HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 1996 0918 CC REG ITEM 10BCITY OF MOORPARK
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
TO: The Honorable City Council
FROM: Donald P. Reynolds Jr., Administrative Services Manager
DATE: September 11, 1996
SUBJECT: Consider Replacement for the City's High Volume Copier
Background
7 . �O
ITEM 10* 19.)
3a8 . q_65) CC
In October, 1988, the City entered into a 60 month lease /purchase agreement for a
high volume copier made by IBM, to accompany the City's Canon NP7550 bought in
1985. The IBM 111 85 ( "IBM ") service and lease were purchased by Kodak, and the City
has maintained a dual relationship with Kodak and various Canon copier dealers since
this time. The total cost of the IBM was $44,140.
Each year, as the IBM ages, the City pays more for fewer copies. In 1993, when the
volumes peaked at 682,000 copies, the City paid approximately $300 per month for
service. Now, at a volume of 255,900, the City pays approximately $500 per month for
service. On July 31, 1996, Kodak discontinued service of the machine, having met their
seven year obligation to support this equipment.
The original goal of having a high volume copier was to produce the Council agenda.
This IBM performed satisfactorily except that it would over -heat when duplexing. The
City's decision to out - source the Agenda in 1994/95, coincided well with the aging IBM
that would no longer duplex reliably.
In 1990, the City bought a small copier (Canon NP2020) to accompany the Canon
NP7550 and the IBM. The old Canon was moved into the Annex in 1991. Decreasing
reliability of the IBM was part of the factors that led the City to purchase a new mid -
volume machine for City Hall in 1993: a Kodak 95s. This was also a 60 month
lease /purchase agreement. In 1994/95, three low to medium volume copiers were
added to the City's inventory including: Canon NP4835- a low to medium volume
machine for the Senior Center; Canon NP3325- a slightly smaller machine for AVCP,
and; a rebuilt Canon 6060 for the Annex, moving the old Canon NP7550 to the Public
Works Yard. The Canon 6060 and the Kodak 95s are the same medium volume
machine, except for a few minor changes made by Kodak to the Canon equipment.
Now, the City uses seven copiers, four at City Hall (one low, two medium and one high
volume machine), and three off - premise.
0057
Attachment "A" summarizes the City's copy volumes since FY 1993/94. Copy volumes
at City Hall decreased by 90,000 in 1994/95 when the Agenda was contracted for
reproduction. However, the total copies being made in the City remained stable at
between 1.17 to 1.16 million copies per year. The additional programs being managed
by the Senior Center and the Arroyo Vista Community Center more than offset the
reduction in volume at City Hall. Because the IBM can no longer handle the large
projects, the Kodak 95s is functioning at a capacity higher than anticipated when
originally purchased. The copiers at AVCP and the Senior Center are also operating at
a 30 percent higher rate than anticipated.
Attachment "B" illustrates how the copy volumes are being distributed, and shows the
disproportionate relationship between the 95s and the IBM. For example, in 1993/94,
the IBM was produced 64 percent of the City Hall work load, but only 22 percent last
fiscal year. The Kodak 95s however, produced almost twice as much as the IBM (43
percent), and is a much smaller machine.
Discussion
Equipment Needs
In April, 1996, staff estimated the cost of a copier to replace the IBM, using copy
volume statistics to arrive at the conclusion that another medium volume machine could
replace the IBM (based on the IBM's 1995/96 statistics). The NP6060 was bought in
1995 reconditioned for $10,000, and based on this is the amount, the Council
appropriated $11,250, split as follows: Gas Tax Fund- $2,250; Community
Development Fund- $3,000 and; the General Fund- $6,000.
Since July 1, 1996, staff has evaluated the actual use of City copiers, (Attachments "A"
and "B "), and has also looked carefully at specific copy jobs and needs. Staff has
concluded from this analysis, that a dependable high volume machine would be more
efficient for staff to use at the Senior Center for copying the Senior News letter, and for
AVCP when marketing various youth activities. This would cause a shift in volumes
from these centers to a high volume machine at City Hall, extending the life of these
machines and stabilizing the current disproportionate ratios of use. A reliable high
production machine will make more efficient use of staff time, which equates to lower
reproduction costs.
