Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
AGENDA REPORT 1997 0820 CC REG ITEM 08C
ITEM AGENDA REPORT CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA CITY OF MOORPARK City Co ncil Meeting Of ?/2 Z 1992 TO: The Honorable City Council A i 10 M. a'1' r FROM: Nelson Miller, Director of Community Development . DATE: August 20, 1997 SUBJECT: Consider request for Industrial Development Permit No(s): IPD -97 -1, IPD- 97 -2, Conditional Use Permit NO. 97-1 (David Morehead). A proposal to construct an Automotive Lube and Tune building 2,312 sq.ft., Warehouse /Industrial building 4,664 sq.ft. Conditional Use Permit No. 97 -1 for proposed automobile repair use. Located on the northeast corner of Los Angeles and Go$dman Avenues, in the City of Moorpark. Assessors Parcel Nos.: 511 -0- 151 -065 and 075. Staff Recommendation: Approve. Summary This item is before the City Council as a result of Section 17.20.020, which requires industrial projects adjacent to residential zones to be acted on by the City Council. The project is a lube and tune facility and an industrial /warehouse building with a total of 7,304 sq. ft. north of residentially zoned property across Los Angeles Avenue. The site is the last vacant parcel of industrial land in this subdivision, located prominently on the corner of Los Angeles and Goldman Avenues. At a continued public hearing, July 14, 1997, the Planning Commission voted 3:0 to recommend this project to the City Council. Staff Recommendation: 1. Open the public hearing and accept public testimony. 2. Review, consider, and adopt proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration. 3. Review and adopt the findings and adopt the attached resolution recommending to the City Council Industrial Planned Development Permits 97 -1 and 97 -2, and Conditional Use Permit No. 97 -1. Additional changes have been made to the conditions of approval as necessary to address certain issues (noted in italics). Background At their meeting of June 23, 1997, the Planning Commission heard and continued the request for approval of a lube and tune facility and light industrial /warehouse building located at the northeast corner of Los Angeles and Goldman Avenues. The Planning Commission considered testimony and continued the item for additional information. Minor revisions to the plans and additional information was prepared and presented at the meeting of July 14, 1997, at which time the Planning Commission recommended conditional approval.. (A copy of the Planning Commission report is attached.) Discussion In response to the concerns of the Planning Commission the applicant revised the following: • interior circulation of the project to avoid conflicts with traffic movements in the alley A:ICCRPT.8203:51 Pm k.. 000024 Industrial Permit 97 -1 and 97 -2 Conditional Use Permit 97 -1 August 20, 1997 Page 2 easement; • altered the color of the glass panels in the roll up doors; • modified the handicapped access; • provided a plan illustrating the landscape shading at maturity; • provided detail drawings of the screening of the mechanical equipment; • increased the screen wall along Los Angeles Avenue; • altered the location of the loading zone. In addition, staff reported the concern of the City Traffic Engineer relative to the left turn movement from the alley easement to Goldman Avenue. Briefly, the Traffic Engineer indicated that the number of vehicles using Goldman Avenue would not warrant the limiting of left turn movements. He felt it was a good idea to place "No Parking" signs along the alley to reinforce to the public that the driveway is access to the businesses only. The Planning Commission recommend to the City Council approval of the project subject to the conditions contained in the resolution. Since the Planning Commission hearing, staff has made recommends additional minor modifications to the conditions of approval which have been completed in legislative format and placed in the Resolution for the Council's convenience. 1. Open the public hearing and accept public testimony. 2. Review, consider, and adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. (Attachment 2) 3. Review and adopt the proposed mitigation monitoring program. (Attachment 3) 4. Make the appropriate findings and adopt the attached resolution recommending adopting of Industrial Planned Development Permits 97 -1 & 97 -2, and Conditional Use Permit 97 -1. (Attachment 3) Attachments: 1. Planning Commission staff reports dated June 23 and July 14, 1997 2. Mitigated Negative Declaration 3. Mitigation Monitoring Program 4. Reduction of site plan and elevation drawings 5. City Council Resolution SML /c:/Morehead /ccrpt.820 000025 t iL(d�7;i. W 01 SECTION 1 - GENERAL INFORMATION A. HEARING DATE: July 14, 1997 Continued Public Hearing C. HEARING LOCATION: City Council Chambers 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California D. CASE NUMBERS: B. HEARING TIME: 7:00 p.m. Industrial Planned Development Permit No. 97 -1 (Automotive Lube and Tune facility), 97 -2 (Light Industrial /Warehouse Building) . E. STAFF CONTACT: Sandra Massa- Lavitt Consulting Planner F. APPLICANT: David Morehead 1001 Montana Santa Monica, CA 90403 G. PROPOSED PROJECT: Industrial Planned Development Permit No. 97 -1, for an automotive lube and tune facility of 2,312 square feet., with limited servicing of vehicles. Industrial Planned Development Permit No. 97 -2 is a light industrial /warehouse building, that is intended as a distribution center for auto parts; and, Conditional Use Permit No 97 -1, for an automotive use in the Industrial zone, and within 300' of a residential zoning district. IPD No. 97 -1 Lube and tune facility IPD No. 97 -2 Industrial /Warehouse 2,312 sq. ft. 4,992 sq. ft. 4:42 pmA1P0MET714.SR Ai7'14CHMlEN? 1 4 0060Z Industrial Planned Development Permit No. 97 -1 and 97 -2 David Morehead July 9, 1997 Page 2 Total Building Area 7,304 sq. ft. H. PROPOSED LOCATION: The proposed development is located at the northeast corner of Los Angeles Avenue and Goldman Avenue, in the City of Moorpark. Assessor's Parcel Nos.: 511 -0- 151 -065 and 075. I. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING At it's meeting of June 23, 1997, the Planning Commission heard this item which was continued to research issues raised during the public hearing. Revised plans submitted to the City show a relocation of the loading area, -new circulation pattern, relationship of the adjacent buildings to the project, handicapped access to the sidewalk, and contour lines of the proposed lighting. The applicant will prepare, for the hearing, a mounted copy of the site plan which will show 50% shading of the site. 1. Queuing of cars and blocking the driveway waiting for service. The applicant has reoriented the traffic pattern on the site plan. The entrance farthest from the Goldman Avenue driveway is now the entrance of bays with overflow parking directly adjacent to the bays. Circulation is one way through the site. However, there is adequate turning radius in the adjacent parking area for two -way traffic. As the applicant indicated in his testimony, the typical heavy day of customer service is approximately 60 vehicles throughout the day. If the business i& ,.open for 10 hours per day, the per hour use is 6 cars, based on the most impacted day of the week. The site plan also accurately depicts the conditions along the alley including nearby parking spaces. Parking for adjacent business back out to the alley. The project under consideration has no parking that would back'onto the alley. 4:42 pmA:1PCMET714.SR 00002 Industrial Planned Development Permit No. 97 -1 and 97 -2 David Morehead July 9, 1997 Page 3 2. Loading Area The relocated loading zone has been identified on the plans including the turning radius for a tractor - trailer that may deliver to the building. The loading dock measures 15' x 401, it has been relocated to the north side of the building, its use will not conflict with the circulation of the alley. The turning radius for the tractor - trailer is also indicated on your plan. 3. Clear glass on roll -up doors The clear glass on the roll -up doors has be changed to black glass, obscuring the view to the interior of the bay. 4. Handicapped access The handicapped access to the sidewalk along Los Angeles Avenue is reflected on the revised drawing. 5. Shading of parking lot The applicant has prepared a landscaping /site plan that demonstrates the shading at maturity. The plan will be mounted and presented at the meeting. 6. No parking on alley According to the City Traffic Engineer, posting of NO PARKING signs in the alley would be acceptable. 7. No left turn from driveway onto Goldman The City Traffic Engineer has indicated that the reason for limiting no left turns is to provide for smoother traffic on high impact street. In his opinion, Goldman Avenue does not qualify as a high impact street, and left turn movements should not be limited or prohibited from this location. 4:42 pmA:1PCMET714.SR 1 000®2V Industrial Planned Development Permit No. 97 -1 and 97 -2 David Morehead July 9, 1997 Page 4 8. Details The Commission requested section drawings of the roof and mechanical equipment. The purpose of which is to ensure the screening of the equipment view. A section drawing is placed on the elevation drawings and clearly indicates the sheltering of the view of the equipment. Lighting of the site is 'by wall fixtures mounted on the building, rather than light standards placed on the ground. The illumination of the fixtures is noted on the site plan by the lighting contours. Adequate coverage is obtain from the proposed fixtures, a specification sheet for the two types of fixtures is enclosed with the staff report. 9. Information on A to Z Storage; an application for storage of ` recreational vehicles The files indicate that the applicant requested an expansion of its original approval to accommodate the storage of recreational vehicles. The owner, Mike Thaker mentioned at the June 23 hearing, that the application was denied. The plans for the storage building show the parking /storage area directly adjacent to the residential property to the east. The denial of the request was based on noise generation from the use and the proximity of the parking area to the adjacent residential neighborhood. The proposed development is 201 feet from the residential property, with the A to Z Storage building between the proposed development and the residential property. 10. The height of the screen wall along Los Angeles Avenue The plans have been revised increasing. the height of the wall to 42 ". I. APPLICATION DEEMED COMPLETE /PROCESSING EXPIRATION DATE: 4:42 pmA:1PCMET714.SR i (��1 000012 uu 1 Industrial Planned Development Permit No. 97 -1 and 97 -2 David Morehead July 9, 1997 Page 5 The entitlement request for the Industrial Planned Development Permits was deemed complete on April 21, 1997. The processing expiration date for the Industrial Planned Development Permits is October 21, 1997. J. REQUESTED ACTION AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: 1. Open the public hearing and accept public testimony. 2. Review, consider, and adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. (Attachment 1) 3. Review and adopt the proposed mitigation monitoring program. (Attachment 2) 4. Make the appropriate findings and adopt the attached resolution recommending to the City Council, Industrial Planned Development Permits 97 -1 & 97 -2, and Conditional Use Permit 97 -1. (Attachment 3) 4:42 pmk\PCMET714.SR I 000030 LINE 102 Rounded Wedge Sconce High Performance Architectural Outdoor Sconces • Wide luminaire spacings from sharp cutoff wall mounted luminaires. • Handsome, compact forms integrate to mounting surface. WIDE SPACINGS The mcPhilben 100 Line luminaires are offered with a forward throw distribution for small parking areas or a wide throw distribution for pedestrian areas. Both optical systems feature highly specu- lar faceted reflectors designed to efficiently direct light and provide high light levels, uniform distribu- tions and remarkably wide luminaire spacings. These high performance optical systems may result in the ability to design with fewer fixtures providing a cleaner wall appearance, lower instal- lation costs, and lower energy and lamp replace- ment costs over the life of the project. Sharp Cutoff Unlike refractor wall packs, the candlepower distributions produced by the precision optical systems of the mcPhilben 100 Line meet the strict IES cutoff criteria. This assures that light above 800 is minimized resulting in exceptional control of dis- abling glare, curtailed light trespass beyond the property line, and elimination of direct upward sky pollution. Handsome, Compact Designs These outdoor sconces are available in two exquisite shapes and both were con- ceived with critical design sen- sitivity. The 101 trapezoidal luminaire mates naturally with rectilinear architectural ele- ments and the 102 rounded wedge is appropriate for softer Performance Sconces building details. Both units feature compact dimensions which are perfectly in scale for the recommended mounting heights of 10 -14 feet. Rugged Construction Housing, door frame, and back plate are all precision die cast aluminum. Heat dissipat- ing fins integrated into the back plate assure cool opera- tion and extended ballast life. Each luminaire is completely prewired and factory tested before shipment. The lens is optically clear tempered soda lime glass. Completely sealed and gasketed at every point of entry and material transition to thoroughly exclude the ele- ments and effects of time, the mcPhilben 100 Line is certain to make a lasting contribution wherever it might be applied. 101 Trapezoidal Sconce mc'- Phi1bUen 000013:1 100 LINE SPECIFICATIONS HOUSING Single piece aluminum housings are die cast in a soft trapezoidal, (101) or rounded wedge (102) form. Memory retentive gasket mates with door frame to exclude moisture, dust. insects and pollutants from electrical and optical systems. Housing is mounted to diecast ribbed back plate which dissipates heat for longer lamp and ballast life. DOORFRAME Single piece die cast aluminum door frame integrates to housing form. Door frame is hinged closed and secured to housing with (2) captive stainless steel fasteners. Heat and impact resistant 1/8" tempered glass lens and one -piece gasket are mechanically secured to door frame with (4) galvanized steel retainers. OPTICAL SYSTEMS Reflectors are composed of specular extruded and Alzak facet components — electropolished, anodized and sealed. Reflector segments are set in arc tube image duplicating patterns to achieve the wide throw (Type II) or the forward throw (Type IV) distributions. ELECTRICAL Each high power factor ballast is the separate component type capable of providing reliable lamp starting to -20 °F. FINISH Each luminaire receives a fade and abrasion resistant, electrostatically applied, thermal -ired, textured polyester powder finish. LABELS All fixtures bear UL Wet Location (for inverted uplighting applications, luminaires are suitable for damp locations) and IBEW labels. Performance Sconces r U_ 101 - Trapezoidal Sconce 8 ' 0 mcPhilben Outdoor 2661 Alvarado Street San Leandro, CA 94577 800/227 -0758 510/357 -6900 (California) 510/357 -3088 FAX In Canada: TOL 640 Cure' Boivin Blvd. Boisbriand Quebec, Canada J7G 2A7 Tel: 514/433 -3216 Fax: 514/433 -9441 r THOJ14 S 79305 8 194 00vu 102 - Rounded Wedge Sconce ORDERING PREFIX DISTRIBUTION WATTAGE VOLTAGE' FINISH OPTIONS 150 MH 277 BRP PCB 102 WT 101 (Trapezoidal) FT (Forward Throw) 35 HPS2 120 BRP Bronze F Fusing 102 (Rounded Wedge) WT (Wide Throw) 50 HPS 277 BLIP Black DCB Emergency Quartz Socket 100 HIPS WP White PCB Button Type Photocell 150 HIPS NP Natural OR Quartz Restrike 70 MH BGP Beige SL SoI00 Lens Notes 1) Contact factory tqr other voltages 100 MH SC Special Color UT 5 Upttlt 2) 120V only 150 MH3 (specify) 3) ANSI 0 M102 175 MH mcPhilben Outdoor 2661 Alvarado Street San Leandro, CA 94577 800/227 -0758 510/357 -6900 (California) 510/357 -3088 FAX In Canada: TOL 640 Cure' Boivin Blvd. Boisbriand Quebec, Canada J7G 2A7 Tel: 514/433 -3216 Fax: 514/433 -9441 r THOJ14 S 79305 8 194 00vu Data Sheet One -piece aluminum housing. Comers are welded and finished to produce a clean, sharp appearance while increasing housing strength and ensuring weather -tight construction. One -piece construction eliminates the worry of moisture entering from poorly sealed top pans and side panels. Porcelain sockets feature spring - reinforced contacts for longer life. Available lenses include an — injection molded dropped prismatic acrylic, a dropped polycarbonate and a clear flat tempered glass. The dropped acrylic allows for uniform ground patterns, while the polycarbonate is an ideal choice for high - vandalism areas. The clear flat tempered glass is used primarily with the Forward Throw or Type III reflectors. The Heritage is designed to utilize either Super Metal Halide, Metal Halide, High Pressure Sodium or Deluxe Mercury Vapor lamp types. A single, captive door fastener allows easy access without loose hardware. HOW TO ORDER LUMINAIRES Select appropriate choice from each column. i T High Power factor. Type CWA Ballast designed for minus 20 degrees Fahrenheit operation. The ballast is mounted to housing reinforcing plate which ensures maximum heat - sinking for long life. A one - piece, asymmetrical reflector is standard. Also available are Forward Throw (FT) and Type 111 (3) reflectors, which add diversity to the fixture, allowing for perimeter lighting and project continuity. Continuous one -piece EPDM gasket for maximum sealing. The Heritage is available in dark bronze, black, sandstone, platinum or white. Other colors are available on request. Paint is applied in a revolutionary superior baked - on powder coating, which gives the fixture an exceptionally attractive appearance. This unique polyester protection lets the fixture withstand extreme weather changes without cracking or peeling. Finish is guaranteed for five full years. -f-1- LIL listed for wet locations. 8 "10" =L�- Luminaire Prefix Distribution Lamp Nhttage Light Source Lans I Line Voltage Luminaire Finish Options HE A- Asymmetrical 150 HPS -High Pressure Sodium DA- Dropped Acrylic 120V BRZ- Bronze Paint PCR- Photoelectric Control 175 150. 200, 250, 400 Watt DP- Dropped Prismatic 208V BLK -Black Paint LL -Less Lamp 200 SMH -Super Metal Halide Polycarbonate 240V SAN - Sandstone Paint CL- Coated Lamp 250 175, 250, 400 Watt F -Clear Flat Tempered 277V PLT- Platinum Paint FS- Fusing for 120V & 400 MH -Metal Halide Glass 480V WHT -White Paint 277V 175, 250, 400 Watt MT -Multi Tap SPL- Special FO- Double Fusing OX- Deluxe Mercury Vapor for 208V & 240V 3 -Type III * F -Clear Flat Tempered FT- Forward 175, 250, 400 Watt Glass FO1-Double Fusing Throw for 480V HSS -House Side Shield NO -No Options EXAMPLE OF A TYPICAL ORDER ! HE- A- 250- MH- DP -I2RV- BRZ -NO 'When specifying Type III or Forward Throw distribution, a clear flat tempered glass lens must be used. 1:3 11116111 111SIMI 11L Malsbary Telex 62838369 d • FaOx (50 42728 3)7 3 -014�'ncinnali, OH 4524020 0 U HERITAGE SERIES MODEL: HE -FT- 400 -HPS -F LAMP 40OW HIGH PRESSURE SODIUM DISTRIBUTION: FT- FORWARD THROW LENS: FLAT GLASS ITL REPORT: ITL32414 SINGLE /FLAT LENS ME Configuration L kil Im on M YJ FA a] 5.10 A B a D E F G H__ 5.10 10% on 7.80 3.10 1.60 .78 Eq 611 08 50,01 Twin a 0, m 3.10 1.60 .78 h 16 Single 12-30 6.20 2.50 1 20 62 25 12 06 18' 4MH 3MH 2MH 1MH 0 1MH 2MH 3MH TWIN /FLAT L 4MH 3MH 2MH 1MH 0 1MH 2MH 3MH Photometric Data KEN LINEVIAME 11111111111IMP5 6%717mm ISM, 10-mmm 4MH 3MH 2MH 1MH 0 1MH 2MH 3MH 4MH Mounting Configuration 3.00 Foot Candle Values For The Following Curves 30 11 Height 5.10 A B C D E F G H__ 5.10 Single 15.60 7.80 3.10 1.60 .78 .31 .16 08 16' Twin 31.30 15.60 7.80 3.10 1.60 .78 .31 16 Single 12-30 6.20 2.50 1 20 62 25 12 06 18' Twin 24.70 12.30 6.20 2.50 1.20 62 25 12 Single 10.00 5.00 2.00 1.00 .50 .20 .10 .05 20, Twin 20.00 10.00 5.00 2.00 100 .50 20 .10 Single 8.30 4.10 1.70 83 41 17 08 .04 22, Twin 1650 8.30 4 10 1 70 83 41 17 08 Single 6.90 3.50 1.40 .69 .35 .14 07 .03 24, Twin 13.90 6.90 3.50 1.40 .69 .35 .14 .07 26' 28' 30' MH•Mounting Height i C1 uC t_']rt17 iino Twin 5.90 300 1 20 59 30 11 06 U3 11.80 5.90 3.00 1.20 59 30 11 06 5.10 2.60 1.00 .51 .26 .10 .05 03 10.20 5.10 2.60 1.00 .51 26 10 05 4.40 2.20 89 44 22 - 09 04 02 8.90 4.40 2.20 89 44 22 09 04 liyll�iny systems- inc. 4201 Malsbary Rd. • P.O. Box 42728 • Cincinnati, OH 45242 Telex 62838369 Fax (513) 793 -0147 (513) 793 -3200 / - tt[j (4n:ja HE- I C' W C!i EAST ELEVATION sum. am. r.r WEST ELEVATION �. $W — SOUTH ELEVATION .ca,, i»- NORTH ELEVATION .,.•..-W XEnaTs Q ww.w wwrow QQ rwn�rw,w wow Oi • �.Yt1M..Al�/w. O rw.wtww.wR. rw.aw.ur..r rs� rwwr.w.u� rr.w QQ 'r.o�.w y�.rw.wnrrw Q .wrwr...w.w�.....a ri+.�rr+vaw.w.r 0 911.�.rO/.�YR M.�w.l Vr�IH`rM.Mrr. O ...A♦ r).rY V rlM'.HL Mt M. rrar� 4 B wq• .N ia► O 41 A" Mo*xW wK WIRw •aDM IMMlT pRl K09 M YMI. BU&DW SECTION wr to 6"Aa PROPOSED 4,664 S.F. BUILDING ELEVATIONS anew SPECULATIVE LOS ANGELES AVE. ng-M—ropWWAaLWW OHM INDUSTRIAL BUILDING MOORPARK, CA C, CC 0 0 0 0 ° ■ T— ........ u - �_ MAN hilm1w rw GCJLB-M'.I,r EAST ELEVATION I I I I o b b IVV"II7 CLCVAIIVIV 5UUIH tLtVATKNY • 4C.", yr•.li WALE, yr••r+ i FLOOR PLAN xnwm ww u.. wwa�.w�„ac v.�iwr�ww � r� � �w..�. �ws.v.rr..a �Ayi�iwrs.��•�r� � r�ea ��arr�wwre.M Q. ����.rr. wrwwu M�M/W ���w1.• r�� � •NO1�s /1st MI.t�Yt.��Y.l.wr ��YY.Y•���I� \rMc it n 19�: MrY.Mwu0, �1 +w•..�.w�... iilll8 1�� b b IVV"II7 CLCVAIIVIV 5UUIH tLtVATKNY • 4C.", yr•.li WALE, yr••r+ i FLOOR PLAN xnwm M'K OWNh ",am N011�gy! M{DW •MM[T 1i1GMI. BULDOW SECTION ,ot to W-0 ..PROPOSED +2,312 S.F. ' BUILDING ELEVATIONS anew KWIK KAR LUBE & TUNE LOS ANGELES AVE. owrans Nr ssnNwiat+ w o MOORPARK, CA uwr�o u,�r wAr.rgr ww u.. wwa�.w�„ac v.�iwr�ww � r� � �w..�. �ws.v.rr..a �Ayi�iwrs.��•�r� � r�ea ��arr�wwre.M Q. ����.rr. wrwwu M�M/W ���w1.• r�� � •NO1�s /1st MI.t�Yt.��Y.l.wr ��YY.Y•���I� \rMc � nri�•wirwi�.r�r�w re�.r•.rrr.rn wr.u�ww�va�a�r 0 YI,rIO1�..O. L•wwr .-Y MrY.Mwu0, �1 +w•..�.w�... M'K OWNh ",am N011�gy! M{DW •MM[T 1i1GMI. BULDOW SECTION ,ot to W-0 ..PROPOSED +2,312 S.F. ' BUILDING ELEVATIONS anew KWIK KAR LUBE & TUNE LOS ANGELES AVE. owrans Nr ssnNwiat+ w o MOORPARK, CA uwr�o u,�r wAr.rgr aD SITE PLAN L1 w"iw""i•�ww� i �w�./rwlMl�w L2 a"".�....�.« . PROJECT DATA w, M. sr•o u•M�wwt walrwwsl •mrwer. war. r .ww.�u�.•ywrr 1r•��nrcwwara rr... wi•:•irw:: wwrwwl.r r •.r•uwls •r lw.ww+ uw�w••s .w.r.sww • rr.ir .w.�• •wwu wrwr..w.•.r. .wwu r.a.www��. .wwu wMw.. •. r .c.e_•.�.wr. iw= r�w��• •wru lillllllllllll'Ioul �11111111111l1O��� �Illllllllllilll 11111111�IIIliil�� O WALL ELEVATION w�. PROJECT I REPRESEWTATNES IL J� AI RM�p 101 MO/OCAG 1Wf SITE 1 "`7 �"B`" VICINJTY MAP wwc raeuw nw1 mrrn. 1rn w ¢xt PROPOSED LUBE & TUNE / LOS ANGELES AVENUE •� SPECULATIVE MOORPARK M WIMM"94TO INDUSTRIAL BUILDING CALIFORNIA 1�RwAloi 11a\� G\IaaIOG w mmb" n s s z A _ CONCEPTUAL GRADING A .DRAINAGE PLAN •...rrrrrr�r .IW.nWf. ,�......_.w. w.aw.�r.rrra.. pnTmAH PROPOSED LUBE & TUNE / LOS ANGELES AVENUE ftew SPECULATIVE MOORPARK INDUSTRIAL BUILDING CALIFORNIA W m n Z A I 4D SITE PLAN r u. •. art li- -# V MN- 0- t--- - - - --- FIXTURE SCHEDULE L1 .r.rwn.e..wrw L2 ru.w.r rr PROJECT DATA w rs., rN r.nr.vwr rrn.w.r.rr ur wriw. .rrw.•w.. � rrwLYrrw �AAw Vrrr Ywr .rrrMiA .Yw�w MN _rr �w r�MY1�YwM rYIMY.�.i rr wrrwwrr nrr.wY LFrrM wrr wrkw err r� w rr�..w•wr. .w�. �r.nrr�wr.rr. r rea..rorr. twat wrr wwrr. rt iii :r• iiw r.a wrrrs�. •wra. O WALL ELEVATION .r".. r.r• . PROJECT REPRESENTATIVES OYNERACER, oro ew.iu om m"" a.rr�Ta n CA wr raw errs AACWTECT. Mrlu WIMP MWTW% tar ft «FWAD am aw CAUM LO. CA %W MNK WTwr l#SW aaaT 4 (.s. 517E 0 _ ID VICINITY MAP myTOWAX . ryrrr�r.wir PROPOSED LUBE & TUNE'/ LOS ANGELES AVENUE C SPECULATIVE MOORPARK c,.,,.,,,.,.....a.,,.,a,a�. INDUSTRIAL BgILDING CALIFORNIA tj to w EAST ELEVATION �. hw NORTH ELEVATION Iaxs. OW - r+ SOUTH ELEVATION K.t, . �.• C� FLOOR PLAN o W.,...... Nr ll6mrn Q ww.e...rww nrw u+..r wow. wn m L�wN«� .wrw p �.t.m.warwrw.wr�r. rwwr.0 p •..wwi.,.r.�..�.n+...r. p .urr rwuwwiraw.t.w... w41�wwYlAY.w. e .+.r'.M�r11O4ra.`N p 11f1a1Mt1w�UA�RnI. ® r).r..w.wwwY11R ® wwi.w inw. ® iwri.�.ur. a'i`awrww ® as wi...asw.lw�wm ® mwe.na r�.asw r. rw.e w.wa u..wr.aww w.. PA rw wr.r wnr Q e PROPOSED 2,312 S.F. BUILDING ELEVATIONS p *now KWIK KAR LUBE & TUNE LOS ANGELES AVE. PP AROMM CTS MOORPARK, CA O�w+weow runes awwraa w wow Y Y Y EAST ELEVATION �. hw NORTH ELEVATION Iaxs. OW - r+ SOUTH ELEVATION K.t, . �.• C� FLOOR PLAN o W.,...... Nr ll6mrn Q ww.e...rww nrw u+..r wow. wn m L�wN«� .wrw p �.t.m.warwrw.wr�r. rwwr.0 p •..wwi.,.r.�..�.n+...r. p .urr rwuwwiraw.t.w... w41�wwYlAY.w. e .+.r'.M�r11O4ra.`N p 11f1a1Mt1w�UA�RnI. ® r).r..w.wwwY11R ® wwi.w inw. ® iwri.�.ur. a'i`awrww ® as wi...asw.lw�wm ® mwe.na r�.asw r. rw.e w.wa u..wr.aww w.. PA rw wr.r wnr Q e PROPOSED 2,312 S.F. BUILDING ELEVATIONS p *now KWIK KAR LUBE & TUNE LOS ANGELES AVE. PP AROMM CTS MOORPARK, CA O�w+weow runes awwraa w wow rco2r�rEs m aMw,w.wrrw © iw���iiawww+wiwrr� m +rr. 41T�iii�t�I ~'� w+rrw/W�1�L Mum O M.A +I�wIWL�.. M Yw. ® ►w.�rvi�.�rrlwrn ® ��nr ►r�.� m rw�ww� }O•-FI 0 PROPOSED 5,000 S.F. BUILDING ELEVATIONS BASDXnWT* SPECULATIVE LOS ANGELES AVE. ol�b INDUSTRIAL BUILDING MOORPARK, CA pa "M Emil M4 m3 m FM Hw 0� C76]� ■nom .IIail r� II _aop Nmult�:aluur� La Lei •�� � i Gill %= ?