HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 1997 1001 CC REG ITEM 09ATO:
FROM:
X51 *7 r
ITEM .4
AGENDA REPORT
C = TY OF MOORPARK
The Honorable City Council
Kenneth C. Gilbert, Director of Public Works
DATE: September 22, 1997 (Council Meeting 10 -1 -97)
MOORPARK. CAUFORNIA
Maim
SUBJECT: Consider 1) Certification of the Tabulation of Ballots
Received Regarding the Proposed Future Levy of
Assessments for the Maintenance of Campesina Park;
2) Approval of a Request to Accept the Ownership and
Future Maintenance of Said Park; and 3) Approval of a
Request to Proceed with the Construction of Said Park
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This presents for consideration the following matters:
• the certification of the tabulation of BALLOTS received from
the property owners in the Villa Campesina neighborhood
regarding the continued levy of assessments to fund future City
costs for the maintenance of the Campesina Park;
• a request from the Cabrillo Economic Development Corporation
(CEDC) that the City Council agree to accept the future
ownership and maintenance of the subject park;
• a request from CEDC that they be allowed to proceed with the
construction of Phase I of the development of the subject park.
DISCUSSION
A. Background
A summary of the background of this proposal is attached as
Exhibit "A."
B. Conditions of Approval
A summary of the Conditions of Approval for Tract 4147 is
attached as Exhibit "B."
C. Request from CEDC
A summary of the request from CEDC, along with comments by City
staff is attached as Exhibit "C."
00 ®1;16
caap4
Campesina Park
October 1, 1997
Page 2
D. Distribution of Ballots
The last time matter was considered by the City Council was on
June 4, 1997. At that time the City Council directed staff to
prepare, distribute, compile and tabulate a Ballot, consistent
with the requirements of Proposition 218, to determine whether
or not the property owners in the Villa Campesina neighborhood
are in support of the payment of an assessment to fund future
City costs for the maintenance of the proposed park.
One prerequisite of proceeding with the Ballot was that CEDC
was to pay the City $1,000 to cover City costs for the
administration f the Ballot process. That amount was paid by
CEDC. CEDC also paid the City $300 to cover City costs for the
review of the plans by a landscape architect.
A copy of the Ballot is attached as Exhibit "D." This Ballot
was mailed to the owners of each of the sixty -two (62) lots
within Tract 4147. The Ballot provides for either an
affirmative or a negative vote on the question of paying a
$60.00 per year assessment to fund City costs for the
maintenance of the subject park. The Ballot also provides some
background information describing the purpose and intent of the
Ballot and of the maintenance assessments.
E. Measure "P"
The background information set forth in the Ballot also
mentions that, if Proposition "P" is approved by the voters in
November, that it is the intent of the City to discontinue the
$60 per lot per year assessments upon the lots within Tract
4147, for the maintenance of Campesina Park.
F. Ballot Results
The provisions of Proposition 218 state that, prior to the levy
of any assessment, at least fifty percent (50 %) of the Ballots
received must vote YES on the proposed assessment. On
September 3, 1997, the City Clerk mailed Ballots to the owners
of all sixty -two (62) lots within Tract 4147. On September 17,
1997, the Ballots were opened and tabulated. The results are
set forth in the Certification attached as Exhibit F and
summarized as follows:
Affirmative: 35
Negative: 9
Spoiled: 3
Total: 47
The ballot results indicates that the owners of the affected
properties are in support of the payment of a $60 per lot per
year assessment for the maintenance of the proposed park.
cnap4 00()1_17
Campesina Park
October 1, 1997
Page 3
G.
H.
Project Status
The city has received a number of requests from CEDC regarding
the construction of the proposed park. A number of those
requests have been responded to by the City Council at prior
meetings. Responses to certain other requests have been
deferred. A summary of the status of those requests /responses
is as follows:
Request Response
1 for City funding of a portion of the Park Denied. This request may be reconsidered
improvement costs; subsequent to:
a) completion of the construction of the
Phase 1 improvements; and,
b) exhaustion of efforts to solicit volunteer
labor and materials.
