HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 1997 0604 CC REG ITEM 08ErrEM $0E .
2��ENi7�. REPORT
C Z'TY OF MCX3RP?si2K
TO: The Honorable City Council
FROK: Ken Gilbert, Director of Public Works 10-
or K
DATE: May 22, 1997 (Council Meeting 6- 4 -97)aff aly
SUBJECT: Consider !Faking Certain Changes to �
and Confirming the Assessments for ACTION; (e
Fiscal Year 1997/98
This presents for approval a Resolution making certain changes to
Assessment District AD84 -2 and confirming the assessments for Fiscal
Year 1997/98. Certain background information pertaining to this
action, including the subject Engineer's Report, is set forth in
Exhibits attached hereto. All Exhibits to this report are listed in
Exhibit "A." A summary comparison of the proposed FY 1997/98
assessments to the amounts assessed in FY 1996/97 is shown on
Exhibit B -1.
Assessment District 84 -2 was formed in 1984 pursuant to the
provisions of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972." This
assessment district was established to allow for the funding of
street lighting and parkway /median maintenance and improvement
expenses through the levying of assessments as provided for in the
act. As set forth in the Engineer's Report (Exhibit "G"), there are
two types of district expenses, generally described as follows:
• those expenses determined to be of general benefit to the
community, which are spread to all of the lots in the City; and,
• those expenses for the construction and maintenance of
improvements determined to be of benefit to the properties
within a number of identified zones, which are spread to all of
the lots within each zone.
In addition to this distinction, there are also two types of
Citywide expenses: street lighting costs and certain parkway and
median landscape maintenance costs. All street lighting costs are
distributed to all of the properties within the City by means of a
formula designed to spread said costs on the basis of benefit. The
benefit spread formula identifies a number of factors (including
lighting intensity, lighting security, people use) which are
associated with benefits derived, and then weighs those factors by
.land use to determining benefits derived.
aM4_98 . spr
Assessment District 84 -2
June 4, 1997
Page 2
Citywide landscaping costs are spread in a manner similar to the
People Use formula used by the Parks Maintenance assessment District
(AD85 -1). According to this benefit- spread formula, twenty -five
percent (25 %) of the total Citywide landscape maintenance costs is
allocated to non - residential properties. The remaining seventy -five
percent (75 %) of such costs is allocated and spread to residential
properties. These allocated costs are spread to both non-
residential and residential properties by a "people -use" benefit
formula based on the land use of each parcel being assessed.
Landscape maintenance costs for each Zone of Benefit are spread
evenly to each lot within that Zone. Storm debris basin maintenance
costs for each Zone of Benefit are spread evenly to selected lots
within that Zone, deemed to derive benefit from such maintenance.
In addition to these maintenance costs, certain Zones may receive an
improvement assessment to fund approved improvements. Zone
improvement assessments are also spread evenly to each lot within
the affected Zone. Except for Zones 7 and 9, these zone expenses
are distributed equally between the non - exempt parcels within each
Zone. Assessments levied upon the properties in the industrial
parks covered by Zones 7 and 9, are spread to each non - exempt parcel
within those Zones via a per acre assessment.
The City must annually act to levy the lighting and landscape
maintenance assessments. Said assessments have been levied each
year since the formation of the district.
In accordance with the requirements of the above mentioned act, the
City Council has taken a number of actions in recent months in
preparation for considering the levy of assessments for Street
Lighting and Landscape Maintenance for FY 1997/98. Those actions
are summarized as follows:
1. on January 15, 1997, the City Council adopted Resolution No.
97 -1267 initiating the proceedings required to consider the levy
of assessments for AD 84 -2 for FY 1997/98. That resolution
called for the establishment of two new Zones of Benefit (Zone
11: Tract 4174 (Colmer); and Zone 12: Carlsberg].
2. on that date, the City Council also selected Dwight French and
Associates to prepare the Engineer's Reports for AD84 -2.
3. On February 19, 1997, the City Council adopted Resolution No.
97 -1285, amending Resolution No. 97 -1267 by adding the
requirement that the Engineer's Report also provide for the
establishment of a third new Zone of Benefit encompassing Tract
4147 (Villa Campesina).
ad84_98.apr
Assessment District 84 -2
June 4, 1997
Page 3
4. On April 2, 1997, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 97-
1296 making certain findings and taking certain actions
including the following:
• approving, subject to change, the Engineers' Report for
AD84 -2 for FY 1997/98;
• stating intent to make certain changes to AD84 -2;
• setting 7:00 p.m. on May 19, 1997, as the time and date of a
Public Meeting for the purpose of allowing the public an
opportunity to meet with City staff to question and discuss
the proposed assessments;
• setting 7:00 p.m. on June 4, 1997, as the time and date of a
Public Hearing to consider the subject actions; and
• directing that Notice of said meetings be sent to the owners
of all affected properties, stating the amount of the
assessment levied for FY 1996/97, the amount of the proposed
increase in the assessment amount and the total amount of the
assessments proposed for FY 1997/98.
..,• _ •
As you know, staff has reviewed the provisions of Proposition
218 and the impacts those provisions may have on the various
fees and assessments levied by the City. Of particular concern
was the impact of Proposition 218 on the City's two maintenance
assessment districts. Staff has determined from that review,
that Proposition 218 does not apply to assessments levied prior
to July 1, 1997. Presuming that the Landscaping and Lighting
Maintenance Assessments (AD84 -2) will be levied prior to July 1,
1997, it is the determination of staff that the provisions of
Proposition 218 do not apply to this year's assessments.
The approved Engineer's Report (Exhibit 'G') uses the same
methodology and rates to determine the amount of the assessments
as has been used in prior years. The Engineer's Report defines
the term methodology as the formulas used to derive the
assessment units. That report defines the term rate as the
relative benefit and /or cost assigned to each land use
category. '
At this point it appears that it may be possible to continue to
levy a street lighting and landscaping maintenance assessments
in future years. However, it may be necessary to modify some of
the assessment methods and procedures to fully comply with the
provisions of Prop. 218.
1 See Exhibit "F" for a discussion of the ten =. 0014'
sd84_98,spr
Assessment District 84 -2
June 4, 1997
Page 4
B. FY 1997/98 Budget
Attached as Exhibit 'D' is the proposed budget for Parkway
Lighting and Landscaping for FY 1997/98. The budget figures set
forth in this Exhibit have been revised from those shown in the
staff report presented to the City Council last April, based on
more up to date cost projections. The revised aggregate total
budget amount for this program has been reduced by $3,600. The
possible resultant reduction in the Citywide assessment is
discussed in more detail in Section D of this report.
The budget figures for FY 1997/98 are approximately $40,000
higher than the amounts budgeted last year (see Exhibit D -1).
Some of the factors which caused these increases are summarized
as follows:
1. Citywide Street Lighting Costs -- The budget amount for
street lighting (Exhibits F) has been increased approximately
2% [$4,518] to cover rate increases and added street lights.
2. Citywide Landecape Maintenance Costs -- In that the budget
for street lighting has increased slightly and the total
budget for Citywide maintenance is down slightly, the budget
for landscape maintenance has been reduced (Exhibit D -2).
3. Zone Maintenance Costs -- The FY 1997/98 budget for Zone
maintenance has been increased approximately $31,7002 from
the FY 1996/97 Budget. A discussion of some of the major
factors which caused this increase is as follows:
a. Water: Projected water costs have been increased $8,248
to reflect actual anticipated needs.
b. Zone 8: Labor costs have been added for the required
locking and unlocking the gates at the Buffer Area
[$3,200].
c. Zone 10: Projected costs for tree maintenance has been
increased approximately $18,000 to cover actual
anticipated needs. In addition, labor costs related to
storm debris basin cleaning has been increased $3,300.
2 From Exhibit D -1:
FY 1997/98 Total: $ 672,385
Less FY 1996/97 Total: S(622,207)
Sub -total $ 50,178
Less Citywide increase: $ (9,756)
Less Zone 2 Capital: $ (5,000)
Less new Zone 13: ,S (3,720)
Total Zone Maint. Increase: $ 31,702 u�,[83
ada� se.spr u
Assessment District 84 -2
June 4, 1997
Page 5
4. Capital 1xWovements -- The only Assessment District funded
capital improvement project proposed for FY 1997/98 is the
Zone 2 funded project to construct parkway landscaping
improvements to the north side of Tierra Rejada Road, east
and west of Southhampton. This project is to be funded by an
improvement assessment levied upon the parcels in Zone 2
(Tract 2865) over the past several years, and recommended to
be levied in FY 1997/98 and future years. It is recommended
that the City proceed with the project design in FY 1997/98
by retaining the services of a landscape architect [$5,000]
to prepare plans and specifications. It is anticipated that
construction could proceed in FY 1998/99.
C. Fund Activity
Attached as Exhibit 'C', is a summary of the Fund Activity for
AD 84 -2 for the past several years. Please note that there is
an anticipated FY 1997/98 year -end Fund Balance for €uture
Citywide Capital Improvements of $30,756 (see Exhibit C -2).
This surplus is discussed in more detail in Section D,
paragraphs 5 & 6, of this report.
� . -7171771101471
A comparison of the Citywide assessments for AD 84 -2 for FY
1996/97 and FY 1997/98 are set forth on Exhibit 'B -11.
1. Summary: A summary of the annual assessments for Citywide
lighting and landscaping is as follows:
Actual Proposed
Elements FY 1996/97 FY 1997198
Landscape Maintenance
Total Cost 130,164 143,927
Less Prior Year Surplus (,43,655) 0
Total Assessment 86,509 143,927
S F Res. Assessment $7.92 $13.20
Street Lighting
Total Cost 203,150 2091150
Less Prior Year Surplus (17,150) 0
Total Assessment 186,000 209,150.
S F Res. Assessment $19.77 $22.07
Total S F Res. Assmnt. $27.69 $35.27
ad84 9B.apr
Assessment District 84 -2
June 4, 1997
Page 6
2. Alternatives: Exhibit B -2 provides four alternative
calculations for the Citywide Assessments for FY 1997/98.
Each alternative shows a different amount needed to be
transfered from other sources, ranging from 0 to $75,000.
Those alternative calculations are summarized as follows:
3. Alternate No. 5: A fifth Alternate would be to identify the
difference between the total amount of the Citywide
assessment allowed by the Public Hearing Notice and the
revised amount of the budget [$356,677 - $353,077 = $3,600]
to be a contingency and set the assessment amount at the
amount identified in the Notice. A summary of that Alternate
is as follows:
Amount ($)
Item Lighting Landscagina Total
Total Cost 209,150 147,527 356,667
Less Transfer In 0 0 0
Total Assessment 209,150 147,527 356,667
SF Res Assessment 22.07 13.53 35.60
4. Reduced FY 1996/97 to: It should be noted that the
FY 1996/97 assessments for Citywide lighting and landscaping
were far less than the cost of those services. The action
taken by the City Council in June 1996, directed that the
shortfall in assessment revenues come from the prior year
aAlt 9®.apr (Moss
Alternate
Item
�_
2
3
4
Street Lioting
Mlimw Assant
209,150
209,150
209,150
209,150
Less Transfer In
0
(10,000)
(20,000)
(30,000)
Total Assesssent
209,150
199,150
189,150
179,150
SF Res Assesssent
22.07
21.01
19.%
18.90
LandSCOPiNg
Nazi= Assort
143,927
143,927
143,927
143,927
Less Transfer In
0
(15,000)
(30,000)
(45,000)
Total Assessment
143,927
128,927
113,927
98,927
SF Res Assessment
13.20
11.82
10.45
9.07
Total Amt
maxims Assmnt
353,077
353,077
353,077
353,077
Less Transfer In
0
(25,000)
(50,000)
(75,000)
Total Assessment
353,077
328,077
303,077
278,077
SF Res Assessment
35.27
32.84
30.41
27.98
3. Alternate No. 5: A fifth Alternate would be to identify the
difference between the total amount of the Citywide
assessment allowed by the Public Hearing Notice and the
revised amount of the budget [$356,677 - $353,077 = $3,600]
to be a contingency and set the assessment amount at the
amount identified in the Notice. A summary of that Alternate
is as follows:
Amount ($)
Item Lighting Landscagina Total
Total Cost 209,150 147,527 356,667
Less Transfer In 0 0 0
Total Assessment 209,150 147,527 356,667
SF Res Assessment 22.07 13.53 35.60
4. Reduced FY 1996/97 to: It should be noted that the
FY 1996/97 assessments for Citywide lighting and landscaping
were far less than the cost of those services. The action
taken by the City Council in June 1996, directed that the
shortfall in assessment revenues come from the prior year
aAlt 9®.apr (Moss
Assessment District 84 -2
June 4, 1997
Page 8
Also shown on Exhibit 'B -1' is a comparison of the Zone
Assessments for FY 1996/97 and FY 1997/98. More detailed
information regarding those assessments is set forth in certain
other Exhibits listed and described as follows:
• B -5: A chart showing the elements of the FY 1997/98 Zone
Assessments, as well as the per lot assessments.
• B -4: A chart showing the elements of the FY 1996/97 Zone
Assessments, as well as the per lot assessments.
• B -3: A chart showing how the FY 1997/98 Zone Assessments
were derived, using projected FY 1996/97 year -end Zone
account balances and FY 1997/98 projected costs.
A discussion of some of the factors affecting the Zone
assessments is as follows:
Zone 1: The proposed assessment of $12,379 ($160.77/lot)
consists of anticipated FY 1997/98 costs of $6,660, plus a prior
year deficit of $5,719. Due to budget adjustments, this
proposed assessment is less than the amount cited in the Public
Hearing Notice [$13,979 ($181.55/lot)].
Zone 2
a) The proposed landscape assessment of $52,633 ($84.62/lot)
consists of anticipated FY 1997/98 costs of $42,800, plus a
prior year deficit of $9,833.
b) Certain lots will be assessed an additional $2,377
($49.52/lot) for storm debris basin maintenance. That
assessment consists of anticipated FY 1997/98 costs of
$1,500, plus a prior year deficit for such costs of $877.
c) This will be the fourth year an additional $10 per lot
improvement assessment has been levied upon the lots within
Zone 2.
d) Due to budget adjustments, the total maximum assessment of
$61,230 ($144.14/lot) is less than the amount cited in the
Public Hearing Notice [$64,130 {$148.80 /lot)].
Zone 3: There is no significant change proposed to the
assessment amount. Due to budget adjustments, the maximum
assessment allowed by the Public Hearing Notice is less than the
revised project costs, resulting in a projected year -end zone
deficit of $100.
Zone 4: Last year's assessment [$9,114 {$70.65/lot)] included
an amount required to recover a zone deficit related to the
refund of certain over assessments. The FY 1997/98 assessment
[$4.060 {$31.47/lot) ] is approximately equal to projected costs.
However, due to budget adjustments, the maximum assessment
allowed by the Public Hearing Notice is less, resulting in a
projected year -end zone deficit of $80.
a484- 9B.apr QW0136
Assessment District 84 -2
June 4, 1997
Page 7
surplus assessments which had been set aside for capital
improvement projects (see Exhibit C -3). A summary of last
year's funding for Citywide maintenance is as follows:
DescriQtion
Total Utimated FY 1996/97 Costs
Less Anticipated assessment Revenue
Required Transfer from
Improvement Set Aside
203,150 130,164 333,314
(186,000) (86,5091 (272.,509)
17,150 43,655 60,805
5. Year -Bnd Balance for Capital Imer+o nts : As shown on
Exhibit C -3, it is estimated that there will be a year -end
balance (FY 1996/97) in the Capital improvement set aside in
the amount of $30,756. [Note: $7,315 of this amount is a developer deposit for
parkway ieprovemensts on the south side of Los Angeles Avenue east of Tierra Rejada Road.]
6. Alternative: The recommended Citywide Assessment
for FY 1997/98 is shown at the top of Exhibit B -1 compared to
last year's Citywide assessment. Those recommended Citywide
assessments are the amount described above in Section C (2 ) as
Alternate #1. It is not recommended that any part of the
above mentioned FY 1996/97 year -end balance in the Capital
Imoprovement set aside be used to reduce the amount of the FY
1997/98 Citywide assessments. It is also not recommended
that any General Fund monies be transferred to Assessment
District AD84 -2 to fund a portion of the FY 1997/98 Citywide
maintenance costs [see Exhibit C -1 & C -2). The reasons for
these recommendations are as follows:
a) Although it is the view of staff that assessment amounts
may increase in the future under Proposition 218 (see
Section A for an explanation), it is always possible that
another view may prevail and that the assessments levied
for FY 1997/98 will "lock -in" the maximum amount of the
Citywide assessment for all future years. Accordingly, it
is recommended that the FY 1997/98 assessment be for the
full amount of the projected FY 1997/98 costs.
b) The projected FY 1997/98 year -end balance set aside for
capital improvements is only an estimate. There is a
history of variability in both revenues and expenses
associated with this program. Actual revenues and
expenses may result in no year -end balance.
c) The possible FY 1997/98 year -end balance for Citywide
Improvement Projects [$30,756] could be held in reserve to
fund future year maintenance cost increases.
saes 99.epr d(M0137
Assessment District 84 -2
June 4, 1997
Page 9
Zone 5: The proposed assessment of $15,646 (71.77/lot) is less
than costs due to a projected FY 1996/97 year -end surplus of
approximately $6,000.
Zone 6: The proposed assessment of $1,561 {70.95/lot} consists
of anticipated FY 1997/98 costs of $1,064, plus a prior year
deficit of $497.
Zone 7: The proposed assessment of $17,074 ($179.73/ac)
consists of anticipated FY 1997/98 costs of $11,730, plus a
prior year deficit of $5,344.
Zone 8: The proposed assessment of $12,442 (City: $12.58/lot;
Home Acres: $31.11/lot) consists of anticipated FY 1997/98 costs
of $10,036, plus a prior year deficit of $2,406. Due to budget
adjustments, this proposed assessment is less than the amount
cited in the Public Hearing Notice [$13,542 [City: $13.62/lot;
Home Acres: $33.86/lot)].
Zone 9: The proposed assessment of $505 ($10.31/ac) is less
than costs due to a projected FY 1996/97 year -end surplus of
approximately $1,145.
Zone 10
a) The proposed landscape assessment of $227,039 ($89.46/lot)
consists of anticipated FY 1997/98 costs of $191,500, plus a
prior year deficit of $37,697. A discussion of this zone
deficit is set forth below in Section F of this report.
b) Certain lots will be assessed $7,904 ($11.62 /lot) for storm
debris basin maintenance. That assessment consists of
anticipated FY 1997/98 costs of $5,100, plus a prior year
deficit for such costs of $3,404.
c) Due to budget adjustments, the maximum assessment allowed by
the Public Hearing Notice is less than the revised project
costs, resulting in a projected year -end zone deficit of
$2,748.
Zone 11: There is no assessment proposed for Tract 4174
(Colmer) for FY 1997 /98 because there are no City costs
anticipated next fiscal year. This zone is being established at
this time to be in place to fund future City costs ( if any) for
the maintenance of landscaping in this Tract.
