Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
AGENDA REPORT 1991 0501 CC REG ITEM 09B
TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Background 70 M 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California,?3021 805) pg -6864 MEMORANDUM The Honorable City Council Patrick J. Richards, Director of Community Devel May 1, 1991 (CC Meeting of May 15, 1991) IPD 90 -1, CUP 90 -1, VARIANCE 90 -1 AND LDM 90 -4 (MARTIN V. SMITH AND ASSOCIATES) The applicant is requesting approval of the following: o Land division to subdivide an existing 7.52 acre parcel into two parcels of 2.88 (future residential site) and 4.64 acres (project site). o Industrial Planned Development and Conditional Use Permit to construct a 135 room hotel and a free - standing 5,100 square foot restaurant. Note: The Conditional Use Permit will be considered the master permit for these two structures. o Variance to permit: a) architectural features of hotel and restaurant to encroach a maximum of 4 -feet into setback areas, b) parking to encroach into sideyard setback, c) permit decorative hardscape paved delivery access to be placed in the rear yard setback area, and d) permit parking requirements for hotel and restaurant to be reduced. The proposed project is located at the northeast corner of Flinn Avenue, east of Spring Road and south of the Southern Pacific Railroad. On April 1, 1991, the above captioned projects were heard by the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission directed staff to prepare a resolution recommending to the City Council approval of IPD 90 -1, CUP 90 -1, Variance No. 90 -2 and LDM 90 -4. The Commission also requested that staff work with the applicant on a suggested modification to condition No. 22 of the Land Division Map related to storm drain improvements. The matter was continued to the Planning Commission meeting of April 15, 1991. On April 15, 1991, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution Nos. PC 91 -233 and 234 recommending to the City Council approval of the above captioned projects. 1 PAUL W. LAWRASON JR. BERNARDO M. PEREZ SCOTT MONTGOMERY ROY E. TALLEY JR. JOHN E. WOZNIAK Mayor Mayor Pro Tem Councilmember Councilmember Councilmember 0 Discussion At the Planning Commission hearing on April 1, 1991, several individuals spoke in favor of the proposed hotel /restaurant project. Letters received by the Planning Commission from the public regarding this project are attached to this staff report. Two major issues were discussed at the Planning Commission meeting. The first was regarding condition No. 22 of the Land Division Map which related to storm drain improvements. The City Engineer originally proposed the following condition language: 22. The applicant shall submit to the City for review and approval, storm drain plans for the Spring Road drain (from the project to the existing reinforced concrete box on the southwest corner of the intersection of Los Angeles Avenue - Spring Road as identified by the City's Master Drainage Study, prepared by a registered civil engineer; shall enter into an agreement with the City to complete the improvements; and shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing the construction of the improvements. This drain shall pick up all flows along the east side of Spring Road and the south side of Flinn Avenue between the railroad tracks and New Los Angeles Avenue. Any necessary right -of -way required to complete this improvement will be acquired by the applicant at their expense. The applicant shall be eligible for reimbursement for the necessary pipeline oversizing of the Spring Road drain only from either adjacent properties that have not yet been developed and /or the Los Angeles Avenue A.O.C. as may be approved by the City Council in a separate reimbursement agreement. The applicant indicated that imposing this condition would require them to pay more than the project's fair share of the storm drain improvements. The Planning Commission directed staff to work with the applicant concerning a modification to the language of this condition. On April 4, 1991, the applicant suggested a modification to condition No. 22. The revised condition which was reviewed by and recommended by the Planning Commission is as follows: 22. The applicant shall be responsible for its pro -rata share of that storm drain system as identified by the City's Master Drainage Study along Spring Road from approximately Flinn Road south of the southwest corner of the intersection of Los Angeles Avenue (Spring Road), as well as an extension easterly within Flinn Road to Minor Street. The applicant's pro -rata share of this storm drain system shall be determined based on the remaining 2 3 undeveloped land within the drainage area served by this master planned storm drain (currently estimated at approximately 50% of the total drainage area). Should the City Engineer determine that the Flinn Road portion of the master planned storm drain is required concurrent with development by the applicant, the cost of this improvement shall be credited against the total contribution made by the applicant. A preliminary storm drain design and cost estimate shall be submitted to the City Engineer for his review, which shall be used as the basis for determining the total cost of the storm drain system. In order to minimize the impacts of drainage by the applicants proposed development, the applicant shall be required to provide on -site retention with a discharge no greater than that of a 10 -year storm from the developed site and sufficient on -site storage to accommodate the difference between this 10 year discharge and a 100 year storm. The second issue discussed by the Planning Commission related to condition No. 25 of the Land Division Map which required realignment of Flinn Avenue to intersect with Spring Road, so as to be opposite Second Street. The applicant stated at the public hearing on April 1, 1991, that the proposed realignment of Flinn Avenue would render the development of the proposed hotel /restaurant infeasible. Montgomery and Associates, traffic engineers for the applicant provided an alternate conceptual geometric design plan for Spring Road between Flinn Avenue and Second Street (see attached). The concept was reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. The reason for the City Engineer's condition to realign Flinn Avenue was because of the potential difficulty of the existing residents, located on the west side of Spring-Road, from making a left turn into and out of Second Street from Spring Road. The proposed traffic study prepared for the project recommended right turn only from Second Street to Spring Road. The Planning Commission questioned whether automobiles traveling northerly on Spring Road would be able to turn left onto Second Street, once the proposed signalization of Flinn Avenue /Spring Road took place as proposed in the latest plan. The applicant's traffic consultant stated that making a left hand turn from Spring Road into Second Street, once the signal is installed would create a traffic hazard and that it would be safer to enter the residential area at Roberts Avenue, where there is an existing left turn lane. After discussion, the Planning Commission recommended to the City Council the following language change to condition 25 of the Land Division Map. 3 4q don (25.1 The applicant shall submit to the City and Caltrans for review and approval street imp rovement lans for and a traffic signal plan l :<::;`:; of the intersection of Spring Road - Second :.. �q i. Street %Flinn Avenue stei'..:......:. <:..:.:: .. +. ,. by '`a registered civil engineer; shal+"enter into an prepare r agreement with the City to complete these improvements; and shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing completion. o determine what street improvements will be necessary, the applicant's engineer shall. submit for City and Caltrans review, alternative conceptual designs of an iu I (aligned intersection. The off -set intersection design ,,/'shall include sufficient information to demonstrate how d the lane configuration and traffic signal phasing will ` r operate. The City and Caltrans will review the conceptual plans (additional conceptual designs may be required), and determine which intersection configuration will be constructed. The applicant shall then proceed } with final design and construction of the improvements. The applicant shall be responsible for all costs • ,�� associated with processing of an associated right-of vacation. lF The applicant shall provide for a traffic signal warrant study to be conducted between three and six months after -� occupancy. If the traffic signal is not warranted, additional traffic signal warrant studies shall be conducted on a semi - annual basis unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. If construction of the traffic signal is not warranted, or Caltrans will not allow its construction prior to occupancy, the applicant shall deposit 125% of the construction cost with the City prior to project acceptance. The required bond for the improvements can be exonerated if the cash deposit is provided to the City. This construction cost shall include associated engineering, construction inspection and administration costs. The cash deposit does not relieve the applicant from constructing the improvements. The applicant shall construct the improvements upon receiving Caltrans permission to do so. Recommendations 1• Open the public hearing and accept public testimony and close the public hearing. 4 2. Consider the Mitigated Negative DEtclaration prepared for these entitlement projects prior to approval or denial of the projects. 3. Make the appropriate findings for each of the entitlements requested by the applicant (see Exhibit No. 1 of the March 4, 1991 Planning Commission staff report. 4. Direct staff to prepare a resolution approving the entitlement projects, subject to City Council modified changes, for presentation at the City Councils next regular meeting. Attachments: 1. Planning Commission Resolution Nos. PC -91 -233 and 234 2. Letter from Montgomery and Associates dated May 1, 1991 and Conceptual Geometric Design Plan for Spring Road between Flinn Avenue and 2nd Street 3. Letters presented by the public at the Planning Commission hearing of April 1, 1991. 4. Planning Commission Staff Report dated February 26, 1991 and March 4, 1991. 5. Area Map W RESOLUTION NO. PC -91 -233 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, REC0YI-iENDING APPROVAL TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR IPD -90 -1, CUP -90 -1 AND VARIANCE 90 -2 ON THE APPLICATION OF MARTIN V. SMITH AND ASSOCIATES Whereas, at a duly noticed public hearing on April 1, 1991, the Planning Commission considered the application filed by Martin V. Smith and Associates requesting approval of an Industrial Planned Development Permit and Conditional Use Permit to construct a 135 room hotel and a free - standing 5,100 square foot restaurant; and a Variance to permit tower to encroach a maximum of 4 -feet into the rear yard setback, window features for the proposed restaurant to encroach into setback a maximum of 4 -feet, parking to encroach into side yard setback, permit decorative hardscape paved delivery access to be placed in the rear yard setback area, and permit parking requirements for hotel and restaurant to be reduced; Whereas, the Planning Commission after review and consideration of the information contained in the staff report, the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the Mitigating Reporting and Monitoring Program and testimony, and has found that the project will not have a significant adverse effect on the environment, and has reached its decision on this matter; and Whereas, at its meeting of April 1, 1991, the Planning Commission opened the public hearing, took testimony from all those wishing to testify, closed the public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 of the Public Resources Code of the State of California {beginning at Section 210001), the Planning Commission of the City of Moorpark has determined that the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigating- Monitoring and Reporting Program prepared for this project has-been completed in compliance with CEQA and State Guidelines. The Planning Commission has received and considered the information contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration prior to acting on the proposed project and has found that this document adequately addresses the environmental effects of the proposed project. Resolution No. PC -91 -233 SECTION 2. The Planning Commission hereby adopts the findings in the staff report dated March 4, 1991, and said report is incorporated herein by reference as though fully set forth. SECTION 3. The Planning Commission does hereby find that the aforementioned projects are consistent with the City's General Plan. SECTION 4. recommends to the recommended changes) and Variance 90 -2 Associates subject conditions attached was approved by the AYES: NOES: ABSENT: That the Planning Commission hereby City Council conditional approval (with of Conditional Use Permit No. 90 -1, IPD -90 -1 on the application of Martin V. Smith and to compliance with all of the attached hereto. The action of the foregoing direction following roll vote: Wesner, Torres, and Schmidt. None. None. PASSES, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED THIS 15TH DAY OF APRIL, 1991. ATTEST: Celia LaFleur, Secretary STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) SS COUNTY OF VENTURA ) Chairman presiding: A. i e6h I, Celia LaFleur, do hereby certify that I am the secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Moorpark, California and that the foregoing resolution was duly adopted at a regular meeting thereof held on April 15, 1991 by the following vote: Ayes: Commissioners Schmidt, Torres, Wesner, Brodsky, ATTEST.- Abstain_ Commissioner Miller. � /-X) & Z,A� Celia LaFleur, Secretary FWAIF" INDUSTRIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 90 -1 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 90 -1 APPLICANT: MARTIN V. SMITH AND ASSOCIATES DATE: March 4, 1991 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS GENERAL REQUIREMENTS: 1. The permit is granted for the land and project as shown on the submitted plot plans and elevations. The location and design of all site improvements shall be as shown on the approved plot plans and elevations except or unless indicated otherwise herein. 2. The development is subject to all applicable regulations of the M -1 Zone and all agencies of the State, Ventura County, the City of Moorpark and any other governmental entities. 3. That unless the project is inaugurated (building foundation slab in place and substantial work in progress) not later than one year after this permit is granted, this permit shall automatically expire on that date. The Director of Community Development may, at his discretion, grant up to one(1) additional year extension for project inauguration if there have been no changes in the adjacent areas and if applicant can document that he has diligently worked towards inauguration of the project during the initial one year period. 4. All facilities and uses other than those specifically requested in the application are prohibited unless a modification application has been approved by the City of Moorpark. 5. The design, maintenance, and operation of the permit area and facilities thereon shall comply with all applicable requirements and enactments of Federal, State, County, and City authorities, and all such requirements and enactments shall, by reference, become conditions of this permit. 6. No conditions of this entitlement shall be interpreted as permitting or requiring any violation of law or any unlawful rules or regulations or orders of an authorized governmental agency. In instances where more than one set of rules apply, the stricter ones shall take precedence. 7. If any of the conditions or limitations of this permit are held to be invalid, that holding shall not invalidate any of the remaining conditions or limitations set forth. 1 INDUSTRIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 90 -1 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 90 -1 APPLICANT: MARTIN V. SMITH AND ASSOCIATES DATE: March 4, 1991 8. The permittee agrees as a condition of issuance and use of this permit to defend, at his sole expense, any action brought against the City because of issuance (or renewal) of this permit or in the alternative to relinquish this permit. Permittee will reimburse the City for any court costs and /or attorney's fees which the City may be required by the court to pay as a result of any such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate in the defense of any such action, but such participation shall not relieve permittee of his obligation under this condition. 9. A sign permit is required for all on -site signs to be approved by the Director of Community Development. No on -site building sign shall be permitted unless the building is occupied by a single user. No off -site signs are permitted. The proposed monument signs shall be redesigned to have a maximum height of five feet. All existing signs on the subject property shall be removed Prior to the issuance of any Zoning Clearance 10. Prior to the submission of construction plan for plan check or initiation of any construction activity, a zoning clearance shall be obtained from the Community Development Department. 11. Prior to initial tenant occupancy and any subsequent change in tenant occupancy, the owner of the subject building, or the owner's representative shall apply for a Zoning Clearance from the Community Development Department. 12. The Director of Community Development, or his designee, shall have the authority to conditionally approve or deny a zoning clearance request for tenant occupancy consistent with Article 45 of the Zoning Code. The cost of the zoning clearance shall be borne by the applicant for tenant occupancy. 13. If in the future, any use or uses are contemplated on the site differing from that specified in the zoning clearance approved for the occupancy, either the permittee, owner, or each prospective tenant shall file a project description prior to the initiation of the use. A review by the Director of Community Development will be conducted to determine if the proposed use is compatible with the M -1 Zone and the terms and conditions of this permit. Said review will be conducted at no charge and an approval letter sent, unless a minor or major modification to the Planned Development is required, in which case all applicable fees and procedures shall apply. 2 /o INDUSTRIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 90 -1 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 90 -1 APPLICANT: MARTIN V. SMITH AND ASSOCIATES DATE: March 4, 1991 14. The permittee's acceptance of this permit and /or commencement of construction and/ or operations under this permit shall be deemed to be acceptance of all conditions of this permit. 15. This permit shall expire if the use for which it is granted is discontinued for a period of 180 consecutive days or more as determined by the City. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A ZONING CLEARANCE, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 16. Prior to the issuance of a Zoning Clearance, the permittee shall sign a statement indicating awareness and understanding of all permit conditions, and shall agree to abide by these Conditions and present such statement to the Department of Community Development. 17. The final construction working drawings shall be submitted to the Director of Community Development for review. 18. Complete landscape plans (2- sets), together with specifications and a maintenance program shall be prepared by a State Licensed Landscape Architect, generally in accordance with the Ventura Guide to Landscape Plans and in compliance with the City of Moorpark Ordinance No. 74, and shall be submitted to and approved by the Director of Community Development. The final landscape plans shall be in substantial conformance with the conceptual landscape plan submitted with the application. The applicant shall bear the total cost of the landscape plan review and final installation inspection. The landscaping and planting plan submitted for review and approval shall be accompanied by a deposit as specified by the City of Moorpark. Additional funds may subsequently need to be deposited to cover all landscape plan check and inspection fees. All landscaping and planting shall be accomplished and approved by the Director of Community Development, or his designee, prior to the approval of occupancy. The project landscape plans shall include the following: a. A 50 percent shade coverage shall be provided within all parking areas. Shade coverage is described as the maximum mid -day shaded area defined by a selected specimen tree at 50 percent maturity. INDUSTRIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 90 -1 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 90 -1 APPLICANT: MARTIN V. SMITH AND ASSOCIATES DATE: March 4, 1991 b. Any turf plantings associated with this project shall be drought tolerant, low water using variety. C. Landscaping at site entrances and exits and any intersection within the parking lot shall not block or screen the view of a seated driver from another moving vehicle or pedestrian. d.' Plantings in and adjacent to parking areas shall be contained within raised planters surrounded by six -inch high concrete curbs. e. Landscaping shall be designed so as to not obstruct the view of any exterior door or window from the street. f. Landscaping (trees) shall not be placed directly under any overhead lighting which could cause a loss of light at ground level. g. Earthen berms shall be provided to screen views of parked vehicles from access roads. h. Landscaping shall be used to screen views of any backflow preventers. 19. Roof design and construction shall include a minimum 18 -inch extension of the parapet wall above the highest point of the roof. 20. All roof mounted equipment (vents, stacks, blowers, air conditioning equipment, etc.) that may extend above any parapet wall shall be enclosed on all four sides by view obscuring material. Prior to the issuance of a zoning clearance, the final design and materials for the roof screen and location of any roof mounted equipment must be approved by the Director of Community Development. 21. All trash disposal areas shall be provided in a location which will not interfere with circulation, parking or access to the building, and shall be screened with a six foot high wall enclosure with metal gates. The final design of the trash enclosure shall be subject to the issuance of a zoning clearance. Trash areas and recycling bins shall be depicted on the construction plans, the size of 4 12 INDUSTRIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 90 -1 am CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 90 -1 APPLICANT: MARTIN V. SMITH AND ASSOCIATES DATE: March 4, 1991 which shall be approved by the Director of Community Development and the City employee responsible for recycling and solid waste management programs 22. Pullover parking (overhangs) shall be limited to 24 inch maximum. No vehicles shall be allowed to encroach onto walkways or into the required landscaped setbacks along roadways. 23. A 45 -foot turning radius shall be provided for loading zones consistent with the AASHO WB -50 design vehicle. Prior to issuance of a zoning clearance, the applicant shall provide a site plan which identifies all loading truck turning movements. 24. All property line walls shall be no further than one inch from the property line. 25. The building shall be constructed using energy saving devices. These shall include those devices required by the California Administrative Code, Title 24. 26. For all exterior lighting, a lighting plan shall be prepared by an electrical engineer registered in the State of California and submitted to the Department of Community Development for review and approval. The lighting plan shall achieve the following objectives: Avoid interferences with reasonable use of adjoining properties; minimize on -site and off -site glare; provide adequate on -site lighting; limit electroliers height to avoid excessive -illumination; and provide structures which are compatible with the total design of the proposed facility. a. The lighting plan shall include the following: b. A photometric plan showing a point -by -point foot candle layout to extend a minimum of twenty (20) feet outside the property lines. Layout plan to be based on a ten (10 ) foot grid center. C. Maximum overall height of fixtures shall be sixteen (16) feet. d. Fixtures must possess sharp cut -off qualities with a maximum of one -half foot candle illumination at property lines. 5 /3 INDUSTRIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 90 -1 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 90 -1 APPLICANT: MARTIN V. SMITH AND ASSOCIATES DATE: March 4, 1991 e. There shall be no more than a seven -to -one (7: 1) ratio of level of illumination shown (maximum -to- minimum ratio between lighting standards). f. Energy efficient lighting fixtures shall be provided which are compatible with adjacent properties. g. Average maximum of one -half foot candle illumination. h. No light shall be emitted above the 90 degree or horizontal plane. No direct light source shall be visible from Spring Road. 27. A utility room with common access to house all meters and the roof access ladder shall be provided. No exterior access ladder of any kind shall be permitted. 28. No downspouts shall be permitted on the exterior of the building. 29. All exterior building materials and paint colors shall be approved by the Director of Community Development to ensure compatibility with adjacent development. 30. No asbestos pipe or construction materials shall be used without prior approval of the City Council. 31. All utilities are required to a underground to the nearest off -site utility pole except through transmission lines. Prior to the issuance of a zoning clearance, the applicant shall submit a plan for review and approval to the Director of Community Development which identifies how compliance with the undergrounding requirement will be met. 32. If skylights are proposed, the specific type and model must be approved by the Director of Community Development to ensure that they shall be of an opaque type to minimize evening illumination as viewed from the exterior. 33. The applicant shall contribute to the City of Moorpark an amount of $.25 per square foot of gross floor area to support the City's current and future park system. 34. The applicant shall contribute to the City of Moorpark's Art in Public Places Fund, an amount of $10 per each 100 square feet of building area. D Iq mom INDUSTRIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 90 -1 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 90 -1 APPLICANT: MARTIN V. SMITH AND ASSOCIATES DATE: March 4, 1991 35. Prior to issuance of a zoning clearance, the permittee shall make a contribution to the Moorpark Traffic Systems Management Fund of $.15 per square foot of floor area to fund Traffic System Management programs. 36. To encourage employees to use alternative means of transportation to reduce automobile trips, common area bicycle storage facilities such as bicycle racks or lockers shall be provided. Proposed bicycle storage areas and facilities for the industrial buildin shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of Community evelopment prior to the issuance of a zoning clearance. 37. All roof mounted equipment and other noise generation sources on -site shall be attenuated to 55 dBA at the property line, or to the ambient noise level at the property line measured at the time of the occupant request. Prior to the issuance of a Zone Clearance for initial occupancy or any subsequent occupancy, the Director of Community Development may request that a noise study be submitted for review and approval which demonstrates that all on -site noise generation sources would be mitigated to the required level. The noise study must be prepared by a licensed acoustical engineer in accordance with accepted engineering standards. 38. Prior to the issuance of a zoning clearance, a Surety Performance Bond in the amount of $10,000 shall be filed and accepted by the Director of Community Development. The Director of Community Development, may, through a public hearing to be heard before the City Council. recommend that any or all of the funds in the Performance Bond be forfeited for noncompliance of the Conditions of Approval or for some other just cause. This condition shall automatically be superseded by a related resolution or ordinance regarding condition compliance for entitlement approvals adopted by the City Council. 39. The applicant, permittee, or successors in interest, shall submit -to the Department of Community Development a fee to cover costs incurred by the City for Condition Compliance review. The applicant shall pay all outstanding case processing (planning and Engineering), and all City legal service fees prior to issuance of a Zoning Clearance. 40. Prior to the issuance of a Zoning Clearance, the site plan shall be revised to recess the loading zone for the hotel into the hotel structure or other location on -site so as to not 7 INDUSTRIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. APPLICANT: MARTIN V. DATE: 1!5 90 -1 90 -1 SMITH AND ASSOCIATES March 4, 1991 create a traffic hazard problem on Minor Street. The revised loading zone shall be approved by the Director of Community Development. 41. The applicant shall deposit with the City of Moorpark $8,430.47 to a Transportation System Management Fund (TSM) as a mitigation measure to fully mitigate the significant impact to air quality so as to fund TSM programs or clean -fuel programs as determined by the City. 42. Within two days after approval of the project by the City Council, the applicant shall deposit with the City $1,250 plus a $25.00 filing fee made out to the County of Ventura for the State required Notice of Determination filing fee in accordance with Assembly Bill 3158. 43. Prior to the issuance of a Zoning Clearance, the applicant shall remove all existing signs on the subject property. PRIOR TO THE ISSIIANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 44. An "Unconditional Will Serve Letter" for water and sewer service will be obtained from the Ventura County Waterworks District No. 1. 45. The applicant shall pay all school assessment fees levied by the Moorpark Unified School District. 46. If any archaeological or historical finds are uncovered during excavation operations, the permittee shall assure the preservation of the site; shall obtain the services of a qualified archaeologist to recommend disposition of the site; and shall obtain the Director of Community Development's written concurrence of the recommended disposition before resuming development. PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OF EITHER THE HOTEL OR RESTAURANT, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 47. All parking areas shall be surfaced with asphalt or concrete and shall include adequate provisions for drainage, striping and appropriate wheel blocks, curbs, or posts in parking areas adjacent to landscaped areas. 48. All landscaping and planting shall be installed and inspected. F INDUSTRIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 90 -1 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 90 -1 APPLICANT: MARTIN V. SMITH AND ASSOCIATES DATE: March 4, 1991 49. No use for which this permit is granted shall be commenced until a Certificate of Occupancy has been issued by the Building and Safety Division. In addition, no Certificate of Occupancy may be issued until all on -site improvements specified in this permit have been completed or the applicant has provided a Faithful Performance Bond. Said on -site improvements shall be completed within 120 days of issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy for either the hotel or restaurant facility. In case of failure to comply with any term or provision of this agreement, the City Council may by resolution declare the surety forfeited. Upon completion of the required improvements to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Development, the surety may be exonerated by action of the Director of Community Development. 50. At the time water service connection is made for each project, cross connection control devices shall be installed for the water system in accordance with the requirements of the Ventura County Environmental Health Department. 51. No Certificate of Occupancy shall be granted prior to acceptance or completion of landscaping or other sight improvements such as perimeter walls, including stucco treatment, landscaping, fences, slope planting or other landscape improvements not related to grading; private recreational facilities, etc. Said on -site improvements shall be completed within 120 days of issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. In case of failure to comply with any term or provision of this condition, the City Council may by resolution declare the surety forfeited. Upon completion of the required improvements to the satisfaction of the City, the City Council may reduce the amount of the bond; however, the bond must be kept in full effect for one year after the last occupancy to guarantee that items such as perimeter tract walls (including stuccp treatment), landscaping, fences, slope planting or other landscape improvements not related to grading, private recreational facilities, etc. are maintained. AFTER ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE APPLICABLE: 52. No later than ten (10) days after any change of property ownership or change of lessee(s) or operator(s) of the subject building, there shall be filed with the Director of Community Development the name(s) and address(es) of the new owner(s), lessee(s) or operator(s) together with a letter from any such person(s) acknowledging and agreeing with all conditions of D /'7 INDUSTRIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. APPLICANT: MARTIN V. DATE: this permit. 90 -1 90 -1 SMITH AND ASSOCIATES March 4, 1991 53. Prior to initial occupancy or any subsequent change of tenant occupancy, the owner of the subject building, or the owners representative shall apply for a zoning clearance from the Community Development Department. The purpose of the zoning clearance shall be to determine if the proposed uses(s) are compatible with the zoning and terms and conditions of the permit. 54. Prior to occupancy by any tenant or subsequent owner whose business would employ or dispose of hazardous materials, a Major Modification approval shall be required. 55. The continued maintenance of the permit area and facilities shall be subject to periodic inspection by the City. The permittee shall be required to remedy any defects in ground maintenance, as indicated by the Code Enforcement Officer within thirty (5) days after notification. 56. The striping for parking spaces and loading bays shall be maintained so that it remains clearly visible. 57. No outside storage of any materials or overnight parking of any delivery truck beyond the loading zone(s) shall be permitted. 58. No noxious odors shall be generated from any use on the subject site. 59. All uses and activities shall be conducted inside the buildings unless otherwise authorized by the Director of Community Development. CITY ENGINEER CONDITIONS DURING CONSTRUCTION, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL COMPLY: 60. That prior to any work being conducted within the State or City right -of -way, the applicant shall obtain an Encroachment Permit from the appropriate agency. 61. If any hazardous waste is encountered during the construction of this project, all work shall be immediately stopped and the Ventura County Environmental Health Department, the Fire Department, the Sheriff's Department, and the City Construction Observer shall be notified immediately. Work 10 INDUSTRIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 90 -1 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 90 -1 APPLICANT: MARTIN V. SMITH AND ASSOCIATES DATE: March 4, 1991 shall not proceed until clearance has been issued by all of these agencies. Contaminated or hazardous soil as defined by Department of Health Services may not be used for on -site soil fill or roadway subgrade unless the Department of Health Services determines in writing that said material has been treated to a level that is no longer considered a public health risk or requires public disclosure by the Department of Real Estate. Any contaminated or hazardous soil shall be removed to an approved landfill. 62. Where roads requiring 4 or more inches of pavement are to be built, the applicant shall construct the required street section minus 1 -inch of paving as an interim condition until all utility cuts or trenching are completed. The final 1 -inch cap of asphalt shall be placed after all necessary trenching is completed. PRIOR TO OCCIIPANCy, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 63. If the land is in a special flood hazard area, the applicant shall notify all potential buyers of this condition. PRIOR TO THE ACCEPTANCE OF PUBLIC INpROVENKNTS AND BOND EXONERATION, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 64. Sufficient surety guaranteeing the public improvements shall be provided. The surety shall remain in place for one year following acceptance by the City Council. 65. Original "as- built" plans will be certified-by the applicant's civil engineer and submitted with two sets of blue prints to the City Engineer's office. Although grading plans may have been submitted for checking and construction on sheets larger than 22" X 36 ", they must be resubmitted as "As- Builts" in a series of 22" X 36" mylars (made with proper overlaps) with a title block on each sheet. Submission of "As- Built" plans are required before a final inspection will be scheduled. 66. Reproducible centerline tie sheets shall be submitted to the City Engineer's office. 67. The applicant's engineer shall file for a time extension with the City Engineer's office at least six weeks in advance of expiration of the agreement to construct subdivision improvements. The fees required will be in conformance with the applicable ordinance section. 11 /9 INDUSTRIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 90 -1 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 90 -1 APPLICANT: MARTIN V. SMITH AND ASSOCIATES DATE: March 4, 1991 MOORPARK POLICE DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A OCCUPANCY PERMIT, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET: 68. Lighting devices shall be high enough so as to eliminate anyone on the ground from tampering with them. All parking areas shall be provided with a lighting system capable of illuminating the parking surface with a minimum of one -half foot candle of light and shall be designed to minimize the spillage of light onto adjacent properties. All exterior lighting devices shall be protected by weather and breakage - resistant covers. 69. Landscaping shall not cover any exterior door or window. 70. Landscaping at entrances /exits or at any intersection within the parking lot shall not block or screen the view of a seated driver from another moving vehicle or pedestrian. 71. Landscaping (trees) shall not be placed directly under any overhead lighting which could cause a loss of light at ground level. 72. All entrance /exit driveways shall be a minimm of 30 feet in width. 73. All exterior doors shall be constructed of solid wood core, a minimum of 1 and three quarters inches thick, or of metal construction. Front glass doors commonly used for entry are acceptable but should be visible to the street. 74. Doors utilizing a cylinder lock shall have a minimum five (5) pintumbler operation with the locking bar or bolt extending into the receiving guide a minimum of 1 -inch deadbolt. 75. There shall not be any easy exterior access to the roof area, i.e. ladders, trees, high walls, etc. 76. If an alarm system is used, it shall be wired to all exterior doors and windows and to any roof vents or other roof openings where access may be made. 77. Address shall be clearly visible to approaching emergency vehicles and mounted against a contrasting color. The numbers shall be a minimum of 6 inches in height and illuminated during the hours of darkness. 12 INDUSTRIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 90 -1 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 90 -1 APPLICANT: MARTIN V. SMITH AND ASSOCIATES DATE: March 4, 1991 78. Front door entrances shall be visible from the street. 79. Peep holes and secondary locking devices shall be placed on all room doors. DURING CONSTRUCTION THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL APPLY: 80. A licensed security guard is recommended during the construction phase, or a 6 -foot high chain link fence shall be erected around the construction site. 81. Construction equipment, tools, etc., shall be properly secured during non - working hours. COUNTY OF VENTURA ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS PRIOR TO ISSIIANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT, THE FOLLOWING CONDITION SHALL BE MET: 82. Prior to the issuance of building permits for the construction of any food or beverage facility, the applicant shall submit complete construction plans, equipment design specifications, finish schedules and other required information to the Community Services of Environmental Health Department for review and approval (see Ventura County Environmental Health Food Establishment Plan Check Guide). VENTURA COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS -SHALL BE SATISFIED: 83. That a street width of 25 -feet for two way traffic with off street parking on both sides shall be provided. 84. That prior to construction, the applicant shall submit two site plans to the Ventura County Bureau of Fire Prevention for approval of the location of fire lanes. The fire lanes shall be posted in accordance with California Vehicle Code, Section 22500.1 and Article 10 of the Uniform Fire Code prior to Occupancy. 85. That access roads shall be installed with an all weather surface, suitable for access by fire department apparatus. 86. That the access roadway shall be extended to within 150 feet of all portions of the exterior walls of the first story of any building. Where the access roadway cannot be provided, 13 INDUSTRIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 90 -1 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 90 -1 APPLICANT: MARTIN V. SMITH AND ASSOCIATES DATE: March 4, 1991 approved fire protection system or systems shall be installed as required and acceptable to the Bureau of Fire Prevention. 87. That all drives shall have a minimum vertical clearance of 13 feet, 6 inches (13', 6 "). 88. That approved turn around areas for fire apparatus shall be provided where the access road is 150 feet or farther from the main thoroughfare. 89. That address numbers, a minimum of 6 inches high, shall be installed prior to occupancy, shall be of contrasting color to the background. Where structures are setback more than 250 feet from the street, larger numbers will be required so that they are distinguishable from the street. In the event a structure(s) is not visible from the street, the address number(s) shall be posted adjacent to the driveway entrance. 90. That prior to construction, the applicant shall submit plans to the Ventura County Bureau of Fire Prevention for approval of the location of fire hydrants. Show existing hydrants on a site plan, within 300 feet of the development. 91. That fire hydrants shall be installed and in service prior to combustible construction and shall conform to the minimum standards of the Moorpark Water Works Manual. a. Each hydrant shall be 6 inch wet barrel design and shall have two 4 inch and one 2 1/2 inch outlet(s). b. The required fire flow shall be achieved at no less than 20 psi residual pressure. C. Fire hydrants shall be spaced 300 feet on center, and so located that no structure will be farther than 150 feet from any one hydrant. d. Fire hydrants shall be recessed in from curb face 24 inches at center. 92. That the minimum fire flow required is determined by the type of building construction, proximity to other structures, fire walls, and fire protection devices provided, as specified by the I.S.O. for determining Required Fire Flow. Given the present plans and information, the required fire flow is approximately 3,000 gallons per minute. The applicant shall verify that the water purveyor can provide the required volume 14 ip2ww�q� INDUSTRIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 90 -1 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 90 -1 APPLICANT: MARTIN V. SMITH AND ASSOCIATES DATE: March 4, 1991 at the project. 93. That if any building(s) are to be protected by an automatic sprinkler system, plans shall be submitted, with payment for plan check, to the Ventura County Bureau of Fire Prevention for review. 94. Than any structure(s) greater than 5,000 square feet in area and /or 5 miles from a fire station shall be provided with an automatic fire sprinkler system in accordance with Ventura County Ordinance #14. 95. That building plans of all A.E,I, & H occupancies shall be submitted to the Ventura County Bureau of Fire Prevention for plan check. 96. That an approved manual and automatic fire alarm system shall be installed and maintained in the building. 97. That plans for any fire alarm system shall be submitted to the Bureau of Fire Prevention for plan check. 98. That fire extinguishers shall be installed in accordance with National Fire Protection Association, Pamphlet #10. The placement of extinguishers shall be reviewed by the Fire Prevention Bureau. 99. That plans for the installation of automatic fire extinguishing system ( such as, halon or dry chemical) shall be submitted to the Ventura County Bureau of Fire Prevention for plan check. 