�'.� _ �n! .>♦ • �� � -�. - Ica A —•_ 117ALI Imo_ � fi11 Iow'1 ■ �1 ■ r>r■ l.� I — —_ Y, Ili hin ill :JC :5= 11111111111 111�111 J i �.,�.__. • lea`- .��r., �a ■ ■ ■.� �1 �.I� AI 01111111:1 _1. E. . ■■y ;;•4L,LA��... ••1/1111/ ..� wA be* � a _ 1!1!1!111 =1 ■ 1 m _ an r ■ -.• ■ iii w � ■■ ■lam► � � .,._. a 1 H 1 nuaann�e I.,.. r 1111111111 = �� _ y, wi"����ji'��I ■ 6LJr � ' '1 ATTA a s Ll RESOLUTION NO. PC -97 -339 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF INDUSTRIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 97 -1 (AUTOMOTIVE LUBE AND TUNE FACILITY), 97 -2 (INDUSTRIAL /WAREHOUSE, AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 97 -1 ON THE APPLICATION OF DAVID MOREHEAD (ASSESSOR PARCEL NO. 511 -0- 151 -065 AND 075) Whereas, at a duly noticed public hearing on June 23, 1997, the Planning Commission considered the application for approval of Industrial Planned Development Permit Nos. 97 -1 (Automotive Lube and Tune Facility),97 -2 (Industrial /Warehouse),and Conditional Use Permit No 97 -1, filed by David Morehead for the following located on the east side of Goldman Avenues in the City of Moorpark: Proposal: Industrial Planned Development Permit Nos. 97 -1. (Automotive Lube and Tune Facility),97 -2 (Industrial /Warehouse), and Conditional Use Permit No. 97 -1, buildings of the following size: Automotive Industrial /Warehouse 2,312 sq. ft. 4,992 sq. ft. Total 7,304 sq. ft. Total Building Area 7,304 sq. ft. Whereas, the Planning Commission after review and consideration of the information contained in the Planning Commission staff report dated June 23, 1997, the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program and testimony, has determined that any adverse impacts will be mitigated to an insignificant level by the imposition of conditions of approval; and Whereas, at its meeting of June 2,3, 1997, the Planning Commission opened the public hearing, took testimony from all those wishing to testify, and closed the public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: 6:40 PWA-- W0REHE -1.BK! ,. X00044 Resolution No. PC -97 -339 IPD 97 -1, IPD 97 -2, AND CUP 97 -1 (DAVID MOREHEAD) Paae 2 SECTION 1. The Planning Commission hereby adopts the following findings: CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) FINDINGS: 1. That any potential adverse impacts have been mitigated to an insignificant level. 2. The Mitigated Negative Declaration /Initial Study for the project is complete and has been prepared in compliance with CEQA, and City policy. 3. The contents in the Mitigated Negative Declaration /Initial Study have been considered in the various decisions on the proposed entitlement request. 4. In order to reduce the potential for adverse impacts, mitigation measures discussed in the Mitigation Monitoring Program have been imposed as conditions of project approval. 5. A Mitigation Reporting and Monitoring Program has been prepared in compliance with Assembly Bill 3180 and considered in the various decisions regarding the proposed project. INDUSTRIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT FINDINGS: Based upon the information set forth above, it is determined that this application with the attached conditions, meets the requirements of the City of Moorpark Municipal Code Section 17.44.030 in that: 1 The proposed use is consistent with the intent and provisions of the City's General Plan and Title 17 of the Municipal Code. The General Plan Land Use designation for this site allows for the uses proposed, a automotive lube and tune facility, and the development of a warehouse as a light industrial use. 6:40 PWAAMOREHE -1219 '000045 Resolution No. PC -97 -339 IPD 97 -1, IPD 97 -2, AND CUP 97 -1 (DAVID MOREHEAD) Paae 3 The Zoning Ordinance permits the automotive lube and tune use with a Conditional Use Permit. 2. The proposed use is compatible with the character of the surrounding development. All of the development in the vicinity is consistent with the zoning district and light manufacturing use that is proposed under this permit. 3. The proposed use will not be obnoxious or harmful or impair the utility of the neighboring properties or uses. The proposed use has accommodated the disposal of and recycling of products it uses. Circulation and parking have been accommodated on site and would not interfere with the light industrial uses adjacent. 4. The proposed use will not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience,. or welfare. The site is conditioned to avoid impacts to the community. Traffic, circulation, building design and function are designed to the least possible impacts to avoid negative effects on the community. 5. The proposed use is compatible with the scale, visual character and design of the surrounding properties, designed so as to enhance the physical and visual quality of the community, and the structure has design features which provide visual relief and separation between land uses of conflicting character. In,this case, surrounding land uses are not conflicting, however, the physical design of the building is compatible with its visual impact along a major highway within the City of Moorpark. Thereby necessitating the increase in the quality of the architectural and physical design of the site. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FINDINGS: 1. The use is consistent with the intent and provisions of the City's General Plan and this title; 2. The use is compatible with the character of surrounding development; 6:40 PWAAMOREHE-1$K ()00®46 Resolution No. PC -97 -339 IPD 97 -1, IPD 97 -2, AND CUP 97 -1 (DAVID MOREHEAD) Paae 4 3. The use would not be obnoxious or harmful, or impair the utility of neighboring property or uses; 4. The use would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare; and 5. The conditionally permitted use is compatible with existing and planned land uses in the general area where the development is to be located. SECTION 2. The Planning Commission adopt the recommended Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program. SECTION 3. The Planning Commission does hereby find that the aforementioned project is consistent with the City's General Plan. SECTION 4. That the Planning Commission hereby approves Resolution No. PC -97 -339 recommending to the City'Council approval of Industrial Planned Development Permit Nos. 97- 1,97 -2, and Conditional Use Permit No. 97 -1, subject to the following Conditions of Approval: CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR INDUSTRIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NOR-97-1 (AUTOMOTIVE LUBE AND TUNE FACILITY),97 -2 (INDUSTRIAL /WAREHOUSE), AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 97 -1. nyPART'MENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS General Requirements 1. The permit is granted for the land and project as identified on the entitlement application form and as shown on the approved plot plans and elevations. The location of all site improvements shall be as shown on the approved plot plans and elevations except or unless otherwise indicated herein in the following conditions. All proposed uses of these buildings shall be required to receive a zoning clearance from the Department of Community Development. The Department may determine that certain uses will require other types of entitlements or environmental assessment. 6:40 PWA:IM0REHE -1.BK Q0004 Resolution No. PC -97 -339 IPD 97 -1, IPD 97 -2, AND CUP 97 -1 (DAVID MOREHEAD) Page 5 2. The development is subject to all applicable regulations of the M -1 Zone, and all requirements and enactments of Federal, State, Ventura County, the City authorities and any other governmental entities, and all such requirements and enactments shall, by reference, become conditions of this permit. 3. The Industrial Planned Development Permit and Conditional Use Permit shall expire when any of the uses for which it is granted is abandoned for a period of 180 or more consecutive days. Submittal of Plans to Department of Community Development 4. All final construction working drawings, grading and drainage plans, plot plans, sign programs, and landscaping and irrigation plans (three full sets) shall be submitted to the Director of Community Development for review and approval. 5. That unless the project is inaugurated (building foundation slab in place and substantial work in progress) not later than two (2) years after this permit is granted, this permit shall automatically expire on that date. The Director of Community Development may, at his discretion, grant up to one (1) additional one (1) year extension for project inauguration if there have been no changes in the adjacent areas and if the applicant can document that he has diligently worked towards inauguration of the project during the initial two year period. The request for extension of this entitlement must be made in writing, at least thirty (30) days prior to the expiration date of the permit. 6. Upon expiration of this permit, or failure to inaugurate the use, the premises shall be restored by the permittee'to the 6:40 PM /AAM0REHE -1.BK �(��48 Resolution No. PC -97 -339 IPD 97 -1, IPD 97 -2, AND CUP 97 -1 (DAVID MOREHEAD) Page 6 conditions existing prior to the issuance of the permit, as nearly as practicable. 7. No conditions of this entitlement shall be interpreted as permitting or requiring any violation of law or any unlawful rules or regulations or orders of an authorized governmental agency. In instances where more than one set of rules apply, the stricter ones shall take precedence. 8. If any of the conditions or limitations of this permit are held to be invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, that holding shall not render this permit null and void at the discretion of the City. 9. The permittee agrees as a condition of issuance and use of this permit to defend, at his sole expense, any action brought against the City because of issuance (or renewal) of this permit. Permittee will reimburse the City for any court costs and /or attorney's fees which the City may be required by the court to pay as a result of any such action or in the alternative to relinquish this permit. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate in the, defense of any such action, but such participation shall not relieve permittee of his obligation under this condition. 10. Construction of both buildings are stand alone buildings, and therefore may be constructed in phases, should one building not be constructed within 2 gears of the approval of this permit, a Minor Modification shall be applied for prior to construction for the additional phase. 6:40 PWA:WOREHE -1.BK! 1 000049 Resolution No. PC -97 -339 IPD 97 -1, IPD 97 -2, AND CUP 97 -1 (DAVID MOREHEAD) Paqe 7 10 FWSTI �• 0 U I W-Wel W 9 a •0 .•WI. • 11. Prior to issuance of a Zoning Clearance for a Building Permit, the applicant must have submitted construction plans to the Department of Community Development which indicate how the project will comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination Standards (NPDES). 12. Prior to approval of construction plans for plan check or initiation of any construction activity, a Zoning Clearance shall be obtained from the Department of Community Development. If a applicant desires, construction plans may be submitted to the Building and Safety Department prior to approval of this Development Permit with a City approved Hold Harmless Agreement. 13. Prior to the issuance of a Zoning Clearance for tenant occupancy, the prospective tenant shall obtain a Business Registration Permit from the City. 14. No later than ten (10) days after any change of property ownership or change of lessee(s) or opeFator(s) of the subject building, there shall be filed with the Director of Community Development the name(s) and address(es) of the new owner(s), lessee(s) or operator(s) together with a letter from any such person(s) acknowledging and agreeing with all conditions of this permit. Other Uses 15. If in the future, any use or uses are contemplated on the site differing from that specified in the Zoning Clearance approved for the occupancy, either the permittee, owner, or each prospective tenant shall file a project description prior to the initiation of the use. A review by the Director of Community Development will be conducted to determine if the 6:40 PMIA:IM0REHE -1.810 v0005V Resolution No. PC -97 -339 IPD 97 -1, IPD 97 -2, AND CUP 97 -1 (DAVID MOREHEAD) Paqe 8 proposed use is compatible with the M -1 Zone and the terms and conditions of this permit and if a minor or major modification to the Planned Development is required. All applicable fees and procedures shall apply for said review. 16. The permittee's acceptance of this permit and /or commencement of construction and/ or operations under this permit shall be deemed to be acceptance of all conditions of this permit. 17. Within two days after the City Council adoption of a resolution approving the Planned Development Permit, the applicant shall submit to the City of Moorpark a check for $1,250 plus a $ 25.00 filing fee payable to the County of Ventura, to comply with Assembly Bill 3158, for the management and protection of statewide fish and wildlife trust resources. Pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21089 (b) and Fish and Game Code section 711.4 (c) , the project is not operative, vested or final until the filing fees are paid. 18. Prior to issuance of a Zoning Clearance for construction, the builder shall provide to the City an image conversion of building, landscape, public improvement; and site plans into an optical format (TIF) acceptable to the City Clerk. 19. No Zoning Clearance may be issued for building occupancy until all on -site improvements specified in this permit have been provided or the Director of Community Development approves the acceptance of a Performance Bond to guarantee the construction and maintenance of exterior improvements including, but not limited to perimeter tract walls (including stucco treatment) , fences, slope planting or other landscape improvements not related to grading, etc. Said on -site improvements shall be completed within 120 days of issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. In case of failure to comply with any term or 6:40 PMlA:1MOREHE -13K1 '900051 Resolution No. PC -97 -339 IPD 97 -1, IPD 97 -2, AND CUP 97 -1 (DAVID MOREHEAD) Pacge 9 provision of this condition, the City Council may by resolution declare the surety forfeited. Upon completion of the required improvements to the satisfaction of the City, the City Council may reduce the amount of the bond; however, the bond must be kept in full force and effect for one year after the last occupancy to guarantee that items such as perimeter tract walls, including stucco treatment; landscaping; fences; slope planting or other landscape improvements not related to grading; private recreational facilities, etc. are maintained. 20. Prior to the occupancy, applicable proposed uses shall be reviewed and approved by the Ventura County Environmental Health Division to ensure that the proposal will comply with all applicable State and local regulations related to storage, handling, and disposal of potentially hazardous materials, and that any required permits have been obtained.- If required by the County Environmental Health Division, the applicant shall prepare a hazardous waste minimization plan. 21. Prior to occupancy, Ventura County APCD Air Pollution Control District (APCD) shall review all applicable uses to ensure compliance with the California Health and Safety Code (Section 65850.5 et seq.) regarding the use, storage and disposition of hazardous materials. Final Certificate of Occupancies shall be withheld until compliance with these provisions from the Ventura County APCD is provided. 22. The applicant agrees not to protest the formation of an underground utility assessment district. Carrifirata of Occupancy Requirement 23. No use for which this permit is granted shall be commenced until a Certificate of Occupancy has been issued by the Building and Safety Division. In addition, no Certificate of Occupancy may be issued until all on -site improvements 6:40 PWAAM0REHE -1.BK! 00605% Resolution No. PC -97 -339 IPD 97 -1, IPD 97 -2, AND CUP 97 -1 (DAVID MOREHEAD) Page 10 specified in this permit-have been completed or the applicant has provided a faithful performance bond. At the discretion of the Director of Community Development,. said on -site improvements shall be completed within 120 days of issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy. In case of failure to comply with any term or provision of this agreement, the city council may by resolution declare the surety forfeited. Upon completion of the required improvements to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Development, the surety may be exonerated by action of the City. 24. Prior to initial occupancy or any subsequent change of tenant occupancy, the owner of the subject building, or the owners representative shall apply for a Zoning Clearance from the Community Development Department. The purpose of the Zoning Clearance shall be to determine if the proposed use(s) are compatible with the zoning and terms and conditions of the permit. 25. The continued maintenance of the permit area and facilities shall be subject to periodic inspection by the City. The permittee shall be required to remedy any defects in ground or building maintenance, as indicated by the City within five (5) days after notification. 26. No repair or maintenance of vehicle shall occur on site, except completely within a wholly enclosed building. 27. No noxious odors shall be generated from any use on the subject site. 6:40 PWA:IMOREHE -I SK! ()00 ®53 Resolution No. PC -97 -339 IPD 97 -1, IPD 97 -2, AND CUP 97 -1 (DAVID MOREHEAD) Pacre 11 28. All uses and activities shall be conducted inside the building(s) unless otherwise authorized by the Director of Community Development consistent with applicable Zoning Code provisions. 29. The applicant and his successors, heirs, and assigns shall remove any graffiti within five (5) .days from written notification by the City of Moorpark. All such graffiti removal shall be accomplished to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Development. 30. The project shall include storm water measures for the operation and maintenance of the project for review and approval of the City Engineer and Director of Community Development. The plans shall identify Best Management Practices (BMPs) appropriate to the uses conducted on -site to effectively prohibit the entry of pollutants into storm water runoff. a. The project plan measures shall also include erosion control measures to prevent soil, dirt and debris from entering the storm drain system.; b. The applicant is responsible for ensuring that all contractors are aware of storm water quality measures and implement such measures. Failure to comply with the approved construction BMPs will result in issuance of correction notices, citations or a stop work order. 31. All washing and /or steam cleaning of equipment must be done at an appropriately equipped facility which drains into the sanitary sewer. The area must be covered and designed to prevent run on and runoff from the area. A sign shall be posted indicating the designated washing area. Any outdoor washing or pressure washing must be managed in such a way that there is no discharge of soaps or other pollutants to the 6:40 PMIAAMOREHE -13KI �tj0ooS4 Resolution No. PC -97 -339 IPD.97 -1, IPD 97 -2, AND CUP 97 -1 (DAVID MOREHEAD) Page 12 storm drain. Washwater shall discharge to the sanitary sewer. All sanitary connections-are subject to the review, approval and conditions of the wastewater plant receiving the discharge. 32. All loading dock areas must be designed to comply with DS -3 standards (DMPs) . Accumulated waste water that may contribute to the pollution of storm water must be drained to the sanitary sewer, or diverted and collected for ultimate discharge to the sanitary sewer, or intercepted and pretreated prior to discharge to the storm drain system. BMPs shall be implemented to prevent potential storm water pollution. 33. Drains in any wash or process shall not discharge to the storm drain system. Drains shall connect to the sanitary sewer. Sanitary connections are subject to the review, approval and conditions of the wastewater treatment plant accepting the discharge. 34. Any storage areas approved by the City shall be designed to eliminate the potential for runoff to contact pollutants. 35. All landscaping shall be designed with efficient irrigation practices to reduce runoff, promote surface filtration, and minimize the use of fertilizers and pesticides which can contribute to runoff pollution. 36. Sidewalks and parking lots shall be swept regularly to prevent the accumulation of litter and debris. If pressure washed, debris shall be trapped and collected to prevent entry to the storm water system. No cleaning agent shall be discharged to the storm drain. If any cleaning agent or degreaser is used, washwater shall not discharge to the storm drains; washwater sTiall be collected and discharged to the sanitary sewer. Discharges to the' sanitary sewer are subject to the review, approval, and conditions of the wastewater treatment plant receiving the discharge. 37. A structural control, such as an oil /water separator, sand filter, or approved equal, shall be installed on -site to intercept and pretreat storm water prior to discharging to the storm drain system. The design, location, and a maintenance 6:40 PWAAMOREHE -t.BK! �VVO�� Resolution No. PC -97 -339 IPD 97 -1, IPD 97 -2, AND CUP 97 -1 (DAVID MOREHEAD) Page 13 schedule shall be submitted to the City Engineer and the Department of Community Development for review and approval prior to the issuance of a building permit. 38. All on -site storm drain inlets shall be labeled "No Dumping" using appropriate methods. 39. All on -site storm drains shall be cleaned at least; once immediately prior to the rainy season (October 15) and once in January. Additional cleaning shall be as required prior the City. 40. Prior to issuance of a Zoning Clearance for construction, a complete landscape plan (3 sets), together with specifications shall be submitted to the Director of Community Development. a. Additional landscaping shall be provided in the area in front of the new wall, trees to be installed shall be grouped together to screen the bay doors from view on Los Angeles Avenue, to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Development. b. Additional trees and scrubs shall be located along the landscaped area north of the new wall at the front of the lot. c. A maintenance program shall be prepared by a State Licensed Landscape Architect, generally in accordance with the Ventura County Guide to Landscape Plans, and shall be submitted to the Director of Community Development for review and approval prior to issuance of a grading permit. d. The landscape plan shall include planting and irrigation specifications. 6:40 PWAAMOREHE -1.8K 000056 Resolution No. PC -97 -339 IPD 97 -1, IPD 97 -2, AND CUP 97 -1 (DAVID MOREHEAD) Page 14 e. Earthen berms shall be provided along the front of the site adjacent to Los Angeles Avenue. Additional landscaping, subject to approval of the Director of Community Development, shall be installed around in the perimeter of the industrial building, including a hedge a minimum of three feet high along Goldman Avenue frontage. f. The final landscape plans shall be in substantial conformance with the conceptual landscape plan submitted with the application, as modified by these conditions and provide screening of parking areas and additional variety of landscape materials along the building frontage and areas visible to public view. g. The applicant shall bear the cost of the landscape plan review, installation of the landscaping and irrigation system, and of final landscape inspection. h. The landscaping and planting plan submitted for review and approval shall be accompanied by a deposit as specified by the City of Moorpark. Additional funds may subsequently need to be deposited to cover all landscape plan check and inspection fees. i. The landscaping shall be approved by the Director of Community Development and in place and receive final inspection prior to occupancy as determined by the Director of Community Development. j. The City's landscape architect shall certify in writing that the landscape and irrigation system was installed in accordance with the approved Landscape and Irrigation Plans. k. Any vacant areas that are part of a*second phase construction, shall have irrigation installed and be landscaped with turf 1. The final landscape plans shall include landscaping specifications, planting details, and design I 6:40 PWA:1M0REHE -1.BK! I 000057 Resolution No. PC -97 -339 IPD 97 -1, IPD 97 -2, AND CUP 97 -1 (DAVID MOREHEAD) Page 15 specifications consistent with the following requirements: i. The landscape plan shall include the final design of all sidewalks, fencing /walls, streetscape elements, urban landscaping and pedestrian paths within the project limits. ii. A 50 percent shade coverage shall be provided within all open parking areas. Shade coverage is described as the maximum mid -day shaded area defined by a selected specimen tree at 50 percent maturity. How can this be done without fingers between parking stalls? Perhaps delete one space and provide two fingers on U -S bay. iii. All plant species utilized shall be drought tolerant, low water using variety. iv. Landscaping at site entrances and exits and any intersection within the parking lot shall not block or screen the view of a seated driver from another moving vehicle or pedestrian. V. Plantings in and adjacent to parking areas shall be contained within raised planters surrounded by six - inch high concrete curbs. vi. Landscaping shall be designed so as to not obstruct the view of any exterior door or window from the street. vii. Trees shall not be placed directly under any overhead lighting which could cause a loss of light at ground level. viii,. Earthen berms planting and /or low walls shall be provided to screen views of parked vehicles from streets and access roads. Wall along Los Angeles Avenue shall have a height a minimum of three feet above the sidewalk on Los Angeles Avenue. 