Zone 12: There is no assessment proposed for the tracts to be
recorded within the Carlsberg Specific Plan for FY 1997/98
because there are no City costs anticipated next fiscal year.
This zone is being established at this time to be in place to
fund future City costs for the maintenance of landscaping within
and /or adjacent to these tracts to be maintained by the City.
aQl4_99.spr � ()( ` 3
Assessment District 84 -2
June 4, 1997
Page 10
Zone 13: The Engineer's report includes a $60.00 per lot per
year assessment in FY 1997/98 to fund anticipated City costs for
the maintenance of Campesina Park, located within Tract 4147.
This assessment is discussed in more detail in Section I of this
report.
1. Transfer of INCA Pzx1;ert1e6 to the City: In the Spring of
1996, the matter of transferring properties owned by the
Mountain Meadows Community Association (MCA) to the City was
being finalized. Costs for City maintenance of those areas
were being estimated in order to determine the amount of the
Zone 10 assessment required to fund that maintenance.
2. May 1996 Bstinate vs. Projected ACtual: In June 1996 the
Zone 10 assessments were considered by the City Council. As
it turns out, the estimates provided to the City Council at
that time for landscape maintenance were very close to
projected year -end actual expenses. A comparison of those
numbers is as follows:
Projected Actual FY 1996/97 L/S Maint. Costs: $189,674
June 1996 Est. of FY 1996/97 L/S Maint. Costs: 5175,937
Amount of under estimate (7%): $ 13,373
3. R®dOCed Assessa�t: Although the total estimated cost for
all areas was close, estimated costs for individual elements
of the required work were not. The estimated cost to
maintain one such element -- the Peach Hill Wash Central
Channel -- was higher than actual costs. Unfortunately, this
element of the work was deleted from the areas to be funded
by the Zone 10 assessment. Accordingly, the total Zone 10
assessment was reduced by the amount of the over estimated
costs. This reduced the amount of the Zone 10 assessment to
a level lower than that required to perform the work
required.
sd$4_98.sgr (MOSS
Assessment District 84 -2
June 4, 1997
Page 11
A summary comparison of the Zone 10 assessments requirements
estimated last June, to the actual amount of the assessment
required based on current information, is as follows:
Description
Amount of Total Required Assessment
Total Assessment
S.F. Res. Assmnt.
Less Peach Hill Wash Central Channel
Required Zone 10 Assessment
Total Assessment
S.F. Res. Assmnt.
Amount of the Reduction in the
S.F. Residential Assessment
May 1996
Current
st.
_Est -
Increase
175,937
189,674
13,737
69.26
74.73
5.47
(55,421)
(28,067)
120,516
161,607
41,091
46.65
63.67
16.19
22.61 11.06
To summarize, the Zone 10 assessment was reduced $22.61 when
the Peach Hill Wash maintenance was deleted from the work to
be funded by the assessments. Based on actual costs, it
should have only been reduced $11.06. This caused a $27,354
shortfall.
4. CCB Funded Maintenance: City Costs for providing maintenance
for the central portion of the Peach Hill Wash ($28,067) was
provided by California Community Builders to meet their
obligation to provide one year of maintenance.
5. Actual Projected Zone 10 Deficit: The above chart indicates
the amount of the Zone 10 assessment was $41,091 less than
what it should have been. This is approximately the amount
of the projected year -end Zone 10 deficit shown on Exhibit C-
3 [Landscape Maintenance: $(37,687); Debris Basin
Maintenance: $(3,404)].
6. Projected FY 1997 198 Assessment: Zone 10 maintenance costs
are expected to increase only slightly over the FY 1996/97
year -end projected costs. In order to cover all past and
future costs, the FY 1997/98 Zone 10 assessment will have to
be increased over the amount assessed in FY 1996/97. In
addition, due to budget adjustments the maximum assessment
allowed by the Public Hearing Notice is less than the revised
ad84_98.apr out fuy(*
Assessment District 84 -2
June 4, 1997
Page 12
project costs, resulting in a projected year -end zone deficit
of $2,748. The calculation of this assessment is shown on
Exhibits B -3 and B -5 and summarized as follows:
8. Assessment Based on Revised Costs Estimate Only: For the
City Council's information, the calculations below show the
amount of the Zone 10 assessment required to fund only the
current Zone 10 cost estimate. This figure should
approximate future year assessments, assuming costs remain
unchanged and future year -end fund balances are at or near
zero.
Landscape Debris
Descron Ha'nt. nt. Tot
Total FY 1997/98 Costs .191,500 5,100 193,752
Total Assessment 191,500 5,100 193,752
S. F. Res. Assessment ** ?5.45 7.50 * 82.95
Note: * Assessed to only the 680 residential lots benefitted
** Assessed to all remaining residential lots
9. Equivalent Residential Unit (ERU): There are 2,443 dwelling
units within PC -3. Each is assessed a given amount per ERU
per year. The commercial property is assessed an amount
equal to 95 ERUs (11.91 acres x 8 dwelling units per acre).
The total number of ERU within PC -3 is, therefore, 2,538.
ad84 -98. apr OM 091
Landscape
Debris
Description __.... _..--- ..�___.__....._.
Hai t.
Ha' t. W
Total
Total FY 1997/98 Costs
191,200
5,100
196,600
Plus FY 1996/97 Zone 10 Deficit
_ 37,687
3,404
41,091
Total Costs
229,187
8,504
2371691
Less FY 1997/98 Year -End Deficit
2 148
600
748
Total Assessment
* 227,039
* 7,904
* 234,943
S. F. Res. Assessment
* ** 89.46
11.62
** 101.08
Note: * Total maximum assessment
as determined
by the public
hearing notice.
** Assessed to only the 680
residential lots benefitted.
* ** Assessed to all remaining residential
lots.
8. Assessment Based on Revised Costs Estimate Only: For the
City Council's information, the calculations below show the
amount of the Zone 10 assessment required to fund only the
current Zone 10 cost estimate. This figure should
approximate future year assessments, assuming costs remain
unchanged and future year -end fund balances are at or near
zero.
Landscape Debris
Descron Ha'nt. nt. Tot
Total FY 1997/98 Costs .191,500 5,100 193,752
Total Assessment 191,500 5,100 193,752
S. F. Res. Assessment ** ?5.45 7.50 * 82.95
Note: * Assessed to only the 680 residential lots benefitted
** Assessed to all remaining residential lots
9. Equivalent Residential Unit (ERU): There are 2,443 dwelling
units within PC -3. Each is assessed a given amount per ERU
per year. The commercial property is assessed an amount
equal to 95 ERUs (11.91 acres x 8 dwelling units per acre).
The total number of ERU within PC -3 is, therefore, 2,538.
ad84 -98. apr OM 091
Assessment District 84 -2
June 4, 1997
Page 13
G. Debris Basin Maintenance
It has been determined that certain properties within Zone 2,
Zone 5 and Zone 10 benefit from, and are therefore assessed an
additional amount for the maintenance of certain storm drain
debris basins. Debris basin maintenance costs, as well as the
per lot assessments, are shown on the assessment detail
information set forth in Exhibits 'B -3" and 'B -5.' The location
of those facilities, and the lots assessed for the maintenance
of same, are set forth in the appropriate District Boundary Maps
in the Engineer's Report (Exhibit "G").
H. Capital Improvements
A list of Assessment District funded landscaping capital
improvement projects is set forth in Exhibit 'E'. Those
projects are summarized as follows:
a. Citywide -- Although several projects are listed, none are
recommended for funding at this time. A summary of that list
of projects is as follows:
• Parkway: North Side of Poindexter Ave.
• Parkway: South side of Los Angeles Avenue east and west
of Tierra Rejada Road [The City has received $7315 frog a
Developer to fund a portion of this project]
• Parkway: West Side of Tierra Rejada Road South of Los
Angeles Avenue.
• Parkway: Peach Hill Road: Various Locations (Design
already completed)
• Parkway: West side of Spring Rd north of L. A. Ave.
b. Zones of Benefit -- As discussed in Section B above, it is
proposed that the City proceed with the design for the
construction of parkway landscaping improvements on the north
side of Tierra Rejada Road east and west of Southhampton
Road. This project is funded by a $10 per lot per year
Improvements Assessments levied upon the lots within Zone 2
over the past, three years, plus a like improvement
assessments recommended to be levied in FY 1997/98 and future
years as .required to fund the project.
I. Campesina Park
If the City Council approves the Engineer's Report unchanged,
the properties within Tract 4147 will be assessed $60.00 per
year (Zone 13) to fund City maintenance costs for this proposed
new park.
a804_98.apr " "" — 082
Assessment District 84 -2
June 4, 1997
Page 14
Presently, City policy provides that any rebate of a zone
assessment is to be funded by the assessments levied upon the
other parcels in that Zone. It is the intent of staff to
request that the City Council revisit the Assessment Rebate
Policies and revise them by eleminating rebates for zone
assessments. This change will restrict assessment rebates to
Citywide assessments only.
J. Engineer's Report
The costs and assessment information presented to the City
Council last April were used by the Assessment Engineer to
develop the Engineer's Report (Exhibit 'G'). Included in that
report are the Boundary Maps for Assessment District AD84 -2.
As required by law, the Engineer's Report was approved by the
City Council last April, via the adoption of Resolution No. 97-
1296. As stated in that Resolution, the City Council may revise
or amend the Engineer's Report at any time prior to the adoption
of the Resolution levying the assessments for FY 1997/98.
K. Public Meeting
Resolution No. 97 -1296 and the Public Hearing Notices stated
that a Public Meeting would be held at 7:00 p.m. on May 19,
1997, in the City Council Chambers, for the purpose of allowing
the public an opportunity to meet with City staff to question
and discuss the proposed assessments. A summary of the comments
made are as follows:
1. A resident in Zone 2 expressed concern about the considerable
increase in the Zone 2 assessment. It was mentioned that the
$144.14 figure stated in the hearing Notice was only for
those properties charged for debris basin maintenance. The
assessment amount recommended for all other properties is
$94.62 (last year's assessment was $44.65).
2. A similar concern was expressed regarding the proposed
increase to the Zone 10 assessment. That increase is
discussed in detail in Section F of this report.
3. Concerns were expressed regarding the fluctuation of the Zone
assessments from year to year. The following requests and /or
responses were discussed:
a) It was requested that the City consider carrying over all
or a portion of any zone surplus in order to establish a
contingency which could be used to fund any future
deficits in that zone. It is recognized that the carry
over of a zone deficit to the following year is the main
cause of a dramatic increase to zone assessments.
ad94_98.apr oUL osa
Assessment District 84 -2
June 4, 1997
Page 15
b) Another reasons for past fluctuations in zone assessments
has been staff's inability to accurately estimate
maintenance costs. It was mentioned that these skills
have improved over the years and that staff anticipates
that the accuracy of future cost projections is expected
to improve further.
c) It was mentioned that the one factor which has proven to
be very difficult to predict is water consumption and
water costs. These factors are very much driven by the
weather.
L. Public Hearing
1. The "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" (Streets and
Highways Code) requires a public hearing to be held prior to
the annual levy of assessments for the purpose of receiving
input and to hear any protests to the proposed assessments.
2. If the amount of the assessments are to remain the same, the
law does not require a Notice of the public hearing to be
mailed to each property being assessed. However, consistent
with past practice, a notice of the public hearing was mailed
to the owners of all of the affected properties.
3. Notwithstanding the above mentioned policy, State law
requires that prior to considering any new or increased
assessment, a public hearing notice must be mailed to the
owners of the properties to be assessed. Said notice shall
state the amount of the existing assessment, the amount of
the proposed assessment and the amount of the proposed
increase in the assessment. The amounts of the approved
assessments MAX NOT EXCEED the amounts stated in the notice.
Said notice must be mailed at least forty -five (45) days
prior to the date of the hearing. In order to meet this
deadline, said Notices were postmarked and mailed prior to
April 18, 1.99`�`
4. Attached as Exhibit 'I' is a copy of the Public Hearing
Notice mailed for AD84 -2. Attached to the Public Hearing
Notice is a chart showing the maximum amount of the
assessments which could be levied.
t
ad84 98.apr 0O ►S4
Assessment District 84 -2
June 4, 1997
Page 16
M. Deferred Action
The attached resolution (Exhibit "J ") making certain changes to
Assessment District AD84 -2 and confirming the assessments for
Fiscal Year 1997/98 must be adopted no later than June 30, 1997,
in order for the assessments to be levied. In prior years the
City Council has adopted such resolutions concurrently with the
adoption of the budget.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council take the following actions:
1) open the public hearing, receive testimony and close the public
hearing;
2) continue all other matters to the date of the Budget Workshops.
Note: Subsequent to the budget workshop meetings, but no ,later
than June 30, 1997, staff recommends that the City Council
take the following actions:
a) make any final desired changes to the Engineer's Report
and to the proposed assessments for FY 1997/98; and,
b) adopt the attached Resolution No. 97- (Exhibit "J ")
making certain changes to AD84 -2 and confirming the
assessments for Fiscal Year 1997/98.
ad84_98.apr O W0 Y5
Exhibit 'A'
LIST OF OTHER EXHIBITS
Exhibit Paae Description
B
Assessment Summary
B 1
Per Lot Assessments Comparison [FY 1996/97 to FY 1997/98]
B 2
Citywide Assessment Options
B 3
FY 1997/98 Zone Assessments
B 4
FY 1996/97 Zone Assessments
B 5
FY 1997/98 Zone Assessment Detail
C
AD 84 -2 Fund Activity
C 1
FY 1997/98 Projection
C 3
FY 1996/97 Year End Projection
C 5
FY 1995/96 Actual
C 6
FY 1994/95 Actual
C 7
FY 1993/94 Actual
C 8
FY 1992/9:3 Actual
D
FY 1997/98 Preliminary Budget
D 1
Combined Budget (All Costs)
D 2
Citywide Expenses
D 3
Zone 1
D 4
Zone 2
D 5
Zone 3
D 6
Zone 4
D 7
Zone 5
D 8
Zone 6
D 9
;gone 7
D 10
Zone 8
D 11
Zone 9
D 12
Zone 1.0
D 13
gone 11.
D 1.4
Zone 12
D 15
:?,one 13
E Capital Improvement Project Summary
F Street Lighting Cost ,/ Assessment Summary
G Engineer's Report
H Discussion of Assessment Rates
I Public Hearing Notice
J Resolution
Ut�Ut}96
EXHIBIT "B" (Page 1 of 5)
Fiscal Year 1997/98
AD 84 -2 ASSESSMENT SUMMARY
Description
Citywide
Assessments
--------------- -
Zone Assessments
Zones
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8 City
Hone Acres
9
10
11
12
13
FY 1996/97
SF Res
101.51
Assmnt ($)
Total I$j
Lighting
19.7"
186,000
Landscaping
7.92
86,509
Capital
0.00
N 'A
Total
27.69
272,509
---------------------..----------------------
S. F. Res.
Assmnt (Per Lot;
N,?A
--------------------------
Total
W/0 Basins
W/ Basins
Assmnt y$1
101.51
N;A
44.65
°x2.01
7.56
N, A
70.65
NA
114.26
121.31
45.86
N 'A
130.78 *
N,'A
6.58
N/A
16.35
N,?A
22.93
0.00
N/A
46.65
49.76
Total Zone Assessientss
Total AD84 -2 Assessments
* per acre
816 j
i
28,126
x,003
i
„114
25,323
v
,009
x2,424
1
x,270
>,270
540
i
G i
120,516
212,871
485,380
20- May -97
FY 1997/98
160.77
94.62
9.25
31.47
71.77
70.95
179.73
12.52
31.11
10.31
89.46
0.00
0.00
60.00
N/A
144.14
N/A
N/A
72.72
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
101.08
N/A
N/A
N/A
* per acre
12,379
61,230
2,450
4,060
15,646
1,561
17,074
6,221
6,221
12,442
505
234,943
0
0
3,720
366,010
719,087
SF Res
Assmnt ($)
Total ($)
Lighting
22.07
209,150
Landscaping
13.20
143,927
Capital
0.00
0
Total
--------------------------------------------
35.27
353,077
S. F. Res. Assmnt (Per Lot)
--------------------
- - - - --
Total
W/0 Basins
W/ Basins
Assmnt ($)
160.77
94.62
9.25
31.47
71.77
70.95
179.73
12.52
31.11
10.31
89.46
0.00
0.00
60.00
N/A
144.14
N/A
N/A
72.72
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
101.08
N/A
N/A
N/A
* per acre
12,379
61,230
2,450
4,060
15,646
1,561
17,074
6,221
6,221
12,442
505
234,943
0
0
3,720
366,010
719,087
EXHIBIT "B" (Page 2 of 5) FY 1997/98 20- May -97
AD 84-2 ASSESSMENT CALCULATIONS Citywide Assessment Examples
----------------------------
----------------------------
Total
Total
Total
Single Family
FY 1997/98
Less FY 1997/98
Less Non- Residential
Residential
Description Costs ($)
Transfer In Assmnt ($)
Residential Assessment
Assessment
Example 1: Assessment District Funding ONLY
Street Lighting 209,150 1,1 209,150
Landscaping 143,927 1) 143,927
Capital 0
453,077 353,077
Example 2: $25,000 General Fwd Transfer
to Lighting & Landscaping Costs
-------------------------------------------------
Street Lighting 209,150 (10,000) 199,150
Landscaping 143,927 (15,000) 128,927
Capital 0 0 0
353,077 x25,000) 328,077
Example 3: $50,000 General Fund Transfer
to Lighting & Landscaping Costs
Street Lighting 109,150 120,000)
Landscaping 1.43,927 00,000)
Capital 0 0
'53,077 (50,000)
209,150
35,982 * 107,945
0 0
35,982 317,095
199,150
32,232 * 96,695
0 0
32,232 295,845
189,150 189,150
113,927 28,482 * 85,445
0 0 0
303,077 28,482 274,595
Example 4: $75,000 General Fund Transfer
to Lighting & Landscaping Costs
-------------------------------------------------
Street Lighting 209,150 (30,000) 179,150
Landscaping 143,927 (45,000) 98,927
Capital 0 p 0
353,077 X75,000) 278,077
Notes: * 25% of Total
Lighting: $9477 for each $1 SF Res Assessed.
