HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 1996 1002 CC REG ITEM 07F il4 • 730
ITEM Z P
AGENDA REPORT
CITY OF MOORPARK
TO: The Honorable City Council
ACTION:MoeDico/
FROM: Jill Rubin Myers, Solid Waste Coordinator
DATE: September 25, 1996 (CC Meeting of October 2, 1996)
ry /(
SUBJECT: Consider 1995 Annual Report to the California Integrated Waste Management
Board (CIWMB) on Waste Reduction Status.
BACKGROUND
The Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989 (AB939) requires each jurisdiction to submit an
annual report that discusses the progress achieved in implementing the programs described in the
Source Reduction and Recycling Element (SRRE) and Household Hazardous Waste Element
(HHWE). The annual report also discusses the progress a jurisdiction has made in achieving the
disposal reduction goals required by AB 939; 25% by 1995 and 50% by 2000.
Attached is a copy of the City's first annual report. The table on page A-6 indicates that the
City's 1995 diversion percentage, based solely on one survey week per quarter at area landfills,
is 25%. Thus, the City has achieved its disposal reduction goal for 1995. Calculations were done
using State-provided methodology accounting for increases in population, employment growth,
and taxable sales since 1990.
Staff hired a consultant to prepare the annual report and examine the base year (1990) generation
numbers and the current year (1995) disposal numbers. Although the City has met the 25% goal,
staff has concerns about the State's methodology used to calculate diversion. In Appendix A-2
on page A-4, staff expresses concern about the City's base year generation that were reported in
the SRRE for 1990. As illustrated in the table, Moorpark is 23% below the county-wide average
in total waste generation. Although the inaccuracy did not affect the City in meeting the 1995
goal, it may affect the 50% diversion mandate for 2000. At this time there is no CIWMB
approved formula or method for correcting inaccuracies in the Base Year Generation data. When
the CIWMB releases the approved methodologies, staff plans to re-examine the base year
generation numbers.
Staff also expressed concern about the current year disposal reporting system in Appendix B-8 on
page B-15. For the survey week period, when waste is delivered to the landfill by haulers and
self haulers (residents and independent contractors), the landfill operator asks the driver to state
what jurisdiction the waste is coming from. The percentage of tonnage delivered for that week
by each jurisdiction is then used to distribute tonnage amounts received at the landfill for the
otoutti6
Honorable City Council
AB 939 Annual Report
Page 2
The issue is that there may be exceptionally heavy loads delivered that week which would not
accurately reflect actual tonnage delivered throughout the quarter. Additionally, the City must
contend with waste generated by State agencies and delivered to large out-of-county landfills and
subcontractors who mix loads from jurisdictions but may inaccurately state that the waste
originated in our City.
Subsequent annual reports are due each August from 1997 through 2001. Staff will have the
opportunity to request revision to the base year generation and/or current year disposal figures,
if necessary, in the 1997 annual report.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council receive and file the annual report.
43007
City of Moorpark
1995 Annual Report
on
Waste Reduction and
Recycling
September 20, 1996
ulx;UbN
Jurisdiction/Regional Agency Information
Jurisdiction
City Name: Moorpark County: Ventura
Primary Contact:
Contact Name: Jill Myers
Contact Title: Solid Waste Coordinator
Phone #: (805) 529-6864 FAX#: (805) 529-8270
Mailing Address: 799 Moorpark Avenue
Moorpark, CA 93021
•
Other Contacts:
Contact Name: Deborah Millais
Contact Title: Principal, Data Research Analysis
Phone #: (805) 642-9168 FAX#: (805) 642-9168
Mailing Address: 5429 Topa Topa Drive
Ventura, CA 93003
00006S
Table of Contents
Section A
1. Measurement of Disposal Reduction A-1
2. Appendix A-1 -Disposal Calculations-Uncorrected Base Year Generation A-2
3. Appendix A-2a- Inaccuracies in Base Year Generation Data A-4
4. Appendix A-2b -Disposal Calculations - Corrected Base Year Generation A-5
Section B
1. SRRE Program Implementation Assessment B-1
2. Appendix B-1 - SRRE Program Form B-4
3. Appendix B-la - SRRE/Annual Report Program Key B-9
4. Appendix B-2-Diversion Quantities B-11
5. Appendix B-3a - Programs Not Implemented B-12
6. Appendix B-3b-Reasons Programs Were Not Implemented B-12
7. Appendix B-5 - Contingency Programs B-13
8. Appendix B-6 - Program Revisions B-14
9. Appendix B-8 - Barriers to Achievement of Disposal Reduction Goal B-15
10. Appendix B-9 -Adequacy of the Solid Waste Generation Study B-15
11. Appendix B-10-Adequacy of the Source Reduction and Recycling Element B-16
12. Appendix B-16 - Technical Assistance from Board Staff B-16
Section C
1. HHWE Program Implementation Assessment. C-1
2. Appendix C-1 - HHWE Program Form C-3
3. Appendix C-2-HHW Programs Not Implemented During Reporting Period C-5
4. Appendix C-5-Public Informational and Educational Materials C-5
5. Appendix C-6 -Expenditures for HHW Programs C-5
6. Appendix C-7 - Barriers to Implementation of HHW Programs . . . . C-5
Section F
1. Areas of Concern/Conditional Approval F-1
2. Appendix F-1 - Areas of Concern F-1
SECTION (A): MEASUREMENT OF DISPOSAL REDUCTION
Check each item as completed,providing attachments as applicable. Refer to the User's Guide for
detailed instructions and examples.
[✓] A-1. Complete the disposal reduction calculations using the Board-approved base-year
generation amount(refer to list provided by Board staff in Data Tables) and using the
reporting-year disposal amount as reported from the disposal reporting system(the sum of
the amounts provided from your county and from any other counties). A blank"CIWMB
Disposal Reduction Calculations Form"is provided. Computerized versions of this form
are available upon request(refer to User's Guide Attachment VI). Attach the completed
form or print-out and label as Appendix A-1.
[✓] A-2. a) Does the Board-approved base-year generation amount need to be corrected due to
inaccuracies or other reasons?
[V] Yes. Attach a discussion and label as Appendix A-2a. Go on to b.
[ ] No. Go on to A-3.
b) If a more accurate base-year generation amount can be quantified, a second set of
calculations may be attached for staff to consider during the Board's evaluation.
Include a discussion on how this amount was derived. Label attachment as Appendix
A-2b.
Revised Base-Year Generation=32.355 tons
[V] A-3. a) Does the disposal amount, as reported from the disposal reporting system, accurately
represent your jurisdiction's reporting-year disposal amount?
[✓] Yes. Go on to A-4.
[ ] No. Attach a discussion and label as Appendix A-3a. Go on to b.
b) If a more accurate reporting-year disposal amount can be quantified, a second set of
calculations may be attached,for staff to consider during the Board's evaluation.
Include a discussion on how this amount was derived. Label attachment as Appendix
A-3b.
Revised Reporting-Year Disposal= tons
OPTIONAL INFORMATION:
[V] A-4. Attach any additional, OPTIONAL information regarding the compliance calculations for
staff to consider during the Board's evaluation (refer to User's Guide for examples). Label
attachment as Appendix A-4. No additional information attached.
'000031
Page A-1
Appendix A-1 - Uncorrected Base Year Generation
CIWMB DISPOSAL CALCULATIONS
1) Input Name/Location I City County
Ivfoorparlc Ventura .`°'.< :
2) Input Base-Year, Board-Approved Base-Year Generation Tonnage and Residential Percentage:
Base Year Waste Sector Tonnages Percents es
13,226 40. •°k
Non-Residential 19,098 59.08%
Total 3`2;3;2;5 100.00%
3) Input Reporting-Year and Re orting Year Disposal Tonnage from Disposal Reporting System)
Reporting Year Total Disposed Tonnage
1995.. .: IMINNI :C'81050IMMEEM
•
4) Input Board Approved Diversion Goal Percentages •
Diversion Goal /o
5) ONLY IF APPLICABLE, Input Reporting-Year Disposal Correction Amounts;
Board-Approved Reductions (e.g. Disaster Wastes, Medical Waste) Tonnage Amount
Total Disaster Waste Disposal Reduction Amount (attach list** by disaster)
Total Medical Waste Disposalosal Reduction Amount (attach list**
by facility)
Total Regional Diversion Facility Residual Waste Amount (attach list by facility)
Total Out of
State Exports subsequently Diverted (attach list** with documentation)
Total Other Disposal Reduction Amountlist**
p (attach byevent/facility)
Y)
Total Reporting-Year Correction Amount 0
6) Input Adjustment Method Factors;
Factors Base-Year Reporting-Year Source of Data
Population (# persons) 25,269 27,544 State :Default Data
Employment (# jobs) 346,200 3 4,90x'•State;D:efault::.Data
Taxable Sales ($) 76,381 103,082 State Default Data'
Consumer Price Index 13 90 1:54;60 •:State Default;:Dat:a
Page A-2
7) Calculated Adjustment To Correct Base-Year Generation for Changes in Population &
Economics
7-a Inflation Multiplier
[IM = Base-year Consumer Price Index/Reporting-Year Consumer Price Index] 0.88
7-b Corrected Reporting-Year Taxable Sales (CTR) =
[CTR= IM x Reporting-Year Taxable Sales] 90,613,
7-c Employment Ratio (ER) =
[ER = Reporting-Year Employment/Base-Year Employment] 1.03
7-d Taxable Sales Ratio(TSR)_
[TSR=CTR/Base Year Taxable Sales] 1.19
7-e Non-Residential Adjustment Factor (NRAF) =
[NRAF = (ER +TSR)/2] 1.11,
7-f Population Ratio (PR)
[PR = Reporting Year Population/Base Year Population] 1.09
7-g Residential Adjustment Factor (RAF)`
[(Population Ratio + NRAF)/2] 1.10
7-h Estimated Reporting-Year Generation Tonnage (ERYG) _
[(Base-Year Residential Gen. x RAF)+(Base-Year Non-residential Gen.x NRAF)] 35,639
8) Computed Maximum Allowable Disposal Tonnage
8-a Reporting-Year Maximum Allowable Disposal Percentage (MAX%) =
[MAX % = 100% -Diversion Goal%] 75%
8-b Reporting-Year Maximum Allowable Disposal Percentage (MAXTONS)
[MAXTONS=ERYG x MAX%] 26,729
9) Determination of Goal Achievement
9-a Corrected Reporting-Year Disposal Tonnage (CRYTONS)
[CRYTONS = Reporting-Year Disposal Amount - Total Reporting-Year Correction Amount] 26,805
9-b Tonnage Over or Under Goal (TOUG)
[TOUG=MAXTONS-CRYTONS] -76
Note: Goal is met if positive or zero.
