HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 1993 0804 CC REG ITEM 11H,"A"K, CALIF02N:A
Y Council Meeting /,,
ITEM
ACTION:
Ey/
AGENDA REPORT
C I T Y O F MOORPARK
TO: The Honorable City Council
FROM: Kenneth C. Gilbert, Director of Public Works
DATE: July 27, 1993 (Council Meeting 8 -4 -93)
SUBJECT: Consider Request to Convey to the City the Maintenance
Responsibility for the Parkway Located on the North
Side of Campus Park Drive East of Loyola Street
OVERVIEW
This presents an analysis of the facts surrounding the development
of the parkway located on the north side of Campus Park Drive east
of Loyola Street, and a request from the HOA that this parkway be
conveyed to the City for maintenance.
BACKGROUND
1. Prior to the incorporation of the City of Moorpark, the County
of Ventura approved Tract 3070. The conditions of approval for
that tract required the developer to dedicate and improve
Campus Park Drive west of Princeton Avenue to the standards
called for by County Plate B -2B. These standards require the
dedication of ninety -four feet (941) of right -of -way and the
improvement of divided arterial street having a curb -to -curb
dimension of seventy -eight feet (781) and a center median
fourteen feet (141) wide.
2. In 1984 the City Council of the City of Moorpark approved Tract
4170 (formerly Tract 3170 -5). The conditions of approval for
that tract revised the above mentioned requirements for the
improvement of Campus Park Drive. Those conditions required
the street improvements to be "tapered" down to a paved section
of thirty -four feet (341) within forty -three and one -half feet
(431) of right -of -way and with no center median. The street
improvement plans for this segment of street (an excerpt of
which are attached as Exhibit 1) implemented this direction.
loyopkvy
Parkway @ Loyola & Campus Park Drive
August 1993
Page 2
3. As shown on Exhibit 1 (the street improvement plans) and
Exhibit 2 (an excerpt from Tract Map 4170) there is a portion
of unused right -of -way on the north side of Campus Park Drive
east of Loyola Street. The conditions of approval for Tract
4170 stated that the right -of -way line on the north side of the
Campus Park Drive was to be changed to be located at the back
of sidewalk. For some unknown reason, this direction was never
implemented.
4. Although the intent is not clearly stated, it is presumed that
the area between the sidewalk and the lot lines was to be
conveyed to the HOA as a common area. This could have been
accomplished by including this area in Lot 11 (see Exhibit 2)
which is owned by the HOA.
5. The conditions of approval for Tracts 3070 and 4170 also
require the landscaping of all common areas owned by the Home
Owners Association. Attached as Exhibit 3 is an excerpt of the
landscaping plans for those common areas. These plans include
the installation of landscaping and irrigation in the subject
parkway.
DISCUSSION
A. Committee Review
The City is in receipt of a request from the HOA that the City
take over the maintenance of the subject parkway. This request
was referred to the Public Works, Facilities and Solid Waste
Committee (Mayor Pro Tem Montgomery and Councilmember Wozniak)
for review and recommendation.
B. Basis of Recommended Action
The action recommended below is based on actions taken by the
City Council in approving the subdivision which created the
subject parkway. Those actions and related facts are
summarized as follows:
1. As stated above, it was the intent of the City that the
area in question be removed from the street right -of -way.
2. Although not clearly stated, it appears that the subject
area should have been granted to the HOA as a separate
parcel or as a part of Lot 11.
loyopkvy
Parkway @ Loyola & Campus Park Drive
August 1993
Page 3
3. The landscaping and irrigation plans prepared by the
developer and approved by the City show this area to be
included in the common areas to be landscaped and to be
maintained by the HOA. There is no discussion in the staff
report or the conditions of approval for these Tract Maps
or accompanying Residential Planned Development permits
that supports the concept that this parcel was to be
maintained by the City.
4. Currently the landscaping and irrigation in the subject
parkway is maintained by the HOA. The irrigation system
for that area is connected to the irrigation system for
other landscaped areas maintained by the HOA. The water
meter for the irrigation system supplies water to many
landscaped areas, including the subject parkway. Although
not impossible, separating this parkway from other areas
maintained by the HOA would be difficult.
Staff and the Public Works, Facilities and Solid Waste Committee
recommend that the subject request be denied.
loyopkvy
cnai-. ri: i•.s r: . r: rt ,.s- r+»r;W.v: <�;:carr *r+•7•nt �:
I ww...r.ai -'.1.; ti:: r'- ui.�r -f . Y_•. � - _ -- —_- - __
r . -.. ... • .. i .•. n. .. • tf - -f. .. -N'�f. ':.fir •.. .. .Wy _ — _ . — — _ - - * — - - — _- —_
t` R/w � G4MPUS PAR.i' R/W
'r DR/vE
CAP
7 7', 32
� T TZ /o _ fF
RE ✓• E} CO.</S7 6" COWC. S' S 14EWALlf' PER
�GUrTER PER PLATE E-4 !RE ✓. G) TrPEA -2 PLATE E -5 (REV,E) ' �� - .
(RE!! G) EXIST. CAMPUS PAR,< DRIVE
NORMAL S EC 7'/ON S TA _ O - & 0
PER PLATE B — 2 B ( RE-Y- F) oil.
(M T S.) v 0 0
YOLA c--7T. }
E 5NT 4 [ l }
co
w 3
CO ti fa �i., � v v' °
2O 20
10 _ .
lu�It•1
�' � �' �Q�' � •
vu
JOI
J& oaVWME
p
- a U
C OnlS TRUC T /ON A/O TE5
�9� TO S TA O f 70. 8 S f, FROM STA z,- 961
C. 12 Z _ Goms7- CROSS GUTTE.Q PER VEiVT / /per' '
GONST. 51,40' "w i
I
'w��D ; Ali
- 3 -- _�.
46
14.22 AC r
N 34° W"W f
"b
S30 443 -,W42 �,,
tk
r
1 0Ak
•
0\0 ` L• - Z i.
co,&
t± g
/ •sal
Ti 20
yr� 22
�^ lOL4 'i
SEE � , 20
��i t2
D 10 ti�F~
ov 4
`'moo t,` 14
o� \>
T '> t6 I?
S
THE NORTHERLY L I NF OF TRACT NO.
B. PAGES 41 TO 46 INCLUSIVE OFD a' 1253-C�O
AS USED AS THE BASIS OF BEAR I NGS�FOR
.�
:�ci`
�+
.. � r: .y`r..
`� .,