Landscaping: $10,905 for each $1 SF Res Assessed
22.07
13.20
0.00
35.27
21.01
11.82
0.00
32.84
19.96
10.45
0.00
30.41
179,150 18.90
24,732 * 74,195 9.07
0 0 0.00
- - - - - -- ----- - - - - -- ------- - - - - --
24,732 253,345 j 27.98
0 00098
EXHIBIT
"B" (Page ] of
5)
FY 1097/90
Fiscal
Year 1997/98
Zones of Benefit
3D 84-2
ASSESSMENT CALCULATIONS
==============
Less
Plus
Loeu
Total
FY 1996/97
FY 1996/97
Transfer In
Total
FY 1997/98
Year End
Year End
or Year Cod
FY 1997/98
Description
Coots (s)
Surplus
Deficit
Deficit
Ausmut
Remarks
Zone
----
I
Landscaping
6,660
(/
�.7p
12,379
12,379
3
Landscaping
42,800
O
9,83}
52/633 /
61,330
Debris B88i88
1,500
O
87"
2,377 /
Improvements
5,000
O +
)
6,230 /
<9CiOC Years
Capital Imp
3
Landscaping
2,460
Y
4(/
(lOO)*
2,450
2,450
Carryover
4
Landscaping
4,460
020)
(80)*
4,060
4/060
5
Landscaping
21,I28
6,553)
0
15,575
15/646
Debris Dani8o
600
1529)
S
71
6
Landscaping
1,064
V
49'
1,561
1/561
7
Landscaping
11,70
'`
5,344
17,074
17/074
8
City
Landscaping
5,018
0
1,203
6'221
6,221
Improvements
O
0
0
0
8
Home Acres
Landscaping
5,018
O
l,203
6,221
6/221
Improvements
0
V
Landscaping
1,650
11,145)
'/
505
505
lO
Landscaping
191,500
U
3,7,687
(2,148)*
337,039
234,942
Debris 88oiuS
5,100
U
3'404
(600)*
7/904
ll
Landscaping
O
O
12
Landscaping
0
0
i`
O
0
13
Landscaping
3,720
_______
0
_______
�
______
__________
3/720
3,720
Total Zones
389,408
/',547)
65,857'
(2,928)*/
________
366,010
EXHIBIT "B" (Page 4 of 5)
AD 84 -2 ZONE ASSESSMENT DETAIL
Last Year: Fiscal Year 1996/97
Total Zone Assessments 212,871
15- Hay -97
Remarks
000100
Total
Zone
Type
Qty
Parcel Assmnt
($)
Total ($)
Assmnt ($)
1
Landscape
101.51
Lot
7,816
>
7,816
Debris Basins
2
Landscape
622
34.65
Lot
21,553
>
28,126
Debris Basins
48
".35
Lot
353
Capital Impr
622
10.00
Lot
6,220
3
Landscape
265
.56
Lot
2,003
2,003
Debris Basins
4
Landscape
29
70.65
Lot
9,114
>
9,114
Debris Basins
5
Landscape
21"
1.14.26
Lot
24,794
>
25,323
Debris Basins
".05
Lot
529
6
Landscape
45.86
Lot.
1,009
>
1,009
Debris Basins
/
7
Landscape
130.78
Acre
12,424
>
12,424
Debris Basins
8 City
I
Landscape
>
3,270
Debris Basins
Capital Impr
19"
h.58
Lot
3,270
8 Home Acres
Landscape
>
3,270
Debris Basins
Capital Impr
20(1
16.35
Lot
3,270
;
9
Landscape
4t1
0.00
Acre
0
0
Debris Basins
10
Landscape
2538
46.65
Lot
118,398
>
120,516
Debris Basins
680
?,11
Loot
2,118
Total Zone Assessments 212,871
15- Hay -97
Remarks
000100
EXHIBIT "B" (Page 5
of 5)
15- Hay -97
AD 84 -2 ZONE ASSESSMENT DETAIL
Last Year: Fiscal
Year 1997/98
Total
Zone
Type
Qty
Parcel Assmnt
Total I$1
Assmnt ($)
Remarks
1
Landscape
160.'7"
Lot
12,379
12,379
Debris Basins
2
Landscape
62,:
84.62
Lot
52,633
>
61,230
Debris Basins
48
49.52
Lot
2,377
Capital Impr
Q7
10.00
Lot
6,220
3
Landscape
"!6��
4,25
Lot
2,450
21450
Debris Basins
4
Landscape
L2Q
31.4"
Lot
4,060
4,060
Debris Basins
5
Landscape
2y
71.77
Lot
15,575
>
15,646
Debris Basins
0.95
Lot
71.
6
Landscape
70,95
Lot
1,561
>
1,561
Debris Basins
7
Landscape
9';
179.' 1 1
Acre
17,074
>
17,074
Debris Basins
8 City
Landscape
49'..
12.52
Lot
6,221
>
6,221
Debris Basins
0
Capital Impr
1)
8 Home Acres
Landscape
20(,
31.11
Lot
6,221
>
6,221
Debris Basins
0
Capital Impr
;
9
Landscape
4
10.31
Acre
505
>
505
Debris Basins
10
Landscape
2538
89.46
Lot
227,039
>
234,943
Debris Basins
680
11.62
Lot
7,904
11
Landscape
0
12
Landscape
0
13
Landscape
60.00
Lot
3,720
3,720
Total Zone Assessments
366,010
EXHIBIT "C' (Page l
of 0
FY 1997/98
&maaaomoot District
Account Activity
=====
6D 84-2: Account 0o.
210.711
FY 1997/90
Projected
Revenue
Total
Projected
Beginning
----------------
Available
Loom
Year-End
Description
Account Number
Balance
Auomoto Other
Total
Funds
Dxp8nG8D
Balance
CITYWIDE
Landscape N8iOt.
210.711.0000.770.3012
O
143/027
10,927
143,927
10/937
O
Street Lighting
210,711.0000.770.1010
0
209,150
209/150
209/150
209/150
O
Capital Imyr
210.711.0000.770.3011
30,756
;
0
30,766
0
20,756
%ouo l:
Landscape M81Dt.
210.711.0000.77I.3012
15,7191
12,379
12,379
6/660
6/660
O
Zone 2;
Landscape Maint.
210.711,0000.772.3012
0,83])
52/633
5316]]
42,800
42,800
O
Debris 8auioo
210.711.0000.772.3012 �
(877)
2,]77
2'377
I/500
1,500
O
Capital Impr
210,711.0000.772.3011
18,395
6,230
6,280
34/615
5/000
19,615
DoUo 2:
Landscape Naint.
210.711,0800.77].]012
(90)
4450
2/450
2/360
2/460
(00)
%ouo 4;
Landscape Haint.
310,711.0000.774.3012
320
4,060
4/060
4/380
4/460
(80)
Zone 5:
Landscape HdiDt.
310.711,0000.775.3012
5,558
15,575
15,575
21/128
21,128
O
Debris Basins
210.711.0000.775.3083
529
71
71
600
600
O
%ouu 6/
Landscape Naiut.
210.711.0000.776.012
(497`
1,561
1/561
1/064
1,064
O
%On8 7:
Landscape .
310.711.0000.777.3012
(5,344)
17,074
17,04
11/730
11,730
O
Zone- 8 `-^'
Landscape .
210.711.0008.70.2012
(l,208}
~,231
6,I21
|
5,08
5,018
O
Capital ImPz
210.711.0000.70.3011**|
0
8
O
0
O
O
Zone 8 (Home Acres):
Landscape .
210,711.0000.70.3012 *!
(l,208)
6,221
6/221
5,018
5,018
0
Capital lmpr
210,711.0000.70.3081*r
0
0
O
1 O
O
O
%oVo 9:
Landscape .
210.711.0000.779.3012
1,145
505
505
1/650
1/668
0
Capital I0pr
210.711.0000.779.3011.
O
0
O
0
U
O
%ooa lO:
Landscape .
210.711.0000.780.3011 .
137/687)
227/039
227/039
189,352
191/500
O/148\
Debris Basins
210.711.0000.780.3083
(3,404)
7,904
7,904
4/500
5/00
(600)
Zone ll:
Landscape NOi8t.
210.711.0000.781.3011
0
O
O
O
O
0
Zone %3:
Landscape 0azot.
210.711.0000.782.3081
0
U
O
0
O
0
XoDa 11:
Landscape 0a18t.
210.711.0000.783.081
O
3,720
3,720
| 3/720
|
�
3,720
O
----------- ------- ----' -------- | ---------- ---------- ----------
Total Account 310.711 (9,1591 710,087 0 719/087 709,928 662/485 47/443
EXHIBIT "C" (Page 2 of 8)
Assessment District Account Activity
AD 84 -2: Account No. 210.711
FY 1997/98
Description Account Number
----------- - - - - -- --------------- - - - - --
CITYWIDE
Landscape Maint. 210.711.0000.770.3012
Street Lighting 210.711.0000.770.3010
Capital Impr 210.711.0000.770.3011
Zone 1:
Landscape Maint. 210.711.0000.771.3012
Zone 2:
Landscape Maint. 210.711.0000.772.3012
Debris Basins 210.711.0000.772.3013
Capital Impr 210.711.0000.772.3011
Zone 3:
Landscape Maint. 210.711.0000.773.3012
Zone 4:
Landscape Maint. 210.711.0000.774.3012
We 5:
Landscape Maint. 210.711.0000.775.3012
Debris Basins 210.711.0000.775.3013
Zone 6:
Landscape Maint. 210.711.0000.776.3012
Zone 7:
Landscape Maint. 210.711.0000.7773012
Zone 8 (City):
Landscape Maint. 210.711.0000.778.3012
Capital Impr 210.711.0000.778.3011 * *'
Zone 8 (Home Acres):
Landscape Maint. 210.711.0000.778.3012
Capital Impr 210.711.0000.778.3011 **
Zone 9:
Landscape Maint. 210.711.0000.779.3012
Capital Impr 210.711.0000.779.3011
Zone 10:
Landscape Haint. 210.711.0000.780.3011
Debris Basins 210.711.0000.780.3013
Zone 11:
Landscape Maint. 210.711.0000.781.3011
FY 1997/98
Plus
20- May -97
Less Protected Set Asides
Year -End
.-------------------------------------- - - - - --
Deficits
Projected
Zone Zone Street Future
Funded by
Available
Year -End
Capital Maint. Lights Capital
Future
Year -End
Balance
Carryover Surplus Surplus Projects
Assessments
s
Surplus
0
30,756
0
0
0
19,615
(1001
180?
0
0
0
0
0
fj
(2,1481
(600''
0
19,615
720
30,756
Zone 12:
Landscape Maint. 210.711.0000.782.3011 0
----------- ---- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- ----- - - - - --
Total Account 210.71). 47,443 19,615 720 0 30,756
100
800
2,148
600
----- - - - - -- - - - - - --
3,648
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
EXHIBIT "C" (Page 3
of 8)
FY 1996/97
15- May -97
Assessment District
Account Activity
----- _ -_ -__
AD 84 -2: Account No.
210.711
Less
FY 1996/97
Revenue
Total
Projected
Projected
Beginning
--- -------------------------
- - - - --
Available
Year -End
Year -End
Description
Account Number
Balance
Assmnts
Other
Total
Funds
Expenses
Balance
CITYWIDE
Landscape Maint.
210.711.0000.770.3012
0
86,509
43,655
130,164
130,164
130,164
0
Street Lighting
210.711.0000.770.3010
0
186,000
17,150
203,150
203,150
203,150 *
0
Capital Impr
210.711.0000.770.3011
91,561
0
�60,805�
(60,805)
30,756
0 *
30,756
Zone 1:
Landscape Maint.
210.711.0000.771.3012
I7,075�
-1,816
7,816
741
6,460
(5,719)
Zone 2:
Landscape Maint.
210.711.0000.772.3012
10,814
21,553
21,553
32,367
42,200
(9,833)
Debris Basins
210.711.0000.772.3013
0
353
353
353
1,230
(877)
Capital Impr
210.711.0000.772.3011
12,175
x;,220
6,220
18,395
0
18,395
Zone 3:
Landscape Maint.
210.711.0000.773.3012
Q331
:,003
2,003
1,770
1,860
(90)
Zone 4:
j
Landscape Maint.
210.711.0000.774.3012
44,834s
',J14
9,114
4,280
3,960
320
Zone 5:
Landscape Maint.
210.711.0000.775.3012
15930
24,794
24,794 ;
24,201
18,648
5,553
Debris Basins
210.711.0000.775.3013
C?
529
529
529
0
529
Zone 6:
Landscape Maint.
210.711.0000.776.3012
(4421
009
1,009
567
1,064
(497)
Zone 7:
Landscape Maint.
210.711.0000.777.3012
(6,0881
12,424
12,424 `
6,336
11,680
(5,344)
Zone 8 (City):
Landscape Maint.
210.711.0000.778.3012
1,575
0
2,172
2,172
3,747
4,950
(1,203)
Capital Impr
210.711.0000.778.3011 **
11,098h
3,270
(2,172)
1,098
0
0
0
Zone 8 (Home Acres):
Landscape Maint.
210.711.0000.778.3012 *
i,575
0
2,172
2,172
3,747
4,950
(1,203)
Capital Impr
210.711.0000.778.3011 **
1,098i
3,270
(2,172]
1,098
0
0
0
Zone 9:
Landscape Maint.
210.711.0000.779.3012
1725
0
3,020
3,020
2,295
1,150
1,145
Capital Impr
210.711.0000.779.3011
;,020
�J
i3,020j
(3,020)
0
0
0
Zone 10:
Landscape Maint.
210.711.0000.780.3011
i>
118,398
28,067 *
146,465
146,465
184,152
(37,687)
Debris Basins
210.711.0000.780.3013
0
2,118
2,118
2,118
5,522
(3,404)
Total Account 210.711 98,534 485,380 28,067 513,447 611,981 621,140 (9,159)
513,447
* CCB Payment for Peach Hill Wash
485380
�Uti►104
EXHIBIT "C" (Page 4 of 8)
Assessment District Account Activity
AD 84 -2: Account No. 210.711
FY 1996/97
Description Account Number
----------- - - - - -- --------------- - - - - --
CITYWIDE
Landscape Maint. 210.711.0000.770.3012
Street Lighting 210.711.0000.770.3010
Capital Impr 210.711.0000.770.3011
Zone 1:
Landscape Maint. 210.711.0000.771.3012
Zone 2:
Landscape Maint. 210.711.0000.772.3012
Debris Basins 210.711.0000.772.3013
Capital Impr 210.711.0000.772.3011
Zone 3:
Landscape Maint. 210.711.0000.773.3012
Zone 4:
Landscape Maint. 210.711.0000.774.3012
Zone 5:
Landscape Maint. 210.711.0000.775.3012
Debris Basins 210.711.0000.775,3013
Zone 6:
Landscape Maint. 210.711.0000.776.3012
Zone 7:
Landscape Maint. 210.711.0000.7773012
Zone 8 (City):
Landscape Maint. 210.711.0000.778.3012
Capital Impr 210.711.0000.7783011 **
Zone 8 (Home Acres):
Landscape Maint. 210.711.0000.778.3012
Capital Impr 210.711.0000.778.3011 **
Zone 9:
Landscape Maint. 210.711.0000.779.3012
Capital Impr 210.711.0000.779.3011
Zone 10:
Landscape Maint. 210.711.0000.780.3011
Debris Basins 210.711.0000.7803013
Total Account 210.711
FY 1996/97
Less Protected Set Asides
------------------------------------------
Projected Zone Zone Street Future
Year -End Capital Maint. Lights Capital
Balance Carryover Surplus Surplus Projects
0
30,756
1 5,719 1
(9,833)
(877)
18,395
190!
320
5,553
529
1497!
f5,344i
1,203
0
(1,203+
1�
1,145
0
37,687
13,404!;
18,395
320
5,553
529
1,145
Plus 15- May -97
Year -End
Deficits
Funded by Available
Future Year -End
Assessments Surplus
30,756
I
i
5,719
9,833
877
i
i
90
----------- ---- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- ---- - - - - --
(9,159^ 18,395 7,54" 0 30,756
497
5,344
1,203
1,203
37,687
3,404
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
- - - - - -- ----- - - - - --
65,857 0
Dios
EXHIBIT "C" (Page 5
of 8)
FY 1995/96
&omaoamuot District
Account Activity
6D 84-2: Account 0o,
210.711 (Fund 02])
FY 1995/96
Revenue
Total
Beginning
--------------------
Available
Ieaa
Year-End
Description
Account Number
Balance
&sumota Other
Total
Funds
Dxpouoou
Balance
CITYWIDE
Landscape N iOt.
210.711.0000.770.3012
0
76,077 56,578
146/922
10,932
146,932
O
Street Lighting
210.711,0000.770.300
8
2O0,000
200,000
200,000
200/000
O
Capital Impr
210,711.0000.770.3011
151,522
'56,578)
(56,578)
04/944
3,382
91/561
Dmoe 1:
Landscape NalDt,
210.711.0000.771.3012
(4,22]/
5,939
5,939
1/716
8/791
/7/075\
%oua 2:
Landscape Na1ot.
210.711.0000.772.3012
6,4961
53,888
53,888
48/392
37,578
10,814
Debris Basins
210.711.0000,772,]01]
O
O
O
O
O
Capital I0p%
210.711.0000.772.3011
5,955
a,220
6,220
12/175
O
12,175
O08o ]:
Landscape Naint.
210,711,0000.772.3012
(l,396`
�,059
3,059
1,663
1,896
/233\
Zone 4:
Landscape Naiot.
210.711.0000.774.3082
4,038
/4,60)**
(4,682)
(644)
4,190
(4,834)
X0Ue 5:
Landscape .
210.71I.0000.775.3012
6,295
l-,9]9
17,939
24,234
24,837
(598)
0u0r/a 8auzno
210.71I.0000.775.3013
V
O
O
O
O
%000 6:
'
Landscape Muiot.
210.711.0000,776.3012
(]081
749
749
� 441
083
(442)
Zone 7:
�
Landscape Nai8t.
210.711.0000.777.3012
(900)
5,420
5,420
4,530
10,608
(6/088)
Landscape Maint.
210.711.0000.70.012
600
3,275
3,275
3,875
2,300
1,575
Capital Imyr
I0.711.0000.778.3081**
16,528
6,948
6,048
23/475
24/573
(1,098)
%OD8 8 (Home Acres):
Landscape .
210.711,0000.778.3012 ^
600
3,275
3/275
3,875
2/300
1/575
Capital 1mpz
210,711.0000.70.3011*+
16'528
8,948
61948
23,475
24/573
(1/098)
Couo 9:
Landscape Maint.
20.711,0000.779.3012
0
650
850
80
1,375
(725)
Capital Impr
210.711.0000.779.3011
3,020
0
3,020
0
3,020
----------- _----'--- _------- __-__--- � ___------ _--------- ----_----
Total Account 210.711 lO2,�2 l8�,7O4 l4,277 299,981 592/743 494/209 98,584
^* Refund of P9 1993/94 over assessment
EXHIBIT "Cn (Page 6
of 8)
F1 1994/95
Assessment D1atrlct
�000uot �ctivity
`~===~~
'
&D 84~2: Account 0o. 210.711 (Fund 02})
FY 1994/95
Revenue
Total
Beginning
-------------------
Available
Luma
Year-Dud
Description
Account 0umhar
Ualu000
&momotm
Other
Total
Funds
Expenses
Balance
CITYWIDE
Landscape int.