2 for City acceptance of the ownership of the
park property;
3 for City acceptance of the future maintenance
of the park;
4 for the release of monies earmarked for the
construction of the park (approximately
$43,5710;
To be considered this date.
To be considered this date.
To be considered this date.
5 for the approval of scope of work proposed for See Section H of this report.
the Phase 1 improvements;
Proposed Project
1. Phase is As discussed and approved by the
prior meetings, the Scope of Work for
improvements shall include the following:
• grading;
• irrigation system;
• soil amendments;
• hydroseeding (turf);
planting of trees / shrubs/ etc.;
• fencing; and,
• security lighting.
City Council at
the Phase 1
Notes: 1) the power source for the lighting shall come from the electrical service
already installed by the City for the pedestrian bridge project.
2) the source of water for the irrigation system shall be the irrigation water
line extended across the pedestrian bridge from the Arroyo Vista Community
Park irrigation water well.
cenpa VM IAS
Campesina Park
October 1, 1997
Page 4
2. Proposed Future Work: Additional park improvements which
have been contemplated by CEDC include the following:
• basketball court;
• tot lot;
• play equipment;
• benches / tables; and,
• BBQ stands or pits.
3. Volunteer Efforts: One of the stated objectives of the
implementation of this park project is the fostering,
development and utilization of volunteer help and donated
material. CEDC is encouraged to continue to work to develop
this resource, for both the initial Phase 1 improvements ,
as well as any future planned improvements.
3. Project Cost Estimate: A summary of project cost estimates
is attached as Exhibit "D."
4. Project Plans and Specifications:
a. Total Project: CEDC has prepared plans and
specifications for all proposed park improvements. A
sketch illustrating that design is attached as Exhibit E.
b. Phase 1 Project: It is the intent of CEDC to proceed
immediately with only those improvements listed above as
Phase 1 improvements. Other elements of the design will
be implemented in the future as resources become
available.
c. city Approval: City staff has reviewed and approved
these plans. The plans and specifications also meet the
standards and requirements of the City for the
development of a City park, with an eye toward minimizing
future maintenance costs.
d. Guide for current and Future Efforts: One of the primary
purposes of the plans is to provide a "blueprint" for the
phased implementation of various park improvements in a
coordinated manner.
I. Project Approval
With the completion of the Ballot process, CEDC requests that
the City Council approve the following:
acceptance of the future ownership of the park;
• acceptance of the future maintenance of the park;
• approval of the park improvement plans;
• authorization to proceed with Phase 1 improvements; and,
• release of funds set aside for park improvements.
camps 000113
Campesina Park
October 1, 1997
Page 5
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council take the following
actions:
1. Certify the tabulation of Ballots received pertaining to the
future levy of a $60 per lot per year maintenance assessment
for Campesina Park, finding the results of said Ballot to be
in favor of said future assessment.
2. Except as provided for below, direct staff to proceed with
the levy of said assessment for Fiscal Year 1998/99 and all
future years requiring said assessment to fund said
maintenance costs.
3. Direct staff to suspend such assessments if Proposition "P"
is approved by the voters.
4. Direct staff to proceed with the efforts necessary to have
the park property conveyed to the City.
5. Direct staff to make preparations for the acceptance of the
subject proposed park for City maintenance.
6. Re- confirm the scope of work for the Phase 1 improvements
for the subject park as defined in this report and authorize
CEDC too proc ed with construction.
7. Dire taff to make appropriate provisions for the release
of CEDC funds set aside for this purpose, to be used
solely for said park construction.
()U ()Uo
canp4
Exhibit A: Background
1. By Resolution 86 -297 the City Council approved Tract 4147 for
the development of the Villa Campesina neighborhood. The
Conditions of Approval for that tract required the developer,
CEDC, to construct a park on a lot at the south end of the
tract (Parcel 'A'). That lot is encumbered by an easement for
flood control purposes, granted to the Ventura County Flood
Control District [VCFCD] (see Exhibit 2).
