring Program. The following Program has been proposed to conform with requirements
(Public Resource Code Section 21081.6) which became effective on January 1989. This Code
requires that, along with the adoption of the findings specified in an EIR, the lead agency must
also adopt a "reporting /monitoring program to ensure compliance during project implementation."
The proposed method for implementation of monitoring for this project is an Environmental
Quality Assurance Plan (EQAP)
Environmental Quality Assurance Plan (EQAP)
The Conditions of Approval for Vesting Map No. 5004 and related entitlements require
preparation and implementation of an Environmental Quality Assurance Plan (EQAP) as follows:
25. Prior to rough grading permit approval, and approval of a Final Map for any
phase, the Subdivider shall submit a deposit for condition compliance review and
mitigation monitoring. The mitigation monitoring program shall be enforced through
implementation of an Environmental Quality Assurance Program (EQAP) as
recommended in the approved mitigation monitoring program. The EQAP shall be
implemented through the City, • at the City s option, contract specialists shall be retained
to monitor construction and mitigation compliance. The Subdivider shall pay to the City
100 percent of all City and consultant costs for condition compliance review and
mitigation monitoring.
In a proposed undertaking with extensive Conditions of Approval that will require coordination of
a number of agencies and considerable field monitoring, an efficient and effective method for
assuring that such conditions are implemented properly is to require that an applicant. funded
monitor be retained to coordinate condition compliance.
Mitigation Monitoring Program
The purpose of a Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) is to avoid or minimize environmental
problems while providing documentation useful to decision makers in the review, evaluation and
development of permit conditions on future projects. The MMP is intended to provide a
procedure for the implementation of mitigation measures that have been identified in the project
Final Environmental Impact Report. The MMP should include the integration, coordination, and
implementation of all mitigation measures and a process to assure compliance. The EQAP
program implements the EIR Mitigation Monitoring Program. The legally required framework
for assuring proper mitigation compliance for all mitigation measures is provided in the Mitigation
Monitoring Program summary table.
Unlike the MMP, the EQAP provides a specific framework for assigning responsibilities, reporting
results and designating authority to secure condition compliance or stop work when deemed
necessary. The EQAP also provides for monitoring and coordination at no expense to the City;
the EQAP monitor is funded by the applicant or project developer. Distinguishing between the
MMP and EQAP is simple; an MMP is a program or plan and the EQAP is the actual
implementation method for assuring compliance. On a large scale project such as the Special
Devices Incorporated development, use of an EQAP program monitor is essential to ensure
proper compliance with the extensive set of conditions applied to the project. Furthermore, the
project will require very extensive rough grading, the preparation of a number of pre - development
studies and reports, and coordination of a number of City and non -City participants.
Important EQAP Monitor Attributes
The overall goal of the EQAP monitor is to establish a framework for a proactive rather than a
reactive approach to environmental monitoring and the protection of neighborhood quality of life
during the construction period. The EQAP monitor is responsible for anticipating environmental
problems and instituting corrective actions before problems materialize or become difficult to
solve. Close coordination of all concerned parties and a spirit of cooperation directed toward the
resolution of problems in a timely and cost effective manner is essential to the success of an
EQAP program. EQAP monitors (or monitoring firms) should have demonstrated breadth of
environmental knowledge and an understanding of the development and permit process.
EQAP Program Activities
Objectives which are important to the effectiveness of an EQAP program include the following:
a) Familiarizing construction workers with the environmental requirements for the
project;
b) Providing a chain of command for carrying out permit conditions and resolution of
issues of concern to the City, the applicant, and the contractors implementing the
construction program for the project;
C) Providing for remedial measures and follow -up until the activity complies with
permit requirements;
d) Providing the City with field monitoring services;
e) Providing a procedure to investigate and respond to any citizen inquiry or
complaint involving site development;
f) Resolving issues in a timely manner to maintain critical construction schedules;
and
g) Meeting permit requirements in a cost effective manner that does not require
expenditures of City monetary resources.
The Mitigation Monitoring Program as implemented by the EQAP monitor should serve as a
concise and effective working framework for the integration of agency personnel, the construction
crew, the on -site monitoring /compliance team, and the applicant/developer. The interpretation of
how best to institute the environmental mitigation measures required by the City is the
responsibility of the EQAP monitor and the City Director of Community Development.
The Mitigation Monitoring Program, as administered by the EQAP monitor, should provide for the
following basic actions:
a) the EQAP monitor shall review all grading, construction, and building
plans submitted to the City for condition compliance review to ensure
that all applicable mitigation measures are addressed;
b) the monitor shall modify the Mitigation Measures for the project (this list is
provided in table form in Appendix 1 of this document) to be consistent with final
Conditions of Approval for the Vesting Map, IPD Permit, and Zone Change. In
cases where a discrepancy exists between these two sets of conditions, the
adopted Conditions of Approval shall prevail.
C) The EQAP monitor shall establish a schedule for legal /administrative involvement
by the City in confirming that mitigation measures have been implemented;
d) determine what field monitoring action(s) are required and what environmental
measures are to be implemented if conditions conflict or if measures become
infeasible due to field conditions;
e) define what person (or agency) is responsible for final compliance checks (in the
cases where specific permits and clearances are required prior to occupancy);
f) assure that a single person is responsible for bridging the implementation of
mitigation measures from plan checking to field monitoring;
g) define a compliance method for each measure;
h) confirm the timing of mitigation in relation to construction activities; and
i) arrange an overall schedule of monitoring activities in relation to rough and
precise or fine grading.
The EQAP monitor also needs to assure that all four distinct phases of mitigation implementation
are properly integrated; these phases include preconstruction, rough and precise or fine grading,
construction and on going operations.
Recommended Monitoring Agencies and Personnel
The following assigned personnel should be designated as participants in the Mitigation
Monitoring Program for this project.
Plan Check Monitoring Participants:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10
conditions.
Community Development Department Staff
Building and Safety Department Staff
City Engineer, Fire Protection District and Police Department staff
Public Works Department Staff
City Arborist/Landscape Architect
Geotechnical Review Consultants (Bing Yen)
Caltrans staff
County Public Works Agency (Flood Control and Traffic Divisions)
The EQAP monitor assigned to the project.
Specialists (biologist, archaeologist & paleontologist) as required by project
Field Monitors:
1. City Community Development Department Staff
2. City Building and Safety Inspector
3. City Public Works Inspectors
4. A soils engineer and geotechnical consultant retained by the City to verify final
geotechnical work performed by the applicant's geologists or geotechnical
engineers
5. County of Ventura Fire Protection and Moorpark Police Department staff
6. City Engineer's Staff
7. The EQAP monitor assigned to the project.
8. Specialists should be retained as required by project conditions (cultural
resources, paleontology, a landscape architect or arborist with experience in native plant
management, etc.).
Issues of Concern for Successful Implementation of an EQAP Program
To be effective, the EQAP monitor should have a regular reporting procedure. This reporting
program should involve preparation of written reports on a weekly basis to the City to provide
feedback regarding the feasibility and effectiveness of the mitigation measures imposed on the
project.
The EQAP monitor is intended to serve as an on -site coordinator to establish a hierarchy of
authority among specialists that are in the field reviewing various remediation and mitigation
actions. The EQAP monitor must have the authority to stop or redirect work if necessary and to
call in specialists or agency staff when needed. Furthermore, the EQAP monitor should establish
a procedure in consultation with the City for settling disputes. In some cases, mitigation measure
wording may not be explicit enough to provide direction to plan checkers or field monitors. The
EQAP monitor should resolve such issues with the approval of the Director of Community
Development.
EQAP Program Management and Communications
Management hierarchy and communication pathways must be clearly delineated to assure
optimal working relationships and appropriate reporting. The EQAP program should be
implemented with a "team" approach. The EQAP monitor should be responsible for working with
the City, the developer's contractors, and responsible and trustee agencies to facilitate clear lines
of responsibility and contact. Frequent and regular communication among the monitoring team
members is essential for successful compliance. Suggested methods for written communication
include daily field logs, compliance reports for when a condition has been satisfactorily
completed, and monthly summary reports if required (depending on the ultimate length and
complexity of the monitoring process).
Responsibility and Authority
Each member of the monitoring team should have distinct and non - overlapping duties and
authority. The persons responsible for implementation of the monitoring program shall be
selected by the City, after consulting with the developer.
For the Special Devices Incorporated project, recommended team members include:
1. On -site Coordinating EQAP Monitor - This monitor is a multi - disciplined manager
of the entire EQAP program; this individual has three key functions: (1) to serve
as a liaison with the developer, the City, other monitoring team members and the
construction crew; (2) to manage and report field monitoring activities, problems
and successes; and (3) to stop or redirect work when determined necessary.
The monitor is responsible for ensuring that daily monitoring assignments are
carried out, for completion and review of daily logs and any compliance reports,
and for the prompt transmittal of information to the City and the developer. The
monitor will be responsible for ensuring that the correct specialist is on -site prior
to initiation of the construction activities affecting that discipline (e.g.,
archaeological clearances, confirming the location of essential Water Works
District facilities; assuring completion of biological remediation, etc).
2. Environmental Specialists -- Environmental specialists may need to be retained
on an as needed basis (e.g., discovery of an archaeological or paleontological
deposit, discovery of hazardous materials, expertise necessary to ensure proper
native plant revegetation, etc.) Such specialists would only be on -site as
needed, when the EQAP monitor determines that the scope of construction
activities warrants special expertise. Engineers, biologists, arborists and
archaeologists are the most frequently retained specialists. The Conditions of
Approval for this project require the presence of an archaeologist and
paleontologist during initial grading. The monitor (or monitoring firm) can provide
these skills or independent consultants can be retained; if independent monitors
are retained, the duration and frequency of monitoring should be defined by the
EQAP monitor.
Construction Crew Orientation
To assure clear lines of communication, the EQAP monitor should provide for an orientation for
all monitoring and construction personnel. The briefing should include the construction
supervisor and his crew directors, the developer and the City. The intent of the briefing is to
acquaint the construction crews with the environmental sensitivities of the project site, to
introduce the monitoring team to the construction team and to review construction specifications
and outline the lines of authority when problems are encountered. Emphasis should be placed
on the need to work together to resolve problems and arrive at solutions in the field. -All field
teams must understand that construction stoppage will be used if necessary in cases of serious
non - compliance with environmental mitigation measures.
The developer shall be required to appoint a contact person (to be provided with a pager) who
shall be accessible to the City staff and EQAP monitor. Field monitors shall also be required to
have pagers to provide a prompt method of City- monitor communication.
Compliance Criteria
Compliance criteria should be developed by the EQAP monitor so that the City and the on -site
monitor can determine if a specific mitigation condition has been successfully completed. Criteria
for plan check as well as field monitoring should be established. The criteria should include
specific violations that could result in a "stop work" order.
Work Stoppages
The monitoring program should include a process by which work stoppages are permitted if
violations of the mitigation measures could result in resource destruction or environmental
contamination. Sample procedures for handling such incidents are set forth below:
Rationale for Work Stoppage: Work should be suspended if mitigation measure
compliance violations could result in significant environmental impacts or the discovery of
an unanticipated problem (such as an unidentified archaeological deposit or a
concentration of hazardous soils requiring remediation); the immediate stoppage of a
specific construction activity should be permitted until necessary remediation is decided
upon and implemented.
Procedure: The EQAP Monitor should have the authority to direct construction crew
to halt activities at specific locations where the violation has taken place and to require
immediate performance of a necessary remediation. Other site construction may
continue.
The EQAP Monitor should immediately notify the construction supervisor and the City. A
course of action should be determined in consultation with the City and a construction
change order should be issued (if necessary).
When remedial work is complete, the Monitor should issue an order for work to resume in
the affected area.
The violation or incident and its resolution shall be documented in the Field Log and
Monthly Report.
Dispute Procedures
The EQAP monitor should arrange a system for resolving disputes. The City shall maintain
ultimate authority to decide the appropriate course of action to achieve resolution of the disputed
issue in consultation with the developer. The Community Development Director shall have
authority over disputes.