Even though the City contracts for agenda reproduction, the City Clerk's office requires
large attachments to be copied in -house by each department. The two City
commissions are scheduled to meet twice a month, and these agendas are also
reproduced in- house. Public requests for City reports including the budget,
environmental impact reports, and studies pertaining to the City's five specific plans,
require frequent one time high volume copy jobs.
2
4jowtib
As the City develops its plan to network City Computers, today wh di (will Ink directly
equipment will be included. Copy machines are available
to PC's in a network environment, and this technology may eventually reduce reliance
on work station laser printers and mid - volume copiers: Tali copier. ier. These digital work-groups
will include a fax, printer and low to medium volume digital p
will then replace machines like the Kodak 95s, and the Canon NP6060, but won't
replace the need to have a high volume machine.
Based upon an evaluation of the four factors listed above (distribution of copy jobs, cost
of staff to make copies, the continuing need to produce large copy jobs, and the
development of future technology to reduce the City's reliance upon the current mid-
volume machines), staff has concluded that at this time,
with a similar machine capable of high volume duplex production. ithout solution
equipment
will
allow the City to continue to expand public outreach programs
limitations, reduce the staff and materials costs by du o the digital technology available
the life of the existing mid - volume machines and fit into
now and in the future.
Equipment ptions
Attachment "C" is a review of various copy machines comparing lease to purchase and
the purchase of rebuilt machines versus the purchase nerl generalization, based upon the capacity of
"Capacity" category on the spread sheet i , a g
the machine to handle original documents, the speed of the machine, the paper supply,
and the sorting abilities. Although mid - volume mac line isl'the NP85 model, rwhich
away from this direction. The highest end of the Canon
maximizes at the volumes specified for the Sharp, Xerox and Kodak products, and vices
would not accommodate City needs over an extended
that no cooperatipe
are substantially higher than Xerox and Kodak, due to the
purchasing options were made available to the City. This narrowed the focus to two
vendors.
Xerox and Kodak remain the most reliable high volume c d
because of their dominance, they are able to secure pricing from the State and Los
Angeles County that the City can take advantage of. For example, a new Canon
NP6060 machine is $9,000 less from Kodak (Kodak 95s), than it is from a Canon
dealer. This arrangement applies to high volume copiers as well.
Staff evaluated the Kodak 2085 before buying the Kodak 95s in 1993. Like the IBM, it
copies at 85 pages per minute, but will hold 100 pages in the feeder and duplex mode,
compared to only 50 in the IBM. The Kodak is more powerful than the IBM, making It a
more reliable duplex machine.
3 WOWS
In 1993, the Kodak 2085 was priced at $36,700. With the State's Multiple Award
Schedule, this cost has been reduced now to only $24,263. Kodak is offering a $2,000
credit for the old machine. The Xerox equipment handles the same volumes, at a
higher cost for both the equipment and service, (applying pricing from the Los Angeles
County), so Kodak is staffs preference at this time.
If the Council concurs with the staffs conclusions, there will be a need to finance the
difference between the $11,250 budgeted and the cost of $24,263, which is $13,013.
Staff looked at lease options, which add as much as 38 percent to the original purchase
prices, use of the Equipment Replacement fund, and the possibility of transferring the
savings in service from the IBM, to the capital line item. The lease option has been
eliminated because of the funding alternatives available.
At an estimated cost of $500 per month, the annual service for the IBM currently
included in the budget will cost $6,600. The month of July has been paid, but no
additional payments are needed, leaving $6,000 available. The Kodak 2085 will use
$1,500 of this savings, reducing this apparent surplus to $4,500.
The IBM was scheduled on the Equipment Replacement inventory with a 10 year life in
1988. To date, $37,519 is available to replace this machine. The use of Equipment
Replacement reserves appears to be more appropriate than relying on the current
appropriation, and at this time, staff recommends using the Equipment Replacement
fund to replace the IBM. The current budgeted monies could then be returned to the
applicable undesignated fund balance in Gas Tax, Community Development,
Redevelopment and General funds.
