Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 1997 1105 CC REG ITEM 09ATO: FROM: DATE: CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT The Honorable City Council CffY OF MO91 City c ..f % I iWA 199 z Paul Porter, Principal Planner Nelson Miller, Director of Community Developm October 17, 1997 (CC Meeting of November 5, 1997) SUBJECT: CONSIDER REQUEST BY MADELAINE SHENKEL AND BILL TANNER FOR THE CITY COUNCIL TO APPROVE A TEMPORARY SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR A TEMPORARY TRUCK STORAGE AND SERVICE FACILITY ON A 2.08 ACRE PARCEL LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF LOS ANGELES AVENUE WEST OF NOGALES AVENUE (APN 513 - 024 -105) (CONTINUED FROM OCTOBER 15, 1997) This application was continued due to potential concerns regarding the applicability of conditions and the Temporary Special Use Permit process to the requested application. A Temporary Special Use Permit for a contractors storage and service yard is recommended for approval subject to recommended conditions of approval to comply with Code requirements and to address safety and environmental issues. On August 19, 1997, Appeal No. 97 -2 was filed by John Newton on behalf of Bill Tanner and Madelaine Shenkel appealing the determination by the Director of Community Development that a Planned Development Permit, rather than a Temporary Special Use Permit, was required for use of a M -2 zoned property for a Contractor Service and Storage Yard on a 2.08 acre parcel located on the south side of Los Angeles Avenue west of Nogales Avenue. On September 3, 1997, the City Council sustained the applicants, appeal, allowing a Temporary Special Use Permit to be considered for the proposed use. The City Council also indicated by consensus that this application would be deferred to the City Council for action. The Department of Community Development received a request for a Temporary Special Use Permit from Mr. John W. Newton on September C:\ OFFICE \WPWIN \WPDOCS \CASES \TUPSHNKR.REV 000328 Temporary Special Use Permit - Tanner /Shenkel City Council meeting 10/15/97 Page No. 2 24, 1997 for Temporary Truck Parking on a portion of a 2.08 acre parcel located on Los Angeles Avenue west of Nogales Avenue. The letter indicates they propose temporary site improvements and will consider other reasonable conditions (see Attachment No. 4). The proposed temporary improvements include clean -up, chain link fencing, a chemical toilet, security lighting, temporary surfacing (decomposed granite or asphalt grindings), with limited truck maintenance, and limited hours. The proposed site for which the applicants are requesting approval for the Temporary Special Use Permit is located on the south side of Los Angeles Avenue, just east of the 23 Freeway overpass and approximately 240 feet west of Nogales Avenue. It is currently zoned Limited Industrial (M -2) and is within the one hundred year flood plain. The site is currently unimproved and has considerable vegetation. Per Section 17.44.030A(1)c of the Municipal Code, Temporary Special Use Permits are considered a discretionary permit which may be conditioned so as to not be physically detrimental to the health, safety, life or property of the applicants or the public. They are for a temporary period of time (not to exceed ninety days), without additional approvals. However, as discussed below, the proposed use is likely to extend significantly longer than ninety days. Therefore, Council may wish to consider review every ninety days for compliance with conditions relating to operations and filing of applications. The applicants are currently operating in violation of City Codes on a residentially designated property on the north side of Los Angeles Avenue, just west of the 23 Freeway. That property consists of approximately 4.78 acres of land northerly of Los Angeles Avenue bordered by the SR- 23/118 Freeway Connector right - of -way and having approximately a 100 foot topographic separation (elevation) to adjacent rural residential properties located to the north and west. The property has a General Plan Land Use C:\ OFFICE \WPWIN \WPDOCS \CASES \TUPSHNKR.REV 0003ZS Temporary Special Use Permit - Tanner /Shenkel City Council meeting 10/15/97 Page No. 3 Designation of "RH" (Rural High ldu. /5 acres minimum) and zoning of RE -lac (Rural Exclusive, one acre minimum). Under Pre Application 96 -11, the applicants had requested permission to process a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change on this property located at 13991 Los Angeles Avenue. The City Council considered this request on April 16, 1997, but on May 7,1997, denied the request upon reconsideration of the Council's original determination on the basis that the applicants were operating in violation of the Municipal Code on the property. The applicants want to relocate to the property on the south side of Los Angeles Avenue in order to correct their violations on the property at 13991 Los Angeles. They have also requested City Council to authorize processing of a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change for the property at 13991 Los Angeles Avenue once the violations are corrected. Pursuant to the Municipal Code, a contractors service and storage yard, or overnight truck storage, requires approval of a Planning Commission approved planned development permit. Therefore, a planned development permit would still be required for that property if the General Plan and Zoning designations were changed to an industrial designation. Pursuant to City Council