Field Inspections
Many of the mitigation measures outlined in the Mitigation Monitoring Program should have a
follow -up field check or will require on -going monitoring during the construction period. The
EQAP monitor should be responsible for defining at what point in the construction process a
check on condition compliance is obtained.
Process Check Points
The EQAP monitor should arrange for specific check points throughout the monitoring process
which identify when crucial information is needed before the next step in the development
process should be taken (e.g., permits should not be issued until all plans are received and have
completed plan check, combustible materials should not be brought onto the site until the
water /fire fighting system is installed, etc.).
Lonq Term Condition Compliance Review
The Director of Community Development shall periodically review the status and operation of the
SDI facility compliance with long term management restrictions; compliance with requirements of
the various managing hazardous materials oversight agencies should also be reviewed
periodically by the Director of Community Development.
SPECIAL DEVICES INCORPORATED PROJECT
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM: SUMMARY TABLE
In cases where a mitigation measure, as included in the Final Environmental Impact Report,
conflicts with an approved Condition of Approval for Vesting Tentative Map No. 5004 and
Industrial Planned Development Permit 95 -2, the stricter or more specific language shall apply,
as determined by the Director of Community Development, during condition compliance review
for each component of the development process. Modifications to mitigation measures since the
close of the public hearing on the Final Environmental Impact Report have generally been made
to clarify how to implement such measures and /or when to require satisfaction of such measures
during the development process. All mitigation measures included in the Final Environmental
Impact Report have been included (sometimes with minor modifications) in the Conditions of
Approval for the project. The mitigation monitoring table on the following pages includes 'a cross -
reference to the final versions of both the Vesting Map and Industrial Planned Development
permit conditions.
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM - SPECIAL DEVICES INCORPORATED
Geologic, Geotechnical and Seismic Hazards
Condition of Approval
Reference
Timing /Actions/
Frequency
Monitoring Staff
Measure of Compliance
Landslides and Slope Stability
(1) If required by the City Engineer or the
Vesting Map
Prior to issuance
City Engineer and
Receipt of and
consulting City Geologist and Geotechnical
Condition (88)
of any permits
City Geologist/
approval of
Engineer, prior to approval of the Final
and approval of
Geotechnical
geotechnical
Map, initiation of rough grading, or
IPD Conditions
the Final Map
Engineer
reports
issuance of any subsequent development
(102) and (105)
permits, the applicant or subsequent
developers shall contract with an
engineering geologist and geotechnical
engineer to further assess landslide
potential, slope stability, and impacts
related to slope failure. The scope of
wDrk for any additional work shall be
designed in consultation with and
approved by the City's geologist and
geotechnical engineer. If directed by
the City's consulting engineering
geologist or geotechnical engineer,
the study shall also quantify the
consolidation potential of the onsite
soil materials, assess the potential
for weak soils or bedding layers to
affect cut and /or natural slopes, and
verify that grading planned within
landslide areas will be remediated
to result in a net increase in
landslide stability. The scope for
this geotechnical study shall, as
deemed necessary by the City Engineer
and consulting City geologist and
geotechnical engineer, further assess
slopes within or adjacent to proposed
development areas (depending on the final
configuration of proposed individual
manufacturing and commercial parcels).
Mitigation Monitoring Program - 1 August 16, 1996
Geologic, Geotechnical and Seismic Hazards
Condition of Approval
Reference
Timing /Actions/
Frequency
Monitoring Staff
Measure of Compliance
Landslides and Slooe Stability
(continued)
Further assessment must
also address stability and mitigation
Same as #(1) above
Same as #(1) above
Same as #(1) above
Same as #(1) above
measures for slopes and landslides
surrounding the developable areas
as well as potential impacts along
access corridors. The findings and
recommendations of the geotechnical
assessment shall be incorporated into
the final design for both the
manufacturing and commercial components
of the project. A separate engineering
study shall be required for the
development of each Lot entitled with
either commercial or manufacturing uses.
All geotechnical reports shall be
reviewed and approved by the City's
consulting engineering geologists prior
to issuance of any grading permits or
approval of a Final Map.
(2) Unless subsequent geotechnical studies
direct otherwise, landslides shall be
Vesting Map Conditions
(67) to (81) and (85)
Same as #(1) above
Same as #(1) above
Same as #0) above
removed and recompacted during grading.
Alternatively, in some instances,
IPD Condition (105)
landslides or unstable slopes can
potentially be stabilized by constructing
buttress or stabilization fill slopes
to reduce their potential for future
downslope movement. All cut and fill
slopes, foundations and structures shall
be designed and constructed to comply
with Appendix 33 of the 1994 Uniform
Building Code (UBC) and applicable City
and /or County Grading Ordinances.
Modifications to these standards shall
be permitted only with the written
concurrence of the City Engineer and
the City's consulting geologist and
geotechnical engineer.
Mitigation Monitoring Program - 2 August 16, 1996
Geologic, Geotechnical and Seismic Hazards
Condition of Approval
Reference
Timing /Actions/
Frequency
Monitoring Staff
Measure of Compliance
Seismic Hazards
(1) Prior to issuance of a building permit,
IPD Condition (105)
Prior to issuance
City Engineer and
Final grading plan
the applicant or subsequent developers
of building
City Geologist/
review and approval
shall contract with an engineering
Vesting Map Conditions
permits
Geotechnical
by City Engineer and
geologist to study any unanticipated
(67) to (81) and (85)
Engineer
Consulting City
faults exposed during grading to detect
Geotechnical
any evidence of possible recent activity.
Engineer
No structure should be placed within 50
feet of any fault trace which is classified
as active by definition of the State Geologist.
Final grading requirements shall be defined
by an engineering geologist. All geological
recommendations shall be reviewed and
approved by the City Engineer and the
City's consulting geologist and geotechnical
engineer.
(2) Prior to issuance of a building permit,
IPD Condition (105) and
Prior to issuance
Building Inspector
Building Plan
all habitable structures shall be designed
of building
and City Geologist/
Check
to current UBC requirements or the City
Vesting Map Conditions
permits
Geotechnical Engineer
approved geotechnical report requirements
(67) to (81) and (85)
for the project, whichever standard is most
restrictive. The geotechnical recommendation
is for a design Z of 0.56, instead of the 0.4
for zone 4 and a recommended site coefficient
for soil type S1 . If the structural design
is based on UBC dynamic lateral -force
procedures, the design criteria for
horizontal ground acceleration shall be a
factor of 0.56g, based on the computed
peak acceleration for a 50 -year
exposure and 10% probability of
exceedance, be used with the
normalized response spectrum for
a soil type S1.
Mitigation Monitoring Program - 3 August 16, 1996
Geologic, Geotechnical and Seismic Hazards
Condition of Approval
Reference
Timing /Actions/
Frequency
Monitoring Staff
Measure of Compliance
Liquefaction Potential
(1) Prior to issuance of any grading permits,
Vesting Map
Prior to issuance
City Engineer and
Final Grading
the applicant or subsequent developers
Condition (86)
of grading permits
City Geotechnical
Plan review and
shall contract with an engineering geologist
Engineer
approval by
and geotechnical engineer to study
lPD Condition
City Engineer
potential liquefaction related effects
(101)
and City Geotechnical
for Lots 1 through 4 (now Lot 3) and the
Engineer
access road linking Lots 3 and 4 (prior
Lot 4 and access road connecting from
Lot 3 are now part of Lot 3). No
structure should be placed within 50 feet
of any adopted setback for minimizing the
consequences of liquefaction related
failure. No development on Lot 4 shall
be permitted until secondary access is
provided over the Arroyo Simi (or by other
routes to the south) or the access road
is designed and built to standards that
will permit the road to remain in place
without significant failure in the event of
an earthquake.
Mitigation Monitoring Program - 4 Augwt 16, 1996
Geologic, Geotechnical and Seismic Hazards
Condition of Approval
Reference
Timing /Actions/
Frequency
Monitoring Staff
Measure of Compliance
Construction Suitability, Site Design,
and Grading Concepts
(1) Prior to approval of the Final Map,
Vesting Map
Prior to approval
City Engineer
Approval of the
initiation of rough grading, or issuance
Conditions (67) to (81)
of the Final Map
and City
Final Map and rough
of any subsequent development permits, the
and (86)
and any subsequent
Geotechnical
grading permit will
applicant or subsequent developers shall
entitlements
Engineer
not occur until all
contract with an engineering geologist and
studies have been
geotechnical engineer to prepare grading
completed and
recommendations, foundation design criteria,
conclusions are
and other recommendations regarding
incorporated into
detailed project design. As a
Final Grading Plans.
component of required subsequent
geologic studies, a soils engineer shall
evaluate the condition of alluvium
and unconsolidated soils. Relatively
loose soils or alluvium shall be
densified or removed and recompacted
prior to placement of structures
upon such soils. Other remediation
methods, acceptable to the City Engineer
and consulting City geologist and geotechnical
engineer, shall be submitted to the
City for review and approval. Other
mitigation measures shall be incorporated
into the final project design as required
by the geological assessment. All
geotechnical and geological recommendations
shall be reviewed and approved by the City
Engineer and the City's consulting geologist
and geotechnical engineer.
Mitigation Monitoring Program - 5 August 16, 1996
Geologic, Geotechnical and Seismic Hazards
Condition of Approval
Reference
Timing /Actions/
Frequency
Monitoring Staff
Measure of Compliance
(2) The applicant shall develop a master
Vesting Map
Prior to issuance
City Engineer
Review and approval
agreement among all owners of commercial
Condition (87)
of rough grading
and City Geotechnical
of slope maintenance
and manufacturing developments within the
permit
Engineer
plan and incorporation
tentative map boundary which shall provide
lPD Condition (101)
of plan into a program
for a Slope Maintenance Program designed to
of long term
ensure that risks of slope failure are
maintenance. Slope
minimized. This slope maintenance program
maintenance
shall address recommendations contained in
requirements shall
the project geotechnical report.
be incorporated
The Slope Maintenance Program document
into CC &R's.
shall be reviewed and approved by
the City Geologist, City Engineer, and
Director of Community Development prior
to issuance of permits for rough
grading. All geological recommendations
shall be reviewed and approved by the
City Engineer and the City's
consulting geologist and geotechnical
engineer.
(3) The applicant's engineering geologist and
Vesting Map
Prior to issuance
City Engineer and
Review and approval
geotechnical engineering consultant shall
Condition (88)
of a grading permit
City Geotechnical
of grading plan
prepare a written review of detailed
Engineer
and issuance of
grading plans (1 " =40' scale). This
IPD Condition
grading permit.
written review is required to assure
(102)
that all geotechnical recommendations have
been incorporated into project plans
and specifications. Supplemental
recommendations shall be made on
a lot by lot basis as necessary
and any additional testing shall
be completed prior to submission
of grading plans. The grading plan
review by the applicant's consultant
may also include a recommendation
to conduct additional subsurface
investigation, if necessary. At the
time of grading plan submittal,
the applicant shall submit this
written review to the City Engineer
and consulting City geologist and
geotechnical engineer for review and
approval.
Mitigation Monitoring Program - 6 August 16, 1996
:)logic, Geotechnical and Seismic Hazards
Condition of Approval
Reference
Timing /Actions/
Frequency
Monitoring Staff
Measure of Compliance
ielopment Feasibility Determination
Development of the flag area of Lot 3
Vesting Map
New IPD required
Community
none required for
should not be approved.by the City until
Conditions
Development
current IPD -95 -2
one of the following three objectives is
(1 and 86)
Project
accomplished: (1) remedial mitigating
measures are proposed that will
IPD Condition
preclude slope failure and loss
(1 and 100)
of the access road during the
design earthquake event; or (2) the
area of the fill slope /access
road to the flag area of Lot 3 is
redesigned to avoid the potentially
liquefiable alluvium; or (3) a
secondary access road is designed
and funded.