310,711,0000.770.3012
112,960
126,287
(138,09E)
(11,808)
103/152
102,152
O
Street Lighting
210.711.0000.770.3010 �
O
175,000
175,000
175/000
175,000
O
Capital Impr
310.711.0000.770.3011
103,577
O
144,237
144,337 1
247/814
96,292
151/522
Xuue l:
Landscape 0aiUt.
210,711.0000.771.3012
/9871
4,131
4/131
2/144
7'367
/4,223\
ZVOo %:
Landscape .
210,711.8800.772.3012 �
(15,519)
43/02
01882
28,363
33,859
(5/496)
Debris Daozoo
210,711.0000.772.3012
D
O
O
O
O
Capital Impr
210.711.0000.772.3011
{9,530`
i5,485
15,485
5,955
O
5/955
ZOD8 };
Landscape 0a1ut.
210.711.0000.773.3012
538
846
846
1,384
2,780
(1/396)
Zone t
Landscape Naint.
210.711.0000.774.012
8.125
O
O
8/125
4,087
4/038
%VU8 5:
Landscape .
210.711,0000.775.3012
(7,501
37,338
37,338
29/796
23,601
6/295
Debris Daoioo
210,711.0000.775,3013
O
0
0
0
O
Zone 6:
LaoUaoayo 0uint.
210,711.0000.776.3012
294
242
242
536
844
(308)
Zone 7:
Landscape Nd1ot.
210.711.0000.777.3012
|3,279�
10,581
10,581
7,202
8,202
(90O\
Zone 8 (City):
' '
Landscape int.
210.711.0000.778.3012 "
0
600
600
600
O
600
Capital lm@r
210.711.0000.778.3011*+
17,445
9,623
9,623
27/068
10/540
16,08
OoU8 8 (8O0e Acres):
�
Landscape int.
210.711.0000.778.3012 *
0
600
600
600
O
600
Capital 1mpy
210.711.0800.778.3011*+
17,40
14,623
�
9 62]
' �
27 O68
'
lO 5�O
'
l6 5J8
'
Zone 9:
Landscape .
210.711.0000.779.3012
0
0
0
O
O
O
Capital Impr
210.711.0000.77M011
b,000
6,000
6,000
2,980
3,020
------- ---------- ------- ----------- | ----------- --------- -----------
Total Account 210.711 224,527 440,237 6,142 446,379 670,906 478,144 192,762
EXHIBIT "C" (Page 7 of 8)
Assessment District Account Activity
AD 84 -2: Account No. 210.711 (Fund 023)
FY 1993/94
Description Account Number
CITYWIDE
Landscape Maint. 210.711.0000.770.3012
Street Lighting 210.711.0000.770.3010
Capital Impr 210.711.0000.770.3011
Zone 1:
Landscape Maint. 210.711.0000.771.3012
Zone 2:
Landscape Maint. 210.711.0000.772.3012
Debris Basins 210.711.0000.772.3013
Capital Impr 210.711.0000.772.3011
Zone 3:
Landscape Maint. 210.711.0000.773.3012
Zone 4:
Landscape Maint. 210.711.0000.774.3012
Zone 5:
Landscape Maint. 210.711.0000.775.3012
Debris Basins 210.711.0000.775,3013
Zone 6:
Landscape Maint. 210.711.0000.776.3012
Zone 7:
Landscape Maint. 210.711.0000.777.3012
Zone 8 (City):
Landscape Maint. 210.711.0000.778.3012 x
Capital Impr 210.711.0000.778.3011 **
Zone 8 (Home Acres):
Landscape Maint. 210.711.0000.778.3012
Capital Impr 210.711.0000.778.3011 **
Zone 9:
Landscape Maint. 210.711.0000.779.3012
Capital Impr 210.711.0000.779.3011
Total Account 210.711
FY 1993/94
15- May -97
Revenue Total
Beginning ------ ------ ------- -- ----- - - - - -- Available Less Year -End
Balance Assmnts Other Total Funds Expenses Balance
184,088 122,389 2,084 124,473
0 ]70,000 170,000
50,069 0
11,8191
9,776
9,776
4,389
1',671
17,671
0
0
52,640
0
1,436
1,405
1,405
,4
12,118
12,118
1,669
17,340
17,340
0
0
722
678
678
942
5,087
3,087
0
0
0
10,223
10,223
10,223
0
0
0
10,223
10,223
10,223
C;
i I !
0
C
0
0
115,355 174,909
308,561
170,000
50,069
7,957
22,060
0
52,640
2,841
12,892
19,009
0
1,400
4,029
0
20,445
0
20,445
0
0
--- - - - - -- ----- - - - - -- I ----- - - - - -- --
2,084 376,993 692,348
Includes over assessment made in error
98,339
170,000
42,754
8,944
37,579
62,170
2,303
4,767
26,551
1,106
7,308
0
3,000
0
3,000
0
0
210,222
0
7,315
(987)
(15,519)
0
(9,530)
538
8,125
(7,542)
0
294
(3,279)
0
17,445
0
17,445
0
0
467,821 224,527
000108
EXHIBIT "C" (Page 8
of 8)
FY 1992/93
Less
Assessment District
Account Activity
Expenses
----- - - - - --
----- - - - - --
Balance
----- - - - - --
----- - - - - --
539,394
AD 84 -2: Account No.
210.711 (Fund 023)
0
0
FY 1992/93
7,315
Revenue
9,279
(1,819)
36,140
Beginning
---------------------------------
0
Description
Revenue Account Number
Balance
Assmnts Other
Total
CITYWIDE
1,811
1,436
6,657
5,883
Landscape Maint.
210.711.0000.770.3012
219,036
320,358 0
320,358
Street Lighting
210.711.0000.770.3010
1,554
832
0
Capital Impr
210.711.0000.770.3011
7,315
0
0
Zone 1:
10,223
0
10,223
0
Landscape Maint.
210.711.0000.771.3012
1,275
6,1.85
6,185
Zone 2:
0
0
0
0
Landscape Maint.
210.711.0000.772.3012
114,360)
50,500
50,500
Debris Basins
210.711.0000.772.3013
0
0
0
Capital Impr
210.711.0000.772.3011
52,640
n
0
Zone 3:
Landscape Maint.
210.711.0000.773.3012
926
x,,321
2,321
Zone 4:
Landscape Maint.
210.711.0000.774.3012
2,445
4,212
4,212
Zone 5:
Landscape Maint.
210.711.0000.775.3012
i14,487i
40,737
40,737
Debris Basins
210.711.0000.775.3013
0
0
Zone 6:
Landscape Maint.
210.711.0000.776.3012
675
879
879
Zone 7:
Landscape Maint.
210.711.0000.777.3012
720
3,527
3,527
Zone 8 (City):
Landscape Maint.
210.711.0000.778.3012
C
0
0
Capital Impr
210.711.0000.778.3011 **
C
10,223
10,223
Zone 8 (Home Acres):
Landscape Maint.
210.711.0000.778.3012
0
Capital Impr
210.711.0000.778.3011 **
C
10,223
10,223
Zone 9:
Landscape Maint.
210.711.0000.779.3012
C.
0
0
Capital Impr
210.711.0000.779.3011
C
I.
U
Total Account 210.711 256,185 449,164 0 449,164
15- May -97
Total
Available
Less
Year -End
Funds
----- - - - - --
-----------
Expenses
----- - - - - --
----- - - - - --
Balance
----- - - - - --
----- - - - - --
539,394
312,552
226,842
0
0
71315
7,315
7,460
9,279
(1,819)
36,140
31,751
4,389
0
0
0
52,640
0
52,640
3,247
1,811
1,436
6,657
5,883
774
26,250
24,581
1,669
0
0
1,554
832
722
4,247
3,305
942
0
0
0
10,223
0
10,223
0
0
0
10,223
0
10,223
0
0
0
0
0
0
705,349 389,994 315,355
OWILOs
EXHIBIT "D" (Page 1 of 15)
AD 84 -2: FY 1997/98 Budget
Department 210.711.0000
Combined Budget: . . . .000
Code Description
SALARIES & BENEFITS
Uniforms 638
MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS
9101 Repair & Maint 658
9115 Vehicle Maint 654
9134 Insurance & Bonds 648
9162 Equipment Maint 651
9191 Contract Services 642
1011 Landscape Maint
1012 Tree Maint
1013 Debris Basins
9198 Allocated Overhead
9199 Other Services 641
Total Purchased Serives
9204 Postage 624
9206 Books & Publications 633
9208 Education / Training 636
9211 Electricity
Utilities 652
9212 Street Lights
9213 Water
9214 Gasoline 655
9218 Operating Supplies 623
9221 Equip Rental 661
9222 Small Tools/ Equip 657
9251 Special Dept Sup. 629
Total Operating Supplies
Total Maint & Operations
Capital Outlay
9903 Capital Projects
Total
FY 96/97
--------------------
FY 94/95 FY 95/96 i Estimated
ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET Actual
20,972 23,,798 26,418 34,920
3,101
2,618
1,794
1,700
10
417,882
200
0
0
0
1,375
6
0
1.16,928
143,636
192,516
184,968
44,000
51,700
1,000
570
0
8,210
--- - - - - --
6,026
--- - - - - --
2,800
--- - - - - --
800
--- - - - - --
128,249
153,655
242,316
239,738
187
2,038
2,100
2,100
205
200
0
0
5,937
6,480
30,648
60,341
'.75,000
200,000
2041632
203,150
136,554
129,150
x,173
1,089
250
1,220
x,076
249
500
1,000
487
200
1,000
1,100
2,500
2,082
105
0
--- - - - - --
'2,08,571
--- - - - - --
264,227
--- - - - - --
353,473
--- - - - - --
346,482
336,820
417,882
595,789
586,220
903 120,352 52,529 0 0
478,1.44 494,209 622,207 621,140
FY 97/98
BUDGET
34,366
2,486
200
0
0
0
193,953
62,400
800
0
8,000
267,839
2,100
0
0
6,880
209,150
130,430
1,220
1,100
2,200
2,200
0
355,280
623,119
5,000
662,485
05/20/97
Remarks
000110
EXHIBIT "D" (Page 2 of 15)
AD 84 -2: FY 1997 /98 Budget
Department 210.711.0000.
Citywide Summary . ...770
Code Description
- - - -- ------- - - - - --
----- ------- - - - - --
SALARIES & BENEFITS
Uniforms 638
MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS
9101 Repair & Maint 658
9115 Vehicle Maint 654
9134 Insurance & Bonds 648
9162 Equipment Maint 651
9191 Contract Services 642
1011 Landscape Maint
1012 Tree Maint
1013 Debris Basins
9198 Allocated Overhead
9199 Other Services 641
Total Purchased Serives
9204 Postage 624
Printing 626
9206 Books & Publications 633
9208 Education / Training 636
9211 Electricity
Utilities 652
9212 Street Lights
9213 Water
9214 Gasoline 655
9218 Operating Supplies 623
9221 Equip Rental 661
9222 Small Tools/ Equip 657
9251 Special Dept Sup. 629
Total Operating Supplies
Total Maint & Operations
Capital Outlay
9903 Capital Projects
Total
FY 96/97
FY 94/95 FY 95/96 Estimated
ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET Actual
- - - - - -- ---- - - - -.. ( ---- - - - - -- --- - - - - --
20,972 23,798 25,418 26,000
r!
3,101 2,618 486
1,000
10 200
0
61,566 85,165 47,832
40,644
33,100
35,000
1.87
0
8,210
--- - - - - --
6,026
--- - - - - --
2,800
--- - - - --
800
--- - - -
'72,887
94,409
-
84,418
- --
77,444
1.87
2,038
2,100
2,100
205
200
0
0
0
(a
1,967
2,500
6,012
24,839
1.75,000
200,000
204,632
203,150
0
0
31,436
17,000
1,173
1,089
250
1,220
434
249
500
1,000
487
700
LL=
800
2,500
1,900
J05
0
0
--- - - - - --
183,293
--- - - - - --
228,725
--- - - - - --
243,385
--- - - - - --
229,870
256,180
323,134
327,803
307,314
903 96,292 3,383 0
73,444 3504,315 353,221 333,314
05/20/97
FY 97/98
BUDGET Remarks
---------------------
----------- --------------- - - - - --
26,266
1,000
200
43,641
38,000
0
8,000
----
- -
90,841
2,100
0
0
0
2,500
209,150
17,000
1,220
1,100
900
2,000
0
235,970
326,811
0
353,077
Note:
Total 353,077
Less Lights (209,150
Citywide
Landscaping 143,927
Owlu
EXHIBIT "D" (Page 3 of 15)
AD 84 -2: FY 1997/98 Budget
Department 210.711.0000.
Zone I . . . . . . . . . 771
Code Description
SALARIES & BENEFITS
Uniforms 638
MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS
9101 Repair & Maint 658
9115 Vehicle Maint 654
9134 Insurance & Bonds 648
9162 Equipment Maint 651
9191 Contract Services 642
1011 Landscape Maint
1012 Tree Maint
1013 Debris Basins
9198 Allocated Overhead
9199 Other Services 641.
Total Purchased Serives
9204 Postage 624
9206 Books & Publications 633
9208 Education / Training 636
9211 Electricity
Utilities 652
9212 Street Lights
9213 Water
9214 Gasoline 655
9218 Operating Supplies 623
9221 Equip Rental 661
9222 Small Tools/ Equip 657
9251 Special Dept Sup. 629
Total Operating Supplies
Total Maint & Operations
Capital Outlay
9903 Capital Projects 903
Total
Zone 1: Tract 2851: Bambi / Benwood / South End of Flood Control Channel
FY 96/97
--------------------
FY 94/95 FY 95/96 Estimated FY 97/98
ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET Actual BUDGET Remarks
0 0
1 [ 0
3,286 489 960 960
2,000 0
r�
7 286 3,489 2,970 960
150 500
4,081 5,302
3,000 5,000
4,081
5,302
3,150
5,500
367
8, 91
6,120
6,460
�d 0
367 8,791 6,120 6,460
0
960
200
1,160
500
5,000
5,500
6,660
0
6,660
05/15/97
0001.1z
EXHIBIT "D" (Page 4 of 15)
AD 84 -2: FY 1997/98 Budget
Department 210.711.0000.
Zone 2 . . . . . . . .772
Code Description
SALARIES & BENEFITS
Uniforms 638
MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS
9101 Repair & Maint 658
9115 Vehicle Maint 654
9134 Insurance & Bonds 648
9162 Equipment Maint 651
9191 Contract Services 642
1011 Landscape Maint
1012 Tree Maint
1013 Debris Basins
9198 Allocated Overhead
9199 Other Services 641
Total Purchased Serives
9204 Postage 624
9206 Books & Publications 633
9208 Education / Training 636
9211 Electricity
Utilities 652
9212 Street Lights
9213 Water
9214 Gasoline 655
9218 Operating Supplies 623
9221 Equip Rental 661
9222 Small Tools/ Equip 657
9251 Special Dept Sup. 629
Total operating Supplies
Total Maint & Operations
Capital Outlay
9903 Capital Projects 903
Total
Zone 2: Tract 2865: EIS Peach Hill i N/S T R Rd / S/S T R Rd (Slopes)
Christian Barret / Spring @ Christian Barrett
FY 96/97
FY 94/95 FY 95196 Estimated FY 97/98
05/15/97
ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET
Actual
BUDGET
Remarks
118
660
700
Debris Basins
284 0
22,919 22,919 28,200 28,200
2,000 0
118 570
22,919 22,919 30,602 28,770
10,497 14,659
443
150 1,000
12,000 13,000
118 0
10,940
14,659
12,268
14,000
33,859
37,57P
42,870
42,770
0 d:! 0
33,859 37,578, 42,988 43,430
100
28,200
500
600
29,400
1,000
13,000
200
14,200
43,600
5,000
49,300
Debris Basins (96/97)
Pers:
660
Contract:
570
Equip:
0
1230
Debris Basins
---------------------
(97/98)
Pers:
700
Contract:
600
Equip:
200
1500
00011,3
EXHIBIT "D" (Page 5 of 15)
Zone 3:
Tract 3032; Buttercreek -
L. A. Ave Entry
/
Peppermill
AD 84 -2: FY 1997/98 Budget
Department 210.711.0000.
FY
96x97
Zone 3 . . . . . . . . .773
--------------------
FY 94/95
FY 95/96
Estimated
FY 97/98
Code Description
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
BUDGET
Actual
BUDGET
Remarks
SALARIES & BENEFITS
0
0
Uniforms
638
MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS
9101 Repair & Maint
658
16
0
0
9115 Vehicle Maint
654
9134 Insurance & Bonds
648
9162 Equipment Maint
651
9191 Contract Services
642
1011 Landscape Maint
1,557
1,557
1,560
1,560
1,560
1012 Tree Maint
200
0
500
1013 Debris Basins
0
0
9198 Allocated Overhead
9199 Other Services
641
Total Purchased Serives
1,557
1,55"
1,776
1,560
2,060
9204 Postage
624
9206 Books & Publications
633
9208 Education / Training
636
9211 Electricity
0
0
Utilities
652
1,024
i3
9212 Street Lights
9213 Water
300
300
400
9214 Gasoline
655
9218 Operating Supplies
623
199
9221 Equip Rental
661
0
0
9222 Small Tools/ Equip
657
9251 Special Dept Sup.
629
Total Operating Supplies
223
339
300
300
400
Total Maint & Operations
- - --
780
--- - - - - --
1,896
--- - - - - --
2,076
--- - - - - --
1,860
----- - - - - --
2,460;
Capital Outlay
9903 Capital Projects
903
a
�.:i
�a
0
0
Total
780
1,896
2,076
-- - - - - --
1,860
----- - - - - -- -
2,460
05/15/97
0002.14
EXHIBIT "D" (Page 6 of 15)
Zone 4:
Tract 3274: Williams Ranch
Rd Barrier /
N/S Parkway / S/S
Parkway 05/15/97
AD 84 -2: FY 1997/98 Budget
Department 210.711.0000.
FY
96/97
Zone 4 . . . . . . . . .774
--------------------
FY 94/95
FY 95/96
Estimated
FY 97/98
Code Description
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
BUDGET
Actual
BUDGET
Remarks
SALARIES & BENEFITS
0
0
Uniforms
638
MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS
9101 Repair & Maint
658
31
0
0
9115 Vehicle Maint
654
9134 Insurance & Bonds
648
9162 Equipment Maint
651
9191 Contract Services
642
1011 Landscape Maint
>,164
3,110
3,060
3060
3060
1012 Tree Maint
2,000
0
500
1013 Debris Basins
0
0
9198 Allocated Overhead
9199 Other Services
641
Total Purchased Serives
3,164
.3,110
5,091
3,060
3,560
9204 Postage
624
9206 Books & Publications
633
9208 Education / Training
636
9211 Electricity
120
200
200
Utilities
652
923
1.,080
9212 Street Lights
9213 Water
1,008
700
700
9214 Gasoline
655
9218 Operating Supplies
623
9221 Equip Rental
661
p
0
9222 Small Tools/ Equip
657
9251 Special Dept Sup.
629
Total Operating Supplies
923
1,080
1,128
900
900
Total Maint & Operations
°-- - - -- --
1,087
--- - - - - --
4,190
--- - - - - --
n,219
--- - - - - --
3,960
----- - - - - --
4,460
Capital Outlay
9903 Capital Projects
903
)
�s
0
0
Total
41,087
4,190
6,219
3,960
4,460
O "a
EXHIBIT "D" (Page 7 of 15)
AD 84 -2: FY 1997/98 Budget
Department 210.711.0000.
