Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 1998 0715 CC REG ITEM 09A- ,A CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA City Council Meeting AGENDA REPORT -1 • I S - 610 CITY OF MOORPARK ACTION: AdogFed Reso . gg-1148'1 4.5 AMe� nded Infy- oducea ora. 144 TO: Honorable City Council d o Fcd f-e s o g g —14T T c�f i FROM: Nelson Miller, Director of Community DevelopmenpY' DATE: July 2, 1998 (City Council Meeting of July 15, 1998) SUBJECT: CONSIDER HIDDEN CREEK RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN (SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 8/SP-93-1), GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO.93 -1, ZONE CHANGE 93 -3 (PREZONING), AND RESOLUTION DIRECTING FILING OF AN APPLICATION REQUESTING EXTENSION OF THE CITY'S SPHERE OF INFLUENCE AND ANNEXATION OF PROPERTIES INCLUDED WITHIN THE HIDDEN CREEK RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN. APPLICANT: HIDDEN CREEK RANCH PARTNERS (PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED -- CONTINUED FROM JULY 1,1998) DISCUSSION At the meeting of June 17, 1998, the City Council continued the discussion of the proposed project to address remaining issues and questions and also directed preparation of resolutions and ordinances for consideration of approval or denial of the proposed project. The consdieration was tabled at the meeting of July 1, 1998, as a result of a tie vote. Due to the changes which have been described in previous staff reports and which have akeady been recommended by the Planning Commission and staff, and modifications to the land use plan in response to Planning Commission concerns, the Specific Plan document needed several revisions. The City's consultant has proceeded to make these revisions to the Specific Plan and will have revised copies of the Specific Plan circulated prior to the July 1 meeting. The Specific Plan does include standards for the various zones which are similar to the standards in the Zoning Code, but with different minimum lot sizes, so that it is more similar to a Residential Planned Development Zone. However, whereas the Zoning Code has one set of standards for all densities, the Specific Plan has various standards appropriate to the various lot sizes. Addendum 1, attached, provides council members a synopsis of the specific plan standard's and the RPD standards for comparison. The plan's standards have been somewhat modified to be more similar to the Residential Planned Development Standards, although some differences remain. Review of the Addendum will show most differences occur in setbacks. A memorandum briefly outlining the modifications in the Specific Plan will be attached to the Specific Plan. It is proposed that the Development Standards Section of the Specific Plan would be incorporated into the Zoning Code by the adoption of an ordinance. If the Council wants to make additional changes, these can be conditioned to be incorporated into the Final Specific Plan document. 000MAL Hidden Creek Ranch Specific Plan July 15, 1998 Page 2 Transferrable Development Rights One change which was discussed by the Ad Hoc Committee and has been previously mentioned is the concept of transferable development rights to provide a potential mechanism for the preservation of existing agricultural lands which are designated prime or unique. These areas involve properties at the west end of the Specific Plan Area, mostly owned by other property owners, but including a couple of properties owned by Hidden Creek Ranch properties, one of which is proposed for the High School site. These areas are shown on the attached map (Attachment 1) along with the property ownerships. However, this concept has not been discussed with all the other property owners. This would affect all or part of Planning Areas 26, 27, 28, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 37 & 39. Or, this might be limited to properties designated "Prime ", since the properties designated "Unique" are largely hillside orchards, which some of the owners have indicated may not be economically viable. Such a mechanism might designate those properties with a basic density of one dwelling unit per five acres, with the opportunity to sell, or otherwise transfer densities