Mitigation Monitoring Program - 7 August 15, 1996
Air Quality
Condition of Approval
Reference
Timing /Actions/
Frequency
Monitoring Staff
Measure of Compliance
Construction Effects
During Preliminary Site Clearing and Grading
(1) All material excavated or graded shall be
sufficiently watered to prevent excessive
Air Quality EIR
Mitigation Measure
Monitoring is to
occur daily during
City Building and
Grading Inspectors
Verification of
field
amounts of dust., Watering shall occur
at least twice daily with complete
Conditions (1)
the rough grading,
and City Planning
compliance
by City staff or
coverage, preferably in the late
through (12) are
superseded by
site preparation,
and final grading
staff.
APCD staff would
APCD.
morning and after work is done
for the day.
Vesting Map
phases of
potentially seek
Condition (133)
construction.
enforcement if
(2) All clearing, grading, earth moving,
through 0 58)
and IPD Conditions
These conditions
should be attached
Conditions are
not complied with
or excavation activities shall cease
during period of high winds (i.e.,
0 16) to 0 34)
to the specifications
during grading.
greater than 20 mph averaged over
for grading contractors.
one hour) to prevent excessive
amounts of dust. Construction
grading shall be discontinued on
days forecasted for first stage
ozone alerts (concentration of
0.20 ppm) as indicated at the
Ventura County APCD air quality
monitoring station closest to the
City of Moorpark. Grading and
excavation operations shall not resume
until the first stage smog alert
expires.
(3) All material transported off -site
shall be either sufficiently watered
or securely covered to prevent
excessive amounts of dust.
(4) Face masks shall be used by all
employees involved in grading or
excavation operations during dry periods
to reduce inhalation of dust
which may contain the fungus
which causes San Joaquin Valley
Fever.
Mitigation Monitoring Program - 8 AugU t 16, 1996
Air Quality
Condition of Approval
Reference
Timing /Actions/
Frequency
Monitoring Staff
Measure of Compliar
(5) The area disturbed by clearing, grading,
Same as #(1) above
Same as #(1) above
Same as #0► above
Same as #(1► above
earth moving, or excavation operations
shall be minimized to prevent excessive
dust generation.
Measures that Apply to Other Construction
Activities
(6) All inactive portions of the construction
Measure (6) through
Same as #(1) above
Same as #0) above
Same as #(1) above
site shall be seeded and watered
(9) are superseded
until vegetative cover is restored.
by Vesting Map
All active portion of the
Conditions
construction site shall be watered
(133) to (158)
sufficiently to suppress excess dust
and IPD Conditions
generation.
(1 16) to (134)
(7) On -site vehicle speed shall be limited
to 15 mph. All areas experiencing
vehicle traffic (e.g. parking areas,
dirt roads linking different construction
areas, etc.) shall be watered periodically.
(8) If used to suppress dust, petroleum -based
dust palliatives shall meet the
road oil requirements of Ventura
County APCD Rule 74.4 (Cutback Asphalt).
(9) Streets adjacent to the project site shall
Same as #(6) above
Same as #(6) above
Same as #(6) above
Same as #(6) above
be swept as needed to remove silt which
may have accumulated from construction
activities to prevent excessive dust
generation.
Measures Designed to Control Ozone Precursor
Construction Emissions
(10) Equipment engines shall be maintained
in good condition and in proper
tune as set forth in manufacturers
specifications.
Mitigation Monitoring Program - 9 August 16,
Air Quality
Condition of Approval
Reference
Timing /Actions/
Frequency
Monitoring Staff
Measure of Compliance
(1 1) During smog season (May through October),
Same as #(6) above
Same as #(6) above
Same as #(6) above
Same as #(6) above
the construction period shall be
lengthened to minimize the number
of vehicles and equipment operating
at the same time.
(12) Construction activities shall utilize
new technologies to control ozone
precursor emissions as they become
available and feasible.
Occupancy and Operation Emissions
(1) The developers of all lots included
Vesting Map
Fees to be paid
Community
Receipt of fees
in the proposed Vesting Map shall
Conditions: none
prior to issuance
Development
to be verified
be required to make a contribution
of building
Director (or
by staff
to the reduction of local and
IPD Condition
permits
designee)
regional air quality impacts through
(32)
the payment of an air quality
impact fee to the Moorpark Traffic
System Management Fund consistent with
the fee recommendations for manufacturing
and commercial projects contained in
the Ventura County Guidelines to
Air Quality Impact Analysis.
Fees shall be paid for emissions in
excess of the 25- pound - per -day ROC /NOx
significance threshold. Fees shall
be paid prior to the issuance
of building permits for each
phase of industrial, office,
or manufacturing building
construction.
Mitigation Monitoring Program - 10 August 16, 1996
Air Quality
Condition of Approval
Reference
Timing /Actions/
Frequency
Monitoring Staff
Measure of Compliance
(2) The commercial developments planned for
Vesting Map
After building
APCD staff
Compliance review
Lots 1 and 2 and the SDI manufacturing
Conditions: none
occupancy
is delegated to
program (Lots 3 and 4) shall comply with
APCD
Ventura County Air Pollution Control
IPD Condition 05)
District Rule 240 (details of this rule
are in preparation - -this rule will
supersede Rule 210)• Rule 240 requires
that an employer develop and implement
a trip reduction plan containing
strategies to reduce the number
of individual drivers commuting to
the work site. Upon commencement of
operations, the commercial operators
shall notify the County APCD
Transportation Program Administrator of an
intent to begin operations. A plan
to reduce air quality effects shall
be coordinated with the APCD.
Potential vehicle trip reductions may
be achieved by (but are not untitled to)
any of the following or other ultimately
adopted reduction measures:
- Direct financial incentives for
employees who carpool, vanpool,
buspool, or use public facilities.
- Use of fleet vehicles for
ridesharing employees for personal
errands.
- Preferential parking for ridesharing
employees.
- Facility improvements which provide
preferential access and /or egress
for ridesharing vehicles.
- Personal rideshare matching and /or
active use of computerized rideshare
matching service such as Commuter
Computer.
Mitigation Monitoring Program - 11 August 16, 1996
Air Quality
Condition of Approval
Reference
Timing /Actions/
Frequency
Monitoring Staff
Measure of Compliance
- A guaranteed ride -home program for
ridesharing employees in emergency
Refer to #(2) above
Refer to #(2) above
Refer to #(2) above
Refer to #(2) above
situations.
- An onsite day care facility.
- Facility improvements to encourage
bicycling and walking (showers, bicycle
racks, or lockers, etc.).
- Flexible work schedules to transit users,
bicycles, and pedestrians.
- Compressed work weeks such as 4/40 or
a 9/80 or a 3/36 work schedules.
Mitigation Monitoring Program - 12 August 15, 1996
Groundwater Supplies, Domestic and Reclaimed
Condition of Approval
Timing /Actions/
Water Systems, and Surface Water Quality
Reference
Frequency
Monitoring Staff
Measure of Compliance
Impacts on Local Groundwater
Supplies and Extraction Systems
(1) Prior to certification of the Final
Verification of
One time activity
City Engineer
Verification of
EIR or approval of the Final Vesting
annexation feasibility
for verification
and /or City
annexation
Map, the feasibility of annexation
has been obtained.
of feasibility.
Community
provided
to the Water Works District No. 1
Vesting Map
City to monitor
Development
through LAFCO
service area shall be determined.
Conditions (41), (42),
annexation process.
Director.
process.
The pressure zone to which the
and 0 28a).
Geotechnical
project will be assigned shall be
IPD Conditions (207)
verification to
identified and the feasibility of
(67) (208) (209).
be provided prior
providing the required domestic,
to issuance of
landscaping, and fire flow supplies
building permits.
to all four proposed developable
Lots on the Vesting Map without
on -site reservoir storage shall
be documented. The infrastructure
plan for the project shall be
designed to address the details
for the placement of all required
water, sewer, and reclaimed
water conveyance facilities in
appropriate alignments. No alignments
shall be approved by the City Engineer
that pass through areas with potential
landslide or liquefaction hazards.
The applicant shall obtain all
necessary right -of -way and
easements to install the required
infrastructure in said alignments.
The City, at its discretion, may
assist with the acquisition of
such easements.
Mitigation Monitoring Program - 13 August 16, 1996
Groundwater Supplies, Domestic and Reclaimed
Water Systems, and Surface Water Quality
Condition of Approval
Reference
Timing /Actions/
Frequency
Monitoring Staff
Measure of Compliance
OAdequacy of Potable Water Suoolies.
Review of Water Demands. and
Domestic Water System Planning
(1) Prior to certification of the Final
Final design issues
One time activity
City Engineer to
Verification of
EIR or approval of the Final Vesting
have been resolved
prior to zone
review and approve
compliance obtained
Map, the proposed infrastructure
in the EIR.
clearance or
infrastructure
through plan check
plan for the project shall be
IPD Conditions
issuance of
plans.
and zoning
designed to address unresolved questions
(207 ), (208),
building or
Community
clearance
regarding the capacity of and need
and (209).
grading permits.
Development
processes.
for on -site storage, provision
Vesting Map
Director (or
of adequate fire flows, the sizing
Conditions (200)
designee) to
of all required mains and distribution
(201).
provide zoning
lines, and related pump station
clearance approval.
planning. The applicant shall
obtain all necessary right -of -way
and easements to install the required
infrastructure. The final infrastructure
plan shall be approved by Waterworks
District No. 1, by the City Engineer,
and by the Fire Prevention District
prior to approval of the Vesting Map.
Adequacy of Wastewater Treatment Planning
(1) Prior to certification of the Final EIR
IPD Condition
Same as #0) above
Same as #0) above
Same as #0► above
or approval of the Final Vesting Map, the
(209)
proposed wastewater treatment conveyance
facility plans for the project shall be
Vesting Map
designed to address unresolved questions
Condition (202)
regarding the capacity of adjacent
sewer mainlines, the ability of the
project effluent to be accommodated,
and the sizing of all required mains
and distribution lines, and related
pump station planning. The applicant
shall obtain all necessary right -of -way
and easements to install the required
infrastructure. The final wastewater
treatment conveyance line plan shall
be approved by Water Works District
No. 1 and by the City Engineer prior
to approval of the Final Vesting Map.
Mitigation Monitoring Program - 14 August 16, 1996
Groundwater Supplies, Domestic and Reclaimed
Water Systems, and Surface Water Quality
Condition of Approval
Reference
Timing /Actions/
Frequency
Monitoring Staff
Measure of Compliance
Surface Water Quality Impacts from Construction
and Commercial /Manufacturing Operations
(1) An Erosion, Debris and Sediment Control Plan
Vesting Map
One time activity
City Engineer
Verification of
shall be prepared by the applicant to
Condition (97)
prior to issuance
(or designee)
compliance in
address construction impacts and long
of grading or
and City Building
plan check review.
term operational effects on downstream
building permits
Inspectors
Field verification
environments and watersheds. This plan
to be provided by
shall be prepared by a California
City Grading and
registered Civil Engineer. Proposed
Building Inspection
management efforts shall include (but
staff.
not be limited to) construction of
debris and detention basins as necessary,
provisions for the use of vegetative
filtering devices, preparation of detailed
erosion /sediment control plans, appropriate
use of temporary debris basins, silt fences,
sediment traps and other erosion control
practices. The proposed plan shall also
address all relevant National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
requirements and recommendations for the
use of best available technology. The
Erosion and Sediment Control Plan
shall be reviewed and approved
by the City Engineer prior to the
issuance of grading permits for
rough grading.
Mitigation Monitoring Program - 15 August 16, 1996
Groundwater Supplies, Domestic and Reclaimed
Water Systems, and Surface Water Quality
Condition of Approval
Reference
Timing /Actions/
Frequency
Monitoring Staff
Measure of Compliance
(2) The Erosion and Sediment Control Plan
Vesting Map
Same as #(1) above
Same as #(1) above
Same as #(1) above
shall provide that temporary erosion
Condition (89) (97)
and continuous
control measures shall be used
field verification
during the construction process to
during grading
minimize water quality effects.
period
Specific measures to be applied
shall be identified in the project
Erosion and Sediment Control Plan.
