Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 1997 0604 CC REG ITEM 09EITEM 9* E i- crrYoFmor-,------ AGENDA REPORT Ci.r C 2 T Y O F MOORPARI�f /`, p ACTION: 7� TO: The Honorable City Council _ FROM: Kenneth C. Gilbert, Director of Publi DATE: May 23, 1997 (Council Meeting 6 -4 -97) SUBJECT: Consider Directing Staff to Administer an Election, Pursuant to the Requirements of Propositions 218, for the Purpose of Determining if the Property Owners Within Tract 4147 (Villa Campesina) Are in Support of Payment of an Assessment to Fund Future City Maintenance Costs for Campesina Parka This requests that the City Council direct staff to administer an election (conducted in accordance with the requirements of Propositions 218) to determine if the property owners within Tract 4147 (Villa Campesina) are in support of the payment of an annual assessment to fund the maintenance costs for Campesina Park. 1. By Resolution 86 -297 the City Council approved Tract 4147 for the development of the Villa Campesina neighborhood. The Conditions of Approval for that tract required the developer, CEDC, to construct a park on a lot at the south end of the tract (Parcel 'A'). That lot is encumbered by an easement for flood control purposes, granted to the Ventura County Flood Control District [VCFCD] (see Exhibit 2). 2. In late 1995 and early 1996 City and County officials met with CEDC and area residents to discuss VCFCD plans for the" construction improvements to the Arroyo Simi. Those plans called for the widening of the channel into the area proposed for the park (Parcel 'A'). As a result of those meetings, revisions were made to the channel improvement plans which moved the channel widening upstream to accommodate a park site on the westerly portion of Parcel 'A'. That action reduced the park from approximately 2.0 acres to approximately 1.5 acres. canp3 OW2 Campesina Park June 4, 1997 Page 2 3. In March of 1996 the City Council approved the revised conceptual design for the park based on the amended channel widening plans. As a part of that action or a prior action of the City Council, it was determined that the City would assist, to a degree, in the development of the plans for this project by not requiring CEDC to pay the City for any staff time expended on the review of the project design or the administration of the project development, nor would CEDC pay any administrative overhead charges for any outside costs incurred by the City, which are normally paid by the applicant. 4. The VCFCD has prepared a legal description for that portion of Parcel 'A' to be developed as a park site. Presuming that this park is to be maintained by the City, the plan would be to have CEDC convey all of Parcel 'A' to the City. The City would then convey that portion east of the park to VCFCD coincidentally with the VCFCD relinquishing its easement over the entire Parcel 'A' (see Exhibit 3), 5. CEDC has had plans and specifications prepared for both the landscape improvements and the " hardscape" improvements. A diagram showing the final design for the park is attached as Exhibit 4. 6. On December 4, 1996, the City Council considered a request from CEDC for partial funding of park improvement costs and to accept the future park and its maintenance. The matter was referred to the Public Works, Facilities and Solid Waste Committee. 7. The Public Works, Facilities and Solid Waste Committee discussed the subject request at their meetings on December 16, 1996, January 22, 1997 and February 18, 1997. Although the matter was discussed, the Committee took no action and made no recommendations. 8. Last April the City Council again considered the request from Cabrillo Economic Development Corporation (CEDC) for 1) City funding of a portion of the Campesina Park construction costs; and, 2) City acceptance of said Park for City ownership and maintenance upon completion of construction. The matter was again referred back to the Public Works, Facilities and Solid Waste Committee, 9. The Public Works, Facilities and Solid Waste Committee (Councilmembers Wozniak and Evans) has discussed this request at their meetings held in April and May. The Committee's recommendations are set forth herein. ceap3 Campesina Park June 4, 1997 Page 3 L___ik • A. Conditions of Approval The Conditions of Approval for Tract 4147 placed the responsibility for the construction of Campesina Park with the developer, CEDC. Certain of those conditions