2. In late 1995 and early 1996 City and County officials met with
CEDC and area residents to discuss VCFCD plans for the
construction improvements to the Arroyo Simi. Those plans
called for the widening of the channel into the area proposed
for the park (Parcel 'A'). As a result of those meetings,
revisions were made to the channel improvement plans which
moved the channel widening upstream to accommodate a park site
on the westerly portion of Parcel 'A'. That action reduced the
park from approximately 2.0 acres to approximately 1.5 acres.
3. In March of 1996 the City Council approved the revised
conceptual design for the park based on the amended channel
widening plans. As a part of that action or a prior action of
the City Council, it was determined that the City would assist,
to a degree, in the development of the plans for this project
by not requiring CEDC to pay the City for any staff time
expended on the review of the project design or the
administration of the project development, nor would CEDC pay
any administrative overhead charges for any outside costs
incurred by the City, which are normally paid by the applicant.
4. The VCFCD has prepared a legal description for that portion of
Parcel 'A' to be developed as a park site. Presuming that this
park is to be maintained by the City, the plan would be to have
CEDC convey all of Parcel 'A' to the City. The City would then
convey that portion east of the park to VCFCD coincidentally
with the VCFCD relinquishing its easement over the entire
Parcel 'A' (see Exhibit 3).
5. CEDC has had plans and specifications prepared for both the
landscape improvements and the "hardscape" improvements. A
diagram showing the final design for the park is attached as
Exhibit 4.
6. On December 4, 1996, the City Council considered a request from
CEDC for partial funding of park improvement costs and to
accept the future park and its maintenance. The matter was
referred to the Public Works, Facilities and Solid Waste
Committee.
0U ()U:l
camp4
Exhibit 'A' : Background
Page 2
7. The Public Works, Facilities and Solid Waste Committee
discussed the subject request at their meetings on December 16,
1996, January 22, 1997 and February 18, 1997. Although the
matter was discussed, the Committee took no action and made no
recommendations.
S. Last April the City Council again considered the request from
Cabrillo Economic Development Corporation (CEDC) for 1) City
funding of a portion of the Campesina Park construction costs;
and, 2) City acceptance of said Park for City ownership and
maintenance upon completion of construction. The matter was
again referred back to the Public Works, Facilities and Solid
Waste Committee.
9. The Public Works, Facilities and Solid Waste Committee
(Councilmembers Wozniak and Evans) has discussed this request
at their meetings held in April and May. The Committee's
recommendations are set forth herein.
10. On June 4, 1997, the City Council considered this matter once
more. The City Council directed staff to prepare, distribute,
compile and tabulate a BALLOT, consistent with the requirements
of Proposition 218, to determine whether or not the property
owners in the Villa Campesina neighborhood are in support of
the payment of an assessment to fund future City costs for the
maintenance of the proposed park.
11. On June 18, 1997, the City Council approved the levy of
assessments for FY 1997/98 for AD 84 -2, which included the
creation of a New Zone of Benefit to allow the levy of a $60
per lot per year assessment upon all of the lots within Tract
4147, to fund future maintenance costs for the subject park.
't 00021
camps
Exhibit B: Tract 4147 Conditions of Approval
The Conditions of Approval for Tract 4147 placed the responsibility
for the construction of Campesina Park with the developer, CEDC.
Certain of those conditions are summarized and commented upon as
follows:
Tract 4147 Conditions
1. No. 15: This condition states that the park
site shall be developed by the residents as a
private park facility to be owned by CEDC. No
Quimby park in lieu fees were paid by CEDC.
2. Nos. 19 & RPD -1049 Cond. No. 26: These
conditions states that an easement for the
park site shall be offered to the City, but
presumably not accepted unless the need
arises. The condition states that, in the
event proper maintenance is not provided by
the residents, said maintenance shall be taken
over by the City and a special assessment
shall be levied upon all of the properties
within the Tract to fund the cost of said City
maintenance.
caap4
Comments
If the City approves City participation in the
costs of the construction of this project, the
City would be rescinding or amending those
conditions requiring the property owners, or
the property owners via CEDC, to construct
these improvements.