10) Calculated Diversion Percentage
10-a Reporting-Year Disposal Percentage (DISP%)
[DISP%=CRYTONS/ERYG] 75%
10-b Reporting-Year Diversion Percentage (DIV%) =
[DIV = 100% -DISP%] 25%
Note: Not meeting the goal does not automatically indicate non-compliance. The Board will
also examine program implementation when making the determination of compliance.
Page A-3 00e053
Appendix A-2a - Inaccuracies in Base Year Generation Data
Undercounted Base Year Generation. Moorpark's Base Year Generation is unrealistically low.
Tables 1 and 2 illustrate the per capita generation rates for Ventura County,for both total waste
generation and residential waste generation.
Table 1 -Per Capita Waste Generation
City Population Base-Year Waste Per Capita
Generation (in Tons)
Camarillo 52,091 84,618 1.62
Fillmore 11,940 11,104 0.93
Moorpark 25,269 32,355 1.28
Ojai 7,641 12,715 1.66
Oxnard 140,369 180,453 1.29
Port Hueneme 20,270 27,185 1.34
Santa Paula 25,068 30,137 1.20
Simi Valley 99,642 206,987 2.08
Thousand Oaks 104,767 224,465 2.14
Ventura 92,597 158,397 1.71
Average 579,654 968,416 1.67
Table 2-Residential Per Capita Waste Generation
City Population Base-Year Waste Per Capita
Residential (in Tons)
Generation
Camarillo 52,091 34,273 0.66
Moorpark 25,269 13,256 0.52
Ojai 7,641 11,171 1.46
Oxnard 140,369 70,143 0.50
Port Hueneme 20,270 8,535 0.42
Santa Paula 25,068 11,558 0.46
Simi Valley 99,642 89,521 0.90
Thousand Oaks 104,767 103,423 0.99
Ventura 92,597 64,284 0.69
Total/Average 567,714 406,164 0.72
Moorpark is 23% below the County average in total waste generation, and 27%below the average in
residential waste generation.
Incorrect Totals in Base Year Generation Data. In reviewing the Base Year Generation data,
staff found a discrepancy in the totals. The total shown in Table 2-5 is 33,214.10 tons. However,if the
tonnages shown in tables 2-1 through 2-4 are added up, the actual total is 33,243.49. If the 888.9 tons
of exclusions made by the Board are subtracted from this corrected total, the final Base Year Generation
is 32,355. Appendix A-2a1 shows the Disposal Reduction Calculation using the corrected Base Year
Generation data.
As noted above, the City has found that its Base Year Generation data is too low. At this time,there is
no Board-approved formula or method for correcting inaccuracies in Base Year Generation data. It is
our understanding that Board staff is working on this issue. When the Board has developed approved
methodologies, the City will proceed to revise its Base Year generation data.
Page A-4 000034
Appendix A-2b - Corrected Base Year Generation
CIWMB DISPOSAL CALCULATIONS
1) Input Name/Location City ' County
2) Input Base-Year, Board-Approved Base-Year Generation Tonnage and Residential Percentage:
Base Year Waste Sector Tonnages Percentages
_1990 ::.. >::::>::::::<: Residential 13256 > ........ ... ..40:47.:.of
Non-Residential 19,098 59.03%
Total 100.00%
..........................
3) Input Reporting-Year and Re orting Year Disposal Tonnage from Disposal Reporting System)
Reporting Year Total Disposed Tonnage
4) Input Board Approved Diversion Goal Percentages
Diversion Goa{ /o
5) ONLY IF APPLICABLE, Input Reporting-Year Disposal Correction Amounts;
Board-Approved Reductions (e.g. Disaster Wastes, Medical Waste) Tonnage Amount
Total Disaster Waste Disposal Reduction Amount (attach list** by disaster)
Total Medical Waste Disposal Reduction Amount (attach list** by facility)
Total Regional Diversion Facility Residual Waste Amount (attach list by facility)
;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
Total Out-of-State Exports subsequently Diverted (attach list** with documentation)
Total Other Disposal Reduction Amount (attach list** by event/facility)
Total Reporting-Year Correction Amount 0
6) Input Adjustment Method Factors;
Factors Base-Year Reporting-Year Source of Data
Population (# persons) .,.. State Df lt . ata
Employment (# jobs) 346 200 .,3`54 900 State:Default Data
Taxable Sales ($) 76,:381 10;3,082 "State :Default Data:
Consumer Price Index 1 4'6:0 :State;Default;Data
.< ;::;:.::;::;:.; ..135 90 ..:. . ....
Page A-5 O0055
7) Calculated Adjustment To Correct Base-Year Generation for Changes In Population &
Economics
7-a Inflation Multiplier
[IM = Base-year Consumer Price Index/Reporting-Year Consumer Price Index] 0.88
7-b Corrected Reporting-Year Taxable Sales (CTR) _
[CTR= IM x Reporting-Year Taxable Sales] 90,613.
7-c Employment Ratio (ER) _
[ER = Reporting-Year Employment/Base-Year Employment] 1.03
7-d Taxable Sales Ratio (TSR) _
[TSR=CTR/Base Year Taxable Sales] 1.19
7-e Non-Residential Adjustment Factor (NRAF) =
[NRAF = (ER +TSR)/2] 1.11.
7-f Population Ratio (PR) =
[PR = Reporting Year Population/Base Year Population] 1.09
7-g Residential Adjustment Factor (RAF)
[(Population Ratio + NRAF)/2] 1.10
7-h Estimated Reporting-Year Generation Tonnage (ERYG) _
[(Base-Year Residential Gen.x RAF) + (Base-Year Non-residential Gen. x NRAF)] 35,671
8) Computed Maximum Allowable Disposal Tonnage
8-a Reporting-Year Maximum Allowable Disposal Percentage (MAX%) =
[MAX % = 100% -Diversion Goal%] 75%
8-b Reporting-Year Maximum Allowable Disposal Percentage (MAXTONS) _
[MAXTONS=ERYG x MAX%] 26,754
9) Determination of Goal Achievement
9-a Corrected Reporting-Year Disposal Tonnage (CRYTONS)
[CRYTONS = Reporting-Year Disposal Amount - Total Reporting-Year Correction Amount] 26,805
9-b Tonnage Over or Under Goal (TOUG)_
[TOUG=MAXTONS-CRYTONS] -51
Note: Goal is met if positive or zero.
10) Calculated Diversion Percentage
10-a Reporting-Year Disposal Percentage (DISP%) _
[DISP%=CRYTONS/ERYG] 75%
10-b Reporting-Year Diversion Percentage (DIV%) =
[DIV = 100% -DISP%] 25%
Note: Not meeting the goal does not automatically indicate non-compliance. The Board will
also examine program implementation when making the determination of compliance.
Page A-6 000036
SECTION (B): SRRE PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION ASSESSMENT
Check each item as completed,providing attachments as applicable. Refer to the User's Guide for detailed
instructions and examples.
[V] B-1. Summarize the progress made in implementing planned programs for this reporting period
(reporting-year or period since last reported). A blank"SRRE Program Form"is provided.
Computerized versions are available upon request(Refer to User's Guide Attachment VI).
Attach completed form or print-out and label as Appendix B-1.