6:40 PWA:IMOREHE -1 SK! i 00058 Resolution No. PC -97 -339 IPD 97 -1, IPD 97 -2, AND CUP 97 -1 (DAVID MOREHEAD) Paae 16 ix. Backflow preventers, transformers, or other exposed above grade utilities shall be shown on the landscape plan(s) and shall be screened with landscaping and /or a wall. X. A sufficiently dense tree planting plan emphasizing tall growing trees and /or shrubs shall be designed. The size of trees shall be as determined by the Director of Community Development. xi. A coordinated tree planting. program shall be developed which will provide a dominant theme tree within the components of the proposed development. xii. Irrigation shall be provided for all permanent landscaping, as identified in the approved landscape plan. The applicant shall be responsible for maintaining the irrigation system and all landscaping. The applicant shall replace any dead plants and make any necessary repairs to the irrigation system consistent with the landscape plan approved for the development. xiii. Exotic plants which are known to spread beyond their original plantings and invade native habitats such as Pampas Grass, Spanish Broom, and Tamarisk shall not be used. xiv. Prior to final inspection of the buildings, permanent irrigation shall be provided for all permanent landscaping (tree replacement, common area landscaping, and erosion control landscaping). The applicant shall be responsible for maintaining any irrigation system and all landscaping. The applicant shall replace any dead plants and make any necessary repairs to the irrigation system consistent with the landscape plan approved for the project. 6:40 PWAWOREHE -122 i 000059 Resolution No. PC -97 -339 IPD 97 -1, IPD 97 -2, AND CUP 97 -1 (DAVID MOREHEAD) Paqe 17 41. Prior to issuance of a Zoning Clearance for construction, the applicant shall provide an irrevocable offer of an easement to the City for the purpose of maintaining all landscaping of the site adjacent to Los Angeles Avenue and Goldman Avenue. The area referred to shall be all landscaped portions of the required setback area adjacent to the public right -of -way on Los Angeles Avenue and Goldman Avenue. The applicant shall be responsible for maintenance of the aforementioned area as well as the landscaping within the public right -of -way adjacent to the project. If the City at it's sole discretion determines the landscape maintenance is determined to be unsatisfactory in any of the aforementioned areas, the City may invoke the offer of dedication and assume responsibility at the owner's expense for any or all of the aforementioned areas. The total cost of maintenance for the areas noted above shall be borne by the applicant. The City may at its sole-discretion place the aforementioned areas in a landscape maintenance assessment district. The applicant shall record a covenant to this effect. The applicant shall maintain the right to protest the amount and spread of any proposed assessment, but not the formation of, or annexation to a maintenance assessment district. 42. The applicant shall pay all outstanding case processing (planning and engineering), and all City legal service fees prior to issuance of a Zoning Clearance for construction. In addition, the applicant shall be required to pay a Condition Compliance deposit pursuant to the requirements of the most recently adopted "Resolution Establishing Schedule of Land Development Preliminary Processing Fee Deposits ". 43. The applicant shall contribute to the City of Moorpark an amount of $.25 per square foot of gross floor area prior to the issuance of a Zoning Clearance for construction. The 6:40 PWAAMOREHE -1.8K -' 900060 Resolution No. PC -97 -339 IPD 97 -1, IPD 97 -2, AND CUP 97 -1 (DAVID MOREHEAD) Paqe 18 funds shall be used to support the City's current and future park system. 44. The applicant shall contribute to the City of Moorpark's Art in Public Places Fund, an amount of $10 per each 100 square foot of building area prior to the issuance of a Zoning Clearance for construction. The applicant may create a public art project on or off -site in lieu of paying the Art in Public Places fee. The art work must have a value corresponding to the fee and must receive approval from the City Council. 45. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall pay a fee established pursuant to Ordinance 102 in the .amount of $.05 per square ft. of the building, to be used to install, maintain and replace landscape work on public property for the purpose of mitigating the removal of the natural landscape from the property of the new development. 46. Prior to issuance of the first Zoning Clearance for construction, the permittee shall make a contribution to the Moorpark Traffic Systems Management Fund of $.15 per square foot of floor area to fund Traffic System Management programs for the total square footage approved for the project. 47. Prior to Zoning Clearance approval for a building permit, the applicant /developer shall pay a Citywide Traffic Mitigation fee totaling $3652.00, calculated at $.50 per square foot of building area. 48. Prior to Zoning Clearance approval for a building permit,, the applicant /developer shall-pay an Intersection Mitigation Fee 6:40 PWA:W0REHE -1.BK 006061 Resolution No. PC -97 -339 IPD 97 -1, IPD 97 -2, AND CUP 97 -1 (DAVID MOREHEAD) Pacte 19 in the amount of $80.00 for Los Angeles Avenue /Gabbert Road, and $357.00 for Los Angeles Avenue /Moorpark Avenue. Ca11e-giaas Municipal_.Wa r DiG r; 1 a 49. Prior to issuance of a Building Permit, the developer shall demonstrate by possession of a District Release from the Calleguas Municipal Water District that arrangements for payment of the Construction Charge applicable to the proposed project have been made. Applicant shall be required to comply with Ventura County Waterworks Rules and Regulations, including payment of all applicable fees. 50. Prior to the issuance of a Building Permit, the applicant shall pay all school assessment fees levied by the Moorpark Unified School District. Code Enforcement Costs 51. The Director of Community Development may declare a development project that is not in compliance with the Conditions of Approval or for some other just cause, a "public nuisance ". The applicant shall be liable to the city for any and all costs and expenses to the city involved in thereafter abating the nuisance and in obtaining compliance with the Conditions of Approval or applicable codes. If the applicant fails to pay all city costs related to this action, the City may enact special assessment proceedings against the parcel of land upon which the nuisance existed (Municipal Code Section 1.12.080) . 52. The plot plan shall not be revised to reflect any requirements for right -of -way, dedications, unless an appropriate modification is approved by the City. In addition, the following revisions to the site plan shall be made subject to the review and approval 'of the Director of Community Development prior to the issuance of a Zoning Clearance for construction: 6:40 PWA:IMOREHE -I SK! 006063 Resolution No. PC -97 -339 IPD 97 -1, IPD 97 -2, AND CUP 97 -1 (DAVID MOREHEAD) Page 20 a. The handicapped parking stalls shall be relocated to the stalls immediately north of the door of the industrial building. 53. A utility room for each building to house all meters shall be provided within the building. 54. No asbestos pipe or construction materials shall be used. 55. All proposed utility lines within and immediately adjacent to the project site (as determined by the Director of Community Development) shall be placed underground to the nearest off - site utility pole. All existing utilities shall also be undergrounded to the nearest off -site utility pole with the exception of 66 KVA or larger power lines. This requirement for under grounding includes all above - ground power poles on the project site as well as those along the frontage of the site. The developer shall indicate in writing how this condition will be satisfied. Any above grade utility fixtures shall be placed adjacent to landscaped areas and screened on three sides. 56. Exterior access ladders are not permitted. There shall not be any easy exterior access to the roof area, i.e. ladders, trees, high walls, etc. 57. The following shall be depicted on the plot plans and shall be subject to approval by the Director of Community Development: a. The transformer and cross connection water control devices shall be shown on the plot plan and landscaping and 6:40 PWA:1MOREHE -133, 000063 Resolution No. PC -97 -339 IPD 97 -1, IPD 97 -2, AND CUP 97 -1 (DAVID MOREHEAD) Paqe 21 irrigation plan and screened from street view with masonry wall or landscaping. b. All fences and walls shall be shown on the plot plan and landscaping and irrigation plan. c. Bicycle racks or storage facilities shall be provided on- site. d. All required loading areas and turning radii shall be depicted on the plot plan. A 45 foot turning radius shall be provided for loading zones consistent with the AASHO WB -50 design vehicle. e. Elevations of proposed hardscape treatment (such as the building entrance, window and door treatment) shall be submitted with the final construction plans. 58. Roof design and construction shall include a minimum 18 -inch extension of the parapet wall above the highest point of the flat roof area. 59. For all exterior lighting, a lighting plan shall be prepared by an electrical engineer registered in the State of California and submitted to the Department of Community Development for review and approval. The lighting plan shall achieve the following objectives: Avoid interferences with reasonable use of adjoining properties; minimize on -site and off -site glare; provide adequate on -site lighting; limit electroliers height; provide structures which are compatible with the total design of the proposed facility and minimize energy consumption. The lighting plan shall include the following: a. A photometric plan showing a point -by -point foot candle layout to extend a minimum of twenty (20) feet outside the property lines. Layout plan to be based on a ten (10) foot 6:40 PWA:IMOREHE -1.8K r �.o�vs4 Resolution No. PC -97 -339 IPD 97 -1, IPD 97 -2, AND CUP 97 -1 (DAVID MOREHEAD) Pacre 22 grid center. Down lighting and accent landscape and building lighting shall be employed throughout the project. b. Maximum overall height of fixtures shall be twenty five (25) feet, unless otherwise approved by the Director of Community Development. c. Fixtures must possess sharp cut -off qualities with a maximum of one foot candle illumination at or beyond property lines. d. Energy efficient lighting devices shall be provided. e. A minimum of one, and a maximum of two foot candle illumination with a 1.5 foot candle average, or as otherwise approved by the Director of Community Development. f. No light shall be emitted above the 90 degree or horizontal plane.. No direct light source shall be visible from the street. g. Lighting devices in the parking lot shall be shielded and directed downward to avoid light and glare on neighboring properties. h. Lighting devices shall be high enough as to prohibit anyone on the ground from tampering with them unless tamper proof fixtures are approved by the Director of Community Development. All exterior lighting devices shall be protected by weather and breakage resistant covers. i. Lighting at all exterior doors shall be lighted with a minimum maintained two foot candles at ground level. 60. Prior to the issuance of a Building Permit, a copy of the lighting plans shall also be submitted to the Police for review. 6:40 PWA:1M0REHE -1.BK! r OWOGS Resolution No. PC -97 -339 IPD 97 -1, IPD 97 -2, AND CUP 97 -1 (DAVID MOREHEAD) Pane 23 E•,s •• 61. No downspouts shall be permitted on the exterior of the building. 62. Roof mounted equipment is prohibited, except for equipment that cannot be mounted on the ground and approved to be roof mounted by the Director of Community Development. All roof mounted equipment (vents, stacks, blowers, air conditioning equipment, etc.) that may extend above any parapet wall shall be enclosed on all four sides by view obscuring material. Prior to the issuance of a Zoning Clearance for construction, the final design and materials for the roof screen and location of any roof mounted equipment must be approved by the Director of Community Development. All screening shall be tall enough to block all ground level views of equipment and shall be maintained during the life of the permit. Construction material shall match the color and material used in the construction of the buildings. Colors, materials and building appendages (such as mechanical equipment on the roof, etc.) of the proposed building shall be compatible with the existing building and adjacent development and non - reflective in nature. Exterior Ground Level Equipment 63. Any outdoor ground level equipment and storage (such as loading docks, shelter docks, cooling towers, generators, etc.) shall be screened from view by a masonry wall, the design of which shall be approved by the Director of Community development or his designee. The wall shall be constructed of materials and colors consistent with the main building. 64. All exterior building materials and paint colors shall be as submitted. 6:40 PWAAMOREHE--1SK! +�%) Resolution No. PC -97 -339 IPD 97 -1, IPD 97 -2, AND CUP 97 -1 (DAVID MOREHEAD) Paste 24 IQ• - -#- Wil • - 65. All roof mounted equipment and other noise generation sources on -site shall be attenuated to 45 decibels (dBA) at the property line, or to the ambient noise level at the property line measured at the time of the occupant request. Prior to the issuance of a Zoning Clearance for initial occupancy or any subsequent occupancy, the Director of Community Development may request that a noise study be submitted for review and approval which demonstrates that all on -site noise generation sources will be mitigated to the required level. The noise study must be prepared by a licensed acoustical engineer in accordance with accepted engineering standards. 66. The striping for parking spaces and loading bays shall be maintained so that it remains clearly visible. 67. All parking areas shall be surfaced with asphalt or concrete and shall include adequate provisions for drainage, striping and appropriate wheel blocks, curbs, or posts in parking areas adjacent to landscaped areas. 68. All trash disposal and recycling areas shall be provided in a Iocation which will not interfere with circulation, parking or access to the building, and shall be screened with a'six foot high solid wall enclosure with metal gates. The final design and location of the trash enclosures shall be subject to review of the Director of Community Development prior to the issuance of a Zoning Clearance for construction. Trash areas and recycling bins shall be depicted on the final construction plans, the size of which shall be approved by the Director of PWkW0REHE -1.BK tit/i t)IR7 Resolution No. PC -97 -339 IPD 97 -1, IPD 97 -2, AND CUP 97 -1 (DAVID MOREHEAD) Paae 25 Community Development and the City employee responsible for recycling /solid waste management programs. a. Rubbish disposal areas shall include adequate, accessible and convenient areas for collecting and loading recyclable materials. The dimensions of the recycling area shall accommodate containers consistent with current methods of collection in the area in which the project is located. b. Adequate number of bins or containers shall be provided to allow for the collection and loading a recyclable materials generated by the development. For commercial (general, office, or retail), developments, space allotment for 2 three cubic yard bins (107" x 84 or 168" x 53.511), or a space allotment for one 40 cubic yard bin (288" x 12011) and one 3 cubic yard bin (84" x 53.5). The intended use for this space is to hold two side -by -side 3 cubic yard containers (one for refuse, one for recyclables), or one 40 cubic yard bin for refuse and one 3 cubic yard for recyclables. c. The design of the refuse disposal areas shall be compatible in design with the development and the surrounding area. d. Disposal areas shall be protected from weather conditions which might render collected recyclable materials unmarketable. e. Driveways or travel aisles shall provide unobstructed access for collection vehicles and personnel, and provide the minimum vertical clearance of 30 feet, or other specified clearance required by the collection methods and vehicles utilized by the hauler. f. A sign, approved by the Director of Community Development, clearly identifying all recycling and solid waste collection and loading areas, and the materials accepted therein shall be posted adjacent to all points of access to the recycling areas. 6:40 PWA:IM0REHE -1.BK 0000ss Resolution No. PC -97 -339 IPD 97 -1, IPD 97 -2, AND CUP 97 -1 (DAVID MOREHEAD) Paqe 26 g. Refuse disposal areas shall not be located in any area required by the Municipal Code to be constructed or maintained as unencumbered, according to fire and other applicable building and /or public safety laws. h. Recycling area (s) shall be located so they are convenient and adjacent to regular refuse collection areas. i. Enclosure. The design of the refuse and recycling enclosures shall be subject to the approval of the Director of Community Development, prior to the issuance of a Zoning Clearance for construction. All rubbish disposal areas and recycling areas shall be screened with a six foot high, solid wall enclosure with metal gates. i. In cases where space for 2 three cubic yard bins is required (107" x 84 or 168" x 53.5"), the opening of any bin enclosure must be at least 84 inches (the size of a three cubic yard bin) . This requirement applies to the amount of space exposed when the gate is fully opened. ii. Each refuse \recycling enclosure shall have gates and should be designed with cane bolts to secure the gates when in the open position. iii. Space allocation for rubbish and recycling enclosures shall be designed in a manner that complies with the equal access requirements of Title 24 and the American Disabilities Act. iv. The enclosure shall have a separate indirect pedestrian access way which does not require doors or gates. 69. The franchised hauler designated to service your location is Moorpark Rubbish Disposal (526- 1919}. 6:40 PWA:W0REHE-1.BK1 000069 Resolution No. PC -97 -339 IPD 97 -1, IPD 97 -2, AND CUP 97 -1 (DAVID MOREHEAD) Pace 27 K- @• 70. Prior to issuance of an Occupancy Permit, a Waste reduction and recycling plan shall be submitted to the City of Moorpark Department of Community Development prior to occupancy of the building. The plan shall include a designated building manager, who is responsible for initiating on -site waste materials recycling programs. This shall include the acquiring of storage bins for the separation of recyclable materials and coordination and maintenance of a curbside pickup schedule. 71. The on -site building manager or designee will conduct a routine waste management education program on -site to alert employees to any new developments or requirements for solid waste management. This measure shall be coordinated through the City's Solid Waste Management Department. 72. Prior to the issuance of a Building Permit, an "Unconditional Will Serve Letter" for water and sewer service will be obtained from the Ventura County Waterworks District No. 1. 73. At the time water service connection is made for each project, cross connection control devices shall be installed for the water system in accordance with the requirements of the Ventura County Environmental Health Department. 74. Prior to Occupancy, the applicant shall request the City to enforce appropriate vehicle codes on subject property as permitted by Vehicle Code Section 21107.7. 6:40 PMIA:IM0REHE -1.BK! 0VW r M Resolution No. PC -97 -339 IPD 97 -1, IPD 97 -2, AND CUP 97 -1 (DAVID MOREHEAD) Paqe 28 O) 1 • � y General Grading: 75. The Developer shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, a rough grading plan prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer, shall enter into an agreement with the City of Moorpark to complete public improvements and shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing the construction of all improvements. The grading plan shall be consistent with the approved conceptual grading. 76. Concurrent with submittal of the rough grading plan an Erosion Control Plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval by the City Engineer. Reclaimed water shall be used for dust control during grading, if available from Waterworks District No. 1 at the time of grading permit approval. 77. This project is projected to balance cut and fill onsite. Unanticipated off -site import /export operations requiring an excess of 10 total truck loads shall require Council approval prior to the commencement of hauling or staged grading operations. 78. The developer shall indicate in writing to the City the disposition of any wells that may exist within the project. If any wells are proposed to be abandoned, or if they are abandoned and have not been properly sealed, they must be destroyed or abandoned per Ventura County Ordinance No. 2372 or Ordinance No. 3991 and per Division of Oil and Gas requirements. Permits for any well reuse (if applicable) shall conform with Reuse Permit procedures administered by the County Water Resources Development Department. 79. All development areas and lots shall be designed so that surface drainage is directed to street frontages or natural or improved drainage courses as approved by the City Engineer. 6:40 PWA:1M REHE -1.BK 000071 Resolution No. PC -97 -339 IPD 97 -1, IPD 97 -2, AND CUP 97 -1 (DAVID MOREHEAD) Page 29 Geotechnical /Geology Review 80. The Developer shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, detailed Geotechnical Engineering Report certified by a California Registered Civil Engineer. The geotechnical engineering report shall include an investigation with regard to liquefaction, expansive soils, and seismic safety. The developer shall also provide a report which discusses the contents of the soils as to the presence or absence of any hazardous waste or other contaminants in the soils. Note: Review of the geotechnical engineering report, by the City's Geotechnical Engineer, shall be required. The Developer shall reimburse the City for all costs including the City's administrative fee for this review. 81. All recommendations included in the approved geotechnical engineering report shall be implemented during project design, grading, and construction in accordance with the approved project. The City's geotechnical consultant shall review all plans for conformance with the soils engineer's recommendations. Prior to the commencement of grading plan check, the developer's geotechnical engineer shall sign the plans confirming that the grading plans incorporate the recommendations of the approved soils report(s). Storm Water Runoff and Flood Control Planning: 82. The Developer shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, drainage plans, hydrologic and hydraulic calculations prepared by a California Registered Civil Engineer; shall enter into an agreement with the City of Moorpark to complete public improvements and shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing the construction of all improvements. 83. The plans shall depict all on -site and off -site drainage structures required by the City. 84. The drainage plans and calculations shall indicate the following conditions before and after development: 6:40 PWA:IMOREHE -1 SKI 000072 Resolution No. PC -97 -339 IPD 97 -1, IPD 97 -2, AND CUP 97 -1 (DAVID MOREHEAD) Paqe 30 a. Quantities of water, water flow rates, major water courses, drainage areas and patterns, diversions, collection systems, flood hazard areas, sumps, sump locations, detention facilities, and drainage courses. Hydrology shall be per the current Ventura County Standards except as follows: b. All storm drains shall carry a 50 -year frequency storm; c. All catch basins shall carry a 50 -year storm; d. All catch basins in a sump condition shall be sized such that depth of water at intake shall equal the depth of the approach flows; e. All culverts shall carry a 100 -year frequency storm; f. Drainage facilities shall be provided such that surface flows are intercepted and contained in a storm drain prior to entering collector or secondary roadways; g. Under a 50 -year frequency storm, local, residential and private streets shall have one dry travel lane available on interior residential streets. Collector street shall have a minimum of one dry travel lane in each direction; h. Drainage to adjacent parcels shall not be increased or concentrated by this development.,, All drainage measures necessary to mitigate storm water flows shall be provided by the Developer; i. All drainage grates shall be designed and constructed with provisions to provide adequate bicycle safety to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; j. If the land to be occupied is in an area of special flood hazard, the Developer shall notify all potential buyers in writing of this hazard condition. The grading plan shall also show contours indicating the 50- and 100 -year flood levels. 