The status of the Equipment Replacement fund is as follows:
General
Community
Gas Tax
Redevelopment
Total
Fund
Development
` '2, y�,: ti<:R;yy:�iti �.i� }y�'t'�}}} Y.vi:\'�}}v : }i`.v }\.:.Y�\
Y "h '' T't }h }{:'tvtl•`w qq t
` {ii <' }:
:: ,:: •.:,•.: • , r. n:.
•ti{tti
, w.v.:,v. 'Cn2v
vrvvrvx:v.
: }• } ^#t
,w.v. n:..:':::: {•:
�} �t,'
„�i:�x: <:L
• •'xrv. ..;,; :t..tt„
•:.t+n:xvn:v,v
t•..:•:::::::::......: y. t•:.;:; } ? }•:::•: }�•....:�v:`2:.:::::n�
rvw.:vw.
:::.:.: tv.::.
:v.v.,v., •:.xv....t:.£Yti#ti {# # }Y;.t
} }tin :,:
v:::. Y#....... .... {.........: }yy }v.:.::n•.,v.
•. :4:Y }#j}
7,504 5,380
4,416 37,519
Reserved for 20,219
the IBM
Copier
}: v, 'ti \. :v:}:Y'{{,•'v:`'' }W;•: { +•::vk :L {:4 }r:• {t {,�
: �; 5.•. '' . { -, w,a.:j4y,{ ,: ,Y .
\:, :�, >;.\ V.
.: ti: 4}•;:.: yY :v }:•:y:.::v:::::•:r'r, }•ry;.,y ..........................
. t.y; .�:.,.... h .:: :y..y:;•. ; ..;. '.. :yy::.; {': {;::;:•y }:. {,;.,y . ....:.::::.:
,,{{+,Y:,�y. t•. ?� \t:;,y:4:;,..:.;•.Y:: \:..tiyy:
�.::;� +y'}:•} } }:- :y> }:•: � }:. �::: {�:: �' :::•.: �::::•: :..:::::::.::::................
{;:'tY}yx'{Y;. {L•:c•: :. :L}• }:Y:;: ;:::::: }.:y:�•y •y:L {.x;; <;; {. t
ii��yyjj�,,.'•iy
rv,#:
::. , ..h}. ', : +.:., {h ':Y:'..:h,.. .: .t....:..�
:Y }::: {.:.:•. }:.:: ::.:.v . ...:.:.::.... t.-
# �'v.,xt ;; ,vtit •'•,tiff..,...:::'::
} \v
t. :. }; },{' }�Y,•:. ,<::: >` ...... }.•`.
.;; ............. ...... ::.:. t:::::.:::.v:..v {..: h• :...
.,, {.r,:v.: {v' :tiff. ,v.Kt,:..:.x
{v }ii:Y�i:vY_.�} }Y:r';:;:Y:�i' : ............. :.:: :.: :...
:}:r t;. yx+ J:•}:.; .: }>:•y:�;.: >xL•:•>::.::::.: -.:
v... ..... .::'•:.: .yv ::i: is ii J: {�. }... .. ::••.
kkXh•:?.:tti,Y ` ::, \tti•: +..Y.:•rv, h.
}},, ,.t#t }{ ;Y ":�tik::•`:•''.•`:``
"ti:Y{::: : {.Zr
t`b
{+�' ` �titi< � •{ }�
} ;'.y,Y;: v:yyi2} }i•�
,#�� � '':�'}vfih'tiv ;Y�y:k Ytti�ti}\Y }yYy
,ck}4,t•:•: {,.:ti } {:�.,.:..; „\•.. « {• nYii '� Yt}i:4:;:
,mot
t.