100. That all grass or brush exposing any structures shall be cleared for a distance of 100 feet prior to framing, according to the Ventura County Weed Abatement Ordinance. 101. That trash containers with an individual capacity of 1.5 cubic yards or greater, shall not be stored within 5 feet of openings, combustible walls, combustible roof eave lines, unless protected by approved automatic fire sprinklers. (Uniform Fire Code, Article 11). WATERWORKS DISTRICT NO. 1 CONDITION 102. Applicant for service shall comply with the Ventura County Waterworks District No. 1 "Rules and Regulations" including all provisions of or relating to the existing Industrial Waste 15 d3 INDUSTRIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 90 -1 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 90 -1 APPLICANT: MARTIN V. SMITH AND ASSOCIATES DATE: March 4, 1991 Discharge Requirements and subsequent additions or revisions thereto. Ultra low plumbing fixtures are required in all new construction. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDED CHANGES PER PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF APRIL 1 1991 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 9.. A sign permit is required for all on -site signs to be approved by the Director of Community Development. No on -site building sign shall be permitted unless the building is occupied by a single user. No off -site signs are permitted. The proposed monument signs shall be redesicmed to have a maximum height of five feetA:� > <: :_;::: ,r.:: • . F, :. exis ing signs on the su ject property s a e removed prior to the issuance of a Zoning Clearance. A:IPDCPD.CNDy HUI a4 RESOLUTION NO. PC -91 -234 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, RECOY- KENDING APPROVAL TO THE CITY COUNCIL LDM -90 -4 ON THE APPLICATION OF MARTIN V. SMITH AND ASSOCIATES Whereas, at a duly noticed public hearing on April 1, 1991, the Planning Commission considered the application filed by Martin V. Smith and Associates requesting approval of a land division to subdivide an existing 7.52 acre parcel into two parcels of 2.88 and 4.64 acres; Whereas, the Planning Commission after review and consideration of the information contained in the staff report, the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the Mitigating Reporting and Monitoring Program and testimony, and has found that the project will not have a significant adverse effect on the environment, and has reached its decision on this matter; and Commiss Whereas, at its meeting of April 1, 1991, the Planning ion opened the public hearing, took testimony from all those wishing to testify, closed the public hearing. MOO NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RPARK, CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: _ SECTION 1. Pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 of the Public Resources Code of the State of California {beginning at Section 21000}), the Planning Commission of the City of Moorpark has determined that the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigating Monitoring and Reporting Program prepared for this project has been completed in compliance with CEQA and State Guidelines. The Planning Commission has received and considered the information contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration prior to acting on the proposed project and has found that this document adequately addresses the environmental effects of the proposed project. SECTION 2. The Planning Commission hereby adopts the findings in the staff report dated March 4, 1991, and said report is incorporated herein by reference as though fully set forth. SECTION 3. The Planning Commission does hereby find that the aforementioned projects are consistent with the City's General Plan. a25 LAND DIVISION MOORPARK NO: 90 -4 APPLICANT: Martin V. Smith and Associates DATE: March 4, 1991 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS GENERAL REOUIREMENTS 1. The conditions of approval of this Tentative Parcel Map supersede all conflicting notations, specifications, dimensions, typical sections and the like which may be shown on said map; and that all provisions of the Subdivision Map Act, City of Moorpark Ordinance and adopted City policies apply. 2. Recordation of this subdivision shall be deemed to be acceptance by the property owner of the conditions of this Map. 3. All applicable requirements of any law or agency of the State, City of Moorpark an any other governmental entity shall be met, and all such requirements and enactments shall, by reference, become conditions of this entitlement. 4. The developer's recordation of this map and /or commencement of construction as a result of this map shall be deemed to be acceptance of all conditions of this map by the applicant. 5. That no condition of this entitlement shall be interpreted as permitting or requiring any violation of law, or any lawful - rules or regulations or orders of an authorized governmental agency. In instances where more than one set of rules apply, the stricter ones shall take precedence. 6. That if any of the conditions or limitations of this subdivision are held to be invalid, that holding shall not invalidate the remaining conditions or limitations set forth. 7. The development shall be subject to all applicable City regulations regarding the M -1 zone. 8. No zone clearance shall be issued for construction until the final map has been recorded. Prior to the issuance of any permit, a zoning clearance shall be obtained from the Department of Community Development and a Building Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Building and Safety after the granting of a zoning clearance. Also, no zoning clearance shal be issued until the applicant pays all outstanding permit processing costs to the City. 1 26 LAND DIVISION MOORPARK NO: 90 -4 APPLICANT: Martin V. Smith and Associates DATE: March 4, 1991 Section 66499.37. The city will promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action or proceeding, and, if the city should fail to do so or should fail to cooperate fully in the defense, the subdivider shall not thereafter be responsible to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City or its agents, officers and employees pursuant to this condition. The city may, within its unlimited discretion, participate in the defense of any such claim, action or proceeding if both of the following occur: The city bears its own attorney fees and costs; The city defends the claim, action or proceeding in good faith. The subdivider shall not be required to pay or perform any settlement of such claim, action or proceeding unless the settlement is approved by the subdivider. The subdivider's obligations under this condition shall apply regardless of whether a final map or parcel map is ultimately recorded with respect to the subdivision. CITY ENGINEER DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS PRIOR TO APPROVAL ON FINAL MAP THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED• 16. a. The applicant shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, a grading plan prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer; shall obtain a grading Permit; and shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing completion. b. An erosion control plan shall be submitted for review and approval along with the grading plan. Along with the erosion control measures, hydroseeding of all graded slopes shall be required within 60 days of completion of grading. C. All.haul routes shall be approved by the City Engineer. On -site haul routes shall be limited to graded areas only. 17 a. The applicant shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, a detailed Soils Report certified by a Registered Civil Engineer in the State of California. The report shall include a geotechnical investigation with regard to liquefaction, expansive soils, and seismic safety. The grading plan shall incorporate the recommendations of the approved Soils Report. a:\1dm90 -4.234 3 a7 LAND DIVISION MOORPARK NO: 90 -4 APPLICANT: Martin V. Smith and Associates DATE: March 4, 1991 C. all catch basins in a sump condition shall be designed such that the depth of water at intake shall equal the depth of the approach flows; - d. all culverts shall be designed for a 100 -year storm; e. drainage facilities shall be provided such that surface flows are intercepted and contained prior to entering any adjacent roadways; f. for a 10 -year storm, all collector streets shall be provided with a minimum of one travel lane with a goal that local, residential streets shall have one travel lane available where possible. g. Drainage to adjacent parcels shall not be increased or concentrated by this development. All drainage measures necessary to mitigate storm water flows shall be provided by the applicant. h. On -site storm water retention facilities shall be designed to the City Engineer's satisfaction. 22. The applicant shall submit to the City for review and approval, storm drain plans for the Spring Road drain (from the project to the existing reinforced concrete box on the southwest corner of the intersection of Los Angeles Avenue- Spring Road) as identified by the City's Master Drainage Study, prepared'by a registered civil engineer; shall enter into an agreement with the City to complete the improvements; and shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing the construction of the improvements. This drain shall pick up all flows along the east side of Spring Road and the south side of Flinn Avenue between the railroad tracks and New Los Angeles Avenue. Any necessary right -of -way required to complete this improvement will be acquired by the applicant at their expense.- The applicant shall be eligible for reimbursement for the necessary pipeline oversizing of the Spring Road drain only from either adjacent properties that have not yet been developed and /or the Los Angeles Avenue A.O.C. as may be approved by -City Council in a separate reimbursement agreement. 23. The applicant shall demonstrate legal access for each parcel to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. a: \ldm90 -4.234 5 LAND DIVISION MOORPARK NO: 90 -4 APPLICANT: Martin V. Smith and Associates DATE: March 4, 1991 27. The applicant shall execute a covenant running with the land on the behalf of itself and its successors, heirs, and assigns agreeing to participate in the formation of an assessment district or other financing technique including, but not limited to, the payment of traffic mitigation fees, which the City may implement or adopt, to fund public street and traffic improvements directly or indirectly affected by the development. The covenant is to be approved by the Director of Commuity Development prior, to recordation. 28. If any of the improvements which the applicant is required to construct or install is to be constructed or installed upon land in which the applicant does not have title or interest sufficient for such purposes, the applicant shall do all of the following at least 60 days prior to the filing of the final or parcel map for approval pursuant to Governmental Code Section 66457. a. Notify the City of Moorpark (hereinafter "City ") in writing that the applicant wishes the City to acquire an interest in the land which is sufficient for the purposes as provided in Governmental Code Section 66462.5. b. Supply the City with (i) a legal description of the interest to be acquired, ( ii) a map or diagram of the interest to be acquired sufficient to satisfy the requirements of subdivision (e) of Section 1250.310 of the Code of Civil procedure, (iii) a current appraisal report prepared by an appraiser approved by the City which expresses an opinion as to the fair market value of .the interest to be acquired, and (iv) a current Litigation Guarantee Report. C. Enter into an agreement with the City, guaranteed by such cash deposits or other security as the City may require, pursuant to which the applicant will pay all of the City's cost (including, without limitation, attorney's fees and overhead expenses) of acquiring such an interest in the land. 29. The applicant shall pay all energy costs associated with street lighting for a period of one year from the initial energizing of the street lights. 30. The applicant shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing completion of all improvements which revert to the City (i.e., landscaping, parks, fencing, etc.) or which require removal (i.e., model homes, temporary debris basins, etc.). a : \ldm90 -4.234 7 LAND DIVISION MOORPARK NO: 90 -4 APPLICANT: Martin V. Smith and Associates DATE: March 4, 1991 25. The applicant shall submit to the City and Caltrans for review and approval street improvement plans for 5fflidffgg�" " '' n and a traffic signal plan fo g a z�? = of the intersection of .: .... Spring Road - Second Stre« e t 7 F I i n n Avenue as disc tried ► 9 dE RECEIVED THOMAS S. ONTO E DISSOCIATES MAY 2 - lgcn Tray "�'�, ara s o ionsffic n wR s City of Moores: 30. May 1, 1991 Mr. Paul Porter City of Moorpark 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 r ` RE r M1Fk k d, Spring Road Between Flinn Avenue And Second Street Traffic Concerns. � i! r Misr I I , t I! 1 , a:, i r bra ,.,j � (} yw �', 1� i it �:� � i•' �Ir �t 1 1'rl lr�i�i� -'F p, tt •:A 4111 ;) i Y � r� Li�.�i�r} Dear Mr Porter .. As re .. -.'.. ;.: we h a ' ..1 quested rve prepared this,summary of our recent analysis of;" J„ Spring iRoad between Flinn Avenue and Second Street that Was '.'onducted in • impact study for the •proposed _�f • h, { Moor ark Count conjunction with the preparation of the traffic P y Inn /Apartments. The results of that study indicated that the intersection of Spring Road and Flinn Avenue should be signalized if the proposed {'y in commercial /apartment Jewelo ment is approve( M� �J, r r _ P pp ved:, Also, we concluded that the future r �Ir signalization of this T intersection would be required with the ultimate build- R at out of the Flinn Road industrial area east of Spring Road, with or without the ,f•. r �x proposed Moorpark Country Inn /Apartment project. - Due to the close proximity of the T- intersection of Spring Road and Second Street to Flinn Avenue (approximately 145 feet from centerline to centerline), an undesirable "wrong way" jogged intersection now exists with potential conflicts between the north and southbound left -turn ingress movements to Second Street and Flinn Avenue, respectively. Since left -turn ingress /egress traffic demands on Second Street at Spring Road are relatively low, and alternate routes are available for access to the residential area off Second Street west of Spring - Road, the pertinent mitigation measures recommended in our traffic impact study for the Moorpark Country Inn /Apartments project was to signalize the intersection of Spring Road and Flinn Avenue in conjunction with restricting turning movements at Second Street to right -turns only, in and out. This recommendation was discussed with, and approved by, the city traffic engineer. ATTACHMENT 2 2151 Alessandro Drive, Suite 210, Ventura, California 93001 • (805) 652 -0411 " FAX. (80,0)) 3I Subsequently, other city personnel determined that the proposed access restrictions to and from Second Street off Spring Road may be inappropriate. A further review of the potential alternatives to solve this traffic operational problem indicated that the only other viable solution would be to encompass both legs of the jogged intersection within one complex traffic signal installation. This alternative would still require the prohibition of the northbound left -turn ingress from Spring Road to Second Street. However, the eastbound left -turn egress from Second Street to Spring Road would be permitted via a protected traffic signal phase. Since alternative access is available to replace the north to westbound ingress traffic movement to the concerned residential area west of Spring Road via another access point further southerly on Sprinq Road, and on Los Angeles Avenue off Millard Street, it does not appear that this partiai access ~_ Y restriction would cause any significant inconvenience to residents in the • concerned area. However, this rb,"�h r� g ion alternative would create a relatively unique ''��'i, t traffic signal operation serving the overall. jogged intersection complex ' .1 v, t�. green time for north - south •h�, resulting in less available " H ' ':.P through traffic on this .! portion of Spring Road. Therefore, from a pure traffic engineering viewpoint, `it �p�14� ,;;would be preferable toVrestrict left -turn ingress and egress at Second Street , with the signalization of .the Spring Road /Flinn Avenue T -i ,, ntersection as � 414"" nitiall recommended. If this recommen ded miti unacce table i n our o ni on i t would be feasible to is nal i 2 measure i s deemed .p p g e the entirejogged intersection complex with the northbound left -turn ingress movement prohibited without" creating any significantly adverse traffic operational, or 'safety problems. If you have any questions regarding this' his matter, or require any „ further input at this time, please contact the project engineer on this matter, Mr. Terry Hockett, or myself, at your convenience. 4r!nry, Truly IATES ��s M NH hb. 697 , E. 't Ev• 9/31/94 Firm Principal s �9rfof ca i� Fo���P TSM /jl Project No. 900510 4. 'z lz f p Spring RoQ cz - - - - _1-- - -- -_ -- - - - - - - -- 64 S' 1�• A.h.L i+.L+�. LLLLHV O1-1ffc $1 ,jnef MOICf Hp. fDpliO �..�rw..... bnT n :CAI(. 1' 100• N O C H V Z CONCEPTUAL GEOMETRIC DESIGN PLAN for SPRING ROAD between F'LINN AVE. and 2ND ST. ilU1/AS i G YOH ICOV C1- F ASSOOAI[S UAr.� 1.IystN� � 10w1.1 7111 4r�M.OM. &A.:1R V--r cwt. e37m "31 e3s-001 . /AC lees) Ue dya n i i �i 1 C fi �d 33 CHAMBER OF COMMERCE April 1, 1991 Moorpark Planning Commission 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021 Re: Hotel Project, Spring & Flinn Dear Commissioners: As a member of the Moorpark business community I feel very strongly that the hotel project, slated for Spring Road and Flinn Street, should be approved by the Planning Commission as soon as possible. As a member of the Chamber of Commerce I encourage you to move forward with this project without delay, because it will be a plus for the entire community as well. I understand that there may be traffic or other issues which are not yet settled with the developer, but I hope that you can refer this project to the City to determine what conditions are reasonable and appropriate. Again, the hotel project is a very important economic asset for the entire community. Please do not delay in making a decision, and moving the project forward. Thank you. Sin i �09ly' V rRo 0ughlon - Presi en t, Moorpark Chamber of Commerce cc:Moorpark City Council ATTACHMENT a 530 MOORPARK AVENUE ♦ MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA 93021 ♦ (805) 529 -0322 c W a imm"s CHAMBER OF COMMERCE April. 1, 1991 Moorpark Planning Commission 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021 Re: Hotel Project, Spring & Flinn Dear Commissioners: As a member of the Moorpark business community I feel very strongly that the hotel project, slated for Spring Road and Flinn Street, should be approved by the Planning Commission as soon as possible. As a member of the Chamber of Commerce I encourage you to move forward with this project without delay, because it will be a plus for the entire community as well. I understand that there may be traffic or other issues which are not yet settled with the developer, but I hope that you can refer this project to the City to determine what conditions are reasonable and appropriate. Again, the hotel project is a very important economic asset for the entire community. Please do not delay in making a decision, and moving the project forward. Thank you. Sincerely, Li a Plaks Moorpark Video cc:Moorpark City Council UI 530 MOORPARK AVENUE ♦ MOORPARK. CALIFORNIA 93021 ♦ (805) 529 -0322 c 195 WEST LOS ANGELES AVENUE '4d) P. 0, BOX 647 (805) 529 -5871 SIMI VALLEY, CA 93062 (818) 782 -2474 FAX: (805) 581.5407 G. I. RUBBISH CO. a Subsidiary of G. I. INDUSTRIES April 1, 1991 Moorpark Planning Commission 799 Moorpark Avenue `. Moorpark, California 93021 RE: Hotel Project, Spring & Flinn Dear Commissioners: As a resident of Moorpark and an active member of both the Moorpark business community and the Moorpark Chamber of Commerce I would like to encourage the Planning Commission to approve the hotel project slated for Spring Road and Flinn Street as soon as possible. very strongly that this project will be of significant benefit I feel to the entire community I realize that there are, or may be, traffic or other issues which have yet to be settled with the developer, and would defer to the City to determine what conditions are reasonable and appropriate. The hotel project is a necessary and important Of Moorpark. Please let this very worthwhile project for the community without delay. Thank project move forward you. Sincerely, Michael E. Smith Senior Vice President Chief Operating Officer cc: Moorpark City Council FILE COPY r- C CHAMBER OF COMMERCE April 1, 1991 Moorpark Planning Commission 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021 Re: Hotel Project, Spring & Flinn Dear Commissioners: As a member of the Moorpark business community I feel very strongly that the hotel project, slated for Spring Road and Flinn Street, should be approved by the Planning Commission as soon as possible. As a member of the Chamber of Commerce I encourage you to move forward with this project without delay, because it will be a plus for the entire community as well. I understand that there may be traffic or other issues which are not yet settled with the developer, and would defer to the City to determine what conditions are reasonable and appropriate. Again, the hotel project is a very important economic asset for the entire community. Please do not delay in making a decision, and moving the project forward. Thank you. Sincerely, cc:Moorpark City Council 530 MOORPARK AVENUE ♦ MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA 93021 ♦ (805) 529 -0322 %- METRICS Inc. April 1, 1991 Moorpark Planning Commission 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021 Re: Hotel Project, Spring & Flinn Dear Commissioners: .37 Now— As a member of the Moorpark business community I feel very strongly that the hotel project, slated for Spring Road and Flinn Street, should be approved by the Planning Commission as soon as possible. As a member of the Chamber of Commerce I encourage you to move forward with this project without delay, because it will be a plus for the entire community as well. I understand that there may be traffic or other issues which are not yet settled with the developer, and would defer to the City to determine what conditions are reasonable and appropriate. Again, the hotel project is a very important economic asset for the entire community. Please do not delay in making a decision, and moving the project forward. Thank you. Sincerely, XW ' -- Rick Tate T- Metrics, Inc. cc:Moorpark City Council T- Metrics Inc. - 530 Moorpark Ave. Suite 210 Moorpark, �' k+ CA 93021 (805) 378 -0000 N.LE COPY Litton Aero Products April 1, 1991 Moorpark Planning Commission 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021 Re: Hotel Project, Spring & Flinn Dear Commissioners: 3, 6101 Condor Drive Moorpark, California 93021.2699 805 378 -2411 R.T. Cameron Vice President Human Resources As a member of the Moorpark business community I feel very strongly that the hotel project, slated for Spring Road and Flinn Street, should be approved by the Planning Commission as soon as possible. As a member of the Chamber of Commerce I encourage you to move forward with this project without delay, because it will be a plus for the entire community as well. I understand that there may be traffic or other issues which are not yet settled with the developer, and would defer to the City to determine what conditions are reasonable and appropriate. Again, the hotel project is a very important economic asset for the entire community. Please do not delay in making a decision, and moving the project forward. Thank you. Sincerely, Richard Cameron Vice President Human Resources cc:Moorpark City Council I -OUE%t �. �Geams, 2�. cpc:A1. ANKL�- PEC A PODIATRY GROUP MOORPARK PLAZA 530 E. LOS ANGELES AVENUE - 2D MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA 93021 TELEPHONE (805) 523 -0400 April 1, 1991 Moorpark Planning Commission 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021 Re: Hotel Project, Spring & Flinn Dear Commissioners: 39 As a member of the Moorpark business community I feel very strongly that the hotel project, slated for Spring Road and Flinn Street, should be approved by the Planning Commission as soon as possible. As a member of the Chamber of Commerce I encourage you to move forward with this project without delay, because it will be a plus for the entire community as well. I understand that there may be traffic or other issues which are not yet settled with the developer, and would defer to the City to determine what conditions are reasonable and appropriate. Again, the hotel project is a very important economic asset for the entire community. Please do not delay in making a decision, and moving the project forward. Thank you. Sincerely, Robert J. Abrams, D.P.M. President Elect, Moorpark Chamber of Commerce cc:Moorpark City Council FILE C 0 111Y S_ANLEY E COHEN EODORE J. ENGLAND A%SON M WHITFIELD oOBERT W SCH ROEDER .AVID W. TREOWAY ROEERT A MCSORLEY ROSERT 8. ENGLAND STUART A. COMIS MITC"E:L B. KAHN MARK A. NELSON ER;C J. KANANEN MARY E. SCHRCEDER RANDALL A. COHEN WILLIAM J. KESATIE MARYANNE G. DALTON OSCAR C. GONZALEZ MELISSA K. FORCE PAUL F. SLEWETT STEVEN K. -ERRIN JEFFREY T. MOERER MELISSA E. COHEN TERRY R. BAILEY MA.ISON M. CHRISTIAN ANDREW S. HUGHES Cohen, England & `fliiffield ATTORNEYS AT LAW SIXTH FLOOR, ONION BANK TOWER 300 ESPLANADE DRIVE OXNARD, CALIFORNIA 93030 (805) 485 -962 7 (805) 647 -823 March 27, 1991 Mr. Patrick J. Richards Director of Community Development City of Moorpark 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 Re: LDM -90 -4, IPD -90 -1, CUP -90 -1, Variance No. 90 -2 (Martin V. Smith & Associates) Dear Pat: 0170q • SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TOLL FREE (800) 2SS -3485 VAX (805) 983-O297 THOUSAND OAKS OFFICE WESTOAKS CENTER 299 WEST HILLCREST DRIVE SUITE 210 THOUSAND OAKS, CALIFORNIA 91360 0162 -958 I appreciate the time that you and Paul Porter spent with me on March 22, 1991 discussing the proposed conditions of approval for the above- captioned project. At the conclu- sion of the telephone conference, you asked if I would put my questions, concerns and criticisms in writing to you for your use and the use of the Planning Commission. I understand that many of the conditions were recommenced by the City Engineer ( Willdan Associates) and, as to those conditions, you sug- gested that any negotiations must take place between Willdan and Martin V. Smith & Associates. We will make that effort, but we have included all our concerns in this letter. Many of our concerns are rather minor because they involve redundancy, typographical errors or simply matters of form. I pointed those matters out to you orally and will not reiterate those concerns in this letter. Turning to the conditions proposed for LD -90 -4, those conditions requiring further discussion include the following: Condition No. 12: "Prior to recordation, all utility lines from the property line shall be placed underground" — RECEIVED — hAR 2 8 1991 rity of AAnnrnark Mr. Patrick J. Richards March 27, 1991 Page 2 You agreed that the condition is not clearly worded and is redundant in that a similar condition is found in Con- dition No. 31 of IPD No. 90 -1 and CUP No. 90 -1. This Condi- tion No. 12 should be eliminated. Condition No. 22: The second paragraph of Condition No. 22 reads as follows: "Any necessary right -of -way required to complete this improvement will be acquired by the applicant at their expense. The applicant shall be eligible for reimbursement for the necessary pipeline oversizing of the Spring Road drain only from either adjacent prop- erties that have not yet been developed and /or the Los Angeles Avenue A.O.C. as may be ap- proved by City Council in a separate re- imbursement agreement." The applicant is being asked to pay its pro rata share into the Los Angeles Avenue A.O.C.; pay a special con- tribution for its pro rata share of the cost of improvements to the intersection of Spring Road and new Los Angeles Avenue; provide improvements, including a traffic signal on Spring Road at Flinn Street; provide full maintenance for the pub- licly owned meandering sidewalk and landscaping fronting the property; contribute to the Moorpark traffic system's manage- ment fund; and execute a covenant to participate in the forma- tion of an assessment district or agree to pay a traffic miti- gation fee that the City may implement at some time in the future to fund additional public street and traffic improve- ments "directly or indirectly" affected by the development. It would appear that the improvement required by Con- dition No. 22, including the acquisition of the necessary right -of -way would be a proper subject for the Los Angeles Avenue A.O.C. It clearly seems that the City is attempting to have each developer pay several times the impact fee or exac- tion for traffic attributable to its project. For the sake of brevity, I will not repeat this protest each time the payment of one of the mentioned fees appears as a condition. Clearly, however, a contribution to the Los Angeles Avenue A.O.C., pur- suant to Condition No. 26, should pay for not only the re- quirements to acquire land pursuant to Condition No. 22, but also to any requirement to make improvements to the inter- section of Los Angeles Avenue and Spring Road pursuant to Con- ., . 0 c. Mr. Patrick J. Richards March 27, 1991 Page 3 dition No. 24. We are more than willing to pay our fair share for improvements required by traffic impacts caused by our project. Condition No. 27: "The applicant shall execute a covenant running with the land on behalf of itself and its successors, heirs and assigns agreeing to participate in the formation of an assessment district or other financing technique in- cluding, but not limited to, the payment of traffic mitigation fees, which the City may implement or adopt, to fund public street and traffic improvements directly or indirectly effected by the development. The covenant is to be approved by the Director of Community Development prior to recordation." As we see it, by our payment of Los Angeles Avenue A.O.C. fees and the payment of the Moorpark traffic system's management fund, along with the other improvements and exac- tions required to mitigate traffic impacts emanating from the project, we are already providing our fair share of money to mitigate any traffic impacts as result of the project. Condi- tion No. 27 becomes redundant and violates our rights of due process. Consistent with the approach used by other commu- nities, at the very least, the developer reserves the right to challenge the amount of the assessment or the fee as well as the spread or allocation formula. We will -not give up that right. Condition No. 31. Without repeating the entire condi- tion, it has to do with the installation and maintenance of a meandering sidewalk along Spring Road, Flinn Avenue and Minor Street. The concern that I mentioned to you was whether or not Caltrans would agree to a meandering sidewalk because we did not want to be held up pending the outcome of negotiations with Caltrans. Additionally, if the sidewalk was to remain privately owned, we would have no concern about maintaining it. However, I am advised that the meandering sidewalk will be partially on and part of the dedicated right -of -way and partially on the private property of the developer. I have a concern relating to the continuing cost of maintaining public L Mr. Patrick J. Richards March 27, 1991 Page 4 39 a. facilities and absorbing the liability. You indicated that there is contemplated a three -way agreement between the City, Caltrans and the developer relating to that subject which has not yet been finalized. I will defer my concern about main- taining the public right -of -way until I am able to review-the agreement. Turning to the conditions relating to IDP No. 90 -1 and CUP No. 90 -1, our concerns are as follows: Condition No. 3: "That unless the project is inaugurated (building foundation slab in place and sub- stantial work in progress) not later than one year after this permit is granted, this permit shall automatically expire on that date . . . ." Because of the nature of the public and private im- provements required prior to the inauguration of work on the building structure, I request that this condition provide two years within which to inaugurate work on the actual buildings following the grant of the permit. As to the remainder of the paragraph, providing for an additional one year extension at the discretion of the Director of Community Development, I am proposing no change. Condition No. 9: "A sign permit is required for all on -site signs to be approved by the Director of Com- munity Development. No on -site building signs shall be permitted unless the building is oc- cupied by a single user. No off -site signs are permitted. The proposed monument signs shall be redesigned to have a maximum height of five feet. All existing signs on the sub- ject property shall be removed prior to the issuance of any zoning clearance." We are agreeable to staying within a maximum height limit of five feet for all monument signs that may be per- mitted in connection with the development with the exceptio of the hotel. That sign must be as shown on the exhibit su mitted to the City previously. The hotel is not located ne ,39E. Mr. Patrick J. Richards March 27, 1991 Page 5 or visible from any freeway, nor is it located on Los Angeles Avenue. In order for patrons unfamiliar with Moorpark to find the hotel easily, it must have a significant sign to indicate its location. The sign will be designed and illuminated in such a way so as not to adversely affect the adjacent prop- erties, including the residences across Spring Road. This is a very important item to assure the success of the hotel. Condition No. 19: "Roof design and construction shall in- clude a minimum 18 -inch extension of the para- pet wall above the highest point of the roof." As we discussed, this condition is inappropriate for the architectural design of the hotel. It was intended for industrial or commercial buildings with principally flat roofs. You indicated that you would review and modify this condition as necessary. Condition No. 37: Without repeating the entire para- graph, it requires a noise study to be submitted for review and approval in contemplation of roof mounted equipment. I indicated to you that there would be no roof mounted equipment on the hotel structure and you concluded that no study would be necessary if that were the case. Condition No. 37 should be deleted. Condition No. 38: Without repeating the entire para- graph, it requires the posting of a $10,000.00 bond to insure permit compliance. It would seem that the threat of a revoca- tion of the permit would be substantially more powerful than a bond which you admit has never been called by the City. In response to my request that Condition No. 38 be deleted, you indicated that more onerous alternatives are being considered. I cannot envision a hotel operator allowing the property to fall into disrepair and expect to stay in business. This condition may be necessary for industrial projects, but I believe it is unnecessary for this project. I would ask that it be deleted. 39) C; Mr. Patrick J. Richards March 27, 1991 Page 6 Condition No. 40: "Prior to the issuance of a zoning clear- ance, the site plan shall be revised to recess the loading zone for the hotel into the hotel structure or other location on -site so as to not create a traffic hazard problem on Minor Street." I indicated to you that this condition was incon- sistent with earlier discussions and plans for a loading zone. (See Condition No. 19 on the proposed tentative map approval.) We would prefer Condition No. 19. You indicated you would study the problem in order to eliminate the apparent in- consistency. Condition Nos. 49 and 51: Without repeating both lengthy paragraphs, the second sentence of each appear re- dundant. Both require that on -site improvements shall be com- pleted within 120 days of issuance of a certificate of oc- cupancy. Condition No. 52: "No later than ten (10) days after any change of property ownership or change of lessee(s) or operator(s) of the subject building, there shall be filed with the Di- rector of Community Development the name(s) and address(es) of the new owner(s), lessee(s) or operator(s) together with a letter from any such person(s) acknowledging and agreeing with all conditions of this permit." As'I indicated to you, the law requires that these permits run with the land and not with the individual owners. The requirement of obtaining a letter from future owners prior to approval of a transfer of the property constitutes a re- striction on alienation of the property. The City has a sub- stantial number of means by which to enforce the permits against subsequent owners. We have no problem disclosing the names and addresses of new owners, lessees or operators. Condition No. 68: The first sentence states that lighting devices shall be high enough so as to eliminate any- one on the ground from tampering with them. Any earlier con- 39 Car . Mr. Patrick J. Richards March 27, 1991 Page 7 dition requires lighting devices not to exceed 16 feet in height. The two conditions should be coordinated to avoid any inconsistency. Condition No. 92: This condition requires fire flow of approximately 3,000 per minute. You indicated that any concern as to that condition should be referred to Shanna Harry in the Fire Prevention Bureau. For the information of the Planning Commission, it appeared to us that 3,000 gallons per minute was considerably higher than normally required for such structures. Once we discuss the matter with the Fire Prevention Bureau, we hope to have additional information on this item. Condition No. 25: The only condition that I did not discuss in any length is the most important condition to this project. That Condition is No. 25 of the land division which was set out in a memo from you dated February 26, 1991. Con- dition No. 25 requires the realignment of Flinn Avenue to create a four -way intersection with Spring Road and Second Street and the signalization of that intersection when war- rants are met. As I understand it, our traffic engineer and the City Engineer thoroughly discussed the alternatives to realigning Flinn Avenue and concluded that the offset intersection that currently exists is quite acceptable from a traffic standpoint so long as a signal is eventually erected at the intersection of Flinn'Avenue and Spring Road, and left turns to and from Second Street are restricted. We are informed that not- withstanding the engineering conclusion reached by our con- sultants, the City Manager has required that Condition No. 25 +: require the realignment of Flinn Avenue. That particular requirement is totally unacceptable and will have the effect of destroying the project because it will render the southern portion of the property useless. Either the restaurant and hotel would have to be relocated to the north which would eliminate the apartment building compo- nent of the project, or the restaurant would have to be eliminated because the remaining property resulting from the realignment would not provide sufficient area. It is our opinion that the hotel cannot survive financially without the Mr. Patrick J. Richards March 27, 1991 Page 8 0 3CIII., restaurant and that the entire project is not feasible without the apartment element. We request that the revised Condition No. 25 be left as originally proposed by, and acceptable to, the traffic engineers according to their original determina- tion. I have recently been provided with another intersection design by our traffic engineer which will have the affect of leaving the current configuration as it is but restriping and signalizing both Flinn Street and Second Street where they intersect with Spring Road to allow left turns from Second Street to Spring Road. That alternative, which has been re- ferred to by the City's engineer, is attached hereto and is also acceptable to us. Finally, the remainder of the paragraph dealing with the timing for the installation of the traffic signal at Spring Road and Flinn Avenue appears internally inconsistent. There must be a better means by which to deal with that issue in a simpler manner. That item will be studied by the en- gineers and the developers' representatives prior to the hearing on the matter. Very, truly yours, M CHEL B. KAHN MBK:js Enc. cc: Mr. Martin V. Smith Mr. Walter Calhoun Mr. Thomas Montgomery Mr. John Dickerson f A R- 2 1- 9 1 T H U 1 1 THOMAS S. MONTGOMERY AND _ASSOCIATES Trahsportatfon & Traffic En8lrieers MEMORANDUM DATE: March 15, 1991 TO: Hark Wessel FROK: Terry L. Hockett P 39z' SUBJECT: Conceptual Geometric Design Plan For Spring Road Between Flynn Avenue And Second Street Attached for your review and comment is a rough copy of our latest preliminary design plan for Spring Road between Flynn Avenue and Second Street. This latest plan involves signalizing Spring Road at both Second Street and Flynn Avenue in conjunction with a raised median to prohibit left -turn ingress traffic into Second Street, but allowing left -turn egressing traffic from Second Street. We feel that this latest design plan may be an acceptable compromise between our earlier proposed plan versus the current city plan to realign Flynn Avenue opposite Second Street. We would appreciate your earliest response to this issue so that appropriate action may be taken. Project No. 900510 64.5• 14' O`, t +oo• LEUND O bone Slgne+ r K O CONCEPTUAL GEOMETRIC DESIGN PLAN for SPRING ROAD between F'LINN AVE, and 2ND ST. MOl[7 NO, 900!10 1NOUA= S 4CH ICW CRY ANO ASSObA1E5 .tll" nu.ar� S[al[: 1• 40' 7r�ywrl�l4n 1R. G -..,.• nI�T n 3711 +u... 41 -64* f h- >.a. rnM C�rw% ►)dT foal afs -al/l . raa- 1m%) aa� -aesa I �-I i �i L 0 PAUL W. LAWRASON JR. Mayor BERNARDO M.PEREZ Mayor Pro Tem SCOTT MONTGOMERY Councilmember JOHN E. WOZNIAK Councilmember LILLIAN KELLERMAN City Clerk Wi0w FROM: DATE: MOORPARK STEM `/ 1L= MEMORANDUM THE PLANNING COMMISSION STEVEN UE CHERYL J.KANE City Attorney PATRICK RICHARDS, A.I.C.P. Director of Community Development JOHN F. KNIPE City Engineer JOHN V. GILLESPIE Chief of Police RICHARD T. HARE City Treasurer PATRICK J. RICHARDS, DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT February 26, 1991 SUBJECT: ADDENDUM TO STAFF REPORT FOR LDM -90 -4, IPD -90 -1, CUP -90- 1, AND VARIANCE NO. 90 -2 On February 26, 1991, the Department of Community development received the following change to Condition No 25 of the Land Division Map from the City Engineer: 25. The applicant shall submit to the City and Caltrans for review and approval, street improvement plans to realign Flinn Avenue to intersect Spring Road, opposite Second Street and a traffic signal plan for the intersection of Spring Road - Second Street /Flinn Avenue, prepared by a registered civil engineer; shall enter into an agreement with the City to complete these improvements; and shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing completion. To determine what street improvements will be necessary, the applicant's engineer shall submit for City and Caltrans review alternative conceptual designs of an aligned intersection. The offset intersection conceptual design shall include sufficient information to demonstrate how the lane configuration and traffic signal phasing will operate. The City and Caltrans will review the conceptual plans (additional conceptual designs may be required) and determine which intersection configuration will be constructed. The applicant shall then proceed with final design and construction of the improvements. The applicant shall be responsible for all costs associated with processing of any associated right -of- way vacation. The applicant shall provide for a traffic signal warrant study to be conducted between three and six months after occupancy. If the traffic signal is warranted and construction is allowed by Caltrans the applicant shall immediately construct the improvements. If the traffic signal is not warranted, additional traffic signal warrant studies stall be conducted ATTACHMENT 4 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 (805) 529 -6864 4/ on a semi - annual basis unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. If construction of the traffic signal is not warranted or Caltrans will not allow its construction prior to occupancy, the applicant shall deposit 125% of the construction cost with the City prior to project acceptance. The required bond for the improvements can be exonerated if the cash deposit is provided to the City. This construction cost shall include associated engineering, construction inspection and administration costs. The cash deposit does not relieve the applicant from constructing the improvements. The applicant shall construct the improvements upon receiving Caltrans permission to so. The City Engineer is requiring the realignment of Flinn Avenue because of the potential impact that the future signalization at the Spring Road /Flinn Avenue signal will have on the residential properties located to the west of the proposed hotel /restaurant project site. Once the signal is operational, it will become more difficult for vehicles on Second Street to make a left hand turn onto Spring Road. MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA Planning Comm=wn Meeting of 19 91__ ACTION AZ4Y � Z' Z�4c BY �- � PAUL W. LAWRASON JR. Mayor BERNARDO M. PEREZ Mayor Pro Tern SCOTT MONTGOMERY Councilmember JOHN E. WOZNIAK Councilmember LILLIAN KELLERMAN City Clerk 4V C. E G. MOORPARK �a CITY OF MOORPARK PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT March 4, 1991 STEVEN KUENY City Manager CHERYL J.KANE City Attorney PATRICK RICHARDS, A.I.C.P. Director of Community Development JOHN F. KNIPE City Engineer JOHN V. GILLESPIE Chief of Police RICHARD T. HARE City Treasurer SECTION I - GENERAL INFORMATION HEARING DATE: B. HEARING TIME: March 4, 1991 HEARING LOCATION: City Council Chambers 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California STAFF CONTACT: Paul Porter Senior Planner PROPOSED PROJECT: 7:00 p.m. D. CASE NUMBERS: LDM -90 -4, IPD -90 -1, CUP -90 -1 and Variance No. 90 -2 E. APPLICANT: Martin V. Smith and Associates 300 Esplanade Drive No. 2100 Oxnard, Ca. 93030 1. Land Division to subdivide an existing 7.52 acre parcel into two parcels of 2.88 (future residential site) and 4.64 acres (project site). 