are summarized and commented upon as follows: Tract 4147 Conditions Comments 1. No 15: This condition states that the park site shall be developed by the residents as a private park facility to be owned by CEDC. No Quimby park in lieu fees were paid by CEDC. Nos. 19 6 RPD -1049 Cond. No. 26: These conditions states that an easement for the park site shall be offered to the City, but presumably not accepted unless the need arises. The condition states that, in the event proper maintenance is not provided by the residents, said maintenance shall be taken over by the City and a special assessment shall be levied upon all of the properties within the Tract to fund the cost of said City maintenance. B. Request from CEDC If the City approves City participation in the costs of the construction of this project, the City would be rescinding or amending those conditions requiring the property owners, or the property owners via CEDC, to construct these improvements. There have been a number of discussions which imply that it is the intent of both CEDC and the City to have the park conveyed to the City and maintained by Assessment District 85 -1 (a Citywide assessment). This action would be contrary to the conditions requiring the owners of the sixty -two lots within Tract 4147 to pay for the maintenance of this park. Cabrillo Economic Development Corporation [CEDC] has requested (see letter attached as Exhibit 1) City funding of a portion of the construction costs for Campesina Park. CEDC has also requested that, upon completion of the construction of the park, that the park be granted to and be maintained by the City. A summary of that request, with comments, is summarized as follows: 1. City B " of Imorovememt Costs: CEDC is requesting the City to fund the difference between the monies they have available to construct the park and their estimated cost to complete that construction. Their estimate of City costs is $61,935 ($999 / lot). Comments It should be noted that the amount of City funds requested by CEDC in prior meetings and correspondence was $40,000 ($645 / lot). In addition, as discussed in Section E2 of this report, the City's estimate of the cost of the improvements proposed to be constructed by the City is in excess of $93,000 ($1,500 / lot). canp3 000257 Campesina Park June 4, 1997 Page 4 2. City Park Maintenance: CEDC is requesting that the City consider funding the maintenance of this proposed future City Park from the Citywide park maintenance district (.085 -1).. 3. Zone of Benefit: CEDC understands that it may be necessary for the City to establish a Zone of Benefit (AD84 -2) to fund the maintenance of this park via an assessment upon all of the lots within Tract 4147, 4. Release of 'Barmarked' Imo: CEDC is requesting that the City release approximately $43,571 of CEDC monies restricted to the development of the subject park. 5. Phase I Construction: CEDC is proposing to proceed immediately with the construction of Phase I improvements consisting of grading, fencing and the construction of the basketball court. It is the intent of CEDC to manage the contracts for this work. It is assumed that these contracts would not be subject to the Public Contracts Code. 6. CM Funding: CEDC's letter mentions that they have submitted a separate request to the City that all or a portion of the remaining park construction costs be funded by Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds. Camp3 As discussed in Section A and Section D of this report, there is a case for requiring park maintenance costs to be funded by local residents. This can be done by establishing a Zone of Benefit assessment for the lots within Tract 4147. See Section D for a discussion of park maintenance. Requires City approval in order for the funds to be released. CEDC has stated that the construction of the basketball court in the first phase of construction is in response to priorities stated by the residents. Unfortunately the expense of this element of work requires almost all of the monies CEDC has available. It should be noted that the construction of irrigation and landscaping after the basketball court and basketball uses have been established, will be a problem. CEDC knows that all construction must be done in accordance with plans and specifications approved by the City, and that said plans and specs must conform to all City standards. As discussed in Section G, CDBG monies can not be used for this purpose. 