HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 1997 1008 CC SPC ITEM 04A7/A.4 (6)
�� A
ITEM
CITY OF MOORPAR& CALIFORMA
City Co%�nc`il Meeting
r.f / A _L_ 1997-
AGENDA REPORT O �� •
CITY OF MOORPARK BY.
TO: Honorable City Council
FROM: Nelson Miller, Director of Community Development
Deborah S. Traffenstedt, Principal Planner '3:)5T
DATE: October 3, 1997 (CC Meeting of 10/8/97)
SUBJECT: CONSIDER CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING FOR HIDDEN CREEK RANCH
SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT (SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 8 /SPECIFIC PLAN NO.
SP -93 -1, GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. GPA -93 -1, AND ZONE CHANGE
NO. ZC- 93 -3), APPLICANT: HIDDEN CREEK RANCH PARTNERS
The first public hearing for the Hidden Creek Ranch Specific Plan Project
was held on October 1, 1997. At that meeting, the City Council directed
staff to revise the meeting originally scheduled for October 29 to
November 12, 1997. The revised public hearing schedule is as follows:
October 8, 1997 Specific Plan draft land use and circulation
plans, phasing, and access and traffic impact
issues.
October 22, 1997 Specific Plan open space, clustering of
development, and park related issues.
November 12, 1997 Specific Plan affordable housing, school
sites, agricultural land, various property
ownerships, and other issues.
The staff report for the October 1 meeting provided a summary of
revisions made to the Specific Plan land use and circulation plans and
phasing. That staff report also included a list of issues, all of which
could have an effect on either the land use plan, circulation plan, or
both (reference staff report for October 1, 1997 meeting, pages numbered
000020 through 000027, for issues discussion). The following discussion
is intended to provide supplemental information pertaining to recommended
land use plan revisions, the planned circulation system and traffic
study, the revised phasing plan, and recommended Specific Plan text
revisions.
DST c: \1- m \sp- 8 \cc- sp8rpt.2 >f
GOOD
Hidden Creek Ranch Specific Plan
To: Honorable City Council
October 3, 1997
Page 2
DISCUSSION
Land Use Plan
The applicant has submitted a revised land use plan that was provided to
the City Council with the staff report for the October 1 meeting.
Included in that staff report were recommendations that the land use plan
be further revised to change Planning Unit 19B from Rural High
Residential to Open Space and Planning Unit 42B from Park to Open Space.
Attachment 1 is a letter from BonTerra Consulting (the EIR preparer) that
provides a summary of the biological issues pertaining to Planning Units
1, 19A, 19B, and 45. The biological habitat value described in the
attached letter for Planning Unit 19B provides further support for
staff's recommendation that the land use designation be revised from
Rural High Residential to Open Space.
The applicant's concept for Planning Unit 42B is that it would function
as a trail corridor leading to the school site, Planning Unit 39A. The
kind of trail envisioned would need to be maintained by a master
homeowners association or assessment district, and staff has recommended
that the proposed trail be included on the Trails Plan as a multi -use
trail /Class 1 bike path and Planning Unit 42A should be designated as
open space.
Circulation System and Traffic Study
Attachment 4 to the staff report for the October 1 meeting included a
detailed discussion of circulation options /alternatives (reference staff
report for October 1, 1997 meeting, pages numbered 000092 through
000097) . The planned traffic control method for intersections within the
Hidden Creek Ranch Specific Plan area has not been discussed in prior
staff reports, but is addressed in the Traffic Study and summarized in
the EIR. The Traffic Study identifies that Hidden Creek Drive will be
designated as a through street with all side streets and the Campus Park
Drive /Campus Road intersection initially being stop -sign controlled, and
that the specific requirements for the internal circulation network will
need to be evaluated when more detailed project plans are available.
The EIR did not include a requirement for subsequent evaluation of the
appropriate traffic control method for all Hidden Creek Drive
intersections. A mitigation measure should be added to require a traffic
study, including a traffic signal warrant analysis, to be submitted with
the master tentative tract map application for each phase (reference
DST c: \1- m \sp- 8 \cc- sp8rpt.2
a 000002
Hidden Creek Ranch Specific Plan
To: Honorable City Council
October 3, 1997
Page 3
following discussion regarding phasing), including intersection geometric
design per City standards, to ensure that all required intersection
improvements are funded in association with development project approval.
If the City Council approves an alternative circulation system that
includes a roadway across lower Happy Camp Canyon Regional Park versus
the Broadway extension, the mitigation measure pertaining to the Happy
Camp Road /Walnut Canyon Road /Broadway intersection would need to be
revised. A traffic study, including traffic signal warrant analysis and
intersection geometric design per City standards, should be required as
a mitigation measure to provide detailed roadway and intersection
improvement requirements for the Spring Road extension / "C" Street access
into Hidden Creek Ranch Specific Plan; and that traffic study would need
to be submitted with the application for the first master tentative tract
map, to ensure that all Hidden Creek Ranch Specific Plan development
projects are conditioned to require payment of a fair share of the
required improvements.
A representative from Associated Transportation Engineers, the consulting
firm that prepared the Hidden Creek Ranch Specific Plan Traffic Study,
will be in attendance at the October 8 City Council meeting to answer
questions. In addition, a representative from Austin - Foust, Inc., the
City's traffic model consultant, will be in attendance. Austin - Foust,
Inc., was hired to complete supplemental traffic counts and further
analyze the Campus Park Drive /Collins Drive intersection. The traffic
counts were completed by Austin - Foust, Inc., in January and September
1997. Attachment 2 summarizes the Campus Park Drive /Collins Drive
intersection traffic count information collected by Austin- Foust, and
will be discussed at the October 8 meeting.
Phasing Plan
The draft EIR identified the project's phasing plan as commencing in the
first year with the development of Planning Units 15, 16, 18, and 31,
which are noncontiguous and generally located in the central portion of
the project. With this initial phasing plan, Hidden Creek Drive was
proposed to be fully constructed in the first phase, which required
substantial grading to result in a balanced grading plan. After
circulation of the Draft EIR, the project applicant recommended to the
Planning Commission that the phasing plan be modified, to allow
development to generally proceed from east to west, with grading limited
to each phase. The revised phasing plan, reviewed by the Planning
Commission, included a secondary access consisting of a roadway
connection to Collins Drive north of Moorpark College (versus the
DST c: \1- m \sp- 8 \cc- sp8rpt.2
i
Hidden Creek Ranch Specific Plan
To: Honorable City Council
October 3, 1997
Page 4
original proposal to extend the roadway through to Broadway for the first
phase of development).
The applicant has now proposed a third phasing plan (reference Attachment
3). Development is now proposed to occur in four phase areas (A through
D). The four phases indicate the general sequence for the development
of major land use areas. The applicant has identified that not all
development within a phase may be constructed before development of the
next phase commences. Several factors including the arterial road
system, public services, and economic /marketing conditions could affect
the buildout schedule and sequence of development. The project applicant
has anticipated that buildout of the project would be approximately 15
years.
The applicant intends that for each development p
for the area within the phase would be recorded.
would create parcels, sized for sale to builders,
individual planning units or portions thereof,
related land use permits can be processed for
projects.
hase, a Master Tract Map
These Master Tract Maps
which correspond to the
so that tract maps and
individual development
The applicant has identified that the revised phasing plan is intended
to model the phasing plan for the Ahmanson Ranch Specific Plan. Staff
concurs that Ahmanson Specific Plan contains superior development phasing
requirements, in comparison to the Hidden Creek Ranch Specific Plan, and
originally staff had requested that the applicant's specific plan
preparers use the Ahmanson Specific Plan as an example (which was not
done). Staff's concern, however, is that the proposed new Hidden Creek
Ranch Specific Plan phasing map (Attachment 3) cannot just be inserted,
without also including the other phasing related components of the
Ahmanson Ranch Specific Plan. For example, the Ahmanson Specific Plan
includes detailed requirements for master tract maps, as identified in
Attachment 4 to this report. In addition, each public facility /service
component in the Ahmanson Specific Plan also includes financing and
phasing requirements, as identified in Attachment 5, which is the Potable
Water System section (and is included as an example). The Hidden Creek
Ranch Specific Plan would need to be rewritten to include the phasing
requirements for grading, master tentative tract maps, public facilities,
and public services. The Environmental Impact Report (EIR) mitigation
measures would also need to be consistent with the revised phasing
requirements.
DST c: \1- m \sp- 8 \cc- sp8rpt.2
000004
Hidden Creek Ranch Specific Plan
To: Honorable City Council
October 3, 1997
Page 5
A new mitigation measure could be adopted to require that individual
development projects could proceed as long as necessary public service
infrastructure and services are available, as documented in a Public
Facilities and Financing Plan, submitted with any master tentative map
application. For each development phase, a Master Tentative Tract Map
for the area within each phase would need to be required. A new Traffic
Study should also be required to be submitted with each Master Tentative
Tract Map application to ensure that the assumptions regarding planned
citywide circulation improvements are valid, and to recommend additional
mitigation measures, if needed to maintain the City's desired level of
service for all intersections (currently Level of Service "C" as
described in the General Plan Circulation Element).
The positive and negative effects of modifying the phasing plan include
the following:
• Less mass grading would occur at the start of project
implementation.
• Less grading can minimize the potential for erosion and lessen
short -term (grading and construction - related) air emissions.
• The revised phasing plan relies on a roadway connection to
Collins Drive, north of Moorpark College, as the only
secondary access, until such time that Hidden Creek Drive is
extended westerly to connect to a roadway across Happy Camp
Canyon Regional Park. The result is that all trips would need
to pass through the Campus Park Drive /Collins Drive
intersection. The Traffic Study preparer has concluded that
the Campus Park Drive /Collins Drive intersection can be
improved to accommodate Phase A development.
The financing plan for public facilities and services must also be linked
to phasing. The financing measures necessary to carry out the land use
and circulation plans, provide required infrastructure and services, and
achieve compliance with development regulations are required by the State
Government Code to be addressed in a specific plan. No financing
information is currently included in the Draft Hidden Creek Ranch
Specific Plan; therefore, staff identified to the Planning Commission
that the Draft Specific Plan was not in compliance with the State
Government Code requirements for implementation measures. Attachment 1
to the Planning Commission's Resolution (reference staff report for
October 1, 1997 meeting, pages numbered 000080 through 000082) consists
of supplemental financing information submitted by the applicant. Staff
recommends that the financing information would also need to be rewritten
DST c: \1- m \sp- 8 \cc- sp8rpt.2
0000015
Hidden Creek Ranch Specific Plan
To: Honorable City Council
October 3, 1997
Page 6
to be consistent with the revised phasing plan (see Attachment 5
example) .
Specific Plan Revisions
The staff report for the Octobez
Commission's Resolution identif
Specific Plan revisions. The C
with the applicant to ensure tha
all recommended revisions, prior
regarding approval or denial
Amendment, and Zone Change.
1 City Council meeting and the Planning
r other recommended Hidden Creek Ranch
_ty Council should direct staff to work
the Specific Plan document incorporates
to any determination by the City Council
of the Specific Plan, General Plan
The staff report for the October 1 meeting identifies that all revisions
made to the Specific Plan prior to certification of the EIR require
analysis to determine whether the EIR must be recirculated for public
review prior to certification. If the EIR is not to be recirculated, the
City Council will need to be able to conclude that the public has not
been deprived of a meaningful opportunity to comment upon a new
substantial adverse environmental effect of the project or a feasible way
to mitigate or avoid such an effect that the project applicant has
declined to implement.
RECOMMENDATION
Accept public testimony and continue the public hearing to a scheduled
special City Council meeting on October 22, 1997, for focused discussion
of Specific Plan open space, clustering of development, and park related
issues.
Attachments:
1. Letter from BonTerra dated 9 -22 -97 regarding field surveys of
Planning Units 19A, 19B, 1, and 45
2. Traffic Count Information from Austin - Foust, Inc.
3. Revised Phasing Plan
4. Ahmanson Specific Plan Development Phasing Section, pages 1 -132
through 1 -141
5. Ahmanson Ranch Specific Plan Potable Water System, pages 3 -39
through 3 -45.
DST c: \1- m \sp- 8 \cc- sp8rpt.2
-lift.
Nelson Miller
September 22, 1997
Page 2
Development of Planning Unit 19B would result in the loss of both Venturan coastal sage scrub and
chaparral, two plant communities that are valuable to onsite plant and wildlife resources. In addition to the
direct loss of these plant community types, the indirect effect on the chaparral and sage scrub communities
immediately adjacent to this planning area would be detrimental. Planning Unit 19B is located in an area
where the value of the habitat increases as you move north and eastward. Limited residential development
is recommended for this planning unit.