[✓] B-2. Provide the reporting-year recycling/composting tonnages for programs funded or operated by
your jurisdiction. A blank "Table 1" is provided. Computerized versions are available upon
request(refer to User's Guide Attachment VI). Attach completed form or print-out and label
as Appendix B-2.
[✓] B-3. a) Were there any programs planned to be implemented this reporting period (reporting-year
or period since last reported) in your Board-approved final SRRE,which have not been
implemented?
[V] Yes. Attach a list and label as Appendix B-3a. Go on to b.
[] No. Go to B-4.
b) Check the applicable reasons that program(s)were not implemented. Discuss each item
noted,explaining the circumstances related to each program and how they impact the
implementation schedule for each program. Label attachment as Appendix B-3b.
[ ] Delays in bringing diversion facilities on-line [ ] Insufficient funding
[ ] Unavoidable regulatory delays [ ] Insufficient staffing
[ ] Existing contractual or legal problems [ ] Lack of cooperation
[✓] Other(describe): from other entities
Please see Appendix B-3b
[V] B-4. a) Have any implemented programs been unsuccessful?
[] Yes. Attach a list and label as Appendix B-4a. Go on to b.
[V] No. Go to B-5.
b) Check the applicable items that contributed to the lack of success of programs. Discuss
each item noted,explaining the circumstances related to each program and how they impact
the implementation schedule for each program. Label attachment as Appendix B-4b.
[] Administration changes [] Funding issues
[] Low participation rates [] Insufficient staffing levels
[] Problems w/markets for recyclable materials
[ ] Targeted materials were not available in the projected quantities
[] Increased waste due to natural disaster(s)
[] Other(describe):
000)9`
Page B-1
[✓] B-5. If applicable, discuss contingency programs or other measures that will be implemented to
increase efforts or effectiveness to achieve the disposal reduction goals. Label attachment as
Appendix B-5.
[V] B-6. Do you anticipate any other revisions to the programs,implementation schedules or funding
sources of the Board-approved, final SRRE? Include any other new program(s) not yet
discussed.
[✓] Yes. Attach a discussion and revised schedules,if applicable. Label attachment as
Appendix B-6.
[ ] No.
[✓] B-7. Have there been any changes in waste types or amounts generated,or your overall waste
management system that may affect achievement of the goals for disposal reduction?
[ ] Yes. Attach a discussion as Appendix B-7.
[✓] No.
[✓] B-8. Check all potential barriers that may realistically prevent achievement of the disposal reduction
goal and attach a discussion as Appendix B-8.
[ ] Administration changes [ ] Funding issues
[ ] Low participation rates [ ] Insufficient staffing levels
[ ] Problems w/markets for recyclable materials
[ ] Targeted materials were not available in the projected quantities
[ ] Delays in implementing program(s)
[V] Other(describe)
[✓] B-9. Examine the adequacy of the Solid Waste Generation Study(SWGS). Does the SWGS need
to be revised?
[✓] Yes. The SWGS is not adequate and may need revision. Attach a discussion (refer
to User's Guide) and label as Appendix B-9.
[] No.
[V] B-10. Examine the adequacy of the Source Reduction and Recycling Element(SRRE)for all sections
other than the SWGS. Does the SRRE need to be revised?
[V] Yes. The SRRE is not adequate and may need revision. Attach a discussion and
label as Appendix B-10.
[] No.
[✓] B-11. Have there been any changes in non-disposal facilities from what was planned for in the Non-
Disposal Facility Element(NDFE)to implement the SRRE?
[] Yes. Attach a discussion and label as Appendix B-11.
[✓] No.
Page B-2
[✓] B-12. Has your jurisdiction received a Board-approved reduction in the diversion goal?
[ ] Yes. Explain why the reduced goal is or is not still applicable. Label attachment as
Appendix B-12.
[✓] No.
[V] B-13. Is a regional medical waste treatment facility or a regional diversion facility located within your
jurisdiction for which you have made a correction to the reporting-year disposal amount in
Section A?
[] Yes. Discuss the waste types in the residual solid waste that cannot feasibly be
diverted and any additional efforts undertaken to divert the waste produced at each
facility. Explain why the adjustment should or should not still apply. Label
attachment as Appendix B-13.
[✓] No.
OPTIONAL INFORMATION:
[ ] B-14. If applicable, attach a discussion on diversion programs for solid waste generated by a local,
state or federally declared disaster. Provide information on the types of diversion programs
implemented; the types of problems encountered; the generated,disposed and diverted
amounts; and your willingness to participate in further studies regarding disaster wastes.
Label attachment as Appendix B-14
[ ] B-15. If your jurisdiction has implemented program(s)that were unique or have been exceptionally
successful, attach a discussion. Provide information on how the program is unique or
exceptional; the participation and diversion rates; the costs involved; the type of criteria other
jurisdictions could use to determine whether this program would be successful in their
jurisdiction; and your willingness to have other jurisdictions contact you for further
information. Label attachment as Appendix B-15.
[✓] B-16. Attach a discussion on any additional technical assistance Board staff could provide to assist
local jurisdictions in implementing diversion programs and achieving the disposal reduction
goals. Label attachment as Appendix B-16.
000352
Page B-3
MODELANNUAL REPORT
APPENDIX B-1: SRRE PROGRAM FORM
JURISDICTION/REGIONAL AGENCY NAME:City of Moorpark
REPORTING PERIOD BEGINNING DATE: 1/1/92 REPORTING PERIOD ENDING DATE: 12/31/95
Check(x)all applicable boxes in columns A-G(note:B-G are optional);provide status codes in columns H,J,L,N;and provide dates in columns I,K,M,O. Insert program/policy types in blank rows as nor
'Program status codes: (I) Implemented;(E)Expanded;(R) Reduced;(M)Modified(attach explanation);(D)Dropped;(C)Contingency
A BCDEF G H I J K L M N 0
i2;<i;;;;ict o.'�1'C%ji
t.E ct,varigsszs Esti"rani`'`'
;» P.ettti...„ <>__ »::>>:> ,....''Gtre:iRdvis!on „... :::::>
o we s<:iisi:
...... ... 11111;:1;:;�:;;;:os:i:;Y:C:i:::Ziiiii:C%Si:.::G;iii:i;:i;:i;: �i';.''�:�i~�i�if;—.-i;-:`;�si " .::� 3>i i i
:;»i::>:<�>:::Z>:�:Zi1::�>11:�>111111ii L:;»::»>:�i1»>:�:�11:Y111i1i1»»> :1» 1:1a::1i11i>::»:;»�:;;;::,:>:...111: ;:11:�;:�::.....::::are;»»:�»»»>:�>::i;...rogm:GQafs...r,................
1::i1::i1:4111i1*i* i:;S 1111>: : ::iai i ;::1111:.:Mii.:M,i;iig 111111i1 :ii1 <;;,,'Pund6 :: :>::;•>::::::a::::<:s::::a::::>:::::::;:o:ci:;:<G1ic. Gi::Z1*:::i:?1r i111r %2 ii; . ', ;:;:.;;::.::::::;;;;:...:... ::::
.:......................... ......................... .... dF........................................................................................ ........Par. .:. :::::::.. ::.;:.::.:;:;:.:;:: :;<.;::;.;>::;: ..,.,:.,: :::..:
....................... ......................... ........ ....................:.:.:......... ..... .............................................................................................. .SRRE................Actual........ ...... SRRE;:;:;;::;;;:fxefslon<>>.
:�:c>:�::o:o:;o�;�::�:<�:�::�:�:��;:�::�;; ::�;:.>;:o:;;•:�:�;::�::�;:�;:�;:�:;o:•::�:::.::�;;;::�:�;:�:<o:a:�::o:-;:s::r i:::•11:.:�1:�1:G: :::1:;:2:: <: :: ::;1 .':::' .::�:
................
:::;;::z:<:><:<iii: :.:;>1><::>::z111� !1//si.111><1i;;':o:;:;:;r.:1:s><.::::.::: :: . ::::::::::.::::. :.:.::.:.:..:..:: ::::. : ::.:: :::.: :. s..........
;0�.#' .� �. ,; :;..; �.. � :�1:�>i11i:�i1iS11i4iii111i::i1:>;.- $f846FJ;:X:i.`�«>i::<:.:: ::::::: ' :<.;: <,:�o::�:»:;::;::;;�;:;:�;:rsssr: :: �iSa� u> : ;:;:::� :: ;;:; :�;,.;::::::::::::.
................... .................. ............................. .....171...,....... ........... ......:....m::i1'lYilii:4:::::..:: N.:::::o��::�:: ............Y+......... ...........N.:: ::c:::.{.6.i:ii1::i11::fa;::::r...... .....
...........W::''..................... i':'j.......
................................... ............... ...........................�...:...:................................. .............................�....... ...... ...:::: :::::::::.::::� G1 1111 i1i::;8:>:'i;Snors�;s:;�.::;ro:
SOURCE REDUCTION
Regulatory Programs: I i !