000258 Campesina Park June 4, 1997 Page 5 7. Phase II Construction: CEDC has requested that the remainder of the park improvements be constructed by the City. Such contracts would be subject to the Public Contracts Code. A summary of those remaining improvements is as follows: a. irrigation system b. soil amendments c. planting (shrubs i trees) d. hydroseeding (turf) e. sidewalks and other remaining concrete work f. Tot Lot play equipment g. specialty items (benches, tables, etc.4 h. electrical / lighting i. domestic water service 8. Well Wad: The park improvement cost estimates discussed herein are based on the assumption that irrigation water will be provided from the wells at Arroyo Vista Community Park. 9. Doted Services aDd Aaterials: one of the goals of this project is to utilized donated materials and labor to the fullest extent possible. The costs estimates provided by CEDC do not include possible receipt of certain donated concrete and plant materials. If received, actual costs by CEDC will be less than those indicated. 10 Plan ►B': The letter from CEDC mentions that if City funding cannot be obtained, that it would be the intent of CEDC to proceed with a revised project which would call for only the construction of only the grading, fencing, irrigation and planting at this time. The basketball court, playground equipment, picnic tables, barbecues, lighting, concrete flatwork and other planned improvements would be deferred. cnmP3 A construction contract administered by the City will have to comply to the requirements of the Public Contracts Code, which adds costs not normally associated with contracts awarded by private agencies. As you might recall, the construction contract for the Arroyo Vista Community Park Bicycle J Equestrian / Pedestrian / Emergency Access Bridge includes the extension of a well water line to the north side of the Arroyo. As discussed in Section H of this report, little information has been provided on how donated services and materials are to be solicited and utilized. See Section H of this report for a discussion of this alternative plan of action. 00OZ5 Campesina Park June 4, 1997 Page 6 C. Project Plans, and Specifications 1. As stated above, CEDC has prepared final plans and specifications for the park. A sketch illustrating that design is attached as Exhibit 4.. City staff has reviewed and approved these plans. 2. CEDC has expended considerable effort to develop a set of plans and specifications for the construction of a neighborhood park of Villa Campesina. These plans provide for the construction of park amenities which meet the wishes of the neighborhood. 3. The plans and specifications also meet the standards and requirements of the City for the development of a City park, with an eye toward minimizing future maintenance costs. Unless the park were constructed to such a plan, it would be the recommendation of staff that the park improvements NOT be accepted by or maintained by the City. 4. The other obvious purpose for the development of these plans is to provide a "blueprint" for the phased implementation of the various park improvements and facilities shown on the plans. 5. In the opinion of staff, CEDC is to be commended for complying with the wishes of staff in meeting these objectives. D. Park Maintenance Costs 1. Additional Parks: During the public hearings last June related to setting the assessment amounts for FY 1996/97, the City Council stated concerns regarding the growing costs for parks maintenance. The City Council stated that, in order to keep these costs under control, that there would be no new parks added to the City's park system. 2. Proposition 218: It appears that the passage of Proposition 218 may limit or even preclude City City's ability to use the 111972 Landscaping and Lighting Act" to levy assessments to fund maintenance costs for parks maintenance costs. Assessments based upon a "special benefit" appear to be more compatible with the provisions of Proposition 218 than assessments based upon a "general benefit." 