HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 1997 1105 CC REG ITEM 09FAGENDA REPORT
CITY OF MOORPARK
TO: THE HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Lillian Hare, City Clerk
aoq . ,� 4 C;10 q.3
ITEM i ' f*_
CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA
City Coun it Meeti«6
,.f # �j 199?
�
r7 / lI —t- fr7-
DATE: October 28, 1997 (for CC mtg of 11/5)
SUBJECT: CONSIDER RESOLUTION 11? DIRECTING THE PLANNING
COMMISSION TO STUDY, SET A PUBLIC HEARING AND MAKE
A RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL REGARDING
REVISIONS TO CHAPTER 2.36 REGARDING THE PLANNING
COMMISSION AND ITS POWERS AND DUTIES, AND
RESOLUTION 97 - DIRECTING THE PARKS AND
RECREATION COMMISSION TO STUDY, SET A PUBLIC
HEARING AND MAKE A RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY
COUNCIL REGARDING REVISIONS TO CHAPTER 2.32
REGARDING THE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION AND
ITS POWERS AND DUTIES
Mayor Hunter requested that this item be placed on the Council's
November 5 agenda.
Attached are the minutes of the Council's last discussions with the
Planning Commission and the Parks and Recreation Commission on
powers and duties.
Review of (1) whether the presence of Commissioners at City Council
meetings to present their view on various issues should be
formalized; and (2)whether it should be codified that scheduling
meetings with applicants /developers and making promises is not
within the purview of the Commissions was referred to the Ad Hoc
Council Rules of Procedure Committee, Mayor Hunter and
Councilmember Evans. A full report on the Committee's
recommendations is also an item for consideration on this agenda.
Exhibits:
"A" - Minutes of the March 26 Joint Meeting
"B" - Minutes of the February 26 Joint Meeting
"C" - Draft Resolutions
C: \MyFiles \LH \REPORTS \POWERS.WPD
L"
MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL
Moor_- >ark, California March 26, 1997
A Special Joint Meeting of t:_ Cite Council and the Parks and
Recreation Commission of the City of Moorpark was held on March 26,
1997, in the Council Chambers of said City located at 799 Moorpark
Avenue, Moorpark, California.
1. CALL TO ORDER:
Mayor Hunter called the City Council to order at 7 :07 p.m.
Chairperson Thompson called the Parks and Recreation
Commission to order at 7 :07 p.m.
2. ROLL CALL:
Council: Councilmembers Evans, Perez, Teasley, Wozniak,
and Mayor Hunter.
Commission: Commissioners Badoud, Dubreuil, Oberg, Parvin
and Chairperson Thompson.
Staff Present: Steven Kueny, City Manager; Mary Lindley,
Community Services Director; and Lillian Hare,
City Clerk.
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
Chairperson Thompson led the Pledge of Allegiance.
4. PRESENTATIONS /ACTION /DISCUSSION:
A. Discussion of Parks and Recreation Commission Duties and
Responsibilities.
Mr. Kueny gave a synopsis of his memo to the City Council
dated March 21, 1997, entitled "Duties and
Responsibilities of the Parks and Recreation Commission."
He said that past commissions have expressed concern
about the role of the commission relative to the Senior
Center Advisory Committee and Teen Council. Mr. Kueny
said that presently, the Commission has been directed not
to review budget requests concerning teen and senior
matters. He said those two groups are advisory to staff,
and the Parks and Recreation Commission is advisory to
the City Council. He said since the Parks and Recreation
oOO434 -
Minutes of the Special Meeting
flirr r'i t l and Parks
Commission Page 2 Mar -h 26, 1997
Commission recommends to the City Council primarily on
policy and budget matters, they should include policy and
budget matters for teen and seniors but not operational,
program content, nor procedural matters. He said budget
matters pertaining to special events and capital outlay
for teens and seniors could be reviewed by the Commission
after the respective advisory group has made any required
recommendations to staff and the Department Director has
developed his /her recommendation to the Commission for
subsequent recommendation to the City Council. He
further said this proposed budget review for recreation
should only involve proposed items that require general
funds and not trust funds created for seniors or teens.
He encouraged the Commission to formally ask the Council
for clarification or direction when something is not
clear.