The following water quality assurance
techniques shall be included as
necessary:
• Minimize removal of existing vegetation.
• Provide temporary soil cover, such as
hydroseeding, mulch /binder and
erosion control blankets, to protect
exposed soil from wind and rain.
• Incorporate silt fencing, berms, and
dikes to protect storm drain inlets
and drainage courses.
• Rough grade contours to reduce flow
concentrations and velocities.
• Divert runoff from graded areas,
using straw bale, earth, and sandbag
dikes.
• Phase grading to minimize soil
exposure during the October through
April storm period.
• Install sediment traps or basins.
• Maintain and monitor erosion /sediment
controls.
Mitigation Monitoring Program - 16 August 16, 1996
Groundwater Supplies, Domestic and Reclaimed
Water Systems, and Surface Water Quality
Condition of Approval
Reference
Timing /Actions/
Frequency
Monitoring Staff
Measure of Compliance
• The developer (or successors of interest)
will ensure that construction activities
include proper management and disposal
of concrete and other masonry wastes,
paint solvents and rinse wastes,
vehicle fuel and maintenance wastes
(including oil), and other construction
debris. This will minimize exposure of
these materials to storm water and
transport to the drainage system.
(3) To minimize the water quality effects of
Vesting Map
Same as #(2) above
Same as #(2) above
Same as #(2) above
permanent erosion sources, the following
Condition (89)
design features shall be incorporated
into the project grading plan to the
degree determined necessary by the
project civil engineer. The City
Engineer shall review and approve
the grading plan to verify implementation
of the following water quality
enhancement features including:
• drainage swales, subsurface drains,
slope drains, storm rain inlet/
outlet protection, and sediment traps;
• check dams to reduce flow velocities;
• permanent desilting basins;
• permanent vegetation, including
grass -lined swales;
• design of drainage courses and storm
drain outlets to reduce scour.
Mitigation Monitoring Program - 17 August 16, 1996
Groundwater Supplies, Domestic and Reclaimed
Water Systems, and Surface Water Quality
Condition of Approval
Reference
Timing /Actions/
Frequency
Monitoring Staff
Measure of Compliance
(4) Because the proposed uses for Lots 1, 2,
Vesting Map
Same as #(2) above
City Engineer
Same as #(2) above
and 3 are presently uncertain, the
Condition 0 00)
and periodic long
(or designee)
applicants for all Commercial or
and (101)
term monitoring for
Industrial Planned Development Permits
facility maintenance
on Lots 1, 2, and 3 shall be required
IPD Conditions
compliance
to prepare and submit to the City
(95) (96) (97)
for review and approval a Water Quality
Management Plan to address the specific
water quality impacts associated with
buildout of each manufacturing and
commercial Lot. This requirement may
be waived by the City Engineer (depending
on future uses and the potential for
water quality impacts). The management
regime recommended in these plans shall
require the long term maintenance of
water quality associated with buildout
of the Final Vesting Map. The City
may periodically monitor adherence to
the individual management plans.
The Plan shall require that each
manufacturing and commercial operator
incorporate the following management
practices into facility design and
operations:
• Best Management Practices for the
control of first flush pollutants
shall be required;
• pesticides and herbicides shall be
used sparingly on landscape
maintenance areas and such
materials shall only be applied
when necessary to cure a problem,
and in positively identified
pre- emergent situations, not as
a preventative measure;
Mitigation Monitoring Program - 18 August 16, 1996
Groundwater Supplies, Domestic and Reclaimed
Water Systems, and Surface Water Quality
Condition of Approval
Reference
Timing /Actions/
Frequency
Monitoring Staff
Measure of Compliance
• fertilizers in either slow - release forms
Same as #(4) above
Same as #(4) above
Same as #(4) above
Same as #(4) above
or in light, frequent application of
soluble forms can be applied to improve
nutrient recovery;
• construction of all impermeable
surfaces with the potential to
introduce pollutants to the Arroyo
Simi shall first collect and drain
irrigation /storm water runoff to
first flush basins;
• to the degree feasible, the project
shall involve reusing collected
irrigation water;
if areas of turf are included in
the landscape plan, computer controlled
irrigation systems with ground moisture
sensors shall be used to control
irrigation rates and levels to match
soil moisture and infiltration rates;
• when appropriate, wetting agents
shall be used to aid infiltration
and reduce runoff.
Mitigation Monitoring Program - 19 August 16, 1996
Groundwater Supplies, Domestic and Reclaimed
Water Systems, and Surface Water Quality
Condition of Approval
Reference
Timing /Actions/
Frequency
Monitoring Staff
Measure of Compliance
(5) Runoff from developed areas shall be
Vesting Map
Same as #(2) above
City Engineer
Same as #(2) above
diverted to detention basins and
Condition 0 02)
(or designee)
then to underground first flush
filters, or other Best Management
Practices, as determined by the
City Engineer. These devices shall
be designed by a registered civil
engineer as part of the drainage
improvement plans for the project.
The basins and traps would require
periodic maintenance by the property owner,
commercial and manufacturing property
owners association, or other entities.
Provisions shall be made by the
applicant to provide for maintenance
of these structures in perpetuity prior
to Final Vesting Map approval.
(6) The grading permits issued for the
Vesting Map
Same as #(2) above
Same as #(2) above
Same as #(2) above
development shall require maintenance
Condition (98)
schedules for earthmoving equipment
(100)
and documentation of proper disposal
of used oil and other lubricants. The
IPD Condition
applicant shall obtain all necessary
(97)
NPDES related permits prior to City
issuance of the initial grading permit
for the project.
(7) To comply with NPDES requirements,
Vesting Map
Same as #(2) above
Same as #(2) above
Same as #(2) above
the applicant for Lot 3 shall prepare
Condition (98)
a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan
(SWPPP) for the project; this Plan shall
be reviewed and approved by the City
Engineer prior to the issuance of permits
for rough grading. This plan shall
define how the receiving water bodies
(the Arroyo Simi) shall be protected
from degradation.
Mitigation Monitoring Program - 20 August 16, 1996
Groundwater Supplies, Domestic and Reclaimed
Water Systems, and Surface Water Quality
Condition of Approval
Reference
Timing /Actions/
Frequency
Monitoring Staff
Measure of Compliance
(8) The applicants for each lot shall be
Vesting Map
One time activity
City Engineer
NOI permit compliance
required to file a Notice of Intent to
Condition (98)
prior to issuance
(or designee)
documentation filed
meet State requirements regarding
of grading permits
with City
runoff associated with construction
IPD Condition
activity.
(95)
(9) Prior to undertaking any bank
Vesting Map
One time activity
City Engineer
404 permit compliance
stabilization or remedial work in
Condition (103)
prior to issuance
(or designee)
documentation filed
the Arroyo Simi, the applicant shall
of grading permits
with City
obtain a Section 404 permit from the
IPD Condition
Army Corps of Engineers.
(103)
Mitigation Monitoring Program - 21 August 16, 1996
Drainage, Sediment Transport,
and Flood Control Planning
Condition of Approval
Reference
Timing /Actions/
Frequency
Monitoring Staff
Measure of Compliance
Changes to Drainage Patterns and Flow Volumes
Vesting Map
One time activity
City Engineer
Receipt and approval
(1) Prior to rough grading permit approval,
a Master Drainage and Flood Control
Conditions
prior to issuance
(or designee)
of plans. Plan
Improvement Plan shall be prepared which
(90) through (96)
of grading permits
and County Flood
check verification
identifies all required drainage and flood
and 0 04)
Control District
and field verification
control improvements necessary to implement
staff
of compliance by
the proposed project. This plan shall be
City Engineer
prepared in consultation with the Moorpark
Inspection staff.
City Engineer and the Ventura County Flood
Control District to facilitate required
interagency coordination. The plan shall
identify all major improvements and typical
drainage facilities for all developable lots
and all maintenance area lots included
within the Vesting Map boundary. The
capacity, location, and size of all
culverts, storm drains, collection
devices, energy dissipaters, and related
improvements shall be designed to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer and
Flood Control District. Capacity details
for the construction of any on -site
detention features shall be included in
the Master Improvement Plan. All
necessary permits required to implement the
Improvement Plan shall be obtained from
the County Flood Control District prior
to City issuance of a permit for
rough grading. The Master Plan shall
identify what improvements must be
completed coincident with the initiation
of rough grading.
Mitigation Monitoring Program - 22 August 16, 1996
Drainage, Sediment Transport,
and Flood Control Planning
Condition of Approval
Reference
Timing /Actions/
Frequency
Monitoring Staff
Measure of Compliance
Flood Control Bank Protection Along the Arroyo
Simi
(1) If deemed necessary by the City Engineer
Vesting Map
One time activity
City Engineer
Receipt and approval
upon review of final grading and /or
Condition (105)
prior to issuance
(or designee) and
of plans. Plan check
building plans, a Bank Protection Plan
of building permits
and Community
verification and
shall be prepared to address potential
and reevaluation of
Development
field verifications
direct and indirect flooding related hazards
the need for bank
Director
by City Engineer
to Lots 3, 4 and the access road linking
protection when
(or designee)
Inspection staff.
these two lots. This Plan shall be
development proposals
prepared after review and approval of
are submitted for
the Master Drainage and Flood Control
lots (1) and (2)
Improvement Plan (Mitigation Measure 1
above). The bank protection devices
incorporated into this Plan shall,
to the degree feasible, emphasize
the use of "soft" surface improvements
(such as gabions, erosion control
matting, buried retention features such
as subsurface retaining walls, and
similar devices) to minimize modifications
to the existing channel.
Potential locations for hazard remediation
shall be identified in the Plan.
Modifications to the Plan required by
the City Engineer or the Ventura
County Flood Control District shall be
made as requested. The Bank Protection
Plan shall also be reviewed by
the Department of Fish and Game
for compliance with 1603 Permit requirements.
An approved Bank Protection Plan shall
be completed prior to issuance of
rough grading permits or any building
permits for commercial or manufacturing
structures. Construction of any required
bank protection along the Arroyo Simi
must be completed before issuance of
Building Permits or occupancy approval.
Mitigation Monitoring Program - 23 August 16, 1996
Drainage, Sediment Transport,
and Flood Control Planning
Condition of Approval
Reference
Timing /Actions/
Frequency
Monitoring Staff
Measure of Compliance
Issue 3: Debris Production and Transport
(1) Sediment yields in the watersheds within
Vesting Map
Same as #0► above
Same as #(1) above
Same as #(1) above
the project boundary shall be computed
Condition 006)
for pre - development and post - development
conditions in accord with methods outlined
in Erosion and Sediment Yields in the
Transverse Ranges, Southern California
(United States Geological Survey, 1978).
These estimates of sediment yield shall
be completed prior to approval of
the grading plan.
(2) Improvements related to sediment management
Vesting Map
Same as #(1) above
Same as #(1) above
Same as #(1) above
shall be made which will be sufficient
Condition 0 07)
and long term
and periodic long
to reduce estimated sediment generation to
monitoring through
term monitoring
pre - development levels. These improvements
periodic review of
by County Flood
shall be made in conjunction with
facility
Control District
commencement of rough grading operations for
maintenance.
and Moorpark
the proposed developable lots. The design
City Engineer.
of debris or sediment retention facilities
shall be reviewed and approved by the
Ventura County Flood Control District and
the City Engineer. All improvements
related to debris management shall be
completed prior to the first rainy
season to occur after rough grading
has commenced.
Maintenance of any debris or sediment
control facilities shall be provided under
an agreement satisfactory to the Flood
Control District and the Moorpark City
Engineer. An improvement and maintenance
cost agreement enforceable upon the future
owners of the four developable lots
shall be required prior to the issuance
of initial rough grading permits or
recordation of the Final Vesting Map.