3. New Zone of Benefit: The Engineer's Report setting forth the assessments for FY 1997/98 for AD84 -2 will allow the City Council to consider the establishment of a new Zone of Benefit to fund maintenance costs for this future park. That Zone will consist of all of the :lots within Tract 4147. The ceap3 ()()# %.b2 tB Campesina Park June 4, 1997 Page 7 use of this mechanism to fund City costs for future maintenance of this park was discussed at one or more meetings of the Public Works and Facilities Committee meeting. Representatives of CEDC and residents of the neighborhood were present. E. Project Costs 1. CEDC Estimate: Attached to the letter from CEDC (Exhibit 1) is an estimate of probable costs prepared by CEDC. Those costs are reformatted on the chart prepared by staff attached as page 5 of that Exhibit. Those cost figures are summarized as follows: 2. City Estimate: Staff has had the project design reviewed by a landscape architect retained by the City. At the request of staff the City's consultant prepared a second construction cost estimate. That construction cost estimate, along with a summary prepared by staff showing certain additional non - construction costs, is attached as Exhibit 5 and summarized as follows: Work by Work by Blgsent CEDC ($), city Total { Construction 23,353 58,684 82,037 Construction Contingency (10°x) 0 0 0 Design 17,469 0 17,469 Contract Admin & Inspection 4!000 2,000 6,000 Total 44,822 60,684 105,506 2. City Estimate: Staff has had the project design reviewed by a landscape architect retained by the City. At the request of staff the City's consultant prepared a second construction cost estimate. That construction cost estimate, along with a summary prepared by staff showing certain additional non - construction costs, is attached as Exhibit 5 and summarized as follows: caep3 00 ti / cal Work by Work by Elegent CE city Total ($1 Construction 23,768 79,194 102,962 Construction Contingency (10 %) 2,377 7,919 10,296 Design 17,469 0 171469 Contract Adidn & Inspection 4,000 6,000 10,000 Total 47,61.4 93,113 140,727 caep3 00 ti / cal Campesina Park June 4, 1997 Page 8 3. Co=Daris : A comparison of the two estimates is as follows: Element Construction Phase I (Constructed by CEDC) Phase II (Constructed by City) Design Contract Admin & Inspection Phase I Phase II Total F. Costs Reduction CEDC's City's Amount of Estimate ISl Estimate Increase 23,353 26,145 2,792 58,684 87,113 28,429 82,037 113,258 31,221 17,469 17,469 0 4,000 4,000 0 2,000 6,000 4,000 6,000 10,000 4,000 1.05,506 140,727 35,221 As stated above, it is the intent of CEDC to utilize donated materials and labor to the fullest extent possible. Although this may be easily done when administered by CEDC, it is difficult to implement and administer volunteer and donated materials and work within the context of a public contract. G. Discussion of City Funding Sources 1. Park I>Uroyeaent end: It would be inappropriate to use Park Improvement funds for this project. As stated above, CEDC paid no Quimby park in -lieu fees when this project was approved. In addition, the project site is not within any park improvement zone. There are no monies available in this fund for this project.. Note: When the City revises the Park Plaster Plan and OSCAR (and even work done relative to Proposition 218) a new Park Improvement (Quimby) Zone could be created which might include the Pacific Communities Property located southwest of Los Angeles Avenue and Liberty Bell Road. If this course is taken, Park Improvement fees paid by that developer could be applied to park improvements at Villa Campesina Park. 2. CDBG Funds: As previously discussed with the City Council, CDBG funds must be "targeted" to benefit certain approved beneficiaries. A park which would be held for general use does not meet this test.. Therefore, CDBG funds cannot be used for this project. 3. General Fu One possible source of funds is the General Fund. camp Campesina Park June 4, 1997 Page 9 4. I=vrovement Assessment: Another option would be to have the City advance the park improvement funds to be repaid by an improvement assessment levied over several years. For example an additional $100 per lot per year improvement assessment added to the AD84 -2 Zone 13 assessment would generate $6,200 per year. The estimated City cost of $93,000+ would be repaid in fifteen years. H. Plan "B" Defined One of the stated objectives of the implementation of this park project is the fostering, development and utilization of volunteer help and donated material. The proposal offered by CEDC does little to implement this goal. Instead CEDC is asking that the City step in and fund all or nearly all of the funding shortfall. An alternative approach would be for CEDC to use the monies they have available to construct an initial phase of construction