Planning Unit 1
The majority of Planning Unit 1 contains non - native grassland. However, the access road on the western
portion of the planning unit would impact coastal sage scrub occurring in a canyon in this area. As
mentioned previously, coastal sage scrub supports many wildlife species present within the study area.
Because of the limited vegetative cover on the planning unit (non- native grassland), wildlife movement is
not expected to be an important use of this area.
Land uses in Planning Unit 1 should be restricted to low density residential units, preferably with limited
access to the natural open space areas by a "gated" community. In addition, the canyon and sage scrub
on the western portion of the planning unit should be avoided as much as possible.
Planning Unit 45
Planning Unit 45 contains a wide variety of plant communities including chaparral, Venturan coastal sage
scrub, non - native grassland, coast live oak woodland, and southern coast live oak riparian forest. The
canyons and drainages contain biologically rich communities (chaparral, sage scrub, and woodland areas).
These resources provide valuable habitats for both plants and wildlife species in the Specific Plan area and
wildlife movement is expected to occur regularly on a local basis. The upper plateaus of the planning unit
are dominated by non - native grasslands that have been heavily grazed for several years and represent
areas of lower biological value.
Proposed land uses in Planning Unit 45 should be limited to passive open space, such as permanent natural
open space, wilderness park, golf course with limited "greens ", or equestrian center. Residential
development should be limited or non - existent within this planning unit. Development should be focused
on the southern portion of the planning unit, away from the proposed natural open space on the northern
portion of the Specific Plan area. Cattle should not be allowed on the planning unit site due their destructive
nature. Any disturbance should be limited, to the greatest extent possible, to the plateau above the canyons.
Adequate buffer measures should be addressed to insure the land uses in these areas do not indirectly
impact the woodland habitats onsite. Because of the diverse topography, drainages, and extensive
disturbance to woodland understory, this planning unit has many opportunities for habitat enhancement.
Please call me at (714) 475 -9520, if you have any questions regarding the biological resources on the
Specific Plan site.
Sincerely,
BonTerra Consulting
Ann M. Johnston
Senior Ecologist
Miller ftr 92297
2O'39Cd SS£9 TSS PTL VT:ST L6, 0£ d3S
RECEWEc) S E P 1 i
® �A11sT /N -F011W ASSOC/•4TESNC.
rNAFFIC ENGINFFNlNG AND rNANJPONrAr/ON PLANNING
2020 NORTH TUSTIN AVENUE • SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 82705 -7827 • TELEPHONE (71411667 -0496
FAX (71411667.7952
MEMORANDUM
TO: Dana Privitt, BonTerra Consulting
FROM: Cathy Lawrence
SUBJECT: COLLINS DRIVE AND CAMPUS PARK DRIVE LEVEL OF SERVICE
DATE: September 10, 1997
The intersection of Collins Drive and Campus Park Drive in the City of M000rpark is
signalized. Until recently the signal phasing included north -south split phasing. The signal pperation
has been revised to include conventional north -south left -turn phasing. AFA has perl'q)rmed an
analysis to determine the impact of revising the signal phasing at Collins Drive and Car pus Park
Drive.
I
Peak hour turning movement counts were collected in January 1997 when the :opal was
operating with north -south split phasing. Based on the January 1997 volumes and split pt4sing. the
intersection was operating with an intersection capacity utilization (ICU) value of .92 (�OS "E ")
during the AM peak hour. During the PM peak hour the intersection operated at .50 (I S "A").
Updated traffic counts were collected in August 1997, after the signal operation % II*s revised
to conventional left -turn phasing and after the fall semester resumed at Moorpark College. Based
on the current signal operation and updated traffic counts, the intersection is operating at LOS "A"
during the AM ant; PIM' peak hours. 'Y%e attached iabie surnusariucs the ikfom" and "a(ice ICU
values. 1
The intersection of Collins Drive and Campus Park Drive is currently operating at an
acceptable level of service during the AM and PM peak hours. The improvement in the AM peak
hour LOS is a result of revised left -turn phasing and lower peak hour traffic volumes.
Attachment: Table
ICU wurkaheets
s7S0 m's
ATTACHMENT 2 � 000009
09/30/1997 15:10 714 - 551 -6355
SEP 30 '97 15:15
66' ZS' OS Z6' wed mdwq v louilloo .1
INd INV Wd 14V NOI H N!
Alivil 1T n3l a3.4v/R toj39
i 3194L
PAGE 03
714 551 6355 PAGE.03
b0'301:18 9929 TSS 17T21
1. Collins i Carpus Park
Before (Jan 1997)
After (Aug 1997)
I
LANES CAPACITY
NOL
1
1600
AM PK HOUR
PM PK HOUR
4800
LANES
CAPACITY
VOL
V/C
VOL
V/C
NBL
1
1600
28
.02
198
.12
NOT
1.5
4800
1460 (.54)*
3200
112
(.22)*
NOR
1.5
1
1268
AT
486
(.21)
SBL
1
1600
14
.01
6
.00
SOT
2
3200
360
.13*
222
.0e*
SOR
0
0
60
38
EBL
1
1600
232
.15
56
.04
EST
2
3200
162
.10*
30
.02'
FOR
0
0
170
.11
56
.04
WSL
1
1600
158
.10*
210
,13*
WOT
2
3200
22
.01
30
.01
WBR
d
1600
10
.01
6
.00
Clearance Interval
.05"
,05*
Note:
i
Assumes N/S Split
Phasing
TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION
.92
.50
After (Aug 1997)
I
LANES CAPACITY
NOL
1
1600
NOT
1.5
4800
NBA
1.5
856
SBL
1
1600
SOT
2
3200
SBR
0
0
EBL
1
1600
(OT
2
3200
EBR
0
0
WSL
1
1600
AT
2
3200
WBR
d
1600
ST :ST 2,6 , 02 d3S
AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR
VOL
V/C
VOL
V/C I
36
.02
182
.1r
856
(.33)•
506
{.16)
837
Z9
327
(,08)
4
.00
10
.01
258
.09
258
.09*
17
39
Clearance Interval
TOTAL CAPACITY U11LIZA1ION
110
46
156
178
10
7
.07
42
.03
.03" i
53
.03*
.10
98
.O6
.11"
249
.16*
00
Z9
.O1
.00
a
.00
.05'
t
.05*
i
j
.52
.44
lflf
VO 39Vd SS69- TSS -VTL OT:ST L661/OE/60
FILE COPY
RECEIVED
F E B 2 61997,
City of Moorpark
Community Development Department
CITY OF MOORPARK
REVIEW OF COLLINS /CAMPUS PARK SIGNAL OPERATION
Technical Notes
Prepared for:
City of Moorpark
Prepared by:
OQP"r Ess"oN9
Austin -Foust Associates, Inc.
2020 North Tustin Avenue
Santa Ana, California 92705 -7827
(714) 667 -0496
February 25, 1997
P
Cxp &/-30 98
000012
CITY OF MOORPARK
REVIEW OF COLLINS /CAMPUS PARK SIGNAL OPERATION
Technical Notes
The intersection of Collins Drive and Campus Park Drive in the City of Moorpark currently
experiences delay and congestion during peak periods, particularly during the morning peak hour
when students arrive for classes at Moorpark College. The existence of this congestion introduces
a concern that future traffic from other sources, such as the proposed Hidden Creek Specific Plan,
may worsen the situation to an intolerable level. Austin -Foust Associates, Inc. (AFA) has been
retained to review the existing condition to determine what, if anything, can be done to improve the
situation.
ANALYSIS
A vicinity map illustrating the three study intersections is presented in Figure 1. Current
traffic data was collected in January 1997 at the three intersections on Collins Drive between Los
Angeles Avenue and Campus Paik Drive is shown in Figure 2. A capacity analysis was performed
using the intersection capacity utilization (ICU) methodology, as well as through computerized
simulation of traffic flow using a program known as TRANSYT -7F, a sophisticated analytical tool
designed especially for this type of analysis. The data and computer model runs are included in the
appendix, while the results are discussed herein.
Currently the signal at the intersection of Collins Drive and Campus Park Drive is operated
in a somewhat unconventional manner. That is, the northbound and southbound movements are
entirely separate (i.e., northbound traffic proceeds while all other movements are stopped, then
southbound movements proceed while northbound stops). At some intersections which have very
high left -tum movements compared with the corresponding through movement, this type of signal
phasing works well. However, at this location it is the north -south through movements (including the
northbound right -turn) that are experiencing the highest volume. In order for the intersection to
operate most efficiently, the northbound and southbound through movement needs to operate
simultaneously rather than sequentially.
Review of Collins/Campus Park Signal Operation
Technical Notes
Austin -Foust Associates, Inc.
38W16.tn
OW 013.
Figure 1
VICINITY MAP
Review of Collins/Campus Park Signal Operation 2 Austin -Foust Associates, Inc.
Technical Notes 380016.tn
0000j 4
Figure 2
COLLINS RD
TRANSYT NODES, LANES AND
AM & PM PEAK HOUR TURN VOLUMES
Review of Collins/Campus Park Signal Operation 3 Austin -Foust Associates, Inc.
Technical Notes 380016.tn
QO IS
-
✓I, i 114
r 114
107
CAMPUS PARK
i }14
CAMPUS PARK
1183
H
hry
r R 121
/ t
2
?0j
}
N�
p
A�
SR -118
SR -118
n �i VO
U0
d
L 314
3
330083 —►
304
LOS ANGELES AVE
:11C LOS ANGELES AVE
LINK
NODE
NUMBERS
EXISTING LANES
00�
O�
�ryb
10
158
6
210
CAMPUS PARK
1e22� }/�
CAMPUS PARK S0 ► }J#
170 NpppOp�
� o0i � R�
HBO
10
J61
SR -118
SR -118
�
10
n
AN V
108
24
s0
4
125 64�
LOS ANGELES AVE
948-+ LOS ANGELES AVE
AM PEAK
HOUR VOLUMES
PM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES
files 380.016 \FIGI.0WG
Figure 2
COLLINS RD
TRANSYT NODES, LANES AND
AM & PM PEAK HOUR TURN VOLUMES
Review of Collins/Campus Park Signal Operation 3 Austin -Foust Associates, Inc.
Technical Notes 380016.tn
QO IS
A test of this generally acknowledged traffic engineering fact was conducted using both the
ICU and TRANSYT -7F traffic flow simulation. The results clearly indicated such is also the case at
this location. Based solely on the lane geometry, this intersection has the capability of operating at
a level of service (LOS) "C" (ICU -= .80) if the north -south through movements are green at the
same time. Under the current split -phase sequence (i.e., north -south through movements timed
separately) the intersection is predicted to operate at LOS "0 during the morning peak period.
Therefore it is concluded that the current signal phasing should be changed to a more
conventional "dual left" turn operation in lieu of the current "opposite" operation (using Caltrans
terminology to describe these two types of signal phasing). This simple change in the phasing will
produce a dramatic improvement in the delay at this intersection. Discussion with Caltrans
representative responsible for this location indicates implementation of such a change is already
underway. The plan is to install a dual left operation for the left -turns on Collins Drive. This
includes changing the signal to enable the north -south through movements to occur together.
Review of the existing intersection traffic movements indicates another improvement is
available that could further enhance the current operation. The northbound right -turn movement
is quite heavy in the peak hour (up to 900 vph) while the eastbound through movement is always low
but has two lanes dedicated to this nominal volume. A more efficient use of roadway space would
be to create a northbound "free" right -turn lane by elimination of the number two existing eastbound
through lane and using this lane as a free northbound right -turn lane. This improvement could be
accomplished within the existing roadway space. However, a better option would be to create a small
traffic island of the southeast corner and create a conventional free right -turn lane. A small piece
of right -of -way from the adjacent park would be required to implement a conventional free right -turn
lane. But it would allow a continuous movement for the heavy northbound right- turning traffic.
CONCLUSION
In summary, it is concluded that the existing signal phasing (called 'opposite" or split phasing
in technical terms) is not the most efficient operation for the current and future traffic volumes and
lane geometry at the intersection of Collins Drive and Campus Park Drive in the City of Moorpark.
Caltrans is planning a change to implement a conventional "dual left" operation which will result in
Review of Collins /Campus Park Signal Operation 4 Austin -Foust Associates, Inc.
Technical Notes 380016.tn
()0W:.6
a substantial improvement in the level of service -- both existing and future. A further improvement
not currently planned could be achieved by creating a northbound free right -turn lane. Two options
exist to do this, one of which involves acquisition of some right -of -way from the park on the southeast
corner. But even without this right -of -way a free northbound right -turn lane can be created by
dedicating the roadway space used by the number two eastbound lane for this purpose.
Review of Collins /Campus Park Signal Operation 5 Austin -Foust Associates, Inc.
Technical Notes 380016.tn
(Jo001.