Mitigation Monitoring Program - 24 August 15, 1996
Drainage, Sediment Transport,
and Flood Control Planning
Condition of Approval
Reference
Timing /Actions/
Frequency
Monitoring Staff
Measure of Compliance
(3) The applicant or subsequent developers
Vesting Map
Same as #(2) above
Same as #(2) above
Same as #(2) above
shall prepare an Erosion and Sediment
Condition 0 07)
Control Plan to address construction
impacts and long term operational effects
on downstream environments and watersheds.
This plan shall be prepared by a Civil
Engineer or a specialist in erosion
and sediment control planning. Proposed
management efforts shall include (but not
be limited to) construction of temporary
debris and detention basins in the project
watersheds, provisions for the use of
vegetative filtering enhanced by creekbed
reconstruction, preparation of detailed
erosion control plans, appropriate use
of temporary debris basins, silt fences,
sediment traps and other erosion control
practices. The proposed plan shall also
address all relevant NPDES requirements and
recommendations for the use of best
available technology. The erosion control
plan shall be reviewed and approved
by the Director of Community Development
and City Engineer prior to the
issuance of grading permits for rough
grading.
Mitigation Monitoring Program - 25 August 16, tees
Biological Resources
Condition of Approval
Reference
Timing /Actions/
Frequency
Monitoring Staff
Measure of Compliance
Destruction of Botanical Resources and
Sensitive Habitats
0) Prior to initiation of rough grading
Vesting Map
Prior to approval
Community
City staff or
or approval of the Final Vesting Map,
Condition (47)
of Final Map or
Development
EQAP Monitor
a proposed Habitat Restoration Plan
issuance of rough
Director (or
to provide
shall be prepared by a qualified
lPD Condition
grading permit,
designee)
field verification
landscape architect with the assistance
(77)
plans are to be
EQAP Monitor,
and provide
of a native plant ecologist to assure
prepared and
and /or contract
reporting of
compensation for the loss of native
submitted to the
landscape
compliance.
habitats that will occur as a result
City for approval.
architect
Plan review
of project development; this plan shall
verification to
be reviewed and approved by the City
be provided by
Community Development Director prior
Planning staff.
to issuance of building permits. The
habitat restoration plan shall emphasize
the selective use of native grasses,
shrubs, trees, and plants in areas
of landscaping within the project boundary
and in the Caltrans interchange improvement
area. The plan shall also require
project perimeter planting and landscaping
of selected areas with the native plants
common to the native ecological communities
on the site (e.g., Salvia apiana, Salvia
leucophylla, Artemisia californica, Rhus
integrifolia, Eriogonum fasciculatum, Encelia
californica, Calochortus catalinae,
Calochortus clavatus, Juncus textilis, Opuntia
basilaris, Mucronea californica, Anemopsis
californica).
Mitigation Monitoring Program - 26 August 16, 1996
Biological Resources
Condition of Approval
Reference
Timing /Actions/
Frequency
Monitoring Staff
Measure of Compliance
(2) The applicant shall fund a program to
Vesting Map
Same as #01 above
Same as #0) above
Same as #0) above
plant and /or restore acreage equal
Condition (48)
to the amount of damaged or destroyed
oak woodland. To properly implement
IPD Condition
this program, an Oak Woodland Restoration
(78)
and Reforestation Plan shall be prepared
by a qualified landscape architect and
arborist; this plan shall be reviewed
and approved by the City Community
Development Director prior to issuance of
building permits. The precise number
of trees, replanting specifications,
tree sizes and locations and related
details shall be enumerated in the
plan once a final grading plan
is prepared for the project. The
intent of this program is to provide
3:1 replacement of oak trees that
are removed during grading and also
replacement of lost habitat. The
Plan shall require the 100 foot fill
slope along the northern perimeter of
Lot 3 to be fully restored with oak
woodland. The applicant (or a designee)
shall be responsible for maintaining the
restored oak woodlands (estimated to
be a period of five years) until the
native trees and associated understory
plants are successfully established and
the City's Director of Community Development
has approved in writing that maintenance
can be discontinued without resulting in
plant mortality.
Mitigation Monitoring Program - 27 August 16, 1996
Biological Resources
Condition of Approval
Reference
Timing /Actions/
Frequency
Monitoring Staff
Measure of Compliance
(3) Prior to initiation of rough grading or
Vesting Map
Same as #(1) above
Same as #(1) above
Same as #(1) above
approval of the Final Map, the site plan
Condition (49)
shall be revised, to the extent feasible,
to provide for preservation of riparian
IPD Condition
habitats situated on the north side
(79)
of the property bordering the Arroyo
Simi and floodway easement area.
In addition, a riparian restoration
and enhancement area shall be set
aside within the portion of Lot 6
that is situated inside the 100 year
flood limit line.
(4) Native plants shall be used in the
Vesting Map
Same as #(1) above
Same as #(1) above
Same as #(1) above
restoration of areas disturbed by the
Condition (50)
and County Fire
and County Fire
construction of the project. The City
Protection District
Protection District
and Ventura County Fire Protection District
IPD Condition
staff
staff
shall monitor the use of native plants
(80)
through review and approval of all project
landscape plans. Native plants acceptable
to the County Fire Protection District
shall be used in fuel modification
zones. To facilitate recovery of native
plants in non -fuel management areas,
topsoil shall be cleared, removed,
stockpiled, and then, at the conclusion
of grading, redistributed on cut and
fill slopes. Replaced topsoil shall
be stabilized to prevent erosion.
Mitigation Monitoring Program - 28 August 15, 1996
Biological Resources
Condition of Approval
Reference
Timing /Actions/
Frequency
Monitoring Staff
Measure of Compliance
(5) The applicant has proposed as mitigation
Vesting Map
Same as #(1) above
Same as #0) above
Same as #(1) above
that areas of the project site shall be
Condition (51)
retained in open space. An open space
easement (such as a conservation easement
IPD Condition
providing for dedication of development
(81)
rights) shall be recorded for Lot 5 (now
Lot A) and portions of Lot 6 (now Lots 4
and D) (within the 100 year flood limit
line) prior to or at the same time as
recordation of the first developable
lot identified on the Vesting Map.
Confirmation of the intent to conserve
lands with easements shall be made
in the project Development Agreement.
The treatment of the resources in
these conservation areas shall be addressed
in the Habitat Management Plan.
To implement these measures, the following
implementing measures shall be incorporated
into Vesting Map Conditions of Approval for
this project:
(1) No Zone Clearance shall be issued for
Vesting Map
Transfers to be
Community
Receipt of proof of
construction on Lots 1, Z 3, 4, or 10
(now Lots 1, Z and 3) of the Vesting Map
Condition (51)
completed prior
to issuance of
Development
Director (or
recordation from
until Open Space Lots 5, 7, 8 (now Lots A,
IPD Condition
Building or
designee) and,
the County Recorder's
Office
B, and Q have been recorded and any
(81)
grading permits
if required,
associated open space easements have been
approval of
transferred, dedicated or otherwise secured
format and
from development. Verification of Open
content by the
Space or Conservation Easement
City Attorney
dedications shall be provided with the
application for Zone Clearance. No
recordation of any Lots shall occur until
the completion of Caltrans right -of -way
land exchanges have been documented
(if such exchanges are still a component
of the applicant's program for land
acquisition and transfer). Evidence
of the successful exchange of right -of-
way shall be provided in the form of
recorded easement or ownership documents
prior to the approval or recordation
of any Phase of the Vesting Tentative Map.
Mitigation Monitoring Program - 29 August 16, 1996
Biological Resources
Condition of Approval
Reference
Timing /Actions/
Frequency
Monitoring Staff
Measure of Compliance
(2) The development or physical improvement
Vesting Map
Same as #(1) above
Same as #(1) above
Same as #(1) above
of Lot 5 (now Lot A) is prohibited. This
Condition (52)
Lot may be conveyed to an appropriate
public or land conservation entity at
the developer /subdividers discretion or
the Lot may be held in fee by the
subdivider. An irrevocable dedication
of all development, agricultural,
grazing, mineral, and extraction rights
and a Conservation or Open Space
Easement prohibiting all forms of
development (other than minor drainage
control or conveyance devices) shall
be placed on this Lot at the time of
recordation. Further, at the time of
recordation, a note shall also be
made on the Final Map that future
development is unconditionally
prohibited on Lot 5 (Lot A), with the
noted exceptions.
(3) Lot 6 (now Lots 4 and D) may either be
Vesting Map
Same as #(1) above
Same as #(1) above
Same as #(1) above
recorded with an Open Space or Conservation
Condition (53)
Easement or the Lot may be retained by the
subdivider for future use and development
with Open Space uses. No prohibition
on future zoning or General Plan
modifications of the Open Space
designation on Lot 6 (Lots 4 and D) is
expressed or implied by the recordation
of this Lot.
Mitigation Monitoring Program - 30 August 16, 1996
Biological Resources
Condition of Approval
Reference
Timing /Actions/
Frequency
Monitoring Staff
Measure of Compliance
(4) Lot 7 (now Lot 8) shall either (1) be
Vesting Map
Same as #(1) above
Same as #(1) above
Same as #0► above
retained in applicant ownership, (2)
Condition (53)
conveyed either to the City of Moorpark
or (31 conveyed to the Ventura County
Flood Control District with deed
restrictions prohibiting the construction
of environmentally destructive
drainage conveyance or management devices.
At the time of recordation, a note shall
be made on the Final Map that future
development is unconditionally prohibited
on Lot 7.
(5) The development or physical improvement of
Vesting Map
Same as #(1) above
Same as #(1) above
Same as #(1) above
Lots 8 and 9 (now Lot Cl shall be prohibited
Condition (54)
by deed restriction with the exception of
the installation drainage conveyance devices.
An irrevocable dedication of all
development rights and deed restriction
prohibiting all forms of development
(other than minor drainage control or
conveyance devices and necessary
environmental restoration) shall be placed
on these Lots at the time of recordation.
Further, at the time of recordation, a note
shall be made on the Final Map that future
development is unconditionally prohibited
on Lots 8 and 9 (now Lot C), with the noted
exceptions.
Mitigation Monitoring Program - 31 August 16, 1996
Biological Resources
Condition of Approval
Reference
Timing /Actions/
Frequency
Monitoring Staff
Measure of Compliance
(6) An updated tree report shall be prepared
Vesting Map
One time activity
EQAP Monitor or
Field verifications
once the required final geotechnical
Condition (55)
prior to issuance
other Community
and reporting to be
analysis of the project is complete and
of grading or
Development Director
provided by EQAP
final site design and grading evaluation
IPD Condition
building permits
designee. City
Monitor. Plan
has been completed. Any additional
(82)
Landscape Architect
verification to be
trees to be impacted by the project not
and /or contract
completed by City
included in the original assessment
biologist
Planning staff.
shall be incorporated into the tree
also would provide
report mitigation statistics (replacement
review assistance
value, etc.). To the degree feasible,
pertaining to
mature trees identified in the tree
tree replacement.
report at the margins of grading activity
shall be preserved whenever possible.
If preservation of the 46 potentially
impacted trees identified in the tree
report as likely to be adversely impacted
or destroyed by the implementation of
this project are destroyed, the value
of the trees removed shall be applied
to upgrading the size of oak tree
plantings associated with the project
identified in the Oak Woodland Restoration
and Reforestation Plan. Other methods
for complying with the intent of the
Moorpark Tree Ordinance may be considered
in providing offset for impacts to tree
species. Impacts to specimen trees shall
be addressed in the Habitat Restoration
Plan to be prepared for this project.
Impacts to Rare or Endangered Plant Populations
Vesting Map
Same as #(6) above
Same as #(6) above
Same as #(6) above
(1) Prior to approval of the Final Map and /or
issuance of rough grading permits, the
Condition (56)
two stands of Lyon's Pentachaeta must
be precisely mapped. The applicant shall
IPD Condition
fund all City costs to monitor the mapped
(83)
sensitive habitat areas during construction.