Zone 5 . . . . . . . . .775
Code Description
- - - -- ---------------------
----- --------------- - - - - --
SALARIES & BENEFITS
Uniforms 638
MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS
9101 Repair & Maint 658
9115 Vehicle Maint 654
9134 Insurance & Bonds 648
9162 Equipment Maint 651
9191 Contract Services 642
1011 Landscape Maint
1012 Tree Maint
1013 Debris Basins
9198 Allocated Overhead
9199 Other Services 641
Total Purchased Serives
9204 Postage 624
9206 Books & Publications 633
9208 Education / Training 636
9211 Electricity
Utilities 652
9212 Street Lights
9213 Water
9214 Gasoline 655
9218 Operating Supplies 623
9221 Equip Rental 661
9222 Small Tools/ Equip 657
9251 Special Dept Sup. 629
Total Operating Supplies
Total Maint & Operations
Capital Outlay
9903 Capital Projects 903
Total
Zone 5: Tract 3019 & 3025: W/S Peach Hill / N/S T R Rd / S/S T R Rd (Slope) 05/15/97
FY 96/97
FY 94/95 FY 95/96 Estimated FY 97/98
ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET Actual BUDGET Remarks
17. 120 1 200 Debris Basins
13'2 200
19,114 19,114 13,128 13,128
2,000 500
176 0
19,114 19,,114 1.5,436 131828
4 , 387 5 , "1::
360 200
5,100 4,500
176 0
4,387
5,71'3
5,636
4,700
3,501
24,827
21,072
18,528
0
23,501 24,827 21,248 18,648
200
13,128
2,000
200
15,528
200
5,600
200
6,000
21,528
0
21,728
Debris Basins (96/97)
Pers:
120
Contract:
0
Equip:
0
120
Debris Basins
---------------------
(97/98)
Pers:
200
Contract:
200
Equip:
200
600
OW3.i6
EXHIBIT "D" (Page 8 of 15)
Zone 6: Tract 3306: West
End of Inglewood
05/15/97
AD 84 -2: FY 1997/98 Budget
Department 210.711.0000.
FY
96/97
Zone 6 . . . . . . . . .776
._._..---------------
FY 94/95
FY 95/96
Estimated
FY 97/98
Code Description
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
BUDGET
Actual
BUDGET
Remarks
SALARIES & BENEFITS
0
0
Uniforms
638
MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS
9101 Repair & Maint
658
r
0
0
9115 Vehicle Maint
654
9134 Insurance & Bonds
648
9162 Equipment Maint
651
9191 Contract Services
642
1011 Landscape Maint
582
582
564
564
564
1012 Tree Maint
200
200
200
1013 Debris Basins
0
0
9198 Allocated Overhead
9199 Other Services
641
Total Purchased Serives
582
5811:
?70
764
764
9204 Postage
624
9206 Books & Publications
633
9208 Education / Training
636
9211 Electricity
0
0
0
< Paid by Nursery
Utilities
652
262
301
9212 Street Lights
9213 Water
160
300
300
9214 Gasoline
655
9218 Operating Supplies
623
9221 Equip Rental
661
0
0
9222 Small Tools/ Equip
657
9251 Special Dept Sup.
629
Total Operating Supplies
262
?01
160
300
300
Total Maint & Operations
844
88:,
930
1,064
1,064
Capital Outlay
9903 Capital Projects
903
)
0
0
0
Total
844
883
930
1,064
- 1,064
0ooll"'
EXHIBIT °D° (Page 9 of 15)
Zone 7:
NIS L A Ave E/0
Gabbert
05/15/97
AD 84 -2: FY 1997/98 Budget
Department 210.711.0000.
FY
96/97
Zone 7 . . . . . .777
--------------------
FY 94/95
FY 95/96
Estimated
FY 97/98
Code Description
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
BUDGET
Actual
BUDGET
Remarks
SALARIES & BENEFITS
0
0
Uniforms
638
MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS
9101 Repair & Maint
658
48
0
50
9115 Vehicle Maint
654
9134 Insurance & Bonds
648
9162 Equipment Maint
651
9191 Contract Services
642
1011 Landscape Maint
4,740
4,980
4,800
4,800
4,800
1012 Tree Maint
0
0
0
1013 Debris Basins
0
0
9198 Allocated Overhead
9199 Other Services
641
Total Purchased Serives
4 „740
4,980
4,848
4,800
4,850
9204 Postage
624
9206 Books & Publications
633
9208 Education / Training
636
9211 Electricity
200
380
380
Utilities
652
x,462
5,628
9212 Street Lights
9213 Water
3,500
6,500
6,500
9214 Gasoline
655
9218 Operating Supplies
623
9221 Equip Rental
661
0
0
9222 Small Tools/ Equip
657
9251 Special Dept Sup.
629
Total Operating Supplies
:,462
5,628
3,700
6,880
6,880
Total Maint & Operations
1,202
10,608
8,548
1.1,680
11,730
Capital Outlay
9903 Capital Projects
903
0
0
0
Total
8,202
10,608
8,548
11,680
11,730
OW1.l.8
EXHIBIT "D" (Page 10 of 15)
Zone 8:
Home Acres Buffer
AD 84 -2: FY 1997/98 Budget
Department 210.711.0000.
FY
96/197
Zone 8 . . . . . .778
--------------------
FY 94/95
FY 95/196
Estimated
Code Description
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
BUDGET
Actual
SALARIES & BENEFITS
C
3,100
Uniforms
638
MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS
9101 Repair & Maint
658
16
0
9115 Vehicle Maint
654
9134 Insurance & Bonds
648
9162 Equipment Maint
651
9191 Contract Services
642
1011 Landscape Maint
2,:120
3,600
3,600
1012 Tree Maint
0
1013 Debris Basins
p
9198 Allocated Overhead
9199 Other Services
641
Total Purchased Serives
2,120
3,636
3,600
9204 Postage
624
9206 Books & Publications
633
9208 Education / Training
636
9211 Electricity
150
200
Utilities
652
s:
',48G
9212 Street Lights
9213 Water
1,200
3,000
9214 Gasoline
655
9218 Operating Supplies
623
9221 Equip Rental
661
p
9222 Small Tools/ Equip
657
9251 Special Dept Sup.
629
Total Operating Supplies
ss
2,480
1,350
3,200
Total Maint & Operations
4,600
4,986
6,800
Capital Outlay
9903 Capital Projects
903
21,080
49,146
0
0
Total
21,080
53,746
4,986
91900
FY 97/98
BUDGET
3,200
36
3,600
0
0
3,636
200
3,000
0
----- - - - - --
3,200
----- - - - - --
6,836
I'
I
0
10,036
05/15/97
Remarks
Gates
NCH 1.1.9
EXHIBIT "D" (Page 11 of 15)
Zone 9.
Condor & I; A
Ave
05/15/97
AD 84 -2: FY 1997/98 Budget
Department 210.711.0000.
FY
96/97
Zone 9 . . . . . . . . .779
--------------------
FY 94/95
FY 95/96
Estimated
FY 97/98
Code Description
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
BUDGET
Actual
BUDGET Remarks
SALARIES & BENEFITS
0
0
Uniforms
638
MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS
9101 Repair & Maint
658
0
0
9115 Vehicle Maint
654
9134 Insurance & Bonds
648
9162 Equipment Maint
651
9191 Contract Services
642
is
a.,7�
6
0
0
1011 Landscape Maint
600
600
600
1012 Tree Maint
500
0
500
1013 Debris Basins
0
0
9198 Allocated Overhead
9199 Other Services
641
Total Purchased Serives
--- - - - - --
0
---- -- - - --
1,375
--- - - - - --
1,106
--- - - - - --
600
----- - - - - --
1,100
9204 Postage
624
9206 Books & Publications
633
9208 Education / Training
636
9211 Electricity
0
100
200
200
Utilities
652
9212 Street Lights
9213 Water
350
350
350
9214 Gasoline
655
9218 Operating Supplies
623
9221 Equip Rental
661
)
0
0
9222 Small Tools/ Equip
657
9251 Special Dept Sup.
629
Total Operating Supplies
---------
--- - - - - --
450
--- - - - - --
550
----- - - - - --
550
Total Maint & Operations
1,3?5
--- - - - - --
1,556
--- - - - - --
1,150
----- - - - - --
1,650
Capital Outlay
9903 Capital Projects
903
2,980
0
0 '
Total
:,980
1,375
.1,556
1,150
1,650
0001.20
EXHIBIT "D" (Page 12 of 15)
Zone 10: PC -:3
05/15/97
AD 84 -2: FY 1997/98 Budget
Department 210.711.0000.
FY
96/97
Zone10 . . . . . . . .780
--------------------
FY 94/95 FY 95/96
Estimated
FY 97/98
Code Description
ACTUAL ACTUAL
BUDGET
Actual
BUDGET
Remarks
SALARIES & BENEFITS
0
706
5,040
4,000
Debris Basins
Uniforms
638
MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS
9101 Repair & Maint
658
745
500
1,100
9115 Vehicle Maint
654
9134 Insurance & Bonds
648
9162 Equipment Maint
651
9191 Contract Services
642
0
0
1011 Landscape Maint
88,212
87,852
90,600
1012 Tree Maint
2,000
16,000
20,000
1013 Debris Basins
706
0
0
Debris Basins
(96/97)
9198 Allocated Overhead
__ _________ ____
_ ___ __
Pers:
5040
9199 Other Services
641
Contract:
0
--- - - - - --
--- - - - ---
----- ---
Equip /Other
482
Total Purchased Serives
91,663
104,352
111,700
----
- - - - --
5522
9204 Postage
624
Debris Basins
(97/98)
9206 Books & Publications
633
______ _______
__ _ _____
9208 Education / Training
636
Pers:
4000
Contract:
0
9211 Electricity
2,740
1,300 I
1,300
Equip /Other
1100
Utilities
652
----------
9212 Street Lights
5100
I'.
9213 Water
78,500
78,500
78,500
9214 Gasoline
655
�
9218 Operating Supplies
623
9221 Equip Rental
661
706
300
900
9222 Small Tools/ Equip
657
182
200
9251 Special Dept Sup.
629
Total Operating Supplies I
81,946
80,282
80,900
Total Maint & Operations
°_____ -------- -
---------
173,609
---------
184,634
-----------
192,600
Capital Outlay
9903 Capital Projects
903
o
0
Total
1
174,31.5
189,674
196,600
oWlzl
EXHIBIT "D" (Page 13 of 15) Zone 11: Colmer
AD 84 -2: FY 1997/98 Budget
Department 210.711.0000. FY 96/97
Zone 11 781 --------------------
FY 94/95 FY 95j96 Estimated
Code Description ACTUAL ACTUAL, BUDGET Actual
SALARIES & BENEFITS 0
Uniforms 638
MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS
9101 Repair & Maint 658 1
9115 Vehicle Maint 654
9134 Insurance & Bonds 648
9162 Equipment Maint 651
9191 Contract Services 642
1011 Landscape Maint
1012 Tree Maint
1013 Debris Basins
9198 Allocated Overhead
9199 Other Services 641
Total Purchased Serives ;.
9204 Postage 624
9206 Books & Publications 633
9208 Education / Training 636
9211 Electricity
Utilities 652
9212 Street Lights
9213 Water
9214 Gasoline 655
9218 Operating Supplies 623
9221 E ' R t 1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
FY 97/98
BUDGET
0
0
0
0
0
_O_ Es
'i
0
0
05/15/97
Remarks
---------- - - - - --
quip en a 661 u 0
9222 Small Tools/ Equip 657
9251 Special Dept Sup. 629
Total Operating Supplies p
---- - - -• -- -------- -- _-- - - - - -- ----- - - - - --
Total Maint & Operations 0
0
Capital Outlay
9903 Capital Projects 903 ± f:1 0 0
Total
'UJZZ
EXHIBIT "D" (Page 14 of 15)
Zone 12: Carlsberq_
AD 84 -2: FY 1997/98 Budget
Department 210.711.0000.
FY 96/97
Zone 12 . . . . . . . .782
--------------------
FY 94/95 FY 95/96
Estimated
FY 97/98
Code Description
ACTUAL ACTUAL
i BUDGET Actual
BUDGET
Remarks
SALARIES & BENEFITS
0
0
Uniforms
638
MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS
9101 Repair & Maint
658
0
0
9115 Vehicle Maint
654
9134 Insurance & Bonds
648
9162 Equipment Maint
651
9191 Contract Services
642
1011 Landscape Maint
0
0
1012 Tree Maint
0
0
1013 Debris Basins
0
0
9198 Allocated Overhead
9199 Other Services
641
I
I
Total Purchased Serives
0
0
9204 Postage
624
t�
9206 Books & Publications
633
9208 Education / Training
636
9211 Electricity
�? 0
0
Utilities
652
9212 Street Lights
9213 Water
t 0
0
9214 Gasoline
655
9218 Operating Supplies
623
9221 Equip Rental
661 ?
i) 0
0
9222 Small Tools/ Equip
657
9251 Special Dept Sup.
629
Total Operating Supplies
-- - - - -(- --- - - - - --
0
----- - - - - --
;I
0
Total Maint & Operations
_ . - -- -------
--- - - - - -- --- - - - - --
0
----- - - - - --
0
Capital Outlay
i
9903 Capital Projects
903
; 0
0
Total
_
0
__________= i.
0
05/15/97
jj06193
EXHIBIT "D" (Page 15 of 15)
Zone 13: Campesina Park
05/15/97
AD 84 -2: FY 1997/98 Budget
Department 210.711.0000.
FY 96/97
Zone 13 . . . . . . . .783
--------------------
FY 94/95 FY 95/96 Estimated
FY 97/98
Code Description
ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET Actual
BUDGET
Remarks
SALARIES & BENEFITS
0
0
Uniforms
638
MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS
9101 Repair & Maint
658
0
0
9115 Vehicle Maint
654
9134 Insurance & Bonds
648
9162 Equipment Maint
651
9191 Contract Services
642
1011 Landscape Maint
i! 0
3,240
12 Mos.
1012 Tree Maint
1013 Debris Basins
9198 Allocated Overhead
9199 Other Services
641
Total Purchased Serives
.. _.. - - -- --------- - - - - -- - --- - - - --- --- - - - - --
0 O
( ----- - - - - --
3,240
9204 Postage
624
I
9206 Books & Publications
633
9208 Education / Training
636
9211 Electricity
is 0
I 400
Utilities
652
9212 Street Lights
9213 Water
0
80
Well Water
9214 Gasoline
655
9218 Operating Supplies
623
9221 Equip Rental
661
) 0
0
9222 Small Tools/ Equip
657
9251 Special Dept Sup.
629
Total operating Supplies
0
480
Total Maint & Operations
0
3,720
Capital Outlay
9903 Capital Projects
903
) 0
( 0
Total
) 0
i 3,720
00OU4
EXHIBIT "E"
AD 84 -2: FY 1997/98
Capital Improvement Projects FY 96/97
9903 --------------------
FY 94/95 FY 95/96 Estimated
Code Description ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET Actual
Citywide Projects
W/S Spring S/0 Peach Hill
f,444 ,583
Irrigation Crossovers
`;;914
Princeton & Campus Park
85,94" 800
Poindexter @ Sierra
52,529
N/S Poindexter
0 0
Median: T. R. Rd. E/0 Spring
S/S L. A. Ave. @ T. R. Rd.
W/S T. R. Rd. S/0 L. A. Ave
Peach Hill Parkways
98
W/S Spring N/0 L. A. Ave
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Citywide Total 96,292 x,383 0 0
Zones of Benefit
---------------------------------
2 N/S T. R. Rd. W/O Spring o 0
8 Buffer Area 21,080 49,146
9 Virginia Colony :,980
Zones of Benefit Total
24,060
49,1.46
0 0
Total
120,352
52,529
0 0
05/15/97
FY 97/98
BUDGET Remarks
0 I
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5,000
5,000
5,000
Dev. Deposit: $7315
Design Completed
Desing Only. Total
ty (j V
Exhibit "F"
AD 84 -2 FY 1997/98
Street Light Cost Analysis
Date
July 1996
Aug 1996
Sept 1996
Oct 1996
Nov 1996
Dec 1996
Total
Street Traffic Signal
Lights Safety Lights
17,014.97
0.00
16,192.59
0.00
16,871.47
0.00
16,941.98
0.00
17,379.41
0.00
17,174.61
0.00
Total Remarks
,014.97
16,192.59
16,, 87147
16,941.98
,379,41
174.61
101,575.03 0.00 101,575.03
Six Month Costs
Projected FY 1996/97 Actual Costs 203,150 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 203,150
Plus Cost of Projected Added Lights . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,000
Plus Cost of Projected Rate Increase . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,000
Estimated FY 1997/98 Street Lighting Costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 209,150
Plus Projected FY 96/97 Year End Deficit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0
Less Projected FY 96/97 Year End Lighting Assmnt Surplus . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0
TOTAL FY 1997/98 STREET LIGHTING ASSESSMENT
209,150
Owurz
PRELIMINARY
ENGINEER'S REPORT
CITY OF MOORPARK
LIGHTING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
NO. AD -84 -2
LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972
PROPOSITION 218
PREPARED BY:
CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES, INC.
3'! Van Ness Way, Suite 200
Torrance, CA 90501
M a r: - h 1 9 9
uouu -- 7
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
1
1
1
Section
1
Authority for Report
Section
2
Definition of Terms
Section
3
Method and Rates of Assessment
Section
4
Description of Improvements
to be Maintained
Section
5
Assessment. Rol',
Section
6
Estimate of C'os*
Appendix
"A"
Street 1lighti_ng Formula - Table 1
Appendix
"B"
Erosion and Flood Control
Related Landscape Formula - Table 2
Appendix
"C"
Assessment Summary - Table 3
Appendix
"D"
Budget Estimate
Appendix
"E"
Boundary Map
Appendix
"F"
Assessment Roll
Appendix
"G"
Resolutions
Appendix
"H"
Rebate Procedure
3
7
7
CITY OF MOORPARK
Engineer's Report
Lighting Maintenance Assessment District
No. AD -84 -2
Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 -
For Fiscal Year 1997 -1998
SECTION 1 AUTHORITY FOR REPORT
This report is prepared pursuant to City Council action taken at
their regular meetings of January 15, 1997 and February 21, 1997
to extend this District for the fiscal year commencing July 1,
1997 and ending June 30, 1998 in compliance with the requirements
of Article 4, Chapter 1, "Landscaping Act of 1972 ", being Part 2
of Division 15 of the 'aliforrli.a Streets and Highways Code and
Proposition 218 whd-(..:h allows Existing assessment districts to
continue as Iona as -I* eF; c nd r(,th-- )dology remain the same.