There have been a number of discussions which
imply that it is the intent of both CEDC and
the City to have the park conveyed to the City
and maintained by Assessment District 85-1 (a
Citywide assessment). This action would be
contrary to the conditions requiring the
owners of the sixty -two lots within Tract 4147
to pay for the maintenance of this park.
000va
Exhibit C: Request from CEDC
Cabrillo Economic Development Corporation [CEDC] has requested (see
letter attached as Page 4 of this Exhibit C) City funding of a
portion of the construction costs for Campesina Park. CEDC has
also requested that, upon completion of the construction of the
park, that the park be granted to and be maintained by the City.
A summary of that request, with comments, is summarized as follows:
Request
1. City Funding of IiRrovement Costs: CEDC is
requesting the City to fund the difference
between the monies they have available to
construct the park and their estimated cost to
complete that construction. Their estimate of
City costs is $61,935 ($999 / lot).
2. City Park Maintenance: CEDC is requesting
that the City consider funding the maintenance
of this proposed future City Park from the
Citywide park maintenance district (085 -1).
3. Zone of Benefit: CEDC understands that it may
be necessary for the City to establish a Zone
of Benefit (AD84 -2) to fund the maintenance of
this park via an assessment upon all of the
lots within Tract 4147.
Release of "Earmarked" Monies: CEDC is
requesting that the City release approximately
$43,571 of CEDC monies restricted to the
development of the subject park.
5. Phase I Construction: CEDC is proposing to
proceed immediately with the construction of
Phase I improvements consisting of grading,
fencing and the construction of the basketball
court. It is the intent of CEDC to manage the
contracts for this work. It is assumed that
these contracts would not be subject to the
Public Contracts Code.
canpa
Comments
It should be noted that the amount of City
funds requested by CEDC in prior meetings and
correspondence was $40,000 ($645 / lot). In
addition, as discussed in Section E2 of this
report, the City's estimate of the cost of the
improvements proposed to be constructed by the
City is in excess of $93,000 ($1,500 / lot).
As discussed in Section A and Section D of
this report, there is a case for requiring
park maintenance costs to be funded by local
residents. This can be done by establishing a
Zone of Benefit assessment for the lots within
Tract 4147.
See Section D for a discussion of park
maintenance.
Requires City approval in order for the funds
to be released.
CEDC has stated that the construction of the
basketball court in the first phase of
construction is in response to priorities
stated by the residents. Unfortunately the
expense of this element of work requires
almost all of the monies CEDC has available.
It should be noted that the construction of
irrigation and landscaping after the
basketball court and basketball uses have been
established, will be a problem. CEDC knows
that all construction must be done in
accordance with plans and specifications
approved by the City, and that said plans and
specs must conform to all City standards.
UU ®1.2'4
Exhibit C
Page 2
Request
6. CDBG Funding: CEDC's letter mentions that
they have submitted a separate request to the
City that all or a portion of the remaining
park construction costs be funded by Community
Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds.
7. Phase II Construction: CEDC has requested
that the remainder of the park improvements be
constructed by the City. Such contracts would
be subject to the Public Contracts Code. A
summary of those remaining improvements is as
follows:
a. irrigation system
b. soil amendments
c. planting (shrubs / trees)
d. hydroseeding (turf)
e. sidewalks and other remaining concrete
work
f. Tot Lot play equipment
g. specialty items (benches, tables, etc.)
h. electrical / lighting
i. domestic water service
8. Well Water: The park improvement cost
estimates discussed herein are based on the
assumption that irrigation water will be
provided from the wells at Arroyo Vista
Community Park.
9. Donated Services and Aaterials: One of the
goals of this project is to utilized donated
materials and labor to the fullest extent
possible. The costs estimates provided by
CEDC do not include possible receipt of
certain donated concrete and plant materials.
If received, actual costs by CEDC will be less
than those indicated.