Procurement Programs SR1^ ; ' 1 6/_9.2_ I _9/91
------------------------------------ -------- —
Product 8 Packaging Bans SR2 ( ; j
----------------------- ------
11
Land Use&Development Standards:
Zoning Changes SR3 Il' I
Building Code Changes SR4 I i f j
Other Source Reduction Programs/Policies: • I
Rate Structure Modifications SR5 X I I I 3/94 1 12/95 I
Economic Incentives SR6 .•
( ; I 1
Materials Exchange SR7 X j i I 3/92 I 4.10/93
Public Awareness(Awards,etc.) SR8 X j I ! 3/92 1 3/92 i I
Technical Assistance SR9 X i I j 3/92 1 12/91 , J
On-Site Mulching SR9a j I + 3/92 1 12/92
Source Reduction Awards SR9b X ! I ; — I I 9/93 I 3/93 I
City Offices Model Program SR9c X j 1 1_ 3/92 1 9/91 I
Compost Bin Distribution SR9d X I I 1 Ongoing I
B B
I j
RECYCLING ! I 1 I
Residential Collection Programs:
C
Curbside (single-family, co-mingled) R1 i I Ongoing
Curbside(single-family,source separated) R2 I I 1
t
I
Curbside (multi-family, co-mingled) R3 I I I 9/93 1 6/92 1 I
Curbside (multi-family, source separated) R4 , j I
Add materials to Curbside Program R4a ! I —_--- -____-_______ ________•_.
9 ! I I I 6/92 1 6/94 1
Ci Commercial Collection Programs: i
C Cardboard Collection R5 I
Office Paper Collection R6 j I I —
Beverage Container Collection R7 —�--
Implement CommerciaVlndustrial Collection R7a I 1 I 1 12/93 1 6/92 �— —
Page B-4
CIWMB File:DIVFORM.XLS Version: February 6,1996
MODEL ANNUAL REPORT
A BCD E F G H I J K L M N 0
i"i
sJv tsdh tIo:'.aril•%'i:
tCtiOtt' �asE��fHfdiv";;j;> :;�> :: ` `
mess•&.P
:<:;.;:;:<::%i::i��::isI:I>;: :::I: '%>:�::4:I>:I>:;:::�.Y'i::i::i::i::»::::>:;:;:i::i::ii::i::i:::�i:::>%';;%'.>::i::i::::i ...... - .. . .
... :.:::::::.:.::::. m Per od ....:;>.:..
� :i% %�ii�'; %i: iiii :;;>;;:;;;:............. .. n onal.............� ........... ..
, ..:...:................... og►a...:................... .. . .....elm..: ;.:...� Status.......... ................�utuce.Hevfsrons:::.:
. : •:::•:::::.�:. ilii:ii...: i::i:•ii K.. i:M:i.;"-.is .'..:: i iiii..:0::iii::;!•: ':"ii'"iiiiiii:•ii:•iii:
..::':.::::.iiiiiii:�i:•it4i:4:•:::ii'i'i`F:.i'.i:...;�.:..:i::"i:�ii:^::i *ii:!:.i:::*::::::::�:;ii:: :!>::i:«i;;iyi;i;i..
Giiiiiiiiiii:::r iiii:'+.::iiiiii%;i;:" iiiiii:::iiiii:�:%:iiiisii'<:'ii:`::iiiiiiii i:L::Ciii::iiiiiiiSSiYii '":.;%ifiii:>ii:i' . "::":..:i ::: ................. ..... ... ............... ..... ........... ..
:.>iiiiii :$!'Coiiiiiwra.•• :. ":. :.Pi. raMGoatswe .:". .::>si:isis>s::?s: iii::::::::::?::i�i:%'::•:•.'::'":.iixis:i:< is:isiiir::i:;:i:;;i:.ii;:.;:iiiiio-i:;r:.;'":
:">:ii:i iiiiii:" 1:::.:;>i:•ii: :o:>:"iigiiis•iii;:•i:"i:":a.'>:.;;. :::: :.� : : ...re..... ....... .... nisi:..... .... ........ . ................. ...ijist.....
">i:nai i:�i:"i:"i:i:•;i:::;o :"is�::�:<�>:�>is�i:o:•:>:: •s :">:�:";i>�>:::"::::i:;'::i::i:i:i: �i::iiii::i%ii::::::: :::
..::::.fie!aF...,.,::„.. ::::..:!k...... ....... ....... . .......:..:,,.
::::::::.... ..............:::.::::::::::.:::::::::::::::.:::::.:::::::::::::::::::::::.:: . .. ... .........:.::..:: :: :::.,::.::....;....................... ... .... .....per e r
.:=x=vr++-�� ::iiiii`<s�`:`_��s_.Jr:r�_s�:-si�:iik�::;>:i.�i.Vii:57i;"ix+:i:i<si;_'?:��:i;>i<:;;:i;:i:i:::;;:»>�2iiiss:i!;;::ii:i'
... .::: : : ::::o > :,isi;iii;i;i .:;i:,:;i�iisi . :;;::;.::::::: :::oi'i... .. .... .. ........ ::::•:: :::: . ::::::::::.::........... .:. ....�:;Y-.
: .TYpa.pf... ar3t,.Pvltc..ar.P..ra�ess:: ::..:::.:.:::: ::::::: da::.:........ ........ .........:.:::.3:•::::.:::::..:::. .:. , :: :.:.:.......... ..... . ... ...........:...:.:. ...:.:. :: . :. :::::.::::::::........... ... ...... .
...............................................
x
................. :. ..... .... ................... .:::.+.�..:. ":::::•: .,;;i:";:::;.,•..i;i:.:;::". :::..:::::: .:"• -• (. >;>ii ".: is
m
....................... . ............................................... ..... ...... ..... :•:;:...:-:.:::::.::<6......:,.:.::::::. .:....;;;ice :::::::::.o..... m.
..::.:::::::::":::::::::::::.iii.:iii.:ii;.i i•
;•. .: :. :...::..:::::::.:::::::::.: .. f
::.:.. ,.i"i::•': :>::iii ii::�iii5i i � ro ... '�......
Seasonal/Special Collection Programs:
Books Telephone s ---Re — _I 3/92 I 12/93
----ne Book --
I 3/92 I 12/93
Christmas Trees R9 I t I
j
Clean-up Events R10
i I I r-
i 3/92 I Ongoing I
I II------ -------- - - - - - -+-
Facilities/Processing Centers:
Drop-off Boxes &Center(s) R11 ! I 3/92 I 3/92
Buyback Center(s) R12 i j I 3/92 I Ongoing
Manua!Materials RecoveryFacility(ies)_ _— R13 ! I
Mechanized Materials Recovery Faci!ity(ies) R14 i ! I 12/93 D
Intermediate Processing Centers)• R15 - - ! I I I
9/92 M 1
Salvage at Landfill(s) R16 i j I [
I 3/92 I [Ongoing
Salvage at Transfer Station(s) R17 ---�- I I
Services —
Expand Buyback R17a j f I 9/92 D__ '
Evaluate Need to Eliminate Buyback Centers R1 7b t I 3/95 D
Continue To Use Existing Processing Facilities R1 7c j I I 3/92 I Ongoing
Other Recycling Programs/Policies: ' -'
i !
Revise Zoning Criteria to Support Recycling Fac. R1 7d ! I 3/92 D
Building Code Revisions for Space Allocation RI 7e X i 1 1 I I L 3/92 M 9/92•
Design Collection&Processing for End Use Req's R1 7f ! ! I 3/92 D
Building Code Revisions for Use of Recycled Mars R1 7 g ; i I i 3/92 _ D
_�----- ---- -------- -- } ------- � 3/92 D
I' --- - -_�-- -_
Implement Zoning Revisions for Use of Recycled M R1 7h ! I, H" -"
I
•
- - - -- I
COMPOSTING - — -- f--- .-- - - - - - -- - -
Collection Programs: •
{_) Curbside Collection,Source Separated Cl i 1 i 9/93 I 3/96
CC Curbside Collection,Co-mingled C2 i
PIII Drop-off C3
Self-hauled to Composting Site C4 --. ! I
Commercial Yard Waste Collection C4a i F I i 12/93 M j 12/95 I
I ! I 1
Page B-5
CIWMB File:DIVFORM.XL$ Version February 6, 1996
MODEL ANNUAL REPORT
A BCD EF G H IJ K L M N O
'jtiri3dtct""`:
kn. Cost E e" ve
ff cu.Hess;�`P` :: ;� ;;s:
r am Gaa s Kati'"" ( .
�:' �` �':` � i� i i'i:2`i3k' :; ;;
ft :#a..ona: .:. ;;;..Re..:,rt""':PeriodlStafu£.»;:..:; »>3!»»»::f^utitra:Reuisrons>s>;.;:;...:..
...S. n.ware.
