HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 1996 0911 CC SPC ITEM 03AAGENDA
C = TY OF MOORPARK ��
TO: The Honorable City Council j
FROM: Kenneth C. Gilbert, Director of Public Works
DATE: September 9, 1996 (CC Meeting: 9- 11 -96)
SUBJECT: Consider Approval of an Increase to the Project Cost and
a Change to the FY 1996/97 Budget for a Project to Widen
Moorpark Avenue to Facilitate Right Turn Traffic from
Moorpark Avenue to Poindexter Avenue
On June 5, 1996, the City Council awarded a contract for the
subject project. On September 4, 1996, the City Council approved
a change to the budget for the project to re- appropriate and re-
budget unexpended monies from last Fiscal Year and to fund certain
additional costs related to the relocation of the conduits and
wiring for the traffic signal interconnect and railroad preemptive
circuit.
g •
VW
The westerly relocation of the curb and gutter is not
compatible with the slope and elevation of the existing
pavement adjacent to the old curb and gutter. It is necessary,
therefore, to remove and replace an additional four feet (41)
wide strip of pavement to reduce the slope on the west side of
the street to match the elevation of the lip of the new gutter.
In hindsight one could say that this factor, and these costs,
should have been anticipated and included in the project design
and project construction cost estimate. However, in an effort
to control and minimize design costs, the design effort did not
include the level of surveying required to predict this problem
and design in a solution. It should be pointed out that, if
the design effort had identified this problem and the design
had included this required work, the scope and cost of
construction would have included these additional costs. There
is, therefore, no increase in the work and cost required to
construct this project.
In order to avoid a delay which could prevent the work being
completed prior to the Country Days Parade, the City Manager
approved the change order for this required additional work.
pndx.r2
Poindexter Right Turn Lane: C.O. #2
September 1996
Page 2
B. Revised Project Cost
The revised estimated cost for the subject project is as
follows:
Element
• Design
• Printing, Advertising, etc.
• Construction
• Construction Contingency (10 %)
• Admin & Inspection
Total
• — :_ {i- • F t 1-74 N
Prior
Revised
Estimated
Additional
Estimated
cost
cost
Cost
4,000
0
4,000
100
0
100
26,659
12,113
38,772
1,741
(113)
1,628
3,500
0
3,500
36,000
12,000
48,000
A re -cap of the recommended revised FY 1996/97 budget and total
project cost estimate is summarized as follows:
Current Revised
Element Bit (s) C e Paget (S)
• 211.901.8015.000.9903 [L A AOC] 31,000 a k i-2-,W
• Plus FY 1995/96 Costs 5,000 0 5.000
Two Year Total 4-
Staff rm4commends at the City Council approve a changes to the
approp ions and at
for the subject project for FY 1996/97 as
follo s: L A AOC Fund (211.901.8015.000.9903): from $31,000 to
$43,0100 ($12,000 ncrease).
pndz.r2