10 Plan 'B': The letter from CEDC mentions that
if City funding cannot be obtained, that it
would be the intent of CEDC to proceed with a
revised project which would call for only the
construction of only the grading, fencing,
irrigation and planting at this time. The
basketball court, playground equipment, picnic
tables, barbecues, lighting, concrete flatwork
and other planned improvements would be
deferred.
cemp4
Comments
As discussed in Section G, CDBG monies can not
be used for this purpose.
A construction contract administered by the
City will have to comply to the requirements
of the Public Contracts Code, which adds costs
not normally associated with contracts awarded
by private agencies.
As you might recall, the construction contract
for the Arroyo Vista Community Park Bicycle /
Equestrian / Pedestrian / Emergency Access
Bridge includes the extension of a well water
line to the north side of the Arroyo.
As discussed in Section H of this report,
little information has been provided on how
donated services and materials are to be
solicited and utilized.
See Section H of this report for a discussion
of this alternative plan of action.
000125
Exhibit D: Park Construction Cost Estimates
Element
Construction
Construction Contingency (10 %)
Construction Total
Design
Contract Admin & Inspection
Total
Notes: a Design costs incurred by CEDC.
b Contract Administration costs to be incurred by CEDC.
c Inspection costs to be incurred by the City.
d Less any volunteer labor and /or donated materials.
e $43,571 in escrow, plus $19,780.38 from other sources
canp4
Total
d 108,842
10,884
119,726
119,726
00®126
Proposed
Phase 1
Future Work ($1
d & e 63,352
d 45,490
6,335
4,549
69,687
50,039
a
a
b & c
b & c
69,687
50,039
Notes: a Design costs incurred by CEDC.
b Contract Administration costs to be incurred by CEDC.
c Inspection costs to be incurred by the City.
d Less any volunteer labor and /or donated materials.
e $43,571 in escrow, plus $19,780.38 from other sources
canp4
Total
d 108,842
10,884
119,726
119,726
00®126
TO'90dd S6T£ 6S9 S @8
LS:TS L6, ZZ d9S
Cabrillo Economic Development Corporation
11011 Azahar Street, Saticoy, California 93004 (805) 659 -3791 Fax (805) 659.3195
UARD 0EM.E=a -5
PRESIOCNT September 21, 1997
DAVID J. SADCDRA
Channel Islands
National Bank
VICE PRESIDENT
Re: Villa Campesina Park
OSCAH 0.GONZALEZ
Englano. Wnirtield,
50htuudcrAIm4way
Kenneth C. Gilbert
SCCONO VICE PAESIDENT
Director of Public Works
MARIA SANDALL
799 Moorpark Avenue
ApricniRart� ^eptOSenL,lim
Moorpark, CA 93021
Simi valloy
but a different phasing than the Budget Dated 3/19/97. I t
TACASUREA
Re: Villa Campesina Park
KENNETH R. MEnIDETI I
Seams, Sanoau,
Dum:=hl B PotrovlCh
Dear Mr. Gilbert;
SFCRETAAY
?r4MA
DARAARA A. JOURNCT
POPesonlativu
Enclosed is a Villa Campesina Park Budget showing the cost
Oxnard
of Phase 1. This Budget- shows the same construction cost
ASSISTANT
CORPORATE UnOKCA Y/
but a different phasing than the Budget Dated 3/19/97. I t
JOHN J.VACCA
Attorney
shows an increase in the Predevelopment Cost based on
actual or projected costs with the following adjustments:
AENCCORAno
CotnmunityAoprosonlaove
• Calleguas MWD fees decreased to reflect only fees
Casa volm-quoz
calrLMala
attributable to park site;
RICHARDFAANcis
• Landscape architect increased based on inclusion of 1994
Auurnoy
billing;
EANICMORALES
Community Raprosnmitive
• City fees increased to include additional City plan
Fdlmore
check fees identified and cost of election;
JESSICA MURRAY
• Civil engineering increased based on actual billing,
Community Roprom l Live
Monlyomary Oaks Community
Homoz,Inc.,Oi^I
As we have discussed, the CEDC is prepared to complete
DEAN A, PwploH 1pIngP
PuOpto Halpinp People
Phase 1 without an additional City assistance. This is
Y y
315TEACARMENRODRIGUEZ
based on the City approving the release of funds in escrow
SI John'slyoulreaC^
on a timely basis. We have tentatively scheduled grading
Oxnard
for the week of October 13, 1997.