2. Industrial Planned Development and Conditional Use Permit to construct a 135 room hotel and a free - standing 5,100 square foot restaurant. Note - The Conditional Use Permit will be considered the master permit for these two structures. 3. Variance to permit: a) architectural tower to encroach a maximum of 4 -feet into the rear yard setback, b) parking to encroach into side yard setback, c) permit decorative hardscape paved delivery access to be placed in the rear yard setback area, and d) permit parking requirements for hotel and restaurant to be reduced. 1 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 (805) 529 -6864 �f3 H. PROPOSED LOCATION: The proposed project is located at the northeast corner of Flinn Avenue, east of Spring Road and south of the Southern Pacific Railroad. The Assessor's Parcel numbers are as follows: 512 -0- 171 -20 and 512 -0- 171 -21. I. PROCESSING EXPIRATION DATE: August 8, 1991 J. REQUESTED ACTION AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: 1. Open the public hearing and accept public testimony. 2. Consider the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for these entitlement projects prior to making a recommendation to the City Council for approval or denial of the projects (Exhibit No. 2). 3. Make the appropriate findings (Exhibit No. 1) for each of the entitlements requested by the applicant. 2 - qq 4. Direct staff to prepare a resolution recommending approval of the requested Land Division Map, Industrial Planned Development Permit and Conditional Use Permit, and the Variance, for presentation at the Planning Commission's next regular meeting of March 18, 1991. R. ALTERNATE RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE CITY COUNCIL: 1. Deny the requested projects. 2. Recommend to the City Council approval of the proposed projects with modifications /changes as recommended by the Planning Commission regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program, or any of the entitlements requested. SECTION II - PROJECT SITE BACKGROUND A. PROJECT SITE HISTORY: On August 11, 1976, Robert Ney applied for Conditional Use Permit No. 3830 to construct a 83,862 square foot shopping center on the subject site. This project was denied by the County of Ventura Planning Commission and subsequently appealed to the Board of Supervisors. On October 3, 1978 the Board of Supervisors upheld the Planning Commission's decision to deny the project based on the project's inconsistency with the Moorpark Community Plan which at that time designated the property as "Industrial" even though the sight was zoned "C -P- D". To correct the site's zoning inconsistency with the plan's specified land use designation, a Zone Change (Z -2593) from "C -P -D" to "M -1" was approved by the Board of Supervisors on September 4, 1979. On September 4, 1979, Robert Ney applied for DP -245 to construct a 144,000 square foot multi - tenant industrial facility. On February 26, 1980 the Ventura County Planning Commission informed the applicant that the Plot Plans that were submitted for DP -245 were not adequate to reflect the adopted "I -1" Land Use designation on the General Plan for the property and requested that the applicant resubmit new plans. Revised plans were not received by the Planning Director, so on May 16, 1980 the Director denied DP -245 based on the project's inconsistency with the General Plan due to inadequate setbacks. This issue was appealed to the Ventura County Planning Commission. On July 3, 1980, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 80 -36 by a vote of 5 -0 denying Appeal No. 75. On October 21, 1980 the Board of Supervisors denied Appeal No. 78 regarding this issue. 3 �5 Donald Scanlin applied for a Land Division Map (LDM -4) on June 18, 1984 to subdivide the proposed parcel into two lots which was approved by the City of Moorpark Planning Commission by adopting resolution No. PC -85 -40 on February 12, 1985. The Moorpark Planning Commission considered an application by Donald Scanlin for Development Plan No. 311 for construction of a 76,189 square foot industrial building and DP -314 for a 68,191 square foot industrial building on February 12, 1985. The Planning Commission passed resolution No. PC -85 -38 recommending to the City Council approval of the project. On February 19, 1985 the City Council adopted Resolution No. 85- 167 and 168 approving DP -311 and 314. The applicant was unable to comply with the condition of approval requiring use inauguration within one year of the approval date for the projects. Prior to the expiration date, the applicant requested a one -year extension. Due to the rapidly changing conditions within the City of Moorpark, the Planning Director approved a six -month extension to the permit. Prior to the expiration of the six month extension, the applicant requested an additional six month extension which was disapproved by the Director on July 22, 1986. On December 20, 1988, Gesundheit Architects applied for Industrial Planned Development No. 88 -18 for the development of a mixed use multi- tenant business park. A letter dated March 7, 1989 was received from Shapco Inc. Due to the fact that the applicant did not complete the application within a reasonable time period, the application for the IPD was closed without completing the review process. B. EXISTING SETTING: The project site consists of vacant undeveloped land with sparse vegetation and a level topography. A Phase 1 archaeological survey was conducted on the property by W and S Consultants. An archival search at UCLA Information Center was performed by the consultant on February 15, 1990. According to pertinent record and maps, the subject property had been partially surveyed by an archaeologist, and no sites are known to exist on it. On February 16, 1990 a field reconnaissance was done on the site. This consisted of a thorough and intensive on -foot survey of the entire site. The site had been recently disced and was essentially clear of vegetation with the exception of some areas of low and sparse grass. There was evidence that the lot had been used as a Christmas Tree lot in the recent past and that a very small area of approximately three by ten meters was covered with asphalt. 4 q0 The result of the survey was that no extant historical or prehistoric archaeological resources were noted during the surface reconnaissance of the subject property. The consultant determined that there was very little possibility for buried archaeological remains to exist within the site area. C. SITE ZONING: The Zoning of the property is M -1 (Industrial Park District) which was adopted by Ordinance No. 3512 by the Ventura County Board of Supervisors on December 23, 1980. D. VICINITY ZONING: North: M -2 Industrial Park District (Area of the Southern Pacific right -of -way). Further to the north is CPD (Commercial Planned Development). South: M -1 (Industrial Park District) East: M -1 (Industrial Park District) West: R -1 (On the west side of Spring Road) E. SITE GENERAL PLAN: I -1 (Light Industrial) F. VICINITY GENERAL PLAN: North: I -1 (Light Industrial) and I -2 (Medium Industrial)(Area of the Southern Pacific Railroad) South: I -1 East: I -1 West: M (Medium Density Residential) on the west side of Spring Road. The proposed hotel and restaurant project would be compatible with the surrounding light industrial uses based on the fact that the industrial uses in the area will be able to use the hotel facility for luncheons, conventions, and serve as overnight accommodations for business people serving the area. Also, there would not be an interface problem with the residential uses located along the west side of Spring Road because the road along with the existing walls located adjacent to the residences along the Spring Road frontage would act as a buffer from the hotel and restaurant uses. _ Also the design of the existing light industrial buildings would be compatible with the design of the proposed buildings of this development. Based on these reasons, the City Council determined that it would be acceptable to accept an application for a hotel and restaurant use in an area planned for industrial uses. 5 A. q7 It should be noted that the northern parcel of the requested parcel map is the location of a proposed amendment to the Land Use Element of the General Plan. Martin V. Smith is proposing a development of approximately 60 residential apartment units on this property. The setbacks of the proposed hotel, combined with a buffer wall and proposed setbacks for the future residential units act as a sufficient buffer of the proposed hotel from the proposed residential apartments should a General Plan amendment for the parcel to the north be approved by the City Council at some point in the future. Therefore, the proposed hotel and restaurant may be found to be compatible with the proposed land uses in the vicinity of this proposed development. SECTION 3 - PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT PROPOSALS /REQUIREMENTS The Conditional Use Permit and the Industrial Planned Development project are for a three story hotel building with associated parking and outdoor pool /recreational area, and a single story restaurant. The hotel will be located on the northwesterly portion of lot no. 2 of the proposed Land Division Map (Parcel Map). The hotel will be located approximately 455 feet south of the existing Southern Pacific Railroad tracks. The proposed single story restaurant will also be located on Lot No. 1 and will be at the southwesterly corner of the parcel. Both of these uses will be located on a 4.64 acre site. The Land Division Map for the subdivision of an existing 7.50 acre parcel into two parcels of 4.64 acre and 2.88 acre site. The proposed 2.88 acre site is the location of a companion project which consists of a General Plan Amendment, Zone Change and Residential Planned Development for a 60 unit apartment complex project. These entitements will be the subject of a future staff report. PROPOSED PROJECT Land Area 4.64 acres Building area Hotel Restaurant Total Site coverage 27,867 s.f. (pad area) 5,100 s.f. 32,967 s.f. 19% 1.1 CITY REQUIREMENTS 10,000 sq. ft. (-8 PARKING PARKING REQUIRED Parking Provided Standard 231 Country Inn, single rms. 190 Compact 0 Suites w /Kitchens 16 Handicapped 6 Restaurant Seating 70 Other 17 Total 237 Total 293 Proposed shared parking between hotel and restaurant is 56 spaces. The applicant has requested a variance from the City of Moorpark Zoning Ordinance based on the fact that the proposed project utilizes shared parking for the proposed hotel and restaurant. The reason the applicant applied for a Variance concerning the parking is because several jurisdictions allow for shared parking uses under similar circumstances. The City's Zoning Ordinance does not allow for shared parking for such uses. Exhibit No. 14, received from the applicant, is a summary of shared parking requirements for this same project if it were located in the following Cities: 10. City of Moorpark 293 SETBACKS (City Requirements) According to Ordinance No. 74, industrial buildings must be set back thirty feet from any street with four or more travel lanes, as shown on the adopted Circulation Element for the front setback. 7 Jurisdiction Number of Spaces 1. Thousand Oaks 259 2. Agoura 203 3. Camarillo 233 4. Oxnard 203 5. Ventura 248 6. Santa Barbara 205 7. Port Hueneme 259 8. Santa Maria 194 9. County of Los Angeles 143 10. City of Moorpark 293 SETBACKS (City Requirements) According to Ordinance No. 74, industrial buildings must be set back thirty feet from any street with four or more travel lanes, as shown on the adopted Circulation Element for the front setback. 7 yq_ For all other streets, the setback shall be 20 feet for the front and ten feet for the side yard. Said setbacks are to be landscaped, except for front -to -back driveways and walkways, and they shall not be used for parking. For interior yard setbacks, the interior lot shall have a minimum 30 foot setback on one site, while the other side may have a zero lot line, except when next to an R -Zone, in which case there shall be a 30 foot setback. Said setback shall be landscaped, except for front -to -back driveways and walkways, and shall not be used for parking. PROJECT SETBACKS Restaurant Front Yard: The front setback for the Restaurant is 30 feet for the restaurant (with the exception of an architectural feature which protrudes approximately 4 feet into the required setback area) Side Yard: The side setback is 20 feet along Flinn Avenue (with the exception of an architectural feature which protrudes approximately 2 feet into the required setback area). The applicant has requested that a Variance be granted to allow the architectural window features in the area of the proposed fountain to protrude into the required from and rear setback areas. Hotel Front Yard: The front setback for the hotel is approximately 111 feet from Spring Road with 30 feet of landscaping prior to where the parking area begins. Side Yard: The side yard setback along the northern border is approximately 82 feet from the main structure of the hotel and approximately 73 feet from the architectural tower features. The applicant is requesting a Variance to allow parking in the setback area based on the fact that the distance from the proposed hotel to the proposed residential hotel project planned to the north of the site has an adequate buffer from the hotel. Also, typically hotels are generally quiet and are compatible with residential projects. In this case, the proposed residential apartment project is substantially setback from the hotel project making an even greater setback area from the hotel site. Rear Yard: The rear yard setback is 20 feet which meets the intent of Ordinance No. 74 with the exception of the loading zone area. The applicant has requested a Variance to allow the loading zone to intrude into the rear yard setback area. ACCESS Three access driveways are provided to the proposed site. The first is located along Spring Road, approximately 230 feet northerly of the intersection of Spring Road and Flinn Avenue, the second on Flinn Avenue, approximately 240 feet easterly of Spring Road and the third along Minor Street, approximately 320 feet northerly of Flinn Avenue. LOADING ZONE The City Engineer has conditioned the Land Division Map to not allow construction of the driveway fronting Minor Street (per the project site plan) at the loading area and shall paint forty feet of yellow curb adjacent to the loading area. The applicant is. also required to conduct all loading /unloading in this zone and is required to construct a wheel chair ramp adjacent to the loading /unloading zone. The reason the City Engineer has required the moving of the loading /unloading zone is because of the traffic sight distance problem along the street from vehicles exiting the driveway located to the north of the existing loading /unloading zone. Department of Community Development staff is of the opinion that allowing the loading /unloading zone to be placed on the street would be setting an undesirable precedent, thus opening the door for future applicants to attempt to circumvent the intent of the zoning Ordinance to require loading /unloading zones to be placed on -site. An option to eliminate the potential sight distance problem would be to require the applicant to place a portion of the loading zone as an inset under the building which would allow trucks to be at least some distance from the street in an effort to reduce the sight distance problem. According to the applicant, goods that are either loaded or unloaded would not be delivered by large semi- tractor trucks, but would be van size vehicles. The highest point for the hotel and restaurant is the tower structures located on the hotel which are approximately 40 feet tall at their peak. The overall height of the hotel at the peak of the roof structure is 34 feet. The zoning ordinance allows a maximum height of 30 feet which can be increased to 60 feet with an increase in yard space of one foot for each additional foot in height. The front and side yard setbacks of the proposed hotel are sufficiently setback to accommodate the height of the building. 9 5/ TRASH ENCLOSURES Trash enclosures are provided at both the hotel as well as the restaurant. Staff has placed a condition on the project to ensure that the size of the trash enclosures will accommodate recycling activities. LANDSCAPING Landscaping of site area: 48,673 square feet or 28.1% Parking area not including driveways: 42,012 square feet Landscaping within parking area not including landscaping: 9,105 square feet Total Parking Area Including Landscaping: 51,117 square feet Percentage of landscaping within parking area: 9,105/51,117 =17.8% PAVING Parking and Driveways 88,523 Sidewalks 612 Hotel Entrance 400 Pool Area 2,100 Total 91,635 TRAFFIC s.f. s.f. s.f. s.f. s.f. permanent A Traffic Study was completed by Thomas Montgomery and Associates for the purpose of determining impacts associated with the additional traffic that would be generated as a result of this project. In general, the study has concluded that the additional traffic generated by this mixed use project would not have any significant adverse effect on the operation of the street system serving the study site as it relates to total future traffic demand levels. 10 sa The additional traffic generated by the proposed development and all other planned developments identified in the City of Moorpark was estimated based on traffic generation factors obtained from the Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, Fourth Edition, and other pertinent sources. Based on the results of the study, maximum daily site traffic demands would be approximately 1,880 vehicle trips per day (VPD) inbound, with directional peak site traffic demands of about 45 vehicles per hour (VPH) inbound, and 85 VPH outbound, during typical morning and afternoon commuter peak travel periods, respectively. (These figures include a proposed 60 unit apartment project to the north of the proposed hotel and restaurant). The orientation of these additional site - generated traffic demands was estimated based on information contained in other traffic impact studies prepared by the same firm doing this study. For the hotel site, it was estimated that 85% of the total site traffic demand would be oriented to and from the east (50% on New Los Angeles Avenue and 35% on Los Angeles Avenue). The remaining 15% on Los Angeles Avenue west of Gabbert Road - Tierra Rejada Road. For the restaurant site, it was estimated that 17% of the total site tra f f is demands would be oriented to and from the north (2% on Spring Road north of High Street -Los Angeles Avenue); 18% to and from the west (8% on High Street and 10% on Los Angeles Avenue west of Gabbert Road- Tierra Rejada Road); 35%.to and from the east (15% on Los Angeles Avenue and 20% on New Los Angeles Avenue east of Science Drive); and 30% to and from the south (25% on Spring Road and 5% on Tierra Rejada Road). For the "total cumulative, with site traffic, with existing geometrics" scenario, four of the study area intersections would operate in excess of design capacity during the morning and /or afternoon commuter peak travel periods. For the "total cumulative with and without site traffic with mitigation" scenarios, five of the study area intersections would operate at an acceptable levels of service during both the morning and afternoon weekday commuter peak travel periods. However, the intersections of Spring Road /High Street -Los Angeles Avenue and Spring Road /Los Angeles Avenue -New Los Angeles Avenue would operate in excess of design capacity during the morning and /or afternoon weekday commuter peak travel periods. Site traffic impacts at these locations are not anticipated to be significant. This determination is based on the consultants definition of a significant adverse impact as one resulting in a differential of "two points" or more in ICU values between the "with" and "without" site traffic condition scenarios at intersections projected to operate at, or in excess of, design capacity. 11 53 The proposed driveways located on the north side of Flinn Avenue and the east side of Spring Road would have ample capacity to serve the additional traffic generated by the propose hotel and restaurant. In addition, parking stall widths, aisle widths, and curb cut -offs would be adequate to handle normal parking maneuvers. The planned on -site parking capacity of parking spaces, according to the traffic consultant should be sufficient to provide ample parking capacity to accommodate normal peak site parking demands. The maximum site traffic contribution to the study area street system would occur at Spring Road and Flinn Avenue, approximately 3.6 %. CIRCULATION AND PARKING The traffic study assumed (due to the present policy to limit access to and from SR118) that ingress /egress traffic would be limited to right turns only at the site access driveway on Spring Road. In addition, due to the recommended future traffic signal at Spring Road and Flinn Avenue, the traffic study recommended that access to and from Second Street at Spring Road be limited to right -turn only. This signal may create a potential problem for the residents located to the west of this project. Without signalization for the residntial uses, the residents may only be able to make a right turn on to Spring Road. The one two -way site access driveway on Flinn Avenue and the one limited access driveway on Spring Road that would serve traffic for the proposed hotel and restaurant would have ample capacity to accommodate future peak site traffic demands, maximum ingress /egress site traffic volumes of about 45 VPD versus driveway capacities of more than 200 VPH in each direction. The proximity of the site access driveway on Spring Road to the Southern Pacific Railroad tracks is far enough to eliminate any significant conflicts between the two locations. Vehicle storage lengths for the site access driveways should be adequate due to the anticipated low number of site traffic. parking maneuvers. Parking stall and aisle widths and corner cut -offs should be adequate to handle normal parking maneuvers. In addition, adequate pedestrian circulation in the parking lot is provided. ARCHITECTURE The architectural style of the hotel and the restaurant is a mixture of Victorian and English Tudor and is design in such a fashion that it will act as a transition from the architecture of the downtown area. The restaurant and hotel windows will be provided with awnings and a fountain that will be located in the from setback area. The colors of the structures are of the pastel variety. The hotel will have Swiss Coffee trim, grey horizontal trim siding, blue awning and slate grey roof. 12 5q The proposed restaurant will complement the colors of the hotel in that it will also have pastel colors with blue canopies, and lighter shades of blue for the stucco finish as well as the horizontal wood siding and swiss coffee stucco trim. The soft colors should blend with the colors in the surrounding area. SIGNS Two signs are proposed for the site. The first sign is a twenty four foot high monument sign that is proposed to be located southerly of the entrance to the hotel adjacent to Spring Road. The second monument sign is six feet high and is located westerly of the entrance on Flinn Avenue. Staff is of the opinion that the height of the signs are to high and has placed a condition on the project limiting the height of the signs to a maximum of five feet. AIR QUALITY In addition to the CEQA definitions of significance, the Ventura County Air Pollution Control Board has adopted a policy which states that future general development projects located in Ventura County nonattainment areas of the County which emit 25 pounds or more per day of either ROC or Nox will individually and cumulatively have a significant adverse impact on air quality. The hotel and restaurant together produce 27.5781 pounds of Nox per day which is significant because it is over 25 pounds per day which is the significance threshold pursuant to the County's guidelines. Using a unit cost for Nox emissions over 25 lbs per day of $2.87 per pound, the cost of mitigating the additional pollutants would be 2.5781 pounds per day times $2.87 or $7.399147 per day or $2700.69 per year. The AQMP further states that mitigation costs should be figured for a three year period adding 4% per year to the mitigation costs for 1992 and 1993. This would equate to costs of $2,808.71 for 1992 and $2,921.07 for 1993, fora total mitigation of $8,430.47. The Ventura County AQMP considers that a three year contribution to an off -site Transportation Demand Management program fully mitigates the air quality impact to an insignificant level. Therefore as a mitigation to this project, a condition of approval has been placed on this project to contribute to a City TDM fund in the amount of $8,430.47. NOISE The proposed project will not result in increases to existing noise in the surrounding areas. However, noise from Spring Road and the Southern Pacific Railroad will affect this project as follows: Pursuant to a noise study prepared by Walker, Celano and Associates dated April 18, 1990 the railroad exposure to the outside of this project would be below CNEL 62 due to the distance to the railroad tracks, and any shielding provided by the future development located on the north between the railroad and this project. 13 55 Similarly, the exposure due to the future traffic on Spring Road would be below CNEL 62 due to the shielding by the hotel structure. Therefore, the composite outdoor exposure in the recreational area would be CNEL 65 or below, and no additional noise mitigation measures would be necessary. The maximum exterior noise exposure would occur along the westerly face of the northerly wing of the hotel and would be approximately CNEL 71 due to the combination of the railroad and the future traffic on Spring Road. The noise exposure on the northerly elevation would range from a maximum of approximately CNEL 70 at the westerly and closest to Spring Road to approximately CNEL 65 at the easterly end. The combined noise exposure at the easterly elevation would be below CNEL 62 due to the distance from the tracks and the shielding of Spring Road by the mass of the building. The noise exposure on the southerly wing would be between CNEL 65 and CNEL 70 depending on the distance from the street. Since the outdoor noise exposure is higher than CNEL 55, the required exterior to interior noise reduction to meet CNEL 45 inside is greater than lOdB, which is the maximum NR normally achievable with open windows. Therefore, the windows will have to be kept closed at least part of the time in order to satisfy the CNEL 45 indoor noise criteria and alternative ventilation may be necessary, per the State and City Codes, to provide an acceptable indoor environment should the occupants provide an acceptable indoor environment should the occupants elect to keep the windows closed to exclude the noise. Normally, air conditioning or the incorporation of a "summer switch" on the heating only system is adequate top meet the ventilation requirement, provided that the system provides a minimum of 2 air changes per hour with 20 percent outside air. In addition to the above information, all uses and activities are conditioned to require all roof mounted equipment and other noise generation sources located .on -site be noise attenuated to 55dBA at the property line, or to the ambient noise level at the property line measured at the time of the occupancy request. Prior to the issuance of a Zoning Clearance for initial occupancy or any subsequent occupancy, the Director of Community Development may request that a noise study or a certificate from a licensed acoustical engineer be submitted for review and approval which demonstrates that all on -site noise generation sources would be mitigated to the required level. VII. AGENCY REVIEW Agencies and Departments which reviewed the proposed projects include the City Engineer, City of Moorpark Police Department, Fire Prevention District, Waterworks District No. 1, Moorpark Unified 14 5� School District, Caltrans Environmental Planning and the County of Ventura (Air Pollution Control District, Public Works Agency, Environmental Health, and the Planning Department). Conditions of approval and comments from the various reviewing bodies have been incorporated into this report and into the Conditions of Approval. VIII. ENVIRONMENTAL, DOCUMENT The proposed hotel and restaurant project is not expected to result in significant environmental impacts. All potential environmental issues have been mitigated through the implementation of mitigation measures that are discussed in the attached Mitigated Negative Declaration and have been included as conditions of approval for the proposed - project. A Mitigation Reporting and Monitoring Program is included with the Mitigated Negative Declaration and must be adopted prior to project approval to comply with Assembly Bill No. 3180. Assembly Bill No. 3180 was adopted by the State Legislature in 1988. This law requires the City to adopt a reporting and monitoring program for adopted or required changes to mitigate or avoid significant environmental effects in conjunction with the adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration or in conjunction with the findings for an Environmental Impact Report. Prepared By: Q'a �'i&' Paul Porter Senior Planner 15 Approved By: Patr' Y. Richards Dire r of Community Deve pment 57 Exhibits 1. Findings 2. Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigating Monitoring Program 3. Traffic Study 4. LDM 90 -4 5. Site Plan 6. Elevations 7. Unit Plans 8. Perspective 9. Floor Plans 10. Drainage Plans 11. Fence, Wall Lighting and Landscaping Plan 12. Conditions of Approval for LDM 90 -4 13. Conditions of Approval for CUP 90 -1 and Variance No. 90 -2 14. Shared Parking Requirements From Other Jurisdictions 15. Planning Commission Resolution 16 58 FINDINGS AND GENERAL PLAN GOALS AND POLICIES If the Planning Commission chooses to recommend to the City Council approval of the aforementioned projects, the following findings may be used. C . E . O .A. Findings 1. That the Mitigated Negative Declaration /Initial Study for the projects is complete and has been prepared incompliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the State CEQA Guidelines, and City policy (This finding can only be made if the applicant agrees to the mitigation measures as identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration); 2. The contents in the Mitigated Negative Declaration/ Initial Study have been considered in the various decisions on these projects; 3. In order to reduce the adverse impacts of these projects, mitigation measures discussed in the environmental document have been incorporated into the proposed projects; 4. A Mitigation Reporting and Monitoring Program has been prepared in compliance with Assembly Bill 3180 and considered in the various decisions regarding these projects. Subdivision Map Act Findings Based on the information set forth above, it is determined that the Tentative Parcel Map, with imposition of the attached conditions, meets the requirements of the Government Code Sections 66473.5, 66474, 66474.6, and 66478.1 et secr., in that: 1. The proposed map is consistent with the applicable general and specific plans; 2. That the design and improvements of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the applicable general and specific plans; 3. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; 4. The site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development; 5. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage; 17 59 6. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems; 7. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements would not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large, for access through, or use of the property within the proposed subdivision; B. There would be no discharge of waste from the proposed subdivision into an existing community sewer system in violation of existing water quality control requirements under Water Code Section 13000 et sect.; and 9. The proposed subdivision does not contain or front upon any public waterway, river, stream, coastline, shoreline, lake, or reservoir. Conditional Use Permit and Industrial Planned Development Findings 1. The proposed use would be consistent with the purpose, intent, guidelines, standards, policies, and provisions of the City's General Plan and Chapters 1 and 2 of the Ordinance Code.; 2. The proposed use would not impair the integrity and character of the zone in which it is to be located; 3. The proposed use would be compatible with land uses permitted within the General Plan land use designations and the zone in the general area where the use is to be located; 4. The proposed use would not be obnoxious or harmful or impair the utility of the property itself or neighboring property or uses; 5. The proposed uses would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare. COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT POLICIES Policy 2 New commercial development should incorporate good design standards. Design standards include landscaping, circulation, off - street parking, architectural compatibility with surrounding, and others. New strip commercial development should be discouraged: existing strip commercial development should be encouraged to consolidate driveways, provide adequate parking areas and landscaped areas. • r Policy 3 To encourage commercial developments to adopt a harmonious architectural style with appropriate landscaping and buffer areas. Policy 4 To provide a range of commercial facilities which serve the residents of the community and encourage new employment opportunities. Policy 5 Provide adequate and appropriate traffic movement on adjoining arterials with relation to location of commercial uses. PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT /HAZARD AREAS Goal 1 To discourage the location of development in natural and human -made hazard areas. AIR QUALITY Policy 2 Feasible methods of relieving traffic congestion should be promoted. Policy 3 Programs to improve air quality in the community should be promoted. .. ECONOMIC SUPPORT AND DEVELOPMENT Policy 2 Encourage the development of appropriate commercial and industrial facilities which will provide job opportunities for local residents. Variance Findings: 1. That there are special circumstances or exceptional characteristics applicable to the subject property with regard to size, shape, topography, location or surroundings, which do not apply generally to comparable properties in the same vicinity and zone (Special circumstances or exceptional 19 6► characteristics as it relates to this development would be that the location of the project is such that a deviation from normal standards would not adversely affect the industrial property which is located easterly and southerly of this proposed project. Another special circumstance is that a portion of the people residing in the hotel or attending a conference would also be using the restaurant. Therefore, it would not be necessary to provide as many parking spaces as required by the current Ordinance requirements); 2. That granting the requested variance will not confer a special privilege inconsistent with the limitations upon other properties in the same vicinity and zone; and 3. That strict application of the zoning regulations as they apply to the subject property will result in practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships inconsistent with the general purpose of such regulations; 4. That the granting of such variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare, nor to the use, enjoyment or valuation of neighboring properties. 20 PAUL W. LAWRASON JR. Mayor BERNARDO M. PEREZ Mayor Pro Tem SCOTT MONTGOMERY Councilmember JOHN E. WOZNIAK Councilmember LILLIAN KELLERMAN City Clerk I. MOORPARK CITY OF MOORPARK COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 799 MOORPARK AVENUE MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA 93021 MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION PROJECT DESCRIPTION: STEVEN KUENY City Manager CHERYL J.KANE City Attorney PATRICK RICHARDS, A.I.C.P. Director of Community Development JOHN F. KNIPE City Engineer JOHN V. GILLESPIE Chief of Police RICHARD T. HARE City Treasurer 1. Entitlement: 1. Land Division Moorpark LDM -90 -4 2. Industrial Planned Development No. IPD -90 -1 3. Conditional Use Permit No. CUP - 90-1 4. Variance No. 90 -2 2. Applicant: Martin V. Smith and Associates 3. Proposal: A. Land division to subdivide an existing 7.52 acre parcel into two parcels of 2.88 and 4.64 acres. B. Industrial Planned Development Permit and Conditional Use Permit to construct a 135 room hotel and free - standing 5,100 square foot restaurant. C. Variance to permit tower to encroach a maximum of 4 -feet into the rear yard setback, permit decorative hardscape paved delivery access to be placed in the rear yard setback area, and permit parking requirements for hotel and restaurant to be reduced. 4. Location and Parcel Number: The proposed development is located at the northeast corner of Flinn Avenue, east of Spring Road and south of the Southern Pacific Railroad. 5. Responsible Agencies: None EXHIBIT 2 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 (805) 529 -6864 63 II. STATEMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS: An initial study was conducted by the Community Development Department to evaluate the potential effects of this project upon the environment. Based upon the findings contained in the attached initial study it has been determined that this project could have a significant effect on the environment. These potentially significant impacts can be satisfactorily mitigated through adoption of the identified measures as conditions of approval (see attachment). III. PUBLIC REVIEW: 1. Leaal notice method: owners within 1,000 feet. 2. Document Posting Period: 4, 1991 Prepared by: Paul Porter, Senior Planner Date: January 30, 1991 Attachment: Mitigation Measures MND Direct mailing to property February 4, 1991 to March PAUL W. LAWRASON JR. Mayor BERNARDO M.PEREZ Mayor Pro Tern SCOTT MONTGOMERY Councilmember JOHN E. WOZNIAK Councilmember LILLIAN KELLERMAN City Clerk MOORPARK CITY OF MOORPARK DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT INITIAL STUDY Entitlement: 1. Land Division Moorpark LDM -90 -4 (0q- STEVEN KUENY City Manager CHERYL J.KANE City Attorney PATRICK RICHARDS, A.I.C.P. Director of Community Development JOHN F. KNIPE City Engineer JOHN V. GILLESPIE Chief of Police RICHARD T. HARE City Treasurer 2. Industrial Planned Development No. IPD -90 -1 3. Conditional Use Permit No. CUP -90 -1 4. Variance No. 90 -2 Date of Initial Study: January 30, 1991 Name of Applicant: Martin V. Smith and Associates Location of Project: The proposed development is located at the northeast corner of Flinn Avenue, east of Spring Road and south of the Southern Pacific Railroad. Assessor's Parcel No(s).: General Plan Land Use Designation: Proposed General Plan Land Use Designation: Present Land Use: Existing Zoning: Proposed Zoning: 512 -0 -171 parcels 20 and 21. I -1 (Light Industrial) N/A Undeveloped property M -1 Industrial Park N/A 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 (805) 529 -6864 (p5 Agency Staff Contact: City of Moorpark Paul Porter, Senior Planner 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021 (805) 529 -6864 I. PROJECT LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION: Location: The proposed development is located at the northeast corner of Flinn Avenue, east of Spring Road and south of the Southern Pacific Railroad. Project: A. Land Division to subdivide an existing 7.52 acre parcel into two parcels of 2.88 and 4.64 acres. B. Industrial Planned Development Permit and Conditional Use Permit to construct a 135 room hotel and a free - standing 5,100 square foot restaurant. C. Variance to permit tower to encroach a maximum of 4 -feet into the rear yard setback, permit decorative hardscape paved delivery access to be placed in the rear yard setback area, and permit parking requirements for hotel and restaurant to be reduced. Site Description: 1. The existing site is flat and consists of sandy soil having been deposited as alluvium in the Arroyo Simi. The parcel has been rough graded and is presently undeveloped. 2. Surrounding Land Uses: North: Southern Pacific Railroad South: Industrial Park buildings which occupied by General Optics and Roror Surgical Corporation. East: Industrial Park buildings occupied by Pacific Bell and Rendex Corporation and a vacant undeveloped parcel of land located along the northeast boundary of this property. West: Spring Road (Single fanily residential properties are located alona the east side of Spring Road, 3 II. IS THE PROPOSED PROJECT CONSISTENT WITH: Yes No N/A Moorpark General Plan X Applicable Specific Plan: g Moorpark Zoning Ordinance g (Note: See Variance Application) III. ARE ANY OF THE FOLLOWING STUDIES REQUIRED: X Noise Study Tree Study X Archaeological Report Biology Report R Geotechnical Report X Soil borings and assessment for liquefaction potential X Traffic Study Other (identify below) IV. INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST AND RESPONSES: A. Earth 1. Does the parcel contain slopes of 20% or greater which will be affected by project construction? Yes Maybe No N/A R The proposed site is located on flat land. 2. Is any significant modification of major landforms proposed? (40q 0 Yes Maybe No N/A X No land forms will be modified by the development od the proposed hotel and restaurant. 3. Will the project result in the exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mudslides, ground failure, or similar hazards? Yes Maybe No N/A X In accordance with a Geotechnical Feasibility Engineering Report prepared by Buena Engineers, Inc. and dated April, 1990, the site should be suitable for the propose development from a Geotechnical Engineering standpoint. It was indicated in the report that adverse geotechnical engineering conditions which would prohibit the development of this site would not expect to be encountered. 4. Does the site include any unique geological features or paleontological resources of significance? Yes Maybe No N/A X The above referenced engineering report did not indicate the presence of any geological features. No paleontological resources of significance are known to exist on the site. 5. Will the project result in a significant increase in wind or water erosion or siltation either off- or on -site .beyond the construction phase of the project? Yes Maybe No N/A X Building Code requirements relating to grading would minimize the potential erosional hazards. Some compaction would result from the grading for the proposed project. B. 6. Will the project result in changes in siltation, deposition, or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream? Yes Maybe No N/A The City Engineer will be requiring the applicant to submit to the City for review and approval, drainage plans, hydrologic and hydraulic calculations prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer. The plans will be reviewed by the City and appropriate provisions made so as to ensure that the project will not result in changes to siltation, deposition, or erosion which may modify the channel of any river or stream. Air 1. Will the project result in a significant adverse air quality impact (based on the estimated date of project completion), as identified in the Ventura County Air Pollution Control District's Guidelines for the Preparation of Air Quality Impact Analyses? Yes Maybe No N/A X The hotel and restaurant is expected to produce approximately 27.6 pounds of NOx per day which is significant because it is over 25 pounds per day which is the significance threshold pursuant to the County's guidelines. The Department of Community Development had conditioned the project to contribute $8,430.47 to a Transpotation System Management Fund (TSM) as a mitigation measure to fully mitigate this impact. The funds shall used to fund TSM programs or clean -fuel programs as determined by the City. 2. Will the project result in a significant cumulative adverse air quality impact based on inconsistency with the Ventura County Air Quality Management Plan? See above. Yes Maybe No N/A X (Oq 6 3. Will the project result in the creation of objectionable odors? Yes Maybe No N/A X Typically, hotels and restaurants do not emit objectionable odors. 4. Will the project result in the exposure of sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? Yes Maybe No N/A X As previously stated, this proposed project is not expected to produce significant concentrations of pollutants. C. Water 1. Does the project involve a major natural drainage course or flood control channel? Yes Maybe No N/A X This project is not located on or adjacent to a major drainage course or a flood control channel. 