:7
"Reserve Balances" were established at the Council July 3, 1996, Council meeting.
this meeting, the Fund 02 (Vehicle Fines) obligation was consolidated with Gas Ta a At
and only 25 percent of the Community Development obligation of $68,220 was x,
contributed.
mm
Despite the reduced copy volumes at City Hall, staff has concluded that a hi
copier is still needed. By adding a new high volume copier to the City's invento volume
e
technology can be introduced as the existing machines reach their capacity. This can
Try, new
Y
be accomplished using reserves in the Equipment Replacement fund freein
current appropriation of $11,250 for other uses. 9 the
That the City Council appropriate $24,500 from the Equipment Replacement
the purchase of a Kodak 2085, (which includes the $2,000 credit for the IBM), fund for
declare the IBM 111 85 as surplus equipment to be used a trade -in for the new and
machine.
Attachments: A) Copy Volumes
B) Work Distributions
C) Cost Analysis
5
CITY COPY VOLUMES
1993/94 1994/95 1995196
1071862 1176102 1163396
CITY HALL
Volumes Since 1993
Purchased
5/1994
Company
CANON
Model FY
NP4835
1993/94
Company -
Model
5/1985
CANON
10/1988
KODAK
KODAK
3/1990
CANON
12/93
6/95
79,992
FY
IBM 111 85 5
NP2020
KODAK
CANON
1993/94
95S
NP6060
TOTAL
1994/95
57,936
46,188
682 101
333,910
113,484
540
218,341
------
0
--______-
1,071,862
1995/96
0
255,857
19,
495, 544,842
99
0
982,480
157 ,872
929,000
PUBLIC WORKS YARD
Purchased mvd 6/95
Company CANON
Model FY
1995/96 10,404
ARROYO VISTA COMMUNITY CENTER
SENIOR CENTER
Purchased
5/1994
Company
CANON
Model FY
NP4835
1993/94
- - -_ p
1994/95
132,000
1995/96
144,000
Purchased
Company
5/1994
Model FY
CANON
= = ='=
NP3325
1993/94
- - - - -o -
1994/95
61,622
1995/96
79,992
COPY96AN. WK4 O2.0 4
CITY COPY VOLUME DISTRIBUTION FOR 1995/96
Purchased
10/1988
3/1990
12/93
6/95
5/1/ 855
5/1994
5/1994
Company
KODAK
CANON
KODAK
CANON
CANON
CANON
CANON
Model
IBM 111 85
NP2020
95S
NP6060
NP7550
NP4835
NP3325
TOTAL
ACTUAL PERCENT
22%
2%
43%
14%
1%
12%
7%
VOLUME
255,857
19,872
495,399
157;872
10,404
144,000
79,992
1,163,396
PER MONTH
21,321
1,656
41,283
13,156
867
12,000
6,666
96,950
PREFERRED VOLUME
-
--
RATIOS
55%
1%
15%
15%
1%
8%
5%
1
PREFERRED VOLUME
BASED ON 95/96
639,868
11,634
174,509
174,509
11,634
93,072
58,170
1,163,396
PER MONTH
53,322
969
14,542
14,542
969
7,756
4,847
96,950
COPY96AN.WK4
VENDOR
MAKE
MODEL
REBUILT
CAPACITY
COST
SERVICE
TOTAL
KODAK
KODAK
95S
NEW
MEDIUM
12047
5548
17595
COPIERLINE
CANON
NP6060
NEW
MEDIUM
21016
6400
27416
LAZER COPY
CANON
NP6060
REBUILT
MEDIUM
13406
5760
19166
COPIERLINE
CANON
NP6060
REBUILT
MEDIUM
8146
6400
14546
COPIERLINE
CANON
NP8530
REBUILT
MED /HIGH
9969
6400
16369
ADV. COPY SYS
SHARP
SD -3075
NEW
MED /HIGH
20860
8954
29815
COPIERLINE
CANON
NP8530
NEW
MED /HIGH
24555
6400
30955
ADV.COPY SYS. SHARP
SD4085
NEW
MED /HIGH
45040
7675
52715
XEROX
XEROX
XEROX 5385
NEW
MED /HIGH
29195
6000
35195
XEROX
XEROX
XEROX 5680
NEW
MED /HIGH
34055
5860
39915
KODAK
KODAK
KODAK2085AF NEW
MED /HIGH
24263
1897
26160
c
e
COPY96AN.WK4