to other properties within the Specific Plan, if all densities were transferred. If such a transfer was made then the total density available for transfer could be the density currently designated in the Specific Plan. The Very High Density Planning Areas, currently designated for up to twelve dwelling units per acre could be receiving properties up to twenty dwelling units per acre, if developed with affordable housing. This could facilitate compliance with the agreements in the Development Agreement which would limit any Planning Area to a maximum of fifty percent affordable housing. Moorpark College Observatory Another issue which has been raised relates to the Moorpark College Observatory. The Environmental Impact Report did identify that implementation of the Specific Plan would result in incremental increases in light and glare that when considered on a cumulative basis, and in relation to the Moorpark College Observatory, would be significant even with the implementation of mitigation. Messenger and College staff have also had additional discussions relating to the observatory. Messenger has indicated a willingness to evaluate the possibility of donating to the college a second accessible astronomical observation site somewhere in the open space area of the project. Carolyn Mallory, of the College staff, has suggested the potential provision of a level, one plus acre site sufficiently remote to minimize light pollution to be paved, with an access road, and with water lines or storage tank, electric utility or solar powered system, and sanitation facilities. She has indicated that would allow for a facility similar to their current facilities plus a twenty percent expansion. Their preferred site would be on the prominent ridgeline, at the northern edge of the property. The suggestions of the College staff do raise several issues and concerns. Location of a site for a future facility on the prominent ridgeline at the north edge of the property may not be consistent with the City's Hillside Management ordinance and the intent of the open space areas in the Specific Plan. Such a site would also be on the ridgeline above the Happy Camp Canyon County Park to the north 00000% Hidden Creek Ranch Specific Plan July 15, 1998 Page 3 of the ridgeline, which may raise additional concerns. The ridgeline area also does not currently have access, except along narrow dirt roads, previously used for ranching activities. Extension of water and utilities to this area would also raise additional issues. A site along the existing oil well access road in the northeastern part of the property may offer a site for which access could be fairly reasonably provided and with the potential for electricity, at such time electricity is provided to the oil well sites to the east of the property. This could be located a quarter to a half mile away from the nearest proposed development, north of and above the tank site identified for "Zone C Water ". If the Council wants to include this option in the Specific Plan, it could be added to the permitted uses in natural Open Space area. Conclusions Council may wish to provide direction if these changes or other changes should be conditioned to be added to the Specific Plan. Attached for consideration are draft resolutions for either approval or denial of the Specific Plan and related applications, a draft ordinance, adopting the proposed zoning designations and development standards, and a draft resolution directing acceptance and processing of an application for expansion of the Sphere of Influence and annexation of the properties within the boundaries of the proposed Hidden Creek Ranch Specific Plan. The Attachments to some of these resolutions and ordinances will be under separate cover. RECOMMENDATION 1. Consider draft resolution for denial of the proposed Hidden Creek Ranch Specific Plan, or draft resolution for adoption of the Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations, adoption of a Mitigation Monitoring Program, approval of proposed Hidden Creek Ranch Specific Plan, and adoption of General Plan Amendment 93 -1; 2. If the Specific Plan is approved, consider draft Ordinance No. for the prezoning of the properties covered by the Hidden Creek