Ia�WMID] ►:/
1111 •
1. Collins a Campus Park
Existing conditions
j Proposed conditions
AM PK
HOUR _
PM PK
Huux
i
LANES
CAPACITY
VOL
V/C
VOL
V!C
NBL
1
1600
28
.02
198
.12
NET
1.5
4800
1460 {.54
}*
712
{.22 }*
NBR
1.5
1268
486
{.211
SBL
1
1600
14
.01
6
.00
car
2
3200
360
.13*
222
.08*
SaR
0
0
60
38
EEL
1
1600
232
.15
56
.04 if
EST
2
3200
162
.10*
30
.02*
EBR
0
0
170
.11
56
.04
WEL
1
1600
158
.10*
210
.13*
WET
2
3200
22
.01
30
.01 �
WER
d
1600
10
.01
6
.00
rle3rance
Interval
.05*
.05*
.nc*
.05*
Note.
.Assumes
N/S "Y tit
Phasing
.42
TOTAL
CAPACITY
UTILIZATION
.92
.50
j Proposed conditions
owQ19
AM PK
HOUR
PM PK
HOUR
i
LANES
CAPACITY
VOL
V!C
VOL
V/r
NBL
1
1600
28
.02
198
.12
NET
2
3200
1460
.46*
712
.22*
NBR
i
f
1268
486
SBL
1
1600
14
.01*
6
.00
SET
2
3200
360
.13
222
.08
SBR
0
0
60
38
EEL
1
1600
232
.15
56
.04
EBT
1
1600
162
.10*
30
.02*
EER
1
1600
170
.11
56
.04
WBL
1
1600
158
.10*
210
.13*
WET
2
3200
22
.01
30
.01
WBR
d
1600
10
.01
6
nn
Clearance Interval
.05*
.nc*
TOTAL
CAPACITY
UTILIZATION
.72
.42
owQ19
T R A, N S Y T- F - T R A F F I C S I G N A L S Y S T E M O P T I M I Z A T I O N P P 0 G R A. M
ELEASE 6 OCTOBER 1988 VERSION 2.0
SPONSORED BY: DEVELOPED BY:
EDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION TRANSPORT AND ROAD RESEARCH LABORATORY
FFICE OF TRAFFIC OPERATIONS UNITED KINGDOM AND
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH CENTER
UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA
;ATE OF RUN: 1121197 START TIME OF RUN: 8:34:54
------------------------------------------------------
I N P U T D A T A R E P O R T F O R R U N 1
------------------------------------------------------
.ELDS: 1 2
- - -- - - --
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
- - -- -- -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - --
1.3 14 I5 IE
- - -- - - -- - - -- - - --
NE
RUN TITLE CARD
NO. TITLE
1) MOORPARK -
COLLINS DR TRANSYT ANALYSIS - EXISTING AM PEAK HOUR
NETWORK CONTROL CARD
SEC/ SEC;
NE CARD MIN
MAX CYCLE STEP STEP LOST GREEN STOP OUT INITIAL PERIOD
SEC(0) SPD(0) ENGL(0) PNCH
ID. TYPE CYCLE
CYCLE INCR. CYCLE NORMAL TIME EXTEN. PENALTY LEVEL TIMINGS LENGTH
PERC(I) TIME(!) METR(1) DECD
2) 1 90
0 0 0 0 2 3 25 10 1 30
0 0 0 0
+ 106 . + WARNING
+ THE SEC /STEPS FACTOR IN FIELD 6 IS TOO SMALL FOR CYCLE
LENGTHS ABOVE 60 SECONDS. IT WILL BE INCREASED TO
ALLOW A MAXIMUM OF 60 STEPS /CYCLE.
- -- PROGRAM NOTE - --
A CARD TYPE 52 CAUSES RUN TO BE OPTIMIZED USING THE
DEFAULT NORMAL OPTIMIZATION STEP SIZES.
IF CARD TYPE 4 WAS INPUT, IT IS IGNORED.
- -- PROGRAM NOTE - --
NO ERRORS DETECTED. TRANSYT -7F PERFORMS FINAL PROCESSING.
IF ERRORS ARE DETECTED, FURTHER PROCESSING IS SUSPENDED.
- -- PROGRAM NOTE - --
THERE ARE A TOTAL OF 3 NODES AND 24 LINKS,
INCLUDING BOTTLENECKS, IF ANY, IN THIS RUN.
- -- PROGRAM NOTE - --
THERE WERE A TOTAL OF 3 WARNING MESSAGES ISSUED
IN THE ABOVE REPORT.
VQ®Q2o
TZ0000
3S 6' = 3Wii O3So'vi3 iii = SxNi i dG 01J c = SNOiiVinWi3 dG '0
SdOiS - AV-130 _ id
SV 03NIZ�3G Si iKNi 33NVWtbojb3d 3i3
ooE'1 91 sot t- Z,966L OC 92E ( %05 'i 9E1P HO,LST EO,LLE 6?, ZEE UT'P9 97 06E PL "825
iHiiW) (H /CJI i7-Hi'H,3iIi (H3A /D3S) (H /H -H3A) (H /H-H3A ) (H /H -H3A) (H /H -H3A) (H /iW -H31t)
X30N: iSO3 Wn5NO3 S601S AVi30 AV-,3G 3W1 i G3l3AVbi
G33dS 330igKO bad 9N1!Vb3dL1 131-1 3 WoC3iNii AVi30 AV-13O WOONVb WWi iiJii i3A'Vbi 3DNViSiG
b'i0i it'iGl 39Vb3AV IviOl lViGl lvi0i IV101 Ivici
<SNNi i i lt 9NiU73NI SIV1G1 HIM WhShS>
T-6
= id
SV'8
( %TL )D'BeZT
Z'
TT'
DD•
TT•
LL•
SZ'££
LS
= XVW
V09T
£
VTE
33VHdl
00'
D
0
(70 )0"
G'
00'
00'
00'
DO'
00'
L
009T
801
PTE
E
ZTE
3SVHdT
OO"I
GZ
0
(70 )G'
0'
00'
00'
OO'
65"
58'6Z
OZ
009T
9TE
ZIE
E
80E
3SVHdT
00'
D
0
(%O )0'
D,
00'
00•
00•
DO'
00'
8
008
89
SOE
E
SOE
3SVHdT
P5"
02
G
( %DOT)0'9E
T'it
TT'
00'
TT"
BI'
OV•£
Z
0
9E
SOE
E
POE
33VHcI
00'
0
G
( %0 )0'
0'
00'
OD'
00'
DO'
OD'
2
009T
PZ
POE
E
ZOE
33VHdT
26'9
0
0
(700T)O"ZSZT
0-
00'
OD'
00'
00'
DO'
LS
0
2521
FOE
E
I'S
= id
9S'VT
( 7.9T )E 09V
P'2
16'1
£T'
BL'T
ES'S
OI'Z8I
6V
= XVW
9682
Z
VTZ
06
00'
0
G
( %0 )O.
G'
00'
00'
DO'
00'
00'
SV
DOPE
0801
VIZ
Z
ZTZ
06
EO'T
VZ
0
( %0 )O
D
OD
DD
DO
19
E6 OE
LT
0091
ZLZ
ZTZ
Z
ZOE
22
91'
0
0
( 7.8L )V'ZT
1'62
ET"
00'
ET'
EI'
00'
6
008
91
ZOE
2
90Z
29
EE'TT
OV
ZT
( %LE )L'9TV
P'S
IL',
21'
65'1
09'E
L9'LOT
6V
DOZE
OVTT
902
Z
202
89
ZC'T
BP
i
(79 )9'12
V'
VO'
TO'
ED'
V8'
8V'OP
91
OOZE
9SE
202
Z
TOE
.89
TE'
OZ
G
WE )S-6
S•V
VO,
00'
V0,
OT,
ZO'£
L
0
ZE
TOE
Z
9'16E = id
96 ZOE
(719 )E BBL2
L ZVE
To 7LL
9L m
5L 2S
98'£8£
6E EIE
x681
= XVW
VV6L
t
BIT
SE
VL•T
SKI
80T
(76L )8'VET
L-82
SE'T
PO'
T£'T
5E'T
00'
ZP
SBOT
011
?IT
I
9TI
OF
ZT'SET
S90T
90T
(7-FS )9'699
9,zBP
66-691
0B 6VT
61'02
9O'VLI
6T'VPT
x68T
5901
8921
9TT
T
VT1
9E
LG'
0
0
( %65 W;
9"LT
SO'
00'
SO'
90'
00'
Z
0091
OT
PIT
T
ZTT
V2
99
SHOT
ZOT
( %E8 ) 0 05
I'TE
25
ED
6P
25
OD
93
SZGT
09
ZTT
T
80T
SE
S9'1
0
< L
( %61 )S'BZT
L'82
62 T
VO,
SZ,T
6Z'T
OO'
2V
d002E
291
801
T
ZOT
9E
PVT
0
< E
(7S9 )E,EOT
L•LT
BL,
SG'
EL'
BL
00'
S£
0091
8ST
LGT
I
901
OF
9S'S9T
32L
< POT
( %£S )V'OLL
9'Z8V
TL' rT
8V'ZLT
CZ-ZZ
DP'DOZ
ZO'99I
x681
d008V
09UI
901
T
SOT
UZ
ET
G
0
( %EL )2,01
0'92
OT"
00'
0T'
DT,
00'
P
009T
VT
SOT
T
POT
9E
ST'
0
0
(765 )D,ET
9,LT
11'
00'
TT'
IT'
00'
Z
OOZE
ZZ
Vol
1
EDT
SZ
8E*2
0
S
( %OB )S,VBT
8'82
S? *1
LT,
89,1
SB T
00'
9S
0
Z£2
COT
1
ZOT
V2
P6'E
O
< 6
(7EB WOOF
['IF
11,E
ST,
96'2
TT'E
00'
99
60OZE
09E
zoi
I
TOT
OE
SV
V2
0
( 7.S9 )1,BT
L'81
ST,
00'
VT'
EZ,
BV E
9
0091
82
TGI
I
(D33) (H
/VJ)
(:ii /H30
(;ii /H3h)
(7..!HiH3A) (H3h/33S)
(H /H-H3A)
(H /H- H3A)(HiIW
-H3h)
(%)
(H /H3A)(H
/H3A)
OtJ
HiDN3i WnSNOD
A1TDVdVD
3n3n0
3O SdOiS
AVi30
iVIO1
WOONVb
WbOJINn
3WI1
13AVbl
1VS 30
MOld
'ON
'ON
7iN1 i
3SVH6
i3n3
3ii3n6
X3V9 ''VW
iibOJINn
39Vb3hV
-- - - - - --
A'Vi30
-- - - ----
lViOl
IVAI
33b93D
1VS
MO id
All
30ON
<S9NIii3S
101idO
H1IPI
3DNVWbG3b3d>
2
39V6 Sd3iS
a "9
S0NG33S
06
313AD
bnOH
)WV d
WV 9N1iSIX3
- SISAIVNV
1A3NVb1 bO
SNI'110D -
)ibVdbODW
T R ,A N S Y T- 7 F -- T R A F F I C S I G N A L S Y S T E M O P T I M I Z A T I O N P R 0 G R A. M
RE' -EASE 6 OCTOBER 1988 VERSION 2.0
SPONSORED BY: - DEVELOPED BY:
FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION TRANSPORT AND ROAD RESEARCH LABORATORY
OFFICE OF TRAFFIC OPERATIONS UNITED KINGDOM AND
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH CENTER
UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA
O,ATE OF RUN: 1121/97 START TIME OF RUN: 8:35:18
------------------------------------------------------
I N P U T 0 A T ,A R E P O R T F O R R U N 1
----------------------- ------- ----------------- - - - - - --
FIELDS: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
- --- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - --
LINE RUN TITLE CARD
NO. TITLE
!) MOORPARK - COLLINS DR TRANSYT ANALYSIS - EXISTING PM PEAK HOUR
NETWORK CONTROL CARD
SEC/ SEC/
LINE CARD MIN MAX CYCLE STEP STEP LOST GREEN STOP OUTPUT INITIAL PERIOD SEC(0) SPD(0) ENGL(0) PNCH
Nn TYPE CYCLE CYCLE [NCR. CYCLE NORMAL TIME EXTEN. PENALTY LEVEL TIMINGS LENGTH PERC(!) TIME(!) METR(l) DECK
2) ! 90 0 0 0 0 2 3 25 1 O 1 30 0 0 0 0
106 +++ WARNING +
THE SEC /STEPS FACTOR IN FIELD 6 IS TOO SMALL FOR CYCLE
LENGTHS ABOVE 80 SECONDS. IT WILL BE INCREASED TO
ALLOW A MAXIMUM OF 60 STEPS /CYCLE.
--- PROGRAM NOTE - -- A CARD TYPE 52 CAUSES RUN TO BE OPTIMIZED USING THE
DEFAULT NORMAL OPTIMIZATION STEP SIZES.