2. Will the project result in changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff? Yes Maybe No N/A (See attached Mitigation) X The City Engineer will be reviewing submitted drainage plans and will require that drainage to adjacent parcels not be increased or concentrated by this proposed development. All drainage measures necessary to mitigate any storm water flows will be provided by the applicant to the City Engineer. 70 7 3. Is the project within a 100 -year flood hazard area as identified on the Federal Emergency Management Agency Flood Insurance Rate Map for the City of Moorpark? Yes Maybe No N/A X According to the FIRM Flood Insurance rate Map, this proposed project is in Zone B (Areas between limits of 100 -year flood and 500 -year flood; or certain areas subject to 100 -year flooding with average depths of less than one (1) foot or where the contributing drainage area is less than one square mile; or areas protected by levees from the base flood. This area is protected from the one percent annual chance (100 year flood) by levee, dike or other structures subject to possible failure or overtopping during larger floods. Also, the City Engineer requires that all building pads be adequately protected from a 100 -year frequency storm and that feasible access be provided during a ten -year storm. 4. Will the project result in alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? Yes Maybe No N/A X The City Engineer requires that all catch basins in sump locations shall carry a 50 -year frequency storm, that all catch basins on continuous grade shall carry a 10 -year storm and all culverts carry a 100 -year storm. 5. Will the project .result in a change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? Yes Maybe No N/A X See above 6. Will the project result in degradation of ground or surface water quality? Yes Maybe No N/A X Q q1 to The project as conditioned by the City Engineer is not expected to result in any additional ground or surface water degradation. 7. Will the project change the amount of surface water in any water body? Yes Maybe No N/A X The project may increase the amount of surface water to an insignificant level; however, the City Engineer requires the project to accommodate any potential increases in surface water that may increase water in any water body accepting water runoff. The development of the hotel and restaurant would increase the rate and amount of surface runoff, lower the infiltration rate and may change the drainage patterns as a result of an increase in impervious surfaces. The use of catch basins, concrete cross - gutters, and surface streets would reduce potential impacts to a level of insignificance. Also, the applicant will be required to submit a drainage plan to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to the issuance of a Zoning Clearance. 8. Will the project result in substantial reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? Yes Maybe No N/A X The Waterworks District No. 1 has indicated through the issuance of a Sanitation Availability Letter that there is available water available for this proposed project. Plant Life 1. Will the project result in a substantial change in the diversity or number of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants)? Yes Maybe No N/A X The project has been rough graded. Therefore, there will be no substantial change in the diversity or the number of any species of plants on the site. '74oZ fog J 2. Are any unique, rare, or endangered species of plants present on the project site? (See State and Federal listings and California Native Plant Society, Inventory of Rare and Endangered Vascular Plants.) Yes Maybe No N/A X See above 3. Will the project result in the introduction of invasive species of plants into the area? Yes Maybe No N/A X The development of this parcel will introduce plants to the area that are compatible with those in the surrounding community. The plants introduced to the site will be approved by a landscape architect. 4. Will the proposal result in the reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? Yes Maybe No N/A X The proposed parcel of land has a General Plan designation and zoning for uses that are not intended for crop production. The surrounding uses of land are developed with uses that will be compatible with this development. E. Animal Life 1. Will the project result in a reduction in the diversity or numbers of any species of animals (birds; land animals, including reptiles; fish and shellfish, benthic organisms; or insects)? Yes Maybe No N/A X See above 7,3 am 10 2. Will the project restrict the range of or otherwise affect any rare or endangered animal species? Yes Maybe No N/A X See above 3. Will the project result in a deterioration of any significant wildlife habitat? Yes Maybe No N/A X The proposed project would not change the diversity and number of animal species or affect the wild life habitat because no rare or endangered species have been known to exist on the site. F. Noise 1. Will the project result in increases to existing noise levels? Yes Maybe No N/A X The project will not result in increases to existing noise in the existing areas. However, noise from Spring Road and the Southern Pacific Railroad will affect this project as follows: Pursuant to a noise study prepared by Walker, Celano and Associates dated April 18, 1990 the railroad exposure to the outside of this project would be below CNEL 62 due to the distance to the tracks and any shielding provided by the future development located to the north between the railroad and this project. Similarly, the exposure due to the future traffic on Spring Road would be below CNEL 62 due to the shielding by the hotel structure. Therefore, the composite outdoor exposure in the recreational area would be CNEL 65 or below, and no additional noise mitigation measures would be necessary. *74 00 11 The maximum exterior noise exposure would occur along the westerly face of the northerly wing of the hotel and would be approximately CNEL 71 due to the combination of the railroad and the future traffic on Spring Road. The noise exposure on the northerly elevation would range from a maximum of approximately CNEL 70 at the westerly end closest to Spring Road to approximately CNEL 65 at the easterly end. The combined noise exposure at the easterly elevation would be below CNEL 62 due to the distance from the tracks and the shielding of Spring Road by the mass of the building. The noise exposure on the southerly wing would be between CNEL 65 and CNEL 70 depending on the distance from the street. Since the outdoor noise exposure is higher than CNEL 55, the required exterior to interior noise reduction to meet CNEL 45 inside is greater than 10dB, which is the maximum NR normally achievable with open windows. Therefore, the windows will have to be kept closed at least part of the time in order to satisfy the CNEL 45 indoor noise criteria and alternative ventilation may be necessary, per the State and City Codes, to provide an acceptable indoor environment should the occupants elect to keep the windows closed to exclude the noise. Normally, air conditioning or the incorporation of a "summer switch" on the heating only system is adequate to meet the ventilation requirement, provided that the system provides a minimum of 2 air changes per hour with 20 percent outside air. In addition to the above information, all uses and activities are conditioned requiring that all roof mounted mechanical equipment and other noise generation sources on -site shall be noise attenuated to 55 dBA at the property line, or to the ambient noise level at the property line measured at the time of the occupancy request. Prior to the issuance of a Zoning Clearance for initial occupancy or any subsequent occupancy, the Director of Community Development may request that a noise study or a certificate. from a licensed acoustical engineer be submitted for review and approval which demonstrates that all on -site noise generation sources would be mitigated to the required level. 2. Will the project result in the exposure of people to conditionally acceptable or unacceptable noise levels based on Figure 3 in the City's Noise Element? Yes Maybe No N/A X See above. 12 G. Light and Glare 1. Will the project result in new light or glare? Yes Maybe No N/A X A standard condition of approval for commercial and industrial developments requires the applicant to submit to the City a lighting Plan which will be reviewed by the Department of Community Development. The lighting Plan achieve the following objective: Avoid interferences with reasonable use of adjoining properties, minimize on -site glare, provide adequate on -site lighting, limit electroliers height to avoid excessive illumination, and provide structures which are compatible with the total design of the proposed development. H. Land Use 1. Will the proposal result in a substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? Yes Maybe No N/A At the present time the proposed property is general plan designation and zoning which allows for industrial uses. The City has determined that the proposed hotel.and restaurant use in this area would be compatible with the surrounding industrial uses with the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. 2. Are adjoining or planned land uses incompatible with the proposed project, so that a substantial or potentially substantial interface problem would be created? Yes Maybe No N/A X See above 3. Could the project serve to encourage the development of presently undeveloped areas or result in increases in the development intensity of existing developed areas (examples include the introduction of new or expanded public utilities, and new industrial, commercial, or I. recreational facilities)? Yes Maybe No X 7(0 to 13 N/A No land use impacts are expected to result from the proposal. The proposed project will be an infill project in a largely already developed area of the City. All public services and utilities are currently in place. Waterwork's District No, 1 states that there is an existing 8" water line in Moorpark Road, Flinn Avenue and a 6" water line in Minor Street. Also, the District has a 21" sewer line in Moorpark Road and Flinn Avenue. The applicant will be required by the Water District to install all off -site water system facilities required by the District as necessary to provide water service and fire protection to the subject property that will meet the District's standards. The applicant will also be required to pay all applicable fees prior to receiving said service.. Any requirements by the Ventura County Fire Protection District will also be the responsibility of the applicant. The applicant will also be required to install all off -site and on -site improvements that will meet the District's standards and will be required to comply with the Ventura County Waterworks District No. 1 "Rules and Regulations." Natural Resources 1. Will the project result in substantial depletion of any nonrenewable resource? Yes Maybe No N/A X There are no known natural resources located on the proposed site. 2. Will the project result in land to nonagricultural agricultural productivity the conversion of agricultural use or impairment of the of agricultural land? Yes Maybe No N/A X As previously stated this parcel of land is not general planned or zoned for agricultural uses. In addition, the property has been rough graded and has not been recently used for agricultural purposes. 7$ 14 J. Risk of Upset and Human Health 1. Will the project involve or be subject to a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radioactive materials) in the event of an accident or upset condition? Yes Maybe No N/A X The proposed project does not produce products that will potentially create an explosion or the release od hazardous substances in the event od an accident or upset condition. 2. Is the project within or adjacent to a high fire hazard area as defined by the Ventura County Fire Protection District? Yes Maybe No N/A X 3. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard and /or the exposure of people to potential health hazards? Yes Maybe No N/A X A significant potential that hazardous materials would be generated and /or stored on -site does not exist because this proposed site will be used for a hotel and restaurant which does'not normally utilize hazardous materials. R. Population 1. Will the project alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? Yes Maybe No N/A X See above ?I 00� 15 L. Housing 1. Will the proposal require the removal of any housing unit(s)? Yes Maybe No N/A X There are no residential housing units located on the site and the land is not planned for residential uses. 2. Will the proposal reduce currently available low and very -low income housing through changes in use or demolition? Yes Maybe No N/A See above 3. Will the proposal require the displacement of people from the project site? Yes Maybe No N/A X See above. Items R - L: The proposed project is not expected to significantly alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population in the City. Nor would the proposed development result in the removal of housing units. As previously stated this parcel is currently vacant. It should be mentioned that the northerly most parcel of the parcel map application has a proposal for a General Plan amendment and accompanying applications for residential apartment units. If these applications are approved by the City, the number of affordable housing units within the City will be increased. M. Transportation /Circulation 1. Will the proposal result in the generation of substantial i 16 additional vehicular movement? (Identify estimated a.m. and p.m. peak hour trips and average daily vehicle trips generated by the project.) Yes Maybe No N/A X On a project level, the amount of traffic generated.by this project is insignificant. At a cumulative level, without mitigation, the project could add to the cumulative traffic at some of the neighboring intersections within the project area. Mitigation measures will be provided by the City Engineer to mitigate these potential impacts. These mitigation measures will be made a part of the Mitigation Measures attached to the Mitigated Negative Declaration for this project. 2. Will the proposal result in a substantial impact to the existing or planned transportation systems? Yes Maybe No N/A (see attached Ritigation measures) __x According to a Traffic Study prepared by Thomas Montgomery and Associates, the conclusion of the study is that the additional traffic generated by the project would not have any significant adverse effect on the operation of the street system serving the study site at total future traffic demand levels. 3. Will the proposal result in an increased demand for off - site parking? Yes Maybe No N/A X At the present time the proposed project does not meet the minimum parking requirements for a restaurant and a hotel if considered as separate projects. As a result, the applicant has requested approval of a variance on the basis that other cities allow for reduced parking on the basis of a joint use. The City Council will need to address this issue at a future public hearing. Therefore, at this time a decision has not been made as to whether this proposed project with the existing site plan showing reduced parking will actually have an impact on off - street.parking. 81 OV 17 4. Will the proposal result in an increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists, or pedestrians? Yes Maybe No N/A X The proposed project pursuant to the Traffic Study that was prepared for this project is not anticipated to ,generate adverse impacts on the adjoining streets. The City Engineer a has conditioned this project so s to reduce any potential traffic problems to a level of insignificance. N. Public Services Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services such as police and fire protection, schools, parks or recreational facilities, or other governmental services? Yes Maybe No N/A X The proposed project as conditioned will be provided with adequate fire protection and police services. Fees related to fire and police protection"as well as any school fees would have to be paid by the applicant prior to issuance of a Building Permit. The project is also not expected to adversely impact the City's park and recreational facilities. The City typically imposes a park and recreational fee of $.25 per square foot of gross floor area to support the City's current and future park system. O. Energy Will the proposal result in the use of excessive amounts of fuel or energy? Yes Maybe No N/A X The project is not expected to use significant amounts of fuel or energy, and would not substantially increase demand upon existing sources of energy or require the development of new sources of energy. P. Utilities Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to utilities, including power or 910Z 18 natural gas, communications systems, water, sewer, storm water drainage, solid waste disposal, and street lighting annexation and /or improvements? Yes Maybe No N/A X The proposed development may result in the need for new connections to existing electrical, natural gas, telephone, water, sewer, and storm water drainage facilities, but would not create excessive demands on the existing systems. Solid waste collection would be contracted out to a private collection service. Q. Aesthetics 1. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? Yes Maybe No N/A X The project consisting of the hotel and restaurant will architecturally enhance the existing site as well as the neighboring properties. 2. Will the project result in the loss, covering, or modification of any unique geologic or physical features such as a natural canyon, rock outcrop, ridgeline, or hillside with a slope in excess of 25 percent? Yes Maybe No N/A X There are no known unique geologic or physical features located on the property. 3. Will the project result in the loss of a distinctive landmark tree or stand of mature trees? Yes Maybe No N/A X There are no distinctive landmark trees located on the property. R. S. �3 19 Archaeological /Historical 1. Is there a potential that the proposal will result in the alteration or destruction of an archaeological or historical site? Yes Maybe No N/A X 2. Will the proposal result in adverse physical or aesthetic effects to an archaeological site or historic building, structure, or object? Yes Maybe No N/A X A Phase 1 Archaeological Survey dated February 19, 1990 was prepared by W and S Consultants for the subject property. The study was initiated with a archival record search undertaken at the UCLA Archaeological Information Center. The archival record search revealed that the subject property had never been systematically surveyed in its entirety and that there were no known cultural resources within its bounds. However, six prehistoric archaeological sites were known to exist within one mile of the property. An on -foot systematic survey of the property was conducted subsequently. This failed to reveal the presence of any cultural resources, historical or prehistoric, within the parcel. Mandatory Findings ofSicmificance 1. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self - sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? Yes Maybe No N/A X 9q OWN 20 2. Does the project have the potential to achieve short -term, to the disadvantage of long -term, environmental goals? (A short - term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long -term impacts will endure well into the future.) Yes Maybe No N/A X 3. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant. The term "cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of an individual project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.) Yes Maybe No N/A X 4. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Yes Maybe No N/A R V. REFERENCES: The references used in responding to this questionnaire include the following: 1. EIR for Ventura County General Plan - -Land Use Element for the Moorpark Area (1980). 2. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Flood Insurance Rate Map, Community Panel Number 060712 0005 A, September 29, 1986. �S 21 3. General Plan of the City of Moorpark. 4. Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation, 1987. 5. U.S.G.S. Topographic Quadrangle Maps for Moorpark. 6. Ventura County Air Pollution Control District, Guidelines for the Preparation of Air Ouality Impact Analyses, 1989. 7. Ventura County Air Pollution Control District, Ventura County Air Quality Management Plan, 1988. 8. Zoning Ordinance of the City of Moorpark. VI. DETERMINATION: On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. X I find that although the proposed project COULD have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures, described on an attached page, could be applied to the project. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION should be prepared. I find the proposed project MAY have a.significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ADDENDUM to an existing certified ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. _January 31, 1991 ow� P;k� Date Paul Porter, Senior Planner January 31, 1991 Date atrick J. i ards, Director of 1commur4ty Development MITIGATION MEASURES AND REPORTING AND MONITORING PROGRAM Item C. 2. 1. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the City Engineer will be requiring the applicant to submit to the City for review and approval, storm drain plans for the Spring Road drain (from the project to the existing reinforced concrete box on the southwest corner of the intersection of Los Angeles Avenue - Spring Road) prepared by a registered civil engineer; shall enter into an agreement with the City to complete the improvements; and shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing the construction of the improvements. Any necessary right -of- way required to complete this improvement will be required by the applicant at their expense. The applicant shall be eligible for reimbursement for the necessary oversizing of the Spring Road drain from the adjacent properties that have not yet been developed. Reporting and Monitorina Prior to the final recordation of the Land Division Map for this project, the Department of Community Development will be requiring written evidence from the City Engineer that this Condition of Approval has been satisfied. Item M -3 2. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall be making a special contribution to the City representing the applicant's prorata share of the cost of improvements to the intersection of Spring Road -New Los Angeles Avenue. To determine the costs of these improvements as identified in the project traffic study, the applicant shall first prepare conceptual plans to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The prorata share shall be approved by the City Council prior to final map approval. Reporting and Monitoring Prior to recordation of the Land Division Map, the City Engineer will require that this Condition of Approval is satisfied and will provide written evidence to the Department of Community Development. 3. The applicant shall submit to the City and Caltrans for review and approval, TRAFFIC SIGNAL and street improvement plans, plans for the intersection of Spring Road -Flinn Avenue and Spring Road /Second Street, prepared by a registered civil engineer; shall enter into an agreement with the City to ,?I complete the improvements; and shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing completion of the traffic signal and traffic improvements. The street improvements will be those necessary to complement installation of the traffic signal, including restriction of left turns into /out of Second Street. A traffic signal warrant study shall be conducted between three and six months after occupancy certification is granted for either the hotel or restaurant. If the traffic signal is warranted and construction is allowed by Caltrans, the applicant shall immediately construct the improvements. If the traffic signal is not warranted, additional traffic signal warrant studies shall be conducted on a semi - annual basis unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. If construction of the improvements is not warranted or Caltrans will not allow its construction prior to project acceptance,the applicant shall deposit 125% of the construction cost with the City. The required bond for the improvements can be exonerated if the cash deposit is provided to the City. The construction cost shall include associated engineering, construction inspection and administration costs. This cash deposit does not relieve the applicant from constructing the improvements. The applicant shall construct the improvements within 90 days from receiving Caltrans permission to do so. Reporting and Monitorin Prior to granting any permit occupancy of the hotel, the Engineer will determine that the provisions of this Condition of Approval have been satisfied and provide written evidence to the Department of Community Development. 4. The applicant shall deposit with the City of Moorpark $8,430.47 to a Transportation System Management Fund (TSM) as a mitigation measure to fully mitigate the significant impact to fund TSM programs or clean -fuel programs as determined by the City. Reporting and Monitorincx Prior to the issuance of a Zoning Clearance from the Department of Community Development, the case planner shall determine that this condition has been satisfied by providing written evidence of such. I} 1 DATE ij f I ! + . IIIIIt' j if4 '�I � i�• , 1 11L�, -� ++ ..:�F��:.� j.. T0:.•. + ,�,, • 1.,,x.1.. tlII ,.f l: I►AAn' MEMORANDUM TES I r ! i l ;rfl l , f ,I 1 I 1N u , Y:. IIS t Irj1, , 7 fifi jir E'u, ?t +I f(�t. �hj December 21;. ] 990 i q , rt ,ti ,yt r {�, 7 t {.t�i! fi�'H lMP�j! �tlri i. q�111 .flHM.i„t n 511114N- tacned` for ydur',reviewYarid "`comment" s a`cop., mpac ;4s'tUdy;;;fo�r; this proposed,develppment`ar If you his, repowt, ° ?or t�equire''any ftlrthe input „at;this .t st; 1. �a I U',I ' I r I 1, ,., , a s _ r :r q u to F' et�u at f "tl, ",.�I' "i:Ii I II r .u,. +r ad 'aP; r• •jr i` Ilat lu , i ° r n , . } 11 1 C I try 1' {. Ca i I(I I, jjll I I !i I n jj t 4. ,I I 1� .'CkBIL , f ri N41 I': + t td. 1 r I -4i f >f Il '!i 1 (! i • I 1 r l+ : N,.� � � Ij •; �lj ti t. �. 1. •1. J'' � k ie_,; si � r"�„ { �.,b; 1 { ,,i•! :{1 ! f � i ". (�a ! -. c'' r � . r.1ii - 'I „Il�tr,. i.'lf@ t,t ! i ��i,; C I +��I I..I f+ I' P , + I7 f r i. 11? I I: 1 11 IL: .l�l till It I I i I 1 + 1 1 I 1 I I i ktJJ I' III Proiect No. 900510 I I - +; I ,�,+(, '•1 G I + j ,III `� 11, I( {' 11 i { ,�; l llr �' 2151 Alessandro Drive, Suite 210, Ventura, California 93001 • (805) 652 -0411 FAX: (805) 652 -0545 + , h ST O ,I ' December 21, 1990 IATES Mr. Walter E. Calhoun MARTIN V. SMITH AND ASSOCIATES 300 Esplanade Drive, Suite 2100 Oxnard, California 93030 j RE: Moorpark Country Inn /Apartments.Traffic Impact Study Draft jl`';ylt ... i 47 �; ,..:.. .:,!.; , ,t ,:_1.1 ' '1, 'I� I { ' -I FY. l+ if, .7f, 111 : :','y'�t IP 1�:�( 1 i !•::p ' f �': {f � , (..r� r i.), u�+ w 4 +.1! , , �,I;� M C I1;. lI � 1 f.:y riit 1' c... i ' M'':::. �. ,,1 1 I t ..li ,:::: :,.:1 S 4 �i : ?. 1NIL+. {,''jl' I! •"�''11{� a r- ��,... ��.,.Sp..;t l.•,eF.� t, �.• � Is ,.ti. � �.: n�C,., -fiar, ut }31 6.i, r! ,f,� txl { o ).: P i' _sal; �iij� "', r r •.177. .zs!l' �: l .,�i.,. �'. it l't:l,.,'t,g �+ ._ ' , ,N, h•�.. , {f? ,i {�'tir. 14� 4ukIN{ N n, � I l.w IN. �. �lA,y,t,+ . t J F., ", , tf , ; !!t ' Is "nlrtl I '.1,• t` - 1, e:.l I t i _ li'' , i„ , �il9Nbn.N • ! I.f Dearl,Mr' Cal houn., +,;M r ! - Jfi ✓ IF •...tl t 1 Fi �t J .; 1 t I t { . ii. r`l:' i a, .{ I .�:..t: t,fl 1, ,I• 1 �' I4 t it, a i i ,raw 14:..1', fA '!.', 1 Fq 1, e '•:E i ..,. i j[ II yy���� n+l,Mnt,,.,µ'., ((,P4. t , {%� R f. ,, I� ttRlyy��f- 4....; 1, �, IY.h+e [ ,�..f i ! fj m .f -. � ;•;. �,,1,. C f �r {1 at .Et ' t1! i hf t.. -� i t f -, 1 *st }irI 'F z . Ii4• •i � .:1:'I ! I i i :4) : { !_�.. i y� r•- 'il i flt �' �l�l l t f .j {: 4 �.'P :.:i� 1 t V I Y 1�- I.Y: ' 'z� " - :: } 1 a �t iif'r.,, � � . l�,w,: t r � 1 t »� �I, c II I . '' "" I:" h n �lal ar.e i r•,!wl 11 f�i!, F7 };.,:. :. t t *t� k yl� :4t Ill { k As authors zed, we have) conducted a study Ito determine the potenti a1 traff "�" impacts associated with, the {additional r,traffi �, d., �, �pv c that woul 4be generated by .the I *VIII} t I.' �" i� i.� I 1 1t111f ^!MIS �t �(.vY }Hj It t ':dl: 4 ''- 1111"'1 t osed I r 1 I jproQ mixed use development , to` be located °'i n the `Ciy "'of Modr' ark the '^ ( U I II t .iNi I tl. =N r b 1, ' 1 t u.1 .,k:,1i} k. f'} t Ira, i '. I P .i't':Parcel';`of land bordered b` 4 Fliinn'AVenue on�.t e ` }„1 I,iI„ � r.,,. „1, i fi Y, .1 1 h south, Spring Road on the Wgst, �1 Minor Street on the the Southern Pacif east, and ic Railroad (SPRR) {tracks on the u1 +`a, _} 6'.I f�;4�Mt M � I'' .N'1'i '' _; ,_. "� ,.i.(i:' , •,� 'Ii t ,t.:(. ;., F;II kI � E :: -• � 1l)INtcs north. .:This report contains the `finds „ngs and conclusions of our analysis withl, I °'•1 I ,.: „i' I ,1 y� i f '' }a hr supportive data. a concTuded� that the additional generated traffic by 'this mixed -use develo ment necessary supp In general we have _ rlt IN {, P would not have�any significant 1! adverse effect on the operation of the. street system serving the study site at':: total future traffic demand levels. 1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed mixed -use development would be located on a vacant parcel of land bordered by Flinn Avenue on the south, Spring Road on the west, Minor Street on the east, and the SPRR tracks on the north, in the eastern portion of the City 2151 Alessandro Drive, Suite 210, Ventura, California 93001 (805) 652 -0411 FAX: (805) 652 -0545 of Moorpark (see Figure 1, "Vicinity Map "). This development would contain a 127 -room hotel, a 511007square -foot quality restaurant, and 60 apartments. It is assumed.that access' 'to the hotel and restaurant would be provided via one 4 driveway, on Spring Road restricted to right turns only, in and out,' p.. I approximately 340 feet north of the centerline of Flinn Avenue; and one two- way driveway on Flinn Avenue located approximately 300 feet east of the centerline of Spring Road. Further discussion of site access and circulation ...is provided later in the report. Two hundred and thirty (230) parking spaces !Y , would be provided ,for hotel . and restaurant uses. Access; to the 60 apartments 4 PT irr ;would be provided via one two -way driveway on Minor Street, with 150 parking I spaces provided on -site. For study purposes,.t was assumed that this mixed use develo ment could be constructed and fully operational by 1995, the selected ,,yam stuff ✓.: des � i n y F....t"..' .. . .'✓ ...�3ru!. .6htl 2Air. {�IUJ �ilil l�.• 4r�.. (:4.g1��91.'�`r n�17r..« bi ,... ..,,'•I, {d. t2..h{ ':. nti + {i -p�` .i..i. u, +ru:..., r Gee lr':li.{ d,.- .,•.a.. ... , -i,�� ,-irT , rH . lney ;,scope,, ot woKtorthis{ traffic `impact ;study was!;:ob'ta'ned .from Hari''yf`h r.{!' d,jti!'YI�i'i�yp'fl {' '%` ',.;, i 5t'� {.;, i ,ik „:+ I t�;:t"1� i r, IiFt�l r3 ,:sr” fE -as• t , f WILLDAN SSOC ATES. „' �t of Moor 's'',;Traff c I. n i r. V. titwa {: �1 C �1 � @Nay +�.,�t`g�r.:ih� the {; !, r Ptark { ,t , E 9 neer`z Its Iltu'D '14, 1( determined- that'this,trafficimp y ,inclutle „� act stud should ai1dd 6 Val uafftfi f ,{p Yr J q fJUl it I +.- I �J e tP 1 of 16AA'ing,. � exi$t ng plus site traffic and '`'total futulre wi h. and with u # v i r L 1' R ��! ��rM��1i {Iti��i,�t �s .{ „t1 !i { site traffic conditions at 'seven ;intersections 'in tthe „v�c nit of the study i n,• �, " a xl ,,, f , !I P, , L,ii't 1 II i i ru+ I + } j ,site: Science Drive /New Los Angeles Avenue, Spring Road�Hig ; Street Los Angeles ` h s 1x rl: i,l?d r :::` , I ”{ ' :;' j' i • ,;: ;.i'1i`;'I �I Avenue,:, Spri.ng Road /Second Street Road /Fl inn � Avenue, Sprin .Road Los !�ti � ;, g " f;l} i4r IF' FN h'< Angeles Avenue,` Los Angeles Avenue /Moorpark Avenue, `land 4 nue —New Los Los An eles „ nge es Ave , g Avenue /Gabbert:Boad— Tierra Rejada Road ;,New peak 'period (6.30 AM !.� s{ to 8:30 AM 'and 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM) manual turning movement traffic volume counts � .I ;�r were made by our personnel ' at three of :the 1 locations ons i n early June 1990. Traff i c ar'I� , volume counts-at the remaining intersections, including 24 -hour machine countsyZ #_'yr,,;. Ifr were made by KAKU ASSOCIATES in early May 1990. Field investigations were made to ascertain the physical and traffic operational characteristics of the study area street system. Information' concerning related planned developments in the p Cit y of Moorpark was obtained from the latest development listing for_the City L. Project No.' 900510 2 TAM1 • R 2, " .__.. -. _.. __ rj - , (D ; r ii ai ,ci 1l� n , , ...1.. it ;/ ;f ;Cs� } , , i--- - - - - -- .+ �- t wL- - I ; ! ♦ _ v; �, { r ._,tea ar , '� ` 1 -- - -- - - - +- a+ r .♦ ♦ 1.MOORPARK� _ _— r— -` 'y �►: `,,,� :'j yr I 1 00 wo - - !== ' ---� - --- - -: - - - - - -- ------------ - - w OF " ,_,•_. � ,: _.� -I ,-,,mss ..� _ _ s I �. jar ` w. -�' 1 tr 19 tit U 0 R ,ff� :� ,,', �• •,��..1]i� �;, �r�s , r�•. ; NCRES Study site VICINITY MA P PROJECT NO. 900510 ` THOMAS S. MONTGOMERY AND ASSOCIATES DRAWINGS \900510 -1.dwg - Transportation do Traffic Engineers 09/25/90 11:56 N 2151 Alessandro Drive, Suite 210, Ventura, California 93001 NO SCALE (805) 652 -0411 FAX: (805) 652 -0545 I , 1 , of Moorpark dated July 2, 1990. All necessary,project description information was obtained from your office and from the preliminary site plans prepared by EBBE VIDERIKSEN ARCHITECT & ASSOCIATES, Sherman Oaks, California. EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS The intersection of Science Drive and New Los Angeles Avenue is currently controlled with a three -phase traffic signal with separate left -turn phasing for' eastbound traffic. The southbound approach at this location is striped,for, a ,. i left tur nd a ri ht, -turn only lane; eastbound „ turn urn-on left-turn-only lane a g y for a left _ y f, lane and two through lanes; and westbound for two through lanes. U,,; w{I" ada; A 11' I t �{ +''; LI. , 1 ftl,ljlj, ldlI , I$ {;t, '+ 1 pl tl I. II ' I j :I + 'I f ''':.fl: L la I, tp �I F.:7.IES x 'i:�r• o�Ml i,iln j4:�T I ., �: 1'i;J ' +. ,fie intersection of.Spring Road and High_ Street Los Angeles' Avenue Is, .'now A I!"! :.i. 1!� r' r cont,olled with [an ''actuated :traffic`: signal'.; with` split Phasin for east 'and ' - , � ` ' ri g L� ��� I :i+4� ! t 1. westby d ra roach traffic with the northbound approach I�striped for `a left -! ,P, .' oun ' ` ' ' tt`��?1 rn'- hnl ,'� , .• 1, ' hl6fiil {II E! j lanes an optional throe h or ri ht =ter lane t 9 9 n and a right turn only , 14 r, I +. � ', ' " ' 9' a r t t`j 1ane;�Isouthbound for aleft -tyrn only lane and two through lanes; eastbound.fo: y p 4 i '.i i I : k a ',left turr�,on�Yi ;two' throe .h ,l n r, j4.' m� ,. :.,III,�i1,L; f la,l: •,.,t 9 a es, ;and .,;a �'i9ht Itu.rn only lane• �, t I i ,. s R I,li 'au r , L:i t westbound ` i or :a eft turn only I 1 ane; 'an :optional left turn or; throe h l ane ;and xH flPft :. � fll�i tlt :!a ri Itijn if 1 - u:r.f. , lr� rn k-1tt� 4o,k:; ). ni� l�. : Y t y h a'7 . ; �ne"4 .. '.;El1 V}ie � I +U�r 4•; ;: fiF#.SY ; d .1rt. 1 •. 1 L , f r r t r I ! { p 4q � 1. !f', '!:. -:, • ,,.r i l ,-t�,;! . ; '�,q y d t1lltII }Ffl, yl,+L��!'�Iri! }L�c.' . _ I >t 1 '.F{ n�'� .1 �e �1b}1 a�i��,ll i il iII i; : n I i i r,•.,l,l ; .4 11 f +3��.MItt'. ,f l f uqi l } C l: 'f *G � i�,, FI,iy N t, .I. . ; r f� { 1tif . .. ..{ 4 I•.Kt,: � �!' ,f ��I +i I :CI..;�L.t+�`G, n s : Sr - 1,LF S {: {i .✓i I� d -(it I :Y.d`. `1' ! 11', t i f'.. '.I !1� :i 7.: ,,�IUi X11. - �1t1 11., }. :1'! tt. x' lltts F1. rt tl' I I'.; 1 ,11,'..,;';` II!r t I,. �Aa I� 1- I,f. +1 �i mt T I't�.i! it 71i. °'1J9 �,! '''�'' *" �. , u'r' r {n a Ily1 !'i',d,�R , dl •. {s I I .�i,� i ,��}� �f h� ,4,' t i � '' '�.�. I � , The;,'intersection of Second tStreet `and Spring Road �s presently. stop -s`ign 1.w + f �,ffll I ., t % " d !ii,• n , : , .. .,il ,;�:. control 1 ed ,for; ! the .` ith th ' eastbound approach of Second Street, 'we eastbound ,' .. , approach 'serving as one ,through lane and a functional (but unstri ped)' ' right , Y , urn-on lane` and the north and southbound approaches each striped for two �! through lanes, ' wi th� a �painted medi an.'i, r t I I The intersection of Flinn Avenue and Spring, Road .;is now stop -sign, controlled for the westbound approach of Flinn Avenue, 'with the westbound approach striped for one travel lane, and the north and southbound approaches each striped for two through lanes, with a painted median: This intersection . does not-currently meet traffic signal warrants, but will in the;future.:,The traffic signal warrant sheets are contained in the Appendix of the report. Project.No: 900510 4 I TN A ' 1 The intersection of Spring Road and New Los Angeles Avenue is currently controlled with an actuated traffic signal with separate left -turn phasing for each approach and separate right -turn phasing for south and westbound approaches, It with the north, south, and westbound approaches each striped for a left -turn- only lane, two through lanes, and a right- turn -only lane; with eastbound for dual left- turn -only lanes, two through lanes, and a right- turn -only lane. The intersection of Moorpark Avenue and Los Angeles Avenue is controlled with a traffic signal with separate left -turn phasing for east and westbound traffic, plus split- phasing on the north and southbound approaches, with the northbound approach striped for a left- turn -only lane and one through lane, southbound for a left- turn -only lane, an optional left- turn /through /right - turns' -i� lane, ' and a right- turn -only lane; eastbound for cleft- turn -only mane; plus two r , ,through lanes; and westbound for a left-turn-only 1 ane,` "i two through 1 anes, ,',and ,, `` §b a right turn onlyl vane. ++ a t 1;11 4 X4,4" ._.. The intersection of, Los Angeles Avenue and Gabbert Road — Tierra Rejada Road I 9 I F 9 for'' fic si na jr control ,wit westbound' tra h separate left turn hasin east and now has tra aw ffi h r'rthe northbolund p` tripe& fort a left +tu - my c, � lwi t approach s rn o ; 1 ��,Flane, ,one through lane;'and a right turn -only lane, southbound for.,`a left turn'` 0'. :only'.laner' and one, through lane; with the,east and westbound approaches'' striped , 5 '�'; �y` T tK r �'r 1 for a l eft turn only lane, two through lanes, and a right- turn -only lane 4KrEFr }'kk �t 111jN�'.'ftrl tl ')II I " I tI{ F- r f Shown on Figure 2 dare the estimated existing total directional k Y ! r peak hour and daily traffic volumes at, and on the approaches to, y� PP the seven selected stud intersections based on the manual turning movement and 24 -hour machine counts made by KAKU ASSOCIATES and TMA personnel in May and June 1990, respectively. ! . It. In order to estimate the existing operational efficiency of the study area street system, the "Intersection Capacity Utilization" (ICU) and Highway Capacity ! �' .r. Manual (HCM) analysis methodologies were used to determine the existing volume /capacity (V /C) relationships at the seven study area intersections for Project No. 900510 5 Wv. , O O f'f e+ 2 O O 0 to 1� O � t 3 LEGEND 00/00 AM /PM Peak Hour 4� Traffic Volumes 000 Daily Traffic Volumes s wor- Second St,- 1700 Gobbert Rd. -.. _ Spring'Rd i O O Cu `51/69 +- •.'n + r - 233/336 670/824 Los Angeles =4 /8 .� ( 32,000 Ave. 2/402 `N C5 - N r i > g - 11/31 1 1 ` nw ? G in `^ N 20/30 Flinn Ave. 800 o° i- Science Dr. O Cu Z i. N 564/473 .5 I6 N�, �? n 308/468 ^ gs9I 2/34- I lB p� .,423/435 k370/388 .= 129/239 rte O - ; - �°Do m - \ -. 4 rC4 3/17 Z_ \ °n `yS8 /2E w ^ n f 1 l —601/739 119/199 '� n N 610184 /,74 1. 126 122/123 --0 86/144 667/738 — 47/29-,,%, ,1 as m hO00 761/796 13/22 NNr .t n \\ 1 m N m 00 Co nn ^ Tierra Re jada Rd. Moorpark Ave _ Spring'Rd i O O Cu `51/69 +- •.'n + r - 233/336 670/824 Los Angeles =4 /8 .� ( 32,000 Ave. 2/402 `N C5 - N r i > g - 11/31 1 1 ` nw ? G in `^ N 20/30 Flinn Ave. 800 o° i- Science Dr. O Cu Z i. N 564/473 .5 I6 N�, �? n 308/468 ^ gs9I 2/34- I lB p� PROJECT NO.' 900510 a DRAViNGSV005t0 -2.esp 12/14/90 1419 5 NO SCALE THOMAS S. MONTGOMERY AND ASSOCIATES i `, I -: Transportation k Traffic Engineers I t,- 2151_ Alessandro 0r1ve, Suits 210, Ventura, Callforola 93001 (605) 652 -0411 FAX: (805) 852 -0545 .,423/435 k370/388 .= 129/239 rte of of x PROJECT NO.' 900510 a DRAViNGSV005t0 -2.esp 12/14/90 1419 5 NO SCALE THOMAS S. MONTGOMERY AND ASSOCIATES i `, I -: Transportation k Traffic Engineers I t,- 2151_ Alessandro 0r1ve, Suits 210, Ventura, Callforola 93001 (605) 652 -0411 FAX: (805) 852 -0545 both the morning and afternoon weekday commuter peak travel periods. The back - up ICU and HCM worksheets arei contained in the Appendix, if more detailed information is needed. The results of this analysis are listed in Table 1 and indicate that five of the study area intersections are currently operating at acceptable levels of service during both commuter peak travel periods. However, the intersections of Spring Road /Second Street and Spring Road /Flinn Avenue are currently operating in excess of design capacity during both commuter peak travel periods. This determination is based on the City of Moorpark's definition of design•capacity as "Level of Service C (LOS C) with a maximum ICU of 0.79. ". it I { { LJIi {!� I ' I r1 f h „tr 4r' t I �I lfl f i I 42 t t„ ,: I .. I, • I II ��? c itts ,. 1 i„ ar ( w r +r11��3ns.:� �i j �, ,7i•h n Ij, I1, �r;� , .;: 32 �[ _' :':. �sy I !' 'I. 1 r, t'i�i r ";'�r,., 1'} t �•,: Yil � �n �i•..{�,x � a'tt r r , I .I,,,�,VI � ti :r? : •: ; r� 4.,. I ]j 1` :.I S t i. �r ,.L.,:.,y M l.. r I . t-Ifi i.11 ,.c I ( ?.: * k i i' 'i III'''l ftiraa: °.:. a - {��8r 6 ., , �I v..,: `.� III,�.H)II'I Jt• {i {rj� ,_�k,+ryFp .,. I�' [L.. ,t.,r a IrJ S a,,l ih P { �;` 1 !irhr I� u I f � q; L :U'.i• n t. p,y,., •'�'Ar�E. ?.4'h :!'iI ,.. il'.G jrr6i.,..1 111 5 ! LE 1 gi(j`jt,lhr'- 'Ex r ",I c� -4' "f L.•, I fy''.Ri r!7 I. 1 1r ilnt 1ht I++ .. �� .EX ;STING VOLIlF1E /CAPACITY RELATIONSHIPS �i,up j - f, I hII .,I� r.ttk[11 r I{r h� ..} (. ��L` 'I':7 {� !''1� Ill .Ye ilk d 1 I J n,lt it T,n - ,it.l�i! �i'fis �1 •4 +i.:lrr,i�il �' f'�i, � > � r- Irr.v�� .y�`� "'t+•i t� I { M }� rl "i[Q�I `Y ' 4 I l I ,lues U d;i ir�tl,� I lr �..�: ��� "�r '$�r , I Study Area li, I,, i�.:. f'g'�� ��..,• i Intersections ig.: .': ` �k '•'V /C, Ratios -; LOS Va ! h ng (,r.r,•. peak Afternoon hlr �.Paak, Mi alrhl .1{ Nour, Pertiod Hour Period ., IOU: New Los Angeles Avenue arW c{ Science Orivef{4H hi 0491 A`�'' t.i 514t4 Ijr!� , �i "§. G�Ir • �'�''` R7 �.111.f, f�f.I��p ") 41 I" � Spring Road and High Street 1�1 HFi �11t h i' rd f rJr I F t 0 758 I "( �' Los Mgeles Avenue Ii� Spring 9d'and f o a hE lAvenue1 'I Spring Road and Flin n E * tt.:t C I 4* Spring Road and Los Angeles 0.722 -C 0.680-8 Avenue -New Los Angeles Avenue , Los Angeles Avenue and Moorpark 0.551 -A 0.629 -8 Avenue Los Angeles Avenue and Gabbert 0.599 -A 0.629 -8 Road- Tierra Rejada Road , i Ir [4 77 iiit, a I I. , . , , SITE TRAFFIC GENERATION AND DISTRIBUTION The additional traffic generated by the proposed mixed -use development, and all other planned developments identified in the City of Moorpark, was estimated based on traffic generation factors obtained from the Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) Trio Generation Manual, Fourth Edition, and other pertinent sources. These factors are listed in Table 2, on page 9, with the resultant directional peak hour and daily site traffic generation quantities shown in Table 3 below. I I � �• t , 1 ,. T - t� TABLE 3 ; ,SITE TRAFFIC GENERATION 1 t' f p Il .. il. t,?� a..! }3 4_�^�z_. .; ,., ;..t .'.J ' -I .�: �NI k {, .;•k 1,ti X51 "' ,.. 1 -' .. _ t iilA I S t�'. Number, of Ailditional Vehicle Trips an d Use DesCriptionl d�t4 hta. P�I��(�k7►tfi ihI�1�r r�;(" lik r' AN Peak Hour PN. Peak Hour Dail IN OUT AN u� �iryl ! A i� t¢' dNI`,I�ilh n "l I i ,l i 1 111 l,r: 1 i l7it 4i f i� '! I,i, Total { till:, OUT ,N I 7 6 � 7 ;!- Itt' T i N i "0.1` ri4 �Iwb` '! 4 1� 4GL� �illhb l� ril� I � I I�iPN^ � ! t� � Q �rI � i 4 i I ifs I( e i, p , 1 II , I +;�� Number, of Ailditional Vehicle Trips an d Use DesCriptionl hta. P�I��(�k7►tfi ihI�1�r r�;(" lik r' AN Peak Hour PN. Peak Hour Dail IN OUT AN u� �iryl ! A i� t¢' dNI`,I�ilh n "l I i ,l i 1 111 l,r: 1 i l7it 4i f i� '! I,i, Total { till:, OUT 121 Rocm Hotel �, 60 " }: u ' 6 � 7 ;!- IAparaaeots 26 lx.i 28 ' 1 13 ; n( 370 5,100 Ft Quality Restauraot' ' Lt t ' ' '.1 L S:I' Z4 , 1 1'1 11, f %i�1 450 f;i f� fi),li ,I., Ir TOTALS. I'1; 45 14 I �,_86 " 53 1.880 't !111,7! All, fs.,4 a !�I 11 i,' irisl. {��1 ,11�I I�i'I'3'r� ,'�{ v�'1 ol it c lk i Ir I II �' ;�I1 �'� �� 'd I., i b t-it h I It. j, Maximum daily site `traffic demands would be approximately 1,880 vehicle) ,trips, per „day (VPD ), with directional peak site traffic demands: of about 45 vehicle trips per hour (VPH) inbound, and 85 VPH outbound, during typical 'morning and afternoon commuter peak travel periods, respectively. Project No. 900510 8 i I Number of Vehicle Trips Base Per Base Factor Unit Land Use Description Factor y 1 AM Peak Hour pJ Daily Unit Total TABLE 2 STUDY TRAFFIC GENERATION FACTORS 7 Number of Vehicle Trips Base Per Base Factor Unit Land Use Description Factor AM Peak Hour _ FM Peak Hour Daily Unit Total IN 7 OUT IN OUT Residential- Single-Family Detached D.U. 0.20 0.55 0.63 0.37 10.0 Condominiums D.U. 0.07 0.37 0.38 0.18 5.9 Apartments D.U. 0.10 0.44 0.46 0.22 6.1 Retail , I I C e II. } �' , �.il I I 3 .� I' ! I .• ' .. i i 1., • I Fast -Food Restaurant1 1000 Ft.' 8.18 6.82 21.84 19.28 685.6 ;5,100 F1;.!-,Quality Restaurant ,; X6.000 Ft 1 QualityRestaurant 1000 Ft.' 1.13 0.13 4.65 ', 2.09 87.4 r 7,500 Ft.';, Shopping Center k�l pit; ! :1000 Ft.' 1000 Ft.' 1.02 3.45 0.11 1.48 4.62 10.59 2.01 11.02 88.2 184.0 !;9.300 Ft . +: Shopping Center ,�" : °10.800 Ft,11= Shopping Cents!?' ,.1000 Ft .� 1000 3.16 1.36 9.55 9.94 170.6 Ft.' 2.98 1.28 8.89 9.25 161.9 20.932 Ft. !,;Shopping Canter,',] 1000 Ft.' 2.29 0.98 6.47 6.73 128.5 ii27.620 Ft.' Shopping Center x'90,830 1000 Ft.' 2.05 0.88 5.66 5.89 . 116.6 Ft.' Shopping Center ,j'! :1000 Ft.' 1.27 0.54 x'3.20 3.33 122,500 Ft = Shopping Center 1000 Ft.' 1.13 0.48 2.77 2.88 7.