Mitigation Monitoring Program - 32 August 16, 1996
Biological Resources
Condition of Approval
Reference
Timing /Actions/
Frequency
Monitoring Staff
Measure of Compliance
Impacts to Riparian Habitats
(1) Prior to issuance of building permits
Vesting Map
Same as #(6) above
Same as #(6) above
Same as #(6) above
for either commercial or manufacturing
Condition (57)
facilities, the destruction and
modification of habitat within and
IPD Condition
adjacent to the riparian corridor shall
(84)
be compensated by the restoration of
Valley Oak Woodland and native riparian
tree canopy within the 100 year flood
limit line of Lot 6 (now Lots 4 and D)
adjacent to the Arroyo Simi. Mitigation
shall require successful establishment of
the following species and plant quantities:
Species Quantity
Populus fremontii (Cottonwood) 10
Alnus rhombifolia (Alder) 8
Acer negundo Subsp. (Box Elder) 8
Platanus racemosa (Sycamore) 20
Sambucus mexicana (Elderberry) 10
Juglans californicus (Walnut) 10
Quercus lobata (Valley Oak) 20
Quercus agrifolia (Live Oak) 20
Mitigation Monitoring Program - 33 August 16, 1996
Biological Resources
Condition of Approval
Reference
Timing /Actions/
Frequency
Monitoring Staff
Measure of Compliance
Trees shall at a minimum be 5 gallon
container specimens (except for willows
which can be 1 gallon in size) or bare
root at the time of planting with a
height of 7 feet from the root crown
to the top branch. A long term
supply of fresh (or reclaimed) water
shall be provided to assure the
perpetuity of the plants. Adequate
root guard protection shall be provided
to reduce mortality from rodent activity.
Department of Fish and Game 1603
Compliance procedures shall govern the
implementation of this restoration program
and a permit shall be obtained from this
agency prior to initiating rough grading
activities. Restoration areas shall
be incorporated into the project
Habitat Management Plan.
(2) The Habitat Management Plan shall require
Vesting Map
not applicable
not applicable
not applicable
the removal of the noxious giant reed
Condition (58) and
(Arundo donax) from the Arroyo Simi
IPD Condition
adjacent to the proposed project once
(85)
every three years or less frequently
if warranted. The landscape maintenance
program to be coordinated for slope
maintenance areas shall also address,
to the degree feasible, long term
removal of this species from the
portion of the Arroyo adjacent to
Lots 1, 3, and 4. Recommendations to
minimize regrowth of this plant shall
be identified in the Habitat Management
Plan.
Mitigation Monitoring Program - 34 August 16, 1996
Biological Resources
Condition of Approval
Reference
Timing /Actions/
Frequency
Monitoring Staff
Measure of Compliance
Indirect Impacts and the Distribution to the
Ecology of Surrounding Open Space
(1) Perimeter fencing shall be provided in
Vesting Map
One time activity
EQAP Monitor or
Field verification
areas where employees or visitors could
Condition (59)
upon completion
Community
to be provided by
obtain access to surrounding conservation
of finish grading
Development
EQAP Monitor
easement lands and maintenance areas which
lPD Condition
Director's
or Planning
can be used for native plant restoration.
(86)
designee
staff
(2) Off road vehicle (ORV) use on property
Vesting Map
Same as #(1) above
Same as #(1) above
Same as #(1) above
within the project boundary shall be
Condition (60)
prohibited. Signage shall be placed
on the property indicating that ORV
IPD Condition
use is prohibited.
(87)
Construction Related Vertebrate Mortality
and Impacts to Faunal Resources
(1) The applicant shall contribute $35,000
Vesting Map
not applicable
not applicable
not applicable
to a sensitive species mitigation program
Condition (61)
to be managed by the City. The purposes
superseded by
of this program include (1) studying the
Development
location and distribution of sensitive
Agreement
species, (2) restoring marginal habitats
Conditions
within proposed onsite conservation easement
areas or within permanent public open
space or right -of -way, (3) contributing
to the purchase of endangered habitats
on private land within the City.
Mitigation Monitoring Program - 35 August 16, 1996
Biological Resources
Condition of Approval
Reference
Timing /Actions/
Frequency
Monitoring Staff
Measure of Compliance
Cumulative Loss of Habitat, Plant Communities,
and Effects on Wildlife Corridors
(1) The project shall allow, to the extent
IPD Condition
One time activity
Community
Field verification
feasible, the preservation of the region
(87)
to be verified
Development
of fencing type to
as a secondary wildlife corridor for
by EQAP Monitor
Director's designee
be provided by EQAP
regional large animal movement. No
Monitor or Planning
fencing that is likely to preclude
staff
the use of this property as a
wildlife corridor shall be placed around
the perimeter of the property,
and all efforts to facilitate the
use of this property as a wildlife
corridor shall be made by the
applicant under the guidance of the
City.
Mitigation Monitoring Program - 36 Auou t 16, 1996
Noise
Condition of Approval
Reference
Timing /Actions/
Frequency
Monitoring Staff
Measure of Compliance
Issue 1: Short -Term Construction Noise
(1) No exceptions shall be permitted to
Vesting Map
During grading
Grading Inspector
Periodic inspections
construction activity limitations in City
Condition (35)
and construction
and Code Enforcement
Noise Ordinances in effect at the time
staff
individual Lots of the Vesting Tentative
IPD Condition
Map are developed.
(73)
(2) Designated parking areas for construction
Vesting Map
One time activity.
EOAP Monitor
Field verification
worker vehicles and for materials storage
Condition (36)
Designated areas
and City
by the EOAP
and assembly shall be provided. These
to be determined at
Engineer
Monitor and /or
areas shall be set back as far as
IPD Condition
pre- construction
City Engineering
possible from or otherwise shielded from
(74)
meeting,
staff
residential neighborhoods situated north of
the project site across the Arroyo Simi.
Impulse Noise Associated with Manufacturing
Activities
(1) All manufacturing processes and testing
Vesting Map
Verification of the
Community
Field verification
with sustained noise sources in excess
Condition (37)
addition of building
Development
of noise associated
of 65 dBa shall be contained within the
containment for
Director
with daily operations
plant facility. No uncontained detonations
IPD Condition
impulse noise to
(or designee)
to be performed by
shall be permitted. Compliance with this
(75)
be provided on site
and Building
City Planning staff
requirement may be achieved by a variety
plan. Long term
Reviewer
and building plan
of means including undergrounding facilities
monitoring to be
review by Building
for impulse tests, providing noise absorbing
achieved through
and Safety staff.
above ground structures, or by other means
periodic review of
devised by a certified acoustical consultant.
facility operations.
No single event testing shall be exempt
from this requirement. The tolerated
noise generation for the project at
the property line for Lot 3 shall not
exceed 65 dBA from 7 a.m. to 10 p.m. and
60 dBA from 10 p.m. to 7 a.m. or CNEL
values shall not exceed 65 dBA, whichever
standard is more restrictive.
Mitigation Monitoring Program - 37 August 16, 1996
Noise
Condition of Approval
Reference
Timing /Actions/
Frequency
Monitoring Staff
Measure of Compliance
Impulse Noise Associated with Manufacturing
Activities (continued)
If ambient noise levels exceed these
restrictions due to the proximity of State
Route 23, the ambient noise level shall be
the standard that shall not be exceeded at
the property line of Lot 3.
(2) The City shall require annual noise
Vesting Map
Same as #(1► above
Same as #(1) above
Same as #0) above
monitoring and reporting for any sustained
Condition (38)
noise generating activity. The Industrial
Planned Development Permits for any project
IPD Condition
constructed on Lot 3 shall be subject
(76)
to this requirement. If Lots 1 or
2 are converted from anticipated
commercial to manufacturing uses, noise
monitoring and reporting requirements shall
also apply to these lots as well.
The City shall, in the conditions for
the Industrial Planned Development Permits
associated with the project, reserve
the right to require additional noise
mitigation if monitoring data indicates such
mitigation is advisable.
Mitigation Monitoring Program - 38 August 16, 1996
Fire Hazards, Fire Suppression and
Risk of Upset Conditions
Condition of Approval
Reference
Timing /Actions/
Frequency
Monitoring Staff
Measure of Compliance
Fire Potential in the Proiect Vicinity: Topography
and Fuels
(1) Prior to approval of the Final Vesting
Draft EIR mitigation
All measures to
Staff of the County
Compliance to be
Map or issuance of building permits
measures have been
be satisfied
Fire Protection
verified through Plan
for any Lot, the applicant shall
superseded by
prior to issuance
District to review
Check. Field
retain a certified fire management
Vesting Map
of grading or
and approve all
verification, as
professional and a landscape architect to
Conditions (16 1)
building permit
plans. City Plan
required, to be
prepare a Fire Hazard Reduction Program;
through (196).
issuance unless
Check staff to
provided by
this program shall be prepared in
All EIR measures
otherwise
verify inclusion
Fire District
consultation with the County Fire Protection
have been included
specified in
of all District
staff, EQAP
District and shall be approved by
in these revised
revised
requirements.
Monitor, or
the Director of Community Development.
conditions.
Conditions'
A Community
Building Inspection
The certified fire management professional
IPD Conditions
of Approval.
Development
staff as appropriate.
shall be familiar with the objectives
(166) through
Director designee
of fuel management in wildland -urban
(203) also
(City staff, EQAP
interface. A native plant specialist
supersede EIR
Monitor) shall
shall participate in the development of
conditions.
monitor field
the fuel management program. The
conditions.
program shall apply to all lands
within 200 feet of the developed
portion of the project (or as amended
by the certified fire professional).
The vegetation management requirements of
the plan shall be clearly defined.
The proposed Owners Association shall be
responsible for implementing this program in
perpetuity. Fuel modification zones are
proposed to be retained in as natural
a state as safety and fire regulations
will permit. The zone will be designed
by and planted under the supervision
of a landscape architect with expertise
in native plant materials and habitat
restoration, with the approval of
the Director of Community Development,
to appear as a transition between
the built environment and natural open
space.
Mitigation Monitoring Program - 39 August 16, 1996
Fire Hazards, Fire Suppression and
Risk of Upset Conditions
Condition of Approval
Reference
Timing /Actions/
Frequency
Monitoring Staff
Measure of Compliance
Within the modification zone, native and
non - native high -fuel vegetation will be
removed and replaced with low -fuel
vegetation. The height of plant
materials will be kept to a minimum.
Planting requirements should include a
combination of trees, shrubs,
and groundcover. Irrigation should not
be provided unless necessitated by the
plant materials selected.
(2) All structures adjacent to open space
Same as #(1) above
Same as #(1) above
Same as #(1) above
Same as #0► above
and structures with blow -out walls shall
be designed to satisfy fire retarding
architectural and building code requirements
of the City and the County Fire
Protection District.
Adequacy of Dual Access
(1) Provisions for adequate all weather dual
Refer to #0► above
The Vesting Map
Community
Revisions are
access to Lots 1 and 2 shall be
has been revised
Development
for Lot 3.
incorporated into future submittals for
to reflect
Director or
Lots 1 and 2
Commercial or Industrial Planned Development
recommendations
designee
dual access to be
Permits. Approval of adequate dual access
in the Draft EIR
determined by
plans for both of these lots shall be
and Alternatives
future CPD
required prior to Final Vesting Map
Analysis regarding
Permit.
approval. An acceptable primary and
Lot 3 (prior Lot
dual access plan for Lot 4 (now flag area
4 was deleted).
of Lot 3) shall be prepared prior to
Dual access to Lots
certification of the Final EIR.
land 2 to be
If such a plan, acceptable to the
established by
County Fire Prevention District,
future CPD
cannot be conceived, then Lot 4 should
Permits.
be deleted from the Vesting Map and the
land within Lot 4 should be incorporated
into Lot 3 (this revision was made).