FATHCR MIKE WALSH
SL Jolla's Sarnin,Vy please contact me if
you have any questions.
AMPRY BDAND
SON L.IICRTEL
Sincerely,
Hertel 000strutlury
OAABARA MACAI.OATIZ
Channel counties
?r4MA
Legal Services
Aasociehon
Karen Flock
RICHARD MCNISs
J UalilmOre Flwnns
project Manager
AL ZAP ANTA
Atlanuc nichhuld Via FAX 529-8270
Company
CXFQUff MBECTO9 cc: Teresa Cort6s
RODNEYE.FERNANDCZ President, Villa Campesina Park Committee
Melissa Harris
Secretary, Villa Campesina Park Committee
Q-11
A Unhoa WRy Aynnry
A community aconomle aevetopmant oorporalion servtnp vondurn County
000V7
p oaw7� �v
eo *29dd 9612 699 Sob
Villa Campcsina Park Budget
Date: 9/21/97
PredcvelopmQa.t
Calleguas MWD fees
Landscape architect
City plan check 1'ecs /deposit
Wecd abatement
Civil engineering
Subtotal
CMtstruction
rat Re •em n c
101 Temp. Facilities/Utilities
103 Protcc:tion /Guard Service
104 Gencral Labor
Subtotal
Site k
202 Rough grading/excavation
205 Irrigation
206 Landscaping & plantings
207 Fences - chain link
208 Field Engineering
209 Water & Sewer
SubtoW
CrCI
302 Pole Bases
307 Platwork
Subtotal
EjectTical
1006 Site Lighting/3 poles
Subtotal
Snecia ties
1401 4 barbeques
1402 4 picnic tables
Subtotal
Eguipmen
1503 Playground equipment
Subtotal
Special ConstructiQA
1601 2 Basketball posts
Subtotal
irecm
1702 Supervision
Subtotal
Total
Total, Construction
Sourc s
Escrow as of 1/97
From Other Sources
Total
Construction in Two Phases
TTAC ha. e I Phase 2
3,207.56
3,207.56
8,551.90
8,551.90
3,170.50
3,170.50
303.81
303.81
5,570.95
5.570.95
20,804.72
20,804.72
2,000.00
1,000.00
500.00
500.00
11000.00
500.00
3,500.00
2,000.00
0.00
1,000.00
500.00
1,500.00
5,123.00
5,123.00
8,588.00
8,588.00
12,589.00
12,589.00
3,397.00
3,397.00
2,000.00
2,000.00
5,000.00
51000.00
36,697.00
31,697.00 5,000.00
1,250.00
1,250.00
18,155.00
18,155.00
19,405.00
1,250.00 18,155.00
5,600.00
5,600.00
5,600.00
5,600.00 0.00
600.00
1,800.00
2,400.00
600.00
1,800.00
0.00 2,400.00
14,679.27 14,679.27
14,679.27 0.00 14,679.27
1,756.00 1,756.00
1,756.00 0.00 1,756.00
4,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00
4,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00
108,841.99 63,351.72 45,490.27
88,037.27 42,547.00 45,490.27
43,571.34 43,571.34
65,270.65 19,78038 45,490.27
108,841.99 63,351.72 45,490.27
L9:TT L6, zz d3s
�-�> C-3 -)
000128
O 'A30 OI WONOO� 0111 MR0 WV 0:11 NOW L6 -ZZ -ES
G9
�O
hl
N �-
EXHIBIT F
CANVASS AND STATEMENT OF RESULT OF BALLOT
CITY OF MOORPARK
VILLA CAMPESINA SPECIAL BENEFIT ASSESSMENT
I hereby certify that on September 17, 1997, I canvassed the
returns of the ballot (a copy of the ballot is attached) held
September 17, 1997, in the City of Moorpark for the Villa Campesina
Neighborhood which includes the properties on James Weak Avenue,
Juarez Avenue, Villa Campesina Avenue, Liberty Bell Road (South of
Los Angeles Avenue). The total number of ballots cast and the
total number of ballots cast for and against are full, true and
correct:
Qualified Landowner Votes 47
Total YES 35
Total NO 9
Total Spoiled 3
0001.31
This is your official ballot to cast your vote
on a Special Benefit Assessment to your Prop-
erty Tax. The ballot must be completed,
signed and received by September 17 at
5:30 p.m. Please note, there is only one
ballot/vote per residential property.