Ranch Specific Plan; 3. If the Specific Plan is approved, consider resolutions for initiation of an amendment to the Sphere of Influence and annexation of the properties covered by the Hidden Creek Ranch Specific Plan. Attachments: 1. Agricultural Lands Map 2. Draft Resolution No. ,denying the Specific Plan and related applications 3. Draft Resolution No. , approving the Specific Plan and related information and applications 000003 Hidden Creek Ranch Specific Plan July 15, 1998 Page 4 4. Draft Ordinance No. , adopting the zoning designations and development standards into the Zoning Code 5. Draft Resolution No. , directing acceptance, processing, and filing of applications for expansion of the Sphere of Influence and annexation of properties within the boundaries of the proposed Hidden Creek Ranch Specific Plan 6. Addendum 1 Comparing SP8 Standards to City Zoning Code RPD cases\sp8 \cc 7198sp.rpt 000004 RFCEIVED NOV « 7 1997 � „s�, - �,� , � // �- � f � � ; n ) X11 \ �• ✓ .4�--�i ,C '[% ^rl �. 1•Y 11 o N WAIT -,kS R.u-111 I u \LVION 17- U v . v� �� ' ✓ �'i LN. )Q ISr TRUST COMPANY KI �� ti +�/ �. .J •�_ � scum R ` � �,�� �' �rI I:. / � /�i f ✓, �4' �� \` _ `• ' ` \+ISSGNGGR �.,,L_ 'r .t' VEN-iLTdA + - PACIFIC 0000.11, / COMMNV % y CAPITAL CO IRI LEGEND WON Developed 52.85 ac. Grazing 3429.44 ac. E:]Local Importance 171.39 ac. (Dry Farming) �p t Prime 118.38 ac. -- NA-MBA S WSIiLNE RAMC} , U Unique 170.58 ac. (Largely Hillside Ochards) ATTACHMMIO(D5 AGRICULTURAL LANDS WON PACIFIC - I . CO D -- NA-MBA S WSIiLNE RAMC} , ATTACHMMIO(D5 AGRICULTURAL LANDS RESOLUTION NO. 98- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 93 -1; SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 93 -1/ HIDDEN CREEK RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN (SPECIFIC PLAN 8) (APPLICANT: HIDDEN CREEK RANCH PARTNERS.) WHEREAS, at a duly noticed public hearing on October 1, 1997, continued public hearings on October 8, 22, November 12, and December 3, 10, 1997, January 7, 21, March 25, April 1, May 6, 20, 27, June 3, 10, 17, and July 1. 1998, the City Council considered the application filed by Hidden Creek Ranch Partners, L.P., also known as Messenger Investment Company, for the Hidden Creek Ranch Specific Plan Project, consisting of Specific Plan No. 8 /Specific Plan 93 -1, General Plan Amendment 93 -1, and Zone Change 93 -3, for an approximately 4323 acre site located within the City of Moorpark Area of Interest in Ventura County contiguous to the City northerly boundary near Moorpark College and the Campus Park and Varsity Park residential areas, and easterly and southerly of Happy Camp Canyon Regional Park and incorporating more or less Assessor Parcel Numbers: 500- 0120 -035, -55, -065; 500 -0- 170 -135, -205, -255, -285, -295, -305, -315, -325, -335, -345, -355, -365, -375; 500- 0- 180 -045, -055, -075, -105, -115; 500 -0- 281 -035, -045, -165, -175, -185, -195, -205, -215; 500 -0- 292 -065, -135, -145; 615 -0- 110 -205, -215; and, 615 -0- 150 -185; and, Whereas, the Planning Commission of the City of Moorpark did adopt Resolution 96 -325 recommending to the City Council approval of Specific Plan 8 /Specific Plan 93 -1, General Plan Amendment 93 -1, Zone Change 93 -3, and certification of the project EIR, subject to findings and amendments incorporated into that resolution; and, Whereas, the City Council on January 21, 1998, adopted Resolution 98 -1425 to certify a Final Environmental Impact Report for the Hidden Creek Ranch Specific Plan as having been completed in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the CEQA Guidelines, and the City's CEQA procedures and meeting all findings required by CEQA; and, NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council after careful consideration and review of the information contained in Planning Commission Resolution 96 -325, staff reports, Final Environmental Impact Report, correspondence, public hearings, recommended mitigation monitoring program for the project and the Statement of Overriding Considerations and through its discussion and analysis, reached its decision on the matter on July 1, 1998; Section 2. The City Council does not find that the Specific Plan, as proposed, provides substantial public benefit to the community to warrant a determination that the number of dwelling units may exceed 2400 dwelling units as specified in Section 5 on page 37, of the General Plan Land Use Element. C:\M\sp8resodeny Page 1 of 2 ATTAC, Ti 2 Section 3. The City Council hereby denies without prejudice all textual and graphic materials contained in the proposed Specific Plan 93 -1 and the related General Plan Amendment 93 -1. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED THIS lst DAY OF July, 1998. Patrick Hunter, Mayor ATTEST: Deborah S. Traffenstedt City Clerk C:\MNsp8resodeny Page 2 of 2 000007 RESOLUTION NO. 98- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING • GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 93 -1; SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 93 -1/ SPECIFIC PLAN 8 - HIDDEN CREEK RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN; ADOPTING A :MITIGATION :MONITORING PROGRAM, ADOPTING A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS FOR SPECIFIC PLAN 93 -1 /SPECIFIC PLAN 8 -THE HIDDEN CREEK RANCH PROJECT (APPLICANT: HIDDEN CREEK RANCH PARTNERS.) WHEREAS, at a duly noticed public hearing on October 1, 1997, continued public hearings on October 8, 22, November 12, and December 3, 10, 1997, January 7, 21, March 25, April 1, May 6, 20, 27, June 3, 10, 17, and July 1, 1998, the City Council considered the application filed by Hidden Creek Ranch Partners, L.P., also known as Messenger Investment Company, for the Hidden Creek Ranch Specific Plan Project, consisting of Specific Plan No. 8 /Specific Plan 93 -1, General Plan Amendment 93 -1, and Zone Change 93 -3, for an approximately 4323 acre site located within the City of Moorpark Area of Interest in Ventura County contiguous to the City northerly boundary near Moorpark College and the Campus Park and Varsity Park residential areas, and easterly and southerly of Happy Camp Canyon Regional Park and incorporating more or less Assessor Parcel Numbers: 500- 0120 -035, -55, -065; 500 -0 -170 -135, -205, -255, -285, -295, -305, -315, -325, -335, -345, -355, -365, -375; 500- 0- 180 -045, -055, -075, -105, -115; 500 -0- 281 -035, -045, -165, -175, -185, -195, -205, -215; 500 -0- 292 -065, -135, -145; 615 -0- 110 -205, -215; and, 615 -0 -150 -185; and, Whereas, the Planning Commission of the City of Moorpark did adopt Resolution 96 -325 recommending to the City Council approval of Specific Plan 8 /Specific Plan 93 -1, General Plan Amendment 93 -1, Zone Change 93 -3, and certification of the project EIR, subject to findings and amendments incorporated into that resolution; and, Whereas, the City Council on January 21, 1998, adopted Resolution 98 -1425 to certify a Final Environmental Impact Report for the Hidden Creek Ranch Specific Plan as having been completed in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the CEQA Guidelines, and the City's CEQA procedures and meeting all findings required by CEQA; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council finds: (1) That the Statement of Overriding Considerations and Mitigation Monitoring Program attached hereto and incorporated by reference have been completed in accordance with CEQA ( Division 13 of the Public Resources Code of the State of California), CEQA Guidelines, and City CEQA procedures. (2) That the Final EIR for the project, certified on January 21, 1998, complies with the requirements of CEQA, and that the final EIR was accepted and reviewed by the City Council and the information contained therein was considered prior to its decision on the CAMNsp8resoadopt Page 1 of 3 ATTAC&M&3 project. (3) That all of the issues raised at the public hearings and in correspondence and other supplemental information provided to Council have been considered, and the City Council further finds that the Hidden Creek Ranch Specific Plan Project EIR adequately addresses all issues raised and no new significant environmental impact has been identified nor has there been identified any feasible project alternative or mitigation measure considerably different from others previously analyzed which would clearly lessen the environmental impacts of the project. All additional correspondence received to this time shall hereby be directed to be incorporated as an