6:40 PWA:IMOREHE -13K! 11000"73 Resolution No. PC -97 -339 IPD 97 -1, IPD 97 -2, AND CUP 97 -1 (DAVID MOREHEAD) Paqe 31 k. All flows from brow ditches, ribbon gutters and similar devices shall be deposited into the storm drain system prior to entering streets. If necessary, the storm drain shall be extended beyond the public right -of -way through easements to eliminate surface flow between parcels. Both storm drain and easements outside the right -of -way are to be maintained by the owners unless otherwise approved by the City Council. 1. Drainage for the development shall be designed and installed with all necessary appurtenances to safely contain and convey storm flows to their final point of discharge, subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. m. A hydraulic /hydrology study shall be prepared which analyzes the hydraulic capacity of the drainage system, with and without the storm drain system for the proposed development. The Developer shall make any downstream improvements, required by Ventura County Flood Control and the City of Moorpark, to support the proposed development. 85. The Developer shall demonstrate for each building pad within the development area that the following restrictions and protections can be put in place to the satisfaction of the City Engineer: a. Adequate protection from a 100 -year. frequency storm; and b. Feasible access during a 50 -year frequency storm. c. Hydrology calculations shall be per current Ventura County Standards. 86. The Developer shall obtain a permit from the State Water Resources Control Board for "All storm water discharges associated with a construction activity where clearing, grading, and excavation results in land disturbances of five or more acres." The developer shall submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) to the City Engineers office as proof of permit application. 6:40 PWAAMOREHE -t.BK! 006074 Resolution No. PC -97 -339 IPD 97 -1, IPD 97 -2, AND CUP 97 -1 (DAVID MOREHEAD) Paqe 32 87. The developer shall also comply with National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) objectives as outlined in the "Stormwater Pollution Control Guidelines for Construction Sites ". This handout is available the City Engineers office and a copy will be attached to the approved grading permit. 88. All structures proposed within the 100 -year flood zone shall be elevated at least one foot above the 100 -year flood level. 89. The developer shall provide for all necessary on -site and off -site storm drain facilities required by the City to accommodate upstream and on -site flows. Facilities, as shown on existing drainage studies and approved by the City, shall be delineated on the final drainage plans. Either on -site retention basins or storm water acceptance deeds from off -site property owners must be specified. These facilities (if applicable) must also be acceptable to the Ventura County Flood Control District. Street Improvement Requirements: 90. The Developer shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, street improvement plans prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer; and shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing the construction of the improvements. 91. Additional security shall be provided for reconstruction of the portion of Goldman Avenue located adjacent to the project. The surety shall be used to secure the curb to curb reconstruction, overlay or slurry the street, as a result of damage from construction work or utility trenching. The City will require restoration of the street before occupancy of the building. 92. The street improvements shall include concrete curb and gutter, parkways, new street lights, and signing, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 'All driveway locations shall be approved by the City Engineer and the Director of Community Development. The developer shall dedicate any additional right -of -way necessary to make all of the required improvements. 6:40 PWAAMOREHE -1.8K! OW 07'x' Resolution No. PC -97 -339 IPD 97 -1, IPD 97 -2, AND CUP 97 -1 (DAVID MOREHEAD) Page 33 93. Street lights shall be provided on the improvement plans per Ventura County Standards and as approved by the City Engineer. 94. The Developer shall pay all energy costs associated with public street lighting for a period of one year from the acceptance of the street improvements. 95. In accordance with Business and Professions Code 8771 the street improvement plans shall, provide for a surveyors statement on the plans, certifying that all recorded monuments in the construction area have been located and tied out or will be protected in place during construction. 96. Any right -of -way acquisition necessary to complete the required improvements will be acquired by the Developer at his expense. 97. The Developer shall submit wall and landscaping plans showing that provisions have been taken to provide for and maintain proper sight distances. 98. The Developer shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing completion of all improvements which revert to the City or which require removal in a form acceptable to the City. The surety shall include provisions for all site improvements within the development and other offsite improvements required by the conditions as described herein. 99. The Developer shall demonstrate legal 4ccess to the parcel to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 100. The developer shall execute a covenant running with the land (or pay a traffic mitigation fee) on the behalf of itself and its successors, heirs, and assigns agreeing to participate in the formation of an assessment district or other financing technique including, but not' limited to, the payment of traffic mitigation fees, which the City may implement or adopt, to fund public street and traffic improvements directly or indirectly affected by the development. 101. The applicant shall make a special contribution to the City representing the developers pro -rata share of the cost of a 6:40 PWAAMOREHE -1.BK! - 0000 / 6 Resolution No. PC -97 -339 IPD 97 -1, IPD 97 -2, AND CUP 97 -1 (DAVID MOREHEAD) Page 34 traffic signal at the Goldman and Los Angeles Avenues intersection: 102. Grading may occur during the rainy season from October 15 to April 15 subject to installation of erosion control facili- ties. Erosion control measures shall be in place and functional between October 15th and April 15th. 103. Prior to any work being conducted within the State, County, or City right of way, the Developer shall obtain all necessary encroachment permits from the appropriate Agencies. 104. During clearing, grading, earth moving or excavation opera- tions, dust shall be controlled by regularly watering. In addition the following measures shall apply: a. Water all site access roads and material excavated or graded on or off -site to prevent excessive amounts of dust. Watering shall occur a minimum of at least two times daily, preferably in the late morning and after the completion of work for the day. Additional watering for dust control shall occur as directed by the City. The grading plan shall indicate the number of water trucks which will be available for dust control at each phase of grading. b. Cease all clearing, grading, earth moving, or excavation operations during periods of high winds (greater than 20 mph averaged over one hour). The contractor shall maintain contact with the Air Pollution Control District (APCD) meteorologist for current information about average wind speeds. c. Water or securely cover all material transported off -site and on -site to prevent excessive amounts of dust. d. Keep all grading and construction equipment on or near the site, until these activities are completed. 6:40 PWAAMOREHE -t.BK 900077 Resolution No. PC -97 -339 IPD 97 -1, IPD 97 -2, AND CUP 97 -1 (DAVID MOREHEAD) Paqe 35 e. Face masks shall be used by all employees involved in grading or excavation operations during dry periods to reduce inhalation of dust which may contain the fungus which causes San Joaquin Valley Fever. f. The area disturbed by clearing, grading, earth moving, or excavation operations shall be minimized to prevent excessive dust generation. g. Wash off heavy -duty construction vehicles before they leave the site. 105. After clearing, grading, earth moving, or excavation operations, and during construction activities, fugitive dust emissions should be controlled using the following procedures: a., Apply non - hazardous chemical stabilizers to all inactive portions of the construction site, including the warehouse building, should it be constructed during phase II. Prior to the occupancy of the Lube and Tune building, exposed surfaces shall be seeded with a fast - growing, soil- binding plant to reduce wind erosion and its contribution to local particulate levels. b. Periodically sweep public streets in the vicinity of the site to remove silt (i.e., fine earth material transported from the site by wind, vehicular activities, water runoff, etc.) Which may have accumulated from construction activities. 106. All diesel engines used in construction equipments shall use reformulated diesel fuel. 107. During smog season (May- October) the City shall order that construction cease during Stage III alerts to minimize the number of vehicles and equipment operating, lower ozone levels and protect equipment operators from excessive smog levels. The City, at its discretion, may also limit construction during Stage II alerts. 108. Construction activities shall be limited to between the following hours: a) 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. Monday through 6:40 PWA:IMOREHE -1.BK! 000078 8 Resolution No. PC -97 -339 IPD 97 -1, IPD 97 -2, AND CUP 97 -1 (DAVID MOREHEAD) Paqe 36 Friday, and b) 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Saturday. Construction work on Saturdays will require payment of a premium for City inspection services, and may be further restricted or prohibited should the City receive complaints from adjacent property owners. No construction work is to be done on Sundays, pursuant to Section 15.26.010 of the Municipal Code. 109. Truck noise from hauling operations shall be minimized through establishing hauling routes which avoid residential areas and requiring that "Jake Brakes" not be used along the haul route within the City. The hauling plan must be identified as part of the grading plan and shall be approved by the City Engineer. 110. The developer shall ensure that construction equipment is fitted with modern sound - reduction equipment. 111. Equipment not in use for more than ten minutes shall be turned off. 112. If any hazardous waste is encountered during the construction of this project, all work shall be immediately stopped and the Ventura County Environmental Health Department, the Fire Department, the Sheriff's Department, and the City Con- struction Observer shall be notified immediately. Work shall not proceed until clearance has been issued by all of these agencies. 113. The developer shall utilize all prudent and reasonable measures (including installation of a 6 -foot high chain link fence around the construction sites or provision of a full time licensed security guard) to prevent unauthorized persons from entering the work site at any time and to protect the public from accidents and injury. 114. Equipment engines shall be maintained in good condition and in proper tune as set forth in manufacturers specifications. 6:40 PWA:1MOREHE-12K! Resolution No. PC -97 -339 IPD 97 -1, IPD 97 -2, AND CUP 97 -1 (DAVID MOREHEAD) Paqe 37 PRI9B- TS- ISSUANCE OF__ SSE FOLL- 0WINCz_C0NDJ-T1 -0NS SHALL_ BE•_SATISFIED: 115. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall pay to the City the Los Angeles Avenue Area of Contribution (AOC) Fee, which shall be the dollar amount in effect at the time the fee is paid. a. If previous payment of this contribution can be demonstrated, to the City's satisfaction upon concurrence of the City Manager, the developer would not have to pay the AOC fee. 116. Prior to issuance of a building permit, all habitable structures shall be designed to current UBC requirements or the City approved geotechnical report requirements for the project, whichever standard is most restrictive. 117. Construction of the access driveway improvements on Goldman Avenue shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Of Moorpark. 118. As directed by the City the developer shall have reconstructed, overlaid or slurried that portion of Goldman and Los Angeles Avenues adjacent the development. The reconstruction, overlay or slurry repairs shall extend from center line to curb along the entire length of the project including transitions unless otherwise approved and shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 119. Reproducible centerline tie sheets shall be submitted to the City Engineer's office. 120. Sufficient surety in a form acceptable to the City guaranteeing the public improvements shall be provided. 6:40 PWAAMOREHE -1.BK! 000080 Resolution No. PC -97 -339 IPD 97 -1, IPD 97 -2, AND CUP 97 -1 (DAVID MOREHEAD) Pane 38 121. All surety guaranteeing.the public improvements shall remain in place for one year following acceptance by the City. Any surety bonds that are in effect three years.after final map approval or issuance of the first building permit shall be increased an amount equal to or greater than the consumers price index (Los Angeles /Long Beach SMSA) for a period since original issuance of the surety and shall be increased in like manner each year thereafter. 122. Original "as built" plans will be certified by the Developer's civil engineer and submitted with two sets of blue prints to the City Engineer's office. Although grading plans may have been submitted for checking and construction on sheets larger than 22" X 3611, they must be resubmitted as "as builts" in a series of 22" X 36" mylars (made with proper overlaps) with a title block on each sheet. Submission of "as builts" plans is required before a final inspection will be scheduled. 123. Prior to construction the applicant shall submit two (2) site plans to the Fire District for approval of the location of fire lanes. The fire lanes shall be posted in accordance with California Vehicle Code, Section 22500.1 and Article 10 of the Uniform Fire Code prior to occupancy. 124. All driveways shall have a minimum vertical clearance of 13 feet 6 inches (13' 611). 125. Address numbers, a minimum of 6 inches (611) high, shall be installed prior to occupancy, shall be of contrasting color to the background, and shall be readily visible at night. Where structures are set back more than 250 feet (2501) from the street, larger numbers will be required so that they are distinguishable from the street. In the event the structure(s) is not* visible from the street, the address number(s) shall be posted adjacent to the driveway entrance. 126. Prior to construction, the applicant shall submit plans to the Fire District for approval of the location of hydrants. On plans, show existing hydrants within 300 feet of the development. 6:40 PWAWOREHE -I SK! 00W81 Resolution No. PC -97 -339 IPD 97 -1, IPD 97 -2, AND CUP 97 -1 (DAVID MOREHEAD) Paae 39 127. Fire hydrants shall be installed and in service prior to combustible construction and shall conform to the minimum standard of the Moorpark Water Works Manual. a. Each hydrant shall be a 6 inch wet barrel design and shall have one 4 inch and two 2 1/2 inch outlet(s). b. The required fire flow shall be achieved at no less than 20 psi residual pressure. c. Fire hydrants shall be spaced 300 feet on center and so located that no structure will be farther than 150 feet from any one hydrant. d. Fire hydrants shall be set back in from the curb face 24 inches on center. 128. The minimum fire flow required shall be determined by the type of building construction, proximity to other structures, fire walls, and.fire protection devices provided, as specified by the 1994 Uniform Fire Code Appendix III -A and adopted Amendments. Given the present plans and information, the required fire flow is approximately 1500 gallons per minute at 20 psi. The applicant shall verify that the water purveyor can provide the required volume at the project. 129. If any building(s)is to be protected by an automatic sprinkler system, plans shall be submitted, with payment for plan check, to the Fire District for review and approval. 130. Building plans of all A, E, I and H, occupancies shall be submitted to the Fire District for plan check review and approval. 131. Plans for any fire alarm system shall be submitted to the Fire District for plan check review and approval. 132. Fire extinguishers shall be installed in accordance with National Fire Protection Association Pamphlet #10. The placement of extinguishers shall be subject to review by the Fire District. 133. Plans for the installation of an automatic fire extinguishing system (such as halon or dry chemical) shall be submitted to the Fire District for plan check. 6:40 PM /kNOREHE -13K! oUVos? Resolution No. PC -97 -339 IPD 97 -1, IPD 97 -2, AND CUP 97 -1 (DAVID MOREHEAD) Page 40 134. All grass or brush exposing any structure(s) to fire hazards shall be cleared for a distance of 100 feet prior to framing, according to the Ventura County Fire Protection Ordinance. 135. Commercial trash dumpsters and containers with an individual capacity of 1.5 cubic yards or greater shall not be stored or placed within 5 feet of openings, combustible walls, .or combustible roof eave lines unless protected by approved automatic fire sprinklers. (Uniform Fire Code, Article 11.) 136. Applicant shall obtain VCFD Form #126 "Requirements For Construction" prior to obtaining a building permit for any new structures or additions to existing structures. Construction site security: All new construction, shall comply with the following security measures until the utilities have been released by the City: 137. Perimeter lighting shall be installed at a height not less than 15 feet from the ground. The light source used shall have a minimum light output of 2000 lumens, be protected by a vandalism resistant cover, and be lighted during the hours of darkness. Additional lighting shall be required if the construction site exceeds four acres in area. Lighting shall be installed at locations designated by the Chief of Police. i38. In addition to perimeter lighting described in Subsection A of this section, one of the following shall be used: a. Fencing, not less than six feet in height, which is designed to preclude human intrusion, shall be installed along the perimeter boundaries of the construction site; or b. A uniformed security guard, licensed according to Business and Professions Code, Chapter 11, shall be utilized to continually patrol the construction site during the hours when construction work has ceased. 6:40 PMlA WOREHE -1.BW 000083 Resolution No. PC -97 -339 IPD 97 -1, IPD 97 -2, AND CUP 97 -1 (DAVID MOREHEAD) Paqe 41 c. Construction equipment, tools and materials will be properly secured to prevent theft during non - working hours. d. All appliances (microwave ovens, dishwashers, trash compactors, etc.) will be properly secured to prevent theft prior to installation during non - working hours. All serial numbers will be recorded for identification purposes. e. If an alarm system is used, it should be wired to all exterior doors, windows, roof vents or other roof openings where access may be made. Windows and Sliding Glass Doors. The following requirements must be met for windows and sliding glass doors: 139. Louvered windows shall not be used, when a portion of the window is less than 12 feet vertically or 6 feet horizontally from an accessible surface or any adjoining roof, balcony, landing, stair tread, platform, or similar structure. Garage -type Doors. All garage doors shall conform to the following standards: 140. Wood doors shall have panels a minimum of 5/16 inch in thickness with the locking hardware being attached to the support framing. 141. Aluminum doors shall be a minimum thickness of .0215 inches and riveted together a minimum of eighteen (18) inches on center along the outside seams. There shall be a full width horizontal beam attached to the main door structure which shall meet the pilot, or pedestrian access, door framing within three (3) inches of the strike area of' the pilot or pedestrian access door. 142. Fiberglass doors shall have panels a minimum density of six ounces per square foot from the bottom of the door to a height of seven (7) feet. Panels above seven (7) feet and panels in residential structures shall have a density not less that five (5) ounces per square foot. 6:40 PMlA WOREHE -13K! opog84 Resolution No. PC -97 -339 IPD 97 -1, IPD 97 -2, AND CUP 97 -1 (DAVID MOREHEAD) Pace 42 143. Doors utilizing a cylinder lock shall have a minimum five -pin tumbler operation with the locking bar or bolt extending into the receiving guide a minimum of one (1) inch. 144. Doors that exceed 16 feet in width, but do not exceed 19 feet in width, shall have the following options as to locking devices: a. Two lock- receiving points, or one garage- door -type slide bolt may be used if mounted no higher that 26 inches from the bottom of the door; i. A single bolt may be used if placed in the center of the door with the locking point located either at the floor or door frame header; ii. Torsion spring counter balance type hardware may be used if such hardware substantially complies with the requirements of this chapter. iii. Except in.a residential building, doors secured by electrical operation shall have a keyed switch to open the door when in a closed position, or shall have a signal locking device to open the door. iv. Doors with slide bolt assemblies shall have frames of a minimum of .120 inches in thickness, with a minimum bolt diameter of one;half inch and protrude at least 1 % inches into the receiving guide. A bolt diameter of 3/8 inch may be used in 'a residential building. The slide bolt shall be attached to the door with non removable bolts from the outside. Rivets shall not be used to attach slide bolt assemblies. V. Except in a residential building, padlock(s) used with exterior mounted slide bolt(s) shall have a hardened steel shackle locking both at heed and toe and a minimum five pin tumbler operation with non removable key when in an unlocked position. Padlock(s) used with interior mounted slide 6:40 WkWOREHE -12KI 000085 Resolution No. PC -97 -339 IPD 97 -1, IPD 97 -2, AND CUP 97 -1 (DAVID MOREHEAD) Page 43 bolts(s) shall have a hardened steel shackle with a minimum four -pin tumbler operation. .. 145. The following standards shall apply to lighting, address identification and parking areas: a. Addresses will be clearly visible to approaching emergency vehicles. The address number of every commercial building shall be illuminated during the hours of darkness so that it shall be easily visible from the street. The numerals in these numbers shall be no less than six inches in height and be of a color contrasting to the background. In addition, any business which affords vehicular access to the rear through any driveway, alleyway or parking lot shall also display the same numbers on the rear of the building. 146. Address Numbers will be placed on all buildings, in an obvious sequenced pattern, to be reviewed by the community services officer prior to designation. 147. All exterior commercial doors, during the hours of darkness, shall be illuminated with a minimum of 2 foot candles of light. All exterior bulbs shall be protected by weather and vandalism resistant covers. 148. Open parking lots, and access thereto, providing more than ten parking spaces and for use by the general public, shall be provided with a maintained minimum of one footcandle of light on the parking surface from dusk until the termination of business every operating day. Landscapi_nge 149. Landscaping shall not cover any exterior door or window. 150. Landscaping at entrances /exits or at any intersection will not block or screen the view of a seated driver from another moving vehicle or pedestrian. 6:40 PWA:IM0REHE -1.BK 000086 Resolution No. PC -97 -339 IPD 97 -1, IPD 97 -2, AND CUP 97 -1 (DAVID MOREHEAD) Pacre 44 151. Landscaping (trees) will not be placed directly under any overhead lighting which could cause a loss of light at ground level. 