Mitigation Monitoring Program - 40 August 16, 1996
Fire Hazards, Fire Suppression and
Risk of Upset Conditions
Condition of Approval
Reference
Timing /Actions/
Frequency
Monitoring Staff
Measure of Compliance
Construction Related Fire Hazards
To mitigate construction related fire hazards,
Refer to revised
Periodic during
EQAP Monitor,
Field verification
the following mitigation measures shall be required:
mitigation measures
the grading
City Building
by EQAP Monitor
(1) During all grading and site clearance
referenced above
portion of the
construction
and Grading
Inspectors, and
or other
identified monitors
activities, earth moving equipment shall
process
Fire Protection
be equipped with spark arrestors and at
District
least two portable fire extinguishers per
vehicle. All equipment used in the
vegetation clearance phase shall be equipped
with spark arrestors and best available
fire safety technology. The vegetation
clearance activities shall be coordinated with
and approved by the County Fire Protection
District.
(2) All equipment and material staging activities
Refer to revised
Same as #(1) above
Same as #0► above
Same as #(1) above
shall be coordinated with the County Fire
mitigation measures
Protection District. Notification of staging
referenced above
locations and equipment storage areas shall
be provided to the District and a location
acceptable to the District shall be designated.
Fire prone construction activities (initial
vegetation clearance, hauling and stockpiling
of vegetation, or any construction
activity involving concentrated sources of
heat) shall be prohibited during
"Santa Ana" wind conditions.
Cumulative Impacts on Fire Protection Services
(1) The primary and dual access road system
Refer to revised
Measure to be
County Fire Protection
Review and
proposed for the project shall be
reviewed and approved by the Ventura
mitigation measures
referenced above
satisfied prior
to issuance of
District staff and
City Plan Check staff
approval of grading
and building plans
County Fire Protection District prior to
grading or building
issuance of grading permits.
permits
(2) Approved turn around areas for fire
apparatus shall be provided where any
access road is 150 feet or
more from the main project access.
Mitigation Monitoring Program - 41 August 16, 1996
Fire Hazards, Fire Suppression and
Risk of Upset Conditions
Condition of Approval
Reference
Timing /Actions/
Frequency
Monitoring Staff
Measure of Compliance
(3) If deemed necessary by the District, the
Same as #(1) above
Same as #(1) above
Same as #(1) above
Same as #(1) above
project shall include a helispot and
associated fire suppression equipment storage.
Any heliport facilities shall be indicated
on the Final Map for the project.
(4) Any gates to control vehicle access are to
Same as #(1) above
Same as #(1) above
Same as #(1) above
Same as #(1) above
be located to allow a vehicle waiting for
entrance to be completely off the public
roadway. The method of gate control shall
be subject to review by the County Fire
Protection District. A minimum clear
open width of 15 feet in each direction
shall be provided. If gates are to be
locked, a Knox System shall be installed.
(5) Prior to approval of the Final Vesting Map,
Same as #(1) above
Same as #(1) above
Same as #(1) above
Same as #(1) above
proposed street names shall be submitted
to the Fire Department Communication Center
and City Engineering Department for review
and approval.
(6) Street signs consistent with County Road
Same as #(1) above
Same as #(1) above
Same as #(1) above
Same as #(1) above
and Fire District Standards shall be
installed prior to occupancy.
(7) Prior to construction, the applicant
Same as #(1) above
Same as #(1) above
Same as #(1) above
Same as #(1) above
shall submit plans to the Ventura
County Fire Protection District for the
approval of the location of fire hydrants;
all hydrants shall be shown on the plan
that are situated within 500 feet of the
perimeter of the development.
(8) A minimum fire flow of 1,000 gallons per
Same as #(1) above
Same as #(1) above
Same as #(1) above
Same as #(1) above
minute shall be provided for all four Lots.
The location and capacity of all water
storage and conveyance facilities shall be
reviewed and approved by the District
prior to the recordation of the Final
Map and prior to the issuance
of building permits.
Mitigation Monitoring Program - 42 August 16, 1996
Fire Hazards, Fire Suppression and
Risk of Upset Conditions
Condition of Approval
Reference
Timing /Actions/
Frequency
Monitoring Staff
Measure of Compliance
(9) Fire hydrants shall be installed and in
Refer to revised
Same as #(1) above
Same as #(1) above
Same as #(1) above
service prior to combustible construction
mitigation measures
and shall conform to the minimum standards
for Vesting Map
of the County Water Works Manual.
(161) through (196)
and IPD Conditions
These standards specify:
(166) through (203)
• Each hydrant shall be a 6 inch wet barrel
design, and shall have one 4 inch and
one 2 1/2 inch outlet.
• The required fire flow shall be achieved
at no less than 20 psi residual pressure.
• Fire hydrants shall be spaced 500 feet
on center, and so located that no
structure will be farther than 250 feet
from any one hydrant.
• Fire hydrants shall be 24 inch on center,
recessed in from the curb face.
(10) All grass or brush exposing any structures
Same as #(1) above
Same as #0) above
Same as #(1) above
shall be cleared for a distance of 100 feet
prior to framing or assembly (for tilt up
concrete structures).
California Administrative Code (Title 24- Section
2.1217) requirements that shall be imposed on the
project include:
0 1) Address numbers, a minimum of 4 inches high,
Same as #0) above
Same as #(1) above
Same as #0 ► above
shall be installed prior to occupancy, shall
be of contrasting color to the background,
and shall be readily visible at night.
Where structures are set back more
than 150 feet from the street, larger
numbers will be required so that
they are distinguishable from the street.
In the event the structure(s) is not
visible from the street, the address
number(s) shall be posed adjacent
to the driveway entrance.
Mitigation Monitoring Program - 43 August 15, 1996
Fire Hazards, Fire Suppression and
Condition of Approval
Timing /Actions/
Risk of Upset Conditions
Reference
Frequency
Monitoring Staff
Measure of Compliance
(12) Portions of this development may be
in a hazardous fire area and
Same as #(1) above
Same as #0) above
Same as #0) above
those structures shall meet hazardous
fire area building code requirements.
Adequacy of Water Supply for Fire Suppression
(1) The ultimate fire suppression and fire
flow requirements for buildout of all
Issues resolved prior
to EIR certification.
not applicable
not applicable
not applicable
four developable lots within the project
No additional
boundary shall be computed by the
mitigation required.
applicant's Civil Engineer based on a
reasonable projection of future uses.
If projected fire flows would not
be adequate using proposed pump station
volumes, then on -site reservoir storage
shall be provided commensurate with Fire
District projections of fire flow requirements.
This issue shall be resolved prior to
certification of the Final EIR.
Risks of Fire, Explosion, Detonation and
Other Upset Conditions
(1) For any lots developed with manufacturing
uses, the applicant shall prepare a Risk
IPD Conditions
(145) through
All required plans
to be prepared
Plan review by
Community
Management Plan, Emergency Response Plan,
(147)
and periodically
appropriate
Federal and State
Development
Director (or
and Hazards Materials Management Plans
acceptable to the City and the County
updated to assure
agencies and County
designee) to
Fire Prevention District. These plans
low level of risk
to the community
Fire Protection
District
periodically
monitor compliance
shall be reviewed and approved by the
activities and
City Director of Community Development prior
facility operations.
to Final Inspection or issuance of
Certificates of Occupancy.
Mitigation Monitoring Program - 44 August 16, 1996
Mitigation Monitoring Program - 45 August 16, 1996
Condition of Approval
Timing /Actions/
Transportation and Circulation
Reference
Frequency
Monitoring Staff
Measure of Compliance
Issue 1: The Effects of Project Added Traffic on
Future Year 2000 and 2010 Intersection Conditions
( Proiect Specific Impacts)
(1) The applicant (SDI) shall contribute to the
Vesting Map
Fees to be paid
City Engineer
Receipt and
Los Angeles Avenue Area of Contribution
Condition 0 25)
prior to issuance
and Director
acceptance of
Fund. The fee that shall be imposed on
of building
of Community
fees by the
the project shall be defined by the City
permits
Development
City
Council as a condition of approval for
the Tentative Vesting Map and Industrial
Planned Development Permit. The proposed
fee of approximately $150,785 (for 150,000
square feet of development) shall be
reviewed and revised since the proposed
project has been substantially increased in
size since this fee was originally
negotiated (in December of 1994).
(2) The applicants for future commercial
Vesting Map
Fees to be paid
Same as #(1) above
Same as #(1) above
projects shall make appropriate contributions
Condition 0 25)
in the future
to the Los Angeles Area of Contribution
prior to issuance
Fund based on fee schedules in
of building
effect at the time of building
permits
permit issuance.
(3) The applicant (SDI) shall contribute to
IPD Condition
Fees to be paid
Same as #(1) above
Same as #(1► above
the City -wide Traffic Mitigation Fee
(31)
in accord with
Program that is currently under consideration.
Development
The fee that shall be imposed on the project
Vesting Map
Agreement
shall be defined by the City Council as a
Condition 0 26)
disposition
condition of approval for the Tentative
Vesting Map and Industrial Planned
Development Permit. The proposed fee
of approximately $75,000 (for 150,000
square feet of development) shall be
reviewed and revised since the proposed
project has been substantially increased in
size since this fee was originally
negotiated (in December of 1994).
Mitigation Monitoring Program - 45 August 16, 1996
Mitigation Monitoring Program - 46 August 16, 1996
Condition of Approval
Timing /Actions/
Transportation and Circulation
Reference
Frequency
Monitoring Staff
Measure of Compliance
(4) The applicants for future commercial
Vesting Map
Same as #(3) above
Same as #11► above
Same as #(1) above
projects shall make appropriate contributions
Condition 0 26)
to the City -wide Traffic Mitigation Fee
and 0 27)
Program. If such a City -wide fee is not
adopted prior to application for building
permits, the appropriate fee shall be imposed
as a condition of approval for Commercial
Planned Development permits.
Operation of the New Los Angeles Avenue /State
Vesting Map
Interchange to
City Engineer
Same as #(1) above
Route 23 Interchange with Full Project Buildout
The applicant has agreed to fund a major
improvement of the State Route 23 /New Los
Condition 0 10)
be upgraded prior
and City
Angeles Avenue Interchange that has been
to occupancy
Traffic
coordinated with the City and Caltrans.
Engineer
With the completion of this improvement,
all impacts to this location associated
with the project and cumulative buildout
will be fully mitigated.
Proiect Consistency with the Ventura
County General Plan
(1) The applicant (SDI) and applicants for
None - until a
not applicable
not applicable
not applicable
future commercial projects shall make
City - County Mutual
appropriate contributions to any adopted
funding agreement
reciprocal traffic mitigation fee agreement
is signed
between the City of Moorpark and the
County of Ventura in effect at the
time an entitlement is granted. This
participation shall be based on a
pro -rata contribution defined by
the City Traffic Engineer.
Mitigation Monitoring Program - 46 August 16, 1996
Public Services and Utilities
Condition of Approval
Reference
Timing /Actions/
Frequency
Monitoring Staff
Measure of Compliance
Educational Quality and School Facilities
(1) Prior to issuance of building permits for
IPD Condition
Fees to be paid
Director of
Receipt of
either the manufacturing or commercial
(53)
prior to issuance
Community
fees and
components of the project, all legally
of building
Development
acceptance
mandated school impact fees applicable
permits
(or designee)
by School
at the time of building permit application
District
shall be paid to the Moorpark Unified
School District.
Police and Emergency Services
(1) Prior to issuance of building permits
IPD Condition
Prior to issuance
City Police
Modification
for either the manufacturing (Lots 3 and 4)
Condition 0 64)
of building
Department
of plans in
or commercial (Lots 1 and 2) components
permits, plans
and Director
accord with
of the project, the Moorpark Police
to be revised
of Community
security
Department shall review development plans
and amended
Development
recommendations.
for the incorporation of defensible space
as recommended
Field verifications
concepts to reduce demands on police
through Plan
services. To the degree feasible,
Check and
public safety planning recommendations shall
construction
be incorporated into project plans.
inspection
The applicant shall prepare a list of
process.
project features and design components
that demonstrate responsiveness to defensible
space design concepts. The City Director
of Community Development shall be responsible
for review and approval of all defensible
space design features incorporated into both
manufacturing and commercial projects. This
review shall occur prior to initiation
of plan check for either manufacturing
or commercial buildings.