The District will provide electrical energy for public lighting
facilities and for operation and maintenance of public lighting
within the city. 1; i addi.tic:n, the District will provide for
installation and /or raintenance of erosion and flood control
related public lands r7apirnex r.he public right -of -way.
SECTION 2 DEFIN:I`'ION OF 'PERMS
Assessment Rate - ThE- assessmernt_ rate is the number assigned to
each land use categor,. The cssessment: rate for a Level 1 Single
Family Residential rt (lanci -ise code 1) is 1 for lighting
assessment and 4 fo.r (rosi(-)r, _ A flood control related landscape
assessment. Assessment rater r other parcels in other land use
categories, includin_1 pubii.c::.Iy ;caned parcels, a re proportioned to
these basic rates. - ese assessment rates remain unchanged.
Methodology - The methodology is the formula used to derive the
assessment amount, k)ased on he assessment rates. The same
methodology to dete ?i7i.rye rfiF i:ssessment: amount has been used in
prior years.
SECTION 3 METHOD AND RATES OF' ASSESSMENT
The methodology and assessment: rates used for Assessment District
No. AD -84 -2 have not :hanged for the past several years, and are
based on how the faci_Lities bei.ng maintained provide benefits as
part of the system c- itreets which serve the City of Moorpark.
Lighting
The benefits of street lightinu are for the convenience, safety
and protection of people and the security or protection of
property, property improvement: and goods. The intensity or
degree of illumination providec- �an have a bearing on both.
The single family home - Levey 1 has been selected as th-e base
unit for the spread �Df assessments. By definition, the single
family home - Level ' is a single family home located on a street
that has existing street Light: An assessment rate of 1.00 has
been assigned to the base zn t which is composed of benefit
factors which cor.r.esp cm(-?, ' tl( loll Lowing types of benefit.
People Use -- Pec;[:)aE related benefits 0.50
Security Benefi.! Proper:tti protection 0.25
Intensity - Degree of i.11�..zminat.on 0.25
Assessment Rate: 1.00
Parcels in other land use categories, including publicly owned
parcels, were then rated by comparison with the basic unit. (See
the following table.
People Use _. People related benefits
1. Reduction in night accidents and attendant human
misery.
2. Reducea vulnerabil=ity to criminal assault during
hours f darknes��..
3. Promot.;..On of bjsiness operations during evening
hours.
4. Increased safety on roads and highways.
Security Benefi- Property Protection
1. Reduction in vandalism and other criminal acts,
and damage to improvements.
2. Reduction t..n burglaries.
Intensity
Intensity or degree of illumination provided on streets
varies with type of street, date of installation and
the use of the property adjacent thereto.
Erosion and Flood Control Related Landscaping
The erosion and flood contro. , maintenance associated with the
landscaping element cif the spread formula recognizes that all
properties within the City benefit from the maintenance of the
landscaping within public~ rights - - -of -way and easements. These
benefits include er.csion an tl.00d control, improved safety
resulting from a regular tree rimming program and improved-= street
sweeping capabil_itie; result.[ rc: 'rom trimming trees which may
otherwise interface a r, .,;tree- sweep�ncq operations.
The method of spreading maintenance costs is based upon the
assessment rates, anc: the assessment rates are determined by the
"people use" attributed to each land use within the City. This
method was chosen oecause -:he benefit received is directly
proportionate to the r-.umber of people generated by each land use.
Recognizing that residential _and uses within the City derive a
higher degree of bHr.E�!. h non- residential land uses, the
formula was subdivided -ito tw main groups, with residential land
uses contributing iLi c)f '.lie assessment and non - residential
uses being assesses t'..r„ �c�mair�_ 259, of the maintenance
costs.
The single family horn(-,, gas been selected as the base unit for the
spread of assessment. An assessment. rate of 4 has been assigned
by the base unit. Parcels in )t-her Land use categories, including
publicly owned parcels, were rated y ,comparison with the basic
unit. (See the foll ,w, r q tabi -
The "people use" facts -ors utiv_ized in determining assessment rates
and in the assessmer:t iistr i.t spread formula are shown in the
following table.
Rebate
The City Council approved a rebate procedure for disadvantaged
property owners. The procedure shall be followed as described in
Appendix "H."
SECTION 4 DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS TO BE MAINTAINED
This report covers the period of July 1, 1997 through June 30,
1998. An updated report is prepared each year to reflect updated
annual costs and changes in pai�:elizati,m .
The City of Moorpark Lighting Maintenance District has proposed to
create three new zones of benefit for the construction and /or
maintenance of the landscapinc:: improvements, which will be
designated as:
1. Zone 11: Tract 4174 (Colmer)
2. Zone 12: Carlsberg Specific Plan
3. Zone 13 Campesina Park (Tract. 4147) -
The improvements to be maintained in this District include all
City -owned and Southern California. Edison (S.C.E.) -owned street
lights as well as all medians and street trees within public
rights -of -way within tale boundaries ()f the city.
Lighting maintenance sha.la include, but is not limited to, energy
costs, removal, repair, replacement ors relocation of light
standards, poles, bulbs, fixtures and all appurtenances.
Servicing of S.C.E. owned lights as defined in Section 22538 of
the Streets and Highways -ode sha-�l be furnished by the Southern
California Edison Company or its successors, or this servicing
shall be as authorized by the Pt.ibii:' IJtilities Commission, State
of California. Mair t 41, riarlcF -owned lighting improvements
shall be furnished b i
Landscape maintenancF i for erosion and flood control shall include,
but is not limited to, watering, fertilizing, mowing, weed
control, shrubbery, tree :removal and pruning, removal and
replacement of dead 4rowth, maintenance of irrigation facilities
and other necessary
In addition, the cosy to maintain improved areas within an
easement will be borne be _>wners within that project. These
easement areas are:
1. Tract No. 2851
Erosion and flood control maintenance costs associated
with landscaping in the Ventura County Flood Control
Easement and portions of the interior tract entry
areas. The obligation upon these 73 lots is pursuant
to a condit :,. ,r: of development.
2. Tract No. 2865
Cost for erosion and flood control maintenance of
specific landscape areas within the tract, including
landscaping at Christian Barrett & Spring Roads; Tierra
Rejada landscaping, and Peach Hill Road landscaping on
east side between Christian Barrett and Tierra Rejada
Roads, and !:he entry monument sign at Christian Barret
and Spring P,oad. The obligation upon the lots within
this tract 11 pursuart tc a condition of development.
W(i132
4
3
M
5
0
7.
MIN
Tract No. 3032
Erosion and flood control maintenance costs associated
with landscaping an entry monument at Buttercreek Road
and Los Angeles Avenue. This cost to be spread to the
265 lots wi-thin the tract.
Tract No. 3274
Erosion avid flood control maintenance costs associated
with landscape areas along Williams Ranch Road parkway
adjacent t(..) Peach Hill drain channel and Edison entries
within PC- ` This cost will be borne by the 220 lots
within the rac~ .,
Tract Nos. 3019, 3525
Erosion and flood control maintenance costs associated
with landsc °aping the Tierra Rejada Road slope and
parkway areas and parkway on the west side of Peach
Hill Road oetween Williams Ranch and Tierra Rejada
Roads withi- Tract 301.9 and 3525. The cost is to
be spread t7 �P within the tracts.
Tract 3306
Cost for erosion and flood
landscape areas within Tract.
terminus of Inglewood Street.
to the 22 cts wit h.ir the tract
Los Angeles Avenue Parkway
control maintenance of
3306 at the westerly
The cost is to be spread
Erosion
and flood control maintenance costs associated
with landscaping the parkway on
the north side
of Los
Angeles
Avenue between Gabbert Road
and Shasta
Avenue
will. be
borne by a], L industrial
lots northerly
of Los
Angeles
Avenue, s3 utherly of
Poindexter
Avenue,
easterly
..gabber' Road, and
westerly of
Shasta
Avenue.
Home Acres Buffer Area
Erosion and flood cc;rit.rol maintenance costs associated
with the buffer area at the west end of the West Ranch
area, is tc be sp _t 50 -50 between the residential
properties within the West ranch area and the area
outside the City known as Home Acres. That portion of
this Zone f Benef7:: with the City consists of the
residentia- areas within Tract. 4340, 4341, 4792 and a
portion of rac.,t 4'142 This area is bounded on the
north by t �� Arrcry�_ `aim; )r the east by Tierra Rejada
OW-1133
Road and the Commercial property at the corner of
Tierra Rejada Road and Mountain Trail Street, on the
south by Tracts 463; ", 4342 -5 and the City boundary and
on the west by 1..:he (" ty Boundary.
9. Condor Drive Industrial Park
Erosion and flood control maintenance costs associated
with the parkway located at the northwest corner of Los
Angeles Avenue and Virginia Colony Place will be borne
by the developed parcels within the Industrial park on
Condor Dri,., - Tract 492) .
10. PC -3
Erosion and flood control maintenance costs associated
with landscaping and debris basin within this area will
be borne by all properties within the Mountain Meadows
Planned Community PC -3). The landscaping to be
maintained consists of the Peach Hill Wash Linear Park,
the slope along the north side of the Peach Hill Wash
and the downstream `_lood .ontrol facility located just
east of Mcur.tain T, Street and certain parkways on
Tierra kej ad, -i Road.
11. Tract 4174 Colmer
Erosion and flood control maintenance costs associated
with landscaping within this area will be borne by all
properties w-Ahin the t ract .
12. Carlsberg Specific Plan
Erosion and flood ;maintenance costs associated with
landscaping within this area will be borne by all
properties 'thin the clanned community.
13. Campesina Park
Improvement:_ and maintenance costs associated with the
improvement:-;, within this park will be borne by all
properties t him Tr�i,�t 414-.
Plans and specificat =yons for the irrigation, landscaping and
lighting of streets, parks and easements, and other authorized
improvements within the ;it,y are on file in the Department of
Public Works. The -ighting Locations and specifications for
Edison -owned lights r_F or, 'ile with the Southern California
Edison Company. Refei ence hereby made to said plans and
specifications for thi exact :atior and nature of the landscape
and lighting improverrierit „ -,. `;aid plans and specifications by
reference are hereby ri,idf:, a pa, 1 t h i_s report.
00GI 34
I
SECTION 5 ASSESSMENT ROL_
All parcels of real property affected are listed on the
"Assessment Roll ", Exhibit- "A," which will be on file in City Hall
with the City Clerk, and is made a part hereof by reference.
These parcels are more particuiarly described in maps prepared in
accordance with Section 32-1 of the Revenue and Taxation Code which
are on file in the -ff =ice of the Ventura County Assessor =in the
County Government Center Admi_nlst:rati.on Building, 800 S. Victoria
Avenue, Ventura, Caa _:f,:) rn �a ain(i which are also made a part hereof
by reference.
SECTION 6 COST ESTIMATE',
The City staff recommendation for the District budget is shown in
Appendix "D" of this apc.rt.
The costs attributed to Landscaping and the costs attributed to
lighting will be separately appointed, according to the formula,
and added together constitute the total assessment for each
parcel..
Conclusion
In conclusion, it _s our opinion that the assessments within
Lighting Maintenance Assessment District No. AD -84 -2 are
apportioned by a formula that fairly distributes the net cost in
accordance with the benefits that are received. The assessment
rates and methodology emain the same for the past several years.
-- i)(L[37.35
c: \msexcel \mpark assess rates ad 84 -2
8 00��J�
CITY OF MOORPARK
Lighting Maintenance Assessment District
No. AD -84 -2
Lighting and Landscape Act of 1972
Assessment Rates
LIGHTING
EROSION /FLOOD
USE
ASSESSMENT
ASSESSMENT
CODE
DESCRIPTION
RATE
RATE
0
RESIDENTIAL VACANT
0.25
0
1
SINGLE FAMILY, LEVEL 1
1
4
2
MOBILE HOME
0
0
3
CONDO
1
3
4
RESIDENTIAL INCOME, 2 4 UNITS
1
3
5
APARTMENTS (5+ UNITS;
0.75
3
6
SINGLE FAMILY, LEVEL
0.75
4-
9
MOBILE HOME & TRAILER PARKS
0.75
3
10
COMMERCIAL VACANT
0.25
0
11
RETAIL STORES, SINGLE STORY
4
3
12
STORE & OFFICE (COMBINATION)
4
3
15
SHOPPING CENTERS (NEIGHBORHOOD)
6.5
10
16
SHOPPING CENTERS (REGIONAL)
6.5
30
17
OFFICE BUILDING (1 STORY)
3
3
18
OFFICE STROES (MULTI - STORY)
4
6
19
RETAIL STORES (MULTI STORY)
4
6
21
RESTAURANTS & COCKTAIL, LOUNGE
5
3
24
BANKS, SAVINGS & LOAN£!
3
3
25
SERVICE STATIONS
4
3
26
AUTO SALES, REPAIR
4
1
30
INDUSTRIAL VACANT LAND
0.25
0
31
LIGHT MANUFACTURING
5
12
32
WAREHOUSING
4
4
33
INDUSTRIAL CONDOS, CO -OPS, PUD,S
5
3
38
MINERAL PROCESSING
3
3
44
TRUCK CORPS
1
2
46
PASTURE (PERMANENT)
1
2
48
POULTRY
1
2
49
FLOWERS, SEED PRODUCTION
1
2
c: \msexcel \mpark assess rates ad 84 -2
8 00��J�
C: \msexcel \mpark assess rates ad 84 -2
y
10013'1
LIGHTING
EROSION /FLOOD
USE
ASSESSMENT
ASSESSMENT
CODE
DESCRIPTION
RATE
RATE
51
ORCHARDS
1
2
53
FIELD CORPS, DRY
2
54
PASTURE OF GRAZE,DRY
1
2 =
55
FEED LOTS
1
2
57
TREE FARMS
1
2
61
THEATER
5
2
69
PARKS
0
0
70
INSTITUTIONAL VACANT LAND
0.25
0
71
CHURCHES, CONVENT, RECTORY
0.25
0
72
SCHOOLS
0
0
73
COLLEGES
0
0
78
PUBLIC BLDGS.,FIREHOUSES, MUSEUMS,ETC.
0
0
79
FLOOD CONTROL
0
0
80
MISCELLANEOUS VACANT LAND
0.25
0
81
UTILITY WATER COMPANI:
0
0
83
PETROLEUM & GAS
2
1
86
WATER RIGHTS, PUMPS
0
0
88
HIGHWAYS & STREETS
0
0
91
UTILITY EDISON
0
0
92
TELEPHONE
0
0
93
S.P.R.R.
0
0
94
UNDEDICATED COMMUNITY CONDO DEVELOPMENT
0
0
95
STATE PROPERITY
0
0
96
COUNTY PROPERTY
0
0
97
CITY PROPERTY
0
0
99
EXEMPT
0
0
C: \msexcel \mpark assess rates ad 84 -2
y
10013'1
APPENDICES
99011,38
APPENDIX A
STREET LIGHTING FORMULA
000139
APBNDIX "A"
CITY OF MOORPARK
Lighting Maintenance Assessment District
No. AD -84 -2
Lighting and Landscape Act of 1972
Table 1
Street Lighting Formula
c: \mydocs \mpark street lighting appendix a
A- 1
-006110
ANNUAL
USE
ASSESSMENT
LIGHTING
CODE
DESCRIPTION
RATE
ASSESSMENT
0
RESIDENTIAL VACANT
0.25
$5.52
1
SINGLE FAMILY, LEVEL 1
1
$22.07
2
MOBILE HOME
0
$0.00
3
CONDO
1
$22.07
4
RESIDENTIAL INCOME, 2 -4 UNITS
1
$22.07
5
APARTMENTS (5+ UNITS)
0.75
$16.55
6
SINGLE FAMILY, LEVEL 2
0.75
$16.55
9
MOBILE HOME & TRAILER PARKS
0.75
$16.55
10
COMMERCIAL VACANT
0.25
$5.52
11
RETAIL STORES, SINGLE STORY
4
$88.28
12
STORE & OFFICE (COMBINATION)
4
$88.28
15
SHOPPING CENTERS (NEIGHBORHOOD)
6.5
$143.45
16
SHOPPING CENTERS (REGIONAL)
6.5
$143.45
17
OFFICE BUILDING C1 STORY)
3
$66.21
18
OFFICE STROES MULTI- STORY?
4
$88.28
19
RETAIL STORES (MULTI STORY)
4
$88.28
21
RESTAURANTS & COCKTAIL LOUNGE
5
$110.35
24
BANKS, SAVINGS & LOANS
3
$66.21
25
SERVICE STATIONS
4
$88.28
26
AUTO SALES, REPAIR
4
$88.28
30
INDUSTRIAL VACANT LAND
0.25
$5.52
31
LIGHT MANUFACTURING
5
$110.35
32
WAREHOUSING
4
$88.28
33
INDUSTRIAL CONDOS, CO -OPS, PUD'S
5
$110.35
38
MINERAL PROCESSING
3
$66.21
44
TRUCK CORPS
1
$22.07
46
PASTURE (PERMANENT)
1
$22.07
c: \mydocs \mpark street lighting appendix a
A- 1
-006110
c: \mydocs \mpark street lighting appendix a 0001.41
A 2
ANNUAL
USE
ASSESSMENT
LIGHTING
CODE
DESCRIPTION
RATE
ASSESSMENT
48
POULTRY
1
$22.07
49
FLOWERS, SEED PRODUCTION
1
$22.07
51
ORCHARDS
1
$22.07
53
FIELD CORPS, DRY
1
$22.07
54
PASTURE OF GRAZE,DRY
1
$22.07
55
FEED LOTS
1
$22.07
57
TREE FARMS
1
$22.07
61
THEATER
5
$110.35
69
PARKS
0
$0.00
70
INSTITUTIONAL VACANT LAND
0.25
$5.52
71
CHURCHES, CONVENT, RECTORY"
0.25
$5.52
72
SCHOOLS
0
$0.00
73
COLLEGES
0
$0.00
78
PUBLIC BLDGS.,FIREHOUSES, MUSEUMS,ETC.
0
$0.00
79
FLOOD CONTROL
0
$0.00
80
MISCELLANEOUS VACANT LAND
0.25
$5.52
81
UTILITY WATER COMPANY
0
$0.00
83
PETROLEUM & GA;
2
$44.14
86
WATER RIGHTS, PUMPS
0
$0.00
88
HIGHWAYS & STREETS
0
$0.00
91
UTILITY EDISON
0
$0.00
92
TELEPHONE
0
$0.00
93
S.P.R.R.