additional appendix to Volume VI of the EIR. (4) That the General Plan Amendment is consistent with the City General Plan requirements and State law. (5) Specific Plan 8 /Specific Plan 93 -1 is consistent with the City of Moorpark General Plan as amended by GPA 93 -1. (6) Specific Plan 8 /Specific Plan 93 -1 is consistent with the requirements of the California Government Code section 65450 et. seq. (7) Specific Plan 8 /Specific Plan 93 -1 satisfies and responds to each of the criteria established by the General Plan Land Use Element for planning area outside the city limits as contained on pages 35 -38 of the element. Section 2. The City Council has reviewed, considered, and hereby approves and adopts the Statement of Overriding Considerations for the Hidden Creek Ranch Specific Plan as attached hereto as Attachment A and incorporated herein by reference. Section 3. The City Council has reviewed and the considered and hereby accepts and adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Plan as attached hereto as Attachment B and incorporated herein by reference. Section 4. The City Council hereby approves General Plan Amendment 93 -1 to modify Table 3 Land Use Plan Statistical Summary to reflect data related to the Hidden Creek Ranch and to modify Exhibits 2, 3 & 4 of the Circulation Element of the General Plan to incorporate the proposed street, bicycle and equestrian trail systems contained within the Hidden Creek Ranch Specific Plan as attached hereto as Attachment C and incorporated herein by reference. Section 5. The City Council has reviewed the text and exhibits comprising the Hidden Creek Ranch Specific Plan (Specific Plan 8 /Specific Plan 93 -1) and hereby adopts and approves said plan as attached hereto as Attachment D and incorporated herein by reference. Section 6. The City Council hereby designates the Office of the City Clerk and the Community Development Department as the custodians of the records constituting the record of proceedings upon which its decision has been based. Original ordinances and resolutions along with one copy of the attachments referenced therein shall be reposited within the office of the City Clerk. The Community Development Department shall be designated the repository and archive for all C:Wsp8resoadopt Page 2 of 3 historical and active materials related to this project. Section 7. If any chapter, section, sentence, clause or portion of the Specific Plan as contained in the attachments hereto is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion thereof. Section 8. The City Council after careful consideration and review of the information contained in Planning Commission Resolution 96 -325, staff reports, Final Environmental Impact Report, public and staff testimony, recommended mitigation monitoring program for the project and the Statement of Overriding Considerations, attached hereto, and incorporated by reference, and through its discussion and analysis reached its decision on the matter on July 1, 1998; PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED THIS 1st DAY OF July, 1998. Patrick Hunter, Mayor ATTEST: Deborah S. Traffenstedt City Clerk ATTACHMENTS: A. Statement of Overriding Considerations B. Mitigation Monitoring Program C. General Plan 93 -1 Exhibits D. Specific Plan 93 -1 /Specific Plan 8 Hidden Creek Ranch C:Wsp8resoadopt Page 3 of 3 00MIL0� ORDINANCE NO: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY CODICIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING ZONING DESIGNATIONS FOR PROPERTIES WITHIN THE HIDDEN CREEK RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN, (SPECIFIC PLAN 8 /SPECIFIC PLAN 93 -1); AND, ADOPTING DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR SAID PROPERTIES; AND, AMENDING TITLE 17, ZONING, OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK TO PLACE SUCH REGULATIONS AS CHAPTER 17.70 WITHIN SAID CODE; AND, AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK TO REFLECT THE LAND USE PLAN CONTAINED WITHIN THE SPECIFIC PLAN. Whereas, at a duly noticed public hearing on October 1, 1997, continued public hearings on October 8, 22, November 12, and December 3, 10, 1997, January 7, 21, March 25, April 1, May 6, 20, 27, June 3, 10, 17 and July 1, 1998, the City