IF CARD TYPE 4 WAS INPUT, IT IS IGNORED.
- -- PROGRAM NOTE - -- NO ERRORS DETECTED. TRANSYT -7F PERFORMS FINAL PROCESSING.
IF ERRORS ARE DETECTED, FURTHER PROCESSING IS SUSPENDED.
- -- PROGRAM NOTE - -- THERE ARE A TOTAL OF 3 NODES AND 24 LINKS,
INCLUDING BOTTLENECKS, IF ANY, IN THIS RUN.
- -- PROGRAM NOTE - -- THERE WERE A TOTAL OF 3 '.DARNING MESSAGES ISSUED
IN THE ABOVE REPORT
0000za
lOORPARK - COLLINS OR TRANSYT ANALYSIS - EXISTING PM PEAK HOUR CYCLE: 90 SECONDS, 60 STEPS PAGE 2
PERFORMANCE WITH OPTIMAL SETTINGS,
NODE
LINK
FLOW
SAT
DEGREE
TOTAL
TOTAL
-- -- - - --
DELAY
-- - - - - --
AVERAGE
_ UNIFORM MAX BACK.
QUEUE
FUEL
PHASE
LINK
NO.
NO.
DELAY
FLOW
OF SAT
TR.4iIEL
TIME
UNIFORM
RANDOM
TOTAL
DELAY
STOPS OF
QUEUE
CAPACITY
CONSUM
LENGTH NO.
302.13
24.73
(VEH /H)(VEH
/H)
(7)
(VEH- MI /H)(VEH
-H /H)
(VEH -H /H)
(SEC /VEH)
(VEH /H; %) (VEH /LK)(VEH
/LK)
(GA /H)
(SEC)
1
101
198
1600
41
22.51
2.03
1.32
.07
1.39
25.3
129.6( 657)
3
24
2.87
30
101
1
102
222
3200P
35
.00
1.76
1.72
.04
1.76
28.6
175.6( 197)
5 ,
0
2.26
24
102
1
103
56
0
13
.00
.36
.35
.0'.
.36
23.0
38.8( 69'.)
1 ,
0
.48
25
103
1
104
30
3200
3
.00
.15
.15
.00
.15
17.6
17.8( 59 %)
0
0
.21
36
104
1
105
10
1600
3
.00
.07
.07
.00
.07
25.9
7.3( 737)
0
O
.09
24
105
1
106
712
4800P
83
80.96
8.14
5.25
.60
5.85
29.6
491.5( 697)
22
72
11.14
30
106
1
107
210
1600
37
.00
1.04
.99
.05
1.04
17.9
131.3( 637)
3 ,
0
1.49
36
107
1
108
30
3200P
11
.00
.21
.21
.00
.21
25.7
21.8( 737)
2 >
0
.28
25
108
1
112
38
102S
35
.00
.30
.30
.01
.30
28.6
30.1( 797)
102
1025
.39
24
112
1
114
10
1600
2
.00
.05
.05
.00
.05
17.6
5.9( 597)
0
0
.07
36
114
1
116
486
106S
83
55.26
5.55
3.59
.41
3.99
29.6
335.8( E97)
106
106S
7.51
30
116
1
118
56
1085
11
.00
.40
.40
.00
.40
25.7
40.7( 737)
108
1085
.52
25
118
1
2058
MAX. =
83
158.74
20.06
14.39
1.19
15.58
27.3
1426.0( 697)
27.39
PI =
25.E
2
201
36
0
6
3,40
.10
.03
.00
.03
3.1
8.3( 237)
0
20
.32
68
201
2
202
320
3200
14
36.39
1.14
.41
.01
.41
4,1
85.2( 277)
2
48
2.85
68
202
2
206
668
3200
29
63.09
2.04
.75
.03
.78
4.2
198.3( 307)
6
40
5.77
68
206
2
207
56
800
33
.00
.51
.47
.04
.51
32.,7
45.3( 81%)
1 ,
0
.62
22
207
2
212
232
1600
15
26.38
.52
.00
.00
.00
.0
.0( 07)
0
24
.88
90
212
2
214
260
2400
11
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.10
. ^( 07)
D
0
.DO
90
214
2
1572
MAX =
33
129.26
4.30
1.66
.08
1.74
4.0
337.1( 217)
10.45
PI =
4.1
3
303
964
0
42
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.0
964.0(1007)
0
0
5.33
!PHASE
303
3
304
10
1600
1
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.0
.0( 07)
0
0
.00
!PHASE
304
3
305
24
0
2
2.27
.12
.07
.00
.07
11.1
24.0(1007)
0
20
.36
!PHASE
305
3
308
48
800
6
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.0
.0( 07)
0
0
.00
!PHASE
308
3
312
132
1600
8
12.47
.25
.00
.00
.00
.0
.0( 07)
0
20
.42
!PHASE
312
3
314
80
1600
5
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.0
.0( 07)
0
0
.00
IPHASE
314
3
1258
MAX =
42
14.73
.37
.07
.00
.07
.2
988.0( 797)
6.10
PI =
6.9
,SYSTEM WIDE TOTALS INCLUDING ALL LINKS,
TOTAL
TOTAL
TOTAL
TOTAL
TOTAL
AVERAGE
TOTAL
TOTAL
DISTANCE
TRAVEL
UNIFORM
RANDOM
DELAY
DELAY
UNIFORM
FUEL OPERATING PERFORMANCE SPEED
TRAVELED
TIME
DELAY
DELAY
STOPS
CONSUM COST INDEX
(VEH -M[/H)
( "EH -H /u)
(VEH -H /H)
'V H -H /N)
( VEH -u /H)
(SE CilEH)
(C- A /H) MI /H)
302.13
24.73
16.13
1.26
17 39
12.91
2751.2', 56Y,?
43.94 162 Ql 36.50 15.23 -TOTALS-
MOTE: PERFORMANCE INDEX IS DEFINED AS:
PI = DELA, - STOPS
0()0023
T R A N S Y T- 7 F -- T R A F F I C S I G N A L S Y S T E M O P T I M I Z A T I O N P R O G R A M
RELEASE 6 OCTOBER 1988 VERSION 2.0
SPONSORED BY:
DEVELOPED BY:
FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION TRANSPORT AND ROAD RESEARCH LABORATORY
OFFICE OF TRAFFIC OPERATIONS UNITED KINGDOM AND
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH CENTER
UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA
DATE OF RUN: 11121/97 START TIME OF RUN: 14:56:41
------------------------------------------------------
I N P U T D A T A R E P O R T F O R R U N 1
------------------------------------------- ----- ------
FIELDS: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
- - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- -- -- - - -- -- -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - --
LINE RUN TITLE CARD
NO. TITLE
1) MOORPARK - COLLINS OR TRANSYT ANALYSIS - AM PEAK HOUR W /IMPROVED SIGNAL PHASE
NETWORK CONTROL CARD
SEC/ SEC/
LINE CARD MIN MAX CYCLE STEP STEP LOST GREEN STOP OUTPUT INITIAL PERIOD SEC(0) SPD(0) ENGL(0) PNCH
NO. TYPE CYCLE CYCLE INCR. CYCLE NORMA(. TIME EXTEN. PENALTY LEVEL TIMINGS LENGTH PERC(1) TIME(1) METR(1) DECK
2) 1 60 0 0 0 0 2 3 25 10 1 30 0 0 0 0
- -- PROGRAM NOTE - -- A CARD TYPE 52 CAUSES RUN TO BE OPTIMIZED USING THE
DEFAULT NORMAL OPTIMIZATION STEP SIZES.
IF CARD TYPE 4 WAS INPUT, IT IS IGNORED.
-- PROGRAM NOTE - -- NO ERRORS DETECTED. TRANSYT -7F PERFORMS FINAL PROCESSING.
IF ERRORS ARE DETECTED, FURTHER PROCESSING IS SUSPENDED.
- -- PROGRAM NOTE - -- THERE ARE A TOTAL OF 3 NODES AND 24 LINKS,
INCLUDING BOTTLENECKS, IF ANY, IN THIS RUN.
- -- PROGRAM NOTE - -- THERE WERE A TOTAL OF 3 WARNING MESSAGES ISSUED
IN THE ABOVE REPORT.
40ORPARK - COLLINS DR TRANSYT ANALYSIS - AM PEAK HOUR W /IMPROVED SIGNAL PHASE CYCLE: 60 SECONDS, 60 STEPS PAGE 2
,PERFORMANCE WITH OPTIMAL SETTINGS-
NODE
LINK
FLOW
SAT
DEGREE
TOTAL
TOTAL
-- - - - - --
DELAY
-- - - - - --
AVERAGE
UNIFORM MAX BACK
QUEUE
FUEL
PHASE
LINK
NO.
NO.
FLOW
OF SAT
TRAVEL
TIME
UNIFORM
RANDOM
TOTAL
DELAY
STOPS
OF
QUEUE
CAPACITY
CONSUM
LENGTH NO.
(VEH /H)(VEH
/H)
(%)
(VEH- M[ /H)(VEH
-H /H)
(VEH -H /H)
(SEC /VEH)
(VEH /H;%)
(VEH /LK)(VEH
/LK)
(GA /H)
(SEC)
1
101
28
0
7
3.18
.13
.04
.00
.04
5.2
7.9(
28%)
0
24
.3L
35
101
1
102
360
3200P
25
.00
.77
.75
.02
.77
7.7
113.9(
48%)
4 ,
0
1.53
35
102
1
103
232
0
38
.00
.80
.74
.06
.80
12.4
144.5(
62%)
3 ,
0
1.39
25
103
1
104
22
3200
2
.00
.08
.08
.00
.08
12.4
13.1(
59%)
0
0
.13
25
104
1
105
14
0
12
.00
.10
.10
.00
.10
26.5
12.3(
88%)
0
0
.14
35
105
1
106
1460
3200
86
166.02
9.31
3.39
1.23
4.62
11.4
683.8(
47%)
15
48
14.95
35
106
1
107
158
0
51
.00
.82
.68
.13
.82
18.5
121.21,
77%)
2 ,
0
1.27
25
107
1
108
162
1600
28
.00
.63
.60
.03
.63
14.0
106.0;
65%)
2 ,
0
1.05
25
108
1
112
60
102S
25
.00
.13
.13
.00
.13
7.7
29.0(
487)
102
!02S
.25
35
112
1
114
10
1600
2
.00
.03
.03
.00
.03
12.4
5.9(
597)
0
0
.06
25
114
1
116
1268
1600
79
144.19
5.59
.77
.75
1.52
4.3
547.7(
43%)
17
24
10.80
60
116
1
118
170
1600
29
.00
.67
.64
.03
.6/
14.1
111.8(
66%)
2 ,
0
1.11
25
118
1
3944
MAX =
86
313.39
19.06
7.96
2.25
10.21
9.3
1957.1(
50 %)
32.97
PI =
23.8
2
201
32
0
8
3.02
.11
.04
.00
.05
5.1,
11.5(
36 %)
0
20
.32
38
201
2
202
356
3200
19
40.48
1.37
.55
.01
.56
5.7
156.4(
44 %)
3
48
4.20
38
202
2
206
1140
3200
61
107.67
4.94
2.56
.24
2.80
8.8
653.5(
577)
12
40
15.82
38
206
2
207
16
800
6
.00
.06
.06
.00
.06
14.5
10.3(
64%)
0
0
.10
22
207
2
212
272
1600
17
30.93
.61
.00
.00
.00
.0
.0(
0%)
0
24
1.03
60
212
2
214
1080
2400
45
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.0
.0(
0%)
0
0
.00
60
214
2
2896
MAX =
61
182.10
7.09
3.22
.25
3.47
4.3
831.7(
29%)
21,48
PI =
9.2
3
303
1252
0
57
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.0
1252.0(1007)
0
0
6.92
!PHASE
303
3
304
24
1600
2
.00
.00
.00
.OD
.00
.0
.0(
O%)
0
0
.00
!PHASE
304
3
305
36
0
2
3.40
.18
.11
.00
.11
11.1
36.0(1000
0
20
.54
!PHASE
305
3
308
68
800
8
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.0
.0(
O%)
0
0
.00
!PHASE
308
3
312
316
1600
20
29.85
.61
.00
.01
.02
.2
2.7(
1%)
1
20
1.05
!PHASE
312
3
314
108
1600
7
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.0
.0(
O%)
0
0
.00
!PHASE
314
3
1804
MAX =
57
33.25
.79
.11
.01
.13
.3
1290.7(
72 %)
8.51
PI =
9,1
<SYSTEM WIDE TOTALS INCLUDING ALL LINKS-
TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL AVERAGE TOTAL TOTAL
DISTANCE TRAVEL UNIFORM RANDOM DELAY DELAY UNi:ORM FUEL OPERATING PERFORMANCE SPEED
TRAVELED TIME DELAY DELAY S7 'PS CONSUM COST INDEX
(VEH -MI /H) (VEH -H /H) (VEH -H /H) (VEH -H /H) (VEH -H /H) (SEC /VEH) (VE ".H -%) (GA /H) (Mr /H)
528.74 26.93 11.29 2.52 13.91 5.75 4079.5 47 "') 62.96 249.45 42.14 23 l5 ,TOTALS,
MITE: PERFORMANCE INDEX IS DEFINED AS:
PI - DELAY STOPS
NO OF STUULA71ONS - 7 NO. OF LINKS = !!I ELAPSED TIME = .5
000025
T R A N S Y T- I F -- T R A F F I C S I G N A L S Y S T E M O P T I M I Z .A ? I O N P R O G R A M
RELEASE 5 OCTOBER 1988 VERSION 2.0
SPONSORED BY: DEVELOPED BY:
FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION TRANSPORT AND ROAD RESEARCH LABORATORY
OFFICE OF TRAFFIC OPERATIONS UNITED KINGDOM AND
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH CENTER
UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA
DATE OF RUN: 1/21/97 START TIME OF RUN: 14:56:58
------------------------------------------------------
I N P U T 0 A T A R E P O R T F O R
------------------------------------------------------
R U N I
=IELDS: 1 2
- - -- - - --
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
-- -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - --
10 11
- - -- - - --
12 13 14 15 16
- - -- - - -- - - -- - --- - - --
-iNE
RUN TITLE CARD
N0. TITLE
1) MOORPARK -
COLLINS OR TRANSYT ANALYSIS - PM PEAK HOUR W /IMPROVED SIGNAL PHASE
NETWORK CONTROL CARD
SEC/ SEC/
.:NE CARD MIN
MAX CYCLE STEP STEP LOST GREEN STOP
OUTPUT INITIAL
PERIOD SEC(0) SPO(0) E,NCL(0) PNCH
NO. TYPE CYCLE
CYCLE INCR. CYCLE NORMAL TIME EXTEN. PENALTY
LEVEL TIMINGS
LENGTH PERC(1) TIME(1) METR(1) DECK
2) 1 60
0 0 0 0 2 3 25
10 1
30 0 0 0 0
- -- PROGRAM NOTE - --
A CARD TYPE 52 CAUSES RUN TO BE OPTIMIZED USING THE
DEFAULT NORMAL OPTIMIZATION STEP SIZES.