0
$0.00
94
UNDEDICATED COMMUNITY CONDO DEVELOPMENT
0
$0.00
95
STATE PROPERITY
0
$0.00
96
COUNTY PROPERTY
0
$0.00
97
CITY PROPERTY
0
$0.00
99
EXEMPT
0
$0.00
c: \mydocs \mpark street lighting appendix a 0001.41
A 2
APPENDIX B
EROSION AND FLOOD CONTROL RELATED LANDSCAPE FORMULA
APPENDIX "B"
CITY OF MOORPARK
Lighting Maintenance Assessment District
No. AD -84 -2
Lighting and Landscape Act of 1972
Table 2
Erosion and Flood Control Related Landscape Maintenance Formula
USE
CODE
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
9
10
11
12
15
16
17
18
19
21
24
25
26
30
31
32
33
38
44
46
DESCRIPTION
RESIDENTIAL VACANT
SINGLE FAMILY, LEVEL
MOBILE HOME
CONDO
RESIDENTIAL INCOME, 2 -4 UNITS
APARTMENTS (5+ UNITS)
SINGLE FAMILY, LEVEL 2
MOBILE HOME & TRAILER PARKS
COMMERCIAL VACANT
RETAIL STORES, SINGLE STORY
STORE & OFFICE (COMBINATION)
SHOPPING CENTERS (NEIGHBORHOODi
SHOPPING CENTERS (REGIONALi
OFFICE BUILDING l- STORY)
OFFICE STROES (MUFTI- STORY)
RETAIL STORES (MULTI STORY)
RESTAURANTS & COCKTAIL LOUNGE
BANKS, SAVINGS & LOANS
SERVICE STATIONS
AUTO SALES, REPAIR
INDUSTRIAL VACANT LAND
LIGHT MANUFACTURING
WAREHOUSING
INDUSTRIAL CONDOS, CO -OPS, PUD'S
MINERAL PROCESSING,
TRUCK CORPS
PASTURE (PERMANENT)
ANNUAL
ASSESSMENT EROSION /FLOOD
RATE ASSESSMENT
0 $0.00
4 $13.53
0 $0.00
3 $10.15
3 $10.15
3
$10.15
4
$13.53
3
$10.15
0
$0.00
3
$59.11
3
$59.11
10
$197.02
30
$591.05
3
$59.11
6
$118.21
6
$118.21
3
$59.11
3
$59.11
3
$59.11
1
$19.70
0
$0.00
12
$236.42
4
$78.81
3
$59.11
3
$59.11
2
$39.40
2
$39.40
OW4
c: \mydocs \mpark assess landscape appendix ',i B -1.
(JOG-144
c: \mydocs \mpark assess landscape appendix h B -2
ANNUAL
USE
ASSESSMENT
EROSION /FLOOD
CODE
DESCRIPTION
RATE
ASSESSMENT
48
POULTRY
2
$39.40
49
FLOWERS, SEED PRODUCTION
2
$39.40
51
ORCHARDS
2
$39.40
53
FIELD CORPS, DRY
2
$39.40
54
PASTURE OF GRAZE,DRY
2
$39.40
55
FEED LOTS
2
$39.40
57
TREE FARMS
2
$39.40
61
THEATER
2
$39.40
69
PARKS
0
$0.00
70
INSTITUTIONAL VACANT LAND
0
$0.00
71
CHURCHES, CONVENT, RECTORY
0
$0.00
72
SCHOOLS
0
$0.00
73
COLLEGES
0
$0.00
78
PUBLIC BLDGS.,FIREHOUSES, MUSEUMS,ETC.
0
$0.00
79
FLOOD CONTROL
0
$0.00
80
MISCELLANEOUS VACANT LAND
0
$0.00
81
UTILITY WATER COMPANY
0
$0.00
83
PETROLEUM & GAS
1
$19.70
86
WATER RIGHTS, PUMPS
0
$0.00
88
HIGHWAYS & STREETS
0
$0.00
91
UTILITY EDISON
0
$0.00
92
TELEPHONE
0
$0.00
93
S.P.R.R.
0
$0.00
94
UNDEDICATED COMMUNITY CONDO DEVELOPMENT
0
$0.00
95
STATE PROPERITY
0
$0.00
96
COUNTY PROPERTY
0
$0.00
97
CITY PROPERTY
0
$0.00
99
EXEMPT
0
$0.00
(JOG-144
c: \mydocs \mpark assess landscape appendix h B -2
Notes:
1. In addition to the landscape charge on the previous table, 75 lots
within Tract No. 2851. are assessed an additional landscape
maintenance cost for a poz:tion of the Ventura County Flood Control
Easement immediately r:orth of Campus Park Dive, as well as
portions of the parkway landscaping at the entrance to and within
the interior of ract 8 >1. The additional cost -per lot is
$186.39. The obli.gat_ic:,n upon these lots is pursuant to a
condition of deve.l_)pmen'
2. In addition to ttre landscape charge on the previous table, 622
lots within Tra(._°:.
2865 are assessed an additional landscape
maintenance charge
for the maintenance of specific landscape areas
and debris basins
within the tract. The landscaped areas include
certain parkways,
t:he Tierra Rejada Road slope and street scape
areas, and the
monument sign within the tract. Also, an
additional $10 assessment
will be levied upon each lot to fund the
future constructi,.r;
" parkway landscape improvements on the north
side of Tierra Ir.
ada Road E >ast and west of Southhampton Road.
The additional. c ,.
t per '
er :t r $89.28. Forty -eight (48) lots are
assessed for an i�idi_ti.onal.
$41a.5,:: per lot for the maintenance of
the debris basi.n.�:
F'he upon these lots is pursuant to
a condition f iF
��icrpmerr`
3. In addition to '..t;e
iandscape charge on the previous table, 265
lots within Tract_
No. 3032 are assessed an additional landscape
maintenance charge
for the maintenance of an entry monument at
Buttercreek Road
end Los Angeles Avenue and landscaping on the
south side of PeP,
.ermi_l l t r e- ,t . The additional cost per lot is
$9.25.
4. In addition to t.le landscape charge on the previous table, 129
lots within Tract No. 3274 are assessed an additional landscape
maintenance charge for the maintenance of the landscaped barrier
in Williams Ranch road at the Edison power lines, and the parkway
landscaping on bot'r sides of_ Williams Ranch Road east and west of
the Edison Easemer!_. The additional cost per lost is $0.00. The
obligation upon n e s e 0 i pursuant to a condition of
development.
S. In addition to the landscape charge on the previous table, 2 *17
lots within Tract Nos. 3019 and 3525 are assessed an additional
landscape maintenance charge for the maintenance of the Tierra
Rejada Road slope and parkways, including the entry statements at
Pheasant Run Street, and the parkway on the west side of Peach
Hill Road between; Williams Ranch and Tierra Rejada Roads. The
additional cost f=7�r lot is S-17 5.69. Seventy -five (75) lots are
assessed for an cii,iditional ;0.9`> per lot for the maintenance of
debris basins. e c,bl icy -it i : >m upon these lots is pursuant to a
condition of deve.l pme r,t .
OWV
E{ - '3
6. In addition to the landscape charge on the previous table, 22 lots
within Tract No. 3306 are assessed an additional landscape
maintenance charge for the maintenance of landscape area at the
westerly terminus c - -)f Inglewood Street. The additional cost per
lot is $70.95. The upon these lots is pursuant to a
condition of deve.LDpmen
7. In addition to the landscape charge on the previous table, 93 lots
northerly of Los Angeles avenue, southerly of Poindexter Avenue,
between Gabbert and Shasta Avenues are assessed an additional
landscape maintenance charge for the maintenance of the parkway on
the north side of i,os Angeles Avenue Parkway. The additional cost
is $183.59 per a( r
8. In addition to `.tie Landscape charge on the previous table, 493
residential unit,> within Tracts 4340, 4341, 4792 and a portion of
Tract 4342 are assessed aii additional $13.73 for fifty percent
(50%) of the impr(c vement and maintenance costs for the Home Acres
Buffer area. Th,: -, remaining. fifty percent (500) of such costs are
recovered via an assessment: upon the properties in the Home Acres
area, in the am( u; t )f. $ 1 . 85. This is the total amount of the
assessment on t h., iC1 Home Acres. Said lots are not
assessed for : "it _d ,
9. In addition to ttie -Landscape charge on the previous table, 11 lots
within the Industrial Pcitk on Condor Drive are assessed an
additional landscape maintenance charge for the maintenance of the
parkway located i!_ the norliwest corner of Los Angeles Avenue and
Virginia Colony e Th idditb<)nal cost is $10.26 per acre.
10. In addition to Lhe Landscape charge on the previous table, 2544
assessment units and one ommercia.l property within the Mountain
Meadows Planned ""ommunit,; (PC -3; are assessed an additional
landscape maintenance barge for the maintenance of the
landscaping w_ith�r. the Pea.--h Hil:L Wash Linear Park, on the slope
along the north de of he Peach Hill Wash and the downstream
flood control fa.:lit:y Located just east of Mountain Trail Street
and within certi,ri parkways Tcng Tierra Rejada Road. The
additional cost: I S $89.2` per equivalent dwelling unit. Six
hundred and sever ,_y (6'7 -ots are assessed for an additional
$11.98 per lot <x the maintenance of debris basins. The
obligation upon hese _ pursuant to a condition of
development.
11. In addition to the Landscape charge on the previous table, 7 lots
within Tract No. 4174 are assessed an additional landscape
maintenance charge for the maintenance of parkway landscaping
within the tract. The additional cost per lot is $0.00.
H-4 -- 006146
12. In addition to the landscape charge in the previous table, 7 large
lots within the Carlsberg Specific Planned Community are assessed
an additional landscape maintenance charge for the maintenance of
landscaping within the specific plan area. The additional cost is
$0.00 per lot. The obligation upon these lots is pursuant to a
condition of developmer':.
13. In addition to the landscape charge in the previous table, 62 lots
within Tract No. 4147 are assessed an additional improvement and
maintenance charge f'or the improvement and maintenance of
landscaping, •ghting, sidewalks, playground equipment,
playcourts, puba_. restrooms and park recreational improvements.
The additional <, 60 .:)0 p ii_( t. .
APPENDIX C
ASSESSMENT SUMMARY
W6148
USE
CODE
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
9
10
11
12
15
16
17
18
19
21
24
25
26
30
31
32
33
38
44
46
APPENDIX "C"
CITY OF MOORPARK
Lighting Maintenance Assessment District
No. AD -84 -2
Lighting and Landscape Act of 1972
Table 3
DESCRIPTION
RESIDENTIAL VACANT
SINGLE FAMILY, LEVEL 1
MOBILE HOME
CONDO
RESIDENTIAL INCOME, 2 -4 UNITS
APARTMENTS (5+ UNITS)
SINGLE FAMILY, LEVEL 2
MOBILE HOME & TRAILER PARKS
COMMERCIAL VACANT
RETAIL STORES, SINGLE STORY
STORE & OFFICE (COMBINATION)
SHOPPING CENTERS (NEIGHBORHOOD)
SHOPPING CENTERS (REGIONAL
OFFICE BUILDING (1 STORY)
OFFICE STROES (MULTI -STORY
RETAIL STORES (MULTI STORY)
RESTAURANTS & COCKTAIL LOUNGE
BANKS, SAVINGS & LOANS
SERVICE STATIONS
AUTO SALES, REPAIR.
INDUSTRIAL VACANT LAND
LIGHT MANUFACTURING
WAREHOUSING
INDUSTRIAL CONDOS, CO -OPS. PUD'S
MINERAL PROCESSING
TRUCK CORPS
PASTURE (PERMANENT)
Assessment Summary
ANNUAL
EROSION /FLOOD
ASSESSMENT
$0.00
$13.53
$0.00
$10.15
$10.15
$10.15
$13.53
$10.15
$0.00
$59.11
$59.11
$197.02
$591.05
$59.11
$118.21
$118.21
$59.11
$59.11
$59.11
$19.70
$0.00
$236.42
$78.81
$59.11
$59.11
$39.40
$39.40
ANNUAL
TOTAL
LIGHTING
ANNUAL
ASSESSMENT
ASSESSMENT
$5.52
$5.52
$22.07
$35.60
$0.00
$0.00
$22.07.
$32.22
$22.07
$32.22
$16.55
$26.70
$16.55
$30.08
$16.55
$26.70
$5.52
$5.52
$88.28
$147.38
$88.28
$147.38
$143.45
$340.47
$143.45
$734.50
$66.21
$125.31
$88.28
$206.49
$88.28
$206.49
$110.35
$169.45
$66.21
$125.31
$88.28
$147.38
$88.28
$107.98
$5.52
$5.52
$110.35
$346.77
$88.28
$167.08
$110.35
$169.45
$66.21
$125.31
$22.07
$61.47
$22.07
$61.47
summary a endix r (' -7. " OC 145 .
c: \m docs m ark assess
Y \ p Y PP-
Actual assessment amounts may vary due to discrepancies between use codes and actual property uses.
W(;150
c: \mydocs \mpark assess summary appendix c _ 2
ANNUAL
ANNUAL
TOTAL
USE
EROSION /FLOOD
LIGHTING
ANNUAL
CODE
DESCRIPTION
ASSESSMENT
ASSESSMENT
ASSESSMENT
48
POULTRY
$39.40
$22.07
$61.47
49
FLOWERS, SEED PRODUCTION
$39.40
$22.07
$61.47
51
ORCHARDS
$39.40
$22.07
$61.47
53
FIELD CORPS, DRY
$39.40
$22.07
$61.47
54
PASTURE OF GRAZE,DRY
$39.40
$22.07
$61.47
55
FEED LOTS
$39.40
$22.07
$61.47
57
TREE FARMS
$39.40
$22.07
$61.47
61
THEATER
$39.40
$110.35
$149.75
69
PARKS
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
70
INSTITUTIONAL VACANT LAND
$0.00
$5.52
$5.52
71
CHURCHES, CONVENT, RECTORY
$0.00
$5.52
$5.52
72
SCHOOLS
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
73
COLLEGES
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
78
PUBLIC BLDGS.,FIREHOUSES, MUSEUMS,ETC
$0.00
$0.00.
$0.00
79
FLOOD CONTROL
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
80
MISCELLANEOUS VACANT LAND
$0.00
$5.52
$5.52
81
UTILITY WATER COMPANY
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
83
PETROLEUM & GAS
$19.70
$44.14
$63.84
86
WATER RIGHTS, PUMPS
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
88
HIGHWAYS & STREETS
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
91
UTILITY EDISON
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
92
TELEPHONE
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
93
S.P.R.R.
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
94
UNDEDICATED COMMUNITY CONDO DEVELOPMENT
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
95
STATE PROPERITY
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
96
COUNTY PROPERTY
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
97
CITY PROPERTY
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
99
EXEMPT
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Actual assessment amounts may vary due to discrepancies between use codes and actual property uses.
W(;150
c: \mydocs \mpark assess summary appendix c _ 2
APPENDIX D
BUDGET ESTIMATE
` 01 JA.
APPENDIX "D"
CITY OF MOORPARK
Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District
No. AD -84 -2
Budget Estimate
FY 1997 -98
ZONES OF BENEFIT
1. Tract No. 2851
Interior Parkway & Flood Control Channel
2. Tract No. 2865
Pacifica & Pardee: Landscape
Debris Basins
Improvements
3. Tract No. 3032
Buttercreek & Peppermil
4. Tract No. 3274
Williams Ranch Road
5. Tract No. 3019, 3025
Warmington: Landscape
Debris Basins
6. Tract No. 3306
Glenhaven (Inglewood)
7. Los Angeles Avenue
North Side Parkway
8. West Village Buffer Area
9. Condor Parkway
10. Peach Hill Wash:
Landscape
Debris Basins
11. Tract No. 4174 Colmer
12. Carlsberg Specific Plan
13. Campesina Park (Tract No. 4147)
SUBTOTAL
$13,979
$55,533
$2,377
$6,220
$2,450
$0
$16,425
$71
$1,561
$17,074
$13,542
$505
$227,039
$7,904
$0
$0
$3,720
$368,400
C :Amydocs \mpark assess budget append -,x d
BUDGET ESTIMATE
FY 1996 -97
Total Annual. Expenses
Prior Year Surplus
Other Revenues
Reserve
Total Assessment.
Zone Assessment.
*City Wide Assessment
* Street Lighting
Landscape
Total
$725,077
$0
$0
$0
$725,077
($368,400)
$356,677
$209,150
$147,527
$356,677
C: \mydocs \mpark assess budget appendal a 2 d �(�� 153
ZOt�I�� 1 - Tf�ACT ZBSI
l
•i
73
W
/+ Z 7. 21
W a � I.OIAt.
1.17k.
Q
OW
t 1 a
i
N
276k
76
w
us
O
� : 4
77
1
1 \
L1 S
c
t
1
\
nfO `
1
1
tt
fi
[(OD
34
/ I7
C
132
19
11 ei
39
O
1
"� 30
29
9 r
32
I O U
131
O9
!7 O
-7
ss
0
5
0
0
lO 7
16 n ^
® 26
6633
64 s
6 6
.00
0" 0
O
O
O
�3 s
2'(D
O2.
�EJ
„•
qi
60
3!
BAMB( }
Q
OW
t 1 a
i
N
276k
76
w
us
O
� : 4
77
1
1 \
L1 S
c
t
1
\
nfO `
1
1
tt
fi
[(OD
34
>s
36
37
34
39
40
Q
42
43
ji
f3
46
-7
ss
0
0
0
0
0
O
O
0
!!
O
O
O
O
O
_
PARK
!
.o•
!R
2
IAY1t3
a DRIVE
®®BCC Parkway Maintained
by Zone Assessment
v
O155
I
Z atq �. 2 �T 2 9t 5
42 "RCP -�
'RCPT 2 36-RCP
r
24 RCP a tiw000 \RF ✓qpq
SLOE \. u
SUN 24 RCP
PL.
�
o
CITY OF MOORP/
B VENTURA COUN
Debris Basin Maintenance Detaia.
Leaend
( ® ® ®® Parkway Maintained
by Zone Assessment
Lots Assessed for
Debris Basin Cleaning
OW156.
T 3032
'®®®R Parkway Maintained
by Zone Assessment
Zarb. �' - 3 2 ?4-
RN ®® Parkway Maintained
by Zone Assessment
N
OWISS
Zone 5
Debris Basin Maintenance Detail
()OC GO
ZotAE- (40 = T 330
MEMS. Parkway Maintained
by Zone Assessment
owlrol
i
Isola`
r�
1
.1
1
I
I
'I
I
i
11,
�i
H
m
,r?ABBERT
� f
.. I
VE. COMMERCE A
Y .. � r� r� � r ■■��+� �..u.r.....r �......� .« -..... , SHASTA
•
i®
e
8
8
rr ro
�w
N 7G'
(D K
>
G7 �
En W
(D z
UI ft
U1 A)
lD t•
z (D
rt, �+
,- -" -%o
'jug ,I
g �yt
Li.