•'76.9 69.2 288.790kF�lt " hopping Con to ' 0.80 0.34 111183 ?, 07;: 49.1 1 w InduErial rP M 11F000`IFt ` t�l I [ ya? jF rll f •:1 I I, 1 M1 f f71 -• {{ a l;l , _ �! i I' { , I'lll II 1 it _ ! I I 1 E � ' F �I,. •.. industrial Park '144.352 Ft .■ Light Industrial 111• 1000 Ft.' 1000 Ft.' 0.83 1.32 0.18 0.18 0,19 0 72!: I 11 ' 8.0 115.200 Ft.t Light Industrial'. `131.727 1000 Ft.' 0.99 0.13 0.17 0.13 1.27 0:9J 8.0 6.5 Ft.' :Light Industrial '' 1000 Ft.' 0.95 0.13 0.13; 0.93 6.3 258.844 Ft.! Light Industrial 1000 Ft.' 0.78 0.11 0.10 0.76 5.5 42.6 -Acre light Industrial Acre 6.80 1.20 Z. ;5.87 51:8" Office; I 1 I" .f° id ' I .23.040 Ft.' Office 1000 Ft.' 2.14 0.32 0 40 2.12 19.8 17.4 -Acre Business Park 1000 Ft.' 16.74 2.73 3.04 13.83 166.9 63,000 Ft.' Civic Center Miscellaneous: 1000 Ft.' 2.00 0.25 .0.90 1.96 25.0 153,000 Ft.' Library 1000 Ft.' 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.52 8.8 Auto-Repair Center Site 0.92 0.43 0.97 0.97. 17.1 Car Wash Facility Site 18.00 18.00 40.00 40.00' 900.0 127 -Room Hotel Roam 0.26 0.13 0.27 0.23 8.3 7 ' r I � • The orientation of these additional site - generated traffic demands was estimated based on information contained in other traffic impact studies prepared by our firm, and on our general knowledge of future traffic and demographic �. characteristics in this portion of the City of Moorpark. For the hotel site, we estimated that 65 percent of the total site traffic demand would be oriented to and from the east (30 percent on New Los Angeles Avenue and 35 percent on Los Angeles Avenue); 15 percent to and from the south on Spring Road south of Los Angeles Avenue -New Los Angeles Avenue; with the remaining 20- oercent oriented to and from the west (5 percent on High Street and 15 percent on Los Angeles Avenue west of Gabbert Road — Tierra Rejada Road). t site, we estimated that 1 r 7 percent' of. the total site ' stauran For the re traffic demands .would be oriented to and from the north (2 percent .on .Spring tliii YP I . n Road north of High Street Los Angeles Avenue and 15 percent. on Moorpark- Avenue north of Los An eles Avenue)•'18 Qercent ��� 41 9 to and from the west (8 percent on High r { tF' a Street' and 10 percent"on Los Angeles Avenue west of Gabbert Road— Tierra Rejada } kr Road ; `35 ) oercent to and from the east (15 percent; on Los Angeles `Avenue and 20 rit ' ) ; and 30 percent to and :percent on New Los An ekes Avenue east of Science Drive, ( _, ,. 9 m the outh (25 percent on,S rin Road and 5 4 P 9 pe;^centl on Tierra Re ada Road). �,: µ :t`° °•' �:I to `�,'; �t�:`'L,ly. f , f•i, r r 9i�1.:; tfi + "�'�k2 t ��� I rE„ o-,i }. i f:r ;, f , _:. -1 N, - .! 1 I'r a.;. :;ahl Ii ,, 4vi 5�1,, .= .y�� ,1 rl ., y1 I� rw�(,1l1� For the apartment area, we estimated thatQercent,`of the total site 'I n' wr r? u traffic demands would be oriented to'and from the east (30 percent on Los Angeles Avenue and 35 percent on New Los Angeles Avenue east of Science Drive); with the ' `� remaining 35 percent oriented to and from the west 5 percent ,, . inin ( p nt on High Street and 30`percent on Los Angeles Avenue, west of Gabbert Road - Tierra Rejada Road). Illustrated on Figure 3 are 'the resultant total directional peak hour and daily site traffic demands, as assigned to the study, area street system, utilizing these site traffic generation and distribution estimates. Maximum daily site traffic demands (about 1,150 VPD) would occur on Spring Road, between Flinn Avenue and Inc Annnlnr A., w .- ►1..... I _ d___, 14 �r's� i•-� :. rr :7 - - si�fV ... -: _ � -ems -z r- ��- �'+_'�- -•'�, �,s. - !P. _ - Sprinq :R&_ . g� LEGEND n bi - - `+ �--- 00/00 AM /PM Peak Hour - Z Traffic Volumes o - = 100 x'14/24 = C 000 Dally Traffic - Los Angeles Volumes 3/6 530 Ave. o - 1 Apts. 370 c get i-- - - - - -- 26/13 r ^ r 410 Study N Y so Site _ Second St.' ' -_ Hotel/ 0 o 1. - c Restaurant o c M cz N u w �., Gobbert Rd. t 370 / Flinn Ave. 1470 28/43 6/28 6/28 -� Science Dr. c n = age 310 �0/1 \ 12/9 / 1 \ �t3 /2s 530 8/16 (i 330 6/n -e-� 370 t 13�t-7 9/20 } E 0 O _ 3 Tierra Rejada Rd. Moor ark Ave -{ z - p Y SITE TRAFFIC DEMANDS PROJECT N0. 900570 THOMAS S. MONTGOMERY AND ASSOCIATES eP Tran ortation & Traffic Engineers ORAVMGS \!00!10 -1d•p � 1131 Aldnan A'o Dow. Suits 210, Ventura, C011fomla 93001 L2/17/90 09.33 rAx: (eos) e52 -0545 NO SCALE ' . % (eos) e52 -0411 ,r .:.r FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS Total 1995 cumulative traffic demands would consist of site - generated traffic, plus the additional traffic generated by all known related planned developments in the vicinity of the study site, plus future background traffic demands. Future background traffic demands were estimated to be 1.1 times greater than existing traffic volumes, an average annual growth rate equivalent to two percent per year to reflect unspecified future developments and continuing regional growth trends.. Based on the City of Moorpark's July 2,`.1990, development listing,' 35. i related projects were identif, led as appropriate for inclusion An our ;,estimate of total future cumulative traffic demands for this study.' ,The general locations C 4,`V these future planned developments are shown Ion Figur¢ 4�' with ap brief summary ^,�+(i {, } i! Y,' +, ! 1 !. �of Ithe land use description and, raffia generation characteristics of'each' one's t -•� t. �,% �Ii,l'��il' i t >+ sted in; able, 4 o na e' 4 � ,� �r„ 9 j q; I nt 1,i ..t. �.t:F;i •��. �'.4. R� �a., , 7' it�l,.i t {-r :tY {: ".I.1h ff'�': ,; 3. .,v ,,: i:I �'djj'1 "�lr.,r, �'U�,.. i` 1� $�N :, -{:IL i`I t>'�:,. ��1�1' EN....1 �:.1 , .i: l•rt ' � i ,i, v:= y�l:.. r � � „e�li , {�. tf i�•M j ;,�: .,..i�i,} +:, # : �:b , � � ¢. �rl .„k1 ,�� i tp.Y , �._' � I, '�A ,i• �i„ '• 14 ese 35 related planned developments would genera t ter�7((aY ! I lSn•t 1 a l .i ' t,� �rsa�4,,, w : �ftI ' a �. .i`'� n i, 17 i e{(•frit+' � °i, l ,4� � � s�� I de mands.7 of approxi mate jy 46 ;080 IIYPD, -'with maximum directional ':pe'ak demands` of,., t tr �? , ;±� I! I "6 .i ;; {,� !Ylf� F 6if`.!i<I Rabout`� 1,660 YPH, inbound' and 2 480; YPH o ,fir { i utbound dur n t ical week ,: t h r !t LI .., I g t yp day morn n .^ItMt.'1.4a.h .. a .t,.ul !LYIi. , ar rlp r..l n.i,.,�o- 1'�,- gr.,s_. r�.....�o.�� N�� �,�, .rapecti,yeiy ne aaaitiona7 trafficsn��Y: s i1� ll; ..� <i'� � ( ' . t! i� Ij(:..� r ,. -. s,i ,! t I ,.i pilkut u.:'il!��i IP I!i,1F{i -i- ! •Y;liv .,. F, t h , ... { �!� ! d b 1 stud , f_p generate y each of these related planned developments. was assigned to the y } ! I ! ,.� ,r:, : , area ,stree s stem util izin tri distribution' charact "iii'' com atible. with n r, pp y g p [ I Y ., , t, those estimated for site traffic assignments: Illustrated. on Figure 5 are the I g j ,,.1. }' ! � ! 1, I } I. sK{�' ilY �l! resultant total future directional peak` hour ;and daily';traffic demands at' and A' seven selected study' intersections. d! ! adjacent to, the y In general, these 1995 traffic demand projections in and indicate' that future daily traffic demands on Spring Road would be approximately 1.4 times existing I traffic volumes, with an increase on Los Angeles Avenue 'we'st oVSpri ng Road of approximately 1.6 times existing traffic volumes. This "worst case" cumulative traffic demand scenario is based on the assumption that all 35 related planned developments are constructed and fully operational by 1995. Project No. 900510 -- _ 12 TMA 0 cr. fl! n I♦ z O 1� 0 0 0 I,- W e- wIS '. f•� 1i 1 I vI I � � ,o 1 }I AR 1 I 1 1 �I —� V100RF 26 '4' OO r • '• °�C� I O C 31 / 1 R t\ r sss Ou l04 w * O 'Wed 0 7. RELATED PROJECTS 00 #;.Related Projects Locotion Number (See Table 4) <} MAP s PROJECT N0. 900310 x THOMAS S. MONTGOMERY AND ASSOCIATES E Tromsportatlon 11 Traffic Englneprs - - -- , \� = c -,'S '; .� �iis1 Nsssmdro Drlw, Sulle 210, Venture. CNUomle 23001 pUV1NOS \!00710- ♦.d,rp `- IV' --"' - '� nievss ID20 NO SCALE -{ (e05) $52-0411 1* t FAX (oos) e52 -0545 - ------- }----- - - - - -- - - -_� -- - (• � I { "' MOORPARK - 21► �'. VA I vI I � � ,o 1 }I AR 1 I 1 1 �I —� V100RF 26 '4' OO r • '• °�C� I O C 31 / 1 R t\ r sss Ou l04 w * O 'Wed 0 7. RELATED PROJECTS 00 #;.Related Projects Locotion Number (See Table 4) <} MAP s PROJECT N0. 900310 x THOMAS S. MONTGOMERY AND ASSOCIATES E Tromsportatlon 11 Traffic Englneprs - - -- , \� = c -,'S '; .� �iis1 Nsssmdro Drlw, Sulle 210, Venture. CNUomle 23001 pUV1NOS \!00710- ♦.d,rp `- IV' --"' - '� nievss ID20 NO SCALE -{ (e05) $52-0411 1* t FAX (oos) e52 -0545 f� F y,: + ��'tt TABLE 4 RELATED PROJECTS TRAFFIC GENERATION Related Number of Vehicle Trips Project AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Daily Number Land Use Description Total IN OUT IN OUT 1 Tract 4341 (West Village) - 154 SFDU's 31 85 97 57 1,540 2 Tract 4340 (West Village) - 166 SFDU's 33 91 105 61 1,660 3 Tract 4342 (West Village) - 179 SFDU's 36 98 113 66 1,790 4 2C -90 -3 - 122,500 Ft.' Shopping Center 138 59 339 353 8,480 5 Tract 4637 -- 257 Condominiums 18 95 98 46 1,510 6 Tract 4660 - 249,320 Ft.' Industrial Park 206 45 47 178 2,000 7 IPD -88 -3 - 68,782 Ft.' light Industrial (a) 201 27 27 198 1420 8 -A IPD -88 -4 - 45,750 Ft.' Light Industrial 8 -6 IPD -88 -5 - 58,166 Ft.' Light Industrial 9 -A IPD -88 -8 - 11,536 Ft.' Light Industrial 9 -8 IPO -88 -9 - 11,555 Ft.' Light Industrial 9 -C" IPD -88 -10 - 11,812 Ft.' Light industrial 9 -0 IPD -88 -11 - 6,780 Ft.' Light industrial 9 -E IPD -88 -12 - 5,624 Ft.' Light Industrial 94 . IPD -88 -13 - 5,790 Ft.' Light Industrial 9 -11 IPO -88 -14 - 5,190 Ft.' Light Industrial 9 -H IPD -88 -15 - 9,409 Ft.' Light Industrial .9 -I IPD -88 -16 - 10,800 Ft,' Light Industrial 9 -1 IPD -88 -17 - 7,050 Ft.' Light Industrial 10 IPO- 90 -2/6 - 115,200 Ft.' light industrial 114 16 15 111 750 11-A OP -351 r7 30,701 Ft.' light industrial (b) 125 17 17 122 830 11-8 OP -352 30,701 Ft,', Light Industrial 11-C ,: OP -353 Ll- 14.635 Ft.# light Industrial , 12 IPO -89 2 -j 32,650 Ft.' Light Industrial 13 -A OP -343 '12;240 Ft.11ight Industrial 13-5_',' !:, 0P -344 ' 10,800 Ft.! light Industrial ;. ' 14 i't"' `t OP -390 9,572 Ft.' Auto No palr 9 4 9 9 160 15 A,;'. "Tri�ett1738,- 116;SFOU'e N,, �r Pa L l 23 64 73 13 1.160 1S 8'!. tract 4738,, -il 175 Condominiums 21 65 67 32 1,030 list CPD -89 3- 90.830 Ft,' Shopping Center 115 49 290 302 :.6,980 ? 17 �It °', CPD -90 -3 - .7,500 Ft.$,'Shopping Center 26 11. 19 83 1,380 18 Tract 41,7,- 62,SFDU o (51 Occupied) 2 6 7 4 110 g 19 t t , 1 RPO.89 236 Apartirmta i ;; f a r i C 24 104 109 52 "' 1.440 21 t• T, T.; 4652 18 SFOU't t l sF t,A s t T. T;.,' 4620 ; SFOU's �, , )" �;'� 4 Il . - 13 7 ` 200 22 t,' -66 t�i„ CPD -90 1 "9,300 Ft.a,Shopping Center` " 13 29 3B 13 42 N 23i�;, 24 LOM -89 2 =- 268.790 Ft.$ Shopping Center. 231 99 89 529 92 39I 1,590 34,190 PD -1066 9.000 Ft.# Car Wash/Auto Service 22 20 41 41 980, !, i 25, ;: CPD -89 4 - 10,800 Ft.' Shopping Center., 32 14 96 100 760 26 ''' '` tPD -88.3 �- `3.965 Ft.' Fast -Food Restaurant 32 27 86 76 '2,720 27i ,; .,;Tract 4095 -� 27 Condominiums 2 10 10 5 ;., 160 28 f ', `i' DP -358 -+ 44,352 Ft.' Light Industrial 58 8 Ti 57 350 29' CUP -68 2 , - 23.040 Ft.' Office ; . ; 49 7 9 49 J 460 30 -A SP -88 1 -- 17.4 -Acre Business Park 1 291 11 ` S3 241 2.900 30 -8 SP -884 -- 42.6 -Acre Light Industrial `- 290 S1 lie 250 2,210 30 -C SP- 884 4 -Acre Civic Center (c) 126 16 57 123 1,580 31 SP -88 -1 - 497 SFOU's ' 1 99 273 313 154 4,970 32 PD- 1062 - 20,932 Ft.' Shopping Center 48 21 135 141 2.690 33 Tract 3963 - 131 SFDU's (12 Occupled) 24 65 75 44 1.190 34 153,000 Ft.' Library 0 O 10 80 1,350 35 -A 4,500 Ft.' Fast -Food Restaurant 37 31 98 87 3,190 35 -8 27,620 Ft.' Shopping Center 57 24 156 163 3,220 35 -C 6,000 Ft.' Quality Restaurant 6 1 28 12 530 TOTAL TRAFFIC DEMANDS: 2,572 1,610 3,461 4,093 79,140 EXTERNAL TRAFFIC DEMAND: (d) 1,656 1,054 2,052 2.482 46,080 NOTES: (a) Traffic generation based on combined square footage for related projects 1, 8, and 9 (258,844 Ft.') (b) Traffic generation based on combined square footage for related projects 11, 12, and 13 (131,727 Ft.') (c) Based on a 40 percent building- area -to- gross -area ratio. (d) Based on a 25 percent reduction for shopping center land uses, a 55 percent - reduction for fast -food restaurant land uses, and an overall reduction of 30 percent to account for development interaction. Project No. 900510 14 Eh F -s 0 n 4f z 0 �o 0 O to r.+ O C11 ORA V 11403 V 00510 -5.d.0 12/20/90 - 09.22 } O LEGEND z X01. x s 00/00 AM /PM Peak. Hqur = __ �a �n °Og,_. s- 289/418 Traffic Volumes - - - 1059/1256 . r `.. 000 Dail Traffic:. t High ,St 13,700 9 y - 9 - Los Angeles 43,600 Volumes F 5/12 Ave. 1-325/489 2 og 9/98.. � tu o m Second St. - 900F 54/33 �. o ,rte 741 Co so 4 n 10 - - 33/41 80/76 Gabbert Rd. _ Flinn Ave. ,/ 2400 0 } - =- ( Science Dr. ° C3 00 n Co ` S o r ` 38/19 n ar -- 898/1245 r'n n l 177/437 201/363 1127/1633 45/139 _ N �Nh 0 � N 657/803 850 53 ,58�5� +— , \ 16%1„ J r J` r f 507000 613 28 1 f�'`Y nor' 28,600 1-3/5 �1i(' / 11 142 323._ 1100/1158 --� to t• n _ N - 1273/1808 ^ - = tr m n 645/715 -+^ "'n N + ='4a in a, n n ,019 1050 � L / 45 —� r / -, 80 134 n 21 47 / '� ��� , 269 509 / h n 139 N N N Nn N^ o ^ Ci O m C, a ate P�6. � P• 5 Tierra Rejado Rd. Moorpark Ave. TOTAL 19 9 5 -.._ TRAFFIC DEMANDS PROJECT 140. 900510, THOMAS S. MONTGOMERY AND ASSOCIATES Transportation k Traffic Engineers 2151 Aleveandro Drive, Suite 210, Ventura, Callfornlo 93001 NO SCALE (805) 652 -0411 FAX: (605) 652 -0545 In order to estimate the future operational efficiency of the study area street system, an ICU /HCM analysis was again conducted at the study area intersections, with and without recommended mitigation measures. The recommended mitigation measures are as follows: 1. Spring Road and Flinn Avenue: That this intersection would be controlled with a two -phase traffic signal, with the northbound approach striped for two through lanes; southbound for a left- turn -only lane and two through lanes; and westbound for a left- turn -only lane and a right- turn -only lane. 2., Spring Road and Los Angeles Avenue —New Los Angeles'Avenue That:the northbound approach at this location would be striped for dual . left-turn only lanes and two through l ones; ' with I `� southbound, , for ;.dual „left- turn -only lanes, lane one through , T l v ,� „;, ; .,, :.and a :: right -turn only :lane. The remaining Anter,section 1; g ics would remain unchanged.' +' control and eometr ii3r; s t F. s i n l 9 V y ' i a��kia a F. f }X. Ir 1 � �. I a n u ai li Ifp .$I ,. f V r t:. t•'- t i I. - nd i `,faiEW ' �� sut t It n13• +tj, Moor Qark Avenue and Los Angeles Avenue. That the'westbou sets a roach at. this location would be .striped fora left -turn ;_ftf rte f only; ".lane ;±'and. ,three.: through ,lanes, ; with"'' the ;r..emai,ning ,ter x 1 , gi r. .. S, . t if 1 t u'.Ik Pb�4n ii: 4, eometricsi�and intersection controls to 'remain unchan ed i411 } f III. ";0 ,i,., r,,..,o, J -.r �'� irFtxr.,� n..: cJ.., . xv -, ...fir .CF:1 iil g iX >{711.? friro :. X'A y 5� {V:.i.,±at o.' r dlullj 1 -tii t rt {; ih N. II �., • e r InIF.. �.` Sabbe'rt Road — Tierra Reiada Roo ' and Los Angeles Avenue. That rory , I � }� 1 ►.=l hl1!1ii the traffic signal control at this location.;would be upgraded 1 I + to provide separate right -turn phasing for northbound traffic The eastbound approach at this location would be stripedfor } ' a left- turn -only lane and three through lanes The remaining intersection control and geometries would remain unchanged. Science Drive and New Los Angeles Avenue: The Carlsberg EIR Traffic 'Analysis recommends that the northbound approach at this location be striped for dual left- turn -only lanes, an optional through or right -turn lane, and a right- turn -only lane; southbound for a left- turn -only lane and one through lane;.eastbound for one left -turn- only lane and three through lanes; and westbound for dual left- turn -only lanes and three through lanes. The results of this ICU /HCM analysis are displayed in Table 5. This V/C analysis indicates that, for the theoretical "existing plus site traffic" scenario, all of the study area intersections would operate at acceptable levels of service. - p t ku69 +' t r1 -(ii �•IF F.� n;,; 1.1 I,,, 5 1 1 TABLE 5 FUTURE VOLUME/CAPACITY RELATIONSHIPS * It is assumed that future traffic will be limited to right turns to and from Second Street. , �j 1 1SW., j I g V/C Ratios - LOS Values Peak Total Cumulative Traffic Demands Study Area Intersections Time ,. Period Existing With Site_: :: !Without With Site-., Plus Site Traffic ( Traffic r' „1 Slite Traffic.' Traff is l Without !;With ji'Wth ' 1 ; ! ! { + 4 (;!;; }i , Ni.tigation '' '1 .Mitigation Mitigation' ;� Oh .�'IPI'�{ y+il;, , ';' '�� �`, Now Los Angeles Avenue ANA Ic 0.495 -A 0:488 -A 0.487 A 0.488 A Science Oriw J + ! ; PH, 0 522 -A 0 536 -A 0.532-A ' 0 536-A Sprin Road 5 Hi h Street g g AN O 787 -C ( 0 995 -E u t� 0.991E ( Q 995 E Los Angeles Avenue M1 u ! + + PN 0 768-0 1.035 L'.0414 11 1 1 1. 4j , Spring Road 6 Second ' i 1 1 AN �i' N /A�1 .�I� "fui11 IS f x(111 = ii N /A :, 'i ;... j�. { 1,2!11 `. I` N/A f� ry'M WWW l` k r h ra Street R ( PM �, „ N/A , li,�Lr,} ,� 1i , N/A # nv ,, N/A �1 7 rs N/A , 14 5 �; "4�•`, Spr ing Road!'6 Flinn 0.SM4 ;. 0.696 -B 0.678 B Avenue .1 f �k� r PM + 0 527 -A 0 675 -8 , I 1 0 604 B' r i{ 0.653-B Spring Road 6 Los Angeles. AN r 0.735 -C 0.994-E 0.875-D 0.884-D Avenue -New Los Angeles PH 0.701 -C 1'152 -F 1 036-F +. 1.044 F Avenue „ {n.: ., I Los Angeles Avenue 6 AN 0.553 -A 0.765 -C 0:751 -C 0.752 -C Moorpark Avenue PH 0.633 -B 1.035 -F 0.938 -E .'; 0.941 -E Los Angeles Avenue 6 AN 0.602 -B 0.874 -D, i 0.799-C :', 0.802 -D Gabbert Road - Tierra PH, 0.635 -8 1.0404 0.863 -D !.0.865 -0' Rejada Road * It is assumed that future traffic will be limited to right turns to and from Second Street. , �j 1 1SW., j I g i I . 1 1 For the "total cumulative with site traffic with existing geometrics" scenario, four of the study area intersections would operate in excess of design capacity during the morning and /or afternoon commuter peak travel periods. For the "total cumulative with and without site traffic with mitigation" scenarios, four of the study area intersections would operate at unacceptable levels of service during the morning and /or afternoon weekday commuter peak travel periods. These intersections are Spring Road /High Street -Los Angeles Avenue, Spring Road /Los Angeles Avenue -New Los Angeles Avenue, Los Angeles Avenue /Moorpark Avenue, and Los Angeles Avenue /Gabbert Road - Tierra Rejada Road. However, site traffic impacts at these locations are not anticipated to be significant.' This determination :is based on our firm's definition of a ;significant adverse impact as one resulting in a'differential of "two points or more .in ICU values b etween the "with" ands "without "'site traffic condition ... _ -'. i r k'. :.':. : r I jf i I ! {...:., r:„ , , ii �ryir ) ,lq t i rI`+'r ah tli +,,,tt , :,..' 'j.'tr e ,. ` nd i I � 473. �l;,,h,, a. ' ; t � ' t P ''t, a. 4 rrt ..� ArtS � �r ' 1 . <' d::� 'p ,�7! , 1 r f{i` 'r b ., d , +y V�. :i` i { iy &I � � vi� S r • . .l.. + Jd�'amav .' i`.: :t : r1 �rri , i Ja L .: t ✓% rli .I i �' , r e h {ir 'V l ' .j•f,,L g 4 l at ii 'J1t I 1 n ; i : . irra s d e i xs - t � coscenarios at intersections projected to des; �in ' t gn ; i .caP acit y i , iS b A - .f.>.f 1 d gi. �i �tirlr I F I+, {'� i I �,l�t +�.' 1 • � 7= F'i`' ffi •'•r,' '`N htf�4.'rtt ll! I rti " r1, 3f1 ' . I ; �! '; . It• F , , iE .t . - 1 FIw4 ' 6 M , iE f F It I .'v E � rI1 S ll t a. # j� ;I t }1I M J1 or i� „ :tt�i1�I}',' a. �i-t � iIE' ;'y . t y ,, rr + 41, ,�t �_n r�. J ,tt� w ' . r � ,. t.Y } � s � ,. � 1�: >'3.�`- . ,�` -' Ny5i3 't) '. Fi �,i1>.t- ' �. . � �' ..' �f .., A: {I' ; i r f � �� " v � C 1or. ' riy. �3.: . �r. ,? �•., . ,•. • t t «f �i s : ,, '�>i £�� k ,. ;. ,t r �, r;;,`` � }I ;tSµki ,5rltl ,.t.� . 'i , ,a t iri y .l . . r. ';�. . ' irT} r ' :5 i . t �1,1,,,1;}� ,r � h! I � {• Vi 1. � :titr •raf!I � I,u, „h,F ri {� t r. � � >;:� �F xrl• E,� �! d i �' r''il •19, k,plM It! VrI�tJ { ; ti.11tt -� _ '?lei} 11`f,,ff t I �.;,L •I> 1 11?l:. t!>t �i �, »d +f cu ,N +•r,ti .! .rfl r,Ri °. r •;�1 t !:'`i�R�. IC ,'5.,, { I,,,,. i� i i t v3_” r ,• "t i � ' N� P I;:: , �., , r r ', r W:la s j,, rt, s } r t A f +{ t i � �i I �,I,,. .: o, if — a; ,SITE ACCESS, •CIRCULATION,:. AND PARKING •}', ��ii+�'�� ���I�'�''I'�`u'; It,f,':f�� ";;� ° a �! 144 [( � , 911 y.t �'��t<. � " �6, ti � r t I' I , �•� . 1 , I pl f f fi .f, rw it : i � {, ' i >' E4 it r tjil tarp - }r {�� r �+�r r tf t�•'t� � � � -�µx ,�� Itl�i s assumed . (due to the "present "policy to r!!i it access ; to and from rhfl.' {., r y .' ,': f i}. I 7- •.',: tr lif ,4,•wJ.'r � II .,, ritjF ,. p,? yr S R 118) that ingress /egress'•traffic would be limited to right turns only at'the O site access driveway on Spring Road.'. In addition r!due t e Y „ ,L IQ h recommended future i t, ';I tra ffic` signal at „Spring,Road and Flinn Avenue,, it is recommended that' access iR „I to and from Second Street at Spring Road be limited to right -turn 'traffic only qtV11 since left turning traffic to and :from Second' Street, would conflict with t I,. southbound approach traffic on Spring Road turnin g left into Flinn Avenue. By 1995,future traffic demands at the intersection of Spring Road and Flinn Avenue will ,.meet the CALTRANS' planning application traffic signal warrant for interruption of continuous traffic for rural conditions (prevailing traffic speed on major street greater than or equal to 40 miles per hour). These traffic signal warrants will be further satisfied when ultimate build -out of the Flinn Avenue area occurs. In order to determine the potential need for traffic signal control at the intersection of Spring Road and Flinn Avenue when ultimate Project No. 900510 18: TA MI. A f i build -out of the Flinn Avenue area occurs, it was deemed appropriate to estimate the future daily traffic demands at the intersections of Spring Road with Flinn Avenue and Second Street for four build -out scenarios of the Flinn Avenue area. The four scenarios selected were, "build -out with remaining vacant land including site using existing land uses," "build -out with remaining vacant land including site using business park land uses," "build -out with remaining vacant land using existing land uses and site using proposed land uses," and "build- out with remaining vacant land using business park land uses and site using proposed land uses." Displayed in Table 6, on page 20, are the estimated future f ,.. daily traffic demands at the intersections of Spring Road with Flinn Avenue and r" Second Street for these four ultimate build -out scenarios of the Flinn Avenue area. scenarios exceeds the minimum daily traffic volume.required �" for' im lementation', of. raff � Each of these scenari h p is signal control per'CALTRANSIstandards Maximum "! �!' n t daily traffic demands o Flinn Avenue would occur: if the adjoining vacant land ci! ,i Il A I f, t 'II i. 11 I IJ , developed utilizing business) park „ land ? uses' with'f the�',subject' (stud site ''r'It' tii. i4- I ';ii' f I y , tw LI � ! r ;rr N,uti�izing proposed land uses (4,820 VP0).N,This, estimate L,,a:on with that. given.. Ole .{j t 9 m l jl �jj f t g fo ,'scena�^io th ee r lr t i ? r i ncl u es peraii tti ng a prodect driveway "on Spring ,Road la, , q$ `Y'�•rl at4u �J'' �F. 4' 5, ,. IL, 1,;,ii Y n•14.t {. '� I j,i:!' ilf , iiti'',2a ' y nic tly A' Iti:� ,ti�,i I',1, h . I i,t, �{ �M j `i. ! If ��.jj Ilt,l ,. j{!11i�f•3F+ cca.T, !' �r,!`; t E �,tl.:: ; ?"W"T: 1AA nNNi..f kl ., rj.�l, r!', ll;,.t.! n.lf?.tiE eli c t9;L il�! jYl I x L, fT f { I{ R� ! il, �'rC{ ��li!!' i . + I pr ,t y° The realignment ,l of n Fl i i6' venu ' „nor y TM' I future four =wa k ` TINY t,t .� , therl ,i to I a l y , f.!a�u x.iiti } t41 •f1 ± i ,i` ;i�fr I t �,.i�'IY ! I I �) ,i. y)'J r; 1 � ntersectioq with Sec; Street ,a d ,,Sp'ring ,Road,.` s nott'cQn`sidere�E a' fear rble ! f .lql ?' { 1,....li I ,, ,:, ;,” n , a �f! }fYj;�; 1'� 1inMn,._ 'I; •7 S..,Ili ! ! 4 ff:"I ,. I ;;! ,li! +p'i rl!! , •-4 rl l� j' f , - a . �'._a: r" alternative to` °e1lminatingthe'�poten,1'° of is #ts be�tween'itr �! I'��F'�''',�.`� ` ( tia co affic .on •Span ,� (1, hri r`J *•j: +,pO;o!a:J!l, ! t ,.,a {'_i: 6� ` 1 , I I •,' ,. g n'lii '.Roa that are `s`imultaneousl{ "'turninlu'.left�� into l ", ! I',:.,la, ;;,,,, ,i ±F ;, f x °4t� y 9 „Flinn Avenue !: and Second Street €'I i -1 Thus realignment would bi 'sect the ro osed stud ,I , p P site ;tj�ereby” eliminating the potential developmentilof this site'as a `y :l i f hotel and quality restaurant. "' , 1,?'{,t t lfiyi r" j:�ll �' I t�: al I t ill t� iJ'I 1�1 I , I I }, i ' t ' A < '� . ❑ , y ' The, one two -way access driveway on Flinn Avenue and theone limited- ``I access, driveway on Spring Road that'-would serve traffic for the proposed hotel +� and quality 'restaurant would have ample capacity 'and. adequate width to t +h' accommodate total future shared peak site traffic:- demands, maximum ;t ingress /egress site traffic volumes of about 45 VPD versus driveway capacities of more than 200 VPH in each direction. Vehicle storage lengths for the site access driveways should be adequate due to the anticipated low number of site traffic parking maneuvers. However, due to the recommended future traffic Project No. 900510 19 P%AA T r , - «. signal control at Flinn Avenue and Spring Road, and restricting the site access driveway on Spring Road to right- turning traffic only, it is recommended that the currently proposed primary site access driveway on Spring Road be redesigned as a secondary site access with the site access driveway on Flinn Avenue redesigned as a primary site access. TABLE 6 FUTURE DAILY TRAFFIC DEMANDS PER FLINN AVENUE AREA BUILD -OUT SCENARIOS Scenario Flinn Avenue Second Street Spring Road I 1 East -Leg West-Leg. I 1 of N/A l if I l I Build -out with remaining 2,040 �Ir- vacant land including site ;; s (1 700 b ) O using existing land uses # „I Il�n a 2 -out with''remaining 4,440 N/A ' 900 LBuiId �itvacant !land including "M14`lte �f } i'i'i Z 1 100 b using business park � land uses { Itl I r4!1T f ty.4 t9 {fry I I iA 1.4 ' I h al= ii y Y} v t•E (I �(1{ { {«�r cl I. ' �j I f I� t {� {all �'! 1� 15 000! 41,000 � Ig t ,1 �a" AII.�MfF "�'I�a ItI {i4' I�11 �'ji � ' I f 1 �i 4 .� I ♦✓ •..�)'��i Iliy h',_fi t �,P 1 -:�� 1. 6,,1 ,i {;� , '� t 1 � tt`4� t' �� � 7 , ,, , 71hI 3 t - 1 k , , .,t�d 11 .M� j � 3,! site Same as 1 except '' 3,100 I 410 a 900 1' ,ef r t using proposed land uses. 1,700 b 4." `Same'a's 2 except site 1i '4,820 410'(a) 900 0. using proposed land uses " (1,700) (b) i (a) Site driveway with ingress /egress restricted to right- turns -only. (b) Traffic volume with no left -turn restrictions. The close proximity of the hotel and quality restaurant site access driveways to adjacent intersections may cause turning movement conflicts between site traffic and adjacent intersection traffic. However, due to low site Project No. 900510 20 .' ' ,, { traffic demands, combined with egressing site,traffic demands being restricted to, or predominantly right turning traffic, these conflicts should be minimal. The proximity of the site access driveway on Spring Road to the Southern Pacific Railroad tracks is far enough to eliminate any significant safety conflicts between the two locations. However, the formation of traffic queues behind motorized railroad gates may extend southerly to Flinn Avenue and beyond, thereby creatinq conflicts between this traffic and traffic a++amn +inn +„ ingress or egress from Flinn Avenue and /or the site access driveway on Spring Road. Parking stall, aisle widths, and corner cut -offs should be adequate to i ndle normal parking maneuvers. In addition, adequate pedestrian circulation I� ha in the parking lot is provided.— The proposed design gives relatively direct } access to 'the hot main entrance. _The proposed placement of the .hotel's ' loading zone on Minor. Street will,create'conflicts between throw~ g h traffic on _ Minor Street and delivery trucks accessing the loading dock, since .these trucks < will have to` i s,lt , y„ , � make part',of their ,backing maneuver, on .Minor Street itself. In d addition, livery trucks parked) at the proposed'loading zone for.' or the quality ' I' estaurant will block one or two of theadjacentparkingstalls However :this a ' 1, #. ih�� IIi�i, �loc�Cage will typically_be of a sort' duration. The 230 parking spaces provided ualit restaurant la IT the `proposed `hotel. ''and ' I'I I q y and use should provide ample 1 harking capacity to meet normal eak arkin demands. i;, �'I��'' P P 9 .,�+�" }��(�1pp'��I nil 4 �` �h, �•. ` - I� 1 ;� t .t { � 11� F 4. { (I' '��1� a I I a I ' YYY x r SITE TRAFFIC IMPACTS In order to estimate the percent of external site -to- external site plus external related projects traffic demands at the study area intersections, we compared the sum of the morning and afternoon directional peak external site traffic demands with the external site plus external related project traffic demands for the same time periods. The results of that comparative analysis are listed in Table 7, on page 22. This analysis shows that external'site /external site plus external related. projects traffic volume, percentages would be as follows: Project No. 900510 21 T11 f I 1 .!'T le My , t xternalSite Peak Hour Vehicle E ' j j to �I K "`u External Site External''Site' Study Area Intersections �, " i! � �s Plus I , I j' Plus r'` I �ajl.j �� I; External Site External Related External Related I lllf4 t # ,�' ; t 1y 1al �� .Traffic ��, {ij�' R'w liProjects , ,.1�projects a � is ;TrafflcDemands j1raffic . Demands' F � �, r� H iI %9`f I1,�, 1 I �I /I tail L J4� Yy If Science Drive and loa AngeyesPj?���; 48 �afa,'N` !;� ^h�I'11�527 �`�` j'k; "I�� 3 U':'�I Avenue , K,. Spring Road and High Street- 58 1.598 3 0 io: Los Angeles Avenue Spring Road and Second Street 64 1,429 I. 4.48 Spring Road and Flinn Avenue 174 1,537 1132 Spring Road and Los Angeles 102 3,391 3.01 Avenue -New Los Angeles Avenue Moorpark Avenue and Los Angeles 36 3,040 1.18 Avenue Gabbert Road - Tierra Rejada Road 33 2,377 1.39 and Los Angeles Avenue WA ,AM, • Science Drive /Los Angeles Avenue — 3.14 percent • Spring Road /High Street —Los Angeles Avenue — 3.63 percent • Spring Road /Second Street — 4.48 percent • Spring Road /Flinn Avenue — 11.32 percent • Spring Road /Los Angeles Avenue —New Los Angeles Avenue — — 3.01 percent • Moorpark Avenue /Los Angeles Avenue — 1.18 percent • Gabbert Road — Tierra Rejada Road /Los Angeles Avenue — 1 1.39 percent . TABLE 7 EXTERNAL SITE -TO- EXTERNAL SITE PLUS EXTERNAL RELATED PROJECTS DEMAND RATIOS j j' I I�,II I I „ �I I ; , ! , , + '� ! t�i•I l liu , II � . � jf �P;qj L -1 ' L LJ'�,ir' � �, �:• I {a!' ;, '; ! . ' j j to �I K "`u External Site External''Site' Study Area Intersections �, " i! � �s Plus I , I j' Plus r'` I �ajl.j �� I; External Site External Related External Related I lllf4 t # ,�' ; t 1y 1al �� .Traffic ��, {ij�' R'w liProjects , ,.1�projects a � is ;TrafflcDemands j1raffic . Demands' F � �, r� H iI %9`f I1,�, 1 I �I /I tail L J4� Yy If Science Drive and loa AngeyesPj?���; 48 �afa,'N` !;� ^h�I'11�527 �`�` j'k; "I�� 3 U':'�I Avenue , K,. Spring Road and High Street- 58 1.598 3 0 io: Los Angeles Avenue Spring Road and Second Street 64 1,429 I. 4.48 Spring Road and Flinn Avenue 174 1,537 1132 Spring Road and Los Angeles 102 3,391 3.01 Avenue -New Los Angeles Avenue Moorpark Avenue and Los Angeles 36 3,040 1.18 Avenue Gabbert Road - Tierra Rejada Road 33 2,377 1.39 and Los Angeles Avenue WA ,AM, WA ,AM, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The street system in the vicinity of the study site is now operating at acceptable levels of service at five of the seven study area intersections. The intersections of Spring Road /Second Street and Spring Road /Flinn Avenue are currently operating in excess of design capacity during both the morning and afternoon commuter peak travel periods. By 1995, future traffic demands on the study area street system are anticipated to increase significantly. For the ` theoretical "existing plus site traffic" scenario, all of the,;study area intersections would operate at acceptable levels of service during both..commuter peak travel periods. ' ti I '.I ,,,:i. For the "total :cumulative with site traffic ,with existing geometries scen4ri0, four, 'of the seven study area,,intersections would operate'in excess :of, {z 1 7 p r {, i lu '.ICE design capacity , during " the morning and /or` afternoon commuter peak travel ' .I ` 4 a� periods.;, For the "total :cumulative with and without site' traffic with „ {, mit x " r' {i ii ti ., { .;i , i t .;. , �. .: !,_ ;Cj.'; t -,J'1� ty. i �;I`� r I i, iF�«1a❑ f.* igation scenarios,yA three `of the ;study are intersections would ope "rate. ate_ r (? Ior E r P' ^% acceptable 1 eve s of service during both commuter peak travel periods However I" 04 >, #the;intersections�of Spring Road /High Street - Los Angeles Avenue,:SpringlRoad /Los fi Lfi' is i f �1Angeles.Avenue —New Los Angeles Avenues Los Angeles Avenue/moor par;k Avenue, and E 4os,Angeles Avenue /Gabbert Road Tierra Rejada'Road would:operate in excess'of h g capacity , during::; . . , . rif esi n the morning - and /or afternoon commuter:', peak travel F1 F4 periods Site traffic :-impacts at these locations are not.'anticipated to be '' i nifica impacts _ ' s g nt: Spring Road and Interim traffic at the intersection of '.High Street -Los Angeles Avenue are considered to be unmitigatable due to current ;right -of -way restrictions. However, construction of the SR 118 -SR 23 Freeway connection is expected to divert a significant volume of traffic away from this location, thereby significantly improving the level of service.' The proposed driveways located on the north side of Flinn Avenue and the east side of Spring Road would have ample capacity to serve the additional traffic generated by the proposed hotel and quality restaurant. In addition, parking stall widths, aisle widths, and curb cut -offs would be adequate to Project No. 900510 23 r handle normal parking maneuvers. The planned,on -site parking capacity of 230 spaces should provide ample parking capacity to accommodate normal peak site parking demands. The maximum site traffic contribution to the study area street system would occur at Spring Road and Flinn Avenue, approximately 11.32 percent. It has been a pleasure to serve you on this interesting project. If you -,have any questions concerning the findings and conclusions of our analysis, or require any further input at this time, please contact us at your convenience. Very truly yours, THOMAS S. MONTGOMERY AND ASSOCIATES ,k ssio E.,lil r I f Mir f i:R Ktl b i s�i11'AP kt- fc rr'v II - i 1 1 ' 1• s �, F��, �,';� ' � . � Ab 6 7 I� ,,�11) , I •� ii';' �t�)41', ,1 � y I - ..,, 'i k,° 4'`11, ? , :v Ili . •,i r. t d I >' r Y 11 I �;,t i i >r f n r'. Ilt iti :111 1 oma S:�Montg ery,r P.r�'Pr�',,, ). +,Lai >�' +i , r" {t � a4 nCipol lii6dP�k'�a twStl t ul?i }�1p iElL� s 7I }1 .� �A�f1C,:,:,��� Firm Pri �e d l l t ,:f.. ':a _, � �>�, 1 ?tl 'f 'i 1ht , rr .Yk a+ },.., •° 2 1 ,�: f t ):.. C��. ! ��I�' V tj ,,f 1• 1A I a��. -.... ..,i., :t" • .::, r '.tij�l !r {; ...� •,�.''�, k"k..:, Fa r?j'�f.l "I s' � fL'�.� a�.d � ;1:.. i.. -.:. .. ' � .11 �. 4�1 �' a.l �„ _ '�.i:�,: .�.,. :. .•`.It ., 1 t. ..1'.44 �J1=1, 4L{.. ?f: .i+ni. '.�9ri't,..11.� }I, IFS -�. {�� iii tJ ,I'I�litt �', ��.') �II`[. �.1 ,7' 1I i,?I,: {: "i ,:i.. t.. I, 1_ _ :, -.n. • t. � '..' -Ii f.i: ?e t, iK,..,1y -17 :1 ".'�'�,,•�•u�'S.1�t,�G'Ff il3�,t1.�:1•.j :.1.'t�� �''�iilv+' „I :IIj[,ll� r11� 4�!1) h! 1.1 111!1' #all {. V._4:� ;7 :.'I` � ,G ,k,, I k � 1 1 },�, ;I , I t l atz"�;riy l fr 'a - e qt,>, �itr,�r . }�rj'a { i'• h! ' i 1 � '. "�r Gi i i )_{�:I;i ,;�11I, V�l1 �I �in �. ' 't ; M �', ,, .sal)iz 3.. ;N +, ,+'ti;��''�?•. >� 111, r I. k Se n...V 4 Y(•�;, � .�Ij.1I ,'4.f4r )� i;i}1�IIlt I 1, !, �,'. 1i- ; i 1 T'� i }'} �3'i Q �1' :)II �pI{ t • 'n - i � �' .: � t . � ' 9� I � '111 ��t,'I n x li I � � ,? �) -1� t'1)R IM�I„ 8 1 1 '�. •t:xi,1G , ( t{ , �1� iq J I tr 17, ,, 1; 1.! ( t I,, ,1 ; r.:ell111.. id 11 Allt:i I ('' "jI A,,.H tt prypry •: , :,. _ ,,1 , � • ,[ ,'� ; � �I � •1 „ '.. ' ,',1u � 1 : ��l�`� ! ,.I+,� 1 I . .)' k , ;�,! :are �I. t�l,>�'1 x - � . � �k �' -1 �� � r, d•�lr� nsrzl +it "1!p .�,'��r?��tl�ll� �d!k ldi�'; 11�11:1111� �,,� 1. 1 �, .. r C- .+ .13' fi '}, I'. k 11;:pp.•tU .1, xr11,11 ! I.I,,.a,. :J _f,y i ) , - s1 .rl ,.ltr 3> f E + I I t• c n•:.0 .•F. L4 .F,, -! w :cd,,�x;f {r� +1 I t"; „i 11 u tV, i;: 1 •'l} lil i 1 {l , 4i Ihlt t 1� l��IIR { I I I ti I 1 ��4 ij Project No. 900510 24 i I' it 1 - - ' � � 1 �•' !� i +'�: i i r r�('' I r { j.' ci �' ' r i' �>��,� r.r + { �lF'�'r i!W ,- � 1 fill fi� '� � ro P1(..,,I� �4.��, i � � � '� ?t �,iu•'t: rA �,�l ir'tl� +�{ P�.:�� 'I ti�. + '' >, �' � �(•i !!� � f r+` � t '� .'.y I 11 { � 3, � �� ,��� �+ r��.�1� � � �i � + ,, G�� r u #'. �'• Fl y�l ✓�{�Y' � I �L,, ��i�i .. ,:1r�� � 1� _ q`: '� fig, , r�"r k4+ 1!; K,! +ir � �{it` � �71q� � �1�'d�".��� �i , ; I } f 7,1 ,- 'rr ESIT .� r . 4r � 1, I 1( 4 t ` � 43 i vI : ' i F l l} ( +�N�1 qt � u . , �9�'} •�' �: 1 �9 :, ti 1 , 1 , ' II; i �, r �i y' tl� l, �r 11i I , � M FC ��! r I l 3 } �i'� t � Hr f t� i Ih1% l I r�!� v t1I �l js , ' �jry l t � 1 HW l }+ � �. i I+fIl ! I6 �` t {+ r m� i+d4L P yi rr . Y, { {;�,� i K � " nt' E (gci• '43}' h lj(j? 4 { ir �? 1 j rr..!. � � � ! J 16} IrE� ..2 '', . , �. l 1�1 $ti� i r ' !P ltr t y'` � y i P, r � r h ' ir , � � II Y� ? N�f f I � fic'4 � J �" .yyI Y t v • �, ` �� 1s� } } }! -�i ! "�: I ! , } s '.; � . ,� t � ri G r� i f � � l� i r W{� ✓ ; 4' r1 I , T r�p ir' HlV ��:� s ,l l � lr . . ,r C M'�z�r � }rj, . . -?�`�. I� . � #i �a r ) ` i l� f i f ( s ffirl"r ,?-' � : , r;e t a� � � � ". , b � f , { 4 , {� � 'c{l� w •.¥ � � r t s c �� +r y1 XX '"kt i� y1 , t - !r 1 r } � IA 4!k 'Or. ) r r ib ail 1• 41 i�'' ; # "• iz f Yk. i tLt �1 . t'r{' h . •Y } ., . • � XIGN3ddd PL 1 L-r Tj MOORPARK I P99• l•. j.: +rw►rsu \� SEMYCOUNTRY" ~ -_ a j �\ \ ` \VlRqlNIA i Z j 4, IT GO Y)CiNFTY MAP TABULATIONS • 1 WM ANALYSM OU .4.• f Me VIA # "A ••& "A T— PL PL y y NOTE LEGEND WE PLAN Z*4 WF ggS El 0 U W 0 0I 0. t - c - M i N, VICN 41TY MAP _ AR: TABULATIONS _ M NOTE LEGEND - - � caw waE . ••••� f- U Srrff PLAN wr�r Thomas S. Montgomery i Associates 2151 Atessandro Drive, Suite 210 Ventura, CA 93001 (805)652 -0411 Client : Job 0 : 900510 Filename : B:900510SN Abnormal Conditions : Time 1 2 3 4 * * * MANUAL COUNT SUMMARY If * * Location : SCIENCE DR. i NEW L.A. AVE. Timeperiod : 630 -830 Day : THURSDAY Date : 6/7/90 TOTAL VOLUMES Movement 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 15 Min HOURLY 630 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 273 0 0 125 14 420 1686 645 0 0 0 3 0 1 10 207 0 0 172 39 432 1765 700 0 0 0 0 0 1 6 231 0 0 115 17 370 1871 715 0 0 0 3 0 0 18 232 0 0 168 43 464 2051 730 0 0 0 2 0 0 11 288 0 0 183 15 499 2078 745 0 0 0 0 0 2 17 205 0 0 249 65 538 800 0 0 0 1 0 3 16 189 0 0 305 36 550 815 0 0 0 1 0 0 11 210 0 0 252 17 491 PNV 0 0 0 4 0 5 55 892 0 0 989 133 Intersection Peak hour begins at 730 with volume ■ 2078 Timeperiod : 1600-1800. Day : THURSDAY. Date : 6/7/90. Abnormal Conditions . I .. i .' ; TOTAL VOLUMES ' Movement T 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 15 Min HOURLY 0 ' 0 0 19 ., 0 32 8 167: 0 0 219...1 3 448 1767 {y' 1615 0 0 0 7 0 . ,.15 3 156 0 , . 0 212 1 5 398 1871' nqn sr I X A �yG 'r neu�it� I I ; G , r;t ° • 1630 ; I 0 0 0 : 29 0 41 i 4 173 0 O 228 2 qy ,, 477 + 1968 ; I ►', kr w I yf 1645 r! -. 0 0 O 11 0 19 1 151 0 0 260 ' 2 44i 1997 r I,i ,< 1715 i¢ •,.. 0 O i . 51 0 39 1 191 0 O 269 1 , 1 552 1 %1 '�L �w $'j�+f' I L); 0 19 0 15 0 195 , 0 0 264 2 495 1730 0 0 0 ;, 15 0 7: 0 165 ,' 0 ',', 0 318 1 506 i t atr i w 4t'"r {w 1745 " 0 0 0 7 0 8 2 126 0 0 265' 0 408 PHY , -0 0 0 . % 0 1 80 2 702 0 0 1111, 6 Intersection Peak hour begins at 1645 with volume ■ 1997 + j d- ,� r ,( 1 7 , • ,., , , '.:I -.. ` , -. r 1 it ly 7e ; r`, { E a t F Y; o 1' q u } r �; t i�j�i"�;jn "Ilti�rl' • LOCition ! SCIENCE DR. i NEW L A. SAVE iI -ts Date(*). 6 /7/90 6/7/90 . , � .r INIS4 w C,�. , kY 1 1Tisrcperiod(s) .630.830; 1600- t,'.J +,,, tr }} 1800 r w !fl V 1 , I t I e '}' t .�. ... 1 jl'�1 I `} • Client .. o +i l + ': :r !1' „ w' AM Peak': 730 -830 JObb S 900510 + c t i i :' PM Peak 1645 -1745 ., , t :I AH *' f tyi 1 1{ilIi }if; "^ It , I t �,1't�{ !! 41 , '! ' ' 11' 1 i�• 1. PH Peak +' i<e�l t��t`I ` ' It�l'�{ , t� �� t'� 1 I �I ' 1 �� , a ` ! � • � � ;', }, k SCIENCE DR. 5 0 4 }, v 6* f fil i I I I l_ 133 1141 I, � � I 1111• '' 989 0* 5 5 J r- 0 NEW L.A. AVE. I 2r V N Tor o —� G* - v 0 r 0 0* 0* O* Thomas S. Montgomery i Associates Client : Job ! : 900510 Filename : 6:90051OFS Abnormal Conditions : Time 1 2 3 4 2151 Alessandro Drive, Suite 210 * * * MANUAL COUNT SUMMARY * * * Ventura, CA 93001 Location : SPRING ROAD i FLINN AVE. Timeperiod : 630 -830 Day : THURSDAY Date : 6/7/90 TOTAL VOLUMES Movement 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 15 Min HOURLY (805)652 -0411 630 3 176 14 3 148 6 13 0 16 3 2 3 387 1784 645 5 260 18 12 174 4 3 2 10 0 0 3 491 1866 700 1 197 15 7 182 5 5 1 14 3 1 2 433 1943 715 1 196 24 20 201 5 5 3 11 6 0 1 473 2086 730 T 220 11 7 205 4 9 0 14 8 2 2 489 2193 745 5 301 19 8 189 3 4 1 11 2 0 5 548 800 12 350 15 6 152 10 5 1 12 T 1 5 576 815 5 337 12 3 184 5 3 1 13 12 1 4 580 PHV 29 1208 57 24 730 22 21 3 50 29 4 16 Intersection Peak hour begins at 730 with volume ■ 2193 Timeperiod 1600 -1800. Day : THURSDAY. Date 6/7/90. Abnormal Conditions - , TOTAL VOLUMES Movement jysr, Time 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 '' 15 Min,;. NOl1RLY ' J, I 1615 9 212 7 7 197 6 6 3 12 17 2 4 473 ::1940 1600 17 227 4 i 171 12 5 � 1 . 9 ;, ! 7 4 20 490 2015 1630 14 185 2 ;:6 212 10 5 3 9 16 ` 2 6 ,! 470 2091 1645 .12 230 4 : 0 19E' 27 5 0 . E 11 4i 8 ,t 507 2141 r 1700 10 251 3 1 233 10 6 0 6 : 16 2 10 1715 13 266 3 : i 2 245 10 ;'7' 1 7 7 ;'' p 5 S66 2105 ra 1730 17 256 1 2 213 14 3 0 9 i ' 0 1 520 r 1745 10 242 1 2 185 8 2 1 9 7 0 4 471 ! C L ! PHV 52 1003 11 5 889 61 21 1 30 ' 38 6 24 ' i f " r r {; { Intersection Peak hour begins at 1645 with volume = 2141 t a a { j 4 } s r s r 4'�� l '..7i � .:. �'1 '.�.. �.. I i.i...' �. � i _r� "fit Location :•SPRING ROAD i FLINN AVE. { L tla �� r..f fi „ti t Date(*) . 6/7/90; 6/7/90 #t Mhfr. jL''' Ttmeperiod(s) 630-830) 1600 cant t:l AM Peak - 730 -830 900510 , r zfr PM Peek 1645 -1745 I PM Peak 61* 889* 5* SPRING ROAD 22 73024 � V 24* 1 — 16 -- - -- 5T- 21 21 N A_ M 00 YI Thomas S. Montgomery t Associates 2151 Alessandro Drive, Suite 210 Ventura, CA 93001 (805)652 -0411 Job N : 890703A Filename : 890703SM Oat& Collectors) JIM 9 ELI Abnormal Conditions : - Time 1 2 3 4 * * * MANUAL COUNT SUMMARY * * * Location : SPRING ROAD i L.A. AVENUE Timeperiod : 700 -900 Day : WEDNESDAY Date : 11/7/90 Movement 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 TOTAL VOLUMES 15 Min HOURLY 700 25 63 8 89 35 89 1D9 119 21 2 54 104 718 3337 715 27 57 4 101 38 86 107 133 21 1 79 124 778 3408 730 44 44 7 144 54 86 111 172 36 0 70 165 933 3302 745 37 83 10 90 45 83 113 132 32 0 81 202 908 3163 800 73 73 7 101 39 59 94 133 40 1 76 93 789 2983 815 54 46 10 76 38 62 69 % 34 2 76 111 672 830 48 56 2 74 25 65 126 96 34 0 74 194 794 845 48 56 5 99 39 51 87 74 40 0 69 160 728 PHV 181 257 28 436 176 314 425 570 129 2 306 584 Intersection Peak hour begins at 715 with volume = 3408 Timeperiod : 1600-1800. Day WEDNESDAY. Date 11/7/90 - Abnormal Conditions !, TOTAL VOLUMES Movement Time i 2, 3•i 4 5 6 7, 8 9 10 11 12 15 Min MOURN i' I .1600 63 55 1 66 57 ._.99 80 94, S8 3 117 111 1 804 3246 �` 1615 52 47 6 ` 73 64 94 = 67 97 SS ! t; } 6 103 r 99 f �� 763 :,;:: 3332 iAll � ". , "' 1630 61 i. 4S 7 ': 62 , 47• . 94 . 99 124 ,51 3 110 :t0i 807: 3140 1645 y 58 34 3 89 . 64 110 ' 9S %' S6 �' 5 134 " 126 872 3475 1700 55 37 t i, 5 95 ; S3 111 110 t tT m 67 i i;12 109 ;.119 890 3486 All „f, ,Mrl `,1715 56 66 ~ 6 81:: 71 , 103. 92 n 51 ; -.6 .146 116 871 4i1 t i „� tii 1730 61 66 „ r„ 9 64 54 90 109 99 60 „ 10 109. 111 , i; 842 1745 69 61 5 • 68 ` 59 106 124 95 61 6 102 127 ' 883 PMV 241 230 25 308 237 410 435 308 239 ' '34 46b, 4T3 ,y Yv�rJiyr, Intersection Peak hour begins at 1700 with volume s 3486 „ It ♦ i,'F k I IF X 11 ' _ ' � S ! 7 � y� dl ' •:.;7i ,� .. fj WI�7 �' �'� h' �hi�r ,.,. •. ,: ,., location SPRING ROAD 9 L A AVEMIJ� 'K _ �'II!'Y ..¢i•^ I "jt'.tu..; Date (s) ! .:u iM. a i <) 11/7/90: 11/7/90 ' Timeperiod(s) a 700 -900. 1600 -1800 AM Peak I I 1 1 c ,� I hf,Oata Collectors) • ,IIN i ELI ,4 4 y 715-815 I t 11''t 'I JobN 890703A - I ' 1 k Inn 1... Peak 1700 1800 !il!!' f * Peak PH e: t Ufa f w w !' I `yf mH e I , }I A , r J..I a• rl I ,c I I Ij i,li ��I ! �:�i 1 nil! I >� . is 41 s' ,ti�rt l�1'�;I� ' , 410* 237* 308* SPRING ROAD 314` 176 436 i . +I j �'{ 4 ref � I �a m d ..' • � I: I i ' 1 473* 466* -C . 306 34 * u I 425 ---I I 2 L.A. AVENUE 435* V N 570 —a 388* 129 —, 239* V <1 81 257 28 r 1 241* 23D* 25* GOLDENSTATE TP.AFFIC COUNTS 41263 ;0TH ST. WEST BUARTI HILL,CA. 93536 SUITE 520 (605) 943 -1604 # t ; MANUAL COUNT SUMMARY # f F kK RD 1, ! LOS ANGELES AVE. IORPA I ; , -------------------------- - - --- - - - - -- TOTAL IUTH80UND 't +'�ii} 114 HR TOTALS",{ EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 114 HR TOTALS VOLUMES — --------- — THRU RIGHT 'i'iIN80 SBO BOTH 01 LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT EBD YBD BOTH 15 HIM HOURLY 1y ' 14 I 26 ti� S6 106 182 +i„ lb 170 '' ,4 `,: 7"' ;I20 19 190 146 336 498 .241 , 34" SS 75 "130 21 213 4 9�, 174 48;,' 231. -469 594 2236 47 +121 168 ° ' ' 1 164 "` `� 11 '150 34 '' ; 163 195, 378 546 '2196 ""q!" 21,,,32 78 ;,11G. _ t 36 214 „ J, 1 14 Ibb _ 51 25I 237 488 598 2t54 74 '104 w .32 203 "' +2 t 18 144 3T 237 154 341 495 �1 ih'14' T'! i f1:' I P Y , . , 1974 24 , 23 90 X113 a I;� 31 211 10 8 147 47 242 202. 