IF CARD TYPE 4 WAS INPUT, IT IS IGNORED.
- -- PROGRAM NOTE - --
NO ERRORS DETECTED. TRANSYT -7F PERFORMS FINAL PROCESSING.
IF ERRORS ARE DETECTED, FURTHER PROCESSING IS SUSPENDED.
- -- PROGRAM NOTE - --
THERE ARE A TOTAL OF 3 NODES AND 24 LINKS,
INCLUDING BOTTLENECKS, IF ANY, IN THIS RUN.
-- PROGRAM NOTE - --
THERE WERE A TOTAL OF 3 WARNING MESSAGES ISSUED
IN THE ABOVE REPORT.
A
40ORPARK - COLLINS DR TRANSYT ANALYSIS - PM PEAK HOUR W /IMPROVED SIGNAL PHASE CYCLE: 60 SECONDS, 60 STEPS PAGE 2
,PERFORMANCE 'WITH OPTIMAL SETTINGS,
NODE
LINK
FLOW
SAT
DEGREE
TOTAL
TOTAL
-- - - - - --
DELAY
-- - - - - --
AVERAGE
UNIFORM MAX
BACK
QUEUE
FUEL
PHASE
LINK
NO.
NO.
FLOW
OF SAT
TRAVEL
TIME
UNIFORM
RANDOM
TOTAL
DELAY
STOPS
OF
QUEUE
CAPACITY
CONSUM
LENGTH
NO.
(VEH /H)(VEH
/H)
(%)
(VEH- MI /H)(VEH
-H /H)
(VEH -H /H)
(SEC /VEH)
(VEH /H
;%) (VEH
/LK)(VEH
/LK)
(GA /H)
(SEC)
1
101
198
0
33
22.51
.84
.16
.04
.20
3.7
53.1(
27 %)
1
24
1.41
35
101
1
102
222
3200P
15
.00
.45
.44
.01
.45
7.2
101.8(
46 %)
2
0
.89
35
102
1
103
56
0
9
.00
.16
.16
.00
.16
10.2
30.5(
54 %)
1
0
.28
25
103
1
104
30
3200
3
.00
.10
.10
.00
.10
12.4
17.8(
59%)
0
0
.17
25
104
1
105
10
0
5
.00
.03
.03
.00
.03
10.7
5.8(
58 %)
0
0
.05
35
105
1
106
712
3200
42
80.96
3.17
.81
.07
.89
4.5
171.1(
24 %)
4
48
5.04
35
106
1
107
210
0
38
.00
.74
.68
.06
.74
12.6
131.4(
63 %)
2 >
0
1.27
25
107
1
108
30
1600
5
.00
.10
.10
.00
.10
12.4
17.8(
59 %)
0
0
.17
25
108
1
112
38
102S
15
.00
.08
.08
.00
.08
7.2
17.4(
46 %)
102
1025
.15
35
112
1
114
10
1600
2
.00
.03
.03
.00
.03
12.4
5.9(
59 %)
0
0
.06
25
114
1
116
486
1600
30
55.26
1.56
.00
.00
.00
.0
.0(
0 %)
0
24
2.09
60
116
1
118
56
1600
10
.00
.20
.19
.00
.20
12.7
34.2(
61 %)
1
0
.33
25
118
1
2058
MAX =
42
158.74
7.46
2.79
.19
2.97
5.2
586.9(
29 %)
11.93
PI =
7.1
2
201
36
0
8
3.40
.12
.05
.00
.05
5.0
13.0(
36%)
0
20
.36
38
201
2
202
320
3200
17
36.39
1.08
.35
.01
.36
4.1
131.0(
41 %)
3
48
3.52
38
202
2
206
668
3200
36
63.09
2.53
1.22
.05
1.27
6.9
312.9(
47 %)
6
40
7.91
38
206
2
207
56
800
22
.00
.25
.23
.02
.25
16.1
38.2(
68 %)
1 >
0
.39
22
207
2
212
232
1600
15
26.38
.52
.00
.00
.00
.0
.0(
0 %)
0
24
.88
60
212
2
214
250
2400
11
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.0
.0(
0%)
0
0
.00
50
214
2
1572
MAX =
36
129.26
4.50
1.86
.08
1.94
4.4
495.1(
31%)
13.07
PI =
5.4
3
303
964
0
42
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.0
964.0(100
%)
0
0
5.33
!PHASE
303
3
304
10
1600
1
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.0
.0(
0 %)
0
0
.00
!PHASE
304
3
305
24
0
2
2.27
.12
.07
.00
.07
11.1
24.0(100%)
0
20
.36
!PHASE
305
3
308
48
800
6
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.0
.0(
0 %)
0
0
.00
!PHASE
308
3
312
132
1600
8
12.47
.25
.00
.00
.00
.0
.0(
0 %)
0
20
.42
!PHASE
312
3
314
80
1600
5
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.0
.0(
0 %)
0
0
.00
!PHASE
314
3
1258
MAX =
42
14.73
.37
.07
.00
.07
.2
988.0(
79 %)
6.10
PI =
6.9
TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL
DISTANCE TRAVEL UNIFORM
TRAVELED TIME DELAY
(VEH -MI /H) (VEH -H /H) (VEH -H /H)
302.73 12.33 4.72
NOTE: PERFORMANCE INOE( IS DEFIN
PI = DELAY + STOPS
TOTAL
RANDOM
DELAY
(VEH -H /H)
.26
-0 ,AS:
,SYSTEM 'WIDE TOTALS INCLUDING ALL LINKS>
TOTAL AVERAGE TOTAL
DELAY DELAY UNIFORM
STOPS
VEH -H /H) (SEC /VEH) (VEH /H -%)
4.98 3.67 2070.0; 42 %)
40. OF SIMULATIONS = 7 NO. OF LINKS = 111 ELAPSED TIME = .6 SEC.
TOTAL
FUEL OPERATING PERFORMANCE SPEED
CCNSUM COST INDEX
(CA. /H) (Mr /H)
31.10 127.75 19.36 29.71 - TOT.ALS-
MOVO2 r
TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES, INC. LOCATION CODE 01703.A01
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx** xxxxxxxxxxxxx* xx* xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
LOCATION - COLLINS -JUST S/0
CAMPUS
DR
AVERAGED
VOLUMES FOR
- TUESDAY
1/14/97
TO
TUESDAY 1/14/97
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
AM xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
PM xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
TIME
NB
SB
- TOTAL
TIME
NB
SB
TOTAL
xxxxxxxzxzzxxxxxxzxxxzztzxzzzzxzxxxxzxxxxxxzxxxzxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxzxz
zxzx***
xxxzxxxxxxxxxzxxxxzxzxzxzz
*zxx *zzzxxzxxxxxxxxz
12:00 -
12:15
0
0
0
12:00
- 12:15
98
179
277
12:15
- 12:30
0
0
0
12:15
- 12:30
135
165
300
12:30 -
12:45
0
0
0
12:30
- 12:45
216
232
448
12:45 -
1:00
0
0
0
0
0
0
12:45
- 1:00
196
645
410
986
606 1631
1:00 -
1:15
0
0
0
1:00
- 1:15
91
364
455
1:15 -
1:30
0
0
0
1:15
- 1:30
90
265
355
1:30 -
1:45
0
0
0
1:30
- 1:45
90
196
286
1:45 -
2:00
0
0
0
0
0
0
1:45
- 2:00
94
365
177
1002
271 1367
2:00 -
2:15
0
0
0
2:00
- 2:15
118
199
317
2:15 -
2:30
0
0
0
2:15
- 2:30
109
284
393
2:30 -
2:45
0
0
0
2:30
- 2:45
115
234
349
2:45 -
3:00
0
0
0
0
0
0
2:45
- 3:00
121
463
244
961
365 1424
3:00 -
3:15
0
0
0
3:00
- 3:15
122
240
362
3:15 -
3:30
0
0
0
3:15
- 3:30
146
238
384
3:30 -
3:45
0
0
0
3:30
- 3:45
171
217
388
3:45 -
4:00
0
0
0
0
0
0
3:45
- 4:00
148
587
243
938
391 1525
4:00 -
4:15
0
0
0
4:00
- 4:15
151
169
320
4:15 -
4:30
0
0
0
4:15
- 4:30
162
161
323
4:30 -
4:45
0
0
0
4:30
- 4:45
169
148
317
4:45 -
5:00
0
0
0
0
0
0
4:45
- 5:00
172
654
139
617
311 1271
5:00 -
5:15
0
0
0
5:00
- 5:15
167
141
308
5:15 -
5:30
0
0
0
5:15
- 5:30
215
154
369
5:30 -
5:45
0
0
0
5:30
- 5:45
308
119
427
5:45 -
6:00
0
0
0
0
0
0
5:45
- 6:00
384
1074
105
519
489 1593
6:00 -
6:15
16
51
67
6:00
- 6:15
0
0
0
6:15 -
6:30
22
68
90
6:15
- 6:30
0
0
0
6:30 -
6:45
83
77
160
6:30
- 6:45
0
0
0
6:45 -
7:00
140
261
95
291
235
552
6:45
- 7:00
0
0
0
0
0 0
7:00 -
7:15
120
122
242
7:00
- 7:15
0
0
0
7:15 -
7:30
178
138
316
7:15
- 7:30
0
0
0
7:30 -
7:45
246
149
395
7:30
- 7:45
0
0
0
7:45 -
8:00
385
929
173
582
558
1511
7:45
- 8:00
0
0
0
0
0 0
8:00 -
8:15
509
157
666
8:00
- 8:15
0
0
0
8:15 -
8:30
569
150
719
8:15
- 8:30
0
0
0
8:30 -
8:45
314
155
469
8.30
- 8:45
0
0
0
8:45 -
9:00
139
1531
128
590
267
2121
8:45
- 9:00
0
0
0
0
0 0
9:00 -
9:15
165
124
289
9:00
- 9:15
0
0
0
9:15 -
9:30
233
105
338
9:15
- 9:30
0
0
0
9:30 -
9:45
367
130
497
9:30
- 9:45
0
0
0
9:45 -
10:00
297
1062
212
571
509
1633
9:45
- 10:00
0
0
0
0
0 0
10:00 -
10:15
95
190
285
10:00
- 10:15
0
0
0
10:15 -
10:30
93
145
238
10:15
- 10:30
0
0
0
10:30 -
10:45
104
144
248
10:30
- 10:45
0
0
0
10:45 -
11:00
160
452
196
675
356
1127
10:45
- 11:00
0
0
0
0
0 0
11:00 -
11:15
248
185
433
11:00
- 11:15
0
0
0
11:15 -
11:30
203
313
516
11:15
- 11:30
0
0
0
11:30 -
11:45
137
268
405
11:30
- 11:45
0
0
0
11:45 -
12:00
117
705
186
952
303
1657
11:45
- 12:00
0
0
0
0
0 0
xxxx* xx*
zxzzx* xxxz* xxz* xxzxxx*** zxz* x* xxzx* zzxxxxxx**
zxx* xzxxxzxxxx* xzxxxz* xxzx* xxxzxzx*
xxxxxxxxxxxzxzxzxxxzxzxzxxxxxxx
TOTALS
4,940
3,661
8,601
3,788
5,023
8,811
ADT'S
8,728
8,684
17,412
xxxxx* xxxxz*
xxx* xxxxzzzx* xxxxxzzzxzxxxxxzxzxzzxzxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxz*
xxxxxxxzzzzzzx xxxzxzxxzxxxxzxxxxxzzxxxzzxxzzxxxxx
0000zs
Traffic Data Services, Inc.