Council considered the application filed by Hidden Creek Ranch Partners, L.P., also known as Messenger Investment Company, for the Hidden Creek Ranch Specific Plan Project, consisting of Specific Plan No. 8 /Specific Plan 93 -1, General Plan Amendment 93 -1, and Zone Change 93 -3, for an approximately 4323 acre site located within the City of Moorpark Area of Interest in Ventura County contiguous to the City northerly boundary near Moorpark College and the Campus Park and Varsity Park residential areas, and easterly and southerly of Happy Camp Canyon Regional Park and incorporating more or less Assessor Parcel Numbers: 500- 0120 -035, -55, -065; 500 -0 -170 -135, -205, -255, -285, -295, -305, - 315, -325, -335, -345, -355, -365, -375; 500- 0- 180 -045, -055, -075, -105, -115; 500 -0- 281 -035, -045, -165, -175, -185, -195, -205, -215; 500 -0- 292 -065, -135, -145; 615 -0 -110 -205, -215; and, 615 -0- 150 -185; and, Whereas, the Planning Commission of the City of Moorpark did adopt Resolution 96 -325 recommending to the City Council approval of Specific Plan 8 /Specific Plan 93 -1, General Plan Amendment 93 -1, Zone Change 93 -3, and certification of the project EIR, subject to findings and amendments incorporated into that resolution; and, Whereas, the City Council on January 21, 1998, adopted Resolution 98 -1425 to certify a Final Environmental Impact Report for the Hidden Creek Ranch Specific Plan as having been completed in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the CEQA Guidelines, and the City's CEQA procedures and meeting all findings required by CEQA; and, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Title 17, Zoning, of the Municipal Code of the City of Moorpark, California is amended by adding thereto Chapter 17.70 as contained and more fully described in Attachment A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference; TITLE 17.70 SPECIFIC PLAN 93 -1 /SPECIFIC PLAN 8 HIDDEN CREEK RANCH C:\M\ O31 \ord ATTACHMENT 4 000011 Sections: 17.70.010 Purpose and Intent 17.70.020 Definitions 17.70.030 General Provisions 17.70.040 Residential Development Standards 17.70.050 Commercial Planned Development 17.70.060 Public and Institutional 17.70.070 Parks and Open Space 17.70.080 Sign Regulations 17.70.090 Parking Regulations 17.70.100 Historic, Native Oak and Mature Trees 17.70.110 Outdoor Lighting Controls Section 2. Title 17, Zoning, of the Municipal Code of the City of Moorpark, California is amended by amending the official zoning map of the city as referenced in Section 17.04.020 of the Moorpark Municipal Code by adding thereto the designation SP 93- 1 /SP -8 and by applying said designation to the Hidden Creek Ranch Specific Plan area as shown in Attachment B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 3. Whenever a conflict shall arise between provisions of the Specific Plan and the Zoning Code as to the meaning of terms, uses permitted, standards applicable or administration thereof, the Specific Plan shall prevail. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED THIS 1st DAY OF July, 1998 AYES: NOES: Patrick Hunter, Mayor ATTEST: Deborah S. Traffenstedt City Clerk ATTACHMENTS: A. Chapter 17.70(added) Moorpark Zoning Code B. Zoning Map Amendment - Specific Plan 93 -1 /Specific Plan 8 Boundary Designation C:`,M\zc9311ord Page 2 of 4 00001% C:N\zc93 I \ord TITLE 17.70 SPECIFIC PLAN 93 -1 /SPECIFIC PLAN 8 HIDDEN CREEK RANCH ATTACHMENT A Page 3 of 4 000013 AMENDMENT TO CITY OF MOORPARK ZONING MAP RELATED TO THE HIDDEN CREEK RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN NORTH PROPOSED CITY LIMITS SPECIFIC PLAN 8 / SPECIFIC PLAN 93 -1 BROADWN ! SPECIFIC PLAN ZONING /CITY LIMITS C:1M\zc93 I \ord CITY LIMITS V4� PRE�'gY ATTACHMENT B Page 4 of 4 000014 CITY LIMITS TIERRA pE•' CITY LIMITS'/�� /��� C:1M\zc93 I \ord CITY LIMITS V4� PRE�'gY ATTACHMENT B Page 4 of 4 000014 RESOLUTION 98- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, DIRECTING THE FILING OF AN APPLICATION REQUESTING THAT THE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION OF VENTURA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVE THE EXTENSION OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK SPHERE OF INFLUENCE BOUNDARY AND CORPORATE LIMITS BY