444 557 12 : 81 ;' 93 ,; ry , '29 140 a� l ua. 1 -154 84 ; 110 246 4f6 509 4 SS 27'- ',74 101'` 24 144 1 ', 12 109 22 143 312 413 �, r 1 L t r r �•.; a ji 10 AM.. 31 Ilf 190 360 5)0 ;� 86 Bbl 15 41 814 158 Bbl 609 1671 2241 2211 PEAK HOUR APPROACH DIAGRAM,' " I 111 31 to 238 it j IN ; 1 . W - -t --E A A r 66 - -+ 761 - --) 15 - -+ v < - -4 A 4 - -; 39 1 119 32 HOORPARI: RD. t -- l58 < -- 610 LOS ANGELES AVE. -- 41 v GOLDENSTATE TRAFFIC COUNTS 42263 50TH ST. WEST DUARTI HILL,CA. 93536 SUITE 520 18;,'51 943 -1604 f f f MANUAL COUNT SUMMARY + f Prepared for KAKU JOB1: 004231 -E INTERSECTION MOORPARK RD. AND INEi LOS ANGELES AVE. DATE: 5 -1 -90 TCS FILE MANE: 8:004231 -E.MCT DAY : TUESDAY TIME: 4:OOPM - 6:04PM ABMOPIK CONDITIONS: NONE +�, �`I � I�•I V MOORPAFi: RD. ;''. NEW LOS ANGELES AVE TOTAL - - -- IIR TOTALS EASTBOUND ,; 1fEST80UND 114 HR TOTALS VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND li4 --------- - - - - -- - - - -- - - - - -- - - -- -- - - - - -- - - -- e r�6EOIVy IEfT* iHPU RIGHT IEFT THRU NOD SOD BOTH LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT EBD W84 BOTH ,15 MIN' HOURLY r !•�±1� F us �3, 1� 6 y , 04 11 31 15 96 111 37 168 6 44 189 42 211 275 466 547 2661. 4 2 { b 100 b . Sb 11 142 153 42 170 . 3 29 191 10 215 296 511 664 '' _ 2183 . 5 ri 10." , {. 111 19 31 a 23 16I IB4 39 222 v 30 251 64 T61 345 606 ti 190. 2607 12 I bb 6 1G 24 82 lOo °� . 34 182 6 32 19b' 60 222 288 510 '`" blb ' 2140 #52004 4aY +,t ,4. ' 6 , 113 9 ,:. 35 r , 14 107 'i 171 �; , 33 188 6 " 31 202: 62 127 310 542 , �i, .113: 200- t '' IT+i 5 15 , ! b1 lb -`, 38 32 115 141 38 204 f0" 33 194` b2 252 284 541 688 I, ,' 3 ., . 1I 8 94 10 40 17 144 161. 44 200 f1 33 205 64 264 aid 562 723 69 13 19 21 141 122 26 155 8 43 141 43 189 227 4I6 538 , '�f PE,1K HOUR fro& 4:30 PM TO 5:30 PM 28 22 43 351 SO I!1 93 515 606 SN i46 22 126 643 268 962 1237 2194 2BG1 .2801 IKAK HOUR APPROACH DIAGRAM ' 114 351 p, W - -t - -E A A S 144 --f +— 268 196 - - -> < -- 843 NEW LOS ANGELES AVE. 22 - -+ t -- 126 v v 28 43 22 MOORPARr RD. GOLDENSTATE TRAFFIC COUNTS 42263 50TH ST. WEST AUAPTI HILL,CA. 93536 SUITE 520 1805) 943-1604 I f 4 MANUAL COUNT SUMMARY f f f Prepared for : KAKU 1NIERSECTION :SPRING RD. AND HIGH ST.&.A. AVE. ICS FILE NAME: B:004231 -F.MCT AONORK;& CONDITIONS: NONE JOB4: 004231 -F DATE: 5 -1 -90 DAY : TUESDAY TIME: 7:00AM - 9:00AM SPRING R0. HIGH ST. /L.A. AVE. -- ------------------------------------- - - - - -. ------------------ - - - - -- ----- - - - - -- - - - - -- TOTAL' NOPIHBOUHD SOUTHBOUND : 114 HR TOTALS,,' EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 114 HR TOTALS VOLUKES TIRE - - -- -. --------- - - - --- - - -' -- - - -- - - - - -- - - - - - -- -- ------------ -------------- ; : LEFT THAW RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT HOD SBD BOTH.,', LEFT THRU P16HT LEFT THRU RIGHT EBD MOD BOTH 15 KIM, HOURLY �1iE6iHf r -� 1:00 ° t ' , r'6 .��, b 191 ?i B l4 1 - -- 203 ` - 23 -= 226 , - -- -- 0 -- - - 57 - -- 3 -- -- 19? -- - . 64 - - -- 10 - =- 60 - -- 266' — 326 - - - -- 551 - - - - -- 2440 l5 ¢� r',13 0��f;`7 191 . 7 24 7 2ll 38 249 :; 3 60 J' S '. 207 ` 76*; 4 : 68 287 355 604 2669 . 130 24l 1J _ 11 b .' 261: 34 295 1 Bl 9 211 63 15 91 289 380 615 2691 JA H! " `.0 `. •G 259 13 lb 1 273 30 303 1 66 2 163 ',59 15 69 231 306 604 '. 2592 t tB:W; ,` 10 ' 13 11� 4`d '; B IO !3 3 . 13 1 477:. 341 '. 24 14 Si�l 365 j • :• 0 2 0 SS 1 ': 1: 149: 147. 57 54 . 13 8 61 58 219 209 2BO To7 ,,: ?81 632 2409 ` .3 -311 r - , 8:34;, 14 " 7 :730 5 9 1 25l ' 1S ?db " ; 2 `? 7 . 169 59 • 10 66 238 304 570 B:IS' l0 f' 4 163 •` 5 4 1 ! 182 ` 1S 19- 0 4? 4 115 b0 3 51 176 229 426 E;PEAK HOUP. fros 7:30 AM TO 6:30 AN t!= 48 29 1275 42 59 11 1352 112 1464 4 262 13 670 233 51 279 954 1233 2697 2697 �: ;.PEAK HOUR. APPROACH DIAGRAM 59 , +jr ncN 11 42 of I , s 4 51 262 - -- 233 HIGH ST./L.A. AVE. 13 - - + -- 670 V V < - -f A + - -> t 46 1275 29 SPRIN6 RD. GOLDENSTATE TRAFFIC COUNTS 42263 50TH ST. WEST OUAF.T! HILL,CA. 93536 SUITE 520 1805) 943 -16+4 ! t f MANUAL COUNT SUHMARY f f t Prepared for : KAKU INTERSECTION : SPRING RD. AND HIGH ST.1L.A. AVE TCS FILE NAME: 8:004231-6.MCT JOB#: 004231 -6 DATE: 5 -1 -90 DA'i : TUESDAY TIME: 4:00PM - bAll ON ABNORMAL CONDITIONS: NONE SPRING RD. _ HIGH ST.X.A. AVE ----------- ------ - - - - -- ------- - - - - -- - - -- -- ----------- - - - -- - - - - -= TOTAL It;? NORTHBOUND SOUT1iB0UN0 1/4 HR TOTALS EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 1/4 HR TOTALS VOLUMES r, H TIME °'" -- - - - -- -- - - -- - - -- - -- -=- ----- - - - - -- - -- - -- = -- fk SEGIIi� LEFt THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT HBD SBD BOTH LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT TNRU kIGNT EBD W6G BOTH 15 MIN HOURLY�� 31., 8 202 12,; ' 13 2 . 241 17 2b8 i S 87 «8 ' 117 76 `. 11' 100 264. 364 632 F 21281' ' .: , , 4 15. 43 �20 194 8 18 2 257 28 285 3 68 13. 181 81 18 " 64 280 364 649 _2814Y ; i 4; 30 ',G " 33 21 210 11 9 1 264 21 285 1 122 15 . 240. 100 17 ' ' 138 357 495 '`': 780 286b X1.1 29 ,.14 215! 12 ° 6 ' 10 263 2B 29l 3 91 6 175 62 17 + 102 214 ;` 376 667 2829 :1+5:46:;4 11 ; 1`r 233 7 10 4 ?65 2l T8b 0 107 23 203 79 20 130 302 1 +2 718 2717 141'. fit., }f r; 23 i 21 241 b ;' 9 1 288 ,' ' ! b ' 30, ��, 4 82 15 206 'r 75.15 101 296 - 397 701 ? nf22 248 14 -23+ 2 ' . 293' 39''332 ky.! ! 95 15 l90 x:96 , 14; 11! 300 '111 7{:'a 743 71r��I �r. 3 tN '0'!" 5': {.. �tl� �i!t9 14 c 239 6 , `r 4 , , 1. 2b2 „ . i t .. 213 k "- 2 . 60 8 .,;. IN 60 ;; 12 I 40 192 ' 282 �, ` 555 E 1 > s �) > h�`# 1p t._.# u .. FI' , 1,� ( T ) - �., j� I .r.'.• Ai y c • q. ^�;�t AK HOUR fro* 4:34 PM 1015:30 Ph.'I 102 A 76 902 36 34 16 1080 06 166 8 402 61 824 336 69 471 1279 1700 2866 28b6 PEAK HOUR APPROACH DIAGRAM 34 t, 16 S 36 W - -t --E A A S 8 - -f t -- 69 402 -- -> < -- 336 HIGH ST. /L.A. AVE 61 --f t -- 824 V V 102 902 76 SPRING RD. GOLDENSTATE TRAFFIC COUNTS 42263 50TH ST. NEST DUARTI HILL,CA. 93536 SUITE 520 (805) 943 -1604 + i i MANUAL COUNT SUMMARY + t + Prepared for : KAKU JOB4: 004231-P INTERSECTION TIERRA REJADA AND LOS ANGELES AVE. DATE: 5-3 -90 TCS FILE NAME: 6:004231 -P.MCT DAY : THURSDAY TIME: 7:00AM - 9:OOPM ABNORMAL CORDITIONS: NONE TIERRA REJADA ; LOS AKElES {`" - - - - -- - - - - -- -------------- -- - ± -- - - - - - - - -- -- - - - -- - -- - - - -- - =TOTAL ; NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND 114 HR TOTALS EASTBOUND.:,' F; NESTBOUHD 114 HR TOTALS VOLUMES +� 77i77 7 ~••- -- 7:3�9E61N LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT KBD SOD BOTH LEFT 1NRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT EBD WIDTH IS MIN HOURLY St; 12 51 I1 '' ?3 12, 100 •1`4b 14b 33 !b4 13 . W26 186 r 5 210 ` 211 427 f 573 2259 +Ts 15 ; J; 3Z "z'� 2G Sb 5 40 l0 113 55 1b6 21 120 11 4b ' 92 ;` 3 ', 153 :,141 294 462 2154 2 27 65 i ' ;b 19 14 150 39 189 L 3 ?; 171 9 19 174 b' 213 J99 412 6011 2164 {�IG `.45 4' 21� 58 10 22 !! 124 43 161 35 211 14 28 149 It 260 .19b 4`rb 623 2022 B Obi F " ': • • +;r ` �r'ti 3 ?; �„k 19 i' 73 9 5` �€ 9 ., 124 23 ''" 1�7 i . 11 172'. 17 , 4 11 °iO4 i a0i. � 200 ;121 ' 32V A 406 _F 1758 �. 6:15, 20' :fir, 2 64 8 12 '` 8 lOb : 28 131 r '' 8 148 9 38 121 14 165 173 338 i �' 472 8: 30" 14t� B 26 45 'i'6,.17 12{ BS35I'110 a�'13 ' I70 10 24:111 _�y5'. i193 146`�339 ` A,454 ?B 28 S 14 7 69 '26 95 9 Ill. 10 7 115 4 138 126 264 • 1 +PEAi, HOUR froo` 7:00 AM TO 8 :00 PM 117`. 80 230 32 104 47 . �B1 183 b70 122 667 47 119 60.1 33 636 753 1589 2259 2259 PEAK HOUR APPROACH DIAGRAM 104 47 1 32 M - -+ --E A A 1 S 122 - -+ +-- 33 667 - --> <-- 601 LOS ANGELES AVE. 47 V V ( - -4 A - -> I 1 1 177 230 80 TIERRA REJADA GOLDENSTAIE TRAFFIC COUNTS 42263 50TH ST. NEST AUARTI 11ILL,CA. 93536 SUITE 520 (805) 943 -1604 t+ t MANUAL COUNT SUMMARY t t t Prepared for KAKU J004: 004231 -9 INTERSECTION TIERRA REJADA AND LOS ANGELES AVE. LATE: 5-3 -90 ICS FILE NAME: 8:004231-0.MC1 DAY : THURSDAY TIME: 4:00PM - 6:00PH, ABNOPMAL CONDITIONS: NONE TIERRA REJADA „ ! ;;, LOS ANGELES AVE . TOTAL it hj ORTHBOUD OUTHB 4 R TOTALS SOU D EASIBOUND WESTBOUND 114 HR iOIALS S YOLUlE 1ME -- — - -- — ------------ " �'.. -- ............. - - = - -- - ---- -- -- - -- - - - - -- -------- - - - - -- I' BEGIN , LEFT. TKU RIGHT : LEFT THRU RIGHT NBD'_ SBD BOTH LEFT TNRU RIGHT LEFT TNRU RIG HT E$0 Y$D BOTH f5 TUN HOURLY «15 t�` - ~41.176 N' -2I63 1 } 4.00,,�"� ' 1� f0 19 20 25 f A "41 60, 101 26 143 8 l 117 224 401 502 +4;15 ;tiC • ; ` 14 18 ; 47 . 18 1.20 13 '; 79 : Si 134 11 180 .. b . . 49 196 4 203 249 ° 452 .. 582 2386 �' ; 15 1b ' 47 ' , ,' 14 21 7 � 78 ' , 41 120 4S l84 3 49 174 3 232 126 458 578 '; 2350 - ^'� r. +4.45' . j II , N "; 12 t4 , 24 '; 47 " 12 1 18 12 88 ,.: 42 • 130 .' 20 14+1 1; IT 36 159 4 172 199, ' 371 501 :;; 2324 y tS: 12 J, ` , 43 , 48 16 ! 30 14 103 .60 163 , 41 232 8 65' 210, b " i .281 181 : 562 725 - 2214 bsjs 5t`15 . 4 j 19 18 ;' 35 8 `; 25 11 ' 12.44 116 30 ' 157 Z ::.. 61 167; . 6 190 240 430 540 5.30 trt ,' 16 16 '' 43 13 17 14 ` 65 44 124 37 174 8 '' 58 142 j 4 214 204 423 552 %i •, �, 5 :45:;:' +, 12 8:42 b ' . 19 2 '; 62 17 89 16 142 4 : 61 133 3 164 198 ' 362 451 at �( t „E ''t' PEAK HOUR 6 a 4:15 PM TO 5:15 PM _ 53 106 189 00 89 46: 346 195 S43 123 136 24 149 734 17 888 455 1843 2386 2386 PEAK HOUR APPROACH DIAGRAM 89 46 60 W - -t - -E A A S 123 - -t t -- 17 736 - - -> < -- 739 LOS ANGELES AVE. 29 - -♦ + -- 199 Y Y 53 t 189 106 TIERRA REJADA W/B New Los Angeles Avenue e/o spring Road VOLUME COUNTING PROGRAM MITRON SYSTEMS CORPORATION - KSC5000 PAGE _I Channel Number 1 Location Code ._ IOWA Date 5/2/90 Real Time. 1046 Start Time 1200 Sample..Time 15 Divide Z Sufrmat i on. 2 -Way YES Operator Number 3 Machine'' Number; Y I 2 j rj }�+ r'1- (H IY ti f N'b�_:�4 � � � ( ;, MSlk kl •, 4 all t: 7 X11 !',! j i<•l"���3Y P {; �5 2 1 40�ilr' 1, 't °' Gil 2000300 0400 0500 0600 0700 4800 0900 1000 1f00 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 1300 2400 ';;1t T01ALS � � s;1�0 !b9 385 365 203 240 .489 465. 312 281 204 97 70 itIn + .t h, ti��0� i Rte illy ! i1 r i n M1s p +a 0�1' 0 X43 ;110 59 bb b3 130 82 77 58 29 114 E c! I I.IfM I I 1 ; t� + i t,j;0 , 0 b8 88 36 ' 541` - bl. 110 42 59 62 '0 1' 72 125 106 56 59 '132 114 97. 71 ' 43 18, +,! t' �y 'Al 52_'' I bl 23 111.' 101 '`" 15 �1 ,f .aEl. .d:.� up w i t;'r 'rl I.�r Yl �#r "p`9N!:rnl —r'1l� il�, Is. :ta�l^!Rtl't'ifr aF�1�P W. tnlr ^ rrr man, F 445 G` 0600 0700 0600 "00 1000 � 2G0: 4 � 2004 f0U 2�G0 2 00�` BTALS` , - yfr,.1AY�{�,, WA h F: {Gic .•I ., �i''ky`. y li�'�><fi r - -, F +{�m�. I� 7i ' 33 ' :78 .491 .120 IL , 743' 151'? `X31. 51 , 2d5.: 158 ;536 255 ► ; I, ; ' �;k I�{ �' 507 1 1 t if I,++� '.I } f r ::,♦• f �� tnF.,��' i !0 . , 63 ' , 143... 154 '131 Bb 18'M I. k 143 ;1 ,105 ff i. i n S 13 g4 mfr; ;l�`F" 8' 11�;y11 '100 126 33 i 11, 37508 3��,e31i'.�? , e', Iy yi { i G '12: 12 23',128 213 254 20 12 ,.., S7 13 , ,►3 }�7 * H r y ,I � a I r 4 1 341 .224 264 211 232 18 u 2 4.142 4 2fi I� 42 t ' i � .• 7�S ,<n ) ' I ;� 4 I + ' t i t�i- � 7� t'�+�1���, i€ 9, ���� , , � � `I� � � I�'t�, (� I T1 '!i .. ".. Mi1111N6 24 HOUR TOTAL SAMPLE CHANNEL 11 ' — - I l S* 900- "0 2000- 0 6929 '1400 1168 1504 7224 1600 6991 1704- 1170 IBGO- 7222 1 ��G2100 -r °., 0 2200 0 2300 . 0 2400- 0 0100 0 0200 0 -0300- 0 0400- 0 j� 6500- l"r 0 0600 0 0700 0 0804- 0 0400 0 1000- 0 1100 , 0 1200 - 0;1� CAannel 1 Traffic Check -sw O.K. tip, L r } itt a al: - a S/B Spring Road n/o New Los Angeles Avenue VOLUME COUNTING PROGRAM MIIRON SYSTEMS CORPORATION - MSC3000 PAGE 1 1500- Channel Number 1 Location Code 20SK Gate 5/8/90 Real Time 1130 Start Time 1200 Sample Time 15 Divide 2 Summation NO 2 -Way YES Operator Number 1 Machine •Nu,rber 4 dip) 0200 0300 0404 0500 06(+) 0700 0800 6900 1102 13� ! {00 l5_r0 1600 1100 1800 19_r2 2000 2100 221 0 2300 X420 TOTALS { 885 785 799 729 676 837 576 458 489 550 223 102 7309 •A 328 290:` 163 155 119 218 157 139 134 1 41 85 33 1 j 203 173 208 167 235 231 143 96 lut 175. 54 44 �' , �'j� , r, a s, , �• 165 160 ; I29 185 2711 207, 133 115 ' 129 133: 47 19 169. 162 199 -222 191 -175 143 108 120 121 37 6 Al I11 hhlr'� h` u!0(► 0200 0300 0400 0_00 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 100 200 1360 1400 1U-0 1600 1700 1800 4�x� 2000 2100 2200 2W, 2 {Ii0 TOTALS 77 44 34 65 253 739 608 721 644 170 IL6 528 5721 34 13 14 1 12 29 155 214 163 123 236 1 996 195 19 21 6 9 45 185 179 164 146 :167 271 182 25 , 13 6 4 25 93 221 223 213 161 157 B 161 15 11 4 10 19 86 178 192 181 214 190 161 HOPING 24 HOUR TOTAL SAMPLE - CHANNEL 11 1300- 12502 1400- 12145 1500- 0 1600- 0 1700- 0 1800- 0 1900- 0 2002- 0 210 (#- 0 2200- 0 2300- 0 2400- 0 0100- 0 0200- 0 0300- 0 0400- 0 0500- 0 0600- 0 0700 - 0 0800 - 0 0900 - 0 1000- 0 1100- 0 1200- 0 Channel 1 Traffic Check -sum O.K. N/B Spring.Road n/o New Los Angeles Avenue , • VOLUME COUNT i NG PRDGRAM niTRON SrSTEMS CCRPDRATIC44 MSC3000 FAGE Channel Nuwber ? Locat i can Code 20NIt ;F Date CIB /9U kr'!al U &e 1 130 Start 7ia.e 1200 Sawp l e T i («e 1. Divide 2 Su �at icon' 140 2 -WAY NO r Operator Number Machine Nusiber 4 ll Yf rye, r Oil I �I. i i �i +, � •i 1 . , i r t � � i ` ' 1 { � '; I i 1, I h , I � � I , 1- if V, f e � * f ii' ft'4�'0 4 � , fEa��� �� aa! i i +f� � _ q , `' I•.V' w , . { ".JIY •��� I '+1 {, {4r" , f..,.I�f ` 6T,.1,.�1, F�Nr��ytyy.f r' �„ + fiii 1 ,.. 1.` t alt '�,M nW� W ,:4;iiW"RI ,H;..�2':f,fM1 1tNr1.' -.'�.I q{'`ifir �t,.;t.� e i...� .•;..:I{i .i� i,,..,. ..a...t :iNl +t,�jt•1^.. Vin, �,7 �f.tig�btt'.�{ 4,arY11r a1s,� 0200 0380 04ir0 0504 8b00 00 OBuO 0900 1008 1 04 l?00 0� 1400;i[ Pk I60 1700"'1660 1900 08 lfi0 .00 23ub 400 '. TOTAIS "-rw 0200 .,fir � *.. • , -....� .. .... .: l.i,.ir n� 1..•u: �4etl 4.,nJq.l..Lu., .,d ie G iL��:F.li i{(P t, Y. .ISr 225 2uo�, �, 23 235 331 ,,.1301 Zi _7 . 145. t60 216`'`214.14, 287.i'." I,?,314 ):52 WAS ' mc'.' %'wZCil,?z'in tnr'. 'TA ,ieo0 i)ta e'` 4:`il•r 1 f 1 }.+1'i` ;rM{ l 1, 1 "r•ll .F�, r.ft`.. „ �:. ..I.:.11 f li j� ' :: :,) 1 Lr I,..1�; Ir !� :v.� 1 I7�''.� � 3 �F'i� I�id s� }It<i�.�: i YI �nI Amo 7' , 1••' .f 25 213 296 290 224 283 2i r t , Si, g IS 09' 4 ! � 11 1 21 , 93 ' 202 285 469 222 156' 290 I It; i i � , " 1S 1 } I T! 21 3/ 12] •`292 311 SO 343 209 183 249 ` fir „ P`i�i,1 "' r , �{„ Eu,�II I I.• aKi + 1 l±<n;� ` ,♦ia JY !!" ; 4' B 22 4b 1 140 313 4t4 249 375 721 255 qp tlIII 111111 `. i 3 ; I F •II , - y I I 9 I L ;, r•1 , +e �,rc, ��' � � tYh *' -:11'1 t `f � �{'. 1W41 Nf; 24 HOUR TOTAL SAMPLE - CHANNEL 12 13x0` e 1 : _.. ti2o4l 1404- 16982 1500- 0 1600= . 0 ` 1700 N 0 1840= 0 1400 -0 2404 ..� V 2100 -! 0 2204- 0 " 2300= 0 2400 - : 0 0100 0 0200 0 0300 0 ! 0400- 4 u50i+- 0 i +WO- 0 0700 • 0 OB00- 0 4900 0 1000- 0. 1100 - u 1200- u•, s I` ;x t; , Channel 2 Traffic Check -sua O.K. I i . 4 N/B Spring road s/o New Los Angeles Avenl•e VOLUME COUNTING PRU Ate MITRON SYSTEMS CORPORATION - KSC3000 Channel Number I.ocation Code Date Real Tiwe Start Tine Sawple Time Divide SIiWWit l an 2-•Wav ape( ator Number Machine Number 5/Bi90 , 61W 0200 0304 000 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 II00 1: 1600 2000, 1, (#I%Vj V20 0300rv4tKI 4`.,wl 06.0 0700 0600 0900 L 110 LO � 600 I7ifi j900 !e 54'3! 345 1. [i ° { �" ! 1' 40_ i ZS 10. 390 {� ,1 1 tL 1 { {iL�. s, i.:X,.C'�� 1��1 .��v, i."N. � :.,L�k �t J�j}i�Je�' i:d�ii. n��ri;,i,!•. :`�, itt .e�! I�. bJ 7B 79> 79 , f00 F714f t 84' 43 ", 26 J ! 1' 9 31 66 L bf 48 , 45 41 46 2 60NE. 5/8/90 18-N9 1900 15 2 NO NU 1 1G1 PAGE 1 D 1304 4ua 130U 1604 110-0 1840 1900 20i'0 240 + : 10T61S „ t t tin ` L C ',li i t n 1 t k i i. i;birti f N�a `172 127 SI 15 ^ 645 ii yi' i 5 . ,'T .37 ",21. 1.�I•.(7 pi i!lin! {I �,.. 1 Channel 2 Traffic Check-sua O.K. 10 " ":. 80 1600 2000, 1, (#I%Vj V20 0300rv4tKI 4`.,wl 06.0 0700 0600 0900 L 110 LO � 600 I7ifi j900 54'3! 345 1. [i ° { �" ! 1' 40_ i ZS 10. 390 {� ,1 1 tL X39 {iL�. s, i.:X,.C'�� 1��1 .��v, i."N. � :.,L�k �t J�j}i�Je�' i:d�ii. n��ri;,i,!•. :`�, itt .e�! Channel 2 Traffic Check-sua O.K. 10 " ":. 1600 2000, 1, (#I%Vj V20 0300rv4tKI 4`.,wl 06.0 0700 0600 0900 L 110 LO � 600 I7ifi j900 345 2bZ 173 75 ,! 2 1 6 20 62 192 330 390 22b 215 198 l95 192 277 323 335 371 �'t �n,t '' " ' I�. bJ 7B 79> 79 , f00 F714f t 84' 43 ", 26 J ! 1' 9 31 66 L bf 48 , 45 41 46 2 ;' O 1 3 21 43 16 �7 52 ' 50 45 45 S1. 19 ";' 92 89: '. 89 . bl bl . 50 26 0 J l 7 ,„ 22 : 47 80 69 . 56 63 52 `r2 , 45 59 '' 71 91,; 44 bi ;, 45 21 l •t G ':. I :. S 4 30 71 108 79 .' 57 54 Sb 54 S0 79 82 " lb' L 84 50, . 35 HO'/196 24 HOUR TOTAL SAMPLE - CHANNEL 12 2040 - 4347 2100- 4339 2200- 4340 2300- 4288 2400- 0 01007 1 0 0200- 0 0300- 0 0400- 0 0500- 0 0600- O 0700- 0 0800- 0 0900- !' 0 1000- 0 1100- 0 1200- J 1300- 0 1400- 0 1500- 0 1600 - 0 1700- 0 1800- G 1900- 0 Channel 2 Traffic Check-sua O.K. 10 " ":. S/B Spring Road S/o New Los Angeles Avenue VOLUME COUNT I ND eROQRAM HITROH SYSTEMS CGUUC TIGH - MSC300if Channel t4miber 1 Loc at i oi, Code 60Sb Gate 5/8/90 Real Ti we 1839 Start Tiwe 1900 - Sdaple Ti&e 15 Divide 2 ,. Su60at i oll NO 2 -N: YES. Operator Nufbber i Machine Murber i0 1600- 0 1700 0 1800- 1900- u Channel i Traffic Check -sus O.K. PAGE I NIYING 24 HOUR TOTAL SAMPLE - CHANNEL 11 �1 1000- 4545 1100- 4540 . 2200- 4 554 2300- 4W? 24 0- 0 OIW , 0 0200- 0 Ow l- 4400- :` 0 '0500- 0 4600- 0 0 0100- 0 0800- 0 '6904- ; ' 0 1000- 0 1100- 0 1200- 0 1300- 0 1400- 0 1500- 0 1600- 0 1700 0 1800- 1900- u Channel i Traffic Check -sus O.K. j 'i W/B Lps Angeles Avenue between Millard St. and Spring Rd. VOLUME COUNTING P R O1j R A M n1TROH SYSTEMS CORPORATION - KSC3000 PAGE i Channel Number 1 Location Code 20WB Date 5/2/90 Reel Time 1124 Start Time 1200 Sample Time 15 Divide 2 Summation NO 2 -Way NO Operator Number 3 Machine'Number 10 - r.: tY , t . I I ,i I p I� I {III � i ! ' .:.1 I I i. y E• 512790 0100 0200 0300 0400 000 0600 0700 0600 0900 1000 1100 1304 1400 15oo 1600 1100 1800 1900 200 7100 2200 2300 2400 'TOTALS �--- p e 1084 460 1039 1211 1262 1245 910 680 528 440 312 118 48.10 .''�Yp s, p?�.; 1r iA Vii# i �f'FI ., Q;# f��sA� � i'i[kl� •D x PIVxFI:�li 1, r 'f �iI It+..,i'• �,I,i. f I ._��,,. ,.251 234 259 .289 2Rb ' .i3 240 215 141 132 103 54 2b4 241 239 258 334 361 218 -172 130 110 104 60 !4 }, AEI I� r -300 234 256 310 271 O—S�1 106 144 ,.123 112 52 29 'W ti� ��I'I',;: e .268 X246 285 k355 .,S 250 246 144 134E 8b 53 35 ��tt,, :}r'C�}�' i' � rrii,. �! ''f G� ,s ry.��yy.,� , _ ,!�x , ..r...., nb IIt + .�, +p�, , t�� (k f ���!�. `(I �Ip� i. � „, ' ..(1!!�� �;Eq- +•I• -' � t.;r� I F I..,� . , ii tL I :f ' - +> xk: �k„ 15x* n•k' S;�t t �< ;��'�rn•,. i un. a(I.':N.�. 1�:4,lirif IIL -��'tj � ,•. iI � {” u:. ,,;;. : .�f , d ;i,,+a k- b x 3 �� r �I ,� -h II t.� :>I� �� ! ?! t f 4ik � �fi•.. ' � �� I � Fk �i ._ 4 . .� ! 1 a� !; 130h 14(10 TOTALS sA t0306 4(0 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 0(�0 100 200 3u0 1400 -Al 1600 1740' 800 1400 2000 2100► 2 ION 127" 7b 45 80 82 244 579'2,940 986 835 893 965 1020 ,1049 L 978 I 11 Ub , I ,.: y of 38 24 13 .1 14 - 22 ' 35 Ili 203 231 131 258 46 267 251 235 288 316 39 17 9 15 15 . 55 135 237 217 185 194 224 224 283 256 283 354 R. 25 17 14 19 19 63 142 244 240 200 214 84 231 256 276 317 .303 25 16 13 27 26 41 191 256 242 219 .217 243 230 282 5�3 I MOVING 24 HOUR TOTAL SAMPLE - CHANNEL 11 1300- 15743 1400- 15624 1500- 15684 1600- 15644' 1100- 15713 1800- 15439 1400- 0 2000- 0 2100- O 2200- 0 2300- 0 2400- 0 0100- 0 0200-' 0 0300- 0 0400- 0 0500- 0 0600- 0 0700- 0 0800- 0 0900- 0 1040 - 1 0 1100- 0 1200- 0 Channel I Traffic Check-sur O.E. I , . rr E/B Los Angeles Avenue between Millard St. and Spring Rd. V O L U M E C O U N T I N G PROGRAM MITRON SYSTEMS CORPORATION - MSC3000 PAGE 1 Channel Number 1 Location Code Date 5/2/90 (teal Time 1129 Start Time 1200 Sample Time 15 Di .,i de 2 Summation NO 2 -Way, NO Operator Number 1 Machine Number 13 J. 1 ' 512/90 yp , it r a W4 0200 0301 0400 0500 0600 6700 0800 0900 � 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1 000 X800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2200 2400 ? TOTALS 1051 911 912 1027 1073 1101 890 662 505 `373 218 115 i 8404 'Li �.Js� ,ir {� FtJ,. .rr 4• ::. 3 �i' r��,'. t'1, €,±'' - v ! +il�'!'j .�.1 4 milli"; "` ' r {:.rir ".s i,...l;'t r,r` {, ,,,1, ,1,:f��1 I.BI. 3J , I 1_3 264 251 233 261, t31 205 192 136 i 0 r k kr z 9 r S r h k jtr,f tr ;`°"`'° 258 234 262 246 287 .228 158 133 86 " 41 29.. i' r : �iSr lt•iSMss yia' °`�(f a:, 1E 228 216 207 231 295 Z70 ; 230 Ur 136 90 SB 29 t • Ih a ;���;,��s�� iit °�� rt ` i 265 239 220 , 301 271, Z13 227 lbi 100 87 32 22 a,pp., i,l; TIT. '�hi�hir�rr.ii - ';.. .�I. i . P 0100 0500 Ob�10 0700 0800 09 0 J000 17� � L � 2200 2300 2400'.' TOTALS � Gt' (a; �f�'y i I �C r l .., '•} fx, .rr +y ~'' ya. J..' i ' s °!. I { 1 +i'i. l i l ji' ,_ rl'.:,t �, �,1 }lI. .. . 47 ibbbbbby 40 * 52 122 421 1181 214 1255 1024 976 i l l I 042 1026 988 1023 855; ` 12526 'r6l' fin" /�� , 4 '� f1 33'`; 67•' 277. 299 , 3' 286 260 300 274 264 ' 252. 267 i'' +,4;G , 8 8 23:, 86 266: 10 309 263 272 267 285 244 275 241 10 k, 16 73. 139 332 WS 283 224 217 273 251 246 226 272 JL6 "if. 414 10 11 43 ' 129' 286 360 273 256 227 277 232 252 233 1r MOVING 24 1i0lIR TOTAL SAMPLE - CHANNEL 11 ' 1u10= 16496' .1400- 16487 1500- 16536 1600- 16612 1700- 16608 1800- 16390 .1900- 0 2000- 0 2100-': , 0, 2200— 0 2300- 0 2400- 0 0100- 0 0200• 0 0300- 0 0400- 0 0500- 0` 0600- 0 0100- 0 0800- 0 0900- 0 1000- 0 1100- 0 1200- 0 Chanel 1 Traffic Check -sue O.K. E/B New Los Angeles Avenue e/o Spring Road VOLUME COUNTING PROGRAM MITRON SYSTEMS CORPORATION - MSC3000 PAGE 1 Channel Number z Location Code 10ER Date 5/2/90 Real Time 1047 Start Time 1200 Sample Time 15 Divide 2 Summation NO 2 -Way NO Operator Number 3 Machine Number 2 5/2/90 8104 0200 0300 0100 0500 0600 0700 OB00 0900 1010 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1604 1100 18 00 1900 2000 2100 1100 2300 2400 TOTALS _ _ _ t , 803 752 674 714 640, 629 450 341 349 346 19 70 5994 305 250 167 167 166, 199 113 9B' :7.7,.,, 69 71 18 186 187 184 149 144 106 85 65 . ''.. 87 48 16 { 23 183 150 112 63 86 122 30 lb t IF , r • 5. 163 151 lbb a jJt � 2 207 164. 157 175 147,, 11B 119 95 101 68 11 20 8 .i�t�" �` .►�,S /3190 0200 f .: �.G -•�, �. ,, f, . ,� f,. ,- i . .. "' ,. s .�, , ; ,_ . 1 I,t,`P 14jy .:� , �+; ;: }x O 0300 0100 0500 0600 0100 0800'0900 1000 1100 , 1200 1300 1400 1300 1600 1180 1800 1900 2000 2200 2300 2400 ±' TOTALS s k 21 20 16 49 279 983 1121 903 696 750 933 863 697 '753 634 178 8951 y , ` i 4,`1t 3 4 {t 9 21 179 231, lbl 239 193 195 234 k157 178 ` i',M '- 17 111 8 2 14 49 232 294 243 177 179 236 211 150 202 149 f 78 4 2 5 12 101 313 16 195 169 156 '266 216 150 163 180 X 3 6' 7 14 96 254 ZLO 192 191 174 238 241 145 154 148 W K6 24 HDUR TOTAL SAMPLE - CHANNEL 12 1300- 11620 1400- 11820 1500- 11765 1600- 11644 1700- 11764 1800- 11302 1900 - 0 2000- 0 2100- 0 2200- 0 2300- 0 2400- 0 0100- '0 0208- 0 0300- 0 0400- 0 450- 0 0600- 0 0700- 0 OB00- 0 0900- 0 1000- 0 1100- 0 1200- 0 Channel 2 Traffic Check -sua O.K. 100 60 -2 OR MORE LANES 1 2'OR MORE LANES x 400 9L lu 0 300 0 Lu 0 200 100 60 -2 OR MORE LANES 1 2'OR MORE LANES 300 400 50 z'- MAJOR ST R EET -TOTAL OF BOTH, APPROACHES -VPH S- VPH NOTE: 100 VPH APPLIES AS THE LOWER7HRESHOLD VOLUME' FOR A MINOR STREET APPROACH WITH TWO OR MORE LANES AND 76 VPH APPLIES AS THE LOWER THRESHOLD VOLUME FOR A MINOR STREET APPROACHING WITH ONE LANE. ee tip 7 1300 113-y '9-4 , e(,l sNp ,n 0 cn F) Z CA z G) mom 300 400 50 z'- MAJOR ST R EET -TOTAL OF BOTH, APPROACHES -VPH S- VPH NOTE: 100 VPH APPLIES AS THE LOWER7HRESHOLD VOLUME' FOR A MINOR STREET APPROACH WITH TWO OR MORE LANES AND 76 VPH APPLIES AS THE LOWER THRESHOLD VOLUME FOR A MINOR STREET APPROACHING WITH ONE LANE. ee tip 7 1300 113-y '9-4 , e(,l sNp ,n 0 cn F) Z CA z G) — 191-5 HCM: UWSIGHALI'PD lNTERSECTI'OWS ****~***************************+*****°*************** **+**4-^*�*****+ IDENTIFYING INFORMATION _ _____________________—___—___—______--____________________—__________ — AVERAGE RUNNING SFEED, MAJOR STREET.............. 40 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ........................°........ 1 ' . `— � ' AREA POPULATION ' ` ~^`^^^^^^~^^.^~^^........~........ 250�0 .' . . NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET'..........'........, 2ND ST.� NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET .^.~.~......~..� .+�5P�ING'RD ' NAME OF, THE ANALYST...' MA DATE OF THE-ANALYSIS 0�m/dd/y 777-7777�777:77!77 77 nw � . . ^ ~ pa TBOUN ED WB NP SD THRU NUMBER 0 F. LANES E WB NB SE; ^ _______ _______ _______ _______ �. . � L A N E E ^ I d i r it I r` it I I. .. r, i I I - . . . / ✓ f/ / , ^ , y LNV I ( ii- J "lam r — .� 9-8 TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND LIGHTING 12.1986 Traffic Manual onnownwamn Figure 9 -1 D TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS (Based on Estimated Average Daily Traffic - See Note 2) URBAN ...................... RURAL .. """' • • • • • • • • • • • • Minimum Requirements I. Minimum Vehicular EADT Satisfied_ Not Satisfied Number of lanes for moving traffic on each approach Major Street Minor Street street (total of both - .... 2 or more ............. 1 2 or more .............. ........ 2 or more 1 ...... 2 or more 2. Interruption of Continuous Traffic J ' Satisfied Not Satisfied Number of lanes for moving traffic on each approach 2,400 1,680 Major Street i Minor Street 1 ,. 2 or more Q� 01 00. 2pO x 2 or more 2 or more 1 if 1 2 or more , , 3. Combination Vehicles per day on major Vehicles per day on higher i Satisfied.______ Not Satisfied No one tisfied warrant sa but following (one direction only) warrants fuffilled 80% or more .. 444 1 I I • 1 2 Vehicles per day on major Vehicles per day on higher - street (total of both - volume minor - street approach approaches) (one direction only) Urban Rural Urban Rural 8,000 5,600 2,400 1,680 9, 0 6,720 2,400 1,680 9,600, 6,720 3,200 2,240 8,000 5,600 3 200 2,240 ' if t! w 1 E I i tiv 1 �l'i'�JXy I 1 Vehicles per day on major Vehicles per day on higher , street (total of both,':...: volume minor- street approach approaches) : f (one direction only) ,I _ 444 1 I I i` Jj I Urban Rural an R Urburall , ii91, 12,000 '. I "" 8.406 ' , °1 200 ' 850 14,400 10,080 1,200 850 14,400 ,'. 10,080 1 120 12,000 8,400 i 1,600 1,120 f ,• 2 Warrants -• 2 Warrants . 1. NOTE: - • 1. Heavier left turn movement from the major street may be included with minor street volume if a separate signal phase is to be provided for the left -turn movement. 2. To be used only for NEW INTERSECTIONS or other locations where actual traffic volumes cannot be counted. { TS-100 l ADJUSTMENT FACTORS '^ t- F-s c.e-2 _____________________________________________________________________ PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATIOK LA�E GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNE ________________ _________________ EASTBOUND 9� 20 E WESTBOUND ----- --- —__ — | _ NORTHBOUND 0.()(-) , — SOUTHBOUND VEHICLE COMPOSITION ASTB o tit AL AL MAJI OR' LEFT S M I NOR LEFTS ` CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-3 _____________________________________________________________________ POTEN- ACTUAL � FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED - RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS ` ' p M SH R SH ------- ________ --------- ------------ ------------ ___ M I NOR STREET EB LEFT. 60 57 57 RIGHT N B LEFT -76 45 456 til rI Ti Ijf 1985 HCM: UNSIGKALIZEE! lNTERSE[TI'ONS Fege-� ***************+************* ******°***.****°�*�***�*��*°****° IDENTIFYING INFORMATION _____________________________________________________________________ AVERAGE RUNNINB SPEED, MAJOR STREET.....'........ 40 PEAK HOUR FACTOR''.'.'..'.'.''^''.......'.'~'.''. 1 AREA POPULATION.......'.......'...~....'.'-.'.'.. 25000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET.'....'.'..'..~..''.' 2ND ST. , NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.......~........... SPRING RD. � NAME OF THE A � ..,......`TMA J.; I ME PERIOD ANALYZED NTER SECT ION TYPE AND�XONTROL- "'INTERSECTION TYPE: T—,INTERSECTION J�MAJOR STREET DIRECTION—NORTH/SOUTH 'l`:�t'ONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND; STOP' SIGN:' ;;'.TRAFFIC VOLUMES. . - -- -- ' `!LEFT 21 -- 58 0 THRU' 0 / -- 975 889 ' . RlGHT 0 61 ' NUMBER OF LANES _____________________________________________________________________ ` E6 W8 NB SE- _______ _______ _______ LANES FNE ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Paoe— ------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - -- PERCENT GRADE EASTBOUND RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS 9� i�� ACCELERATION LANE FOR RIGHT TURNS N WESTBOUND - - - -- - -- - -- NORTHBOUND 0, i►if 90 C ► hd SOUTHBOUND 0, 0 0 90 ^i N to VEHICLE COMPOSITION - - - -- -- - - - -- — — — — — — T — ,.i /.. SU TRUCK 5 `f.' COMES I NAT ION AND Filj S ' 'f VEH I CLES / MQTOFtYCLE$' !i I�` rlfi j , lr -.rk •+ fr, 2 Pt r EASTBOUND J, Hrill rr tt ) f ` �[; u, i x r A s 4 Y f i �{ 1..,1 r } �i,¢ , ti x H� ft .t t Pi r1 l l r 11 1. 'i43 { y E I .. II f A{ }d s', , II ti c: fr r 1? �.1 WEST BOUND`; j:;!,! t r s y rr i � •� I • � '4 � � . , ,, : � r -. ', -`. � t w � x a. NORTHBOUND , (7 I a s �.�� "; s n ! tj$�t:1 b r rltrrty ,i frit:f r�p� �a m �,y irktf Ylt -. !! i ,r. r '�r eI �1�� 1� i•r i 1. r {�� Gl.f ,f �� k�'•�Pi �. `�i 'tk ✓.a��''�GY,�.'E{It(` f ,I �,, fJ, r I J =�� rHr t"le'7�w_..f° r�� rr�fa S` OUTHHOUND r G r *t _ Ikh�� 1.� ! � t C. -:,1 ji '�rlf 't i L � I f 1r�P �'r✓ al4 �! F h1 N "v I { � T -..� �I�! J i �;' V ,: t: �f w� C F, r T � ,� .�. 1Yt! 1�'E. +�t.:• "r f! tI t� 'li t -. kt `�Sh:'b i''� 'L =3 tr.,f� +��tz "> 2� ;� rQT.lt G.r r (�v' 4�K�r r ' ""� ( •., { , ap �, rtk�u� a t If „r. 4 , a. r+ �: �1 I a �' a i. -, i '), - >4� ,t `: , � � ij '. •' =• t � r � r i,' �,. s w�.� ,,r �� � �'} �'r � ,f f °� u r� Y' #; QRITIGAL SAPS.`, TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST f 'l' STMEtfT CF ITICAL CIS„ (Table' e ' 10 VALUE ADJL) MINOR 'RIGHTS -------------- ; -- - - - - -- ----------- EB 5.9i� 5.9c ii,iir-� C , �, - 5. 9�. MAJ0r� LEFTS c NB 5.70 5.70 i�. i;lf_) C,. 70 MINOR LEFTS ED 7.60 7.60 C). (Y-) 7.60' CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE _______________________________________________________________Page-- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED FESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH. _______ ________ _________ ____________ ____________ ___ ` MINOR STREET ' EB LEFT 23 60 53 '5Z�' ' � � ''E RIGHT ^ 34 56B 568 ' �"' ' ` /�` � 568` �ij��'.� 533 MAJOR STREET NB LEFT 64 354 oi Pq it VA Wit 19E5 HCM: UN6IGNALlZED'INTERSECTI'ONE P&. c. e—� IDENTIFYING INFORMATION _ _________________________—___—_____________—_________________—___--__ ' AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.............. 40 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ^~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^'~^^^^^..... 1 ^ . ` AREA POPULATION . ' _� __..^.~ .~.~..~.~.....~.......~......... 25000 NAME OF THE EASTIWES7 STREET..................,..'FLINN AVE. r: OF THE NORTH SO ` ' [ ' ,SPRING RD. NAME OF THE ANALYST.... JEtV INTERSECT! L TRAFFIC VOLUMES" LEFT. 5B 27 ANV RIGHT, 40 57 61 NUMBER OF LANES ' ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Fage-� _____________________________________________________________________ PERCENT RIGHT TURN GRADE ANGLE _______ __________ EASTBOUND ----- --- CURB RADIUS (ft", ACCELERATION LANE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR FIGHT TURNS ________________ _________________ WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N , ' . NORTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N ` `!� SOUTHBOUND 0 00 '' ` VEHICLE COMPOSITION Iv M NOR 0 it TABU D .(Ta VALUE CRITICAL GAF ADJUSTMENT MINOR RIGHTS. MAJOR LEFTS MINOR LEFTS CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF- SERVICE Fagg - -' POTEN- FLOW- TIAL RATE CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) ACTUAL MOVEMENT SHAFTED RESERVE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY I tpr_ph) c tpcph) c= c - v LCD_, p M SH R SH MINOR STREET WB LEFT 32 60 55 > 55 23 > E k� > 66 Q 32 ;E RIGHT 22 46 46,1 461 ;. 439 '. A .1 ' } MAJOR STREET SP LEFT '�.1 234 4 p li * 4 20 4 G, I �jrl '4151 Y �1Yr N' �5� �1 f!i ' I s,•i i 'a"�r ' t 4 q Iii , ,,>�fi^ji hilt 1 �G.� ,d f t.. + r� I �- I! i.- �.!` 51 �i 113 f�. 41� - 1 ��r ;�����rt i `t •s : -1 � a ru i I y Y . will, , ilk I Ass Q q r M-aF �.-�,a y. 1j;,"! ��' !i• I :rl .� e nr� �f+�j i �urn�li�'�'f�" 1 f- ' .: - 1 1 � �t ,,it K ih °; Iri lli 'S )III .• i ' SAW {L �r � G (1r r t ' ( 1 p ! 1 -- , x '•� I ,� + I ,� 1 ,i - > i 1� i hoW ,,I� -�� f f � , 1 � i;? r - I � •.' I tell. 0 of 1965 HC|i. UWSIG L]ZED INTERE-ELTl' " Ns F�ge-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION _ --------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET ......^....... 40 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ''-^'^'^^^'''''^^''^-'^'^''^''... 1 ' ADJUSTMENT FACTORS F'agP PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURE, RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS - - - -- -------------- - - - -- EASTBOUND - - - -- WESTBOUND 0.00 90 +_) N NORTHBOUND 0.00 90 N SOUTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION --------------------- 4 % SU TRUCKS' :1 COMBINATION �f AND RV S' ` f � VEHICLES ` " '/, MOTORC: CI .ES ; t}j t 777 7777- H4,4 , EASTRniwn r"IAJOF:' LEFTS MINOR LEFTS w 7.60 7.6(-) i►. c_it_� 7. 60 CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SER*,�;ICE _______________________________ Par'e-3 ____________________________________ POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESE��E RATE CAPAClTY CApACITY CAPACITY CAPAI ]TY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcoh` c <pcph/ c (pcph) c = c - v LOIE P M SH R S� _______ ________ _________ ____________ ____________ ___ MINOR STREET � WB ` � ' RIGHT MAJOR STREET Wit 325 325 KI Yj- jA DESCRIPTION : EXISTING + SITE INTERSECTION: SCIENCE DR. / NEW L.A Existing y Cumulative 4j _ x x -Lj,�- LTi RTi Si `_ M lTi RTi Si 3E_ l - -3E DATE: 12/14/1990 TIME: 11:4:16 JOB NUMBER: 900510 Approach Traffic Movement Capacity Peak Hour Traffic Votunes - V/C Ratios (Critical w / *) Existing Site Cus.- Site Cumutative `. Existing Ex.+ Site Cum.- Site Existing Cumulative AM PM AM PM AM`: PM AM PM AM PM AM PM AM PM NBRT NB NBLT SBRT 1500 5 80 0.003 0.053 0.003 0.053 SB 1A SBLT 1500 4 % 0.003* 0.064" 0.003* 0.064" EBRT EB 3200 892 702 13 17 0.279 0.219 0.283 0.225 EBLT 1500 55 2 ;_ =_ - 0:037* 0.001* 0.037" 0.001* WBRT WB 3200 1122 1117 13 = 25 " 0.351* 0.349" 0.355* 0.357" WELT _ Tettow 0.100* 0.100* 0.100* 0.100* TOTAL ICU: 0.491 0.514 0.495 0.522 LEVEL OF SERVICE: A A A A ! 1 Cumutative AM I PM Files : A- 900510.INT 1- 900510E.VOL W110-IR",1 DESCRIPTION EXISTING + SITE s f - INTERSECTION: SPRING RD. / HIGH ST _ - s W �� s'k '°' ` fi �c t a x Existing -� z Cumulative f _t s� � - t ! bi LTf RT! S# i ! S# LTB RTB S+ i 4 N EN ,. z 4 N EW DATE: 12/14/1990 TIME: 11:4:38 JOB NUMBER: 900510 A2 Approach Traffic Movement Capacity Peak Hour Traffic Volumes, _ `: -' V/C Ratios (Critical w / *) Existing Site -: Cum.= Site Cumulative Existing Ex.+ Site Cum.- Site Cumulative Existing Cumulative AM r PH- AM PH: `` AM _ : ;- PM AM -- N AM r PM AN PM AM PM AM PM NBRT 1500(de) 1275 902 14 _.15 77 - 0.280* 0.134 0.282* 0.136* NB 1600(e) 29 76 0.280 0.134* 0.282 0.136 NBLT 1500 48 102 2, 4 0.032 0.068 0.033 0.071 SBRT SB 3200 70 SO - 0.022 0.016 0.022 0.016 SBLT 1500 42 36 0.028* 0.024* 0.028* 0.024* EBRT 1500 13 61 3 6 `: - " ; ".' 0.009 0.041 0.011 0.045 ES 3200 262 402 0.082* 0.126* 0.082* 0.126* EBLT 1500 4 8 - - 0.003 0.005 0.003 0.005 WBRT 1500 51 69 • 0.034 0.046 0.034 0.046 WB 1600(e) 233 336 0.291* 0.374* 0.295* 0.382* WBLT 1500(e) 670 824 13 24 - 0.291' 0.374 0.295 0.382 Yellow F77F-j 0.100* 0,100* 0.100* 0.100* TOTAL ICU: 0.781 0.758 0.787 0.768 LEVEL OF SERVICE: C C C C Files : A-900510.INT 1- 900510E.VOL DESCRIPTION EXISTING + SITE F: INTERSECTION: SPRING RD. /-FLINN A 4 .. ft LTB RTi Si 2 1 1 _ S n i�-- ;._Cumulative DATE: 12/14/1990 TIME: 14:28:24 JOB NUMBER: 900510 03 Approach Traffic Movement Capacity Peak Hour Traffic Volumes V/C Ratios (Critical w / *) Existing Site CLAN.;- Site Cumulative Existing Ex.+ Site Cum.- Site Cumulative Existing Cumutative AM PM AM - PM _ AM PM AM PM AM PM AM PM AM PM AM PM WORT NB 3200 1265 1014 28 56 _ 0.395* 0.317* 0.404* 0.334* NBLT SBRT SB 3200 756 914 0.236 0.286 0.236 0.286 SBLT 1500 27 6 16 -,.30 0.018* 0.004* 0.029* 0.024* EBRT ES _. EBLT WBRT WB 1600 49 68 39 42 0.031* 0.043* 0.055* 0.069* WELT (1500) (29) (38) (28) (34) 0.019 0.025 0.038 0.048 Tallow - 0.100* 0.100* 0.100* 0.100* TOTAL ICU: 0.544 0.464 0.588 0.527 LEVEL OF SERVICE: A A I A A Files : A-900510.INT 1- 900510E.VOL DESCRIPTION EXISTING + SITE INTERSECTION: SPRING RD. / NEW L.A� DATE: 12/14/1990 TIME: 11:4:47 JOB NUMBER: 900510 !4 Approach Traffic Movement Capacity Peak Hour Traffic Volumes = V/C Ratios (Critical w / *) Existing Site Cum.- Site Cumulative Existing Ex.+ Site Cum.- Site Cumulative Cumulative Existing Cumulative x'11`' PM AM u. "•�llL• PM AN PH AM PM AM PM AM } 0# LT# RTi Si i NBRT _ M LT! RTf S4 i 25 8 NSEWSW"'► _. NSEWSW 0.019 0.017 0.019 0.017 -8 NB 3200 257 230 6 11 t - s1 I I f' 0.072 DATE: 12/14/1990 TIME: 11:4:47 JOB NUMBER: 900510 !4 Approach Traffic Movement Capacity Peak Hour Traffic Volumes = V/C Ratios (Critical w / *) Existing Site Cum.- Site Cumulative Existing Ex.+ Site Cum.- Site Cumulative Existing Cumulative AN PM AM PM AM PM AN PH AM PM AM PM AM PM AM PM NBRT 1500 28 25 _. 0.019 0.017 0.019 0.017 NB 3200 257 230 6 11 - 0.080* 0.072 0.082* 0.075* NBLT 1500 181 241 - 0.121 0.161-10.121 0.161 SBRT 1500(d) 314 410 12 10 0.058 0.118* 0.062 0.118 SB 3200 176 237 3 7 0.055 0.074 0.056 0.076 SBLT 1500 436 308 13 17 0.291* 0.205 0.299* 0.217* EBRT 1500 129 239 `. 0.086 0.159 0.066 0.159 EB 3200 570 388 0.178 0.121 0.178 0.121 EBLT, 2800(c) 425 435 9 20 0.152* 0.155* 0.155* 0.163* 1500(d) 584 473 '= 13 25 0.099* 0.110 0.099* 0.115 A 3200 306 466 0.096 0.146* 0.096 0.146* 1500 2 34 _ 0.001 0.023 0.001 0.023 Yellow _ !. 0.100* 0.100* 0.100* TOTAL ICU: 0.722 E0.680* 0.735 0.701 LEVEL OF SERVICE: I I C C C - :�E Files : A-900510.INT 1- 900510E.voL DATE: 12/14/1990 TIME: 11:4:55 JOB NUMBER: 900510 05 Approach Traffic Movement Capacity Peak Hour Traffic Votumes - V/C Ratios (Critical w / *) Existing -., Site Cum.- Site Cumulative Existing Ex.+ Site Cum.- Site Cumulative Existing Cumutative AM PM AN PM AN PM AN PM AN PM AN PM AN PH AM PM NBRT NB 1600 151 65 0.094* 0.041* 0.094* 0.041* NBLT 1500 39 28 0.026 0.019 0.026 0.019 SBRT 1500(d) 111 114 - - ;- - 0.017 — 0.017 — SB 1600(e) 31 SO _ 0.087* 0.129* 0.087* 0.130• SBLT 1500(e) 238 351 1 3 0.087 0.129 0.087 0.130 EBRT EB 3200 776 818 8 17 =' 0.243* 0.256 0.245* 0.261 EBLT 1500 86 144 0.057 0.096* 0.057 0.096* WBRT 1500(d) 158 268 0.019 0.049 0.018 0.049 WB 3200 610 843 12 9 0.191 0.263* 0.194 0.266* WBLT 1500 41 126 0.027* 0.084 0.027* 0.084 Tallow 0.100* 0.100* 0.100* 0.100* TOTAL ICU: 0.551 0.629 0.553 0.633 LEVEL OF SERVICE: A. B A B NOTES: (a) Exclude RTs ins c separate free flowing RTO lane. (b) Existing LT votumes > 0 VPH and cumulative LT volumes > O VPH.treated as separate LT (c) Doubte turn lane capacity ■ 1.867 times single lane capacity (d) Net V/C = Total minus overlapping LT V /C. - �_ (e) Optional lane. `ti EiiK IWI _ 1 Files : A- 900510.INT 1- 900510E.VOL DESCRIPTION EXISTING + SITEr INTERSECTION: GABBERT RD. / L.A. AV -_ Existing ._ Cumulative ! N lT; RTi Si i } Aw LT! RT# Si i ►. 6 El! .► 6 EW 41 tr -,tr- DATE: 12/14/1990 TIME: 11:5:0 JOB NUMBER: 900510 s6 Approach Traffic Movement Capacity Peak Hour Traffic Volumes V/C Ratios (Critical w / *) Existing - Site Cum.- Site Cumulative Existing Ex.+ Site Cum.- Site Cumulative Existing Cumulative AN PN AN PM AN PH AN PN AN PM AM PM AM PM AM PM NBRT 1500 230 189 1 - 0.153 0.126* 0.153 0.127* N8 1600 80 106 0.050 0.066 0.050 0.066 MELT 1500 177 53 0.118* 0.035 0.118* 0.035 SBRT SB 1600 151 135 _ _ " "_ _.: = 0.094* 0.084 0.094* 0.084 SBLT 1500 32 60 -: r; :: ::' T 0.021 0.040* 0.021 0.040* 1500 47 29 -.- 0.031. 0.019 0.031 0.019 3200 667 736 8 16 0.208* 0.230* 0.211* 0.235* 1500 122 123 - 0.081 0.082 0.081 0.082 dYetlow 1500 33 17 - - = 0.022 0.011 0.022 0.011 3200 601 739 12 8 - - 0.188 0.231 0.192 0.233 1500 119 199 1 0.079* 0.133* 0.079* 0.133* 0.100* 0.100* 0.100* 0.100* TOTAL ICU: 0.599 0.629 0.602 0.635 LEVEL OF SERVICE: - - A B B B NOTES: (a) Exclude RTs in separate free ftowing RTC lane. 44-i- (b) Existing LT volumes > 0 VPH and cumulative LT volumes > O (c) Double turn lane capacity - 1.867 times single lane taped (d) Net V/C = Total minus overlapping LT V/C (e) Optional lane. _ L- rested as separate LT a Files : A- 900510.INT 1.900510E.VOL DESCRIPTION 1995 W /EXISTING GEOM.' rf. INTERSECTION: SCIENCE DR. / NEW L.A` F Existing' ON LT# RT# S# ! 3E DATE: 12/17/1990 TIME: 17:47:9 JOB NUMBER: 900510 01 Approach Traffic Movement Capacity Peak Hour Traffic Votumes V/C Ratios (Critical w / *) Existing Site-;' Cum.- Site Cumulative Existing Ex.+ Site Cum.- Site Cumulative Existing Cumulative AM Cumulative AM - M.r PN �- PM AN ! Of LT# RTt SE AM 3 NSEW i .''. AM PM NBRT 1500(e) DATE: 12/17/1990 TIME: 17:47:9 JOB NUMBER: 900510 01 Approach Traffic Movement Capacity Peak Hour Traffic Votumes V/C Ratios (Critical w / *) Existing Site-;' Cum.- Site Cumulative Existing Ex.+ Site Cum.- Site Cumulative Existing Cumulative AM PM AM PM M.r PN AN PM AN PM AM PM AM PM AM PM NBRT 1500(e) i2S 137 r 25 _ 137 0.008 0.044 0.008 0.044 NB 16000) s 0.008 0.044 0.008 0.044 NBLT 2800(e) 22 ': :;120 22 ::120 0.008* 0.043* 0.008* 0.043* SBRT 1500 (1500) (13) .(138) ';(13) (138) 0.009* 0.092* 0.009* 0.092* SB 1600 13. .. 138 13 138 0.008 0.086 0.008 0.086 SBLT 1500 1500 =, _ 8 -.129 -:a r =129 ,-; 0.005 0.086 0.005 0.086 EBRT. EB 3200 4800 - 9 12 1180 1052 1189' 1064 0.003 0.004 0.246 0.219 0.248 0.222 EBLT 1500 1500 =: ° 112 + 11 112 11 0.075* 0.007" 0.075* 0.007* WBRT WB 3200 4800 9 18 1414 1391 1423 1409 0.003* 0.006* 0.295* 0.290* 0.296* 0.294* WELT 2800(c) 158, 51 -.158. 51 - -_ 0.056 0.018 0.056 0.018 Yellow 0.100* 0.100* 0.100* 0.100* 0.100* 0.100* TOTAL ICU: ._< - -` 0.103 0.106 0.487 0.532 0.488 0.536 LEVEL OF SERVICE: A A A A A A Files : A- 900510.1NT 1- 900510F.VOL DATE: 12/18/1990 TIME: 16:39:50 JOB NUMBER: 900510 *2 Approach Traffic Movement Capacity Peak Hour Traffic Volumes -_ V/C Rstios (Critical w / *) Existing Site DESCRIPTION 1995 W/EXISTING GEOMz- cumulative. _ Ex.+ Site r INTERSECTION: SPRING RD. / HIGH ST',}��?�,` x Cumulative Exist irq cumulative - Existing Lb j l 4_ AM PM AM PM = AN PM AM fi LT# RT! Sit Af LTf RTi Si i 4 N EW 4 N EW AM PM AM PM AM PM NBRT 1500(de) 1500(de) DATE: 12/18/1990 TIME: 16:39:50 JOB NUMBER: 900510 *2 Approach Traffic Movement Capacity Peak Hour Traffic Volumes -_ V/C Rstios (Critical w / *) Existing Site Cu.,- -.Otte cumulative. Existing Ex.+ Site Cum.- Site Cumulative Existing Cumulative AM PM AM PM = AN PM AM PM .. AM PM AM PM AM PM AM PM NBRT 1500(de) 1500(de) - 10 ?A l 1621: 1395. _1631 ;1406" ;. 0.002* 0.001 0.325* 0.220* 0.326* 0.221* NO 1600(e) 1600(e) x:33 :- 89 33 =89 - 0.002 0.001 0.325 0.220 0.326 0.221 NBIT 1500 1500 - - ;1 = 3 69 - __:137 - .: >s,70 °140 0.001 0.002* 0.046 0.091 0.047 0.093 SORT _ SO 3200 3200 -- = 84 61 84 '61 0.026 0.019 0.026 0.019 SOLT 1500 1500 41 ': 48 41 :' 0.032* 0.027* 0.032* 0.027* EBRT 1500 1500 _ 2 4 27 94 29 go j 0.001* 0.003* 0.018 0.063 0.019 0.065 EB 3200 3200 325 489 325 489 0.102* 0.153* 0.102* 0.153* EBLT 1500 1500 5 _12 5 12 0.003 0.008 0.003 0.008 WORT 1500 1500 57 78 57 78 0.038 0.052 0.038 0.052 WB 1600(e) 1600(e) 289 418 289 418 _ 0.003* 0.005* 0.432* 0.535* 0.435* 0.540* WELT 1500(e) 1500(e) 10 - 17 1049 1239 1059 1256 ._ 0.003 0.005 0.432 0.535 0.435 0.540 Yellow 0.100* 0.100* 0.100* 0.100* 0.100* 0.100* TOTAL ICU: ,_ 0.106 0.110 0.991 7035 0.995 1.041 LEVEL OF SERVICE: - A I A E F E F Fates : A- 900510.INT 1- 900510F.VOL Approach Traffic Movement Capacity Peak Hour Traffic Volumes V/C Ratios (Critical w / *) Existing Site DESCRIPTION 1995 W /EXISTING GEOM., Cumulative Existing DATE: 12/18/1990 INTERSECTION: SPRING RD. / FLINN A TIME: 16:53:34 =k JOB NUMBER: 900510 ` AM Existing =r_°; Cumutative 9 3 PM AM PM AN /# LT# RT# Si N LT# RT# S# AM 2 2 1 - i I AM Approach Traffic Movement Capacity Peak Hour Traffic Volumes V/C Ratios (Critical w / *) Existing Site - Ct=.- Site Cumulative Existing Ex.+ Site Cum.- Site Cumutative Existing Cumulative AM PM AM PM AM PM AN PM AM PM I AM PM AM PM AM PM NBRT (1500) (12) (29) 0.008* 0.019* NB 3200 3200 20 40 1614 1507 1634 1547 0.006 0.013 0.504* 0.471* 0.511* 0.483* MOLT SORT - SO 3200 3200 1163 1371 1163 1371 0.363 0.428 0.363 0.428 SOLT 1500 1500 12 21 29 - 7 41 28 0.008* 0.014* 0.019* 0.005* 0.027* 0.019* EBRT - EB EBLT WBRT WB 1600 1600 39 ; -42 54: 75 93 117 0.024* 0.026* 0.034* 0.047* 0.058* 0.073* WELT (1500) (1500) (28) (34) (32) —142) ,;(60) -(76) 0.019 0.023 0.021 0.028 0.040 0.051 Yellow 1 0.100* 0.100* 0.100* 0.100* 0.100* 0.100* TOTAL ICU: 0.140 0.159 0.657 0.623 07696 0.675 LEVEL OF SERVICE: A I A B O 8 I B Fites : A- 900510.iNT 1- 900510F.VOL r DESCRIPTION 1995 W /EXISTING GEOMi� INTERSECTION: SPRING RD. / NEW L.A Existing Cumulative .111 L+ Lb ? iM# LT• RTi Si i 00 LT# RT* Si i 8 NSEWSW - 8 NSEWSW i } } i 'l I I r' '1 t I r' DATE: 12/17/1990 TIME: 17:47:53 JOB NUMBER: 900510 94 Approach Traffic Movement Capacity Peak Hour Traffic Volumes V/C Ratios (Critical w / *) Existing Site Cum.- Site Cumulative Existing Ex.+ Site Cum.- Site Cumulative Existing Cumulative AM PM AM PH AM PM AN PH AM PM AM PM AM PM AN PH NBRT 1500 1500 41 39 41 39 0.027 0.026 0.027 0.026 NB 3200 3200 - 4 8 361 367 365 375 0.001* 0.003* 0.113* 0.115 0.114* 0.117 NBLT 1500 1500 342 518 342 518 0.228 0.345* 0.228 0.345* SBRT 1500(d) 1500(d) 8 7 498 655 506 662 0.003 - 0.115 0.182* 0.118 0.181* SB 3200 3200 2 5 277 368 279 373 0.001 0.002 0.087 0.115 0.087 0.117 SBLT 1500 1500 9 12 584 419 593 431 0.006* 0.008* 0.389. 0.279 0.395* 0.287 EBRT 1500 1500 269 509 269 509 0.179 0.339 0.179 0.339 EB 3200 3200 845 715 845 715 0.264 0.223 0.264 0.223 EBLT 2800(c) 2800(c) 6 14 607 714 613 728 0.002* 0.005* 0.217* 0.255* 0.219* 0.260* WBRT 1500(d) 1500(d) 9 18 648 585 657 - 603 - 0.004* 0.043 0.111 0.043 0.115 WS 3200 3200 531 850 531 850 0.166* 0.266* 0.166* 0.266* WBLT 1500 1500 18 ill 18 111 0.012 0.074 0.012 0.074 Yellow -,' 0.100* 0.100* 0.100* 0.100* 0.100* 0.100* TOTAL ICU: 0.109 0.120 0.985 1.148 0.994 2 LEVEL OF SERVICE: " A A E F E EF Files : A-900510.INT 1-900510F.VOL It DATE: 12/17/1990 - t TIME: 17:48:5 JOB NUMBER: 900510 85 Approach Traffic Movement Capacity Peak Hour Traffic.Votumes V/C Ratios (Critical w / *) Existing Site °_ cum. = Site Cumulative = Existing Ex.* Site Cum.