W w�
1.
OC
J
r�
1•' 7r B�Z
J
7
N
k
r1N0100 I
{ 1
r •,.� N ' S Q
9 • �.
•TIfO'1 q�
V
•�J
• �
� of � •� :�
Y
vrLO.1
1
M
•ortC'1
t
•
�O
,,, YI1.1
,"Vt't-
40.i
6
� �
R�
wga9
1
'o
4-)
• ., + A
it
H U)
NOO
H!�•�r
7r
J
7r XlY c i�;
�r 4V
�Y woos
�'
l �• 1
1
J
I 1 .,yYN
0
ON
tD O
�i tD
N-
N N
O
W
W
�ro
�• w
Zto
z
m
p1 N
h+-
z O
rt, ►-A
fD
� w
w �-
Q
O
CD
rt
Al
H-
F-
27 "f
48 "RCP
39 "RCP
0
ill
t+
ol
X33 "RCP
CT.
36 "RCP
iESTNUT
36_F2CP
D. B
zo ^N
0 0 to o
p- u' w Z
Z"4(D
,t p- M
N N I-'
Li O
1" 500' A) 0
ncaM
l `° W
v v
rt
\� ,l 02 "RCF
V
MooAlWA
U / 72 "RCP
66-RCP A O �
v 6 0 -RCP O
s
54 "RCP O
O 5 rF. 54 "RCP
_
EADOW M
S1 48 "RCP
C r
""'
6 t 48 "RCP
H
'30 RCP CITY OF MOORPARK
D =$' VENTURA COUNTY
30 "RCP
��36"RCP O
ZMAL %% *- "T MRCT 4174
Legend
Parkway Maintained
by Zone Assessment
I I I
\CANYO
'ARK
I
N
MOORP
PAUL KER NV,
GRIFFIN
PARK
oo(AGS
ZONE %3 * 7R KLT 414'7
Legend _
Area to be Maintained
Zone Assessment
1 1
LOS ANGELES Auf,
()00 .70
APPENDIX F
ASSESSMENT ROLL
Appendix "F ", the Assessment Roll, shows the assessment upon each lot or
parcel (approximately 8580 parcels) within this District and is on file in
the Office of the City C__erk and County Assessor. The Ventura County
Assessor's office no longer tilts p_k:1=ic l_ati_lity easements on the Assessor's
Roll.
W 7l
APPENDIX G
RESOLUTIONS
oo(;,1 `2
APPENDIX H
REBATE PROCEDURE
�1
�-
()''173
Exhibit 'H'
DISCUSSION OF ASSESSNENT RATES
1. The term methodology means the formulas used to spread
the total assessment to each land use category. This is
done by assigning a number to each land use category, or
code, representing the relative value received by
properties with that land use code. The methodology used
has not changed in several years.
2. The term rate refers to the above mentioned number
assigned to each land use category. Again, this number
represents to relative value received by properties
having that land use code. As with the methodology, the
rates assigned to each land use code have not change in
several years.
3. To determine the amount of the assessment assigned to
each land use category in any given year, the total
amount being assessed is divided by the sum of all of the
rates assigned to all of the properties being assessed
that year. This calculation yields a dollar amount per
assessment unit. That dollar amount per assessment unit
is then multiplied by the rate assigned to a given land
use code tc�) j i.eld the assessment amount for that land use
code.
4. An increase in costs funded by assessments, between one
year and the next, will result in an increase to the
total amount of the assessment. That revised total
assessment amount, when entered into the above described
calculations, will yield a higher dollar amount per
assessment unit and higher assessments to be applied to
each land use node.
5. This increase in the amounts assessed does not represent
a change to the methodology or an increase in the rates.
As stated above, the methodology and rates have not
changed for several years. Changes to the numbers
entered into the formulas (methodology) used will result
in changes in the dollar amount assigned to the rate for
each land ease code and a change to the amounts of the
assessment. This increase in one of the factors entered
into the formula is not a change to the methodology used
to spread costs to the various land use categories, nor
is it a change to the relative cost /benefit (rate)
assigned t<) earth, land use code.
()MI"74
PUBLIC NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Moorpark, California, on April 2, 1997, adapted Resolution No. 97 -1296
fixing the date and time of a public meeting to be held on the 19th day of May 1997, at the hour of 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Moorpark
City Hall, located at 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark. The purpose of saidpublic meeting is to allow the public an opportunity to meet with City staff to
question and discuss the proposed annual assessments for the "MOORPARK LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT
DISTRICT NO. AD -84 -2" for the fiscal year commencing on July 1, 1997 and ending on June 30, 1998, which would provide for the furnishing of
power for and the usual maintenance and servicing of street lights and the landscape maintenance of public rights -of -way within the said City, and to
question and discuss the proposed increases in said assessments over those levied for said District in FY 1996/97.
PUBLIC NOTICE IS ALSO HEREBY GIVEN that said Resolution No 97 -1296 also fixed the date and time of a public hearing of the Moorpark City
Council to be held on the 4th day of June, 1997, at the hour of 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Moorpark City Hall, Rated at 799 Moorpark
Avenue, Moorpark. The purpose of said public hearing is to consider making certain changes in, and to order the annual assessments for the
"MOORPARK LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. AD -84 -2" for the fiscal year commencing on July
1, 1997, and ending on June 30, 1998, which would provide for the fumishing of power for and the usual maintenance and servicing of street lights and
the landscape maintenance of public rights -of -way within the said City
A copy of Resolution No. 97 -1296, which is captioned as follows: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR, AND DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO MAKE CERTAIN CHANGES AND TO
ORDER THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS FOR THE "MOORPARK LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT
DISTRICT NO. AD -84 -2" FOR THE FISCAL YEAR COMMENCING JULY 1, 1997, AND ENDING JUNE 30, 1998 PURSUANT TO THE
LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972, AND FIXING THE TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC MEETING TO DISCUSS AND A
PUBLIC HEARING TO RECEIVE OBJECTIONS THERETO." is on file with the City Clerk and open to inspection. A summary of said Resolution is
summarized as follows:
1. That the Engineer's Report prepared for Assessment District No AD84 -2 for FY 1997/98 is approved.
2. That said Engineer's Report may be further modified or changed, pursuant to applicable State law.
3. That, although the methodology and rates used to determine the assessments for FY 1997/98 have not changed from those used in prior years, due
to cost increases the amount of the assessments for Assessment District No. AD94 -2 for FY 1996/97 are proposed to increase from the amount of
the assessments levied for said district in FY 1996/97
4. That it is the intention of the City Council a) to make certain changes to Assessment District No. AD 842, b) to order the extension of the annual
assessment for said district for FY 1997/98; and, c) to levy and collect assessments for certain improvements described herein. Said district
consists of a single city-wide zone to provide electric current or energy for public lighting within the City, to install, construct or maintain any
authorized improvements under the Act, including but not limited to one or more of street lights, public lighting facilities, landscaping, statuary,
fountains, and other ornamental structures and facilities, and any facilities which are appurtenant to any of the aforementioned or which are
necessary or convenient for the maintenance or servicing thereof, including irrigation, electric current and energy, and to provide incidental
expenses in connection therewith. Said district also includes assessments for the improvement and maintenance of the above described landscaping
and related improvements in a number of zones of benefit.
S. That said lighting and landscaping maintenance assessment district includes the lighting and landscaping sites with all improvements located
therein, described by and included within Assessment District No AD 84 -2
6. That the foregoing described work is to be located within Assessment District No. AD 84 -2, the boundary of which is described on a map on file in
the City Clerk's office.
7. That said proposed maintenance and improvement is of benefit to, and expense for which are chargeable upon, the district.
8. That a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon
assessable parcels within said District, is set forth in a copy of the afore mentioned Engineer's Report on file with the City Clerk and open to
inspection.
9. That the existing assessments, the proposed assessments and the proposed increases to the assessment amounts are set forth in Exhibit 'A'
attached hereto and made a part hereof.
10. That a public meeting shall be convened on May 19, 1997, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at the Moorpark City Hall to allow the public an
opportunity to meet with City staff to question and discuss the proposed annual assessments for Assessment District No. AD84 -2 for FY 1997/98,
and the proposed increases to said assessments over those levied in FY 1996/97
00CIL75
..} I ( z 4' -)
11. That a public hearing of the Moorpark City Council shall behold on June 4, 1997, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at the Moorpark City Hall
to consider making certain changes in, and to order the annual assessments for Assessment District No. AD84 -2 for FY 1997/98.
12. That this Joint Notice of Public Meeting and Public Hearing is given, in order that any persons having any objections to the work or extent of the
assessment district may appear and show cause why said work should not be done or carried out or why said district should not be extended for the
fiscal year commencing July 1, 1997, and ending June 30,1998. Protests must be in writing and must be filed by the property owner with the City
Clerk prior to the conclusion of the hearing. Protests may be mailed to the City Clerk, City of Moorpark, 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, CA
93021. Protest shall state all grounds for the objection and shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property being assessed. A majority
protest will cause the assessment increase to be abandoned. For additional information about these proceedings or assessments contact Ken Gilbert
at (805) 529 -6864, Ext. 256.
13. That all the work proposed shall be done in accordance with the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets
and Highways Code of the State of California_ —
14. That the City Clerk shall cause notice of said public meeting and public hearing to be given by causing this summary of the Resolution of Intention
to be published and mailed in the manner required by Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code and Section 54954.6 of the
Government Code of the State of California
15. That the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution
ATTEST:
City Clerk Patrick Hunter, Mayor
THIS NOTICE IS GIVEN pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Section 22500 et. sec. of the Streets and Highway
Code of the State of California, and is dated this 2nd day of April, 1997
City Clerk
0Mty `G
E t �'
AD 84 -2
Summary of Assessments
A. City
Wide Assessments
Use
Proposed
Proposed
Code
Description
Existing
FY 1996/97
Inane
Assmut ($)
Assmnt
D( � )
0
Residential Vacant
4.94
5.52
1
Single Family - Level 1
27.69
35.60
0.57
2
Mobil Home
0.00
0.00
7.91
3
4
Condo
Residential Income 24 units
25.71
32.22
0.00
6.51
5
Apartments (5 +)
25.71
32.22
6.51
6
Singe Family - Level 2
20.77
26.70 -
5.93
9
Mobil Home & Trailer Park
22.75
20.77
30.08
7.33
10
Commercial Vacant
4.77
26.70
5.93
11
Retail Store, single story
113.68
5.52
147.38
0.57
12
Store & Office Combination
113.68
147.38
33.70
15
Shopping Centers (Neighborhood)
243.85
33.70
16
Shopping enters (Regional)
474.53
340.47
96.62
Building (one story)
734.50
259.97
18
Office Building (multi-story)
93.91
125.31
31.40
19
Retail Stores (multi -story)
148.29
206.49
58.20
21
Restaurants & cocktail lounges
148.29
206.49
58.20
24
Banks, Savings & Loans
133.45
169.45
36.00
25
Service Stations
93.91
125.31
31.40
26
Auto sales, re pair, storage &rental
113.68
147.38
33.70
30
Industrial Land Vacant
90. 61
107.98
17.36
31
Light Manufacturing
4.94
5.52
0.37
32
Warehousing
237.26
346.77
109.51
33
Industrial Condos, Coops, PUI)'s
125.22
167.08
41.87
38
Mineral Processing
133.45
169.45
36.00
44
Truck Crops
91 1 93.9
125.31
31.40
46
Pasture (permanent)
42.84
61.47
18.63
&
48
Poultry
42.84
61.47
1 63
49
Rowers, seed production
42.84
61.47
18.63
51
Orchards
42.84
61.47
18.63
S3
Field crops, dry
42. 84
61.47
18.63
54
Pastures of graze, dry
42.84
61.47
18.63
55
Feed lots
42.84
61.47
18.63
57
Tree farms
42.84
61.47
18.63
61
Theater
42.84
61.47
18.63
70
Institutional vacant land
121.92
149.75
17.83
71
Churches, convent & recto
4.94
5.52
0.57
78
Public Bldgs. Fire Houses, Museums, etc
4.94
5.52
0.57
80
Misc, Vacant land
0.00
0.00
0.00
81
Utility Water Company
4.94
5.52
0.57
83
Petroleum & gas
0.00
0.00
0.00
91
Utility Edison
51.07
63.84
12.77
92
'Telephone
0.00
0.00
0.00
93
SPRR
0.00
0.00
0.00
94
Undedicated Community Condo Development
0.00
0.00
0.00
9 9
1?xempt
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0001,77
B
Zone of le 11-* In addition to the Ci
below will be assessed a per lot Zone
_
fo
seal the
assessment the improvement and maintenanceeo�ec
to the properties within those Zones.
�m xo�es within
Wined to be of benef
Z- °
1
OII
FY 1996/97
Proposed
FY 1997/'98
Pressed
Tract 2851
Ass t
A
Increase
2
Tract 2865
10 1. 51 *
mnt (S1
181.55 *
(Deore K M
80.04
3
Tract 3032
52.01 *
148.80 *
96.79
4
Tract 3274
7.56 *
9.25 '
1.69
5
Tracts 3019 & 3525
70.65'
31. 47'
(39.18)
6
Tract 3306
121.32 *
76.64 '
(46.37)
7
Industrial Park Northeast Gabbert
45.86 *
70.95 *
25.09
of
& LA. Ave.: Parkway North side of
L.A. Ave east of Gabbert
130.78 s'
179.73 * s
48.95
8
Home Acres Buffer:
• City area
• Home Acres
6.58
13.62 s
9
Condor Drive
16.35 *
33.86 s
7.04
17.51
10
Mountain Meadows Planned Community
0
10.31 s'
10.31
Residential
Commercial
49.76 *
01.08 s
11
Tract 4174 (Colmer) 0.00
4,727.20 *
9,11 02.60 *
51.32
4,875.40
12
Carlsberg Specific Plan
0.00
0.00
13
Tract 4147 (Villa Cam Pew)
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00 *
60.00 '
60 .00 s
Note* * Per Parcel Assessment
Per Acre Assessment
wpkpt1ad85- 98.not
OOG-Lr�s
RESOLUTION NO. 97-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, MAKING CERTAIN
CHANGES TO THE "MOORPARK LIGHTING AND
LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. AD -84 -2"
AND CONFIRMING THE ASSESSMENT FOR SAID
DISTRICT THE FISCAL YEAR COMMENCING JULY 1,
1997 AND ENDING JUNE 30, 1998.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Moorpark, by
Resolution No. 97 -1267, adopted January 15, 1997, declared its
intention to make certain changes to the "MOORPARK LIGHTING AND
LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. AD- 84 -211, and to order the
extension of the annual assessments for said district for the
fiscal year commencing July 1, 1997 and ending June 30, 1998; and,
WHEREAS, said Resolution No. 97 -1267 ordered the City Manager to
cause to be prepared an Engineer's Report for Assessment District
84 -2 for FY 1997/98, in accordance with Article 4, Chapter 1, Part
2, Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code, said
Engineer's Report to include the establishment of two new Zones of
Benefit for Tract 4147 and for the Carlsberg Specific Plan; and,
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 97 -1285, the City Council amended
said Resolution No. 97 -1267 to also require said Engineer's Report
to also provide for the establishment of a third new Zone of
Benefit for Tract 4147 (Villa Campesina); and
WHEREAS, said "MOORPARK LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE
DISTRICT NO. AD- 84 -21' consists of a single city -wide zone to
provide electric current or energy for public lighting within the
City, to install, construct or maintain any authorized improvements
under the Act, including but not limited to one or more of street
lights, public lighting facilities, landscaping, statuary,
fountains, and other ornamental structures and facilities, and any
facilities which are appurtenant to any of the aforementioned or
which are necessary or convenient for the maintenance or servicing
thereof, including irrigation, electric current and energy; and to
provide incidental expenses in connection therewith; and,
WHEREAS, said "MOORPARK LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. AD -84 -2" also consists of a number of
specific zones in carder to provide for the assessment of the
properties within said zones for the cost of maintaining certain
specified improvement's which benefit said properties; and,
0 ,L79
Resolution No. 97-
Page 2
WHEREAS, pursuant to the terms of a Joint Powers Agreement
(JPA) between the City of Moorpark and the County of Ventura, the
City Council of the City of Moorpark, by Resolution No. 92 - 860
adopted on June 29, 1992, annexed certain unincorporated area just
west of the City known as Home Acres, to the "MOORPARK LIGHTING AND
LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. AD -84 -2" in order
to implement those provisions of the JPA pertaining to the
construction and maintenance of a buffer area between said
unincorporated area and the West Ranch area of PC -3 (Tracts 4340,
4341 and 4342); and„
WHEREAS, in accordance with the provisions of the aforesaid
JPA, it has been determined that said buffer area provides benefit
to both the aforesaid Home Acres area and the West Ranch area of
PC -3, and a Zone of Benefit encompassing said areas was established
to allow for the levy of assessments on the properties within said
Zone of Benefit for the purpose of developing and maintaining said
buffer area; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Moorpark, by
Resolution No. 97 -1296, adopted April 4, 1997, approved the
Engineer's Report pertaining to such matters; and,
WHEREAS, said Resolution No. 97 -1296 also set 7:00 p.m., May
19, 1997, as the time and date of a public meeting to allow the
public an opportunity to discuss the proposed increased assessment
with City staff; and,
WHEREAS, said public meeting was convened on May 19, 1997, at
7 :00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers for the purpose of allowing
the public an opportunity to discuss with City staff the proposed
increased assessments; and,
WHEREAS, said Resolution No. 97 -1296 also set 7:00 p.m. , June
4, 1997, as the time and date of a public hearing to consider such
matters; and,
WHEREAS, on June 4, 1997, the City Council held a public
hearing to determine whether said changes to said district should
be made, and whether the annual assessments should be ordered and
confirmed for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 1997 and ending
June 30, 1998; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that written protests against
the proposed work or assessment have not been made by owners
representing more than one -half of the area of land to be assessed:
and,
� : 1
Resolution No. 97-
Page 3
WHEREAS, the City Council, having duly received, considered
evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the jurisdictional facts
in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the
contemplated work and benefits to be derived therefrom, and the
City Council having now acquired jurisdiction to order the proposed
assessments for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 1997 and - =ending
June 30, 1998.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK,
CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The Engineer's Report for "MOORPARK LIGHTING AND
LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. AD- 84 -211, filed with the City
Clerk on March 28, 1997, as amended or revised by action of the
City Council, is hereby approved and adopted, and the improvements,
changes to, and extension of the annual assessments in the
Assessment District, in accordance with said report, as revised,
and in accordance with Resolution No. 97 -1296 approving said
Engineer's Report, is hereby levied for the Fiscal Year 1997/98.
SECTION 2. The City Clerk shall cause the diagram and
assessment, or a certified. copy thereof, to be filed with the
County Auditor.
SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of
this resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS _ day of 1997.
ATTEST:
Patrick Hunter, Mayor
City Clerk
OW2,81