......Pt. [at{1:GOaIS:,Wef9J:z:Y`i; :5 �i;;::: i?::::!:!?:i£<�2iC z�$>::i:;J:i:
::>::;;:s;;;::;>::;>;;;r:.>:<os::::: ; »>;:":;;;;>;;;;;>;:. ; 'a>::::i:Y?: .. ..;::::v ?:i;i 2t: ::.: c::4:;i:`. .:i::5"?s:;::a;i
':;:.::g' : :GS:is is 2:G:>: 3: : G:M I°.::.>;:::::i: c:;: >:>:;::>:-::is i:G:::: .::
PecSKiRE................ Actual...........:. :petSf3F�............... rs
r Irc
lt"IR
......... ..
TYR::a1....agram�.Po._ .4C.P.oce s:::"::...:::: >:::>::::'.?:>::...?1?. (,. — ;:3'>>::::;::.:: .
f.......... m;» 3E.,4: : » ::is
r;;:y : i�'i:±-! - L ..:D:;+�i� :�:':�'i<'i iii�:U.ii' :ii$ >::::i 'iiiU�.�: `�: ; :"b:�:
g1111111.11111111.111111.1101.10.111111111"::��:.:.::>:::�:"::"::.:.>::� ". <. ::.
... ......... .......:.... ...........:.:::.to"::�.:. .....:. "<:a>:
Processing Methods: i
.. ....
Backyard Composting C5 I _ _
Aerobic,Windrow C6 ! I I
--.-- ------------------C-•----------1 --r----- — — — __— —— — --- —— ---— - —---- `-- —�
Aerobic,Static Pile 7 I t
Anaerobic, In-Vessel C8 f
. Brush/Wood Waste Chipping C9 I
X I I j
Participate in Existing Mulching Operation C9a ! ! j I I 1 3/92---I 12/92 i 1
Help Develop Centralized Mulching Facility C9b X i ! 1 I 12/93 M Ongoing j !
Drop-Off Site for Grinding and Mulching C9c ! I 12/93 M 1 12/94
•
Participate in Centralized Composting Facility C9d X I j 3/97 M 1 I
.Possible MSW Composting at MRF C9e X I I I On oin M
Other Composting Programs/Policies:
Landfill Ban on Green Waste C10 I i I I 3/98 D I
j I•
•
Assess/Expand Existing Markets C1 Oa X I • I I 6/92 I Ongoing
Support/Enact Legislation for Compost Markets C10b X ! ! I _ I ! 6/92 I On oin !
Procurement Policy for Compost C10c X 1 I 3/92 I 12/95 i
Develop Market Standards C10d X i I ( 3/92 M Ongoing
I I L
SPECIAL WASTE DIVERSION j !
Ash: ! !
i i I j
Land Applications SP1 I 1 I I !
Landfill Cover Material SP2
. I 1 j
i !
Inerts(Construction/Demolition):
Wood Chipping for Mulch or Compost SP3
Concrete/Rubble Used for Rip-Rap SP4 iI i
I
Fill for Land Reclamation SP5 I ; I I
Subbase Marl for Roads SP6 i 1 I
Concrete/Asphalt Recycling SP7 I
CShingles used as Asphalt Enhancer SP8 ! j — —
C Drop-Off Program for Inerts SP8a I 9/95_ 1 9/91 j
C I i
lea IndustriaVSewage Sludge:
C Soil Amendment SP9 I
Co-composting SP10 __
Contingency Plans for EPA 503 Regulations SP10a I I I I 12/91— D I
Page B-6
GWMBFie:DNFORM.XLS Version: February 6, 1996
MODEL ANNUAL REPORT
A BCDEF G H I J K L M N 0
:>-:::::;::
. . :: :. ..: ........... ,.,Gu istltcxlon` Cost:.Effecttveness.;&"Pr ;artt"Goals;i3atttt ..............
::::: :::": ;..:. ;::::;: . a :: ;: c: > .;>.:.:.>:>'"<:;:..ia:; onal R :.. .. Fetfod:;Stalos "`::::>.>::; Fu�treAevfsrors :.,
:*:; :��:�;;:;;;;:«:r:s::":a::::i :;o:�a��i:;::::::::::::::::::::::::�::::::::":::.�:.:�::;:.�:.::::�::�.::: ::::::.::......... ,::::::::::::::::�::PtOg,3tR.iGQa15.vVBtGJii"];: ;:,::.;.;:::.:b:::::::::::::::::i:::r:>::i:iS:'r?�:::,,;.; ::::...:... ....:...:...: �: ...:.
:::?:T`i:::::xo::":>::o::: o::::> o> :::!>>:r:::: : :G: >:-;:<zt.i.:::5:::::::i:0'':Z. ::,::: .:. ......:::::: :::::::::ct ...::::.:: .::.;::P.r.00%iii, r5 ,,s....5;ii:;_.;.rt
. .. .. :n:o:::::::.:::;o:.o:::< .s::i::::.is::::>;:::4:9'?;:::-;i<..�;;i�eF.��.. ACtila ...... ................
............ 1....... ......perSRE�...... .......Aevlsiort ...
i'..e{:3f'#j ii;:i ,,:;'''i
"erfiteiiz'- - - - - -- --- - --—
le
.::.::.::.::.::.:
TYp.�t.:.r.1?:9p?m.:poiy:¢:Pracess.»>:::»::>::::>;%::::>::»:<::::<::;::°�.: :;4�1 :: ::;:a::::::<i«::s:>Ji>:<ri»>.Ei>>::><.�_.._::::": >k:>` > '^� :::::::>�::: ;•.1:::::..,
...........:
::::.•::::::::::::..:.
i �.'-.i....
.:.:::: . ii :::.�:. :.iiii.ii..ii.-:.:..:....:......:...::.:..:........... i:......�...i..:....;..:.:..:..�. ...........,....,....„.1.......„:„.,;7,
.
.
iii:::.:i�:.:.:.::..,.:.:...,..,:,:,:,..,..0::::„:„..,..4%.„..„,,...
V:::.: ::::: :i:;: ::;::y.::: ::::: �::::.:.�:..N:::::.v:.�:fl:::: �::: i:::::w .................... .'...... ...;.:.{..:.:.d............... ...................... ............. ........ ... ..:.......i �i.:: . M..,... : Wr&.:v :: i . :, : .ii� : i :;: : : :.:. : ::" ::.�........ .....::,„..: . . ::,. ....i ..„,,1iiiiiiii:.i.ii..i...i..:..:.....:....:....... ................................................................... ...................:......................:...:...:.:.,.:.::..::..:.:..:.. .i.i.i.:..:....:.:.:.:..�:::.iiiii...::....:....... p...:i.4.i4.i.i.i.:.?.ili.i:.•::.4.'..0. ..:.::.:.:.:.:.�.:�.:.::.:. ... ...... .................. .......... :..........:....:•::..::w;::::::0:::.:::.�:.::::::::..:........:. ...::.:...:.:.:.:.:::s .:”:::• ................ : . .... ......... ........:................................. ...... : : . .. ...
•Tires: I I I
Retreads SP11 ! I i
Other Reuse: SP12
Rubberized Asphalt SP13 I
( I f
Other Tire-Derived Products: SP14 I !
Tire-Derived Fuel/Incineration SP15 Ii i I I 1
Drop-Off Program for TiresSP15a j I I 9/95 _ I 9/91 _ ___
! II I
White Goods:
Repair/Re-use SP16 !
Special Collection Events— ------=-
SP17 I I I I I
— — --------------------------------•------------ --- -
Salvage at Landfill SP18 I-- 1 --- — —•-_
Salvage at Transfer Station SP19 I
j I i
l
Salvage at Processing Centers SP20
i
Drop Off Program for White Goods SP20a — I I j 9/95 I 1 9/91 t
Scrap Metals/Abandoned Vehicles: I ( I
Salvage at Landfill SP21 I I
Salvage at Transfer Station SP22 I ff
Salvage at Processing Centers SP23 I
Other Special Waste Programs/Policies:
Landfill Ban on: • SP24
C EDUCATION I I
.r i
Media: i
ilerh Public Service Announcements EDI I
C Newspaper Articles ED2 I _ _ I i
Multi-Media Activities ED2a X i I Varied I 8/96
Develop SlideNideo Presentation ED2b X i I I I 6/92 I 12/91
Display Centers ED2c X I I I 3/92 1 3/92
Mobile Display Vehicle ED2d X I I 1 3/96 M 8/96 I '
i I I f i
1 1 _ I I
Page 8-7
CIWMB File:DIVFORM.XLS Version: February 6,1996
MODEL ANNUAL REPORT
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N 0
: ns°1°:1Qn. Cost Effe-Iveness: pro rant Goals Aatln 0 oral Re In Pmriotf StaHis :;':.. ... Frti re;Revis ons
...."": . :. .S/Toh were PO°''a ir`',°,"were:; .
::. r ... :.... �....: .-. ,...:... ::.ii.F'vndedt:;: .. .':.i�-':5555 ;:�Fsi ss:i:. 4'� �.
:: ::;� `%b:559 5555::�:�..�: •::i� �:: :'.Gi":':. �..>': i
Per ..>::;: .....Aetual>;:%.:»;i . .:.:.. perSRF�..:.s::�.:..::ffievlslon
:.::.::....