consisting of grading, security, irrigation and landscaping. That effort could include the use of donated and volunteer labor and materials to the fullest extent possible, in order to minimize costs. Subsequent to the construction of those "basic" park improvement, CEDC could reassess the amount of funds remaining and then determine if they are in a position to proceed with additional phases of work to construct some of the other park amenities shown on the plans. CEDC could then make further attempts to drawn upon volunteer labor from the neighborhood and donated materials from the business community to construct one or more of those future phases of work. When all of these efforts have been exhausted, the matter of City funding of a portion of the park improvements could then be reconsidered. I. Conclusions 1. Priorities: It is the view of staff that the development of the "greenscape" should preceed the construction of the basketball court and other park amenities. There are a number of problems associated with attempting to construct these improvements after the basketball facilities and uses have been established. Also, moving the basketball court to a later phase provides a greater incentive for seeking and obtaining donated labor and materials. 2. Donated Efforts: CEDC has requested that a considerable portion of their obligation to provide a neighborhood park for Tract 4147 be assumed by the City. This request is being made before adequate efforts have been expended to maximize the use of volunteer labor and donated materials to build the park. In the view of staff, the request is premature. Every effort should be made to explore the limits of volunteer and donated resources before the City is asked to fund this project. camp3 oW 2ro*3 Campesina Park June 4, 1997 Page 10 J. Committee Review This matter was discussed by the Public Works, Facilities and Solid Waste Committee (Councilmembers Wozniak and Evans) at their meetings of April 21, 1997, and May 19, 1997. The Committee remains concerned that the City is being asked to accept and maintain another park without any firm assurances that those costs will be borne by the property owners within Tract 4147, as stipulated in the Conditions of Approval for that Tract. As you may recall, because of Proposition 218 there are no assurances that the City will be able to continue to levy the assessments proposed by the establishment of a new Zone of Benefit (Zone 13). The Committee recommended, therefore, that an election be conducted to confirm that there is support for those assessments, prior to City consideration of the acceptance of this park. Said election would be conducted in accordance with the requirements of Proposition 218. The Committee also recommended that the Phase I park improvements to be constructed by CEDC, include the installation of security lighting. • ... - t�- The requirements of Proposition 218 state that prior to the levy of any new assessment, or prior to any increase to the rates and /or methodology used to compile and compute any assessment, the owner of each property being assessment shall receive a ballot to enable each property owner to vote for or against such proposed action. The ballots distributed for this purpose shall be weighted to reflect the amount of the assessment being levied on each property. In the case of Tract 4147, in that all of the lots would be assessed the same amount, the ballots would be weighted evenly. In order for any such new assessment (or methodology) to be valid, the City indicating affirmative votes totally (50 %) of the total of the weighted distributed. K. Fiscal Impact increase to any rate or must receive ballots at least fifty percent value of the ballots It is estimated that the cost in staff time to administer a Prop. 218 election for Tract 4147 will be approximately $800 to $1,000. It is recommended that these costs be borne by CEDC. cenp3 s4 Campesina Park June 4, 1997 Page 11 Staff and the Public Works, Facilities and Solid Waste Committee recommend that the City Council take the following actions: 1. Direct staff to request advance payment of $1,000 form CEDC to fund City costs to administer an election in accordance with the requirements of Proposition 218. 