HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 1996 1016 CC REG ITEM 10GAGENDA REPORT
CITY OF MOORPARK
TO: The Honorable City Council
FROM: Lillian E. Hare, City Clerk
DATE: October 10, 1996(CC Meeiing of 10/16/96)
SUBJECT: BOLLINGER RESOLUTION
0. Car..
a . f, r4 ) (W`
Mayor Pro Tem Wozniak requested that a resolution be prepared in the event the Council should
decide to take action to redesignate the Bollinger property.
Attachment: Draft resolution.
OOOZOI
CITY OF MOORPARK
MEMORANDUM
TO: Steven Kueny, City Manager
FROM: Nelson Miller, Director of Community Developmivy—
DATE: October 2, 1996
SUBJECT: Potential Schedule for Bollinger Reversion
Per your request, following is a potential schedule for reversion of the Bollinger property to the
previous General Plan and Zoning Designations:
October 16, 1996 - Resolution of Intention. Initiation of action by City Council Resolution
of Intention. It has been City policy that all General Plan Amendments and Changes in
Zoning are initiated by City Council Resolution. Section 17.60.020 of the Municipal Code
indicates Amendments to Zoning must be initiated by either City Council or Planning
Commission Resolution or by application of the property owner. If Council directed, a
resolution could be returned for their action on October 16.
2 November 11,19% - Planning Commission Hearing. It appears that if the direction was
to revert to exactly the same designation as previous, then we could use the previous EIR.
However, any changes might trigger additional environmental review. On that basis, we
could probably prepare the required notices, staff reports, and draft Planning Commission
Resolution for the November 11, 1996, Planning Commission Meeting. If a Negative
Declaration was required then a minimum additional ten day notice would be required which
would delay Planning Commission meeting to November 25.
3. December 4, 1996 - City Council Hearing. Planning Commission recommendations
transmitted to the City Council for consideration. City Council could adopt the resolution for
the General Plan designation and conduct first reading of an ordinance to change the zoning
designation.
4. December 18, 1996 - Second reading of Zone Change Ordinance.
January 17, 1996 - Effective date of Zone Change Ordinance.
The typical processing deposits for a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change on 655 acres would
be $!0,543.50. Considering the nature of this action, staff processing time and costs might be thirty
to fifty percent of the typical. In such case costs of processing these actions could range from $3,000
to $5,000.
(':\ OFFICE\ W P W IN \WPDOCSWEMOSCM \BOLLNGRS. WPD
October l5 i 996
FAX and MAIL
MOORPARK
799 Moorpark Aven,�e Moorpark, California 93021 (805) 529 -6864
Mr. Paul A. Bollinger
Bollinger Development Corp.
351 Rolling Oaks Drive, Ste. 100A
Thousand Oaks, CA 91361
Dear Paul:
This is in response to your October 15, 1996 letter. I am
disappointed in that you have chosen not to provide the
information you previously agreed to provide. The requested
financing plan and schedule would not disclose confidential or
proprietary information. It would show who has committed what
amount of financing, under what conditions and a specific
schedule.
From my review of the documents shared with me on October 7,
1996, you are still considering three financing options and are
months away from being able to conclude any of the options.
Again, what I thought you agreed to provide is a reply to
questions of how much financing, from whom, under what conditions
and when. Your written response to these questions should be
provided to me prior to the scheduled October 16, 1996 ad hoc
committee meeting.
Sincerely,
Steven Kueny i
City Manager
SK:db
cc: The Honorable City Council
Richard Hare, Deputy City Manager
Nelson Miller, Director of Community Development
Mr. Bob Haaland, The Haaland Group, Inc.
c:\citymqr\bo1nqr10.15
PAUL W. LAWRASON JR. JOHN E. WOZNIAK ELOISE BROWN PATRICK HUNTER
Mayor BERNARDO M. PEREZ Ma or Pro Tern Councilmember
Councilmember Councilmember
- _ -- "u
October 15, 1996
Mr. Steve Kueny
City Manager
City Of Moorpark �cccox,
799 Moorpark Avenue 'y 00,
MOOrpark, CA 93021 �c�T tijq'�/r
Subject: meoO
NCe'9
Dear Steve:
'7E: 00 00' 60 Nd.
Steve, at our meeting
Mrs. Kane, the b of October 7, 1996 we discussed
City Attorney on October 2� y °u that we had spoken with
City our private financi. , 1996 and that we w
Mrs. matters; but did not want ant to share with the
Kane informed us that if we showed to become a
leaving the material this would keep You the information discussed Public record.
p the matter private and not for publi se. it without
At our meeting of October 7
financing plans that demonstrate our abilitydto close
they are the private business of Bollinger and show you Se�,e� different
on subject project however, because
public and per the g Development, Inc. and are not for
documentation advice of Mrs. Kane we the general
and that was acknowledged lected not to leave you an
ged between us. y written
I am perplexed as to your letter of O
I would furnish October 11, wherein you state
You a letter explaining my financing that it was agreed
time contingency that
g Plans In fact
acknowledged y of receipt of naat you have Placed a
that no written material w uld be s�m t e October 14, when it was
record available to
questioned whether Your 1. In fact at the meeting as it then becomes
Personal notes would become Of tober 7 a Public
Mr, Haaland even
We will public record.
however, cooperate and
property and show again demonstrate our ability t
business and discuss with you and the y o close
plans finance the purchase ADD HOC committee our subject
6:00 p. m..
Surely of subject property Private
Y You must understand that these are not t matters they public October 16, at
Sin e y y Irs, record.
Paul ollinor
Qollinger I-)tneio
351 ROLLING OAKS DAiVE, SUITE 100A TF {pUSA�Ome�t Corp
1 (805) 379 -0077
FAX: (905) 379 -6i3y
Zd Wd6£:�0 966E �r •�,