- Site Cumulative Existing Cumulative AN PM AN PN AM:: PN AM PM AM; PM AM PM AM PH AM PM MORT NB 1600 1600 -= 7167 ='73 X167 _73 0.104* 0.046* 0.104* 0.046* NBIT 1500 1500 52 52 ---52 'S2 0.035 0.035 0.035 0.035 SORT 1500(d) 1500(d) 195 ...275 195 275 0.035 - 0.035 - SB 1600(e) 1600(e) f'35 56 35 56 0.001* 0.114* 0.163* 0.114* 0.164* SOLT 1500(e) 1500(e) "` 1 `2 318 i49 319 451 .k' - 0.001 0.114 0.163 0.114 0.164 EBRT .; ES 3200 3200 6 12 1288 1643 1294 1655 0.002 0.004* 0.403 0.513 0.404 0.517 EBLT 1500 1500 142 323 142 '323 _ 0.095* 0.215* 0.095* 0.215* WORT 1500(d) 1500(d) , 1 201 '362 201 363 - 0.020 0.078 0.020 0.078 we 3200 3200 8 - b 1119 1627 1127 1633 0.003* 0.002 0.350* 0.508* 0.352* 0.510* YBLT 1500 1500 - 45 45 139 " 0.030 0.093 0.030 0.093 Yellow - =' 0.100* 0.100* 0.100* 0.100* 0.100* 0.100• TOTAL ICU: - .:.: t 0.103 0.105 0.763 1.032 0.765 1.035 LEVEL OF SERVICE: A A C f C F NOTES: (a) Exclude RTs in separate free flowing RTO lane Files A- 900510.iNT (b) Existing LT volumes > 0 VPH and cumulative LT, volumes > 0 VPN treated .as separate LT ♦ 1- 900510F.VOL (c) Double turn lane capacity w 1.867.times single _lane capacity r -r (d) Net V/C z Total minus overlapping LT V/C (e) Optional lane. t .K ^' p z - DESCRIPTION : 1995 W /EXISTING &EOM DATE: 12117/1990 TIME: 17 :48:10 JOB MLS48ER: 900510 96 Approach Traffic Movement Capacity Peak Hour Traffic Volumes INTERSECTION: GABBERT RD. / L.A. AV� Existing Site :. _ Cum. - Site Cumulative Existing Ex.+ Site Cum.- Site Cumulative Existing Existing - ° = ` Cumutative AN PH _ _ >s fr <= ._ AM PM -= AN PM AM PM AM PM = t _ NBRT t } M LT# RTt Sf j ' - Of LT# RT+ S! j 381 6 EW 381 6 EW -� 0.254 0.243* 0.254 0.243* NB 1600 1600 '11r•' DATE: 12117/1990 TIME: 17 :48:10 JOB MLS48ER: 900510 96 Approach Traffic Movement Capacity Peak Hour Traffic Volumes V/C Ratios (Critical w / *) Existing Site :. _ Cum. - Site Cumulative Existing Ex.+ Site Cum.- Site Cumulative Existing Cumulative AM PM AN PH AN PM AM PM -= AN PM AM PM AM PM AM PM NBRT 1500 1500 1 381 364 381 365 0.001* 0.254 0.243* 0.254 0.243* NB 1600 1600 127 101 - 127 0.063 0.079 0.063 0.079 NBLT 1500 1500 261 :116 281 116 0.187-10.077 0.187* 0.077 SBRT - - SB 1600 1600 _ -200 205 - 200 -205 0.125* 0.128 0.125* 0.128 SBLT 1500 1500 °' = 3S -: 66 -35 ::66 0.023 0.044* 0.023 0.044* EBRT 1500 1500 134 :80 134 0.053 0.089 0.053 0.089 EB 3200 3200 6 11 10% 1147 1100 1158 0.002 0.003* 0.342* 0.358* 0.344* 0.362* EBLT 1500 1500 - ;163, •' 161 . =163 - :::161 0.109 0.107 0.109 0.107 WBRT 1500 1500 ' :`36 :''19 -.36 19 0.024 0.013 0.024 0.013 WB 3200 3200 8 :: 6 890' 1239 898 1245 '_ 0.003* 0.002 0.278 0.387 0.281 0.389 WELT 1500 1500 1. ':.177 436 -177 437 0.001* 0.118* 0.291* 0.118* 0.291* Yellow = _ '-= '' 0.100' 0.100* 0.100* 0.100* 0.100* 0.100* TOTAL ICU: = - 0 .103 0.105 0.872 1.036 0.874 1.040 LEVEL OF SERVICE: - A A D f 0 F NOTES: (a) Exclude RTs in separate free flowing RTO tens. files A- 900510. [NT (b) Existing LT volumes > 0 VPH and cumulative LT volumes > -O VPH treated as separate LT ♦ '" 1- 900510F.VOL (c) Double turn lane capacity = 1.867 times single lane capacity (d) Net V/C ■ Total minus overlapping LT V/C - - (e) Optional lane. r _ 7. - * =M' - r FI "+ 1� t } �..,.. 3 ; I M�. DESCRIPTION 1995 W/MIT. DATE: 12/18/1990 7 2 TIME: 16:52:39 INTERSECTION: SPRING RD. FLINN A JOB NUMBER: 900510 Existing Cumulative 3 Of LT# RT# S# of LT# RT# S# f 2 t t I t Volumes Approach Caw f ty Peak No Traffic V/C Ratios (Critical wl*) Traffic Existing Site cum-, Site Cumulative Movement Existing Ex.+ Site CUM.- Site Cumulative Existirg I Mutative AN PH AM PM AM, PM PX PH AN PH AN PH AM P14 M P14 NORT (1500) (12) (29) 0.008* 0.019* NB 3200 3200 20 ` "`i0 1614 1507, 1634 0.006 0.013 0.504* 0.471* 0.511* 0.483• NBLT SBRT Se 3200 3200 11.63 1371 1163 1371 0.363 0.428 0.363 0.428 SBLT 1500 1500 12 21 4 29 7 41 28 0.008* 0.014* 0.019* 0.005* 0.027* 0.019* EBRT EB EBLT WBRT 1500 22 33 33 41 0.015 0.022 0.022 0.027 we 1600 39 42 0.024. 0.026• WELT (1500) 1500 (34) 32 60 10. 42 0.019 0.023 0.021. 0.028* 0.040* 0.051* Yettow 0.10()* 0.100* 0.100- 0.100* 0.100* 0.100* TOTAL ICU: 0.140 0.159 0.644 0.604 0.678 0.653 LEVEL OF SERVICE: A A I B B B B NOTES: (a) Exclude RTs in separate free flowing RTO tar*. (b) Existing LT volumes 3- 0 WH and cumulative LT volumes 3P 0 VPH treated as separate LT ♦. (c) Double turn lane capacity ■ 1.867 times single lane capeCjty.;r (d) Net V/C = Total minus overlapping LT V/C. (e) Optional lane. Files : A-900510.101T 1-900510F.VOL I Approach Traffic Movement Capacity Peak Nour.Trsffic Volumes 7 V/C Ratios (Critical w / *) K ; :-site Ciw - Site DESCRIPTION 1 995 W/MITIGATION � # Ex.• Site DATE: 12/18/1990 Cumulative Existing TIME: 14:15:50 INTERSECTION: SPRING RD. / NEW L.A �} -. �, =, ,, , AN JOB NUMBER: 900510 AN 3 =� � � � 2 Cumulstive Existing AN S 4 -AN - r# AN PM AN PM AM PH ! 1500 Ali LT# RTB S! f � Of LTB RTlt St i : -.- _. 8 NSEWSW 8 NSEWSW - s - a NB 3200 _ �r r r -4 ! =`402 406 Approach Traffic Movement Capacity Peak Nour.Trsffic Volumes 7 V/C Ratios (Critical w / *) Existing ; :-site Ciw - Site Cumulative Existing Ex.• Site C.- Site um Cumulative Existing Cumulative AN PN AN PM - AN 3 - P14 _ AN PM -AN PM AN PM AN PM AM PH NBRT 1500 : -.- _. - NB 3200 3200 -4 8 =`402 406 406 = 414: 0.001* 0.003' 0.126* 0.127 0.127* 0.129 NBLT 1500 2800(q - -518 - -34Z :518 - 0.122 0.185* 0.122 0.185* SBRT 1500(d) 1500(d) _ 8 7 498 655 506 662 0.003 - 0.115 0.182 0.118 0.181 SB 3200 1600 2 S --"277. ;.368 279 373 0.001 0.002 0.173 0.2306 0.174 0.233• SBLT 1500 2800(c) 9 12 -.584 :.419 593 431 0.006* 0.008* 0.209* 0.150 0.212* 0.154 EBRT 1500 1500 269: :509 269 509 0.179 0.339 0.179 0.339 ES 3200 3200 - - 845 715 845 715 0.264 0.223 0.264 0.223 EBLT 2800(c) 2800(c) 6 :. -14 607 714 613 _ 728 0.002* 0.005* 0.217" 0.255* 0.219* 0.260* WBRT 1500(d) 1500(d) 9 18 648 585 657 ='603 - 0.004* 0.223* 0.240 0.226* 0.248 WB 3200 3200 531 850 531 850 0.166 0.266* 0.166 0.266* WBLT 1500 1500 -' .18 111 18 111 _ - 0.012 0.074 0.012 0.074 Yet tow 0.100* 0.100* 0.100* 0.100* 0.100* 0.100* TOTAL 1CU: 0.109 0.120 0.875 1.036 0.884 1.044 LEVEL OF SERVICE: I A I A D F I D F Files : B- 900510M.INT 1- 900510F.VOL s Q DESCRIPTION 1995 V/NITIGATION _ �� _• INTERSECTION: MOORPARK AVE. / L.A. AV - i r `, Ii LT# RTC SB i.. _ t 8 EW . SW NS LL Approach Ca Capacity t:- � ....., V/C Ratios (Critical w / *) Traffic Movement DATE: 12/18/1990 Existing TIME: 14:19:3 C up.— Site JOB NUMBER: 900510 Existing Ex.* Site Cum.- Site Cumulative Cumulative Cumulative AM PM AM PM AM PM AM._ PM = AM PM H LTE RT! Sf i 8 EW SW NS AM PM AM PM AM PM NBRT Approach Ca Capacity Peak Hour Traffic Volumes � ....., V/C Ratios (Critical w / *) Traffic Movement Existing Site C up.— Site Cumulative_ Existing Ex.* Site Cum.- Site Cumulative Existing Cumulative AM PM AM PM AM PM AM._ PM = AM PM AM PM AM PM AM PM NBRT U _ 1, Tffl NO 1600 1600 167 73 0.104* 0.046* 0.104* 0.046* NBLT 1500 1500 52 52 52 '52 0.035 0.035 0.035 0.035 SORT 1500(d) 1500(d) : °195 275 195 275 0.035 — 0.035 — SB 1600(e) 1600(e) -_35 56 35 56 0.001. 0.114* 0.163. 0.114* 0.164• SBLT 1500( *) 1500(*) 1 2 .;;318_ ,,449 319 - 451 0.001 0.114 0.163 0.114 0.164 EBRT EB 3200 3200 6 12 1288 1643 1294. 16551. 0.002 0.004. 0.403. 0.513 0.404. 0.517 EBLT 1500 1500 142 323 .142_ 323 0.095 0.215. 0.095 0.215* _ WORT 1500(d) - WB 3200 4800 8 6 1320 1989 1328 1996 0.003* 0.002 0.275 0.414. 0.277 0.416• WELT 1500 1500 :.45 139 45 139 - . 0.030* 0.093 0.030* 0.093 Yellow _ - 0.100. 0.100. 0.100. 0.100* 0.100* 0.100* TOTAL ICU: 0.103 0.105 0.751 0.938 0.752 0.941 IEVEL OF SERVICE: A A C E C E Files : B- 900510M.INT 1- 900510F.VOL 1 -� IF 0 IL :iSCRIPTIb ? 1495 W/MITIGAT ;ON -' - DATE: 1211E/1990 TIME: 14:24:7 1NTERSECHON: GABBERT RD. / L.A. AV , s ": fiu JOB NUMBER: 900510 Existing _.:�..� Cumulative 6 tFi LTA RTit SB i - = ! 04 LT# RT! S! i -► 6 EW 6 EW N s1 I f = } rw Approach Traffic Capacity Peak Hour Traffic Volumes _ V/C Ratios (Critical w / *) Existing Site Ctn.- Site Cumulative Existing Ex.+ Site Cum.- Site Cumulative Movement Existing Cumulative AM PH AN PH AN : PN AN PM AN PM AM PM AN I PH AM PM NBRT 1500 1500(d) 1" -381 364 381.' : 365 `- -_ 0.001* 0.136 - 0.136 - NB 1600 1600 101: _.127. x.101 127 - 0.063 0.079 0.063 0.079 NBLT 1500 1500 281 A16 281 .116 0.187* 0.077* 0.187* 0.077* SBRT = - SB 1600 1600 200 205 -200 205 0.125* 0.128* 0.125* 0.128* SBLT 9500 1500 - 35 66 35 - -` -66- 0.023 0.044 0.023 0.044 EBRT 1500 -: - EB 3200 4800 6 11 1174 1281 1180 1292 0.002 0.003* 0.245 0.267* 0.246 0.269* EBLT 1500 1500 ==`" ° 163< ;.161 :_163 161 _ 0.109' 0.107 0.109* 0.107 WBRT 1500 1500 36 19 36 - 19 0.024 0.013 0.024 0.013 WS 3200 3200 8 6 -890 1239 898 1245 0.003* 0.002 0.278* 0.387 0.281* 0.389 WELT 9500 1500 " 1 177 436 177 437 0.001* 0.118 0.291* 0.118 0.291* Yellow 0.100* 0.100* 0.100* 0.100* 0.100* 0.100* TOTAL ICU: 0.103 0.105 0.799 0.863 0.802 0.865 LEVEL OF SERVICE: - A A C D 0 D Files : B- 900510M.INT 1- 900510F.VOL . .� ,•• Y 111" w "i•"'''l�� {� *�N 41,y�c �,nr' �- �� � V'C'w"� tir � I � srx tft. ,t ii,- Aq aa4 y y{y Los Angeles Ave. �•` 7 -'fie ' :a+. •^..* i • _ a: s _ • nrrr4'i 13' 12 12' 11' 11' 12 2 T i~� 4 506d rAtto Spring Rd. / a ttt RR� 100 _ q -1000' 10' _546 t4apoeod 125.3' McOandd'e Dry. 10: 3204 Trorieltion rrith r"ierse curve with - - ----- r reds of 1346' and 1000' Fl I S Uw rr r,r, P, ,pP,y Or. i 25 112' 8 12' 12'11' 11 New Los Angeles Ave. T. k _ r+ T r CONCEPTUAL GEOMETFRIC I_)�SIGi� r c SPRING ROAD ./` LOS AN��ELES AVENUE NEW LOS ANGELES A %/ENUE i4' ; SFiOMAS S MONTGOMERY AND ASSOCIATES 4. Tronsportotion do Traffic Engineers P!n!�rF ORAMNC5 307 3. d.1 > L /en roac i- 2151 Alessondro Orive, Suite 210, Ventura, California 03001 �'a t (605) 652 -0411 SAX: (605) 652 -0545 t r Uj W' .' 1,',1rV VTR /AL 77i'ACT �� I� � it - - - - -- -� - - �—~. c�v .��.'------- .1�?�J----- - - -• -- P.e•pA*•t �. - �__.... ._ - v — N-- - - - - -- .�/C/NB I �I MUMS GAS 5our/r tN G*u/ 1W ca"44A Y Od7Ril moN LYALf7A*,vr RO AN C4" f4A*) N.I.76t/ fLxlcLLCr) ronr�t sa MA& W CAL 1, eat'" iz?VAWY CUFA%Wt JM"JCE.YAWNER MS "^mPlALl AVW TAoz IRO a4X3' L 4Ull 11'1'16/ (an) !!*-/440 MAPA O-AC: A aNc a&z 1/10 &%WANE/N',L•-A0 W AN StV /WLLEY, CAL /RNN /A HOGS ti � Mort � 1 Cam- / LVAfA$hwry: 1!00716161 COUWY MOMMVfAJ AM. Atl / nAN./t IMtRS AA ACY 7/901111LAt/71:4V AMP rQ EOY 190 AS aq.-A T, CAUAW W APQW (m*) 9DP•44lo CURE MTA A -af os•L>r- A` fl> M cvAAx r -ss.n d- PD•o1•tn• A-rAOO 4t-0799 PA1A* d- l- 07•dL• R -Nnoo I -ZA* r -Mr7 d- 1!•11!•16• A• Ila tl L•AM.N r-mid G d- ft7CG'Qt A••I*00 L -1lA f-SKOO �... ;i < MM} - 1 11 4 eAae/+11ewn O a0EAWVr 7D AIIW44OW AIVNNt AMn" 4WAWY (M/X MLI / /pf MJ4R lM! M' gl?EE! M' A�1•O AKgtKO AV mw OPM Aw ow, O/ Q.t. I1.l4ANNr Ib AMC//K 7!lEIM1Y! � srLEecAAV etl Alt ACYlvtt/1ttrY/YPVOlr1 AIGt ASCOREQNAlO AV A W AMA AAiI k . LV " (9.110 -AN0Mt !47[) © &mmzNrs Ax Auwx murY Itw,&w* /se Mr O-A64C7 AO ZM6/ A>CJ M 04XWJ 7 AW 41, Of AdVn. EXHIBIT 4 E y.. I S � •i V/C/N /TY /Wr eC4Z., -•6M• ow-F--T/s &wY /m`T W" t ASI OCLATSt 800 ESPLANADE DMVS - ROME 1100 *1199 WALTER CAL - tot/48t -31t1 - . &C /NEE/( OYAEAW'V 4YD AS*OCIAIZS 1160 MA/tl muff - ,*cure ft, VEWLA4, i117sotNN fan/ At -7tu A rTN: s7etMCN 1 AtW/MW N(Nfelf•R Lv tors L t W77 ___1_w ZLY✓ /NB "1571Ne ' 0-1 Aro -V-VD % NPO (LOT 11 CFO LOT 1) TfNUTNE PA/tCE1 M4P M ZVN90 -4 &TYO- AfCt?f/KA, COW 7Y L' VE/VICKA, GL / /UGV /A MA11C A "01W1 10N oe LOT -A-, A Re5UMIVV /510^: LY A ltKTIZ V OP rRAC7 NO /Z" -/ (AA00CnWR /NOW,,t/AL 7x.KJ. 4V 7) C' CI) YLYAkaXAA) C, LIXNrY ar WVfutA, JVAM a UL /i .0 tAHr 7N &VZr MCOtOeO /NAZW!O MGC 41, CYM✓7w Me Lif /ACE N 7714 LW,WrY REQNLY.f a- A410 CtkMY !1'.4CE : /• -p' 419616 ,lR7 t K.a1 .rr. nw >*141" LOT ! I AC"3 � , _ t N-- - - - - -- .�/C/NB I �I MUMS GAS 5our/r tN G*u/ 1W ca"44A Y Od7Ril moN LYALf7A*,vr RO AN C4" f4A*) N.I.76t/ fLxlcLLCr) ronr�t sa MA& W CAL 1, eat'" iz?VAWY CUFA%Wt JM"JCE.YAWNER MS "^mPlALl AVW TAoz IRO a4X3' L 4Ull 11'1'16/ (an) !!*-/440 MAPA O-AC: A aNc a&z 1/10 &%WANE/N',L•-A0 W AN StV /WLLEY, CAL /RNN /A HOGS ti � Mort � 1 Cam- / LVAfA$hwry: 1!00716161 COUWY MOMMVfAJ AM. Atl / nAN./t IMtRS AA ACY 7/901111LAt/71:4V AMP rQ EOY 190 AS aq.-A T, CAUAW W APQW (m*) 9DP•44lo CURE MTA A -af os•L>r- A` fl> M cvAAx r -ss.n d- PD•o1•tn• A-rAOO 4t-0799 PA1A* d- l- 07•dL• R -Nnoo I -ZA* r -Mr7 d- 1!•11!•16• A• Ila tl L•AM.N r-mid G d- ft7CG'Qt A••I*00 L -1lA f-SKOO �... ;i < MM} - 1 11 4 eAae/+11ewn O a0EAWVr 7D AIIW44OW AIVNNt AMn" 4WAWY (M/X MLI / /pf MJ4R lM! M' gl?EE! M' A�1•O AKgtKO AV mw OPM Aw ow, O/ Q.t. I1.l4ANNr Ib AMC//K 7!lEIM1Y! � srLEecAAV etl Alt ACYlvtt/1ttrY/YPVOlr1 AIGt ASCOREQNAlO AV A W AMA AAiI k . LV " (9.110 -AN0Mt !47[) © &mmzNrs Ax Auwx murY Itw,&w* /se Mr O-A64C7 AO ZM6/ A>CJ M 04XWJ 7 AW 41, Of AdVn. EXHIBIT 4 E y.. I S � •i V/C/N /TY /Wr eC4Z., -•6M• ow-F--T/s &wY /m`T W" t ASI OCLATSt 800 ESPLANADE DMVS - ROME 1100 *1199 WALTER CAL - tot/48t -31t1 - . &C /NEE/( OYAEAW'V 4YD AS*OCIAIZS 1160 MA/tl muff - ,*cure ft, VEWLA4, i117sotNN fan/ At -7tu A rTN: s7etMCN 1 AtW/MW N(Nfelf•R Lv tors L t W77 ___1_w ZLY✓ /NB "1571Ne ' 0-1 Aro -V-VD % NPO (LOT 11 CFO LOT 1) TfNUTNE PA/tCE1 M4P M ZVN90 -4 &TYO- AfCt?f/KA, COW 7Y L' VE/VICKA, GL / /UGV /A MA11C A "01W1 10N oe LOT -A-, A Re5UMIVV /510^: LY A ltKTIZ V OP rRAC7 NO /Z" -/ (AA00CnWR /NOW,,t/AL 7x.KJ. 4V 7) C' CI) YLYAkaXAA) C, LIXNrY ar WVfutA, JVAM a UL /i .0 tAHr 7N &VZr MCOtOeO /NAZW!O MGC 41, CYM✓7w Me Lif /ACE N 7714 LW,WrY REQNLY.f a- A410 CtkMY !1'.4CE : /• -p' 419616 ,lR7 t K.a1 .rr. nw >*141" mom STRICT p, r P% PROJECT SITE -- O N 1 V 10 )OAPARK IL t $MY OOIMTRr SIN 00.4 • AA1— "AMI d !14, VICINrTY MAP TABULATIONS SITE ANALYSIS A, .... ... all ft Al NIPA .0 "llb" NO-TE LEGEND k, AAAf.S• tip Lot, LL L ., EXHIBIT 5 HAS I—L D7 rY•U01M Ml. SITE " A- m Qe om U) ICI U 0 a: w x Wj- 'A— 17. I STORY RESTAURANT 2 V, A _6••. rY•U01M Ml. SITE " A- m Qe om U) ICI U 0 a: w x 19 1.4 Aga SOUTHWESTIFVATr�N_ IOUTHEAST ELEVATION egRIECOCHERE act WEST ELEVATION MAIN _ENTRANCE .. EXHIBIT 6 WEST ELEMAT19ti- MATERIAL SCIIEDULE . .... ...... COLOR SCHEDULE SOUTHELEVATX)N _ 0 3a Qti -'PH:i j V) I. > U.1 ELEVATIONS J w SS -U;.- W7 1% A SOUTH EL VLATPN_ Co f, IV.Wl f EAST ELEVATION � 41- V NORTHEAST kVAjK A —,--E!r — m Y 7- jmm!ml!. rl��j f, IV.Wl f EAST ELEVATION � 41- V NORTHEAST kVAjK A —,--E!r — O as I �4 T' 0 a o WRTH "L YAT" Y 7- O as I �4 T' 0 a o WRTH "L YAT" (a)o COLOR SCHEDULE rrn fn n EAST ELEVATION •.♦ ce ni L WEST ELEVATION SOUTH EI"An (m ce (I Lt 0 0 Qe cc w 0 N x ; =0 KITCHEN UNIT TYPE - A TYPICAL UNIT TYPE - S EXHIBIT 7 KITCHEN UNIT TYPE - C VNIT PLANS a Mh r M Ap Aa as � al Qh• A0� p wA. dF: MMM W a� al. . i� 4J42 y r 2 I u w 3 0 uia w �... N �+ O W x � i 1 �7 i m x 00 i oG/ F= bC MOORP RK N _ ffPERSPECTlVE z v n a x s s n a. JHO II XIr M C) 0 ZJT 13 11 MIXED USE PROJECT PERSPECTIVE n H a n V Z D 71 H x = s 77 xr. AL. I. A�. PC .' 1 ___ -._ _.. _ _ ___._. . �.�• .v. +w wuswu moo+... o..� �..so.... �..e. .�. .spa trAw .�_ ti • • j1 re.o..oJ� �r • • '1 • 1 f •ro•AO• •..•A•. - C on..o•uow �- (((( ♦ ♦ ♦♦ / � tAYMO11� • � ■ rAe J U • EXHIBIT 9 WANT. 6MW i yr �.{ uwwNr ••• i • • i e--,,.., .Q /1 M a Ap Qa as �1 f Qh. i Ap: } dF: IMIF� Q M i9p; S Q1. . I �1� O a(,) N W i 1 I •TM I I EFM 2,- M i� q ME . /1 w zo am M yy E Ap. a yMy : Q W Wo; t mz: ii � v �t a — - -- Q R 0 TIT Tl- z)-<- Y•I• -r I L �— tauro•r i jj •ro••e• it � I r- ing X _. a u at�7 I o � W � ' MOORPA,SK + 4W ti —MWRPARK ROAD, (�mg ROAD) EXHIBIT 10 x 4 4 A AV T MAY RES 'AURAW 0 cc cL ul v) SITE VICINITY MAP TABULATIONS NOTE LEGEND ti —MWRPARK ROAD, (�mg ROAD) EXHIBIT 10 x 4 4 A AV T MAY RES 'AURAW 0 cc cL ul v) SITE PROPOSED PLANT MATERIAL LIST r.. u.r�.rr...� CA MABONN =WALL _ IDNOII M99T ..w.. ex« LIGHTING LEGEND WALL LEGEND 1 ►A11K ROAD RING IIOADI • w..re .er .N.n �..•.... ..•.... • w.r. INI EXHIBIT 11 F&CEI WALL, LIGHTING AN LAND C7p PLAN Ip .A M 0 i 11 bl1 N G I AF 0� �a. dF: , N I A�� r1 1 i 1JI� n H U W O cr CA .. La W _X E I LLE 1 LAND DIVISION MOORPARK NO: 90 -4 APPLICANT: Martin V. Smith and Associates DATE: March 4, 1991 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS GENERAL REOUIREMENTS 1. The conditions of approval of this Tentative Parcel Map supersede all conflicting notations, specifications, dimensions, typical sections and the like which may be shown on said map; and that all provisions of the Subdivision Map Act, City of Moorpark Ordinance and adopted City policies apply. 2. Recordation of this subdivision shall be deemed to be acceptance by the property owner of the conditions of this Map. 3. All applicable requirements of any law or agency of the State, City of Moorpark an any other governmental entity shall be met, and all such requirements and enactments shall, by reference, become conditions of this entitlement. 4. The developer's recordation of this map and /or commencement of construction as a result of this map shall be deemed to be acceptance of all conditions of this map by the applicant. 5. That no condition of this entitlement shall be interpreted as permitting or requiring any violation of law, or any lawful rules or regulations or orders of an authorized governmental agency. In instances where more than one set of rules apply, the stricter ones shall take precedence. 6. That if any of the conditions or limitations of this subdivision are held to be invalid, that holding shall not invalidate the remaining conditions or limitations set forth. 7. The development shall be subject to all applicable City regulations regarding the M -1 zone. 8. No zone clearance shall be issued for construction until the final map has been recorded. Prior to the issuance of any permit, a zoning clearance shall be obtained from the Department of Community Development and a Building Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Building and Safety after the granting of a zoning clearance. Also, no zoning clearance shal be issued until the applicant pays all outstanding permit processing costs to the City. 1 /077 LAND DIVISION MOORPARK NO: 90 -4 APPLICANT: Martin V. Smith and Associates DATE: March 4, 1991 9. Prior to approval of a Final Map, the developer shall demonstrate by possession of a District Release from the Calleguas Municipal Water District that arrangements for payment of the Construction Charge applicable to the proposed subdivision have been made. 10. The Tentative Parcel Map shall expire three years from the date of its approval. Failure to record a final map with the Ventura County Recorder prior to expiration of the Tentative Map shall terminate all proceedings, and any subdivision of the land shall require the filing and processing of a new Tentative Map. 11. Prior to approval of Final Map, an unconditional availability letter shall be obtained from the County Waterworks District No. 1 for sewer and water service for each lot. Said letter shall be filed with the Department of Community Development or, if said Unconditional Availability Letter in a form satisfactory to the City cannot be obtained from the County Waterworks District No. 1, the developer shall execute a Subdivision Sewer Agreement in a form satisfactory to the City. Said agreement shall permit deferral of unconditional guarantee for sewer and water service until issuance of a building permit for each lot in the subdivision. Said agreement shall include language holding the City harmless against damages in the event of the ultimate lack of adequate sewer service. 12. Prior to recordation all utility lines from the property line shall be placed underground 13. At the time water service connection is made, cross connection control devices shall.be installed on the water system in a manner approved by the County Waterworks District No. 1. 14. As of the date of recordation of final parcel map, the parcels depicted thereon shall meet the requirements of the zoning ordinance and General Plan applicable to the property when the application was deemed complete. 15. That the subdivider shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City and its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action or proceeding against the City or its agents, officers or employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul any approval by the City or any of its agencies, departments, commissions, agents, officers, or employees concerning the subdivision, which claim, action or proceeding is brought 2 LAND DIVISION APPLICANT: DATE: MOORPARK NO: 90 -4 Martin V. Smith and Associates March 4, 1991 /78 within the time period provided therefore in Government Code Section 66499.37. The city will promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action or proceeding, and, if the city should fail to do so or should fail to cooperate fully in the defense, the subdivider shall not thereafter be responsible to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City or its agents, officers and employees pursuant to this condition. The city may, within its unlimited discretion, participate in the defense of any such claim, action or proceeding if both of the following occur: The city bears its own attorney fees and costs; The city defends the claim, action or proceeding in good faith. The subdivider shall not be required to pay or perform any settlement of such claim, action or proceeding unless the settlement is approved by the subdivider. The subdivider's obligations under this condition shall apply regardless of whether a final map or parcel map is ultimately recorded with respect to the subdivision. CITY ENGINEER DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS PRIOR TO APPROVAL ON FINAL MAP THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED• 16. a. The applicant shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, a grading plan prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer; shall obtain a grading Permit; and shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing completion. b. An erosion control plan shall be submitted for review and approval along with the grading plan. Along with the erosion control measures, hydroseeding of all graded slopes shall be required within 60 days of completion of grading. C. All haul routes shall be approved by the City Engineer. On -site haul routes shall be limited to graded areas only. 17 a. The applicant shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, a detailed Soils Report certified by a Registered Civil Engineer in the State of California. The report shall include a geotechnical investigation with regard to liquefaction, expansive soils, and seismic safety. The grading plan shall incorporate the recommendations of the approved Soils Report. LAND DIVISION MOORPARK NO: 90 -4 APPLICANT: Martin V. Smith and Associates DATE: March 4, 1991 b. Review of the soils and geotechnical report by the City's geotechnical consultant may be required by the City Engineer. If so, the applicant shall reimburse the City for all costs including the City's administrative costs. 18. The applicant shall indicate in writing to the City of Moorpark, the disposition of any water well(s) and any other water that may exist within the site. If any wells are proposed to be abandoned, or if they are abandoned and have not been properly sealed, they must be destroyed per Ventura County Ordinance No. 2372 and any applicable Division of Oil and Gas requirements. 19. The applicant shall not construct the driveway fronting Minor Street (per the project site plan) at the loading area and shall paint forty feet of yellow curb adjacent to the loading area. All loading /unloading shall be conducted in this zone. To facilitate loading /unloading the applicant shall construct a standard wheelchair ramp adjacent to this loading/ unloading zone. 20. The applicant shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the City Engineer that each building pad has adequate protection from a 100 -year storm and feasible access during a 10 -year storm. 21. The applicant shall submit to the City for review and approval, drainage plans, hydrologic and hydraulic calculations prepared by a registered civil engineer; shall enter into an agreement with the City to complete the improvements and shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing the construction of the improvements. The drainage plans and calculations shall indicate the following conditions before and after development:. Quantities of water, flow rates, major water courses. drainage areas and patterns, diversions, collection systems, flood hazard areas, sups and drainage courses. Hydrology shall be per current Ventura County Standards except as follows: a. all catch basins in sump locations shall be designated for a 50 -year storm; b. all catch basins on continuous grades shall be designed for a 10 -year storm; 4 /� LAND DIVISION MOORPARK NO: 90 -4 APPLICANT: Martin V. Smith and Associates DATE: March 4, 1991 C. all catch basins in a sump condition shall be designed such that the depth of water at intake shall equal the depth of the approach flows; d. all culverts shall be designed for a 100 -year storm; e. drainage facilities shall be provided such that surface flows are intercepted and contained prior to entering any adjacent roadways; f. for a 10 -year storm, all collector streets shall be provided with a minimum of one travel lane with a goal that local, residential streets shall have one travel lane available where possible. g. Drainage to adjacent parcels shall not be increased or concentrated by this development. All drainage measures necessary to mitigate storm water flows shall be provided by the applicant. h. On -site storm water retention facilities shall be designed to the City Engineer's satisfaction. 22. The applicant shall submit to the City for review and approval, storm drain plans for the Spring Road drain (from the project to the existing reinforced concrete box on the southwest corner of the intersection of Los Angeles Avenue - Spring Road) as identified by the City's Master Drainage Study, prepared by a registered civil engineer; shall enter into an agreement with the City to complete the improvements; and shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing the construction of the improvements. This drain shall pick up all flows along the east side of Spring Road and the south side of Flinn Avenue between the railroad tracks and New Los Angeles Avenue. Any necessary right -of -way required to complete this improvement will be acquired by the applicant at their expense. The applicant shall be eligible for reimbursement for the necessary pipeline oversizing of the Spring Road drain only from either adjacent properties that have not yet been developed and /or the Los Angeles Avenue A.O.C. as may be approved by City Council in a separate reimbursement agreement. 23. The applicant shall demonstrate legal access for each parcel to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 5 LAND DIVISION MOORPARK NO: 90 -4 APPLICANT: Martin V. Smith and Associates DATE: March 4, 1991 24. The applicant shall make a special contribution to the City representing the applicant's prorata share of the cost of improvements to the intersection of Spring Road - New Los Angeles Avenue. To determine the cost of these improvements as identified in the project traffic study, the applicant shall first prepare conceptual plans to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The prorata share shall be approved by the City Council prior to Final Map approval. The contribution shall then be paid to the City, prior to Final Map approval. 25. The applicant shall submit to the City and Caltrans for review and approval a traffic signal plan for the intersection of Spring Road - Flinn Street, prepared by a registered civil engineer; shall enter into an agreement with the City to complete those improvements; and shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing completion. The street improvements will be those necessary to complete installation of the traffic signal, including restriction of left turns into /out of Second Street as detailed in the project traffic study. The applicant shall provide for a traffic signal warrant study to be conducted between three and six months after occupancy. If the traffic signal is warranted and construction is allowed by Caltrans the applicant shall immediately construct the improvements. If the traffic signal is not warranted, additional traffic signal warrant studies shall be conducted on a semi - annual basis unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. If construction of the traffic signal is not warranted or Caltrans will not allow its construction prior to occupancy, the applicant shall deposit 125% of the construction cost with the City prior to project acceptance. The required bond for the improvements can be exonerated if the cash deposit is provided to the City. This construction cost shall include associated engineering, construction inspection and administration costs. The cash deposit does not relieve the applicant from constructing the improvements. The applicant shall construct the improvements upon receiving Caltrans permission to do so. 26. The applicant shall deposit with the City a contribution for the Los Angeles Avenue Area of Contribution. The actual deposit shall be the then current Los Angeles Avenue Area of Contribution rate at the time of Zone Clearance. If previous payment of this contribution can be demonstrated to the City's satisfaction, this condition shall be waived. 6) LAND DIVISION MOORPARK NO: 90 -4 APPLICANT: Martin V. Smith and Associates DATE: March 4, 1991 27. The applicant shall execute a covenant running with the land on the behalf of itself and its successors, heirs, and assigns agreeing to participate in the formation of an assessment district or other financing technique including, but not limited to, the payment of traffic mitigation fees, which the City may implement or adopt, to fund public street and traffic improvements directly or indirectly affected by the development. The covenant is to be approved by the Director of Commuity Development prior to recordation. 28. If any of the improvements which the applicant is required to construct or install is to be constructed or installed upon land in which the applicant does not have title or interest sufficient for such purposes, the applicant shall do all of the following at least 60 days prior to the filing of the final or parcel map for approval pursuant to Governmental Code Section 66457. a. Notify the City of Moorpark (hereinafter "City ") in writing that the applicant wishes the City to acquire an interest in the land which is sufficient for the purposes as provided in Governmental Code Section 66462.5. b. Supply the City with (i) a legal description of the interest to be acquired, (ii) a map or diagram of the interest to be acquired sufficient to satisfy the requirements of subdivision (e) of Section 1250.310 of the Code of Civil procedure, (iii) a current appraisal report prepared by an appraiser approved by the City which expresses an opinion as to the fair market value of the interest to be acquired, and. (iv) a current Litigation Guarantee Report. C. Enter into an agreement with the City, guaranteed by such cash deposits or other security as the City may require, pursuant to which the applicant will pay all of the City's cost (including, without limitation, attorney's fees and overhead expenses) of acquiring such an interest in the land. 29. The applicant shall pay all energy costs associated with street lighting for a period of one year from the initial energizing of the street lights. 30. The applicant shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing completion of all improvements which revert to the City (i.e., landscaping, parks, fencing, etc.) or which require removal (i.e., model homes, temporary debris basins, etc.). 13e3 LAND DIVISION MOORPARK NO: 90 -4 APPLICANT: Martin V. Smith and Associates DATE: March 4, 1991 31. A meandering sidewalk along the Spring Road, Flinn Avenue, and Minor Street property frontage shall be constructed, with the precise design and location approved by the city Engineer and Director of Community Development. The following criteria for the design of the meandering sidewalk shall be met: 1. Crossfall shall not exceed two percent. 2. Sidewalks shall be a minimum 5 feet wide at all points. 3. The meandering sidewalk shall be contained either within public right -of -way or within an easement offered to the City. 4. The applicant shall agree to maintain the sidewalk any related landscaping. IN CONJUNCTION WITH FINAL MAP APPROVAL, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 32. Applicant shall offer to dedicate on the Final Map to the City of Moorpark for public use, all right -of -way for public streets as shown on the map. 33. Applicant shall dedicate on the Final Map to the City of Moorpark, public service easements as required. A:pm /tt.cnd _1 /9 INDUSTRIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 90 -1 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 90 -1 APPLICANT: MARTIN V. SMITH AND ASSOCIATES DATE: March 4, 1991 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS GENERAL REQUIREMENTS: 1. The permit is granted for the land and project as shown on the submitted plot plans and elevations. The location and design of all site improvements shall be as shown on the approved plot plans and elevations except or unless indicated otherwise herein. 2. The development is subject to all applicable regulations of the M -1 Zone and all agencies of the State, Ventura County, the City of Moorpark and any other governmental entities. 3. That unless the project is inaugurated (building foundation slab in place and substantial work in progress) not later than one year after this permit is granted, this permit shall automatically expire on that date. The Director of Community Development may, at his discretion, grant up to one(1) additional year extension for project inauguration if there have been no changes in the adjacent areas and if applicant can document that he has diligently worked towards inauguration of the project during the initial one year period. 4. All facilities and uses other than those specifically requested in the application are prohibited unless a modification application has been approved by the City of Moorpark. 5. The design, maintenance, and operation of the permit area and facilities thereon shall comply with all applicable requirements and enactments of Federal, State, County, and City authorities, and all such requirements and enactments shall, by reference, become conditions of this permit. 6. No conditions of this entitlement shall be interpreted as permitting or requiring any violation of law or any unlawful rules or regulations o'r orders of an authorized governmental agency. In instances where more than one set of rules apply, the stricter ones shall take precedence. 7. If any of the conditions or limitations of this permit are held to be invalid, that holding shall not invalidate any of the remaining conditions or limitations set forth. ]. INDUSTRIAL CONDITIONAL APPLICANT: DATE: PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. USE PERMIT NO. MARTIN V. 185 90 -1 90 -1 SMITH AND ASSOCIATES March 4, 1991 8. The permittee agrees as a condition of issuance and use of this permit to defend, at his sole expense, any action brought against the City because of issuance (or renewal) of this permit or in the alternative to relinquish this permit. Permittee will reimburse the City for any court costs and /or attorney's fees which the City may be required by the court to pay as a result of any such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate in the defense of any such action, but such participation shall not relieve permittee of his obligation under this condition. 9. A sign permit is required for all on -site signs to be approved by the Director of Community Development. No on -site building sign shall be permitted unless the building is occupied by a single user. No off -site signs are permitted. The proposed monument signs shall be redesigned to have a maximum height of five feet. All existing signs on the subject property shall be removed prior to the issuance of any Zoning Clearance 10. Prior to the submission of construction plan for plan check or initiation of any construction activity, a zoning clearance shall be obtained from the Community Development Department. 11. Prior to initial tenant occupancy and any subsequent change in tenant occupancy, the owner of the subject building, or the owner's representative shall apply for a Zoning Clearance from the Community Development Department. 12. The Director of Community Development, or his designee, shall have the authority to conditionally approve or deny a zoning clearance request for tenant occupancy consistent with Article 45 of the Zoning Code. The cost of the zoning clearance shall be borne by the applicant for tenant occupancy. 13. If in the future, any use or uses are contemplated on the site differing from that specified in the zoning clearance approved for the occupancy, either the permittee, owner, or each prospective tenant shall file a project description prior to the initiation of the use. A review by the Director of Community Development will be conducted to determine if the proposed use is compatible with the M -1 Zone and the terms and conditions of this permit. Said review will be conducted at no charge and an approval letter sent, unless a minor or major modification to the Planned Development is required, in which case all applicable fees and procedures shall apply. 2 INDUSTRIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 90 -1 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 90 -1 APPLICANT: MARTIN V. SMITH AND ASSOCIATES DATE: March 4, 1991 14. The permittee's acceptance of this permit and /or commencement of construction and/ or operations under this permit shall be deemed to be acceptance of all conditions of this permit. 15. This permit shall expire if the use for which it is granted is discontinued for a period of 180 consecutive days or more as determined by the City. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A ZONING CLEARANCE, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 16. Prior to the issuance of a Zoning Clearance, the permittee shall sign a statement indicating awareness and understanding of all permit conditions, and shall agree to abide by these Conditions and present such statement to the Department of Community Development. 17. The final construction working drawings shall be submitted to the Director of Community Development for review. 18. Complete landscape plans (2- sets), together with specifications and a maintenance program shall be prepared by a State Licensed Landscape Architect, generally in accordance with the Ventura Guide to Landscape Plans and in compliance with the City of Moorpark Ordinance No. 74, and shall be submitted to and approved by the Director of Community Development. The final landscape plans shall be in substantial conformance with the conceptual landscape plan submitted with the application. The applicant shall bear the total cost of the landscape plan review and final installation inspection. The landscaping and planting plan submitted for review and approval shall be accompanied by a deposit as specified by the City of Moorpark. Additional funds may subsequently need to be deposited to cover all landscape plan check and inspection fees. All landscaping and planting shall be accomplished and approved by the Director of Community Development, or his designee, prior to the approval of occupancy. The project landscape plans shall include the following: a. A 50 percent shade coverage shall be provided within all parking areas. Shade coverage is described as the maximum mid -day shaded area defined by a selected specimen tree at 50 percent maturity. 91 IY47 INDUSTRIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT N0. 90 -1 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 90 -1 APPLICANT: MARTIN V. SMITH AND ASSOCIATES DATE: March 4, 1991 b. Any turf plantings associated with this project shall be drought tolerant, low-water using variety. C. Landscaping at site entrances and exits and any intersection within the parking lot shall not block or screen the view of a seated driver from another moving vehicle or pedestrian. d. Plantings in and adjacent to parking areas shall be contained within raised planters surrounded by six -inch high concrete curbs. e. Landscaping shall be designed so as to not obstruct the view of any exterior door or window from the street. f. Landscaping (trees) shall not be placed directly under any overhead lighting which could cause a loss of light at ground level. g. Earthen berms shall be provided to screen views of parked vehicles from access roads. h. Landscaping shall be used to screen views of any backf low preventers. 19. Roof design and construction shall include a minimum 18 -inch extension of the parapet wall above the highest point of the roof. 20. All roof mounted equipment (vents, stacks, blowers, air conditioning equipment, etc.) that may extend above any parapet wall shall be enclosed on all four sides by view obscuring material. Prior to the issuance of a zoning clearance, the final design and materials for the roof screen and location of any roof mounted equipment must be approved by the Director of Community Development. 21. All trash disposal areas shall be provided in a location which will not interfere with circulation, parking or access to the building, and shall be screened with a six foot high wall enclosure with metal gates. The final design of the trash enclosure shall be subject to the issuance of a zoning clearance. Trash areas and recycling bins shall be depicted on the construction plans, the size of 4 INDUSTRIAL CONDITIONAL APPLICANT: DATE: PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. USE PERMIT NO. MARTIN V. 90 -1 90 -1 SMITH AND ASSOCIATES March 4, 1991 which shall be approved by the Director of Community Development and the City employee responsible for recycling and solid waste management programs 22. Pullover parking (overhangs) shall be limited to 24 inch maximum. No vehicles shall be allowed to encroach onto walkways or into the required landscaped setbacks along roadways. 23. A 45 -foot turning radius shall be provided for loading zones consistent with the AASHO WS -50 design vehicle. Prior to issuance of a zoning clearance, the applicant shall provide a site plan which identifies all loading truck turning movements. 24. All property line walls shall be no further than one inch from the property line. 25. The building shall be constructed using energy saving devices. These shall include those devices required by the California Administrative Code, Title 24. 26. For all exterior lighting, a lighting plan shall be prepared by an electrical engineer registered in the State of California and submitted to the Department of Community Development for review and approval. The lighting plan shall achieve the following objectives: Avoid interferences with reasonable use of adjoining properties; minimize on -site and off -site glare; provide adequate on -site lighting; limit electroliers height to avoid excessive. illumination; and provide structures which are compatible with the total design of the proposed facility. a. The lighting plan shall include the following: b. A photometric plan showing a point -by -point foot candle layout to extend a minimum of twenty (20) feet outside the property lines. Layout plan to be based on a ten (10 ) foot grid center. C. Maximum overall height of fixtures shall be sixteen (16) feet. d. Fixtures must possess sharp cut -off qualities with a maximum of one -half foot candle illumination at property lines. A 189 INDUSTRIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 90 -1 �....�� CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 90 -1 APPLICANT: MARTIN V. SMITH AND ASSOCIATES DATE: March 4, 1991 e. There shall be no more than a seven -to -one (7: 1) ratio of level of illumination shown (maximum -to- minimum ratio between lighting standards). f. Energy efficient lighting fixtures shall be provided which are compatible with adjacent properties. g. Average maximum of one -half foot candle illumination. h. No light shall be emitted above the 90 degree or horizontal plane. No direct light source shall be visible from Spring Road. 27. A utility room with common access to house all meters and the roof access ladder shall be provided. No exterior access ladder of any kind shall be permitted. 28. No downspouts shall be permitted on the exterior of the building. 29. All exterior building materials and paint colors shall be approved by the Director of Community Development to ensure compatibility with adjacent development. 30. No asbestos pipe or construction materials shall be used without prior approval of the City Council. 31. All utilities are required to e underground to the nearest off -site utility pole except through transmission lines. Prior to the issuance of a zoning clearance, the applicant shall submit a plan for review and approval to the Director of Community Development .which identifies how compliance with the undergrounding requirement will be met. 32. If skylights are proposed, the specific type and model must be approved by the Director of Community Development to ensure that they shall be of an opaque type to minimize evening illumination as viewed from the exterior. 33. The applicant shall contribute to the City of Moorpark an amount of $.25 per square foot of gross floor area to support the City's current and future park system. 34. The applicant shall contribute to the City of Moorpark's Art in Public Places Fund, an amount of $10 per each 100 square feet of building area. 6 ICI INDUSTRIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 90 -1 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 90 -1 APPLICANT: MARTIN V. SMITH AND ASSOCIATES DATE: March 4, 1991 35. Prior to issuance of a zoning clearance, the permittee shall make a contribution to the Moorpark Traffic Systems Management Fund of $.15 per square foot of floor area to fund Traffic System Management programs. 