Mitigation Monitoring Program - 47 August 15, 1996
Public Services and Utilities
Condition of Approval
Reference
Timing /Actions/
Frequency
Monitoring Staff
Measure of Compliance
(2) The applicant (or future applicants) shall
IPD Condition
Prior to issuance
Moorpark Police
Modification of
prepare and submit to the City Director
(160)
of building
Chief and
plans in
of Community Development for review and
permits, plans
Community
accord with
approval Security Plans for Commercial
to be amended
Development
security
Developments situated on Lots 1 or 2.
and revised
Director
recommendations.
These plans will be reviewed and approved
as recommended
(or designee)
Field verification
through the Commercial Planned Development
through Plan Check
permit process. A security plan shall
and construction
also be provided for manufacturing facilities
inspection process.
situated on Lots 3 or 4. SDI (or other
manufacturing facility developers) shall
provide a private security program to
assure the safety of all explosive and /or
hazardous materials used in present or
future manufacturing operations. These plans
shall be prepared to assure reduction
of potential service demands on police
or emergency service providers. The
plan shall be approved prior to the
issuance of building permits for
construction on any developable Lots.
Solid Waste Facilities and Planning
(1) Prior to approval of the issuance of
IPD Condition
Plan to be
Community
Preparation and
building permits for either manufacturing
(59)
prepared prior
Development
acceptance of
or commercial development on Lots 1, 2, 3,
to issuance of
Director
solid waste plan
or 4, a Solid and Hazardous Waste
building
by the City
Management Plan shall be prepared and
permits
submitted to the City Director of Community
Development for review and approval.
This plan shall include specific measures
to reduce the amount of refuse generated
by the proposed project and shall be
developed in consultation with the Ventura
County Sold Waste Management District and
the City of Moorpark to meet waste
reduction requirements established by
the California Integrated Waste Management
Act of 1989.
Mitigation Monitoring Program - 48 August 15, 1996
Public Services and Utilities
Condition of Approval
Reference
Timing /Actions/
Frequency
Monitoring Staff
Measure of Compliance
(2) The Solid and Hazardous Waste Management
IPD Condition (60)
Same as #(1) above
Same as #(1) above
Same as #(1) above
Plan shall include provisions for the
recycling of manufacturing or commercial
facility waste products suitable for reuse
programs. A green waste reduction
program for landscaping maintenance shall
be included in this Plan. Provisions for
on -site source separation and recycling
shall be incorporated into the building
plans for any buildings or facilities
constructed on Lots 1, 2 or 3.
(3) The Solid Waste Mitigation Plan shall
IPD Condition (61)
Same as #0► above
Same as #(1) above
Same as #(1) above
require the integration of waste reduction
and hazardous waste management concepts
into the project CC & R's for the Lots
included within the Vesting Map.
(4) Where feasible, the use of recycled building
IPD Condition (62)
Same as #(1) above
Community
Inclusion of proper
materials shall be included in the construction
Development
language in
of both the manufacturing and commercial
Director
CC &Rs
components of the project. Language
(or designee)
shall be included in the CC &R's to
to review
encourage such use.
compliance
(5) Any on -site commercial cafeteria(s)
IPD Condition (63)
Same as #(1) above
Same as #(4) above
Same as #(4) above
shall include "built -in" recycling and
trash separation areas.
(6) Both commercial and manufacturing projects
IPD Condition (64)
Same as #(1) above
Same as #(1) above
Same as #(1) above
shall include designated recycling areas
with appropriate bins to provide for
on -site source separation. Bins shall
also be provided for greenwaste and
related recyclable material. Specific
solid waste source separation areas shall
be provided for all Lots.
Mitigation Monitoring Program - 49 August 16, 1996
Aesthetics and Visual Resources
Condition of Approval
Reference
Timing /Actions/
Frequency
Monitoring Staff
Measure of Compliance
Proiect Visibility Along Public Street View Corridors
(1) The entrance to the proposed project shall
Revised by Vesting
Review of Final
Community
Review and
incorporate suitable community entry
Map Condition (34)
Landscape
Development
acceptance of
monumentation, appropriate landscaping
Plans - The
Director
Final Landscape
at entry points, and a program of
IPD Condition
Project
(or designee)
plans
coordinated signage. An orderly and
(28)
Description
consistent street tree planting program
has been
shall be required for the project entrance
modified to
roads and entrances to the commercial
reflect this
properties (Lots 1 and 2). The streetscape
requirement
landscaping pattern along the entranceways
should incorporate vertical elements
(in the form of trees and /or lighting)
that help to define and enclose the street.
All entry roads shall be planted so trees
are spaced at equal intervals. Recommended
tree plantings for these entry points
shall be extended from the New Los Angeles
Avenue underpass into the parking area for
Lot 3.
(2) To the degree feasible and permitted by
Revised by Vesting
The project
Community
Review and
geotechnical constraints, the northern
Map Condition (33)
Landscape plan
Development
acceptance of
perimeter of the project adjacent to the
should be
Director
the Landscape
Arroyo Simi shall be designed to provide
IPD Condition
modified to
(or designee)
plan by the
a setback from the escarpment above the
(27)
reflect this
City.
Arroyo Simi. An oak woodland restoration
requirement
Field verification
zone shall be provided on the edge and
prior to submittal
by EQAP Monitor
side slope of this re- graded escarpment.
to the City for
or City arborist
The entire areas of visible surface of the
review and
or landscape
fill slopes proposed along the northern
approval
architect.
side of the development should be planted
and screened with native woodland tree
species common in oak woodland habitats.
The ridge system demarcating the northern
perimeter of the project should, to the
extent feasible, be restored to native
woodland conditions. Landscaping around
the escarpment system, once it is stabilized
after rough grading, shall emphasize
reestablishment of existing native and
non - native habitat.
Mitigation Monitoring Program - 50 August 16, 1996
Mitigation Monitoring Program - 51 August 16, 1996
Condition of Approval
Timing /Actions/
Aesthetics and Visual Resources
Reference
Frequency
Monitoring Staff
Measure of Compliance
Proiect Visibility Along Public Street View Corridors
(continued)
The landscaping program around
the escarpment boundary shall emphasize
the use of tiered, tree lined buttress
fills, which should be set back in
segments to prevent highly visible
buttress or crib walls.
(3) Lot 3 along the western perimeter of the
Same as #(2) above
Same as #0 above
Same as #(2) above
Same as #(2) above
project shall incorporate the use of
a berm and extensive tree and shrub
native landscaping to minimize the visibility
of the manufacturing facilities.
Transformation of the Rural Landscape and Quality
of Life Impacts on Surrounding Properties
(1) The lowest intensity adequate night lighting
Vesting Map
Photometric
Same as #(2) above
Review of photometric
shall be required within the streetscape
Condition (39)
plans to be
plans prior to
and at intersections. A photometric
and (46)
submitted for
zoning clearance
plan shall be prepared which shall
review and
have, as a primary design objective,
approval prior
creating a low intensity night lighting
to zoning
solution to development of Lots 3 and 4.
clearance for
All lighting within 200 feet of the
a building
Arroyo Simi shall be shielded and
permit
directed away from the Arroyo. Building
lighting restrictions shall be included in
the project CC and Rs and Planned
Development Permit conditions for all four
developable Lots.
Mitigation Monitoring Program - 51 August 16, 1996
Aesthetics and Visual Resources
Condition of Approval
Reference
Timing /Actions/
Frequency
Monitoring Staff
Measure of Compliance
Issue 5: Hillside Manaaement Considerations
(1) The design of the project shall be modified
Development
not applicable
not applicable
not applicable
to comply, to the extent feasible, with
Agreement
the design guidelines and development
Language and
standards contained in the City's Hillside
agreements
Management Ordinance. The framework
supersede this
for compliance is provided in the EIR
condition
analysis of applicable features of the
Ordinance (in Chapter 16 of the EIR).
Final details concerning landscaping,
streetscape, and the architecture of
manufacturing facilities shall be
provided to the City Director of
Community Development as part of
the IPD compliance process.
Mitigation Monitoring Program - 52 August 16, 1996
Cultural and Heritage Resources
Condition of Approval
Reference
Timing /Actions/
Frequency
Monitoring Staff
Measure of Compliance
(1) A cultural resource monitoring program shall
Vesting Map
Grading Monitor
EQAP Monitor to
EQAP Monitoring
be instituted during the initial vegetation
Condition (62)
to be continued
arrange for
report to
clearance for the project. The purpose
until all
qualified monitor
verify compliance
of this monitoring program is to determine
IPD Condition
clearing,
and Chumash
with mitigation
if any significant deposits not identified
(89)
grubbing, and
representative
program
during the Phase I and If survey exist
initial 2 meters
within the project boundary. The monitoring
of excavation
shall be limited to the initial
by heavy equipment
vegetation clearance phase of the grading
is completed
program. If cultural deposits meeting
the significance criteria defined in CEQA
Guidelines are encountered, limited data
recovery shall be conducted. The costs
of this data recovery shall be limited
as defined in Appendices to CEQA Guidelines.
Chumash representatives shall be actively
involved in the monitoring and any
subsequent phases of the project mitigation
program. Participation shall include
monitoring of archaeological investigations,
construction monitoring, and data analysis.
(2) Prior to initiation of rough grading, the
Vesting Map
Data recovery
Qualified cultural
EQAP or Community
surface artifacts situated within Ven -898
Condition (63)
to be completed
resource specialist
Development Director
shall be mapped, recorded, and collected
prior to
to clear the deposit
to be informed
and this data, together with previously
IPD Condition
initiation of
prior to initiation
that site deposit
collected Phase II subsurface testing
(90)
rough grading
of grading and
is cleared prior
information, shall be incorporated into
issuance of grading
to issuance
a cultural resource mitigation document for
permit
of grading
the project. This report should also
permit
address the results of any investigation
related to monitoring of initial grading
activities.
Mitigation Monitoring Program - 53 August 16, 1996
Paleontological Resources
Condition of Approval
Reference
Timing /Actions/
Frequency
Monitoring Staff
Measure of Compliance
(1) A paleontological mitigation plan outlining
procedures for paleontological data recovery
Vesting Map
Condition (64)
Data recovery to
be conducted during
EQAP Monitor to
review
Completion of
data
shall be prepared and submitted to the City
Community Development Department Director
IPD Condition
initial grading
grading
activities and
recovery
report or
for review and approval prior to the
(91)
monitoring if
significant
request presence of
paleontologist
EQAA Monitoring
report (if no
initiation of mass grading. The development
and implementation of this program shall
on an as- needed
resources are
include consultations with the applicant's
basis
found during
engineering geologist. The monitoring and
grading)
data recovery shall be performed by a
qualified paleontologist. The data recovery
should include periodic inspections of
excavations and, if necessary, fossil data
recovery should be performed to recover
exposed fossil material. The costs of
this data recovery shall be limited to
the recovery of a reasonable sample of
available material. The interpretation
of reasonableness shall rest with the
City Community Development Department
Director. The costs of this paleontological
mitigation plan shall not exceed the
financial limitations set forth in CEQA
Appendix K Guidelines.
Mitigation Monitoring Program - 54 August 15, 1996
1
Zone Change No. 95 -3 - Requires adoption of an ordinance to revise
the Project site zoning for Vesting Tentative Map No. 5004 Lots 1
and 2 (11.52 acres) from Open Space (OS) -40 Acres to Commercial
Planned Development (CPD), for Lot 3 (39.86 acres) from OS -40 Acres
to Limited Industrial (M -2), for Lot 4 (10 acres) from OS -40 Acres
to OSI for Lot B (22.95 acres) from OS -40 Acres to OS, for Lot C
(15.66 acres) from OS -40 Acres to OS, for Lot D (11.98 acres) from
OS -40 Acres to OS, and for the portion of Lot A located in the
County (56.84 acres), to pre -zone that area as OS -40 Acres.
ZONE CHANGE 95 -3 (SDI)
ORDINANCE NO.
IM �AV' AV' 1
z'.rc r�_ero'