policy, the development permit cannot be considered until the General Plan and zoning are approved by the City Council. Consideration of a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change are likely to take four to six months to process for consideration from receipt of a complete application, if given a priority. However, there is currently a backlog of applications in the Planning Division, including a number of other General Plan Amendment applications already pending. A development permit would be likely to take another three to four months to process for consideration. Review of applications for completeness and getting applicants to file all the necessary information, studies, and materials may add a couple of more months to this process. Therefore, it can be expected to take nine to twelve months, or more, for a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change and other necessary permits to be considered for use of the property at 13991 Los Angeles Avenue. As part of a review process of permits, Section 17.36.010 of the Municipal Code requires that potential impacts be evaluated, including the following: C:\ OFFICE \WPWIN \WPDOCS \CASES \TUPSHNKR.REV 000330 Temporary Special Use Permit - Tanner /Shenkel City Council meeting 10/15/97 Page No. 4 * Biological Resources, including flora, fauna and ecological system * Circulation, including impacts on circulation systems, traffic safety and emergency access * Erosion and flood hazards * Land - unique natural land features and natural resources * Noise - increase in noise levels * Vegetation impacts on unique native, ornamental or agricultural plant populations * The potential for water - degradation of quality or reduction in supply as a result of a project * Sewage Disposal Public notice and mailed notice to surrounding property owners is not provided for Temporary Special Use Permits. The approved Street Improvement Plans for the Los Angeles Avenue East street widening project, indicates a need to increase the existing right -of -way to provide for an 88 foot wide right -of -way along the project frontage (see Attachment 3) . Therefore, a portion of the storage container area, the parking for the trucks and the office trailer as shown on the plot plan encroaches in the proposed right -of -way. The dedication of right -of -way is recommended to be a condition of this permit. The right -of -way is targeted to be obtained by June, 1998, for the widening project to proceed. The Ordinance requires that uses be set back from ultimate right -of -way on proposed four lane streets a minimum of 30 feet. However, for a temporary use, the City Council may allow a lesser setback. Staff would recommend that at least a ten foot setback from the ultimate right -of -way be provided. A condition has been included requiring that the plot plan be revised to move proposed uses a minimum of ten (10) feet behind the ultimate street right -of -way, or two (2) feet behind any slope easement, whichever is the greater setback. This property is located adjacent to residential properties which are located to the east of the property. The City has recently received complaints from neighboring residences regarding noise C:\ OFFICE \WPWIN \WPDOCS \CASES \TUPSHNKR.REV 000331 Temporary Special Use Permit - Tanner /Shenkel City Council meeting 10/15/97 Page No. 5 created from other industrial uses along Los Angeles Avenue, especially from the backing of trucks. Typically, the noise intrusion happens early in the morning or after sunset. A petition was received at the City Council meeting of September 17, 1997, requesting that operating time be limited to between 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. for Monday- Saturday only for Calmat and Conejo Ready Mix, primarily relating to noise from trucks. Due to the proximity of residences to this proposed temporary use, it is recommended that the hours of operation be limited from 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Monday through Saturday and that maintenance or repair of trucks other than those specified in Mr. Newton's letter dated September 23, 1994 be prohibited. In addition, it is recommended that no outdoor paging or intercom system be used on the site. Pursuant to Section 17.36.050, outside storage and operations yards are to be confined to the area to the rear of the building line (behind the building setback) and shall be screened from view from any street by appropriate walls fencing, earth mounds or landscaping. If Council approved a reduced setback, such screening would be at the reduced setback line (ten feet). A condition has been included for the screening to be a solid wood fence since chain link proposed by the applicants would not provide any screening. Section 17.32.030 stipulates that required parking areas be paved with asphalt, concrete, or other material of similar rigidity and durability and adequate drainage shall be provided. Paving would also be a requirement of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination Standards which require that any storage areas approved by the City shall be designed to eliminate the potential for runoff to carry pollutants into the sewer system. The State of California issued a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit covering all urban areas in Ventura County. One of the requirements of the system is for jurisdictions to incorporate storm water pollutant control consideration measures on projects so as to control storm water pollution from other sources such as industrial