36. To encourage employees to use alternative means of transportation to reduce automobile trips, common area bicycle storage facilities such as bicycle racks or lockers shall be provided. Proposed bicycle storage areas and facilities for the industrial building shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Development prior to the issuance of a zoning clearance. 37. All roof mounted equipment and other noise generation sources on -site shall be attenuated to 55 dBA at the property line, or to the ambient noise level at the property line measured at the time of the occupant request. Prior to the issuance of a Zone Clearance for initial occupancy or any subsequent occupancy, the Director of Community Development may request that a noise study be submitted for review and approval which demonstrates that all on -site noise generation sources would be mitigated to the required level. The noise study must be prepared by a licensed acoustical engineer in accordance with accepted engineering standards. 38. Prior to the issuance of a zoning clearance, a Surety Performance Bond in the amount of $10,000 shall be filed and accepted by the Director of Community Development. The Director of Community Development, may, through a public hearing to be heard before the City Council. recommend that any or all of the funds in the Performance Bond be forfeited for noncompliance of the Conditions of Approval or for some other just cause. This condition shall automatically be superseded by a related resolution or ordinance regarding condition compliance for entitlement approvals adopted by the City Council. 39. The applicant, permittee, or successors in interest, shall submit -to the Department of Community Development a fee to cover costs incurred by the City for Condition Compliance review. 40. Prior to the issuance of a Zoning Clearance, the site plan shall be revised to recess the loading zone for the hotel into the hotel structure or other location on -site so as to not create a traffic hazard problem on Minor Street. 7 l9/ INDUSTRIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 90 -1 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 90 -1 APPLICANT: MARTIN V. SMITH AND ASSOCIATES DATE: March 4, 1991 The revised loading zone shall be approved by the Director of Community Development. 41. The applicant shall deposit with the City of Moorpark $8,430.47 to a Transportation System Management Fund (TSM) as a mitigation measure to fully mitigate the significant impact to air quality so as to fund TSM programs or clean -fuel programs as determined by the City. 42. Within two days after approval of the project by the City Council, the applicant shall deposit with the City $1,250 plus a $25.00 filing fee made out to the County of Ventura for the State required Notice of Determination filing fee in accordance with Assembly Bill 3158. 43. Prior to the issuance of a zoning Clearance, the applicant shall remove all existing signs on the subject property. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 44. An "Unconditional Will Serve Letter" for water and sewer service will be obtained from the Ventura County Waterworks District No. 1. 45. The applicant shall pay all school assessment fees levied by the Moorpark Unified School District. 46. If any archaeological or historical finds are uncovered during excavation operations, the permittee shall assure the preservation of the site; shall obtain the services of a qualified archaeologist to recommend disposition of the site; and shall obtain the Director of Community Development's written concurrence of the recommended disposition before resuming development. PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OF EITHER THE HOTEL OR RESTAURANT, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 47. All parking areas shall be surfaced with asphalt or concrete and shall include adequate provisions for drainage, striping and appropriate wheel blocks, curbs, or posts in parking areas adjacent to landscaped areas. 48. All landscaping and planting shall be insta_ led and inspected. N. INDUSTRIAL CONDITIONAL APPLICANT: DATE: PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. USE PERMIT NO. MARTIN V. SMITH /9a 90 -1 90 -1 AND ASSOCIATES March 4, 1991 49. No use for which this permit is granted shall be commenced until a Certificate of Occupancy has been issued by the Building and Safety Division. In addition, no Certificate of Occupancy may be issued until all on -site improvements specified in this permit have been completed or the applicant has provided a Faithful Performance Bond. Said on -site improvements shall be completed within 120 days of issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy for either the hotel or restaurant facility. In case of failure to comply with any term or provision of this agreement, the City Council may by resolution declare the surety forfeited. Upon completion of the required improvements to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Development, the surety may be exonerated by action of the Director of Community Development. 50. At the time water service connection is made for each project, cross connection control devices shall be installed for the water system in accordance with the requirements of the Ventura County Environmental Health Department. 51. No Certificate of Occupancy shall be granted prior to acceptance or completion of landscaping or other sight improvements such as perimeter walls, including stucco treatment, landscaping, fences, slope planting or other landscape improvements not related to grading; private recreational facilities, etc. Said on -site improvements shall be completed within 120 days of issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. In case of failure to comply with any term or provision of this condition, the City Council may by resolution declare the surety forfeited. Upon completion of the required improvements to the satisfaction of the City, the City Council may reduce the amount of the bond; however, the bond must be kept in full effect for one year after the last occupancy to guarantee that items such as perimeter tract walls (including stucco treatment) , landscaping, fences, slope planting or other landscape improvements not related to grading, private recreational facilities, etc. are maintained. AFTER ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE APPLICABLE: 52. No later than ten (10) days after any change of property ownership or change of lessee(s) or operator(s) of the subject building, there shall be filed with the Director of Community /93 INDUSTRIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 90 -1 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 90 -1 APPLICANT: MARTIN V. SMITH AND ASSOCIATES DATE: March 4, 1991 Development the name(s) and address(es) of the new owner(s), lessee(s) or operator(s) together with a letter from any such person(s) acknowledging and agreeing with all conditions of this permit. 53. Prior to initial occupancy or any subsequent change of tenant occupancy, the owner of the subject building, or the owners representative shall apply for a zoning clearance from the Community Development Department. The purpose of the zoning clearance shall be to determine if the proposed uses(s) are compatible with the zoning and terms and conditions of the permit. 54. Prior to occupancy by any tenant or subsequent owner whose business would employ or dispose of hazardous materials, a Major Modification approval shall be required. 55. The continued maintenance of the permit area and facilities shall be subject to periodic inspection by the City. The permittee shall be required to remedy any defects in ground maintenance, as indicated by the Code Enforcement Officer within thirty (5) days after notification. 56. The striping for parking spaces and loading bays shall be maintained so that it remains clearly visible. 57. No outside storage of any materials or overnight parking of any delivery truck beyond the loading zone(s) shall be permitted. 58. No noxious odors shall be generated from any use on the subject site. 59. All uses and activities shall be conducted inside the buildings unless otherwise authorized by the Director of Community Development. CITY ENGINEER CONDITIONS DURING CONSTRUCTION, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL COMPLY: 60. That prior to any work being conducted within the State or City right -of -way, the applicant shall obtain an Encroachment Permit from the appropriate agency. 10 lqq-- INDUSTRIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 90 -1 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 90 -1 APPLICANT: MARTIN V. SMITH AND ASSOCIATES DATE: March 4, 1991 61. If any hazardous waste is encountered during the construction of this project, all work shall be immediately stopped and the Ventura County Environmental Health Department, the Fire Department, the Sheriff's Department, and the City Construction Observer shall be notified immediately. Work shall not proceed until clearance has been issued by all of these agencies. Contaminated or hazardous soil as defined by Department of Health Services may not be used for on -site soil fill or roadway subgrade unless the Department of Health Services determines in writing that said material has been treated to a level that is no longer considered a public health risk or requires public disclosure by the Department of Real Estate. Any contaminated or hazardous soil shall be removed to an approved landfill. 62. Where roads requiring 4 or more inches of pavement are to be built, the applicant shall construct the required street section minus 1 -inch of paving as an interim condition until all utility cuts or trenching are completed. The final 1 -inch cap of asphalt shall be placed after all necessary trenching is completed. PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 63. If the land is in a special flood hazard area, the applicant shall notify all potential buyers of this condition. PRIOR TO THE ACCEPTANCE OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AND BOND EXONERATION, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 64. Sufficient surety guaranteeing the public improvements shall be provided. The surety shall remain in place for one year following acceptance by the City Council. 65. Original "as- built" plans will be certified by the applicant's civil engineer and submitted with two sets of blue prints to the City Engineer's office. Although grading plans may have been submitted for checking and construction on sheets larger than 22" X 36 ", they must be resubmitted as "As- Builts" in a series of 22" X 36" mylars (made with proper overlaps) with a title block on each sheet. Submission of "As- Built" plans are required before a final inspection will be scheduled. 66. Reproducible centerline tie sheets shall be submitted to the City Engineer's office. 11 INDUSTRIAL CONDITIONAL APPLICANT: DATE: PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. USE PERMIT NO. MARTIN V. /95 90 -1 90 -1 SMITH AND ASSOCIATES March 4, 1991 67. The applicant's engineer shall file for a time extension with the City Engineer's office at least six weeks in advance of expiration of the agreement to construct subdivision improvements. The fees required will be in conformance with the applicable ordinance section. moo POLICE DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A OCCUPANCY PERMIT, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET: 68. Lighting devices shall be high enough so as to eliminate anyone on the ground from tampering with them. All parking areas shall be provided with a lighting system capable of illuminating the parking surface with a minimum of one -half foot candle of light and shall be designed to minimize the spillage of light onto adjacent properties. All exterior lighting devices shall be protected by weather and breakage - resistant covers. 69. Landscaping shall not cover any exterior door or window. 70. Landscaping at entrances /exits or at any intersection within the parking lot shall not block or screen the view of a seated driver from another moving vehicle or pedestrian. 71. Landscaping (trees) shall not be placed directly under any overhead lighting which could cause a loss. of light at ground level. 72. All entrance /exit driveways shall be a minimum of 30 feet in width. 73. All exterior doors shall be constructed of solid wood core, a minimum of 1 and three quarters inches thick, or of metal construction. Front glass doors commonly used for entry are acceptable but should be visible to the street. 74. Doors utilizing a cylinder lock shall have a minimum five (5) pintumbler operation with the locking bar or bolt extending into the receiving guide a minimum of 1 -inch deadbolt. 75. There shall not be any easy exterior access to the roof area, i.e. ladders, trees, high walls, etc. 12 Iq� INDUSTRIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 90 -1 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 90 -1 APPLICANT: MARTIN V. SMITH AND ASSOCIATES DATE: March 4, 1991 76. If an alarm system is used, it shall be wired to all exterior doors and windows and to any roof vents or other roof openings where access may be made. 77. Address shall be clearly visible to approaching emergency vehicles and mounted against a contrasting color. The numbers shall be a minimum of 6 inches in height and illuminated during the hours of darkness. 78. Front door entrances shall be visible from the street. 79. Peep holes and secondary locking devices shall be placed on all room doors. DURING CONSTRUCTION THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL APPLY: 80. A licensed security guard is recommended during the construction phase, or a 6 -foot high chain link fence shall be erected around the construction site. 81. Construction equipment, tools, etc., shall be properly secured during non - working hours. COUNTY OF VENTURA ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT, THE FOLLOWING CONDITION SHALL BE MET: 82. Prior to the issuance of building permits for the construction of any food or beverage facility, the applicant shall submit complete construction plans, equipment design specifications, finish schedules and other required information to the Community Services of Environmental Health Department for review and approval (see Ventura County Environmental Health Food Establishment Plan Check Guide). VENTURA COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 83. That a street width of 25 -feet for two way traffic with off street parking on both sides shall be provided. 84. That prior to construction, the applicant shall submit two site plans to the Ventura County Bureau of Fire Prevention for approval of the location of fire lanes. The fire lanes shall 13 lq7 INDUSTRIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 90 -1 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 90 -1 APPLICANT: MARTIN V. SMITH AND ASSOCIATES DATE: March 4, 1991 be posted in accordance with California Vehicle Code, Section 22500.1 and Article 10 of the Uniform Fire Code prior to Occupancy. 85. That access roads shall be installed with an all weather surface, suitable for access by fire department apparatus. 86. That the access roadway shall be extended to within 150 feet of all portions of the exterior walls of the first story of any building. Where the access roadway cannot be provided, approved fire protection system or systems shall be installed as required and acceptable to the Bureau of Fire Prevention. 87. That all drives shall have a minimum vertical clearance of 13 feet, 6 inches (131, 611). 88. That approved turn around areas for fire apparatus shall be provided where the access road is 150 feet or farther from the main thoroughfare. 89. That address numbers, a minimum of 6 inches high, shall be installed prior to occupancy, shall be of contrasting color to the background. Where structures are setback more than 250 feet from the street, larger numbers will be required so that they are distinguishable from the street. In the event a structure(s) is not visible from the street, the address number(s) shall be posted adjacent to the driveway entrance. 90. That prior to construction, the applicant shall submit plans to the Ventura County Bureau of Fire Prevention for approval of the location of fire hydrants. Show existing hydrants on a site plan, within 300 feet of the development. 91. That fire hydrants shall be installed and in service prior to combustible construction and shall conform to the minimum standards of the Moorpark Water Works Manual. a. Each hydrant shall be 6 inch wet barrel design and shall have two 4 inch and one 2 1/2 inch outlet(s). b. The required fire flow shall be achieved at no less than 20 psi residual pressure. C. Fire hydrants shall be spaced 300 feet on center, and so located that no structure will be farther than 150 feet from any one hydrant. 14 /9f INDUSTRIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 90 -1 , CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 90 -1 APPLICANT: MARTIN V. SMITH AND ASSOCIATES DATE: March 4, 1991 d. Fire hydrants shall be recessed in from curb face 24 inches at center. 92. That the minimum fire flow required is determined by the type of building construction, proximity to other structures, fire walls, and fire protection devices provided, as specified by the I.S.O. for determining Required Fire Flow. Given the present plans and information, the required fire flow is approximately 3,000 gallons per minute. The applicant shall verify that the water purveyor can provide the required volume at the project. 93. That if any building(s) are to be protected by an automatic sprinkler system, plans shall be submitted, with payment for plan check, to the Ventura County Bureau of Fire Prevention for review. 94. Than any structure(s) greater than 5,000 square feet in area and /or 5 miles from a fire station shall be provided with an automatic fire sprinkler system in accordance with Ventura County Ordinance #14. 95. That building plans of all A.E,I, & H occupancies shall be submitted to the Ventura County Bureau of Fire Prevention for plan check. 96. That an approved manual and automatic fire alarm system shall be installed and maintained in the building. 97. That plans for any fire alarm system shall be submitted to the Bureau of Fire Prevention for plan check. 98. That fire extinguishers shall be installed in accordance with National Fire Protection Association, Pamphlet #10. The placement of extinguishers shall be reviewed by the Fire Prevention Bureau. 99. That plans for the installation of automatic fire extinguishing system ( such as, halon or dry chemical) shall be submitted to the Ventura County Bureau of Fire Prevention for plan check. 100. That all grass or brush exposing any structures shall be cleared for a distance of 100 feet prior to framing, according to the Ventura County Weed Abatement Ordinance. 15 /99 INDUSTRIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 90 -1 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 90 -1 APPLICANT: MARTIN V. SMITH AND ASSOCIATES DATE: March 4, 1991 101. That trash containers with an individual capacity of 1.5 cubic yards or greater, shall not be stored within 5 feet of openings, combustible walls, combustible roof eave lines, unless protected by approved automatic fire sprinklers. (Uniform Fire Code, Article 11). WATERWORKS DISTRICT NO. 1 CONDITION 102. Applicant for service shall comply with the Ventura County Waterworks District No. 1 "Rules and Regulations" including all provisions of or relating to the existing Industrial Waste Discharge Requirements and subsequent additions or revisions thereto. Ultra low plumbing fixtures are required in all new construction. A:IPDCPD.CNDy 16 MIXED U5E DEVELOrMENT . MJINAL P tl-' -IN D5zu ?EMEWTS EXHIBIT 14 -�S3 Q$ 0 rwrCl �rsr.uw,NT TOTAL r<lC-M ^XK- -s :4 ;T 4(u KIT,06A LWIT Wll4TUlo 4 OTHERS o ?HEaLS 51^1106 5EKVICE r1�6 ( 1' -'7 �x�l' /t� _ �2� 135(I�S)= 2� •}obo�25o 3o6a (�J.}S) 9040onso) 25 1 I { li 'jOO 15/1000 1 /Z�io (� _ 50/ nou�l� twNTW6 f/ MIXED USE _ w� NO LESS 4000 /30o 3060(16 /1000) 10.+0(1 /2sn) 20 srAr -94 (��S`,'., M7e' /2 ENP�iErj I fQ50�Off�[L �d SEATS � /45t ( 250 - tbUbLC GoutyTiNG P� o+Ke. (�l - I Ibo� (infptAl 3,066 1 /psi Z °4.0(1/75) S tA25o� - -- ,H (nn�ME.D 1 �r 3.143 4 ^av I/ZS o) 3a�81/45) 2O 9(I /tso) 2�8 - - -- — — — — oo I 4/1000 S F oR 1/,3 OUTS (04E oy Q S'1� - 90VL1♦G 601111711:(4 Pte. O l l' VA( . Aqpft 306x('/ {s.): I Z0 ¢o (4 /�o.e) 205 ('l 7> (I) = g I/2 I /SUNItS I /�,,,rb �j-t5� _ �►►�+rKlub +I ,n:. rvY y. irf, I /t5o1p ________ —_ -_ 121 - ce >�I�Z�:12 _- ._. -_. _.._ 135('15:27 _._.�— _..___ —.. 4oal�l /250) _._. -... _ 3D6�(1/¢4) 4°40(1 /tSa) 1 Br i:J °• N// 2:1i':rACF1, MII1. F14 -6kI -- = 8 9 A "A I � I /loo � i /2<� � p9o8LE coun;nN4 pEaz ZOti:11J � 30/v0(�/bo) 20400s•) F I/L I f /� ouopnNt I/9 i6cu /A11ts - -- _ _ I �3 a4 2o4o('/ :,.)(/ -,rwei — 111 Y'('�)- ICS Zao /3 = �0 51ao /goo = 17 EXHIBIT 14 -�S3 Q$ 0 ao/ RESOLUTION NO. PC -90- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL TO THE CITY COUNCIL LDM -90 -4, IPD -90 -1, CUP -90 -1 AND VARIANCE 90 -2 ON THE APPLICATION OF MARTIN V. SMITH AND ASSOCIATES Whereas, at a duly noticed public hearing on March 4, 1991, the Planning Commission considered the application filed by Martin V. Smith and Associates requesting approval of a land division to subdivide an existing 7.52 acre parcel into two parcels of 2.88 and 4.64 acres; an Industrial Planned Development Permit and Conditional Use Permit to construct a 135 room hotel and a free- standing 5,100 square foot restaurant; and a Variance to permit tower to encroach a maximum of 4 -feet into the rear yard setback and parking to encroach into side yard setback, permit decorative hardscape paved delivery access to be placed in the rear yard setback area, and permit parking requirements for hotel and restaurant to be reduced; Whereas, the Planning Commission after review and consideration of the information contained in the staff report, the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the Mitigating Reporting and Monitoring Program and testimony, and has found that the project will not have a significant adverse effect on the environment, and has reached its decision on this matter; and Whereas, at its meeting of March 4, 1991, the Planning Commission opened the public hearing, took testimony from all those wishing to testify, closed the public hearing.. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 of the Public Resources Code of the State of California {beginning at Section 21000}), the Planning Commission of the City of Moorpark has determined that the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigating Monitoring and Reporting Program prepared for this project has been completed in compliance with CEQA and State Guidelines. The Planning Commission has received and considered the information contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration prior to acting on the proposed project and has found that this document adequately addresses the environmental effects of the proposed project. SECTION 2. The Planning Commission hereby adopts the findings in the staff report dated March 4, 1991, and said report is incorporated herein by reference as though fully set forth. aoa SECTION 3. The Planning Commission does hereby find that the aforementioned projects are consistent with the City's General Plan. SECTION 4. That the Planning Commission hereby recommends to the City Council conditional approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 90 -1, LDM -90 -4, IPD -90 -1 and Variance 90 -2 on the application of Martin V. Smith and Associates subject to compliance with all of the attached conditions attached hereto. The action of the foregoing direction was approved by the following roll vote: AYES: NOES: PASSES, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED THIS 4TH DAY OF MARCH, 1991. alls ommm t p �i immi :wroliflowN ls 1_ �,U !!1::::!n: i i RESOLUTION NO. PC -91 -234 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL TO THE CITY COUNCIL LDM -90 -4 ON THE APPLICATION OF MARTIN V. SMITH AND ASSOCIATES Whereas, at a duly noticed public hearing on April 1, 1991, the Planning Commission considered the application filed by Martin V. Smith anal Associates requesting approval of a land division to subdivide an existing 7.52 acre parcel into two parcels of 2.88 and 4.64 acres; Whereas, the Planning Commission after review and consideration of the information contained in the staff report, the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the Mitigating Reporting and Monitoring Program and testimony, and has found that the project will not have a significant adverse effect on the environment, and has reached its decision on this matter; and Whereas, at its meeting of April 1, 1991, the Planning Commission opened the public hearing, took testimony from all those wishing to testify, closed the public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 of the Public Resources Code of the State of California {beginning at Section 21000}), the Planning Commission of the City of Moorpark has determined that the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigating Monitoring and Reporting Program prepared for this project has been completed in compliance with CEQA and State Guidelines. The Planning Commission has received and considered the information contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration prior to acting on the proposed project and has found that this document adequately addresses the environmental effects of the proposed project. SECTION findings in the staff report ldated gMarch 4si1991,e and said is the is incorporated herein by reference as though fully set forth. SECTION 3. The Planning Commission does hereby find that the aforementioned projects are consistent with the City's General Plan. Resolution No. PC -91 -234 page 2 SECTION 4. That the Planning Commission hereby recommends to the City Council conditional approval (with recommended changes) of LDM -90 -4 on the application of Martin V. Smith and Associates subject to compliance with all of the attached conditions attached hereto. The action of the foregoing direction was approved by the following roll vote: AYES: Wesner, Torres, and Schmidt NOES: None. ABSENT: Hone. PASSES, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED THIS 15TH DAY OF APRIL, 1991. ATTEST: .Z � . Celia LaFleur, Secretary STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) SS COUNTY OF VENTURA ) Chairman presiding: hae H. s I, Celia LaFleur, do hereby certify that I am the secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Moorpark, California and that the foregoing resolution was duly adopted at a regular meeting thereof held on April 15, 1991 by the following vote: Ayes: Commissioners Schmidt, Torres, Wesner, Brodsky; Abstain: Commissioner Miller. ATTEST. i .. Celia LaFleur, .Secretary LAND DIVISION MOORPARK NO: 90 -4 APPLICANT: Martin V. Smith and Associates DATE: March 4, 1991 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS GENERAL REOUIREMENTS 1. The conditions of approval of this Tentative Parcel Map supersede all conflicting notations, specifications, dimensions, typical sections and the like which may be shown on said map; and that all provisions of the Subdivision Map Act, City of Moorpark Ordinance and adopted City policies apply. 2. Recordation of. this subdivision shall be deemed to be acceptance by the property owner of the conditions of this Map. 3. All applicable requirements of any law or agency of the State, City of Moorpark an any other governmental entity shall be met, and all such requirements and enactments shall, by reference, become conditions of this entitlement. 4. The developer's recordation of this map and /or commencement of construction as a result of this map shall be deemed to be acceptance of all conditions of this map by the applicant. 5. That no condition of this entitlement shall be interpreted as permitting or requiring any violation of law, or any lawful - rules or regulations or orders of an authorized governmental agency. In instances where more than one set of rules apply, the stricter ones shall take precedence. 6. That if any of the conditions or limitations of this subdivision are held to be invalid, that holding shall not invalidate the remaining conditions or limitations set forth. 7. The development shall be subject to all applicable City regulations regarding the M -1 zone. 8. No zone clearance shall be issued for construction until the final map has been recorded. Prior to the issuance of any permit, a zoning clearance shall be obtained from the Department of Community Development and a Building Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Building and Safety after the granting of a zoning clearance. Also, no zoning clearance shal be issued until the applicant pays all outstanding permit processing costs to the City. 1 LAND DIVISION MOORPARK NO: 90 -4 APPLICANT: Martin V. Smith and Associates DATE: March 4, 1991 9. Prior to approval of a Final Map, the developer shall demonstrate by possession of a District Release from the Calleguas Municipal Water District that arrangements for payment of the Construction Charge applicable to the proposed subdivision have been made. 10. The Tentative Parcel Map shall expire three years from the date of its approval. Failure to record a final map with the Ventura County Recorder prior to expiration of the Tentative Map shall terminate all proceedings, and any subdivision of the land shall require the filing and processing of a new Tentative Map. 11. Prior to approval of Final Map, an unconditional availability letter shall be obtained from the County Waterworks District No. 1 for sewer and water service for each lot. Said letter shall be filed with the Department of Community Development or, if said Unconditional Availability Letter in a form satisfactory to the City cannot be obtained from the County Waterworks District No. 1, the developer shall execute a Subdivision Sewer Agreement in a form satisfactory to the City. Said agreement shall permit deferral of unconditional guarantee for sewer and water service until issuance of a building permit for each lot in the subdivision. Said agreement shall include language holding the City harmless against damages in the event of the ultimate lack of adequate sewer service. 12. Prior to recordation all utility lines from the property line shall be placed underground 13. At the time water service connection is made, cross connection control devices shall be installed on the water system in a manner approved by the County Waterworks District No. 1. 14. As of the date of recordation of final parcel map, the parcels depicted thereon shall meet the requirements of the zoning ordinance and General Plan applicable to the property when the application was deemed complete. 15. That the subdivider shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City and its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action or proceeding against the City or its agents, Officers or employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul any approval by the City or any of its agencies, departments, commissions, agents, officers, or employees concerning the subdivision, which claim, action or proceeding is brought within the time period provided therefore in Government Code a:\ldm90- 4.234 LAND DIVISION MOORPARK NO: 90 -4 APPLICANT: Martin V. Smith and Associates DATE: March 4, 1991 Section 66499.37. The city will promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action or proceeding, and, if the city should fail to do so or should fail to cooperate fully in the defense, the subdivider shall not thereafter be responsible to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City or its agents, officers and employees pursuant to this condition. The city may, within its unlimited discretion, participate in the defense of any such claim, action or proceeding if both of the following occur: The city bears its own attorney fees and costs; The city defends the claim faith. , action or proceeding in good The subdivider shall not be required to pay or perform any settlement of such claim, action or proceeding unless the settlement is approved by the subdivider. The subdivider's obligations under this condition shall apply regardless of whether a final map or parcel map is ultimately recorded with respect to the subdivision. CITY ENGINEER DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS SATISFIED• ""` 1� ruw1NG CONDITIONS SHALL $$ 16. a. The applicant shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, a grading plan prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer; shall obtain a grading Permit; and shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing completion. b• An erosion control plan shall be submitted for review and approval along with the grading plan. Along with the erosion.. control measures, hydroseeding of all graded slopes shall be required within 60 days of completion of grading. C. All haul routes shall be approved by the City Engineer. On -site haul routes shall be limited to graded areas only. 17 a• The applicant shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, a detailed Soils Report certified by a Registered Civil Engineer in the State of California. The report shall include a geotechnical investigation with regard to liquefaction, expansive soils, and seismic safety. The grading plan shall incorporate the recommendations of the approved Soils Report. a : \ldm90 -4.234 3 LAND DIVISION MOORPARK NO: 90 -4 APPLICANT: Martin V. Smith and Associates DATE: March 4, 1991 b. Review of the soils and geotechnical report by the City's geotechnical consultant may be required by the City Engineer. If so, the applicant shall reimburse the City for all costs including the City's administrative costs. 18. The applicant shall indicate in writing to the City of Moorpark, the disposition of any water well(s) and any other water that may exist within the site. If any wells are proposed to be abandoned, or if they are abandoned and have not been properly sealed, they must be destroyed per Ventura County Ordinance No.,2372 and any applicable Division of Oil and Gas requirements. 19. The applicant shall not construct the driveway fronting Minor Street (per the project site plan) at the loading area and shall paint forty feet of yellow curb adjacent to the loading area. All loading /unloading shall be conducted in this zone. To facilitate loading /unloading the applicant shall construct a standard wheelchair ramp adjacent to this loading /unloading zone. 20. The applicant shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the City Engineer that each building pad has adequate protection from a 100 -year storm and feasible access during a 10 -year storm. 21. The applicant shall submit to the City for review and approval, drainage plans, hydrologic and hydraulic calculations prepared by a registered civil engineer; shall enter into an agreement with the City to complete the improvements and shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing the construction of the improvements. The drainage plans and calculations shall indicate the following conditions before and after development: Quantities of water, flow rates, major water courses. drainage areas and patterns, diversions, collection systems, flood hazard areas, sups and drainage courses. Hydrology shall be per current Ventura County Standards except as follows: a. all catch basins in sump locations shall be designated for a 50 -year storm; b. all catch basins on continuous grades shall be designed for a 10 -year storm; a :\1dm90 -4.234 4 LAND DIVISION MOORPARK NO: 90 -4 APPLICANT: Martin V. Smith and Associates DATE: March 4, 1991 C. all catch basins in a sump condition shall be designed such that the depth of water at intake shall equal the depth of the approach flows; d. all culverts shall be designed for a 100 -year storm; e. drainage facilities shall be provided such that'surface flows are intercepted and contained prior to entering any adjacent roadways; f. for a 10 -year storm, all collector streets shall be provided with a minimum of one travel lane with a goal that local., residential streets shall have one travel lane available where possible. g. Drainage to adjacent parcels shall not be increased or concentrated by this development. All drainage measures necessary to mitigate storm water flows shall be provided by the applicant. h. On -site storm water retention facilities shall be designed to the City Engineer's satisfaction. 22. The applicant shall submit to the City for review and approval, storm drain plans for the Spring Road drain (from the project to the existing reinforced concrete box on the southwest corner of the intersection of Los Angeles Avenue- Spring Road) as identified by the City's Master Drainage Study, prepared'by a registered civil engineer; shall enter into an agreement with the City to complete the improvements; and shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing the construction of the improvements. This drain shall pick up all flows along the east side of Spring Road and the south side of Flinn Avenue between the railroad tracks and New Los Angeles Avenue. Any necessary right -of -way required to complete this improvement will be acquired by the applicant at their expense. The applicant shall be eligible for reimbursement for the necessary pipeline oversizing of the Spring Road drain only from either adjacent properties that have not yet been developed and /or the Los Angeles Avenue A.O.C. as may be approved by City Council in a separate reimbursement agreement. 23. The applicant shall demonstrate legal access for each parcel to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. a:\1dm90 -4.234 5 LAND DIVISION MOORPARK NO: 90 -4 APPLICANT: Martin V. Smith and Associates DATE: March 4, 1991 24. The applicant shall make a special contribution to the City representing the applicant's prorata share of the cost oft improvements to the intersection of Spring Road - New Los Angeles Avenue. To determine the cost of these improvements as identified in the project traffic study, the applicant shall first prepare conceptual plans to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The prorata share shall be approved by the City Council prior to Final Map approval. The contribution shall then be paid to the City, prior to Final Map approval. 25. The applicant shall submit to the City and Caltrans for review and approval a traffic signal plan for the intersection of Spring Road - Flinn Street, prepared by a registered civil engineer; shall enter into an agreement with the City to complete those improvements; and shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing completion. The street improvements will be those necessary to complete installation of the traffic signal, including restriction of left turns into /out of Second Street as detailed in the project traffic study. The applicant shall provide for a traffic signal warrant study to be conducted between three and six months after occupancy. If the traffic signal is warranted and construction is allowed by Caltrans the applicant shall immediately construct the improvements. If the traffic signal is not warranted, additional traffic signal warrant studies shall be conducted on a semi - annual basis unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. If construction of the traffic signal is not warranted or Caltrans will not allow its construction prior to occupancy, the applicant shall deposit 125% of the construction cost with the City prior to project acceptance. The required bond for the improvements can be exonerated if the cash deposit is provided to the City. This construction cost shall include associated engineering, construction inspection and administration costs. The cash deposit does not relieve the applicant from constructing the improvements. The applicant shall construct the improvements upon receiving Caltrans permission to do so. 26. The applicant shall deposit with the City a contribution for the Los Angeles Avenue Area of Contribution. The actual deposit shall be the then current Los Angeles Avenue Area of Contribution rate at the time of Zone Clearance. If previous payment of this contribution can be demonstrated to the City's satisfaction, this condition shall be waived. a: \ldm90 -4.234 6 LAND DIVISION MOORPARK NO: 90 -4 APPLICANT: Martin V. Smith and Associates DATE: March 4, 1991 27. The applicant shall execute a covenant running with the land on the behalf of itself and its successors, heirs, and assigns agreeing to participate in the formation of an assessment district or other financing technique including,. but not limited to, the payment of traffic mitigation fees, which the City may implement or adopt, to fund public street and traffic improvements directly or indirectly affected by the development. The covenant is to be approved by the Director Of Commuity Development prior to recordation. 28. If any of the improvements which the applicant is required to construct or install is to be constructed or installed upon land in which the applicant does not have title or interest sufficient for such purposes, the applicant shall do all of the following at least 60 days prior to the filing of the final or parcel map for approval pursuant to Governmental Code Section 66457. a. Notify the City of Moorpark (hereinafter "City ") in writing that the applicant wishes the City to acquire an interest in the land which is sufficient for the purposes as provided in Governmental Code Section 66462.5. b. Supply the City with (i) a legal description of the interest to be acquired, (ii) a map or diagram of the interest to be acquired sufficient to satisfy the requirements of subdivision (e) of Section 1250.310 of the Code of Civil procedure, (iii) a current appraisal report prepared by an appraiser approved by the City which expresses an opinion as to the fair market value of the interest to be acquired, and (iv) a current Litigation Guarantee Report. C. Enter into an agreement with the City, guaranteed by such cash deposits or other security as the City may require, pursuant to which the applicant will pay all of the City's cost (including, without limitation, attorney's fees and overhead expenses) of acquiring such an interest in the land. 29. The applicant shall pay all energy costs associated with street lighting for a period of one year from the initial energizing of the street lights. 30. The applicant shall post sufficient surety completion of all improvements which revert o guaranteeing the City (i.e., landscaping, parks, fencing, etc.) or which require removal (i.e., model homes, temporary debris basins, etc.). a:\1dm90 -4.234 7 LAND DIVISION MOORPARK NO: 90 -4 APPLICANT: Martin V. Smith and Associates DATE: March 4, 1991 31. A meandering sidewalk along the Spring Road, Flinn Avenue, and Minor Street property frontage shall be constructed, with the precise design and location approved by the city Engineer and Director of Community Development. The following criteria for the design of the meandering sidewalk shall be met: 1. Crossfall shall not exceed two percent. 2. Sidewalks shall be a minimum 5 feet wide at all points. 3. The meandering sidewalk shall be contained either within public right -of -way or within an easement offered to the City. 4. The applicant shall agree to maintain the sidewalk any related landscaping. IN CONJUNCTION WITH FINAL MAP APPROVAL, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 32. Applicant shall offer to dedicate on the Final Map to the City Of Moorpark for public use, all right -of -way for public streets as shown on the map. 33. Applicant shall dedicate on the Final Map to the City of Moorpark, public service easements as required. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDED CHANGES PER PLANNING COMMISSION MEETNG OF APRIL 1 1991 CITY ENGINEER CONDITIONS PRIOR TO APPROVAL ON FINAL MAP THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED• 22. t#e—e� eet r e the existing einfer eee bam en the identified aster Dr- * term=ed —eiv- -- engine ' shall. eemei3t a:\1dm90 -4.234 Q LAND DIVISION MOORPARK NO: 90 -4 APPLICANT: Martin V. Smith and Associates DATE: March 4, 1991 25. The applicant shall submit to the City and Caltrans for review and approval, street improvement plans for a xedesgnq Sprang; Road between F1I Avenue an d> 2nd iae,"d Street and a traffic signal plan for signalization of the intersection of Spring Road - Second Street /Flinn Avenue as descabea iay ;tire LAND DIVISION MOORPARK NO: 90 -4 To determine what street improvements will be necessary, the applicants engineer shall submit for City and Caltrans review alternative conceptual designs of an aligned intersection. The off -set intersection design shall include sufficient information to demonstrate how the lane configuration and traffic signal phasing will operate. The City and Caltrans will review the conceptual plans (additional conceptual designs may be required) and determine which intersection configuration will be constructed. The applicant shall then proceed with final design and construction of the improvements. The applicant shall be responsible for all costs associated with processing of any associated right -of- way vacation. The applicant shall provide for a traffic signal warrant study to be conducted between three and six months after occupancy. If the traffic signal is not warranted, additional traffic signal warrant studies shall be conducted on a semi- annual basis unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. If construction of the traffic signal is not warranted, or Caltrans will not allow its construction prior to occupancy, the applicant shall deposit 125% of the construction cost with the City prior to project acceptance. The required bond for the improvements can be exonerated if the cash deposit is provided to the City. This construction cost shall include associated engineering, construction inspection and administration costs. The cash deposit does not relieve the applicant from constructing the improvements. The applicant shall construct the improvements upon receiving Caltrans permission to do so. a: \ldm90 -4.234 10