152. Swinging exterior glass doors, wood or metal doors with glass panels, solid wood or metal doors shall be constructed or protected as follows: a. Wood doors shall 'be of solid core construction with a minimum thickness of 1 3/4 inches. Wood panel doors with panels less than one inch thick shall be covered on the inside with a minimum sixteen U.S. gauge sheet steel, or its equivalent, which is to be attached with screws on minimum six -inch centers. Hollow steel doors shall be of a minimum sixteen U.S. gauge and have sufficient reinforcement to maintain the designed thickness of the door when any locking device is installed; such reinforcement being able to restrict collapsing of the door around any locking device. b. Except when double cylinder dead bolts are utilized, any glazing in exterior doors or within 48 inches of any door - locking mechanism shall be constructed or protected as follows: i. Fully tempered glass or rated burglary resistant glazing; or ii. Iron or steel grills of at least 1/8 inch material with a minimum two -inch mesh secured on the inside of the glazing may be utilized; or iii. The glazing shall be covered with iron bars of a least one -half inch round or one inch by 1/4 inch flat steel material, spaced not more than five inches apart, secured on the inside of the glazing; iv. Items b and c shall not interfere with the operation of opening windows if such windows are 6:40 PWAWOREHE -13K! ,()VW8 Resolution No. PC -97 -339 IPD 97 -1, IPD 97 -2, AND CUP 97 -1 (DAVID MOREHEAD) Paqe 45 required to be openable by the Uniform Building Code. V. All swinging exterior wood and steel doors shall be equipped as follows: (1) A single or double door shall be equipped with a double cylinder dead bolt. The bolt shall have a minimum projection of one inch and be constructed so as to repel cutting tool attack. The deadbolt shall have an embedment of at least 3/4 inch into the strike receiving the projected bolt. The cylinder shall have a cylinder guard; a minimum of five pin tumblers, and shall be connected to the inner portion of the lock by connecting screws of at least 1/4 inch in diameter. The provisions of the preceding paragraph do not apply where: (2) Panic hardware is required; or (3) An equivalent device is approved by the enforcing authority. (4) Double doors shall be equipped as follows: (5 ) The inactive leaf of double door(s) shall be equipped with metal flush bolts having a minimum embedment of 5/8 inch into the head and threshold of the door frame. (6) Double doors shall have an astragal constructed of steel a minimum of .125 thick which will cover the opening between the doors. The astragal shall be a minimum of two inches wide, and extend a minimum of one inch beyond the edge of the door to which it is attached. The astragal shall be attached to the outside of the active door by means of welding or with nonremovable bolts spaced apart on not more that ten -inch centers. The door to which such an astragal is attached 6:w 000088 Resolution No. PC -97 -339 IPD 97 -1, IPD 97 -2, AND CUP 97 -1 (DAVID MOREHEAD) Paqe 46 must be determined by the fire safety codes adopted by the enforcing authority. (7) Every single or double exterior door equipped with lever - handled locking mechanism hardware shall have an approved handicapped- accessible threshold complying with provisions of Title 24 of the Uniform Building Code (as amended from time to time) beneath the door. The opening between the threshold and, the door shall be secured in a manner approved by the Crime Prevention Bureau of the Moorpark Police Department designed to prevent the passing of rigid materials or mechanical devices between the door and the threshold for the purposes of unlocking the door from the interior side. c. Aluminum frame swinging doors shall be equipped as follows: i. The jamb on all aluminum frame swinging doors shall be so constructed or protected to prevent pealing of the door frame around the strike and withstand 1600 pounds of pressure in both a vertical distance of three inches and a horizontal distance of one inch each side of the strike, so as to prevent violation of the strike. ii. A single or double door shall be equipped with a double cylinder deadbolt with a bolt projection exceeding one inch, or a hook shaped or expanding dog bolt that engages the strike sufficiently to prevent spreading. The deadbolt lock shall have a minimum of five pin tumblers and a cylinder guard. d. Panic hardware, whenever required by the Uniform Building Code or Title 19, California Administrative Code, shall be installed as follows: i. Panic hardware shall contain a minimum of two locking points on each door; or 6:40 PMIAWOREHE -133 00008y Resolution No. PC -97 -339 IPD 97 -1, IPD 97 -2, AND CUP 97 -1 (DAVID MOREHEAD) Paqe 47 ii. On single doors, panic hardware may have one locking point.which is not to be located at either the tope or bottom rails of the door frame. The door shall have an astragal constructed of steel .125 inch think which shall be attached with nonremovable bolts to the outside of the door. The astragal shall extend a minimum of six inches vertically above and below the latch of the panic hardware. The astragal shall be a minimum of two inches wide and extend a minimum of one inch beyond the edge of the door to which it is attached. e. Double doors containing panic hardware shall have an astragal attached to the doors at their meeting point which will close the opening between them, but not interfere with the operation of either door. 153. Horizontal sliding doors shall track at top and bottom and a with a hardened steel shackle toe, and a minimum five nonremovable key when in an track shall be so designed that the track when the door is in be equipped with a metal guide L cylinder lock and /or padlock which locks at both heel and pin tumbler operation with unlocked position. The bottom the door cannot be lifted from a locked position. 154. In office buildings (multiple occupancy), all entrance doors to individual office suites shall meet the construction and locking requirements for exterior doors. 155. Windows shall be deemed accessible if less than twelve feet above ground. Accessible windows and all exterior transoms having a pane exceeding 96 square inches in an area with the smallest dimension exceeding six inches and not visible from A--public or private vehicular access way shall be protected in the following manner: a. Fully tempered glass or burglary resistant glazing; or b. The following window barriers may be used but shall be secured with nonremovable bolts: 6:40 PWAAM0REHE -1.BK 0010030 Resolution No. PC -97 -339 IPD 97 -1, IPD 97 -2, AND CUP 97 -1 (DAVID MOREHEAD) Paqe 48 i. Inside or outside iron bars of at least % inch round or one inch by 1/4 inch flat steel material, spaced not more than five inches apart and securely fastened; or ii. Inside or outside iron or steel grills of at least 1/8 inch material with not more than a two -inch mesh and securely fastened. c. If a side or rear window is of the type that can be opened, it shall, where applicable, be secured on the inside with either a slide bar, bolt, crossbar, auxiliary locking device, and /or padlock with hardened steel shackle, a minimum four pin tumbler operation. d. The protective bars or grills shall not interfere with the operation of opening windows if such windows are required to be openable by the Uniform Building Code. 156. Roof openings shall be equipped as follows: a. All skylights on the roof of any building or premises used for business purposes shall be provided with: i. Rated burglary resistant glazing; or ii. Iron bars of at least % inch round or one inch by 1/4 inch flat steel material under the skylight and securely fastened; or iii. A steel grill of at least 1/8 inch material with a maximum two -inch mesh under the skylight and securely fastened. b. All hatchway openings on the roof of any building or premises used for business purposes shall be secured as follows: i. If the hatchway is of wooden material, it shall be covered on the inside with at least sixteen U.S. gauge sheet metal, or its equivalent, attached with screws. 6:40 PM MMOREHE -1.BK! 00003 Resolution No. PC -97 -339 IPD 97 -1, IPD 97 -2, AND CUP 97 -1 (DAVID MOREHEAD) Paae 49 ii. The hatchway shall be secured from the inside with slide bar or slide bolts. iii. Outside hinges on all hatchway openings shall be provided with nonremovable pins when using pin -type hinges. c. All air duct or air vent openings exceeding 96 square inches on the roof or exterior walls of any building or premises used for business purposes shall be secured by covering the same with either of the following: i. Iron bars of at least % inch round or one inch by 1/4 inch flat steel material spaced no more than five inches apart and securely fastened; or ii. Iron or steel grills of at least 1/8 inch material with a maximum two -inch mesh and securely fastened. iii. If the barrier is on the outside, it shall be secured with bolts which are nonremovable from the exterior. iv. The above (a and b) must not interfere with venting requirements creating a potentially hazardous condition to health and safety or conflict with the provisions of -the Uniform Building Code or Title 19, California Administrative Code. 157. Permanently affixed ladders leading to roofs shall be fully enclosed with sheet metal to a height of ten feet. This covering shall be locked against the ladder with a case - hardened hasp, secured with nonremovable screws or bolts. A -inges on the cover will be provided with nonremovable pins when using pin -type hinges. If a padlock is used, it shall have a hardened steel shackle, locking at both heel and toe, and a minimum five -pin tumbler operation with nonremovable key when in an unlocked position. 6:40 PWAAMOREHE -1.BK 00009Z Resolution No. PC -97 -339 IPD 97 -1, IPD 97 -2, AND CUP 97 -1 (DAVID MOREHEAD) Page 50 158. Applicant for service shall comply with the District "Rules and Regulations" including all provisions of or relating to the existing Industrial Waste Discharge Requirements and subsequent additions or revisions thereto. Grading (Also see City Engineer Conditions 159. Every effort shall be made to use reclaimed water for common area landscaping irrigation and for dust control of grading operations. Sufficient proof shall be given to the Director of Community Development that using reclaimed water is physically or economically not feasible prior to the Director's decision to dispose with this condition. Generally, if the line is not located closer than 500 feet from the site, it may be deemed to be economically not feasible. 160. Temporary irrigation shall be provided for all non permanent erosion control landscaping until it is replaced with permanent irrigation. Temporary irrigation must be replaced with permanent irrigation prior to issuance of a Zoning Clearance for the first building. 161. Prior to approval of a Final Map, the subdivider shall demonstrate by possession of a District Release from the Calleguas Municipal Water District that arrangements for payment of the Construction Charge applicable to the proposed subdivision have been made. The subdivider shall comply with Ventura County Waterworks Rules and Regulations, including payment of all applicable fees. 162. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, an unconditional availability letter shall be obtained from the County Waterworks District No. 1 for sewer and water service. Said letter shall be filed with the Department of Community Development or, if said Unconditional Availability Letter in a form satisfactory to the City cannot be obtained from the County Waterworks District No. 1, the developer shall execute a Subdivision Sewer Agreement in a form satisfactory to the 6:40 PWX- W0REHE -1.BK 000093 Resolution No. PC -97 -339 IPD 97 -1, IPD 97 -2, AND CUP 97 -1 (DAVID MOREHEAD) Paqe 51 City. Said agreement shall permit deferral of unconditional guarantee for sewer and water service until issuance of a building permit for each lot in the subdivision. Said agreement shall include language holding the City harmless against damages in the event of the ultimate lack of adequate water or sewer service. 163. At the time water service connection is made, cross connection control devices shall be installed on the water system in a manner approved by the County Waterworks District No. 1. 164. The applicant shall post sufficient. surety bond to assure that all proposed utility lines within and immediately adjacent to the project site shall be placed undergrounded to the nearest off -site utility pole.. All existing utilities shall also be undergrounded to the nearest off -site utility pole with the exception of 66 KVA or larger power lines. The subdivider shall indicate in writing how this condition will be satisfied. The action of the foregoing direction was approved by the following roll vote: AYES: NOES: PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED THIS 23TH DAY OF June, 1997. Attest: Celia LaFleur, Secretary to the Planning Commission 6:40 PWA:IM0REHE -1.BK1 1..00094 SECTION 1 - GENERAL INFORMATION A. HEARING DATE: June 23, 1997 C. HEARING LOCATION: City Council Chambers 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California D. CASE NUMBERS: B. HEARING TIME: MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA 7:00 p.m. T anning Commission Meeting A ON 1. � 7 BY Industrial Planned Development Permit No. 97 -1 (Automotive Lube and Tune facility), 97 -2 (Light Industrial /Warehouse Building) . E. STAFF CONTACT: Sandra Massa - Lavitt Consulting Planner F. APPLICANT: David Morehead 1001 Montana Santa Monica, CA 90403 G. PROPOSED PROJECT: Industrial Planned Development Permit No. 97 -1, for an automotive lube and tune facility of 2,312 square feet., with limited servicing of vehicles. Industrial Planned Development Permit No. 97 -2 is a light industrial /warehouse building, that is intended as a distribution center for auto parts; and, Conditional Use Permit No 97 -1, for an automotive use in the Industrial zone, and within 300, of a residential zoning district. Building Building Area IPD No. 97 -1 Lube and tune facility IPD No. 97 -2 Industrial /Warehouse Total Building Area 2,312 sq. ft. 4,992 sq. ft. 7,304 sq. ft. 10:43 AMAIMOREHE -4APD 000095 Industrial Planned Development Permit No. 97 -1 and 97 -2 David Morehead June 3, 1997 Paae 2 H. PROPOSED LOCATION: The proposed development is located at the northeast corner of Los Angeles Avenue and Goldman Avenue, in the City of Moorpark. Assessor's Parcel Nos.: 511 -0- 151 -065 and 075. I. APPLICATION DEEMED COMPLETE /PROCESSING EXPIRATION DATE: The entitlement request for the Industrial Planned Development Permits was deemed complete on April 21, 1997. The processing expiration date for the Industrial Planned Development Permits is October 21, 1997. J. REQUESTED ACTION AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: 1. Open the public hearing and accept public testimony. 2. Review, consider, and adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. (Attachment 1) 3. Review and adopt the proposed mitigation monitoring program. (Attachment 2) 4. Make the appropriate findings and adopt the attached resolution recommending to the City Council, Industrial Planned Development Permits 97 -1 & 97 -2, and Conditional Use Permit 97 -1. (Attachment 3) 19:39 amC.MWP6VM0REHEA0V"EHE -4.WPD 006036 Industrial Planned Development Permit No. 97 -1 and 97 -2 David Morehead June 18, 1997 Paqe 3 SECTION II - PROJECT SITE BACKGROUND A. SITE ZONING: M -1 (Industrial Park Zone) B. SITE GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: The City's General Plan Land Use Element designates the site as I -1 (Light Industrial). Therefore, allowing development of the site with the proposed automotive tune facility and industrial building is consistent with the General Plan land use designation. C. VICINITY ZONING AND LAND USE: Zoning North: M -1 (Industrial Park Zone) South: RPD -13 East: M -1 West: M -1 Land Use North: Existing Industrial Building South: Vacant East: Existing Public Storage Building West: Existing Industrial Building D. VICINITY GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: North: I -1 (Light Industrial) South: R -VH (Residential -Very High, 15 du /ac) East: I -1 West: I -1 E. PROJECT SITE HISTORY Development Permit 390 was submitted in 1989, for an auto parts distribution center. The application was extended once. And expired in 1992. No site work took place subsequent to the discretionary approval. 10:43 AMAAM0REHE -4.WP0 1 '000097 Industrial Planned Development Permit No: 97 -1 and 97 -2 David Morehead June 18, 1997 Page 4 F. EXISTING SETTING: The site is a 0.70 acre parcel which is currently undeveloped and is level. No structures exist on the lot where the proposed development will be constructed. SECTION III - PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND ANALYSIS: The following are the site specifications for this project: 25.8% Based on the above calculations, the proposed industrial project exceeds the City's Ordinance requirement of providing a minimum of 10% landscaping within the parking area and on the site. The site improvements include the installation of a wall along the front of the site to continue the line that is established along Los Angeles Avenue. The materials of the wall are consistent with the materials used in the existing walls. On this particular site, there is a slight elevation change which effectively lowers the visual impact of the wall, so that only one or two courses of block will be visible. The purpose of the wall is to obscure the vehicle activity taking place on the lot. Existing walls along this stretch of Los Angeles, is 3M' high. Increasing the height of the wall will accomplish the screening of the vehicle activity and continue the line of the wall through to Goldman Avenue. A condition of approval will be reflected that would require the height of the wall to extend 3M' above the curb elevation on Los Angeles Avenue. Along Goldman Avenue, screening of much of the vehicle activity at the site occurs by the use of berming of the landscaping. Also installation of shrubs that would, at maturity, form a hedge continue the screen effect. A condition of approval will reflect 10:43 AMA:WOREHE -4.WPD 000098 Industrial Planned Development Permit No. 97 -1 and 97 -2 David Morehead June 18, 1997 Paqe 5 the use of shrubbery along Goldman Avenue with the ultimate affect of forming a hedge. Lube and Tune facility 8 stalls Industrial /Warehouse 10 stalls Total 18 Combined buildings 19 2 21 Based on the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance, the proposed project has sufficient parking for the proposed buildings. The City's Zoning Ordinance allows a maximum height of the main building in the M -1 Zone of 30 feet. The height of the highest proposed building is 25.1 feet which is within the height limitation as specified in the Zoning Ordinance. The project is consistent with the City's Zoning Ordinance which requires a setback from edge.of right -of -way for all existing and planned two lane connectors as follows: twenty feet of building setback for all front yard and ten feet for all side yards with a minimum of ten feet of landscaping behind the front and side yard property lines. The setbacks shall be landscaped, except for walkways and front -to -back driveways. It further states that setbacks shall be landscaped, except for front -to -back driveways and walkways, and shall not be used for drive aisles or parking. 10:43 AMA:IMOREHE-4APD 000099 Industrial Planned Development Permit No. 97 -1 and 97 -2 David Morehead June 18, 1997 Page 6 The minimum front yard setback for the proposed buildings is 20 feet. The applicant has been conditioned to provide concrete curb and gutter, parkways, new street lights and signing to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The applicant is also required to pay all energy costs associated with public street lighting for one year from the date of acceptance of the street improvements. Adequate access will be provided to the proposed project via a driveway access easement taken from Goldman Avenue. The easement wraps around the site to what appears to be a driveway that would have been cut on Los Angeles Avenue. It is apparent that the driveway cut is not likely to occur for the lots on this block. Reciprocal access easements are existing and defined in the title report, which allows access through the existing driveway to all the users on the block. The completion of the two (2) buildings on vacant land along Goldman Avenue was considered as part of the City's General Plan build -out. The traffic from the proposed buildings will exit onto Goldman Avenue to a non - signalized intersection at the intersection of Goldman Avenue and New Los Angeles Avenue. Therefore, the project's proposed additional traffic will be consistent with the Circulation Element of the City's General Plan. According to Section 17.32.090 of the City's Zoning Ordinance, one loading space shall be provided if the gross floor area of the building exceeds 3,000 square feet. The required size of each loading space must be at least 12 feet wide by 40 feet long and have a 14 foot vertical clearance and be located near the service 10:43 AMA:IMOREHE-4.WPO 000100 Industrial Planned Development Permit No. 97 -1 and 97 -2 David Morehead June 18, 1997 Paqe 7 entrance of the building. In this case, the proposed industrial building has one loading area. The loading and dock area is located on the east side of the building, which meets the length, width and height requirements as specified in the Zoning Ordinance. The loading door to the industrial building is off the unused easement on the east side of the building. Loading will be partially screened by the elevation change of the site, which is lower than street level of Los Angeles Street; and, as the landscape matures. Although the proposed buildings are of a smaller scale than other buildings along Goldman Avenue, the architectural design of the both structures will be more compatible with a retail development. The architectural style is mission style, offering building fenistrations, roof lines, and undulating parapet walls. The face of the buildings incorporate similar use of materials and colors. It's visibility to Los Angeles Avenue creates the need for greater architectural compatibility than that of the existing industrial buildings. Sufficient architectural relief to soften the expansive walls combined with massed landscaping adjacent to the front of the building will provide sufficient contrast and provides visual relief from a distance. According to the 1989 Air Pollution Control District Guidelines, this project will produce approximately 15 pounds of ROC (Reactive Organic Compounds) and 14 pounds of NOx (Nitrogen Oxides) per day based on an analysis year of 1997. According to the AQMP (Air Quality Management Program), development projects capable of daily emissions less than 25 pounds per day of Reactive Organic Compounds or Nitrogen Oxides are not considered to have a significant adverse impact individually and cumulatively on air quality. The proposed project is not expected to result in substantial deterioration of the ambient air quality. The anticipated movement of vehicles and trucks to and from the site would not generate enough air emissions to degrade the ambient air quality. Since the project does 10:43 AMA:IM0REHE-4.WPD 000101- Industrial Planned Development Permit No. 97 -1 and 97 -2 David Morehead June 18, 1997 Pane 8 contribute additional air pollutants to the airshed, staff has placed a condition on the project requiring that the applicant make a contribution to the Moorpark Traffic Systems Management Fund of $.15 per square foot of building area to fund Traffic System Management programs. Resolution 1135 adopted by the City Council on June 21, 1995, requires the City Council to review and approve all industrial development within 300' of a residential zoning district. The parcel considered for development is within 300' of residential zoned property. To the south, across Los Angeles Avenue, is a site that is zoned residential. SECTION IV. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Mitigated Negative Declaration: Staff determined that a Mitigated Negative Declaration should be prepared. The proposed project is not expected to result in significant impacts to the environment. Potential environment issues are discussed in the attached Initial Study and mitigation measures have been incorporated into the conditions of approval for the project. The mitigation measures will be enforced through implementation of the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. A Mitigation Monitoring Program has been prepared with mitigation measures mitigate potential impacts associated with project to an insignificant level. Based upon an Initial Study, staff has determined that environmental impacts associated with development of this project will be limited; in the unlikelihood that environmental impacts should occur, impacts would be mitigated to a level of insignificance. SECTION V - OTHER AGENCY REVIEW Agencies and Departments which have reviewed the application include the City Engineer, City of Moorpark Police Department, Fire 10:43 AMAAM0REHE -4.WPD 0001.02 Industrial Planned Development Permit No'. 