COMMENTS:
00001a
TABULAR
SUMMARY OF
VEHICULAR TURNING
MOVEMENTS
N/S STREET:
COLLINS
E/W STREET:
CAMPUS
CITY:
MOORPARK
DR
PARK
DR
DATE: 1/14/97
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
DAY:
TUESDAY
FILENAME:
0170301A
15 Min
Northbound
Southbound
Eastbound
Westbound
Period
Beginning
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
NL
NT
NR
SL
ST
SR
EL
ET
ER
WL
WT
WR
TOTAL
LANES:
1
1.5
1.5
1
2
0
1
2
0
1
2
0
6:00 AM
15 AM
30 AM
45 AM
7:00 AM
8
63
76
1
63
4
4
4
69
27
3
1
323
15 AM
3
84
74
1
47
1
8
8
36
10
1
2
275
30 AM
10
124
94
1
79
4
10
11
56
26
2
3
420
45 AM
10
238
173
8
106
19
44
14
43
33
3
7
698
8:00 AM
9
381
279
5
118
22
54
27
44
20
3
2
964
15 AM
5
349
355
2
62
8
62
54
41
59
8
3
1008
30 AM
16
184
163
7
66
9
9
3
46
47
6
1
557
45 AM
7
57
83
4
63
10
11
4
25
50
2
4
320
9:00 AM
15 AM
30 AM
45 AM
10:00 AM
15 AM
30 AM
45 AM
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AM Peak Hr
Begins at
745
VOLUMES =
40
1152
970
22
352
58
169
98
174
159
20
13
3227
COMMENTS:
00001a
Traffic Data Services, Inc.
COMMENTS:
000030
TABULAR
SUMMARY OF
VEHICULAR
TURNING
MOVEMENTS
N/S STREET:
COLLINS
E/W STREET:
CAMPUS
CITY:
MOORPARK
DR
PARK
DR
DATE: 1/14/97
DAY:
TUESDAY
FILENAME:
0170301P
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
15 Min
Northbound
Southbound
Eastbound
Westbound
Period
Beginning
NL
NT
NR
SL
ST
SR
EL
ET
ER
WL
WT
WR
TOTAL
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
LANES:
1
1.5
1.5
1
2
0
1
2
0
1
2
0
2:00 PM
15 PM
30 PM
45 PM
3:00 PM
15 PM
30 PM
45 PM
4:00 PM
34
75
41
2
82
8
6
2
8
92
8
1
359
15 PM
43
65
55
1
62
13
4
3
22
76
1
2
'347
30 PM
52
78
47
0
72
9
6
6
23
66
3
0
362
45 PM
36
89
39
2
52
7
11
3
20
64
11
0
'334
5:00 PM
42
83
55
0
82
5
9
3
17
60
4
2
362
15 PM
56
82
63
8
75
7
7
4
19
58
5
1
'385
30 PM
39
151
102
2
60
10
13
7
17
50
6
1
458
45 PM
60
205
141
1
51
9
15
8
11
55
9
2
567
6:00 PM
15 PM
30 PM
45 PM
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
PM Peak Hr
Begins at
1700
VOLUMES =
197
521
361
11
268
31
44
22
64
223
24
6
1772
COMMENTS:
000030
Traffic Data Services, Inc.
TABULAR SUMMARY OF VEHICULAR TURNING MOVEMENTS
N/S STREET:
COLLINS
E/W
STREET:
SR -118 WB
CITY:
MOORPARK
DR
ON /OFF RAMPS
DATE: 1/14/97
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
DAY:
TUESDAY
FILENAME:
0170302A
15 Min
Northbound
Southbound
Eastbound Westbound
Period
Beginning
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
NL
NT NR
SL ST
SR
EL ET ER WL
WT
WR TOTAL
LANES:
1
2
2
1
0.3
0.3
1.3
6:00 AM
15 AM
30 AM
45 AM
7:00 AM
12
58
55
51
3
0
37 216
15 AM
30 AM
13
159
76
75
2
0
79 404
45 AM
8:00 AM
8
285
89
68
4
0
270 724
15 AM
30 AM
6
254
85
76
5
0
134 560
45 AM
9:00 AM ,
15 AM
30 AM
45 AM
10:00 AM
15 AM
30 AM
45 AM
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AM Peak Hr
Beqins at
VOLUMES =
COMMENTS: GRIDLOCK FROM 8:00 - 8:37 AM
CONTROL TYPE = SIGNAL
0010031.
Traffic Data Services, Inc.
TABULAR SUMMARY OF VEHICULAR TURNING MOVEMENTS
N/S STREET:
COLLINS
E/W
STREET:
SR -118 WB
CITY:
MOORPARK
DR
ON /OFF RAMPS
DATE: 1/14/97
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
DAY:
TUESDAY
FILENAME:
0170302P
15 Min
Northbound
Southbound
Eastbound Westbound
Period
Beginning
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
NL
NT NR
SL ST
SR
EL ET ER WL
WT
WR TOTAL
LANES:
1
2
2
1
0.3
0.3
1.3
2:00 PM
15 PM
30 PM
45 PM
3:00 PM
15 PM
30 PM
45 PM
4:00 PM
19
80
89
92
10
0
57 347
15 PM
30 PM
40
75
75
77
10
0
79 356
45 PM
5:00 PM
17
91
73
106
15
0
65 367
15 PM
30 PM
9
167
80
58
14
1
130 459
45 PM
6:00 PM
15 PM
30 PM
45 PM
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
PM Peak Hr
Begins at
VULUMES =
COMMENTS: CONTROL TYPE = SIGNAL
00003
Traffic Data Services, Inc.
TABULAR SUMMARY OF VEHICULAR TURNING MOVEMENTS
N/S STREET: COLLINS
E/W STREET:
SR -118
EB CITY:
MOORPARK
DR
ON /OFF
RAMPS
DATE: 1/14/97
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
DAY: TUESDAY
FILENAME:
0170303A
15 Min Northbound
Southbound
Eastbound
Westbound
Period
Beginning NL NT NR
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
SL
ST SR
EL
ET
ER WL WT
WR TOTAL
LANES:
1
1
1.5
0.5
1
1
6:00 AM
15 AM
30 AM
45 AM
7:00 AM
15 AM
4
81
109
11
10
13 228
30 AM
45 AM
19
81
251
22
2
19 394
8:00 AM
15 AM
9
79
313
17
6
27 451
30 AM
45 AM
7
56
88
9
3
21 184
9:00 AM
15 AM
30 AM
45 AM
10:00 AM
15 AM
30 AM
45 AM
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AM Peak Hr
Begins at
VOLUMES =
COMMENTS: CONTROL TYPE = 3 -WAY STOP
000033
Traffic Data Services, Inc.
TABULAR SUMMARY OF VEHICULAR TURNING MOVEMENTS
N/S STREET: COLLINS
E/W STREET:
SR -118
EB CITY:
MOORPARK
DR
ON /OFF
RAMPS
DATE: 1/14/97
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
DAY: TUESDAY
FILENAME:
0170303P
15 Min Northbound
Southbound
Eastbound
Westbound
Period
Beginning NL NT NR
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
SL
ST SR
EL
ET
ER WL WT
WR TOTAL
LANES:
1
1
1.5
0.5
1
1
2:00 PM
15 PM
30 PM
45 PM
3:00 PM
15 PM
30 PM
45 PM
4:00 PM
15 PM
14
69
80
14
2
19 198
30 PM
45 PM
13
43
90
1
1
19 167
5:00 PM
15 PM
15
64
86
11
0
34 210
30 PM
45 PM
6
33
241
12
1
20 313
6:00 PM
15 PM
30 PM
45 PM
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
PM Peak Hr
Begins at
VOLUMES =
COMMENTS:
000034
I^
PHASING LEGEND
PHASE "A" - --
PHASE "B" --
PHASE "C" ••••••••••••••
HPHASE "D" — — — — — — —
H _ Y- ✓� 1
t '
;I T
t�
lk.�
ow-
C
C !}°
LA f`
"A r �i
0
m
7r
nva® rac
L_ 9
w
•` O
o
�9
9
L-AND USE DATA
iC�rwl��
1...0 0�O wj� 0 .
RE=lO[wrL^L Tor� 1221.5 3221 DA
szrn+ -t. �r�.r, r- s.,•r'. -�i� r_Tr.rr•
!9lts i�::a�i�1. •f.�SiS�i I
•sssr_i .
�cr_rsr :� naRras -�,�
_.. `�J F!V
"OW_RCs.DJWM TOTALA J 73
rROJCCf TOTALS NR3 AD. 7219 D.l
SEP 19 1997
HIDDEN CREEK RANC
-�.iiy ur ivioorpark
SPECIFIC PLAN
- -'— `�
CITY OF MOORPARK, CA
PROPOSED LAND USE
PREPARED w:
RA 1_1 1;R OP• Q1C.
r. r.w � s. Iw�n w
\�
9EITE"•ER. 1997 SHEET 1 OF 1
FAHIRIT 9.
LAND USE/DEVELOPMENT PLANS
1.10 DEVELOPMENT PHASING
1.10.1 Land Use Phasing
The Master Tract Maps Phasing Plan (Figure 1.10 -1) and accompanying Land Use
Phasing Table (Figure 1.10 -2) set forth the four (4) Development Phases
(Development Phases A through D) and depict the land uses that will be
constructed within each Development Phase. The Land Use Phasing Table also
depicts seven (7) time increments within which certain development projects are
planned to be built. - Each time increment is anticipated to average two (2) years
but may vary depending upon market demand.
Each Development Phase shall commence in alphabetical sequence by the
recordation of a Master Tract Map as set forth in Section 1.10.3. Because the
actual sequence and timing of individual development projects will be market
driven, not all planned development within a given Development Phase need be
completed before initiation of the next Development Phase, provided that the
various programs contained in this Specific Plan (e.g., Affordable Housing Program,
Local Park Implementation Program, etc.) are implemented and the appropriate
Backbone Systems of the Project and Public Community Facilities are provided.
For each Development Phase there is a corresponding Grading Phase, as set forth
in Section 1.10.2. There are also corresponding phasing plans for the backbone
infrastructure systems of the Project, as set forth in Sections 3.2 through 3.7, and
the Public Community Facilities, as set forth in Sections 3.8 through 3.15. Figure
1.10 -3, Public Facilities /Grading/Infrastructure Phasing Table; illustrates the
orderly phasing sequence of such facilities.
As set forth in Section 1.10.3, the Master Tract Map process, among other things,
assures the timely completion of the backbone infrastructure systems of the Project
and the Public Community Facilities.
000030
ATTACHMENT 4
December 15. 1992 I -132
"OR Y
VD.
LAS VRGENES THOUSAND `AHMANSON RANCH
ROAD OAKS BLVD.
BLVD.
—Tia—
AHMANSW
R A MASTER TRACT MAPS PHASING PLAN
SPHCEM PLAN 0 Village Center Town Hal/Library/Fire Station /Sherdt Station
Cornmercia, Orrice. Resiaent,a. LOGOS.
CC Grahavfe, Public Cammanity facl;tiee
Q
Neighborhood Center
SF /A
Canmercal. Reewenta.
Public nit
Commuy Faclitiw
Single
o of uan*,Attached
Q
Sink Family Traditional
2 -5 Du /Acre
®
Single Family Estate
0.15 -2 DU /AC.e
A -T i
Planning Unit Number
Loner .elws to Phasing Area
0
C.01 cows"
®
Community a Open r erpace
0
Emergency Access Easement
®
Residential Access Road
® 0 xvw
nC/'C'A /LiCA 1009
1211 Maintenance Facility/Recycling Center /Edison Substation
F7 Water Reclamation Facility
Water Storage Facility
® Community Park
® Neighborhood Park
® Village Green
® Elementary School
K5 Sch[]d
Combined KS and 6-8
00003!