..:. -: ......... ... erated i.s:: .: . ..._.�..,. .
T. a.Q�pfS# �fTA pylic...4fi.E?f4Ce63 ;i::;>.>::::»:::::: .... :.Oa. �). .. ;:>::: :::::: : <::::::>.>: ::::,::::::,,,,,i::.::—'�
..................... ..........:.:.:. ...................................... .................
c � .. .... .... . . ..:::.::.: :... ..... .;� ; ;;:�;�;: � :;'.vs 555::>;�:;; :2'D�i `ssi 55.��s::� i�:
:.: ..................... ......................... .................. .:......:.::: . ....... .. ........... i sis. ; ;i:+i:.�. �:�: :.� ;;..:<:..0::.�: :' : o�;;:: .
: ... .. ::::: os . .. :;;�;?:f:� . >�5R5555 5555;::r.C45:G �?�i a:;'y.:;
::�:.;;:�-;•;:o:;:�;:o;:<.;:o:o:->: ;;:�:;:�:;�;;:,»�;:�:::•::�;:�s:�;:�> :�;:�s:�s:�>:�::o; -s:o:o:�;>:�.:�::': :�;::. ; '<::c: :;;:.;..... ::.:::: ::�;:�:I�;;:.:.:�:;:,.;..::::::
........:�.. ...... ...........+.r.:::::::�.. . :... ::.:: ::�.6f::�:G: ..`. :::/m'iiss: 55;:;:;:55•;::;::�ss;
�::::.�.:�: ::.:::::::::. :::::::. : :::�::;isvi;;i;i;iiiiiiiiiiii:�::�iiii:ii:�iii�i:: :: i:;:�. 0.....Mtn
�.... ...
' � .�::�-�5:G5�5555::;@:55'::5':C;;.:............. .....:..... . :. ... ... . .:...... Nen ::.. .:::.:
:�: iiiii::�i;ii:�ii::�i:�::�Y:-:::-i:::4:!� :�::�Yi:�i:�S;:iS;Y iii;;:�ii:�iiii?ii:�Y:�i:4Y.'4: :�: :^ii i;ii;:�ii �::::
Communication: i I
Brochures, Newsletters&Publications -- -ED3- - X ! I 3/92 I Ongoing
Seminars/Workshops ED4 ! — -- —
I I
Speakers Bureau ED5 --- ----T ------— (--- --- -- ,—._.__--
Awards Programs ED6 X • —I 1 6/92 I I 3/93 J
"Buy Recycled"Educational Programs ED6a X i [ 3/92 I Ongoing j j
Education and Public Outreach for Composting ED6b X i --I --� 9/92 I 3/92
Promotional Items ED6c X I j I ! 12/92 I j 4/92 j
Recycling Hotline ED6d X j j ! I I ! 12/92 I 2/94 I
Public Education: i
I I
School Curriculum ED7 ! 1 I
Field Trips ED8 i I tI j
Speakers ED9 X j I j 9/92 I ',Ongoing I — !
School Informational Materials Distribution ED9a X i I 1 I j 3/92 I Ongoing T j
Waste Reduction Video ED9b X i { j I 1 3/92 I Ongoing I I
Bi-Monthly Meetings w/School District ED9c X j – I I 3/92 M i 6/92 ; !
Develop Resources&Activities ED9d X I i 3/92 I Ongoing I
Continue Moorpark College Presentations ED9e X ( I I 9/92 I Ongoing i
Technical Assistance:
Commercial (Waste Audits, Brochures,etc.) ED10 _ 1 1 6/92 I 12/95 _
Industrial (Waste Audits, Brochures, etc.) ED11 r I I 6/92 I 12/95
roch u r s,et — -•--•--____------------
i fOther Education Programs/Policies:
Composting Workshops ' ED12 X II 12/93 I 9/92
---------- ------- ------------ ------- --------- ------------------------- ------- --------
Displays/Model Compost Sites EDI2a X I I I 9/93 1 7/93
Master Gardener Compost Education ED12b X � I I 6/92 I j 2/94 j
Point of Purchase Informational Brochure ED12c X j I L 3/93 I j 4/93 j I
C Employee Training _-- —-- — ED12d X i i 6/92 I Ongoing
-- --------- - ------------------- -- ---------------
1
OTHER PROGRAMS/POLICIES i
Alternative Daily Cover(ADC) OT1
l'a Recycling Market Development Zone(RMDZ) OT2 X i I 12/92 I 4/93 I
C Support Legislation for Content Req'ts OT2a X j~— — —_l________3/?2
1 I _ 3/92 I Ongoing
p� Participate in Market Development Consortiums OT2b X — -- ( I3/92 I 12/93
I —
_ .
Page B-8
CIWMB Fie:DIVFORM.XLS
Version: February 6, 1996
Appendix B-la - SRRE / Annual Report Program Key
Program Table B-1 No.
A. Source Reduction (p. 3-38)
1. Volume Based Rates SR5
2. Waste Audits ED10
3. Backyard Composting/Master Composting ED12
4. Displays/Model Compost Sites ED12a
5. On-Site Mulching SR9a
6. Business Technical Assistance SR9
7. Waste Exchange SR7
8. Source Reduction Education SR8
9. Source Reduction Awards SR9b
10. City Offices Model Program SR9c
11. Purchase Preferences SR1
B . Recycling Programs (p. 4-63)
1. Support Existing Drop-off Centers R11
2. Continue Annual Clean-Up Days R10
3. Continue X-mas Tree and Telephone Book Drop Off R8 &R9
4. Consider Drop Off For Inerts,White Goods, &Tires SP8a, SP15a,
SP20a
5. Support Existing Certified Buyback Centers R12
6. Expand Buyback Services R17a
7. Evaluate Need to Eliminate Buyback Centers R17b
8. Add Materials to Curbside Program R4a .
9. Implement Multi-Family Collection Citywide R3
10. Implement Residential Yard Waste Collection Cl
11. Implement Commercial/Industrial Collection R7a
12. Implement Commercial Yard Waste Collection C4a
13. Participate in Existing Mulching Operation C9a
14. Participate in Development of Centralized Mulching Facility C9b
15. Continue to Use Existing Processing Facilities R17c
16. Participate in Development of IPC in Eastern Wasteshed R15
17. Participate in Development of MRF in Eastern Wasteshed R14
18. Support Existing Salvaging Operations R16
19. Revise Zoning Criteria to Suppport the Siting of Recycling Facilities R17d
20. Implement Building Code Revisions for Space Allocation R17e
21. Develop Educational Program ED3
22. Implement Volume Based Pricing SR5
23. Design Collection and Processing Systems to Meet End-Use Req's R17f
24. Implement Building Code and Permitting Revisions R17g
25. Implement Zoning Revisions R17h
26. Support Legislation for Content Req's,Market Develop't, &Tax Credits OT2a
27. Participate in Market Development Consortiums OT2b
28. Develop"Buy Recycled"Educational Programs ED6a
29. Apply for Recycling Market Development Zone Designation OT2
Curbside Collection(Implemented prior to SRRE) R1
Page B-9 ��
Program Table B-1 No.
C. Composting Programs (p. 5-23)
1. Drop-Off Site with Grinding and Mulching Capability&Windrow Composting C9c
Option
2. Participate in Centralised Composting Facility C9d
3. Possible MSW or Co-Composting Facility C9e
4. Master Gardener Compost Education Program ED12b
5. Assess/Expand Existing Markets ClOa
6. Support/Enact Legislation for Compost Markets ClOb
7. Adopt Procurement Policies Favoring Use Of Compost ClOc
8. Develop Education and Public Outreach Program ED6b
9. Develop Market Standards ClOd
10. Develop Contingency Plans for Implementation of EPA 503 Standards SP10a
11. Consider Ban for Disposal of Yard Waste with Refuse C10
Compost Bin Distribution(Not selected in SRRE) SR9d
D. Special Wastes (p. 6-12)
No programs chosen.
E. Education (p. 7-12)
1. School Informational Materials Distribution ED9a
2. Waste Reduction Video ED9b
3. Bimonthly Meetings between Recycling Coordinator and School District ED9c
4. School Presentations ED9
5. Develop Educational Resource and Educational Activities ED9d'
6. Moorpark College Presentations ED9e
7. Multi-Media Activities ED2a
8. Promotional Items ED6c
9. Awards Programs ED6
10. Point of Purchase Diversion Informational Brochure ED12c
11. Develop Slide/Video Presentation ED2b
12. Display Centers ED2c
13. Employee Training ED12d
14. Recycling Information Hotline ED6d
15. Waste Audits ED10,ED11
16. Mobile Display Vehicle ED2d
•
OOC 1&S
Page B-10
#B-2: TABLE 1 (Page 1 on )
DIVERSION QUANTITIES(TONS)FOR SRRE PROGRAMS FUNDED OR OPERATED BY JURISDICTION/AGENCY
JURISDICTION/REGIONAL AGENCY NAME(S): City of Moorpark
BEGINNING DATE: 1/1/95 ENDING DATE: 12/31/95
DIVERTED MATERIAL(TONS) BY WASTE TYPE
PROGRAM DESCRIPTION Yard TOTAL
Waste TONS
Compost Bins 78 78
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
•
TOTALS 78 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 78
C
C Page B-11
0
I"
C
Appendix B-3a - Programs Not Implemented During Reporting Period
The following programs, scheduled to be implemented by this reporting period, were not implemented.