Mayor Hunter stated that he would like to explore
assigning Commissioners to certain youth groups as a
liaison. He suggested that the Commissioners to be
assigned would be determined by the Parks and Recreation
Commission.
The need for a defined purpose for such a program was
discussed by the Council and Commission.
Commissioner Dubreuil recommended the creation of a
sports advocacy council.
Mayor Hunter responded that his objective was to enhance
the dialogue between the City and youth sports groups,
specifically to work out scheduling problems and any
other issues that might arise.
Commissioner Badoud said he endorsed the idea of
assignments but questioned how a determination would be
made on where to be involved.
It was discussed by Council and Commission that groups
which utilize City facilities, staff, or resources, would
be considered for a liaison.
Minutes of the Special Meeting
the �� ty Coun�i_1 and Parks
'_,nMjsSion Page 3 March 2 199
In response to a Commission question, Mr. Kueny indicated
that the Little League Agreement being finalized by staff
would become a model for future agreements with youth
sports groups.
Councilmember Perez cautioned that the outreach should
not bestow "favored nation" status on any group.
Councilmember Evans said that sports advocacy is a good
idea but that "upstart" groups should not be neglected.
Chairperson Thompson indicated support for a sports
advocacy council that would meet on a semiannual or
quarterly basis. She suggested rotating two
Commissioners to serve on the council.
Councilmember Teasley expressed concern about the liaison
program and the perception that the liaison would have
authority which they in fact did not have to make
decisions.
Commissioner Badoud said he liked the liaison outreach
program best.
Mr. Kueny said he believed a sports council might work
best. He said many of the things that Commissioner
Badoud liked about the liaison program can still be
accomplished by the individual on
as they are
"out there in the community." He suggested that the
sports council meet semiannually. Mr. Kueny said that he
saw the advocacy council as a youth sports council but
that if there is greater participation in startup of
adult sports, a council could be formed for adults as
well.
Councilmember Evans indicated his support for going
forward with the sports council rather than an outreach
program.
Mr. Kueny said that he sees the sports council as a
beginning. He said he envisions the Commission exploring
with staff and the community at -risk youth programs and
bringing in the churches and the Boys and Girls Club and
others.
Minutes of the Special Meeting
of the City Council and Parks
and Recreati.on Commission Page 4 March 26, 1997
Mr. Kueny said that one way in which the Council can
reinforce the role of the Commission is by sending those
people who come before the Council before appearing
before the Parks and Recreation Commission back to the
Commission.
The Council and the Commission discussed the duties and
responsibilities list in the City Manager's memo to the
City Council dated March 21, 1997. The following
comments were made regarding the respective items:
2. Provide post event evaluations of all recreation,
special events, and seasonal programs and
activities to staff and, if determined necessary,
to the City Council.
The discussion was that the Commission should
decide the format for any evaluations to be sent to
the Council.
Councilmember Wozniak said that if a Commissioner
is present at an event, they should write a report.
Councilmember Evans said he would like a one -page
synopsis of events listing the objective of the
event; what happened; the dollars spent; people
served; and a wrap -up statement.
6. Review the Open Space, Conservation and Recreation
Element (OSCAR) as directed by the City Council.
Mr. Kueny stated that a joint meeting with the
Parks and Recreation Commission and Planning
Commission would be scheduled when the consultant
is ready.
7. Review the Parks Master Plan and Parkland
Dedication Ordinance and Park Improvement Fund
4637.
Minutes of the Special Meeting
of the City Council and Parks
and Recreation Commission Page 5 March 26, 1997
Zone designations every two years and make
recommendations to the City Council.
Mr. Kueny said that the Director of Community
Services will start working with the Commission
soon on this matter.
12. Make recommendation on means for promoting public
recreation programs and to stimulate interest
therein.
Councilmember Perez indicated how important this
item is to him. I
15. Review relevant portions of proposed budget (for
recommendation to City Council) including general
recreation programs, special events, teen and
senior programs, and capital projects.
Mayor Hunter indicated the importance of the budget
recommendations.
In response to Commissioner Parvin, Councilmember
Perez said he believed that any action to set up a
nonprofit organization to support parks and
recreation would need to be done in concert with
City Council direction. He said he was very
excited by the enthusiasm of the new Commissioners.