land use activities by controlling runoff, provide oil /water separators so first flush of runoff can be directed into them, or other types of control devices designed to remove C:\ OFFICE \WPWIN \WPDOCS \CASES \TUPSHNKR.REV 00033 Temporary Special Use Permit - Tanner /Shenkel City Council meeting 10/15/97 Page No. 6 petroleum compounds and grease or other pollutants. The applicants have indicated parking for 19 trucks and 5 additional trailers and proposed installation of "truck crossing signs ". Staff would recommend a condition requiring that the applicants provide a study from a Traffic Engineer addressing existing curve and an elevation differentials which may create possible sight distance concerns and traffic impacts and that if the Traffic Engineer or the City Engineer requires additional measures to mitigate traffic hazards, the applicants provide them prior to any use of the property on a temporary basis. Typically temporary uses are categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), however Section 15300.2 of CEQA Guidelines specifies that where resources or hazards are mapped, such uses may have significant impacts which should be considered. In this case, most of the site outside the proposed right -of -way is within the 100 year flood plain. Therefore a condition is recommended that all facilities and improvements comply with FEMA recommendations for flood proofing and construction, which would include special utility connections, anchoring of structures, and design of footings for fences. The area generally from just west of the 23 Freeway over crossing east to the City limits has been identified as having significant wetland and riparian habitats which support the Least Bell's Vireo, a state and federally endangered bird. Therefore, a condition is also recommended that a biological survey be completed and reviewed by the City's consultants and that all recommendations resulting from this study be complied with. As previously discussed, these applicants have previously filed a Pre - Application for a General Plan Amendment, an appeal of the Community Development Director's decision, and an application for this Temporary Special Use Permit. The filing fee for a Temporary C:\ OFFICE \WPWIN \WPDOCS \CASES \TUPSHNKR.REV 000333 Temporary Special Use Permit - Tanner /Shenkel City Council meeting 10/15/97 Page No. 7 Special Use Permit is normally only $43.00. Due to the previous consideration, reconsideration, and Code Enforcement costs related to the previous applications, and the number of issues relating to the processing of the Application for Temporary Special Use Permit, the costs staff have accrued are estimated at approximately $3500 in excess of deposits collected. The applicants have also requested a refund of the fees for the appeal ( see Attachment 4). A condition is recommended that prior to issuance of a Zoning Clearance for use of the site, the applicants pay all outstanding costs, pay a condition compliance deposit of $2500, and pay deposits for the review of all required studies to be submitted by the applicants (traffic and biological studies) . In addition, cash deposits are typically required on Temporary Special Use Permits to assure clean -up of the site, or removal of installations. It is recommended that a $10,000 cash deposit be made to the City to guarantee clean -up of the site and removal of facilities, which the City could utilize at its discretion, if the applicants failed to perform. The applicants have also requested authorization for processing of a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change for their property on the north side of Los Angeles Avenue once they have corrected the existing violations on that property. Council may wish to direct staff to prepare a resolution of intention for Council consideration of this request, subject to any prerequisites as Council may direct. Pursuant to Section 17.44.010A(1)c of the Code, Temporary Special Use Permits shall not exceed ninety days without additional approvals. However, as previously indicated, it is anticipated that consideration of the necessary permits for use of their property on the north side of Los Angeles Avenue may take one year, or longer. Council may wish to review progress on filing and processing of applications, and compliance with conditions every ninety days and consider appropriate extensions. In the first ninety days it is recommended that the applicants should complete all conditions for authorization to utilize the site on the south side of Los Angeles Avenue, with payment of all required costs and deposits within two weeks of Council approval of the Temporary C:\ OFFICE \WPWIN \WPDOCS \CASES \TUPSHNKR.REV 000334 Temporary Special Use Permit - Tanner /Shenkel City Council meeting 10/15/97 Page No. 8 Special Use Permit, and filing of completed applications, including all required studies for General Plan Amendment and Zone Change for the property on the north side of Los Angeles Avenue, if authorized by City Council. 1. Adopt the attached resolution conditionally approving a Temporary Special Use Permit for temporary truck storage facility on a 2.08 acre parcel located on the south side of Los Angeles Avenue west of Nogales Avenue. 2. Direct staff to prepare a Resolution of Intention to authorize acceptance of applications for General Plan Amendment and Zone Change for the property on the north side of Los Angeles Avenue subject to requirements as the Council may direct. 