97 -1 and 97 -2 David Morehead June 18, 1997 Paqe 9 Prevention District, Caltrans District 7, Waterworks District Number 1, Moorpark Unified School District, and the County of Ventura. Conditions of approval imposed by the reviewing agencies have been incorporated into the conditions of approval on the proposed project. SECTION VI - CONFORMANCE WITH THE GENERAL PLAN The requested buildings are Industrial Planned Development are consistent with the Land Use Element of the General Plan. In particular, the following policies are considered applicable to the proposed industrial project: Policy 2: To encourage industrial development to adopt a harmonious architectural style with appropriate landscaping and buffer areas. Discussion: The buildings as proposed are of an architectural style consistent with other industrial buildings contained in the general area of the proposed buildings. The proposed landscaping exceeds the required City landscape standards. Policy--S: In order to discourage strip industrial development, future industrial facilities should be in the form of industrial parks. Discussion: The industrial buildings will infill vacant land within the existing industrial area along Science Drive. Therefore, this project is consistent with providing industrial development within areas planned for industrial parks within the City. Policy-4: To establish sites for appropriate industrial uses in locations which are harmonious with adjoining land uses, and will not degrade the general physical environment of Moorpark. . Discussion: The project site is within an area zoned and planned for industrial uses. The proposed industrial buildings are designed as to minimize the impacts to the environment and required mitigation measures have been included as conditions of project approval. 10:43 AMA:IMOREHE -4.WPD 000103 Industrial Planned Development Permit No. 97 -1 and 97 -2 David Morehead June 18, 1997 Paqe 10 Prepared By: Sandra Massa - Lavitt Consulting Planner ATTACHMENTS: Reviewed By: Nelson Miller Director of Community Development 1. Initial Study, Negative Declaration 2. Mitigation.Monitoring Program Zoning Map 3. Draft Resolution containing Findings and Conditions of Approval 4. Site Plan, Elevations, and Conceptual Landscape Plan 5. Zoning Map 6. General Plan Map 10:43 AMA:IMOREHE -400 O00j.04. CITY OF MOORPARK DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Entitlement: Date of Initial Study: Name of Applicant: Location of Project: Assessor's Parcel No(s).: General Plan Land Use Designation: Present Land Use: Existing Zoning: Agency Staff Contact: Industrial Planned Development IPD 97 -1 & 2, Conditional Use Permit CUP 97 -1 April 25, 1997 David Morehead Northeast corner of Goldman Avenue and Los Angeles Avenue in the City of Moorpark. Assessor's Parcel No. 511 -0- 151 -065, 511 -0- lSl -075 I -1 (Light Industrial) Undeveloped property M -1 (Industrial Park) City of Moorpark Sandra Massa - Lavitt Consulting Planner 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021 (805) 529 -6864 I. PROJECT LOCATION, DESCRIPTION, SURROUNDING LAND USES AND HISTORY: Location: Intersection of Goldman Avenue and Los Angeles Avenue in the City of Moorpark. 9:52 AWA W0REHE -2.WPD ATTACHMENT Industrial Planned Development IPD 97 -1 & 2; Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 97 -1 (Morehead) Initial Study Paqe 2 Project: IPD 97 -1 is a 2313 sq. ft. Automobile Lube and Tune facility; IPD 97 -1 is a 4992 sq. ft. building for Industrial /Manufacturing/ Warehouse uses. Land Use Element of the General Plan Land use designation is I -1 (Light Industrial) The zoning is M -1 (Industrial Park). Site Description: 1. Surrounding zoning North: M -1 South: RPD 13 East: M -1 West: M -1 2. Surrounding Land Uses: North: Industrial use South: Vacant East: Public storage facility West: Industrial 3. Site History: There have not been any proposed projects on this site in the past. II. IS THE PROPOSED PROJECT CONSISTENT WITH: Yes No N/A Moorpark General Plan x Moorpark Zoning Ordinance x_ J 9:52 AWA:IMOREHE -2.WPD I00106 Industrial Planned Development IPD 97 -1 & 2; Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 97 -1 (Morehead) Initial Study Paae 3 III. ARE ANY OF THE FOLLOWING STUDIES REQUIRED: Noise Study Tree Study Archaeological Report Biology Report x Geotechnical Report _ x Soil borings and assessment for liquefaction potential x Traffic Study Other (identify below) Hydrology study IV. INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST AND RESPONSES: A. Earth 1. Does the parcel contain slopes of 20% or greater which will be affected by project construction? Yes Maybe No N/A x Response: Pursuant to a Soils Report prepared by Earth Systems Consultants, the development of the site is considered feasible from a soils engineering standpoint, based on implementation and incorporation of the recommendations which follow into the site preparation, grading and construction of the site. 9:52 AWA:WOREHE--2.WPD 000107 Industrial Planned Development IPD 97 -1 & 2; Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 97 -1 (Morehead) Initial Study Paqe 4 * A grading plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer. The applicant shall obtain a grading permit; and shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing grading completion. * All haul routes shall be approved by the City Engineer. On -site haul routes shall be limited to graded areas only. * The applicant shall submit to the City for review and approval, detailed soil engineering /geotechnical reports, and hydrology report, prepared by both a civil engineer and a geotechnical engineer registered in the State of California. The report shall include a geotechnical investigation with regard to liquefaction, expansive soils, and seismic safety. The grading plan shall incorporate the recommendations of the approved soil engineering /geotechnical report. * The Community Development Department and the City Engineer's office will review the submitted grading plan, soil engineering / geotechnical reports, and the comments from the City's geotechnical report. The Community Development Department shall ensure that all aspects of grading will be done in accordance with the City of Moorpark's Grading Ordinance and in accordance with Building Code requirements. 2. Is any significant modification of major landforms proposed? Yes Maybe No N/A Based upon studies and field investigations conducted by staff and evidenced in the geotechnical report, the land sits upon relatively flat topography; no significant landforms exists on the project site. To ensure that there is no potential for soil and landform impacts, standard City conditions of approval will be imposed as identified in Response number 1, above. 9:52 AM/A:IMOREHE -2AP0 A 000108 Industrial Planned Development IPD 97 -1 & 2; Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 97 -1 (Morehead) Initial Study Paqe 5 3. Will the project result in the exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mudslides, ground failure, or similar hazards? 9:52 AWAAMOREHE -2.WPD r 00010s Industrial Planned Development IPD 97 -1 & 2; Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 97 -1 (Morehead) Initial Study Paqe 6 Yes Maybe No N/A The proposed site is considered suitable for the commercial development provided that undercutting and recompaction of bearing soils is conducted. Pursuant to building code, the building pad areas for the proposed commercial building will be compacted in order to support the proposed commercial structure and in accordance with the Geotechnical report. No geologic or seismic hazards are known to exist on -site or within the immediate vicinity. The construction of the commercial building is not expected to result in the exposure of people or property to geologic or seismic hazards. 4. Does the site include any unique geological features or paleontological resources of significance? Yes Maybe No N/A The project site on the valley floor and field investigations have identified that no unique geological features or paleontological resources exist on the subject site or surrounding areas. Standard City requirements will be imposed as follows:. During Grading• * If -any archaeological, paleontological, or historical finds are uncovered during excavation operations, the permittee shall assure the preservation of the site; shall obtain the services of a qualified archaeologist to recommend disposition of the site; and shall obtain the Director of Community Development's written concurrence with the recommended disposition before resuming site development. * The City Engineer's office shall conduct field inspections during the grading phase of the proposed development, to document that no 9:52 AWAAMOREHE -2.WPD 1000110 Industrial Planned Development IPD 97 -1 & 2; Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 97 -1 (Morehead) Initial Study Paqe 7 cultural or paleontological resources have been encountered; and that the grading and fill placement are to the City's acceptance in regard to the City's Grading Ordinance and Building Code requirements. * If grading is to occur between October 15th and April 15th, an erosion control plan shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval. 5. Will the project result in a significant increase in wind or water erosion or siltation either off- or on -site beyond the construction phase of the project? Yes Maybe No N/A Standard site preparation and grading conditions of approval will ensure that no significant impacts result. Mitigation measures found in responses to questions No. 1, 2 and 5 will help ensure that the proposed project will not result in negative erosion impacts. 6. Will the project result in changes in siltation, deposition, or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream? Yes Maybe No N/A A standard project condition of approval requires City Engineer approval of a grading plan prepared by a registered Civil Engineer. The City Engineer will review the grading plan to ensure that all aspects of grading including site preparation, grading and fill placement, keying and benching will be done in accordance with the City of Moorpark Grading Ordinance and to ensure that the grading controls are incorporated into the grading plan. To eliminate the possibility of erosion impacts, the applicant will be required to do the following: 9:52 AWA:WOREHE -2.WPD Industrial Planned Development IPD 97 -1 & 2; Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 97 -1 (Morehead) Initial Study Paae 8 * Prior to Fine and Bulk Grading Permit approval by the City Engineer, the design mitigation recommended by the City Engineer shall be incorporated into the project grading plan. The City Engineer shall verify that all grading control measures are incorporated into the grading plan prior to issuance of the grading permit. B. Air 1. Will the project result in a significant adverse air quality impact (based on the estimated date of project completion), as identified in the Ventura County Air Pollution Control District's Guidelines for the Preparation of Air Qualit -y Impact Analyses? Yes Maybe No N/A The County of Ventura Air Pollution Control District reviewed the proposed project and made the following comment: Based upon the criteria in the Ventura County's "Guidelines for the Preparation of Air Quality Impact Analyses ", the project will not result in a potentially significant impact on regional air quality. 2. Will the project result in a significant cumulative adverse air quality impact based on inconsistency with the Ventura County Air Quality Management Plan? Yes Maybe No N/A X * Please refer to Response, No. 1, above. 3. Will the project result in the creation of objectionable odors? Yes Maybe No N/A X 9:52 AWA:IMOREHE =2APD 00.011 Industrial Planned Development IPD 97 -1 & 2; Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 97 -1 (Morehead) Initial Study Paqe 9 Since this is a commercial development, there is little potential for odor impacts. The storage and /or production of odorous substances is prohibited. 4. Will the project result in the exposure of sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? Yes Maybe No N/A Grading improvements necessary to prepare the project site for construction would generate a considerable volume of total suspended particulates. This is not considered a potentially significant impact due to the short duration of the effect (plus or minus 10 months) . During and after project construction, measures reducing pollutant concentrations will be imposed. To reduce the potential for air quality impacts, require that the following mitigation measures are followed: standard City procedures and monitoring procedures * If feasible, the applicant shall ensure that contractors properly maintain and operate construction equipment and use direct injection diesel or gasoline powered engines. * All active portions of the construction site shall be sufficiently watered to prevent excessive amounts of dust generated. Complete coverage watering shall occur at least twice daily, preferably in the late morning and after work is done for the day. Non - potable water shall be used if determined feasible by the Director of Community Development, the City Engineer and the applicant. 9:52 AWA:IMOREHE -2.WPO 000114 Industrial Planned Development IPD 97 -1 & 2; Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 97 -1 (Morehead) Initial Study Paqe 10 * All trucks importing fill to the site shall use tarpaulins to cover the truck load and shall operate per the terms 'of the required encroachment permit. * So as to prevent excessive amounts of dust, all clearing, grading, earth moving, or excavation activities shall cease during periods of high winds greater than 20 miles per hour (mph) averaged over one hour. * All unimproved areas with vehicle traffic shall be watered two times a day; vehicle speed shall be limited to 15 mph. * So as to prevent excessive amounts of dust, streets adjacent to the area being graded shall be swept as needed to remove silt which may have accumulated from construction activities. * The areas disturbed by clearing, grading, earth moving, or excavation operations shall be minimized at all times. 9:52 AWA:IMOREHE -2.WPD 000.114 Industrial Planned Development IPD 97 -1 & 2; Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 97 -1 (Morehead) Initial Study Page 11 * Dust control mitigation measures will be enforced by the Air Pollution Control District (APCD) and by the City Engineer's office during the construction period. C. Water 1. Does the project involve a major natural drainage course or flood control channel? Yes Maybe No N/A X Response: The automotive lube and tune facility and the industrial use lies outside of a natural drainage course or flood control channel. Therefore, development on this site is not considered an impact, and does not require mitigation. 2. Will the project result in changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff? Yes Maybe No N/A Any development project where pre- existing natural land is paved will result in changes to existing absorption rates. However, the degree of surface runoff, absorption rates, and drainage patterns can be sufficiently mitigated through the installation of appropriate catch basins, drainage channels, pad grading, and orientation of the drainage system on site. To control drainage impacts, standard City mitigation measures and monitoring procedures will be imposed as follows: 9:52 AMIA:IMOREHE -2APD l 000115 Industrial Planned Development IPD 97 -1 & 2; Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 97 -1 (Morehead) Initial Study Pace 12 * The applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for review and approval, drainage plans, hydrologic and hydraulic calculations prepared by a registered civil engineer; and enter into an agreement with the City to complete the improvements and shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing the construction of the improvements. * To the satisfaction of the City Engineer, the applicant shall demonstrate that each building pad has adequate protection from a 100 -year storm and feasible access - during a 10 -year storm. * Quantities of water, water flow rates, major water courses, drainage areas and patterns, diversions, collection systems, flood hazard areas, sumps and drainage courses shall be to the acceptance of the City Engineer. * Hydrology shall be pursuant to current Ventura County standards except as follows: a. All catch basins in sump locations shall be designed for a 50- year storm; b. All catch basins on continuous grades shall be designed for a 10 -year storm; C. All catch basins in a sump condition shall be designed such that the depth of water at intake shall equal the depth of the approach flows; d. All culverts shall be designed for a 100 year storm; e. "-- Drainage facilities shall be provided such that surface flows are intercepted and contained prior to entering collector or secondary roadways; f. For a 50 -year storm, all collector streets shall be provided with a minimum of one travel lane with the goal that the local residential streets shall have one travel lane available where possible; 9:52 AWA:WOREHE -2.WPD 000116 Industrial Planned Development IPD 97 -1 & 2; Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 97 -1 (Morehead) Initial Study Paqe 13 g. Drainage to adjacent parcels shall not be increased or concentrated by this development. All drainage measures necessary to mitigate storm water flows shall be provided by the applicant. 3. Is the project within a 100 -year flood hazard area as identified on the Federal Emergency Management Agency Flood Insurance Rate Map for the City of Moorpark? Yes Maybe No N/A The Federal Emergency Management Agency has designated the subject site as within Zone C on the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM), Zone C is defined as, "areas of minimal flooding ". Standard City procedures require that the following mitigation measures and monitoring procedures are followed and incorporated as conditions of approval for the proposed entitlement request: * For each building pad, the applicant shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the City of Moorpark as follows: a. Adequate protection from 100 -year frequency storm, and; b. Feasibility access during a 50 -year frequency storm. Prior to Issuance of a Building Permit: * Hydrology calculations shall be pursuant to current Ventura County Standards and require approval by the City Engineer. 9:52 AMIA WOREHE -2.WPD 000117 Industrial Planned Development IPD 97 -1 & 2; Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 97 -1 (Morehead) Initial Study Paqe 14 4. Will the project result in alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? Yes Maybe No N/A Response• Please refer to Response No. 2, above. 5. Will the project result in a change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? Yes Maybe No N/A X— Responses No ground water impact is expected and no water wells are located on the project site. 6. Will the project result in degradation of ground or surface water quality? Yes Maybe No N/A _X Response• Please refer to Response No. 5, above. 7. Will the project change the amount of surface water in any water body? Yes Maybe No N/A 9:52 AWA:IMOREHE -2APD 000 -.1.8 Industrial Planned Development IPD 97 -1 & 2; Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 97 -1 (Morehead) Initial Study Paste 15 Please refer to Response No. 2, above. 8. Will the project result in substantial reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? Yes Mayb -e No N/A Development of the subject site will use minimal amounts of water. In relation to the total amount of water used in the City, the amount of water used by the proposed facility will not change the amount of water otherwise available for public use. D. Plant Life 1. Will the project result in a substantial change in the diversity or number of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants)? Yes Maybe No N/A Response: No rare or endangered plant or animal species were observed or are expected to exist on the project site. Considering that the existing vegetation is rather barren, the loss of vegetation associated with the proposed project is not considered significant. Standard City requirements will be imposed as identified below: * All landscaping associated with this project shall be drought tolerant, and of the low water using variety. 9:52 AM /AAMOREHE -2.WPO 000119 Industrial Planned Development IPD 97 -1 & 2; Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 97 -1 (Morehead) Initial Study Paae 16 * The final construction working drawings and a final landscaping plans shall be submitted for review and approval to the Director of Community Development. * The applicant shall comply with Section 14.08 et.seq. of the Municipal Code related to mature trees, shrubs and plants. * All landscaping and irrigation shall be installed and receive final inspection and approval. 2. Are any unique, rare, or endangered species of plants present on the project site? (See State and Federal listings, California Native Plant Society Inventory of Rare and Endangered Vascular Plants, and /or General Plan EIR.) Yes Maybe No N/A Please refer to Response No. 1, above. 3. Will the project result in the introduction of new plant species that may cause increased competition and displacement of existing native vegetation patterns? Yes Maybe No N/A At present, the vegetation on the project site is of the non - native grassland species. Standard City conditions of approval will be imposed as identified below: 9:52 AWAAMOREHE -2.WPO 00012.0 Industrial Planned Development IPD 97 -1 & 2; Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 97 -1 (Morehead) Initial Study Paae 17 Vegetation–CQndi-tions Prior tQ- Issuance of a Zoning- -C _ arence:_ * The applicant shall submit for review and approval to the City a detailed landscaping plan. * Complete landscape plans (2 sets), together with specifications and a maintenance program shall be prepared by a State Licensed landscape Architect, generally in accordance with the Ventura County Guide to Landscape Plans, and in compliance with City of Moorpark zoning code and shall be submitted to the Director of Community Development. The applicant shall bear the total cost of the landscape plan review and final installation inspection. The landscaping and planting plan submitted for review and approval shall be accompanied by a deposit to cover all landscape plan check and inspection fees. The final landscape plans shall be approved by the Director of Community Development prior to issuance of Zoning Clearance. * All landscaping and planting shall be accomplished and approved by the Director of Community Development, or his designee, prior to Final Building Permit Approval. * The Community Development Department will ensure that landscaping has been installed and has received final inspection. * The Community Development Department staff will determine whether the developer must replace any dead landscaping. 4. Will the proposal result in the reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? Yes Maybe No N/A — Response• 9:52 AM /A:IMOREHE -2.WPD 000121 Industrial Planned Development IPD 97 -1 & 2; Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 97 -1 (Morehead) Initial Study Paqe 18 The project site is not used for the growing of any agricultural crop and is not considered farmland of prime or statewide importance. E. Animal Life 1. Will the project result in a reduction in the diversity of any species of animals (birds; land animals, including reptiles; fish and shellfish, benthic organisms; or insects) which currently occupy or utilize the project site in some way? Yes Maybe No N/A Response: Please refer to Response No. D1, above. 2. Will the project restrict the range of or otherwise affect any rare or endangered animal species? Yes Maybe No N/A Response• No rare or endangered animal species have been identified within the project limits or within the immediate vicinity.of the project site. 3. Will the project result in a deterioration of any significant wildlife habitat? Yes Maybe No N/A x Response: Refer.to Response No. 2, above. F. Department of Fish and Game "De Minimis Finding" 9:52 AWA:IMOREHE -2.WPD 000122 Industrial Planned Development IPD 97 -1 & 2; Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 97 -1 (Morehead) Initial Study Paqe 19 Will the project have an adverse effect, either individually or cumulatively, on fish and wildlife resources? Wildlife is defined as "all wild animals, birds, plants, fish, amphibians, and related ecological communities, including the habitat upon which the wildlife depends for its continued viability" (Section 711.2, Fish and Game Code) Yes Maybe No N/A Based upon substantial evidence, the Department of Community Development has found that the proposed development would result in a loss of open land and vegetation which would result in a loss of habitat for small species. Please refer to Section D 1 for a discussion of why no significant adverse impacts to fish and wildlife resources are expected. Standard City requirements will be as follows: * Within two days after the Planning Commission adoption of a resolution approving the Planned Development Permit, the applicant shall submit to the City of Moorpark a check for $1,250 plus a $ 25.00 filing fee payable to the County of Ventura, to comply with Assembly Bill 3158, for the management and protection of statewide fish and wildlife trust resources. Pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21089 (b) and Fish and Game Code section 711.4 (c), the project is not operative, vested or final until the filing fees are paid. Monitorina: * Prior to approval of a Zoning Clearance, written record must be received by the Department of Community Development that these fees, discussed above, have been paid in full. FROM ,. - 1. Will the project result in increases to existing noise levels? Yes Maybe No N/A 9:52 AWAAMOREHE -2APD 0001.23 Industrial Planned Development IPD 97 -1 & 2; Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 97 -1 (Morehead) Initial Study Paae 20 9:52 AWA:IMOREHE -2.WPD ()001.24 Industrial Planned Development IPD 97 -1 & 2; Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 97 -1 (Morehead) Initial Study Paqe 21 The proposed automotive lube and tune and industrial building is not expected to expose people to conditionally acceptable or unacceptable noise levels. Therefore, this is not considered a significant impact. 