FIGURE L10-1
FIGURE MG-2
LAND USE PHASING TABLE
Ahmanson Ranch Specific Plan
PHASM ARV A / LAM USE
1
DWELLING UNITS/SQUARE FOOTAGE CONSTRUCTED WITHIN 71ME INCREMENT'
2
3
4
S
6
7
TOTAL
PHASE A
. ... . ...
...... ....
............
SINGLE FAMILY ESTATES
Ss
107
26
0
0
0
0
188
SINGLE FAMILY TRADITIONAL
60
132
60
0
0
0
0
252
SINGLE FAMILY / ATTACHED
60
78
0
0
0
0
0
138
NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER
Public Affordable
0
30
0
0
0
0
0
30
Private Affordable
0
0
SO
0
0
0
0
so
Commercial (2)
0
0
5,000
0
0
0
0
5,000
VILLAGE CENTER (VC-A)
Golf Course Clubhouse
STADIUM GOLF COURSE (G(-1)
SLIBTDTAL - LINIM
17S
347
136
0
0
0
0
SILIVIDTAL. - SQ. Fr.
0
0
S,000
0
0
0
0
5,000
PHASE
....... ..
SINGLE FAMILY ESTATES
0
0
60
11
o
0
0
71
SINGLE FAMILY TRADITIONAL
0
0
43
0
0
0
0
43
SINGLE FAMILY / ATTACHED
0
0
82
60
28
0
0
170
VILLAGE CENTER (YC-B)
Market Rate Residential
0
0
40
0
0
0
0
40
Private Affordable
0
0
0
105
0
0
0
10S
Public Affordable
0
0
0
0
35
0
0
35
Office?
0
0
30,000
95,000
125,000
0
0
250,000
CoMmerci&12
0
0
0
40,000
50,000
SS,000
0
145.000
SLMMTAL - UWM
0
0
225
176
63
0
0
464
SUBTOTAL - sq. Fr.
0
0
30,000
135,000
175,000
55,000
0
395,000 I
PHASE C
: :,.:,.22 :...:
:: : ::: : :.: :0,:.;.
SINGLE FAMILY ESTATES
0
0
0
100
2
0
0
122 -
SINGLE FAMILY TRADITIONAL
0
0
0
160
160
78
0
398
SENGLE FAMILY/ ATTACHED
0
0
0
83
33
30
0
146—,
VILLAGE CENTER (VC-C)
-
Market Rate Residential
0
0
0
0
100
100
0
200
Private AffotdabW
0
0
0
64
Ss
so
0
169
Public Affordable
0
0
0
0
0
35
0 j
MA70M - LINIM
0
0
0
407
370
2c)3
0
—
1.0707
777
PHAW D
...... . . . :: ::113 :::;.
SINGLE FAMILY ESTATES
0
0
0
0
80
74
267
SINGLE FAMILY TRADITIONAL
0
0
0
0
30
87
59
176
SINGLE FAMILY / ATTACHED
0
0
0
0
0
0
65
6S
WEST GOLF COURSE (CC,2)
SLETUTAL - UNrfS
0
0
0
0
110
200
198
508
7WAL RESMOMAL ILMS
17S
347
361
Sm
543
493
198
2,700
SIXIDM DWELLM LWM
23
48
37
S4
57
S6
2S
SDKaE ROOM OCCUPANCY UNITS
0
0
25
0
25
0
0
TWALALLUWM
198
395
423
637
625 1
549
213
3.050
I Increments average two (2) years depending on market demand, and may range from One (1) to three (3) Years.
2 Square feet of net floor area.
3 300 overnight accomadations within the Lodge.
4 Inchides sbrty-kur (64) Affordable Townhomes. 000038
December 15, 1992 1-134
LAND USE/DEVELOPMENT PLANS
1.10 DEVELOPMENT PHASING
FIGURE 1.10 -3
PUBLIC FACILMES /GRADING/INFRAS RUGTURE
PHASING TABLE
Ahmanson Ranch Specific Plan
PUBLIC
FACILITY /ACTIVITY
PUBIC FA(3UnES/GRADI WnNINIHE INCRENEW 1
1
2
3
4
s
6
PUBLIC COMMUNITY FACILITIES:
Town Hall
p
•
Sheriff Station
p
•
Fire Station
13
•
Library
p
•
Recycling Center
p
•
Maintenance Facility
p
•
Water Reclamation Center
p
•
PUBLIC PARKS: 2
Community Park
p
•
South Neighborhood Park
p
•
West Neighborhood Park
p
•
North Neighborhood Park
p
•
Village Green
p
•
PUBLIC SCHOOLS: '
K -5 Elementary School
13
•
K -8 Combined School
13
•
GRADING /INFRASTRUCTURE
PHASE A
PHASE B _
PHASE .C;
PHASE D
BUILDING PERMITS (End of Invemmcs)
400
800
1,200
1,800
2,300
2,600
2,700
Increments average two (2) years depending on market demand, and may range from one (1) to three (3) years.
The park construction indicated is that which is required by the Master Developer and includes turf and irrigation
systems only. Per the Park Agreement, additional park improvements are the responsibility of RSRPD.
Actual construction will be based upon the number of students at the Project and the number of residential building
permits issued (see 3.16.3).
Q Denotes time of Offer of Dedication. �
• Demotes time of construction. 0000439 �
December 15, 1992 1 -135
LAND USE/DEVELOPMENT PLANS
1.10 DEVELOPMENT PHASING
1.10.2 Grading Phasing
Grading Phases "A" through "D" as indicated on Figure 1.10 -4, Grading Phasing Plan,
shows grading construction phasing. As shown on Figure 1.10 -3, grading and
infrastructure development begins roughly one -half of a time frame increment, or
approximately one (1) year, before residential development occurs for each Development
Phase.
The following grading elements will be incorporated within each Grading Phase.
1. ALL GRADING PHASES
a. Mass grading for development;
b. Rough grading for streets;
C. Borrow area grading;
d. Stockpile /spoil area grading;
e. Remedial Grading; and
f. Custom graded areas.
The following are additional grading elements that will occur within each respective
phase.
2. GRADING PHASE "A"
Grading for:
a. the flood control facilities;
b. the custom grading for the TPC Stadium Course;
C. the water transmission lines within the future park sites and open space areas;
d. the Recycling Center;
e. the Maintenance Facility;
f. the South Neighborhood Park; and
g. the K-5 Elementary School.
3. GRADING PHASE "B"
Grading for:
a. the water storage tank site; and
b. the Community Park and Village Green.
1111
December 15, 1992 1 -136
LAND USE/DEVELOPM[ENT PLANS
1.10 DEVELOPMENT PHASING
4. GRADING PHASE "C"
Grading for:
a. the water storage tank sites;
b. the Water Reclamation Facility;
C. the water line;
d. the West Neighborhood Park and North Neighborhood Park; and
e. the K-8 Combined School.
S. GRADING PHASI; "D"
Grading for:
a. the West Course; and
b. the seasonal storage reservoir.
1.10.3 Master Tract Maps
1. For each Development Phase, the recordation of a Master Tract Map is a condition
precedent to the approval of any discretionary permit or other discretionary
entitlement respecting property within the Development Phase, except as otherwise
provided in this Section. The following discretionary permits or entitlements may
be approved prior to the recording of a Master Tract Map:
a. The tentative map for a Master Tract Map;
b. Any permit required to satisfy any condition of approval of a tentative map
for a Master Tract Map which condition of approval may or must be satisfied
prior to or concurrently with recordation of the Master Tract Map.
2. Each Master Tract Map, upon recordation, will create lots corresponding to the
following:
a. The individual Planning Units or portions thereof located within the
geographic area of the applicable Development Phase;
b. Any parcels located within the Project, either inside or outside of the
geographic area of the applicable Development Phase, that are to be dedicated
of offered for dedication in fee as a condition of approval of the applicable
Master Tract Map; and
C. Any remainder parcel located outside of the geographic area of the applicable
Development Phase that has not previously been created as a discrete lot.
0U ()Q41
December 15, 1992 1 -137
LAND USE/DEVELOPU ENI' PLANS
1.10 DEVELOPMENT PHASING
3. Specific Plan requirements for the processing and/or recordation of Master Tract
Maps include the following:
a. As set forth in Section 1.1.2, Master CC&Rs must be recorded concurrently
with the recordation of the Master Tract Map for Development Phase A;
b. As set forth in Section 1.2.3, the approval of a VC District Master Plan is a
condition precedent to the approval of the Master Tract Map for Development
Phase B; and pursuant to Section 1.2.3 -3.a., the VC District Master Plan shall
reference the location, acreage and range of floor area of the Lodge. If it has
been determined that a Lodge will not be constructed, the Master Developer
shall, as a condition precedent to the recordation of the Master Tract Map for
Development Phase B, designated an equivalent revenue producing land use,
subject to the approval of the Planning Director.
C. As set forth in Section 1.6.1, COS located within a given Development Phase
must be irrevocably offered for dedication to the County in fee concurrently
with the recordation of the Master Tract Map for that Development Phase;
d. As set forth in Section 1.7.1, a grading permit for each Development Phase
shall be processed concurrently with the Master Tract Map for that
Development Phase;
e. As set forth in Section 1.8.8, the approval of a Master Lighting PIan for each
Development Phase, is a condition precedent to the recordation of the Master
Tract Map for that Development Phase;
f. As set forth in Section 1.9.2 -2a, the number of (and various other matters
respecting) Affordable Residential Units and Ancillary Units for each Planning
Unit within the area covered by a particular Master Tract Map must be
identified and designated as a condition to recordation of such Master Tract
Map;
g. As set forth in Section 1.9.3, each of the three (3) Public Affordable Housing
sites shall be irrevocably offered for dedication in fee to the County or its
designee concurrently with the recordation of the Master Tract Map for the
Development Phase which includes the respective sites;
h. As set forth in Section 2.2, establishment of the Institute is a condition
precedent to the recordation of the Master Tract Map for Development Phase A;
000042
December 15, 1992 1 -138
LAND USE/DEVELOPMENT PLANS
1.10 DEVELOPMENT PHASING
i. As set forth in Section 2.4.5, approval by the County of the three (3)
component plans (the plant community management plan described in
Sections 2.4.2; the wildlife management plan described in Section 2.4.3; and
the water harvesting plan described in Section 2.4.4) of the Habitat
Management Program is a condition precedent to the recordation of the Master
Tract Map for Development Phase A;
j. As set forth in Section 2.5.5 -5, approval by the County of a model five (5)
year maintenance and monitoring plan, a component of the Oak Tree
Mitigation Program, is a condition precedent to the recordation of the Master
Tract Map for Development Phase A or the approval of the first discretionary
grading permit for the Project, whichever is earlier;
k. As' set forth in Section 2.7.3 -2, approval by the County of a plan for research
regarding native grass revegetation, a component of the Grasslands Mitigation
Program, is a condition precedent to the recordation of the Master Tract Map
for Development Phase A.
1. As set forth in Section 3.10.3 -1, a demonstration to the satisfaction of the
County that interim fire protection services will be provided is a condition
precedent to the recordation of the Master Tract Map for Development Phase A.
M. As set forth in Section 3.15.3 -1.g., the Master Developer shall demonstrate to
the satisfaction of the County that the Park Agreement has been executed and
that the necessary boundary changes, if any, to the tentative Master Tract
Map, have been effected.
4. In addition, as a condition precedent to the recordation of the Master Tract Map for
the Development Phase A, formation of the CSA must have been completed and an
election held authorizing a special tax and an appropriation limit as required by
California Constitution Article XIIIB, Section 4, in an amount sufficient to allow the
CSA to perform adequately all of its functions as set forth in this Specific Plan.