THE ANNEXATION AND INCORPORATION OF THAT PROPERTY KNOWN AS THE HIDDEN CREEK RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN INTO THE CITY OF MOORPARK. Whereas, the City Council of the City of Moorpark has considered the applications for General Plan Amendment, Specific Plan, and Prezoning on behalf of the Hidden Creek Ranch Partners pursuant to applicable state law; and Whereas, the City Council reviewed and certified an EIR pertaining to the Hidden Creek Ranch Specific Plan and adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations and Mitigation Monitoring Program pursuant to the requirements of the Public Resources Code of the State of California; and Whereas, the State of California Government Code, Section 56000 et. seq. provides for the annexation of lands within corporate boundaries of cities and provides for establishments of Spheres of Influence for the logical and orderly development of communities within the state; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council hereby directs staff to accept and process all necessary applications and information received from Hidden Creek Ranch Partners for submission to Ventura County LAFCO as a formal request for extension and change in the Sphere of Influence of the City of Moorpark and to approve annexation of all properties identified to be within the boundaries of the Hidden Creek Ranch Specific Plan to the City of Moorpark. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED THIS 1' DAY OF July, 1998. ATTEST: Deborah S. Traffenstedt City Clerk Patrick Hunter, Mayor ATTACHMENT 5 000015 ADDENDUM 1 SP -8 STANDARDS COMPARED TO RPD STANDARDS The following information compares the standards of the City RPD zone to the Hidden Creek Ranch Specific Plan request. It is furnished to assist council members to understand the differences between the Plan and Zoning Code provisions when reaching a decision on the Hidden Creek Ranch prod ect. • Proposed Lot Areas = consistent to RPD requirements since the permit sets lot areas • Front setbacks for VH1 attached and detached are less than adopted RPD but would offer a more flexible design option along street scapes. • Side street yards in the single family are consistent to RPD but less in multiple family developed areas. • Rear yards are consistent with RPD in single family areas, and are subject to the permit approval by plan. • Building heights are consistent to RPD. • Lot areas are consistent to RPD in that the permit sets the lot size. It should be noted that for the Very High 2 designation, the Plan speaks to site area, meaning amount of land area necessary to get credit for a unit. RPD STANDARDS STANDARD RPD SINGLE FAMILY RPD MULTIPLE FAMILY Setbacks Front 20ft 20ft with ave 24 from arterials /20 from other streets Side Street 10 20 Side, interior 5 f with sum of ten; 10 to lot line where windows face 10 Rear 20ft main structure; 20ft when windows face; per permit Building separation 12ft single story with no common wall; 15ft two story per permit Building height 3 stories 35ft/3 stories Lot Area per permit per permit Page 1 of 2 ATTACHM"ift(; C N HIDDEN CREEK RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN STANDARDS Standards RH L ML M H H Attached VH1 VH 1 VH 2 SFR VH 2 MFR Detached detached attached attached setbacks Front 25 25 20 20 20 20 to 10 "L' 20 to 24 ft to 24 ft to arterial, 15 shaped arterial, 15 arterial. 20 arterial. 20 to drive, 20 to ft collector ft collector collector, straight in, collector, 10 all 15 all 10 all others others others Side 10/ 15 if 10/ 15 if 5 when 5 when 5' with 10' 10' to 5' 10' to 10 10' to over 25' over 25' building building when zero detached detached detached high high less than less than lot line otherwise otherwise otherwise 25; 10 25; 10 plan used 6' between 6' between 6' between when when buildings buildings buildings windows windows face face side street 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 rear 20 20 20 15 10/15 per plan per plan per plan per plan per plan when windows face building 35 35 35 35 35/ 3 story 35/ 3 story 35/ 3 story 35/ 3 story 35/ 3 story 35/ 3 story height Lot area 1 acre 20,000 sf 15,000 sf 5,500 sf 4,000 sf 3,000 sf 3,500 sf 3,000 sf 2,500 site 2,000 site area area Page 2 of 2