2. Will the project result in the exposure of people to conditionally acceptable or unacceptable noise levels based on the City's Noise Element? Yes Maybe No N/A Response• * Please refer to Response Number 1, above. H. Licht and rlara 1. Will the project result in a significant new source of light or glare? Yes Maybe No N/A Response: Development of a vacant site will always lead to an increase in lighting on a site. The proposed facilities will introduce new lighting. To mitigate the potential glare impacts associated with development of the site, the following requirements will be imposed. The lighting plan shall show and be required to abide by the following conditions: a. A photometric plan showing a point -by -point foot candle layout to extend a minimum of twenty fee (201) outside the property 9:52 AM /AIMOREHE -2APD 0001,25 Industrial Planned Development IPD 97 -1 & 2; Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 97 -1 (Morehead) Initial Study Paqe 22 lines. The layout plan should be based on a ten foot (10' ) grid center. b. Fixtures must possess sharp cut -off qualities with a maximum of one foot candle illumination at the property lines. C. There shall be no more than a seven -to -one (7:1) ratio of level of illumination shown (maximum -to- minimum ratio between lighting standards). d. Energy efficient lighting fixtures shall be provided which are compatible with adjacent properties. e. Average maximum of one foot candle illumination. f. No light shall be emitted above the 90 degree or horizontal plane. g. All parking lights shall be fully hooded and backshielded to prevent light "spillage" and glare with a maximum height of 20 feet. * A lighting plan showing the dimension, type and light illumination of all exterior lighting shall be prepared by an electrical engineer registered in the State of California and submitted to the City for review and approval. The lighting plan shall achieve the following objectives: avoid interferences with reasonable uses of adjoining properties; minimize on -site and off -site glare; provide adequate on -site lighting; limit electroiler height to avoid excessive illumination; and provide structures which are compatible with the total design of the proposed facility. I. Land Use 1. Will the proposal result in a substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? Yes Maybe No N/A 9:52 AM /AAMOREHE -2.WPD 000126 Industrial Planned Development IPD 97 -1 & 2; Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 97 -1 (Morehead) Initial Study Paqe 23 No land use impacts are expected to result from the planned development since it is consistent with the current General Plan land use designation. 2. Are adjoining or planned land uses incompatible with the proposed project, so that a substantial or potentially substantial interface problem would be created? Yes Maybe No N/A The planned land use is compatible with the General Plan Land Use designation, and is consistent with the existing development patterns within the same zoning district in this area. 3. Could the project serve to encourage the development of presently undeveloped areas or result in increases in the development intensity of existing developed areas (examples include the introduction of new or expanded public utilities, and new industrial, commercial, or recreational facilities)? Yes Maybe No N/A The proposed project will not result in a significant increase in the rate or.use of any natural resources, and would not result in substantial depletion' of any non - renewable resources. Development around this corner has been anticipated and thus the public utilities have been expanded to facilitate future services. 1. Will the project result in substantial depletion of any nonrenewable resource? Yes Maybe No N/A 9:52 AWAAMOREHE -2APD OOOV7 Industrial Planned Development IPD 97 -1 & 2; Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 97 -1 (Morehead) Initial Study Paqe 24 The proposed project will not result in a significant increase in the rate or use of any natural resources, and would not result in substantial depletion of any non - renewable resources. 2. Will the project result in the conversion of agricultural land to nonagricultural use or impairment of the agricultural productivity of agricultural land? Yes Maybe No N/A The project site is not used for the growing of any agricultural crop and is not considered farmland of prime or statewide importance. The area has been farmed consistently in the past. However, the present orchard is in poor condition from lack of maintenance. 1. Will the project involve or be subject to a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radioactive materials) in the event of an accident or upset condition? Yes Maybe No N/A The project does not involve a risk of an explosion or the significant release of hazardous substances, because hazardous materials are not involved during the construction phase of, or normally associated with this development project. Standard City requirements will be imposed as follows: AM1AAMOREHE -2.WPD 000128 Industrial Planned Development IPD 97 -1 & 2; Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 97 -1 (Morehead) Initial Study Pane 25 * If any hazardous waste is encountered, all work shall be stopped immediately and the Ventura County Environmental Health Department, the Fire Department, the Sheriff's Department, and the City Construction Observer shall be notified immediately. The work shall not proceed until clearance has been issued by all of these agencies. Contaminated or hazardous soils as defined by the Department of Health Services may not be used for on -site soil fill or roadway surface unless the Department of Health Services determines, in writing, that said material has been treated to a level that is no longer considered a public health risk or required public disclosure by the Department of Real Estate. Any contaminated or hazardous soils shall be removed to an approved landfill. * Any tenant or subsequent owner whose business would employ or dispose of hazardous materials, must apply for a Major Modification and must received Major Modification approval prior to commencing business. * The applicant shall be reviewed and approved by the Ventura County Environmental Health Division to ensure that the business complies with all applicable State and local regulations related to the storage, handling, and disposal of potentially hazardous materials, and that any required permits have been obtained. If required by the County Environmental Health Division, the applicant shall prepare a hazardous waste minimization plan which shall be reviewed and approved prior to issuance of a zoning clearance. 2. Is the project within or adjacent to a high fire hazard area as defined by the Ventura County Fire Protection District? Yes Maybe No N/A The project site is not considered to be located in a high fire hazard area. The Ventura Country Fire Protection District has identified that the proposed development has sufficient access to allow for adequate fire protection. 9:52 AMIMMOREHE -2APD 0(11.2.9 Industrial Planned Development IPD 97 -1 & 2; Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 97 -1 (Morehead) Initial Study Paqe 26 3. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard and /or the exposure of people to potential health hazards? Yes Maybe No N/A The proposed site is considered suitable for the proposed project provided that undercutting and recompaction of bearing soils is conducted. Pursuant to building code, the building pad areas for the proposed building will be compacted in order to support the proposed structure and in accordance with the soil engineering/ geotechnical report. No geologic or seismic hazards are known to exist on -site or within the immediate vicinity. The construction of the commercial building is not expected to result in the exposure of people or property to geologic or seismic hazards. L. population 1. Will the project alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? Yes Maybe No N/A _%__ Response• The proposed project is a industrial project and therefore, could not possibly alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of human population in the City of Moorpark. Standard City requirements will be imposed as follows: * The applicant will be required to pay all traffic, school, public utilities, or other required development fees. AWA:IMOREHE-2.WPD . 00013o- Industrial Planned Development IPD 97 -1 & 2; Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 97 -1 (Morehead) Initial Study Pacre 27 * The Department of Community Development shall not grant the final building inspection approval until all City and other agency fees associated with the proposed development have been paid. M. Housing 1. Will the proposal require the removal of any housing unit(s)? Yes Maybe No N/A There are no existing residential units on the project site. Therefore, no mitigation is required. 2. Will the proposal reduce currently available low and very -low income housing through changes in use or demolition? Yes Maybe No N/A X See response to No. 1. 3. Will the proposal require the displacement of people from the project site? Response: Please refer to Response No. 1, above. N. Yes Maybe No N/A 1. Will the proposal result in the generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? (Identify estimated a.m. and p.m. peak hour trips and average daily vehicle trips generated by the project.) Yes Maybe No N/A 9:52 AM /A:IMOREHE--2APD 000131 Industrial Planned Development IPD 97 -1 & 2; Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 97 -1 (Morehead) Initial Study Paste 28 INTY-4.1-517r7m A Traffic Study prepared by Thomas Montgomery, P,E., Transportation Engineer, states that the proposed project is expected to generate approximately 88 total daily trips. In general the primary use of the lub and tune facility will be weekend trips with by their nature, occur off -peak. Depending on the use of the industrial building it can expect 12 a.m. and p.m peak trips, with the remaining trips occurring during the working day, in off -peak hours. The Traffic Impact Study was reviewed by John Whitman, City Traffic Engineer. The Traffic Engineer indicates that the project appears to have little impact on the Los Angeles Avenue /Goldman Avenue intersection at the year 2000 analysis, which is projected to be peak traffic. Site Circulation On -site circulation for the proposed project generally appears to be adequate for safe, efficient movement of vehicles and pedestrians. General mitigation measures identified below will assist in vehicular movement to and from the subject site: * The applicant shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, street improvement plans prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer; and shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing the construction of the improvements. * Prior to receipt of an Occupancy Permit for the proposed project, the Department of Community Development will assure that all of the project conditions have been completed. 9:52 AWAAMOREHE -2APD wol-3Z Industrial Planned Development IPD 97 -1 & 2; Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 97 -1 (Morehead) Initial Study Paqe 29 2. Will the proposal result in a cumulative impact to the existing or planned transportation systems? Yes Maybe No N/A X Response: Please refer to Response No. 1, above. 3. Will the proposal result in an increased demand for off -site parking? Yes Maybe No N/A _X_ Response: The amount of parking provided meets the City's Zoning Ordinance requirements; therefore, no significant impact is expected. 4. Will the proposal result in an increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists, or pedestrians? Yes Maybe No N/A _X Response: See response to No. 1 above. O. Public Services Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or.,altered governmental services such as police and fire protection, schools, parks or recreational facilities, or other governmental services? Yes Maybe No N/A X— Response• The proposed commercial project would not require additional fire protection or police protection personnel. Schools are not expected to 9:52 AWA:IMOREHE -2.WPD 900133 Industrial Planned Development IPD 97 -1 & 2; Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 97 -1 (Morehead) Initial Study Paqe 30 be effected by the proposed development and thus fees are not warranted. The applicant will be required to contribute fees to the City's future and current park system. Prior to the issuance of a Zoning Clearance, the Department of Community Development will collect the appropriate contribution from the applicant. P. Enera Will the proposal result in the use of excessive amounts of fuel or energy? Yes Maybe No N/A 9:52 AWA:IMOREHE -2. 1 Industrial Planned Development IPD 97 -1 & 2; Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 97 -1 (Morehead) Initial Study Paqe 31 The proposed development is not expected to use substantial amounts of fuel or energy, and would not substantially increase demand upon existing sources of energy or require the development of new sources of energy. Standard City conditions of approval will be as follows: Prior to the Issuance of a Zoning Clear n o:* * All buildings shall be constructed using energy saving devices. These shall include those devices required by the California Administrative Code, Title 24. * The Department of Building and Safety will review the proposed electrical devices for energy efficiency. Q. i7t;l;tias Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to utilities, including power or natural gas, communications systems, water, sewer, storm water drainage, solid waste disposal, and street lighting annexation and /or improvements? Yes Maybe No N/A The proposed project will result in the need for new connections to existing* electrical, natural gas, telephone, water, sewer, and storm water drainage facilities, but will not create excessive demands on the existing system. Solid waste collection and disposal will be provided by a private collection service. However, the applicant will be required to use one of the City's refuge haulers for collection of recycled materials. Standard City requirements will be imposed as follows: 9:52 AWAAMOREHE -2APD P 000135 Industrial Planned Development IPD 97 -1 & 2; Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 97 -1 (Morehead) Initial Study Paqe 32 9:52 AMIAAMOREHE -2.WPD 000136 Industrial Planned Development IPD 97 -1 & 2; Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 97 -1 (Morehead) Initial Study Paqe 33 * All proposed utilities shall be undergrounded to the nearest off - site utility pole. All existing utilities shall also be undergrounded to the nearest off -site utility pole. R. Aesthetics 1. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? Yes Maybe No N/A The proposed site is flat and does not include a major ridgeline. Therefore, there is no potential for a significant effect on the environment due to involvement of a major ridgeline. Combined with low glare lighting fixtures, and specific fixture design guidelines, the proposed development should not significantly interfere with any view sheds. Standard City requirements will be imposed as follows: * All sign permits must be obtained. No off -site signs or pole signs are permitted. * The trash disposal area shall be provided in a location which will not'interfere with circulation, parking or access to the building, and shall be screened with a six foot high wall enclosure with metal gates and gazebo, and a lanai covering on the top of the trash enclosure. 9:52 AWA:IMOREHE -2APD 0001,37 Industrial Planned Development IPD 97 -1 & 2; Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 97 -1 (Morehead) Initial Study Paqe 34 2. Will the project result in the loss, covering, or modification of any unique geologic or physical features such as a natural canyon, rock outcrop, ridgeline, or hillside with a slope in excess of 25 percent? Yes Maybe No N/A As discussed under Item No. A, "Earth ", of this. Initial Study, the project does not involve grading of slopes. 3. Will the project result in the loss of a distinctive landmark tree or stand of mature trees? Yes Maybe No N/A Response: Item No. D, "Plant life ", of this Initial Study. S. Archaeological /Historical 1. Is there a potential that the proposal will result in the alteration or destruction of an archaeological or historical site? Yes Maybe No N/A X_ Response: As discussed under Item No. A 4, of this Initial Study, no archaeological or historical sites have been identified within the vicinity of the project site, and there are no existing historical structures. 2. Will the proposal result in adverse physical or aesthetic effects to an archaeological site or historic building, structure, or object? Yes Maybe No N/A 9:52 AM/AAMOREHE -2APD I 000138 Industrial Planned Development IPD 97 -1 & 2; Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 97 -1 (Morehead) Initial Study Paqe 35 Please refer to Response No. 1, above. T. Mandatory Findings of Significance 1. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self - sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? Yes Maybe No N/A As previously discussed under Items No. E and S, "Animal Life" and Archeological /Historical, no biological or cultural resources exist on the site and would not be impacted as a result of the proposed development. 2. Does the project have the potential to achieve short -term, to the disadvantage of long -term, environmental goals? (A short - term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long -term impacts will endure well into the future.) Yes Maybe No N/A The proposed development is consistent with the City's General Plan. Short -term impacts may result from construction activities, but are not expected to be significant. Possible long -term impacts will be mitigated through the payment of fees and dedications. 9:52 AWA1MOREHE-2.WPO .1 000135 Industrial Planned Development IPD 97 -1 & 2; Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 97 -1 (Morehead) Initial Study Page 36 3. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant. The term "cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of an individual project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.) Yes Maybe No N/A The proposed industrial development is not expected to result in significant cumulative traffic and air quality impacts when considered with other past, present and reasonably foreseeable future projects and in conjunction with implemented mitigation measures. The additional traffic generated by the subject development is not expected to significantly contribute to projected future adverse traffic conditions nor is it expected to significantly affect the air quality of the region. Please refer to the discussion under item B (Air) of the Initial Study, Response No. 1 and 4 as well as N 1 and 2 for clarification of mitigation proposed to minimize the potential for significant cumulative air quality and traffic impacts. 4. Does the project ha substantial adverse or indirectly? e environmental effects which will cause effects on human beings, either directly Yes Maybe No N/A Please refer to the discussion under item K (Risk of Human Health) of the Initial Study, Response No. 1. V. REFERENCES: 9:52 AM/AAMOREHE -2.WPO 0001.40 Industrial Planned Development IPD 97 -1 & 2; Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 97 -1 (Morehead) Initial Study Paae 37 The references used in responding to this questionnaire include the following: 2. Soils Investigation Report prepared by Earth Systems, Consultants, March 12, 1997. 3. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Flood Insurance Rate Map, Community Panel Number 060712 0005 A, September 29, 1986. 4. General Plan of the City of Moorpark. 5. Traffic Impact Study for the Proposed Project prepared by Thomas Montgomery, P.E. February 25, 1997. 6. U.S.G.S. Topographic Quadrangle Maps for Moorpark. 7. Ventura County Air Pollution Control District, Guid lin G or the Preparation of Air Quality T=act-- Analyses, 1989. 8. Zoning Ordinance of h y of Moorpark (Title 7 of the Municipal Code). VI. DETERMINATION: On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. 9:52 AWAAMOREHE -2. 000141. Industrial Planned Development IPD 97 -1 & 2; Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 97 -1 (Morehead) Initial Study Paqe 38 I find that although the proposed project COULD have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures, described in this initial study, could be applied to the project. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION should be prepared. I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ADDENDUM to an existing certified ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. Sandra Massa - Lavitt, Consulting Planner April 25, 1997 9:52 AMIA:\MOREHE -2.WPD 1 000142 Industrial Planned Development IPD 97 -1 & 2; Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 97 -1 (Morehead) Initial Study Paqe 39 City of Moorpark Mitigation Monitoring Program IPD 97 -1 & 2 CUP 97 -1 MENNUFTM01 * A grading plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer. The applicant shall obtain a grading permit; and shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing grading completion. Cut and fill slopes shall be no steeper than 2:1 (horizontal to vertical). * All haul routes shall be approved by the City Engineer. On -site haul routes shall be limited to graded areas only. * The applicant shall submit to the City for review and approval, detailed soil engineering / geotechnical reports, and hydrology report, prepared by both a civil engineer and a geotechnical engineer registered in the State of California. The report shall include a geotechnical investigation with regard to liquefaction, expansive soils, and seismic safety. The grading plan shall incorporate the recommendations of the approved soil engineering / geotechnical report. * The Community Development Department and the City Engineer's office will review the submitted grading plan, soil engineering / geotechnical reports, and the comments from the City's geotechnical report. The Community Development Department shall ensure that all aspects of grading including site preparation, grading and fill placement, keying and benching will be done in accordance with the City of Moorpark's Grading Ordinance and in accordance with Building Code requirements. * If any archaeological, paleontological, or historical finds are uncovered during excavation operations, the permittee shall assure the preservation of the site; shall obtain the services of a qualified archaeologist to recommend disposition of the site; and shall obtain the Director of Community Development's written 9:52 AM /AAM0REHE -2.WPD Industrial Planned Development IPD 97 -1 & 2; Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 97 -1 (Morehead) Initial Study Paqe 40 concurrence with the recommended disposition before resuming site development. * The City Engineer's office shall conduct field inspections during the grading phase of the proposed development, to document that no cultural or paleontological resources have been encountered; and that the grading and fill placement are to the City's acceptance in regard to the City's Grading Ordinance and Building Code requirements. * If grading is to occur between October 15th and April 15th, an erosion control plan shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval. * Prior to Fine and Bulk Grading Permit approval by the City Engineer, the design mitigation recommended by the City Engineer shall be incorporated into the project grading plan. The City Engineer shall verify that all grading control measures are incorporated into the grading plan prior to issuance of the grading permit. B. AiX * If feasible, the applicant shall ensure that contractors properly maintain and operate construction equipment and use direct injection diesel or gasoline powered engines. * All active portions of the construction site shall be sufficiently watered to prevent excessive amounts of dust generated. Complete coverage watering shall occur at least twice daily, preferably in the late morning and after work is done for the day. Non - potable water shall be used if determined feasible by the Director of Community Development, the City Engineer and the applicant. * All trucks importing fill to the site shall use tarpaulins to cover the truck load and shall operate per the terms of the required encroachment permit. 