2. Direct staff to administer said election, for the purpose of determining if the property owners within Tract 4147 (Villa Campesina) are in support of payment of an assessment to fund future City maintenance costs for Campesina Park, when and if this advance deposit is received, 3. Direct the Cabrillo Economic Development Corporation (CEDC) to include in the Phase I park improvements to be constructed by them, the installation of security lighting. cnnp3 OZGS Cabrillo Economic Development Corporation 11011 Azahar Street, Saticoy, California 93004 805 ( ) 659-3791 379 Fax (805) 659-3195 BOARD OF DIRECTORS KENNETH R MERIDETH March 19, 199" President W 2 0 N1 Snares, Sandall, {�� Bernacchi 8 Petrovich DAVID J dent A City of Mo0ipark Vice President City WSW Gi Channel Islands Public Works Department National Bank Kenneth C. Gilbert RICHARD FRANCIS Director of Public Vice President WOr k, � Attorney 799 Moorpark. Avenue OSCAR C GONZALEZ Moorpark, CA 93021 Treasurer England, Whitfield. Schroeder & Tredway BARBARA A Re: Vi' a Campesina Park JOURNET Secretary Community Representative Dear Mr. 1 l k- )E? Oxnard - "'': JOHN J. VACCA Assistant Secretary Corporate Broker The CEDC requests that the City approve participation in Attorney the cost of the Villa Campesina park and upon completion RENECORADO accept ownership and maintenance of the park. The City Community Representative Casa velasquez funding required is u to approximately $61,935 based on g � p pp Camarillo the current park desig: MARY KAISER California Community Reinvestment Corporation Our preference is that the maintenance for the park be ERNIE MORALES funded under the citywide park maintenance district. Community Representative Flllmore However, we understand that ' t i s currently City policy JESSICA MURRAY not to add new, fac:il.it es, and if necessary, maintenance Community Representative Montgomery Oaks Community could be covered under _a zone of benefit. We understand Homes Inc Ojai that the Cit,v Lss proceeding wi..th steps necessary to SISTER CARMEN RODRIGUEZ implement_ su . "o to St John's Community Outreach Oxnard Specifically, we propose that: MARLA SANDA Commu Community Representative 1) The City g approve - eleasin the funds in the escrow AprcotRanch account for t rl is :: >roj ec t: $43 , 571.34 as of January 23, 1997; FATHER MIKE WALSH St. Johns Seminary 2) The CEDC: wit _L move immediately to complete the following work !see attached budget, first phase): AWISORY BOARD . staking and grading RONLHERTEL • fence Lnstali.ati. :n Hertel Constructors • basketbai 1 cc: >urt (f latwork) BARBARA MACRI -ORTIZ Channel Counties L, • basketball hoops Legal Services Association 3) The Cit�r ✓il_ provide funding to cover park costs RICHARDMcNISH over the $43 , '" 1..34 plus in escrow (the CEDC has submitted StrathmoreHomes - -an applicaticr. for CDBG� funds for equipment and this is ALZAPANTA Atlantic Richfield one potential..unding s:�lzrce) Company 4) When water hookups are available, the following will be completed: rrigat:_ic1. system and water hookups, balance EXECTIVE DIRECTOR of flatwork, r; crc_seedir g, and planting. For the RODNEY E FERNANDEZ hydroseeding r E U' 1- 1_�. c tr�it a n a 90 day maintenance warranty and provide f e ; r"(, r a.r , Some of the wuoii~, such Is lighting, could be completed later, after r�,,: epts the park, as funds are available. IQ 00026 42,11b Kenneth Gilbert March 19, 199'7 Page 2 Attached is the CEDC budget, for a total cost of approximately x,105,506 The construction budget is based on actual bids for most work. This budget does not provide for turf. It also does not include a potential donation worth about $3,300 for half the -ost of -h, concrete or the donation of plant material. We also looked at a scenario that would require minimal or no additional funding r' :OR' tiie city. The basketball court, other concrete, 1:d ayground equipment, picnic tables, barbecues, and i.ghting would be eliminated. Please contact Mike ar o11 c :r me if you have any questions. Sincerely, Karen Flock Project Manager cc: Mike Carroll, CEDC :'onst-ruction Manager Melissa Harris, Vi:_la;"ampesina Via FAX 529 --8�' pacxc,s .. 4Ut)("7 ° �V Kenneth Gilbert March 19, 199'7 Page 2 Attached is the CEDC budget, for a total cost of approximately x,105,506 The construction budget is based on actual bids for most work. This budget does not provide for turf. It also does not include a potential donation worth about $3,300 for half the -ost of -h, concrete or the donation of plant material. We also looked at a scenario that would require minimal or no additional funding r' :OR' tiie city. The basketball court, other concrete, 1:d ayground equipment, picnic tables, barbecues, and i.ghting would be eliminated. Please contact Mike ar o11 c :r me if you have any questions. Sincerely, Karen Flock Project Manager cc: Mike Carroll, CEDC :'onst-ruction Manager Melissa Harris, Vi:_la;"ampesina Via FAX 529 --8�' pacxc,s .. 