3. Deny the request for refund of costs of the appeal of the Community Development Director's determination. Attachments: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Draft Resolution Zoning and General Plan Maps Street Widening Plans Letter from John Newton dated September 23, 1997 Site Plan C:\ OFFICE \WPWIN \WPDOCS \CASES \TUPSHNKR.REV 000335 RESOLUTION NO 97- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK CALIFORNIA APPROVING A TEMPORARY SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR MADELAINE SHENKEL AND BILL TANNER PERMITTING TEMPORARY TRUCK STORAGE AND SERVICE FACILITY ON A 2.08 ACRE PARCEL LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF LOS ANGELES AVENUE WEST OF NOGALES AVENUE (APN 513 - 024 -105) Whereas, on September 3, 1997, the City Council allowed a Temporary Special Use Permit to be considered for the proposed use and indicated by consensus that this application would be deferred to the City Council for action; and Whereas, the Department of Community Development received a request for a Temporary Special Use Permit from Mr. John W. Newton on September 24, 1997 for temporary truck storage facility; and Whereas, on October 15, 1997, the City Council considered the applicants' request for a Temporary Special Use Permit for temporary truck storage on a 2.08 acre parcel located on the south side of Los Angeles Avenue west of Nogales Avenue (APN 513 -024- 105) . NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The Temporary Special Use Permit is categorically exempt from CEQA requirements as a Class 4 exemption for minor alterations to land, subject to compliance with the conditions of approval and that there are no significant, unmitigated adverse impacts identified by the required studies. SECTION 2. The City Council conditionally approves a Temporary Special Use Permit for temporary truck storage on a 2.08 acre parcel located on the south side of Los Angeles Avenue west of Nogales Avenue (APN 513- 024 -105 subject to the following Conditions of Approval: 1. That this permit is granted for a Temporary Special Use Permit for a period of no more than 90 days for the storage of six 10' by 30' concrete mixers, three 10' by 30' pup trailers, ten 10' by 30' 10 wheel trucks, three 10' by 60' semi - trailers with tractor, two 10' by 40' trailers and one 10' by 20' C:\ OFFICE \WPWIN \WPDOCS \CASES \TUPSHNKR.REV 1 000336 Temporary Special Use Permit Tanner /Shenkel Resolution office trailer only. Any extension of time or modifications to the site plan or permit shall require a modification to the permit to be filed by the applicants for review and approval by the City Council. Maintenance shall be limited to only checking and filling of fluid levels, minor change of electrical, belts and hoses, and flat tire replacement. Hours of operation for all activities shall be limited to Monday through Saturday from 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. The final site plan shall be modified as required by the conditions of approval of this permit and shall be subject to the approval of the Director of Community Development. 2. All uses and outside storage shall be screened from view from the street, or any occupied property by an eight(8) foot high solid wood fence as approved by the Director of Community Development. 3. All vehicle parking, storage, and driveway areas, or areas designated for oil /fluid changes shall be paved and approved by the City Engineer and Community Development Director for compliance with NPDES requirements and shall be designed to eliminate the potential for runoff of contact pollutants. 4. Prior to any occupancy of the site, the right -of -way and slope easements for the Los Angeles Avenue East Street Improvement Project shall be dedicated consistent with the alignment, width, and improvements approved on June 5, 1996, and the preliminary design for street improvements, right -of -way acquisition, and slope easements approved on September 3, 1997. 5. The plot plan shall be revised so as to have all truck storage areas, fencing, and other temporary improvements relocated to be confined to the area a minimum of ten (10) feet behind the ultimate street right -of -way, or two (2) feet behind any slope easement, whichever is the greater setback from the proposed right -of -way of Los Angeles. 6. Within thirty days after expiration of this permit, or abandonment of the use, all structures and materials shall be removed from the site. A $10,000 cash deposit shall be deposited with the City to guarantee performance and which may C:\ OFFICE \WPWIN \WPDOCS \CASES \TUPSHNKR.REV 2 000337 Temporary Special Use Permit Tanner /Shenkel Resolution be used by the City to offset any costs related to assure compliance. 7. The development, design, operation, and maintenance of the permit area and facilities is subject to all applicable regulations of the M -2 Zone and all applicable requirements of any law or agency of the State, City of Moorpark and any other governmental entity shall be met, and all such requirements and enactments shall, by reference, become conditions of this entitlement. 8. All facilities and uses other than those specifically requested in the application and approved are prohibited unless an application for a modification has been approved by the City Council. 