It was discussed by the Commission and Council that
the list of duties and responsibilities should be
reconciled with 2.32.090 of the Municipal Code.
In response to Commissioner Dubreuil regarding J of
Section 2.32.090 of the Municipal Code which says:
To aid the City Council in the planning,
beautification, maintenance, and development
of parks, boulevard and street tree program;
Mr. Kueny said to have the Commission involved in
that process would add another layer of review.
After further discussion regarding post event
evaluations, the following consensus was reached:
000438
Minutes of the Special Meeting
of the City Council and Parks
and Recreation Commission Page 6 March 26, 199
CONSENSUS: By consensus, the Council determined to request
Post event evaluations from the Parks and Recreation
Commission and to allow the Parks and Recreation Commission to
determine in what format to provide them to the City Council.
Commissioner Badoud requested the Council to consider
park items on specific meetings of the month so that
Commissioners could attend and give their comments.
Mr. Kueny explained that the Council needed the latitude
to schedule more freely but that members of the
Commission can be notified via receiving the staff report
when an item regarding parks and recreation is going to
the City Council agenda. He suggested that the Council
Ad Hoc Committee on the Rules of Procedure look at the
notice to be provided the Commission.
The Council discussed the need to decide if certain
events are going to be supported as regular community
events by the City, for example, the fireworks event.
Commissioner Dubreuil requested the Council to consider
letting the Commission expand into suggestions and
planning for events.
Councilmember Wozniak suggested that the Commission can
become more involved in programming of events through the
budget process.
Mr. Kueny suggested that if there is an event the
Commission wants to support in their budget, that staff
should be requested to provide information in January so
that the costs can be determined and provided during the
budget process.
In response to Commissioner Badoud, Mayor Hunter said the
budget can include both capital and program items.
000439
f�rj �- /--�
Minutes of the City Council and Planning Commission
Moorpark, California Page 6 February 26, 1997
City Council can consider at their regular meeting of March
19, 1997 which includes the overall land uses for the
Downtown Specific Plan.
CONSENSUS: By consensus, the Council determined that staff
will include the parcels of land as adopted in Ordinance 224
(Assessor Parcel Nos. 512 -0- 171 -215, 512 -0 -171 -205, 512 -0-
171 -185, 512 -0- 160 -585, 512 -0- 160 -595, 512 -0- 016 -070) to be
studied and included in the Downtown Study.
Councilmember Perez joined the meeting at 8:30 p.m.
B. Discussion of Planning Commission Powers and Duties.
Mr. Kueny gave the staff report.
Commissioner Acosta stated that Section 2.36 of the Municipal
Code, entitled "Planning Commission" needs to be amended to
be consistent the policy for making appointments. He
clarified that the Code currently states that the Planning
Commission will be appointed by members of the City Council
and that, since the City changed to an elected Mayor, the
appointments are in reality made by the Mayor and not the
members of the City Council.
The Commissioners and City Councilmembers discussed the
presence of Commissioners at the City Council meetings to
present their view on various planning related issues.
Mayor Hunter indicated that in the upcoming process of
updating the City Council Rules of Procedure he would like to
see this as part of the review.
Joe Ahearn, 484 E. Los Angeles Avenue, said it is important
that the Planning Commission and City Council work well
together. He stated that he believes there is a need to
simplify the zoning codes so the layperson in the community
can easily understand the language and process. He also
indicated that a set fee schedule needs to be established for
the development process and that there is a need to
streamline the processes.
Mr. Ahearn also stated that he has cited a safety hazard in
the City which consists of the pedestrian part of the Spring
Road bridge across the Arroyo Simi. He stated that it is
dangerous the way the bike lane, pedestrian walkway and the
auto lanes all converge at the entrance to the bridge. He
asked that the Council or city staff review this alignment.
Minutes of the City Council and Planning Commission
Moorpark, California Page 7 February 26, 1997
In response to Councilmember Perez, Mr. Kueny said City staff
will prepare a report to Council with regard to the timeline
for the replacement of the Spring Road bridge.
In response to Commissioner Lowenberg, Mayor Hunter requested
a Consent Calendar item for March 19 that will evaluate the
staff time required to review the zoning ordinance and the
sign ordinance for appropriateness as they relate to
allowable uses.
000441L