4Ut)("7 ° Villa Campesina Park Budget Alternative A Date: 3/19/97 Date Total Phase 1 Phase 2 Predevelopment Costs Paid Or To Be Paid (see attached) Calleguas MWD fees 10/31/91 3,543.56 3,543.56 City plan check fees /depo0 6/15/94 180.00 180.00 Landscape architect 6/20/94 3,225.00 3,225.00 Weed abatement 6 /20/94 140.00 140.00 Civil engineering 10/25/94 2,245.03 2,245.03 Civil engineering 12/20/96 1.183.38 1.183.38 City plan check fees 1/16/97 277.00 277.00 Landscape architect 1/27/97 3,065.56 3,065.56 Weed abatement 3/14/97 163.81 163.81 City plan check fees 9,826.50 1,132.50 1,132.50 Civil engineering 9,578.50 2,032.00 2,032.00 City inspection fees 281.00 281.00 17,468.84 17,468.84 Construction General Requirements 101 Temp. Facilities/Utilities 103 Protection/Guard Service 104 General Labor Subtotal Site Work 202 Rough grading/excavation 205 Irrigation 206 Landscaping & plantings 207 Fences - chain link 208 Field Engineering 209 Water & Sewer Subtotal Concrete 302 Pole Bases 307 Flatwork Subtotal will] 2,000.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 500.00 500.00 1,000.00 500.00 500.00 3,500.00 2,000.00 1,500.00 5,123.00 .5,123.00 8,588.00 8,588.00 12,589.00 12,589.00 3,397.00 3,397.00 2.000.00 2,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 36,697.00 10,520.00 26,177.00 1,250.00 1,250.00 18,155.00 9,826.50 8,328.50 19,405.00 9,826.50 9,578.50 1 of 2 I 5 2of2 O9 Electrical 1006 Site Lighting/3 poles 5,600.00 5,600.00 Subtotal 5,600.00 0.00 5,600.00 Specialties 1401 4 barbeques 600.00 600.00 1402 4 picnic tables 1,800.00 1,800.00 Subtotal 2,400.00 0.00 2,400.00 EQuioment 1503 Playground equipment 14,679.27 14,679.27 Subtotal 14.679.27 0.00 14,679.27 Special Construction 1601 2 Basketball posts 1,756.00 1,756.00 Subtotal 1756.00 1,756.00 0.00 In directs 1702 Supervision 4,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 Subtotal 4.000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 Total 105.506.11 43,571.34 61,934.77 Total, Construction only 88,037 27 26,102.50 61,934.77 Sources Escrow as of 1/97 43,571.34 43,571.34 Requested from City 61,934.77 0.00 61,934.77 Total 105,506.11 43,571.34 61,934.77 2of2 O9 Campesina Park Construction Cost Estimate -- CEDC ---------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------- Phase 1 Phase 2 Description CEDC City Construction Total 101 Temp Facilities 1,000 1,000 2,000 103 Protection /Guard Service 500 500 104 General Labor 500 500 1 000 Sub -total 100 202 Rough Grading 205 Irrigation 206 Landscaping 207 Fencing 208 See Construction Engineering 209 Water / Sewer 302 Pole Bases 307 Flatework Sub -total 200 Sub -total 300 1006 Site Lighting 1401 4 barbeques 1402 4 picnic tables 1503 Playground equipment 1601 2 basketball poles Sub -total Other Sub -Total Contingency Construction Sub -total Construction Engineering --------------------------------------- 208 Field Engineering (inspection) 1702 Contract Administration Design Grand Total 2,,000 1,500 I 3,500 5.123 2,000 - - - - -- 5,123 ------- 4,000 8,588 8,588 17,469 12,589 12,589 3,397 - - - - -- 60,684 3,397 0 ------- - - - - -- ------- 5,000 - - - - -- ------- 5,000 - - - - -- 8,520 26,177 34,697 1,250 0 1,250 9,827 ------- - - - - -- ------- 8,328 - - - - -- ------- 18,155 - - - - -- 11;077 8,328 19,405 0 5,600 5,600 0 600 600 0 1,800 1,800 0 14,679 14,679 1,756 ------- - - - - -- 0 1,756 ------- 1,756 - - - - -- ------- 22,679 - - - - -- 24,435 ------------- ------- 23,353 - - - - -- ------- 58,684 - - - - -- 82,037 0 ------- - - - - -- ------- 0 - - - - -- ------- 0 - - - - -- ------------- ------- 23,353 - - - - -- ------- 58,684 - - - - -- 82,037 2,000 2,000 2,000 ------- - - - - -- ------- ------------- 2,000 - - - - -- 4,000 ------- - - - - -- ------- 4,000 - - - - -- 2,000 ------- - - - - -- 6,000 17,469 0 17,469 ------- - - - - -- ------- 44,822 - - - - -- 60,684 ------- - - - - -- 105,506 00OZ70 J A i 1] • 4 x N V I TOT' 05 N u•!r'!o "w 6l I.SI' ° a NI DOS AVEIYUEN16bf'Nw' 2MRTr .O' . r_Y 4 m '� i, rtfl tall 40 41",05 r AL 7 ran' 42 O 40 t0.e a' 1 : 2 V -3 4 s 34! e 9 10 8.11 112 II.II N77•tl'f 40' /•w 1170' _t _ A^a s p' 1461' � y NIeb7 [ ° sY �� zt,ro s/." d 2 / N 37 3 6 ^,J N7711lt 4. JAMES WEAK AVENUES r' °^rn� 39 130 1" N77•r!'7at,'11.7e' N77rt I'It•w /770' x'' , v u )n ^1 uro.u� °O •o' xs h 41",05 r ran' 42 O { 4 a' u.e0 2 e1rz'l �w22 °�J I 2+ 20 O 9 O B 17 O 16 O 15 !0 14 ll 13 a /2 b 24 Oo A^a s Ot' o zs 23 Sg22 27 28 29 342 32 33 34 35 13 36 1r.zr 0 26 c 30 .3, ��•m.:e'eo.:x 40' 40 rta ' S, a ao •0 ro, xs h 41",05 r ran' 42 O { 4 �a co �. Nr7•tl'rf'r, lrro' N77•l�'!O•t. /1.70' `. o• rO.I! VILLA AVENUE. Oj 9 N77•ts'tot Nef•57b0 "w N77•r1'tfY,l7. M, w 9o.1e� <.' ) rro tt e0 40 10 t.to w f�° 62 61 �. 