9. Within two weeks of Council approval of the Temporary Special Use Permit, applicants shall pay all outstanding costs incurred by the City related to processing this permit, as well as other outstanding balances for processing of previous permits and related code enforcement costs, and applicants shall also make a $2500 deposit for condition compliance costs. If all required costs and deposits are not made within two weeks, this approval shall automatically become null and void. 10. No conditions of this entitlement shall be interpreted as permitting or requiring any violation of law or any unlawful rules or regulations or orders of an authorized governmental agency. In instances where more than one set of rules apply, the stricter ones shall take precedence. 11. If any of the conditions or limitations of this permit are held to be invalid, that holding shall not invalidate any of the remaining conditions or limitations set forth. 12. The permittee agrees as a condition of issuance and use of this permit to defend, at his sole expense, any action brought against the City because of issuance (or renewal) of this permit or in the alternative to relinquish this permit. Permittee will reimburse the City for any court costs and /or attorney's fees which the City may be required by the court to pay as a result of any such action. The City may, at its sole C:\ OFFICE \WPWIN \WPDOCS \CASES \TUPSHNKR.REV 3 000338 Temporary Special Use Permit Tanner /Shenkel Resolution discretion, participate in the defense of any such action, but such participation shall not relieve permittee of his obligation under this condition. 13. Prior to any occupancy of the site, or any alteration of the site, the applicants, or the owner's representative shall apply for a Zoning Clearance from the Community Development Department for review of compliance with all conditions of approval and shall obtain all permits required by Building and Safety and any other permits required by any other agency. 14. Prior to the issuance of a Zoning Clearance for initiation of the use, or any alteration of the site, the applicants shall submit for review and approval a biological survey from a qualified biologist inventorying the site and identifying any sensitive, threatened, or endangered plants or biological resources and indicating any recommended mitigation measures. Applicants shall also make deposit for review of the study by City consultants and comply with all recommended mitigation measures. 15. Prior to the issuance of a Zoning Clearance for the initiation of the Temporary Special Use Permit, the applicants shall submit for review and approval a traffic study from a Registered Traffic Engineer addressing any appropriate remedial action for traffic and sight distance concerns Applicants shall also make deposit for review of the study by City consultants and comply with all recommended mitigation measures. 16. For all exterior lighting, a lighting plan shall be prepared by an electrical engineer registered in the State of California and submitted to the Department of Community Development and Building and Safety Division for review and approval. The lighting plan shall achieve the following objectives: Avoid interferences with reasonable use of adjoining properties; minimize on -site and off -site glare; provide adequate on -site lighting; limit height to avoid excessive illumination; and provide structures which are compatible with the total design of the proposed facility. The lighting plan shall include the following: C:\ OFFICE \WPWIN \WPDOCS \CASES \TUPSHNKR.REV 4 VUV -339 Temporary Special Use Permit Tanner /Shenkel Resolution A photometric plan showing a point -by -point foot candle layout to extend a minimum of twenty (20) feet outside the property lines. Layout plan to be based on a ten (10) foot grid center. Maximum overall height of fixtures shall be twenty (20) feet. Fixtures must possess sharp cut -off qualities with a maximum of one -half foot candle illumination at property lines. There shall be no more than a seven -to -one (7:1) ratio of level of illumination shown (maximum -to- minimum ratio between lighting standards). Energy efficient lighting fixtures shall be provided which are compatible with adjacent properties. Average maximum of one -half foot candle illumination. No light shall be emitted above the 90 degree or horizontal plane. 17. The Director of Community Development may declare that this site is a "public nuisance" if the permit is not in compliance with the conditions of approval, or for some other just cause. The applicants shall be liable to the City for any and all costs and expenses to the City involved in thereafter abating the nuisance and in obtaining compliance with the conditions of approval or applicable codes. If the applicants fail to pay all City costs related to this action, the City may enact special assessment proceedings against the parcel of land upon which the nuisance existed (Moorpark Municipal Code Section 1.12.080) 18. The continued maintenance of the permit area and facilities shall be subject to periodic inspection by the City. The permittee shall be required to remedy any defects in ground maintenance, as indicated by the Code Enforcement Officer within thirty (30) days after notification. 19. The applicants and successors, heirs, and assigns shall remove any graffiti within five (5) days from written notification by the City of Moorpark. All such graffiti removal shall be accomplished to the satisfaction of the Director of Community C:\ OFFICE \WPWIN \WPDOCS \CASES \TUPSHNKR.REV 5 000340 Temporary Special Use Permit Tanner /Shenkel Resolution Development. 