Recycling Programs
R14 Participate in Development of MRF in Eastern Wasteshed
R17a Expand Buyback Services
R17b Evaluate Need to Eliminate Buyback Services
R17d Revise Zoning Criteria to Support Recycling Facilities
R17f Design Collection and Processing for End Use Requirements
R17g Implement Building Code and Permitting Revisions to Encourage Use of Recycled Materials
R17h Implement Zoning Revisions to Encourage Use of Recycled Materials
Composting Programs
C10 Landfill Ban on Green Waste
Special Waste Programs
SP10a Contingency Plans for EPA 503 Regulations
Appendix B-3b - Reasons Programs Were Not Implemented
These programs were not implemented for the following reasons.
Recycling Programs
R14 Participate in Development of MRF in Eastern Wasteshed
Existing facilities have proved satisfactory for the City's needs. No MRF is needed.
R17a Expand Buyback Services
R17b Evaluate Need to Eliminate Buyback Services
The existing certified buyback centers have proved adequate. With the implementation of residential
curbside collection, there is less demand for buyback services.
R17d Revise Zoning Criteria to Support Recycling Facilities
R17g Implement Building Code and Permitting Revisions to Encourage Use of Recycled Materials
R17h Implement Zoning Revisions to Encourage Use of Recycled Materials
Satisfactory markets for recycled materials have developed without need for these regulatory measures.
R17f Design Collection and Processing for End Use Requirements
This is more appropriately done by the haulers.
Composting Programs
C10 Landfill Ban on Green Waste
This program was dropped because it was unnecessary, after the implementation of curbside collection for
yard waste.
Special Waste Programs
SP 10a Contingency Plans for EPA 503 Standards
This program was dropped because it was unnecessary given the City's sludge treatment processes.
Page B-12 00C108
Appendix B-5 - Contingency Programs
The following programs were listed in the SRRE as contingency programs.
Source Reduction
1. Increase public education and information activities relating to source reduction awareness.
2. Consider implementation of alternatives discussed in Source Reduction Component but not selected.
3. Review individual source reduction programs to strengthen individual activities within programs.
4. Consider increasing diversion from activities other than source reduction (such as recycling and
composting) to reach overall diversion goals.
Recycling
1. Evaluate existing programs to determine why objectives were not met. Consider more frequent
program monitoring and maintaining up-to-date timelines.
2. Consider mandating participation in residential and commercial programs.
3. Consider requiring large commercial generators to submit annual plans for achieving 25% to 50%
diversion for their waste.
Composting
1. Consider additional education and publicity programs.
2. Consider implementation of residential and commercial volume based pricing.
3. Consider ban on disposal of yard waste in MSW containers.
4. Consider diversion of residual organics (food wastes,non-recyclable paper, etc.) at MSW
composting facilities.
Special Wastes
1. Develop additional educational programs and composting publicity programs.
2. Decrease diversion goals for sludge. (An increase in diversion of other materials would be
necessary to compensate.
If the already selected programs do not achieve the 50%reduction goal, the City would conduct a
comprehensive evaluation of its reduction and diversion programs, and make revisions and additions based
on the experience staff has gained with these programs. As noted in Appendix B-9,it may also be
necessary to carry out another Solid Waste Generation Study, to determine what types of materials remain in
the undiverted waste stream.
Page B-13 000105
Appendix B-6 - Revisions to Programs
The following programs, listed in the Board approved SRRE,were modified.
Recycling Programs
R15 Participate in Development of IPC in Eastern Wasteshed.
One of the franchised haulers, GI Industries, has an IPC which processes the recyclables
from the City's recycling programs.
R17e Implement Building Code Revisions for Space Allocation.
Requirements for space for recycling needs are incorporated into a project's permit
conditions.
Composting Programs
C-4a Commercial Yard Waste Collection.
The City has implemented discounted disposal rates for commercial yard waste and
compostables.
C-9b Participate in Development of Centralized Mulching Facility
A private firm, Cal Wood,provides chipping, grinding, and mulching services.
C-9c Drop-off Site with Grinding and Mulching Capability and Windrow Composting Option.
A local private firm provides the necessary grinding,mulching, and chipping capability.
Simi Valley Landfill is in the process of revising its Conditional Use Permit to allow co-
composting
C-9d Participate in Centralized Composting Facility
As noted above,the Simi Valley Landfill is planning to provide co-composting capability.
C-9e Possible MSW Composting at MRF.
Please see C-9c and C-9d above.
C-10d Develop Market Standards. Compost market standards must be implemented over a regional
or statewide basis in order to be effective. This program has been modified to include
supporting legislation for such standards.
Education Programs
ED2d Mobile Display Vehicle
This program was modified to consist of a portable kiosk.
ED9c Bi-Monthly Meetings with School District
This program was modified in that the meetings are less frequent.
000110
Page B-14
Appendix B-8 - Barriers to Achievement of Disposal Reduction Goal
1 . Inaccurate Base Year Generation Data. The primary barrier to achievement of the Disposal
Reduction Goal, as determined by the Disposal Reduction Calculation,is the City's faulty Base Year
Generation data. As noted in Appendix A-2a,the City has reason to believe that its base year generation
was significantly undercounted. Assistance from the Board staff in developing an acceptable method to
correct this widespread problem would be greatly appreciated.
2 . Inaccurate Disposal Reporting Year Data. Although Moorpark's 1995 disposal data appears to
be approximately accurate,the City is concerned that the Disposal Reporting System has the potential to
significantly distort a jurisdiction's waste data and therefore its diversion rate. In particular, the practice of
surveying only one week per quarter and extrapolating that out to a full quarter could cause serious
problems if a company or agency happened to dispose of an exceptionally heavy load that week. If an
independent hauler takes even a small load to a large facility during the survey week, significant tonnage
would be attributed to the City. Alternatively,the survey week might happen to be unusually light,causing
errors in the other direction. In either case,the disposal reduction calculation would not accurately reflect
the City's performance.
3 . Lack of Control Over Waste Generators. Local jurisdictions must contend with waste generated
by state and federal agencies over which they have no control. For example, Caltrans may generate
significant amounts of waste attributed to a city,while the City has no control or influence over this
generator. In addition,the City has no flow control over such agencies, so that loads can be taken to less
expensive disposal facilities which may offer less complete or no recycling options.
4 . Costs of Program Implementation. Although the City has achieved the 25% diversion goal in a
relatively short time period,it will be much more difficult to reach 50% diversion.All of the waste materials
which are easily separated and recycled have been captured. Increasing diversion will now require
identifying relatively smaller quantities of less desirable materials,with heavier program implementation
costs.
Appendix B-9 - Adequacy of the Solid Waste Generation Study
As discussed in Appendix A-2a, the City believes that its Solid Waste Generation Study is inadequate. The
disposal and diversion tonnages were calculated using average pounds per day factors for residents and
employees within the four generator types; residential, commercial,industrial, and other. The results show
the City with significantly lower generation than other cities with similar development patterns.Although the
same method was used for the City of Thousand Oaks, its waste generation is much higher,even when per
capita residential generation is considered.
Moorpark plans to revise its Solid Waste Generation Study after the Board has developed approved methods
and formulas to accomplish this.
00(1111
Page B-15
Appendix B-10 - Adequacy of the Source Reduction and Recycling Element
Based on five years experience in implementing diversion programs,the City has determined that the
Program Selection and Implementation Schedule of the SRRE need revision. The necessary changes are set
forth in Appendix B-1,with more detail provided in Appendices B-3a,B-3b and B-6.
If the changes described in this Annual Report are considered to be revisions to the SRRE for the purposes
of future annual reports, there will be no need for further revisions. If a formal revision process is required,
the City anticipates completing this as a part of the five-year review.
Appendix B-16 - Technical Assistance from Board Staff
Board staff can provide assistance in the following ways;
1. Develop accurate and efficient methods for revising base year numbers.
2. Looking forward to the difficulties of achieving the 50%reduction goal, develop cost-effective
model programs for capturing and diverting waste materials which represent smaller portions of the
waste stream, and/or are less recyclable.
00G1.12
Page B-16
SECTION (C): HHWE PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION ASSESSMENT
Check each item as completed,providing attachments as applicable. Refer to the User's Guide for
detailed instructions and examples.
[✓] C-1. Summarize the progress made in implementing planned programs for this reporting
period(reporting-year or period since last reported). A blank "HHWE Program
Form" is provided. Computerized versions are available upon request(refer to
User's Guide Attachment VI). Attach the completed form or print-out and label as
Appendix C-1.
[V] C-2. Were there any programs planned to be implemented this reporting period(reporting-
year or period since last reported)in your Board-approved final HHWE, which have
not been implemented?
