HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 1996 0904 CC REG ITEM 07ETO: The
AGENDA REPORT
C=TY O1F MOORPARK
Honorable City Council
FROM: Kenneth C. Gilbert, Director of Public Works
DATE: August 20, 1996 (CC Meeting: 9 -4 -96)
l
?0r
SUBJECT: Consider Approval of an Increase to the Project Cost and
a Change to the FY 1996/97 Budget for a Project to Widen
Moorpark Avenue to Facilitate Right Turn Traffic from
Moorpark Avenue to Poindexter Avenue
On June 5, 1996, the City Council awarded a contract for the
subject project.
A. Revised Contract Cost
pndx.rl
During the course of construction the City was advised by
Caltrans that it is necessary to relocate certain traffic
signal conduits which interconnect the Poindexter traffic
signal to the High Street signal and the railroad crossing
preemptive circuit. The cost of a Change Order to cover this
and other work is $5,750. This amount exceeds the ten percent
(10 %) construction contingency approved for the project. It is
necessary, therefore, to request City Council approval of a
revised project cost and budget for this project. The work was
authorized by the City Manager in advance of City Council
approval in order to avoid construction delays.
The project cost adjustment requested below also includes an
increase to the construction contingency and an adjustment to
the Inspection and Contract Administration costs to reflect
actual anticipated costs. A summary of the requested increase
to the approved project cost is as follows:
r -I
Original
Revised
Estiaated
Additional
Estizated
Relent
Cost
Cost
Cost
• Design
4,000
0
4,000
• Printing, Advertising, etc.
100
0
100
• Construction
19,909
5,750
25,659
• Construction Contingency (10 %)
1,991
750
2,741
• Advin & Inspection
2,000
X500
-150-0
Total
28,000
8,000
36,000
r -I
Poindexter Right Turn Lane
September 1996
Page 2
B. Budget Carryover
It was presumed that the construction of this project would
have been completed before July 1996. The bulk of the funds
for the project were, therefore, budgeted in FY 1995/96. As
you know, the work was not started until recently. However,
the unexpended funds in FY 1995/96 were not carried over to FY
1996/97. It is necessary, therefore, to include in the
required budget amendment, the reappropriation and re- budgeting
of funds for this project. A summary of the required budget
amendments is as follows:
RFC�NHEND1�iTION
Staff recommends that the City Council take the following actions:
1. Approve the revised project cost and construction
contingency for the subject project as stated in this
report.
2. Approve a changes to the appropriations
for FY 1996/97 as follows:
a) LTF Fund (203.801.8015.000.9903):
($5,000 decrease);
b) L A AOC Fund (211.901.8015.000
$31,000 ($31,000 increase).
pndx.rl
and budget amount
from 5,000 to 0
.9903): from 0 to
Current
Unexpended/
Revised
Elpvent
%"t ($)
* Ch
FY 1995/96
• 027.142.903.000420 [L A AOC]
30 000
r
(25,000)
5,000
FY 1996/97
• 203.801.8015.000.9903 [LTF]
5,000
* (5,000)
0
• 211.901.8015.000.9903 [L A AOC]
0
* 31,000
_�,
Two Year Total
36,000
RFC�NHEND1�iTION
Staff recommends that the City Council take the following actions:
1. Approve the revised project cost and construction
contingency for the subject project as stated in this
report.
2. Approve a changes to the appropriations
for FY 1996/97 as follows:
a) LTF Fund (203.801.8015.000.9903):
($5,000 decrease);
b) L A AOC Fund (211.901.8015.000
$31,000 ($31,000 increase).
pndx.rl
and budget amount
from 5,000 to 0
.9903): from 0 to