S. As set forth in this Specific Plan, prior to or concurrently with the recordation of
each Master Tract Map, the Master Developer must dedicate and/or construct or
provide surety for such dedication and/or construction of the following backbone
infrastructure systems of the Project described in Sections 3.2 through 3.7 and Public
Community Facilities described in Sections 3.8 through 3.16 (including the land
required to accommodate such Public Community Facilities) which are required by
this Specific Plan to be dedicated and/or constructed, as applicable, in the
corresponding Development Phase covered by that Master Tract Map as more
specifically described in the section referenced below:
a. Off - Project Improvements (Section 3.22-1)
b. Backbone Circulation System (Section 3.2)
C. Backbone Potable Water System (Section 3.3)
000043
December 15, 1992 1 -139
LAND USE/DEVELOPMENT PLANS
1.10 DEVELOPMENT PHASING
d. Backbone Reclaimed Water System (Section 3.4)
e. Backbone Sanitary Sewer System (Section 3.5)
f. Backbone Drainage System (Section 3.6)
g. Backbone Utilities (Section 3.7)
h. Sheriff Station (Section 3.9)
i. Fire Station (Section 3.10)
j. Library (Section 3.11)
k. Town Hall (Section 3.12)
1. Recycling Center (Section 3.13)
M. Maintenance Facility (Section 3.14)
n. Locals Parks, Trails and COS (Section 3.15 and as further defined in the Park
Agreement)
o. Schools (Section 3.16 and as further defined in the School Agreement with
the School District)
6. The Master Tract Maps required by this Section 1.10.3 must be recorded in the
following sequence:
a. Master Tract Map for Development Phase A
b. Master Tract Map for Development Phase B
C. Master Tract Map for Development Phase C
d. Master Tract Map for Development Phase D
7. Planning Units created as discrete lots by Master Tract Maps may be further
subdivided for ultimate development. As applications for approval of Subdivision
maps subdividing a given Planning Unit are processed, information respecting
topography and other matters pertaining to development of that PIanning Unit will
become available in greater detail than was available at the Master Tract Map stage.
Where such information indicates some changes to boundaries of the land dedicated
or offered for dedication at the Master Tract Map stage are reasonably necessary to
accommodate development of the Planning Unit in a manner permitted by this
Specific Plan and that such changes can be effected consistently with the
requirements of this Specific Plan and the purposes for which the dedication or offer
of dedication was made, the County will cooperate with the Merchant Builder (and,
where applicable, any entity other than the County to which the dedication or offer
of dedication was made) to effectuate such boundary changes through lot -line
adjustments and appropriate exchanges of property.
000044
December 15, 1992 1 -140
PHA
TREN
FOR F
INSTAI
FUTL
DEI
LAS VIRGENES THOUSAND \--AHMANSON RANCH
ROAD OAKS BLVD.
BLVD.
000045
'ORY
.VD.
RH GRADING PHASING PLAN
0
sesmw " ® 7, FIGURE L10-4
DECEMBER 1992 1 -141
PUBLIC COMMUNITY FACIIIrEES /SERVICES
PLANS/PROGRAMS
3.3 POTABLE WATER SYSTEM
3.3.1 Backbone Potable Water Plan
1. DESCRIPTION
The Backbone Potable Water PIan for the Project is set forth in Figure 3.3 -1. On-
site storage and water distribution systems will be built to provide adequate fire
and domestic service, as required.
The principal source of water for the Project will be the CMWD. The CMWD's
Lindero feeder system west of the Project will supply up to 8.7 mgd to the
development, through an existing 24 -inch water line on the Project site in Las
Virgenes Canyon.
The proposed water system includes four (4) pressure zones (see Figure 3.3 -1,
Backbone Potable Water Plan) with storage tanks to serve the entire site gravity.
All of the required water storage for the Project will be provided by the proposed
On- Project storage tanks. The storage tank which serves zones A and B is located
in the SFE District, northwest of the K-8 Combined School. Storage tanks for
zones C and D are clustered in the northern portion of the SFT District, north of
the VC District. The water for the zone C tank will be delivered by directly from
the CMWD Supply System. Zone A and parts of zone B will be served through
pressure - regulating stations from zone B. Zone D will be supplied by pumping
from zone C.
2. POTABLE WATER DEMAND AND CONSUMPTION REQUIREMENTS
Potable water demands for the Project are interrelated to the use of non - potable
water for landscape irrigation.
Based on Figure 3.3 -2, Potable Water Design Criteria, and Figure 1.1 -2, Land Use
Table, the estimated potable water demand for the Project is as follows:
a. Average Daily Demand: 2.33 mgd
b. Maximum Daily Demand: 4.66 mgd
C. Maximum Daily Supply- 8.7 mgd
000046
ATTACHMENT 5
December 15, 1992 3 -39
I
AH AANMN
R A N C H
i
srzcntc PLAN
i
LAS v RGENES
ROAD
Existing 12" L. V.M. W.D.
THOUSAND AHMANSON RANCH wars. Line
OAKS BLVD.
BLVD.
BACKBONE POTABLE WATER PLAN
Pressure Zones
Zone (A
950' TO 11DO' ELEVATION
Zone
1100' TO 1250' ELEVATION
Zone
1250' TO 1100' ELEVATION
Zone OD
1,100' TO 1.550' ELEVATION
0.
000047
® 0 2000' FIGURE 33 -1
DECEMBER 1992
7 AA
Water Transmission Line
®
Water Tank
Pump Station
EE
Pressure Regulating Station
0
Pressure Zone Boundary
Existing 12" L. V.M. W.D.
THOUSAND AHMANSON RANCH wars. Line
OAKS BLVD.
BLVD.
BACKBONE POTABLE WATER PLAN
Pressure Zones
Zone (A
950' TO 11DO' ELEVATION
Zone
1100' TO 1250' ELEVATION
Zone
1250' TO 1100' ELEVATION
Zone OD
1,100' TO 1.550' ELEVATION
0.
000047
® 0 2000' FIGURE 33 -1
DECEMBER 1992
7 AA
PUBLIC COMMUNITY FACIIITIF.S /SERVICES
PLANS/PROGRAMS
3.3 POTABLE WATER SYSTEM
FIGURE 3.3 -2
POTABLE WATER DESIGN CRITERIA
Ahmanson Ranch Specific Plan
Category
'
Estimated
Average Daily Consumption of
Potable (Domestic) Water
SFE
2,100 gpd/unit
Residential -=
Single - Family
700 gpd/unit
Residential --
Multi- Family
600 gpd/unit
Office
2,500 gpd/acre
Retail
2,500 gpd/acre
Schools
25 gpd/student
Golf Course
Clubhouses
7,000 gpd/each
Community Facilities --
Buildings
2,500 gpd/acre
Support Areas"
2,000 gpd/acre
Lodge
120 gpd/room
Note: Potable water supply figures from CMWD and non - potable water supply for Water
Reclamation Facility, Tapia Water Reclamation Plant and Ahmanson Well No. 1.
Value includes potable and non - potable use.
Public Community Facility support areas include the Water Reclamation Facility, Maintenance Facility and the SCE
Electric Sub - Station.
December 15, 1992 000041S 3 -41
PUBLIC COMMUNH Y FAC HIES /SERVICES
PLANS/PROGRAMS
3.3 POTABLE WATER SYSTEM
3. POTABLE WATER SYSTEM INFRASTRUCTURE
DESIGN CRITERIA
a. Design Criteria
Potable water design criteria for various categories of development is shown in
Figure 3.3 -2. Except where indicated, the estimated average daily consumption
value reflects reductions associated with the use of reclaimed water for irrigation.
Values shown in the table are based on data from the LVMWD, adjusted to reflect
the proposed development concept. Actual average daily demand will probably
be lower than projected because of the mandatory use of low flow fixtures in
residential and commercial properties.
b. Maximum baiiy Demand
Two (2) x (times) average daily consumption.
C. Fire Flow Demand
5,000 gpm for four (4) hours duration, at 20 pounds per square inch minimum
residual pressure.
d. Pipeline Sizing
Maximum velocity in transmission mains equals seven (7) feet/second at
maximum daily demand plus fire flow demand. This maximum velocity does not
apply to local street lines when subjected to fire flows.
e. Storage Tank Sizing
Fire storage equals 1.2 million gallons (5,000 gpm for four (4) hours);
Emergency storage equals 0.25 x (times) maximum daily demand; and,
Equalizing storage equals 0.25 x (times) maximum daily demand.
f. Emergency Ties
Emergency ties will be provided to the LVMWD system in Las Virgenes Road
subject to CMWD approval.
December 15, 1992 00004y 3 -42
PUBLIC COMMUNITY FACILIrIFS /SERVICES
PLANS/PROGRAMS
3.3 POTABLE WATER SYSTEM
g. Pressure Zones
The water supply provided from the Lindero feeder system has an average water
surface elevation of 1,530 feet. The system's operating range is from 1,515 to
1,545 feet. Based on proposed grading of the Project site, the following pressure
zones (as depicted on Figure 3.3 -1) have been established:
Pressure Zones Range of Elevation Served
A' 950 - 1,100 feet
B 1,100 - 1,250 feet
C 1,250 - 1,400 feet
D 1,400 - 1,550 feet
h. Storage Tank Pads
Potable and reclaimed water storage tanks shall be located and designed to
minimize visual impacts. Such design may include deepening the pads where
feasible, berming and landscaping. The tanks should be painted a non - reflective
color and the surrounding area landscaped with plants native to the adjoining
COS.
i. Fire Flow Requirements
Prior to issuance of building permits for subsequent entitlements, improvement
plans shall be submitted by the Master Developer or Builder, as appropriate, to the
VCFPD that demonstrate the compliance of the development water system with
County fire flow requirements (for single family and multi- family dwellings) and
the County Water Works Manual and I.S.O. guide for determining fire flow (for all
other structures).
3.3.2 Off - Project Improvements
1. POTABLE WATER LINE
The existing 16 -inch water line in Las Virgenes Road, which now terminates 400
feet south of the Project, will be extended into the Project to provide an emergency
connection to the LVMWD system. This improvement is not necessary to meet
Project water demands, but will serve as an alternate water source in emergency
situations. The emergency connection is subject to CMWD approval.
December 15, 1992 OW (j,541 3 -43
PUBLIC COMMUNr1Y FACILTTIBS /SERVICES
PLANS/PROGRAMS
3.3 POTABLE WATER SYSTEM
2. PHASING (OFF - PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS)
The above off-Project 16 -inch water line will be extended into the Project prior to
the issuance of a building permit for a permanent structure within Development
Phase D of the Project.
3. DESIGN CRITERIA
The design criteria set forth in Section 3.3.1 -3 will apply to the off-Project potable
water distribution improvements.
3.3.3 Governance and Financing
1. GOVERNANCE
The governance of potable water service within the Project will be the
responsibility of the appropriate district described herein. The ultimate acceptance
of responsibility will be according to applicable laws and regulations. Any changes
in responsibility will not require an amendment to the Specific Plan.
The Specific Plan provides for creation of a new CSA. Potable water service within
the Specific Plan Area will be provided by the special districts below.
a. Wholesaler. CMWD
b. Retailer. CSA
2. FINANCING
The Master Developer will be responsible for the financing and construction of the
Backbone Potable Water System improvements necessary to support the
development proposed with each Master Tract Map. Pursuant to Section 1.10.3,
prior to or concurrent with the recordation of each Master Tract Map, the Master
Developer will dedicate and/or construct, as applicable, or provide surety for such
dedication and/or construction of that portion of the Backbone Potable Water
System which is required to be dedicated and/or constructed in the Development
Phase covered by that Master Tract Map.
If approved by the appropriate governing agency, public financing may be used for
construction of portions of the Backbone Potable Water System which are deemed
by such to benefit the Bell Canyon Community.
December 15, 1992 J)00 "A 3 -44
PUBLIC COMMUNITY FACR= /SERVICES
PLANS/PROGRAMS
3.3 POTABLE WATER SYSTEM
3.3.4 Phasing (Backbone Potable Water System)
That portion of the Backbone Potable Water System required to be constructed in any
Development Phase will be built in construction increments prior to the issuance of a
building permit for a permanent structure requiring the associated Backbone Potable Water
System within such construction increment. The phasing of the Backbone Potable Water
System is shown on Figure 3.3 -3.
Following are the specific Backbone Potable Water System elements that will be built prior
to the completion of each Development Phase as indicated below. Notwithstanding the
above, the completion of the Backbone Potable Water System in each Development Phase
should not be a prerequisite to beginning construction in another phase.
1. DEVELOPMENT PHASE "A"
a. Transmission lines;
b. Pressure regulating stations; and
C. Connection to the 24 -inch line from the Lindero feeder system.
Temporary storage may be accommodated at the existing four (4) million gallon
Cheseboro Tank. The availability of the Cheseboro Tank is subject to further
evaluation and discussion with CMWD. Temporary storage in the Cheseboro Tank
is proposed until the planned 2.5 mgd tank is constructed in Development Phase B.
2. DEVELOPMENT PHASE "B"
a. Transmission lines;
b. Pressure regulating stations; and
C. 2.5 million gallon storage tank -- Pressure zone C.
3. DEVELOPMENT PHASE "C
a. Transmission lines;
b. Pressure regulating stations;
C. 2.0 million gallon storage tank -- Pressure zone B;
d. 2.5 million gallon storage tank -- Pressure zone C; and
e. 1.0 million gallon storage tank -- Pressure zone D.
4. DEVELOPMENT PHASE "D"
a. Transmission lines;
b. Pressure regulating stations; and
C. Connection to existing LVMWD 16 -inch line in Las Virgenes Road.
December 15, 1992 VWV ,5 4 3 -45