[V] Yes. Attach a list of programs. Discuss the circumstances related to each
program and how they impact the implementation schedule. Label attachment
as Appendix C-2.
[] No.
[✓] C-3. Have any implemented programs been unsuccessful?
[] Yes. Attach a list of programs. Discuss the circumstances contributing to the
lack of success for each program and how they impact the implementation
schedule. Label attachment as Appendix C-3.
[✓] No.
[V] C-4. Do you anticipate any other revisions to the programs,implementation schedules or
funding sources of the Board-approved,final HHWE? Include any other new
programs not yet discussed.
[] Yes. Attach a discussion and revised schedules, if applicable. Label
attachment as Appendix C-4.
[V] No.
[✓] C-5. Discuss the efforts that have been made to inform the public of household hazardous
waste collection events or facilities. Provide examples of flyers or written public
educational materials that have been distributed. Label attachment as Appendix C-5.
[✓] C-6. Discuss the expenditures (including any CIWMB grant monies) that have been
devoted to the collection, treatment,recycling and disposal of household hazardous
waste. Label attachment as Appendix C-6.
000113
Page C-1
[V] C-7. If applicable, attach a discussion on potential barriers that may realistically affect the
implementation of successful household hazardous waste programs. Label
attachment as Appendix C-7.
OPTIONAL INFORMATION:
[ ] C-8. If your jurisdiction has implemented program(s) that were unique or that have been
exceptionally successful, attach a discussion. Provide information on how the
program is unique or exceptional; the participation and diversion rates; the costs
involved; the type of criteria other jurisdictions could use to determine whether this
program would be successful in their jurisdiction; and your willingness to have other
jurisdictions contact you for further information. Label attachment as Appendix C-8.
[ ] C-9. Attach a discussion on any additional technical assistance Board staff could provide to
assist local jurisdictions in implementing household hazardous waste programs.
Label attachment as Appendix C-9.
QOC1g,4
Page C-2
MODEL ANNUAL REPORT
APPENDIX C-1: HWWE PROGRAM FORM
JURISDICTION/REGIONAL AGENCY NAME: City of Moorpark
REPORTING-YEAR BEGINNING DATE: 1/1/92 REPORTING-YEAR ENDING DATE: 12/31/95
Check(x)all applicable boxes in columns A-G (note: B- G are optional); provide status codes in columns H, J, L, N; and provide dates in columns I, K, M, O. Insert program/policy types in I
'Program status codes: (I) Implemented; (E) Expanded; (R) Reduced; (M) Modified (attach explanation); (D) Dropped; (C) Contingency
A B CD EFGH I J K L M N 0
;:: > ..;::::.. Program..Goals
u
Cost>✓ffectweness&. •
::...•':• ...: J nsdn;ion Reporting-Year Status :::`.Future:Revisions::
. �. Ratin�,�O�pUonal.,.,,,.„.,„„.n..,.,
F : .. 1'. c;';; on were; .8.: r ram o were. ..
::.!.. :::;:::;;: ..>•.:> ;:>:.>:::.. •0.. .. utlde.i ...... mak _ r P og _ Gats . Per HWWE Actual .,:.PerHHWE Revision
'...i :' :" :'.T e of.Pro rant .Poll or Process 4 rated x
Pe • m as
J
O fl
p
.yZ : ....',';...7k. :N � YS7
< : : ; 'rn s.u , . tito
Data Input Example#1 x x x • R 2/93 D 5/95
•
Data Input Example#2 x • x ` x I i 2/92 I `: 9/92 E 12/97
Data Input Example#3 x x I E i 6/93 E 7/93
Data Input Example#4 / 7/97 1 i 5/98
PERMANENT
Recyclables HHW Collection Facility X • I 1995 I 3/93
•
•
•
•
MOBILE
Mobile Collection Program I 2000 D
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
PERIODIC ;
Periodic Collection for Non-Recyclables I i 1995 I 5/94
C Integrate Recycling in Collection Programs I . 1995 I 5/94
•
•
•
r . :
. , ..
•
: :
•
..."1 :
_ _.
Page C-3
CIWMB File:HWFORM.XLS Version: February 6, 1996
MODEL ANNUAL REPORT
A B C D EFGH I J K L M N 0
Cost.EffecUveites,, Prograrrt.Goals
Jurl5tlictton
... .:. ........ ;.: . .. ; ' �Ie Orlin Year 8tatsis>:' "";> : 1=uturaAevisions
F:.
� at
..."....... ... .... . :... u n d edT.
' :'>;`:: ::::::;:;•" ;,. ..>;>s>c,;;. .: :..:. :.: Pt tath,f36ais were:
s
$tion were og ;Per HWWE Actual PerHf-tWE Revfsran
P li r:;P . ... . .ated x .. 1... w
:;':::>:;::>< : :::::;:Type•�f::Pr ram ..o. . .v.....rocess...... ..: ..:.: x :> .::-....:.:----.::::::,.,:*:;,:.-;.-z.]: ' .. :. ;;>:.: ;;;;f:.
:.::.;:...:...
m
......".".....". :::::
...... : ::::.:Eif::..............
Ni.:....... .........
"............. . :... .�.�::.�:::.
::: : 0..........::. ..z.::...
RECYCLE ONLY
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
OTHER
•
Load Checking at Simi Valley Landfill I ` Ongoing I Ongoing
Curriculum Supplements I 1995 I I 1995 •
•
Speakers and Presentations I 1995 I 1994
Environmental Education Curriculum I 1995 I 1994
Educational Assistance from Industry I 1995 D
Multi-Jurisdictional Display Vehicle I i 2000 M
Multi-Media Outreach • I 1995 I 9/94
Distribution of Informational Materials i I i 1995 I 1 1995
HHW Speakers Bureau I I 1995 I ! Ongoing
Utility Bill Inserts I i 1995 I 1994
Point of Purchase Fliers I 1995 I 1995
County-Wide Hotline I 1995 I 1995
Public Information Campaign •
I i 2000 I 1 1994
C Legislation Monitoring and Support •
I 1995 I 1 1992
C Permanent HHW Display at City Hall •
I 1995 I 1 9/94
en Use of Non-Hazardous Products within City Government I 2000 I 1992
Cr; 1 :
•`
Page C-4
CNVMB File:HWFORM.XLS Version: February 6, 1996
Appendix C-2 - Programs Not Implemented During Reporting Period
Two programs were not implemented.
Mobile Collection Program. This program was found to be too expensive. The Recyclables HHW
Collection Facility and the periodic collection events provide convenient service for Moorpark
residents who need to dispose of HHW.
Educational Assistance from Industry. Staff determined that sufficient educational resources were
available and that soliciting industry involvement was not an efficient use of limited funds and staff
time.
Appendix C-5 - Public Information Efforts
The City uses the following methods to notify citizens of upcoming HHW events.
• Flyers and brochures
• Utility Bill inserts •
• Assessment District mailer inserts
• Newspaper advertisements
• Public Service Announcements
Copies of the written materials are included as Attachment C.
Appendix C-6 - Expenditures for HHW Programs
The City has spent the following funds for HHW programs.
1. CIWMB discretionary grant for interactive $69,100
computer/kiosk public education campaign
2. CIWMB grant for Used Oil Recycling $8,500
Subtotal CIWMB funds $77,600
3. City funds for Collection events, Resource Conservation Center, and public $23,100
information
Total HHW Funds $100,700
Appendix C-7 - Barriers to HHW Programs
The most significant barrier to HI-IW programs is the high cost of both collection and disposal.
Ongoing funding for all types of HHW programs, in addition to used oil, would be very helpful.
Page C-5 00C 117
SECTION (F): AREAS OF CONCERN/CONDITIONAL APPROVALS
Check each item as completed,providing attachments as applicable. Refer to the User's
Guide for detailed instructions and examples.
[✓] F-1. Attach a discussion on any Areas-of-Concern that your jurisdiction was
requested or required to address in the Annual Report as noted in the Board's
determination of element/plan adequacy. Label attachment as Appendix F-1.
[ ] F-2. If your jurisdiction had a conditional approval on any planning document,
attach a discussion on any stipulations that required action as noted in the
Board's determination of element/plan adequacy. Label attachment as
Appendix F-2. The SRRE was approved unconditionally.
Appendix F-1 - Areas of Concern
Three Areas of Concern were listed in the Board's approval of the SRRE.
1. Biomass Conversion. The City is not planning any biomass conversion at this time,
nor is it being considered as a contingency program.
2. Co-Composting. If co-composting is implemented,procedures must comply with Title
14, California Code of Regulations. (14 CCR)
At this time, the Simi Valley Landfill is considering a co-composting effort. If
implemented, this program will comply with all applicable regulations.
3. Alternative Daily Cover. Regulatory limitations on use of green waste for ADC are in
being reviewed and it is not clear what the final outcome will be. The City is monitoring
these changes, and will design its diversion efforts to meet the regulations in force at the
time.
Page F-1 0 1118