9:52 AWAAMOREHE -2.WPO 0001.44 Industrial Planned Development IPD 97 -1 & 2; Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 97 -1 (Morehead) Initial Study Paqe 41 * So as to prevent excessive amounts of dust, all clearing, grading, earth moving, or excavation activities shall cease during periods of high winds greater than 20 miles per hour (mph) averaged over one hour. * All unimproved areas with vehicle traffic shall be watered two times a day; vehicle speed shall be limited to 15 mph. * So as to prevent excessive amounts of dust, streets adjacent to the area being graded shall be swept as needed to remove silt which may have accumulated from construction activities. * The areas disturbed by clearing, grading, earth moving, or excavation operations shall be minimized at all times. * Dust control mitigation measures will be enforced by the Air Pollution Control District (APCD) and by the City Engineer's office during the construction period. C. Water * The applicant shall: submit to the City Engineer for review and approval, drainage plans, hydrologic and hydraulic calculations prepared by a registered civil engineer; and enter into an agreement with the City to complete the improvements and shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing the construction of the improvements. * To the satisfaction of the City Engineer, the applicant shall demonstrate that each building pad has adequate protection from a 100 -year storm and feasible access during a 10 -year storm. * Quantities of water, water flow rates, major water courses, drainage areas and patterns, diversions, collection systems, flood hazard areas, sumps and drainage courses shall be to the acceptance of the City Engineer. 9:52 AMIAWOREHE -2.WPD W0145 Industrial Planned Development IPD 97 -1 & 2; Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 97 -1 (Morehead) Initial Study Paqe 42 * Hydrology shall be pursuant to current Ventura County standards except as follows: a. All catch basins in sump locations shall be designed for a 50- year storm; b. All catch basins on continuous grades shall be designed for a 10 -year storm; C. All catch basins in a sump condition shall be designed such that the depth of water at intake shall equal the depth of the approach flows; d. All culverts shall be designed for a 100 year storm; e. Drainage facilities shall be provided such that surface flows are intercepted and contained prior to entering collector or secondary roadways; f. For a 50 -year storm, all collector streets shall be provided with a minimum of one travel lane with the goal that the local residential streets shall have one travel lane available where possible; g. Drainage to adjacent parcels shall not be increased or concentrated by this development. All drainage measures necessary to mitigate storm water flows shall be provided by the applicant. * The applicant shall: submit to the City Engineer for review and approval, drainage plans, hydrologic and hydraulic calculations prepared by a registered civil engineer; and enter into an agreement with the City to complete the improvements and shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing the construction of the improvements. * To the satisfaction of the City Engineer, the applicant shall demonstrate that each building pad has adequate protection from a 100 -year storm and feasible access during a 10 -year storm. 9:52 AM /A:IMOREHE -2.WPD 000140 Industrial Planned Development IPD 97 -1 & 2; Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 97 -1 (Morehead) Initial Study Pane 43 * Quantities of water, water flow rates, major water courses, drainage areas and patterns, diversions, collection systems, flood hazard areas, sumps and drainage courses shall be to the acceptance of the City Engineer. * Hydrology shall be pursuant to current Ventura County standards except as follows: a. All catch basins in sump locations shall be designed for a 50- year storm; b. All catch basins on continuous grades shall be designed for a 10 -year storm, C. All catch basins in a sump condition shall be designed such that the depth of water at intake shall equal the depth of the approach flows; d. All culverts shall be designed for a 100 year storm; e. Drainage facilities shall be provided such that surface flows are intercepted and contained prior to entering collector or secondary roadways; f. For a 50 -year storm, all collector streets shall be provided with a minimum of one travel lane with the goal that the local residential streets shall have one travel lane available where possible; g. Drainage to adjacent parcels shall not be increased or concentrated by this development. 'All drainage measures necessary to mitigate storm water flows shall be provided by the applicant. * For each building pad, the applicant shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the City of Moorpark as follows: a. Adequate protection from 100 -year frequency storm, and; 9:52 AMIA:IMOREHE-2.WPD 00014'7 Industrial Planned Development IPD 97 -1 & 2; Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 97 -1 (Morehead) Initial Study Paqe 44 b. Feasibility access during a 10 -year frequency storm. Prior to Issuance of a Building Permit: * Hydrology calculations shall be pursuant to current Ventura County Standards and require approval by the City Engineer. * Within two days after adoption of resolution approving the project, the applicant shall submit to the City of Moorpark a check for $1275.00 payable to the County of Ventura, to comply with the Assembly Bill 3158. Approval of the CUP shall be contingent upon payment of the Fish and Game fee. Pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21089(b) and Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c), the project is not operative, vested, or final until the filing fees are paid. 9:52 AMIA:IMOREHE-2APD 000148 Industrial Planned Development IPD 97 -1 & 2; Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 97 -1 (Morehead) Initial Study Page 45 * Prior to Issuance of a Zoning Clearance, written record must be received by the Department of Community Development that these fees, discussed above, have been paid in full. F. Light and Glare: The lighting plan shall show and be required to abide by the following conditions: a. A photometric plan showing a point -by -point foot candle layout to extend a minimum of twenty fee (201) outside the property lines. The layout plan should be based on a ten foot (101) grid center. b. Fixtures must possess sharp cut -off qualities with a maximum of one foot candle illumination at the property lines. C. There shall be no more than a seven -to -one (7:1) ratio of level of illumination shown (maximum -to- minimum ratio between lighting standards). d. Energy efficient lighting fixtures shall be provided which are compatible with adjacent properties. e. Average maximum of one foot candle illumination. f. No light shall be emitted above the 90 degree or horizontal plane. g. All parking lights shall be fully hooded and backshielded to prevent light "spillage" and glare. * A lighting plan showing the dimension, type and light illumination of all exterior lighting shall be prepared by an electrical engineer 9:52 AWA1MOREHE -2.WPD 000143 Industrial Planned Development IPD 97 -1 & 2; Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 97 -1 (Morehead) Initial Study Paqe 46 registered in the State of California and submitted to the City for review and approval. The lighting plan shall achieve the following objectives: avoid interferences with reasonable uses of adjoining properties; minimize on -site and off -site glare; provide adequate on -site lighting; limit electroiler height to avoid excessive illumination; and provide structures which are compatible with the total design of the proposed facility. .r4' .� General mitigation measures identified below will assist in vehicular movement to and from the subject site: * The applicant shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, street improvement plans prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer; and shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing the construction of the improvements. * A 10 ft wide sidewalk, on Condor Drive adjacent to CUP 95 -2, shall be constructed according to Ventura County Standard Plate number E =5. * All driveway locations shall be approved by the City Engineer and the Director of Community Development. * Driveways shall be constructed per Ventura County Road Standard Plate E -2 (REV.B) as approved by the City Engineer. * Prior to receipt of an Occupance Permit for the proposed project, the Department of Community Development will assure that all of the project conditions have been completed. 9:52 AWA: 000150 Industrial Planned Development IPD 97 -1 & 2; Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 97 -1 (Morehead) Initial Study Paqe 47 Prior to the issuance of a Zoning Clearance, the Department of Community Development will collect the appropriate contribution from the applicant. 9:52 AM /A:IMOREHE-2.WP6 0001,51 Industrial Planned Development IPD 97 -1 & 2; Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 97 -1 (Morehead) Initial Study Page 48 Monitoring Prior to the Issuance of a Zoning Clearance, the Department of Community Development will collect the required contribution from the applicant. z 9:52 AM /A:IMOREHE -2.WPO 00015 (GRIP wwrrwrnw ama urwwr� wr wwtrn FIXTURE SChED LE aD SITE PLAN L1 L2 NV kl PWJECT DATA MME rAN r..AY.GI/Nrr \�MY.rY RIIr .r MR AC��N. 4I� MNL rM.t wairA+cu r+u►.rtr. Nar. rr wnamra�.ww Naw..,1wyc�wrN�NrN wAw.r .Ar.w.ur. noNNrl..w r. M1MNNr.w..AY rr rr.rNar.�w� au ruW �+N Awrnr, .Arr.a.w+ ��Nlro v �r�r .rN.vr. •NIW •MMr t N.r t s Ina as@ a is i�atNEW alrlll�laalalt�� PRo Ecr REPRESENTATIVES 01MR44 t DAvv pcmc o IMMWAY "WANG G.0 IWM (W? AP%CMMCT: PRIMM ~ AM♦ RnN PR1T IIOM UMI� 71 u era tM1(M/ f1►T7N PROPOSED LUBE & TUNE'/ SPECULATIVE INDUSTRIAL BUILDING I it I ... u ANY Ara +,4 sire � aD VICINITY MAP""' I TO SC/LE LOS ANGEI _ES AVENUE MOORPARK CALIFORNIA !CALM . Aft' . r{ — _ FIAI min SOUTH ELEVA �cAU , rr• . r.rr C • C. CA 8 anvw T�ww. Iwo am a uw�w a w .��o. NORTH ELEVATION N•. r.. 1 PROPOSED 4, 64 S.P. SPECULA IVE INDUSTRIAL B; ILDING j �pD.1YY., I..,IJA M unp Q Y.TAAOf ALLO.O YYW1. O /IL'O.I.Y�.1A I�EOIp�}v� 0 .MY�,M�}I111.I. ww Q ti...Y.I.IRALpW pLA\q�.11 Q .IYpIYU.. p,,.4 L...•r.{ MGM,. Q •bw.d�V�i11�M� i�i. MYM.. WM TIE TOP p ALL App PUNDOW ww-Nl1�II1 EMU K At OR MLLD�I� PARWO WWAff. BUILDAW SECTION wr t0 da" BUILDING ELEVATIONS LOS ANGELES AVE. MOORPARK, CA rra Aft'. rte• tASI ELEVATION ICAU - 1 - . r -I NORTH ELEVATION spirrom w �cxa ,i.• . r-r GROW AnswTwTs fan»wiau unit ulwau �r w�rrw PROPOSED 2,' 12 S.P.' ' KWIK KAR LUBE & TUNE e FLOOR PLAN .. `k7 rte -. w. r-i Q+ ��1 wr.wiwna w urr.rww wr Q ro.is aaw�w.oaa rw.la•.� ria.v Mw u�r.•.w �wwrwrww�cew ® 4YMWRiA rer..r. �rrr r�wowlu rra sr.rt�w�rNwK Q 1iIIw� � �A y..�Mfww u.r•�•.a. Ytidy��tiw1 Q rfwa ara..ur.srr n.. Q rte �rlwiuwic. rwf�Nrlsw Qr rw w.r.w�.r.r.LL nr. Q LLY�aiIOi.YIwr.ISrtlR ® ••Y� al�l/I��ir. p{..Mm11. MIIIY�W 1{Y Y..r O ru R114 y�111�IY� Q •rsrraw rYrr.roM nr�rrrnr.w�rs 0 wM A.4 Q r.rrr�rua- Ir1�•oawwar• Mwb Lwr..•. -Y ..ter erw waar r�rro ..w v+r•..a �w r.. wn. 1K A fi 41 KCr FGrllm At C 800 U &W41 OC �1 CO �Ld Tlt NRDlD PA"m How. BULDMQ SECTION BUILDING ELEVATIONS LOS ANGELES AVE. MOORPARK, CA IL 02 '97 02 :58PM CMWD PROJ /ADMIN /ENG 8055263675 CALLEGUAS MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT 2100 OLSEN ROAD THOUSAND OAKS, CA 91360 -6800 805/526 -9323 FAX COVER LETTER FAX 805/526 -3675 DATE: Trt4E PLEASE Dr-LIVER THE FOLLOWING PAGES TO- NAME : Z-,- ff" LOCATION: FAX NO. Sr 7 -- 3 FROM: +��L SUBJECT; TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES: (INCLUDING COVER LETTER) N `ice C(a 7-�a- I , ?,/�' 1i9 EXTRA PAGE. 001 PATRICK H. MILLER, PRESIDENT TED GRANDSEN, VICE- PRESIDENT DIVISION b DIVISION 1 WILLIAM R. SEAVER, DIRECTOR DONALD G. HAUSER. SECRETARY DIVISION 5 DIVISION 3 JEFFREY A. BORENSTEIN, TREASURER DONALD R. KENDALL. Ph.D., P.E. DIVISION 2 GENERAL MANAGER 2100 OLSEN ROAD • THOUSAND OAKS, CALIFORNIA 91360 -6800 805/526.9323 • FAX: 805/5225730 • FAX: 805/5263675 July 2, 1997 Ms. Lillian Hare, City Clerk City of Moorpark 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021 Re: City Council Presentation -- Sand Diego /Metropolitan Water Wheeling Agreement Dear Ms. Hare: The Calleguas Municipal Water District (Calleguas) is in the process of scheduling presentations before area city councils to address a critical water supply issue that could potentially lead to dramatically higher water rates for residents and businesses in Ventura County. I would appreciate the opportunity to address the Moorpark City Council on this matter at a July meeting, if possible. Included with this letter is a briefing packet which summarizes the proposed water transfer between the San Diego County Water Authority ( SDCWA), Imperial Irrigation District, and the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Metropolitan). The proposal calls for long -term, exclusive capacity rights within Metropolitan's Colorado River Aqueduct for the SDCWA. Calleguas' primary concern with respect to this issue is the wheeling rate that Metropolitan would assess SDCWA to transport water SDCWA purchases from Imperial through Metropolitan facilities. SDCWA's most recent proposal would result in significant cost shifting, that undoubdtedly would result in higher water rates, to other Metropolitan member agencies. For the Calleguas service area alone, water users would incur additional costs estimated to total $70,000,000 through the year 2020. This matter has elevated to such a level that Governor Wilson has asked David Kennedy, Director of the California Department of Water Resources, to facilitate negotiations between the two agencies. The state legislature has also become involved in the process and various bills have been introduced to address the issue. and various bills have been introduced to address the issue. EXTRA PAGE. 002 July 2, 1997 Ms. Lillian Hare Page 2 Calleguas, along with other Metropolitan member agencies, is taking steps to inform local governing bodies and civic organizations of the proposal and its adverse impacts on non- participating agencies. As a mechanism to formally express a particular municipality's or organization's support for fair and equitable water transfers, Calleguas has developed a resolution that can be adopted by the respective councils and boards. For the Moorpark City Council's consideration, I have included a copy of this resolution with this letter. At your earliest convenience, I ask that you call Mr. Eric Bergh, Calleguas' Manager of Resources, at (805) 579 -7128 to discuss possible dates that we can present this matter to the city council. Your assistance is greatly appreciated. Sincerely, Donald R. kendall, Ph.D, P.E. General Manager Enclosures EXTRA PAGE. 003 JUL 02 '97 16:12 6055263675 PAGE.01 JUL 02 197 02:58PM CMWD PROJ /ADMIN /ENG 8055263675 P.2i9 San Diego County Water Authority Imperial Irrigation District Metropolitan Water District of Southern California Transfer/Wheeling Proposal A Local Perspective June 1997 JUL 02 '97 02:58PM CMWD PROJ /PDMIN /ENG 8055263675 San Diego County Water Authority I Imperial Irrigation District Water Transfer Summary Agencies: San Diego County Water Authority (SDCWA) Imperial Irrigation District (11D) Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (MWD) Program Concept: (two elements) P.3 /9 1. IID utilizes less water through implementation of conservation measures. SDCWA and IID enter into a contract that would provide conserved water to SDCWA. 2. SDCWA has proposed to use the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California's Colorado River Aqueduct to transport conserved water to San Diego. Agreements: SDCWA / IID Agreement — SDCWA and IID have entered into a MOU that provides the principle points of a 75 year agreement. IID would sell 200,000 to 400,000 afy to SDCWA at an initial price of $200 /af escalating to $300. IID benefits by receiving capital contributions which enable implementation of conservation practices. SDCWA benefits by developing water supply "independent" of MWD. SDCWA / MWD A reement — Utilizing MWD's Colorado River Aqueduct and other facilities is the most economical method of transporting conserved IID water to SDCWA. The price MWD charges SDCWA to utilize its facilities is under debate both locally and in Sacramento. Other Parties: Coachella -- As a party to the "Law of the River", Coachella must approve SDCWA I IID transfer. Coachella currently uses 325,000 afy and is seeking a firm entitlement of 500,000 afy. Coachella's position is that conserved water should first be offered available to Coachella before being transferred. The other 26 MWD member agencies — Most of MWD's member agencies receive Colorado River water from MWD. All agencies have made the necessary financial investment to construct the aqueduct and related facilities. Any wheeling arrangement that does not recover all associated costs and ensure that each member agency will fulfill its financial commitments will result in inequitable cost shifts. 1. California Aqueduct I!j Monev Flow_ 1. IID receives water at no cost 2. Farmers conserve water 3. SDCWA buys conserved water 4. SDCWA pays MWD wheeling rate 5. Potential subsidy of transfer if all costs are not recovered 1 I-,uiurauu ruvei L Aqueduct (capacity =1.2 mafy) �\ $ 0.251 a f . _.... --- -.. r ..._...._ .... _ ............ ..x-ex. ♦ / Z .................................... - - --�, . cc Area Farmers Coachella 2 • HID $ Olaf $2001af —_ M E X I C C) All- American Canal E-4 C r- N tD NI A lD Monev Flow_ 1. IID receives water at no cost 2. Farmers conserve water 3. SDCWA buys conserved water 4. SDCWA pays MWD wheeling rate 5. Potential subsidy of transfer if all costs are not recovered 1 I-,uiurauu ruvei L Aqueduct (capacity =1.2 mafy) �\ $ 0.251 a f . _.... --- -.. r ..._...._ .... _ ............ ..x-ex. ♦ / Z .................................... - - --�, . cc Area Farmers Coachella 2 • HID $ Olaf $2001af —_ M E X I C C) All- American Canal E-4 C r- N tD NI A lD JUL 02 '97 02:59PM CMWD PROJiADMIN /ENG 6055263675 P.5i9 THE PARTNERSHIP FOR REGIONAL WATER RELIABILITY I. Who Are We: The Partnership for Regional Water Reliability is a consortium of independent water agencies committed to advancing efficient and effective use of all Southern California's regional water resources now and well into the future. Given the uncertainties that exist with the region's water supplies, including the State Water Project, The Colorado River, and other sources, the Partnership's members joined together and are working to make a reliable water supply for the entire region a reality. II. Who Are The Specific Members: The Partnership for Regional Water Reliability is comprised of Metropolitan Water District (MWD) member agencies from four Southern California counties — Ventura, Los Angeles, Orange, and Riverside. Members include: Calleguas MWD (Ventura), Central and West Basin MWD (Los Angeles); Eastern MWD (Riverside); Las Virgenes MWD (Los Angeles); Long Beach Water Department (Los Angeles); Los Angeles DWP (Los Angeles); Municipal Water District of Orange County (Orange); and Three Valleys MWD (Los Angeles). III. The Partnership for Regional Water Reliability's Goals: 1. To Support A Regional Planning Process MWD and its 27 member agencies have an Integrated Resources Plan (IRP) that was negotiated through an inclusive and open, public process and approved by the MWD Board of Directors. The IRP focuses on the following resource management areas: Conservation; Water Recycling; Groundwater Storage; Colorado River; Bay /Delta State Water Project; Desalination; and Water Transfers. 2. To Support Equitable Water Transfers We support EQUITABLE WATER TRANSFERS which are based on equitable cost sharing and enhancing the water reliability of the entire region. The Partnership opposes any water transfer that would benefit an individual agency at the expense of other MWD member agencies. Such water transfers would force customers throughout the MWD service area to pay higher prices for less water. 3. To Support MWD- agency approved Wheeling Principles The MWD Board of Directors approved WHEELING PRINCIPLES to resolve issues of extra capacity on the Colorado River Aqueduct while preventing cost shifting and requiring a regional benefit for all of its member agencies. These wheeling principles are supported by 26 of 27 MWD member agencies. Final Message The Partnership for Regional Water Reliability supports policies that will: Stop Cost Shifting Prevent Economic Dislocation Promote Conservation Practices Ensure the Economic Future of California 4 TI 11 GY) +O7 1C•IZ JUL 02 '97 02:59PM CMWD PROJ /ADMIN /ENG 9055263675 P.6 /9 SUMMARY OF AVERAGE WATER RATES FOR MWD MEMBER AGENCIES Based on Averages from FY 85 -86 through FY 95 -96 Page 1 Average Effective Average Effective Member Agency Rate per AF without Member Agency Rate per AF with MWD Subsidies MWD Subsidies Chino Basin MWD $253 Chino Basin MWD $252 San Diego CWA $277 San Diego CWA $274 Central Basin MWD $291 Burbank $279 Pasadena $294 Central Basin MWD $284 Anaheim $296 Westem MWD $288 Western MWD $300 Pasadena $290 Burbank $300 Anaheim $290 USGVWD $302 MWDOC $300 MWDOC $310 USGVWD $300 Three Valleys MWD $312 Las virgenes MWD $306 Santa Ana $315 Three Valleys MWD $311 Long Beach $317 Long Beach $311 West Basin MWD $321 West Basin MWD $314 Calleguas MWD $322 median Santa Ana $320 Glendale $323 Glendale $320 Compton $332 Calleguas MWD $321 Las Virgenes MWD $336 Los Angeles $325 Torrance $338 Compton $328 Foothill MWD $340 Foothill MWD $330 Fullerton $341 Torrance $337 Los Angeles $344 Fullerton $341 Beverly Hills $349 Beverly Hills $349 Coastal MWD $354 Coastal MWD $351 Eastem MWD $378 Eastern MWD $375 San Fernando $407 Santa Monica $378 Santa Monica $408 San Fernando $406 San Marino $473 San Marino $468 Note: Historical average unit cost is defined as total dollars paid to Metropolitan during a given fiscal period through water rates, treatment surcharge, RTS (including Standby), connection maintenance charge, and property taxes divided by total sales for that period. Subsidies include water purchased from Metropolitan through the Conservation Credits Program, Local Projects Program, Local Storage Program, and the Groundwater Recovery Program. Page 1 JUL 02 '97 02:59PM CMWD PROJ /PDMIN /ENG 8055263675 Proposed SDCWA / I1D Water Transfer Financial Analysis of Impacts on Calleguas MWD Ar)nUa4,qOsttSh ftirig,�,, , IJ r w/ Delta wlq Delta V Year 1997 $0.00 $0.00 1998 $0.00 $0.00 1999 $100,000.00 $0.00 2000 $512,500.00 $512,500.00 2001 $945,000.00 $840,000.00 2002 $967,500.00 $957,500.00 2003 $1,320,000.00 $1,320,000.00 2004 $1,750,000.00 $1,875,000.00 2005 $1,955,000.00 $2,415,000.00 2006 $2,935,000.00 53,522,000.00 2007 $3,354,400.00 $4,073,200.00 2008 $3,788,200.00 $4,521,400.00 2009 $3,862,600.00 $4,610,200.00 2010 $3,937,000.00 $4,826,000.00 2011 $3,872,400.00 $4,775,960.00 2012 $3,541,320.00 $4,459,440.00 2013 $3,730,720.00 $4,530,160.00 2014 $3,653,640.00 $4,600,880.00 2015 $3,572,400.00 $4,534,200.00 2016 $3,488,000.00 $4,325,120.00 2017 $3,541,000.00 $4,390,640.00 2018 $3,234,240.00 $3,908,040.00 2019 $3,355,240.00 $4,084,640.00 2020 $3,552,000.00 $4,292,000.00 $60,968,160.00 $73,384,080.00 06124/97 P.7/9 JUL 02 '97 03.00PM CMWD PROJ /ADMIN /ENG 8055263675 P.8/9 JUL bC "7( IOd blot l'I U IW1) h'KUJ /H1X11 `I /tI`Ib tf17JJGbdb(J Draft Resolution in Support of Fair Water Transfer Agreements WHEREAS, The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Metropolitan), comprised of 27 member agencies, is the primary wholesale provider of imported water for the Southern California region; and P. 9/9 WHEREAS, Metropolitan has helped ensure Southern California' growth and prosperity for 68 years by providing a growing population that now measures 16.5 million with a continuous supply of safe, reliable, and affordable water; and WHEREAS, Metropolitan and its member agencies developed, with full public participation, the Integrated Resources Plan (IRP) to meet future water needs in Southern California. The IRP includes provisions for encouraging water conservation and developing new sources of water, including water transfer agreements; and WHEREAS, The Metropolitan Board of Directors has adopted ten principles to guide the agency's decisions for all water transfers agreements that require the use of Metropolitan's water delivery infrastructure to transport water supplies (wheeling); and WHEREAS, the ten principles ensure that all communities are protected by a water transfer policy that is fair to all users and will not benefit one community over another, and WHEREAS, the ten principles ensure that with regard to water quality, costs, or reliability, no harm will come to Metropolitan member agencies not participating in a water transfer agreement; and WHEREAS, the San Diego County Water Authority and the Imperial Irrigation District are seeking a water transfer agreement that includes transporting water through Metropolitan's Colorado River Aqueduct. THEREFORE, be it resolved that the supports Metropolitan's efforts to negotiate a water transfer agreement with SDCWA that protects water rates, water reliability, and water quality for every Member Agency.