46 !o t,0p, i.,4 ro.l,' 47 !.' vn.1o' .0 E 46 12 © Oo.1T 19 53 aa� to l4' •z. 4 a' 7 1 °• �ee'J.,•, t 18 a J+, $ $ 5;49 3 r 32 x kto.? Par. A r d SC 14 E ee,. �1 + 1.78AC. 8 5 u 343 , Par. X \\ f7 A6AC. PRA I PRA z� r c.3 �a co A^a s k ; O O jS Y !S6 1 � 1 �-, \A 111 i C 1 1 C 0 � d _ k Q Q m a C G .Q Rl N68- 20 W NG 535.02" P 1I N 1 E R 71" L.iSTiNG EASEMENT u JCFCD PER PARCEL A PER 112 MR 07 CABRILLO ECONOMIC PER DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION AP 506-0-343-165 PARCEL A PER 112 MR 7 1.78 ACRES Al ESTATE I 2-- -- --------------- 0.589 AC NO ---683m ITH 12 DISTRIC m--175- 7! ''F" 2 -77 PARCEL - W PER 112 MR 7 - - — — — — — 490 Vs 69 th o VEN CO FLOOD CON 40 _T4 -LJ ;ONCRETE SIDEWALK N - -- EXISTING BACK YARD FENCING -- COURT STRIPING CONCRETE BASKETBALL COURT - REDWOOP HEADER - TYPICAL i- -- BASKETBALL GOAL �. 40 CHIPPER MULCH ENDING POINT FOR 72' HIGH CONTINUOUS CHAIN LINK FENCE -- - �1 r p Campesina Park Construction Cost Estimate -- CITY Phase 1 Phase 2 CEDC City Total Description - - - - - -- ------- - - - - -- -------------------------------------- Construction ----------------------------- - - - - -- - Grading 2,600 2,600 Playground 25,530 25,530 Basketball 14,418 14,418 Site Features Walls /Fences Hardscape Landscaping Irrigation Lighting Sub-Total Contingency Construction sub -total Construction Engineering --------------------------------------- 208 Field Engineering (inspection) 1702 Contract Administration Design Grand Total 4,300 4,300 6,750 6,750 6,882 6,882 18,663 18,663 17,819 17,819 6,000 6,000 23,768 - - - - -- 79,194 102,962 2,377 7,919 10,296 ,6,145 - - - - -- 87,113 113,258 2,000 3,000 * 5,000 2,000 3,000 * 5,000 ----- 4,000 - - - - -- 6,000 10,000 17,469 0 17,469 47,614 ----- - - - - -- 93,113 140,727 Note: * Contract costs only. Does not reflect majority of constract administration and inspection costs which are to be perform by City personnel. b ti L 4 g/14/1997 15:50 9093694039 COMMUNITY WORKS COMMUNITY WORKS DESIGN GROUP PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE PAGE 02 Pagel 00OZ"' 5 DATE: 03/14/97 PROJECT: CAMPESINA PARK - MOORPARK ESTIMATE BY: CHRIS GIANNINI UNIT TOTAL DESCRIPTION OTY. UNIT COST COST DEMOLITION AND CLEARING CLEAR AND GRUB 35500 S.F. $0.05 $1,775 GRADING 660 C.Y. $1.25 $825 CONSTRUCTION PLAY GROUND PLAY EQUIPMENT ALLOW $17,500.00 517,500 . PLAY AREA CONC CURB 1YX30- 148 L.F. $22.50 $3,330 FIBAR 1400 S.F. $3.00 $4,200 SUMP (8' DEEP X 4' DIA) 1 EACH $500.00 $500 BASKETBALL HALF COURT BASKETBALL 4750 S.F, $2.50 $11,875 POLE, RIMS, ETC. 2 EACH $1.100.00 $2,200 SURFACE STRIPING 527 L.F. $0.65 $343 SITE FEATURES PICNIC TABLE 4 EACH $700.00 $2,800 BAR-8-0 GRILL - STANDARD 4 EACH $200.00 $800 BENCH 2 EACH $350.00 $700 WALLSIFENCES CHAINLINK FENCE 6' 500 L.F. $13.50 $6,750 HAROSCAPE CONCRETE PAVING - 4• 3441 S.F. $2.00 $8,882 LANDSCAPING SOIL PREP /FINE GRADING 25900 S.F. $0.18 $4.W2 lb WEED ABATEMENT 25900 S.F. $0.03 $777 90 DAY MAINTENANCE PERIOD 25900 S.F. $0.08 $1.554 TREES (16 GAL) 44 EACH $85.00 $3,740 SHRUBS (5 GAL) 236 EACH $14.00 $3,304 00OZ"' 5 03/14/1997 15:50 9093694039 CIMMUNITY WORKS PAGE 03- DATE: 03/14/97 ESTIMATE BY: CHRIS GIANNINI - PROJECT: CAMPESINA PARK - MOORPARK . LIGHTING/ ELECTRICAL SECURITY WALKWAY/LIGHTS 3 EACH $2,000.00 $8,000 SUBTOTAL $102,982 10.00% CONTINGENCY $10.298 4 GRAND TOTAL $113,259 CAMPESI NAL I 0002'76- UNIT TOTAL DESCRIPTION OYY. UNIT COST COST TURF HYDROSEED 13427 S.F. $0.05 $871 REDWOOD HEADER 390 L.F. $3.50 $1,280 WOOD MULCH 77 C.Y. $35.00 $2,895 IRRIGATION/ WATER/ SEWER AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEM LARGE AREAS 13427 S.F. $0.35 $4,899 SMALL AREAS 11120 S.F. $1.00 $11,120 CONTROLLER 1 EACH $2,000.00 $2,000 LIGHTING/ ELECTRICAL SECURITY WALKWAY/LIGHTS 3 EACH $2,000.00 $8,000 SUBTOTAL $102,982 10.00% CONTINGENCY $10.298 4 GRAND TOTAL $113,259 CAMPESI NAL I 0002'76-