20. All facilities and improvements shall be submitted to the Director of Community Development and Building and Safety Division for review and compliance with FEMA recommendations for flood proofing and construction, which would include special utility connections, special anchoring of structures, and design of footings for fences and any other structure. All appropriate fees and permits shall also be submitted for such review and approval. 21. Applicants shall provide evidence of regular maintenance and dumping of any on -site chemical toilets. 22. The noise level at any property line adjacent to residential uses shall not exceed SS dbA. No outdoor paging or intercom systems shall be allowed on the site. SECTION 3. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED THIS DAY OF , 1997. AYES: NOES: Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk C:\ OFFICE \WPWIN \WPDOCS \CASES \TUPSHNKR.REV 6 00034JL Y � ) 3 1 CIS MESA AM A SON lull r- , .� IlFw- -V,c 11111 w. i u �• �ii�% :r� C] b r � d a = A a s e PROPOSED N1Y EP. le 9 a ' D EMST N'LY F$ e _ RT OF PM CL s 8b. l 3 1 1 1 J S + r � 3 TT^" f ' f I r I KM, IM DESIOED <EVAJMIS W E. q „FOOT AEIMAL. { PROFILE .S L_i IIOISLt VEM. 17rr111FF r v• _ c c c.� i c C C W CA LOS ANGELES AVENUE EAST LEGEND ® rwaosn Mr ® an sac ® ru sac LT• - I, CITY OF LOS ANGELES AVENUE EAST MG MOORPARK "°"° STA. 19 +25.80 TO STA. 29+00.00 ' RIGHT OF WAY PLANS John W. Newton & Associates, Inc. JDzofeiiionat comiultants, 165 High St., Suite 103 Post Office Box 471 Moorpark, California 93021 September 23, 1997 Nelson Miller Director, Community Development 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 Re: Temporary Special Use Permit TRUCK PARKING 14250 Los Angeles Avenue APN: 513 - 024 -105 Dear Mr. Miller: Telephone (805) 378 -0073 Fax No. (805) 378 -0080 Pursuant to direction of the City Council this letter is transmitted with a Zoning Clearance application for Temporary Truck Parking on a portion of APN: 513 - 024 -105, a 2.08 acre parcel on the south side of L.A. Avenue west of Nogales Avenue. Six (6) copies of a detailed Site Plan are enclosed. The property is zoned "M -2" Limited Industrial which allows truck parking as a principally permitted use. The portion of the property proposed for temporary use is out of the flow way of the Arroyo Simi but is within the 100 year storm flood plain, as are the adjacent properties east and west of this location. The portion of the property proposed for temporary use is the NW quadrant which is higher in elevation and has no evidence of erosion due to storm flows either from the Arroyo Simi on the south or the tributory flow way along the east boundary. This existing, useable area is approximately .75 acres. The area of the property which is in the flow way, south and east, and which contains considerable willow growth and other vegetation is not a part of the proposed use area. The applicants propose the following temporary site improvements at a minimum, and will consider any other reasonable conditions appropriate to the short term, temporary truck parking use: 1. Clean up, including brush & vegetation along fence frontage west to freeway overpass (for sight distance). 2. Fence perimeter of parking area. 3. Chemical Toilet. REAL ESTATE BROKERAGE MINERAL REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT Commercial • Industrial • Land RESOURCE Engineering r* Land Division • Permits Residential Relocation ATTw�F�� MT 4 Pla " "anQ L " 6 3 Nelson Miller September 23, 1997 Page 2 4. Bottled water. 5. Telephone. 6. Shielded, security lighting. 7. "Truck Crossing" warning signs, 200' east and west of entrance. 8. Hours of operation limited to "daylight ", Monday- Saturday. 9. Maintenance limited to driver type: oil, water, fluid levels, minor electrical, belts, hoses and flat tire repair /replacement. 10. Temporary surface with asphalt grindings or decomposed granite for dust control. Please schedule this application for the next available City Council agenda, per the Council's request. Also, as a part of the City Council review of this TSUP, please provide the necessary information, in action form, for the Council to authorize the processing of the applicants' GPA /ZC request on their property at 13991 Los Angeles Avenue upon staff verification that the applicants' trucks have been moved from the subject property to the temporary use site. Finally, per City Council action of September 3, 1997 please refund the $344.00 appeal fee previously required of the applicants. Thank you. cc: Bill Tanner and Madelaine Shenkel Don Hartman rds, G� W. Newton Applicants' Representative 000347 9 1N3MlH *V.L" / w / 1 z m �o s m� q b b 0 i! /I 1 c• m I � We 9 140" c M co 2 1 Ii 1 p0 O -- --• Ii m N m cc, CD N I 1 i NOGALES AVENUE M/h 30pIa6 AVM33d, d0 3NI7 AlHaISV3 40"£ 91 01 ^ C� Nt FFN 6 '20. i CO�lo. x3p 'py0 0�,� Mjx£RS 9 NF trCA S-to ~�5 ; 99 7llpt ?CNS i 4 ,q'3 4, 6p AQ 'ltd, a"ayy o` s�• R �o m z C m y � Dy A 7. •,a c i 1 .so Na• �ly Ep�6 *00 t jNN ld .oDNylp� �'lyy �l John W. Newton & Associates, Inc. �co fe�slona� �onsu�tants 165 High St., Suite 103 Post Office Box 471 Moorpark, California 93021 Telephone (805) 378 -0073 Fax No. (805) 378 -0080 November 5, 1997 City Council 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 Re: Madelaine Shenkel and Bill Tanner Temporary Special Use Permit S /Los Angeles Avenue, E /SR- 23/118 Connector ITEM 9.A. WITHDRAW FROM CONSIDERATION Mayor and Members of the Council: The above - referenced applicants have directed me to withdraw their request for a TSUP for Temporary Truck Parking on "M -2" Industrially Zoned property, a portion of APN: 513 - 024 -105, also known as 14250 Los Angeles Avenue. The applicants thank the Council for upholding their