Ballots must be returned by mail in the en-
closed stamped envelope, or in person to the
City Clerk at City Hall, 799 Moorarpk Av-
enue. All ballots will be opened at 5:30 p.m.
on September 17.
Yes, I approve being assessed $60.00 per year
to fund City costs related to the maintenance
of a future park planned to be constructed on
vacant property located south of Juarez
Avenue.
FIN% I do not approve being assessed $60.00
each year to fund City costs related to the
maintenance of a future park planned to be
constructed on vacant property located south
of Juarez Avenue.
Signature of Property Owner or Authorized Representa-
tive, in the case of property owned by non- individuals
and enclose in return envelope)
Background Information
Pertaining to the
BALLOT for a Special Benefit Assessment
for the Maintenance of Campesina Park
1. The Cabrillo Economic Development Corporation (CEDC) was required, as a con-
dition of the development of your Tract, to construct a park on vacant land located
at the south end of Juarez Avenue in your neighborhood. C MC, has prepared plans
and is ready to proceed with the construction of that park. However, in order to
adequately provide for the future maintenance of the park, CEDC has asked that the
park be conveyed to the City and that the City provide for the future maintenance of
the park.
2. In June of this year, the City established a $60 per lot per year assessment upon all of
the properties within your tract to fund these future park maintenance costs. That
assessment will appear on your property tax bill for Fiscal Year 1997/98. However,
new laws established subsequent to the adoption of Proposition 218, will make it
impossible for the City to continue to levy this new assessment in future years, without
0001.32
i
- continued front other side
the consent of the majority of those being assessed. At the present time this assess-
ment is the only source of funds identified to pay for these future park maintenance
costs. Without these assessment revenues, there is no assured funding source for
these costs. It is necessary for the City to first determine that there will be a long-
term funding source for these costs, before the City agrees to accept this park and
these future maintenance responsibilities.
3. The purpose of this Ballot is to determine whether or not you and your neighbors are
in support of the $60.00 annual assessment which has been established to pay for the
future maintenance of this park. The owners of all sixty -two (62) lots within your
Tract will receive a Ballot. If at least one -half of the ballots returned to the City shoE:,
a YES vote, the City will be able to continue levying this assessment each year. If
more than one -half of the Ballots returned to the City show a NO vote, the City will
not be able to levy the assessment for FY 1998/99 or future years.
4. You are advised that the annual assessment will fund only actual City costs for con-
tract maintenance costs, plus costs for utilities, materials, equipment, etc. No City
labor costs or administrative costs will be applied to the assessment revenues. You
are also advised that the utility costs for this future park will be much less than most
City parks, because the water for the park will be provided from a City -owned water
well — not from the water utility.
5. In addition, if Proposition "P" on the November ballot passes, it is the intent of the
City to abandon this separate assessment of your property for the maintenance of the
future Campesina Park. Proposition "P ", if approved, will establish a Special City-
wide tax "earmarked" for parks maintenance which would include Campesina Park if
and when it's accepted by the City.
6. Your YES vote is needed to assure that park construction can proceed in the near
future. If the majority of the Ballots returned to the City are not in support of the
assessment, the construction of the park will be in doubt.
oOOl.33