appeal of the Director's refusal to issue a Zoning Clearance, on September 3, 1997. However, staff has now disregarded the City Council's explicit direction to issue the Zoning Clearance /TSUP by authoring a staff report designed to "kill" the project. Worse yet, the public dissemination of this staff report has fueled flames of political discontent to the degree that facts, or reason, cannot possibly prevail. Neighbors to the east in Virginia Colony have read misinformation and misrepresentation in the staff report, deliberately designed to excite the process. Even if the applicants were to provide factual responses to correct the staff report, and to demonstrate that the TSUP could issue under the reasonable conditions outlined in their September 23, 1997 Zoning Clearance filing, following your Council's unanimous support of the appeal; the perception would remain now that the applicants, and the City, don't care about the neighbors. Nothing could be farther from the truth. Of the 19 employees of Tanner and Shenkel, many have friends or relatives in Virginia Colony. The unfortunate results of the inappropriate, and incompetent staff report are that some perceive project impacts to Colony residents — None would occur. I personally have invested much time and effort over the years in procuring improvements to the public facilities in Virginia Colony, in particular the Happy Camp Canyon Drain, and have actively pursued and supported other REAL ESTATE BROKERAGE MINERAL REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT Commercial • Industrial • Land RESOURCE Engineering • Land Division • Permits Residential Relocation DEVELOPMENT Planning • Zoning City Council November 5, 1997 Page 2 improvements and enhancements to this neighborhood since 1975. The City has been very diligent in causing improvements and upgrades to this area, one of the oldest tax paying neighborhoods in our City. I would never advocate any project that would directly harm residents or negatively affect their property, and neither would Madelaine Shenkel or Bill Tanner. A travesty of justice has occurred here. It no longer matters that it can be demonstrated that the TSUP can be appropriately issued on this properly zoned property. Your City Council would be forever condemned for doing so, and the applicants would be hounded during their occupancy. And the applicants are confused and beat up. The recommendation is to a the TSUP, yet it is conditioned to death so that it could never be impleove mented. The staff effort should have been to assist your Council in implementing the TSUP, as you directed, not to try to subvert your objec- tives by placing you in the impossible political circumstances now before us. We all are aware that Temporary Special Use Permits cannot be legally conditioned by the City. They are for special circumstances such as this, and usually applicants offer to provide temporary improvements to reduce any Possible impacts, thereby entering an enforceable, contractual relationship with the City. The staff report and proposed conditions are inappropriately and illegally proposed. Objective public service professionals cannot allow personal bias to so cloud their work as to reach beyond their authority, or the law. This report proposes to set policy as well. Who is running the City? Or, as one Councilman was recently quoted: "This is out of control." Yes it is. The authors and authorizers of the Item 9.A. (and the October 15, 1997 Item 9.C.) staff reports should be the subjects of personnel action. I will personally respond to an investigative inquiry regarding the errors, ommissions and deliberate misrepresentations in the reports. For example: The proposed use area is not in the flood plain; has been previously used for similar uses; was a staging area for Caltrans during the SR- 23/118 Connector construction; and, would not affect the vegetation in the flowway. The TSUP is categorically exempt from CEQA and therefore would not be subject to the extensive "review requirements" listed. The process could be expe- dited by concurrent filings (GPAjZC /IPD) utilizing the current "deemed incomplete until rezoning" policy which could result in a 4 -6 month time - frame for temporary use. The Los Angeles Avenue Relinquishment /Widening project is funded and proceeding. It is inappropriate and illegal under the TSUP process to attempt to secure dedication of ROW for the road improvement project. The fees proposed are inappropriate to the application and beyond reason for a TSUP. REQUEST FOR CONSIDERATION 1. Recognize that the TSUP can be issued, but withdraw the Zoning City Council November 5, 1997 Page 3 Clearance /TSUP application dated September 23, 1997, at the applicant's request. 2. Allow the applicants to remain on their own property, accepting the GPA /ZC /IPD application as a means of " per Code Section 17.44.040.B. abating the violation" (attached). 3. Or, recognize that the applicants will be required to relocate their business out of town, as soon as a suitable site can be located, to the detriment of Moorpark, T & S employees and employee families. All of this needs closure. What is paramount, in my opinion, is that people and businesses need to feel that City efforts are geared to helping well- meaning, although misguided efforts, We cannot, as a communit a conclusion that: ..if you try to work with the City, , allow by uncaring, regulatory bureaucrats." If the You i be allowed to be proven true: "...do what you want, and try not to get caught ", we end up promoting intentional non - compliance rather than of our town. compliance for the good Tanner and Shenkel voluntarily approached the City with their dilemna, before they moved, and tried to get their GPA /ZC screening acted upon for 4 months before any member of the public knew they were on their property on Los Angeles Avenue. Your Council recognized the well - intentions but perhaps poor judgement on their part when it authorized the GPA /ZC screening on April 16, 1997 per Code Section 17.44.040.B. In my humble opinion, the Council should, under these extenuating circumstances, return to that original action and retain this business in Moorpark. Thank you for your thoughtful and reasoned consideration. S rely John W. Newton Applicant's Representative Attachments cc: Madelaine Shenkel /Bill Tanner FRO' -1 °.002 e MOORPARK 2 ° ° ° a 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 (805) 529 -6864 April 21, 1997 MaClelaine Slici-1kel /Dill Tanner 4875 Sprinq Road MoorYdik, CA. 93021 SUBJECT: CITY COUNCIL AUTHORIZATION FOR APPLICANT TO INITIATE AND STAFF TO ACCEPT AN APPLICATION FOR GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT TO AMEND THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN ON 4.78 ACRES OF LOCATED AT 13991 LOS ANGELES AVENUE (APN. 513- 01 -22) FROM "RH^ (RURAL HIGH 1DU -/5 ACRES MINIf+IUTM) TO 111-2" (MEDIUM INDUSTRIAL) AND ZONE CHANGE FROM RE -1 ACRE (RURAL EXCLUSIVE 1 ACRE MINIMUM) TO M -2 (LIMITED INDUSTRIAL) Dcai Ms. Chenlccl /Mr. Tanner: The purpose of this letter is to inform you that on April 16, 1997, the city Council took action to authorize the applicant to initiate and staff to accept, an applicativa for General Plan Amendment to change the Land Use IL'Utt1 tL0111 "Rli" (Rural high lou. /b Acres Minimum) to 11I -211 (Medium Industrial) and Zonc Change from RE -1 Acre (Rural Exclusive 1 Acre Minimum) to M -2 (Limited Industrial). If you have any questions, pleas give me a call at (805) 529 - 6864, extension 243. Thanlc you. ;Sincerely yours, Paul Porter Scnior Planner CC. Stcvcn kucny, City Manager Nelson Millec•, DILeC:Wr of Community Development Case Filc C11ron. File structures or building construction has commenced and is being diligently pursued. C. Variances. Variances are adjustments in the regula- tions contained in this title. Variances are based on discre- tionary decisions and may be granted to allow deviations from ordinance regulations governing such development factors as setbacks, height, lot coverage, lot area and width, signs, off - street parking, landscaping and wall, fencing and screening standards. Variances shall be processed in accor- dance with the provisions of this chapter. Variances may not be granted to authorize a use or activity which is not otherwise expressly authorized by the zone regulations governing the property. Except as provided in subsection (C)(5) of this section, variance requests shall be heard by the planning commission through a public hearing process. 1. Purpose. The sole purpose of any variance shall be to enable a property owner to make reasonable use of his or her property in the manner in which other property of like character in the same vicinity and zone can be used. For the purposes of this section, vicinity includes both incorporated and unincorporated areas if the property in question is within a one thousand (1,000) foot area outside of the city's boundary. 2. Standards for Variances. Before any variance may be granted, the applicant must establish, and the decision - making 'authority must determine, that all of the following standards are met: a. ° That there are special circumstances or exceptional characteristics applicable to the subject property with regard to size, shape, topography, location or surroundings, which do not apply generally to comparable properties in the same vicinity and zone; and : b. Than granting the requested 'variance will not confer a special privilege inconsistent with the limitations uaon 17.44.030 4. Duration. Any variance is considered to run with the land. An expiration date may be imposed at the time the variance is granted. 5. Administrative Variance by Director of Community Development Approval. A request for a minor variance from certain types of zoning regulations may be approved by the director of community development as an adminis- trative variance, if the standards of subsection (C)(2) of this section are met. An administrative variance may be granted through an administrative hearing process, only in the following situations: a. To allow a decrease not exceeding twenty percent (20 %) in required minimum setbacks; b. To allow a decrease not exceeding ten percent (10%) in required parking aisle width or similar dimensional requirements; c. To allow walls, fences or hedges to exceed the height limit regulations by a maximum of one (1) foot it setback areas, except in a required sight triangle; d.. To allow an increase not exceeding ten percen (10 %) for maximum building coverage, or sign area o height. (Ord. 196 § 3 (part), 1994; Ord. 189 § 3 (8111 -2) 1994) 17.44.040: Filing and processing of application requests. A. Submission of Applications. An application for permit or variance may be filed by the owner of the proper ty or his/her authorized agent, a lessee who holds a lea: whose. terms permit the use applied for, or by any du constituted government authority or agent thereof. Su( application requests shall be filed with the department o community development. No application request shall 1 accented for filing and nrocessing unless it nnnfornmc